Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0257478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257478

4-Coumaroyl-CoA ligases in the biosynthesis of the anti-diabetic metabolite montbretin A

Frederick G Sunstrum 1, Hannah L Liu 1, Sharon Jancsik 1, Lufiani L Madilao 1, Joerg Bohlmann 1,2,3,*, Sandra Irmisch 1,*
Editor: Igor Cesarino4
PMCID: PMC8496819  PMID: 34618820

Abstract

Background

Montbretins are rare specialized metabolites found in montbretia (Crocosmia x crocosmiiflora) corms. Montbretin A (MbA) is of particular interest as a novel therapeutic for type-2 diabetes and obesity. There is no scalable production system for this complex acylated flavonol glycoside. MbA biosynthesis has been reconstructed in Nicotiana benthamiana using montbretia genes for the assembly of MbA from its various different building blocks. However, in addition to smaller amounts of MbA, the therapeutically inactive montbretin B (MbB) was the major product of this metabolic engineering effort. MbA and MbB differ in a single hydroxyl group of their acyl side chains, which are derived from caffeoyl-CoA and coumaroyl-CoA, respectively. Biosynthesis of both MbA and MbB also require coumaroyl-CoA for the formation of the myricetin core. Caffeoyl-CoA and coumaroyl-CoA are formed in the central phenylpropanoid pathway by acyl activating enzymes (AAEs) known as 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligases (4CLs). Here we investigated a small family of montbretia AAEs and 4CLs, and their possible contribution to montbretin biosynthesis.

Results

Transcriptome analysis for gene expression patterns related to montbretin biosynthesis identified eight different montbretia AAEs belonging to four different clades. Enzyme characterization identified 4CL activity for two clade IV members, Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2, converting different hydroxycinnamic acids into the corresponding CoA thioesters. Both enzymes preferred coumaric acid over caffeic acid as a substrate in vitro. While expression of montbretia AAEs did not enhance MbA biosynthesis in N. benthamiana, we demonstrated that both Cc4CLs can be used to activate coumaric and caffeic acid towards flavanone biosynthesis in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae).

Conclusions

Montbretia expresses two functional 4CLs, but neither of them is specific for the formation of caffeoyl-CoA. Based on differential expression analysis and phylogeny Cc4CL1 is most likely involved in MbA biosynthesis, while Cc4CL2 may contribute to lignin biosynthesis. Both Cc4CLs can be used for flavanone production to support metabolic engineering of MbA in yeast.

Introduction

The large chemical space of specialized (i.e., secondary) metabolites produced by plants contains some of the most powerful medicinally active compounds. Montbretia (Crocosmia x crocosmiiflora), a member of the Iris family (Iridaceae), produces the flavonoid molecule montbretin A (MbA) and a series of related molecules MbB and MbC [1, 2] (Fig 1). MbA is a complex acylated flavonol glycoside, defined as myricetin 3-O-(glucosyl-6’-O-caffeoyl)-1,2-β-D-glucosyl 1,2-α-L-rhamnoside 4’-O-α-L-rhamnosyl 1,4-β-D-xyloside. MbA inhibits human pancreatic α-amylase (HPA) in a highly efficient and selective manner, thereby slowing starch digestion in the intestine and reducing post-prandial blood glucose levels [3]. This unique activity and specificity make MbA a candidate for its development into a novel pharmaceutical or nutraceutical to treat or prevent type-2 diabetes and obesity [2, 4]. MbA has successfully passed animal trials with diabetic rats and is now entering human clinical trials [3]. A sustainable and scalable production system is needed to develop MbA as a widely available pharmaceutical or nutraceutical. Currently, the only known source for MbA are the underground storage and reproductive organs, called corms, of montbretia [5]. The rare taxonomic occurrence and low amounts of MbA in montbretia corms [2, 5] together with the lack of large-scale cultivation, currently render montbretia inadequate for farm-based MbA production. Large-scale chemical synthesis of MbA is also not feasible due to its complex chemical structure. MbA production by means of synthetic biology or metabolic engineering of a recombinant plant or microbial system appears to be a viable approach [58].

Fig 1. Structures and inhibitor activity of montbretin A, B and C found in montbretia corms.

Fig 1

(A) Montbretin A (MbA) contains a caffeoyl moiety which contributes to the highly efficient inhibition of human pancreatic α-amylase (HPA). MbB and MbC have a coumaroyl- and feruloyl moiety, respectively, and are not effective HPA inhibitors. (B) Ki values for HPA inhibition were reported previously [4].

To enable metabolic engineering of MbA production, we are investigating the genes and enzymes of MbA biosynthesis in montbretia. We recently elucidated the assembly of the complete MbA molecule from its different building blocks, specifically myricetin, UDP-glucose, UDP-rhamnose, UDP-xylose, and caffeoyl-CoA. Five UDP-dependent glycosyltransferases (UGTs) and a BAHD-acyltransferase (AT) have been identified to catalyze MbA assembly in a linear six-step biosynthetic pathway [5, 6, 8]. The third step in MbA biosynthesis is the acylation of myricetin glycosyl rhamnoside (MRG) into mini-MbA catalyzed by CcAT. This enzyme is not specific for its acyl donor and accepts different hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA thioesters as substrates. The incorporation of caffeoyl-CoA, coumaroyl-CoA, or feruloyl-CoA leads to the formation of MbA, montbretin B (MbB), or montbretin C (MbC), respectively (Fig 1). The meta-hydroxy group of the caffeoyl moiety in MbA is essential for the biological activity of HPA inhibition; MbB and MbC are not efficient inhibitors of HPA due to the absence and methylation, respectively, of this meta-hydroxy group [2, 4].

We are exploring both yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Nicotiana benthamiana as hosts for metabolic engineering of MbA production. Successful reconstruction of the MbA biosynthetic pathway was achieved in N. benthamiana through transient expression of MbA assembly genes together with montbretia flavonol biosynthesis genes [6, 7]. While MbA is the predominant montbretin in montbretia corms, transiently transformed N. benthamiana predominantly produced MbB likely due to better availability of coumaroyl-CoA relative to caffeoyl-CoA.

The hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA thioesters caffeoyl-CoA, coumaroyl-CoA and feruloyl-CoA are produced from the respective hydroxycinnamic acids by enzymes generally referred to as 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligases (4CLs) [9, 10]. 4CLs belong to the larger family of acyl-activating enzymes (AAEs), which mainly catalyze the conjugation of an organic acid to CoA using an ATP-dependent two-step mechanism [11]. The AAE family can be divided into seven clades [11] with 4CLs clustering in clade IV. However, enzymes possessing 4CL activity have also been identified in clades V, VI, and VII [1217]. As enzymes in the central phenylpropanoid pathway, 4CLs are ubiquitous across the plant kingdom [18, 19]. They are best known for the production of coumaroyl-CoA which serves as a precursor for a multitude of metabolites, including lignin and flavonoids.

AAE and specifically 4CLs have not been explored in montbretia, where they are likely involved in two different biosynthetic reactions essential for MbA biosynthesis, the production of coumaroyl-CoA for the biosynthesis of the core flavonol myricetin and the production of caffeoyl-CoA as the acyl donor for CcAT in MbA assembly. In this work we explore the molecular basis for the formation of hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA precursors for myricetin and MbA production in montbretia and the utility of Cc4CLs for metabolic engineering. We describe the discovery and characterization of two montbretia 4CLs and their heterologous expression in N. benthamiana and S. cerevisiae in the context of MbA production.

Results

Identification of AAEs expressed in montbretia corms

In order to identify AAEs potentially involved in MbA biosynthesis, we performed a BLASTP search using a set of published AAE sequences from other plant species (S1 File) against a previously described montbretia transcriptome database covering a time course of corm development [6]. We focused on AAEs with high similarity to 4CLs and on AAEs clustering in clades for which enzyme activity with hydroxycinnamic acids has been shown in other species [1217]. We identified 16 contigs encoding full length montbretia AAEs in clades IV, V, VI, and VII (Fig 2 and S2 File). All 16 sequences contained the AMP-binding/adenylate-forming (SSGTTXXPKGV, PROSITE PS00455) motif characteristic for AAEs [11]. A phylogeny of the predicted amino acid sequences revealed two contigs that clustered with known 4CLs (Fig 2). Cc4CL1 (CcAAE2) was most similar to the monocot subclade of class II 4CLs, thought to be involved in phenylpropanoid metabolism other than lignin biosynthesis; while Cc4CL2 (CcAAE10) clustered with monocot class I 4CLs, involved in monolignol biosynthesis [9, 10, 20]. Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 share 60% amino acid identity and 79.7% amino acid similarity. Eleven montbretia contigs clustered with clade V, two with clade VI, and one with clade VII (Fig 2). Both clade V and VI AAEs have been shown to contain peroxisomal acyl-CoA ligases, and amino acid sequence analysis revealed that, except for Cc4CL1, Cc4CL2, CcAAE4, CcAAE5, and CcAAE9, all other candidate AAE possess a C-terminal peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1) (S2 File) [21].

Fig 2. Phylogeny of montbretia acyl activating enzymes (AAEs).

Fig 2

Predicted amino acid sequences of montbretia AAEs that showed expression patterns that matched those of known MbA biosynthetic genes during young corm development were aligned with selected AAEs from other plant species. A neighbour-joining tree was built and tested with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values are displayed at branch nodes. Enzyme clades I, IV, V, VI, VII are labelled [11]. Montbretia enzymes characterized in this work are in bold. Only AAE clades reported to contain enzymes that activate aromatic acids were considered. AtLACS1 was used as the outgroup. Cc: Crocosmia x crocosmiiflora, Gm: Glycine max, At: Arabidopsis thaliana, Pn: Piper nigrum, Os: Oryza sativa, Pv: Panicum virgatum, Sb: Scutellaria baicalensis.

To further narrow down the list of montbretia candidate AAEs, temporal patterns of expression in developing corms were compared to previously characterized MbA biosynthetic genes (MBGs). Transcript abundance in counts-per-million for five developmental time points [6] was used to generate a heatmap and to cluster genes based on expression correlation (Fig 3, S3 and S4 Files). We had previously shown that MBGs share a common pattern of transcript expression with highest transcript abundance in the early summer in developing young corms (Fig 3) [58]. Based on their expression clustering with MBGs, eight candidate genes CcAAE1, CcAAE3, CcAAE4, CcAAE5, CcAAE7, CcAAE9, and Cc4CL1 (AAE2) and Cc4CL2 (AAE10) were selected for further characterization.

Fig 3. Temporal expression profile of montbretia AAEs and previously characterized MbA biosynthetic genes.

Fig 3

Heatmap showing relative transcript abundance of AAEs in montbretia young corms at six different time points of corm development. Each value represents the mean counts per million of two biological replicates centered and scaled by transcript. Genes previously characterized as being involved in MbA biosynthesis are shown in gray. Candidate AAEs selected for characterization in this work are bold. Sampling dates in 2016 are indicated at the bottom.

Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 activate hydroxycinnamic acids

The cDNAs covering the full-length open reading frames of the eight AAEs were cloned using cDNA template made from young corm transcripts, and AAEs were individually expressed in E. coli for functional characterization. For initial tests for 4CL activity, whole protein extracts were prepared and assayed with ATP, MgCl2, coenzyme A, and individual phenylpropanoid substrates, specifically cinnamic acid, coumaric acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and sinapic acid. A whole protein extract prepared from E. coli harbouring an empty vector was used as a negative control. Products were identified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). We observed CoA ligase activity with the above-mentioned substrates only for Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 (Fig 4 and S5 File). Whole protein extracts as well as Ni-purified Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 converted coumaric acid, caffeic acid, and ferulic acid to the corresponding CoA thioesters coumaroyl-CoA (peak 1; m/z 912), caffeoyl-CoA (peak 2; m/z 928), and feruloyl-CoA (peak 3; m/z 942) (Fig 4A). In addition, Cc4CL2 also converted cinnamic acid to cinnamoyl-CoA (m/z 896). No activity was detected with sinapic acid. None of the other tested AAEs showed product formation with any of the tested hydroxycinnamic acids. Protein expression was verified by Western blot (S5B File).

Fig 4. Enzyme activities of Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2.

Fig 4

(A) LC-MS product profiles. Enzymes were heterologously expressed in E. coli and Ni-purified protein was assayed with ATP, MgCl2, CoA, and one of the hydroxycinnamic acids, cinnamic acid, coumaric acid, caffeic acid, or ferulic acid. As controls, assays were performed with purified protein extracts of E. coli transformed with the empty vector. Products were analyzed using LC-MS and extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) are shown. Peak 1, tentatively identified as cinnamoyl-CoA (m/z 896); peak 2, coumaroyl-CoA (m/z 912); peak 3, caffeoyl-CoA (m/z 928); peak 4, feruloyl-CoA (m/z 942). n.d. not detected. (B) Relative product formation in competition assays. Cc4CL1 or Cc4CL2 were assayed with a combined set of the three hydroxycinnamic acid substrates, coumaric acid, caffeic acid and ferulic acid, in one reaction. The 100% activity value was defined by the substrate that yielded the most abundant product in the competition assays.

Both caffeoyl-CoA and coumaroyl-CoA are required for MbA biosynthesis. In addition, utilization of coumaroyl-, caffeoyl- and feruloyl-CoA by CcAT leads to the formation of MbB, MbA and MbC, respectively. Since Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 were both active with caffeic acid and coumaric acid, as well as other hydroxycinnamic acids as substrates, we measured their activity with different substrates in vitro with competition assays. Assays were performed with Ni-purified enzyme using equimolar concentrations of the three substrates caffeic acid, coumaric acid and ferulic acid. In competition assays, coumaric acid was the preferred substrate for both Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 (Fig 4B). Cc4CL1 displayed 4.2 ± 0.7% activity with caffeic acid and no detectable activity with ferulic acid relative to the activity with coumaric acid (set 100%), while Cc4CL2 displayed 11.4 ± 0.2% activity with caffeic acid and 26.0 ± 1.8% with ferulic acid relative to activity with coumaric acid (100%). We observed a lack of stability of the Ni-purified enzyme which prevented us from assessing enzyme kinetic parameters.

CcAAEs did not affect MbA levels when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana

We previously established a transient N. benthamiana montbretin pathway expression system in which the expression of MBGs enables MbB and trace amounts of MbA formation [6]. Here, we tested the effect of co-expressing CcAAEs on montbretin levels. We individually co-expressed each of the eight candidate CcAAEs, regardless of their in vitro 4CL activity, with the MBGs (35Spro:(CcMYB4 + CcFLS + CcCYP2 (CYP75B138) + CcUGT1 + CcUGT2 + CcUGT3 + CcUGT4 + CcUGT5 + CcAT1) + pBIN:p19) (S6 File) in N. benthamiana leaves. Expression of Cc4CL1 or Cc4CL2 in combination with MBGs did not affect montbretin product profiles relative to expression of MBGs alone (Fig 5 and S7 and S8 Files). MbB was the major product formed (371.4 ± 31.3 μg/g), followed by MbC (79.9 ± 10.6 μg/g), and lower amounts of MbA (6.3 ± 1.4 μg/g). Beyond Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2, expression of the other CcAAEs also had no effect on the levels of MbA (F8,18 = 1.566, p = 0.204), MbB (F8,18 = 1.426, p = 0.252) or MbC (F8,18 = 1.064, p = 0.429) (S7 and S8 Files).

Fig 5. Montbretin accumulation in N. benthamiana co-expressing MbA biosynthetic genes and Cc4CL1 or Cc4CL2.

Fig 5

N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with different combinations of A. tumefaciens transformed with plasmids carrying the 35S-promoter-gene constructs for myricetin and MbA biosynthetic genes (= MBGs, [6]) as well as 4CL1 or 4CL2 (see S6 File). Leaves were collected 5 days post-infiltration. Metabolites were extracted with 50% MeOH, analyzed by LC-MS. Data represents mean ± SE (n = 4). MbA (F8,18 = 1.57, p = 0.204), MbB (F8,18 = 1.43, p = 0.25), MbC (F8,18 = 1.06, p = 0.43), n.s. not significant.

Utilizing Cc4CLs to reconstruct flavanone biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Unlike plants, S. cerevisiae does not have endogenous 4CL activity which is essential for flavonoid biosynthesis. We tested the utility of Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 in S. cerevisiae to convert exogenously fed p-coumaric acid to p-coumaroyl-CoA, and exogenously fed caffeic acid to caffeoyl-CoA, to support formation of the flavanones naringenin and eriodictyol (Fig 6). Naringenin and eriodictyol are precursors for myricetin, which is the core building block of MbA (Fig 1). For metabolic engineering of montbretin in yeast, 4CL activity would also enable the formation of p-coumaroyl-CoA or caffeoyl-CoA as acyl donors for CcAT in MbB or MbA biosynthesis, respectively.

Fig 6. Reconstruction of flavanone biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using montbretia 4CLs.

Fig 6

(A) Flavanone biosynthesis module. For expression in S. cerevisiae, expression modules containing montbretia chalcone synthase (CcCHS2), chalcone isomerase (CcCHI2) and one of two 4-coumaroyl CoA ligases (4CLs), montbretia Cc4CL1 or Cc4CL2, were constructed. (B) Schematic representation of flavanone biosynthetic pathway. Coumaric acid or caffeic acid are converted into naringenin or eriodictyol, respectively. Lactone formation occurs as a side reaction. (C,D) Engineering flavanone production in S. cerevisiae. Flavanone biosynthesis modules (see A) differing in their Cc4CL genes were heterologously expressed in S. cerevisiae. Genes were constitutively expressed from the same low copy plasmid. Yeast cultures were grown for 67h in 48-well plates, extracted and analysed for flavanone formation using LC-MS. Representative extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) (C) and amounts of produced naringenin or eriodictyol are shown (n = 2) (D). Peak 1, tentatively identified as p-coumaroyltriacetic acid lactone; peak 2, naringenin; peak 3, tentatively identified as caffeoyltriacetic acid lactone; peak 4, eriodictyol. Changes in flavanone levels were tested using Welch’s two-sample t-tests (naringenin: p = 0.27; eriodictyol: p < 0.001).

We expressed Cc4CL1 or Cc4CL2 together with the previously described CcCHS2 and CcCHI2 in S. cerevisiae [7]. Constructs were assembled using the yeast toolkit for modular cloning (MoClo-YTK) [22] to express all three genes from one plasmid using constitutive promotors of different strengths (Fig 6A and S9 File). Plasmids were transformed into S. cerevisiae BY4741, cultures were fed with p-coumaric acid or caffeic acid and grown in 48-well plates for 67 h. Naringenin or eriodictyol formation was detected using LC-MS. Both 4CLs activated p-coumaric or caffeic acid to provide hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA thioesters necessary for flavanone production as shown by the formation of naringenin or eriodictyol, respectively (Fig 6C and 6D). Hydroxycoumaroyl triacetic lactone formation occurred as a side product (S10 File). Expression of Cc4CL1 resulted in slightly higher levels of naringenin production (5.8 mg * L-1) when p-coumaric acid fed, compared to Cc4CL2 (5.2 mg * L-1); eriodictyol production (caffeic acid fed) was higher with the expression of Cc4CL2 (2.3 mg * L-1) compared to Cc4CL1 (1.5 mg * L-1). Naringenin titers were about 3-fold higher compared to eriodictyol titers. The formation of the side product, triacetic acid lactone was more pronounced when caffeic acid was fed and eriodictyol produced. No product formation could be detected using a GFP control vector or when no hydroxycinnamic acid was fed.

Discussion

Previous research on the biosynthesis of the anti-diabetic and anti-obesity compound MbA has focused mostly on the unique assembly of MbA from a suite of common plant metabolites (i.e., MbA building blocks), specifically the flavonoid myricetin, the phenylpropanoid caffeoyl-CoA, and the UDP-sugars UDP-rhamnose, UDP-glucose and UDP-xylose [58]. The central phenylpropanoid pathway [23] produces the precursor coumaroyl-CoA for myricetin, and it also produces caffeoyl-CoA, thus feeding twice into the MbA biosynthetic system. While caffeoyl-CoA is required for the acylation reaction in the MbA assembly pathway, the similar phenylpropanoids coumaroyl-CoA and feruloyl CoA provide the acyl functionalities for MbB and MbC, respectively (Fig 1). MbB and MbC have no significant potential for treatment of diabetes or obesity [2], but their biosynthesis in montbretia or in metabolically engineered tobacco or yeast competes with MbA production [2, 7]. Here, we investigated montbretia AAEs with a focus on 4CLs and their ability to convert caffeic acid, coumaric acid or ferulic acid into caffeoyl-CoA, coumaroyl-CoA or feruloyl-CoA, respectively. We identified two Cc4CLs, both of which showed activity with all three hydroxycinnamic acids and an apparent preference for coumaric acid as substrate relative to caffeic acid and ferulic acid. While expression of AAEs failed to enhance MbA biosynthesis in tobacco, we demonstrated that both Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 can be used to activate coumaric and caffeic acid towards flavanone biosynthesis in metabolically engineered yeast.

Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 are not substrate specific

The CcATs that catalyze the formation of montbretins can use caffeoyl-CoA, coumaroyl-CoA and feruloyl-CoA, thus leading to the formation of MbA, MbB and MbC [5]. Given the lack of CcAT substrate specificity it is possible that preferential biosynthesis of any one of these three montbretins might be controlled by differences in the availability of caffeoyl-CoA, coumaroyl-CoA or feruloyl-CoA. In addition, all three montbretins require coumaroyl-CoA for the myricetin core. We hypothesized that montbretia corms might express a set of different Cc4CLs with distinct substrate specificities as a means to regulate the formation of caffeoyl-CoA, coumaroyl-CoA and feruloyl-CoA. However, the results of this work indicate that this is not the case. Substrate promiscuity of 4CLs has also been observed in other plant species [2428]. The majority of 4CLs have been studied in dicot species where they generally display a preference for p-coumaric acid or caffeic acid [24, 29, 30]. Fewer 4CLs have been characterized in monocots. In rice (Oryza sativa), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and great millet (Sorghum bicolor), 4CLs generally prefer coumaric acid and ferulic acid relative to caffeic acid [25, 31, 32]. This pattern holds true for Cc4CL2, which displayed preference for p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid compared to caffeic acid, while Cc4CL1 did not accept ferulic acid in competition assays.

In addition to bona fide 4CLs, some AAEs outside the 4CL clade have been reported to use phenylpropanoid substrates. For example, AAEs in clades V, VI, and VII contribute to benzenoid metabolism through activation of cinnamic acid [12, 13, 33, 34]. In yew (Taxus media) AAEs outside of the 4CL clade can activate hydroxycinnamic acids with TmAAE12 preferring caffeic acid in vitro [17]. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) clade V AAEs also activate p-coumaric acid and/or caffeic acid [33, 35]. In contrast, none of the CcAAEs outside of the 4CL clade showed activity with hydroxycinnamic acids. Thus, 4CL activity in montbretia appears to be limited to the bona fide 4CL clade, and does not contribute to selective biosynthesis of MbA relative to other montbretins.

Cc4CL1 is likely involved in MbA biosynthesis

4CLs cluster within clade IV of the AAE family. Within clade IV, two functionally distinct sub-clades exist, class I and class II. Enzymes involved in lignin biosynthesis cluster within class I, while class II contains 4CLs that are likely involved in soluble phenylpropanoid metabolism, including flavonoid biosynthesis [9, 10, 20]. Cc4CL1 clusters within class II 4CLs, accepts coumaric acid and caffeic acid as substrates, and its gene expression pattern matches that of MBGs during young corm development. Cc4CL2 clusters within class I, accepts coumaric acid, caffeic acid as well as ferulic acid as substrates, but its expression profile pattern does not match that of other MBGs. Both Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2 show high transcript abundance in early summer. These observations suggest that Cc4CL1 is more likely to contribute to MbA biosynthesis while Cc4CL2 may be involved in lignin biosynthesis.

CcAAEs do not enhance MbA production in N. benthamiana

We previously engineered N. benthamiana for the production of MbA by transiently co-expressing a suite of genes for myricetin and MbA biosynthesis [6, 7]. This system yielded small amounts of less than 10 μg MbA per g fresh weight of tobacco leaf material, while levels of MbB and MbC were about 60-fold and 15-fold, respectively, higher. We showed here that co-expression of AAEs, including Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2, did not alter these product profiles suggesting that 4CL activity is not rate limiting for overall montbretin production in N. benthamiana. However, future work shall focus on the possibility to enhance caffeoyl-CoA formation in N. benthamiana in order to increase the relative ratio and overall yield of MbA. This may be achieved through selection or mutagenesis of a 4CL enzyme with higher substrate preference for caffeic acid. The Arabidopsis thaliana At4CL2 was shown to have higher activity toward caffeic acid [29] and could also be explored for increasing caffeoyl-CoA formation in N. benthamiana.

Engineering flavanone biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

N. benthamina and yeast each have unique advantages and also provide challenges for metabolic engineering of MbA production. In contrast to N. benthamiana, which naturally produces all of the MbA building blocks, MbA biosynthesis in yeast will require more extensive engineering for most of the MbA building blocks, in addition to engineering of the MbA assembly pathway. However, the fact that yeast does not produce caffeic acid/caffeoyl-CoA and coumaric acid/coumaroyl-CoA, may allow for better control of MbA versus MbB production in yeast by controlled feeding of caffeic acid. CHS which is the entry enzyme for flavonol biosynthesis efficiently uses caffeic acid although coumaric acid is generally the preferred substrate [36]. Here we demonstrated the feasibility of producing the flavanones eriodictyol and naringenin, two possible precursors to myricetin, from caffeic acid and coumaric acid, respectively, by heterologous co-expression of Cc4CLs with montbretia flavanone biosynthetic genes. The yields of these flavanones were comparable to eriodictyol and naringenin production reported for yeast ectopically expressing flavanone biosynthetic genes, while higher levels can be achieved through genomic integration and pathway optimization [3740]. In future work we will further optimize eriodictyol production from caffeic acid in yeast, similar to the previously described naringenin production [39, 40].

Conclusion

The caffeoyl moiety is essential for the anti-diabetic function of MbA. Here we investigated the production of hydroxycinnamic CoA thioesters for myricetin and MbA production in montbretia. Montbretia expresses two functional Cc4CLs, Cc4CL1 and Cc4CL2. Cc4CL1 is likely involved in MbA biosynthesis, while Cc4CL2 may contribute to lignin biosynthesis. Cc4CL activity does not enhance MbA production or the production of other montbretins, MbB and MbC, when expressed together with MbA pathway genes in N. benthamiana. Both Cc4CLs can be used for flavanone production in yeast to support metabolic engineering of MbA.

Materials and methods

Identification of target CcAAE

RNA extraction from montbretia corms, cDNA synthesis, and corm time-course transcriptome sequencing, assembly, and differential expression analysis was described previously [5, 6]. To identify putative AAEs involved in MbA biosynthesis, a BLASTP search of the translated montbretia transcriptome was conducted using a set of characterized AAE (S1 File). Results were filtered using a reciprocal BLASTP search against the non-redundant protein database of NCBI. Resulting montbretia AAEs were used in a second reciprocal BLASTP analysis. Only sequences clustering into clade IV, V, VI and VII of the AAE family were considered as candidates. This process resulted in 38 putative AAEs. Sixteen of those were longer than 400 amino acids and retained for further analysis.

Transcript expression data in counts per million (cpm), from six different developmental time-points of montbretia young corms, were generated as previously described [6]. We used this time-course expression data to compute Pearson correlation coefficients (S3 File). Genes which clustered into the 4CL clade and/or showed a correlation coefficient > 0.9 were selected yielding eight final candidate genes. Expression data for 16 AAE can be found in S4 File.

A heatmap visualizing expression patterns of putative CcAAEs alongside characterized montbretia myricetin and MbA biosynthetic genes was generated in R 4.0.2 [41] using the ‘pheatmap’ package [42]. Genes possessing similar transcript expression patterns were determined by hierarchical clustering using Pearson correlation distance and complete-linkage clustering. Each data point represents normalized mean counts per million from two biological replicates.

The predicted amino acid sequences of putative montbretia AAEs and AAE from other plants were aligned using ClustalW algorithm and the GONNET protein weight matrix implemented in MEGA7 [43] (S1 File). This alignment was used to generate a phylogenetic tree with MEGA7 using the neighbour-joining algorithm and the Poisson model. The tree topology was evaluated by performing a bootstrap resampling analysis with 1000 replicates.

Cloning and heterologous expression in E. coli

The eight selected CcAAEs were amplified from young corm cDNA (harvested June 10th, 2016) and cloned into the pJet1.2/blunt vector for sequencing (S11 File) [5]. Complete open reading frames of the target CcAAEs were cloned as BsaI or BbsI fragments into the pASK-IBA37+ expression vector (IBA), for N-terminal His6-tagging. The E. coli TOP10 strain (Invitrogen) was used for heterologous CcAAE expression. Cultures were grown at 21°C, 220 rpm and induced at OD600 = 0.6 with 200 μg * L-1 anhydrotetracycline (Sigma-Aldrich) and further cultured at 18°C for 20 h. Cultures were collected by centrifugation (4300 x g) and disrupted by five freeze and thaw cycles in chilled extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 10% [v/v] glycerol, 1x Pierce protease inhibitor [EDTA-free; Thermo Fisher Scientific], 25 U Benzonase Nuclease [Merck, Germany], and 0.2 mg * mL-1 lysozyme). Cell fragments were removed by centrifugation (14 000 x g), and the supernatant was desalted into assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, and 10% [v/v] glycerol) using Econopac 10DG columns (Bio-Rad, USA). For protein purification of 4CL1 and 4CL2 using Ni-NTA, a modified extraction buffer was used (50mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 10mM MgCl2;5mM DTT; 2% [v/v] glycerol; 150 mM NaCl2; 20 mM imidazole; 1x Pierce protease inhibitor [EDTA-free, ThermoFisher Scientific], 25 U Benzonase Nuclease [Merck, Germany], and 0.2 mg * mL-1 lysozyme) and the lysate was directly loaded onto a Ni-NTA agarose column (Qiagen). Protein was eluted with elution buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 400 mM imidazole; 1mM DTT; 10% [v/v] glycerol) and desalted into assay buffer using Illustra NAP-5 Columns (GE Healthcare). Enzyme assays were set up the same day as storage at 4°C or shock-freezing of the purified protein led to loss of activity. The Monoclonal AntipolyHistidine-Alkaline Phosphatase antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) and the 1-Step NBT/BCIP Substrate Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to ensure successful heterologous enzyme expression (S5B File).

Enzyme assays with recombinant CcAAEs

To test for 4CL activity, initial enzyme assays were performed with 100 μL bacterial extract, 5 mM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM CoA (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), and 100 μM of substrate in a Teflon-sealed, screw-capped 1 mL glass vial for 2 h at 25°C. Substrates tested were cinnamic acid, coumaric acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and sinapic acid (Sigma-Aldrich). For the competitive assays, Ni-purified enzyme was incubated with 100 μM of each substrate, caffeic acid, coumaric acid and ferulic acid, at 25°C for 10, 20 or 30 minutes (two replicates each). Assays were stopped by adding 100 μL methanol and placing on ice. Products were detected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The identity of coumaroyl-CoA, caffeoyl-CoA, and feruloyl-CoA was confirmed by comparing mass and retention time with authentic standards. For competitive assays, peak area of extracted ion chromatograms was used to calculate percentage of products formed.

Transient expression of CcAAEs in Nicotiana benthamiana

For transient expression in N. benthamiana, the coding sequence of the eight CcAAEs were separately cloned into the pCAMBiA2300U vector. After sequence verification, pCAMBiA vectors carrying the CcAAEs as well as pCAMBiA vectors carrying the previously described genes for myricetin biosynthesis CcFLS, CcCYP2 and CcMYB4 [7] and the genes for MbA biosynthesis CcUGT1, CcUGT2, CcAT1, CcUGT3, CcUGT4 and CcUGT5 (all nine genes are referred to as montbretin biosynthetic genes = MBGs) [5, 6, 8] and the pBIN:p19 were individually transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58pMP90. Agrobacterium cultures were prepared as previously described [6]. Briefly, overnight cultures were grown (220 rpm, 28 °C) and used to inoculate 10 mL LB-media containing 50 μg * mL-1 kanamycin, 25 μg * mL-1 rifampicin and 25 μg * mL-1 gentamicin for overnight growth. The following day the cultures were centrifuged (4,000 x g, 5 min) and cells were re-suspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 μM acetosyringone, pH 5.6) to a final OD600 of 0.5. After shaking for 2 h at 21°C, combinations were prepared for leaf infiltration by mixing equal volumes of transformed A. tumefaciens. MBGs were used as a control: A. tumefaciens 35Spro:(CcMYB4 + CcFLS + CcCYP2 + CcUGT1 + CcUGT2 + CcUGT3 + CcUGT4 + CcUGT5 + CcAT1) + A. tumefaciens pBIN:p19. AAE were individually tested in the background of MBGs: MBGs + A. tumefaciens 35Spro:(CcAAE) (AAE being 1/11 of the mixture; S6 File). The leaves of four-week-old N. benthamiana plants were infiltrated with these Agrobacterium suspensions using a 1-mL needleless syringe to gently push the suspension into the leaf’s abaxial surface. Infiltrated leaves were labeled with tape and harvested five days after infiltration. Leaf discs 1 cm in diameter were cut from harvested leaves using a cork borer. Leaf discs were then weighed, and metabolites were extracted using 1 mL of 50% MeOH (v/v) per 100 mg of tissue. Extracts were analyzed using LC-MS.

Reconstruction of flavanone biosynthesis in yeast

For heterologous expression in yeast the yeast toolkit for modular cloning (MoClo-YTK) was used (Addgene, MA, USA) [22]. First, the montbretia flavanone biosynthetic genes, CcCHS2, CcCHI2 [7], and Cc4CL1, Cc4CL2 (this work), were individually cloned into the entry vector, sequenced, paired with a promotor and terminator (Fig 6 and S9 File) and cloned into a transcriptional unit. Transcriptional units were then combined to multigene constructs containing CcCHS2, CcCHI2 and one of the 4CLs; Cc4CL1 or Cc4CL2 (S9 File). This yielded two flavanone biosynthesis expression modules, each differing in their 4CL. Details about promotors, terminators and parts for the vector backbone can be found in S9 File. Each module was individually transformed into the yeast strain BY4741 (GE Life Sciences, http://www.gelifesciences.com/). For flavanone biosynthesis, a single yeast colony was used to inoculate a starting culture in 5 mL selective uracil dropout media (SD-URA), which was grown overnight at 28 °C and 180 rpm. The following day, 250 μL SD-URA media were inoculated to an OD of 0.1, fed with coumaric or caffeic acid (100 μM end concentration; 2.5 μL of 100 mM stock dissolved in ethanol) and grown in 48-well plates covered with a sterile-breathable sealing film (VWR, ON, Canada) for 67h at 28 °C and 180 rpm. To prevent evaporation, plates were placed in a plastic container under high humidity. Three replicates were grown for each sample and the experiment was repeated two times independently. For metabolite analysis, 50 μL sample was mixed with 50 μL methanol and the supernatant was analysed as described in the LC-MS section.

LC-MS analyses

LC analysis was done on an Agilent 1100 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (50 x 4.6 mm, 1.8 μm particle size) (Merck, Darmstadt, 370 Germany). In vitro enzyme assays were analyzed using 10 mM aqueous ammonium acetate (Mobile phase A) and acetonitrile plus formic acid (0.2% v/v; Mobile phase B) with the following elution profile: 0–5 minutes, 5–35% B in A; 5 to 9 minutes, 35–90% B in A. The flow rate was 0.8 mL x min-1 at a column temperature of 50 °C. N. benthamiana extracts and yeast assays were analyzed using aqueous formic acid (0.2% v/v; Mobile phase A) and acetonitrile plus formic acid (0.2% v/v; Mobile phase B). The elution profile for N. benthamiana leaf extracts was: 0–0.5 min, 95% A; 0.5–5 min, 5–20% B in A; 5–7 min 90% B in A and 7.1–10 min 95% A. The flow rate was 0.8 mL x min-1 at a column temperature of 50 °C. The elution profile for flavanones produced in yeast was: 0–0.5 min, 95% A; 0.5–5 min, 5–40% B in A; 5–7 min 90% B in A and 7.1–10 min 95% A. The flow rate was 0.8 mL x min-1 at a column temperature of 50 °C.

LC was coupled to an Agilent MSD Trap XCT-Plus mass spectrometer using electrospray ionization functioning in negative mode (capillary voltage, 4000 eV; temp, 350 °C; nebulizing gas, 60 psi; dry gas 12 L/min). MS/MS was used to monitor daughter ion formation. Agilent LC/MSD Trap Software 5.2 (Bruker Daltonik) was used for data acquisition and analysis. MbA, MbB, and MbC production in N. benthamiana was quantified using an external MbA standard curve and flavanone production in yeast was quantified using naringenin or eriodictyol standard curves. Compounds were identified using their retention times, molecular masses, and specific fragmentation patterns and by use of authentic standards if they were available (eriodictyol and naringenin, Sigma-Aldrich; MbA and MbB, [2, 5]).

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for significant differences in the accumulation of MbA, MbB and MbC in N. benthamiana. Welch’s two-sample t-test was used to test for differences in flavanone production in yeast. These analyses were conducted in base R 4.0.2 [41].

Accession numbers

Nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank with the accession numbers MZ944850 (Cc4CL1), MZ944849 (Cc4CL2). Accession numbers or sequences for all other genes/proteins used in this work are indicated in S1 and S2 Files. Previously published transcriptome libraries as well as time course data described in the manuscript are available in the NCBI/GenBank Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the project PRJNA389589 (SRP108844).

Supporting information

S1 File. Protein accession numbers.

(DOCX)

S2 File. Amino acid sequences of candidate CcAAEs.

(XLSX)

S3 File. Correlation of CcAAEs expression with previously identified MbA pathway genes during young corm development.

(DOCX)

S4 File. Expression data of 16 candidate AAEs.

(XLSX)

S5 File. Activity and expression of AAEs.

(DOCX)

S6 File. Combinations of genes used for transient expression in N. benthamiana.

(DOCX)

S7 File. Montbretin A, B and C levels in N. benthamiana plants transiently expressing MBGs and AAE.

(DOCX)

S8 File. Identification of montbretins produced by N. benthamiana transiently expressing MBGs.

(DOCX)

S9 File. Parts of the MoClo system used for the construction of S. cerevisiae expression modules.

(DOCX)

S10 File. Identification of products formed by S. cerevisiae expressing a flavanone biosynthetic module.

(DOCX)

S11 File. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephen G. Withers for insightful discussions and collaboration, Carol Ritland for project management and Macaire M. S. Yuen for bioinformatic support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The research was supported with funds from the GlycoNet Networks of Centres of Excellence (to J.B.), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Discovery Grant to J.B.), NSERC CGS-M fellowship (to F.G.S.), and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through a Feodor Lynen Research Fellowship (to S.I.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Asada Y, Hirayama Y, Furuya T. Acylated flavonols from Crocosmia crocosmiiflora. Phytochemistry. 1988;27:1497–501. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tarling CA, Woods K, Zhang R, Brastianos HC, Brayer GD, Andersen RJ, et al. The search for novel human pancreatic α-amylase inhibitors: High-throughput screening of terrestrial and marine natural product extracts. ChemBioChem. 2008;9:433–8. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yuen VG, Coleman J, Withers SG, Andersen RJ, Brayer GD, Mustafa S, et al. Glucose lowering effect of montbretin A in Zucker Diabetic Fatty rats. Mol Cell Biochem. 2016;411:373–81. doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2599-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Williams LK, Zhang X, Caner S, Tysoe C, Nguyen NT, Wicki J, et al. The amylase inhibitor montbretin A reveals a new glycosidase inhibition motif. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:691–6. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Irmisch S, Jo S, Roach CR, Jancsik S, Yuen MMS, Madilao L, et al. Discovery of UDP-glycosyltransferases and BAHD-acyltransferases in the biosynthesis of the anti-diabetic plant metabolite montbretin A. Plant Cell. 2018;30 August:1864–86. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Irmisch S, Jancsik S, Man Saint Yuen M, Madilao LL, Bohlmann J. Complete biosynthesis of the anti-diabetic plant metabolite montbretin A. Plant Physiol. 2020;184:97–109. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Irmisch S, Ruebsam H, Jancsik S, Yuen MMS, Madilao L, Bohlmann J. Flavonol biosynthesis genes and their use in a synthetic biology approach to engineering the plant antidiabetic metabolite montbretin A. Plant Physiol. 2019;180:1277–90. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Irmisch S, Jancsik S, Yuen MMS, Madilao LL, Bohlmann J. Biosynthesis of the anti-diabetic metabolite montbretin A: glucosylation of the central intermediate mini-MbA. Plant J. 2019;100:879–91. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cukovic D, Ehlting J, VanZiffle JA, Douglas CJ. Structure and evolution of 4-coumarate: Coenzyme A ligase (4CL) gene families. Biol Chem. 2001;382:645–54. doi: 10.1515/BC.2001.076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li Y, Kim JI, Pysh L, Chapple C. Four isoforms of Arabidopsis thaliana 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL) have overlapping yet distinct roles in phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:2409–21. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shockey J, Browse J. Genome-level and biochemical diversity of the acyl-activating enzyme superfamily in plants. Plant J. 2011;66:143–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04512.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gaid MM, Sircar D, Müller A, Beuerle T, Liu B, Ernst L, et al. Cinnamate: CoA ligase initiates the biosynthesis of a benzoate-derived xanthone phytoalexin in Hypericum calycinum cell cultures. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:1267–80. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.204180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Klempien A, Kaminaga Y, Qualley A, Nagegowda DA, Widhalm JR, Orlova I, et al. Contribution of CoA ligases to benzenoid biosynthesis in petunia flowers. Plant Cell. 2012;24:2015–30. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee S, Kaminaga Y, Cooper B, Pichersky E, Dudareva N, Chapple C. Benzoylation and sinapoylation of glucosinolate R-groups in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012;72:411–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05096.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martin C, Xue H, Zhang Y, Wang G, Zhao Q, Weng J-K, et al. A specialized flavone biosynthetic pathway has evolved in the medicinal plant, Scutellaria baicalensis. Sci Adv. 2016;2:1–15. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schnabel A, Cotinguiba F, Athmer B, Yang C, Westermann B, Schaks A, et al. A piperic acid CoA ligase produces a putative precursor of piperine, the pungent principle from black pepper fruits. Plant J. 2019;102:569–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Srividya N, Lange I, Hartmann M, Li Q, Mirzaei M, Lange BM. Biochemical characterization of acyl activating enzymes for side chain moieties of taxol and its analogs. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:4963–73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.012663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gao H, Guo DM, Liu WJ, Ran JH, Wang XQ. Evolution of the 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL) gene family: Conserved evolutionary pattern and two new gene classes in gymnosperms. J Syst Evol. 2012;50:195–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lavhale SG, Kalunke RM, Giri AP. Structural, functional and evolutionary diversity of 4-coumarate-CoA ligase in plants. Planta. 2018;248:1063–78. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2965-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ehlting J, Büttner D, Wang Q, Douglas CJ, Somssich IE, Kombrink E. Three 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligases in Arabidopsis thaliana represent two evolutionarily divergent classes in angiosperms. Plant J. 1999;19:9–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00491.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reumann S. Specification of the peroxisome targeting signals type 1 and type 2 of plant peroxisomes by bioinformatics analyses. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:783–800. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.035584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee ME, DeLoache WC, Cervantes B, Dueber JE. A highly characterized yeast toolkit for modular, multipart assembly. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:975–86. doi: 10.1021/sb500366v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vogt T. Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Mol Plant. 2010;3:2–20. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lindermayr C, Möllers B, Fliegmann J, Uhlmann A, Lottspeich F, Meimberg H, et al. Divergent members of a soybean (Glycine max L.) 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase gene family. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:1304–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02775.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gui J, Shen J, Li L. Functional characterization of evolutionarily divergent 4-coumarate: Coenzyme a ligases in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:574–86. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.178301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun H, Li Y, Feng S, Zou W, Guo K, Fan C, et al. Analysis of five rice 4-coumarate: Coenzyme A ligase enzyme activity and stress response for potential roles in lignin and flavonoid biosynthesis in rice. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2013;430:1151–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin CY, Wang JP, Li Q, Chen HC, Liu J, Loziuk P, et al. 4-Coumaroyl and caffeoyl shikimic acids inhibit 4-coumaric acid:coenzyme a ligases and modulate metabolic flux for 3-hydroxylation in monolignol biosynthesis of Populus trichocarpa. Mol Plant. 2015;8:176–87. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu XY, Wang PP, Wu YF, Cheng AX, Lou HX. Cloning and functional characterization of two 4-coumarate: CoA ligase genes from Selaginella moellendorffii. Molecules. 2018;23:1–11. doi: 10.3390/molecules23030595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Costa MA, Bedgar DL, Moinuddin SGA, Kim KW, Cardenas CL, Cochrane FC, et al. Characterization in vitro and in vivo of the putative multigene 4-coumarate:CoA ligase network in Arabidopsis: Syringyl lignin and sinapate/sinapyl alcohol derivative formation. Phytochemistry. 2005;66:2072–91. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.06.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen HC, Song J, Williams CM, Shuford CM, Liu J, Wang JP, et al. Monolignol pathway 4-coumaric acid: Coenzyme A ligases in Populus trichocarpa: Novel specificity, metabolic regulation, and simulation of coenzyme a ligation fluxes. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:1501–16. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.210971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu B, Escamilla-Treviño LL, Sathitsuksanoh N, Shen Z, Shen H, Percival Zhang YH, et al. Silencing of 4-coumarate: Coenzyme A ligase in switchgrass leads to reduced lignin content and improved fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. New Phytol. 2011;192:611–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03830.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Saballos A, Sattler SE, Sanchez E, Foster TP, Xin Z, Kang C, et al. Brown midrib2 (Bmr2) encodes the major 4-coumarate: Coenzyme A ligase involved in lignin biosynthesis in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Plant J. 2012;70:818–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04933.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Block A, Widhalm JR, Fatihi A, Cahoon RE, Wamboldt Y, Elowsky C, et al. The origin and biosynthesis of the benzenoid moiety of ubiquinone (Coenzyme Q) in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:1938–48. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.125807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Soubeyrand E, Kelly M, Keene SA, Bernert AC, Latimer S, Johnson TS, et al. Arabidopsis 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase 8 contributes to the biosynthesis of the benzenoid ring of coenzyme Q in peroxisomes. Biochem J. 2019;476:3521–32. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20190688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kienow L, Schneider K, Bartsch M, Stuible HP, Weng H, Miersch O, et al. Jasmonates meet fatty acids: Functional analysis of a new acyl-coenzyme A synthetase family from Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot. 2008;59:403–19. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schröder J. The family of chalcone synthase-related proteins: Functional diversity and evolution. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry. 2000;34:55–89 [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jiang H, Wood KV., Morgan JA. Metabolic engineering of the phenylpropanoid pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71:2962–9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.2962-2969.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yan Y, Kohli A, Koffas MAG. Biosynthesis of natural flavanones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:5610–3. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5610-5613.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lyu X, Ng KR, Lee JL, Mark R, Chen WN. Enhancement of naringenin biosynthesis from tyrosine by metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Agr Food Chem. 2017;65:6638–46. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lehka BJ, Eichenberger M, Bjørn-Yoshimoto WE, Vanegas KG, Buijs N, Jensen NB, et al. Improving heterologous production of phenylpropanoids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by tackling an unwanted side reaction of Tsc13, an endogenous double-bond reductase. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017;17:1–12. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kolde R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.8. 2015.
  • 43.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Igor Cesarino

26 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-23997

4-Coumaroyl-CoA Ligases Involved in the Biosynthesis of the Anti-Diabetic Metabolite Montbretin A

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bohlmann,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After the evaluation of two experts in the field, we consider that your article can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections suggested by the reviewers. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Note that, although the opinions from the reviewers were quite positive, they did raised interesting points to improve the manuscript. Some changes might be considered and additional information might be added.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 10 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Igor Cesarino, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please update your submission to use the PLOS LaTeX template. The template and more information on our requirements for LaTeX submissions can be found at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/latex.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: PONE-D-21-23997, 4-Coumaroyl-CoA Ligases Involved in the Biosynthesis of the Anti-Diabetic Metabolite Montbretin A

Sunstrom and co-workers approach an interesting problem in the engineered biosynthesis of the potential therapeutic plant specialized metabolite Montbretin A. It was previously observed that it accumulates only as a minor part in a mixture of related, but unwanted compounds when functionally characterized steps of the pathway were heterologously expressed in the transient Nicotiana benthamiana system. Here, a family of 4-coumarate CoA ligases is identified in Crocosmia, where Montbretin A is a major metabolite.

These enzymes have evolved to provide precursors for specific phenylpropanoid pathways but are known to display significant functional redundancy as well. Solid biochemical characterization of the enzymes demonstrated relevant activities for two of the family toward phenylpropanoid substrates, including those involved in Montbretin biosynthesis. However, this also showed functional redundancy and non-selectivity for their substrates. Engineering of the pathway in N. benthamiana, including these novel enzymes, did not show the hoped-for shift in the distribution of the formed product pattern.

Deployment of the enzymes in yeast supports and validates their function.

Discussion of the results is comprehensive and possible future perspectives, i.e., the use of recombinant enzymes outside of Cocosmia or the engineering of the substrate specificity are valid points for follow-up.

Despite these seemingly negative results, this study remains solid and in my opinion is well suited for PlosOne’s publication criteria. Below are minor comments, or suggestions.

It is possible that the product pattern in Crocosmia is result of a distinct substrate pattern, i.e., much higher concentration of caffeic acid. What are the specific expression pattern of HCT, Hydroxycinnamoyl CoA shikimate:quinate hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, C3′H, p-coumaroyl shikimate 3′-hydroxylase and CSE, caffeoyl shikimate esterase? These are possibly driving the caffeate formation.

The Arabidopsis 4CL2 isoform was shown to have higher activity toward caffeate and was also investigated for its substrate specificity, albeit against sinapate.

I strongly suggest to have cytochromes P450 enzymes annotated by David Nelson, instead of using a generic nomenclature.

L 193, symbol font

L 472, font color

Phylogeny, I suggest collapsing branches with less than 50% bootstrap support.

Fig. 6, I suggest labelling the tentatively identified products in panel C in the schematic representation B.

Accession numbers are missing.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by Sunstrum et al provides a molecular characterization of a set of acyl-activating enzymes focusing on 4-coumarate-CoA ligases (4CL) from Montbretia. Two putative 4CLs were identified through sequence comparison and phylogenetic reconstruction as likely 4CLs and were biochemically confirmed as bona fide 4CLs through heterologous expression in E. coli and end-point enzyme activity tests. Both 4CLs showed substrate utilization profiles expected for 4CLs. An additional six related, yet distinct acyl-activating enzymes showed no activity with the ‘standard’ range of 4CL substrates. No additional substrates were tested.

The rational for characterizing the 4CL family from Montbretia was previous work on the biosynthesis and metabolic engineering of a species-specific set of secondary metabolites called montbretins (MbA, MbB, and MbC). Only MbA has medicinal activity as a potential anti-diabetic, while other montbretins do not. Heterologous expression of montbretin biosynthetic genes in Nicotiana yielded MbB and MbC production but only trace amounts of the desired MbA. The bioactive MbA requires caffeoyl-CoA as a precursor, while other montbretins require other 4CL products. The hypothesis was that Montbretia possesses a caffeate-specific 4CL isoform specific for MbA biosynthesis that could increase MbA yield also in heterologous hosts such as yeast or Nicotiana. This hypothesis is intriguing, but proved to be wrong as none of the tested enzymes was specific for caffeic acid (instead were ‘classical’ 4CLs able to utilize multiple substrates) nor did they increase MbA (or MbB or MbC) production in Nicotiana. The latter suggests that 4CL-generated precursors are not limiting heterologous production of montbretins in Nicotiana.

Towards establishing a MbA biosynthetic pathway in yeast, the authors co-expressed the Montbretia 4CLs with two initial steps of flavonoid biosynthesis and showed that Montbretia genes can reconstitute the initial steps of the pathway in yeast, confirming other approaches using the corresponding genes from other plants.

Overall, the manuscript is extremely well written, clearly describes all experimental designs and rationales and provides sufficient details on the methods employed. It is rare that I do not have any editorial suggestions to improve a manuscript, but this is the case here.

Hera are a few minor points for discussion and possible improvement:

The title may be perceived as misleading, because no functional (e.g. reverse genetic) data are presented that prove involvement of the 4CLs in montbretin biosynthesis. It may also be an overstatement that MbA is an anti-diabetic; without clinical studies are published, it should rather be considered a candidate.

The supporting information show a Western lot highlighting successful heterologous expression of the enzymes tested. It is unclear what antibody has been used (anti-His?) and if protein crude extracts have been used or purified proteins as the method is not described in the M&M section. It is noteworthy that 4CL1 and 4CL2 had highest expression levels (and the largest amounts of unspecific labelling); is it just a coincidence that the only two active enzymes also expressed best?

NCBI accession numbers for the 4CLs are to be published (replace ‘xxx’ with actual accession numbers). It would also be good to provide accession numbers for the previously published transcriptome assembly and transcript count data.

To determine substrate specificity, it would have been better to determine enzyme kinetic properties, especially given that simple photometric assays are available to test for 4CL activity. This would have given a more accurate comparison compared to the competition assays used. However, I acknowledge that protein stability of purified 4CL enzymes is a frequently observed problem rendering it difficult to determine extensive kinetic properties.

You discuss that using a caffeate-specific 4CL would be an intuitive way to increase MbA production in Nicotiana and suggest targeted or directed evolution techniques to increase substrate-specificity. I agree but would suggest to start with a 4CL that already has a preference for caffeate; I think this is true for one of the Arabidopsis isoforms.

It remains unclear to me why it would be important to establish the early steps of flavonoid biosynthesis in yeast using the Montbretia enzymes when similar approaches using genes from other plants were already successful. Wouldn’t it be more efficient to build on these published successes and add the montbretin specific part to these strains that already produce basic flavonoids? I assume this relates to the ability to protect the engineered strains once or if efficient MbA production in yeast has been achieved making it commercially viable to produce it this way?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Bjoern Hamberger

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Igor Cesarino

2 Sep 2021

4-Coumaroyl-CoA Ligases in the Biosynthesis of the Anti-Diabetic Metabolite Montbretin A

PONE-D-21-23997R1

Dear Dr. Bohlmann,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Igor Cesarino, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Igor Cesarino

24 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-23997R1

4-Coumaroyl-CoA Ligases in the Biosynthesis of the Anti-Diabetic Metabolite Montbretin A

Dear Dr. Bohlmann:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Igor Cesarino

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Protein accession numbers.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File. Amino acid sequences of candidate CcAAEs.

    (XLSX)

    S3 File. Correlation of CcAAEs expression with previously identified MbA pathway genes during young corm development.

    (DOCX)

    S4 File. Expression data of 16 candidate AAEs.

    (XLSX)

    S5 File. Activity and expression of AAEs.

    (DOCX)

    S6 File. Combinations of genes used for transient expression in N. benthamiana.

    (DOCX)

    S7 File. Montbretin A, B and C levels in N. benthamiana plants transiently expressing MBGs and AAE.

    (DOCX)

    S8 File. Identification of montbretins produced by N. benthamiana transiently expressing MBGs.

    (DOCX)

    S9 File. Parts of the MoClo system used for the construction of S. cerevisiae expression modules.

    (DOCX)

    S10 File. Identification of products formed by S. cerevisiae expressing a flavanone biosynthetic module.

    (DOCX)

    S11 File. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 00 Response to Reviewer comments 083021.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES