Abstract
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is a widely used plastic in bottles and fibers; its waste products pollute the environment owing to its remarkable durability. Recently, Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6 was isolated as a unique bacterium that can degrade and assimilate PET, thus paving the way for the bioremediation and bioconversion of PET waste. We found that this strain harbors a poly(hydroxyalkanoate) (PHA) synthesis gene cluster, which is highly homologous with that of Cupriavidus necator, an efficient PHA producer. Cells grown on PET accumulated intracellular PHA at high levels. Collectively, our findings in this study demonstrate that I. sakaiensis can mediate the direct conversion of non-biodegradable PET into environment-friendly plastic, providing a new approach for PET recycling.
Subject terms: Biotechnology, Microbiology, Environmental sciences
Introduction
Petroleum-based plastics are used extensively worldwide. However, owing to their inertness, plastics entering the environment are tough to degrade, and their accumulation has serious negative impacts1. Recent reports on microbial degradation of plastics including polyethylene2, polystyrene3, and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)4 highlight these problems, but the number of such reports is limited. Particularly, mechanisms underlying PET biodegradation are best known by analyzing Ideonella sakaiensis strain 201-F64. This bacterium uses two unique enzymes, PET hydrolase (PETase) and mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalic acid (MHET) hydrolase (MHETase), to hydrolyze PET into terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) monomers, which are then assimilated. Biodegradable plastics can be developed as more environmentally compatible and sustainable alternatives to common plastics. Poly(hydroxyalkanoate) (PHA), a polyester synthesized by various microorganisms for intracellular carbon and energy storage, is a promising biodegradable plastic, given its excellent biodegradability5. A representative PHA-producing strain, Cupriavidus necator H16 can produce and accumulate massive quantities of the PHA poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), of up to ≈80 w/w% of dry cell weight (DCW, ≈4 g/L culture), using plant oils as the sole carbon source for growth6. A critical challenge in microbial fermentation-mediated biodegradable plastic production is lowering the carbon source cost, as it influences the product price5. PET is cheap and abundant but deleterious to the environment; thus, the digestion of PET is expected to be a useful carbon source for PHA production. Kenny et al.7 isolated Pseudomonas species, including the GO16 strain, which can accumulate PHAs with monomers comprising more than six carbons (medium chain-length PHAs) from TPA. These strains, when cultured using TPA derived from PET pyrolysis products, accumulated PHA at ≈25 w/w% of DCW (≈1 g/L culture), thereby achieving a PHA production of 0.25 g/L. Tiso et al.8 modified the GO16 strain for EG and TPA assimilation. They cultured the strain with TPA and EG, which were obtained by complete PET hydrolysis using a thermostable polyester hydrolase, to obtain PHAs at 7 w/w% of DCW (2.3 g/L culture) with a PHA production of 0.15 g/L. Here, we investigated the use of I. sakaiensis for directly converting PET into PHA, which does not require prior PET hydrolysis.
Results and discussion
We found a gene cluster on the Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6 genome essential for converting acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) into PHAs (Fig. 1). The cluster comprises phaC, phaA, and phaB encoding PHA synthase, β-ketothiolase, and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase, respectively. The amino acid sequences of these proteins are highly similar to those of the proteins produced by C. necator, indicating that this bacterium is a potential PHB producer. I. sakaiensis was cultured on PET granules in a minimal medium (yeast extract-sodium carbonate-vitamins-oyster shell [YSVO] medium) for 3, 6, and 9 days, and stained with Nile red, a lipophilic fluorescent dye. Microscopy revealed that fluorescence intensity in the intracellular regions increased over time with the highest abundance and intensity on day 6 (Fig. 2a,c). This was likely to have affected the bacterial cell area, which increased 1.3-fold between days 3 and 6 (Fig. 2a,b). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the 6-day-cultured cells showed multiple large granules in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2d), which were consistent with those observed using fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 2a). The chloroform-soluble fraction was extracted from the lyophilized I. sakaiensis cells cultured on PET and analyzed via proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to determine the chemical structure and molecular weight, respectively. The 1H NMR spectrum showed typical signals of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), as noted previously9 (Fig. 3a). SEC revealed a number-average-molecular weight (Mn) of 3.2 × 105 and a weight-average-molecular weight (Mw) of 8.0 × 105 (Fig. 3b), which are similar to that of PHB produced by C. necator (Mn, 4.0 × 105; Mw, 1.0 × 106)6. To quantify the PHA content, I. sakaiensis was cultured in PET granules-added YSVO medium while monitoring the DCW. We have previously shown that I. sakaiensis degrades PET films, exhibited by a significant reduction in their weight4 and that it causes an increase in the proportion of the functional (hydroxyl and carboxyl) groups through surface hydrolysis10. However, the amount of PET hydrolysates in the culture supernatant was small (0.003% of MHET units of the degraded PET), indicating their rapid uptake into the cell. Therefore, we used the weight loss of PET as another measure of the degradation. I. sakaiensis exhibited minimal growth on the culture medium without PET, with the highest DCW of 0.040 g/L, but much higher growth on the medium with PET with DCW of up to 1.6 ± 0.1 g/L, concurrent with a PET weight loss of 7.6 ± 0.6 g/L (Fig. 4a), indicating that PET was a major carbon source for its growth; oyster shell, consisting mostly of calcium carbonate and various trace amounts of minerals11, has little to no factors that contribute to cell growth. The PHB content was quantified by performing gas chromatography (GC) of the lyophilized cells after methanolysis. Methyl 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB) (~ 100 mol%) along with trace amounts of methyl 3-hydroxyvalerate (3HV) were detected among the potential methylated-PHA monomers (Table 1), indicating that the synthesized PHA was nearly a PHB homopolymer. The highest amount of accumulated PHA was observed on day 6, accounting for 48 ± 5 w/w% of the DCW (Fig. 4b, Table 1). The highest PHA production rate was 0.75 ± 0.09 g/L on day 6. Subsequently, the carbon yield of PHA from PET on day 6 was calculated as 9.0 ± 1.5 % (Table 1), indicating that a majority of the carbon in PET was converted into other compounds including carbon dioxide through respiration. We further examined cultivation of I. sakaiensis in YSVO medium supplemented with the PET monomer(s); 0.5 w/v% disodium terephthalate (TPA-2Na), 0.5 w/v% EG, or a mixture of both. The DCWs were significantly higher when compared to the culture without carbon source: 0.21 ± 0.03 g/L on TPA-2Na, 0.15 ± 0.02 g/L on EG, and 0.33 ± 0.02 g/L on TPA-2Na/EG for 2 days, and small amounts of PHA (< 5.0 wt%) were detected (Fig. 5 and Table 1). These facts indicated that I. sakaiensis was able to incorporate extracellular TPA and EG and then metabolized them to acetyl-CoA and other intermediates. However, considering much high cell growth and PHA accumulation on PET, the cellular ability to assimilate the monomer(s) appeared to be poor. One of explanations for the observations would be better preference of the uptake system of I. sakaiensis to PET hydrolytic oligomer products rather than TPA and EG.
Table 1.
Carbon source | Cultivation time (days) | DCW (g/L) | PHA (g/L) | PHA content (wt%) | Composition (mol%) | PET weight loss (g/L) | *Carbon yield of PHA from PET (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3HB | 3HV | |||||||
PET | 3 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 42 ± 3 | ~ 100 | Trace | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 15 ± 2 |
6 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 48 ± 5 | ~ 100 | Trace | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 9.0 ± 1.5 | |
9 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 0.32 ± 0.00 | 27 ± 1 | ~ 100 | Trace | 7.9 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | |
TPA-2Na | 2 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.00059 ± 0.00006 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 100 | 0 | ||
EG | 2 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.0073 ± 0.0006 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 100 | 0 | ||
TPA-2Na/EG | 2 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.0033 ± 0.0002 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 100 | 0 | ||
None | 3 | 0.014 | 0.00039 | 2.8 | 100 | 0 | ||
6 | 0.039 | 0.0019 | 5.0 | 100 | 0 | |||
9 | 0.040 | 0.00022 | 0.56 | 100 | 0 |
Error bars represent the standard error among three independent biological replicates.
DCW dried cell weight, EG ethylene glycol, ND not detected, PET poly(ethylene terephthalate), PHA poly(hydroxyalkanoate), TPA-2Na disodium terephthalate, 3HB 3-hydroxybutyrate, 3HV 3-hydroxyvalerate.
*Calculated as [(carbon weight of PHA produced with PET—carbon weight of PHA produced without PET)/carbon weight in degraded PET]×100%.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that I. sakaiensis could not only metabolize PET, but also produce PHA, and that these two pathways were functionally linked. This information can contribute to the development of new PHA production pathways, which can help reduce plastic pollution and increase the production of inexpensive biodegradable plastics and PET recycling. Compared with previous studies on PHA production from the digestion of PET by Pseudomonas GO167 and the modified strain8, I. sakaiensis produced 3.0- and 5.0-fold more PHA, respectively, from PET. However, scaling up the production levels to an industrial scale remains challenging. The metabolic and fermentation engineering strategies previously applied for C. necator, which enable the production of PHA copolymer (> 100 g/L) by high-density fed-batch cultivation under nitrogen limitation12, offers a potentially useful approach.
Methods
Culture
I. sakaiensis (NITE Biological Resource Center, NBRC 110686) was cultured as described previously4,13 with several modifications. Briefly, I. sakaiensis was pre-cultured in NBRC 802 medium (1.0 w/v% polypeptone, 0.2 w/v% yeast extract, and 0.1 w/v% MgSO4) at 30 °C and harvested by centrifugation (5000×g, 5 min, 4 °C). The cell pellet was resuspended in YSV medium (0.01 w/v% yeast extract, 0.02 w/v% sodium hydrogen carbonate, 0.1 w/v% ammonium sulfate, 0.01 w/v% calcium carbonate, 0.1 v/v% vitamin mixture [0.25 w/v% thiamine-HCl, 0.005 w/v% biotin, and 0.05 w/v% vitamin B12], and 1 v/v% trace elements [0.1 w/v% FeSO4·7H2O, 0.1 w/v% MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 w/v% CuSO4·5H2O, 0.01 w/v% MnSO4·5H2O, and 0.01 w/v% ZnSO4·7H2O] in 10 mM phosphate buffer; pH 7.4). The suspension was inoculated into a Petri dish (90 mm in diameter) containing 30 mL YSV medium supplemented with ≈ 300 mg of oyster shells as a pH adjusting agent (YSVO medium) in the presence or absence of 10 g (≈ 560 pieces) of PET granules shaped like an elliptic cylinder [2 (minor axis) × 3 (major axis) × 3 (height) mm]; 5.8% crystallinity determined by differential scanning calorimetry (Bell Polyester Products, Inc., Yamaguchi, Japan), 0.5 w/v% of disodium terephthalate (TPA-2Na), EG, or a mixture of 0.5 w/v% TPA-2Na and 0.5 w/v% EG as the carbon source to adjust the absorbance measured at 660 nm to 0.002. The culture dish was placed in a reciprocal shaker set at 50 strokes/min at 30 °C. After filtering the culture fluid through a 5 µm pore size poly-vinylidene difluoride filter (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA) to remove the small broken pieces of oyster shells, cells were harvested, lyophilized using an FZ-2.5 freeze-dry system (Labconco, Kansas City, MO), and weighed. As a portion of the cells was trapped by the filter, the DCW was corrected using the amounts of protein before and after filtration. Briefly, cells were mixed with an equal volume of 10 w/v% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and heated at 90 °C for 10 min to lyse the cells and solubilize the cellular protein, and the protein concentration was determined with a DC protein assay kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA) with comparison to a calibration curve using bovine serum albumin. The PET granules were washed with 1 w/v% SDS, distilled water, and then ethanol. After drying in air and a desiccator, the granules were weighed to determine the weight reduction.
Fluorescence microscopy
PHA that accumulated in the cells was stained with Nile red (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan)14. A glass slide was coated with 0.01 w/v% poly-l-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Lois, MO) for cell attachment. The culture suspension (100 µL) was placed on the poly-l-lysine-coated glass slide for 10 min and then aspirated. The cells attached to the glass slide were incubated with a drop of 10 µg/mL Nile red in D-PBS(−) (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 30 min, washed with D-PBS(−), mounted with Prolong Diamond antifade medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for immobilization, and covered with a coverslip. Cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope (BZ-X800, Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The frame of each individual cell was manually identified, and the cell area was calculated using the BZ-X800 Analyzer software (Keyence). PHA formation was visualized using a tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate filter set (λem ≈ 554 nm, λex ≈ 570 nm). The fluorescence intensity of the Nile red-stained dot assembly was calculated on average using the BZ-X800 Analyzer software.
TEM
The I. sakaiensis cells grown on PET granules for 6 days were harvested by centrifugation, fixed with phosphate-buffered 2% glutaraldehyde, and post-fixed with 2% osmium tetraoxide for 3 h on ice. Next, the samples were dehydrated using an ethanol gradient and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections of the specimen were stained with uranyl acetate and lead, and subjected to TEM using the H-7600 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Polymer extraction and analyses
Samples were prepared as described previously15 with several modifications. The lyophilized cells of I. sakaiensis were suspended in chloroform with vigorous stirring for 1 day, and the extract was filtered through a polytetrafluoroethylene filter (pore size, 0.2 µm). The filtrate was mixed with twofold volume of 35% methanol:35% ethanol:30% water (v/v/v), and the precipitate was dried in vacuo and then dissolved in chloroform. To determine the molecular weight of the polymer, the chloroform-soluble fraction was analyzed using a size exclusion chromatography system equipped with a RI-2031Plus refractive detector (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) and two in-line TSKgel GMHHR-M columns with a TSK-guard column HHR-H (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) at 40 °C. Chloroform was used as the mobile phase and passed through the column at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The molecular weight was estimated by comparison with poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) standards (PMMA calibration kit M-M-10, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). To analyze the polymer chemical structure, the chloroform-soluble fraction was further purified by precipitation in cold methanol. The precipitate was dissolved in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) and analyzed via proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) (JNM-ECX400P, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan).
PHA quantification and composition analysis
The cellular PHA content and composition were determined by GC after direct methanolysis of the dried cells in the presence of 15% sulfuric acid at 100 °C for 140 min, as described previously16. The GC analysis was performed using GC-2014 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an InertCap 1 capillary column (30 m × 0.23 mm; GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan) and a flame ionization detector. PHA composition was further determined by mass spectrometry.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Tsuyoshi Ando, Yumiko Kawakami, and Mari Nakagawa for research assistance.
Author contributions
S.Y. designed the study. R.F. conducted the growth experiments and analyzed the data. R.S. conducted fluorescence microscopy and analyzed the data. H.A. and R.F. conducted the 1H NMR and SEC experiments and analyzed the data. T.F. conducted the GC experiments and analyzed the data. S.Y., R.F, and T.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained errors. Modifications have been made to the Methods and Acknowledgements sections. Full information regarding the changes made can be found in the correction for this Article.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
7/9/2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41598-024-66149-z
References
- 1.Taniguchi I, et al. Biodegradation of PET: Current status and application aspects. ACS Catal. 2019;9:4089–4105. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b05171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang J, Yang Y, Wu WM, Zhao J, Jiang L. Evidence of polyethylene biodegradation by bacterial strains from the guts of plastic-eating waxworms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:13776–13784. doi: 10.1021/es504038a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang Y, et al. Biodegradation and mineralization of polystyrene by plastic-eating mealworms: Part 2. Role of gut microorganisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49:12087–12093. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yoshida S, et al. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate) Science. 2016;351:1196–1199. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akaraonye E, Keshavarz T, Roy I. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates: The future green materials of choice. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010;85:732–743. doi: 10.1002/jctb.2392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fukui T, Doi Y. Efficient production of polyhydroxyalkanoates from plant oils by Alcaligenes eutrophus and its recombinant strain. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998;49:333–336. doi: 10.1007/s002530051178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kenny ST, et al. Up-cycling of PET (polyethylene terephthalate) to the biodegradable plastic PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoate) Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:7696–7701. doi: 10.1021/es801010e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tiso T, et al. Bio-upcycling of polyethylene terephthalate. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.16.993592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jan S, et al. 1H NMR spectroscopic determination of poly 3-hydroxybutyrate extracted from microbial biomass. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996;18:195–201. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(95)00096-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yoshida S, et al. Response to comment on "A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate)". Science. 2016;353:759. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang HY, Kuo WT, Lin CC, Po-Yo C. Study of the material properties of fly ash added to oyster cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013;41:532–537. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sato S, Fujiki T, Matsumoto K. Construction of a stable plasmid vector for industrial production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) by a recombinant Cupriavidus necator H16 strain. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013;116:677–681. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoshida S, Hiraga K, Taniguchi I, Oda K. Ideonella sakaiensis, PETase, and MHETase: From identification of microbial PET degradation to enzyme characterization. Methods Enzymol. 2021;648:187–205. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2020.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Degelau A, Scheper T, Bailey JE, Guske C. Fluorometric measurement of poly-b hydroxybutyrate in Alcaligenes eutrophus by flow cytometry and spectrofluorometry. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995;42:653–657. doi: 10.1007/BF00171939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kenny ST, et al. Development of a bioprocess to convert PET derived terephthalic acid and biodiesel derived glycerol to medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;95:623–633. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kato M, Bao HJ, Kang CK, Fukui T, Doi Y. Production of a novel copolyester of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and medium chain length 3-hydroxyalkanaic acids by Pseudomonas sp. 61–3 from sugars. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996;45:363–370. doi: 10.1007/s002530050697. [DOI] [Google Scholar]