Skip to main content
Reproductive Medicine and Biology logoLink to Reproductive Medicine and Biology
. 2021 Aug 26;20(4):410–418. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12410

History and prospects of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the development of golden hamster ICSI embryos

Nami Morishita 1,, Masanori Ochi 2, Toshitaka Horiuchi 1,3
PMCID: PMC8499600  PMID: 34646068

Abstract

Background

Golden (Syrian) hamsters have many advantages for the study of reproductive biology and developmental biology, including a consistent estrous cycle, a stable superovulation response, and a short gestation period. However, there are serious difficulties in doing in vitro manipulations of hamster embryos, because they are very sensitive to various environmental factors. Thus, biotechnological researches of hamster embryos should be performed with high‐level skills of embryo manipulations.

Methods

The authors summarized the history of hamster intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and introduced key points for hamster ICSI, which were found in our previous studies on the production of embryos by ICSI and offspring by embryo transfer.

Main findings

The key points for hamster ICSI were in vitro manipulations under the light‐controlled environment, injection of acrosome‐less sperm heads into oocytes as soon as possible before spontaneous oocyte activation occurs, and determination of the optimal culture conditions.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, there are no available reports on production of offspring from ICSI embryos in hamsters except our reports. Moreover, success rates of hamster ICSI remain very low. For the purpose of spreading hamster ICSI, it is necessary to make further researches to improve manipulation techniques and to resolve experimental problems.

Keywords: development, embryo, golden hamster, intracytoplasmic sperm injection

1. HISTORY OF HAMSTER INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION

The first success of in vitro production of fertilized oocytes with the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed with oocytes from the golden hamster (hereafter referred to as hamster; Table 1). 1 Later, pronuclear formation was observed after injecting testicular spermatozoa, and caput or caudal epididymal spermatozoa into hamster oocytes. 2 Other studies applied ICSI techniques to clarify the timing of sperm nuclear chromatin decondensation, pronuclear formation, and DNA synthesis. 3 , 4 In addition, interspecies differences in the stability of mammalian sperm nuclei were clearly shown in the comparative experiments in which spermatozoa from the hamster, human, mouse, chinchilla, rat, and bull were injected into hamster oocytes. 5

TABLE 1.

History of the development of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the round spermatid injection (ROSI) into golden hamster oocytes

Year Author ICSI/ROSI Sperm source Sperm treatment Results
1976 Uehara and Yanagimachi 1 c‐ICSI Cauda epididymal Homogenized PN formation; the first report of fertilization by ICSI in mammals
1977 Uehara and Yanagimachi 2 c‐ICSI Testicular, caput, and cauda epididymal Homogenized, sonicated (some samples) PN formation
1987 Perreault et al 3 c‐ICSI Testicular, caput, and cauda epididymal Sonicated, DTT‐treated Timing of SP nuclear decondensation and PN formation
1987 Naish et al 4 c‐ICSI Caput and cauda epididymal Sonicated, DTT‐treated Decondensation, PN formation, and DNA synthesis
1988 Perreault et al 5 c‐ICSI Cauda epididymal Sonicated Time course of decondensation of SP nuclei: 45–60 min
1991 Yanagida et al 6 c‐ICSI Testicular, caput, and cauda epididymal Sonicated & heated at 60–125°C for 20–120 min PN formation
Thermostability of sperm nuclei
1992 Katayose et al 7 c‐ICSI Cauda epididymal Freeze‐dried PN formation; stored 12 months at 4°C
1993 Ogura et al 12 e‐ROSI Spermatid 69.4% 2‐cell
1993 Ogura and Yanagimachi 13 e‐ROSI Round spermatid 73.4% 2‐cell
2002 Yamauchi et al 8 p‐ICSI Cauda epididymal Frozen‐thawed & piezo‐pulse separation 48.6% (121/249) morulae
19.1% (9/47) live pups
2004 Haigo et al 10 p‐ROSI Round spermatid 51.3% (59/115) morulae
21.7% (25/115) blastocysts
5.3% (3/57) live pups
2008 Kanatsu‐Shinohara et al 19 p‐ROSI Derived from male germ stem cells 3.8% (4/104) morulae/blastocysts
2011 Muneto and Horiuchi 11 p‐ICSI Cauda epididymal Freeze‐dried & piezo‐pulse separation 62.2% (23/37) morulae
16.2% (6/37) blastocysts
13.0% (3/23) live pups
2014 Pan et al 18 p‐ICSI Cauda epididymal Piezo‐pulse separation 84.7% 2‐cell
2019 Morishita et al 17 p‐ICSI Cauda epididymal Frozen‐thawed & sonicated 78.4% (69/88) morulae
42.0% (37/88) blastocysts
9.3% (4/43) live pups

Abbreviations: c‐ICSI, conventional‐ICSI; DTT, dithiothreitol; e‐ROSI, electrofusion‐ROSI; p‐ICSI, piezo‐ICSI; PN, pronuclear; p‐ROSI, piezo‐ROSI; SP, sperm.

After several basic research studies by the Perreault group in 1987–88, 3 , 4 , 5 Yanagida et al. (1991) 6 reported that the thermostability of hamster sperm nuclei was related to disulfide cross‐linking of sperm protamines. Then, Katayose et al. (1992) 7 reported that dehydrated sperm nuclei could develop into individual pronuclei. However, at that time, a culture system for hamster zygotes had not been established. Thus, it was not possible to study in vitro embryo development beyond the 2‐cell stage or the transfer of ICSI embryos into hosts to produce offspring. In 2002, twenty‐five years after the first hamster ICSI, Yamauchi et al 8 reported the first birth of offspring from hamster ICSI embryos which were produced according to the mouse piezo‐ICSI method of Kimura and Yanagimachi (1995). 9 In that report, Yamauchi et al. described the separation of heads from tails in hamster spermatozoa with piezo‐pulses and the injection of acrosome‐less sperm heads into oocytes. In 2004, in our laboratory, Haigo et al. produced the first birth of offspring from round spermatid injection (ROSI) into oocytes by using Yamauchi method. 10  Then, in 2011, Muneto and Horiuchi 11 reported the first birth of offspring from hamster ICSI embryos produced by injecting freeze‐dried spermatozoa into oocytes. The success of the ROSI method was supported by the pioneering efforts of Ogura et al. (2003), 12 and Ogura and Yanagimachi (2003), 13 who developed the electrofusion ROSI approach.

The methods of Yamauchi et al., 8 Haigo et al., 10 and Muneto and Horiuchi 11 required high‐level skills of micromanipulation for quick separation of relatively tighter association between heads and tails in hamster spermatozoa by using piezo‐pulses. Moreover, there was a time limit for the procedure of hamster ICSI, because hamster oocytes had the tendency to undergo parthenogenetic activation during ICSI process. 14 , 15 , 16  Therefore, we applied the sonication treatment of the separation of sperm heads from tails in order to simplify the hamster ICSI technique. Especially, we found that the use of Tris‐HCl buffer with EGTA was valid for conserving chromosomal integrity of sperm head during the sonication treatment. Consequently, this new technique allowed us to produce embryos more efficiently leading to the achievement of birth of offspring by rapid injection of the sperm nuclei. 17

Despite these efforts for technical improvements, hamster ICSI is still suffering from low efficiency of in vitro early development of embryos and birth of offspring after embryo transfer. For instance, Pan et al. (2014) 18 reported that hamster ICSI embryos severely stopped at the 2‐cell stage (2‐cell block). Although hamster offspring could be produced from ROSI embryos as described previously, 10 the microinjection of hamster round spermatids generated from cultured male germline stem cells had problems that these ROSI embryos stopped early development by the morula stages. 19  Thus, it is very difficult to manipulate hamster spermatozoa, oocytes, and embryos in vitro. In order to overcome these difficulties, it is necessary to refine the procedures of hamster ICSI. In this review, we introduced key points for a successful ICSI and proposed the utilization of ICSI embryos in hamsters.

2. OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGE OF PRODUCING LIVE OFFSPRING WITH HAMSTER ICSI

2.1. Keys to the success of hamster ICSI

As mentioned in section 1, only four studies, 8 , 10 , 11 , 17 all performed in our laboratory, have achieved the in vitro development of injected oocytes beyond the 2‐cell stage, into morulae and blastocysts. In addition, we successfully transferred hamster ICSI embryos into recipients and produced offspring. In our experience, three keys to the success of hamster ICSI were (1) manipulating oocytes/zygotes in a dark room and performing ICSI under a microscope with a red‐light source, (2) injecting sperm heads without acrosomes (Figure 1), and (3) performing ICSI as soon as possible, before spontaneous oocyte activation occurs.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Hamster oocytes should be fertilized by acrosome‐less sperm injection, not acrosome‐intact. Hamster acrosome can be observed by using phase‐contrast microscope (acrosome‐less: top left, a sperm head with dark tip region, acrosome‐intact: bottom left, a sperm head with white tip region). Acrosome‐less sperm was fertilized normally (top), but acrosome‐intact sperm was deformed oocytes (bottom). Scale bars are 5 µm, in the sperm photograph, and 50 µm, in the oocytes photograph

2.1.1. Avoid light damage

During in vitro manipulations of oocytes or embryos, ambient light affects their subsequent in vitro development. 20 , 21  We handled hamster oocytes and zygotes under a microscope light covered with a piece of red cellophane in a dark room. When embryos were manipulated under typical room lighting conditions, none of the cleaved embryos developed beyond the 2‐cell stage. 8  Most researchers that work with mouse embryos do not believe that light can damage embryos during in vitro manipulations, because when mouse embryos are manipulated in vitro under light conditions, they develop normally to blastocysts. Thus, some researchers might think that light only affects golden hamster embryos under unusual, special, or exceptional conditions. If you think that, please see the study by Takenaka et al. (2007). 22 Indeed, when hamster or mouse zygotes were exposed to 1200 lx of cool white fluorescent light for 15 min, 97% of hamster zygotes underwent the first cleavage, but did not divide further. In contrast, 100% of mouse zygotes exposed to the same light developed into blastocysts. However, the incidence of apoptotic cells was high in mouse blastocysts in the light‐exposed group, compared with the light‐controlled group. The light exposure induced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in zygotes, which led to a developmental block in hamster embryos and a high incidence of apoptosis in mouse blastocysts. 22  Nakayama et al. (1994) showed that exposure to visible light significantly increased ROS in hamster embryos. 23  Much more ROS was produced in hamster zygotes than in mouse zygotes. Therefore, an important point in performing ICSI is to manipulate both oocytes and embryos in a dark room, under a microscope with a red‐light source. In our studies, all in vitro handling of hamster oocytes and embryos, particularly unfertilized eggs and pronuclear embryos, was strictly conducted under light‐controlled conditions. 8 , 10 , 11 , 17

2.1.2. Remove acrosomes from spermatozoa

The second key to the success of hamster ICSI is to remove the acrosomes from spermatozoa. 8  When hamster oocytes are injected with acrosome‐intact spermatozoa, they grow deformed and die. Conversely, when hamster oocytes are injected with acrosome‐less heads, they survive and develop into live offspring (Figure 1). The acrosome is a cap‐like structure that covers the anterior portion of the sperm head. This structure contains hydrolyzing enzymes 24 that are detrimental to the cytoplasm of hamster oocytes. Yamauchi et al. (2002) 8  removed the acrosomes from sperm heads by freeze‐thawing the spermatozoa. Then, the sperm heads without acrosomes were separated from the tail by applying piezo‐electric pulses.

In human ICSI, high fertilization and pregnancy rates were achieved by injecting the entire motile spermatozoon, after immobilization. 25 Unlike hamster oocytes, human oocytes can survive the injection of acrosome‐intact spermatozoa, because human sperm acrosomes are very small, and the small amount of hydrolyzing enzymes cannot compromise oocytes. However, when four or more human spermatozoa were injected into mouse oocytes, the multiple human spermatozoa produced vacuole‐like structures within the ooplasm. 26

2.1.3. Perform ICSI immediately after oocyte retrieval

The third important point for a successful hamster ICSI is to perform the ICSI as soon as possible, before the onset of spontaneous oocyte activation. It is well known that, after oocytes are collected from the oviducts and cumulus cells are removed, unfertilized hamster oocytes readily undergo spontaneous activation. 14 , 15 , 16  Thus, during the ICSI, hamster oocytes may initiate activation. Within 1 h after starting the ICSI, a cytoplasmic protrusion appears on the surface of the oocyte, and this is followed by the excursion of the second polar body. Therefore, it is important to perform ICSI as soon as possible, before spontaneous activation occurs. In mice, the MII stage is strongly maintained in oocytes, and the spontaneous activation rate increases as the post‐ovulatory oocyte age increases. When hamster oocytes were collected from oviducts at 15 and 17 h after the hCG injection and cultured for 6 h, the oocyte activation rate increased markedly at 17 h (unpublished results). The spontaneous activation of hamster oocytes in vitro is oocyte age‐related. 18

Yamauchi et al. (2002) 8 and Haigo et al. (2004) 10  removed acrosomes from sperm heads by freezing and thawing. Then, they separated the heads from the tails with piezo‐electric pulses. In frozen‐thawed hamster spermatozoa, the heads are relatively tightly bound to the tails, and it takes time to separate them with piezo‐electric pulses. Thus, the efficiency of the piezo‐ICSI method was very low for producing fertilized eggs. As mentioned above, hamster oocytes are prone to spontaneous activation. Therefore, the ICSI must be performed immediately after oocyte retrieval. In the early days of developing hamster ICSI, 2  sonication was introduced for sperm separation. This method is very simple, and it is more efficient than the piezo‐electric method for performing ICSI. However, some studies found that sonicating spermatozoa caused chromosome fragmentation, similar to freeze‐drying spermatozoa. 27  We found that this damage was not caused by the sonication, but by the activation of DNase by Ca2+, which was present in the treatment solution. Sperm sonication with a Tris‐HCl solution supplemented with EGTA significantly improved the efficiency of hamster ICSI (by 2‐ to 3‐fold). In addition, the developmental rate was improved, due to the preservation of chromosome integrity. 17

2.2. In vitro hamster ICSI embryo cultures

Hamster embryos are developmentally blocked in vitro at both the 2‐ and 4‐cell stages, due to their high susceptibility to a variety of factors. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31  The development of culture media for in vivo‐fertilized hamster embryos can be attributed largely to the work of Bavister and colleagues. 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37  They described modifications to the culture medium that enabled in vivo‐fertilized 1‐cell hamster embryos to develop beyond the 2‐cell stage to blastocysts. These modifications included removing glucose, phosphate, and pyruvate, reducing lactate and adding glutamine. Currently, hamster embryo culture medium‐3 (HECM‐3) is the basic medium for culturing zygotes in vitro. Later, the basic HECM was improved by supplementing it with amino acids and vitamins. The HECM series is chemically defined, and instead of serum albumin, it contains polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Although the medium improved the efficiency of culturing hamster embryos, it remained difficult to induce in vitro‐fertilized (IVF) hamster embryos to develop into blastocysts, 34  much less ICSI embryos.

In our laboratory, two types of culture media were designed for in vitro cultures of hamster ICSI zygotes. The first was TCM199 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 5 mM taurine, and 25 µM EDTA (M199TE, Table 2). We used this medium for culturing ICSI zygotes up to the 2‐cell stage. We supplemented TCM199 with 5% FBS, because in an interspecies in vitro fertilization study, an analysis of human sperm chromosomes showed that this medium produced the highest rate of chromosome appearance in zona‐free hamster oocytes. 38 Furthermore, we added taurine and EDTA to reduce environmental stress. However, M199TE contains glucose and phosphate, which cause a 2‐cell block in hamster embryos. Thus, in this medium, it is impossible to culture embryos consistently beyond the 2‐cell stage.

TABLE 2.

Components of M199TE and modified hamster embryo culture medium‐9 (HECM‐9)

M199TE
Component Concentration Amount in 10 ml
M199 a 9.5 ml
FBS 5% 0.5 ml
Taurine 5.0 mM 6.3 mg
EDTA·2Na·2H2O b 25.0 µM 25 µl
Modified HECM9
Component mM mg/100 ml, unless otherwise indicated
NaCl 113.8 665.0
KCl 3.0 22.4
CaCl2·6H2O 1.9 27.9
MgCl2·6H2O 0.5 10.2
NaHCO3 25.0 210.0
Phenol red 1.0
Na‐lactate (60% syrup) 4.5 0.06 ml
Glutamine 0.2 2.9
NEAA (×100) c 10 µl/ml
Alanine 0.1
Asparagine 0.1
Aspartic acid 0.1
Glutamic acid 0.1
Glycine 0.1
Proline 0.1
Serine 0.1
Taurine 5.0 0.63 mg/ml
Pantothenate (×100) d 0.003 10 µl/ml
Human serum albumin (HSA) 0.5 mg/ml

Modified HECM9: The pH was adjusted by adding 0.45 µl/ml of 1 M HCl.

The modified HECM‐9 was stored at 4°C for no more than 1 week prior to an experiment.

a

Medium 199 with 2.2 g/L NaHCO3 + 25 mM HEPES (GIBCO, #12340‐030).

b

EDTA stock:18.6 mg/5 ml Milli‐Q water.

c

NEAA: MEM non‐essential amino acids (GIBCO, #11130).

d

Pantothenate (×100): 1.4 mg Ca‐Pantothenate in 10 ml.

The second culture medium we designed was a modification of HECM‐9. Original HECM‐9 is a simple composition medium (HECM‐3) with 9 amino acids (0.01 mM each of asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamic acid, glycine, histidine, lysine, proline, and serine), 0.5 mM taurine, 3 µM pantothenate and 0.1 mg/ml PVA. 37  With this medium, Yamauchi et al. (2002) 8  showed that ICSI 2‐cell embryos could develop into morulae, but not into blastocysts. Therefore, we needed to improve the original HECM‐9 to induce ICSI 2‐cell embryos to develop into blastocysts. We modified the amino acid content (0.1 mM each of alanine, asparagine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, serine), and we substituted the 0.5 mM taurine and PVA with 5 mM taurine and 0.5 mg/ml human serum albumin (HSA) (Table 2). With this modified medium (mHECM‐9), in vivo‐fertilized 2‐cell hamster embryos developed into blastocysts at high rates (>90%). Moreover, in this medium, ICSI 2‐cell hamster embryos developed to morulae and blastocysts, and after an embryo transfer, they produced offspring. 10 , 11 , 17

The time schedule we used for culturing ICSI embryos is shown in Figure 2. At 15 h after the donor hamster was injected with hCG, oocytes were collected and placed in M199TE for ICSI. After ICSI, zygotes were cultured in M199TE for 24 h. Recently, for this step, instead of M199TE, we have cultured zygotes in mHECM‐9 supplemented with 5% FBS. At 24 h after ICSI, the embryos were transferred to mHECM‐9 supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml HSA. About 72–78 h after ICSI, hamster ICSI embryos developed into morulae and blastocysts. The medium changes are very important for continuous development of hamster embryos.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Time schedule for culturing hamster intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) embryos. At 15 h after the hCG injection, hamster oocytes were collected, and ICSI was performed in M199TE. Then, hamster embryos were cultured in M199TE, or mHECM‐9 supplemented with 5% FBS, and incubated at 37.5℃, with 10% CO2, 10% O2, and 80% N2. At 24 h after ICSI, the embryos were transferred to mHECM‐9 supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml HSA. At about 72–78 h after ICSI, hamster ICSI embryos developed into morulae and blastocysts. All medium changes were performed at 10:00 a.m.

The gas‐phase condition for hamster embryo incubations was maintained at 10% CO2, 10% O2, and 80% N2. This gas‐phase condition is essential for hamster embryo cultures, because it influences pH adjustments and ROS production in the culture environment. Indeed, in vitro cultures of 2‐cell and 8‐cell hamster embryos developed into morulae and blastocysts at significantly higher rates in 10% CO2 than in 5% CO2 and at higher rates in 10% O2 than in 20% O2. 35 , 39 On the other hand, 5% O2 is often used for in vitro cultures of hamster pronuclear embryos. 40 , 41  The intracellular pH of hamster embryos is 7.24. Therefore, the CO2 concentration for in vitro cultures should be higher than 5%. 40 , 42

3. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF HAMSTER ICSI EMBRYOS

Hamster ICSI is a useful model for improving ICSI technology. Using our in vitro culture system, most of in vivo‐fertilized zygotes developed into blastocysts (about 80%). However, in vitro‐fertilized zygotes (such as with ICSI) could not developed into blastocysts at such a high rate (about 40%). 17 Reduced developmental competence of hamster ICSI‐fertilized zygotes into blastocysts is dependent on the fertilization process by ICSI. This result suggested that the ICSI method has some problems that affect embryos before the pronuclear stage, for example, oocyte activation by sperm injection and the following male and female pronuclear formation.

Currently, there are two types of human embryo culture media: sequential medium 43 and single medium. 44 Although there is much debate about the superiority of these, they are used differently, depending on laboratory efficiency and patient background. A continuous culture system for hamster embryo production has not been established, because we lack medium with a clear composition that can generate a high rate of development from pronuclear embryos. When a single culture medium for hamster embryos is invented that anyone can reproduce, it will definitely represent a breakthrough. A stress‐free hamster embryo culturing method could lead to many new applications.

Recently, new genome editing technology has been used to produce knockout (KO) hamsters without in vitro embryo development. The KO hamsters have provided new information, different from that gained previously in mouse models. 45 , 46  Many transgenic hamsters can be produced with this technique, without the need for embryo manipulation in vitro. However, in vitro culture systems combined with IVF and ICSI will be needed to investigate issues related to embryo and fetal development. Exactly, there were many restrictions to produce transgenic hamsters due to the developmental block, because it is not easy to culture hamster embryos. In our laboratory, we produced one green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐expressing ICSI hamster offspring by mixing freeze‐dried sperm heads with pCX‐EGFP DNA fragments before performing ICSI (Figure 3, doctoral thesis of T. Muneto).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

A transgenic hamster that expresses green fluorescent protein (GFP), produced with ICSI of freeze‐dried sperm heads mixed with pCX‐EGFP DNA fragments. (A) In blue light, green tinting in the ears and nose indicate that GFP is expressed in transgenic hamster skin. GFP expression is easy to detect in hamster fingers, shown (B) in a bright field and (C) in UV light [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The low production efficiency of hamster ICSI requires improvement. It is well known that, in most mammals, in vitro‐fertilized embryos develop more slowly than in vivo‐fertilized embryos. Indeed, the developmental speed of hamster ICSI embryos was about half a day slower than that of in vivo‐fertilized embryos. In hamster embryo transfers, synchronization of the donor embryos and recipient females was important for embryo implantation and development in vivo, 29 , 34 , 47 because the implantation time for embryo transfer is very limited. One solution to this problem is the cryopreservation of hamster embryos. However, few studies have investigated the storage of frozen hamster embryos. 48 , 49 It is essential to establish a reliable technique for the cryopreservation of hamster embryos to facilitate the widespread use of transgenic hamsters in the future.

4. CONCLUSION

The golden hamster is a useful animal for research on IVF/ICSI and embryo development, for example, due to evaluate the relationship between fertilization events and the subsequent embryo development. In addition, the use of hamsters in biomedical research might provide new knowledge that is difficult to gain in a mouse model, for example, they have recently attracted attention as a small animal model for SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and countermeasure development. 50 In the hamster, the fertilized oocytes can be stably obtained by ICSI, and the timing of sperm injection is clear. Although it was not a high success rate, we showed that hamster ICSI embryos could develop into blastocysts in vitro and we could produce live offspring after ICSI embryo transfer. At the present, the research on the interaction between ICSI and embryo development will be performed followed by the time course of fertilization events. Improvements in the ICSI technique for over 26 years have continued to overcome developmental blocks and facilitated the production of live pups. Here, we highlighted the most important steps for achieving a successful ICSI: (1) manipulate the eggs under a light‐controlled environment, (2) inject sperm heads without acrosomes, (3) perform ICSI as soon as possible after collection, and (4) select the optimal culture system: use M199TE for culturing embryos up to the 2‐cell stage, and use mHECM‐9 for culturing from 2‐cells to blastocysts. Additionally, the incubation environment should be maintained at 10% CO2, 10% O2, and 80% N2. The rate of ICSI embryo development to the blastocyst stage and the rate of producing pups remain relatively low. Therefore, more improvements are needed to make ICSI practical for widespread use.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Nami Morishita, Masanori Ochi, and Toshitaka Horiuchi declare no conflict of interest.

HUMAN/ANIMAL RIGHTS

This review article included no patients, and thus, it did not require approval from an Ethics Committee.

HUMAN RIGHTS STATEMENT AND INFORMED CONSENT

This study did not contain any human materials.

Morishita N, Ochi M, Horiuchi T. History and prospects of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the development of golden hamster ICSI embryos. Reprod Med Biol. 2021;20:410–418. 10.1002/rmb2.12410

REFERENCES

  • 1. Uehara T, Yanagimachi R. Microsurgical injection of spermatozoa into hamster eggs with subsequent transformation of sperm nuclei into male pronuclei. Biol Reprod. 1976;15:467‐470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Uehara T, Yanagimachi R. Behavior of nuclei of testicular, caput and cauda epididymal spermatozoa injected into hamster eggs. Biol Reprod. 1977;16:315‐321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Perreault S, Naish SJ, Zirkin BR. The timing of hamster nuclear decondensation and male pronucleus formation is related to sperm nuclear disulfide bone content. Biol Reprod. 1987;36:239‐244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Naish SJ, Prreault S, Foehner AL, Zirkin BR. DNA synthesis in the fertilizing hamster sperm nucleus: sperm template availability and egg cytoplasmic control. Biol Reprod. 1987;36:245‐253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Perreault SD, Barbee RR, Elstein KH, Zucker RM, Keefer CL. Interspecies differences in the stability of mammalian sperm nuclei assessed in vivo by sperm microinjection and in vitro by flow cytometry. Biol Reprod. 1988;39:157‐167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yanagida K, Yanagimachi R, Perreault SD, Kleinfeld RG. Thermostability of sperm nuclei assessed by microinjection into hamster oocytes. Biol Reprod. 1991;44:440‐447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Katayose H, Matsuda J, Yanagimachi R. The ability of dehydrated hamster and human sperm nuclei to develop into pronuclei. Biol Reprod. 1992;47:277‐284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yamauchi Y, Yanagimachi R, Horiuchi T. Full‐term development of golden hamster oocytes following intracytoplasmic sperm head injection. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:534‐539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 1995;52:709‐720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Haigo K, Yamauchi Y, Yazama F, Yanagimachi R, Horiuchi T. Full‐term development of hamster embryos produced by injection of round spermatids into oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:194‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Muneto T, Horiuchi T. Full‐term development of hamster embryos produced by injecting freeze‐dried spermatozoa into oocytes. J Mamm Ova Res. 2011;28:32‐39. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ogura A, Yanagimachi R, Usui N. Behaviour of hamster and mouse round spermatid nuclei incorporated into mature oocytes by electrofusion. Zygote. 1993;1:1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ogura A, Yanagimachi R. Round spermatid nuclei injected into hamster oocytes form pronuclei and participate in syngamy. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:219‐225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yoo E. Spontaneous activation and cleavage in unfertilized ova of the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Biol Reprod. 1990;42:93 (abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • 15. He F, Liow S, Chen M, Ng S, Ge Q. Spontaneous activation of hamster oocytes in vitro. Chin Med J. 1999;112:1105‐1108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sun XS, Yue KZ, Zhou JB, Chen QX, Tan JH. In vitro spontaneous parthenogenetic activation of golden hamster oocytes. Theriogenology. 2002;57:845‐885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Morishita N, Ochi M, Horiuchi T. Development of golden hamster embryos effectively produced by injection of sperm heads sonicated in Tris‐HCl buffer with EGTA. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18:83‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pan X, Kong D, Liu L, et al. Development block of golden hamster ICSI embryos is associated with decreased expression of HDAC1, HSPA1A and MYC. Cell Bio Int. 2014;38:1280‐1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kanatsu‐Shinohara M, Muneto T, Lee J, et al. Long‐term culture of male germline stem cells from hamster testes. Biol Reprod. 2008;78:611‐617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hirao Y, Yanagimachi R. Detrimental effect of visible light on meiosis of mammalian eggs in vitro. J Exp Zool. 1978;206:365‐369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Umaoka Y, Noda Y, Nakayama T, Narimoto K, Mori T, Iritani A. Effect of visual light on in vitro embryonic development in the hamster. Theriogenology. 1992;38:1043‐1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Takenaka M, Horiuchi T, Yanagimachi R. Effects of light on development of mammalian zygotes. PNAS USA. 2007;104:14289‐14293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Nakayama T, Noda Y, Goto Y, Mori T. Effect of visible light and other environmental factors on the production of oxygen radicals by hamster embryos. Theriogenology. 1994;41:499‐510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zaneveld LJD, DeJonge CJ. Mammalian sperm acrosomal enzymes and the acrosome reaction. In: Dunber BS, O'Rand MG, eds. A Comparative Overview of Mammalian Fertilization. Plenum Press; 1991:63‐79. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, et al. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1061‐1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Morozumi K, Yanagimachi R. Incorporation of the acrosome into the oocyte during intracytoplasmic sperm injection could be potentially hazardous to embryo development. PNAS USA. 2005;102:14209‐14214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tateno H, Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Sonication per se is not as deleterious to sperm chromosomes as previously inferred. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:341‐346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yanagimachi R, Chang MC. In vitro fertilization of golden hamster ova. J Exp Zool. 1964;156:361‐376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bavister BD, Leibfried ML, Lieberman G. Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. Biol Reprod. 1983;28:235‐247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Whittingham DG, Bavister JD. Development of hamster eggs fertilized in vitro and in vivo. J Reprod Fertil. 1974;38:489‐492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Monis K, Bavister BD. Analysis of the inhibitory effect of inorganic phosphate on development of four‐cell hamster embryos. J Exp Zool. 1990;256:75‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bavister BD. Culture of preimplantation embryos:facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update. 1995;1:91‐148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Schini SA, Bavister BD. Development of hamster 2‐cell embryos in vitro is blocked by phosphate and glucose. Biol Reprod. 1988;39:1183‐1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Barnett DK, Bavister BD. Hypotaurine requirement for in vitro development of golden hamster one‐cell embryos into morulae and blastocysts, and production of term offspring from in vitro‐fertilized ova. Biol Reprod. 1992;47:297‐304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. McKiernan SH, Bavister BD. Environmental variables influencing in vitro development of hamster 2‐cell embryos to the blastocyst stage. Biol Reprod. 1990;43:404‐413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. McKiernan SH, Bavister BD, Tasca RJ. Energy substrate requirements for in‐vitro development of hamster 1‐ and 2‐cell embryos to the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:64‐75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. McKiernan SH, Bavister BD. Culture of one‐cell hamster embryos with water soluble vitamins: pantothenate stimulates blastocyst production. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:157‐164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kamiguchi Y, Mikamo K. An improved, efficient method for analyzing human sperm chromosomes using zona‐free hamster ova. Am J Hum Genet. 1986;38:724‐740. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Carney EW, Bavister BD. Regulation of hamster embryo development in vitro by carbon dioxide. Biol Reprod. 1987;36:1155‐1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lane M, Baltz JM, Bavister BD. Bicarbonate/chloride exchange regulates intracellular pH of embryos but not oocytes of the hamster. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:452‐457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ludwig TE, Squirrell JM, Palmenberg AC, Baviste BD. Relationship between development, metabolism, and mitochondrial organization in 2‐cell hamster embryos in the presence of low levels of phosphate. Biol Reprod. 2001;65:1648‐1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Edwards LJ, Williams DA, Gardner DK. Intracellular pH of the preimplantation mouse embryo: effects of extracellular pH and weak acids. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;50:434‐442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture of viable human blastocysts in defined sequential serum‐free media. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(Suppl 3):148‐159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Biggers JD, Summers MC. Choosing a culture medium: making informed choices. Fert Steril. 2008;90:473‐483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Fan Z, Li W, Lee SR, et al. Efficient gene targeting in golden Syrian hamsters by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. PLoS One. 2014;9:e109755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Hirose M, Honda A, Fulka H, et al. Acrosin is essential for sperm penetration through the zona pellucida in hamsters. PNAS USA. 2020;117:2513‐2518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Sato A, Yanagimachi R. Transplantation of preimplantation hamster embryos. J Reprod Fertil. 1971;30:329‐332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Fan Z, Meng Q, Bunch TD, White KL, Wang Z. Effective cryopreservation of golden Syrian hamster embryos by open pulled straw vitrification. Lab Anim. 2016;50:45‐53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Lane M, Bavister BD, Lyons EA, Forest KT. Containerless vitrification of mammalian oocytes and embryos. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:1234‐1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Imai M, Iwatsuki‐Horimoto K, Hatta M, et al. Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and countermeasure development. PNAS USA. 2020;117:16587‐16595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Reproductive Medicine and Biology are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

RESOURCES