Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Aug 23:fdab327. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab327

Conspiracies and the nocebo effect during the COVID-19 pandemic

Andrew A Siguan 1,
PMCID: PMC8499766  PMID: 34426841

Last June 2021, the editors discussed ‘conspiracy theorists and naysayers’.1 It was later succeeded by an in-depth correspondence that underscored adverse outcomes and greater anxiety levels when conspiracy and disinformation beliefs are present.2 Pandemics have a negative impact on a person’s well-being, which may cause psychological and physiological distress.3 That being pointed out, in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the possibility of an enhanced nocebo effect occurring is much higher. This scenario is further made worse by people’s sense of powerlessness in the face of a new set of circumstances, a perceived high contagion risk, a dearth of knowledge to use, a lack of effective cures or vaccinations and an increased supply of negative news.4

The nocebo effect is used to characterize unfavorable health consequences claimed by patients after they are exposed to seemingly innocuous new technologies or stimuli which they feel are likely to trigger symptoms or be harmful to their health. Studies have demonstrated that when individuals predict poor outcomes, they negatively affect treatment outcomes,5 which can unfavorably affect people’s perception toward vaccinations and other health measures. Included in the COVID-19 pandemic is a negative situation that strong nocebo effects might fuel. In addition to verbal information and recommendations, a person’s environment, such as reading unfavorable media campaigns, can influence the nocebo effect.6 One of the most significant stressors of the present pandemic is uncertainty and environmental and activity changes. These stresses frequently lead to opposing ideas and expectations. Information in this approach floods individuals with dramatic and usually negative information because of social networks and media. They provide information that is contradictory and unclear, which is reinforced by conspiracy theories and hoaxes. The information presented in these news sources might create an environment conducive to mental illness and place an extraordinary strain on the people who encounter it. It is crucial to understand that stress is connected with misleading information.7

A positive understanding of and reduced expectations of infection are critical to decreasing psychological suffering after and during the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of probable nocebo effects, it should be stressed how individuals may mitigate the adverse impacts of messages and communication flows by translating them into neutral or positive information. Make progress in the field of new medicines and vaccine innovations is always an excellent way to go about having supportive expectations. There should be a goal of increased balance in positive and negative information, emphasizing prevention and prognosis7 and promoting discussions on dangers in public health emergencies by employing social media literacy that rigorously scrutinizes conspiratorial thinking.8 Based on the details presented, to diminish both the perils of conspiracies and the nocebo effect requires a synergistic action both from government agencies, through effective information circulation strategies, and a cognizant citizenry.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to extend his gratitude to the editor of the journal for reviewing and acknowledging this paper for possible publication.

References

  • 1.Webster P, Neal K. “Normal led to this”-where next? J Public Health (Oxf) 2021;43(2):217–8.34102750 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kahambing JG. COVID-19, conspiracies, and manufactured consent. J Public Health (Oxf) 2021; 1–2. 10.1093/pubmed/fdab300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Daniali H, Flaten MA. Experiencing COVID-19 symptoms without the disease: the role of nocebo in reporting of symptoms. Scand J Public Health 2021 May;27:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LEet al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Petrie KJ, Rief W. Psychobiological mechanisms of placebo and nocebo effects: pathways to improve treatments and reduce side effects. Annu Rev Psychol 2019 Jan 4;70:599–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amanzio M, Howick J, Bartoli Met al. How do nocebo phenomena provide a theoretical framework for the COVID-19 pandemic? Front Psychol 2020;11:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Torales J, O’Higgins M, Castaldelli-Maia JMet al. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2020 Jun;66(4):317–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stein RA, Ometa O, Shetty SPet al. Conspiracy theories in the era of COVID-19: a tale of two pandemics. Int J Clin Pract 2021 Feb;75(2):1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES