Skip to main content
VA Author Manuscripts logoLink to VA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Anesthesiology. 2019 May;130(5):824. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002585

Sounds Impossible, but It’s Knot

Loren E Smith 2, Dillon R Heath 2, Matthias L Riess 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC8500457  NIHMSID: NIHMS1740259  PMID: 30632983

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1740259-f0001.jpg

Keywords: accidental extubation, complication, endotracheal tube, orogastric tube


Orogastric tube placement during anesthesia is common. Rarely, serious complications occur, including tracheal or bronchial placement and pneumothorax, esophageal perforation, intravascular placement and hemorrhage, and entanglement with other equipment including endotracheal tubes.1 Anesthesia providers need to be cognizant of these complications in order to ensure rapid detection and correction of incorrectly placed or entangled orogastric tubes. The orogastric tube shown was blindly inserted after anesthetic induction and endotracheal intubation, and gastric fluid was suctioned. Upon attempted removal, it was found to be knotted around the endotracheal tube. Potential signs of orogastric tube entanglement include high inserted length (>50–60 cm in an adult), poor drainage of gastric contents, synchronous movement of the endotracheal tube with orogastric tube movement, and high peak airway pressures and flow-volume loops consistent with fixed upper airway obstruction due to endotracheal tube constriction. Risk factors for orogastric and endotracheal tube entanglement may include blind orogastric tube placement, multiple placement attempts, repeated decreases and increases in the depth of insertion, and surgical movement of the orogastric or endotracheal tube. Minimizing placement attempts, length inserted, indwelling time, and intraoperative manipulation may decrease the incidence of orogastric tube entanglement. Visualization of esophageal placement using direct laryngoscopy or fiberoptic bronchoscopy, or guided orogastric tube placement using lengthwise split endotracheal tubes or commercially available tube guides may also reduce the risk of entanglement.2,3 If entanglement occurs, successful disentanglement has been documented using McGill forceps under direct visualization. Alternatively, entangled orogastric and endotracheal tubes may require removal as a unit followed by reintubation.

Acknowledgments

Funding Statement: Supported by institutional funds from the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. Research funding for LES was received from the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (MRTG-CT-08-15-17). Research funding for MLR was received from the United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory R&D Service (Merit Review Award I01 BX003482), Washington, DC, USA and the National Institutes of Health (5R01 HL123227), Bethesda, MD, USA. Neither of these had any influence on writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Footnotes

Prior Presentations: no

Summary Statement: not applicable

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

2. References:

  • 1.Long M, Machan M, Tollinche L: Intraoperative Gastric Tube Intubation: A Summary of Case Studies and Review of the Literature. Open J Anesthesiol 2017; 7: 43–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fakhari S, Bilehjani E, Negargar S, Mirinazhad M, Azarfarin R: Split Endotracheal Tube as a Guide Tube for Gastric Tube Insertion in Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial ; Vol.1 (1): 17–22. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2009; 1: 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alflen C, Kriege M, Schmidtmann I, Noppens RR, Piepho T: Orogastric tube insertion using the new gastric tube guide: first experiences from a manikin study. BMC Anesthesiol 2017; 17: 54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES