Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2021 Apr 9;16(10):1961–1967. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.1c00034

Optimization of Metabolic Oligosaccharide Engineering with Ac4GalNAlk and Ac4GlcNAlk by an Engineered Pyrophosphorylase

Anna Cioce †,‡, Ganka Bineva-Todd ‡, Anthony J Agbay §, Junwon Choi §, Thomas M Wood §, Marjoke F Debets §, William M Browne †,‡, Holly L Douglas ∥, Chloe Roustan ⊥, Omur Y Tastan ‡, Svend Kjaer ⊥, Jacob T Bush #, Carolyn R Bertozzi §,∇, Benjamin Schumann †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC8501146  NIHMSID: NIHMS1736127  EMSID: EMS122676  PMID: 33835779

Abstract

graphic file with name cb1c00034_0005.jpg

Metabolic oligosaccharide engineering (MOE) has fundamentally contributed to our understanding of protein glycosylation. Efficient MOE reagents are activated into nucleotide-sugars by cellular biosynthetic machineries, introduced into glycoproteins and traceable by bioorthogonal chemistry. Despite their widespread use, the metabolic fate of many MOE reagents is only beginning to be mapped. While metabolic interconnectivity can affect probe specificity, poor uptake by biosynthetic salvage pathways may impact probe sensitivity and trigger side reactions. Here, we use metabolic engineering to turn the weak alkyne-tagged MOE reagents Ac4GalNAlk and Ac4GlcNAlk into efficient chemical tools to probe protein glycosylation. We find that bypassing a metabolic bottleneck with an engineered version of the pyrophosphorylase AGX1 boosts nucleotide-sugar biosynthesis and increases bioorthogonal cell surface labeling by up to two orders of magnitude. A comparison with known azide-tagged MOE reagents reveals major differences in glycoprotein labeling, substantially expanding the toolbox of chemical glycobiology.

Introduction

Protein glycosylation is an essential modulator of biological processes. Chemical MOE reagents have developed into important alternatives to protein-based binding reagents to profile the roles of glycans in cellular processes.1−4 Monosaccharides with chemical modifications can be fed to living cells as hydrophobic caged analogues that cross the plasma membrane. Once deprotected by (thio-)esterases, these monosaccharides are metabolically activated and introduced into the glycome by the activity of glycosyltransferases (GTs).1,4−6 Modifications such as azides or alkynes can be probed by bioorthogonal ligation using Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) to allow for the visualization and characterization of glycoconjugates.2,4,7,8 While it is generally accepted that small chemical perturbations are compatible with metabolic activation, the actual fate and turnover efficiency of modified monosaccharides is only beginning to be understood. The key to being used by GTs is the biosynthesis of modified nucleotide-sugars, such as derivatives of uracil diphosphate (UDP)-activated N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) (Figure 1A). The biosynthetic salvage pathway of GalNAc derivatives features the kinase GALK2 and the pyrophosphorylases AGX1/2, while GlcNAc derivatives have to be activated by the kinase NAGK, the mutase AGM, as well as AGX1/2.9,10 In the cytosol of mammalian cells, the derivatives of UDP-GalNAc and UDP-GlcNAc can be interconverted by the UDP-GalNAc/GlcNAc 4′-epimerase GALE, which interconnects both nucleotide-sugar pools. Epimerization substantially decreases the glycan specificity while enhancing the labeling efficiency of certain MOE reagents and can be suppressed by careful choice of the chemical modification.10−12 Once biosynthesized, the derivatives of UDP-GalNAc and UDP-GlcNAc can be used as substrates by cellular GTs, including the large polypeptide GalNAc transferase (GalNAc-T) family in the secretory pathway and a myriad of GlcNAc transferases in several cellular compartments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Metabolic fate of GalNAlk and GlcNAlk. (A) Biosynthesis of UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 from caged precursors using salvage pathways. Dashed arrows indicate diffusion across membranes and (thio-)esterases. (B) In vitro epimerization of UDP-GalNAlk 3 (yellow) to UDP-GlcNAlk 4 (blue) using a GALE-containing (ctrl sgRNA) cell lysate or a GALE-KO lysate as a control, as assessed by high-performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC). The reaction was also performed using purified GALE, and the retention times were compared to those of the standards (Figure S1). (C) In vitro glycosylation with purified GalNAc-Ts of synthetic peptides using UDP-GalNAlk 3 or UDP-GalNAc as substrates. The amino acids in red are new glycosylation sites. T* denotes α-d-GalNAc-Thr. Data are individual measurements of independent duplicates and means. The reactions using UDP-GalNAc as a substrate have been used previously.11

Recent years have seen increasing evaluation of the metabolic fate of MOE reagents. Although the enzymes of GalNAc and GlcNAc salvage pathways generally display reduced efficiency toward modifications on the acetamide side chain, the relatively small azide group is accepted as part of reliable MOE reagents.10,12−15 In contrast, bulkier modifications prevent the enzymatic activation of GalNAc and GlcNAc analogues.11,16,17 Yu et al. thus developed an engineered version of AGX1 (mutant F383G) to increase substrate promiscuity and biosynthesize UDP-GlcNAc analogues from the corresponding GlcNAc-1-phosphate analogues that can be delivered through caged precursors.16 We have used the similar F383A mutant, herein termed mut-AGX1, to biosynthesize UDP-GalNAc analogues that would not normally be made in the living cell.4,11,17 Somewhat surprisingly and contrary to azide-tagged analogues of similar size, Batt et al. found that, after feeding the commercial MOE reagents Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2, the most simple alkyne-tagged UDP-GalNAc and UDP-GlcNAc derivatives, UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4, are biosynthesized in varying and often low efficiency in mammalian cells (Figure 1A).18 Previous experience by us and Yu et al. on delivering UDP-sugar analogues with even longer side chains suggested that AGX1-mediated pyrophosphorylation may be a roadblock to the biosynthesis of UDP-GalNAc/GlcNAc derivatives.16,17 These longer derivatives could only be delivered through caged sugar-1-phosphates that are of limited stability and tedious to synthesize. We thus sought to investigate if simply enhancing pyrophosphorylation with mut-AGX1 would allow delivery from the readily available reagents Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2.

Here, we profile the metabolic fate of the weak MOE reagents Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2 in order to turn both reagents into highly efficient tools to probe cell surface glycosylation. We find that mut-AGX1 effectively biosynthesizes UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 with greatly increased efficiency over WT-AGX1 from caged precursors that can thus be used to profile cell surface protein glycosylation. By suppressing GALE-mediated epimerization, we further find that UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 are used to glycosylate non-identical gycoprotein subsets to azide-tagged analogues, potentially due to differential acceptance by GTs. We show that close monitoring of the biosynthetic fate enables the development of highly effective MOE reagents.

Results and Discussion

To study the metabolic fate of UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4, we first assessed in vitro whether both reagents are epimerized by GALE (Figure 1B). The incubation of synthetic 3 with either a wild type (WT) GALE-containing lysate of control cells transfected with a non-targeting single guide (sg) RNA,17 or purified GALE led to epimerization to 4, as detected either by ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or high-performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC). A lysate of GALE-KO cells did not lead to epimerization.17 We next profiled the suitability of UDP-GalNAlk 3 as a substrate for members of the GalNAc-T family. GalNAc-Ts prime highly abundant mucin-type protein O-GalNAc glycans, and the acceptance of 3 would thus correlate with high cell surface labeling efficiency. Synthetic peptides served as acceptor substrates in in vitro glycosylation experiments. Compared to the native substrate UDP-GalNAc, UDP-GalNAlk 3 was used with a lower but well-measurable efficiency by GalNAc-T1 and T2 and a similar efficiency by GalNAc-T7 and T10 (Figure 1C). The isoenzymes T7 and T10 differ from T1 and T2 in their preference of pre-O-GalNAc-glycosylated substrate peptides, which may hint to the use of UDP-GalNAlk 3 as a GalNAc-T subset-selective substrate.20

We next studied the biosynthesis of UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 in cells fed with caged, membrane-permeable precursors. Since AGX1 has been identified as a metabolic bottleneck of other modified GalNAc analogues, we synthesized caged GalNAlk-1-phosphate 5 to specifically probe the AGX1-mediated biosynthesis of UDP-GalNAlk 3.4,11,17 We tested UDP-sugar biosynthesis from 5 in K-562 cells with either normal GALE expression or a GALE-KO and stably transfected with either mut-AGX1, WT-AGX1, or an empty vector. HPAEC revealed measurable biosynthesis of both UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 in the presence of mut-AGX1 but not WT-AGX1 (Figure 2A and Figure S2). The levels of UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 were in the same range as the levels of native UDP-GalNAc and UDP-GlcNAc. Free GalNAlk-1-phosphate was detectable in all cases, as observed by comparison with a synthetic standard (Figure S2). In the absence of GALE, UDP-GlcNAlk was not detectable, indicating that UDP-GalNAlk 3 is biosynthesized by mut-AGX1 and subsequently epimerized by GALE in the cytosol.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Mut-AGX1-mediated biosynthesis of UDP-GalNAlk 3 and cell surface labeling. (A) Metabolite profiling of K-562 cells based on AGX1 expression (mock signifies empty vector) and the presence of GALE by HPAEC. The arrowhead depicts the epimerization of UDP-GalNAlk 3 to UDP-GlcNAlk 4. ADP-glucose was added as an external standard. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Dose response of cell surface labeling of AGX1-stably transfected K-562 cells after feeding 3 as assessed by flow cytometry. Data are mean ± SEM as fold increase from DMSO-treated cells from at least three independent experiments. Error bars for WT-AGX1 data are too small to be shown. (C) Competition assay of cell surface labeling in mut-AGX1-transfected GALE-KO K-562 cells fed with 50 μM caged GalNAlk-1-phosphate 5, 50 μM Ac4GlcNAlk 2, or 10 μM Ac4ManNAlk by different concentrations of GalNAc or GlcNAc. Data are means +SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by unpaired, two-tailed t test against labeling experiments without additives (dashed line). Asterisks indicate P values: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. n.s. nonsignificant. DTAF = dichlorotriazinylamino fluorescein; MFI = median fluorescence intensity.

We then assessed metabolic cell surface labeling mediated by caged GalNAlk-1-phosphate 5 by flow cytometry. Clickable biotin-picolyl azide was used in noncytotoxic Cu(I)-click CuAAC conditions followed by streptavidin-DTAF to visualize labeling.8,21 The presence of mut-AGX1 led to a dose-dependent increase of fluorescence by up to two orders of magnitude compared to WT-AGX1 (Figure 2B). Of note, the presence of WT-AGX1 still led to low but discernible cell surface labeling, indicating that UDP-GalNAlk 3 can be biosynthesized at levels that are too low to detect chromatographically. This was especially pronounced in GALE-KO cells in which no endogenous UDP-GalNAc is present to compete with UDP-GalNAlk 3 as a substrate of GalNAc-Ts (Figure 2B and Figure S3B). A labeling difference of one order of magnitude was observed between cells expressing WT-AGX1 and mut-AGX1 when fed with Ac4GlcNAlk 2, indicating that mut-AGX1 also mediates UDP-GlcNAlk 4 biosynthesis (Figure S3A). Increasing the UDP-GalNAc levels in GALE-KO cells by supplementing cell culture media with free GalNAc led to a decrease of an UDP-GalNAlk 3-dependent labeling signal (Figure 2C and Figure S3C).17 Likewise, the labeling signal by Ac4GlcNAlk 2 was abrogated by the addition of free GlcNAc (Figure 2C). In contrast, labeling by the control compound Ac4ManNAlk, a MOE reagent that enters the biosynthetic pathway of the sugar sialic acid, was unchanged irrespective of AGX1 overexpression or the addition of free GalNAc or GlcNAc (Figure 2C and Figure S3B). Enhancing the levels of native UDP-sugars thus competed out the incorporation of GalNAlk and GlcNAlk, but not ManNAlk, into glycoproteins. We concluded that AGX1 is likely a bottleneck in the biosynthesis of both UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4, impairing metabolic labeling, which can be enhanced by a stable overexpression of mut-AGX1 but not WT-AGX1. Our data further indicate that Ac4GalNAlk 1 exhibits low-level metabolic glycoprotein labeling without mut-AGX1 expression, in line with findings of Zaro et al.7 UDP-GalNAlk 3 formation is not measurable under these conditions, underlining the highly inefficient biosynthesis of 3 by the GalNAc salvage pathway without mut-AGX1.18

As the overexpression of mut-AGX1 enabled cell surface labeling from Ac4GlcNAlk 2, GlcNAlk-1-phosphate biosynthesis from the free monosaccharide by NAGK/AGM1 was apparently not a major metabolic bottleneck. We next assessed whether UDP-GalNAlk 3 biosynthesis followed the same principles, which would, in turn, allow us to use the readily available MOE reagent Ac4GalNAlk 1 instead of caged GalNAlk-1-phosphate 5. We found that mut-AGX1, but not WT-AGX1, efficiently biosynthesized UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 from the peracetylated precursors Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2, respectively, in living cells (Figure S4). We note that the “upstream” precursors Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2 required longer feeding times (12–16 h instead of 6–9 h) than caged GalNAlk-1-phosphate 5 for UDP-sugar biosynthesis to be detected, in line with additional enzymatic reactions being required. At these time points, free GalNAlk-1-phosphate is clearly detectable (Figure S4) These data indicated that WT-AGX1-mediated pyrophosphorylation is likely the rate-determining step in the biosynthesis of UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4. The expression of mut-AGX1 likely renders the upstream activation steps NAGK/AGM and GALK2 as rate-determining.

We next visualized the impact of metabolic engineering on glycoprotein labeling by Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2. Following the feeding of AGX1-transfected K-562 cells with alkyne-containing monosaccharide precursors, cell surfaces were either treated with a neuraminidase that removes sialic acid from glycoproteins, or left untreated. The living cells were then subjected to CuAAC with the clickable near-infrared fluorophore CF680-picolyl azide, and labeled cell surface glycoproteins were analyzed by in-gel fluorescence.17 Under these conditions, the compounds Ac4GalNAlk 1, Ac4GlcNAlk 2, and caged GalNAlk-1-phosphate 5 exhibited mut-AGX1-dependent labeling while the control reagent Ac4ManNAlk labeled glycoproteins irrespective of the AGX1 construct used (Figure 3A). Neuraminidase treatment led to an increase of signals in all cases except for Ac4ManNAlk-labeled cells, consistent with an increased availability of GalNAc- and GlcNAc-carrying alkyne tags toward click reagents when the layer of sialic acid was enzymatically trimmed.11,17 While these results suggest that neither GlcNAlk nor GalNAlk enter the sialic acid pool through metabolic interconversion, more detailed experiments are needed to exclude such a metabolic crosstalk.12 Of note, the dependence on mut-AGX1 for GalNAlk/GlcNAlk labeling emphasizes that UDP-sugar formation is a prerequisite for efficient labeling, excluding previously reported nonenzymatic cysteine adduct formation that typically happens under very high concentrations of peracetylated sugars.22,23 We next visualized glycocalyx labeling by fluorescence microscopy. We chose adherent murine 4T1 cells to allow for straightforward imaging and further demonstrated the robustness of our approach. Clickable biotin picolyl azide and streptavidin-AF647 readily detected a large enhancement of Ac4GalNAlk 1-mediated cell surface labeling in 4T1 cells stably expressing mut-AGX1 compared to nontransfected cells (Figure 3B). In contrast, cell surface labeling by the AGX1-independent MOE reagent Ac4ManNAlk remained unchanged upon mut-AGX1 transfection (Figure S5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Mut-AGX1 enables efficient metabolic labeling with caged precursors of GalNAlk and GlcNAlk. (A) Cell surface labeling of AGX1-transfected K-562 cells fed with 50 μM Ac4GalNAlk 1, 50 μM Ac4GlcNAlk 2, 10 μM Ac4ManNAlk, or 25 μM caged GalNAlk-1-phosphate 5 as assessed by on-cell CuAAC with the NIR fluorophore CF680-picolyl azide and in-gel fluorescence. Cells were treated with the neuraminidase SialEXO before the click reaction where indicated. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Fluorescence microscopy of mut-AGX1-expressing or nontransfected 4T1 cells fed with DMSO or 25 μM Ac4GalNAlk 1 treated with biotin-picolyl-azide under on-cell CuAAC conditions and visualized with streptavidin-AF647. Data are representative of two independent experiments. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Due to the GALE-mediated interconversion of UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4, the glycoprotein profiles labeled by both MOE reagents Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2 were identical (Figure 3A). To assess the contribution of each UDP-sugar to the signal, we profiled the glycoprotein patterns in GALE-KO cells that functionally separate UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 (Figure 4A). Cells were grown in GalNAc-containing media to maintain the native levels of metabolites such as UDP-GalNAc, allowing for comparison with GALE-expressing control cells when all cell lines were transfected with mut-AGX1. DMSO feeding did not lead to discernible labeling (Figure 4A, lanes 1 and 2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

GalNAlk- and GlcNAlk-mediated labeling of glycoprotein subsets. (A) Cell surface labeling of mut-AGX1-transfected K-562 GALE-KO or control sgRNA-expressing cells fed with 10 μM Ac4GalNAlk 1, 50 μM Ac4GlcNAlk 2, or 10 μM Ac4ManNAlk as assessed by on-cell CuAAC and in-gel fluorescence. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Comparison of cell surface labeling of mut-AGX1-transfected K-562 GALE-KO or control sgRNA-expressing cells fed with 10 μM Ac4GalNAlk 1, 50 μM Ac4GlcNAlk 2, 3 μM Ac4GalNAz 6, 8 μM Ac4GlcNAz 7, or 100 μM caged GalNAzMe-1-phosphate 8. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

While GALE-expressing control cells displayed identical labeling patterns when fed with either Ac4GalNAlk 1 or Ac4GlcNAlk 2 (Figure 4A, lanes 3 and 4), GALE-KO had a striking effect on labeling patterns. In GALE-KO cells, Ac4GalNAlk 1 contributed highly intense glycoprotein bands at approximately 100 and 40 kDa (Figure 4A, lane 5), while Ac4GlcNAlk 2 contributed a diffuse pattern of lower overall intensity (Figure 4A, lane 6). These results suggested that separating the UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 pools led to labeling of different subsets of glycoproteins. In contrast, feeding Ac4ManNAlk led to similar band patterns in both GALE-expressing and GALE-KO cell lines (Figure 4A, lanes 7 and 8), indicating that sialylation is not affected by GALE-KO. We speculated that the intense bands labeled by UDP-GalNAlk 3 (Figure 4A, lanes 3–5) are highly GalNAc-glycosylated mucin-domain-containing glycoproteins. To test this notion, we treated cagedGalNAlk-1-phosphate 5-fed, mut-AGX1-expressing K-562 cells with CF680-picolyl-azide under CuAAC conditions to fluorescently tag the GalNAlk-containing glycoproteome. We then subjected the living cells to different concentrations of the mucin protease StcE or the more promiscuous O-glycoprotease OpeRATOR (Figure S6).24 Treatment with both proteases led to a decrease of cell surface glycoprotein signal in a dose-dependent manner, while a signal was recovered as fluorescently-labeled broad bands of lower molecular weight in the supernatant. Several glycoprotein bands were digested by OpeRATOR, but not StcE, indicating that labeling of nonmucins containing O-GalNAc glycans was observed. These data confirm that GalNAlk enters mucin-domain-containing proteins and other O-GalNAc-glycosylated proteins.

We next compared the Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2 labeling band patterns in GALE-KO or control cells with previously characterized, azide-containing MOE reagents Ac4GalNAz 6 and Ac4GlcNAz 7 (Figure 4B). Both reagents are converted to azide-tagged UDP-GlcNAc/GalNAc analogues that are interconvertible by GALE.10−12 We further used the O-GalNAc-specific reagent Ac3GalNAzMe-1-P(SATE)28, a precursor to an epimerization-resistant, azide-tagged UDP-GalNAc analogue that is not a substrate for GALE in the living cell.11 To ensure that band patterns are comparable between azide- and alkyne-tagged monosaccharides, we used the same NIR-fluorophore CF680 with either alkyne or picolyl azide groups for CuAAC. Compound 8 showed a band pattern attributable to O-GalNAc glycosylation in GALE-containing and GALE-KO cells (Figure 4B, lanes 1 and 6). Ac4GalNAz 6/Ac4GlcNAz 7 (Figure 4B, lanes 2 and 3) labeled the same band pattern in GALE-containing cells, consistent with the interconversion of azide-tagged UDP-sugar pools.10,11 This labeling pattern was somewhat different from the pattern observed after feeding GALE-containing cells Ac4GalNAlk 1/Ac4GlcNAlk 2 (Figure 4B, lanes 4 and 5), with more bands being visible with azide-tagged monosaccharide analogues. These findings can be explained by UDP-GalNAz being a better substrate for the commonly expressed glycosyltransferases GalNAc-T1 and T2 than UDP-GalNAlk 3 (Figure 1C).11,19 Upon GALE-KO, Ac4GalNAz 6 and Ac4GlcNAz 7 led to different band patterns, as reported before (Figure 4B, lanes 7 and 8).11 In comparison, the Ac4GalNAlk 1-labeled band pattern in GALE-KO cells resembled only a subset of the pattern seen from Ac4GalNAz 6 or compound 8 feeding (Figure 4B, lane 9), indicating that UDP-GalNAlk 3 labels a subset of O-GalNAc glycoproteins. Finally, Ac4GlcNAlk 2 exhibited a diffuse labeling pattern in GALE-KO cells (Figure 4B, lane 10) similar to that of the azide-tagged counterpart Ac4GalNAz 7. Taken together, these data suggest that UDP-GalNAlk 3 and UDP-GlcNAlk 4 label different sets of glycoproteins but are interconnected by GALE in the living cell. Structurally simple azide- and alkyne-tagged GalNAc/GlcNAc derivatives label particular glycoprotein subsets and should thus serve as orthogonal but potentially complementary MOE reagents in the presence of mut-AGX1. Western blot analysis with an antibody against AGX1 indicated that our expression constructs lead to an approximately 2–3-fold overexpression, suggesting that metabolic engineering does not require abundant expression levels of mut-AGX1 (Figure S7).

We have shown that comprehensive metabolic profiling can turn weak MOE reagents into efficient chemical biology tools to profile cellular glycosylation. The expression of mut-AGX1 enhances labeling by Ac4GalNAlk 1 and Ac4GlcNAlk 2 by orders of magnitude, substantially expanding the toolbox for glycobiology. While our approach relies on cell transfection, the plasmids we used are based on transposase-mediated stable integration, which is compatible even with hard-to-transfect cell lines and more complex model systems such as organoids.11 Our work focused on improving metabolic labeling efficiency with Ac4GalNAlk 1/Ac4GlcNAlk 2. While we showed that the corresponding activated sugars UDP-GalNAlk 3/UDP-GlcNAlk 4 can be incorporated in GalNAc- and GlcNAc-containing glycoconjugates, we did not assess their fine specificity for certain subtypes of glycans. We and others have previously focused on assessing such specificity for similar MOE reagents,11,25 and further studies extending this work are underway.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank D. Fox for help with HPAEC experiments, K. Pedram for providing StcE, M. Pratt for helpful discussions, P. Walker for advice on vector choice, and A. Garza-Garcia for helpful discussions on HPLC. The authors would like to thank R. D’Antuono of the Crick Advanced Light Microscopy STP for support and assistance in this work. The authors are grateful for support by the Francis Crick Institute Cell Services and Peptide Chemistry Science Technology Platforms.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschembio.1c00034.

  • Figures of in vitro epimerization, metabolite profiling, dose response of cell surface labeling, fluorescence microscopy, in-gel fluorescence, Western blot analysis, 1H and 13C NMR spectra and discussions of experimental and characterization details (PDF)

  • Primary data and plasmids are available upon request. Compounds are available upon request as long as stocks last.

Author Present Address

○ J.C.: Department of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.

Author Present Address

◆ T.M.W.: Biological Chemistry Group, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Sylvius Laboratories, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands.

Author Present Address

M.F.D.: Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, United States.

Author Contributions

☆ A.C. and G.B.-T. contributed equally. A.C., M.F.D., J.T.B., C.R.B., and B.S. conceived the project and planned experiments. A.C., G.B.-T., A.J.A. H.L.D., and B.S. performed experiments. J.C., T.M.W., W.M.B., C.R., and S.K. made and contributed key reagents. A.C., G. B.-T., A.J.A., M.F.D., and B.S. analyzed data. A.C., G.B.-T., and B.S. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

The authors are thankful for generous funding by Stanford University, Stanford Chemistry, Engineering and Medicine for Human Health (ChEM-H), and Howard Hughes Medical Institute. This work was supported by NIH Grant R01 CA200423 (to C.R.B.) and by the Francis Crick Institute (A.C., G.B.-T., and B.S.), which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK Grant FC001749, UK Medical Research Council Grant FC001749, and Wellcome Trust Grant FC001749. M.F.D. was supported by a Dutch Research Council (NWO) Rubicon Postdoctoral Fellowship. W.M.B. was supported by a PhD studentship funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Doctoral Training in Chemical Biology – Innovation for the Life Sciences Grant EP/S023518/1 and GlaxoSmithKline. H.L.D. acknowledges funds from Wellcome Trust New Investigator Award 104785/B/14/Z. A.J.A. was supported by a Stanford ChEM-H undergraduate scholarship. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [FC001749 and 104785/B/14/Z]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

cb1c00034_si_001.pdf (1MB, pdf)

References

  1. Sletten E. M.; Bertozzi C. R. (2009) Bioorthogonal Chemistry: Fishing for Selectivity in a Sea of Functionality. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 48 (38), 6974–6998. 10.1002/anie.200900942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Parker C. G.; Pratt M. R. (2020) Click Chemistry in Proteomic Investigations. Cell 180 (4), 605–632. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zol-Hanlon M. I.; Schumann B. (2020) Open Questions in Chemical Glycobiology. Commun. Chem. 3 (1), 1–5. 10.1038/s42004-020-00337-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cioce A.; Malaker S. A.; Schumann B. (2021) Generating Orthogonal Glycosyltransferase and Nucleotide Sugar Pairs as Next-Generation Glycobiology Tools. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 60, 66–78. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mahal L. K.; Yarema K. J.; Bertozzi C. R. (1997) Engineering Chemical Reactivity on Cell Surfaces through Oligosaccharide Biosynthesis. Science 276 (5315), 1125–1128. 10.1126/science.276.5315.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hang H. C.; Yu C.; Pratt M. R.; Bertozzi C. R. (2004) Probing Glycosyltransferase Activities with the Staudinger Ligation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (1), 6–7. 10.1021/ja037692m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zaro B. W.; Yang Y. Y.; Hang H. C.; Pratt M. R. (2011) Chemical Reporters for Fluorescent Detection and Identification of O-GlcNAc-Modified Proteins Reveal Glycosylation of the Ubiquitin Ligase NEDD4–1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (20), 8146–8151. 10.1073/pnas.1102458108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Besanceney-Webler C.; Jiang H.; Zheng T.; Feng L.; Soriano Del Amo D.; Wang W.; Klivansky L. M.; Marlow F. L.; Liu Y.; Wu P. (2011) Increasing the Efficacy of Bioorthogonal Click Reactions for Bioconjugation: A Comparative Study. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50 (35), 8051–8056. 10.1002/anie.201101817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Peneff C.; Ferrari P.; Charrier V.; Taburet Y.; Monnier C.; Zamboni V.; Winter J.; Harnois M.; Fassy F.; Bourne Y. (2001) Crystal Structures of Two Human Pyrophosphorylase Isoforms in Complexes with UDPGlc(Gal)NAc: Role of the Alternatively Spliced Insert in the Enzyme Oligomeric Assembly and Active Site Architecture. EMBO J. 20 (22), 6191–6202. 10.1093/emboj/20.22.6191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyce M.; Carrico I. S.; Ganguli A. S.; Yu S. H.; Hangauer M. J.; Hubbard S. C.; Kohler J. J.; Bertozzi C. R. (2011) Metabolic Cross-Talk Allows Labeling of O-Linked β-N- Acetylglucosamine-Modified Proteins via the N-Acetylgalactosamine Salvage Pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (8), 3141–3146. 10.1073/pnas.1010045108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Debets M. F.; Tastan O. Y.; Wisnovsky S. P.; Malaker S. A.; Angelis N.; Moeckl L. K. R.; Choi J.; Flynn H.; Wagner L. J. S.; Bineva-Todd G.; Antonopoulos A.; Cioce A.; Browne W. M.; Li Z.; Briggs D. C.; Douglas H. L.; Hess G. T.; Agbay A. J.; Roustan C.; Kjaer S.; Haslam S. M.; Snijders A. P.; Bassik M. C.; Moerner W. E.; Li V. S. W.; Bertozzi C. R.; Schumann B. (2020) Metabolic Precision Labeling Enables Selective Probing of O-Linked N -Acetylgalactosamine Glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 (41), 25293–25301. 10.1073/pnas.2007297117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shajahan A.; Supekar N. T.; Wu H.; Wands A. M.; Bhat G.; Kalimurthy A.; Matsubara M.; Ranzinger R.; Kohler J. J.; Azadi P. (2020) Mass Spectrometric Method for the Unambiguous Profiling of Cellular Dynamic Glycosylation. ACS Chem. Biol. 15 (10), 2692–2701. 10.1021/acschembio.0c00453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hang H. C.; Yu C.; Kato D. L.; Bertozzi C. R. (2003) A Metabolic Labeling Approach toward Proteomic Analysis of Mucin-Type O-Linked Glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (25), 14846–14851. 10.1073/pnas.2335201100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Woo C. M.; Iavarone A. T.; Spiciarich D. R.; Palaniappan K. K.; Bertozzi C. R. (2015) Isotope-Targeted Glycoproteomics (IsoTaG): A Mass-Independent Platform for Intact N- and O-Glycopeptide Discovery and Analysis. Nat. Methods 12 (6), 561–567. 10.1038/nmeth.3366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pouilly S.; Bourgeaux V.; Piller F.; Piller V. (2012) Evaluation of Analogues of GalNAc as Substrates for Enzymes of the Mammalian GalNAc Salvage Pathway. ACS Chem. Biol. 7 (4), 753–760. 10.1021/cb200511t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu S. H.; Boyce M.; Wands A. M.; Bond M. R.; Bertozzi C. R.; Kohler J. J. (2012) Metabolic Labeling Enables Selective Photocrosslinking of O-GlcNAc-Modified Proteins to Their Binding Partners. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (13), 4834–4839. 10.1073/pnas.1114356109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schumann B.; Malaker S. A.; Wisnovsky S. P.; Debets M. F.; Agbay A. J.; Fernandez D.; Wagner L. J. S.; Lin L.; Li Z.; Choi J.; Fox D. M.; Peh J.; Gray M. A.; Pedram K.; Kohler J. J.; Mrksich M.; Bertozzi C. R. (2020) Bump-and-Hole Engineering Identifies Specific Substrates of Glycosyltransferases in Living Cells. Mol. Cell 78 (5), 824–834. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Batt A. R.; Zaro B. W.; Navarro M. X.; Pratt M. R. (2017) Metabolic Chemical Reporters of Glycans Exhibit Cell-Type-Selective Metabolism and Glycoprotein Labeling. ChemBioChem 18 (13), 1177–1182. 10.1002/cbic.201700020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Choi J.; Wagner L. J. S.; Timmermans S. B. P. E.; Malaker S. A.; Schumann B.; Gray M. A.; Debets M. F.; Takashima M.; Gehring J.; Bertozzi C. R. (2019) Engineering Orthogonal Polypeptide GalNAc-Transferase and UDP-Sugar Pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (34), 13442–13453. 10.1021/jacs.9b04695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de las Rivas M.; Lira-Navarrete E.; Gerken T. A.; Hurtado-Guerrero R. (2019) Polypeptide GalNAc-Ts: From Redundancy to Specificity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 56, 87–96. 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Uttamapinant C.; Tangpeerachaikul A.; Grecian S.; Clarke S.; Singh U.; Slade P.; Gee K. R.; Ting A. Y. (2012) Fast, Cell-Compatible Click Chemistry with Copper-Chelating Azides for Biomolecular Labeling. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51 (24), 5852–5856. 10.1002/anie.201108181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qin W.; Qin K.; Fan X.; Peng L.; Hong W.; Zhu Y.; Lv P.; Du Y.; Huang R.; Han M.; Cheng B.; Liu Y.; Zhou W.; Wang C.; Chen X. (2018) Artificial Cysteine S-Glycosylation Induced by Per-O-Acetylated Unnatural Monosaccharides during Metabolic Glycan Labeling. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 57 (7), 1817–1820. 10.1002/anie.201711710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin K.; Zhang H.; Zhao Z.; Chen X. (2020) Protein S-Glyco-Modification through an Elimination-Addition Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (20), 9382–9388. 10.1021/jacs.0c02110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Malaker S. A.; Pedram K.; Ferracane M. J.; Bensing B. A.; Krishnan V.; Pett C.; Yu J.; Woods E. C.; Kramer J. R.; Westerlind U.; Dorigo O.; Bertozzi C. R. (2019) The Mucin-Selective Protease StcE Enables Molecular and Functional Analysis of Human Cancer-Associated Mucins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116 (15), 7278–7287. 10.1073/pnas.1813020116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pedowitz N. J., and Pratt M. R. (2021) Design and synthesis of metabolic chemical reporters for the visualization and identification of glycoproteins. RSC Chem. Biol., in press. 10.1039/D1CB00010A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cb1c00034_si_001.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Chemical Biology are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES