Abstract
There are an increasing number of reports on the safe use of rituximab (RTX), a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in pregnant women with hematological malignancies or refractory autoimmune diseases. In 2014, the use of RTX for patients with complicated steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) was approved in Japan. We herein report a woman with childhood-onset complicated SDNS due to focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, who had two successful pregnancies while receiving RTX maintenance therapy. No adverse complications were observed during the pregnancies, and she delivered healthy newborns. This case suggested that RTX may be used safely in pregnant women complicated with SDNS.
Keywords: childhood-onset steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, pregnancy, rituximab, safety use
Introduction
Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a condition resulting from massive glomerular proteinuria, and it is associated with hypoalbuminemia, hypercholesterolemia, and edema. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) accounts for approximately 20% of childhood NS cases in the United States (1) and approximately 10% of NS cases in Japan (2), and it is a common glomerular disorder leading to end-stage renal failure (1,3). Therapy for FSGS should be individualized based on factors particular to the patient, such as age and comorbidities (4). The commonly used agents for children with refractory FSGS are prednisolone (PSL), cyclosporine A (CyA), and mizoribine (MZR) (4,5). A systemic review by Kronbichler et al. (6) suggested that rituximab (RTX) is effective in reducing the number of relapses and sparing immunosuppression in frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) due to minimal change in disease and FSGS. Based on the results of a multicenter trial (7), the use of RTX for the treatment of complicated SDNS was approved in Japan in 2014 (8).
Women with childhood-onset complicated SDNS may face pregnancy problems. In the present report, we describe two pregnancies that occurred during RTX maintenance therapy in such a case.
Case Report
A Japanese girl developed NS at 9 years of age. The diagnosis of FSGS was made based on renal biopsy findings. Light microscopy showed global sclerosis in 14 of 36 glomeruli. Glomerulomegaly and adhesions were observed in some of the 22 remaining glomeruli; 2 glomeruli showed segmental areas of sclerosis and hyalinosis in the perihilar segment (Fig. 1). Mesangial hypercellularity or podocyte hypertrophy was not observed. There was mild tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis around the sclerotic glomeruli. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed granular IgM staining in the mesangial areas and along the glomerular capillary walls (Fig. 1). These findings were consistent with those of a FSGS perihilar variant in the Columbia classification that had been proposed after renal biopsy of this patient (9). She was treated with oral PSL (60 mg/day) and CyA. Thereafter, remission was achieved. However, discontinuing PSL resulted in relapses at the ages of 12 and 16 years, requiring long-term therapy with oral PSL, CyA, and MZR. After 22 years of age, she was treated only with CyA. At 24 years of age, monotherapy with CyA resulted in a relapse, requiring high to middle doses of oral PSL. She also developed steroid-induced psychosis. At that time, her blood pressure was 116/73 mmHg. A physical examination showed pitting edema in the legs. The results of laboratory tests are shown in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Renal biopsy findings. A-C: Light microscopy of serial sections of a glomerulus, showing segmental areas of sclerosis and hyalinosis in the perihilar segment (periodic acid-Schiff staining, original magnification ×400). The arrow indicates an arteriole. The scale bars represent 50 μm. D: Immunofluorescence microscopy of a glomerulus, showing IgM deposits (original magnification ×400).
Table 1.
Laboratory Data at the Time of Initiation of Rituximab Therapy.
| Urinalysis | Blood chemistry | |||||
| Protein | 4+ | Aspartate aminotransferase | 24 | IU/L | ||
| 9.1 | g/g creatinine | Alanine aminotransferase | 11 | IU/L | ||
| Occult blood | ± | Lactate dehydrogenase | 209 | IU/L | ||
| Red blood cells | 1-4/high power field | γ-glutamyltransferase | 16 | IU/L | ||
| β2-microglobulin | 65 | μg/L | Total protein | 5.5 | g/dL | |
| NAG | 5.3 | IU/L | Albumin | 2.6 | g/dL | |
| Blood count | Blood urea nitrogen | 9.1 | mg/dL | |||
| White blood cells | 7,300 | /μL | Creatinine | 0.58 | mg/dL | |
| Neutrophils | 87.1 | % | Total cholesterol | 390 | mg/dL | |
| Eosinophils | 0.1 | % | Triglyceride | 256 | mg/dL | |
| Basophils | 0.4 | % | LDL-cholesterol | 164 | mg/dL | |
| Monocytes | 1.5 | % | HDL-cholesterol | 131 | mg/dL | |
| Lymphocytes | 10.9 | % | Serology | |||
| Red blood cells | 396×104 | /μL | Antinuclear antibody | - | ||
| Hemoglobin | 12.7 | g/dL | IgG | 472 | mg/dL | |
| Hematocrit | 36.8 | % | IgA | 192 | mg/dL | |
| Platelets | 27.9×104 | /μL | IgM | 173 | mg/dL | |
| Coagulation test | CH50 | 27.6 | IU/mL | |||
| APTT | 23.2 | s | C3 | 129 | mg/dL | |
| Prothrombin time-INR | 0.93 | C4 | 33 | mg/dL | ||
APTT: activated partial thromboplastin time, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, INR: international normalized ratio, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, NAG: N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase
As shown in Fig. 2, RTX therapy (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks) was introduced, in addition to treatment with PSL, CyA, and MZR. A significant improvement in NS was seen after introducing RTX therapy with a low dose of oral PSL. During maintenance therapy, single-dose infusions of RTX (375 mg/m2) were administered at intervals of about 6 months with reference to the previously reported protocol for adult patients with SDNS (10), except after such patients became pregnant. The course of the peripheral blood CD19+ B-cell counts and serum levels of IgG are shown in Table 2.
Figure 2.
Clinical course. Alb: albumin, Cr: creatinine, CyA: cyclosporine A, M: miscarriage, MZR: mizoribine, PSL: prednisolone, RTX: rituximab, UP: urinary protein
Table 2.
Levels of Peripheral Blood CD19+ B-cells and Serum IgG over Time.
| Months after 1st RTX therapy |
CD19+ B-cells/ total lymphocytes (%) |
Serum IgG (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 27.2 | 472 |
| 6 | 0 | - |
| 12 | 0 | - |
| 24 | 0 | - |
| 30 | 0 | - |
| 36 | 0 | - |
| 42 | 0 | 493 |
| 48 | 1.3 | 743 |
RTX: rituximab
At 25 years of age, she got married and desired to have children. Because she did not wish to receive immunosuppressive therapy with CyA and MZR, these agents were discontinued. Based on evidence concerning RTX therapy before and during pregnancy (11), the potential risks and benefits of the RTX therapy (safety, steroid-sparing effect, and recurrence prevention) were discussed with the patient. At 26 years of age, she had a miscarriage at 9 weeks, 3 months after the RTX maintenance administration. A chromosomal analysis showed monosomy X. This abnormality seemed not to be related to RTX treatment, because rates of miscarriage and congenital malformation in 153 RTX-exposed pregnancies were similar to expected rates in the general population (11). Four months after RTX maintenance administration, she was found to be 5 weeks pregnant. She decided to continue the pregnancy. No complications were observed during the pregnancy, and recurrence of NS did not occur without maintenance RTX administration. She delivered a healthy baby girl (Apgar score 9/9, birth weight 2,932 g) at 38 weeks. After confirming that there was nothing wrong with her at the one-month postpartum check-up, RTX maintenance therapy was restarted. The following year, 1 month after the start of RTX maintenance administration, she was found to be 9 weeks pregnant. She again decided to continue the pregnancy. No complications were observed during the pregnancy, and recurrence of NS did not occur without maintenance RTX administration. She delivered a healthy baby boy (Apgar score 8/9, birth weight 3,117 g) at 39 weeks. Both babies were breastfed. The first child (1.5 years of age) and the second child (3 months of age) were developing normally with no history of any serious infection.
Discussion
Our patient with childhood-onset complicated SDNS (8) due to FSGS achieved a sustained remission with a low dose of oral PSL after introducing RTX therapy. During RTX maintenance therapy, the patient had two successful pregnancies. RTX was administered 3 months before the second pregnancy and during the first trimester of the third pregnancy. There is a case report on the safe use of RTX during pregnancy in a patient with primary membranous nephropathy and circulating autoantibodies to M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) (12). In this case, RTX was administered during the first trimester of pregnancy. To the best of our knowledge, our case is only the second reported case of a successful pregnancy in a patient with primary glomerular disease treated with RTX.
The use of RTX for the treatment of relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was registered by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States in 1997. Thereafter, RTX has been used in the treatment of numerous other B-cell malignancies, as well as autoimmune conditions (13). Thus, the number of women of childbearing age receiving RTX therapy is increasing. Placental transfer of RTX containing IgG1κ occurs from the second trimester onwards; therefore, exposure during organogenesis in the first trimester is likely to be limited (14). Although the safety of RTX in pregnancy is not very well established, the existing evidence suggests that RTX is possibly safe for use during early pregnancy (11,14). A recent retrospective cohort study of 74 pregnancies among 55 women treated with RTX for multiple sclerosis also showed the safety of RTX in pregnancy (15). Regarding maternal treatment and breastfeeding, the American College of Rheumatology considers RTX to be acceptable for use during breastfeeding (16). Krysko et al. (17) determined minimal transfer of RTX into mature breast milk in patients with multiple sclerosis, and suggested that low oral bioavailability may also limit the absorption of RTX by a newborn.
Table 3 summarizes the clinical findings in 9 reported cases of successful pregnancies in patients receiving RTX therapy during the first trimester of pregnancy, in which clinical information is available (12,18-25), and in our case. The mean age of the patients was 31 years old (22‒41 years). The indications for RTX therapy included non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia, recalcitrant atopic dermatitis, active rheumatoid arthritis, PLA2R-associated active membranous nephropathy, anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, and childhood-onset complicated SDNS. These underlying diseases were controlled by RTX therapy in these cases. No complications were observed during pregnancy, except for 2 patients with premature delivery or premature delivery episode at 35 weeks. In 4 cases, cesarean section was performed at 34-38 weeks. All newborns were healthy at birth and after follow-up, except for 1 child with transient low granulocyte levels and 1 child with suspected mild infection at 1-4 days. The levels of peripheral blood CD19+ B-cells were examined in 2 newborns. B-cell counts at 2-16 days were low in the case of Kimby et al. (18), whereas the count at 1 week was normal in the case of Sprenger-Mähr et al. (23).
Table 3.
Successful Pregnancies in Patients Receiving Rituximab Therapy during the First Trimester of Pregnancy.
| Reference | Age, year | Indication | Complications during pregnancy | Pregnancy outcome | Newborn conditions | Child follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 37 | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | No | 40 weeks, V delivery | 3,610 g | Low granulocyte count (0-5 weeks), low CD19+ B-cell count (2-16 days), normal immunity at 18 months |
| 19 | 41 | Severe AIHA | No | 38 weeks, V delivery | Apgar 10/10, 3,060 g | Suspected mild infection (1-4 days), normal growth at 6 months |
| 20 | 30 | Recalcitrant atopic dermatitis | No | 36 weeks, C section | Healthy identical twins | Normal growth and normal levels of B cells at 8 months (each twin) |
| 21 | 22 | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | No | 34 weeks, V delivery | Apgar 9/9 | Normal growth after 1 year |
| 22 | 25 | Active rheumatoid arthritis | Premature delivery episode at 35 weeks | 37 weeks, C section | Apgar 10/10, 3,110 g | Doing well after 4.5 years |
| 12 | 39 | Active MN with anti-PLA2R Ab | No | 38 weeks, C section | Healthy | No proteinuria (0-6 weeks) |
| 23 | 30 | Anti-GBM disease | No | 38 weeks, C section | Apgar 10/10, 2,280 g | Normal CD19+B-cell count (1 week) |
| 24 | 28 | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | No | Two times | Healthy (each newborn) | Neither child showed abnormalities of the immune system after >10 years |
| 25 | 31 | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | Preterm delivery at 35 weeks | 35 weeks, V delivery | Apgar 8, 1,664 g No malformation | Not described |
| Present case | 27 | Complicated SDNS | No | 39 weeks, V delivery | Apgar 9/9, 3,117 g | Normal growth after 2 months |
Ab: antibodies, AIHA: autoimmune hemolytic anemia, C: cesarean, GBM: glomerular basement membrane, MN: membranous nephropathy, PLA2R: phospholipase A2 receptor, SDNS: steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, TTP: thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, V: vaginal
In summary, the above-mentioned growing evidence (11,14,15) and the reported cases summarized in Table 3 (12,18-25) suggest the safety of RTX during early pregnancy. In the field of nephrology, the number of RTX-treated young women with childhood-onset complicated SDNS is increasing. Pregnancy may be planned in such patients during RTX maintenance therapy after balancing the potential risks and benefits.
Author's disclosure of potential Conflicts of Interest (COI).
Naoto Takahashi: Honoraria, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Otsuka Pharmaceutical; Research funding, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Astellas Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical and Eisai Pharmaceuticals.
References
- 1.D'Agati VD, Kaskel FJ, Falk RJ. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med 365: 2398-2411, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yamamoto R, Imai E, Maruyama S, et al. Regional variations in immunosuppressive therapy in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome: the Japan nephrotic syndrome cohort study. Clin Exp Nephrol 22: 1266-1280, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yamamoto R, Imai E, Maruyama S, et al. Incidence of remission and relapse of proteinuria, end-stage kidney disease, mortality, and major outcomes in primary nephrotic syndrome: the Japan Nephrotic Syndrome Cohort Study (JSNCS). Clin Exp Nephrol 24: 526-540, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosenberg AZ, Kopp JB. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 502-517, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aizawa-Yashiro T, Tsuruga K, Watanabe S, Oki E, Ito E, Tanaka H. Novel multidrug therapy for children with cyclosporine-resistant or -intolerant nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 26: 1255-1261, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kronbichler A, Kerschbaum J, Fernandez-Fresnedo G, et al. Rituximab treatment for relapsing minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a systematic review. Am J Nephrol 39: 322-330, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iijima K, Sako M, Nozu K, et al. Rituximab for childhood-onset, complicated, frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 384: 1273-1281, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Iijima K, Sako M, Nozu K. Rituximab treatment for nephrotic syndrome in children. Curr Pediatr Rep 3: 71-77, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.D'Agati VD, Fogo AB, Bruijn JA, Jennette JC. Pathologic classification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a working proposal. Am J Kidney Dis 43: 368-382, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Iwabuchi Y, Takei T, Moriyama T, Itabashi M, Nitta K. Long-term prognosis of adult patients with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome following rituximab treatment. Medicine (Baltimore) 93: e300, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chakravarty EF, Murray ER, Kelman A, Farmer P. Pregnancy outcomes after maternal exposure to rituximab. Blood 117: 1499-1506, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al-Rabadi L, Ayalon R, Bonegio R, et al. Pregnancy in a patient with primary membranous nephropathy and circulating snit-PLA2R antibodies: a case report. Am J Kidney Dis 67: 775-778, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marshall MJE, Stopforth RJ, Cragg MS. Therapeutic antibodies: what have we learn from targeting CD20 and where are we going? Front Immunol 8: 1245, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Whittam DH, Tallantyre EC, Jolles S, et al. Rituximab in neurological disease: principles, evidence and practice. Pract Neurol 19: 5-20, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smith JB, Hellwig K, Fink K, et al. Rituximab, MS, and pregnancy. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 7: e734, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sammaritano LR, Bermas BL, Chakravarty EE, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the management of reproductive health in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol 72: 529-556, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Krysko KM, LaHue SC, Anderson A, et al. Minimal breast milk transfer of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody used in neurological conditions. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 7: e637, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kimby E, Sverrisdottir A, Elinder G. Safety of rituximab therapy during the first trimester of pregnancy: a case history. Eur J Haemotol 72: 292-295, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ojeda-Uribe M, Gilliot C, Jung G, Drenou B, Brunot A. Administration of rituximab during the first trimester of pregnancy without consequences for the newborn. J Perinatol 26: 252-255, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ponte P, Lopes MJP. Apparent safe use of single dose rituximab for recalcitrant atopic dermatitis in the first trimester of a twin pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 63: 355-356, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Perez CA, Amin J, Aguina LM, Cioffi-Lavina M, Santos ES. Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma during pregnancy. Case Rep Hematol 2012: 197347, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ojeda-Uribe M, Afif N, Dahan E, et al. Exposure to abatacept or rituximab in the first trimester of pregnancy in three women with autoimmune diseases. Clin Rheumatol 32: 695-700, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sprenger-Mähr H, Zitt E, Soleiman A, Lhotta K. Successful pregnancy in a patient with pulmonary renal syndrome double-positive for anti-GBM antibodies and p-ANCA. Clin Nephrol 91: 101-106, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sica A, Vitiello P, Papa A, et al. Use of rituximab in NHL malt type pregnant in I° trimester for two times. Open Med 14: 757-760, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hattori D, Yahagi Y, Uryu H, et al. Successful treatment with preceding low-intensity chemotherapy in a primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma patient diagnosed at 11 weeks of pregnancy. Rinsho Ketsueki 60: 112-117, 2019. (in Japanese, Abstract in English). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


