Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
letter
. 2021 Nov 5;31(11):581. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20210281

Urine Dipstick Proteinuria and Cholelithiasis

Shih-Wei Lai 1,2
PMCID: PMC8502829  PMID: 34421082

Dear editors,

A retrospective cohort study conducted by Park et al published in the Journal of Epidemiology reported that dipstick proteinuria (≥2+) was associated with an increased hazard of cholelithiasis in Korea (adjusted hazard ratio 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.96).1 Some points are discussed. First, urinary protein changes dynamically over time. The majority of proteinuria detected using urine dipstick are benign and no related morbidity can be found, such as dehydration or orthostatic proteinuria.2 Previous studies suggest that urine dipstick is a not accurate tool for screening proteinuria.3,4 In Park et al’s study, the measurement of proteinuria was detected using urine dipstick based on only one single voided urine sample. No confirmation test was performed. The accuracy of proteinuria is doubtful. Therefore, the interpretation of the association between dipstick proteinuria and cholelithiasis risk found in Park et al’s study should be cautious. Second, the eGFR data were available in Park et al’s study. Thus, the stage of chronic kidney disease can be defined. If dipstick proteinuria is associated with chronic kidney disease, the hypothesis raised by the authors that the presence of renal disease reflected by dipstick proteinuria might be partially supported. The readers will understand the association between proteinuria, chronic kidney disease, and cholelithiasis risk more clearly. Third, the probability that patients with dipstick proteinuria (≥2+) truly had cholelithiasis was only 2.4% during the cohort period in Park et al’s study.1 That is, the positive predictive value for cholelithiasis using dipstick proteinuria (≥2+) was low. Dipstick proteinuria is not a cost-effective tool for screening cholelithiasis. Fourth, whether or not asymptomatic people with proteinuria should undergo routine abdominal ultrasound examination for detecting cholelithiasis is still uncertain. However, if an acute abdomen is presented, it is a reasonable arrangement to undergo abdominal ultrasound examination. Finally, I agree with the authors’ conclusion that the long-term association between proteinuria, renal function, and cholelithiasis risk needs further investigation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Conflicts of interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Park SK, Jung JY, Oh CM, et al. The level of urine dipstick proteinuria and its relation to the risk of incident cholelithiasis. J Epidemiol. 2021;31:59–64. 10.2188/jea.JE20190223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carroll MF, Temte JL. Proteinuria in adults: a diagnostic approach. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62:1333–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gangaram R, Ojwang PJ, Moodley J, Maharaj D. The accuracy of urine dipsticks as a screening test for proteinuria in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2005;24:117–123. 10.1081/PRG-200059849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Naruse M, Mukoyama M, Morinaga J, Miyazaki M, Iseki K, Yamagata K. Usefulness of the quantitative measurement of urine protein at a community-based health checkup: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020;24:45–52. 10.1007/s10157-019-01789-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES