There is an error in the fourth sentence of the second paragraph of the Statistics subsection of the Materials and methods section. The correct sentence is: Thus, one may assume a prevalence estimate of 0.23, 0.31, or 0.40 under p ≈ 1/3.
Reference
- 1.Dietz P, Quermann A, van Poppel MNM, Striegel H, Schröter H, Ulrich R, et al. (2018) Physical and cognitive doping in university students using the unrelated question model (UQM): Assessing the influence of the probability of receiving the sensitive question on prevalence estimation. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0197270. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]