Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Oct 13;177(10):1262–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.05.005

Early tolerability of Comirnaty vaccine in patients with chronic neurological diseases

C Budowski a,b,*, C Zavanone a, L Thivard a, K Vassilev a, S Dupont a,b,c
PMCID: PMC8511656  PMID: 34654546

Abstract

Patients with chronic neurological diseases may have predisposing risk factors for severe COVID-19 and should be considered as priority candidates for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Nevertheless, the safety of RNA vaccine was evaluated in healthy volunteers or in patients with stable chronic medical conditions excluding patients with chronic neurological diseases. We report here the early tolerability of Comirnaty vaccine in 36 patients with chronic neurological diseases and demonstrate good early tolerability, better than found in healthy people in phase 3 trials.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, RNA vaccination, Tolerability, Comirnaty, Neurologic disease

1. Introduction

The global pandemic of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affected millions of persons worldwide. In December 2020, BionNTech and Pfizer launched a new mRNA-based vaccine: Comirnaty [1]. In France, this vaccine has been available since January 2021 in rehabilitation services [2]. Patients in neurological rehabilitation units often have predisposing risk factors for severe COVID-19 such as advanced age, cardiovascular comorbidity [3], or the neurological disease itself like brain tumour, stroke, or multiple sclerosis. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 infection may worsen the underlying chronic neurological disease. Therefore, these patients should be given priority for vaccination, which is why Comirnaty vaccine was systematically proposed to all the patients hospitalised in the neurological rehabilitation unit of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. We describe here the early tolerability of the vaccine in the first patients with chronic neurological diseases who underwent complete vaccination.

2. Methods

We collected oral consent for each patient or from the trusted person if necessary. All patients were vaccinated by intramuscular injection in the arm. Hemiplegic patients were vaccinated in the contralateral non-plegic arm. Adverse events were systematically assessed in all patients 10 days after the vaccination according to the following list [4]: lymphadenopathy, anaphylaxis, insomnia, headache, facial paralysis, nausea, myalgia, joint pain, local reactions, pain at the injection site, fever and a category “other”. Exclusion criteria were a previous recent (< 3 months) clinical or microbiologic diagnosis of COVID-19. Five patients declined vaccination.

3. Results

Between January 8th and February 26th, 36 patients were vaccinated: 35 received the two doses; one patient died from aspiration pneumonia complicated by atelectasis before the second injection. This patient had post-stroke swallowing difficulties and multiple comorbidities. His death was not related to the vaccination. The average length between the two injections was 28 days. Mean age of the patients was 69 ± 12 years. There were 22 men and 14 women. Neurological diseases are described in Table 1 . Six patients had concomitant immunosuppressive treatments for their underlying neurological disease: temozolomide (4 patients); temozolomide with bevacizumab (1 patient); rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatine, and etoposide (1 patient).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients and main side effects.

Age Interdose (days) Gender Pathology Adverse Events I Adverse Events II
55 28 Male Epilepsy
71 28 Male Haemorrhagic stroke
62 28 Male Haemorrhagic stroke Myalgia, joint pain, insomnia and nausea
72 28 Female Haemorrhagic stroke
67 28 Male Haemorrhagic stroke
43 42 Female Haematoma Dizziness headache, fatigue, pain at the injection site, insomnia
88 28 Male Ischaemic stroke Myalgia
76 28 Female Ischaemic stroke
77 28 Female Ischaemic stroke Pain at the injection site
63 28 Male Ischaemic stroke
62 28 Male Ischaemic stroke Pain at the injection site
46 28 Male Ischaemic stroke
86 28 Female Ischaemic stroke
83 28 Female Ischaemic stroke
54 28 Female Ischaemic stroke Pain at the injection site fever
73 Male Ischaemic stroke Vomiting
86 28 Female Ischaemic stroke Fever
80 28 Male Ischaemic stroke
58 28 Male Ischaemic stroke
55 21 Female Ischaemic stroke
56 28 Female Demyelinating disease of the central nervous system
74 28 Male Multiple sclerosis
80 21 Male Parkinson's disease
84 21 Male Parkinson's disease Fatigue
86 28 Male Parkinson's disease
81 21 Female Parkinson's disease
68 28 Male Progressive supranuclear palsy Fatigue
48 28 Male Thrombophlebitis Myalgia, local haematoma
73 28 Female Tuberculosis of the central nervous system
76 32 Male Astrocytoma
61 28 Male Glioblastoma
77 28 Female Glioblastoma
69 28 Female Glioblastoma
64 28 Male Glioblastoma
75 28 Male Primary central nervous system lymphoma Local haematoma
77 26 Male Primary central nervous system lymphoma

No allergic reactions were noticed.

After the initial dose, adverse events were reported for 12 patients (33%). These events resolved quickly and only two patients experienced adverse events after the second dose (6%).

We distinguished local events from systemic events. Concerning local events, five patients reported adverse events after the first dose: three experienced pain (8%) and two (6%) developed a local haematoma at the injection site. All the symptoms, except the local haematoma related to thrombopaenia or anticoagulant therapy, lasted less than 24 hours. One patient had pain at the injection site after the second dose.

Concerning systemic events, eight patients (22%) reported systemic side effects after the first dose: myalgia (n  = 3, 8%); fatigue (n  = 2, 6%); nausea and/or vomiting (n  = 2, 6%); fever, dizziness, joint pain, and insomnia (n  = 1 each, 3%). After the second dose, only two patients reported adverse events which resolved in one day: respectively headache, asthenia, insomnia in one patient and fever in another one.

4. Discussion

In our study, a two-dose regimen of Comirnaty/BNT162b2 vaccine (30 μg per dose, given 28 days apart) was found to be safe in a brief follow-up period after the administration with even better tolerability than those found in the phase 2/3 trial assessing the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the vaccine [5].

In the phase 2/3 trial, 43,448 participants received either two 30 μg doses of BNT162b2 administered 21 days apart or placebo. Participants were all healthy adults or adults with stable chronic medical conditions including human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection. Compared to these participants, our patients were older (median age of 69 years old versus 55 years) with a larger proportion of men (61% vs. 50.6%), all exhibiting chronic neurological diseases. Like Polack et al. [5], we excluded patients with a medical history of COVID-19, but contrarily to that study we included patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy or having immunocompromising conditions such as multiple sclerosis or brain tumours. Six of our patients had concomitant immunosuppressive treatments including rituximab for one patient. The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in patients treated by rituximab has been recently questioned by Boyarsky et al. who found that patients on rituximab were less likely to develop antibody response [6]. Nevertheless, we did not test our patients for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and only report here data on early tolerability that was not modified by concomitant immunosuppressive treatments.

Globally, the tolerability was better in our patients with chronic neurological diseases than in healthy volunteers. Conversely to the phase 3 study, in our study the adverse events (local or systemic) were:

  • more frequent after the first than the second dose and;

  • not influenced by age.

4.1. Local reactogenicity

In Polack's study [5], mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site within seven days after an injection was the most commonly reported local reaction. Pain was less frequent among participants older than 55 years (71% after the first dose, 66% after the second dose) than among younger participants (83% after the first dose; 78% after the second dose). In general, local reactions were mild-to-moderate in severity and resolved within one to two days.

In our study, only four patients reported pain at the injection site (11%, 8% after the first dose; 3% after the second dose) and two patients treated with oral anticoagulants reported local haematoma (6%) after the first dose. We didn’t find the severe pain at the site of injection preventing daily activities that was present in less than 1% of participants across all age group in the phase 2/3 trial.

4.2. Systemic reactogenicity

Fatigue, fever (temperature ≥38̊) and headache were less frequent in our patients with chronic neurological diseases (fatigue in 8%, fever in 6% and headache in 3%) than in the phase 3 trial (fatigue in 59% of younger participants and in 51% of the older ones, fever in 16% of the younger participants and 11% of the older ones and headache in respectively 52% and 39% of younger and older vaccine recipients).

Nausea and vomiting were very rare in our study (3%) as in the 2/3 phase study.

Finally, as in the phase 2/3 study, we didn’t find serious adverse events related to the vaccine.

Nevertheless, we must acknowledge that our study has some limitations: the limited number of patients, the absence of a control group and the short follow-up time period (less than two months after the second dose).

5. Conclusion

The two-dose regimen of BNT162b2/Cominarty vaccine (30 μg per dose, given 28 days apart) seems to be safe in a brief follow-up period in chronic neurological patients hospitalised in our neurological rehabilitation unit. Other studies are required to detect the long-term effects of this vaccine in chronic neurological patients.

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References


Articles from Revue Neurologique are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES