Abstract
Testis differentiation is initiated when Sry in pre-Sertoli cells directs the gonad toward a male-specific fate. Sertoli cells are essential for testis development, but cell types within the interstitial compartment, such as immune and endothelial cells, are also critical for organ formation. Our previous work implicated macrophages in fetal testis morphogenesis, but little is known about genes underlying immune cell development during organogenesis. Here, we examine the role of the immune-associated genes Mafb and Maf in mouse fetal gonad development, and we demonstrate that deletion of these genes leads to aberrant hematopoiesis manifested by supernumerary gonadal monocytes. Mafb; Maf double knockout embryos underwent initial gonadal sex determination normally, but exhibited testicular hypervascularization, testis cord formation defects, Leydig cell deficit, and a reduced number of germ cells. In general, Mafb and Maf alone were dispensable for gonad development; however, when both genes were deleted, we observed significant defects in testicular morphogenesis, indicating that Mafb and Maf work redundantly during testis differentiation. These results demonstrate previously unappreciated roles for Mafb and Maf in immune and vascular development and highlight the importance of interstitial cells in gonadal differentiation.
Keywords: Mafb, Maf, gonad, vascular remodeling, monocyte, morphogenesis
Deletion of Mafb and Maf genes leads to supernumerary monocytes in fetal mouse gonads, resulting in vascular, morphogenetic, and differentiation defects during testicular organogenesis.
Introduction
Gonad morphogenesis is a highly orchestrated process involving germ cells, somatic supporting cells, interstitial/mesenchymal cells, immune cells, and vascular endothelial cells [1]. Cells in the fetal mouse testis undergo extensive cellular rearrangement between embryonic day (E) E11.5 and E12.5, which leads to the formation of testis cords, the basic structural unit of the testis. Testis cords are comprised of Sertoli and germ cells and give rise to seminiferous tubules in the adult organ [2]. Sertoli cells, the supporting cells of the testis that are the first sex-specific cell type specified in the XY gonad, express the sex-determining genes Sry and Sox9 [3, 4]; in contrast, XX gonads are comprised of FOXL2+ granulosa cells, the female supporting counterparts of Sertoli cells. Sertoli cells are considered to be the critical cells that initiate testis cord morphogenesis and drive several aspects of testicular differentiation, including the specification of androgen-producing Leydig cells in the interstitial compartment [1]. However, other studies in the field suggest that endothelial and interstitial/mesenchymal cells play essential, active roles in testis morphogenesis, including driving testis cord formation and establishing a niche to maintain multipotent interstitial progenitor cells [5–10].
A growing body of evidence supports the idea that immune cells, such as macrophages, are critical players in organ formation and repair [11]. Other hematopoietic-derived cells, including myeloid cells like granulocytes and monocytes, also play a role in organ formation and homeostasis [12, 13], and infiltration by immune cells has been proposed to be a critical, fundamental part of the organogenesis program [14]. During development and growth, myeloid cells are implicated in the morphogenesis of multiple tissues, including bone, mammary gland ducts, heart, pancreatic islets, and retinal vasculature [15–19]. Within reproductive tissues, macrophages are critical for multiple aspects of ovulation, estrus cycle progression, and steroidogenesis in the adult ovary [20, 21], as well as Leydig cell development and spermatogonial stem/progenitor cell differentiation in the postnatal and adult testis, respectively [22, 23].
We have previously shown that depletion of macrophages, which represent the majority of immune cells in the early nascent gonad, disrupted fetal testicular vascularization and morphogenesis [8], demonstrating that immune cells are an integral part of the testicular organogenesis program. A recent single-cell study revealed there are multiple myeloid cell types in the mid-to-late-gestation fetal and perinatal testis, including monocytes and granulocytes [24]. However, the role of different immune cell types and how their numbers are regulated or balanced during organogenesis are still outstanding questions in the field. To carry out their diverse activities during organ development and function, macrophages and other myeloid cells have a diverse cellular repertoire, with potential to influence angiogenesis, tissue remodeling and clearing, and the production of various growth factors and cytokines [25, 26].
One group of proteins that may contribute to immune or macrophage function in the gonad is the family of large Maf bZIP transcription factors, which in mammals is comprised of MAFA, MAFB, and MAF (also called C-MAF). Mouse mutant models have demonstrated that Mafb and Maf play roles in different aspects of hematopoiesis, including macrophage differentiation within tissues and macrophage function during definitive erythropoiesis in the fetal liver [27–31]. In addition to regulating hematopoiesis, the large Maf factors influence cell fate decisions during the differentiation of multiple organs, including pancreas [32, 33], hindbrain [34, 35], eye [36], and kidney [29, 37]. The sole Drosophila ortholog of the mammalian large Maf genes, traffic jam, directs gonad development in flies via regulating cell adhesion molecules that mediate soma–germline interactions. Gametogenesis is stunted in traffic jam mutant testes and ovaries, leading to sterility in both sexes [38]. However, little is known about the functional role of large Maf factors in mammalian gonadal development.
In mice, MAFB and MAF, but not MAFA, are expressed in the fetal gonad [9, 39]. MAF is expressed in macrophages within the developing gonad-mesonephros complex [8], and MAFB has been well-characterized as a marker of monocyte-derived myeloid cells [29, 40]. In addition to immune cell expression, both MAFB and MAF are early markers of interstitial mesenchymal cells in both sexes [9], and in later stages of fetal development MAFB is expressed in both Leydig and Sertoli cells [39]. Knock-in mutant analyses and global conditional deletion of Mafb revealed that it was not required for fetal testicular differentiation or for maintenance of adult spermatogenesis [39]. However, multiple studies have suggested that Mafb and Maf have redundant or overlapping roles [27, 41], perhaps due to similar and conserved DNA binding domains [38, 42, 43]; additionally, Mafb; Maf double homozygous knockout embryos have earlier embryonic lethality than other combinations of large Maf genes [44], indicating that these genes have essential, redundant roles in embryogenesis.
Because of their previously reported roles in myeloid cell differentiation and in Drosophila gonad morphogenesis, here we have investigated the role of Mafb and Maf during mouse fetal gonad development. While Mafb or Maf alone were largely dispensable for fetal gonad differentiation, Mafb; Maf double-homozygous knockout embryos exhibited supernumerary monocytes, a newly-identified population of gonadal immune cells, which specifically localized near vasculature at the gonad-mesonephros border. Along with disrupted hematopoiesis in double-homozygous knockout embryos, we observed testicular hypervascularization, testis cord morphogenesis defects, and a reduction in germ cells in both sexes. Therefore, in conjunction with our previous findings, these results demonstrate that both reduced and increased numbers of immune cells disturb gonad differentiation. Additionally, double-homozygous knockout testes possessed a reduced number of Leydig cells. However, reduced Leydig cell differentiation in knockout testes was likely a secondary effect of hypervascularization driven by excess immune cells, as Mafb- and Maf-intact fetal testes in which vasculature was disrupted ex vivo also displayed reduced numbers of Leydig cells. In general, there appeared to be a stronger requirement for Maf, as compared with Mafb, in testicular differentiation; however, our data demonstrate that Mafb and Maf work redundantly to promote development of the testis by regulating differentiation of the interstitial compartment. This study provides evidence supporting the idea that immune cell activity and number are delicately balanced during organogenesis to regulate vascular and tissue remodeling processes that are integral to testis morphogenesis.
Materials and methods
Mice
All mice used in this study were housed in the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center’s or Duke University Medical Center’s animal care facility, in compliance with institutional and National Institutes of Health guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained for all animal experiments by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center or Duke University Medical Center. Mice were housed in a 12-h light/dark cycle and had access to autoclaved rodent Lab Diet 5010 (Purina, St. Louis, MO, USA) and ultraviolet light-sterilized RO/DI constant circulation water ad libitum.
CD-1 (Charles River, Wilmington, MA; stock #022) and C57BL/6J (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME; stock #000664) mice were used for wild-type expression studies. MafbGFP (Mafbtm1Jeng), a null Mafb knock-in allele in which the eGFP coding sequence replaced the Mafb coding sequence [29], was a gift from S. Takahashi (University of Tsukuba, Japan) via L. Goodrich (Harvard University). Maf −/− knockout mice (Maftm1Glm; [45]) were a gift from I.C. Ho (Harvard University/Brigham and Women's Hospital). Mafb and Maf knockout mice were maintained and bred as double-heterozygous animals, which were on a mixed background of BALB/c, C57BL/6J, and CD-1. Vav1-Cre mice (Tg(Vav1-cre)1Graf), which target all cells of the hematopoietic lineage [46], were a gift from H.L. Grimes (Cincinnati Children's Hospital). Lyz2-Cre mice (Lyz2tm1(cre)Ifo; also called LysM-Cre), which target myeloid cells [47], were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME; stock #004781). Csf1r-Cre mice (Tg(Csf1r-icre)1Jwp) (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME; stock #021024), which target monocytes and macrophages [48], were a gift from R. Lang (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital). Rosa-Tomato mice (Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze), used as a Cre-responsive fluorescent reporter strain [49], were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME; stock #007914). Cx3cr1-GFP mice (Cx3cr1tm1Litt), a knock-in Cx3Cr1 reporter allele which is expressed in monocytes and differentiated tissue-resident macrophages, subsets of NK and dendritic cells, and brain microglia [50], were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME; stock #005582). Ccr2-GFP mice (Ccr2tm1.1Cln) [51], in which infiltrating monocytes are labeled with GFP, were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME; stock #027619).
Presence of the MafbGFP knock-in allele was assessed via a fluorescent dissecting microscope to visualize GFP fluorescence in embryos, particularly in the central nervous system, snout, eye lens, and interdigital webbing, and was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping for GFP with primers 5′ GAC GTA AAC GGC CAC AAG TT 3′ and 5′ AAG TCG GTG CTG CTT CAT GTG 3′. Presence of the Mafb wild-type allele was determined via PCR genotyping with primers 5′ GGT TCA TCT GCT GGT AGT TGC 3′ and 5′ GAC CTT CTC AAG TTC GAC GTG 3′. The Maf knockout allele was identified by PCR genotyping with primers 5′ TGC TCC TGC CGA GAA AGT ATC CAT CAT GGC 3′ and 5′ CGC CAA GCT CTT CAG CAA TAT CAC GGG TAG 3′ specific to the neomycin cassette in the knockout allele. Presence of the Maf wild-type allele was determined by presence of immunofluorescent MAF staining in the eye lens and in eye-associated macrophages, using a whole-mount immunofluorescence protocol (described below) on dissected fetal eyes. All PCR genotyping was performed on tail DNA isolated via an alkaline lysis protocol.
To obtain fetal samples at specific stages, timed matings were arranged in which a single adult male was paired with one or two adult females. Noon on the day a vaginal plug was observed was designated as E0.5.
Throughout the manuscript, we define the “control” genotype as: Mafb+/+ or MafbGFP/+ for Mafb experiments; Maf +/+ or Maf +/− for Maf experiments; and Maf +/−; MafbGFP/+ for compound heterozygous+knockout (compound heterozygous+KO, defined as three of four copies of Mafb and Maf are KO alleles) experiments and double knockout (double KO, defined as all four copies of Mafb and Maf are KO alleles) experiments. We define the “Mafb single KO” genotype as MafbGFP/GFP; the “Maf single KO” genotype as Maf −/−; and the “double KO” genotype as MafbGFP/GFP; Maf −/−. For compound heterozygous+KO analyses, we define the “Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous” genotype as MafbGFP/GFP; Maf +/− and the “Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO” genotype as MafbGFP/+; Maf −/−.
Immunofluorescence
Whole-mount immunofluorescence was performed as previously described [10]. Gonads were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) with 0.1% Triton X-100. After several washes in PBTx (PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100), samples were incubated in a blocking solution (PBTx + 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS] + 3% bovine serum albumin [BSA]) for 1–2 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and samples were rocked in primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After several washes in PBTx, fluorescent secondary antibodies were applied for 3–5-h rocking at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. After several washes in PBTx, samples were mounted on slides in Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL) or 2.5% DABCO (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 90% glycerol. For co-labeling of anti-CD11b or anti-F4/80 antibody with anti-CD45 antibody (which are all raised in rat), a sequential stain was done, in which F4/80 or CD11b was first incubated and labeled with fluorescently-conjugated Cy3 anti-rat secondary followed by extensive washes and subsequent incubation with anti-CD45 antibody directly conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488. Primary antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Alexa-488, -555, -568, and -647-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were all used at 1:500. Dy-Lite 488 donkey anti-chicken and Cy3 donkey anti-rat secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) were used at 1:500. Nuclei were stained with 2-μg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) or DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Samples were imaged either on a Nikon Eclipse TE2000 microscope (Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) with an Opti-Grid structured illumination imaging system using Volocity software (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA), a Nikon A1 inverted confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan), or a Leica SP2 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Germ cell depletion
Pregnant CD-1 females were injected intraperitoneally at E10.5 with 100 μl of 16 mg/ml busulfan (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) dissolved in 50% DMSO or an equivalent volume of 50% DMSO, as previously described [52]. Embryos were harvested at E13.5 and processed for immunofluorescence.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted and processed for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Tissue was homogenized in 200-μl TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RNA extraction was then performed using a TRIzol/isopropanol precipitation method. Briefly, 40 μl of chloroform was added to the TRIzol/tissue mixture, shaken by hand, incubated at room temperature for 3 min, and centrifuged at 12 000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The upper aqueous layer was carefully recovered and added to 80-μl isopropanol and 0.4-μl GlycoBlue coprecipitant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), which was rocked at room temperature for 10 min. After centrifugation at 12 000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed with 500 μl of ethanol. After another centrifugation (with same parameters), the RNA pellet was briefly air-dried and diluted in nuclease-free water. RNA quality was assessed by spectrophotometric analysis via absorbance at 260 and 280 nm, in which only RNA samples with a 260/280 ratio greater than or equal to 1.6 was used for qRT-PCR analysis (although sample ratios were usually between 1.7 and 2.0). An iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used on 500 ng of RNA for cDNA synthesis. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) on the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The following parameters were used: 95°C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 s and 60°C for 30 s, followed by a melt curve run. Primer specificity for a single amplicon was verified by melt curve analysis. Gapdh was used as an internal normalization control.
Ex vivo whole gonad droplet culture
Whole gonad-mesonephros complexes from E12.5 male CD-1 embryos were dissected in PBS and cultured for 48 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 in 30 μl droplets containing DMEM medium with 5% (or 10% in PDGF-BB + VEGFR-TKI II experiments) FBS (for VEGFA165 and PDGF-BB alone experiments) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin, as described previously [10, 53]. For PDGF-BB experiments, recombinant rat PDGF-BB (R&D Biosystems, Minneapolis, MN; #520-BB, 50 ng/ml) or equivalent amount of 0.1% BSA vehicle was added to media. For VEGFA experiments, recombinant murine VEGFA165 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ; #450-32, 50 ng/ml) or equivalent amount of 0.1% BSA vehicle was added to media. For VEGFR-TKI II experiments, VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor II (VEGFR-TKI II; EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA; #676481-5MG, 1.8 μg/ml) or equivalent amount of DMSO vehicle was added to media.
For PDGF-BB experiments in Figure 8, 5% FBS media was used since the baseline amount of vasculature is lower and hypervascularization can be more easily induced upon PDGF-BB treatment. Thus, upon this increase in vasculature, there is a visible reduction of Leydig cell number relative to controls in these conditions. To address whether the reduction of Leydig cells in the above experiment was caused by hypervascularization or is a direct negative effect of PDGF-BB treatment on Leydig cell differentiation, in Supplementary Figure S8 we used 10% FBS media, which has a higher baseline amount of vasculature relative to 5% FBS (as seen in Figure 8), so we can block the hypervascularization caused by 10% FBS (via additional simultaneous treatment with VEGFR-TKI II) to determine more definitively if PDGF-BB has any direct negative effect on Leydig cell number in the absence of hypervascularization.
After culture, gonads were fixed in 4% PFA for immunofluorescence and processed for whole-mount immunofluorescence as described above; alternatively, gonads were separated from the mesonephros for RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis as described above.
Microarray analysis
Purified populations of E12.5 XY Mafb-GFP-positive cells were obtained from three independent pairs of MafbGFP/+; Maf +/− testes (control) and three independent pairs of MafbGFP/+; Maf −/− (mutant) testes via FACS as previously described [54]. The testis was left attached to the gonad/mesonephros border region and its associated macrophage and interstitial cell populations [9]. Total RNA was extracted from approximately 100 000 GFP-positive cells per biological replicate using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), with modifications as previously described [54], and submitted to the Duke University Microarray Facility for labeling and hybridization to Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Genome 430A 2.0 microarrays. Data analyses were performed with Affymetrix Expression Console Software using an RMA (Robust Multi-Array Average) algorithm and transformed into log base 2. Genes that had 1.5-fold-or-higher fold change with a P-value of <0.05 were considered significantly upregulated or downregulated. The raw data are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE41715.
Germ cell quantification and testis cord morphometric analyses
Germ cells of E11.5 XY gonads were labeled by anti-SOX2 antibody and testis cords of E13.5 XY gonads were visualized by anti-AMH antibody. For meiotic germ cell counts, the number of SYCP3+ germ cells was counted per total germ cells, as marked by PECAM1 or CDH1. For all quantifications, a sample size of n = 3–10 gonads for each genotype were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH). For E11.5 XY gonads, SOX2+ germ cells per optical section (within a field of view 375-μm wide) were counted manually; three separate optical sections of each gonad were counted and averaged. For E13.5 XY gonads, five testis cords of each gonad in each image (within a field of view 750-μm wide) were measured and averaged. Surface-biased longitudinal optical sections that showed the full height of the cords were used for height measurements, while both longitudinal and transverse sections of cords were used for width measurements. For E13.5 XX gonads, three or four separate optical sections per gonad were analyzed and averaged for both total germ number and SYCP3+ cell number.
Sample sizes and statistical analyses
For qRT-PCR, fold change in mRNA levels was calculated relative to controls using a ΔΔCt method. Results were shown as mean ± SD. An unpaired, two-tailed Student t-test was performed to calculate P values based on ΔCt values, in which P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad). At least three gonads from independent embryos (n ≥ 3) were used for qRT-PCR analyses. For ex vivo gonad culture, at least three independent experiments were performed and within each experiment at least three gonads from independent embryos (n ≥ 3) were pooled for each biological replicate. For immunofluorescence assays, at least three independent experiments were performed and within each experiment multiple gonads from independent samples (n ≥ 2) were used. For germ cell quantifications and morphometric analyses, sample sizes are listed above for each group. Data are represented as mean ± SD, and statistical significance was determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student t-test in which P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Initial gonadal sex differentiation occurs normally in the absence of Mafb or Maf
As a first step to investigate the role of the large Maf factors, we examined basic aspects of male and female gonadal sex differentiation in Mafb single KO or Maf single KO gonads. Relative to control XY littermates, we observed comparable numbers of Sertoli cells in XY Mafb single KO and Maf single KO fetal gonads (Supplementary Figure S1A–C). While we did note some testis cord formation defects and reduced germ cell numbers in E12.5 Mafb single KO and Maf single KO testes (Supplementary Figure S1D–F), testis cord structure and germ cell numbers generally recovered by E13.5 (Supplementary Figure S1G–I). We also observed that there were comparable numbers of Leydig cells in E13.5 control versus Mafb single KO and Maf single KO testes (Supplementary Figure S1J–L). However, in E13.5 Maf single KO testes, we noticed subtle defects in cord architecture and some disruptions of the surface coelomic artery [55], in which the vessel was disorganized and multi-layered (Supplementary Figure S1M–O). These data indicate that male gonadal sex differentiation generally occurred normally in Mafb single KO or Maf single KO testes, but we did note that Maf single KO mutant testes were smaller than controls.
We observed FOXL2+ cells throughout E13.5 XX Mafb single KO and Maf single KO fetal gonads comparably to control XX gonads (Supplementary Figure S2A–C), indicative of ovarian differentiation. Another aspect of fetal ovarian differentiation is the entry of germ cells into meiosis, marked by SYCP3 (synaptonemal complex protein 3) expression, starting at E13.5, which does not occur in the fetal testis [56]. As in E14.5 control XX gonads (Supplementary Figure S2D), germ cells throughout E14.5 XX Mafb single KO and Maf single KO gonads expressed SYCP3 (Supplementary Figure S2E and F). These findings demonstrate that female gonadal sex differentiation and germ cell differentiation occurred normally in the absence of Mafb or Maf. However, as with fetal testes, we observed that Maf single KO mutant ovaries were smaller than their control counterparts. Overall, our data indicate that initial gonadal sexual differentiation in either sex does not require Mafb or Maf.
Double KO gonads undergo initial gonadal sex differentiation normally
To address the possibility that Mafb and Maf act redundantly during gonad development, we examined compound heterozygous+KO and double KO embryos. Adult double-heterozygous control males and females were fertile and able to generate double KO embryos. However, since double KO embryos only survive until E13.5 [44], we focused on early aspects of gonad differentiation.
First, to assess if initial gonadal sex differentiation and supporting cell specification occurred normally in double KO gonads, we examined the expression of SOX9 and FOXL2, markers for Sertoli and pre-granulosa cells, respectively. We found that E13.5 XY double KO gonads expressed SOX9 within Sertoli cells, similar to controls (Figure 1A and B). However, mutant testes were smaller than controls. E13.5 XX double KO gonads expressed FOXL2 within pre-granulosa cells, similar to controls (Figure 1C and D), but, as with testes, double KO ovaries were smaller than their control counterparts. Overall, these data indicate that initial gonadal sex differentiation occurred normally in the absence of both Mafb and Maf.
Cord morphogenesis is disrupted and germ cells are reduced in double KO testes
We next examined testis cord formation in E13.5 XY compound heterozygous+KO and double KO gonads relative to control littermate gonads. In general, testis cords were smaller in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO and double KO testes (Figure 2A–D), likely due to decreased numbers of germ cells. Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous testes appeared grossly normal in their cord architecture (Figure 2B). However, in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO samples, cord abnormalities such as fused or branched cords were more common than in controls (Figure 2C), and we noted a more severe germ cell deficit as compared with Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous mutant testes. In double KO testes, there were more dramatic perturbations in testis cord structure as compared with other genotypes (Figure 2D). Although Sertoli cells were aggregated and usually sorted out from interstitial cells, virtually all cords were fused or branched, resulting in dramatic disorganization of cords in double KO testes. Morphometric analyses confirmed a reduction in testis cord height and width in E13.5 XY compound heterozygous+KO and double KO gonads (Figure 2M and N). Overall, our analyses showed that Maf plays a more critical role than Mafb in testis cord formation, but double KO gonads generally had the most severe phenotype.
Time course analysis of compound heterozygous+KO gonads revealed that germ cells were present in numbers comparable to controls at E9.5, but germ cells in KO embryos were aberrantly localized outside the hindgut while migrating and were consequently dramatically reduced in number by E10.5 and E11.5, particularly in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO gonads (Figure 3A–I). These data suggest that defective germ cell migration is an underlying cause of germ cell reduction in KO gonads. We found that germ cells themselves do not express MAFB or MAF (Figure 3J–L), indicating that germ cell reductions were likely not due to germ-cell-intrinsic defects. We did not observe any defects in cell cycle status or proliferation, nor an increase in apoptosis, in germ cells in double KO gonads (Supplementary Figure S3A–H). We also investigated expression levels of Cxcl12 (also called sdf-1) and Kitl (kit ligand; also called stem cell factor), which encode critical ligands secreted by the soma to recruit germ cells to the gonad, but did not find any significant changes in Cxcl12 or Kitl mRNA expression within E11.5 XY Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO gonad/mesonephros complexes relative to controls (Supplementary Figure S3I). Finally, to address if any defects in gonad size and germ cell colonization were due to disruptions in initial sex determination, we examined the expression of Sox9, a testis-specific gene, and Foxl2 and Wnt4, ovary-specific genes, in E13.5 XX and XY Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO gonads via qRT-PCR, and we found no significant changes in expression (Supplementary Figure S3J).
One potential concern was whether the lack of germ cells in XY KO gonads affected their ability to form testis cords efficiently. To investigate this possibility, we examined the development of fetal testes in which germ cells were ablated. Using busulfan administration in utero to efficiently deplete germ cells from the fetal testis (Supplementary Figure S4A and B), we assessed effects on testis morphogenesis. Germ cell ablation revealed no gross differences in Sertoli cell specification, testis cord structure, or vascular development between germ-cell-depleted testes and vehicle control testes at E13.5 (Supplementary Figure S4A–D). These data suggest that Mafb and Maf affect testis cord structure independently of their effects on germ cell numbers, and that the two genes act redundantly to promote proper testis cord formation.
Double KO ovaries exhibit germ cell reduction with a potential delay in meiosis onset
In E13.5 XX KO gonads, similarly to E13.5 XY KO gonads, we found progressively more severe phenotypes as we knocked out more copies of Mafb and Maf, whereby Maf mutation had more deleterious effects than Mafb mutation. We found that XX double KO gonads were smaller, with a reduction in germ cells (Figure 2E–H and O), although Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO mutant gonads were occasionally similar or more severe in germ cell loss as compared with Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous gonads (Figure 2E–L and O). To investigate the onset of meiotic entry as a readout of ovarian differentiation, we examined the expression of SYCP3. Although there were widespread SYCP3+ cells in the anterior of E13.5 control ovaries, there were many fewer SYCP3+ cells in compound heterozygous+KO and double KO ovaries (Figure 2I–L). Quantification of total germ cells and SYCP3+ cells revealed that E13.5 Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO and double KO ovaries showed not only a reduction in total germ cell number, but also a reduced percentage of germ cells expressing SYCP3 (Figure 2O and P). These data suggest that there was a delay in meiotic entry in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO and double KO gonads. It is possible, and perhaps likely, that they could recover later in development, as we observed in single KO gonads, but we could not address this possibility due to early embryonic lethality of double KO embryos after E13.5.
Vascular remodeling is severely disrupted in double KO testes
Vascularization is a hallmark of testicular differentiation that is critical for testis cord morphogenesis and maintenance of Leydig progenitor cells [5–7, 10], and is characterized by formation of a main coelomic artery and a vascular plexus that runs along the gonad-mesonephros border [55, 57]. In E13.5 control and Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous testes, a coelomic artery was visible (Figure 2A and B), although there were some disruptions in the gonad-mesonephric vascular plexus in Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous testes (Figure 2B). In Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO testes, the characteristic coelomic artery was still present, but was disorganized and multi-layered rather than structured as a single vessel; additionally, the vascular plexus at the mesonephric border was disorganized and thinner relative to control samples (Figure 2C). This phenotype was similar to, but more severe than, Maf single KO testes (Supplementary Figure S1O).
In double KO testes, the vascular phenotype was even more dramatic, and was characterized by extensive hypervascularization throughout the gonad. Instead of a well-defined vascular plexus and an avascular mesonephric region adjacent to the gonad as in controls (Figure 4A), in double KO testes endothelial cells were highly disorganized, resulting in a severe disruption of the mesonephric vascular plexus (Figure 4B). Additionally, the coelomic artery was multi-layered and severely disorganized as compared with controls. Therefore, for vascularization, Maf appeared to be more critical than Mafb, but, ultimately, mutating all copies of Mafb and Maf resulted in the most severe defects.
Maf KO gonad/mesonephros complexes exhibit ectopic CD11b-bright immune cells
In our analyses of KO gonads, we observed changes in the GFP expression pattern (from the MafbGFP allele) in Maf KO gonads. In addition to the interstitial mesenchyme GFP expression we previously reported [9], in Maf KO gonads there were numerous ectopic GFP-bright round cells scattered throughout the gonad and mesonephros, although mostly concentrated in the mesonephros near the highly vascularized gonadal border, in both fetal testes and ovaries (Supplementary Figure S5A–F). The shape and localization of the ectopic GFP-positive cells within KO gonads, in addition to previous reports of MafbGFP expression in macrophages [29], suggested that these cells were immune cells. Therefore, we investigated whether loss of Mafb or Maf function affected hematopoietic cells in the gonad/mesonephros complex. We first examined F4/80-positive macrophages, a prevalent immune cell in the fetal gonad, but detected no differences in F4/80 expression in Mafb single KO or Maf single KO gonads relative to controls (Figure 5A–D). In contrast, there was a dramatic change in the pattern of expression for CD11b (official name ITGAM), a marker of myeloid immune cells such as macrophages, granulocytes, and their monocyte progenitors [58]. As compared with controls or Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous gonads, there was a dramatic increase in the number of CD11b-bright cells in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO and double KO gonad/mesonephros complexes in both sexes (Figure 5E–H and M–N). These findings suggest that Maf is required to suppress supernumerary CD11b-bright immune cells in the gonad and mesonephros.
To address the source of increased numbers of CD11b-bright cells, we assessed whether these cells were proliferative in the fetal testis, using phosphoHistone H3 (pHH3) to mark mitotic cells. We detected pHH3 expression in CD11b-bright cells in E13.5 control, Mafb KO; Maf-heterozygous, Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO, and double KO testes and mesonephros (Figure 5I–L). These data indicate that differential mitotic activity is unlikely to be the sole source of supernumerary CD11b-bright cells in Maf KO embryos.
Supernumerary immune cells in Maf KO and double KO gonads are monocytes
We next sought to determine the identity of ectopic immune cells in KO gonad/mesonephros complexes. To label and identify all immune cells in the gonad/mesonephros complex, we permanently lineage-traced all hematopoietic-derived cells and their progeny using a Rosa-Tomato fluorescent reporter driven by Vav1-Cre. At E12.5, when testis-specific vascular remodeling and initial sexual differentiation occur, most Tomato+ cells in the developing gonad-mesonephros complex were F4/80+ macrophages (Figure 6A). However, there was a population of Tomato+ cells that did not express F4/80 (Figure 6A), which had a unique, round morphology as compared with more ramified, dendritic-like macrophages. To confirm these cells were in fact immune cells, we examined expression of CD45, a pan-hematopoietic marker, as well as CD11b and F4/80, and confirmed that gonadal and mesonephric CD11b-bright round cells were immune cells that were not differentiated macrophages (Figure 6B and C).
To determine if CD11b-bright cells had a myeloid identity, we lineage-traced myeloid cells and their progeny using Lyz2-Cre. Despite a low labeling efficiency (~20%) in fetal gonad immune cells, we found AIF1+ (also called IBA1) macrophages labeled with the fluorescent lineage reporter (Figure 6D). In addition to Tomato+ macrophages, we also identified Tomato+, AIF1-negative round cells that strongly expressed CD11b (Figure 6D). These data indicate that this population of immune cells in the fetal gonad/mesonephros complex originated from a myeloid lineage.
To investigate further the immune identity of CD11b-bright cells within the myeloid lineage, we utilized Csf1r-Cre to lineage-trace monocyte/macrophage cells. We found that CD11b-bright cells were effectively labeled with Tomato (Figure 6E), similar to gonadal and mesonephric macrophages, indicating that CD11b-bright cells were likely monocytes or monocyte-derived cells. Consistent with a non-macrophage identity, this subpopulation of hematopoietic-derived cells did not express colony stimulating factor receptor 1 (CSF1R), AIF1, neuropilin 1 (NRP1), MRC1 (also called CD206), or Cx3cr1-GFP (Supplementary Figure S5G–K), markers we previously reported as markers of fetal testicular macrophages [8].
In contrast to tissue-resident F4/80+ macrophages, which were found throughout the gonad and mesonephros, Mafb-GFP-positive, CD11b-bright cells were specifically localized near vasculature at the vascular plexus of the gonad-mesonephros border in both sexes, as well as the developing coelomic artery in males (Figure 6F and G; Supplementary Figure S5G and H). In addition, round CD11b-bright cells possessed a characteristic horseshoe-shaped nuclear morphology (Supplementary Figure S5L), indicating that these cells were monocytes. To address this hypothesis, we examined a marker of monocytes, Ccr2-GFP, and found numerous round GFP+ cells in the gonad, which were mostly localized near the vascularized gonad-mesonephros border at E12.5 (Figure 6H–J). GFP+ cells, as expected, expressed CD45 (Figure 6H), and did not express F4/80 except in a small number of cells (Figure 6I). However, unexpectedly, GFP+ cells did not yet express CD11b, possibly suggesting that these cells are myeloid progenitor cells. Overall, our data suggest that the round ectopic cells observed in Maf KO and double KO gonad/mesonephros complexes are likely monocytes or, alternatively, a myeloid progenitor cell.
MAFB and MAF are expressed in macrophages but not in monocytes
To address the potential mechanisms of how Mafb and Maf regulate hematopoiesis, we examined the expression of MAFB and MAF within gonadal and mesonephric immune cells. We found that both MAFB and MAF were expressed in F4/80+ macrophages in the gonad/mesonephros complex, which were likely of yolk sac origin, as early as E10.5 (Supplementary Figure S6A and B). At E12.5, during testicular morphogenesis, MAFB and MAF were both expressed in F4/80-positive macrophages (Supplementary Figure S6C and D), but neither MAFB nor MAF were expressed in CD11b-bright monocytes in the fetal gonad and mesonephros (Supplementary Figure S6E and F). The co-expression of MAFB and MAF in F4/80+ cells was maintained at E13.5 (Supplementary Figure S6G).
Mafb and Maf mutation disrupts Leydig cell differentiation and immune gene expression
We next sought to determine if other interstitial cell types, apart from vasculature, were disrupted by Mafb and Maf loss of function. To assess specifically the effects of Maf loss of function on interstitial cells, we FACS-purified Mafb-GFP-positive cells, which include interstitial mesenchymal and immune cells [9, 54], from E12.5 Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO versus control fetal testis-mesonephros complexes and performed microarray transcriptomic analyses (Table 1; Supplementary Table S1). We found among the top 20 downregulated genes were all the major components of the Leydig cell steroidogenic pathway: Star, Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, and Cyp17a1 were all reduced in Maf-mutant interstitial cells (Figure 7A; Table 1). Additionally, other Leydig-specific genes such as Insl3 and Ren1 were downregulated (Figure 7A; Table 1), suggesting there was a reduction in Leydig cell number as opposed to a specific disruption of the steroidogenic pathway within a normal number of Leydig cells. In immunofluorescence analyses, control testes contained Leydig cells throughout the interstitium (Figure 7B), but there was a reduction in Leydig cell number in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO testes (Figure 7C). We found that double KO gonads also exhibited a reduced Leydig cell number relative to controls in immunofluorescence assays (Figure 7D and E).
Table 1.
Entrez gene ID | Gene symbol | Gene name | Fold change |
---|---|---|---|
17110 | Lyz1* | Lysozyme 1 | 7.303613054 |
17105 | Lyz2 | Lysozyme 2 | 6.349422294 |
12721 | Coro1a* | Coronin, actin binding protein 1A | 2.655902772 |
100040462 | Mndal* | Myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen like | 2.610571489 |
216616 | Efemp1 | Epidermal growth factor-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 | 2.420834858 |
66857 | Plbd1 | Phospholipase B domain containing 1 | 2.378568653 |
66152 | Uqcr10 | Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, complex III subunit X | 2.339773158 |
23833 | Cd52 | CD52 antigen | 2.262969803 |
13040 | Ctss | Cathepsin S | 2.185314621 |
56644 | Clec7a | C-type lectin domain family 7, member a | 2.094641481 |
13032 | Ctsc | Cathepsin C | 2.087394572 |
18040 | Nefm | Neurofilament, medium polypeptide | 2.079774819 |
22177 | Tyrobp | TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein | 2.064332458 |
12307 | Calb1 | Calbindin 1 | 2.057357726 |
12772 | Ccr2 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 | 2.011874993 |
13723 | Emb | Embigin | 1.958363173 |
17476 | Mpeg1 | Macrophage expressed gene 1 | 1.930645119 |
109660 | Ctrl | Chymotrypsin-like | 1.913685828 |
15229 | Foxd1 | Forkhead box D1 | 1.866402313 |
19264 | Ptprc | Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, C | 1.863935581 |
13074 | Cyp17a1 | Cytochrome P450, family 17, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 | −10.79564348 |
15492 | Hsd3b1 | Hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 beta- and steroid delta-isomerase 1 | −4.75975286 |
13070 | Cyp11a1 | Cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 | −4.223344696 |
21473 | A130082M07Rik /// Tcra* | RIKEN cDNA A130082M07 gene /// T-cell receptor alpha chain | −4.119219486 |
17533 | Mrc1 | Mannose receptor, C type 1 | −3.782353838 |
209378 | Itih5 | Inter-alpha (globulin) inhibitor H5 | −3.59491751 |
14858 | Gsta2 | Glutathione S-transferase, alpha 2 (Yc2) | −3.294938795 |
54354 | Rassf5* | Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 5 | −3.253218373 |
16336 | Insl3 /// Jak3 | Insulin-like 3 /// Janus kinase 3 | −3.181115307 |
319195 | Rpl17 | Ribosomal protein L17 | −3.121015813 |
19701 | Ren1 /// Ren2 | Renin 1 structural /// renin 2 tandem duplication of Ren1 | −3.069606376 |
20845 | Star* | Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein | −3.037431766 |
18295 | Ogn | Osteoglycin | −2.89451908 |
244954 | Prss35 | Protease, serine, 35 | −2.808343354 |
78609 | 8030411F24Rik | RIKEN cDNA 8030411F24 gene | −2.653684763 |
11475 | Acta2 | Actin, alpha 2, smooth muscle, aorta | −2.614708288 |
66106 | Smpx | Small muscle protein, X-linked | −2.579192285 |
16891 | Lipg | Lipase, endothelial | −2.519043438 |
27366 | Txnl4a | Thioredoxin-like 4A | −2.431413612 |
11668 | Aldh1a1 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, subfamily A1 | −2.371111216 |
Notes: Table shows the top 20 upregulated and top 20 downregulated genes in FACS-purified GFP+ cells from E12.5 XY Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO (MafbGFP/+; Maf −/−) versus control (MafbGFP/+; Maf +/−) testis and mesonephric tissue. Asterisks denote genes that were represented by two probe sets within the top 20 upregulated or downregulated probe sets; the most upregulated or downregulated probe set for that gene is listed.
To determine any effects on Leydig progenitors, we performed qRT-PCR analyses on E13.5 XY control and Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO gonads for several interstitial progenitor-specific genes, such as Jag1, Arx, Nr2f2 (also called COUP-TFII), and Nes (Nestin). We only found a reduction in Nes expression (Figure 7F), which is specific to a subset of perivascular progenitor cells [10], indicating there may be some defects in vascular–mesenchymal interactions or Leydig cell differentiation, but there do not appear to be any widespread, general defects in the establishment of progenitor populations in KO fetal testes.
As opposed to downregulated genes, which were mostly associated with Leydig cells, most upregulated genes in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO cells were associated with macrophage and monocyte immune function. While genes normally expressed in M2-type tissue-resident macrophages, such as Mrc1 (CD206) and Lyve1 were significantly downregulated, genes associated with monocytes, such as Ccr2 and Ptprc (CD45), and degradative activity of myeloid cells, such as Lyz1, Lyz2, and cathepsin-encoding genes Ctss and Ctsc, were upregulated (Figure 7G; Table 1; Supplementary Table S1). In addition, the gene encoding the actin regulatory protein Coronin1a (Coro1a), involved in forming the phagolysosome, was also significantly upregulated in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO cells, along with other less well-characterized genes associated with myeloid or immune function (Supplementary Table S1), suggesting that the ectopic immune cells in Maf KO gonads were phagocytic and had degradative activity.
Leydig cell reduction in KO gonads is likely due to hypervascularization
Our previous work demonstrated that Leydig progenitors in the fetal testis were maintained by vasculature, and the number of differentiated Leydig cells was increased when vascularization was inhibited ex vivo [10]. The converse situation occurred in Maf single KO and double KO testes, in which there was hypervascularization; therefore, we hypothesized that the reduction of fetal Leydig cells in mutant gonads was potentially a secondary effect in which excess or dysregulated vascularization inhibited the ability of interstitial cells to differentiate into Leydig cells. To address this hypothesis, we manipulated vascularization in XY gonads via the addition of PDGF-BB in ex vivo culture. PDGF signaling regulates vascularization in the fetal testis, and addition of PDGF-BB to both XX and XY gonads ex vivo induced vasculature [7, 59]. After addition of PDGF-BB, we found that vascular patterning was disrupted, as evident by increased blood vessels in the coelomic surface of the gonad (Figure 8A and B). Along with increased surface vasculature, we found that there was a reduction in Leydig cells in PDGF-BB-treated fetal testes (Figure 8B). Using qRT-PCR, we found that the expression of the endothelial marker Cdh5 was not increased, indicating that the overall number of endothelial cells was likely not changed, but that instead vascular remodeling and patterning were affected. Additionally, the expression of Sertoli cell (Sox9, Amh) and germ cell (Ddx4) genes was not significantly different in PDGF-BB-treated testes (Figure 8C). Consistent with immunofluorescence data for CYP11A1, expression of Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, and Cyp17a1 mRNA were all significantly reduced in PDGF-BB-treated testes relative to controls (Figure 8C), indicating a reduction in Leydig cells. Similar to PDGF-BB treatment, we also saw that Leydig cell number was reduced in another scenario in which vascular patterning was experimentally disrupted, such as culturing in 10% FBS instead of 5% FBS (Figure 8D–F) and in the presence of VEGFA (Supplementary Figure S7). Therefore, our data suggest that dysregulated vasculature in Maf KO or double KO testes is the likely cause of reduced Leydig cell number in mutant gonads.
To address whether factors other than disrupted vasculature are the cause of reduced Leydig cells in PDGF-BB-treated testes, we performed PDGF-BB gonad culture experiments in the presence of the vascular inhibitor VEGFR-TKI II to eliminate vasculature during PDGF-BB treatment. We found that there was no significant difference in Leydig cell gene expression in PDGFBB+VEGFR-TKI-II-treated versus VEGFR-TKI-II-alone treated testes (Supplementary Figure S8A–E), indicating that vasculature, or the lack of vasculature in this case, was the main driver of the Leydig cell phenotype in PDGF-BB culture experiments.
Finally, to address whether there is any potential miscommunication between Sertoli and Leydig cells that could cause Leydig cell dysregulation in KO gonads, we examined several pathways that involve Sertoli-Leydig crosstalk. Quantitative RT-PCR analyses for the Pdgf pathway (Pdgfa and Pdgfra) and Notch pathway (Notch interstitial target genes Hes1, Hey1, and Heyl) did not reveal any defects in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO gonads (Supplementary Figure S8F). We also examined the desert hedgehog (DHH) pathway; while we did not see any effect on mRNA levels of Dhh, which is expressed by Sertoli cells [60, 61], in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO gonads, we did observe a significant reduction in the expression of Ptch1 (patched 1), which encodes the DHH receptor and is expressed in the fetal testis interstitial compartment [61] (Supplementary Figure S8F).
Discussion
In this study, we have uncovered new roles for the transcription factors MAFB and MAF (C-MAF) in gonadal development and hematopoiesis. Our data demonstrate that Mafb and Maf, acting redundantly, regulate immune cell fate and vascular remodeling that are required for testicular differentiation and morphogenesis. In double KO gonads, we observed a significant increase in the number of monocytes, which was associated with multiple perturbations in gonadal development, including testicular hypervascularization, testis cord abnormalities, Leydig cell deficits, and a reduced number of germ cells in both sexes. Although mutations in the Drosophila large Maf gene traffic jam caused gonad morphogenesis defects via disruption of cell adhesion molecules [38], here we found no evidence from transcriptome data that this was the case in mice. Instead, our results suggest that aberrant gonad development in mice was caused by Maf-dependent changes in hematopoiesis that resulted in disruption of vascular remodeling. These results support a broadly emerging idea that vasculature and the balance of immune cell types are critical for mammalian organogenesis.
The family of large Maf transcription factors has been described, in multiple contexts, as critical regulators of cellular differentiation during organogenesis [62, 63]. In hematopoiesis, both MafB and Maf have significant roles in the fate of myeloid cells. MAFB directly interacts with the DNA-binding domain of ETS-1, thereby repressing erythroid differentiation in pluripotent myeloid cells [64]. Through transduction of Mafb in hematopoietic precursor cells, Mafb has been further shown to promote formation of myeloid colonies and macrophage differentiation [65, 66]. Maf also possesses a regulatory role in myelomonocytic differentiation, though its involvement is currently not defined as definitively as Mafb’s monocytic promotion. Induced expression of Maf resulted in the accumulation of monocytes and macrophages, followed by their eventual apoptosis [67]. More recently, analysis of Maf-deficient embryos revealed that they are anemic due to deficiencies in macrophage functions essential for maintenance of erythroblastic island formation and functional erythrypoiesis [28]. Indeed, Maf has been repeatedly observed to regulate expression of various genes encoding immune cytokines, such as Il4 and Il21 [68, 69].
Our data, in conjunction with previous studies, point to a scenario in which lack of Maf, or lack of both Maf and Mafb, results in a bias in hematopoietic differentiation toward a gonadal monocyte fate. In our study, the F4/80-positive macrophage population was comparable between control, Mafb single KO, and Maf single KO gonads, indicating that individual Maf genes are not required for tissue-resident macrophage differentiation in the gonad. However, the CD11b-bright population of monocytes was dramatically increased in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO and double KO gonads. A previous study demonstrated that mutation in Mafb and Maf disassociated cell cycle activity from differentiation in hematopoietic cells, resulting in extensive proliferation of mature monocytes and macrophages [27], which rarely occurs in normal development. In addition, Maf also is involved in inducing apoptosis of CD11b-expressing monocytic and myeloid cells [67]. Given the well-characterized roles of Maf factors in cell fate determination, we propose that the Maf family of genes normally suppresses the differentiation or survival of CD11b-positive monocytes from a hematopoietic progenitor population. This idea is consistent with our observation that CD11b-positive monocytes are MAFB-negative and MAF-negative. An in-depth analysis of myeloid cell populations in Maf KO and double KO gonads could uncover further roles for this gene in regulating cell fate decisions during organogenesis and organ homeostasis.
Blood vessels form an intricate and interconnected network that is critical for sustaining functional organs via oxygen and nutrient supply to tissues. Prior to vascular function in delivering blood flow, embryonic endothelial cells (ECs) and nascent vessels play a general role in promoting organogenesis, as has been reported in liver, testis, and pancreas [7, 10, 70–72]. ECs are important components of essential niches for stem cell self-renewal versus differentiation during organogenesis [70], such as during pancreas development, in which pancreatic progenitors rely on EC-supplied EGFL7 for renewal and maintenance [73]. Our previous results showed that EC-derived Notch signaling is essential for maintaining fetal Leydig progenitors in mice, whereby both vascular inhibition and inactivation of Notch signaling induced excess fetal Leydig cell differentiation and loss of Nestin-positive interstitial progenitor cells [10]. Conversely, stimulation of Notch signaling by zearalenone administration in utero (likely mediated via the vascular- and perivascular-associated Notch receptors NOTCH1 and NOTCH3) inhibited differentiation of fetal Leydig cells in rats [74]. Therefore, aberrant vascularization in double KO gonads likely disrupted vascular–mesenchymal interactions responsible for promoting differentiation of interstitial cells and establishing a niche for Leydig cell progenitors. This paradigm applies to both double KO gonads and Maf-intact gonads in which we experimentally disrupted testicular vascularization ex vivo, demonstrating the importance of proper vascular remodeling on testicular organogenesis. Our results here do not point toward disruption of Notch as a potential mechanism in KO gonads, as interstitial Notch target gene expression was unaffected. However, we did observe a reduction in Nes expression, which is expressed in perivascular progenitor cells, indicating that there are some underlying defects in vascular interactions. We also observed a reduction in Ptch1 expression, which encodes the receptor for the Hedgehog ligand DHH that is essential for fetal Leydig cell differentiation, implicating a disruption in Hedgehog signaling as a potential cause of Leydig cell defects in KO gonads. We will add the caveat that our microarray transcriptome analyses were performed at E12.5, which may be too early to detect some Leydig-cell-specific genes reliably at that stage [75]; therefore, it should be kept in mind that some of our transcriptome findings may be based on differences in low-level expression.
There were clear differences in the phenotype here, in which gonadal myeloid cells were dramatically increased in number due to Maf mutation, versus our previous report in which we ablated myeloid cells via a Cre-mediated approach [8]. Specifically, a major difference was observed regarding the vascular network of the mesonephric vascular plexus, from which testicular vasculature (especially the coelomic artery) is derived due to migration of freed mesonephric endothelial cells into the gonad [55, 57]. Here we found that the existing vascular network of the mesonephric vascular plexus was excessively degraded, leading to a dramatic disruption in vascular patterning and hypervascularization of the testis. In contrast, depletion of myeloid cells in our previous study resulted in a poorly remodeled vascular plexus, in which a reduced number of migrating endothelial cells failed to generate a coelomic artery. However, in both cases testicular organ architecture and vascularization were disrupted, leading to aberrant cord formation and, in this study, a disruption of Leydig cell differentiation. Overall, these results demonstrate that a proper balance of immune cell number is critical for regulating vascular remodeling that establishes the morphogenetic and differentiation programs of the developing testis.
Our transcriptome data indicated that genes encoding degradative enzymes, such as lysozymes and cathepsins, were upregulated in Mafb-heterozygous; Maf KO gonads, and ectopic monocytes were specifically localized near vasculature in the mesonephros region near the gonad border. Therefore, it is likely that supernumerary monocytes in KO gonads led to a disruption of vascular remodeling by excessive, dysregulated breakdown of vasculature in areas such as in the gonad-mesonephros vascular plexus. A growing body of work has shown that monocyte-macrophage cells are critical to support proper vascular remodeling and growth in development [76], and here we show that extensive hypervascularization occurs in Maf KO and double KO gonads that possess supernumerary monocytes. An increased accumulation of CD11b + myeloid cells in this study and its association with hypervascularization is reminiscent of tumor models, in which myeloid cell recruitment is linked to tumor vasculature and growth recovery after radiation [77]. It is well-accepted that CD11b + myeloid cells have proangiogenic activity to promote the formation of tumor vasculature [78], but here we propose that monocytes can also drive disruptions in vascular remodeling when dysregulated in developing organs. One possibility for monocyte action in the gonad is CD11b–mediated binding of monocytes to endothelial ICAM1, which contributes to vascular sprouting in liver sinusoids and portal space after partial hepatectomy [79, 80]. Therefore, we posit that the dramatic, dysregulated increase of CD11b-positive monocytes in double KO gonads leads to hypervascularization resulting from a disruption in the balance of vascular remodeling versus breakdown during testis differentiation.
Therefore, our data add to evidence supporting the idea that ECs are essential regulators of organ formation, which when disrupted, can lead to developmental abnormalities. In humans, birth defects of various organ structures, such as in the gut and limbs, have been linked with vascular disruption [81], indicating that further investigation into the role of blood vessels during fetal development will be an important area of future research. Our findings here also highlight the non-immune roles that vascular and hematopoietic/immune cells play during mammalian gonad development. Studies from other model systems suggest that non-immune, developmental functions for immune cells are evolutionarily conserved across the animal kingdom. In Xenopus embryos, targeted ablation of macrophages resulted in developmental defects such as disrupted limb morphogenesis and early death [82]. In Drosophila, the macrophage-like hemocyte lineage plays important roles in organogenesis, such as in central nervous system morphogenesis [83, 84], where it acts through modulation of extracellular proteins and clearance of apoptotic cells, and in the intestinal stem cell niche, where hemocytes regulate stem cell proliferation via BMP signaling [85]. In the study of Drosophila traffic jam mutants [38], it was not addressed whether there was a change in hemocytes; therefore, it is unclear whether immune cells played a role in the traffic jam gonad phenotype. Interestingly, limb regeneration in adult salamanders and fin, heart, and axonal regeneration in zebrafish all require myeloid cells [86–89], and perhaps also in heart repair in mouse injury models [90]. Regeneration studies in diverse species have led to an emerging idea that a proper immune response is essential for both organ formation and regeneration [91]. Increasing evidence supports the idea that myeloid cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, play broad and evolutionarily conserved roles in organogenesis via their extensive repertoire of cellular and molecular functions, one of which is regulating vascular and tissue formation and function. Further investigation into the links between immune cell activity, vascularization, and morphogenesis will be critical for a deeper understanding of organogenesis and fetal development.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Takahashi, L. Goodrich, I.C. Ho, H.L. Grimes, and R. Lang for mice; we also thank K. Morohashi and D. Wilhelm for antibodies.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
† Grant Support: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R37HD039963 to BC, R35GM119458 to TD, R01HD094698 to TD, F32HD058433 to TD); March of Dimes (1-FY10-355 to BC, Basil O’Connor Starter Scholar Award 5-FY14-32 to TD); Lalor Foundation (postdoctoral fellowship to SL); and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (Research Innovation and Pilot funding, Trustee Award, and developmental funds to TD).
Contributor Information
Shu-Yun Li, Division of Reproductive Sciences, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Xiaowei Gu, Division of Reproductive Sciences, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Anna Heinrich, Division of Reproductive Sciences, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Emily G Hurley, Division of Reproductive Sciences, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Blanche Capel, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Tony DeFalco, Division of Reproductive Sciences, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Authors’ contributions
SL conducted experiments, performed data analyses, co-wrote the original manuscript, and edited the manuscript. XG and AH conducted experiments, co-wrote the original manuscript, and edited the manuscript. EGH conducted experiments and edited the manuscript. BC supervised the project, acquired funding, and edited the manuscript. TD supervised the project, acquired funding, performed experiments, co-wrote the original manuscript, and edited the manuscript.
Data availability
Raw data associated with microarray transcriptome analyses are publicly available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE41715. Other data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
- 1. Svingen T, Koopman P. Building the mammalian testis: origins, differentiation, and assembly of the component cell populations. Genes Dev 2013; 27:2409–2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cool J, DeFalco T, Capel B. Testis formation in the fetal mouse: dynamic and complex de novo tubulogenesis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2012; 1:847–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Albrecht KH, Eicher EM. Evidence that Sry is expressed in pre-Sertoli cells and Sertoli and granulosa cells have a common precursor. Dev Biol 2001; 240:92–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sekido R, Bar I, Narvaez V, Penny G, Lovell-Badge R. SOX9 is up-regulated by the transient expression of SRY specifically in Sertoli cell precursors. Dev Biol 2004; 274:271–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bott RC, McFee RM, Clopton DT, Toombs C, Cupp AS. Vascular endothelial growth factor and kinase domain region receptor are involved in both seminiferous cord formation and vascular development during testis morphogenesis in the rat. Biol Reprod 2006; 75:56–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Combes AN, Wilhelm D, Davidson T, Dejana E, Harley V, Sinclair A, Koopman P. Endothelial cell migration directs testis cord formation. Dev Biol 2009; 326:112–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cool J, DeFalco TJ, Capel B. Vascular-mesenchymal cross-talk through Vegf and Pdgf drives organ patterning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:167–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. DeFalco T, Bhattacharya I, Williams AV, Sams DM, Capel B. Yolk-sac-derived macrophages regulate fetal testis vascularization and morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:E2384–E2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. DeFalco T, Takahashi S, Capel B. Two distinct origins for Leydig cell progenitors in the fetal testis. Dev Biol 2011; 352:14–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kumar DL, DeFalco T. A perivascular niche for multipotent progenitors in the fetal testis. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Theret M, Mounier R, Rossi F. The origins and non-canonical functions of macrophages in development and regeneration. Development 2019; 146:dev156000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Groeneweg L, Hidalgo A, AG N. Emerging roles of infiltrating granulocytes and monocytes in homeostasis. Cell Mol Life Sci 2020; 77:3823–3830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jardine L, Haniffa M. Reconstructing human DC, monocyte and macrophage development in utero using single cell technologies. Mol Immunol 2020; 123:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mass E, Ballesteros I, Farlik M, Halbritter F, Gunther P, Crozet L, Jacome-Galarza CE, Handler K, Klughammer J, Kobayashi Y, Gomez-Perdiguero E, Schultze JL et al. Specification of tissue-resident macrophages during organogenesis. Science 2016; 353:aaf4238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Banaei-Bouchareb L, Gouon-Evans V, Samara-Boustani D, Castellotti MC, Czernichow P, Pollard JW, Polak M. Insulin cell mass is altered in Csf1op/Csf1op macrophage-deficient mice. J Leukoc Biol 2004; 76:359–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gouon-Evans V, Rothenberg ME, Pollard JW. Postnatal mammary gland development requires macrophages and eosinophils. Development 2000; 127:2269–2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Leid J, Carrelha J, Boukarabila H, Epelman S, Jacobsen SE, Lavine KJ. Primitive embryonic macrophages are required for coronary development and maturation. Circ Res 2016; 118:1498–1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lobov IB, Rao S, Carroll TJ, Vallance JE, Ito M, Ondr JK, Kurup S, Glass DA, Patel MS, Shu W, Morrisey EE, McMahon AP et al. WNT7b mediates macrophage-induced programmed cell death in patterning of the vasculature. Nature 2005; 437:417–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak WW, Ahmed A, Szczylik C, Skelly RR. Hematological characterization of congenital osteopetrosis in op/op mouse. Possible mechanism for abnormal macrophage differentiation. J Exp Med 1982; 156:1516–1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Care AS, Diener KR, Jasper MJ, Brown HM, Ingman WV, Robertson SA. Macrophages regulate corpus luteum development during embryo implantation in mice. J Clin Invest 2013; 123:3472–3487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Van der Hoek KH, Maddocks S, Woodhouse CM, van Rooijen N, Robertson SA, Norman RJ. Intrabursal injection of clodronate liposomes causes macrophage depletion and inhibits ovulation in the mouse ovary. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:1059–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. DeFalco T, Potter SJ, Williams AV, Waller B, Kan MJ, Capel B. Macrophages contribute to the Spermatogonial niche in the adult testis. Cell Rep 2015; 12:1107–1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gaytan F, Bellido C, Aguilar E, van Rooijen N. Requirement for testicular macrophages in Leydig cell proliferation and differentiation during prepubertal development in rats. J Reprod Fertil 1994; 102:393–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lokka E, Lintukorpi L, Cisneros-Montalvo S, Makela JA, Tyystjarvi S, Ojasalo V, Gerke H, Toppari J, Rantakari P, Salmi M. Generation, localization and functions of macrophages during the development of testis. Nat Commun 2020; 11:4375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nucera S, Biziato D, De Palma M. The interplay between macrophages and angiogenesis in development, tissue injury and regeneration. Int J Dev Biol 2011; 55:495–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pollard JW. Trophic macrophages in development and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2009; 9:259–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Aziz A, Soucie E, Sarrazin S, Sieweke MH. MafB/c-Maf deficiency enables self-renewal of differentiated functional macrophages. Science 2009; 326:867–871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kusakabe M, Hasegawa K, Hamada M, Nakamura M, Ohsumi T, Suzuki H, Tran MT, Kudo T, Uchida K, Ninomiya H, Chiba S, Takahashi S. c-Maf plays a crucial role for the definitive erythropoiesis that accompanies erythroblastic island formation in the fetal liver. Blood 2011; 118:1374–1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Moriguchi T, Hamada M, Morito N, Terunuma T, Hasegawa K, Zhang C, Yokomizo T, Esaki R, Kuroda E, Yoh K, Kudo T, Nagata M et al. MafB is essential for renal development and F4/80 expression in macrophages. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:5715–5727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nakamura M, Hamada M, Hasegawa K, Kusakabe M, Suzuki H, Greaves DR, Moriguchi T, Kudo T, Takahashi S. c-Maf is essential for the F4/80 expression in macrophages in vivo. Gene 2009; 445:66–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sarrazin S, Mossadegh-Keller N, Fukao T, Aziz A, Mourcin F, Vanhille L, Kelly Modis L, Kastner P, Chan S, Duprez E, Otto C, Sieweke MH. MafB restricts M-CSF-dependent myeloid commitment divisions of hematopoietic stem cells. Cell 2009; 138:300–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Artner I, Blanchi B, Raum JC, Guo M, Kaneko T, Cordes S, Sieweke M, Stein R. MafB is required for islet beta cell maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:3853–3858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhang C, Moriguchi T, Kajihara M, Esaki R, Harada A, Shimohata H, Oishi H, Hamada M, Morito N, Hasegawa K, Kudo T, Engel JD et al. MafA is a key regulator of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:4969–4976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Frohman MA, Martin GR, Cordes SP, Halamek LP, Barsh GS. Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr). Development 1993; 117:925–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. McKay IJ, Muchamore I, Krumlauf R, Maden M, Lumsden A, Lewis J. The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres. Development 1994; 120:2199–2211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kawauchi S, Takahashi S, Nakajima O, Ogino H, Morita M, Nishizawa M, Yasuda K, Yamamoto M. Regulation of lens fiber cell differentiation by transcription factor c-Maf. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:19254–19260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sadl V, Jin F, Yu J, Cui S, Holmyard D, Quaggin S, Barsh G, Cordes S. The mouse Kreisler (Krml1/MafB) segmentation gene is required for differentiation of glomerular visceral epithelial cells. Dev Biol 2002; 249:16–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Li MA, Alls JD, Avancini RM, Koo K, Godt D. The large Maf factor traffic jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:994–1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Shawki HH, Oishi H, Usui T, Kitadate Y, Basha WA, Abdellatif AM, Hasegawa K, Okada R, Mochida K, El-Shemy HA, Muratani M, Ogura A et al. MAFB is dispensable for the fetal testis morphogenesis and the maintenance of spermatogenesis in adult mice. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0190800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Sieweke MH, Tekotte H, Frampton J, Graf T. MafB is an interaction partner and repressor of Ets-1 that inhibits erythroid differentiation. Cell 1996; 85:49–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Pai EL, Vogt D, Clemente-Perez A, McKinsey GL, Cho FS, Hu JS, Wimer M, Paul A, Fazel Darbandi S, Pla R, Nowakowski TJ, Goodrich LV et al. Mafb and c-Maf have prenatal compensatory and postnatal antagonistic roles in cortical interneuron fate and function. Cell Rep 2019; 26:1157, e1155–1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Dlakic M, Grinberg AV, Leonard DA, Kerppola TK. DNA sequence-dependent folding determines the divergence in binding specificities between Maf and other bZIP proteins. EMBO J 2001; 20:828–840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kerppola TK, Curran T. A conserved region adjacent to the basic domain is required for recognition of an extended DNA binding site by Maf/Nrl family proteins. Oncogene 1994; 9:3149–3158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Takeuchi T, Kudo T, Ogata K, Hamada M, Nakamura M, Kito K, Abe Y, Ueda N, Yamamoto M, Engel JD, Takahashi S. Neither MafA/L-Maf nor MafB is essential for lens development in mice. Genes Cells 2009; 14:941–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kim JI, Li T, Ho IC, Grusby MJ, Glimcher LH. Requirement for the c-Maf transcription factor in crystallin gene regulation and lens development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:3781–3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Stadtfeld M, Graf T. Assessing the role of hematopoietic plasticity for endothelial and hepatocyte development by non-invasive lineage tracing. Development 2005; 132:203–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, Forster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res 1999; 8:265–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Deng L, Zhou JF, Sellers RS, Li JF, Nguyen AV, Wang Y, Orlofsky A, Liu Q, Hume DA, Pollard JW, Augenlicht L, Lin EY. A novel mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease links mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent hyperproliferation of colonic epithelium to inflammation-associated tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol 2010; 176:952–967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, Lein ES, Zeng H. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13:133–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Jung S, Aliberti J, Graemmel P, Sunshine MJ, Kreutzberg GW, Sher A, Littman DR. Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:4106–4114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Satpathy AT, Briseno CG, Lee JS, Ng D, Manieri NA, Kc W, Wu X, Thomas SR, Lee WL, Turkoz M, McDonald KG, Meredith MM et al. Notch2-dependent classical dendritic cells orchestrate intestinal immunity to attaching-and-effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat Immunol 2013; 14:937–948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Yao HH, DiNapoli L, Capel B. Meiotic germ cells antagonize mesonephric cell migration and testis cord formation in mouse gonads. Development 2003; 130:5895–5902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Potter SJ, DeFalco T. Using ex vivo upright droplet cultures of whole fetal organs to study developmental processes during mouse organogenesis. J Vis Exp 2015; e53262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Jameson SA, Natarajan A, Cool J, DeFalco T, Maatouk DM, Mork L, Munger SC, Capel B. Temporal transcriptional profiling of somatic and germ cells reveals biased lineage priming of sexual fate in the fetal mouse gonad. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1002575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Brennan J, Karl J, Capel B. Divergent vascular mechanisms downstream of Sry establish the arterial system in the XY gonad. Dev Biol 2002; 244:418–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Bullejos M, Koopman P. Germ cells enter meiosis in a rostro-caudal wave during development of the mouse ovary. Mol Reprod Dev 2004; 68:422–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Coveney D, Cool J, Oliver T, Capel B. Four-dimensional analysis of vascularization during primary development of an organ, the gonad. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:7212–7217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Springer T, Galfre G, Secher DS, Milstein C. Mac-1: a macrophage differentiation antigen identified by monoclonal antibody. Eur J Immunol 1979; 9:301–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Brennan J, Tilmann C, Capel B. Pdgfr-alpha mediates testis cord organization and fetal Leydig cell development in the XY gonad. Genes Dev 2003; 17:800–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Bitgood MJ, Shen L, McMahon AP. Sertoli cell signaling by desert hedgehog regulates the male germline. Curr Biol 1996; 6:298–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Yao HH, Whoriskey W, Capel B. Desert hedgehog/patched 1 signaling specifies fetal Leydig cell fate in testis organogenesis. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1433–1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Tsuchiya M, Misaka R, Nitta K, Tsuchiya K. Transcriptional factors, Mafs and their biological roles. World J Diabetes 2015; 6:175–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Yang Y, Cvekl A. Large Maf transcription factors: cousins of AP-1 proteins and important regulators of cellular differentiation. Einstein J Biol Med 2007; 23:2–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sieweke MH, Tekotte H, Frampton J, Graf T. MafB represses erythroid genes and differentiation through direct interaction with c-Ets-1. Leukemia 1997; 11:486–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Gemelli C, Montanari M, Tenedini E, Zanocco Marani T, Vignudelli T, Siena M, Zini R, Salati S, Tagliafico E, Manfredini R, Grande A, Ferrari S. Virally mediated MafB transduction induces the monocyte commitment of human CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13:1686–1696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Kelly LM, Englmeier U, Lafon I, Sieweke MH, Graf T. MafB is an inducer of monocytic differentiation. EMBO J 2000; 19:1987–1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Hegde SP, Zhao J, Ashmun RA, Shapiro LH. c-Maf induces monocytic differentiation and apoptosis in bipotent myeloid progenitors. Blood 1999; 94:1578–1589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Bauquet AT, Jin H, Paterson AM, Mitsdoerffer M, Ho IC, Sharpe AH, Kuchroo VK. The costimulatory molecule ICOS regulates the expression of c-Maf and IL-21 in the development of follicular T helper cells and TH-17 cells. Nat Immunol 2009; 10:167–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Ho IC, Hodge MR, Rooney JW, Glimcher LH. The proto-oncogene c-maf is responsible for tissue-specific expression of interleukin-4. Cell 1996; 85:973–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Azizoglu DB, Cleaver O. Blood vessel crosstalk during organogenesis-focus on pancreas and endothelial cells. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2016; 5:598–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Lammert E, Cleaver O, Melton D. Induction of pancreatic differentiation by signals from blood vessels. Science 2001; 294:564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Matsumoto K, Yoshitomi H, Rossant J, Zaret KS. Liver organogenesis promoted by endothelial cells prior to vascular function. Science 2001; 294:559–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Kao DI, Lacko LA, Ding BS, Huang C, Phung K, Gu G, Rafii S, Stuhlmann H, Chen S. Endothelial cells control pancreatic cell fate at defined stages through EGFL7 signaling. Stem Cell Reports 2015; 4:181–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Pan P, Ma F, Wu K, Yu Y, Li Y, Li Z, Chen X, Huang T, Wang Y, Ge RS. Maternal exposure to zearalenone in masculinization window affects the fetal Leydig cell development in rat male fetus. Environ Pollut 2020; 263:114357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zimmermann S, Schottler P, Engel W, Adham IM. Mouse Leydig insulin-like (Ley I-L) gene: structure and expression during testis and ovary development. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 47:30–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ogle ME, Segar CE, Sridhar S, Botchwey EA. Monocytes and macrophages in tissue repair: implications for immunoregenerative biomaterial design. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2016; 241:1084–1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Ahn GO, Tseng D, Liao CH, Dorie MJ, Czechowicz A, Brown JM. Inhibition of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) enhances tumor response to radiation by reducing myeloid cell recruitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:8363–8368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. De Palma M, Venneri MA, Galli R, Sergi Sergi L, Politi LS, Sampaolesi M, Naldini L. Tie2 identifies a hematopoietic lineage of proangiogenic monocytes required for tumor vessel formation and a mesenchymal population of pericyte progenitors. Cancer Cell 2005; 8:211–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Fagerholm SC, Varis M, Stefanidakis M, Hilden TJ, Gahmberg CG. Alpha-chain phosphorylation of the human leukocyte CD11b/CD18 (Mac-1) integrin is pivotal for integrin activation to bind ICAMs and leukocyte extravasation. Blood 2006; 108:3379–3386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Melgar-Lesmes P, Edelman ER. Monocyte-endothelial cell interactions in the regulation of vascular sprouting and liver regeneration in mouse. J Hepatol 2015; 63:917–925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Cignini P, Giorlandino C, Padula F, Dugo N, Cafa EV, Spata A. Epidemiology and risk factors of amniotic band syndrome, or ADAM sequence. J Prenat Med 2012; 6:59–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Smith SJ, Kotecha S, Towers N, Mohun TJ. Targeted cell-ablation in Xenopus embryos using the conditional, toxic viral protein M2(H37A). Dev Dyn 2007; 236:2159–2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Olofsson B, Page DT. Condensation of the central nervous system in embryonic Drosophila is inhibited by blocking hemocyte migration or neural activity. Dev Biol 2005; 279:233–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Sears HC, Kennedy CJ, Garrity PA. Macrophage-mediated corpse engulfment is required for normal Drosophila CNS morphogenesis. Development 2003; 130:3557–3565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ayyaz A, Li H, Jasper H. Haemocytes control stem cell activity in the Drosophila intestine. Nat Cell Biol 2015; 17:736–748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Godwin JW, Pinto AR, Rosenthal NA. Macrophages are required for adult salamander limb regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:9415–9420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Petrie TA, Strand NS, Yang CT, Rabinowitz JS, Moon RT. Macrophages modulate adult zebrafish tail fin regeneration. Development 2014; 141:2581–2591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Sanz-Morejon A, Garcia-Redondo AB, Reuter H, Marques IJ, Bates T, Galardi-Castilla M, Grosse A, Manig S, Langa X, Ernst A, Piragyte I, Botos MA et al. Wilms tumor 1b expression defines a pro-regenerative macrophage subtype and is required for organ regeneration in the zebrafish. Cell Rep 2019; 28:1296, e1296–1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Tsarouchas TM, Wehner D, Cavone L, Munir T, Keatinge M, Lambertus M, Underhill A, Barrett T, Kassapis E, Ogryzko N, Feng Y, van Ham TJ et al. Dynamic control of proinflammatory cytokines Il-1beta and Tnf-alpha by macrophages in zebrafish spinal cord regeneration. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Simoes FC, Cahill TJ, Kenyon A, Gavriouchkina D, Vieira JM, Sun X, Pezzolla D, Ravaud C, Masmanian E, Weinberger M, Mayes S, Lemieux ME et al. Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair. Nat Commun 2020; 11:600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Lai SL, Marin-Juez R, Moura PL, Kuenne C, Lai JKH, Tsedeke AT, Guenther S, Looso M, Stainier DY. Reciprocal analyses in zebrafish and medaka reveal that harnessing the immune response promotes cardiac regeneration. Elife 2017; 6:e25605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw data associated with microarray transcriptome analyses are publicly available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE41715. Other data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.