Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2021 Aug 11;71(8):004945. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004945

Serpentinimonas gen. nov., Serpentinimonas raichei sp. nov., Serpentinimonas barnesii sp. nov. and Serpentinimonas maccroryi sp. nov., hyperalkaliphilic and facultative autotrophic bacteria isolated from terrestrial serpentinizing springs

Lina J Bird 1,2, J Gijs Kuenen 2,3, Magdalena R Osburn 4, Naotaka Tomioka 5, Shun’ichi Ishii 5,6, Casey Barr 2, Kenneth H Nealson 2, Shino Suzuki 5,6,7,*
PMCID: PMC8513617  PMID: 34379584

Abstract

Three highly alkaliphilic bacterial strains designated as A1T, H1T and B1T were isolated from two highly alkaline springs at The Cedars, a terrestrial serpentinizing site. Cells from all strains were motile, Gram-negative and rod-shaped. Strains A1T, H1T and B1T were mesophilic (optimum, 30 °C), highly alkaliphilic (optimum, pH 11) and facultatively autotrophic. Major cellular fatty acids were saturated and monounsaturated hexadecenoic and octadecanoic acids. The genome size of strains A1T, H1T and B1T was 2 574 013, 2 475 906 and 2 623 236 bp, and the G+C content was 66.0, 66.2 and 66.1 mol%, respectively. Analysis of the 16S rRNA genes showed the highest similarity to the genera Malikia (95.1–96.4 %), Macromonas (93.0–93.6 %) and Hydrogenophaga (93.0–96.6 %) in the family Comamonadaceae . Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and phylogenomic analysis based on core gene sequences revealed that the isolated strains diverged from the related species, forming a distinct branch. Average amino acid identity values of strains A1T, H1T and B1T against the genomes of related members in this family were below 67 %, which is below the suggested threshold for genera boundaries. Average nucleotide identity by blast values and digital DNA–DNA hybridization among the three strains were below 92.0 and 46.6 % respectively, which are below the suggested thresholds for species boundaries. Based on phylogenetic, genomic and phenotypic characterization, we propose Serpentinimonas gen. nov., Serpentinimonas raichei sp. nov. (type strain A1T=NBRC 111848T=DSM 103917T), Serpentinimonas barnesii sp. nov. (type strain H1T= NBRC 111849T=DSM 103920T) and Serpentinimonas maccroryi sp. nov. (type strain B1T=NBRC 111850T=DSM 103919T) belonging to the family Comamonadaceae . We have designated Serpentinimonas raichei the type species for the genus because it is the dominant species in The Cedars springs.

Keywords: alkaliphile, autotrophic growth, Serpentinization, Serpentinomonas/Serpentinimonas


The family Comamonadaceae , which belongs to the class Betaproteobacteria , was first described by Willems et al. [1] and now contains at least 50 genera. Most members of this family were isolated from soil, freshwater, activated sludge, hot springs and pond water [2–8]. These genera harbour a phenotypic diversity that includes aerobic organotrophs [2], anaerobic denitrifiers [5, 9], Fe3+-reducing bacteria [10], hydrogen oxidizers [11], and phosphate-accumulating and -removing bacteria [6, 12], and cyclohexane-degrading bacteria [13]. In this study, we characterize three hyper-alkaliphilic strains (A1T, H1T and B1T) isolated from an active terrestrial serpentinization site that represents an unusual microbial habitat, as the fluids are highly alkaline, enriched in calcium, low in sodium and have abundant dissolved hydrogen gas [14–16]. Given that relatives of strains A1T, H1T and B1T were dominant in various terrestrial active serpentinizing sites, these strains are likely relevant to the geochemistry of terrestrial serpentinization sites. We expect future studies on the ecology, physiology, biochemistry and molecular genetics of these organisms to contribute to a better understanding of life under these extremely alkaline conditions.

The samples were collected from Barnes Spring 1 (BS1) and Barnes Spring 5 (BS5; elevation 282 m, N: 38° 37.282′, W: 123° 07.987′) located at The Cedars serpentinization site in northern California as described previously [17, 18]. Briefly, samples of pre-autoclaved glass beads (0.11 mm diameter ballotini beads) that were incubated in situ in the BS1 pool at Eh of around −250 mV for 1 week and then collected for the isolation of strains A1T and B1T. Strain H1T was isolated from a sample of pool BS5 water. The samples were inoculated in sterile Cedars standard medium (CSM) 1 containing 0.05 mm Na2SO4, 0.378 mm NH4Cl, 0.05 mm MgCl2, 0.06 mm K2HPO4, 10 mm CABS or Na2CO3/NaHCO3, 2 mm CaCO3 (as suspension), 4 mm sodium acetate, 10 ml l−1 of ATCC trace mineral supplement and 10 ml l−1 of ATCC vitamin solution. The pH was adjusted to pH 10.5–11.2 using NaOH. Gas phase of the media in stoppered serum vials was replaced with a mixture of O2/H2/N2/Ar (2.6 : 50 : 9.8 : 37.6 by volume at 1 atm). After incubation for 2 weeks at 16–18 °C, the sample suspension was streaked on CSM1 agar plates containing CSM1 with 2 % prewashed noble (Difco) or Korean (Daishin) agar at pH 10.5, and incubated under the same gas mixture. Streaked plates were incubated at 18 °C for 2 weeks.

Creamy/opaque colonies of strains A1T, B1T and H1T were purified after repeatedly culturing on the CSM1 agar plates at 18 °C for 2 weeks. Colonies of strains A1T and B1T were suspended in glycerol diluted by CSM1 (20 % v/v) and stored at −80 °C. Strain H1T purified on the plate was incubated at 16 °C in liquid CSM1 and concentrated by centrifugation and then stored in glycerol diluted by CSM1 (20 % v/v) at −80 °C.

DNA extraction from the strains and determination of genome sequences have been described previously [19]. The complete genomes of two strains, A1T and B1T, and the draft genome of strain H1T have been reported previously [19]. The 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequences of the strains were retrieved from the genome sequences and aligned with 24 reference sequences from public databases using the program muscle [20]. Strains A1T, H1T and B1T were closely related to the type species of three genera including Malikia granosa P1T (95.3, 96.4, 96.3 % 16S rRNA gene sequence identities, respectively), Macromonas bipunctata DSM 12705T (93.0, 93.5, 93.6 %) and Hydrogenophaga flava DSM 619T (95.3, 96.3, 96.6 %). Among the three strains, 16S rRNA gene sequence identity between strains A1T and H1T was 98.9 %, between strains A1T and B1T it was 97.6%, and between strains B1T and H1T it was 98.7 %.

A phylogenetic tree was created by using the maximum-likelihood method with RaxML [21]. The robustness of furcated branches was supported by bootstrap values (1000 replicates) (Fig. 1). The topology was further confirmed by neighbour-joining. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA genes revealed that strains A1T, H1T and B1T belong to the family Comamonadaceae in the order Burkholderiales . The three isolates formed a distinct branch separate from other members of Comamonadaceae with the bootstrap value of 100 (Fig. 1). The closest relatives of the three isolates were the genera Macromonas [4], Malikia [6] and Hydrogenophaga [11].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic relationship derived from 16S rRNA gene sequences between strains A1T, B1T and H1T and other related taxa of the family Comamonadaceae . The tree was reconstructed using the maximum-likelihood method based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Bootstrap values greater than 80 % are shown at branch points. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.

The genome sizes of strains A1T, H1T and B1T were 2 574 013, 2 475 906 and 2 623 236 bp, and the G+C contents were 66.0, 66.2 and 66.1 mol%, respectively. CheckM analysis showed that the genome completeness of the strains was over 99 % [22]. Thirty conserved marker genes were extracted from the 14 genomes in the family Comamonadaceae and Burkholderia cepacia in the family Burkholderiaceae , and a concatenated alignment (5823–6689 amino acids) was generated in the CheckM platform [23]. A maximum-likelihood phylogenomic tree based on the concatenated alignment was generated by using mega X [24] and the JTT matrix-based model with 100 resamples. This phylogenomic tree indicated that strains A1T, H1T and B1T are deeply branching among those of closely related genera, as seen in the tree based on 16S rRNA genes (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phylogenomic relationship based on concatenated alignment of amino acid sequences between strains A1T, B1T and H1T and other related taxa of the family Comamonadaceae . The tree was reconstructed using the maximum-likelihood method based on concatenated alignment of amino acid sequences of 30 conserved marker genes coded in the genomes. Bootstrap values are shown at branch points.

Amino acid identity (AAI) values of the strains against the genomes of closely related genera in the family Comamonadaceae were obtained using the Kostas lab AAI calculator web server (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/aai/) [23]. In the past, AAI values between 60–80 % were taken as thresholds for distinguishing genera [25, 26]. However, recent studies of new genus descriptions in the family Comamonadaceae and other phylum proposed that the threshold for genera boundaries should be 70 % for AAI [8, 27]. The three isolated strains showed the highest AAI values to genus Macromonas , with a value of 67 %. The next highest AAI values were 65–66 % with the genus Malikia , while AAI values with the genus Hydrogenophaga were 64–65 % (Table 1). All the AAI values were lower than the proposed genus boundary threshold [27], making the strains A1T, H1T and B1T distinct from previously described genera.

Table 1.

AAI, ANIb and dDDH results for the three strains with genera Macromonas , Malikia and Hydrogenophaga

Top, AAI values from the genome-based distance matrix calculator. Bold letters are above genus cut-off values (70 %). Bottom, ANIb values from JSpeciesWS and dDDH values derived from the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (in parentheses). Bold letters are above species cut-off values (70 % for dDDH and 96 % for ANIb).

A1T

H1T

B1T

Macromonas bipunctata

Malikia granosa

Malikia spinosa

Hydrogenophaga flava

Hydrogenophaga psuedoflava

Hydrogenophaga taeniospiralis

Hydrogenophagasp. PBC

Hydrogenophaga intermedia

Hydrogenophagasp. RAC07

Hydrogenophagasp. Root209

Hydrogenophaga palleronii

Total length (bp)

G+C content (mol%)

No. of sccafold

Refseq accession no.

A1T

*

93

85

67

65

65

65

65

65

64

64

65

64

65

2 574 013

66.0

1

GCF_000828895.1

H1T

92.0 (46.6)

*

85

67

66

66

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

2 475 906

66.2

93

GCF_000696225.1

B1T

85.3 (29.6)

85.0 (28.8)

*

67

65

65

64

65

65

64

64

64

64

64

2 623 236

66.1

2

GCF_000828915.1

Macromonas bipunctata

75.1 (20.5)

75.3 (20.6)

75.3 (20.5)

*

71

71

66

67

66

65

65

66

66

66

2 699 505

63.8

115

GCF_002837135.1

Malikia granosa

74.4 (20.3)

74.6 (20.5)

74.7 (20.9)

77.7 (22.4)

*

90

66

66

66

64

64

65

65

65

3 832 968

66.8

162

GCF_002980595.1

Malikia spinosa

74.4 (20.2)

74.4 (20.2)

74.6 (20.8)

77.5 (22.4)

89.8 (40.3)

*

65

66

65

63

64

65

64

65

3 778 566

65.6

103

GCF_002980625.1

Hydrogenophaga flava

73.2 (19.8)

73.2 (19.9)

73.4 (19.9)

75.6 (21.3)

75.1 (21.3)

74.8 (21.1)

*

94

77

69

69

74

73

72

5 161 958

67.1

82

GCF_001571145.1

Hydrogenophaga psuedoflava

73.3 (19.6)

73.5(19.8)

73.5(20.2)

75.7(21.2)

75.6(21.2)

75.2(21.1)

92.5(50.7)

*

78

70

70

74

74

73

4 505 692

67.3

43

GCF_001592285.1

Hydrogenophaga taeniospiralis

73.5 (19.9)

73.6(20.2)

73.6(20.4)

75.9(21.8)

75.1(21.8)

74.9(21.5)

80.4(24.5)

80.2(24.3)

*

70

70

76

76

74

5 275 331

66.7

53

GCF_001592305.1

Hydrogenophagasp. PBC

73.5 (20.1)

73.6 (20.3)

74.0 (20.8)

75.5 (20.6)

74.6 (20.9)

74.2 (20.7)

76.5 (21.4)

76.7 (21.9)

77.1 (22.2)

*

100

74

73

74

5 144 529

68.4

1

GCF_000263795.2

Hydrogenophaga intermedia

73.4 (20.1)

73.5 (20.2)

73.8 (20.5)

75.4 (20.6)

74.3 (20.8)

74.3 (20.8)

76.6 (21.4)

76.8 (21.8)

77.2 (22.3)

99.7(99.2)

*

74

73

73

5 288 135

68.4

124

GCF_000723405.1

Hydrogenophagasp. RAC07

73.0 (19.8)

73.2 (20.1)

73.2 (20.3)

75.4 (20.8)

74.3 (20.6)

74.2 (20.9)

77.5 (21.8)

77.5 (21.9)

79.5 (24.1)

77.6 (21.5)

77.6 (21.5)

*

89

79

4 674 680

65.5

1

GCF_001713375.1

Hydrogenophagasp. Root209

72.8 (19.4)

73.1 (19.6)

73.0 (19.9)

75.3 (20.7)

74.4 (21.4)

73.9 (20.6)

77.1 (21.8)

77.2 (22.0)

79.2 (24.1)

77.1 (21.8)

77.0 (21.7)

86.5 (34.2)

*

79

5 307 743

65.1

34

GCF_001428625.1

Hydrogenophaga palleronii

73.5 (20.0)

73.7 (19.9)

73.7 (20.6)

75.9 (21.2)

74.8 (21.2)

74.6 (21.0)

77.6 (22.5)

77.9 (22.7)

79.4 (24.1)

78.2 (22.6)

78.1 (22.6)

80.7 (25.3)

80.5 (25.3)

*

4 841 746

66.8

110

GCF_001571225.1

Average nucleotide identity by blast (ANIb) values and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) were calculated by using JSpecies [28] and the DSMZ Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator platform [29], respectively. The ANIb and dDDH values among the three isolated strains were 85.0–92.0 % and 28.8–46.6 %, respectively (Table 1), which are lower than the delineation of species boundaries (ANIb <95 % and dDDH <70 %) [30].

The purified strains were initially grown and tested on CSM2, which contains 0.1 mm Na2SO4, 0.755 mm NH4Cl, 0.1 mm MgCl2, 0.23 mm K2HPO4, 20 mm CaCO3 (as suspension), 15 mm CAPS buffer (pH 11), 10 ml l−1 ATCC trace mineral supplement and 10 ml l−1 ATCC vitamin solution. The portion for the liquid and gas phase was approximately 35 : 65. The gas composition was H2/N2/air 35 : 35 : 30, the temperature for the cultivations is at 30 °C. Further optimization led to CSM3, which contained 0.2 mm Na2SO4, 1.5 mm NH4Cl, 0.199 mm MgCl2, 0.23 mm K2HPO4, 5 mm CaCl2, 10 ml l−1 ATCC vitamin solution, 10 ml l−1 ATCC mineral solution and 15 mm CAPS buffer (pH 11) and the gas composition was H2/N2/air 35 : 35 : 30 for autotrophic growth and N2/air 75 : 30 for heterotrophic growth. Calcium, phosphate, vitamins and minerals were added as separate filter-sterilized solutions after autoclaving the basal salt solution. For autotrophic growth, the CaCl2 in CSM3 was replaced with 20 mm CaCO3, while 3 mm acetate was used for routine heterotrophic growth. Substrate utilization were tested in CMS2. pH range and optimum pH were tested in both CSM2 and CSM3. Growth rate determination, antibiotic sensitivity, catalase assay, Gram staining, light microscopy, TEM and SEM, cytochrome analysis, and lipid analysis were performed in CSM3. When testing utilization of organic substrates, a substrate was added to the CSM2 and CSM3. For testing the anaerobic growth, medium was thoroughly flushed with N2. The results of substrate utilization are shown in Table 2. All three strains were able to grow autotrophically using hydrogen, calcium carbonate and oxygen or heterotrophically on a variety of electron donors, although strain A1T grew poorly in the absence of hydrogen. None of the strains could utilize sulphate, iron (III) hydroxide, or iron (II/III) oxide as electron acceptors. All strains grew best aerobically on sub-atmospheric levels of oxygen (1–4 % v/v). During mixotrophic growth on hydrogen and acetate, the minimum doubling time was 10 h for strain A1T, 12.5 h for strain H1T and 8.5 h for strain B1T, respectively.

Table 2.

Differentiating characteristics of strains A1T, H1T and B1T from closely related type strains in the family Comamonadaceae

Strains: 1, A1T (data from this study and [19]); 2, H1T (data from this study and [19]); 3, B1T (data from this study and [19]); 4, Malikia granosa P1T [6]; 5, Hydrogenophaga flava DSM 619T [11, 40]; 6, Hydrogenophaga palleronii DSM 63T [11, 40, 41]; 7, Macromonas bipunctata DSM 12705T [6]. +, Positive; −, negative; w, weak positive; nt, not tested or not available in the literature

Characteristics

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Isolation source

Serpentinized water

Serpentinized water

Serpentinized water

Activated sludge

Mud

Soil and water

Slime

Colony colour

Opaque cream

Opaque cream

Opaque cream

Cream white

nd

Pale yellow

nd

Temperature for growth (°C)

18–37

18–37

18–37

<40

<42

<42

nd

Optimum temperature for growth (°C)

26–30

26–30

26–30

35

30

30

28

pH range for growth

10.0–11.5

9.0–12.0

9.5–12.5

nd

nd

nd

nd

Optimum pH for growth

11

11

11

6.5–7.0

7.2

7.2

7.2–7.4

NaCl tolerance range (g l−1)

0–0.5

0–0.5

0–0.5

0-10

nd

nd

nd

Flagella

Polar

Polar

Polar

Polar

Polar

Polar

Polar tuft

Polyhydroxyalkanoate accumulation

+

+

+

+

+

+

Utilization of:

 H2

+

+

w

+

+

 Thiosulfate

+

nt

+

 Formate

w

w

w

+

+

 Acetate

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

 Propionate

nt

nt

nt

nt

 Butyrate

w

w

+

nt

w

nt

nt

dl-Lactate

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

 Pyruvate

+

nt

+

+

+

nt

nt

 Glucose

+

+

+

+

+

 Glutamate

nt

nt

+

+

nt

 Glycerol

nt

+

+

 Cyclohexane

+

w

nt

nt

nt

nt

 Fumarate

+

nt

+

+

+

+

Electron acceptors

Oxygen

thiosulfate

Oxygen

nitrate

Oxygen

nitrate

Oxygen

nitrate

Oxygen

nitrate

Oxygen

Oxygen

Fermentation by glucose

w

w

Antibiotic sensitivity was tested both on solid and in liquid medium for kanamycin at 50 µg ml−1 and for gentamycin at 10 µg ml−1. Growth on plates was assessed visually, while growth in liquid medium was monitored via protein concentrations using the Lowry assay [31]. All three strains were sensitive to both kanamycin and gentamycin, showing no growth on plates or in liquid medium.

Fatty acid content for strains A1T and B1T were analysed from acetate grown chemostat cultures. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation and stored at −20 °C. Cells for H1T were grown in batch culture on acetate and harvested in the same way. Membrane lipids were extracted via a modified Bligh–Dyer protocol [32, 33] followed by saponification with 0.5 M NaOH at 70 °C for 4 h. Extracts were separated into hydrocarbon and acid fractions using solid phase extraction columns with an aminopropyl stationary phase (Supelco). Fatty acids were analysed as methyl ester derivatives. Double bond positions were determined by derivatization to dimethyl disulfide adducts following the methods of Shibamoto et al. [34]. Fatty acid derivatives and hydrocarbons were identified via GC-MS(Thermo Fisher Trace GC and DSQ quadrupole mass spectrometer) and quantified using a coupled flame-ionizing detector relative to an internal standard [35]. Major fatty acid constituents were consistent between strains, with strain A1T containing C16 : 0 (3.3 %), C16:1ω7c (50.6 %), C18 : 0 (0.4 %) and C18:1ω7 (21.0 %), strain H1T containing C16 : 0 (27.8 %), C16:1ω7c (7.1 %), C18 : 0 (5.9 %) and C18:1ω7c (22.6 %), and strain B1T containing C16 : 0 (12.9 %), C16:1ω7c (34.3 %), C18 : 0 (3.1 %) and C18:1ω7c (20.9 %). The fatty acid profiles were determined from a single set of cultures with one replicate of each culture. The major fatty acid constituents of strains A1T, H1T and B1T (C16 : 0, C16:1ω7c and C18:1ω7c) are similar to those of the Malikia granosa P1T, Hydrogenophaga flava DSM 619T, and Hydrogenophaga palleronii DSM 63T, but different from those of Macromonas bipunctata DSM 12705T (Table 3). Interestingly, an unusual monosaturated nonadecanoic acid (omega 6) was found in all strains at low levels (A1T 0.9 %, H1T, 0.3 %, B1T 1.1 %) Further, a series of saturated and monounsaturated even-chain linear hydrocarbons C16 to C28 was detected in all strains and strains A1T and H1T additionally contained squalene. There are some differences in the ratio of major fatty acid composition of strains A1T, H1T and B1T, especially in ratio of C16 : 0, C16:1ω7c and C18 : 0. The differences enable to discriminate the strains. The respiratory quinone of strains A1T, H1T and B1T was ubiquinone, which was deduced from the coded genes of the respective genomes (kegg module M00117).

Table 3.

Major fatty acids (%) of strains A1T, H1T, B1T and their closely related type strains

Strains: 1, A1T (data from this study and [19]); 2, H1T (data from this study and [19]); 3, B1T (data from this study and [19]); 4, Malikia granosa P1T [6]; 5, Hydrogenophaga flava DSM 619T [11, 40]; 6, Hydrogenophaga palleronii DSM 63T [11, 40, 41]; 7, Macromonas bipunctata DSM 12705T [6]. For unsaturated fatty acids, the position of the double bond is located by counting from methyl (ω) end of the carbon chain. nd, Not detected.

Fatty acid

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Saturated:

 C14 : 0

nd

nd

nd

1.4

2.8

0.4

2.4

 C15 : 0

nd

nd

nd

nd

0.4

nd

1.2

 C16 : 0

3.3

27.8

12.9

14.7

19.4

31.6

5.3

 C17 : 0

nd

nd

nd

nd

1.3

17.8

0.8

 C18 : 0

0.4

5.9

3.1

nd

1.5

0.6

nd

Unsaturated:

 C15 : 1  ω6c

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

0.1

0.9

 C16 : 1  ω5c

nd

nd

nd

3.2

nd*

nd

1.1

 C16 : 1  ω7c

50.6

7.1

34.3

71.0

51.7*

25.0†

62.5

 C17 : 1  ω6c

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

12.5

 C17 : 1  ω8c

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

nd

1.1

 C18 : 1  ω7c

21.0

22.6

20.9

6.3

13.7*

19.5‡

11.9

 C19 : 1  ω6c

0.9

0.3

1.1

nd

nd

nd

nd

Hydroxy:

 C8 : 0 3-OH

nd

nd

nd

nd

1.2

3.8

0.2

 C10 : 0 3-OH

nd

nd

nd

nd

2.9

nd

nd

Cyclo propane:

 C17:0 cyc

nd

nd

nd

nd

<0.1

17.2

nd

*Summed feature comprised C16 : 1 or C18 : 1.

†Summed feature comprised C16 : 1 ω6c and/or C16 : 1 ω7c.

‡Summed feature comprised C18 : 1 ω6c and C18 : 1 ω7c.

Phase contrast images were taken using a confocal microscope (LSM8000, Zeiss) equipped with an Orca-Flach 4.0 camera (Zeiss). Scanning electron microscopy images were taken with JSM-7001 apparatus (jeol). For transmission electron microscopy, the specimens negatively strained by EM stainer (Nisshin EM) for 5 min. Cells were observed under a transmission electron microscope (JEM-ARM200F, jeol) operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. These microscopic analyses revealed that the cell of strains A1T, H1T and B1T features rod-shaped, motile cells 1–3 µm long, with a single polar flagellum (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Microscopic observation of strain A1T. (a) Phase contrast microscopy image of strain A1T grown on acetate and oxygen. The three strains are visually indistinguishable. (b) SEM image of strain A1T on carbon filter paper. Morphologies are indistinguishable for the three strains. (c) TEM image of strain A1T grown on acetate with oxygen.

Gram stain and catalase activity analyses revealed that all three strains were gram negative and catalase positive. The cytochromes were examined by sonicating whole cells, centrifuging at 10 000 g for 5 min, and performing a wavelength scan from 350 nm to 700 nm with a UV-Vis spectrometer (UV2600, Shimadzu). A difference spectrum was collected from air oxidized vs. dithionite reduced cell lysate. The difference spectrum showed cytochrome peaks with the maximum readings at 418–421 nm, and 550–553 nm.

Comparison of characteristics of the strains A1T, H1T and B1T with the related genera in the family Comamonadaceae are summarized in Table 2. While genera in the family Comamonadaceae harbour a remarkable phenotypic diversity, the strains A1T, H1T and B1T also share the phenotypic similarity with other genera in this family. For instance, genus Hydrogenophaga and strains A1T, H1T and B1T have a capability of autotrophic growth [11] and the genera Hydrogenophaga , Malika and strains A1T, H1T and B1T accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoate [6]. A notable physiological feature of strains A1T, H1T and B1T is the extremely high pH for the optimum growth (pH 11), which distinguishes it from closely related members, This high pH growth was confirmed in a continuous flow chemostat (BioFlo) at constant pH for strains A1T and B1T; both strains showed growth at pH 11 under these conditions, and B1 continued to grow when the pH was shifted to pH 012. The optimum pH of 11 is the highest value for any prokaryote reported so far [36]. Several species in the family Comamonadaceae were reported as alkali tolerant or alkaliphilic, which include Ramlibacter alkalitolerans [37] and Melaminivora alkalimesophila [38] with the optimum pH 7.0 and 9.5, respectively. Genome size of strains A1T, H1T and B1T was smaller than those of the closely related strains of the family Comamonadaceae , while the G+C content was similar to those. Utilization of organic and inorganic substrates, as well the ability to grow on alternative electron acceptors, was variable both between the strains and in the most closely related genera. Genomic comparison of the carbon utilization genes among the three strains showed that only strain A1T encodes carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, benzoyl-CoA-oxygenase and phenylacetate-CoA oxygenase, as described previously [19]. Regarding electron acceptor utilization, all three genomes encode genes for oxygen respiration, while only, H1T and B1T encode genes for nitrate reductase, which agrees with the experimental results (the observed ability to grow anaerobically with nitrate).

High sequence diversity of the strains A1T, H1T and B1T from members of family Comamonadaceae are represented in the phylogenetic dendrograms based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. 1) and concatenation of 30 conserved marker genes (Fig. 2). These relationships are also supported by the low AAI values as shown in Table 1. Thus, strains A1T, H1T and B1T merit recognition as representative of a novel genus in the family Comamonadaceae . Further, due to the low values of ANIb, dDDH and 16S rRNA gene identity, strains A1T, H1T and B1T each represent distinct species in this novel genus. Based on above findings, we propose that strains A1T, H1T and B1T represent three novel species in a new genus within the family Comamonadaceae .

Description of Serpentinimonas gen. nov.

Serpentinimonas (Ser.pen.ti.ni.mo′nas. N.L. neut. n. serpentinum a dark green mineral produced from reaction of olivine with water; L. fem n. monas a shape, a monad; N.L. fem. n. Serpentinimonas, a monad from a serpentinizing site.).

Cells are Gram-stain-negative, rod shaped, motile cells 1–3 µm long, with a single polar flagellum. Organisms in this genus form small light-coloured (opaque creamy) colonies on plates (<1 mm). Optimum growth occurs at 30 °C at pH 11. Preferred media is without NaCl. Cells are catalase positive and sensitive to the antibiotics, kanamycin (50 µg ml−1) and gentamicin (10 µg ml−1). Fatty acid profiles are simple, containing primarily C16 : 0, C16:1ω7c, C18:0, C18:1ω7c and C19:1ω6c fatty acids as well as linear hydrocarbons. Respiratory quinone was ubiquinone. Phylogenetically, the genus is a member of the Comamonadaceae . Although we proposed the novel strains as the new genus candidatus ‘Serpentinomonas’ in our previous publication, the genus name is inappropriate as Latin name, based on the publication written by H.G. Trüper [39]. Therefore, here we propose the new genus name as Serpentinimonas. The type species is Serpentinimonas raichei.

Description of Serpentinimonas raichei sp. nov.

Serpentinimonas raichei (rai′che.i. N.L. gen. n. raichei, named after R. Raiche, one of the owners of The Cedars nature reserve).

In addition to the characteristics given above in the genus description, S. raichei has the characteristics described below. Growth occurs at 18–37 °C and pH 10.0–11.5 with optimal growth at 30 °C and pH 11.0. NaCl ranges from 0 to 0.5 g l−1. The DNA base composition of the type strain is 66.6 % G+C (determined from the genome). The strain grows autotrophically with hydrogen gas and calcium carbonate and heterotrophically on acetate, butyrate, lactate, pyruvate, ethanol, cyclohexane and fumarate under microaerophilic condition. The strain cannot utilize nitrate, sulphate, iron (III) hydroxide or iron (II/III) oxide as electron acceptors. The strain cannot ferment glucose. Major fatty acids are C16:1ω7c and C18:1ω7c. The respiratory quinone is ubiquinone.

The type strain, A1T, (=NBRC 111848T=DSM 103917T), was isolated from a highly alkaline serpentinizing spring (Barnes Spring 1) in The Cedars located in north California, USA.

Description of Serpentinimonas barnesii sp. nov.

Serpentinimonas barnesii (bar.ne′si.i. N.L. gen. n. barnesii, named after I. Barnes, geochemist and first describer of The Cedars serpentinization site).

In addition to the characteristics given above in the genus description, the type strain has the characteristics described below. Growth occurs at 18–37 °C and pH 9.0–12.0 with optimal growth at 30 °C and pH 11.0. NaCl ranges from 0 to 0.5 g l−1. The DNA G+C composition of the type strain is 66.7 mol% (determined from the genome). The strain grows autotrophically with hydrogen gas and calcium carbonate and heterotrophically on acetate, butyrate, lactate, pyruvate, ethanol and fumarate under microaerophilic conditions. The strain can ferment glucose. The strain is also able to utilize glucose as an electron donor, and nitrate as an electron acceptor. Major fatty acids are C16 : 0 and C18:1ω7c. The respiratory quinone is ubiquinone.

The type strain, H1T (=NBRC 111849T=DSM 103920T), was isolated from a highly alkaline serpentinizing spring (Barnes Spring 5) in The Cedars located in north California, USA.

Description of Serpentinimonas maccroryi sp. nov.

Serpentinimonas maccroryi (mac.cro′ry.i. N.L. gen. n. maccroryi, named after D. McCrory, one of the owners of The Cedars nature reserve).

In addition to the characteristics given above in the genus description, the type strain has the characteristics described below. Growth occurs at 18–37 °C and pH 9.0–12.5 with optimal growth at 30 °C and pH 11.0. The strain tolerates NaCl ranges from 0 to 0.5 g l−1. The DNA G+C composition of the type strain is 66.7 mol% (determined from the genome). The strain grows autotrophically on formate and hydrogen gas but not on thiosulfate under microaerophilic conditions. The strain can use nitrate, but not thiosulfate as an electron acceptor. The strain can ferment glucose and grow heterotrophically on acetate, butyrate, lactate, pyruvate, ethanol, glucose and fumarate. Major fatty acids are C16 : 0, C16:1ω7c and C18:1ω7c. The respiratory quinone is ubiquinone.

The type strain, B1T (=NBRC 111850T=DSM 103919T), was isolated from a highly alkaline serpentinizing spring (Barnes Spring 1) in The Cedars located in north California, USA.

Funding information

This work was funded by the NSF-EAR (Grant Nos.1424646 and 1424711). This work was partly supported by the JSPS Grand-in-Aid for Science Research (Nos. 20H04620 and 18H02501).

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate Roger Raiche and David McCrory for providing their private land for our research. We appreciate Orion Johnson, Greg Wanger and Orianna Bretschger for the field support and Koji Mori for constructive discussions. The advice on name giving by Latinist Dr. A.H. van der Laan (University of Groningen, NL) is gratefully acknowledged

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AAI, average amino acid identity; ANIb, average nucleotide identity by blast; BS, Barnes Spring; CSM, Cedars standard medium; dDDH, digital DNA–DNA hybridization.

References

  • 1.Willems A, Pot B, Falsen E, Vandamme P, Gillis M, et al. Polyphasic taxonomic study of the emended genus Comamonas: relationship to Aquaspirillum aquaticum, E. Falsen group 10, and other clinical isolates. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991;41:427–444. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hiraishi A, Sugiyama J, Shin YK. Brachymonas denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic chemoorganotrophic bacterium which contains rhodoquinones, and evolutionary relationships of rhodoquinone producers to bacterial species with various quinone classes. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1995;41:99–117. doi: 10.2323/jgam.41.99. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grabovich M, Gavrish E, Kuever J, Lysenko AM, Podkopaeva D, et al. Proposal of Giesbergeria voronezhensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and G. kuznetsovii sp. nov. and reclassification of [Aquaspirillum] anulus, [A.] sinuosum and [A.] giesbergeri as Giesbergeria anulus comb. nov., G. sinuosa comb. nov. and G. giesbergeri comb. nov., and [Aquaspirillum] metamorphum and [A.] psychrophilum as Simplicispira metamorpha gen. nov., comb. nov. and S. psychrophila comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:569–576. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64027-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dubinina GA, Grabovich MY. Isolation, cultivation, and characteristics of Macromonas bipunctata . Microbiology. 1984;53:610–617. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heylen K, Lebbe L, de Vos P. Acidovorax caeni sp. nov., a denitrifying species with genetically diverse isolates from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:73–77. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65387-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spring S, Wagner M, Schumann P, Kämpfer P. Malikia granosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel polyhydroxyalkanoate- and polyphosphate-accumulating bacterium isolated from activated sludge, and reclassification of Pseudomonas spinosa as Malikia spinosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:621–629. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63356-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu XY, Li YF, Zheng JW, Li Y, Li L, et al. Comamonas zonglianii sp. nov., isolated from phenol-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:255–258. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.019612-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ding YP, Khan UK, Li MM, Xian WD, Liu L, et al. Calidifontimirobium sediminis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Comomonadaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:434–440. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ginige MP, Hugenholtz P, Daims H, Wagner M, Keller J, et al. Use of stable-isotope probing, full-cycle rRNA analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization-microautoradiography to study a methanol- fed denitrifying microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:588–596. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.588-596.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Finneran KT, Johnsen CV, Lovley DR. Rhodoferax ferrireducens sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, facultatively anaerobic bacterium that oxidizes acetate with the reduction of Fe(III. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:669–673. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02298-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Willems A, Busse J, Goor M, Pot B, Falsen E, et al. Hydrogenophaga, a new genus of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria that includes Hydrogenophaga flava comb. nov. (formerly Pseudomonas flava), Hydrogenophaga palleronii (formerly Pseudomonas palleronii), Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (formerly Pseudomonas pseudoflava and “Pseudomonas carboxydoflava”), and Hydrogenophaga taeniospiralis (formerly Pseudomonas taeniospiralis . Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989;39:319. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hesselmann RP, Werlen C, Hahn D, van der Meer JR, Zehnder AJ. Enrichment, phylogenetic analysis and detection of a bacterium that performs enhanced biological phosphate removal in activated sludge. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1999;22:454–465. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(99)80055-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rouvière PE, Chen MW. Isolation of Brachymonas petroleovorans CHX, a novel cyclohexane-degrading beta-proteobacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;227:101–106. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00655-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morrill PL, Kuenen JG, Johnson OJ, Suzuki S, Rietze A, et al. Geochemistry and geobiology of a present-day serpentinization site in California: The Cedars. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2013;109:222–240. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.01.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Szponar N, Brazelton WJ, Schrenk MO, Bower DM, Steele A, et al. Geochemistry of a continental site of serpentinization, the Tablelands Ophiolite, Gros Morne National Park: A Mars analogue. Icarus. 2013;224:286–296. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marques JM, Carreira PM, Carvalho MR, Matias MJ, Goff FE, et al. Origins of high pH mineral waters from ultramafic rocks, central Portugal. Appl Geochemistry. 2008;23:3278–3289. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Suzuki S, Ishii S, Wu A, Cheung A, Tenney A, et al. Microbial diversity in The Cedars, an ultrabasic, ultrareducing, and low salinity serpentinizing ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:15336–15341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302426110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Suzuki S, Ishii S, Hoshino T, Rietze A, Tenney A, et al. Unusual metabolic diversity of hyperalkaliphilic microbial communities associated with subterranean serpentinization at The Cedars. ISME J. 2017;11:2584–2598. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Suzuki S, Kuenen JG, Schipper K, van der Velde S, Ishii S, et al. Physiological and genomic features of highly alkaliphilic hydrogen-utilizing Betaproteobacteria from a continental serpentinizing site. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3900. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008;57:758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2014;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe. 2014;9:111–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC, et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:2210–2215. doi: 10.1128/JB.01688-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:e73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu L, Sun C, Fang C, Oren A, Xu XW. Genomic-based taxonomic classification of the family Erythrobacteraceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:4470–4495. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2015;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Richter M, Rossello R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–917. doi: 10.1139/o59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schubotz F, Meyer-Dombard DR, Bradley AS, Fredricks HF, Hinrichs KU, et al. Spatial and temporal variability of biomarkers and microbial diversity reveal metabolic and community flexibility in streamer biofilm communities in the Lower Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park. Geobiology. 2013;11:549–569. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shibamoto S, Murata T, Yamamoto K. Determination of double bond positions and geometry of methyl linoleate isomers with dimethyl disulfide adducts by GC/MS. Lipids. 2016;51:1077–1081. doi: 10.1007/s11745-016-4180-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Johnson DB, Beddows PA, Flynn TM, Osburn MR. Microbial diversity and biomarker analysis of modern freshwater microbialites from Laguna Bacalar, Mexico. Geobiology. 2018;16:319–337. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kevbrin VV. In: Alkaliphiles in Biotechnology. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. Mamo G, Mattiasson B, editors. Vol. 172. Cham: Springer; 2019. Isolation and Cultivation of Alkaliphiles; pp. 53–84. Vol. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee DH, Cha CJ. Ramlibacter alkalitolerans sp. nov., alkali-tolerant bacterium isolated from soil of ginseng. Int J Syst Evol Mirobiol. 2017;67:4619–4623. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang H, Li J, Hu A, Qin D, Xu H, et al. Melaminivora alkalimesophila gen. nov., sp. nov., a melamine-degrading betaproteobacterium isolated from a melamine-producing factory. Int J Syst Evol Mirobiol. 2014;64:1938–1944. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.055103-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Trüper GH. How to name a prokaryote?: Etymological considerations, proposals and practical advice in prokaryote nomenclature. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 1999;22:231–249. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Davis DH, Stanier RY, Doudoroff M. Taxonomic studies on some gram negative polarly flagellated “Hydrogen bacteria” and related species. Arch Mikrobiol. 1970;70:1–13. doi: 10.1007/BF00691056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Beak C, Kim E, Shin SK, Choi S, Yi H. Hydrogenophaga crassostreae sp. nov., isolated from a pacific oyster. Int J Syst Evol Mirobiol. 2017;67:4045–4049. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES