Abstract
A novel facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, Gram-stain-negative, non-endospore-forming alphaproteobacterium, strain 1011MAR3C25T, was isolated from a white biofilm colonizing the walls of the Andalusian show cave Gruta de las Maravillas (Huelva, Spain). Strain 1011MAR3C25T grew at 8–42 °C (optimum, 20–30 °C), at pH 5.0–9.0 (optimum, pH 5.0–6.0) and in the presence of 0–12 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum 3–5 %). Cells were catalase- and oxidase-positive. The strain grew heterotrophically with various carbon sources and chemoautotrophically with thiosulfate under aerobic conditions. Results of phylogenetic analysis showed that strain 1011MAR3C25T was related to Paracoccus saliphilus DSM 18447T and Paracoccus alkanivorans LMG 30882T (97.90 % and 97.32 % 16S rRNA sequence identity values, respectively). The major respiratory quinone was ubiquinone Q-10 and the predominant fatty acid was C18 : 1 ω7c. The polar lipid profile consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol, an unidentified aminolipid, an unidentified glycolipid and an unidentified polar lipid. The DNA G+C content was 60.3 mol%. Based on a polyphasic taxonomic study it is proposed that strain 1011MAR3C25T (=CECT 9092T=LMG 29414T) represents a novel species of the genus Paracoccus , for which the name Paracoccus onubensis sp. nov. is proposed.
Keywords: Paracoccus, Proteobacteria, show cave, whole genome average nucleotide identity
The genus Paracoccus belongs to the class Alphaproteobacteria and family Rhodobacteraceae . It was described by Davis et al. [1] with Paracoccus denitrificans as the type species. Members of this genus are Gram-stain-negative, non-spore-forming, usually non-motile, and catalase- and oxidase-positive. The major cellular fatty acid is C18 : 1 ω7c. The G+C content of the DNA is 64–70 % mol. Currently the genus Paracoccus includes 74 validly named species and 15 non-validly named species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/paracoccus). The general model of metabolism is chemoorganotrophic. Some species are able to grow as facultative chemolithoautotrophs using reduced sulphur compounds as substrates and others can live as facultative methylotrophs using methanol as a substrate [2]. Paracocci are ubiquitous and growth occurs in water [3] and soil [4–6], among other environments [7]. Paracoccus cavernae was isolated from a cave air [8]. In this study, a bacterial strain, 1011MAR3C25T, was isolated from white biofilms coating the walls of a cave and characterized using a polyphasic approach to determine its taxonomic position. Strain 1011MAR3C25T is proposed to represent a novel species within the genus Paracoccus named Paracoccus onubensis sp. nov.
Isolation and ecology
Strain 1011MAR3C25T was isolated from white biofilms coating the walls of Gruta de las Maravillas (37° 53′ 27.92″ N, 6° 33′ 57.25″ E). Gruta de las Maravillas is a cave located in Southwestern Spain. This was the first show cave open to tourism, in 1914. Its length is 2130 m from which around 1400 m are visited. Along the tourist trail, small, round, white-coloured colonies forming biofilms on the walls can be observed, which are particularly abundant close to the cave exit. White cave biofilms are composed of a large diversity of uncultured representatives of many different major evolutionary lineages [9, 10]; therefore, they represent an important source of novel bacteria. In October 2011, samples were obtained aseptically by scraping off the white-coloured colonies with a sterile scalpel, stored in sterile tubes at 5 °C, and analysed immediately upon arrival in the laboratory. The samples were resuspended in a sterile 0.85 % (w/v) NaCl solution and subsequently seeded in a 10-fold diluted marine agar medium (Difco). Strain 1011MAR3C25T was isolated on marine agar after incubation at 30 °C for 7 days.
Phylogeny
Genomic DNA was extracted according to Marmur [11]. The 16S rRNA genes were amplified following the method described by Jurado et al. [12]. The identification of phylogenetic neighbours was determined using the global alignment algorithm on the EzTaxon-e database [13]. The phylogenetic analyses were carried out by aligning and comparing the nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain 1011MAR3C25T with corresponding sequences of members of the genus Paracoccus . In addition, to find more precise phylogenetic relationships of the species closest to strain 1011MAR3C25T, phylogenomic treeing based on 139 single-copy genes was performed according to Campbell et al. [14]. Alignments were created using the multiple sequence alignment program muscle [15]. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using the best substitution model selected by the software mega X [16]. The evolutionary history using the 16S rRNA gene sequences was inferred by using the maximum-likelihood method, Kimura's two-parameter model with a discrete Gamma distribution and invariant sites [17]. The evolutionary history of the concatenated genes was deduced using the maximum-likelihood method and the general time reversible model with a discrete gamma distribution and invariant sites [18]. The robustness of the tree was evaluated by bootstrap resampling (1680 replicates).
Sequencing of its 16S rRNA gene revealed that strain 1011MAR3C25T belonged to the genus Paracoccus. The results of phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain 1011MAR3C25T was closely related to Paracoccus saliphilus DSM 18447T, Paracoccus alkanivorans LMG 30882T, ‘ Paracoccus siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T, Paracoccus homiensis DSM 17862T and Paracoccus aestuarii DSM 19484T, with identity values of 97.90, 97.32, 97.18, 96.96 and 96.96%, respectively. Besides, the phylogenetic trees showed that the closest relatives of strain 1011MAR3C25T were P. saliphilus and P. alkanivorans (Figs 1, S1 and S2, available in the online version of this article) and were separated from the rest of the species within the genus Paracoccus . In the phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (Figs 1 and S1), the nodes were well-supported with bootstrap values greater than 60. The bootstrap value of 100 in the phylogenomic tree (Fig. S2) showed the high phylogenetic relatedness between strain 1011MAR3C25T, P. saliphilus and P. alkanivorans.
Fig. 1.
Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship of strain 1011MAR3C25T with other species of the genus Paracococcus. Bootstrap values (>50 %) are expressed as percentages of 1680 replicates. There were a total of 1418 positions in the final dataset. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Rhodobacter capsulatus ATCC 11166T (D16428) was used as an outgroup. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Genome features
The genomic DNA of strain 1011MAR3C25T, P. aestuarii DSM 19484T and ‘ P. siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T were sequenced using 250 bp paired-end reads on an Illumina HiSeq platform by means of a Nextera XT library prep kit. The read quality was checked with FastQC 0.11.5 (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Reads were adapter-trimmed using Trimmomatic 0.36 with a sliding window quality cutoff of Q15 [19]. De novo assembly of this draft genome was performed using SPAdes 3.7 [20]. The remaining genomes of the reference strains were taken from public databases. Calculations of whole genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) and tetra values were carried out using the JSpecies software [21], whereas OrthoANI measurements were calculated as described by Lee et al. [22]. Additionally, the genomic relationship between strain 1011MAR3C25T and its closest relatives was examined by classical DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH) as described by Urdiain et al. [23] and whole genome sequenced-based DDH predicted by the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 2.1 (http://ggdc.dsmz.de) [24]. Gene prediction was carried out with Prodigal [25], whereas Sma3s [26] was implemented for functional annotations using the curated Uniprot-SwissProt database [27].
The relatedness between strain 1011MAR3C25T and its phylogenetically closest type strains according to 16S rRNA gene sequences was assessed by ANI, tetra and OrthoANI calculations. The genome sizes and accession numbers of strain 1011MAR3C25T, P. aestuarii DSM 19484T, ‘ P. siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T and P. alkanivorans LMG 30882T were 4 764 139 bp (QZCG00000000), 3 747 355 bp (QZEV00000000), 4 906 790 bp (QZEW00000000) and 4 662 693 bp (QOKZ00000000), respectively. The genome of strain 1011MAR3C25T contained a total of 40 contigs. The N50 value was 272 503, and the largest contig was 518 150 bp. The average G+C content was 60.3 mol%. A total of 4595 genes were detected, with three rRNA and 45 tRNA genes predicted and 4486 proteins (Table S1). Genome coverage was 30.0×.
Strain 1011MAR3C25T showed ANI and OrthoANI values below 85 % with the closest species of the genus Paracoccus (Table 1). Values ranging from 84.52 to 79.57 % and from 84.67 to 80.10 % were obtained for strain 1011MAR3C25T and both P. saliphilus DSM 18447T and P. alkanivorans LMG 30882T, respectively. Values below 85 % are lower than the generally accepted species boundary 94–96 % proposed by Richter and Rosselló-Móra [21]. Moreover, the tetra values were less than 0.99, supporting the ANI calculation and the species circumscription. The ANIb, ANIm, OrthoANI and tetra results showed that strain 1011MAR3C25T should be classified as a novel member of the genus Paracoccus .
Table 1.
Results of ANI calculations (%), tetra correlations and DDH values (%) of strain 1011MAR3C25T and other species of the genus Paracoccus
Taxa: 1, 1011MAR3C25T (QZCG00000000); 2, P. saliphilus (FTOU00000000); 3, ‘ P. siganidrum ’ (QNRC00000000); 4, P. homiensis (FOHO00000000); 5, P. aestuarii (QZEV00000000); 6, P. alkanivorans (QOKZ00000000). nd, Not determined, – duplicate data
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANIb |
||||||
|
1 |
100 |
78.21 |
75.54 |
74.75 |
73.86 |
78.76 |
|
2 |
78.03 |
100 |
76.63 |
75.86 |
74.71 |
84.70 |
|
3 |
76.25 |
77.28 |
100 |
77.23 |
78.14 |
77.88 |
|
4 |
75.21 |
76.47 |
77.44 |
100 |
76.40 |
76.77 |
|
5 |
74.63 |
75.57 |
78.68 |
76.76 |
100 |
76.02 |
|
6 |
78.81 |
84.86 |
77.24 |
76.22 |
75.41 |
100 |
|
ANIm |
||||||
|
1 |
100 |
84.53 |
83.79 |
83.39 |
83.50 |
84.66 |
|
2 |
84.52 |
100 |
84.10 |
83.77 |
83.43 |
87.87 |
|
3 |
83.79 |
84.09 |
100 |
84.38 |
84.69 |
84.32 |
|
4 |
83.39 |
83.77 |
84.39 |
100 |
84.20 |
83.87 |
|
5 |
83.52 |
83.43 |
84.70 |
84.21 |
100 |
83.76 |
|
6 |
84.67 |
87.87 |
84.31 |
83.87 |
83.76 |
100 |
|
OrthoANI |
||||||
|
1 |
100 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
2 |
79.57 |
100 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
3 |
77.33 |
78.78 |
100 |
– |
– |
– |
|
4 |
76.51 |
77.94 |
78.77 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
5 |
75.77 |
77.00 |
79.64 |
77.87 |
100 |
– |
|
6 |
80.10 |
86.45 |
79.33 |
78.25 |
77.24 |
100 |
|
tetra |
||||||
|
1 |
||||||
|
2 |
0.95674 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
3 |
0.75838 |
0.86604 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
4 |
0.85423 |
0.89725 |
0.88234 |
– |
– |
– |
|
5 |
0.69568 |
0.81374 |
0.93282 |
0.90284 |
– |
– |
|
6 |
0.961 |
0.98794 |
0.85662 |
0.89001 |
0.80492 |
– |
|
WGS-based DDH |
100 |
23.20 |
21.40 |
20.40 |
20.40 |
23.70 |
|
Classical DDH value |
100 |
49.84 |
42.17 |
44.14 |
46.56 |
nd |
DDH values among strain 1011MAR3C25T and P. saliphilus DSM 18447T, P. aestuarii DSM 19484T, P. homiensis DSM 17862T, P. alkanivorans LMG 30882T and ‘ P. siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T were between 42.17–49.84 % for classical DDH, and 20.40–23.70 % for in silico DDH (Table 1). In both analyses, the percentages were below the recommended cutoff point of 70 % DDH for species delineation and, therefore, indicated that strain 1011MAR3C25T was not related at the species level with any of the five studied type strains.
Predicted and annotated genes with Prodigal and Sma3s were grouped according to the biological processes classified in the UniProt database (Fig. S3). Genes involved in the transport category were the most represented in strain 1011MAR3C25T, with 22.22 % of the total. This category includes the movement of ions, molecules, complexes and organelles into, out of or within the bacterium through agents such as transporters, pores or motor protein.
In silico analysis for the genome annotation of strain 1011MAR3C25T confirmed the in vivo physiological studies detailed below for nitrogen and carbon metabolism. Thus, the assimilation of nitrate and urea was confirmed after the prediction of nasAD and ureABCDEFG genes in the genome, respectively, as well as the presence of mechanisms for the assimilation of inorganic carbon, such as the CO2 fixation process, through the presence of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain (cbbL) and the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit (cbbS), among others.
Of interest, the annotated genome of strain 1011MAR3C25T suggested the presence of genes involved in the synthesis of the flagellum, with the presence of five genes, flhGHI and fliIP, which contrasted with the in vivo analyses where no motility was observed. These annotations could be also related to the stress response and virulence factors in this bacterium being part of these biological processes.
Physiology and chemotaxonomy
The investigation of morphological, chemotaxonomic and physiological characteristics of strain 1011MAR3C25T and its phylogenetically closest strains, P. saliphilus DSM 18447T, ‘ P. siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T, P. homiensis DSM 17862T and P. aestuarii DSM 19484T was performed in triplicate on marine agar medium at 30 °C, unless otherwise indicated.
Cell morphology and dimensions were examined in a Zeiss Axioscope two phase-contrast microscope equipped with image-analysing Axio Vision 2.05 software, and by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). For FESEM observations, the biomass was collected from the agar surface and fixed with 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4 °C for 2 h. The cells were separated from the mixture by centrifugation and washed twice in cacodylate buffer for 5 min each and post-fixed in 1 % osmium tetroxide for 1 h at 4 °C. After dehydration by subsequent dilution series in ethanol and acetone, the bacteria were dried in a critical point drying device (CPD 030, Balzers) at 34.5 °C. Finally, the bacterial cells were sputter-coated with a thin gold–palladium film and examined in a jeol JSM-7001F microscope. FESEM examinations were operated in secondary electron detection mode with an acceleration potential of 15 kV. Colony morphology was analysed using 3–5 days old cultures grown on marine agar medium utilizing a stereo microscope. Motility was examined on nutrient broth or marine broth media containing 0.3 % agar [28] and confirmed by staining with flagella stain droppers (BD; according to the manufacturer’s instructions) and observation in a phase contrast microscope. Oxidase activity was tested by monitoring the oxidation on BBL DrySlide Oxidase (BD). Catalase activity was determined by the production of bubbles after addition of a drop of 3 % (v/v) hydrogen peroxide on cellular biomass smeared on a glass slide. Acid production from carbohydrates, assimilation tests and enzymatic activities were identified with the API 50CH, API 20NE and API ZYM galleries (bioMérieux), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Gram reaction was performed following the method of Hucker [29] and was confirmed by KOH-lysis test [30]. The temperature range for growth was tested at 3, 4, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 37, 40, 42 and 45 °C. Tolerance to NaCl was assessed on nutrient agar medium supplemented with 0, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15 and 16 % (w/v) NaCl. Growth at different pH values were assessed with marine broth adjusted to pH 3.0–13.0 (at intervals of 1.0 pH unit) by using the following buffer system: pH 3.0–5.0 with 0.1 M citric acid/0.1 M sodium citrate; pH 6.0–8.0 with 0.2 M sodium phosphate dibasic/0.2 M sodium phosphate monobasic; pH 9.0–11.0 with 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate/0.1 M sodium carbonate; pH 12.0–13.0 with 0.2 M potassium chloride/0.2 M sodium hydroxide. Negative controls were used to verify each buffer. Utilization of ammonium sulphate (7.8 g l−1), sodium glutamate (20 g l−1), sodium nitrate (7.8 g l−1), casamino acids (10 g l−1) and peptone (10 g l−1) as sole nitrogen sources were tested in medium N (artificial seawater containing 1.0 g l−1 glucose and 0.2 g l−1 NaHCO3, pH 7.0) [31]. The oxygen requirement for bacterial growth was tested in anaerobic chambers (GENbag anaer, bioMérieux). Endospore production was tested on oatmeal agar (Difco), nutrient agar (Difco) and Bennett’s agar media [32]. DNA and casein hydrolysis were tested by using DNAse test agar (Difco) and milk agar (Merck), respectively, according to Barrow and Feltham [33]. Lypolytic activity was examined in Tweens 20, 40 and 80 [34]. In addition to chemoorganotrophic metabolism, strain 1011MAR3C25T was tested for chemolithoautotrophy and methylotrophy using reduced sulphur compounds: as thiosulphate and methanol, respectively. Strain 1011MAR3C25T was grown aerobically and anaerobically at 28 °C in E-basal salts (EBS) [35], supplemented with agar (15.00 g l−1) and 20 mm sodium thiosulfate [36]. Culture of strain 1011MAR3C25T on methanol (50 mm) was performed in a liquid medium [37]. As a control, EBS supplemented with glucose (1.0 g l-1) was used. Cellular fatty acid profiles were analysed in triplicate after collecting biomass from a culture grown on trypticase soy broth agar for 72 h at 30 °C following the methodology described by Jurado et al. [38]. Analyses of quinones and polar lipids were carried out by the Identification Service, Leibniz-Institut DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlug von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany).
The results from the phylogenetic analysis and whole genome comparisons indicated that strain 1011MAR3C25T was different from the previously published type strains. Thus, morphological, physiological and biochemical analyses of strain 1011MAR3C25T were only compared with the closest type strains: P. saliphilus DSM 18447T, P. alkanivorans LMG 30882T and other Paracoccus species (Table 2).
Table 2.
Differential characteristics of strain 1011MAR3C25T and its closest relatives
Strains: 1, 1011MAR3C25T; 2, Paracoccus saliphilus DSM 18447T; 3, ‘Paracoccus siganidrum’ DSM 26381T; 4, Paracoccus homiensis DSM 17862T; 5, Paracoccus aestuarii DSM 19484T; 6, Paracoccus alkanivorans LMG30882T. Results from this study were obtained from cells grown under the same conditions. All data from the present study unless otherwise indicated. +, Positive; –, negative; (+), weakly positive.
|
Characteristics |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Growth conditions: |
||||||
|
10 % NaCl |
(+) |
+ |
(+) |
+ |
– |
+ |
|
12 % NaCl |
(+) |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
|
16 % NaCl |
– |
(+) |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
Optimum NaCl |
3–5 |
5–7 |
0–5 |
3–5 |
3 |
0–3 |
|
4 °C |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(+) |
– |
|
6 °C |
– |
+ |
(+) |
– |
+ |
– |
|
42 °C |
(+) |
– |
+ |
(+) |
+ |
+ |
|
Optimum pH |
5 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
|
Hydrolysis of: |
||||||
|
Tween 20 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
– |
– |
+ |
|
Tween 40 |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
– |
+ |
|
Reduction of nitrate to nitrite |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
+ |
|
Urease |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
|
Growth on: |
||||||
|
Adipate |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
– |
|
Citrate |
+ |
+ |
+ |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
Phenylacetate |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
– |
|
Casamino acids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
– |
+ |
|
Enzymatic activity: |
||||||
|
α-Galactosidase |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
– |
|
β-Galactosidase |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
– |
|
Acid produced from: |
||||||
|
d-Adonitol |
(+) |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
– |
|
Amygdalin |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
d-Arabinose |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
l-Arabinose |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
d-Arabitol |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
l-Arabitol |
(+) |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
(+) |
|
Arbutin |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
– |
|
Cellobiose |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
Erythritol |
v |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
– |
|
d-Fructose |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
d-Fucose |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
l-Fucose |
(+) |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
|
d-Galactose |
+ |
+ |
+ |
– |
– |
+ |
|
Gentibiose |
– |
– |
(+) |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
d-Glucose |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
Glycerol |
(+) |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
+ |
|
Inositol |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
Lactose |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
d-Lyxose |
(+) |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
– |
|
Methyl α-d-glucopyranoside |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
– |
|
Maltose |
(+) |
– |
+ |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
d-Mannitol |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
d-Mannose |
+ |
– |
+ |
+ |
(+) |
+ |
|
Melibiose |
(+) |
– |
+ |
+ |
(+) |
+ |
|
N-Acetylglucosamine |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
Raffinose |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
l-Rhamnose |
– |
– |
(+) |
– |
– |
+ |
|
d-Ribose |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
|
Sucrose |
(+) |
– |
(+) |
– |
+ |
+ |
|
Salicin |
– |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
– |
|
d-Sorbitol |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
d-Tagatose |
– |
– |
(+) |
– |
– |
– |
|
Trehalose |
(+) |
– |
(+) |
– |
+ |
– |
|
Turanose |
– |
+ |
+ |
– |
+ |
(+) |
|
Xylitol |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(+) |
– |
|
d-Xylose |
+ |
(+) |
+ |
– |
(+) |
+ |
|
l-Xylose |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
– |
|
G+C content (mol%)* |
60.3 |
60.3a |
64.3b |
63.0c |
62.0d |
61.4e |
Strain 1011MAR3C25T and the reference strains had many differences (Table 2). These differences were mainly related to NaCl tolerance, temperature and pH conditions for growth, hydrolysis of Tweens 20 and 40, reduction of nitrate, growth on different substrates, enzymatic activity, and acid produced from different sugars.
Strain 1011MAR3C25T tolerated concentrations of 0–12 % (w/v) NaCl, like P. homiensis DSM 17862T , P. alkanivorans LMG 30882T and P. saliphilus DSM 18447T. P. aestuarii DSM 19484T and ‘ P. siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T tolerated 5 and 10 % (w/v) NaCl, respectively. Optimal growth conditions also differed from one species to another. All the studied strains grew up to a temperature of 42 °C, except P. saliphilus DSM 18447T, which grew up at 37 °C. Only P. aestuarii DSM 19484T grew at 4 °C. All the studies strains grew within pH 5–8; however, the pH optimum differed between them. Strain 1011MAR3C25T, ‘ P. siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T and P. aestuarii DSM 19484T produced acid from a greater number of sugars than P. saliphilus DSM 18447T, P. alkanivorans LMG 30882T and P. homiensis DSM 17862T.
All strains used sodium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, sodium glutamate and peptone as sole nitrogen sources. All strains, except P. aestuarii DSM 19484T, used casamino acids. Strain 1011MAR3C25T was able to oxidize thiosulfate but it did not grow anaerobically with this sulphur compound. Neither did it grow on methanol as an energy source. Strain 1011MAR3C25T had a fatty acid pattern similar to that of the genus Paracoccus [2] (Table 3). The most abundant fatty acid was C18 : 1 ω7c (72.55 %), followed by others in minor proportions (C18 : 0, C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c, C16 : 0, C14 : 0 3-OH and/or C16 : 1 iso I, C10 : 0 3-OH, C17 : 1 ω8c). The main difference from its closest reference strain was the presence of the fatty acid C17 : 1 ω8c and the proportion of some others such as C16 : 0. Strain 1011MAR3C25T contained ubiquinone-10 as the major respiratory quinone like other species of the genus Paracoccus. The composition of its polar lipids included diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol, an unidentified aminolipid, an unidentified glycolipid and an unidentified polar lipid.
Table 3.
Major fatty acid compositions of strain 1011MAR3C25T and its related species
Strains: 1, 1011MAR3C25T; 2, Paracoccus saliphilus DSM 18447T; 3, ‘ Paracoccus siganidrum ’ DSM 26381T; 4, Paracoccus homiensis DSM 17862T; 5, Paracoccus aestuarii DSM 19484T; 6, Paracoccus alkanivorans LMG30882T. Data in columns 1–5 are from this study and were obtained from cells grown under the same conditions. –, Not detected.
|
Fatty acids |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6† |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
C16 : 0 |
3.27 |
1.23 |
1.40 |
1.27 |
1.14 |
<1 |
|
C17 : 0 |
<1 % |
– |
– |
– |
– |
1.2 |
|
C18 : 0 |
7.90 |
8.74 |
4.51 |
7.86 |
6.30 |
5.7 |
|
C17 : 1 ω8c |
1.41 |
– |
<1 |
<1 |
– |
– |
|
C18 : 1 ω7c |
72.55 |
83.17 |
85.95 |
76.70 |
85.01 |
57.4 |
|
C18 : 1 ω7c-methyl |
– |
– |
– |
6.81 |
– |
– |
|
C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c |
6.66 |
2.11 |
1.14 |
– |
– |
22.4 |
|
C10 : 0 3-OH |
2.89 |
3.14 |
2.92 |
3.34 |
3.90 |
6.0 |
|
C18 : 0 3-OH |
– |
– |
– |
1.25 |
– |
– |
|
Summed feature 2* |
3.10 |
1.17 |
3.34 |
2.06 |
3.17 |
3.2 |
*Summed feature 2 contains one or more of the following fatty acids: C12:0 aldehyde/C14:0 3-OH and/or C16:1 iso I. Summed features are fatty acids that cannot be resolved reliably from another fatty acid using the chromatographic conditions chosen. The midi system groups these fatty acids together as one feature with a single percentage of the total.
†Data from Zhang et al. [41].
Based on the results of the phenotypic and genotypic analyses presented in this study, it is proposed that the alphaproteobacterium strain 1011MAR3C25T represents a novel species within the genus Paracoccus . We propose the name Paracoccus onubensis for strain 1011MAR3C25T.
Description of Paracoccus onubensis sp. nov.
Paracoccus onubensis (o.nu′ben.sis, N.L. masc. adj. onubensis, pertaining to Onuba, the Roman name of Huelva, the province where the organism was first isolated).
Cells are facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, Gram-stain-negative and non-endospore-forming. They are 0.5–0.7 µm×1.2–1.8 µm in diameter, grow in pairs or singly (Fig. S4). Colonies on marine agar are 0.5–1.3 mm in diameter, circular, convex, smooth and have entire margins. Good growth at 10–37 °C, optimal at 20–30 °C and weak growth at 8 and 42 °C. Tolerates up to 12 % NaCl, with optimum growth within 3–5 % (v/w) NaCl. Growth occurs at pH 5.0–9.0, with an optimum at pH 5.0–6.0. Catalase- and oxidase-positive. It grows heterotrophically with various carbon sources and chemoautotrophically with thiosulfate under aerobic conditions. d-Glucose, l-galactose, d-mannose, d-mannitol, N-acetylglucosamine, maltose, potassium gluconate, adipate, malate, citrate and phenylacetate can be utilized as carbon sources. Utilizes sodium nitrate, ammonium sulphate, sodium glutamate, casamino acids and peptone as sole nitrogen sources. Produces acid from d,l-arabinose, aesculin, d-fructose, d-fucose, d-galactose, d-glucose, d-mannose, d-ribose and d,l-xylose; weakly from d-adonitol, l-arabitol, l-fucose, glycerol, d-lyxose, maltose, melibiose, sucrose and trehalose. Negative for amygdalin, d-arabitol, arbutin, dulcitol, gentibiose, glycogen, inositol, inulin, lactose, melezitose, methyl α-d-glucopyranoside, methyl α-d-mannopyranoside, methyl β-d-xylopyranoside, N-acetylglucosamine, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-ketogluconate, potassium 5-ketogluconate, raffinose, l-ramnose, salicin, d-sorbitol, l-sorbose, starch, d-tagatose, turanose and xylitol. Reduces nitrate to nitrite. Hydrolyses aesculin and Tween 20, and does not hydrolyse DNA, casein or Tweens 40 and 80. Produces alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and α-glucosidase. Assimilates glucose, arabinose, mannose, mannitol, N-acetyl-glucosamine, maltose, potassium gluconate, adipic acid, malate, trisodium citrate and phenylacetic acid, but does not assimilate capric acid. The most abundant fatty acid is C18 : 1 ω7c. Ubiquinone-10 is the major respiratory quinone. The polar lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol and an unidentified aminolipid, an unidentified glycolipid and unidentified polar lipid.
The G+C content of the type strain is 60.3 mol%. The type strain, 1011MAR3C25T (=CECT 9092T=LMG 29414T), was isolated from white biofilms on the walls of the cave Gruta de las Maravillas, Aracena (Huelva, Spain).
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This study was supported by project 0483_PROBIOMA_5_E, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund within the framework of the Interreg V A Spain–Portugal program (POCTEP) 2014–2020.
Acknowledgements
We thank Isabel Galocha (IRNAS-CSIC) for technical assistance.
Author contributions
S.G.P., J.L.G.P., A.Z.M. and B.H.: data acquisition. V.L.: writing–original draft. C.S.J.: writing–review and editing.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ANI, average nucleotide identity; DDH, DNA–DNA hybridization; EBS, E-basal salts.
One supplementary table and four supplementary figures are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Davis DH, Doudoroff M, Stanier RY, Mandel M. Proposal to reject the genus Hydrogenomonas: taxonomic implications. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1969;19:375–390. doi: 10.1099/00207713-19-4-375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pujalte MJ, Lucena T, Ruvira MA, Arahal DR, Macián MA. In: The Prokaryotes. Rosenberg E, DeLong E, Stackebrandt E, Lory S, Thompson F, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. The Family Rhodobacteraceae; pp. 439–512. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roh SW, Nam YD, Chang HW, Kim KH, Kim M-S, et al. Paracoccus aestuarii sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:790–794. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65759-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dastager SG, Deepa CK, Li W-J, Tang S-K, Pandey A. Paracoccus niistensis sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, India. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2011;99:501–506. doi: 10.1007/s10482-010-9515-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Siller H, Rainey FA, Stackebrandt E, Winter J. Isolation and characterization of a new gram-negative, acetone-degrading, nitrate-reducing bacterium from soil, Paracoccus solventivorans sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46:1125–1130. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-4-1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang Y, Tang SK, Lou K, Mao PH, Jin X, et al. Paracoccus saliphilus sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from a saline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:1924–1928. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.005918-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Spanning RJM, Stouthamer AH, Baker SC, van Verseveld HW. In: Bergey´s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Breener D, Krieg N, Staley J, Garrity G, editors. New York: Springer; 2005. Genus Paracoccus davis 1969, 384AL emend. Ludwig, Mittenhuber and Friedrich 1993, 366; pp. 197–204. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dominguez-Moñino I, Jurado V, Hermosin B, Saiz-Jimenez C. Paracoccus cavernae sp. nov., isolated from a show cave. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1–6. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Riquelme C, Hathaway JJM, Dapkevicius M, Miller AZ, Kooser A, et al. Actinobacterial diversity in volcanic caves and associated geomicrobiological interactions. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1342. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lavoie KH, Winter AS, Read KJH, Hughes EM, Spilde MN, et al. Comparison of bacterial communities from lava cave microbial mats to overlying surface soils from Lava Beds National Monument, USA. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marmur J. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms. J Mol Biol. 1961;3:208–218. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80047-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jurado V, Miller AZ, Alias-Villegas C, Laiz L, Saiz-Jimenez C. Rubrobacter bracarensis sp. nov., a novel member of the genus Rubrobacter isolated from a biodeteriorated monument. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012;35:306–309. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA and whole genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Campbell JH, O’Donoghue P, Campbell AG, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, et al. UGA is an additional glycine codon in uncultured SR1 bacteria from the human microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:5540–5545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303090110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 1–333. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee I, Kim YO, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;66:1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Urdiain M, López-López A, Gonzalo C, Busse HJ, Langer S, et al. Reclassification of Rhodobium marinum and Rhodobium pfennigii as Afifella marina gen. nov. comb. nov. and Afifella pfennigii comb. nov., a new genus of photoheterotrophic Alphaproteobacteria and emended descriptions of Rhodobium, Rhodobium orientis and Rhodobium gokarnense . Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008;31:339–351. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Goker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, et al. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Muñoz-Mérida A, Viguera E, Claros MG, Trelles O, Pérez-Pulido AJ. Sma3s: a three-step modular annotator for large sequence datasets. DNA Res. 2014;21:341–353. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsu001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Consortium U. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D506–D515. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tambalo DD, Del Bel KL, Bustard DE, Greenwood PR, Steedman AE, et al. Regulation of flagellar, motility and chemotaxis genes in Rhizobium leguminosarum by the VisN/R-Rem cascade. Microbiology. 2010;156:1673–1685. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.035386-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hucker GJ. A new modification and application of the gram stain. J Bacteriol. 1921;6:395–397. doi: 10.1128/jb.6.4.395-397.1921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Halebian S, Harris B, Finegold SM, Rolfe RD. Rapid method that aids in distiguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;13:444–448. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.444-448.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khan ST, Takaichi S, Harayama S. Paracoccus marinus sp. nov., an adonixanthin diglucoside-producing bacterium isolated from coastal seawater in Tokyo Bay. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:383–386. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65103-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jones KL. Fresh isolates of actinomycetes in which the presence of sporogenous aerial mycelia is a fluctuating characteristic. J Bacteriol. 1949;57:141–145. doi: 10.1128/jb.57.2.141-145.1949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barrow GI, Feltham RKA. Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1965. pp. 21–45. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lányi B. In: Methods in Microbiology. Colwell R, Grigorova R, editors. London: Current Methods for Classification and Identification of Microorganisms, Academic Press; 1987. Classical and rapid identification methods for medically important bacteria; pp. 1–67. Vol. 19. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wood AP, Kelly DP. Physiological characteristics of a new thermophilic obligately chemolithotrophic Thiobacillus species Thiobacillus tepidarius . Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1985;35:434–437. doi: 10.1099/00207713-35-4-434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boden R, Hutt LP, Rae AW. Reclassification of Thiobacillus aquaesulis (Wood & Kelly, 1995) as Annwoodia aquaesulis gen. nov., comb. nov., transfer of Thiobacillus (Beijerinck, 1904) from the Hydrogenophilales to the Nitrosomonadales, proposal of Hydrogenophilalia class. nov. within the “Proteobacteria”, and four new families within the orders Nitrosomonadales and Rhodocyclales . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1191–1205. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kelly DP, Wood AP. Autotrophic growth of Thiobacillus A2 on methanol. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1982;15:229–233. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jurado V, Kroppenstedt RM, Saiz-Jimenez C, Klenk HP, Mouniée D, et al. Hoyosella altamirensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the order Actinomycetales isolated from a cave biofilm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:3105–3110. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.008664-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu Y, Q-y X, Hong K, Li L, Zhao YM, et al. Paracoccus siganidrum sp. nov., isolated from fish gastrointestinal tract. Anton Leeuw. 2013;105:1133–1139. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9894-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kim BY, Weon HY, Yoo SH, Kwon SW, Cho YH, et al. Paracoccus homiensis sp. nov., isolated from a sea-sand sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2387–2390. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64275-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang YX, Li X, F-L L, S-C M, Zheng GD, et al. Paracoccus alkanivorans sp. nov., isolated from a deep well with oil reservoir water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:2312–2317. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

