Abstract
This study describes JE7A12T (=ATCC TSD-225T=NCTC 14479T), an isolate from the ruminal content of a dairy cow. Phenotypic and genotypic traits of the isolate were explored. JE7A12T was found to be a strictly anaerobic, catalase-negative, oxidase-negative, coccoid bacterium that grows in chains. The API 50 CH carbon source assay detected fermentation of d-glucose, d-fructose, d-galactose, glycogen and starch. HPLC showed acetate to be the major fermentation product as a result of carbohydrate fermentation. Phylogenetic analysis of JE7A12T based on 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence and amino acid sequences from the whole genome indicated a divergent lineage from the closest neighbours in the genus Ruminococcus . The results of 16S rRNA sequence comparison, whole genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) and DNA G+C content data indicate that JE7A12T represents a novel species which we propose the name Ruminococcus bovis with JE7A12T as the type strain.
Keywords: genome, rumen, Ruminococcus
The genus Ruminococcus was first described by Sijpesteijn [1] with Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the type strain [2]. Previously, members of the genus Ruminococcus have most frequently been isolated from the rumen and gastrointestinal tract of a wide variety of animals, including humans [3]. The genus is polyphyletic and divided into two groups. Ruminococcus group 1 includes the type strain Ruminococcus flavefaciens , Ruminococcus albus , Ruminococcus bromii and Ruminococcus callidus. Ruminococcus group 2 species have recently undergone taxonomic re-classification with many species being reassigned to different genera [4]. It is now believed that true members of the genus Ruminococcus are the species found in group 1 [4].
Microbial fermentation plays a prominent role in the utilization of feed by ruminants. In the rumen, bacterial fermentation is known to contribute to the stabilization of ruminal pH, increase volatile fatty acid production, reduce ammonia concentration and improve fibre digestibility [5–12]. Ruminococci are ubiquitous members of the human gastrointestinal and rumen microbial consortia worldwide where they play a role in the fermentation of cellulose rich feedstuffs and resistant starch [13–19]. Assessment of the global distribution of rumen microbes by Henderson et al. found that species of the genus Ruminococcus were present in all ruminants surveyed and, on average, were found to comprise 3.6 % of the total rumen bacterial community [20]. While the abundance of members of the genus Ruminococcus is naturally high there is evidence that their functional role is larger than the abundance would suggest. Xia et al. revealed that 70–80 % of the starch degrading bacteria in the barley-fed beef heifers were members of the family Ruminococcaceae [21]. Similarly, shotgun metagenomics approaches have demonstrated that a disproportionately high number of genes encoding hemicellulase and cellulase in the rumen can be associated with members of group 1 of the genus Ruminococcus [22]. Thus, characterization of novel species of the genus Ruminococcus has the potential to elucidate underlying microbial functionality in the rumen and the influence of members of the genus with regards to ruminant feed utilization and nutrition. The following description pertains to the isolation and classification of a novel group 1 amylolytic species, represented by strain JE7A12T, of the genus Ruminococcus .
Isolation and ecology
JE7A12T was recovered from the rumen content of a healthy, Holstein dairy cow obtained from a farm in Tulare, California, USA on a modified chopped meat broth with carbohydrates solid medium (DSMZ Medium 110) at 37 °C in an anaerobic environment (5 % H2, 20 % CO2, 75 % N2). The medium was modified by the removal of fat-free ground meat and casein and the addition of 30.0 g peptone, 15.0 g meat extract, 10.0 g meat peptone, 15.0 g agar and 100 ml clarified rumen fluid [23] per litre of medium. After 48 h of anaerobic incubation at 37–39 °C, JE7A12T displayed off-white colonies approximately 0.1–0.3 mm in diameter on supplemented Bacto Tryptic Soy Broth (BD) with 0.4 g l-cysteine hydrochloride, 0.02 g ferric ammonium citrate, 10 µg vitamin K1, 2.0 mg resazurin sodium salt, 10.0 ml vitamin supplement ATCC MDVS (ATCC) and 7.0 g Gelrite (CP Kelco) per litre of medium (TSB+FAC). Gram-staining was performed as described by Beveridge [24]. Cell morphology was observed under an Accu-Scope EXC-350 light microscope using cells grown for 48 h at 37 °C on TSB+FAC. Cell size was measured using the microscopy imaging software Captavision + (Accu-Scope). Cells were Gram-stain positive, non-spore-forming and presented as small cocci (0.9–1.2 µm in diameter) (Figs S1 and S2, available in the online version of this article). The strain did not grow in the presence of oxygen and therefore is considered obligately anaerobic. Consistent with previous descriptions of the genus, JE7A12T is a strictly anaerobic coccoid, commonly found in pairs and chains [3]. Although isolated from rumen content, JE7A12T does not require rumen fluid for growth.
16S rRNA phylogeny
16S rRNA based phylogeny was computed by the neighbor-joining method using mega X [25]. JE7A12T was placed in a dendrogram of all type strains of species from the order Clostridiales for which a full length 16S rRNA sequence was available in the RDP database [26]. The dendrogram was trimmed to include all the current members of the genus Ruminiococcus as well as close phylogenetic neighbours (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
JE7A12T 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree by mega X, dendrogram; JE7A12T and type strains of species of the genus Ruminococcus as well as type strains of closely related species. The tree was reconstructed using 16S rRNA type strain sequences from members of the order Clostridiales in the RDP database by the neighbor-joining method based on the comparison of 1500 nt sequences. JE7A12T node and label are in green type. Ruminococcus group 1 type strains are in blue type. Bootstrap values, resulting from 500 replications, are given at each branch point.
To confirm the results from the tree reconstructed from 16S rRNA sequences, a second phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using PhyloPhlan and a subset of 400 conserved proteins [27]. JE7A12T was placed in the dendrogram generated by PhyloPhlan with type strains of species of the genus Ruminococcus as well as type strains of species that were close matches from the 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). Both the 16S rRNA tree reconstructed using mega X and the tree reconstructed using PhyloPhlan placed JE7A12T on a divergent branch within the Ruminococcus group 1 cluster. In agreement with the results of the ANI analysis, R. bromii was revealed to be the closest neighbour of JE7A12T by both phylogenetic reconstruction methods. As previously reported, the species of Ruminococcus group 2 form a separate and distinct cluster.
Fig. 2.
JE7A12T phylogenic tree by PhyloPhlan dendrogram; JE7A12 T and type strains of species of the genus Ruminococcus as well as type strains of other close phylogenetic neighbours. JE7A12T is indicated in green type, type strains of members of Ruminococcus group 1 are indicated in blue type. Branch length based on relative concatenated amino acid sequence similarity is appended to each branch. NCBI GenBank accession numbers are appended to each species label.
Genome features
DNA from a pure culture of JE7A12T was extracted by a modified Sambrook phenol–chloroform extraction/purification protocol [28]. Short-read libraries for whole genome sequencing were generated using a Kapa HyperPlus kit (Roche and single-end sequenced (1×300) on a MiSeq (Illumina). In parallel, long-read libraries were generated using the SQK-RAD004 kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and 1D sequenced on the MinION (R9.4 flowcell). Sequencing resulted in greater than 100× coverage by Illumina reads and 55× coverage by Oxford Nanopore. The genome was assembled by hybrid methods, utilizing both Canu [29] and Pilon [30], as described by George et al. [31]. The assembly resulted in the generation of a single, circular contig with a length and N50 of 2 440 231 base pairs. The DNA G+C content of the assembly is 34.6 mol%. The whole genome has been deposited at NCBI (accession number CP039381). Whole genome size and DNA G+C content were compared between JE7A12T and all current members of the genus Ruminococcus (Table 1). At 34.6 mol%, the DNA G+C content of JE7A12T should act as a differentiating characteristic for the species as it is significantly lower than those of any other member of the genus. The lowest known DNA G+C content for other members of the genus is 39 mol% for strains of R. flavefaciens and R. bromii [3].
Table 1.
Characteristics of JE7A12T compared with members of the genus Ruminococcus
Fermentation data for R. champanellensis and R. gauvereauii were taken from Chassard et al. [15] and Domingo et al. [42], respectively. Fermentation data for all other species were taken from Ezaki [3]. +, Positive; −, negative; sd, strain dependent; w, weak reaction; nd., no data; A, acetate; F, formate; S, succinate; *, average based on all assemblies in the NCBI database.
Characteristic |
JE7A12T |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genomic DNA G+C content (mol%) |
34.6 |
44.7* |
41.0* |
49.1* |
53.3* |
46.9* |
47.6* |
42.7* |
42.7* |
41.7 |
Genome size (Mbp) |
2.44 |
3.71* |
2.15* |
3.10* |
2.54* |
2.70* |
4.10* |
3.50* |
2.73* |
3.00* |
Major fermentation product(s) |
A |
A, F |
A |
A, S |
A, S |
A, F, S |
A |
A, F |
A, F |
A, L |
Fermentation of: | ||||||||||
Arabinose |
– |
– |
– |
– |
nd |
– |
nd |
+ |
– |
– |
Cellobiose |
– |
+ |
– |
+ |
+ |
+ |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Glucose |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
– |
– |
nd |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Lactose |
– |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
+ |
+ |
Mannose |
– |
+ |
w/– |
– |
– |
– |
nd |
– |
w/– |
w/– |
Maltose |
+ |
– |
+ |
+ |
– |
– |
nd |
+ |
sd |
w |
Mannitol |
– |
– |
– |
– |
nd |
– |
nd |
– |
+ |
– |
Raffinose |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
– |
+ |
– |
– |
The full length 16S rRNA sequence of JE7A12T was extracted from the whole genome sequence. The authenticity of the assembled 16S rRNA sequence was confirmed by comparison with a 16S rRNA amplicon sequence obtained using the 27F and 1492R primers and previously described methods [32]. The full length 16S rRNA sequence was subsequently compared with entries in the NCBI database by blast. Excluding species without validly published names, the closest neighbours to JE7A12T based on 16S rRNA sequence similarity are Ruminococcus bromii (93.3 %), Clostridium leptum (91.2 %) and Caproiciproducens galactitolivorans (89.2 %).
To further investigate taxonomic identity, whole genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) was compared between JE7A12T and type strains for all current species of the genus Ruminococcus [33]. Additionally, type strains of Clostridium leptum and Caproiciproducens galactitolivorans were included in the ANI analysis due to their close 16S rRNA similarity. Due to bias in ANI algorithms, the ANI of JE7A12T was evaluated utilizing both MUMmer and blast algorithms [34–36] (Tables 2 and 3).There were no matches at the suggested 95 % cutoff for defining a species [33, 34, 37]. The best match by blast was to Ruminococcus bromii . However, the two species are genetically distant as their genomes share 72.7 % sequence similarity but at only 20.1 % coverage of the genome (Table 3). MUMmer offered higher sequence similarity matches than blast, with sequence alignment values between 81.7 and 93.9 % for all species. However, these matches exhibited very low genome coverage (Table 2). The only species which demonstrates greater than 0.3 % genome coverage was Ruminococcus bromii . Whole genome nucleotide dissimilarity is a strong differentiator of JE7A12T from the other taxa of the genus.
Table 2.
Average nucleotide identity by MUMmer
ANI using MUMmer between JE7A12T and type strains of species of the genus Ruminococcus as well as type trains of closely related species as determined by 16S rRNA sequence alignment.
Genus species (Genbank accession number) |
ANI (%) |
Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|
Ruminococcus gauvreauii CCRI-16110T (GCA_000425525) |
93.7 |
0.11 |
Caproiciproducens galactitolivorans BS-1TT (GCA_004768785) |
92.5 |
0.31 |
Clostridium leptum VPI T7-24-1T (GCA_000154345) |
89.8 |
0.16 |
Ruminococcus champanellensis 18 P13T (GCA_000210095) |
88.8 |
0.24 |
Ruminococcus callidus VPI57-31T (GCA_000468015) |
87.8 |
0.20 |
Ruminococcus flavefaciens ATCC 19208T (GCA_000518765) |
86.0 |
0.21 |
Ruminococcus albus ATCC 27210T (GCA_000179635) |
85.8 |
0.14 |
Ruminococcus bromii VPI 6883T (GCA_002834225) |
84.5 |
1.66 |
Ruminococcus gnavus VPI C7-9T (GCA_009831375) |
82.3 |
0.13 |
Ruminococcus torques VPI B2-51T (GCA_000153925) |
82.2 |
0.18 |
Ruminococcus lactaris VPI X6-29T (GCA_000155205) |
81.7 |
0.21 |
Table 3.
Average nucleotide identity by blast
ANI using blast between JE7A12T type strains of species of the genus Ruminococcus as well as type species of closely related species as determined by 16S rRNA sequence alignment.
Genus species (Genbank accession number) |
ANI (%) |
Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|
Ruminococcus bromii VPI 6883T (GCA_002834225) |
72.8 |
20.2 |
Ruminococcus torques VPI B2-51T (GCA_000153925) |
71.9 |
3.32 |
Ruminococcus albus ATCC 27210T (GCA_000179635) |
71.6 |
2.76 |
Ruminococcus flavefaciens ATCC 19208T (GCA_000518765) |
70.9 |
3.28 |
Ruminococcus gnavus VPI C7-9T (GCA_009831375) |
70.9 |
2.54 |
Ruminococcus lactaris VPI X6-29T (GCA_000155205) |
70.8 |
3.69 |
Caproiciproducens galactitolivorans BS-1TT (GCA_004768785) |
70.1 |
5.48 |
Ruminococcus champanellensis 18 P13T (GCA_000210095) |
70.1 |
2.88 |
Ruminococcus callidus VPI57-31T (GCA_000468015) |
70.0 |
3.08 |
Clostridium leptum VPI T7-24-1T (GCA_000154345) |
69.7 |
3.93 |
Ruminococcus gauvreauii CCRI-16110T (GCA_000425525) |
69.3 |
1.38 |
Physiology and chemotaxonomy
Catalase and oxidase activities of JE7A12T were determined using a 3 % (v/v) hydrogen peroxide solution and 1.2 % tetra-methyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride solution, respectively. Growth temperature ranges were determined in TSB+FAC medium at 25, 30, 37, 40 and 50 °C. Optimal growth was observed at 37 and 40 °C, reduced growth at 30 °C and no growth at 25 and 50°C incubation temperature. No motility was observed. Growth in the presence of salt was studied by supplementing TSB+FAC liquid medium with NaCl (0.5–4.5 % w/v in 0.5 % increments). Hungate tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h and monitored for growth. JE7A12T was capable of growing in salt concentrations of up to 2.5 %. Tolerance to pH (5.0–9.0) was tested on TSB+FAC with pH tested in increments of 0.5 pH units. Hungate tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h and monitored for growth. The optimal pH for growth was pH 7.0–7.5 with reduced growth at pH 6.0–6.5. No growth was observed at pH 8.0–9.0 and pH 5.0–5.5 on TSB+FAC.
Carbohydrate fermentation of JE7A12T was qualitatively measured using the API 50CH carbon panel (BioMérieux). JE7A12T cells were grown to late exponential phase and recovered by centrifugation at 3000 g for 10 min. Cells were resuspended and 0.017 % (w/v bromocresol purple added as a pH indicator for acidification of carbohydrates [38]. JE7A12T fermented d-galactose, d-glucose, d-fructose, maltose, glycogen, aesculin/ferric citrate and starch. No fermentation of glycerol, erythritol, d-arabinose, l-arabinose, d-ribose, d-xylose, l-xylose, methyl β-d-xylopyranoside, d-cellobiose, d- adonitol, d-lactose, d-saccharose, d-trehalose, d-melibiose, d-mannose, l-arabitol, l-sorbose, l-rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, d-mannitol, d-sorbitol, methyl d-mannopyranoside, methyl d-glucopyranoside, N-acetyl glucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, melezitose, raffinose, xylitol,inulin, salicin, gentiobiose, turanose, d-lyxose, d-tagatose, d-fucose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-ketogluconate and potassium 5-ketogluconate was observed (Table S1).
A comparison of carbon source fermentation between JE7A12T and all current species of the genus Ruminococcus can be found in Table 1. Similarly to R. bromii , JE7A12T shows narrow specialization with regards to carbohydrate fermentation, while other members of the genus Ruminococcus generally ferment a wider range of carbohydrates [39]. Specifically, R. bromii has been reported to ferment most of the same carbon sources as JE7A12T, including galactose, glucose, fructose, maltose, glycogen and starch [3, 40]. Despite the similarities between the species, strains of R. bromii derived from the bovine rumen are not known to ferment fructose or galactose and are rarely able to ferment glucose. Utilization of these carbon sources have more commonly been observed in human derived R. bromii [41]. Therefore, fermentation of glucose, fructose and galactose could act to differentiate JE7A12T from ruminally derived Ruminococcus bromii .
Metabolite production was measured using a Waters Acquity UPLC Q System with RI detector. The column used was a Phenomenex 00 H-0138-K0 Rezex ROA Organic Acid H+ (8 %) operated at 60 °C. The mobile phase was 0.001625 M H2SO4 at 0.5 ml min−1. Pure standards of acetate, ethanol, glycerol, lactate, butyrate, butanol, propionate, succinate and pyruvate were used for calibration at varying concentrations. JE7A12T produces acetate as a major fermentation product as well as ethanol and glycerol as minor products. No lactate, butyrate, butanol, propionate, succinate or pyruvate is produced. A comparison of metabolite production between JE7A12T and all current species of the genus Ruminococcus can be found in Table 1. The fermentation profile of JE7A12T most closely resembles that of R. bromii and R. gauvreauii which are the only species in the genus that produce acetate, and only acetate, as a major metabolic product. While the other members of the genus produce acetate, they also produce high levels of succinate, lactate and formate.
Description of Ruminococcus bovis Sp. Nov.
Ruminococcus bovis (bo'vis. L. gen. n. bovis of the cow)
Ruminococcus bovis is an obligately anaerobic, catalase-negative and oxidase-negative bacterium. It is Gram-stain-positive and forms chains of small cocci when cultured in liquid medium. When cultured on TSB+FAC solid medium, it forms small, slightly opaque, off-white, circular colonies with even margins. Fermentation of d-galactose, d-glucose, d-fructose, maltose, glycogen, aesculin/ferric citrate and starch is indicated by API CH50. The major fermentation product is acetate, with ethanol and glycerol as minor products. No lactate, butyrate, butanol, propionate, succinate or pyruvate is produced.
The type strain is JE7A12T (=ATCC TSD-225T=NCTC 14479T) and was originally isolated from rumen content of a healthy, Holstein cow from Tulare, California, USA. The genomic DNA G+C content of the type strain is 34.6 mol%.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
Native Microbials (formerly known as ASCUS Biosciences, Inc.) provided funding for this project.
Conflicts of interest
All authors are members of Native Microbials (formerly known as ASCUS Biosciences, Inc.) which provided funding for this project.
Ethical statement
Sampling procedures were approved by veterinarians at Dairy Experts (Tulare, CA) and Native Microbials, Inc.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ANI, average nucleotide identity.
One supplementary table and two supplementary figures are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Sijpesteijn AK. Cellulose-decomposing bacteria from the rumen of cattle. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1949;15:49–52. doi: 10.1007/BF02062631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sijpesteijn AK. On Ruminococcus flavefaciens, a cellulose-decomposing bacterium from the rumen of sheep and cattle. J Gen Microbiol. 1951;5:869–879. doi: 10.1099/00221287-5-5-869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ezaki T. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. 2015. Ruminococcus; pp. 1–5. In. pp. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu C, Finegold SM, Song Y, Lawson PA. Reclassification of Clostridium coccoides, Ruminococcus hansenii, Ruminococcus hydrogenotrophicus, Ruminococcus luti, Ruminococcus productus and Ruminococcus schinkii as Blautia coccoides gen. nov., comb. nov., Blautia hansenii comb. nov., Blautia hydrogenotrophica comb. nov., Blautia luti comb. nov., Blautia producta comb. nov., Blautia schinkii comb. nov. and description of Blautia wexlerae sp. nov., isolated from human faeces [Internet] Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:1896–1902. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65208-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Henning PH, Horn CH, Leeuw KJ, Meissner HH, Hagg FM. Effect of ruminal administration of the lactate-utilizing strain Megasphaera elsdenii (Me) NCIMB 41125 on abrupt or gradual transition from forage to concentrate diets. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2010;157:20–29. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jeyanathan J, Martin C, Eugène M, Ferlay A, Popova M, et al. Bacterial direct-fed microbials fail to reduce methane emissions in primiparous lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10:41. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0342-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krehbiel CR, Rust SR, Zhang G, Gilliland SE. Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performance response and mode of action. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:E120–32. [Google Scholar]
- 8.McAllister TA, Beauchemin KA, Alazzeh AY, Baah J, Teather RM, et al. Review: The use of direct fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and enhance production in cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 2011;91:193–211. doi: 10.4141/cjas10047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nocek JE, Kautz WP, Leedle JAZ, Allman JG. Ruminal supplementation of direct-fed microbials on diurnal pH variation and in situ digestion in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:429–433. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74091-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Qiao GH, Shan AS, Ma N, Ma QQ, Sun ZW. Effect of supplemental Bacillus cultures on rumen fermentation and milk yield in Chinese Holstein cows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2010;94:429–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2009.00926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weinberg ZG, Shatz O, Chen Y, Yosef E, Nikbahat M, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silages. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:4754–4762. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yoon IK, Stern MD. Influence of direct-fed microbials on ruminal microbial fermentation and performance of ruminants - A Review. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 1995;8:533–555. doi: 10.5713/ajas.1995.553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leitch ECM, Walker AW, Duncan SH, Holtrop G, Flint HJ. Selective colonization of insoluble substrates by human faecal bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:667–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ze X, Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint HJ. Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon. ISME J. 2012;6:1535–1543. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chassard C, Delmas E, Robert C, Lawson PA, Bernalier-Donadille A. Ruminococcus champanellensis sp. nov., a cellulose-degrading bacterium from human gut microbiota. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:138–143. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.027375-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moraïs S, Mizrahi I. The road not taken: The rumen microbiome, functional groups, and community states. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27:538–549. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lay C, Sutren M, Rochet V, Saunier K, Doré J, et al. Design and validation of 16S rRNA probes to enumerate members of the Clostridium leptum subgroup in human faecal microbiota. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:933–946. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00763.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moore WE, Holdeman LV. Human fecal flora: the normal flora of 20 Japanese-Hawaiians. Appl Microbiol. 1974;27:961–979. doi: 10.1128/am.27.5.961-979.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wegmann U, Louis P, Goesmann A, Henrissat B, Duncan SH, et al. Complete genome of a new Firmicutes species belonging to the dominant human colonic microbiota (“Ruminococcus bicirculans”) reveals two chromosomes and a selective capacity to utilize plant glucans. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:2879–2890. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, et al. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14567. doi: 10.1038/srep14567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xia Y, Kong Y, Seviour R, Yang H-E, Forster R, et al. In situ identification and quantification of starch-hydrolyzing bacteria attached to barley and corn grain in the rumen of cows fed barley-based diets. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015;91:fiv077. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dai X, Tian Y, Li J, Luo Y, Liu D, et al. Metatranscriptomic analyses of plant cell wall polysaccharide degradation by microorganisms in the cow rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:1375–1386. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03682-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grubb JA, Dehority BA. Variation in colony counts of total viable anaerobic rumen bacteria as influenced by media and cultural methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976;31:262–267. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.2.262-267.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beveridge TJ. Mechanism of gram variability in select bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:1609–1620. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.3.1609-1620.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. mega X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, et al. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D633–42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Segata N, Börnigen D, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C. PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2304. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jain M, Koren S, Miga KH, Quick J, Rand AC, et al. Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:338–345. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k -mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.George S, Pankhurst L, Hubbard A, Votintseva A, Stoesser N, et al. Resolving plasmid structures in Enterobacteriaceae using the MinION nanopore sequencer: assessment of MinION and MinION/Illumina hybrid data assembly approaches. Microb Genom [Internet] 2017 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Heuer H, Krsek M, Baker P, Smalla K, Wellington EM. Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:3233–3241. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.8.3233-3241.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, et al. MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1005944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods. 2016;8:12–24. doi: 10.1039/C5AY02550H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Avgustin G, Wallace RJ, Flint HJ. Phenotypic diversity among ruminal isolates of Prevotella ruminicola: proposal of Prevotella brevis sp. nov., Prevotella bryantii sp. nov., and Prevotella albensis sp. nov. and redefinition of Prevotella ruminicola . Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:284–288. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-2-284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.La Reau AJ, Suen G. The Ruminococci: Key symbionts of the gut ecosystem. J Microbiol. 2018;56:199–208. doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-8024-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moore WEC, Cato EP, Holdeman LV. Ruminococcus bromii sp. n. and emendation of the description of Ruminococcus Sijpestein. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1972;22:78–80. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mukhopadhya I, Moraïs S, Laverde-Gomez J, Sheridan PO, Walker AW, et al. Sporulation capability and amylosome conservation among diverse human colonic and rumen isolates of the keystone starch-degrader Ruminococcus bromii . Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:324–336. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Domingo M-C, Huletsky A, Boissinot M, Bernard KA, Picard FJ, et al. Ruminococcus gauvreauii sp. nov., a glycopeptide-resistant species isolated from a human faecal specimen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:1393–1397. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65259-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.