Abstract
Introduction
Staphylococcus coagulans (formerly Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans ) is a common commensal and opportunistic pathogen of companion dogs. It carries a range of antimicrobial resistance genes and is an occasional zoonotic pathogen.
Hypothesis/Gap Statement
Despite the potential insight offered by genome sequencing into the biology of S. coagulans , few genomes are currently available for study.
Aim
To sequence and analyse S. coagulans genomes to improve understanding of this organism’s molecular epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance and bacterium–host interactions.
Methodology
Twenty-five genomes of clinical isolates collected at a veterinary referral hospital in Scotland, UK, were sequenced with Illumina technology. These genomes were analysed by a series of bioinformatics tools along with 16 previously sequenced genomes.
Results
Phylogenetic comparison of the 41 genomes shows that the current S. coagulans phylogeny is dominated by clades of closely related isolates, at least one of which has spread internationally. Ten of the 11 methicillin-resistant S. coagulans genomes in this collection of 41 encoded the mecA promoter and gene mutations that are predicted to render the isolates susceptible to penicillins in the presence of clavulanic acid, a feature only described to date in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Seven such isolates were from the current study and, in line with the genome-based prediction, all were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in vitro. S. coagulans shared very few highly conserved virulence-associated genes with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius , another common commensal and opportunistic canine pathogen.
Conclusion
The availability of a further 25 genome sequences from clinical S. coagulans isolates will aid in better understanding the epidemiology, bacterial–host interactions and antimicrobial resistance of this opportunistic pathogen.
Keywords: coagulase-positive staphylococci, methicillin resistance, Staphylococcus coagulans, veterinary microbiology
Introduction
Staphylococcus coagulans was originally described in 1990 as Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans [1] before being promoted, on the basis of genomic parameters, to a separate species in 2020 [2]. S. coagulans is primarily a commensal and opportunistic pathogen of companion dogs. It is frequently isolated from the skin [3] and the external ear canal [4] of healthy dogs as well as being associated with external ear otitis [1, 3–5] and pyoderma [4, 6–8]. While rare, there are also reports of S. coagulans causing opportunistic infections in compromised humans [9–13]. In addition to companion dogs and humans, the list of currently reported hosts or sites of S. coagulans isolation, to the best of my knowledge, is as follows; domestic cats [14], chicken meat [15], ready to eat retail fish [16], healthy feral and domestic pigeons [17], Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) [18], South polar skua (Stercorarius maccormicki) [18], Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) [18], southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) [18, 19], grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) [19] and Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) [19]. Akin to many staphylococcal species, S. coagulans is therefore widely distributed in avian and mammalian host species and is probably found more widely among such host species than is presently documented.
As with other staphylococci [20], methicillin resistance is encoded by mecA in S. coagulans [8, 21, 22] and resistance against a range of other antimicrobials has been reported including penicillin [23, 24], erythromycin [8, 23–26], clindamycin [7, 8, 23–25], lincomycin [7], gentamicin [8, 23, 25, 26], fusidic acid [24], tetracycline [23, 25] and fluoroquinolones [7, 8, 24–26]. Not only could this resistance impede the successful treatment of S. coagulans infections, antimicrobial resistance genes have been shown to move between staphylococcal species and there is potential for S. coagulans to act as a genetic reservoir for the onward dissemination of resistance determinants to other staphylococci, including more pathogenic species such as Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius [27–30].
Despite the frequency of S. coagulans as an opportunistic pathogen in companion dogs and its zoonotic potential, relatively few genome sequences are available with which to inform our understanding of S. coagulans biology, such as its epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance and bacterium–host interactions. Ultimately, such data may facilitate new interventions to prevent, diagnose and treat S. coagulans infections. Reported herein is the genome sequencing and analysis of 25 S. coagulans clinical isolates collected at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies Hospital for Small Animals, Scotland, UK. This collection comprises 24 canine isolates, of which seven are methicillin-resistant, and a single methicillin-sensitive feline isolate. The isolates are placed into wider context by phylogenetic comparison with other available genomes, resulting in a final collection of 41 genome-sequenced S. coagulans isolates.
Methods
Bacterial isolation, identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing
Twenty-five S. coagulans study isolates were collected during routine diagnostic work performed at Easter Bush Pathology, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies [R(D)SVS], University of Edinburgh, from samples received from the R(D)SVS Hospital for Small Animals between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2019. With the exception of a single isolate which failed genome sequencing, all isolates recovered during this time period are included in this study.
Clinical isolates were isolated on Columbia agar supplemented with 5 % horse blood (E and O Laboratory) and incubated atmospherically at 37 °C for 18–24 h. Isolates from samples screening for methicillin-resistant staphylococci were isolated on MRSA Brilliance (Oxoid) and incubated atmospherically at 37 °C for 24 h.
Isolates were identified and antimicrobial sensitivity testing was performed using a Vitek2 (bioMéurieux) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Using AST-GP80 cards, the following antimicrobials were tested: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, benzylpenicillin, cefovecin, cefoxitin (screen), ceftiofur, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, doxycycline enrofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, clindamycin (inducible resistance), kanamycin, marbofloxacin, neomycin, nitrofurantoin, oxacillin, pradofloxacin, tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Interpretation was made according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria (2017).
Whole genome sequencing
Whole genome sequencing was performed by Microbes NG (University of Birmingham, UK) as described previously [19]. In brief, genomic DNA was extracted using Solid Phase Reversible Immobilization beads and genomic DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina) following the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications: input DNA is increased 2-fold, and PCR elongation time is increased to 45 s. Libraries were sequenced using Illumina sequencers (HiSeq/NovaSeq) using a 250 bp paired-end protocol. Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.30 [31], using a sliding window quality cut-off of 15. Genome assembly was done de novo using SPAdes, version 3.7, with default parameters for 250 bp Illumina reads [32] and annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [33].
Genome analysis
Study isolates were confirmed to belong to S. coagulans using the Type Strain Genome Server [34]. Acquired resistance genes were identified using ResFinder-4.1 employing the threshold of 80 % for percentage identity and minimum length of 80 % [35]. Virulence-factor genes were identified by blast using MyDbFinder 2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MyDbFinder/) and a published list of S. pseudintermedius virulence-related gene sequences [36]. Thresholds of 90 % for percentage identity and 80 % for minimum length were applied to the virulence-related gene blast search. SCCmec typing from genome sequences was performed using SCCmecFinder [37].
Phylogenetic relationships between study isolates and previously sequenced, assembled and annotated S. schleiferi isolates [19, 38–41] were inferred using CSI Phylogeny 1.4 (Call SNPs and Infer Phylogeny) [42] using the type strain S. coagulans DSM 6628T (GCA_002901995.1) as the reference genome and applying default settings [minimum depth at single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions: 10×; minimum relative depth at SNP positions: 10 %, minimum distance between SNPs (prune): 10 bp; minimum SNP quality: 30; minimum read mapping quality: 25 and minimum Z-score: 1.96]. In total, 2 096 299 positions were found in all analysed genomes. Staphylococcus schleiferi ATCC 43808T (GCA_011137195) was included as the outgroup to root the tree. The resultant tree was annotated using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) [43].
Data availability
Isolate metadata and nucleotide accessions are provided in Table S1 (available in the online version of this article).
Results and discussion
Isolate collection and phylogenetic analysis
Twenty-five S. coagulans isolates were collected and genome-sequenced during the collection period. Isolates were initially identified phenotypically as S. schleiferi by the Vitek2 during routine diagnostic work and subsequently shown to represent S. coagulans following genome sequencing and analysis using the Type Strain Genome Server. At the time of isolate collection, the Vitek2 platform was validated to identify S. schleiferi but was not able to differentiate the two subspecies S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi and S. schleiferi subsp. coagulans ; the latter was subsequently changed to a species in its own right, S. coagulans, in 2020 [2]. Hence, study isolates were originally identified as being S. schleiferi on the basis of phenotype and then identified definitively following genome sequencing. The Type Strain Genome Server uses Genome Blast Distance Phylogeny to delimitate bacterial species and was selected for the genome-based identification due to its comprehensive and curataed database of type strains. The 25 genomes sequenced in this study ranged in size from 2 426 360 to 2 544 913 bp with a mean of 2 483 639 bp. The G+C content ranged from 35.75 to 36.32 mol% with a mean of 35.91 mol%. These figures are comparable to those for the species type strain, DSM 6628T, which has a 2 443 567 bp genome with a G+C content of 35.83 mol%. A single isolate came from a cat with the remainder being from dogs. The most common sites of isolation were skin/wound/lesion (11 isolates) followed by ear swabs (six isolates; Table S1). Thirteen of the 25 isolates were susceptible to all 21 antimicrobials tested (Table S1). Seven isolates of these 25 were phenotyically methicillin-resistant, all of these seven were resistant to oxacillin but only two of them were resistant in cefoxitin. This agrees with previous data demonstrating that oxacillin is more reliable than cefoxitin for the detection of mecA-mediated methicillin resistance in S. coagulans [21]. All phenotypcially methicillin-resistant isolates encoded mecA on an SCCmec type V element except for 5909-02 which encoded mecA within an SCCmec type IVa element.
The 25 study isolates were compared with the 16 currently available S. coagulans genome-sequenced isolates (Table S1) using an SNP-based phylogenetic analysis. This phylogeny, comprising 41 isolates, shows that the currently sequenced S. coagulans population is dominated by three highly clonal clades, A–C, which together comprise 29 (71 %) of the available genome-sequenced isolates (Fig. 1). Clade A comprises of seven Scottish methicillin-resistant isolates with isolates separated by a pairwise average of 29 SNPs. Two isolates in this clade came from the same individual dog 54 days apart. These two isolates are separated by only two SNPs and indicate that colonization with the same strain of methicillin-resistant S. coagulans can last for at least 7 weeks. Clade B comprises only five isolates but includes isolates from Scotland, USA and South Korea separated by an average pairwise difference of 232 SNPs. This demonstrates the international dissemination of this lineage, which is further noteworthy with regard to variation in methicillin resistance among these isolates. Two of these isolates are methicillin-sensitive, and while three isolates are methicillin-resistant, two, 2317-03 and OT1-1, encode SCCmec type V with 5909-02 encoding SCCmec type IVa. Clade C is the largest cluster of related isolates, comprising 16 isolates, all from Scotland, and separated by an average pairwise difference of 90 SNPs. Among the canine isolates in Clade C is a single feline isolate, separated from the nearest canine isolate by 35 SNPs and thus demonstrating that different companion animal species can be infected by closely related S. coagulans strains.
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic analysis of currently available S. coagulans genome-sequenced isolates. The phylogeny was generated from SNPs across 2 096 299 positions in the core genome using CSI Phylogeny 1.4 [42] with S. coagulans DSM 6628T as the reference genome and S. schleiferi ATCC 43808T as the outgroup to root the tree. Host (column 1) and country of origin (column 2) are indicated in coloured columns. Presence (black square) or absence (white square) of indicated antimicrobial resistance genes are shown in subsequent columns. Genome accessions are provided in Table S1.
Eleven isolates in the sequenced collection of 41 encoded mecA and in each case this was within an SCCmec type V apart from the aforementioned exception of type IVa encoded in isolate 5909-02. Other resistance genes were not common (Fig. 1). The lincomycin resistance gene lnu(A) [44] was present in five of the seven Scottish methicllin-resistant S. coagulans (MRSC) isolates in Clade A. The aminoglycoside resistance determinants, aadD and acc(6′)-aph(2′), were present in two previously sequenced isolates from South Korea and USA, OT1-1 and 2317-03, with blaZ also present in the latter isolate (Fig. 1).
Suscpetibilty to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
In addition to oxacillin, all seven Scottish MRSC isolates were resistant to the tested β-lactams penicillin, cefalotin and ceftiofur (Table S1). However, all seven were unexpectedly susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Similar unexpected susceptibility to penicillins and β-lactamase inhibitors has been reported in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) [45]. In MRSA this susceptibility is conferred by a combination of two mutations in the mecA promoter region which lowers expression of the mecA gene and penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), and two substitutions in PBP2a (E246G or M122I) which increase its affinity for penicillins in the presence of clavulanic acid [45]. All seven Scottish MRSC isolates encoded the E246G mutation in PBP2a and the mecA promoter mutation mecA[−33]:C-T which, based on their characterization in MRSA, most probably confer their susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first demonstration of these mecA mutations and their association with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid susceptibility in methicillin-resistant staphylococci other than S. aureus . While not available for phenotypic testing, the previously sequenced MRSC isolates OT1-1 and TSCC54 possessed these same two mutations, suggesting that they too would be susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. MRSC isolate 5909-02 is also likely to be susceptible, as it carried the E246G mutation in PBP2a and the second characterized mecA promoter mutation, mecA[−7]:G-T, associated with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in MRSA. However, isolate 2317-03 demonstrates that these mutations are not ubiquitous in MRSC, as it lacked any of the four mutations and is therefore predicted to be resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.
Eight of the 25 study isolates displayed resistance to fluoroquinolones (Table S1). All seven MRSC isolates were resistant to enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin and intermediate with regard to pradofloxacin. A single methicillin-sensitive isolate, p17922383, showed resistance to all three tested fluoroquinolones. In staphylococci, four SNPs in grlA (G239T and G250A) and gyrA (C251T and A263G) are the mutations most commonly associated with fluoroquinolone resistance [46, 47]. All eight fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates carried the gyrA C251T mutation, which is probably responsible for this resistance.
Virulence factors in S. coagulans
The virulence-associated gene reportiore of S. coaglans is, as yet, poorly characterized. Therefore all 41 S. coagulans genomes were investigated for the presence of 69 virulence-associated genes from another staphylococcal opportunistic pathogen of dogs, S. pseudintermedius , with similar epidemiology. Thresholds for nuclelotide identity and length match were set at 90 and 80% respectively. Thirty-nine isolates had no matches to any of the 69 virulence-associated genes. Staphylococcal entertoxin C3 (sec3) and toxic shock syndrome toxin (tst) were present in the two indistinguishable seal isolates, A/G14/99/8 and A/W41/99/1. The only other virulence-related gene found in this analsyis was the gene encoding the bacterocin and immunomodulatory peptide, BacSp222 [48], which is present in another seal isolate, M615/02/4. To the best of my knowledge, these represent the first reports of these virulence-associated genes in S. coagulans . These data indicate a limited sharing of highly conserved virulence-related genes between S. coagulans and S. pseudintermedius . Notably, no S. coagulans isolate carried coa, encoding staphylocoagulase, purported to be responsible for coagulase activity in staphylococci. The molecular basis for this activity in S. coagulans therefore remains to be defined. The availablity of an expanded collection of genome-sequenced S. coagulans will facilitate the future exploration of virulence-related genes and the bacterial–host interactions of this organism.
Conclusion
This report describes the genome sequencing of 25 clinical isolates of S. coagulans from Scotland, UK, and their analysis with the 16 other available S. coagulans genomes. The resultant S. coagulans phylogeny is dominated by clusters of highly related isolates indicative of the clonal expansion of successful lineages, including their international dissemination. Many isolates are susceptible to all tested antimicrobials and lack antimcroibial resistance determinants. Few conserved virulence-related genes are shared with S. pseudintermedius , highlighting that much remains to be elucidated with regard to S. coagulans bacterial–host interactions.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This work received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Acknowledgements
The excellent technical assistance of Jennifer Harris and Sarah Goodbrand, University of Edinburgh, is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflicts of interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
Samples were collected through routine diagnostic procedures with the written informed consent of the owner and approved by the R(D)SVS Veterinary Ethical Review Committee (reference 28.21).
Footnotes
Abbreviations: CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; CSI Phylogeny, Call SNPs and Infer Phylogeny; iTOL, Interactive Tree of Life; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MRSC, methicllin-resistant S. coagulans; PBP2a, penicillin-binding protein 2a; R(D)SVS, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
A supplementary table is available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Igimi S, Takahashi E, Mitsuoka T. Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans subsp. nov., isolated from the external auditory meatus of dogs with external ear otitis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1990;40:409–411. doi: 10.1099/00207713-40-4-409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Madhaiyan M, Wirth JS, Saravanan VS. Phylogenomic analyses of the Staphylococcaceae family suggest the reclassification of five species within the genus Staphylococcus as heterotypic synonyms, the promotion of five subspecies to novel species, the taxonomic reassignment of five Staphylococcus species to Mammaliicoccus gen. nov., and the formal assignment of Nosocomiicoccus to the family Staphylococcaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5926–5936. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yamashita K, Shimizu A, Kawano J, Uchida E, Haruna A, et al. Isolation and characterization of staphylococci from external auditory meatus of dogs with or without otitis externa with special reference to Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp coagulans isolates. J Vet Med Sci. 2005;67:263–268. doi: 10.1292/jvms.67.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.May ER, Hnilica KA, Frank LA, Jones RD, Bemis DA. Isolation of Staphylococcus schleiferi from healthy dogs and dogs with otitis, pyoderma, or both. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;227:928–931. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Foster G, Barley J. Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans in dogs. Vet Rec. 2007;161:496. doi: 10.1136/vr.161.14.496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hariharan H, Gibson K, Peterson R, Frankie M, Matthew V, et al. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi Subspecies coagulans from Canine Pyoderma Cases in Grenada, West Indies, and Their Susceptibility to Beta-Lactam Drugs. Vet Med Int. 2014;2014:850126. doi: 10.1155/2014/850126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kawakami T, Shibata S, Murayama N, Nagata M, Nishifuji K, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans isolated from dogs with pyoderma in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2010;72:1615–1619. doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Griffeth GC, Morris DO, Abraham JL, Shofer FS, Rankin SC. Screening for skin carriage of methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus schleiferi in dogs with healthy and inflamed skin. Vet Dermatol. 2008;19:142–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vandenesch F, Lebeau C, Bes M, Lina G, Lina B, et al. Clotting activity in Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies from human patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:388–392. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.388-392.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kumar D, Cawley JJ, Irizarry-Alvarado JM, Alvarez A, Alvarez S. Case of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans endocarditis and metastatic infection in an immune compromised host. Transpl Infect Dis. 2007;9:336–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thibodeau E, Boucher H, DeNofrio D, Pham DT, Snydman D. First report of a left ventricular assist device infection caused by Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans: a coagulase-positive organism. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74:68–69. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tzamalis A, Chalvatzis N, Anastasopoulos E, Tzetzi D, Dimitrakos S. Acute postoperative Staphylococcus schleiferi endophthalmitis following uncomplicated cataract surgery: First report in the literature. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23:427–430. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yarbrough ML, Hamad Y, Burnham CA, George IA, McAdam AJ. The brief case: Bacteremia and vertebral osteomyelitis due to Staphylococcus schleiferi . J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:3157–3161. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00500-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abraham JL, Morris DO, Griffeth GC, Shofer FS, Rankin SC. Surveillance of healthy cats and cats with inflammatory skin disease for colonization of the skin by methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus schleiferi ssp. schleiferi. Vet Dermatol. 2007;18:252–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2007.00604.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martins PD, de Almeida TT, Basso AP, de Moura TM, Frazzon J, et al. Coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from chicken meat: Pathogenic potential and vancomycin resistance. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:771–776. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sergelidis D, Abrahim A, Papadopoulos T, Soultos N, Martziou E, et al. Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. from ready-to-eat fish products. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2014;59:500–506. doi: 10.1111/lam.12304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kizerwetter-Swida M, Chrobak-Chmiel D, Rzewuska M, Antosiewicz A, Dolka B, et al. Genetic characterization of coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from healthy pigeons. Pol J Vet Sci. 2015;18:627–634. doi: 10.1515/pjvs-2015-0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vrbovska V, Sedlacek I, Zeman M, Svec P, Kovarovic V, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus intermedius group isolates associated with animals from Antarctica and emended description of Staphylococcus delphini . Microorganisms. 2020;8 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Foster G, Robb A, Paterson GK. Isolation and genome sequencing of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans from antarctic and North Sea seals. Access Microbiol. 2020;2:acmi000162. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peacock SJ, Paterson GK. Mechanisms of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus . Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:577–601. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huse HK, Miller SA, Chandrasekaran S, Hindler JA, Lawhon SD, et al. Evaluation of oxacillin and cefoxitin disk diffusion and MIC breakpoints established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for detection of meca-mediated oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus schleiferi . J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01653–17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01653-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Roberts S, O’Shea K, Morris D, Robb A, Morrison D, et al. A real-time PCR assay to detect the Panton Valentine Leukocidin toxin in staphylococci: screening Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans strains from companion animals. Vet Microbiol. 2005;107:139–144. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chanchaithong P, Perreten V, Schwendener S, Tribuddharat C, Chongthaleong A, et al. Strain typing and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococcal species in dogs and people associated with dogs in Thailand. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;117:572–586. doi: 10.1111/jam.12545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Costa SS, Oliveira V, Serrano M, Pomba C, Couto I. Phenotypic and molecular traits of Staphylococcus coagulans associated with canine skin infections in Portugal. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021;10 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Detwiler A, Bloom P, Petersen A, Rosser EJ. Multi-drug and methicillin resistance of staphylococci from canine patients at a veterinary teaching hospital (2006-2011. Vet Q. 2013;33:60–67. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2013.799792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Penna B, Varges R, Medeiros L, Martins GM, Martins RR, et al. Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from canine otitis externa. Vet Dermatol. 2010;21:292–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rossi CC, Pereira MF, Giambiagi-deMarval M. Underrated Staphylococcus species and their role in antimicrobial resistance spreading. Genet Mol Biol. 2020;43:e20190065. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Haaber J, Penadés JR, Ingmer H. Transfer of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus . Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:893–905. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Frosini SM, Bond R, McCarthy AJ, Feudi C, Schwarz S, et al. Genes on the move: in vitro transduction of antimicrobial resistance genes between human and canine staphylococcal pathogens. Microorganisms. 2020;8:12. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8122031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Méric G, Miragaia M, de Been M, Yahara K, Pascoe B, et al. Ecological overlap and horizontal gene transfer in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis . Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:1313–1328. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zukancic A, Khan MA, Gurmen SJ, Gliniecki QM, Moritz-Kinkade DL, et al. Staphylococcal Protein A (spa) locus is a hot spot for recombination and horizontal gene transfer in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius . mSphere. 2020;5 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00666-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kaya H, Hasman H, Larsen J, Stegger M, Johannesen TB, et al. Sccmecfinder, a web-based tool for typing of staphylococcal cassette chromosome MEC in Staphylococcus aureus using whole-genome sequence data. mSphere. 2018;3 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00612-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cole K, Foster D, Russell JE, Golubchik T, Llewelyn M, et al. Draft genome sequences of 64 type strains of 50 species and 25 subspecies of the genus Staphylococcus Rosenbach 1884. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:e00062–19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00062-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee GY, Yang SJ. Complete genome sequence of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus schleiferi strain from canine otitis externa in Korea. J Vet Sci. 2020;21:e11. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Misic AM, Cain CL, Morris DO, Rankin SC, Beiting DP. Complete genome sequence and methylome of Staphylococcus schleiferi, an important cause of skin and ear infections in veterinary medicine. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01011–15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01011-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Kuwahara-Arai K, Matsuo M, Lu YJ, et al. Complete genome sequence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus schleiferi strain TSCC54 of canine origin. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01268–15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01268-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kaas RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Feßler AT, Wang Y, Wu C, Schwarz S. Mobile lincosamide resistance genes in staphylococci. Plasmid. 2018;99:22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Harrison EM, Ba X, Coll F, Blane B, Restif O, et al. Genomic identification of cryptic susceptibility to penicillins and β-lactamase inhibitors in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1680–1691. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0471-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Descloux S, Rossano A, Perreten V. Characterization of New Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) and topoisomerase genes in fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius . J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1818–1823. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02255-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yamagishi J, Kojima T, Oyamada Y, Fujimoto K, Hattori H, et al. Alterations in the DNA topoisomerase IV grlA gene responsible for quinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1157–1163. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wladyka B, Piejko M, Bzowska M, Pieta P, Krzysik M, et al. A peptide factor secreted by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius exhibits properties of both bacteriocins and virulence factors. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14569. doi: 10.1038/srep14569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Isolate metadata and nucleotide accessions are provided in Table S1 (available in the online version of this article).

