Abstract
A reusable sensor architecture, through the combination of self-assembled monolayers and cyclodextrin supramolecular interactions, is demonstrated for class recognition of hydrophobic analytes demonstrated with trans-resveratrol. The reloadable sensor is based on reversible immobilization of α-cyclodextrin on polyethylene glycol surface. α-cyclodextrins complexes with polyethylene glycols and causes the polymer chains to change their surface configuration. The reproducibility and stability of the sur-face, in the detection of nanomolar concentrations of trans-resveratrol, can be demonstrated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. We propose that during sensor operation, α-cyclodextrin decouples from the poly-ethylene glycol surface to complex with trans-resveratrol in solution, and after use, the surface regeneration is conducted with a simple α-cyclodextrin soak. To test the nonspecific response, the sensor was also tested with trans-resveratrol spiked human urine.
Keywords: biosensor, cyclodextrin (CD), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), hydrophobic analytes, resveratrol
Graphical Abstract

1. INTRODUCTION
Reusable sensors are critical in applications where automated in-process analyte sensing is essential, as in environmental screening,1 cellular monitoring,2 food monitoring,3 and biopharmaceutical applications.4,5 A reusable sensor surface would reduce material and reagent costs, and, once an appropriate calibration curve is obtained, it can be applied for subsequent sample screenings.6,7 In recent years different strategies have been directed toward the development of reusable aptamer-based sensors and immunosorbent surfaces; although, the restoration to the appropriate original antibody orientation and function is difficult after multiple uses.8
In engineering processes, hydrophobic content can indicate process efficiency or disruptions in the purity of the final product that are of interest for real-time monitoring. Water purification processes remove organic or inorganic chemical impurities and endotoxins with a roughly hydrophobic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) constituent.9–11 Cellular and metabolic engineering processes monitor proteins and cellular secretions; most cell secretions are soluble, but some proteins exhibit hydrophobic functionalities. And pharmaceutical processes optimize drug loading processes based on API chemical and physical properties (i.e. hydrophobicity, solubility) and drug dissolution.12,13 Thus, real-time monitoring of hydrophobic content would contribute to an increase in process efficiency and final product quality. Among hydrophobic molecules of interest, trans-resveratrol offers ideal characteristics for a model analyte to evaluate the sensitivity and selectivity of the proposed sensor; trans-resveratrol is largely hydrophobic with a strong association to alpha-cyclodextrin, being the functional component of the proposed class recognition hydrophobic analyte sensor.
Animal studies and preliminary clinical trials have shown the effect of trans-resveratrol on general health maintenance and prevention of various diseases and disorders.14–16 Although, due to rapid metabolism and poor bioavailability, many of the promising health-promoting effects of trans-resveratrol in animal models have not yet been confirmed in humans, and trans-resveratrol is currently not prescribed for the treatment of any human disease.15,16 Previous clinical studies indicate nanomolar range of trans-resveratrol sensing is necessary for pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and metabolite studies of trans-resveratrol in humans.15,17
Cyclodextrins (CDs) are cyclic compounds composed of a hydrophobic inner cavity and a hydrophilic surface, and they are used in various applications including drug delivery and sensors.18–20 CDs can capture various organic and inorganic hydrophobic molecules into their cavity by reversible binding, which makes them promising candidates for use as hydrophobic recognition elements in our sensor development. αCD is the most appropriate receptor for determination of trans-resveratrol.21 A CD modified glassy carbon electrode for trans-resveratrol detection has been engineered for single-use applications; trans-resveratrol adsorbed strongly to the surface and could not be removed by polishing or cleaning the electrode.21 Other CD-metal surfaces, such as CD self-assembled monolayers with thiolated cyclodextrins or CD surface free-radical polymerization, are also single use due to strong analyte complexation, and the surface needs to be abated or polished for reuse applications.22–25
Reusable CD surfaces enable future scientists to work on commercial sensors capable of continuous class-recognition detection of various hydrophobic analytes in aqueous solutions for point-of-need applications. To improve the reusability of the sensor, we propose to use a weak surface CD mediator: surface-bound polyethylene glycol (PEG). A gold surface can be modified with carboxy-PEG 12-Thiol (PEG-SH) via thiol chemistry. After PEG modification, the surface is thoroughly washed with water to remove any nonspecific bindings, leaving adsorbed and covalently-bound PEG. αCD forms inclusion complexes with PEG if the molecular weight is higher than 200.26,27 A single αCD molecule is estimated for every two CH2-O-CH2 PEG groups, indicating a surface-based rotaxane can be created.26,27 Surface PEG will be complexed with αCD; the carboxyl end-group of PEG allows for an additional CD to potentially hydrogen bond with COOH. To demonstrate the reusability of αCD-PEG surface, we performed consecutive trans-resveratrol serial dilutions using a single surface. Chemical structures of the sensor compounds and trans-resveratrol are demonstrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Chemical structures of the reusable sensor compounds and trans-resveratrol, the model hydrophobic analyte. (A) Carboxy-PEG 12-Thiol (CT(PEG)12) (B) α-cyclodextrin (αCD) (C) Trans- resveratrol.
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Modification of a reusable PEG-αCD surface.
Faradaic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), in the presence of ferri/ferrocyanide, was used for surface monitoring during modification stages by tracking charge transfer resistance. To construct a reusable CD sensor, a gold surface was modified with carboxy-PEG 12-Thiol (PEG-SH) and then the PEG surface was complexed with αCD. Finally, the αCD-PEG surface was exposed to trans-resveratrol in phosphate buffered solution, pH = 7.4 (PBS) (Figure 2A). A measurable amount of αCD decouples from the surface to form a complex in solution with trans-resveratrol, because trans-resveratrol has a greater affinity with αCD compared to PEG. The initial PEG modified surface had an increase in charge transfer resistance following αCD loading on the surface (Figure 2B). These results indicate that during the first αCD loading, αCD molecules complexed with physiosorbed PEGs, and the charge transfer resistance increased because a layer of αCD was formed on the surface. Thus, for the first αCD loading, αCD favorably bound to physiosorbed PEG, compromising of hydrogen bonding between the -OH of CD to the COOH end groups or the C-O-C chain groups of PEG. By exposing the PEG-αCD modified surface to trans-resveratrol solution, αCD molecules dissociated from the surface, and the charge transfer resistance decreased. The action of αCD removal also caused the removal of physiosorbed PEG, further allowing the incomplete PEG surface to form a bent over shape keeping a consistent impedance response (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Developing a sensor for trans-resveratrol detection (A) (left) Schematic representation of surface PEG modification, (middle) the first αCD loading, and (right) the first αCD release by trans-resveratrol (B) EIS Nyquist plots in 20 mM ferri/ferrocyanide in deionized water after each modification step. After αCD loading, the impedance increased due to the formation of an αCD layer on physiosorbed PEG. αCD release was after exposure to 160 nM trans-resveratrol in PBS.
The surface was regenerated with a second αCD soak (Figure 3A). A decrease in charge transfer resistance was observed following αCD reloading, and an increase was observed after the αCD was fully removed following serial dilution (Figure 3B). The αCD cavity threads the chemisorbed PEG chains to form channel-type crystalline microdomains resulting in a faster electron transfer and easier diffusion of ions through the surface.28 When there is no αCD on surface, chemisorbed PEG groups have a mushroom configuration, which resulted in the PEG layer becoming a less porous surface and a decreasing electron transfer rate (Figure 3). Unloaded states were generated after serial dilutions with trans-resveratrol (Figure 3B). We were able to obtain a similar response from ethanol soaking used to remove the αCD from the surface (Figure 3C and Figure S1). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) were used to further investigate both αCD-loaded and unloaded surface states as described in Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Reversible binding of αCD on PEG. (A) (left) the αCD release by trans-resveratrol (same as Figure 2A, right). (right) regeneration of surface by αCD loading (B) Nyquist plots of reloading and release of αCD by 160 nM trans-resveratrol in PBS. EIS measurements were done in 20 mM ferri/ferrocyanide in deionized water (C) αCD release by ethanol soaking for 45 min. (B&C) The surface is fully reloadable and reusable showing it can return to original sensing state.
XPS analysis (Figure 4 and Table S1) revealed a Au-S peak was observed at 160eV, indicating the surface was covered by thiol groups covalently attached to the gold surface. After PEG modification, the relative-intensity of Au peaks decreased with respect to carbon indicating the PEG was on the surface. When αCD was loaded on the surface, the Au peaks were weaker compared to when αCD had been released from the surface indicating a surface complexation. The XPS results indicate the αCD had a strong interaction with the PEG surface, and the similarity between the ratios of Au/C and C/O after the first (0.063 and 1.306) and the second (0.087 and 1.259) CD loading confirms the reproducibility of the PEG:CD surface (Table S1).
Figure 4.

Characterizing the electrode after different modification steps with XPS. Intensity of Au peaks (Au 4f:84.4 and 87.92, Au 5S:125.4, Au 4d:336.4 and 354.4, and Au 4p:533 eV) decrease during different steps of surface development, i.e., PEG modification and αCD loading. Au peak intensities return after 160 nM trans-resveratrol soak for 10 min, which confirms the release of αCD from the surface to bind with trans-resveratrol. Au-S peak at 160 eV shows the presence of covalently attached PEG on the surface. Similarity between the spectra before αCD loading and after αCD release confirms the reproducibility of the surface and reversible binding of αCD on PEG.
ATR-FTIR analysis (Figure 5) showed the presence of C=O bonds of the PEG end-groups at 1750 cm−1 and the C-O-C PEG bonds at 1260 cm−1. After αCD loading, C=O double bonds and C-O-C bonds were replaced by C-OH bonds from αCD, because the αCD host is dominating the spectra of the PEG guest indicating the αCD is forming surface rotaxane supramolecules and hydrogen bonding with the COOH end-groups. The intensity of PEG peaks at 1750 and 1260 cm−1 increased after the αCD is released. A similar response can be observed after αCD reloading, reconfirming the EIS and XPS results indicating the successful development of reusable CD surface.
Figure 5.

Characterizing the electrode after different modification steps with ATR-FTIR. After PEG-gold modification, C=O at 1750 cm−1 and C-O-C bindings at 1260 cm−1 appear. After αCD loading, COH bonds (1150 cm−1) of αCD dominate the spectra; masking the PEG signal. The spectra after (1) αCD release returns in similarity to a PEG-gold modification (orange vs red) and (2) after αCD reloading returns in similarity to the initial αCD loading (grey lines), confirming reusability of the surface.
Trans-resveratrol detection by PEG-αCD surface.
For point-of-need applications, multiple studies have shown that auxiliary redox agents are less desirable.29–36 In addition, non-faradaic analysis is more sensitive to changes in the interface between the electrode and the solution because the faradaic charge-transfer resistive process can mask simultaneous surface resistive and capacitive effects.29 Thus, a non-faradaic approach is used for more sensitive and direct surface quantification.30–36 The surface’s ability to monitor repeated non-faradaic impedance response to nM concentrations of trans-resveratrol was first explored in a PBS solution. All experiments were performed in triplicate to confirm reproducibility and standard variation. Original Bode plots for four different concentrations are presented in Figures S2 (αCD-PEG modified surface - test) and Figure S3 (bare gold electrode - control).
The magnitude and phase of the impedance are shown for 20nM concentration (Figure 6A) indicating the difference between the control and test case. The capacitive behavior of the modified surface at low frequencies is indicative of the PEG coating layer which blocks the current. Based on these results, the equivalent circuit that best describes and fits our sensor is proposed as a coating with porous structure (Figure 6B).37
Figure 6.

The developed αCD-PEG surface for trans-resveratrol detection: (A) Magnitude and phase of the impedance for 20.8 nM concentration of (red) a bare gold surface and (black) an αCD-PEG modified surface. The green circle shows that the phase of the modified surface is closer to −90°C and is more capacitive. (B) Equivalent circuit model used to fit the data for the αCD-PEG surface. Leakage resistance (RL) was used as the dominating element of interest. I is the total current; I1 and I2 are the current through the blocking PEG layer and leakage resistor, respectively. (C) Calibration curve of (red) a bare gold surface and (black) an αCD-PEG surface indicating greater sensitivity in the αCD surface
In parallel with the coating capacitance, a resistive path can be modeled by leakage resistance (RL), due to the small ionic current that flows through the surface pores of the sensing layer. The serial dilution results show that leakage resistance was the main affected circuit element, and the leakage resistance provided the most detailed information about the physiochemical processes of the αCD release and PEG flattening into a mushroom configuration. The change in leakage resistance between a certain concentration and the 0nM concentration base signal was then used for the analysis (ΔRL=RL-RL0). The sensor was first tested for concentrations in the range of 2.5 to 160 nM (Figures 6C and S2). As the surface was exposed to trans-resveratrol, αCD was released from the surface, and a decrease in leakage resistance was observed. Theoretically, for an ideal insulating layer, RL would be infinite and the current through the leakage resistance (I2) would equal zero (Figure 6B). However, PEG coating layer imperfectly blocks ionic current and RL is finite. With decrease in leakage resistance followed by an increase in trans-resveratrol concentration, the current through the leakage resistance (I2) increases and the current through the coating capacitance (I1) decreases. This suggests that the PEG capacitive layer becomes less porous and more capacitive due to flattening into a mushroom structure as described earlier. Figure S2 confirms the decrease in phase and increase in capacitance following the increase in concentration of trans-resveratrol.
From Figure 6C, we can observe that 20 nM was the saturation concentration; the leakage resistance remained constant at concentrations higher than 20 nM because all αCD molecules were removed from the surface. In contrast, almost no response was observed by the bare gold surface (Figures S3). Likewise, a sensor employing αCD produced a weaker response to cortisol, a competing analyte that is mostly known for making complexes with βCD and γCD (Figures S4). Two additional controls showing minimal response were (1) a PEG surface not loaded with αCD to confirm trans-resveratrol was not physisorbing to PEG (Figure S5) and (2) no trans-resveratrol in the solution to show that the αCD surface was in PBS (Figure S6). We observed Langmuir isotherm unbinding with a dissociation constant of 0.0904 nM−1 for the αCD-PEG surface after first modification (Figure 7A) and 0.1439 nM−1 after subsequent αCD loadings (Figure 7B). Finally, the third serial dilution was performed to confirm the reusability of the sensor and reproducibility of the surface (Figure 7C). To test the non-specific response of the surface in a complex media, the proposed surface was tested in human urine (Figure 7D, 7E, and S7). Langmuir dissociation constants were found to be 0.5640 and 0.5106 nM−1 for initial modified surface and regenerated surface, respectively. Additionally, a control experiment was performed in urine with no trans-resveratrol addition (Figure S8). The cyclodextrin sensor in PBS and human urine showed significantly higher phase change in the presence of trans-resveratrol compared with controls (p-values <0.05 and <0.01, respectively) (Figure 7F) indicating αCD-trans-resveratrol binding and release occurring at the surface. The discrepancy between Langmuir dissociation constants in PBS (pH=7.4) and urine (pH= 6.3) can be attributed to the difference in conductivity, ionic strength of the solutions, and pH of the two solutions.38 This difference can be also explained by additional αCD decoupling due to unspecific bindings of αCD with other molecules in urine which are not present in PBS (Figure 7F).
Figure 7.

Calibration curve of the average of αCD-PEG surfaces response to trans-resveratrol during the (A) first usage in PBS pH=7.4 and the (B) second usage in PBS pH=7.4. Data points (dots) and calculated Langmuir isotherm fit (dotted line) with the standard deviation error of quadruplicate data. (C) Calibration curve comparison of (black) second) and (red) third usage in PBS pH=7.4 showing minimal loss of activity from subsequent serial dilutions. Calibration curve of the average of αCD-PEG surfaces response to trans-resveratrol during the (D) first usage in urine pH=6.3 and the (E) second usage in urine pH=6.3. Data points (dots) and calculated Langmuir isotherm fit (dotted line) with the standard deviation error of triplicate data. (F) Average phase change at 0.1 Hz comparing the baseline to 17nM trans-resveratrol in PBS, PBS only (no trans-resveratrol), trans-resveratrol in urine, and urine only (no trans-resveratrol); *p-value<0.05 & **p-value<0.01.
After gold surface modification with PEG, the surface was rinsed with UHP to remove excess physiosorbed PEG molecules. However, the first serial dilution showed some physiosorbed PEGs still exist on the surface (Figure 2, 7A and 7D). Consequently, the sensor response after the first αCD loading (Figure 7A and 7D) had larger error bars indicating a less precise response due to the presence of physiosorbed PEG that bound with αCD (Figure 2). When trans-resveratrol was introduced to the solution, the physiosorbed PEGs decoupled from the surface with the CD:Res complexes. The second trans-resveratrol serial dilution, after reloading of αCD on the surface, showed smaller error (Figure 7B and 7E). Figure 7C showed the consistency between the second and third serial dilution in the absence of physiosorbed PEG molecules.
The resulting kd values in PBS are different than kd values in urine. By comparing the response of blank PBS to the response of blank urine (Figure 7F), it can be inferred that the binding of non-specified molecules within urine complex matrix to αCD also contribute to the release of physiosorbed PEGs and αCD. The complex interaction of non-specified molecules with αCD within the urine complex matrix leads to differences in the reported kd values compared to PBS and subsequent uses of the sensor.
3. CONCLUSION
In this work, we developed a reusable cyclodextrin sensor which demonstrated excellent selectivity and sensitivity to nM ranges of hydrophobic analytes demonstrated with trans-resveratrol. Specifically, we modified a gold surface with PEG and then αCD was loaded on PEG surface. Faradaic EIS was used to monitor charge transfer resistance during sensor modification steps. ATR-FTIR and XPS techniques were further used to characterize the surface and verify the impedance response. A large conformational change takes place when αCD releases from PEG surface to make inclusion complexes with trans-resveratrol in solution. In the absence of αCD, PEG flattening on the surface increases coating capacitance, allowing measurement of leakage resistance. The change in leakage resistance is further proportional to trans-resveratrol concentration in PBS or urine. These findings were in line with faradaic EIS results in the presence of ferri/ferrocyanide and can substantially affect the ability to improve the performance of nonfaradaic sensors. In addition, reusable cyclodextrin sensors are significant for point-of-need applications due to ubiquitous presence of hydrophobic molecules.
4. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
4.1. Chemicals and reagents.
All chemicals were used without additional purification. Carboxy-PEG 12-Thiol, methanol (ACS Reagent), and ethanol (ACS Reagent) were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific. Trans-resveratrol (99%) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. α-cyclodextrin (98%) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Both Potassium ferrocyanide (ACS Reagent) and Potassium ferricyanide (98%) were purchased from Acros Organics. Phosphate Buffered Saline Solution (PBS) was prepared using a standard protocol from chemicals purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (pH 7.4 and conductivity 14 mS/cm). Raw, unprocessed pooled human urine from 12 donors was provided by Lee BioSolutions (pH 6.3 and conductivity 12.12 mS/cm).
4.2. Preparation of αCD-PEG Surface.
A gold electrode was polished in a figure-eight by 3 μm diamond for 1 min followed by 1 μm diamond for 1 min. After each polishing step, the electrode was rinsed with methanol and ultra-high purity (UHP) water for 1 minute. The electrode was then polished with 0.55 μm alumina for 1 min. The electrode was rinsed with UHP and dried with nitrogen. Oxygen plasma was used to remove any remaining surface organic impurities. The gold surface was modified by carboxy-PEG12-Thiol. 5 mg of thiolated polyethylene glycol (PEG-SH) was added to 10 ml of PBS and stirred by sonication for 10 min at room temperature. The gold surface was incubated in the solution for 30 min to allow the -SH groups to covalently bond with gold surface.39 Excess and weakly adsorbed carboxy-PEG 12-Thiol were removed by rinsing with UHP for 90 seconds. The third step consisted of immobilizing αCD on the PEG-modified surface via incubation in a 5 mM αCD solution for 45 min at room temperature.
4.3. Trans-resveratrol Serial Dilution in PBS.
All trans-resveratrol stock solutions were stored in a dark fridge to prevent trans-resveratrol from changing to its cis isomer conformation. 1.08 mg of trans-resveratrol was added to 50 ml of PBS to make a concentrated trans-resveratrol solution. Then the solution was sonicated for 10 min. Serial dilutions of the trans-resveratrol solutions were done in a beaker containing PBS (pH 7.4) by adding the concentrated solution to 15 ml of PBS solution to get 2.5, 5.4, 11.1, 20.8, 40.35, 80.6, and 160.5 nM concentrations. For lower concentrations, concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.5, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, 13, and 17 nM were used. The modified surface was incubated in the trans-resveratrol solution, with the desired concentration, for 5 min prior to running EIS.
4.4. Trans-resveratrol Serial Dilution in urine.
Received pooled urine was filtered through 0.2μm Polyethersulfone (PES) membrane filter and it was stored in −20°C freezer. Stock solution was prepared by adding 0.447 mg trans-resveratrol to 100 mL of urine prior to filtering. The concentrated trans-resveratrol solution in urine was serially diluted in 20 mL of filtered urine.
4.5. Surface Regeneration.
The surface was washed thoroughly with UHP after each serial dilution. The surface was reloaded with a 45 min soak 5 mM αCD deionized water solution at room temperature.
4.6. EIS Measurements.
The electrodes were carefully rinsed with UHP thoroughly before and after each EIS experiment to remove any excess and weakly adsorbed chemicals. The electrochemical experiments were performed with Gamry Instruments Reference 600+ potentiostat in a Vista Shield faradaic cage at room temperature. The results were analyzed by Gamry Echem Analyst. Platinum wire auxiliary electrode, Ag/AgCl/ 3M NaCl reference electrode, and a gold disc electrode (BASi, area=0.0201 cm2) working electrode. These measurements were performed by scanning the frequency from 100 kHz to 0.1 Hz, acquiring 10 points per decade, unless stated otherwise. DC voltage was 0 V versus open circuit potential, and the AC voltage was 10 mV. The faradaic EIS measurements for monitoring surface modification were carried out in 20 mL of 20mM ferri/ferrocyanide in UHP. For non-faradaic analysis, EIS was performed in PBS or urine without added redox active molecules. All other parameters were kept the same.
4.7. Surface Characterization.
Gold-coated silicon wafers were used for ATR-FTIR and XPS analysis for better contact with the analytical equipment; the gold-coated silicon wafer was prepared the same as the gold disc electrodes. ATR–FTIR data collection was conducted with Thermo Nicolet iS10 equipped with air purge with a dew point of −95 °F. Spectra were the results of 128 scans. XPS analyses were performed using Kratos Axis Supra XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy).
4.8. Data Fitting.
Previous studies have shown that a surface covered by self-assembled monolayers acts as an insulator at low frequencies.40 Thus, we assumed PEG-αCD layer to be an inert porous layer, and we used the corresponding circuit model, Figure 5B, to explain our serial dilution data. Also, since the impedance of solid electrodes deviates from the ideal capacitive behavior, a constant phase element was used in the circuit instead of ideal capacitance. The changes in leakage resistance by serial dilutions are proportional to the amount of αCD molecules released by trans-resveratrol from the PEG surface. The amount of αCD release from self-assembled monolayers of PEG, i.e. changes in leakage resistance, is dependent on the trans-resveratrol concentration. All the experiments were repeated in triplicate or quadriplicate, and the mean value data fitted with a Langmuir model of desorption (Eq. 1).
| (Eq. 1) |
C is trans-resveratrol concentration (nM), N is desorption capacity, and kd is the Langmuir (dissociation) constant (nM−1).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by NIH P20 GM113131. The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Center for Integrated Bio-medical and Bioengineering, the College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, and the Surface Enhanced Electrochemical Diagnostic Sensors (SEEDS) Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire.
Footnotes
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Figures S1–S8 are available.
REFERENCES
- (1).Wang R; Zhou X; Shi H Triple Functional DNA–Protein Conjugates: Signal Probes for Pb2+ Using Evanescent Wave-Induced Emission. Biosens. Bioelectron 2015, 74, 78–84. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Lorestani F; Khademhosseini A; Dokmeci MR Multi Use Microfluidic Biosensors for Continual Monitoring of Biomarkers from Microphysiological Systems. In 2019 20th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems & Eurosensors XXXIII (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXXIII); IEEE, 2019; pp 1036–1039. 10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2019.8808693. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Boschis L; Ciprianetti N; Spadaro D; Gullino ML; Rinaldi R; Garino C; Arlorio M Smart Micro-Sensing: Antibodies and Aptamer-Based Micro-ELISA as Performing Offline/on Line Tool for Allergens and Mycotoxins Detection in Foods. In 2017 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS); IEEE, 2017; Vol. 2018-Janua, pp 1–4. 10.1109/BIOCAS.2017.8325179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Riahi R; Shaegh SAM; Ghaderi M; Zhang YS; Shin SR; Aleman J; Massa S; Kim D; Dokmeci MR; Khademhosseini A Automated Microfluidic Platform of Bead-Based Electrochemical Immunosensor Integrated with Bioreactor for Continual Monitoring of Cell Secreted Biomarkers. Sci. Rep 2016, 6 (1), 24598. 10.1038/srep24598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Shin SR; Kilic T; Zhang YS; Avci H; Hu N; Kim D; Branco C; Aleman J; Massa S; Silvestri A; Kang J; Desalvo A; Hussaini MA; Chae S; Polini A; Bhise N; Hussain MA; Lee H; Dokmeci M; Khademhosseini A Label-Free and Regenerative Electrochemical Microfluidic Biosensors for Continual Monitoring of Cell Secretomes. Adv. Sci 2017, 4 (5), 1600522. 10.1002/advs.201600522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Choi S; Chae J Reusable Biosensors via in Situ Electrochemical Surface Regeneration in Microfluidic Applications. Biosens. Bioelectron 2009, 25 (2), 527–531. 10.1016/j.bios.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Liu L; Zhou X; Lu Y; Shan D; Xu B; He M; Shi H; Qian Y Facile Screening of Potential Xenoestrogens by an Estrogen Receptor-Based Reusable Optical Biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron 2017, 97, 16–20. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Wang R; Xiang Y; Zhou X; Liu L; Shi H A Reusable Aptamer-Based Evanescent Wave All-Fiber Biosensor for Highly Sensitive Detection of Ochratoxin A. Biosens. Bioelectron 2015, 66, 11–18. 10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Liyan S; Youcai Z; Weimin S; Ziyang L Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals (HOCs) Removal from Biologically Treated Landfill Leachate by Powder-Activated Carbon (PAC), Granular-Activated Carbon (GAC) and Biomimetic Fat Cell (BFC). J. Hazard. Mater 2009, 163 (2–3), 1084–1089. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Cancelli AM; Gobas FAPC; Wang Q; Kelly BC Development and Evaluation of a Mechanistic Model to Assess the Fate and Removal Efficiency of Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants in Horizontal Subsurface Flow Treatment Wetlands. Water Res. 2019, 151, 183–192. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Trellu C; Mousset E; Pechaud Y; Huguenot D; van Hullebusch ED; Esposito G; Oturan MA Removal of Hydrophobic Organic Pollutants from Soil Washing/Flushing Solutions: A Critical Review. J. Hazard. Mater 2016, 306, 149–174. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Li H; Thompson MR; O’Donnell KP Examining Drug Hydrophobicity in Continuous Wet Granulation within a Twin Screw Extruder. Int. J. Pharm 2015, 496 (1), 3–11. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.07.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Kunnath K; Huang Z; Chen L; Zheng K; Davé R Improved Properties of Fine Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Powder Blends and Tablets at High Drug Loading via Dry Particle Coating. Int. J. Pharm 2018, 543 (1–2), 288–299. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Baur JA; Pearson KJ; Price NL; Jamieson HA; Lerin C; Kalra A; Prabhu VV; Allard JS; Lopez-Lluch G; Lewis K; Pistell PJ; Poosala S; Becker KG; Boss O; Gwinn D; Wang M; Ramaswamy S; Fishbein KW; Spencer RG; Lakatta EG; Couteur DL; Shaw RJ; Navas P; Puigserver P; Ingram DK; Cabo R; Sinclai DA Resveratrol Improves Health and Survival of Mice on a High-Calorie Diet. Nature 2006, 444 (7117), 337–342. 10.1038/nature05354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Tomé-Carneiro J; Larrosa M; González-Sarrías A; Tomás-Barberán F; García-Conesa M; Espín J Resveratrol and Clinical Trials: The Crossroad from In Vitro Studies to Human Evidence. Curr. Pharm. Des 2013, 19 (34), 6064–6093. 10.2174/13816128113199990407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Singh AP; Singh R; Verma SS; Rai V; Kaschula CH; Maiti P; Gupta SC Health Benefits of Resveratrol: Evidence from Clinical Studies. Med. Res. Rev 2019, 39 (5), 1851–1891. 10.1002/med.21565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Carter LG; D’Orazio JA; Pearson KJ Resveratrol and Cancer: Focus on in Vivo Evidence. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2014, 21 (3), R209–R225. 10.1530/ERC-13-0171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Balu S; Palanisamy S; Velusamy V; Yang TCK; El-Shafey E-SI Tin Disulfide Nanorod-Graphene-β-Cyclodextrin Nanocomposites for Sensing Dopamine in Rat Brains and Human Blood Serum. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 108, 110367. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Prasad Aryal K; Kyung Jeong H Electrochemical Detection of Ascorbic Acid with Chemically Functionalized Carbon Nanofiber/β-Cyclodextrin Composite. Chem. Phys. Lett 2020, 757, 137881. 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Shehatta IS; Ibrahim MS Binding of Anti-Inflammatory Drug Indomethacin with Cyclodextrin and DNA: Solubility, Spectroscopic, and Voltammetric Studies. Can. J. Chem 2001, 79 (10), 1431–1438. 10.1139/v01-105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Pekec B; Oberreiter A; Hauser S; Kalcher K; Ortner A Electrochemical Sensor Based on a Cyclodextrin Modified Carbon Paste Electrode for Trans-Resveratrol Analysis. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci 2012, 7, 4089–4098. [Google Scholar]
- (22).Camacho C; Matías JC; Chico B; Cao R; Gómez L; Simpson BK; Villalonga R Amperometric Biosensor for Hydrogen Peroxide, Using Supramolecularly Immobilized Horseradish Peroxidase on the β-Cyclodextrin-Coated Gold Electrode. Electroanalysis 2007, 19 (24), 2538–2542. 10.1002/elan.200703993. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Wu Y; Bi H; Ning G; Xu Z; Liu G; Wang Y; Zhao Y Cyclodextrin Subject-Object Recognition-Based Aptamer Sensor for Sensitive and Selective Detection of Tetracycline. J. Solid State Electrochem 2020, 24 (10), 2365–2372. 10.1007/s10008-020-04751-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Thompson G; Marnoto S; Halpern JM Proper Controls to Electrochemically Evaluate Carotenoids Using β-Cyclodextrin Modified Surfaces. ECS Trans. 2017, 80 (10), 1177–1187. 10.1149/08010.1177ecst. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Hernández-Muñoz LS; Frontana C; González FJ Covalent Modification of Carbon Surfaces with Cyclodextrins by Mediated Oxidation of β-Cyclodextrin Monoanions. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 138, 22–29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Berney H; Alderman J; Lane W; Collins JK A Differential Capacitive Biosensor Using Polyethylene Glycol to Overlay the Biolayer. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 1997, 44 (1–3), 578–584. 10.1016/S0925-4005(97)00239-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Harada A; Kamachi M Complex Formation between Poly(Ethylene Glycol) and α-Cyclodextrin. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (10), 2821–2823. 10.1021/ma00212a039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Kaya E; Mathias LJ Synthesis and Characterization of Physical Crosslinking Systems Based on Cyclodextrin Inclusion/Host-Guest Complexation. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem 2010, 48 (3), 581–592. 10.1002/pola.23771. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Pruna R; López M; Teixidor F Tuning the Deposition Parameters for Optimizing the Faradaic and Non-Faradaic Electrochemical Performance of Nanowire Array-Shaped ITO Electrodes Prepared by Electron Beam Evaporation. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (1), 276–284. 10.1039/C8NR07908K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Qureshi A; Niazi JH; Kallempudi S; Gurbuz Y Label-Free Capacitive Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of Multiple Biomarkers Using Gold Interdigitated Capacitor Arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron 2010, 25 (10), 2318–2323. 10.1016/j.bios.2010.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Kazemi SH; Shanehsaz M; Ghaemmaghami M Non-Faradaic Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Reliable and Facile Method: Determination of the Potassium Ion Concentration Using a Guanine Rich Aptasensor. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 52, 151–154. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Liu J; Chisti MM; Zeng X General Signal Amplification Strategy for Nonfaradic Impedimetric Sensing: Trastuzumab Detection Employing a Peptide Immunosensor. Anal. Chem 2017, 89 (7), 4013–4020. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Halliwell J; Savage AC; Buckley N; Gwenin C Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Biosensor for Detection of Active Botulinum Neurotoxin. Sens. Bio-Sensing Res 2014, 2, 12–15. 10.1016/j.sbsr.2014.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Luo X; Xu M; Freeman C; James T; Davis JJ Ultrasensitive Label Free Electrical Detection of Insulin in Neat Blood Serum. Anal. Chem 2013, 85 (8), 4129–4134. 10.1021/ac4002657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Daniels JS; Pourmand N Label-Free Impedance Biosensors: Opportunities and Challenges. Electroanalysis 2007, 19 (12), 1239–1257. 10.1002/elan.200603855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Lin K-C; Kunduru V; Bothara M; Rege K; Prasad S; Ramakrishna BL Biogenic Nanoporous Silica-Based Sensor for Enhanced Electrochemical Detection of Cardiovascular Biomarkers Proteins. Biosens. Bioelectron 2010, 25 (10), 2336–2342. 10.1016/j.bios.2010.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Orazem ME; Tribollet B Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, 2nd Ed.; Wiley John & Sons: Hoboken, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- (38).Bontidean I; Berggren C; Johansson G; Csöregi E; Mattiasson B; Lloyd JR; Jakeman KJ; Brown NL Detection of Heavy Metal Ions at Femtomolar Levels Using Protein-Based Biosensors. Anal. Chem 1998, 70 (19), 4162–4169. 10.1021/ac9803636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Xue Y; Li X; Li H; Zhang W Quantifying Thiol–Gold Interactions towards the Efficient Strength Control. Nat. Commun 2014, 5 (1), 4348. 10.1038/ncomms5348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Boubour E; Lennox RB Insulating Properties of Self-Assembled Monolayers Monitored by Impedance Spectroscopy. Langmuir 2000, 16 (9), 4222–4228. 10.1021/la991328c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
