Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0254793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254793

Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Rano Raraku crater lake basin: Geochemical characterization and implications for the Ahu-Moai Period

E Argiriadis 1,2, M Bortolini 2,*, N M Kehrwald 3, M Roman 2, C Turetta 1, S Hanif 2, E O Erhenhi 2, J M Ramirez Aliaga 4, D B McWethy 5, A E Myrbo 6, A Pauchard 7, C Barbante 1,2, D Battistel 1,2
Editor: Gregory Carling8
PMCID: PMC8513918  PMID: 34644295

Abstract

Rano Raraku, the crater lake constrained by basaltic tuff that served as the primary quarry used to construct the moai statues on Rapa Nui (Easter Island), has experienced fluctuations in lake level over the past centuries. As one of the only freshwater sources on the island, understanding the present and past geochemical characteristics of the lake water is critical to understand if the lake could have been a viable freshwater source for Rapa Nui. At the time of sampling in September 2017, the maximum lake depth was ~1 m. The lake level has substantially declined in the subsequent years, with the lake drying almost completely in January 2018. The lake is currently characterized by highly anoxic conditions, with a predominance of ammonium ions on nitrates, a high concentration of organic carbon in the water-sediment interface and reducing conditions of the lake, as evidenced by Mn/Fe and Cr/V ratios. Our estimates of past salinity inferred from the chloride mass balance indicates that it was unlikely that Rano Raraku provided a viable freshwater source for early Rapa Nui people. The installation of an outlet pipe around 1950 that was active until the late 1970s, as well as grazing of horses on the lake margins appear to have significantly impacted the geochemical conditions of Rano Raraku sediments and lake water in recent decades. Such impacts are distinct from natural environmental changes and highlight the need to consider the sensitivity of the lake geochemistry to human activities.

1. Introduction

Hundreds of massive megalithic statues, known as moai, populate the landscape of Rapa Nui (Easter Island). The walls constraining the Rano Raraku crater served as the primary quarry for moai by the ancient Rapa Nui inhabitants between ~1200 and 1600 CE [1]. Due to the importance of Rano Raraku to the creation of the moai, archeologists have intensely investigated this site [2, 3, 412]. These studies demonstrate a consensus on the cultural centrality of Rano Raraku from ~1200 until at least ~1450 CE. During the time when humans were carving moai, people cultivated taro and sweet potato in adjacent uplands [11], and palms were widespread in the landscape surrounding Rano Raraku [9]. The timing and reasons for the cessation of moai quarrying at Rano Raraku are hotly debated. Many explanations suggest abandonment of quarrying may have been associated with major cultural and environmental changes on the island [3, 1318].

The Rano Raraku crater was formed ~0.7 mya along the Rano Kau ridge. The area around Rano Raraku is a single tuff cone, and in some sectors, the tuff is strongly altered to become reddish ash. The tuff is stratified, composed of sideromelane, slightly altered to palagonite, and contains lithic blocks of older lavas. Scoria lapilli are present with olivine, clinopyroxene, plagioclase, and ilmenite [19].

The crater catchment supports a lake (~80 masl) that is directly adjacent to one of the primary moai quarries on Rapa Nui, providing a link between archeological investigations and evidence of past environmental changes. Rano Raraku (~300 m in diameter) has a small catchment size on the scale of ~1100 m2, is a closed basin with no inflow or outflow streams and is therefore an ideal archive for paleoenvironmental reconstructions [9, 13, 2023].

Lake sediments contain multiple proxies for reconstructing past environments and geochemical conditions (e.g., charcoal, pollen, biological indicators, and elemental chemistry [2426]. Additionally, lake level fluctuations can be reconstructed through marginal depositional facies [27]. Past variability in salinity can be inferred from Mg/Ca and Ca/Sr ratios. In more saline water, the precipitation of high-Mg aragonite (or calcite) is favored compared to low-Mg calcite, resulting in an increased Mg/Ca ratio in the sediment. As aragonite is also enriched in Sr, an increase in Mg/Ca generally coincides with a Ca/Sr decrease [26, 2830]. Lakes respond dynamically to changes in the water balance, especially in closed systems. When evaporation increases, lake water often becomes more saline and its composition becomes enriched in the heavier oxygen and hydrogen isotopes (δ18O and δ2H) [31].

Lake conditions also affect the ratios of several redox sensitive elements, such as Mn/Fe [32] and Cr/V [33]. Changes in the oxidation state of Mn affect their solubility and mobility. Mn and Fe have different redox potentials, so that Mn is reduced (oxidized) faster (slower) than Fe, resulting in a decrease in Mn/Fe in the sediment when oxygen concentrations decrease in the water column [34, 35]. Chromium (Cr) and vanadium (V) exhibit a similar behavior, with distinct oxidation states as well as the tendency to form complexes with Fe-hydroxides or organic ligands, depending on their redox state [36]. As a result, Cr/V increases in sediments under anoxic conditions and decreases in oxic conditions. Rare earth elements (REEs) help determine past hydrological and transport processes inside the basin, lake level variability, and in situ partitioning [37]. The fractionation of light and heavy rare earth elements (LREEs and HREEs, respectively) is promoted by preferential leaching during runoff and/or the formation of compounds with different solubilities in the aquatic environment, as HREE complexes are generally more soluble than LREEs [38]. The different forms of the REE cerium can provide additional information on fractionation processes and redox conditions. Both of the oxidized forms of Ce (trivalent and tetravalent) are less soluble than the other REEs. Therefore, leaching processes can lead to fractionation because more soluble Ce species are preferentially transported into the lake where redox conditions drive the mobility cycle of cerium. In oxic conditions, Ce(IV) prevails resulting in the enrichment of the element in the sediment and subsequent depletion in the lake water [39, 40].

In this paper, we investigate the modern environmental processes at the Rano Raraku crater basin as recorded from TEs and REEs in water, soil, and surface sediments and their application for past environmental changes. Many studies conducted on Rano Raraku sediment cores highlight the difficulties in the determination of signals from the past few centuries, after the first human settlement, as radiocarbon dating and age-depth chronologies are poorly resolved for the last 2000 years [7, 8]. Saez et al. [6] reconstructed the past hydrological changes in Rapa Nui for the last 34,000 years BP through major element quantification, but the conditions of the lake since the human occupation of the island remain unclear [6]. Macro and microfossils in soil surveys demonstrate the higher lake levels (~10 m above the current level) before the settlement period [11]. Information about the pH and electrical conductivity from previous research [41] is limited. To enrich interpretations of recent past environmental change from paleoecological records from Rano Raraku, this study provides a detailed characterization of modern lake and geochemical conditions. Moreover, the reconstruction of the lake conditions can help evaluate the likelihood that the Rano Raraku basin provided a viable freshwater resource on the island. Our detailed characterization can also contribute to a better understanding of the interconnection between environment and socio-cultural transformation from the Ancient Moai (beginning c. 1000 to 1100 CE) to the Birdman cult (c. 1600 CE) cultural periods.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Study site

Rapa Nui (Easter Island) is a small island that rises above sea level (~160 km2) from a large volcanic complex located in the Pacific Ocean (27°09’S, 109°26’W) (Fig 1). Rapa Nui is one of the most isolated inhabited islands in the world as the nearest mainland is the Chilean coast, more than 3,500 km away. The climate is warm-temperate, with remarkably stable seasonal and daily temperatures ranging from mean ~18°C in July-September to mean temperatures of ~23°C in January-March. Mean annual precipitation is ~1,070 mm, and monthly precipitation amounts are slightly more abundant in April-June (mean monthly values >100 mm) than other months of the year. The rainfall distribution significantly differs across the island, with higher precipitation at higher elevations (e.g., Mount Terevaka, 507 masl) and lower precipitation in lowlands including Hanga Roa (12 masl), the primary town on Rapa Nui [42]. Rainfall quickly infiltrates volcanic soils on Rapa Nui and, as a result, few permanent streams or surface water bodies exist on the island. Today, Rano Raraku (Fig 1) is one of the three main freshwater sources of the island along with Rano Kau and Rano Aroi in crater basins. The crater (Figs 1 and 2B) is >300,000 years old [43] and consists of basaltic lapilli tuff used in the statues [44]. The chemistry and petrography of basaltic rocks and tuff of the Rano Raraku quarry show a general enrichment in Fe and a depletion of alkali and silica content of ~55–60% [43, 45].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

(a) The location of Rano Raraku on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). Base map and data from ESRI and OpenStreetMap Foundation. (b) Aerial view of the crater lake with the positions of the samples collected. Map provided by Base map and data from ESRI and OpenStreetMap Foundation. (c) Picture of the Rano Raraku basin on 7 Sep 2017. The photo was taken on the SW section of the lake and photo is taken by Dario Battistel facing NE.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Geological representation of Rano Raraku a) picture of the lake (7 Sep 2017) with facies, b) cross section of the crater lake with the past lake level maximum at 17,000 cal yr. BP and at the time of the sampling [68, 1012].

Large-scale climatic variability has acted as a primary control on crater basin lake levels and sedimentation dynamics during the last 34,000 years [6, 8]. Increased sedimentation of material largely derived from the catchment indicates strong erosion and runoff around the termination of the last glacial (34,000–14,600 cal. yr BP, [8]). Over the last 34,000 years, lake levels at Rano Raraku have fluctuated dynamically with several periods where the absence of sedimentation suggests the lake dried. Following high lake levels c. 17,000 cal yr. BP when lake levels were as high as 13 m, lake levels, while highly variable, generally declined. Warm conditions, reduced runoff, and increased productivity led to lower lake levels during the early Holocene. Lake levels decreased significantly during the middle Holocene (8700–4500 cal. yr BP), promoting the onset of anoxic conditions. Dry conditions during the late Holocene led to hiatuses in sedimentation between 4500 and 800 cal. yr BP. Sedimentation resumed after 800 cal. yr BP. However, drying may have occurred many times in the recent decades to centuries, as a result of changes in land use and the introduction of semi-wild sheep, cattle, and horses around 1864 CE, where their grazing and associated erosion impacted the hydrological system.

2.2 Sample collection

Samples were collected in September 2017. All necessary permits for field activity in the Rano Raraku area were obtained from the Chilean Government through the Corporaciòn Nacional Forestal and the Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales de Chile (see the Acknowledgments section for details).

Three surface water samples (~500 mL) were collected at P1, P2, and P3 in September 2017 (Fig 1). At each of the three locations, P1-P3, water samples (~500 mL) were also collected from the water column at depths of 90 (P1), 51 (P2), and 38 (P3) cm, respectively. Six 4-cm thick topsoil samples (~5 g) were collected at P4, P5, P6, and P7 (Fig 1). Exact locations of the sampling points are reported in Fig 1, and Table 1 records the characteristics of each sample. A lake sediment core (LTS-RKU17-1A-1P-1), approximately 1 m long, was collected 95 cm below the water surface using a Livingstone-type surface corer [46] at P3. In this paper, we examine sediment samples corresponding to (a) the water-sediment interface (WSI; top 2 cm) and (b) bed sediments (between 3–5 cm depth).

Table 1. Characteristics of samples collected at Rano Raraku.

Location Samples Depth (cm) Elevation (masl) Volume / Weight
P1 Water–Suspended particulate matter (SPM) 0 - 500 ml
Deep water–SPM 90 - 500 ml
Water-sediment interface (WSI) 0–2 - 5 g
Bed sediment 3–5 - 5 g
P2 Water–SPM 0 - 500 ml
Deep water–SPM 50 - 500 ml
P3 Water–SPM 0 - 500 ml
Deep water–SPM 38 - 500 ml
P4 Topsoil - 82 5 g
P5 Topsoil - 88.5 5 g
Topsoil 89 5 g
P6 Topsoil - 80 5 g
Topsoil 81 5 g
P7 Topsoil - 105 5 g

2.3 Sample preparation and analysis

All water samples were filtered in situ through 0.45 μm cellulose nitrate membranes (Whatman) using a polycarbonate system equipped with a manual vacuum pump. Membranes containing suspended particulate matter (SPM) were stored in plastic Petri dishes, while the filtered water was kept in 50 mL polyethylene bottles. All samples were stored at 4°C before being shipped to the Ca’ Foscari University of Venice for analysis. Soil and sediment samples were dried to a constant weight in a desiccator at room temperature before further preparation for the analysis.

2.4 Water analysis

Major ions (Cl-, SO42-, NO3-, NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) in water samples were analyzed using an ion chromatography system (883 Basic IC plus, Metrohm) equipped with a Metrosep Cation 1–2 (particle size 7 μm; eluent: HNO3 3 mM) and a Metrosep Anion supp/4 (particle size 5 μm; eluent: HCO3-/CO32-buffer 1.7/1.8 mM) column for cation and anion analysis, respectively. Liquid samples were directly injected into the chromatographic system after filtration through 0.45 μm syringe filters. Quantification of trace elements (TEs) and REEs in water samples were performed at the ISP-CNR laboratory in Venice (Italy) using an inductively coupled plasma—sector field mass spectrometer (ICP-SFMS model Element-XR, Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Water samples were acidified with ultrapure grade HNO3 (Romil) and analyzed 24 hours later. TEs and REEs were quantified using external calibration curves. Method accuracy was assessed through the analysis of a certified reference material (TMRAIN95).

The isotopic composition of water samples was determined with a DeltaV-Advantage mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a gas bench. For the analysis, 200 μL of each water sample was introduced into a glass vial. The samples were first flushed with a gas mixture of 2% H2 in He and analyzed to determine δ2H. The same samples were then flushed with a gas mixture of 0.4% CO2 in He and analyzed to determine δ18O after 20 hours of equilibration. All samples were measured at least in triplicate. The SMOW2 and SLAP2 isotopic standards were used as references together with a laboratory standard that was analysed every nine samples to evaluate the stability of measurements. The isotopic compositions are expressed as δ2H for 2H/ 1H or δ18O for 18O/16O in the samples (s) and in the reference material (r), respectively.

2.5 Sediment, soil, and SPM analysis

Sediment, soil and SPM samples were digested with a mixture of HNO3, HCl and HF (6:2:1 mL for 0.2 g of sample, suprapure grade acids, Romil), using an Ethos 1 microwave oven (Milestone) and a temperature-controlled program up to 200°C in pressurized Teflon vessels. The digests were diluted in 50 mL of ultrapure water (PURELAB Ultra system, Elga, High Wycombe, UK), randomized and analyzed within 24 hours for determination of major, trace, and rare earth elements. The analysis was carried out by ICP-MS (iCAP RQ, Thermo Scientific) equipped with an ASX-560 autosampler (Teledyne Cetac Technologies), PFE cyclonic spray chamber at temperatures of 2.7°C, sapphire injector, quartz torch, Ni cones, and 1550 W of plasma RF power. Triplicate acquisitions were performed in kinetic energy discrimination (KED)–high matrix mode (collision gas He). Quantification was obtained by external calibration with standards prepared by mixing the multi-elemental solutions IMS-101, IMS-102, and IMS-104 (UltraScientific) and using on-line spiked Rh as the internal standard. Accuracy was assessed by contextual mineralization and analysis of the certified reference materials NIMT/UOE/FM/001 (peat) and BCR-667 (estuarine sediment).

Total organic carbon in sediments (TOC %) was determined with a Flash 2000 HT Elemental Analyzer (Thermo Scientific). A small amount of dry sample (~0.2 mg) was weighed and sealed into tin capsules, then introduced into the CHNO quartz reactor, composed of chromium oxide, copper, silvered cobalt, and cobalt oxide. The reactor temperature was set at 950°C, while the column was held at 65°C. Samples were analyzed in triplicate.

2.6 Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using the RStudio software. Pearson correlation coefficients and Student’s t-tests were run to analyse data correlation and similarity, respectively. All of the data discussed throughout the paper are available in an open access repository: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/k93rp3p4pd/1).

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Source of the Rano Raraku water

The absence of inflow streams into the crater lake of Rano Raraku strongly implies that the input of new freshwater mainly derives from meteoric water. Rapa Nui is a small, isolated island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean where the nearest land mass is >2000 km away. Because Rapa Nui is close to the South Pacific High and outside the range of the Intertropical Convergence Zone, evaporation and convective activity from the surrounding ocean provide the main source of precipitation. Precipitation that directly derives from a marine source often contains higher concentrations of salts than does precipitation from evaporation and convection from terrestrial freshwater sources. Our results are consistent with this idea, strongly indicating precipitation originated from evaporation of ocean water. The major element concentrations in filtered water samples demonstrate that Cl and Na are particularly abundant in the dissolved fraction (mean concentrations of 968 ± 28 and 609 ± 12 mg L-1, respectively). The Na/Cl mean ratio is 0.63, slightly higher—but comparable to—the reference Na/Cl ratio in seawater (0.56) [47]. Major ions (Cl-, SO42-, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) in Rano Raraku correlate (r2 = 0.970; slope of 18 ± 1; p-value < 0.001) with typical seawater [47] providing further evidence of a direct marine source. The Na/Cl ratio in Rano Raraku water (0.63 ± 0.01) is also comparable to that reported in Hanga Roa meteoric waters collected in 2002–2003 (3–14 mg L-1, 0.74 ± 0.12; p-value = 0.016; [42]). Therefore, Na+ and Cl- input almost completely results from meteoric waters, in agreement with the general scarcity of Na+ found in soils in the Rano Raraku catchment. This finding supports the results of Herrea and Custodio [42], who found that that the contribution from runoff and soil erosion is likely negligible.

The isotopic composition of Rano Raraku water ranges between 25 ± 2 ‰ and 4.0 ± 0.1 ‰ for δ2H and δ18O, respectively. These positive values indicate that the lake has predominantly been affected by evaporation processes. A simplified version of the Craig and Gordon [48] model that assumes no resistance to mixing in the liquid phase can model closed water systems (such as a small lake), where no inflow or outflow is present and the isotopic composition is driven only by evaporation [49]. The observed slope of the evaporation line (LEL) predicted by the Craig-Gordon model is:

SLEL=[h(δAδP)+(1+δP)(εK+ε+α+)hεKε+α+]δD[h(δAδP)+(1+δP)(εK+ε+α+)hεKε+α+]δ18O (1)

where δA is the isotopic composition of atmospheric moisture, δP is the isotopic composition of precipitation, h is the relative humidity, α+ is the liquid-vapor equilibrium isotopic fractionation, ε+ is the equilibrium isotopic separation between liquid and vapor, and εk is the equivalent kinetic isotopic separation based on tunnel experiments [42, 4952]. The α+ value is solely a function of temperature that, in this study, was assumed to be equal to 20°C. This temperature is based on the fact that Rapa Nui temperatures do not change significantly during the year, because they only range between 18°C in July/September and 23°C in January/March [42]. Relative humidity was set to h = 0.79 [33]. Based on these assumptions, LEL was 6.02, slightly lower than the mean meteoric water line (δ2H = 8·δ18O + 10‰; blue line in Fig 3). Forcing the straight line through the δ2H and δ18O mean precipitation values, we obtained the equation δ2H = 6.02·δ18O + 4.04‰ (red line in Fig 3). The isotopic composition of the Rano Raraku water matches the model, as the points (in red) lie close to the red line.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Isotopic composition of rainfall on Rapa Nui (black dots; from Herrera and Custodio [42]) and Rano Raraku water in 2017 (red dots). Mean meteoric water line (blue), rainfall best fit (black line), and equation straight line derived from the evaporation model (red line).

3.2 Chloride mass balance

To evaluate the precipitation-evaporation balance during the last few decades, we estimate the chloride mass balance. We assume that Cl- input predominantly derives from saline rainfall, while evaporation further increases the salinity of the lake water. In 2017, which was the driest year since 1967 (Center for Climate and Resilience Research, http://www.cr2.cl/datos-de-precipitacion/?cp_Precipitacion=1), the mean Cl- concentration in Rano Raraku lake water was 968 mg L-1. Considering a mean lake depth of 0.6 m, a surface area of 0.07 km2, and a mean slope of 10% (both calculated from aerial images of the basin at the time of the sampling), the total mass of chloride in the lake was ~38 metric tons. This number was obtained by approximating the lake to the frustum of a cone and multiplying the volume of liters by the measured concentration of chloride. As previously mentioned, the rainfall regime differs across Rapa Nui, where precipitation is more abundant in higher elevations including Mount Terevaka (507 masl) than in the rest of the island [42]. The only multi-decadal (1954–2018) precipitation record for Rapa Nui is from the Mataveri airport gauge in Hanga Roa (Fig 4). Although not representative of the overall precipitation regimes in the island, this site is comparable to Rano Raraku in terms of annual rainfall [53]. Based on the Mataveri rainfall data, mean annual precipitation at Rano Raraku can be estimated around 1100 mm yr-1 with a Cl- content of ~7 mg L-1 (derived from Herrera and Custodio [42]).

Fig 4. Monthly precipitation at Mataveri, Rapa Nui (Easter Island) (Center for Climate and Resilience Research, http://www.cr2.cl/datos-de-precipitacion/?cp_Precipitacion=1).

Fig 4

The red line is a 10-year moving average.

Under these assumptions, we estimate that the amount of Cl- input to the basin, provided solely by meteoric water, averaged 550 kg y-1 (at 2017 lake level conditions), obtained by multiplying the annual volume of meteoric water deposited on the lake surface by the average chloride concentration in rainfall. The precipitation record was used to calculate the amount of Cl- provided solely by precipitation since 1954 and resulted in a total of approximately 35 metric tons, a value not far from the 38 metric tons of Cl- estimated in Rano Raraku in 2017.

In 1990, the electrical conductivity of the lake water was 640 μS cm-1 (i.e. 0.64 dS m-1[41]). Using the equation proposed by Peinado-Guevara et al. [54] ([Cl-] (meq L-1) = 4.928 EC (dS m-1)), we can estimate a concentration of 112 mg L-1. Considering a mean lake depth of ~3 m [41] and a surface area of 0.09 km2 [3] in 1990, we can estimate that about 25 metric tons of Cl- were present in the lake at that moment. In this study, the precipitation record was also used to determine the amount of Cl- supplied by rainfall. Assuming the chloride content to be constant in rainfall (7 mg L-1), the amount of the ion that accumulated in the lake since 1954 is ~25 metric tons, which coincides with the previous estimation supporting precipitation as the only source of chloride in the lake. The discrepancy between the 2017 estimates of chloride accumulated in the lake and the amount supplied by rainfall can likely be ascribed to the contribution of dry deposition. This source of chloride can be significant although it is rather difficult to model since it is influenced by several factors such as windspeed, elevation, and distance from the sea [55]. In Atlantic coastal sites, for example, dry deposition of chloride can reach up to 30% of the total bulk deposition [56]. The relative contribution of dry deposition is certainly increased with the pronounced decrease in precipitation that occurred from 2010 to 2017 (Fig 3) and, together with intensified evaporation, contributed to the high concentration of Cl- we measured in the Rano Raraku water.

These data from 1990 and 2017 suggest that Cl- only started to accumulate in the Rano Raraku lake since the 1950s, even though the lake formed thousands of years ago (>50,000 cal yrs BP). This accumulation could be due to the fact that Rano Raraku is a naturally closed basin and that the insertion of a pipe in 1958 [13] could have artificially drained much of the water that was present in the 1950-60s.

Although this calculation of chloride mass balance requires several assumptions, these results suggest that (a) the source of water in Rano Raraku is solely meteoric and (b) Rano Raraku is a closed system where the lake level is controlled mainly by the evaporation-precipitation balance. The isotopic composition of the water in 2017 agrees with the hydrological closed system model where the isotopic composition is affected solely by evaporation. During the last 30 years, the lake level was reported to remain between the depths of 2 and 4 m [3, 6, 8, 11, 41]; although current lake levels are less than 2 m. These fluctuations in water depth follow the same general trend as the precipitation record (Fig 4), further suggesting that the evaporation-precipitation balance is the main natural lake level control.

3.3 Redox conditions

In September 2017, Rano Raraku water levels were low (~1 m) and NH4+concentrations were higher than nitrate concentrations in water, indicating a potential lack of nitrification reactions indicate highly anoxic conditions. In oxygenated waters, NH4+ is subject to nitrification, transforming NH4+ into N-oxidized forms, such as NO3- [57]. At relatively low concentrations of dissolved oxygen, nitrification reactions of NH4+ ceases and consequently ammonium concentrations increase [58]. Besides the degradation of autochthonous organic matter, additional sources of NH4+ include fertilizers and animal feces. In recent times, the fecal input from free-roaming horses that often graze inside the crater may be a possible NH4+ source. Horses, as well as sheep and cattle, were introduced by the missionaries who settled in 1864 [13]. Although sheep were numerous for almost a century after 1870, they were then largely replaced by cattle and horses.

The higher NH4+ concentrations likely contribute to the slightly alkaline pH of 7.8 measured during our sampling campaign, which differs from the slightly acidic conditions (pH of 6.3) observed in 1990 by Geller [41]. At Rano Raraku, the total organic carbon content of the sediment samples was 18.3% and 16.9% in WSI and bed sediments, respectively. Organic decomposition can occur in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, with a complex mechanism that involves several steps, favored by the presence of electron acceptors such as nitrates, sulfates, and Fe3+. In water samples, sulphates were slightly depleted (i.e. SO42-/Cl- ratio ~ 10−3) compared to the other shallow crater lakes fed by precipitation, where ratios are at least one order of magnitude higher [59]. This difference suggests that sulphate reduction in Rano Raraku might be involved in the decomposition of the organic matter.

In the aqueous phase, mean Mn and Fe concentrations were 4 ± 1 and 2.0 ± 0.5 μg L-1, respectively, resulting in a relative enrichment of Mn (Mn/Fe = 2.0 ± 0.9). In the SPM, the concentrations of the redox-sensitive elements Mn and Fe were 58 ± 18 and 868 ± 515 μg L-1, respectively. This large concentration range is related to the variability in SPM mass (data were normalized by the volume of water). The Mn/Fe was 0.07 ± 0.02 (with a variability less than 30%). The Fe and Mn concentrations were 96 ± 14 mg g-1 and 2.3 ± 0.4 mg g-1 in WSI (Fig 5). In bed sediments, Fe slightly increases while Mn substantially decreases. Consequently, the Mn/Fe ratio is higher in WSI (0.024 ± 0.003) than in bed sediments (0.015 ± 0.002). In the topsoil samples (Fig 5), Fe is particularly abundant in the form of oxyhydroxide minerals, as also observed by Horrocks et al. [11]. However, the topsoil Mn/Fe ratio is 0.020 ± 0.005 and is close to the Mn/Fe in the upper crust (i.e. 0.020; [60]) as well as the ratio in volcanic glass in Rano Raraku hyalotuff (i.e. Mn/Fe ~ 0.025 ± 0.007; [45]), but substantially lower than values found in Rano Raraku water and in SPM.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Mean Mn/Fe (blue) and Cr/V (green) ratios with standard deviations of the analysed matrices: Water, SPM (suspended particulate matter), WSI (water-sediment interface), bed sed. (bed sediment), topsoil.

The cycling of Mn and Fe in lake sediments is associated with the oxic/anoxic conditions of the water body [61] and is often used as a proxy in paleoclimate reconstructions [32, 62, 63]. External sources of Mn and Fe include catchment erosion and redox-related dissolution of minerals. Internal biochemical and/or physical processes are responsible for the increasing/decreasing concentrations of these elements in the water column, as a result of remobilization and redox-controlled release from the sediment [6466]. In Rano Raraku, the external input of Mn and Fe derives from catchment erosion or wind transport from the surrounding areas, where the Mn/Fe ratio in topsoil is 0.020 ± 0.005 on average, ranging from 0.017 to 0.029. Fig 6 presents a schematic explanation of the cycling of Mn and Fe at Rano Raraku. The reducing (anoxic) environment favors the reduction of Mn(IV) and Fe(III) in the sediment where Mn(II) and Fe(II) diffuse through the water body. Due to the higher mobility of Mn(II) ions, they diffuse faster than Fe(II), enriching the WSI with Mn (Mn/Fe = 0.024 ± 0.003), compared to the underlying sediment (Mn/Fe = 0.015 ± 0.002). In the water, Mn(II) is stabilized by the reducing conditions and prevails in dissolved forms (Mn/Fe = 2.0 ± 0.9). The reoxidation of Fe is faster than Mn, promoting the formation of iron oxyhydroxides that adsorb onto the SPM, where the SPM is then enriched in Fe compared to the dissolved fraction (Mn/Fe = 0.07 ± 0.02), but more depleted than the sediment. This mechanism implies that under anoxic conditions, Mn/Fe is expected to increase in the water body, while decreasing in the sediment, as supported by concentration data (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Scheme of the fractionation process of Mn and Fe in Rano Raraku.

Fig 6

In addition to the Mn/Fe ratio, Cr and V can also reconstruct redox conditions in lacustrine environments. Under anoxic and more reducing conditions, vanadyl (VO2+) and Cr(III) ions interact differently with surface particles and organic ligands. VO2+ prevails in dissolved forms, thus enriching the Cr/V ratio in sediments. In the aqueous phase, Cr and V concentrations were 61 ± 14 and 116 ± 39 ng L-1, respectively, providing Cr/V values of 0.6 ± 0.2. In the SPM, Cr and V concentrations were 6.4 ± 0.7 and 2.2 ± 0.4 μg L-1, respectively, resulting in a Cr/V ratio of 3.0 ± 0.2. The Cr/V ratio for SPM was significantly higher (p-value < 10−4) than the dissolved fraction ratio. Cr/V ratios in WSI and bed sediments do not show substantial differences, although these values (Cr/V = 0.039 ± 0.006 and 0.038 ± 0.006) are considerably lower than Cr/V in all of the other environmental compartments, indicating a relative depletion of Cr with respect to V. Vanadium content in topsoil samples was 155 ± 62 μg g-1 and, despite the high variability, does not significantly differ on average from the upper crustal concentration (p-value = 0.07; V = 97 μg g-1 from Rudnick and Gao [60]). Conversely, the Cr concentration in soils is 64 ± 18 μg g-1, which is significantly depleted when compared to the upper crust composition (Cr = 92 μg g-1 from Rudnick and Gao [60]; p-value = 0.012). Therefore, the Cr/V value of 0.4 ± 0.1 in the soil is significantly lower than SPM but comparable to values found in water (p-value = 0.16).

Although Cr/V has lower values in the water (0.6 ± 0.2) and higher values in SPM (3.0 ± 0.2), the Cr/V ratio is very low in the WSI and in the underlying sediment. Since V is expected to form more soluble compounds in reducing environments, this occurrence in the sediment is unexpected. Vanadium equilibrium is sensitive to pH, and the speciation of V under reducing conditions is still under debate [67]. In reducing sediments, a mixture of vanadyl (IV) and unknown vanadium (III) species is strongly complexed by organic compounds, while under oxic conditions, vanadate (V) preferentially interacts with Fe (hydro)oxides. The Rano Raraku lacustrine system is particularly enriched both in Fe and in organic matter, and the pH increases with the eutrophication of the lake. Therefore, V may be entrapped in sediment, which is compatible with Cr/V values of 0.039 ± 0.006 in WSI and 0.038 ± 0.006 in the sediment underneath, meaning that using the Cr/V ratio as a proxy for redox conditions in Rano Raraku must be carefully evaluated.

3.4 Salinity and alkaline earth element fractionation

The Rano Raraku topsoil is generally depleted in alkaline earths and alkali metals, especially Na and Ca. The Ca/Sr and Mg/Ca ratios are 47 ± 15 and 8 ± 4, respectively. Although slightly higher than the ratios from SPM and water, the soil ratios are within the same order of magnitude.

The Rano Raraku water is relatively rich in Mg and Ca (mean values of 53 ± 1 and 15 ± 1 mg L-1), followed by Sr (mean value 622 ± 136 μg L-1), in line with other inactive crater lakes [59]. The Ca/Sr and Mg/Ca ratios are 24 and 3.6, respectively. Magnesium and Ca are strongly partitioned in the SPM (143 and 59 μg L-1) compared to the more soluble alkaline ions (Na and K), which were lower than 20 μg L-1.The SPM differs from the dissolved fraction and is depleted in Sr (2 ± 1 μg L-1), but the Ca/Sr and Mg/Ca ratios (35 ± 6 and 2.5 ± 0.4) in SPM do not markedly differ from water. In the WSI, which is defined as the uppermost 2 cm of the core, alkaline earths are significantly higher (Ca 151 ± 23 μg g-1; Mg 2.3 ± 0.3 mg g-1) than in the deeper section (between 3 and 5 cm from theWSI, Ca 47 ± 7 mg g-1; Mg 1.7 ± 0.3 mg g-1), as well as Ca/Sr (WSI: 5.4 ± 0.8; bed sediments: 3.5 ± 0.5). However, Mg/Ca is higher in bed sediments (36 ± 5) than WSI (15 ± 2).

The precipitation of aragonite and calcite infers oscillations in water salinity in marine and lacustrine systems [26, 2830]. In more saline waters, high-Mg and high-Sr calcite or aragonite preferentially precipitate. The log-log plot of Mg/Ca vs Ca/Sr agrees with this process (r2 = 0.983; p-value = 0.0089; Fig 7). Except in the topsoil, the increase in Mg/Ca from SPM to bed sediments corresponds with a decrease in Ca/Sr. Therefore, the precipitation of carbonates enriched in Mg and Sr depletes the water column of these elements, while the WSI is more depleted than in bed sediments, likely due to the mixing effect exerted by water. However, the topsoil is not directly involved in this fractionation process (Fig 7). As a first approximation, we assume that Mg/Ca (or Ca/Sr) responds linearly to a change in salinity, as observed in a previous study (Dissard et al., 2010).

Fig 7. Log-log plot of Mg/Ca vs Ca/Sr values in different environmental components.

Fig 7

Topsoil (red point) does not lie on the line because it is not involved in the fractionation process occurring in the lake.

3.5 REE fractionation and lake level oscillations

Average concentrations of REEs in Rano Raraku water range from 0.3 to 3.7 ng L-1, where Ce and Nd are the most abundant. In this paper, we propose a diagnostic ratio between LREE (La, Pr, and Nd) and HREE (Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu) to investigate possible fractionation processes. The ratio LREE/HREE is defined as the following:

(LREEHREE)i=4([La]i[La]c+[Pr]i[Pr]c+[Nd]i[Nd]c)3([Er]i[Er]c+[Tm]i[Tm]c+[Yb]i[Yb]c+[Lu]i[Lu]c) (2)

where the subscript i refers to the concentration in samples and the subscript c refers to the upper crust concentration [60]. As shown in Fig 8, the Rano Raraku water has LREE/HREE = 0.10 ± 0.02, indicating a depletion (enrichment) in LREE (HREE). Among the REEs, Ce is of particular interest as its concentration is affected by a combination of environmental factors and processes such as leaching, runoff, and redox equilibria. This combination is mainly due to the higher solubility of reduced Ce(III) compared to oxidized Ce(IV) species, which differs from the other REEs that exhibit only one redox state (III) in the environment (except Eu). The cerium anomaly (Ce/Ce*) is defined as the following [68]:

CeCe*=3([Ce]i[Ce]c)2([La]i[La]c]+([Nd]i[Nd]c) (3)

Fig 8.

Fig 8

Ce/Ce* (brown) and LREE/HREE (green) mean ratios with standard deviation in the analyzed matrices: Water, SPM (suspended particulate matter), WSI (water-sediment interface), bed sed. (bed sediment), topsoil.

We also use Eq (3 to calculate Ce/Ce* in all of the investigated matrices. In water, Ce/Ce* was 0.6 ± 0.1, suggesting a depletion in Ce with reference to the value expected when no fractionation occurs (i.e. Ce/Ce* = 1).

In the Rano Raraku SPM, REE concentrations range between a few to hundreds of ng L-1 where, similarly to the surrounding water, Ce and Nd are the most abundant REEs. The LREE/HREE ratio is 0.76 ± 0.03, which is significantly higher than in the dissolved phase (p-value < 10−4), indicating a REE fractionation with an enrichment (depletion) of less (more) soluble LREEs (HREEs) in SPM. Similarly, Ce/Ce*(1.02 ± 0.04) is significantly higher in SPM than in water (p-value < 10−4).

In sediments, REEs range between tens of ng to a few μg per gram, with higher concentrations of Ce, Nd, and La than the other REEs. The LREE/HREE ratio is 0.42 ± 0.06 and 0.28 ± 0.04 in WSI and bed sediments, respectively. The Ce anomaly slightly exceeds unity in both WSI (1.3 ± 0.2) and bed sediments (1.5 ± 0.2), indicating an enrichment in Ce, which is similar to the Ce anomaly in SPM.

Rare earth elements in topsoil samples contain concentrations between 1 and 150 μg g-1 and are particularly enriched in Ce and to a lesser extent in Nd and La. The LREE/HREE ratio in soils was 0.4 ± 0.1, significantly higher than in the water, but lower than in SPM and comparable to ratios in the sediment. The cerium anomaly is more variable than in the other matrices with values (Ce/Ce* = 4 ± 2) that are substantially higher than in both water and SPM, indicating a general excess of Ce in topsoil.

The REE fractionation is a complex process that can be due to leaching during runoff or the formation of soluble/insoluble compounds in the aquatic environment when organic or inorganic ligands are present. Assuming that the marine source contribution to REEs is negligible due to the low concentration of REEs in the Pacific Ocean [69], the comparison between LREE/HREE in the different compartments suggests that REEs fractionate inside the water body. This fractionation is driven by the difference in solubility between LREE and HREE in aqueous solutions, where HREEs are more soluble than LREEs [70]. In Rano Raraku, a possible mechanism may involve the preferential LREE adsorption onto the particulate fraction bonded to Fe-Mn oxides or organic material or an enhanced solubility of HREEs due to the presence of organic anions, hydroxides, and carbonates. Although Cl- can increase LREE solubility [71], this mechanism does not seem to dominate in Rano Raraku despite the high Cl- concentration; in fact, LREE concentrations remain relatively low in water with respect to the other matrices.

Cerium can provide additional information on fractionation processes. In the water body, Ce/Ce* shows a slight depletion in the dissolved phase and a moderate enrichment in SPM and sediments. The reducing environment stabilized the relatively more soluble Ce(III) complexes, thus limiting the fractionation inside the water body. The slightly higher values in the underlying sediment, although not remarkable, may be ascribed to conditions in the recent past when the lake was slightly more oxic. Therefore, although Ce/Ce* fractionation resembles the LREE/HREE partitioning, the Ce anomaly may be potentially more sensitive to redox conditions than LREE/HREE, where the latter is more sensitive to the chemical composition of the water column. Therefore, REE analysis suggests that these elements are more sensitive to the dynamics occurring in the water body rather than to potential changes in the transport of exogenous material. Airborne transport has a potential role in terrigenous material input, as field observations confirm the presence of moderately intense dusty winds. Erosion or leaching processes during lake level fluctuations were likely limited during the last decades. However, all of these factors may have been more influential in the past, although their interpretation may be affected by contrasting factors. For example, if leaching increases during lake level rise, a Ce/Ce* depletion should be observed in the lake system, because Ce is less soluble than other REEs. Nevertheless, the lake level rise is accompanied by more oxic conditions that favor the Ce(IV) precipitation in the sediment. Therefore, the variation in Ce/Ce* in the sediment depends on the balance between these factors. In topsoil samples, LREE/HREE and Ce/Ce* significantly correlate when using a log-log scale (r2 = -0.905; p-value = 0.013). LREE/HREE increases with increasing the elevation, while Ce/Ce* decreases (Fig 9). This trend is consistent with past lake level oscillations. At relatively higher lake levels, the topsoil may have been directly exposed to lake water only during times of exceptionally high lake levels, while at lower lake levels, the soil was in contact with water for a longer time. Lake water preferentially solubilizes HREE rather than LREE, and REE rather than Ce. Since these solubilization processes are kinetically controlled, the longer that soil was exposed to water, the lower the LREE/HREE and the higher the Ce/Ce*.

Fig 9. LREE/HREE and Ce anomaly vs elevation of topsoil samples from the Rano Raraku internal crater.

Fig 9

3.6 Managing freshwater limitations on Rapa Nui

The chloride mass balance demonstrated that the salinity of the lake is driven solely by evaporation-precipitation balance and chlorides are constantly introduced in the lacustrine system by saline rainfalls. The modern concentration of ~1 g L-1 is a consequence of a combination of evaporation and precipitation that was reset when the lake was artificially drained during the 1950s. Sedimentary evidence shows how the basin has likely completely dried several times over the past four millennia. The last hiatus corresponds to approximately 4000 to 800 yr BP [11]. A high-end estimate of the chloride content of the lake could therefore be obtained by calculating the accumulation of chloride from the end of the hiatus (~1150 CE) to the crisis in population due to the introduction of epidemic diseases following European arrival (~1750 CE). With a lake level of 10 m, close to the maximum possible level estimated by Horrocks et al. [11], and in absence of further removal of water, the chloride concentration would be about 400 mg L-1. This value is reasonably close to the 250 mg L-1 threshold recommended today for potable water [72]. However, the concentration of 400 mg L-1 likely exceeds the concentration at the time when people from Rapa Nui likely used Rano Raraku water for drinking, cooking, and irrigating including when a natural col was manually excavated and deepened by people [11]. Severe droughts are reported to have occurred between 1570 and 1720 CE [9, 17] causing the almost complete disappearance of the old forest surrounding Rano Raraku. This drought and associated vegetation change are believed to have promoted a significant cultural shift from the Ancient Moai to the Birdman cult from the mid-16th to late 18th centuries [73, 74]. The last catastrophic droughts on the pre-contact island coincided with the movement of the cultural centre to Orongo, near Rano Kau, where the Birdman cult existed until 1868, when slavery raids and foreign diseases brought Rapanui people to the brink of extinction.

The severe and prolonged droughts that are evident in the Rano Raraku record reflect a significant reduction of freshwater availability throughout the island. Undoubtedly, freshwater availability in Rapa Nui was, and still is, a considerable limitation. Archaeological evidence suggested that maintaining and managing limited freshwater resources on Rapa Nui was a persistent challenge following human arrival. Historical accounts report that Rapanui used groundwater for drinking, in addition to the freshwater available in the lakes [75, 76]. DiNapoli et al. [77] recently found a significant correlation between the location of monumental platforms (ahu) and the presence of freshwater sources. Several groundwater seeps are present along the coastline 1–2 km from the Rano Raraku crater, radially discharging groundwater from the central aquifer [77]. We observed horses drinking freshwater along the coastline from these seeps near Rano Raraku. The Rapanui excavated large shallow wells along the lines of discharge of the central aquifer [78] as well as shallow artificial basins carved into basalt rocks (taheta) used to hold rainwater [79]. Many windmills were installed along the coast to pump water by the British company, Williamson-Balfour, which exploited the entire island of Rapa Nui as a sheep farm from 1895 to 1953 [80]. Until the late 1960s, Rapanui collected drinking water from deep reservoirs inside the many lava tubes near Roiho area, north of the main town of Hanga Roa. In the 1960s, deep wells were drilled to enhance modern aquifer exploitation for animals. One modern well is located close to Rano Raraku (about 0.7 km southwest from the cone and 0.9 km from the coast) and has a static water level of about 31 m, while the closest ancient well is located about 3.3 km from Rano Raraku along the northern coast and is 4 m deep. In 2010, the Chilean government published a hydrological survey of Rapa Nui. In this study, the Na+ and Cl- content of the waters from both deep and shallow wells largely exceeded the Rano Raraku concentrations and increased with depth, further highlighting the issue of saltwater intrusion, well known by the Rapanui and worsened by modern exploitation [81]. Today, the salinity of groundwater in Rapa Nui ranges from ~80 mg L-1 in the central Vaitea up to ~1.9 g L-1 along the coast [42].

Norton [82] noted that Rapa Nui is the only major Polynesian island where drinking brackish water was a common occurrence. Thus, despite being salty, both the water from Rano Raraku and groundwater were likely an important source of drinking water for Rapanui. In addition to being brackish, the available water sources on Rapa Nui are limited and cannot sustain the water demand of the present population. In the past, even groundwater availability was significantly reduced all along the island, coinciding with prolonged droughts at Rano Raraku, potentially contributing the social instability in a densely populated island with an estimated population of up to 10–20 thousand people [53, 8385].

4. Conclusions

Studies of current geochemical characteristics help interpret past environmental changes. Rapa Nui is often used as an example of a location where human influence on environmental change is closely linked and amplified due to Rapa Nui’s size and isolation. However, few studies on Rapa Nui provide modern baselines against which these past changes can be compared. The interactions between soil, water, and lake sediments from Rano Raraku demonstrate a modern system that has substantially changed after the introduction of an outlet pipe in the 1950s and then the return to a closed basin after the 1970s. The stable isotopic ratios (25 ± 2 ‰ and 4.0 ± 0.1 ‰ for δ2H and δ18O, respectively) and the Craig-Gordon model, demonstrate that the origin of Rano Raraku water is solely meteoric, originating from the nearby Pacific Ocean. This Pacific source is also highlighted by dissolved ion concentrations. The high salinity of Rano Raraku waters, due to the influence of coastal rainfall, affects the precipitation balance of alkaline earth elements. The topsoil is essentially depleted in alkaline earths, yet the uppermost 2 cm of the core contain relatively high alkaline earth concentrations (Ca 150 ± 20 μg g-1; Mg 2.3 ± 0.3 mg g-1) that are double those from the deeper section (between 3 and 5 cm from the WSI, Ca 50 ± 7 mg g-1; Mg 1.7 ± 0.2 mg g-1). The lake level is mainly dependent on the evaporation-precipitation balance, as Rano Raraku is essentially a closed system with limited influence from runoff where the insertion of a pipe between 1950 until the end of the 1970s provided the only outflow. Rano Raraku is currently anoxic, as demonstrated by higher concentrations of ammonium than nitrate. Horses that graze on the shores of the lake may be responsible for the increasing ammonium concentrations since the 1990s, as well as the increase in lake pH since the 1990s.

Field observations and the balance of redox-sensitive elements such as Mn, Fe, Cr, and V are consistent with dominant reducing conditions in the basin, likely related to a current eutrophic state further supported by the high sedimentary organic carbon values. Ratios of Ce/Ce* are slightly depleted in the lake water yet are enriched in both SPM and sediments. The current reducing conditions stabilize the more soluble Ce(III) complexes. However, in the recent past, the lake was more oxic, resulting in slightly higher Ce/Ce* values in the underlying sediment. LREE/HREE values in the water and sediment agree with this change from past oxic to current reducing conditions, even though LREE/HREE is more sensitive to the chemical composition of the water column. The sensitivity of the lake to this human interference is important to consider when investigating past changes determined from Rano Raraku lake sediments as the Rano Raraku surrounding area was and has been an important cultural site and quarry for hundreds of years. Our results highlight how limited availability of freshwater resources on Rapa Nui was an enduring problem faced by Rapanui. Declines in the availability of freshwater resources may be linked to the decline of the Ancient Moai cult and is a problem that persists today.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Corporación Nacional Forestal and, in particular, Lilian Gonzalez Nualart, Ninoska Cuadros, and Michel Pate. We also thank the Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales and, in particular, Maria Gabriela Atallah Leiva and Merahi Atam Lopez. Field and laboratory support was provided by CSDCO/LacCore, University of Minnesota. All the data collected for this research are available at Mendeley Data using the following link https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/k93rp3p4pd/1.

Data Availability

All the data collected for this research are available on Mendeley Data using the following link https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/k93rp3p4pd/1.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by Università Ca' Foscari di Venezia through the Progetto di Ateneo 2015 in the form of funds awarded to DB, the National Science Foundation in the form of a grant awarded to DM to cover his travel to and accommodation in Rapa Nui (BCS-1832486), CSDCO/LacCore through field activity by AM and sampling instrumentation, and Elga (High Wycombe, UK) in the form of the PURELAB Ultra system employed for producing the ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm-1 resistivity) used throughout the study and laboratory research activity at Ca' Foscari University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hamilton S., Seager Thomas M., & Whitehouse R. (2011). Say it with stone: constructing with stones on Easter Island. World Archaeology, 43(2), 167–190. 10.1080/00438243.2011.586273 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Skjølsvold A. (1961). The stone statues and quarries of Rano Raraku. Archaeology of Easter Island. Reports of the Norwegian Archaeological Expedition to Easter Island and the East Pacific, 1, 339–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dumont H. J., Cocquyt C., Fontugne M., Arnold M., Reyss J. L., Bloemendal J., et al. (1998). The end of moai quarrying and its effect on Lake Rano Raraku, Easter Island. Journal of Paleolimnology, 20(4), 409–422. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Azizi G., & Flenley J. R. (2008). The last glacial maximum climatic conditions on Easter Island. Quaternary International, 184(1), 166–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mann D., Edwards J., Chase J., Beck W., Reanier R., Mass M., et al. (2008). Drought, vegetation change, and human history on Rapa Nui (Isla de Pascua, Easter Island). Quaternary Research, 69(1), 16–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sáez, A., Giralt, S., Valero-Garcés, B. L., Moreno, A., Bao, R., Pueyo, J. J., et al. (2009, April). Glacial to Holocene climate changes in Easter Island (SE Pacific, 27. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (p. 1445).
  • 7.Rull V., Cañellas-Boltà N., Sáez A., Giralt S., Pla S., & Margalef O. (2010). Paleoecology of Easter Island: evidence and uncertainties. Earth-Science Reviews, 99(1–2), 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cañellas-Boltà N., Rull V., Sáez A., Margalef O., Giralt S., Pueyo J. J., et al. (2012). Macrofossils in Raraku Lake (Easter Island) integrated with sedimentary and geochemical records: towards a palaeoecological synthesis for the last 34,000 years. Quaternary Science Reviews, 34, 113–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cañellas-Boltà N., Rull V., Sáez A., Margalef O., Bao R., Pla-Rabes S., et al. (2013). Vegetation changes and human settlement of Easter Island during the last millennia: a multiproxy study of the Lake Raraku sediments. Quaternary Science Reviews, 72, 36–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cañellas-Boltà N., Rull V., Sáez A., Margalef O., Pla-Rabes S., Valero-Garcés B., et al. (2016). Vegetation dynamics at Raraku Lake catchment (Easter Island) during the past 34,000 years. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 446, 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Horrocks M., Baisden W. T., Flenley J., Feek D., Nualart L. G., Haoa-Cardinali S., et al. (2012). Fossil plant remains at Rano Raraku, Easter Island’s statue quarry: evidence for past elevated lake level and ancient Polynesian agriculture. Journal of Paleolimnology, 48(4), 767–783. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sherwood S. C., Van Tilburg J. A., Barrier C. R., Horrocks M., Dunn R. K., & Ramírez-Aliaga J. M. (2019). New excavations in Easter Island’s statue quarry: Soil fertility, site formation and chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 111, 104994. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Flenley J., & Bahn P. (2003). The Enigmas of Easter Island. OUP Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Diamond J. (2011). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nunn P. D. (2007). Climate, environment, and society in the Pacific during the last Millennium. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lipo C. P., Hunt T. L., Horneman R., & Bonhomme V. (2016). Weapons of war? Rapa Nui mata’a morphometric analyses. Antiquity, 90(349), 172–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rull V. (2016). The EIRA database: Glacial to Holocene radiocarbon ages from Easter Island’s sedimentary records. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 44. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rull V., Montoya E., Seco I., Cañellas-Boltà N., Giralt S., Margalef O., et al. (2018). CLAFS, a Holistic climatic-ecological-anthropogenic hypothesis on Easter Island’s deforestation and cultural change: Proposals and testing prospects. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 32. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vezzoli L., & Acocella V. (2009). Easter Island, SE Pacific: An end-member type of hotspot volcanism. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 121(5–6), 869–886. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Flenley J. R., King A. S. M., Jackson J., Chew C., Teller J. T., & Prentice M. E. (1991). The Late Quaternary vegetational and climatic history of Easter Island. Journal of Quaternary Science, 6(2), 85–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Flenley J. R. (1993). The palaeoecology of Easter Island, and its ecological disaster. Easter Island studies: Contributions to the history of Rapanui in memory of William T. Mulloy, 27–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Flenley J. R. (1996). Further evidence of vegetational change on Easter Island. South Pacific Study, 16(2), 135–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Flenley J. R., & King S. M. (1984). Late quaternary pollen records from Easter Island. Nature, 307(5946), 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barker P. A., Roberts N., Lamb H. F., van der Kaars S., & Benkaddour A. (1994). Interpretation of Holocene lake-level change from diatom assemblages in Lake Sidi Ali, Middle Atlas, Morocco. Journal of Paleolimnology, 12(3), 223–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dean J. R., Eastwood W. J., Roberts N., Jones M. D., Yiğitbaşıoğlu H., Allcock S. L., et al. (2015). Tracking the hydro-climatic signal from lake to sediment: A field study from central Turkey. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 608–621. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ito E. (2002). Application of Stable Isotope Techniquesto Inorganic and Biogenic Carbonates. In Tracking environmental change using lake sediments (pp. 351–371). Springer, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Magny M. (2006). Holocene fluctuations of lake levels in west-central Europe: methods of reconstruction, regional pattern, palaeoclimatic significance and forcing factors. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tesoriero A. J., & Pankow J. F. (1996). Solid solution partitioning of Sr2+, Ba2+, and Cd2+ to calcite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60(6), 1053–1063. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dissard D., Nehrke G., Reichart G. J., & Bijma J. (2010). The impact of salinity on the Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratio in the benthic foraminifera Ammonia tepida: Results from culture experiments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 74(3), 928–940. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kelts K., & Hsü K. J. (1978). Freshwater carbonate sedimentation. In Lakes (pp. 295–323). Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Leng M. J., & Marshall J. D. (2004). Palaeoclimate interpretation of stable isotope data from lake sediment archives. Quaternary Science Reviews, 23(7–8), 811–831. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Naeher S., Gilli A., North R. P., Hamann Y., & Schubert C. J. (2013). Tracing bottom water oxygenation with sedimentary Mn/Fe ratios in Lake Zurich, Switzerland. Chemical Geology, 352, 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schaller T., Moor H. C., & Wehrli B. (1997). Sedimentary profiles of Fe, Mn, V, Cr, As and Mo as indicators of benthic redox conditions in Baldeggersee. Aquatic sciences, 59(4), 345–361. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Davison W. (1993). Iron and manganese in lakes. Earth-Science Reviews, 34(2), 119–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Martin S. T. (2005). Precipitation and dissolution of iron and manganese oxides. Environmental Catalysis, 1, 61–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wehrli B., & Stumm W. (1989). Vanadyl in natural waters: Adsorption and hydrolysis promote oxygenation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53(1), 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Battistel D., Roman M., Marchetti A., Kehrwald N. M., Radaelli M., Balliana E., et al. (2018). Anthropogenic impact in the Maya Lowlands of Petén, Guatemala, during the last 5500 years. Journal of Quaternary Science, 33(2), 166–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aide M. T., & Aide C. (2012). Rare earth elements: their importance in understanding soil genesis. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Holser W. T. (1997). Evaluation of the application of rare-earth elements to paleoceanography. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 132(1–4), 309–323. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xiong Z., Li T., Algeo T., Chang F., Yin X., & Xu Z. (2012). Rare earth element geochemistry of laminated diatom mats from tropical West Pacific: Evidence for more reducing bottomwaters and higher primary productivity during the Last Glacial Maximum. Chemical Geology, 296, 103–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Geller W. (1992). The temperature stratification and related characteristics of Chilean lakes in midsummer. Aquatic Sciences, 54(1), 37–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Herrera C., & Custodio E. (2008). Conceptual hydrogeological model of volcanic Easter Island (Chile) after chemical and isotopic surveys. Hydrogeology Journal, 16(7), 1329–1348. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Baker P. E., Buckley F., & Holland J. G. (1974). Petrology and geochemistry of Easter Island. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 44(2), 85–100. 10.1007/BF00385783 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gonzalez-Ferran, O., & Baker, P. E. (1974). Isla de Pascua. Field guide book, including the first easter island geological map 1: 50.000. In IAVCEI International Symposium, Santiago, Chile (Vol. 32).
  • 45.Gioncada A., Gonzalez-Ferran O., Lezzerini M., Mazzuoli R., Bisson M., & Rapu S. A. (2010). The volcanic rocks of Easter Island (Chile) and their use for the Moai sculptures. European Journal of Mineralogy, 22(6), 855–867. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wright H. E. (1967). A square-rod piston sampler for lake sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 37(3), 975–976. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Millero F. J. (1974). The physical chemistry of seawater. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2(1), 101–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Craig H., & Gordon L. I. (1965). Deuterium and oxygen 18 variations in the ocean and the marine atmosphere. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gonfiantini R. (1986). Environmental isotopes in lake studies. Handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry, 2, 113–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Horita J., & Wesolowski D. J. (1994). Liquid-vapor fractionation of oxygen and hydrogen isotopes of water from the freezing to the critical temperature. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58(16), 3425–3437. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gat J. R. (1996). Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in the hydrologic cycle. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 24(1), 225–262 [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gibson J. J., Birks S. J., & Edwards T. W. D. (2008). Global prediction of δA and δ2H‐δ18O evaporation slopes for lakes and soil water accounting for seasonality. Global biogeochemical cycles, 22(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Puleston C. O., Ladefoged T. N., Haoa S., Chadwick O. A., Vitousek P. M., & Stevenson C. M. (2017). Rain, sun, soil, and sweat: A consideration of population limits on Rapa Nui (Easter Island) before European contact. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 69. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peinado-Guevara H., Green-Ruíz C., Herrera-Barrientos J., Escolero-Fuentes O., Delgado-Rodríguez O., Belmonte-Jiménez S., et al. (2012). Relationship between chloride concentration and electrical conductivity in groundwater and its estimation from vertical electrical soundings (VESs) in Guasave, Sinaloa, Mexico. Ciencia e investigación agraria, 39(1), 229–239. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guan H., Love A. J., Simmons C. T., Makhnin O., & Kayaalp A. S. (2010). Factors influencing chloride deposition in a coastal hilly area and application to chloride deposition mapping. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(5), 801–813. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alcalá F. J., & Custodio E. (2008). Atmospheric chloride deposition in continental Spain. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 22(18), 3636–3650. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Quirós R. (2003). The relationship between nitrate and ammonia concentrations in the pelagic zone of lakes. Limnetica, 22(1–2), 37–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bhateria R., & Jain D. (2016). Water quality assessment of lake water: a review. Sustain Water Resour Manag 2: 161–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Armienta M. A., Vilaclara G., De la Cruz-Reyna S., Ramos S., Ceniceros N., Cruz O., et al. (2008). Water chemistry of lakes related to active and inactive Mexican volcanoes. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 178(2), 249–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rudnick R. L., Gao S., Holland H. D., & Turekian K. K. (2003). Composition of the continental crust. The crust, 3, 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Abesser C., & Robinson R. (2010). Mobilisation of iron and manganese from sediments of a Scottish Upland reservoir. Journal of Limnology, 69(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vegas-Vilarrúbia T., Corella J. P., Pérez-Zanón N., Buchaca T., Trapote M. C., López P., et al. (2018). Historical shifts in oxygenation regime as recorded in the laminated sediments of lake Montcortès (Central Pyrenees) support hypoxia as a continental-scale phenomenon. Science of the total environment, 612, 1577–1592. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Żarczyński M., Wacnik A., & Tylmann W. (2019). Tracing lake mixing and oxygenation regime using the Fe/Mn ratio in varved sediments: 2000 year-long record of human-induced changes from Lake Żabińskie (NE Poland). Science of the Total Environment, 657, 585–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Murray, J. W. (1987). Mechanisms controlling the distribution of trace elements in oceans and lakes. In Hites, RA And SJ Eisenreich (Ed.). Advances in Chemistry Series, 216. Sources and Fates of Aquatic Pollutants; Symposium Held at the 190th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Chicago, Illinois, USA, September 8–13, 1985. Xiii+ 558p. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA. Illus. Maps Isbn 0-8412-0983-9.; 0 (0). 1987. 153–184.
  • 65.Balistrieri L. S., Murray J. W., & Paul B. (1992). The cycling of iron and manganese in the water column of Lake Sammamish, Washington. Limnology and Oceanography, 37(3), 510–528. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Giles C. D., Isles P. D., Manley T., Xu Y., Druschel G. K., & Schroth A. W. (2016). The mobility of phosphorus, iron, and manganese through the sediment–water continuum of a shallow eutrophic freshwater lake under stratified and mixed water-column conditions. Biogeochemistry, 127(1), 15–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gustafsson J. P. (2019). Vanadium geochemistry in the biogeosphere–speciation, solid-solution interactions, and ecotoxicity. Applied Geochemistry, 102, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Elderfield H., & Greaves M. J. (1982). The rare earth elements in seawater. Nature, 296(5854), 214–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.De Baar H. J. W., Bacon M. P., Brewer P. G., & Bruland K. W. (1985). Rare earth elements in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 49, 1943–1959. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nelson B. J., Wood S. A., & Osiensky J. L. (2003). Partitioning of REE between solution and particulate matter in natural waters: a filtration study. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 171(1–2), 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tsay A., Zajacz Z., & Sanchez-Valle C. (2014). Efficient mobilization and fractionation of rare-earth elements by aqueous fluids upon slab dehydration. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 398, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Edition F. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO chronicle, 38(4), 104–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Edwards E., Edwards A., & Roa H. (2013). When the Universe was an island: exploring the cultural and spiritual Cosmos of Ancient Rapa Nui. Hangaroa: Hangaroa Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rull V. (2016). Natural and anthropogenic drivers of cultural change on Easter Island: Review and new insights. Quaternary Science Reviews, 150, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dos Passos J. (2011). Easter Island: island of enigmas. Doubleday. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Richards R. (2008). Easter Island 1793 to 1861: Observations by early visitors before the slave raids. Easter Island Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.DiNapoli R. J., Lipo C. P., Brosnan T., Hunt T. L., Hixon S., Morrison A. E., et al. (2019). Rapa Nui (Easter Island) monument (ahu) locations explained by freshwater sources. PloS one, 14(1), e0210409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Métraux A. (1940). Ethnology of Easter Island (No. 160). The Museum. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Métraux A. (1957). Easter Island: A stone-age civilization of the Pacific. A. Deutsch. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Porteous J. D. (1978). Easter Island: the Scottish connection. Geographical Review, 145–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Gobierno de Chile Ministerio De Obras Públicas Direccion General De Aguas (2010) Caracterización Hidrogeológica De La Isla de Pascua
  • 82.Norton S. A. (1992). Salt consumption in ancient Polynesia. Perspectives in biology and medicine, 35(2), 160–181. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1992.0016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Fischer S. R. (2005). Island at the end of the world: The turbulent history of Easter Island. Reaktion Books. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Fagan B. (2008). The great warming: Climate change and the rise and fall of civilizations. Bloomsbury Publishing; USA. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lipo C. P., DiNapoli R. J., & Hunt T. L. (2018). Commentary: rain, sun, soil, and sweat: a consideration of population limits on Rapa Nui (Easter island) before European contact. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 25. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory Carling

23 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-39268

Easter Island Rano Raraku crater lake basin: geochemical characterization and implications for the Moai cult society

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bortolini,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Two reviewers have given a favorable opinion of the manuscript so I look forward to seeing a new version with minor revisions. My apologies for the delay in finding reviewers.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 03 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Greg Carling

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. 

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.  Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

3.  In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained to collect samples for the present study. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

4. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript refers mostly to climate related changes in the volcano crater lake. to My comments refer to the hydrological aspects and not to the paleoclimate results, which seems to me correct. Anthropic dominated situations like this are common in mountain wetlands.

The manuscript would benefit from an additional figure with a cross section of the volcano, the lake, the sediments (including the maximum level in the past), and the visible or inferred hydrogeological conditions in the flanks and in the surroundings. The Cl balance seem too coarse and the origin and value of Cl in rainfall is not mentioned. Under local conditions the values are quite variable and the dry atmospheric deposition should be added, as it is surely relevant. Lake water has the characteristics of rain and intra crater runoff evaporation, but rainfall data also show evaporation during the fall. The presentation of the water.chloride balance should be improved to make them more understandable (lines 265 and ....)

The age, alteration degree of the strato and pyroclastic volcano and erosion + organic sediments explain the existence of the lake, as in many other volcanic areas, but some comments should be added on the existence of a natural top drainage level and traces of possible springs or seeps in the outer cone surface and surroundings, if there are some observation ponts or excavations.

Line 56 Scoria-ceous delete -

Line 181 2H/1H add 1

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is well organized and well written making it easy to read. The authors presented a very good and detailed geochemical characterization of Rano Raraku freshwater lake. The authors used a very comprehensive and detailed experimental design to achieve their goal, which was to investigate the modern environmental process of the lake and its implications in past environmental changes and how those changes in the lake may have influenced in ancient cultures that inhabited on the island. The authors performed major ions, trace and rare earth elements, and diagnostic elements ratios analyses in different compartments of the lake: water (surface water and water column), sediment (sediment-water interface and bed sediments) and topsoil. They also performed an isotopic composition in the water. The materials and methods used are very complete and strong that supports the results found. I recommend the manuscript for publication.

This manuscript is an important contribution to the worldwide studies focused in freshwater systems, which in general are scarcer than marine ones. The only weakness of the work is that the authors begin the introduction directly by pointing to the lake under study. I think that before starting to talk about the lake under study, the authors should highlight the importance of the study carried out in Rano Raraku Lake in a more global context. What is known about this lake compared to other freshwater lakes in the world? (previous studies). Why is important to study the Rano Raraku lake? What is unknown about this lake that has not yet been studied previously?

The authors should highlight the importance of studying this lake compared to others. In lines 98-100 the authors name three previous studies in this lake “This study expands upon studies of major elements (Si, Ca, S, Fe and Ti) (Saez et al., 2009), pH and electrical conductivity (Geller, 1992) and macro and microfossils in a soil survey (Horrocks et al., 2012). The results of these studies led the authors to ask questions that led them to the present study?. What are those questions, if any? I wonder if the studies mentioned above served as a baseline for the development of this study. If so, I think that a briefly mention of the main results of those studies may contribute to understand better the importance of the present study.

Material and Methods

Well detailed and complete. I only suggest to the authors that they add what statistical analysis they used for the significant differences they show in the results and the statistical program used.

Line 146: “at -27.12220, -109.29031”: I suggest putting P1 in place of the coordinates to continue with the same writing format.

Line 158: “HDPE bottles”: What does HDPE means? Are special bottles?

Results and Discussion

Well developed and complete with reading easy to follow except in a few cases mentioned below:

Lines 219-220: “These values are within the range of the Eriksson (1952) equation that suggests Cl- values between 6 and 12 mg L-1 (in meteoric waters at ~1 km from the sea).” This sentence is a bit confusing for me. What does Ericksson's equation show? When the authors say these values are within the range… What values do the authors refer to? The values from table S4 correspond to the soil and the ones from Eriksson (1952) equation correspond to meteoric water. Also, Cl- values between 6 and 12 mg L-1 in meteoric waters are much smaller than found in the present study. Please clarify.

Line 247 “Chloride mass balance section”: This section is a bit confusing for me. In lines 271-274 the authors say “In this study the precipitation record was also used to determine the amount of Cl- supplied by rainfall. Assuming the chloride content to be constant in rainfall (8 mg L-1), the amount of the ion that accumulated in the lake since 1954 is ~ 29,000 kg”. Previously in lines 263-265 the authors said “The precipitation record was used to calculate the amount of Cl- provided solely by precipitation since 1954 and resulted in a total of approximately 40,000 kg”. I do not understand well what the difference between these two sentences is. It seems similar to me. In both cases the authors are using the precipitation record to calculate the amount of Cl supply by rainfall/precipitation since 1954. If that is not the case please clarify.

Also, in some cases is a bit difficult to follow how the authors made the calculations of Cl in this section. As examples:

Line 263 “we estimate that the amount of Cl- input to the basin, provided solely by meteoric water, averaged 680 kg y-1 (at 2017 lake level conditions)”. The value 680 kg y-1 comes from 41000kg/60years?

Line 265 “...of approximately 40,000 kg”: How is this value calculated?

Line 274 “...is ~ 29,000 kg”: the same here. Please clarify.

Lines 310-312 “In water samples sulfates were significantly depleted (i.e. SO42-/Cl- ratio ~ 10-3) compared to seawater (SO4 2-/Cl- = 0.14) suggesting that sulfate reduction may be involved in the decomposition of the organic matter”. Yes, but the authors should take into account that sulfate concentrations are typically two orders of magnitude higher in marine environments than in freshwater ones. I wonder if the difference in sulfate concentration between these two environments can affect the results. Is it possible to know if the difference found by the authors is not due to the lower concentration of sulphates in freshwater?

Line 324-325 “The Mn/Fe ratios are substantially lower than values found both in Rano Raraku water and in SPM (t-test of the means provides p-value lower than 10-4)”: Which is the meaning of this sentence? Please clarify. What Mn/Fe ratios do the authors refers to? Which samples? What statistical program was used for the analysis?

Line 361 “(p-value = 0.16)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 398 “(r2 = 0.983; p-value = 0.0089”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 400-401 “Therefore, the precipitation of carbonates enriched in Mg and Sr depletes the water column of these elements”: I think this is contradicted by line 385 where the authors say that the water is enriched in Mg. Please clarify.

Line 424 “(Elderfield et al, 1982)”: Is this the correct form? Two authors are listed in the references. Please clarify.

Line 425 “∗”: What does it mean?

Line 432 “(p-value < 10-4)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 435 “(p-value < 10-4)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 476 “(r2 = -0.905; p-value = 0.013)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 510 “Rull et al. 2016b”: Is this the correct form? Only one author is listed in the references. Please clarify.

Line 522 “Di Napoli et al. 2019”: Is this the correct form? 2018 is listed in the references. Please clarify.

Line 582 “References”: The authors should check the list references. See other minor comments in the text.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-39268_reviewer.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0254793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254793.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 Jun 2021

Point by point response to reviewers

Reviewer #1: The manuscript refers mostly to climate related changes in the volcano crater lake. to My comments refer to the hydrological aspects and not to the paleoclimate results, which seems to me correct. Anthropic dominated situations like this are common in mountain wetlands.

The manuscript would benefit from an additional figure with a cross section of the volcano, the lake, the sediments (including the maximum level in the past), and the visible or inferred hydrogeological conditions in the flanks and in the surroundings.

We added this figure in the text to better characterize the lake in the Materials and Methods | Study Site section. Figure 2 represents a cross section of the basin and a view of the internal Rano Raraku crater.

The Cl balance seem too coarse and the origin and value of Cl in rainfall is not mentioned. Under local conditions the values are quite variable and the dry atmospheric deposition should be added, as it is surely relevant. Lake water has the characteristics of rain and intra crater runoff evaporation, but rainfall data also show evaporation during the fall. The presentation of the water chloride balance should be improved to make them more understandable (lines 265 and ....)

We refined the Cl- balance by adjusting some estimates to be compliant with source data and considering the slope of the lake shore to compute the water volume. Reference for the origin of Cl- concentration in rainfall was included.

Dry deposition for chloride is seldom estimated in the literature, where mainly bulk deposition data is available. In addition, the rate of deposition is dependent on many factors such as wind, slope, elevation, distance from the sea. However, it is true that the input from dry deposition is relevant, accounting for up to the 30% in Atlantic coastal sites (Alcalà and Custodio, 2008). We included the contribution of dry deposition to account for the discrepancy between the total amount of chloride estimated in the basin and the value accumulated through rainfall.

The age, alteration degree of the strato and pyroclastic volcano and erosion + organic sediments explain the existence of the lake, as in many other volcanic areas, but some comments should be added on the existence of a natural top drainage level and traces of possible springs or seeps in the outer cone surface and surroundings, if there are some observation ponts or excavations.

Several coastal seeps are present 1-2 km from the cone (DiNapoli et al., 2019), and both ancient and modern wells mainly fed by groundwater with a significant saline intrusion from the sea, increasing with depth, as reported by Herrera and Custodio (2008) and by the hydrological survey conducted for the Chilean government in 2010 (https://snia.mop.gob.cl/sad/SUB5214.pdf). The shallow wells were used by the ancient island inhabitants as water supply together with water from Rano Raraku and other crater lakes. We mentioned this in paragraph 3.6 “Anthropological implications”, which was reviewed to include this discussion and a more realistic estimation of chloride in Rano Raraku at the time of early settlers.

Line 56 Scoria-ceous delete

We corrected it with: “Scoria basaltic lapilli…”

Line 181 2H/1H add 1

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is well organized and well written making it easy to read. The authors presented a very good and detailed geochemical characterization of Rano Raraku freshwater lake. The authors used a very comprehensive and detailed experimental design to achieve their goal, which was to investigate the modern environmental process of the lake and its implications in past environmental changes and how those changes in the lake may have influenced in ancient cultures that inhabited on the island. The authors performed major ions, trace and rare earth elements, and diagnostic elements ratios analyses in different compartments of the lake: water (surface water and water column), sediment (sediment-water interface and bed sediments) and topsoil. They also performed an isotopic composition in the water. The materials and methods used are very complete and strong that supports the results found. I recommend the manuscript for publication.

This manuscript is an important contribution to the worldwide studies focused in freshwater systems, which in general are scarcer than marine ones. The only weakness of the work is that the authors begin the introduction directly by pointing to the lake under study. I think that before starting to talk about the lake under study, the authors should highlight the importance of the study carried out in Rano Raraku Lake in a more global context. What is known about this lake compared to other freshwater lakes in the world? (previous studies). Why is important to study the Rano Raraku lake? What is unknown about this lake that has not yet been studied previously?

The authors should highlight the importance of studying this lake compared to others. In lines 98-100 the authors name three previous studies in this lake “This study expands upon studies of major elements (Si, Ca, S, Fe and Ti) (Saez et al., 2009), pH and electrical conductivity (Geller, 1992) and macro and microfossils in a soil survey (Horrocks et al., 2012). The results of these studies led the authors to ask questions that led them to the present study?. What are those questions, if any? I wonder if the studies mentioned above served as a baseline for the development of this study. If so, I think that a briefly mention of the main results of those studies may contribute to understand better the importance of the present study.

A wide number of studies have been conducted at Rapa Nui, specifically at Rano Raraku, to investigate past environmental conditions in the past, to try to reconstruct the vegetation and climatic oscillation. Nevertheless, there is a lack of knowledge about the present and recent (∼ 800 yr BP) conditions of the lake.

We emphasized the importance of the results in the mentioned studies, highlighting their contribution to the knowledge of the past environmental and climatic conditions of Rapa Nui. The present work aims at investigating the modern environmental processes at Rano Raraku and put the basis for the application of trace element analysis to draw past environmental changes.

Material and Methods

Well detailed and complete. I only suggest to the authors that they add what statistical analysis they used for the significant differences they show in the results and the statistical program used. -

The statistical analysis was performed using R software. We added a sentence in the Methods section: “All statistical analyses were performed using the RStudio software. Pearson correlation coefficients and Student’s t-tests were run to analyse data correlation and similarity, respectively.”

Line 146: “at -27.12220, -109.29031”: I suggest putting P1 in place of the coordinates to continue with the same writing format.

We removed the coordinates and replaced that point with “P3” with the same coordinates.

Line 158: “HDPE bottles”: What does HDPE means? Are special bottles?

We meant high density polyethylene bottles, for simplicity we used “polyethylene bottles” in the text.

Results and Discussion

Well developed and complete with reading easy to follow except in a few cases mentioned below:

Lines 219-220: “These values are within the range of the Eriksson (1952) equation that suggests Cl- values between 6 and 12 mg L-1 (in meteoric waters at ~1 km from the sea).” This sentence is a bit confusing for me. What does Ericksson's equation show? When the authors say these values are within the range… What values do the authors refer to? The values from table S4 correspond to the soil and the ones from Eriksson (1952) equation correspond to meteoric water. Also, Cl- values between 6 and 12 mg L-1 in meteoric waters are much smaller than found in the present study. Please clarify

We understand that this passage might have created confusion in the reader, so we preferred to remove the sentence and the reference to the Eriksson equation from the text. We completed the sentence about soil values by adding the following clarification: “[...] meaning that the contribution from runoff and soil erosion is likely negligible, as stated by Herrera and Custodio (2008).”

Line 247 “Chloride mass balance section”: This section is a bit confusing for me. In lines 271-274 the authors say “In this study the precipitation record was also used to determine the amount of Cl- supplied by rainfall. Assuming the chloride content to be constant in rainfall (8 mg L-1), the amount of the ion that accumulated in the lake since 1954 is ~ 29,000 kg”. Previously in lines 263-265 the authors said “The precipitation record was used to calculate the amount of Cl- provided solely by precipitation since 1954 and resulted in a total of approximately 40,000 kg”. I do not understand well what the difference between these two sentences is. It seems similar to me. In both cases the authors are using the precipitation record to calculate the amount of Cl supply by rainfall/precipitation since 1954. If that is not the case please clarify.

We used the precipitation record and average Cl concentration in rainfall twice, to calculate the accumulation of Cl in the lake from 1954 to 1990 and from 1954 to 2017, respectively, in order to show how the input is solely controlled by atmospheric deposition and the lake balance only depends on the precipitation-evaporation equilibrium.

Also, in some cases is a bit difficult to follow how the authors made the calculations of Cl in this section. As examples:

Line 263 “we estimate that the amount of Cl- input to the basin, provided solely by meteoric water, averaged 680 kg y-1 (at 2017 lake level conditions)”. The value 680 kg y-1 comes from 41000kg/60years?

Line 265 “...of approximately 40,000 kg”: How is this value calculated?

Line 274 “...is ~ 29,000 kg”: the same here. Please clarify.

We specified how values were obtained and added reference for the average chloride content in rainfall. Some values were corrected based on more precise estimates of the lake volume and Cl concentrations.

Lines 310-312 “In water samples sulfates were significantly depleted (i.e. SO42-/Cl- ratio ~ 10-3) compared to seawater (SO4 2-/Cl- = 0.14) suggesting that sulfate reduction may be involved in the decomposition of the organic matter”. Yes, but the authors should take into account that sulfate concentrations are typically two orders of magnitude higher in marine environments than in freshwater ones. I wonder if the difference in sulfate concentration between these two environments can affect the results. Is it possible to know if the difference found by the authors is not due to the lower concentration of sulphates in freshwater?

We compared SO42-/Cl- ratios with waters from similar crater lakes fed by precipitation, rather than with seawater. Values in Rano Raraku are still at least one order of magnitude lower, thus we hypothesize a possible role of sulfates in the decomposition of organic matter.

Line 324-325 “The Mn/Fe ratios are substantially lower than values found both in Rano Raraku water and in SPM (t-test of the means provides p-value lower than 10-4)”: Which is the meaning of this sentence? Please clarify. What Mn/Fe ratios do the authors refers to? Which samples? What statistical program was used for the analysis?

We connected the sentence to the former one, in order to make it clear that the Mn/Fe ratios referred to topsoil samples. We removed the reference to the t-test, since it was out of place. The statistical tools used were included in the methods section.

Line 361 “(p-value = 0.16)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 398 “(r2 = 0.983; p-value = 0.0089”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

As mentioned above, the information about statistical analysis was included in the Methods section.

Line 400-401 “Therefore, the precipitation of carbonates enriched in Mg and Sr depletes the water column of these elements”: I think this is contradicted by line 385 where the authors say that the water is enriched in Mg. Please clarify.

Compared to other lake waters, Rano Raraku water is relatively rich in Mg and Sr, although in line with other crater lakes. We corrected the text and added reference.

Line 424 “(Elderfield et al, 1982)”: Is this the correct form? Two authors are listed in the references. Please clarify.

We corrected using “Elderfield and Greaves, 1982”.

Line 425 “∗”: What does it mean? –

We use the expression Ce/Ce* to define the Cerium anomaly, as references in the paper use the same nomenclature. In the paper we used the equation from Elderfield and Greaves (1982) to point out the different Ce concentration into the analysed matrices.

Line 432 “(p-value < 10-4)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 435 “(p-value < 10-4)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Line 476 “(r2 = -0.905; p-value = 0.013)”: What statistical analysis and statistical program the authors used?

Please see above.

Line 510 “Rull et al. 2016b”: Is this the correct form? Only one author is listed in the references. Please clarify.

We corrected using “Rull 2016b”.

Line 522 “Di Napoli et al. 2019”: Is this the correct form? 2018 is listed in the references. Please clarify. –

The correct reference is from 2019. We revised the reference section.

Line 582 “References”: The authors should check the list references. See other minor comments in the text.

References have been entirely checked in the text and in the reference list.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Gregory Carling

6 Jul 2021

Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Rano Raraku crater lake basin: geochemical characterization and implications for the Moai cult society

PONE-D-20-39268R1

Dear Dr. Bortolini,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Greg Carling

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: no new specific comments. I agree with the authors thar dry deposition is raraly measured as such but as a difference between bulk deposition and only wet deposition. My mention of dry depossitio was only to call the attention that bulk depossition may be significantly larger than only wet deposition as deduces from point samples of rainfall in gauges that only open prior to rain or are frequently washed,

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Gregory Carling

15 Sep 2021

PONE-D-20-39268R1

Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Rano Raraku crater lake basin: geochemical characterization and implications for the Ahu-Moai Period

Dear Dr. Bortolini:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Gregory Carling

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-39268_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All the data collected for this research are available on Mendeley Data using the following link https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/k93rp3p4pd/1.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES