Abstract
The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to rapid vaccine development and emergency use (EU) rollout. Six vaccines, including two using novel mRNA technology, are EU-listed by the World Health Organisation, and promising published trial data are available for nine more. While efficacy is good, there are various barriers to their global use. Long-term safety and immunogenicity data are being collected along the way.
Many aspects define future-fit SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
Since wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in China in 2019, the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted the rapid development, emergency use listing or approval (EUL or EUA) and rollout of vaccines [1, 2]. This paper summarises promising COVID-19 vaccines as of 7 September 2021, based on available data, with emphasis on published phase 3 trial results. Data are sourced from peer-reviewed journals, press releases, public health organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO), the European Medicines Association (EMA) and the US Communicable Diseases Centre (CDC), review articles (Kyriakidis et al, McDonald et al and Sadarangani et al. [1, 3, 4]) and vaccine tracking websites [2, 5].
An ideal vaccine provides long-term protection in all populations after one dose, and is safe, affordable and easy to mass manufacture, store and distribute [1]. It must also be accepted; at present, WHO includes vaccine hesitancy (outside of the scope of this article) in its top 10 threats to global health [6]. While scientific opinions initially predicted that it would take at least a year to a year and a half for a COVID-19 vaccine to be approved for use in the USA, advances in the field allowed the issuing of EUAs for various vaccines by national and international drug regulation agencies within a year of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence being released [4]. By 7 September 2021, six COVID-19 vaccines had received WHO EULs, one of which (the AstraZeneca/University of Oxford formulation) has two versions (VaxzevriaTM and CovishieldTM, the latter manufactured by the Serum Institute of India) (Tables 1, 2). Nine more vaccines (Table 3) had published acceptable or excellent phase 3 efficacy results and ≥ 20 others had reached phase 3 trials (Table 5) [2, 5]. However, among the plethora of potential efficacious options, few meet the various ideal-vaccine [1] criteria.
Table 1.
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines with World Health Organisation (WHO) emergency use listing as at 7 Sep 2021 [2, 4, 9, 10]
| Vaccine (company developing) | Key information |
|---|---|
| mRNA-1273; TAK-919 (Moderna/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/Takeda)a | |
| Name (brand name): dosage | Elasomeran (Spikevax®) IM: 2 × 0.5 mL (100 μg) doses 4 wks apart |
| Class of vaccine | Modified mRNA encapsulated in lipid NP vector, encoding full-length S protein [3, 4] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | Approved in Switzerland and EUA in European Union, Japan, UK, USA and > 30 other countries [2]: adults and adolescents aged >12 y (e.g. European Union) or adults aged ≥ 18 y (e.g. USA) |
| Storage | Stable at −20 °C for ≤ 6 mo and 2–8 °C for 30 d [4] |
| Cost per dose/doses available (2021) | US $15 in USA, $18 in EU [9]/800M leaving 860M shortfall vs orders [10]b |
| BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer/Fosun Pharma)a | |
| Name (brand name): dosage | Tozinameran (Comirnaty®) IM: 2 × 0.3 mL (30 μg) doses 3 wks apart |
| Class of vaccine | Modified mRNA encapsulated in lipid NP vector, encoding full-length S protein [3, 4] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | Approved in USA, Switzerland, Bahrain, Brazil, New Zealand and Saudi Arabia, EUA in European Union and > 50 other countries [2]: mostly adults and adolescents aged ≥ 12 y (US full approval in ≥ 16 y and US EUA in ≥ 12 y) |
| Storage | Stable at −60 °C; 2–8 °C for 1 mo [11] |
| Cost per dose/doses available (2021) | US $19.50 for first 200M doses in USA, $14.70 in EU [9]/3B leaving 580M shortfall vs orders [10]b |
| AZD1222; Covishield (AstraZeneca/University of Oxford/Serum Institute of India)a | |
| Name (brand names): dosage | ChAdOx1-S (VaxzevriaTM; CovishieldTM manufactured by Serum Institute of India) IM: 2 × 0.5 mL (≥ 2.5 × 108 InfU = 5 × 1010 VP) doses 4–12 wks apart |
| Class of vaccine | Recombinant debilitated chimpanzee AD OX1 vector DNA expressing full-length S protein [3, 4] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | Approved in Brazil, EUA in European Union, Argentina, UK and > 50 other countries (not USA): adults aged ≥ 18 y; permanently stopped in Denmark and Norway [2] |
| Storage | Stable at 2–8 °C |
| Cost per dose/doses available (2021) | US $2.15 in EU, $3 in UK, $4 in USA [9]/2.1B, with 1.1B shortfall vs orders [10]b |
| Ad26.COV2.S; JNJ-78436735 (Janssen of Johnson & Johnson/Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre)a | |
| Name (brand name): dosage | COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen [Ad26.COV2-S (recombinant)] IM: 1 × 0.5 mL dose (≥ 8.92 log10 InfU = 5 × 1010 VP) [12] |
| Class of vaccine | Recombinant, debilitated human AD 26 vector expressing stabilised prefusion full-length S protein [3, 4] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations |
EUA in European Union, UK, USA and > 30 other countries: adults aged > 18 y Vaccine rollout stopped in Denmark, Finland and restricted to volunteers in Norway [2] |
| Storage | Stable at 2–8 °C |
| Cost per dose/doses available (2021) | US $10, $8.50 in EU [9]/500M, with 395M shortfall [10]b |
| CoronaVac (Sinovac R&D)a | |
| Name: dosage | CoronaVac IM: 2 × 3 μg doses 2 wks apart |
| Class of vaccine | Inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 grown in Vero cells, aluminium hydroxide adjuvant [4, 13] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | Approved in China (people aged ≥ 3 y); EUA in > 30 countries: WHO EUL for adults aged ≥ 18 y; use stopped in Malaysia |
| Storage | Stable at 2–8 °C |
| Cost per dose/doses available (2021) | US $29.75 in China /1.75B, with 751M spare capacity |
| BBIBP-CorV COVID-19 vaccine [Sinopharm; China National Biotec Group (CNBG)]a | |
| Name: dosage | SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell) IM: 2 × 0.4 μg doses 2–4 wks apart [14] |
| Class of vaccine | Inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 (HB02 strain) grown in Vero cells, aluminium hydroxide adjuvant [4] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | Approved in China (aged ≥ 3 y), Bahrain, UAE; EUAs in Hungary and > 40 others: adults aged ≥ 18 y |
| Storage | Stable at 2–8 °C |
| Cost per dose/doses available (2021) | US $19–36 [15], $30 in China/1B, with 645M spare capacity [10]b |
AD adenovirus, B billion, d day, EUA/L emergency use authorisation/listing, h hour(s), IM intramuscular, InfU infectious units, M million, mo months, NP nanoparticle, S protein SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, VP viral particles, vs versus, wk(s) week(s)
aApproval and/or EUA in countries meeting WHO stringent regulatory authority criteria
bManufacturing capacity is for 2021, while some orders may be for 2022, so shortfalls may not eventuate [10]
Table 2.
Efficacy and safety in randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trials of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines with WHO emergency use listing at 7 Sep 2021 [14]
| Phase 3 trial | Results |
|---|---|
| mRNA-1273, TAK-919, elasomeran (Spikevax®): Moderna/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/Takeda | |
| COVE trial: regimens [20] | > 30,000a US adults: 2 × 0.5 mL (100 μg) IM doses mRNA-1273 or PL, both 28 d apart |
| Demographics (BL) | 5% Asian, 10% Black, 79% White, 21% Hispanic, 25% aged ≥ 65 y (mean 51 y), mean BMI 29 |
| Efficacy: PEb (n = 28,207)a | 94.1% (95% CI 89.3–96.8%) [21] |
| Other endpoints/subgroups | SCH 100%; those aged ≥ 65 y 86.4%; race, sex, and presence of risk for severe COVID-19 all 90.9–97.5% [20] |
| Safety (n = 30,351)a |
Common ADEs: ISP (> 90%), fatigue (70%), headache, myalgia (> 60%), arthralgia, chills (> 40%), nausea/vomiting (> 20%), axillary swelling/pain, fever or ISR (> 10%) [20, 21] Serious/severe ADEs: Bell’s palsy in 3 vaccine and 1 PL recipient, facial swelling in 2 vaccine recipients with dermatological fillers, severe nausea/vomiting in 1 vaccine recipient [20] |
| Post-trial surveillance | Mild myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in young male adults and adolescents [21] |
| BNT162b2, tozinameran (Comirnaty®): BioNTech/Pfizer [11, 22] | |
| NCT04368728: regimens |
> 43,000a people, 77% in USA, aged ≥ 16 y: 2 × 0.3 mL (30 μg) doses IM Comirnaty or PL, 21 d apart Additional analysis in 2,260 adolescents aged 12–15 y [23], with similar demographics |
| Demographics (PPS) | 5% Asian, 9% Black, 83% White, 27% Hispanic, 22% aged ≥ 65 y (median 52 y), 46% with comorbidityc |
| Efficacy: PEb (n = 36,523 SN at BL, 40,137 SN or SP at BL)a |
95.0% (95% CI 90.3–97.6%) in those SN at BL [22] 94.6% (95% CI 89.9–97.3%) in those SN or SP at BL [22] |
| Other endpoints/subgroups | SCH 75%; people aged ≥ 65 y/75 y 94.7/100%; 2,230 SN or SP adolescents aged 12–15 y 100%; by race, gender, and in Argentina, Brazil and USA all 89–97% [14] |
| Safety (n = 37,586)a |
Common ADEs: ISP/R (> 80%), fatigue (> 60%), headache (> 50%), myalgia, chills (> 30%) arthralgia (20%), fever (> 10%) [11]; ADEs similar, but slightly more common in adolescents [24] 4 cases Bell’s palsy in vaccine group [11, 24], insufficient data for conclusion |
| Post-trial surveillance | Mild myocarditis and pericarditis especially in young male adults and adolescents |
| ChAdOx1-S recombinant IM injection (VaxzevriaTM, CovishieldTM): AstraZeneca/University of Oxford [25] | |
| COV 001, 002, 003 and 005: regimens | > 24,000a adults in UK, Brazil and South Africa: 2 × 0.5 mL (≥ 2.5 × 108 InfU = 5 × 1010 VP) IM doses ChAdOx1-S or PL 4–12 wks apart [3, 25] |
| Demographics (BL) | 71% White, 12% Black (↓ to 6% in PPS), 3% Asian, 39% with comorbidityc, 13% ≥ 65 y |
| Efficacy: PEb (n = 14,380)a | COV 002 (UK) and 003 (Brazil): 59.5% (95% CI 45.8–69.7%) |
| Other endpoints/subgroups | SCH 100% after 1 or 2 doses; any dose interval (21–159 d) 62.6% [25]; those with comorbidityc 58.3% |
| Safety (n = 23,745)a | Common ADEs: ISP/R (> 60%), headache, fatigue (> 50%), myalgia, malaise (> 40%), pyrexia, chills (> 30%), arthralgia, nausea (> 20%), fever ≥ 38 ℃ (7.6%) |
| Post-trial surveillance | Very rare: TTS, mostly in women aged < 60 y, CLS (some in people with CLS history), GBS [25] |
| Ad26.COV2.S; JNJ-78436735 (Janssen of Johnson & Johnson/Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre) [12, 26] | |
| COV 3001 trial: regimens | > 44,000a adults in Latin America, South Africa and the USA: 1 × 0.5 mL (≥ 8.92 log10 InfU = 5 × 1010 VP) dose IM Ad26.COV2.S or PL [27] |
| Demographics (PPS) | 41% Latin America, 13% South Africa, 47% US, 20% aged ≥ 65 y (median 52 y), 40% comorbidity |
| Efficacy: PEb (n = 39, 321)a |
Moderate/severe COVID-19 14 d post-vacc: 66.9% (95% CI 59.0–73.4%) in SN or unknown BL serostatus Moderate/severe COVID-19 28 d post-vacc: 66.1% (95% CI 55.0–74.8) in SN or unknown BL serostatus |
| Other endpoints/subgroups | SCH 76.7% and 85.4% 14 and 28 d post-vacc; age ≥ 60 y (any COVID-19) 76.3% and 66.2% 14 d and 28 d post-vacc; Brazil, South Africa and USA all 64–72% for COVID-19 and 82–88% for SCH at 28 d post-vacc |
| Safety (n = 43,783)a | Common ADEs: IS pain (> 40%), headache, fatigue, myalgia (> 30%), nausea (> 10%), fever ≥ 38 ℃ (9%) |
| Post-trial surveillance | Very rare: TTS, mostly in women aged < 60 y, GBS, mostly in men aged ≥ 50 y [12] |
| CoronaVac (Sinovac R&D) | |
|
PROFISCOV trial: regimens Turkey trial: regimens |
> 12,500a adult HCW in Brazil (pre-P.1 variant): 2 × 0.5 mL (3 μg) IM doses CoronaVac or PL 14 d apart > 10,000a: HCW + others aged 18–59 y, randomised 1:1 (HCW) or 2:1 (others) to: 2 × 0.5 mL (3 μg) IM doses CoronaVac or PL 14 d apart |
| Demographics (BL) |
Brazil: 5% aged ≥ 60 y (mean 39.5 y), 36% male, 89.9% SN at BL, 10.1% SP at BL Turkey: 36% HCWs, 58% male, 16% obese (BMI ≥ 30c), median BMI 25.7, median age 45 y |
| Efficacy: PEb (n = 9823 in Brazil [14], 10,029 in Turkeya [28]) |
Brazil: 50.7% (95% CI 35.9–62.0%) Turkey: 83.5% (95% CI 65.4–92.1%) |
| Other endpoints/subgroups: |
Brazil: SCH efficacy not shown, ↑ dose interval (21–28 d) 62.3% (95% CI 13.9–83.5); 60.4% at ≤ 56 d post-dose, waned to 52.5% (51.9–53.1) at ≤ 98 d post-dose Efficacy not shown in males, those aged ≥ 60 y or with comorbiditiesc, or dose interval < 21 d Turkey: SCH 100% in young, healthy population [28] |
| Safety (n = 12,396 in Brazil, 10,214 in Turkey)a [14] |
Common ADEs: ISP, ISR, headache, fatigue, myalgia Serious/severe ADEs: Anaphylaxis in 1 vaccine recipient in Turkey |
| Post-trial surveillance | After ≈ 36M doses in China, 49 serious ADEs including anaphylactic shock (6 cases), Henoch-Schönlein purpura (5 cases), facial paralysis (4 cases), laryngeal oedema, demyelination, cerebral haemorrhage (3 cases each) and GBS (2 cases) |
| BBIBP-CorV COVID-19 vaccine [Sinopharm; China National Biotec Group (CNBG)]a [14] | |
| COVIV-02: regimens | 3-way trial in > 41,000a adults in Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, UAE randomised 1:1:1a to BIBP, or a second vaccine WIBP, or PL: BIBP dosage 2 × 4 μg IM doses 21 d apart |
| Demographics (safety data) | 98% < 60 y, 85% male, 22.2% obesec, 13% Chinese, 87% Asian [14] |
| Efficacy: PEb (n = 27,536, excluding WIBP group)a | 78.1% (95% CI 64.8–86.3) (PEb does not specify SN) [14] |
| Other endpoints/subgroups | 78.1–80.8% in SN at BL, those aged < 60, with BMI ≥ 30c and males [14] |
| Safety (n = 29,237)a |
Common ADEs: ISP, headache, fatigue Serious ADEs: nausea, inflammatory demyelination syndrome possibly linked to BIBP, thrombus (each in one patient) |
| Post-trial surveillance | 5.9M BBIBP-CorV recipients, China: facial nerve symptoms (n = 11), fever ≥ 38.6 ℃ (n = 86) |
ADE(s) adverse drug event(s), BL baseline, BMI body mass index in kg/m2, CLS capillary leak syndrome, d day, GBS Guillain-Barre syndrome, HCW healthcare workers, IM intramuscular, InfU infectious units, ISP/R injection-site pain/reaction, mo month(s), PE primary endpoint, PL placebo, post-vacc post-vaccination, PPS per-protocol set, SCH severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalisation, SN seronegative, SP seropositive, TTS thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndrome, wk(s) week(s), ↑ increased
aUnless otherwise indicated, participant numbers are: for trial, those randomised 1:1 vaccine:PL; for efficacy analysis, PPS for vaccine and PL; and for safety analysis, those who received ≥ 1 dose of vaccine or PL; some safety analyses are from combined trial results
bUnless otherwise stated, prevention of laboratory-confirmed, symptomatic COVID-19 in those SN at BL, with onset > 7 d (BNT162b2 vaccine), > 14 d (mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1-S, Ad26.COV2.S, CoronaVac, BBIBP-CorV vaccines) and/or 28 d (Ad26.COV2.S vaccine) post-dose 2
cComorbidities associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19
Table 3.
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines with reported phase 3 results, but without WHO emergency use listing at 7 Sep 2021 [2, 9, 10, 13]
| Vaccine (company developing) | Key information |
|---|---|
| ZyCoV-D (Zydus Cadila Healthcare, India)a | |
| Type of vaccine | Non-replicating and non-integrating plasmid DNA encoding S protein |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | Intradermal, applied via The PharmaJet® needle-free Tropis® system: 3 × 3 mg doses, 4 wks apart |
| Reported efficacy | 66.6% for symptomatic COVID-19, including in adolescents (via company press release) [36] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | EUA in India: phase 3 trial in adults and 1000 adolescents aged 12–18 y |
| Other considerations | Stored at 2–8 °C, but stable at 25 °C for 3 mo; 2021 mfg target 100M doses, all available |
| Sputnik; Gam-Covid-Vac (Gamaleya Research Institute and Health Ministry of the Russian Federation) | |
| Type of vaccine | Replication-deficient human AD5 (dose 1) and AD26 (dose 2) vector expressing S protein [13] |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | IM Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V or Light): 2 × 0.5 mL (1011 VP [3]) doses 3 wks apart (Light = 1 dose) |
| Reported efficacy | Sputnik V: 91.6% in peer-reviewed journal, but sufficiency of data questioned [37] |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | EUA in > 70 countries: adults |
| Other considerations | Liquid/freeze-dried stable at −18 °C/2–8 °C; CPD ≤ US$10; 2021 mfg target ≈ 390M doses, with 58M shortfall vs ordersb |
| AD5-nCoV (CanSino Biologics, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology and Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences)a,c | |
| Type of vaccine | Recombinant human AD type 5 vector DNA expressing full-length S protein [3, 13] |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | IM AD5-nCoV (Convidecia): single 5 × 1010 VP dose [13] |
| Reported efficacy | 65.3% (via media reports) |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | Approved in China, EUA in Latin America, Hungary, Malaysia, Mexico, Moldova, Pakistan: adults |
| Other considerations | Stable at 2–8 °C + for 3 wks at RT; CPD US$27 [15]; 2021 mfg target 500M doses, with 359M available |
| NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax), manufactured as Covovax (Serum Institute of India) | |
| Type of vaccine | Prefusion recombinant full-length S protein NP + saponin-based Matrix-M1TM adjuvant [3, 4] |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | IM NVX-CoV2373 (Covovax): 2 × (5 μg protein + 50 μg adjuvant) doses, 3 wks apart |
| Reported efficacy | 89.7% for symptomatic COVID-19, 86.3% against α variant (via peer-reviewed journal) [35]; may be less effective against β variant |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | Plans to apply to US FDA for EUA in 4th quarter (applications filed in India, Indonesia, Philippines) |
| Other considerations | Stable at 2–8 °C; CPD US$16 in USA; 2021 mfg target 580M doses, with shortfall of 939Mb |
| CIGB-66 (Center for Genetic Engineering, Cuba)a | |
| Type of vaccine | Protein subunit (receptor-binding domain of S glycoprotein) + aluminium hydroxide |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | IM CIGB-66 (Abdala): 3 × 50 μg doses 2 wks apart |
| Reported efficacy | 92.28% (via media reports) |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | EUA in Cuba and Venezuela |
| Other considerations | Stable at 2–8 °C [38] |
| BBV152 (Bharat Biotech and Indian Council of Medical Research, Ocugen USA) | |
| Type of vaccine | Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 grown in Vero cells + aluminium hydroxide adjuvant + imidazoquinoline molecule [3] |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | IM BBV152 (CovaxinTM): 2 × 6 μg doses 28 d apart |
| Reported efficacy | 77.8% against symptomatic COVID-19, 93.4% against severe COVID-19 (article preprint) |
| Approvals/EUAs: patient populations | EUA in India and > 10 other countries, seeking full approval from US FDA, use stopped in Brazil [2]b |
| Other considerations | Stable at 2–8 °C, RT for 1 wk; CPD ≈ US$3; 2021 mfg target 590M doses, with 537M shortfallb |
| WIBP COVID-19 (Vero) vaccine (Sinopharm, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products and Beijing Institute of Biological Products) | |
| Type of vaccine | Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 grown in Vero cells with aluminium hydroxide adjuvant [4] |
| Formulation: dosage | IM WIBP Cor-V: 2 × 5 μg doses 21 d apart |
| Reported efficacy | 72.8% (WIV04 strain group) and 78.2% (HB02 strain group) [initial report in peer-reviewed journal] [39] |
| EUA/approvals: patient populations | Approval in China, limited use in UAE |
| Other considerations | Stable at 2–8 °C |
| ZF2001 (Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biologic Pharmacy)a | |
| Type of vaccine | Protein subunit (receptor-binding domain of S protein) with aluminium hydroxide adjuvant |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | (Zifivax) IM: 3 × 25 μg doses 4 wks apart |
| Reported efficacy | 81.76% (100% against severe cases and death, 77.54% against δ variant; via media reports) |
| EUA/approvals: patient populations | EUA in China and Uzbekistan |
| Soberana 2 (Instituto Finlay de Vacunas)a | |
| Type of vaccine | Protein subunit (receptor-binding domain of S protein) with aluminium hydroxide adjuvant |
| Formulation (brand name): dosage | IM FINLAY-FR-2; Soberana 2 (Pasteur in Iran), Soberana Plus (booster): IM 2 (Soberana 2) or 3 (Soberana Plus) × 25 μg doses 28 d apart |
| Reported efficacy | 62% with two doses, 91.2% with Soberana Plus (via media reports) |
| EUA/approvals: patient populations | EUA for Soberana 2 and Soberana Plus in Cuba; EUA of Soberana 2 (Pasteur) in Iran |
AD adenovirus, d day(s), CPD cost per dose, EUA emergency use authorisation, FDA Food & Drug Administration, h hour(s), IM intramuscular, mfg manufacturing, NP nanoparticle, RT room temperature, S SARS-CoV-2 spike, VP viral particles, wk(s) week(s), y year(s)
aInitial press release only, no results published in peer-reviewed journal
bManufacturing capacity is for 2021, while some orders may be for 2022, so shortfalls may not eventuate [10]
cEUA in Hungary, which meets WHO stringent regulatory authority criteria
Table 5.
New SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines in phase 2/3 or 3 trials, including those yet to recruit or enrol [2, 5, 30]a
| Companies developing | Vaccine namea,b | Trial number, location(s) and comments |
|---|---|---|
| DNA or mRNA vaccines | ||
| Abogen Biosciences/Yuxi Walvax Biotechnology (mRNA) | ARCoV | NCT04847102; global; no detail |
| Arcturus Therapeutics/Duke-NUS Medical School (mRNA) | ARCT-021 | NCT05012943; Vietnam |
| AnGes/Japan Agency for Medical R&D (DNA) | AG0302-COVID19 skin injection | NCT04655625, AG0302-COVID19-JN-02; Japan |
| Inovio Pharma (DNA) | INO-4800 (intradermal injection then electroporation) | NCT04642638, INNOVATE; multinational |
| Recombinant viral vector vaccines | ||
| ReiThera SRL/Leukocare Univercells | GRAd-COV2 (1 or 2 doses) | EUCTR2020-005915-39; multinational; in severe disease |
| NCT04791423; Italy | ||
| AstraZeneca | AZD2816 (nasal spray vaccine tailored to β variant) | NCT04973449; Brazil, UK |
| Israel Institute for Biological Research/NRx Pharmaceuticals | Brilife | NCT04990466; Brilife studies to be conducted in Israel, Georgia and Ukraine |
| Inactivated whole virus vaccines | ||
| Beijing Minhai Biotechnology/Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products | No name | NCT04852705; multinational; no detail; EUA in China |
| Chinese Academy of Medical Science Institute of Medical Biology | No name | NCT04659239; Brazil, Malaysia |
| Erciyes University/Health Institutes of Turkey | TURKOVAC | NCT04942405; Turkey; comparative trial vs CoronaVac |
| Kazakhstan Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems | QazCovid-in®, QazVac | NCT04691908; Kazakhstan; early use in Kazakhstan |
| Shafa Pharmed Industrial | COVIran, Barekat | IRCT20201202049567N3; Iran; EUA in Iran |
| Valneva Austria/Dynavax | VLA2001 | NCT04864561; UK; comparative trial vs ChAdOx1 |
| Valneva Austria/Dynavax | VLA2101 | NCT04956224; New Zealand; one arm in adolescents aged ≥ 12 y, compares Wuhan- (VLA2001) and variant- (VLA2101) based vaccines |
| Protein subunit vaccines | ||
| Baylor/Texas Children’s Hospital, Biological E/Dynavax | BECOV 2, Corbevax | Trial approved by Central Drugs Standard Control Organization - Subject Expert Committee, India [2] |
| Clover/Dynavax | SCB-2019 | NCT04672395 (SPECTRA study); multinational |
| PHRR210209-003334; Philippines | ||
| Nanogen Biopharma | Nanocovax | NCT04922788; Vietnam |
| Sanofi Pasteur/GSK | No name | NCT04904549; USA, Honduras, Japan, Africa; 2-stage (monovalent and bivalent vaccines) |
| Vaxxinity (Covaxx) | UB-612 | NCT04683224; no detail (US company) |
| West China Hospital/West Vac Biopharma | No name (3 doses) | NCT04904471; global; no detail |
| Vector Institute | EpiVacCorona, Aurora-CoV | No details; approved in Turkmenistan, early use in Russia |
| Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp. | MVC-COV1901 | NCT05011526; Paraguay; compared with AZD1222; EUA in Taiwan |
| Cinnagen/Vaxine | Spikogen | NCT05005559; Iran |
| Livzon Pharmaceutical Group/Institute of Biophysics (Chinese Academy of Sciences) | V-01 | Phase 3 trial in Philippines; no details |
| Plant-based virus-like particle | ||
| Medicago/GSK | CoVLP | NCT04636697; Brazil, Canada, UK, USA |
EUA emergency use authorisation
aExcludes new trials in vaccines with published phase 3 results and/or World Health Organisation emergency use listing
bDosage regimen is 2 x intramuscular injections and versus placebo, unless otherwise stated
Varied technology, varied pros and cons
Some vaccine technologies are well established [e.g. inactivated or live-attenuated whole virus, or viral subunit (protein or virus-like particles)], but COVID-19 vaccines have employed technologies such as novel modified viral mRNA or DNA approaches [4] and adenovirus (AD) vectors, generally with good efficacy (Tables 1, 3) [4, 7]. Immunology (Table 4) is not yet clear, but predictable issues with various technologies include:
inactivated, non-replicating virus and protein subunit vaccines (e.g. Sinovac’s CoronaVac and Sinopharm’s BBIBP-CorV) usually need booster shots and/or adjuvants as they typically prompt either no, or a weak, short-lived cellular immune response [4, 7];
potential reversion to virulent or wild-type strains mean all whole virus vaccines need regular testing [7];
mRNA is very unstable, necessitating freezer storage of the Moderna mRNA-1273 and Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccines (Table 1), and booster doses are probably needed [2, 7];
DNA vaccines could potentially integrate into the human genome, and probably need booster shots [7];
the efficacy and tolerability of AD vector vaccines can be affected by recipients’ previous exposure and antibodies (Abs) to common ADs, although this risk has been mitigated by the use of chimp AD (e.g. AstraZeneca’s AZD1222; Table 1), rare human AD26 (Janssen’s Ad26.COV2.S, [4]; Table 1) and different AD vectors in doses one and two (Gamaleya’s Sputnik vaccines; Table 3); and
novel technologies may cost more and increase vaccine hesitancy [6].
Table 4.
Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines with published data in humans, as reviewed by Sadarangani et al [3]
| Vaccine (brand name): dosage regimena; efficacyb | Neutralising Ab response | Binding Ab response | T-cell response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vaccines with World Health Organisation (WHO) emergency use listing as of 7 September 2021 | |||
|
mRNA-1273 Elasomeran (Spikevax®): 2 × 100 μg mRNA doses 4 wks apart; 95% |
Minimal NAb after dose 1, peak 14 d after dose 2 | S-BAb 14 d after dose 1, slight ↑ at 28 d, marked ↑ after dose 2 | Small/significant ↑ in CD4+ cells secreting TH1 cytokines after dose 1/2, little TH2 or CD8+ response |
|
BNT162b2 Tozinameran (Comirnaty®): 2 × 30 μg mRNA doses 3 wks apart; 95% |
Significant NAb only after dose 2 | Some S-BAb after dose 1, ↑ after dose 2 | After dose 2, ↑ IFN-ɣ, antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, likely TH1 polarisationc |
|
ChAdOx1-S (VaxzevriaTM, CovishieldTM): 2 × (5.0 × 1010 VP) doses ≥ 4 wks apart; 62–67% |
Significant NAb after dose 1, ↑ by 14 d after dose 2 | S-BAb 14 d after dose 1, slight ↑ at 28 d, marked ↑ after dose 2 |
After dose 1, peak TCR at 14 d, but ↑ 28 d after dose 2 ↑ TNF and IFN-ɣ production by CD4+ T cells at day 14 |
|
Ad26.COV2-S (recombinant): 1 × (5 × 1010 VP) dose; 67% |
NAb in 99% by 28 d post-dose, Ab levels sustained at ≥ 84 d post-vacc | S-BAb in 99% by 28 d post-dose, Ab levels sustained at ≥ 84 d post-vacc | CD4+ and CD8+ TCRs at 14 d and 28 d post-vacc, likely TH1 polarisationc |
|
CoronaVac: 2 × 3 μg protein doses 2 wks apart; 50–84% |
NAb in ≥ 94% 28 d after dose 2 | By day 28, RBD BAb in ≥ 88% and ≥ 99% after 14 d and 28 d dose intervals | Not reported |
|
BBIBP COVID-19 Cor-V: 2 × 0.4 μg protein doses 21 d apart; 86% |
NAb in 100% by 21 d after dose 2 | BAb in 46–87% and 92–100% at 14 d and 28 d after dose 2 | Not reported |
| Vaccines with reported efficacy and immunogenicity [3], without WHO emergency use listing as of 7 September 2021 | |||
|
Gam-Covid-Vac (Sputnik V): 2 × 1011 VP doses 3 wks apart; 91% |
NAb in 61% and 95% 14 d after doses 1 and 2 | S-BAb in 85–89% 14 d after dose 1 and 98% 14 d after dose 2 | CD4+ and CD8+ TCR 14 d after dose 1, S-specific IFN-ɣ responses in 100% 7 d after dose 2 |
|
AD5-nCoV (Convidecia): Single 5 × 1010 VP dose; 66% |
NAb in 47–50% by 28 d post-vacc, ↓ NAb if pre-existing AD5 Ab titre > 1:200 |
RBD BAb in 44% and 97% 14 d and 28 d post-vacc ↓ BAb if pre-existing AD5 Ab titre >1:200 |
TCR in 78–88% 28 d post-vacc; peak at 14 d post-vacc |
|
NVX-CoV2373 (Covovax): 2 × 5 μg protein doses 3 wks apart; 90% |
Some NAb after dose 1, marked ↑ 7 d after dose 2 | S-BAb 21 d after dose 1, marked ↑ after dose 2 | CD4+ TCR by 7 d after dose 2, strong TH1 biasc |
|
BBV152 (CovaxinTM): 2 × 6 μg protein doses 4 wks apart; 78% |
NAb in 48% after dose 1 and 97%, with ↑ titres, by 14 d after dose 2 | S-BAb in 65% after dose 1, and 98%, with ↑ titres, 14 d after dose 2 | Strong TH1 biasc, ↑ some memory T-cells by 76 d after dose 2 |
|
WIBP-CorV: 2 × 5 μg protein doses 3 wks apart; 73% |
NAb in 98% by 14 d after dose 2 | BAb against whole inactivated virus in 100% at 14 d after dose 2 | Not reported |
It should be noted that antigen-specific antibodies and TCRs are not directly comparable between vaccines, as specific assays varied
AD adenovirus, BAb binding antibodies, d day(s), IFN-ɣ interferon-ɣ, IL interleukin, mo months, (N)Ab (neutralising) antibody/ies, post-vacc post-vaccination, RBD receptor-binding domain, S- SARS-CoV-2 spike, TCR T-cell response, TH1/2 T-helper cell type 1 or 2, VP virus particle(s), wk(s) week(s), ↓ decrease(d), ↑ increase(d)
aDosages from phase 2/3 trials, all intramuscular injection; adjuvant dosages and excipients not included
bReported efficacy for primary endpoint of prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 infection 7–28 days after scheduled trial dosage regimen
cTH1 bias likely, based on production of IFN-ɣ, IL-2 and/or tumour necrosis factor, vs TH2-associated cytokines, e.g. IL-4, 5 and 13
Although proven, eventually cheap to make and conferring long-lasting immunity, live-attenuated viruses (used, e.g., to prevent measles) seem unsuited to the COVID-19 pandemic, as they may take years to develop, do not suit fast-changing viruses and may be affected by coronavirus cross-immunity [4].
WHO approval linked to COVAX, others are needed
Equitable distribution of vaccines is proving difficult and the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) initiative, co-led by WHO, aims to provide doses to lower-income countries [8]. However, COVAX may only distribute vaccines with WHO EULs (Table 1) [8] and the six that qualify so far are not logistically ideal. All are IM formulations requiring frozen or refrigerated storage, most are expensive and all but one require two initial doses (Table 1) [4, 8].
Good efficacy, especially for severe COVID-19
Several WHO EUL vaccines demonstrate ≥ 75% efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 infection, and all showed excellent efficacy against severe illness (Table 2) [14]. Longer-term safety data now reveal anaphylaxis and very rare, but serious, vaccine adverse events (e.g. myocarditis, predominantly affecting men aged < 30 years, with the mRNA vaccines; thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, most common in women aged < 55 years and 30–49 years with the ChAdOx1 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines, respectively [16, 17]) [Table 2], leading to some rollout reviews (Table 1). More positively, after the administration of well over 180 and 133 million doses of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, BNT162b2 has now received full US FDA approval [18] and Moderna has filed for full approval for mRNA-1273 [19].
Pregnant women and children last…
Only the BNT162b2 vaccine is WHO-listed for adolescents (Table 2), but increased COVID-19 knowledge confirms children and adolescents, as well as pregnant women, need safe vaccines. Several developments are in progress:
Moderna is seeking FDA approval for people aged ≥ 12 years, as its TeenCOVE phase 2/3 study in 3732 adolescents met its primary endpoint of non-inferior immunogenicity versus that in adult comparators (vaccine efficacy 100%) [29];
Pfizer, Moderna and China National Biotec Group with Beijing Institute of Biological Products (CNBG/BIBP) have all registered Phase 2/3/4 trials in children aged 6 months to 12 years (Moderna; NCT04796896/KidCOVE, and Pfizer; NCT04816643), those aged 3 to 17 years (CNBG/BIBP; NCT04863638, NCT04917523) or adolescents (Pfizer dose-boost study; NCT04368728) [30];
Phase 2/3 studies in younger people have been registered for the non-WHO EUL vaccines (Table 3) Covaxin (ages 2–18 years), Sputnik V and Novavax NVX-CoV2373 (both ages 12–17 years) [30]; and
Pfizer is conducting a phase 2/3 study of the BNT162b2 vaccine in pregnant women (NCT04754594) [30].
While preliminary US surveillance system and registry data have not revealed any obvious safety signals among pregnant women administered mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, more extensive long-term data are needed [31].
… along with immunocompromised patients
Immunocompromised patients, including those with autoimmune disorders or on immunosuppressive medications, have typically been excluded from vaccine trials and require particular attention, given that infections are a common cause of mortality in this group [32]. Although further research is warranted to determine the effects of immunocompromising medical conditions and immunosuppressing medications on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, the benefits of vaccination are expected to outweigh any possible risks [33]. Additional doses may be required to achieve adequate protection; in August 2021, the US FDA approved an update to the EUAs for BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 to include a third dose for certain immunocompromised patients [34].
Other promising vaccines yet to be WHO-listed
Table 3 shows currently COVAX-ineligible vaccines with reported phase 3 trial efficacy of 62–93%, plus other benefits [2, 35]. Two are stable for weeks at room temperature (Table 3), and two developed in India (one needle-free) appear effective against the delta strain [36]; the phase 3 trial of the needle-free ZyCoV-D vaccine also included adolescents [36]. Most of these vaccines are already in use (Table 3) [2, 5].
Understanding of immunogenicity just beginning…
Understanding the immunological mechanisms of current vaccines, the related correlates of protection (COPs) and the durability of immunity is essential to optimise the efficacy and practicality of COVID-19 vaccines and limit the development of viral “escape mutants” [1, 3]. At present, immunological data are short-term and very limited, trial assays vary and immunogenicity is not well understood [3, 40]. Questions around the need for booster doses, the ideal dose interval, and mucosal immunity and responses are largely unanswered [3].
… but humoral and cell-mediated immunity involved
The genome of SARS-CoV-2 encodes the spike (S) protein (among others), which includes the S1 subunit containing the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the S2 subunit that mediates membrane fusion and cell entry [7]. SARS-CoV-2 uses the RBD to engage with the host cells’ receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2). The S protein can trigger both humoral and cell-mediated (i.e. neutralising Abs and T- and B-cell) immune responses [7]; both types appear to mediate recovery from COVID-19 infection (Table 4 [3]).
Most vaccines are designed to generate neutralising Abs (NAbs) against S proteins (Table 4), with several studies identifying a strong correlation between vaccine efficacy and mean NAb, even at very low NAb levels [13]. For example, the vaccine-generated NAb levels for 50% and full protection against detectable COVID-19 were 20.2% and 28.6% of the mean convalescent level and 50% protection against severe COVID-19 occurred at 3.0% [13]. After two doses, both mRNA and AD-vectored vaccines elicit NAb levels equivalent to, or higher than, those of patients who are in convalescence (with NAb levels relative to those in convalescent plasma being somewhat greater with mRNA vaccines than with AD-vectored vaccines) [3].
However, other evidence and experience with other coronavirus infections, e.g. SARS-CoV-1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), strongly suggest that NAbs alone are unlikely to provide such significant immunity [3, 40]. Cellular immunity, non-neutralising Abs and innate mechanisms, e.g. type I and II interferons, are all likely to be involved [3, 40].
The many functions of cytotoxic T-cells include recognising and killing infected cells, releasing cytokines and supporting the antibody response of B-cells [3, 40]. Clinical evidence for their involvement in COVID-19 immunity includes milder or asymptomatic infection in people with a strong T-cell response [3, 40] and the presence of T-cells in people with undetectable SARS-CoV-2 Abs [40]. More T-cell data are needed [40]. The NAb titre also correlates with anti-RBD immunoglobulin (Ig)G levels [7] and Ab activity in this region is also of interest (Table 4 [3]).
Very virulent variants may still respond
Vaccines were initially developed for protection against COVID-19 strains identified in Wuhan, China, but SARS-CoV-2’s fast mutation rate means efficacy against more transmissible variants of concern (VOCs) and perhaps additional variations of interest is required [41]. VOCs are:
alpha (⍺, or B.1.1.7 +/- E484K), which spreads faster and may cause more severe illness;
beta (β or B.1.351);
gamma (ɣ or P.1), which spreads faster; and
delta (δ or B.1.617.2), which spreads much faster and may cause more severe illness, now present in almost 100 countries.
An Indian study (preprint) found the δ variant dominated in breakthrough symptomatic COVID-19 in vaccinated healthcare workers [42]. Relative to wild-type virus, it showed an 8-fold reduction in sensitivity to vaccine-generated Abs. ChAdOx1 recipients had significantly lower serum neutralizing titers against the δ variant than BNT162b2 recipients [42]. However, severe COVID-19 in fully vaccinated people was rare [42]. The β, ɣ and δ variants seem to reduce convalescent immunity [30].
Other analyses [43–45] suggest VOCs are still susceptible to several vaccines [35, 43–45]. Post-hoc analyses showed the Novavax NVX-CoV2373 vaccine was 86.3% effective against the ⍺ variant and 96.4% effective against other variants [35]. A Canadian study (preprint) in > 400,000 people found BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1 vaccines provided good protection against VOCs, especially after two doses [45]. Against all VOCs, one dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine provided 72–83% protection, versus 56–66% with BNT162b2 and 48–67% with ChAdOx1. Efficacy in preventing COVID-19 increased to 84–92% with two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273; there were insufficient data for ChAdOx1 [45].
The pattern of results was similar, albeit with slightly better efficacy, in two earlier Qatar studies of BNT162b2 [43] and mRNA-1273 [44] against ⍺ and β strains. The efficacy of BNT162b2 against the β variant was about 20% lower than that reported against other strains and both vaccines provided > 90% protection against severe COVID-19 [44, 46].
Vaccines in development may be more accessible
There are many COVID-19 vaccines in early-stage trials and Table 5 shows those registered at phase 3 level at 7 September [2, 5, 30]. These studies, if successful, may overcome some of the cost, VOC, logistical and other problems that will otherwise limit global access to effective COVID-19 vaccines [8]. Several companies have registered comparative trials, with placebo-controlled trials becoming less feasible as effective vaccines become more widely available, and some are targeting VOCs (Table 5). Among other areas of investigation are differing vaccines for doses one and two (which may be a reasonable and feasible strategy, although further research is needed [47]), and needle-free vaccines [2].
Take home messages
The global spread of SARS-CoV-2 and resultant COVID-19 pandemic has spawned the rapid development of effective vaccines.
The six vaccines with WHO EULs are effective, especially against severe COVID-19, but barriers to their global use, such as cost, formulation and storage, mean EULs for other vaccines with good, published phase 3 trial results are urgently needed.
SARS-CoV-2 mutates rapidly and vaccines must be effective against several highly transmissible VOCs; current indications are that vaccines still prevent severe COVID-19 when VOCs are prevalent.
All understanding of COVID-19 and vaccines, especially safety and immunogenicity, is short-term and incomplete, limiting the scope for vaccine optimisation.
Acknowledgements
The manuscript was reviewed by: A. Al Hamid, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia; S. A. Antoniu, Department of Medicine II, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iaşi, Romania; F. J. Araujo, Department of Pharmacy, Virgen del Rocio Hospital, Seville, Spain; M. Morgado, CICS-UBI Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. Changes resulting from comments received were made on the basis of scientific and editorial merit.
Declarations
Funding
The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding. C Fenton, a contracted employee of Adis International Ltd/Springer Nature, declares no relevant conflicts of interest. Y Lamb, a salaried employee of Adis International Ltd/Springer Nature, declares no relevant conflicts of interest. All authors contributed to the review and are responsible for the article content.
Ethics approval, Consent to participate, Consent for publication, Availability of data and material, Code availability
Not applicable.
References
- 1.McDonald I, Murray SM, Reynolds CJ, et al. Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of reactogenicity, immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. npj Vaccines. 2021;6(1):74. doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00336-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carl Zimmer Jonathan Corum and Sui-Lee Wee for The New York Times. Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker. 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 3.Sadarangani M, Marchant A, Kollmann TR. Immunological mechanisms of vaccine- induced protection against COVID-19 in humans. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00578-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kyriakidis NC, Lopez-Cortes A, Gonzalez EV, et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines strategies: a comprehensive review of phase 3 candidates. npj Vaccines. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00292-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McGill University. Covid19 vaccine tracker. 2021. https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 6.World Health Organization. WHO top threats to global health—special article collection. 2021. https://www.annualreviews.org/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 7.Blasi F, Gramegna A, Sotgiu G, et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a critical perspective through efficacy data and barriers to herd immunity. Respir Med. 2021;180:106355. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gavi The Vaccine Alliance. COVAX. 2021. https://www.gavi.org/covax-facility. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 9.Dyer O. Covid-19: countries are learning what others paid for vaccines. BMJ. 2021 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Duke Global Health Innovation Center. Launch & scale speedometer: vaccine manufacturing. 2021. https://launchandscalefaster.org/covid-19/vaccinemanufacturing. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 11.European Medicines Agency. Comirnaty concentrate for dispersion for injection: summary of product characteristics. 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 12.Janssen Biotech. FDA fact sheet for healthcare providers administering vaccine (vaccination providers): Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Janssen Covid-19 vaccine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). 2021. https://www.fda.gov/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 13.Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2021;27(7):1205–1211. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01377-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) fWHO. Covid-19 vaccines technical documents. 2021. https://www.who.int/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 15.P4H Social Health Protection Network. Thailand to procure an array of COVID-19 vaccines from multiple global suppliers to meet demand [media release]. 29 Apr 2021. https://p4h.world/
- 16.Rosenblum HG, Hadler SC, Moulia D, et al. Use of COVID-19 vaccines after reports of adverse events among adult recipients of Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna): update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, July 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(32):1094–1099. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7032e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lai C-C, Ko W-C, Chen C-J, et al. COVID-19 vaccines and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021;20(8):1027–1035. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1949294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.U.S. Food & Drug Administration. FDA approves first COVID-19 vaccine [media release]. 23 Aug 2021. https://www.fda.gov/
- 19.Moderna. Moderna announces initiation of rolling submission of Biologics License Application (BLA) with U.S. FDA for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine [media release]. 1 Jun 2021. https://investors.modernatx.com/
- 20.Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403–416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.U.S. Food & Drug Administration. EUA fact sheet for providers. 2021. https://www.modernatx.com/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 22.Pfizer-BioNTEch. Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine—BNT162b2 injection, suspension: fact sheet for healthcare providers administering vaccine. 2021. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 23.Moderna. FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in individuals 18 years of age and older [media release]. 2020. https://www.fda.gov/.
- 24.Pfizer-BioNTech. Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2): FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an unapproved product review memorandum. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 25.European Medicines Agency. COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca: EMA product information. 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 26.European Medicines Agency. COVID-19 vaccine Janssen suspension for injection (Ad26.COV2-S [recombinant]): summary of product characteristics. 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 27.Janssen Biotech. Janssen COVID-19 vaccine: Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) FDA review memorandum. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 28.Tanriover MD, Doganay HL, Akova M, et al. Efficacy and safety of an inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac): interim results of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial in Turkey. Lancet. 2021;398(10296):213–222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01429-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moderna. Moderna announces TeenCOVE study of its COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents meets primary endpoint and plans to submit data to regulators in early June [media release]. 25 May 2021. https://investors.modernatx.com/
- 30.U.S. National Library of Medicine. Clinical Trials. 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=COVID-19. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 31.Shimabukuro T, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. Preliminary findings of mRNA Covid-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2273–2282. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sonani B, Aslam F, Goyal A, et al. COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:797–798. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05547-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Duly K, Farraye FA, Bhat S. COVID-19 vaccine use in immunocompromised patients: a commentary on evidence and recommendations. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Coronavirus (COVID-19) update: FDA authorizes additional vaccine dose for certain immunocompromised individuals [media release]. 12 Aug 2021. https://www.fda.gov/
- 35.Heath PT, Galiza EP, Baxter DN, et al. Safety and efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021. 10.1056/NEJMoa2107659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Zydus Cadila. Zydus applies to the DCGI for EUA to launch ZyCov-D, the world’s first plasmid DNA vaccine for COVID-19 [media release]. 1 Jul 2021. https://www.zyduscadila.com/
- 37.Bucci E, Andreev K, Bjorkman A, et al. Safety and efficacy of the Russian COVID-19 vaccine: more information needed. The Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31960-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gorry C. SOBERANA, Cuba's COVID-19 vaccine candidates: Dagmar Garcia-Rivera PhD. MEDICC Rev. 2020;22(4):10–15. doi: 10.37757/MR2020.V22.N4.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Al KN. Effect of 2 inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on symptomatic COVID-19 infection in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021 doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.8565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sewell HF, Agius RM, Stewart M, et al. Cellular immune responses to covid-19. BMJ. 2020;370:m3018. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Covid-19. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.
- 42.Mlcochova P, Kemp SA, Shanka Dhar M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 delta variant emergence and breakthrough. Res Square. 2021 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-637724/v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Butt AA, et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):187–189. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2104974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chemaitelly H, Yassine HM, Benslimane FM, et al. mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants and severe COVID-19 disease in Qatar. Nat Med. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01446-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nasreen S, He S, Chung H, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against variants of concern. medRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.06.28.21259420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Butt AA, et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants. N Engl J Med. 2021;05:05. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2104974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chiu N-C, Chi H, Tu Y-K, et al. To mix or not to mix? A rapid systematic review of heterologous prime–boost covid-19 vaccination. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021 doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1971522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]