Abstract
Several naturally occurring cyclopentenones, such as palmenones and nigrosporiones, exhibit antimicrobial activity. Herein we describe the antimicrobial activity of cyclopentenones and derivatives that can be easily accessed from biomass derivatives furfural and 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural. Upon screening a range of functionalized trans‐diamino‐cyclopentenones (DCPs) and δ‐lactone‐fused cyclopentenones (LCPs), an oxime ether derivative of DCP was identified that exhibited remarkable antimicrobial activity against Gram‐positive bacteria, including resistant strains such as methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin‐resistant E. faecalis (VRE) strains.
Keywords: antimicrobial, biomass, cyclopentenones, sustainability, furfurals
Readily sourced! The antimicrobial activity of biomass‐derived cyclopentenones reveals a novel scaffold, exhibiting activities in methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin‐resistant E. faecalis (VRE) strains (MIC values of 0.976 and 3.91 μg mL−1, respectively). The straightforward preparation from easily accessible furfurals provides a versatile scaffold that allows further hit‐to‐lead optimization.
Infectious diseases are a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Amongst the several pathogens involved in infectious diseases, Staphylococcus aureus has developed resistance to most antibiotics. Barber described in 1961 methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains in clinical isolates derived from an hospital in England. [1] From that point on, MRSA infections have seen a dramatic increase.[ 2 , 3 ] Vancomycin is the gold standard for MRSA infections, however exhibits drawbacks such as the low oral bioavailability that limits its use to intravenous, [4] and vancomycin‐associated nephron and ototoxicity that leads to the need of constant monitoring of serum vancomycin concentrations. [5] Moreover the appearance of vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin‐resistant S. aureus (VRSA) is a cause of concern. [6] For this reason the search for new molecules with antibiotic properties, especially against MRSA[ 7 , 8 , 9 ] is urgently needed. Concerning antimicrobial naturally occurring products, examples such as Nigrosporione A–B [10] and Palmenone A–B [11] contains a cyclopentenone (CP) scaffold (Scheme 1 A).
Scheme 1.
(A) Examples of relevant antimicrobial cyclopentenones and (B) new biobased cyclopentenones evaluated for antimicrobial activity.
Inspired by these natural products, we envisioned that synthetic cyclopentenones easily prepared from biomass synthons [12] could provide access to a new sustainable scaffold with antimicrobial activity.
In particular, trans‐diamino‐cyclopentenones (DCPs) and δ‐lactone‐fused cyclopentenones (LCPs) can be prepared respectively from furfural and activated 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), both furan derivatives being derived from biomass (Scheme 1B).[ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] In line with our interest regarding sustainable production of biologically active compounds, we have also developed choline‐based ionic liquids with antibiotic activity. [25] Herein we report a novel sustainable based cyclopentenone scaffold exhibiting antimicrobial activity against MRSA.
The aforementioned DCP family was previously prepared by us from the condensation of furfural and secondary amines in aqueous conditions in the presence of Cu(OTf)2 [13] as depicted in Scheme 2A. Novel DCP 7, 8 and 9 were prepared using the same method in moderate to good yields.
Scheme 2.
Tested cyclopentenones prepared from biomass derived furfural and 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural.
The LCP family 10–19 was previously prepared by us from the condensation of activated HMF and secondary amines in dichloromethane promoted by (R)‐BINOL. [24]
The CPs antimicrobial activity was evaluated. An initial screening was performed by assessing the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against a Gram‐positive bacteria strain Staphylococcus aureus (Sa) and yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc).
The initial screening revealed that DCPs 1–5 exhibited MIC>62.5 μg ⋅ mL−1 against Gram‐positive bacteria Sa and yeast Sc. However, amongst the DCP family, examples containing aryl amines (4–9) showed activity with MIC ranging from 3.91 to 7.81 μg ⋅ mL−1 in bacteria and moderate antifungal activity with MIC ranging from 31.2 to 62.5 μg ⋅ mL−1. (Table 1, compounds 6–9).
Table 1.
Selected observed of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC) values for the synthesized cyclopentenones.[a]
CP |
Sa |
MRSA |
Ef |
VRE |
Ec |
Sc |
HEK 293T |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MBC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MIC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MBC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MIC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MBC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MIC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MBC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MIC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MBC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MIC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MFC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
[% viability at 20 μM] |
6 |
7.81 |
>31.2 |
15.6 |
250 |
1.95 |
>15.6 |
7.81 |
>62.5 |
62.5 |
125 |
62.5 |
125 |
90 |
7 |
7.81 |
>62.5 |
3.91 |
>31.2 |
1.95 |
>15.6 |
3.91 |
>31.2 |
62.5 |
250 |
31.2 |
62.5 |
95 |
8 |
3.91 |
>31.2 |
3.91 |
>31.2 |
0.49 |
>3.91 |
0.98 |
15.6 |
62.5 |
250 |
62.5 |
125 |
65 |
9 |
7.81 |
250 |
62.5 |
250 |
15.6 |
500 |
nt |
nt |
nt |
nt |
31.2 |
125 |
59 |
20 |
7.81 |
>62.5 |
0.976 |
>7.81 |
0.976 |
>7.81 |
3.91 |
62.5 |
62.5 |
125 |
15.6 |
62.5 |
100 |
Vanco |
1.95 |
500 |
3.91 |
nt |
<0.49 |
>500 |
62.5 |
>500 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<0.49 |
500 |
|
|
|
NYS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
500 |
[a] The MIC corresponding to the lowest concentration at which no visible growth was observed, was assessed by the microdilution method. For MBC evaluation, the bacterial suspension on the wells was homogenized, serial‐diluted, triplicate spread on appropriate medium and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Data represent the median values of at least three replicates. Vanco: vancomycin. NOR: norfloxacin. NYS: nystatin. Sa: Staphylococcus aureus. MRSA: methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ef: Enterococcus faecalis. VRE: vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Ec: Escherichia coli. Sc: Saccharomyces cerevisiae. HEK: Human Embryonic Kidney.
LCP derivatives 10–19 despite the structural resemblance to naturally occurring Nigrosporiones (Scheme 1) exhibited no antimicrobial activity.
Next, we evaluated the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) values against Gram‐positive (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MSSA), S. aureus CIP 106760 (MRSA), Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. faecalis ATCC 51299 (Low VRE)), Gram‐negative (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922) bacteria and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 2601) strains for the selected CP 6–9 (Table 1). Due to the potential Michael acceptor character of the CP that can cause undesired ADMET properties (absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination and toxicity), we prepared 20 as a model oxime derivative of DCP. Moreover, previous reports had shown that oxime and oxime ether lead to increased antimicrobial activity of the corresponding ketones.[ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] The oxime ether of DCP 6 was prepared by condensation with O‐benzylhydroxylamine hydrochloride under basic conditions in good yield (Scheme 3). The formation of an oxime using the corresponding free hydroxylamine was not possible, DCP 6 underwent decomposition and no oxime was observed despite full conversion of the starting material.
Scheme 3.
Preparation of oxime ether 20 from trans‐diamino‐cyclopent‐2‐enone 6.
Overall selected DCP 6–9 were active in Gram‐positive strains, including methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MIC of 3.91 μg ⋅ mL−1, CP 7 and 8) and vancomycin‐resistant E. faecalis (MIC of 0.98 μg ⋅ mL−1, CP 8). No activity was observed against Gram‐negative strain E. coli nor in yeast strain S. cerevisiae. Despite the relevant antimicrobial activity, CP 6–9 also exhibited toxicity in healthy cell line HEK 293T, in particular CP 8 and 9 decreased the cell viability at 20 μM in 65 and 59 %, respectively.
On the other hand, oxime derivative 20 remained active in MRSA and VRE (MIC of 0.976 μg ⋅ mL−1 and 3.91 μg ⋅ mL−1, respectively) yet did not induce cell death in HEK 293T. Moreover 20 was active against yeast strain S. cerevisiae with MIC value similar to positive control nystatin (MIC of 15.6 μg ⋅ mL−1).
Focusing on the lead compound 20, the analysis of its effect on bacterial growth over time was performed against S. aureus MRSA. In order to address the bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties of 20, viable cells (CFU/mL) were determined in the presence of different concentrations of 20 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Monitoring of bacterial S. aureus MRSA strain growth curve by following the optical density (OD 620 nm), represented by a line chart on the right‐side axis, and by determining the number of colony forming units (CFU/mL), represented by a column chart on the left side axis. The growth curves were determined in the absence (black bars and squares) or in the presence of compound 20 at MIC (0.976 μg ⋅ mL−1; striped bar and white square), at 2×MIC (1.952 μg ⋅ mL−1; withe bar and circle) and at MIC (0.488 μg ⋅ mL−1; grey bar and circle). Mean standard deviation (SD) values calculated for three independent bioassays, SD=±0.48.
Compound 20 displayed delay and decrease of the growth rate of MRSA at all tested concentrations. This decreased is more noticeable for the concentration of 0.488 μg ⋅ mL−1. The comparison between the growth and the viability profiles showed that the cells remain viable, indicating a bacteriostatic effect for this compound
Previous reports show the thio‐Michael addition to DCP lead to the release of the amine in position 4 to reform the enone system. To evaluate the possibility of such event (e. g. CP undergoing non‐specific Michael addition in the bacteria cells releasing the corresponding thio‐amino CP compound and tetrahydroquinoline (THQ)) both the thiol adduct and the THQ were tested as antimicrobial inhibitors. Derivative 21 was prepared by addition of thiophenol under basic conditions (Scheme 4A). Also reduced derivative 22 was prepared by reduction with NaBH4 (Scheme 4B) in order to evaluate the importance on the activity of the enone functionality.
Scheme 4.
Preparation of cyclopentenone derivatives of 6 by A) Michael addition and B) reduction with NaBH4.
Upon antimicrobial assays, was observed low activity when the bacteria was incubated either with 21 or free amine THQ (Table 2). In addition, similar behavior was observed upon reduction of the enone (compound 22, Table 2). The combined results highlight the importance of the enone system.
Table 2.
Observed Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values for the synthesized CPs[a]
CP |
Staphylococcus aureus, Sa |
|
---|---|---|
|
MIC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
MBC [μg ⋅ mL−1] |
6 |
7.81 |
>31.2 |
21 |
125 |
>500 |
22 |
62.5 |
>500 |
THQ |
125 |
>500 |
Vanco |
1.95 |
500 |
[a] The MIC corresponding to the lowest concentration at which no visible growth was observed, was assessed by the microdilution method. For MBC evaluation, the bacterial suspension on the wells was homogenized, serial‐diluted, triplicate spread on appropriate medium, and incubated at 37 °C. Data represent the median values of at least three replicates. Vanco: vancomycin. Sa: Staphylococcus aureus.
Finally, the drug‐like properties of the enones were accessed and are depicted in Table 3. CPs 6, 7 and 8 exhibits good drug‐like properties, with low molecular weights, cLogP between 3.03 to 4.31. No hydrogen bond donors (HBD) and only 3–5 hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA). TPSA between 23 and 42. The calculated properties fits the Lipinski's rule of 5 and also the rules described by Veber et al. [31] <140 PSA and <12 rotatable bonds. Oxime derivative 20 exhibits similar properties with the exception of cLogP. The value is 6.63, higher than the recommended value of <5. However the remaining parameters point towards acceptable drug‐like properties.
Table 3.
Calculated properties of relevant cyclopentenones.
CP |
cLogP |
MW |
HBA |
HBD |
TPSA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 |
4.31 |
344.4 |
3 |
0 |
23.55 |
7 |
3.03 |
348.4 |
5 |
0 |
42.02 |
8 |
3.79 |
380.5 |
3 |
0 |
23.55 |
20 |
6.63 |
449.6 |
4 |
0 |
28.07 |
In summary, we observed that amongst the tested cyclopentenones the trans‐4,5‐diamino‐cyclopent‐2‐enones are the most promising antibacterial agents. In particular tetrahydroquinoline analogs show activity against Gram‐positive strains, including MRSA and VRE. Although enones are Michael acceptors and possible PAINS, the corresponding oxime ether 20 exhibit enhanced activity in MRSA and VRE (MIC of 0.976 μg ⋅ mL−1 and 3.91 μg ⋅ mL−1 respectively) and better toxicity profile in HEK 293T cell lines. Further studies on the identification of the target for this scaffold and optimization of the activity are ongoing.
Experimental Section
Details for chemical synthesis, analytical and biological methods together with characterization data are described in the Supporting Information.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (SFRH/BD/137671/2018, SFRH/BD/148211/2019, PTDC/QUI‐QOR/32008/2017, UID/DTP/04138/2019, UIDB/04567/2020 and UIDP/04567/2020) and COMPETE Programme (SAICTPAC/0019/2015) for financial support. The project leading to this application has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 951996.
R. F. A. Gomes, V. M. S. Isca, K. Andrade, P. Rijo, C. A. M. Afonso, ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 2781.
Contributor Information
Dr. Rafael F. A. Gomes, Email: rafael.gomes@campus.ul.pt.
Prof. Patrícia Rijo, Email: p1609@ulusofona.pt.
Prof. Carlos A. M. Afonso, Email: carlosafonso@ff.ulisboa.pt.
References
- 1. Barber M., J. Clin. Pathol. 1961, 14, 385–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Grundmann H., Aires-de-sousa M., Boyce J., Tiemersma E., Lancet 2006, 368, 874–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chambers H. F., Deleo F. R., Mountain R., Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 629–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Van Bambeke F., Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2006, 7, 740–749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cantu T. G., Yamanaka-yuen N. A., Lietman P. S., Clin. Infect. Dis. 1994, 533–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Howden B. P., Davies J. K., Johnson P. D. R., Stinear T. P., Grayson M. L., Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 99–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dhanda G., Sarkar P., Samaddar S., Haldar J., J. Med. Chem. 2018, 62, 3184–3205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Benoit T., Duval R., Fontanay S., Varbanov M., Boisbrun M., ChemMedChem 2019, 14, 1232–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Naclerio G. A., Karanja C. W., Opoku-temeng C., Sintim H. O., ChemMedChem 2019, 14, 1000–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wu Z., Xie Z., Wu M., Li X., Li W., Ding W., She Z., Li C., J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5368–5372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Matsumoto T., Hosoya T., Tomoda H., Shiro M., Shigemori H., Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 59, 1559–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gomes R. F. A., Coelho J. A. S., Afonso C. A. M., Chem. A Eur. J. 2018, 24, 9170–9186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gomes R. F. A., Esteves N. R., Coelho J. A. S., Afonso C. A. M., J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 7509–7513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li S.-W., Batey R. A., Chem. Commun. 2007, 8, 3759–3761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hiscox A., Ribeiro K., Batey R. A., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6668–6672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Griffiths K., Gallop C. W. D., Abdul-Sada A., Vargas A., Navarro O., Kostakis G. E., Chem. A Eur. J. 2015, 21 (17), 6358–6361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Griffiths K., Kumar P., Mattock J. D., Abdul-Sada A., Pitak M. B., Coles S. J., Navarro O., Vargas A., Kostakis G. E., Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55 (14), 6988–6994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sampani S., McGown A., Vargas A., Abdul-Sada A., Tizzard G., Coles S., Spencer J., Kostakis G., J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 6858–6867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Procopio A., Costanzo P., Curini M., Nardi M., Oliverio M., Sindona G., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2013, 1 (5), 541–544. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nardi M., Costanzo P., De Nino A., Di Gioia M. L., Olivito F., Sindona G., Procopio A., Green Chem. 2017, 19 (22), 5403–5411. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Luisa M., Gioia D., Nardi M., Costanzo P., De Nino A., Maiuolo L., Oliverio M., Procopio A., Molecules 2018, 23 (8), 1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bonacci S., Nardi M., Costanzo P., De Nino A., Luisa M., Gioia D., Oliverio M., Procopio A., Catalysts 2019, 9, 301–312. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gomes R. F. A., Cavaca L., Goncalves J., Ramos R., Peixoto A., Arias-Serrano B., Afonso C. A. M., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2021, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00884. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gomes R. F. A., Coelho J. A. S., Afonso C. A. M., ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 420–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Siopa F., Figueiredo T., Frade R. F. M., Neto I., Meirinhos A., ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 5909–5916. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hong C. Y., Kim Y. K., Chang J. H., Kim S. H., Choi H., Nam D. H., Kim Y. Z., Kwak J. H., J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3584–3593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhu D., Hunter C. D., Baird S. R., Davis B. R., Bos A., Geier S. J., Vogels C. M., Decken A., Gray C. A., Westcott S. A., Heteroat. Chem. 2017, 28, e21405. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kuntala N., Telu J. R., Banothu V., Balasubramanian S., Anireddy J. S., Pal S., Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 803–809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Parthiban P., Rathika P., Ramkumar V., Mo S., Tae Y., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1642–1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Luo Y., Zhang L., Hu Y., Zhang S., Fu J., Wang X., ChemMedChem 2012, 7, 1587–1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Veber D. F., Johnson S. R., Cheng H.-Y., Smith B. R., Ward K. W., Kopple K. D., J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615–2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information