Abstract
The mainstream applications of visible‐light photoredox catalysis predominately involve outer‐sphere single‐electron transfer (SET) or energy transfer (EnT) processes of precious metal RuII or IrIII complexes or of organic dyes with low photostability. Earth‐abundant metal‐based MnLn‐type (M=metal, Ln=polydentate ligands) complexes are rapidly evolving as alternative photocatalysts as they offer not only economic and ecological advantages but also access to the complementary inner‐sphere mechanistic modes, thereby transcending their inherent limitations of ultrashort excited‐state lifetimes for use as effective photocatalysts. The generic process, termed visible‐light‐induced homolysis (VLIH), entails the formation of suitable light‐absorbing ligated metal–substrate complexes (MnLn‐Z; Z=substrate) that can undergo homolytic cleavage to generate Mn−1Ln and Z. for further transformations.
Keywords: 3d transition metals, dissociative ligand-to-metal charge transfer, inner-sphere electron transfer, photoredox catalysis, visible-light-induced homolysis
The use of earth‐abundant metal complexes in photoredox catalysis offers a complementary mode of activation for organic substrates through visible‐light‐induced homolysis (VLIH) of metal–substrate bonds. This Minireview describes different electronic transitions that occur in photoexcited metal–substrate complexes as well as recent advancements and future prospects in this area.
1. Introduction
The emergence and upsurge of visible‐light photoredox catalysis have made an ineradicable impact on contemporary organic synthesis in the last decade, providing access to unconventional reactivity profiles of small molecules by the efficient conversion of photonic into chemical energy. [1] To date, the prevailing external chromophores used in such transformations are heavy transition‐metal catalysts with appropriate ligands such as RuII‐ or IrIII‐polypyridyl complexes or metal‐free organic dye sensitizers as they possess long excited‐state lifetimes, strong absorption in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum, and the corresponding photoexcited states have high reduction or oxidation potentials. [1c] The modes of action of the excited states of these photocatalysts are either single‐electron transfer (SET) or energy transfer (EnT) processes to generate various radical species complementary to common thermal two‐electron processes. [2] However, organic dyes and heavy transition metal‐based complexes have downsides in terms of their low photostability [2b] and adverse economic, biological, and environmental impacts, [3] respectively. In this context, the exploration and exploitation of earth‐abundant and inexpensive 3d transition‐metal complexes as the next generation photocatalysts is rewarding from the perspectives of sustainability and large‐scale synthetic applicability. [4] However, the wide application of such earth‐abundant metal complexes is greatly limited by their ultrashort excited‐state lifetimes (pico‐ to nanosecond range) compared to iridium‐ and ruthenium‐based photocatalysts (microsecond range), thus making the prospect of initiating bimolecular SET and EnT processes bleak. [5]
A few well‐designed copper complexes have been used as alternative photocatalysts that demonstrate distinct mechanisms involving electron transfer within the inner coordination sphere, thereby controlling reactions through their ligand environment. [6] Other first‐row transition‐metal salts have been used as successful photocatalysts in isolated cases, [5b] but more notably used as co‐catalysts in various photochemical coupling reactions. [7]
Complexes based on 3d transition metals generally possess a high degree of ligand‐substitution lability—a feature that impedes the attainment of favorable photoexcited‐state properties such as long lifetimes or photoluminescence.[ 1c , 2a ] Nonetheless, this property can be creatively utilized for developing mechanistically distinct new photocatalytic processes, termed visible‐light‐induced homolysis (VLIH), complementary to the conventional/cooperative processes with coordinatively saturated and substitution‐inert heavy‐metal‐based photocatalysts.
The mechanism of VLIH proceeds through 1) the initial formation of the metal–substrate complex [L n M n (X)‐Z] from the electronic ground state of the metal complex and the substrate through ligand transfer/exchange, oxidative addition, single‐electron oxidation, or transmetalation; 2) photoexcitation of the metal–substrate complex to form [L n M n (X)‐Z]*; and 3) inner‐sphere redox processes through various metal‐complex‐specific electronic transitions that ultimately result in homolysis of the metal–substrate (M n ‐Z) bond to generate the reduced metal species [L n M n−1(X)] and a radical species (Z.) from the substrate that is set for further transformations (Figure 1 A). The advantages of this strategy are the high chemoselectivity and site selectivity of the photochemical processes, as the targeted oxidation takes place solely at the transiently ligating atom or functional group, with other oxidation‐prone functionalities being left intact.
The key mechanistic event in the VLIH process is the homolytic cleavage of the metal–substrate (M−Z) bond, for which various inner‐sphere electronic charge‐transfer modes can be responsible. The traditional mononuclear heavy‐metal‐based photoactive complexes display metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT) involving d→π*, ligand‐to‐metal charge‐transfer (LMCT) involving π→d, and intraligand (IL) transitions. In general, these charge‐separating transitions are nondissociative and do not result in the cleavage of the corresponding metal–ligand bonds. Therefore, the complexes can participate in various reversible outer‐sphere electron‐transfer processes without losing the integrity of their molecular structure.
In the majority of modern synthetic applications of VLIH, the LMCT electronic transition induces the desired homolysis of the M−Z bonds as a result of the ability of the M−Z complexes to absorb in the visible‐light region of the electromagnetic spectrum. However, these dissociative LMCT processes are inherently different from the nondissociative ones, as the dissociative processes tend to alter the electronic population of the σ/σ* orbitals of covalent M−Z bonds either by depopulating the M−Z σ‐molecular orbital or by populating the M−Z σ*‐molecular orbital and usually engage metals to participate in the process from their high oxidation states [8] (CuII, NiIII, FeIII, CeIV, CoIII, etc; Figure 1 B). [9]
Nevertheless, VLIH does not always exclusively involve LMCT modes. Excitation of the metal–substrate complexes with visible light can result in other modes of electronic transitions that also induce homolysis of the M−Z bonds (Figure 1 B). In square‐planar [NiII( t‐Bubpy)(o‐Tol)Cl]‐type complexes, the VLIH events involve MLCT/3d‐d electronic transitions that result in cleavage of the Ni−aryl bond to generate aryl radicals and the corresponding NiI species. [10] However, M(Sub)(CO)3(diimine)‐type complexes can demonstrate an alternate charge‐transfer mode from a σ‐bond to the ligand (SBLCT, σ→π*), thereby resulting in ligand reduction along with the generation of the radical (Z.) from the substrate (Figure 1 B). [11] Although direct access to σπ* states is forbidden by spectroscopic transition rules, it can be generated by relaxation from the 1MLCT states. However, in some complexes with non‐oxidizable metal centers, access to 1MLCT states is also prohibited, rendering electrons prone to be directly transferred from the σ‐orbital of the M−Z bond to the antibonding orbitals of other ligands, which is regarded as a ligand‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer mode (LσLπ*CT). [12]
As mentioned earlier, most of the developments in newer synthetic methods reliant on the VLIH concept have been limited to LMCT transitions. However, the ever‐expanding development of spectroscopic and analytical techniques has led to the other types of electronic transitions being recognized as the effective cause of VLIH, which might open up opportunities in future developments for organic synthesis. In this Minireview, we discuss the advancements in the field of VLIH, their different mechanistic aspects based on charge‐transfer modes, and the prospects for its application in synthetic organic chemistry.
2. Copper
Copper(I)‐based complexes are rapidly emerging as capable visible‐light‐mediated photoredox catalysts that offer not only economic and ecological advantages but also otherwise inaccessible inner‐sphere mechanisms to enable challenging transformations.[ 6 , 9a , 9b , 13 ] In contrast, there are only a handful of reports available for photocatalytic processes using CuII compounds. In the area of radical‐mediated organic reactions, chlorine radicals are attractive reactive species, partly because of their varied reactivity with different organic compounds and partly because of the easy availability of a wide array of earth‐abundant transition‐metal chloride salts as potential precursors. However, generating chlorine radicals from these salts by photochemical means is challenging, as the oxidation potential of the chloride anion is much higher (E o(Cl./Cl−)=+2.03 V vs. SCE in MeCN at 298 K) [14] than the excited‐state oxidation potentials of commonly used photocatalysts. [9c]
In 1962, Kochi observed the photolysis of cupric chloride (CuCl2; exists as a chlorocupric complex in organic media) to cuprous chloride (CuCl) and the chlorine radical under unfiltered radiation from a medium‐pressure mercury lamp at ambient temperatures. [15] The observation could only be explained by a sequential process of ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer (LMCT) followed by homolysis of the Cu−Cl bond, thereby establishing one of the earliest examples of the VLIH principle with a copper salt. Subsequently, the photogenerated chlorine radical could be successfully exploited to perform different organic transformations, such as the quantitative oxidation of 2‐propanol to acetone or the formation of styrene dichloride from styrene in 87 % yield [Scheme 1 D, Eq. a‐i].
Capitalizing on Kochi's discovery, Wan and co‐workers developed a visible‐light‐induced vicinal dichlorination of olefins by directly using CuCl2 as a photoactive species without any exogenous ligand [Scheme 1 D, Eq. a‐ii]. [16] Although a combination of 20 mol % CuCl2 and 2.5 equiv hydrochloric acid as the chlorine source was required for effective dichlorination of unactivated olefins, 4.0 equiv CuCl2 alone were adequate to induce the same transformations for activated olefins upon irradiation with a 38W white LED (λ=390–760 nm). Very recently, the Rovis group achieved the selective C(sp3)−H alkylation and amination of feedstock alkanes with electron‐deficient olefins, such as acrylates and vinyl sulfones, in the presence of a catalytic amount of CuCl2 under irradiation with long‐wavelength UV light. [17] The transformation proceeds by VLIH of an intermediate CuII species by LMCT to generate a chlorine radical which acts as a powerful hydrogen atom transfer reagent capable of abstracting strong electron‐rich C(sp3)−H bonds [Scheme 1 D, Eq. a‐iii].
In 2019, [CuII(dap)Cl2] (dap=2,9‐bis(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐1,10‐phenanthroline) was used in a photochemical atom‐transfer radical addition (ATRA) reaction between sulfonyl chloride and olefins [Scheme 1 D, Eq. a‐iv]. [9b] In line with Kochi's proposal, VLIH of the LCu(II)−Cl bond generates the catalytically active LCu(I) species that initiates the reduction of sulfonyl chlorides. Improving on this concept, [CuII(dmp)2Cl]Cl (dmp=2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline, Scheme 1 C) can be utilized as a more robust and economic photocatalyst compared with its dap variant, as the dmp ligand is inexpensive and commercially available [Scheme 1 D, Eq. a‐v]. [18] Direct spectroscopic evidence obtained from a follow‐up study in collaboration with the Castellano group [8] has proved that cleavage of the L n Cu−Cl bond occurs in <100 fs and requires blue excitation into the Cl→Cu LMCT transition for the photochemical transformation of CuII to CuI and the generation of a reactive chlorine atom radical.
Activation of the LMCT state of CuIIX2‐type complexes endowed with suitable ligands other than halides by irradiation with visible light could also be expected to produce radicals (X.) by homolysis and these could initiate productive organic transformations (Scheme 1 A). In 2018, Reiser and co‐workers developed a photocatalyzed method based on Cu(dap)Cl2 (Scheme 1 C) for the synthesis of azido ketones from vinyl arenes and trimethylsilyl azide in air [Scheme 1 D, Eq. b‐i]. [9a] Mechanistically, the CuII complex undergoes ligand exchange with azide to generate a new LCuIIN3‐bridged dimer, which upon VLIH forms an LCuI species and an azido radical. The incipient azido radical can be intercepted by an alkene, followed by trapping of molecular oxygen. The rebinding of the O‐centered radical with LCuI regenerates the LCuII species, which releases the product and closes the catalytic cycle.
Shortly after this report, Gong and co‐workers developed the visible‐light‐induced copper(II)‐catalyzed enantioselective alkylation of imines [Scheme 1 D, Eq. c‐i], [19] wherein a chiral CuII‐bisoxazoline complex is alkylated through transmetalation from the corresponding alkyl trifluoroborate salt and, subsequently, VLIH generates an alkyl radical and a CuI intermediate. In a second catalytic cycle, this alkyl radical adds to a protected imine, which is activated by the same chiral CuII‐bisoxazoline complex. The newly generated N‐centered radical is reduced by the previously formed CuI species of the first cycle to release the alkylated imine with high enantioselectivity.
3. Nickel
The use of NiII‐ [20] or Ni0‐based [21] complexes as standalone photocatalysts has only been sporadically reported. [22] However, in the realm of metallaphotoredox‐catalyzed C−C cross‐coupling reactions, nickel compounds have been exploited most widely because of the excellent radical‐capturing ability (aryl, alkyl, acyl, etc.) and ligand lability of NiII species (d8 system). In this case, the formation of the products takes place either by oxidation‐induced reductive elimination from the electronic ground state of the NiIII species [23] or from excitation‐induced reductive elimination from an electronically excited state of NiII* species. [24]
Halogen radicals can be generated from NiII complexes either by UV irradiation [25] or through triplet‐triplet energy transfer from exogenous photocatalysts [26] and used as HAT catalysts for C(sp3)−H cross‐coupling reactions. A counterintuitive mechanistic approach has emerged, wherein direct VLIH of high‐valent nickel(III) complexes is exploited to photogenerate halogen radicals (Scheme 2 B). In 2015, Nocera and co‐workers reported several NiIII trihalide complexes from which homolytic photoextrusion of halogen radicals—intermediately stabilized by an arene‐to‐halogen‐atom charge‐transfer interaction in the secondary coordination sphere—could be possible from a dissociative LMCT excited state to induce a Ni−Cl σ→σ* transition [Scheme 2 C, Eq. i]. [27] The feature was subsequently exploited by the Doyle group in a series of cross‐coupling reactions involving the generation of alkyl radicals through C−H abstraction by the incipient photogenerated chlorine radical from light‐absorbing NiIII species.[ 9c , 28 , 29 ] The general mechanistic pathway initiates with the oxidative addition of L n Ni0 to the halide substrate to generate an intermediary ZL n NiIIX species, which is oxidized by the excited photocatalyst to give ZL n NiIIIX species. Irradiation of this species with visible light results in the homolytic cleavage of the NiIII−X bond and generation of the corresponding halogen radical (X.) and Z‐L n NiII species. X. can participate in a hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) process by interacting with the substrate (or a HAT mediator) to generate an incipient alkyl radical (R.), which gets trapped by the ZL n NiII species. The resulting ZL n NiIIIR species can then undergo reductive elimination to furnish the cross‐coupled product Z‐R and a L n NiI species, which gets reduced by the reduced photocatalyst to L n Ni0 to complete both of the catalytic cycles (Scheme 2 A).
Doyle and co‐workers used this concept to develop a successful strategy for the (hetero)arylation of cyclic and acyclic ethers in the presence of [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 as the exogenous photocatalyst and a Ni co‐catalyst, whereby (hetero)aryl chlorides were used as both the cross‐coupling partners and the chlorine radical source. [9c] Although the strategy was effective for the abstraction of hydrogen from ethereal C(sp3)−H bonds [BDE(C‐H(THF))=92 kcal mol−1; Scheme 2 C, Eq. a‐i] by a chlorine radical generated through VLIH of [(dtbbpy)NiIII(aryl)(Cl)]‐type species and led to the formation of the corresponding benzylic ethers in up to 93 %, cyclohexane was only obtained in 41 % yield. The issue was addressed in a subsequent report by the same group, wherein chloroformates and acid chlorides were used as the cross‐coupling partner and the chlorine radical sources to functionalize C(sp3)−H bonds of unactivated alkanes (BDE=90–95 kcal mol−1) for the syntheses of various carbonyl derivatives [Scheme 2 C, Eq. b‐i]. [29a] A strategy for the alkylation of cyclic ethers has been developed by König and co‐workers, wherein VLIH of [L n NiIII(alkyl)(Br)] species (Scheme 2Bc) is involved in the generation of nascent bromine radicals that can act as HAT mediators and abstract hydrogen from ethereal C(sp3)−H bonds [Scheme 2 C, Eq. c‐i]. [30]
In an expansionary study of the first report, Doyle and co‐workers also developed a selective formylation reaction of aryl chlorides by employing 1,3‐dioxolane as the solvent (instead of THF) and a post‐reaction mildly acidic workup of the reactions [Scheme 2 C, Eq. a‐ii]. [28] Here also, the key mechanistic step involves the generation of a chlorine radical by VLIH of [L n NiIII(aryl)(Cl)] species (Scheme 2Ba) to abstract hydrogen from the 2‐position of 1,3‐dioxolane (BDE(C2‐H)=86.8 kcal mol−1).
In the same line, the Doyle group reported a methylation strategy of (hetero)aryl chlorides using trimethyl orthoformate as the methyl radical source [Scheme 2 C, Eq. a‐iii]. [29b] The transformation proceeds via the formation and subsequent VLIH of [L n NiIII(aryl)(Cl)] species to generate an incipient chlorine radical that undergoes a HAT process with trimethyl orthoformate and a subsequent homolytic β‐scission to form the methyl radical for methylation.
A photophysical and photochemical study collaboratively conducted by the Castellano and Doyle groups on a series of (Rbpy)NiII(aryl)X‐type of complexes using ultrafast UV/Vis and mid‐IR transient absorption spectroscopy revealed that, upon irradiation with visible light, an initially formed square‐planar 1MLCT state of the complex gradually evolves over 5–10 ps into a long‐lived, tetrahedral 3d‐d (MC) state lying about 0.5 eV above the ground state with a lifetime of about 4 ns. [10] This transition also results in a change in orbital symmetry to (e)4(t2*)4 and thus to a higher occupancy of antibonding orbitals (t2*) that weakens the NiII−Ar bond and ultimately leads to its homolysis to generate the aryl radical (probed by spin‐trapping experiments with N‐tert‐butyl‐α‐phenylnitrone, Scheme 2 D) and a NiI species. The study refuted previously assigned long‐lived MLCT states [31] and offered a new mechanistic pathway to initiate catalysis by NiI. Indeed, an Ni‐catalyzed C‐O coupling strategy of (hetero)aryl electrophiles with 1° and 2° alcohols mediated by long‐wavelength UV light (λ=390–395 nm) was subsequently developed by Xue and co‐workers, wherein the photoexcited NiII intermediary complex undergoes Ni−C bond homolysis to generate aryl radicals and the NiI proceeds to take part in a NiI‐NiIII catalytic cycle to furnish the corresponding C−O cross‐coupled products. [32]
4. Iron
Unlike the precious‐element‐based (RuII, IrIII, OsII, ReI, etc.) polypyridyl complexes, iron(II) complexes have found far fewer applications in organic photoredox catalysis because of their much shorter photoexcited‐state lifetimes. This arises because their MLCT excited states can be deactivated extremely rapidly (ca. 50 fs) by energetically lower‐lying metal‐centered (MC) excited states, which results in incompetent electron‐transfer reactivity and a lack of photoluminescence. [33] Significant efforts have been expended to prolong the excited‐state lifetimes of iron complexes either by the use of chelating ligands that allow robust metal coordination to achieve high symmetry—ideally close to Oh coordination—to maximize the overlap between the metal and ligand orbitals or by enhancing the ligand‐field strength, thereby raising the energy levels of the metal‐centered states by the use of ligands with strong σ‐donor and π‐acceptor properties such as N‐heterocyclic carbenes. [34] However, another emerging complementary method entails in situ formation of photoactive iron–substrate complexes that can undergo VLIH to generate radicals that can initiate the desired reactions (Scheme 3 A).
Potassium ferrioxalate has been widely used as a sensitive chemical actinometer since the discovery of its photoinduced reduction to ferrous oxalate and carbon dioxide under irradiation at λ<490 nm, as first reported by Parker and Bowen in 1953. [35] In 1986, Sugimori and Yamada reported that the alkylation of pyridine rings with alkyl radicals could be performed through the decarboxylation of alkanoic acids in the presence of visible light instead of γ‐rays by using ferric sulfate as a stoichiometric additive [Scheme 3 C, Eq. a‐i]. [36] The formation of a FeIII‐alkanecarboxylate complex that absorbed near‐ultraviolet visible light and could undergo VLIH followed by decarboxylation to generate the desired alkyl radical as well as the potency of Fe2(SO4)3 to act as an oxidant were postulated to facilitate the homolysis. Jin and co‐workers brought this transformation into the catalytic domain in 2019 with the successful photoinduced iron‐catalyzed decarboxylative alkylation of heteroarenes [Scheme 3 C, Eq. a‐ii]. [37] With the effective combination of 5 mol % FeSO4⋅7 H2O, 10 mol % 2‐picolinic acid as the ligand, and sodium bromate as the exogenous oxidant, a wide range of alkanoic acids and heteroarenes could be employed to furnish the corresponding products in up to 94 % yield. The key step involves the VLIH of a FeIII‐carboxylate complex to generate the FeII species and the carboxyl radical, which upon CO2 extrusion produces the nucleophilic alkyl radical (Scheme 3Ba). The exogenous oxidant oxidizes FeII to FeIII, which then reenters the catalytic cycle. In a subsequent report, the same group could extend the scope of the radical decarboxylative alkylation strategy by employing a range of Michael acceptors, such as alkylidenemalononitriles and azodicarboxylates, to furnish the corresponding products with C−C and C−N bonds, respectively. [38] Of note, the electron‐deficient radical intermediate generated after the initial addition of the alkyl radical to the Michael acceptor could effectively oxidize FeII back to FeIII to complete the catalytic cycle, thereby making the process redox‐neutral and obviating the use of any exogenous oxidant [Scheme 3 C, Eq. a‐iii].
After demonstrating the effectivity of iron(II) and iron(III)‐based photocatalysts in decarboxylative alkylation reactions, Lei, Jin, and co‐workers developed an intramolecular C−H oxygenation of 2‐biphenylcarboxylic acids in the presence of a catalytic amount of Fe(NO3)3⋅9 H2O/ 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylic acid and two equivalents of sodium bromate as an exogenous oxidant under irradiation at λ=427 nm with an LED to synthesize several benzo‐3,4‐coumarins. [39] The reaction proceeds through the intermediacy of an aryl carboxylate‐iron(III) complex which undergoes VLIH under the reaction conditions to furnish FeII and aroyloxy radicals that are almost impervious to decarboxylation at ambient temperature and could easily oxygenate aromatic C−H bonds. Subsequently, NaBrO3 can oxidize the FeII to FeIII to complete the catalytic cycle [Scheme 3 C, Eq. b‐i].
Direct visible‐light‐induced homolysis of ferric halides has recently been exploited by Zhu and co‐workers when developing a straightforward and nonhazardous synthesis of α‐haloketones from activated olefins. [40] The catalytic amount of FeX3 (X=Br, Cl) used in the reactions undergoes homolytic cleavage under irradiation with visible light to generate FeIIX2 and a halogen atom radical that gets trapped by the olefin. The resulting C‐centered radical reacts with oxygen and, upon dehydration, furnishes the desired product. An additional halogen source (KX) and TsOH assist in regenerating FeX3 to complete the catalytic cycle [Scheme 3 C, Eq. c‐i].
5. Cobalt
Vitamin B12 (cobalamin), a naturally occurring organocobalt complex, has been utilized extensively in organic synthesis for its ability to undergo homolytic cleavage of the Co−C bond to generate C‐centered radical species. [41] Different cobalt salts and complexes have been used in conjunction with exogenous photocatalysts to perform various dehydrogenative and C−C or C‐heteroatom bond‐forming transformations. [42] Ligand photodissociation of CoH[PPh(OR)2]4‐type complexes is a well‐known feature [43] that has been leveraged in various transformations. [44] Nevertheless, VLIH of Co−R bonds is observed only when LMCT transitions are within the visible region and depends on the R moiety. The Rovis group has reported that in situ formed photoactive CoII‐acetylide species can undergo LMCT excitation upon irradiation (λ≈380 nm) to generate an aryl radical cation and a CoI complex without any bond cleavage to assist in a subsequent oxidative cyclization process (Scheme 4). [45] The distinctive catalytic activities of the three oxidation states of four‐coordinated cobalt complexes (“supernucleophilic” CoI, metalloradical CoII, organo‐, and hydro‐CoIII species) possessing substantial ligand field stabilization energy (LFSE) are characteristic features and are also involved in VLIH events (Scheme 5 A). Of note, several organo‐CoIII species are critical intermediates in cobalt‐catalyzed transformations involving photoinduced β‐hydride elimination [46] as well as the VLIH process. [47] In 2011, the Carreira group reported an intramolecular Heck‐type coupling of aryl iodides with olefins catalyzed by a cobaloxime complex, wherein the use of a mild base can deprotonate a hydridocobalt [CoIII‐H] intermediate to regenerate the catalytically active CoI species. [48] Photoinduced homolysis of CoIII−alkyl bonds was observed in alkylcobalamins and alkylcobaloximes under irradiation with a 100 W high‐pressure mercury lamp. [49] In 2018, Soper and co‐workers carried out the trifluoromethylation of (hetero)arenes with [(SOCO)CoIII(CF3)(MeCN)]‐type complexes supported by redox‐active [SOCO] pincer ligands. [50] The trifluoromethylcobalt(III) complexes could undergo facile VLIH of the CoIII−CF3 bond to release the corresponding CoII species and a CF3 radical for further reactions. The resulting CoII species can trap H. to generate an unobserved [(SOCO)CoIII(H)] intermediate that could produce H2 and regenerate the CoI species to close the catalytic cycle. In 2019, Martin and co‐workers demonstrated an efficient approach for the activation of C−O bonds of alcohols by carbonylating them with CoII‐porphyrins to generate alkoxycarbonyl cobalt(III) complexes that could undergo VLIH of the Co−C bonds (BDE=39.8 kcal mol−1) and subsequent decarboxylation to furnish the corresponding alkyl radicals for trapping. [51] A few common Co complexes are shown in Scheme 5 C.
In 2016, Gryko and co‐workers reported a cobalester‐catalyzed olefinic C(sp2)−H alkylation with diazo reagents as the carbene source. [52] The key mechanistic step involves the VLIH of the alkylcobalester(III) species—formed by the reaction of CoI with ethyl diazoacetate—to generate the CoII and the corresponding α‐ester alkyl radical species for further transformation [Scheme 5 D, Eq. a‐i]. CoI is regenerated by the reduction of the hydridocobalester (CoIII‐H) intermediate. In 2019, the same group demonstrated the reductive dimerization of 1,1‐diphenylethylene in the presence of cobalamin‐like catalysts through VLIH of CoIII−C bonds [Scheme 5 D, Eq. a‐ii] while studying the role of the nucleotide loop in general cobalamine‐catalyzed reactions. [53]
The generation of acyl radicals [54] by the VLIH of CoIII‐acyl complexes was also achieved by Gryko and co‐workers [55] wherein the heptamethyl cobyrinate [(CN)(H2O)Cby(OMe)7], a vitamin B12 derivative, is initially reduced to the corresponding supernucleophilic CoI complex that undergoes addition‐elimination with 2‐S‐pyridyl thioesters, the acyl radical precursors, to form the acyl‐vitamin B12 complex. Afterwards, VLIH of the Co−C bond furnishes the CoII complex and the acyl radical that participates in the Giese‐type acylation of activated olefins [Scheme 5 D, Eq. b‐i]. In a subsequent study, the merger of the alkyl and acyl radical generation capabilities of the same CoIII catalyst through VLIH of Co−C bonds of in situ generated alkylcobalt(III) and acylcobalt(III) complexes was demonstrated, which allowed the consecutive Giese‐type alkylation and acylation of electron‐deficient olefins to synthesize highly functionalized molecules in a single step [Scheme 5 D, Eq. b‐ii]. [56] Of note, the in situ formation of the alkylcobalt(III) complex was faster than that of the acylcobalt(III) complex, which is reflected in the order of the two successive VLIH events in the reaction pathway.
A recent report from the Gryko group involves the visible‐light‐driven heptamethylcobyrinate‐catalyzed Giese‐type addition and Co/Ni‐catalyzed reductive cross‐coupling radical reactions of spring‐loaded cyclic reagents. [57] The mechanistic pathway involves the initial formation of the CoIII‐alkyl complex intermediate by the reaction of the “supernucleophilic” CoI form of the catalyst and the electrophilic bicyclic reagents. The CoIII‐alkyl complex subsequently undergoes visible‐light‐induced homolysis to generate the CoII complex and the corresponding alkyl radicals that further engage in different radical transformations, such as the addition to SOMOphiles or transition‐metal‐catalyzed radical cross‐coupling reactions [Scheme 5 D, Eq. a‐iii].
A regioselective coupling reaction of epoxides and aziridines with alkenes in the presence of a simple cobalt dimethylglyoximate complex has been developed by Prina Cerai and Morandi to synthesize value‐added homoallylic alcohols and amines [Scheme 5 D, Eq. a‐iv]. [58] The key mechanistic steps of the transformation involve the nucleophilic opening of the epoxide/aziridine ring with CoI and the VLIH of the CoIII−C bond from the corresponding CoIII intermediate to generate CoII and carbon‐centered radical species. The catalyst is regenerated with the help of the basic intermediate (e.g. alkoxide), which can deprotonate the CoIII‐H species. The method successfully addressed the inefficiencies of the previous method reported by Harrowven and Pattenden by obviating the use of stoichiometric amounts of cobalt, base, and reductant. [59]
6. Cerium
Besides the ever‐increasing use of first‐row 3d transition‐metal complexes, interest has mounted substantially in recent times in the use of earth‐abundant lanthanide complexes. Being the 26th most abundant element, cerium has found extensive use in photocatalysis and warrants discussion in the context of VLIH. In a series of seminal studies conducted by Schelter and co‐workers, several luminescent cerium(III)‐based complexes have been used as both inner‐sphere [60] and outer‐sphere potent single‐electron photoreductants. [61] Their ability to absorb in the visible‐light region and undergo interconfigurational doublet‐to‐doublet, parity, and spin‐allowed 4f→5d metal‐centered electronic transitions, thereby minimizing the loss of energy from the long‐lived 2D excited states, provides a unique profile for application as photocatalysts.[ 60 , 61 , 62 ] Whereas the excited‐state CeIII metalloradical (5d1) has been exploited for the abstraction of a chlorine atom from benzyl chlorides to generate benzyl radicals, the chloride‐CeIV LMCT excitation has also been leveraged in parallel photo‐oxidation processes involving C−C and C−heteroatom bond‐forming reactions. [62d]
The photocatalytic properties of CeIII chloride complexes in a C−C bond‐cleavage and amination reaction of cycloalkanols was first reported by Zuo and co‐workers in 2016. [63] However, a mechanistically different and complementary catalytic manifold of cerium photocatalysis was unveiled in a series of reports by the same group,[ 9d , 64 ] wherein the general mechanistic archetype involves: a) initial single‐electron oxidation of the CeIIIL n complex by an oxidant to generate an intermediary CeIVL n complex; b) coordination of an alcoholic ligand to form a L n CeIV‐OR complex; and finally c) VLIH of the L n CeIV‐OR species through photoinduced LMCT excitation and subsequent homolysis to generate oxygen‐centered radicals and CeIIIL n species to complete the catalytic cycle. The incipient, reactive alkoxide radical can then participate in a variety of transformations, such as intramolecular or intermolecular hydrogen atom abstraction (HAT), addition to another functional group, or homolytic β‐scission (Scheme 6 A). [65]
Based on these mechanistic features, Zuo and co‐workers developed a method for the efficient δ‐selective C−H bond functionalization of protecting‐group‐free primary alcohols in the presence of 1 mol % CeCl3 and 5 mol % nBu4NCl. [9d] In this process, the VLIH of the CeIV‐OR complex under irradiation with visible light was carried out to generate a transient alkoxy radical that undergoes a thermodynamically favored intramolecular 1,5‐HAT to form a highly nucleophilic alkyl radical. Subsequent addition of this radical to DBAD and a SET reduction of the N‐centered radical furnishes the desired product and regenerates the CeIV catalyst [Scheme 6 C, Eq. a‐i]. The strategy of combining the VLIH of CeIV‐OR complexes and intermolecular HAT was later expanded by the same group to valorize low molecular hydrocarbon feedstocks (C n H2n+2, n=1–4, Cy; BDE(C‐H)=105 kcal mol−1 for CH4) by successfully achieving C−H amination with DBAD, C−H alkylation with electron‐deficient alkenes, and Minisci‐type C−H heteroarylation [Scheme 6 C, Eq. a‐ii]. [64a] In 2020, Zuo and co‐workers extended this strategy to the C(sp3)−H functionalization of hydrocarbons [Scheme 6 C, Eq. a‐iii]. [64c] Of note, steady‐state homolysis experiments and transient absorption spectroscopic studies revealed that the VLIH event involving the CeIV‐OMe complex was not the rate‐determining step in C−H amination and alkylation processes.
In a different mechanistic approach, an effective merger of the VLIH of CeIV‐alkoxide complexes with a subsequent β‐C−C scission of the alkoxy radical species has been achieved to develop a range of useful transformations. In 2018, Zuo and co‐workers reported atom‐ and step‐economic formal cycloadditions of cycloalkanols with alkenes to afford bridged lactone scaffolds. [64b] The key step of the developed transformation entails the VLIH of a CeIV‐OR complex to generate a secondary alkoxy radical, which subsequently undergoes a rapid β‐scission process to form a nucleophilic alkyl radical that adds to an electron‐deficient alkene. Then, a SET process for the reduction of the generated α‐acyl radical by photoexcited 9,10‐diphenylanthracene (DPA; E 1/2=−1.77 V versus SCE in CH3CN), an intramolecular aldol reaction of the enolate, and acidification furnishes the desired bridged lactone product [Scheme 6 C, Eq. b‐i]. When 1,2‐diols were employed as the substrate instead of alcohols, oxidative cleavage of the C−C bond was observed and the corresponding aldehydes were obtained in very high yields [Scheme 6 C, Eq. b‐ii]. [66] Following this approach, Zuo and co‐workers developed a dihydroxymethylation strategy wherein primary alcohols were converted into alkyl radicals with the loss of one molecule of formaldehyde, which underwent 1,4‐conjugate additions with Michael acceptors [Scheme 6 C, Eq. b‐iii]. [64d] Notably, a double‐excitation mechanism was proposed for the transformation, as it was observed that irradiation with LEDs at λ=365 nm could induce excitation of L n CeIII‐OR as well as ultraviolet‐induced homolysis (UVLIH) of L n CeIV‐OR complexes, whereas a cerium/DPA dual photocatalytic system had to be employed under irradiation with LEDs at λ=400 nm as it could only effect the VLIH of the intermediary L n CeIV‐OR complex.
Recently, Zhang and co‐workers successfully achieved the selective cleavage of Cα−Cβ bonds in various lignin model compounds in the presence of 2 mol % CeCl3 and 5 mol % nBu4NCl under irradiation with visible light (λ=460 nm). [67] The mechanistic pathway entails VLIH of the L n CeIV‐lignin species coordinated through the benzylic α‐hydroxy group (α‐OH). The VLIH‐generated alkoxy radical intermediate enables cleavage of the Cα−Cβ bond to ultimately furnish the corresponding aldehydes (up to 97 %) and the hydrazinium derivatives (up to 95 %) by amination with DBAD [Scheme 6 C, Eq. b‐iv]. Zuo and co‐workers extended the activation strategy from alcohols to ketones through an effective merger of CeIV‐VLIH and Lewis acid catalysis to selectively cleave C−C bonds of various acyclic and cyclic ketones and install different functional groups at the incipient acyl and alkyl radicals. [68] The reaction proceeds through the activation of the carbonyl group by TiCl4 and nucleophilic addition of TMSCN to form the corresponding cyanohydrin derivative. Then, VLIH of the coordination complex formed between CeIV and cyanohydrin results in the formation of CeIII species and an O‐centered radical species that undergoes β‐scission of the C−C bond to form a distal C‐centered radical—a process facilitated by the release of ring strain in the case of small cyclic ketones. Finally, orthogonal selective functionalization of both acyl and alkyl radicals with diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (DIAD) in the case of small and medium‐sized cyclic as well as acyclic ketones followed by a PET process with DPA furnish the desired products in high yields [Scheme 6 C, Eq. b‐v]. The same group has developed a straightforward ring‐expansion strategy of cyclic alkoxyketones to synthesize 9‐ to 19‐membered macrolactones in the presence of a cerium salt and cyanoanthracene under aerobic conditions through irradiation with visible light [Scheme 6 C, Eq. b‐vi]. [69] The successful development of the strategy relied upon the capability of the [Cl n CeIV‐OR] intermediate to undergo VLIH to form [Cl n CeIII] and an alkoxy radical species for the subsequent β‐scission step. Of note, the mild Lewis acidic nature of the cerium salt was also conducive to enhance the formation of the lactol intermediate from the ketone/lactol tautomeric equilibrium. In a different set of transformations, effective decarboxylation of alkyl carboxylic acids has been achieved with Ce photocatalysis, wherein the key mechanistic step involves the VLIH of cerium‐carboxylate complexes of the CeIV‐O(CO)R type to form CeIII and highly reactive alkylcarboxyl radical species that undergo facile decarboxylation to generate the corresponding alkyl radicals for further transformations. [70] In 2019, König and co‐workers utilized this property for the decarboxylative hydrazination of 1°, 2°, and 3° carboxylic acids in the presence of 10 mol % CeCl3⋅7 H2O and 20 mol % Cs2CO3 under irradiation with blue LEDs, wherein the corresponding VLIH‐generated alkyl radicals were trapped with DBAD to furnish the hydrazine derivatives in 28–90 % yield [Scheme 6 C, Eq. c‐i]. [70a] In 2020, Tsurugi, Satoh, Mashima, and co‐workers performed the decarboxylative oxygenation of aliphatic carboxylic acids in the presence of 5 mol % Ce(O t Bu)4 under air at atmospheric pressure to obtain products containing C−O bonds such as aldehydes and ketones in up to quantitative yields. [70b] The transformation proceeds via the formation of a hexanuclear oxocerium(IV) carboxylate complex cluster, Ce6O4(OH)4(OCOR)12, from the reaction between Ce(O t Bu)4 and carboxylic acids. This hexanuclear CeIV species undergoes VLIH under irradiation with blue light and forms CeIII species and a carboxyl radical that further engages in decarboxylation and oxygenation to form the corresponding alkyl peroxyl radical (RCH2OO.). This radical forms alkylperoxo‐CeIV species, from which alkyl hydroperoxides are formed that undergo dehydration to finally afford the corresponding aldehydes as the terminally oxidized major products along with minor amounts of the corresponding alcohols [Scheme 6 C, Eq. c‐ii].
Recently, Song, Xu, and co‐workers have brought the decarboxylative alkylation of heteroarenes with aliphatic carboxylic acids and cerium into the electrophotocatalytic domain, [70c] wherein the reaction is initiated by the anodic oxidation of CeIII to CeIV, which coordinates with the carboxylic acid. A subsequent VLIH of the CeIV‐carboxylate complex and decarboxylation forms the corresponding alkyl radical that adds to the heteroarene in a Minisci‐type reaction to afford the alkylated product in good to high yields [Scheme 6 C, Eq. c‐iii]. A photocatalytic method for the dehydrogenative lactonization of 2‐arylbenzoic acids in the presence of CeCl3 as the photocatalyst and O2 as the terminal oxidant has been developed by Yatham and co‐workers. [71] In this process, a CeIV‐aryl carboxylate complex is formed by the coordination of the aryl carboxylic acid with CeIV, and subsequent VLIH generates a CeIII species and the corresponding aryl carboxyl radical, which gets trapped by the aryl substituent without undergoing decarboxylation and eventually furnishes the lactonized product in very high yields [Scheme 6 C, Eq. c‐iv].
7. Miscellaneous Examples
Although not explored for synthesis in as much detail as the specific cases discussed previously, there is increasing recognition of the potential to develop photocatalytic transformations with other transition‐metal‐based photocatalysts such as vanadium, chromium, manganese, or palladium by capitalizing on their ability to undergo VLIH. VLIH of Mn‐alkyl bonds has been studied with various Mn(CO)5R‐type complexes. [72] Photoinduced homolytic cleavage of a range of paramagnetic CrIII monohydrocarbyl complexes with the general formula CpCr[(ArNCMe)2CH](R) has also been studied in detail. [73]
Wang and co‐workers have recently reported vanadium(V)‐catalyzed visible‐light‐driven selective Cα−Cβ bond cleavage of β‐1 interlinkages of lignin models to afford valuable aromatic products (Scheme 7 a). [74] The proposed mechanistic pathway for this transformation entails the initial coordination of the benzylic hydroxy group to the vanadium center. Then, excitation of the resulting complex with visible light induces an LMCT process and reduction of the vanadium center, which in turn causes the homolytic cleavage of the Cα−Cβ bond to produce benzaldehyde and a benzyl radical for further reaction. Torres et al. have reported a visible‐light‐driven palladium‐catalyzed carbonylation reaction to synthesize acid chlorides from aryl halides, wherein the irradiation with light assists in the initial radical‐induced oxidative addition of Pd0 as well as excitation of the PdII intermediate that subsequently undergoes photoinduced reductive elimination. [75] Interestingly, one of the possible pathways for the last mechanistic step involves VLIH of a Pd−acyl bond to generate the incipient acyl radical in the reaction medium, which has been probed by trapping experiments.
The VLIH concept has also been successfully applied to organic catalyst–substrate complexes. Melchiorre and co‐workers recently used a nucleophilic dithiocarbamate anion catalyst with an attached chromophoric unit to activate various alkyl electrophiles bearing different leaving groups through an SN2 pathway. The resulting photon‐absorbing intermediate undergoes VLIH to generate C‐centered radicals which can, thereafter, participate in various C−C bond‐forming reactions (Scheme 7 b). [76]
8. Summary and Outlook
As can be gleaned from the examples discussed in this Minireview, by utilizing the VLIH concept with earth‐abundant transition‐metal‐based photocatalysts it is possible to transcend the limits of traditional photocatalysts that demonstrate only outer‐sphere electron‐transfer and energy‐transfer processes from their excited, populated, and emissive MLCT states. The concept has also been successfully applied within the wavelength range of 350–400 nm, where the event could be termed as UVLIH. Although the majority of the VLIH processes that have found successful applications in organic synthesis involve dissociative LMCT of different metal–substrate complexes to generate targeted radicals, evermore variants of electronic transitions such as dissociative 1MLCT/3d‐d or dissociative SBLCT transitions are also being recognized, together with the continuous advancement in the field of sophisticated spectroscopic methods and computational studies to determine the intermediate radicals species and complexes. With the creative exploitation of the VLIH activation mode, new synthetic processes are possible, wherein the reaction pathways will be directed by the inner‐sphere mechanism of the sustainable photocatalysts and should, in turn, allow the development of enantioselective approaches and the generation of new radical species by the selective homolysis of metal–substrate bonds. We are confident that alternative modes and applications will be discovered through the effective collaboration of synthetic organic chemists and spectroscopists, and that the so far discovered methods will find wide applications in both academic and industrial set‐ups.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Biographical Information
Youssef Abderrazak was born in Casablanca, Morocco. He obtained his M.Sc. in organic chemistry from the Hassan II University of Casablanca. His M.Sc. thesis was conducted under the supervision of Prof. J. Jamaleddine on the synthesis of pyrans by organocatalysis. He then joined the group of Prof. O. Reiser at the University of Regensburg, where he is doing his Ph.D. His research interests are photocatalysis and synergistic catalysis.
Biographical Information
Aditya Bhattacharyya was born in West Bengal, India. He graduated in Chemistry from the University of Calcutta and received his M.Sc. from Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur. Subsequently, he obtained his Ph.D. in organic chemistry under the supervision of Prof. M. K. Ghorai at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. He then moved to the group of Prof. O. Reiser at the University of Regensburg with a Marie Skłodowska‐Curie Individual Fellowship to pursue postdoctoral studies in the field of photoredox catalysis.
Biographical Information
Oliver Reiser studied in Hamburg, Jerusalem, and at UCLA, obtaining his Ph.D. under the supervision of Prof. A. de Meijere. After postdoctoral research at IBM with Dr. R. D. Miller and at Harvard University with Prof. D. A. Evans, he began his independent career at the University of Göttingen. He moved to Stuttgart as an associate professor and became a full professor of organic chemistry in 1997 at the University of Regensburg. His research interests center around synthesis and catalysis, including the development of new photo‐ and magnetic nanoparticle catalysts.
Acknowledgements
We thank the DFG (RE948/18‐1) for financial support. A.B. thanks the European Union's Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014–2020) for a fellowship received under the Marie Skłodowska‐Curie Grant Agreement No. 795161. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Y. Abderrazak, A. Bhattacharyya, O. Reiser, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 21100.
Dedicated to Prof. Henning Hopf on the occasion of his 80th birthday
Contributor Information
Dr. Aditya Bhattacharyya, Email: aditya.bhattacharyya@chemie.uni-regensburg.de.
Prof. Dr. Oliver Reiser, Email: oliver.reiser@chemie.uni-regensburg.de.
References
- 1.
- 1a. Prier C. K., Rankic D. A., MacMillan D. W. C., Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5322–5363; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1b. Schultz D. M., Yoon T. P., Science 2014, 343, 1239176; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1c. Marzo L., Pagire S. K., Reiser O., Koenig B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10034–10072; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 10188–10228; [Google Scholar]
- 1d. Shaw M. H., Twilton J., MacMillan D. W. C., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 6898–6926; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1e. Abderrazak Y., J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 920, 121335. [Google Scholar]
- 2.
- 2a. Ravelli D., Protti S., Fagnoni M., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9850–9913; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2b. Romero N. A., Nicewicz D. A., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10075–10166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.
- 3a. Iavicoli I., Cufino V., Corbi M., Goracci M., Caredda E., Cittadini A., Bergamaschi A., Sgambato A., Toxicol. in Vitro 2012, 26, 963–969; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3b. Vedeanu N., Voica C., Magdas D. A., Kiss B., Stefan M.-G., Simedrea R., Georgiu C., Berce C., Vostinaru O., Boros R., Fizesan I., Rusu M. E., Grozav A., Loghin F., Popa D.-S., Environ. Chem. 2020, 17, 163–172; [Google Scholar]
- 3c. Fast O. G., Gentry B., Strouth L., Niece M. B., Beckford F. A., Shell S. M., Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20190378; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3d. Iavicoli I., Fontana L., Marinaccio A., Bergamaschi A., Calabrese E. J., Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2010, 29, 213–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cieśla P., Kocot P., Mytych P., Stasicka Z., J. Mol. Catal. A 2004, 224, 17–33. [Google Scholar]
- 5.
- 5a. Larsen C. B., Wenger O. S., Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 2039–2058; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5b. Wenger O. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13522–13533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hossain A., Bhattacharyya A., Reiser O., Science 2019, 364, eaav9713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.
- 7a. Twilton J., Le C., Zhang P., Shaw M. H., Evans R. W., MacMillan D. W. C., Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0052; [Google Scholar]
- 7b. Skubi K. L., Blum T. R., Yoon T. P., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10035–10074; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7c. Milligan J. A., Phelan J. P., Badir S. O., Molander G. A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6152–6163; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 6212–6224; [Google Scholar]
- 7d. Lipp A., Badir S. O., Molander G. A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1714–1726; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 1738–1750. [Google Scholar]
- 8.
- 8a. Fayad R., Engl S., Danilov E. O., Hauke C. E., Reiser O., Castellano F. N., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 5345–5349; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8b. Fayad R., Engl S., Danilov E. O., Hauke C. E., Reiser O., Castellano F. N., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 5749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.
- 9a. Hossain A., Vidyasagar A., Eichinger C., Lankes C., Phan J., Rehbein J., Reiser O., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8288–8292; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 8420–8424; [Google Scholar]
- 9b. Hossain A., Engl S., Lutsker E., Reiser O., ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1103–1109; [Google Scholar]
- 9c. Shields B. J., Doyle A. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12719–12722; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9d. Hu A., Guo J.-J., Pan H., Tang H., Gao Z., Zuo Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1612–1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ting S. I., Garakyaraghi S., Taliaferro C. M., Shields B. J., Scholes G. D., Castellano F. N., Doyle A. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 5800–5810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.
- 11a. Rosa A., Ricciardi G., Baerends E. J., Stufkens D. J., Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 6244–6254; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11b. Stor G. J., Morrison S. L., Stufkens D. J., Oskam A., Organometallics 1994, 13, 2641–2650; [Google Scholar]
- 11c. Rossenaar B. D., Stufkens D. J., Oskam A., Fraanje J., Goubitz K., Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996, 247, 215–229; [Google Scholar]
- 11d. Nieuwenhuis H. A., Van De Ven M. C. E., Stufkens D. J., Oskam A., Goubitz K., Organometallics 1995, 14, 780–788; [Google Scholar]
- 11e. Djurovich P. I., Watts R. J., J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 396–397; [Google Scholar]
- 11f. Djurovich P. I., Watts R. J., Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4681–4682; [Google Scholar]
- 11g. Rossenaar B. D., Kleverlaan C. J., Van De Ven M. C. E., Stufkens D. J., Oskam A., Fraanje J., Goubitz K., J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 493, 153–162; [Google Scholar]
- 11h. Lucia L. A., Burton R. D., Schanze K. S., Inorg. Chim. Acta 1993, 208, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
- 12.
- 12a. Kaim W., Klein A., Hasenzahl S., Stoll H., Záliš S., Fiedler J., Organometallics 1998, 17, 237–247; [Google Scholar]
- 12b. Kaupp M., Stoll H., Preuss H., Kaim W., Stahl T., Van Koten G., Wissing E., Smeets W. J. J., Spek A. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5606–5618; [Google Scholar]
- 12c. Hasenzahl S., Kaim W., Stahl T., Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 225, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
- 13.
- 13a. Pirtsch M., Paria S., Matsuno T., Isobe H., Reiser O., Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 7336–7340; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13b. Kern J.-M., Sauvage J.-P., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1987, 546–548; [Google Scholar]
- 13c. Bagal D. B., Kachkovskyi G., Knorn M., Rawner T., Bhanage B. M., Reiser O., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6999–7002; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 7105–7108; [Google Scholar]
- 13d. Hernandez-Perez A. C., Vlassova A., Collins S. K., Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2988–2991; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13e. Minozzi C., Caron A., Grenier-Petel J.-C., Santandrea J., Collins S. K., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5477–5481; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 5575–5579; [Google Scholar]
- 13f. Sagadevan A., Hwang K. C., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 3421–3427. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Isse A. A., Lin C. Y., Coote M. L., Gennaro A., J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 678–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kochi J. K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 2121–2127. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lian P., Long W., Li J., Zheng Y., Wan X., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 23603–23608; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 23809–23814. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Treacy S. M., Rovis T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2729–2735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Engl S., Reiser O., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 1523–1533. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Li Y., Zhou K., Wen Z., Cao S., Shen X., Lei M., Gong L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15850–15858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mandal T., Das S., De Sarkar S., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 3200–3209. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tian Y.-M., Guo X.-N., Krummenacher I., Wu Z., Nitsch J., Braunschweig H., Radius U., Marder T. B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 18231–18242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Grübel M., Bosque I., Altmann P. J., Bach T., Hess C. R., Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 3313–3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.
- 23a. Zuo Z., Ahneman D. T., Chu L., Terrett J. A., Doyle A. G., MacMillan D. W. C., Science 2014, 345, 437–440; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23b. Noble A., McCarver S. J., MacMillan D. W. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 624–627; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23c. Chu L., Lipshultz J. M., MacMillan D. W. C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7929–7933; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 8040–8044; [Google Scholar]
- 23d. Zuo Z., Cong H., Li W., Choi J., Fu G. C., MacMillan D. W. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1832–1835; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23e. Zhang X., MacMillan D. W. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11353–11356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.
- 24a. Welin E. R., Le C., Arias-Rotondo D. M., McCusker J. K., MacMillan D. W. C., Science 2017, 355, 380–385; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24b. Kim T., McCarver S. J., Lee C., MacMillan D. W. C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3488–3492; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 3546–3550; [Google Scholar]
- 24c. Tian L., Till N. A., Kudisch B., MacMillan D. W. C., Scholes G. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 4555–4559; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24d. Zhu C., Yue H., Chu L., Rueping M., Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 4051–4064; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24e. Tasker S. Z., Standley E. A., Jamison T. F., Nature 2014, 509, 299–309; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24f. Wenger O. S., Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 27, 2270–2278.33111994 [Google Scholar]
- 25.
- 25a. Powers D. C., Anderson B. L., Nocera D. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18876–18883; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25b. Lee C. H., Lutterman D. A., Nocera D. G., Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 2355–2357; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25c. Ishida N., Masuda Y., Ishikawa N., Murakami M., Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 669–672. [Google Scholar]
- 26.
- 26a. Heitz D. R., Tellis J. C., Molander G. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12715–12718; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26b. Huang L., Rueping M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10333–10337; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 10490–10494; [Google Scholar]
- 26c. Das S., Murugesan K., Rodríguez G. J. V., Kaur J., Barham J., Savateev A., Antonietti M., König B., ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 1593–1603. [Google Scholar]
- 27.
- 27a. Hwang S. J., Anderson B. L., Powers D. C., Maher A. G., Hadt R. G., Nocera D. G., Organometallics 2015, 34, 4766–4774; [Google Scholar]
- 27b. Hwang S. J., Powers D. C., Maher A. G., Anderson B. L., Hadt R. G., Zheng S.-L., Chen Y.-S., Nocera D. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6472–6475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nielsen M. K., Shields B. J., Liu J., Williams M. J., Zacuto M. J., Doyle A. G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7191–7194; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 7297–7300. [Google Scholar]
- 29.
- 29a. Ackerman L. K. G., Martinez Alvarado J. I., Doyle A. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14059–14063; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29b. Kariofillis S. K., Shields B. J., Tekle-Smith M. A., Zacuto M. J., Doyle A. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 7683–7689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Santos M. S., Corrêa A. G., Paixão M. W., König B., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 2367–2372. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Shields B. J., Kudisch B., Scholes G. D., Doyle A. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3035–3039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yang L., Lu H. H., Lai C. H., Li G., Zhang W., Cao R., Liu F., Wang C., Xiao J., Xue D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 12714–12719; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 12814–12819. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wenger O. S., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 6043–6052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kjær K. S., Kaul N., Prakash O., Chábera P., Rosemann N. W., Honarfar A., Gordivska O., Fredin L. A., Bergquist K.-E., Häggström L., Ericsson T., Lindh L., Yartsev A., Styring S., Huang P., Uhlig J., Bendix J., Strand D., Sundström V., Persson P., Lomoth R., Wärnmark K., Science 2019, 363, 249–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.
- 35a. Parker C. A., Bowen E. J., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 1953, 220, 104–116; [Google Scholar]
- 35b. Hatchard C. G., Parker C. A., Bowen E. J., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 1956, 235, 518–536. [Google Scholar]
- 36.
- 36a. Sugimori A., Yamada T., Chem. Lett. 1986, 15, 409–412; [Google Scholar]
- 36b. Sugimori A., Yamada T., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59, 3911–3915. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Li Z., Wang X., Xia S., Jin J., Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4259–4265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Feng G., Wang X., Jin J., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 6728–6732. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Xia S., Hu K., Lei C., Jin J., Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 1385–1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Luo Z., Meng Y., Gong X., Wu J., Zhang Y., Ye L. W., Zhu C., Chin. J. Chem. 2020, 38, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
- 41.
- 41a. Giedyk M., Goliszewska K., Gryko D., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3391–3404; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41b. Busato S., Tinembart O., Zhang Z.-D., Scheffold R., Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 3155–3166; [Google Scholar]
- 41c. Proinsias K. Ó., Jackowska A., Radzewicz K., Giedyk M., Gryko D., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 296–299; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41d. Zhao Y., Yu M., Zhang S., Liu Y., Fu X., Macromolecules 2014, 47, 6238–6245; [Google Scholar]
- 41e. Shimakoshi H., Tokunaga M., Kuroiwa K., Kimizuka N., Hisaeda Y., Chem. Commun. 2004, 50; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41f. Chen Y., Zhang X. P., J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2431–2435; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41g. Kräutler B., Coord. Chem. Rev. 1991, 111, 215–220. [Google Scholar]
- 42.
- 42a. Kojima M., Matsunaga S., Trends Chem. 2020, 2, 410–426; [Google Scholar]
- 42b. Xu Q., Zheng B., Zhou X., Pan L., Liu Q., Li Y., Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 1692–1697; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42c. Dighe S. U., Juliá F., Luridiana A., Douglas J. J., Leonori D., Nature 2020, 584, 75–81; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42d. Wimmer A., König B., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 3277–3285; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42e. Sun H.-L., Yang F., Ye W.-T., Wang J.-J., Zhu R., ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 4983–4989; [Google Scholar]
- 42f. Srinath S., Abinaya R., Prasanth A., Mariappan M., Sridhar R., Baskar B., Green Chem. 2020, 22, 2575–2587; [Google Scholar]
- 42g. McManus J. B., Griffin J. D., White A. R., Nicewicz D. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 10325–10330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.
- 43a. Masayoshi O., Shigero O., Mitoshi S., Isato T., Katsuma H., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59, 3925–3930; [Google Scholar]
- 43b. Masayoshi O., Katsuma H., Masahiko M., Tetsuo F., Chem. Lett. 1983, 12, 261–264. [Google Scholar]
- 44.
- 44a. Beltran F., Bergamaschi E., Funes-Ardoiz I., Teskey C. J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 21176–21182; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 21362–21368; [Google Scholar]
- 44b. Bergamaschi E., Beltran F., Teskey C. J., Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 5180–5184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ravetz B. D., Wang J. Y., Ruhl K. E., Rovis T., ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 200–204. [Google Scholar]
- 46.
- 46a. Meng Q. Y., Schirmer T. E., Katou K., König B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 5723–5728; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 5779–5784; [Google Scholar]
- 46b. Branchaud B. P., Choi Y. L., Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 6037–6038; [Google Scholar]
- 46c. Bhandal H., Pattenden G., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1988, 1110–1112; [Google Scholar]
- 46d. Branchaud B. P., Meier M. S., Choi Y., Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 167–170; [Google Scholar]
- 46e. Sun X., Chen J., Ritter T., Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 1229–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Michiyuki T., Komeyama K., Asian J. Org. Chem. 2020, 9, 343–358. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Weiss M. E., Kreis L. M., Lauber A., Carreira E. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11125–11128; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 11321–11324. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Rao D. N. R., Symons M. C. R., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1984, 80, 423. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Harris C. F., Kuehner C. S., Bacsa J., Soper J. D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1311–1315; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 1325–1329. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Chambers D. R., Juneau A., Ludwig C. T., Frenette M., Martin D. B. C., Organometallics 2019, 38, 4570–4577. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Giedyk M., Goliszewska K., Proinsias K. Ó., Gryko D., Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 1389–1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Karczewski M., Ociepa M., Gryko D., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 469–477. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Scheffold R., Orlinski R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7200–7202. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ociepa M., Baka O., Narodowiec J., Gryko D., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 3560–3565. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Potrząsaj A., Ociepa M., Baka O., Spólnik G., Gryko D., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 1567–1571. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ociepa M., Wierzba A. J., Turkowska J., Gryko D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 5355–5361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Prina Cerai G., Morandi B., Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 9769–9772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Harrowven D. C., Pattenden G., Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 243–246. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Yin H., Carroll P. J., Anna J. M., Schelter E. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9234–9237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Yin H., Carroll P. J., Manor B. C., Anna J. M., Schelter E. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5984–5993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.
- 62a. Yin H., Jin Y., Hertzog J. E., Mullane K. C., Carroll P. J., Manor B. C., Anna J. M., Schelter E. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 16266–16273; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62b. Qiao Y., Schelter E. J., Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2926–2936; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62c. Qiao Y., Cheisson T., Manor B. C., Carroll P. J., Schelter E. J., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 4067–4070; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62d. Qiao Y., Yang Q., Schelter E. J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10999–11003; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 11165–11169. [Google Scholar]
- 63. Guo J.-J., Hu A., Chen Y., Sun J., Tang H., Zuo Z., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15319–15322; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 15545–15548. [Google Scholar]
- 64.
- 64a. Hu A., Guo J.-J., Pan H., Zuo Z., Science 2018, 361, 668–672; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64b. Hu A., Chen Y., Guo J.-J., Yu N., An Q., Zuo Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13580–13585; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64c. An Q., Wang Z., Chen Y., Wang X., Zhang K., Pan H., Liu W., Zuo Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 6216–6226; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64d. Zhang K., Chang L., An Q., Wang X., Zuo Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 10556–10564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.
- 65a. Zhao R., Shi L., Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 3018–3021; [Google Scholar]
- 65b. Guo J.-J., Hu A., Zuo Z., Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 2103–2111. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Schwarz J., König B., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 486–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Wang Y., He J., Zhang Y., CCS Chem. 2020, 2, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
- 68. Chen Y., Du J., Zuo Z., Chem 2020, 6, 266–279. [Google Scholar]
- 69. Du J., Yang X., Wang X., An Q., He X., Pan H., Zuo Z., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 5370–5376; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 5430–5436. [Google Scholar]
- 70.
- 70a. Yatham V. R., Bellotti P., König B., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3489–3492; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70b. Shirase S., Tamaki S., Shinohara K., Hirosawa K., Tsurugi H., Satoh T., Mashima K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 5668–5675; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70c. Lai X. L., Shu X. M., Song J., Xu H. C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10626–10632; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 10713–10719. [Google Scholar]
- 71. Wadekar K., Aswale S., Yatham V. R., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 983–987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Baerends E., Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 177, 97–125. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Macleod K. C., Conway J. L., Patrick B. O., Smith K. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17325–17334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Liu H., Li H., Luo N., Wang F., ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 632–643. [Google Scholar]
- 75. Torres G. M., Liu Y., Arndtsen B. A., Science 2020, 368, 318–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.
- 76a. Schweitzer-Chaput B., Horwitz M. A., De Pedro Beato E., Melchiorre P., Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 129–135; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76b. Spinnato D., Schweitzer-Chaput B., Goti G., Ošeka M., Melchiorre P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 9485–9490; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 9572–9577; [Google Scholar]
- 76c. Cuadros S., Horwitz M. A., Schweitzer-Chaput B., Melchiorre P., Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 5484–5488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]