Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0257126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257126

Female adolescents living with HIV telling their story through ‘my story’ book in Malawi: A visual methodology innovation

Gertrude Mwalabu 1,*, Ida Mbendera 2, Pammla Petrucka 3, Violet Manjanja 4
Editor: Tanya Doherty5
PMCID: PMC8519441  PMID: 34653192

Abstract

Introduction

Female adolescents living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus are a unique population facing lifelong challenges in reproductive and sexual health ranging from relational, social and legal-ethical considerations. While HIV prevalence of young females is higher than the males (4.9% versus 1%), evidence show that these adolescents in Malawi initiate sex as early as 15 years mostly with adult partners. Yet, young people are frequently reported to be reluctant to discuss sexual matters and demonstrate avoidance of direct questions on sexual issues during interviews. It is critical therefore that researchers invoke youth-friendly approaches to address these complex issues and enable these vulnerable individuals to articulate and advocate for their preferred futures.

Methods

This study used an innovative visual qualitative approach known as ‘my story’ book which combined image selection and sentence completion exercises to enable adolescents living with HIV to share their stories through interviews. The study involved 14 cases comprising of 14 female adolescents aged 15 to 19, 14 caregivers and 14 health providers working at HIV multidisciplinary centres in Malawi.

Results

The ‘my story’ book enabled in-depth exploration of the experiences and issues faced by this vulnerable population. The use of images and sentence completion exercise enabled the researcher to appreciate the type of interactions (or lack of) on sexual issues and status disclosure to significant others including sexual partners. Three themes were revealed, included creating meanings, revealing confirmatory and/or complementary evidence and enabling intergenerational research.

Conclusions

The ‘my story’ book captured the life experiences and needs of the female adolescents. The book assisted the participants in constructing, communicating, and controlling the articulation of their stories. It positioned female adolescents as a diverse group of social agents able to construct and reflect on their social worlds and real-life issues. This approach was highly effective in creating a youth-friendly context for reflection and revelation regarding sensitive cultural and social issues faced by this group. As such, the ‘my story’ book could be used in one-on-one counselling or provide data to inform intervention development.

Introduction

Globally, the number of young people living with perinatally acquired HIV continues to rise, mainly in Africa, including Malawi. Between 2015–2016 HIV prevalence among young people aged 15–24 years was significantly higher among females (4.9%) than their male counterparts (1%) in Malawi [1]. Evidence suggests that young women are particularly vulnerable to sexual abuse and this situation exists in the sub-Saharan Africa context including Malawi [2, 3]. Many HIV positive females in Malawi initiate sex by the age of 15, mostly with older or non-cohabiting sexual partners for material support and survival, and these encounters are overwhelmingly unprotected [1, 4]. This pattern often results in poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes, including unplanned pregnancies and early childbearing. HIV services in Malawi provide support for the young women’s HIV-related clinical needs but still face unprecedented challenges of meeting the SRH needs of this growing population as they grow into adulthood. There is little specific provision for young people transitioning from child to adult within the health systems in HIV Management centres [2, 4]. The services offered in the centres include counselling and teen club meetings which are conducted once every month. The main activities include: medical care (including condom distribution), group discussions on sexual and reproductive issues and games.

However, evidence suggests that health professionals encounter challenges in addressing young women’s distinctive SRH needs and it becomes a challenge for the majority of young people to access contraceptives offered by adults [2, 4]. This is attributed to service providers being ill-equipped to discuss sexual issues with young people.

While challenges on discussing sexual issues with young people are well documented elsewhere [46], likewise in Malawi premarital sex and parent-child discussion on sexual issues is culturally unacceptable for the fear of influencing young people to initiate sex too early or because sexual discussions are customarily held in secret within families [4, 7]. Yet, 98% of girls aged 15–19 are aware of modern methods of contraception and only about one-third of sexually active unmarried young women use contraceptives [8]. Reasons cited for lack or limited uptake of the services include fear of being seen as not conforming to religious, cultural and social norms, negative attitude of service providers, inability to negotiate safer sex with partners and misconceptions [2, 4, 7]. A growing body of qualitative studies has also shown that inferior socio-economic status, lack of bargaining power in sexual relationships coupled with gender power inequality (in terms of experience, authority, and control over sexual activity) affect the female adolescents’ ability to take informed decisions particularly on safer sex and contraception [2, 4, 5, 7, 8]. This becomes more complicated particularly in Africa where young people are frequently reported being reluctant to discuss sexual matters and demonstrate avoidance of direct questions on sexual issues during interviews particularly those living with HIV [4, 5]. All these consistently point to a need for more information, open communication, friendly and flexible services for young people [9], and calls for innovative data collection tools to enable young people in articulating the realities of their lives including sexual and reproductive issues with adult researchers.

Kellett and Robinson as cited by Fraser indicate that it can be methodologically difficult for an adult researcher to find techniques to listen to the young people’s voices in research [6]. They argued that the gap in generations between the adults and young people creates differences in viewpoints, experiences and power, and it can become difficult to bridge this gap. In response to this concern, Samuels stressed the value of techniques for “bridging the culturally distinct worlds of the researcher (an adult) and the researched (young people)” [10]. To address this concern, the incorporation of visual forms of expression has become common in qualitative research over the past two decades, with participant-employed photography being most prevalent. For instance, the evolution of the ‘memory book’, in the United Kingdom as an innovative method for biographical research dates as early as 2005 [11]. Memory books were created as a method to be used alongside interviews in a longitudinal qualitative study of young people’s transitions to adulthood as critical tools for the understanding of identity, sources of documentation and resources for elaboration. The method assisted in facilitating the expression of a range of ‘voices’ and time frames which complicate cohesive narrative presentations of self. Visual methods such as photovoice have also been used in community-based studies and with individuals to explore their lived experiences, particularly because of their participatory nature [12]. With photovoice, researchers often aim to decrease power differentials in the research process and empower young research participants [13], which aligns with empowerment models that are becoming increasingly advocated by health professionals [14]. Photovoice study conducted in Canada with young adult women affected by serious illness, provides examples of participants’ photographs to illustrate how participant-employed photography could enhance the depth of research data. In particular, the examples highlighted how the photographs enriched participants’ verbal descriptions of their lived experiences, which generated a better understanding of their personal embodied realities. Guillemin and Drew [15] in their study further indicated that images have the ability to “express the unsayable” (p. 178). Images can therefore be “both a form of data and a conduit for the elicitation of interview data thereby revealing more and greater details than other methods alone would have generated” [16] (p. 239). However, in the Sub-Saharan region, including Malawi there is paucity of literature on use of photovoice in data collection, despite young people being reported to be reluctant to discuss sensitive issues including sexual behaviours and HIV [4, 5, 7]. Our paper therefore adds to this body of knowledge by focusing specifically on ‘my story’ book (a novel data collection tool with young people). In addition, it is the first innovative data collection method to particularly consider the global and Malawian contexts.

Materials and methods

Study design

A qualitative case study was conducted in Malawi with 14 female adolescents with perinatally-acquired HIV between January—November 2012. Each ‘case’ comprised a female adolescent (aged 15–19 years), a nominated caregiver, and a service provider.

Settings

This study was conducted at three HIV Management Centres providing services to paediatrics and young people living with HIV (two urban centres and one rural centre). All the centres offer comprehensive paediatric HIV care and support, including SRH, counselling, nutrition, entrepreneurship, and family planning services to young people. The rural facility is affiliated to the public facility which is the first specialist centre in Malawi for the care and support of people living with HIV [4]. By the time of data collection in 2012, the centre excluding its sites had registered over 20,000 HIV positive patients; out of which 387 (192 females, 195 males) were young people aged 12 to 19 years. The other facility is a non-governmental and non-profitable organization working in partnership with the Ministry of Health and manages 10% of all children commenced on antiretrovirals (ARVs) in Malawi, including young people. By 2012, the centre had a total of 2825 active patients, out of which 956 were young people: 635 were aged 10 to 14 years (325 females, 310 males), and 321 were aged 15 to 19 years (157 females, 164 males).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The University of Nottingham Research Ethics Committee in the United Kingdom (C 09 2011), and College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee in Malawi (P.09/11/1124) approved all study protocols. Each participating specialized paediatric HIV centre gave written permission to conduct the study.

Verbal and written informed consents were obtained from the adolescents aged 18 and above and their caregivers. Assent was obtained from adolescents under age 18 in tandem with parental permission for their participation because young people are considered ‘persons with diminished autonomy hence vulnerable to coercion or undue influence [17]. The informed consent offered the ‘opportunity to hear their views of any kind of taken-for-granted issues regarding research with young people’ [18], and the participants were recruited into the study with full disclosure. Pseudonyms invented by participants themselves (adolescents, caregivers and service providers) were used to ensure maximum anonymity and confidentiality.

Recruitment and sampling

The adolescents were recruited through the multidisciplinary centres providing specialised paediatric HIV care and serving this study’s target population. The healthcare professionals approached adolescents who met the inclusion criteria and their primary caregivers to ask them to participate in the study. Both the adolescents and their caregivers were approached on an individual basis if they expressed an interest in participating in the study. Adolescents who visited the centres on their own were given information sheets to share with their caregivers which invited them to participate in the study and bring feedback during the following visit. If the caregivers were unable to attend the centre, the lead author visited them to provide further explanation of the study and followed this visit up with a phone call or another visit. The young woman and her caregiver were then given an opportunity to identify a service provider who had been in constant contact with the young woman for at least six months to round out the ‘triad’ for the study.

14 participants were recruited through purposive sampling, five adolescents aged 15–19 were recruited from each urban HIV management centre, and four from the rural facility (two urban centres and one rural centre). The lead author’s personal experience shaped the age of adolescents selected for the current study. Based on her own experience as an adult female and mother, the lead author felt that older adolescents had wider experience than younger adolescents, which was consistent with the existing literature [4, 19, 20]. All adolescents who met the selection criteria were invited to participate in the study by the service providers. The criteria included perinatal exposure to HIV, awareness of their HIV positive status, clinic attendance for a minimum of six months, and a cognitive capacity to complete ‘my story’ book. Adolescents who were illiterate, pregnant, already had children, or were married were also included if they fulfilled the above criteria. Adolescents that were unaware of their exposure to HIV, and/or were either clinically unwell or too sick to complete ‘my story’ book were excluded. This exclusion was implemented to reduce any additional stress to such adolescents and to minimise the potential loss of informants due to critical illness prior to completion of the study. Out of the 20 adolescents who met the inclusion criteria, only 14 were able to assemble as ‘complete cases’, (i.e. each case comprised of an adolescent, her caregiver and a service provider). Six adolescents did not participate because their primary caregivers were not willing to participate in the study for fear of being associated with the adolescents’ HIV status. Out of the 14 cases, ten were recruited from the urban setting and four from the rural centre (See Table 1). Only adolescents whose caregivers also participated in the study (for complete cases) were given a full explanation about the use of ‘my story book and took part in the sentence completion exercise. All adolescents that participated in the current study gave written content to publication of the cases’ details with pseudonyms invented by adolescents themselves.

Table 1. Profile of participating female adolescents (as referred to on page 5).

Pseudonym Residential area Age Type of caregiver Educational level Access to specialised HIV care Sexual characteristics
Main source of financial & material Support Sexual debut No. of partners Number of children Age of child bearing
Alindine Rural 19 Aunt Tertiary Aunt X 1 x x
Chitsanzo Rural 19 Sister Secondary Sexual partners 15 3 1 17
Dalo Urban 19 Mum & Dad Primary Sexual partners & small business 12 unknown 2 15
Fatsani Urban 17 Mum & Dad Secondary Mum & Sexual partners 14 4 x x
Gonjetso Rural 16 Aunt Secondary Aunt, teacher & service provider X x x x
Mwatitha Urban 18 Aunt Secondary Aunt & sexual partners 12 3 x x
Nane Urban 19 Dad Tertiary Dad 16 2 x x
Penina Urban 19 Dad Secondary Dad X 1 x x
Tamando Urban 17 Mum & Dad Secondary Sexual partner & small business 12 1 1 15
Tanyada Urban 16 Mum & Dad Primary Mum & Dad X x x x
Tawina Rural 18 Uncle Secondary Sexual partners & uncle 14 5 x x
Ulemu Urban 18 Aunt Secondary Small business X x x x
Zaiwo Urban 19 Mum Primary Mum 14 1 1 14
Ziliwe Urban 18 Aunt Secondary Sexual partners 15 unknown 1 17

Data collection using ‘my story’ book

Data from female adolescents was collected through semi-structured interviews using the open-ended questions that formed the ‘sentence completion exercise’ in ‘my story’ book (See Fig 1). The concept of ‘my story’ book, loosely originated from the idea of ‘memory books’ and shares foundational elements of photo voice. A memory book is a tool used in memory work with individuals living with HIV. It is a diary of a typical day, which includes spaces for drawing [11, 21]. However, ‘my story’ book included a sentence completion exercise and researcher-generated images depicting different life experiences, events and issues potentially affecting lives of the female adolescents as they are growing up with HIV (See Figs 27) in English and Chichewa (Malawian language). As asserted by Teachman et al. [18] and Wills et al. [19], the inclusion of photographs helps generate thick description of data. Furthermore, central to ‘my story’ book were the explanations, interpretations, and meanings surrounding the chosen images.

Fig 1. Definitive sentence completion exercise in “my story” book.

Fig 1

Fig 2. Having a partner.

Fig 2

Fig 7. Type and approach of health services.

Fig 7

The main themes of the ‘my story’ book which formed the interview guide included experiences of growing up with HIV infection, SRH, disclosure of HIV status, ART adherence, psychosocial support, future aspirations and priorities and other medical issues. The themes were derived from the literature, empirical data, research objectives, consultations with experts on the research topic, and an intent to challenge assumptions and taboos (both cultural and inter-generational) and also informed the choice of images [18, 20]. The consulted experts (six) were the medical and nursing specialists in Paediatric HIV and AIDS directly working with the young people in the HIV management centres. The use of literature and research objectives in the choice of images also assisted in reducing bias throughout the research. In this case, the researcher critically reflected on how and what kind of knowledge to produce, and how to relate the new knowledge to that already in existence.

The indicative images were extracted from the copyright free websites such as Wikimedia Commons. The definitive images were captured after pretesting the indicative images with female adolescents living with perinatally acquired HIV at a different health facility offering HIV services, to determine their applicability and relevance in the Malawian context (See Figs 27). Adolescents were invited to put stickers on images that best reflected their different emotions/experiences, major needs, and issues that impacted upon their lives, future aspirations and priorities. The plan was for adolescents to complete the ‘sentence completion exercise’ (See Fig 1) at their own time and pace within the scheduled period of two months. However, some young women (three) took more than two months (three to four months) to complete ‘my story’ book. Follow up visits (ranging from three to seven visits) to adolescents were conducted to establish a degree of trust in the research relationship and to enable adolescents to complete the ‘my story’ book. Out of 14, 13 adolescents filled all sections of ‘my story’ book (See Figs 17).

There was also provision of plain papers to allow adolescents to draw images or suggest topics for cases where the images were not applicable to their situations but none of the adolescents used the plain papers. The images were used as a catalyst to guide in-depth interviews with the researcher, as the adolescents were asked to explain their reasons for selecting particular images and the meaning(s) attached to them. With reference to the chosen images, an open-ended question such as ‘can you tell me about your story of growing up with HIV? was posed to initiate the interviews with the adolescents. This question enabled the adolescents to recount details from any aspect of their life depending on the chosen images. Adolescents discussed those cultural aspects of their social world and social relations that they considered relevant, in accordance with the written/filled in reasons for choosing the images or responses in their ‘sentence completion exercise’. Follow up questions included, ‘How do you feel about having HIV? What do you think makes you feel like that? What might be your major challenges or difficulties of living with HIV as you are growing up to adulthood? What helps you to cope up with living with your condition? The questions created the setting in which the adolescents were allowed to sketch the big-picture issues surrounding their lives. Thus, ‘my story’ book assisted young women to actively construct the story of their experiences, which communicated not only key events but also contexts, feelings, values, challenges and opinions as they were explaining the experiences in reference to the chosen images. Prompts and probes developed as the interviews progressed to encourage the respondents to think more deeply and facilitate openness for the complexity and uniqueness of individual experiences, challenges and perceived needs for young women.

The interviews were conducted by the lead author according to the participant’s schedule, availability and preferences in terms of venue to minimise distress and ensure that participants felt at ease, particularly the young women. In situations where interviews were conducted at participants’ homes, other family members were asked to stay at a distance, or sit outside of the house where possible, while the interview was in progress to ensure privacy and confidentiality. However, a 21year old caregiver had a repeated interview because she was distressed during the interviews as she recounted their relationship with an uncle (a husband to their aunt) who used to sexually abuse them, and was referred for support services within the centre.

Semi-structured interview guides were used to collect data with caregivers and service providers. All interviews lasted between 30 to 90 minutes and were recorded using an audio digital recorder. There were no incentives given apart from refreshments and transport refunds where necessary. Interviews conducted in Chichewa were mostly transcribed straight into English by the lead author herself, as a native speaker of Chichewa. Each transcript (the translated) was then audited through proof reading and spot checking during its development against the original audio recording by a lecturer in language and communication (bilingual expert), who is also content expert and an HIV and AIDS work place coordinator. After data analysis, the lead author returned all booklets to adolescents during adolescents’ following visits to the clinic. Audio recording provided a complete description of participants’ responses and comments in the context with which they were made, hence facilitating the interview process [22]. The lead author transcribed all the recorded interviews verbatim soon after each interview. The keeping of a thematic log during in-depth interviews, maintaining detailed researcher field notes, writing reflective remarks during data collection, ongoing reading of the literature and transcript readings were components of the research approaches that facilitated decision about data saturation and ongoing sampling [23].

Data analysis

A multi-step retroductive process, including thematic analysis within and across cases, was done to produce contextually grounded, transferable findings. Retroduction is the process of “moving backwards from an observed event and asking, what must be true in order to make this event possible?” [24]. Easton states that, in ‘retroductive analysis, events are explained by identifying mechanisms which are capable of producing the events’ (p. 123). This iterative process of uncovering underlying structures and mechanisms was relevant to the topic under study. Thus, the retroductive analysis provided an alternative way of answering ‘why’ questions [25]. The interviews were analysed thematically using a constant comparison approach of different data sets [25]. Images were analyzed with respect to their content and the meanings assigned to them by participants during interviews.

Individual accounts within each ‘case’ were analysed. Codes, sub-themes, and themes were identified inductively from the individual accounts within the case then conclusions were drawn. The lead author engaged in inter-rater reliability activities to ensure credibility of the study findings. The lead author and her PhD research supervisors coded the same data set independently and achieved a high level of agreement on the codes. The outcome of the method ranged from 0 (no agreement at all) to 1 (agreement). We often used a unique code only once in a transcript. We would determine the value for each code in a transcript comparing all the three coders together and then combine the specific values into an average across the board. We considered reliability measured in aggregate for each transcript (total number of agreements among the coders).

Each transcript within a case (for all the 14 cases) incited potential reconsideration of the previously identified themes as commonalities and differences emerged. This enabled researchers view each case individually within its own context, and remain true to the case study approach [26]. Cross-case analysis was then undertaken to identify similarities, differences, relationships, and contradictions in the accounts of adolescents, caregivers, and service providers across the cases to draw conclusions (See S1 Dataset–Chapter 9 Study conclusion). The comprehensive analysis of the whole data set from multiple sources of evidence (images, sentence completion exercise) were linked to data from semi-structured interviews within the individual ‘case’, across the ‘cases’ to strengthen each case. The results related to the content are forthcoming.

Trustworthiness of the study findings was achieved through ensuring credibility and transferability of the study results. To enhance the rigour of the interpretive process, emerging themes were discussed with the research supervisors and the selected respondents. Participant validation exercises (through meetings) were conducted with the young women, caregivers, and service providers (i.e. separately for each category of participants) after data collection to also ensure the credibility of the results. This mechanism enabled the participants to comment on whether the lead author’s tentative interpretations reflected their expressed experiences and enable further discussion about emerging issues and themes. During participant validation exercise, all participants affirmed that the lead author’s interpretation of the data captured and expressed their personal experiences. In order to enhance the potential for transferability of the findings of the current study, a multiple case study approach was adopted. In addition, a diverse sample of young women, based on a range of demographic, socio-economic and HIV-related variables were selected to gain in-depth knowledge of a wider group. Furthermore, the comprehensive analysis of the whole data set from multiple sources of evidence coupled with the comparison of the findings within the individual ‘case’, across the ‘cases’ then with other findings in the existing literature likely allows transferability of the findings to young women growing up with perinatal HIV in a similar context.

Results

Participants demographic characteristics

14 adolescents completed the ‘my story’ book component of the study. Six reported living with their biological parent(s) (father/mother), three were married and living with their husbands, and five were double orphans living with either an aunt, an uncle, or a sister. Five adolescents were still attending school (four in secondary school and one in primary school), one was in college, one had completed studies at a tertiary level, and two were out of school (due to failed exams and/or lack of fees). Five participants had children. None of the adolescents was employed and the majority depended on their caregivers for survival and/or adopted other means of survival. This broad profile of the female adolescents in terms of age, parenthood, settings (rural/urban), literacy level, economic status, sexual behaviour, as well as marital and child bearing status contributed to strengthening of the study’s capacity to compare and contrast their experiences, and identify commonalities and/or differences in their needs.

Significance of ‘my story’ book

Through the sentence completion exercise, participants indicated reflective relevance of the chosen images to their sexual and reproductive experiences, needs, and challenges. In addition, the exercise probed the participants to express their experiences or views and the meanings they ascribed to their chosen images [9, 21]. This paper therefore highlights the methodological potentials that ‘my story’ book demonstrated under the following themes: i) creating meanings; ii) enabling an understanding of ambiguities and complex issues; and iii) gaining insight into inter-generational dissonance.

Creating meanings

With the use of ‘my story’ book, adolescents were competent social actors. This was demonstrated during interviews as they were asked to elaborate or explain about their chosen images, and the meaning(s) they attached to them in relation to their sexual and reproductive needs. Most participants reported that accompanying loss of parental affection and care due to death of a parent(s), they experienced a diminished sense of belonging to family, peers, and society. Relationships with parents, caregivers, aunts, uncles, step-parents, siblings and significant others fundamentally influenced not only how one perceived one’s self, but also perceptions of their value or worth to the social world. The strong attachment with a parent/caregiver or significant others was observed as an important ingredient to self-acceptance and positive self-image, as they were fundamental in building economic capital. However, in the case of Ziliwe, who chose images seen in Fig 2. ‘Having a sexual partner’ and Fig 3. Image of ‘Pregnancy’, indicated that losing both parents meant loss of love and adult support networks. As such, she engaged in intimate relationships to seek love, acceptance, and support. Ziliwe felt that her partner understood her challenges and was very supportive, which boosted her self-image as a young woman. She further reported making repeated efforts to negotiate condom use, but what became apparent was a common trajectory of events in which talking about condom use resulted in arguments and potential loss of the desperately needed support. Instead, she succumbed to her partner’s demands and engaged in unprotected sexual encounters, which resulted in early pregnancy. She described her experience as follows:

Fig 3. Image of ‘pregnancy’.

Fig 3

I was passing through hard life at home, no-one cared for me; he gave me his ears, he supported me, and thus how I got connected to him; he accepted me and used to give me money which I used to buy food, and my necessities like body lotion, clothes which made me look like other girls…I felt loved, gave back in kind (sex); he could not accept using them (condoms) we argued and I just gave up and yielded to his demands, I became pregnant. (Ziliwe, 18).

Similarly, Zaiwo explained the reasons for engaging in early sexual activities through rationale and meaning ascribed to an image of ‘having a sexual partner’. Through the chosen image, Zaiwo was able to explain her early child bearing as attributed to lack of financial/material support which led to her school dropout, and early sexual activities to earn a living. In responding to how she felt that she is HIV positive, Zaiwo selected an image of ‘Am angry with my illness’ and proffered the explanation that she felt bitter because her parents passed on to her a shameful and secretive disease.

Through ‘my story’ book, young women reported encountering several challenges that influenced their SRH choices contrary to caregivers’ and service providers’ expectations. For instance, Tawina selected three images depicting use of contraceptives, taking medications (i.e., Anti-retrovirals [ARVs]), and type/approach of health services as she was responding to, ‘what might be your major challenges or difficulties of living with HIV as you are growing up to adulthood?. In her accounts in the exercise and during interviews, Tawina elaborated on her choices that she could not disclose to her sexual partner that she was taking ARVs for fear of losing the support gained. The exercise enabled her to explain why she could not suggest use of condoms as the fear of being suspected by the boyfriend that she was HIV positive and also wanted to portray to service providers that she was not engaging in sexual activities as service providers advocated abstinence to young women living with HIV in order to reduce risk of transmitting the virus.

Young women’s sexual health became more complicated as they sought love, acceptance and/or financial support. They reported being in a dilemma because their partners, upon whom they were materially dependent insisted on sex without condoms as a demonstration of love and for sexual pleasure, leading to early child bearing. Ziliwe, Chitsanzo, Tamando, Dalo and Tawina believed that apart from condoms, if the injectable contraceptives were readily available to them, their teenage pregnancies could have been prevented.

In contrast, the majority of service provider emphasised on abstinence and condom use, as the best options. Furthermore, Ms Kando, Ms Mbenu, Mrs Tayenda and Mr Malido perceived that injectable contraceptives should never be reinforced, as they exposed young women to potential for other STIs or secondary HIV transmissions.

“Condoms are safe in preventing HIV transmission; with injectable contraceptives, adolescents are at risk of STIs, in addition to many effects of injectable contraceptives like delayed fertility return or bleeding, which if coupled with HIV positive status can likely expose them to anaemia. (Mrs Tayenda, Mwatitha’s service provider, 39)

When attempting to understand their social realities, most adolescents revealed they were depressed and choose the image in Fig 4. ‘Am depressed’. They perceived that they were not being loved and accepted within the family and the society, which resulted in a loss of sense of belonging and adult support. Loss of parental love and adult support networks, made the majority engage in sexual relationships with older partners. This exposed them to gender power inequalities, increased their vulnerability to sexual exploitation and early childbearing as they succumbed to unsafe sexual practices to maintain their sources of support, social status, and identity.

Fig 4. Am depressed.

Fig 4

Enabling an understanding of ambiguities and complex issues

Among our key interview questions was the issue of status disclosure particularly, with whom did the adolescents talk to about their HIV positive status and why they preferred talking to the chosen people and not others about their status. For the caregivers, we asked them, to whom could they disclose the positive HIV status of their adolescents. In response to this question, Fatsani’s mother indicated that though status disclosure to significant others was necessary, she felt that disclosure of the youth’s status simultaneously potentiates parental status, thus subjecting their family to social isolation and embarrassment. On the other hand, she felt disclosing status to sexual partners was important to prevent the risk of transmitting the virus and legal implications.

“…..we said let’s not tell them (the children) about the status ………..will they not tell others? Will that not disclose our status? If others know, how will they treat us as a family? Later we disclosed the status to them because the older daughter (Fatsani) kept on demanding reasons for taking her daily drugs; but we told them not to tell our relations, family friends to avoid social isolation. But I have always told her to disclose the status to her sexual partners for fear of being sued if she does not disclose her status and infect her partners. Personally, I feel she better gets someone who is already infected so that they disclose their status to each other without any challenge…..” (Mrs Ndazi, Fatsani’s caregiver, 41)

While the caregiver’s (Fatsani’s caregiver) concerns seemed to revolve around legal implications if the partners discovered themselves that her daughter was HIV positive, the adolescent (Fatsani) related her position on non-disclosure to a previous relationship termination by her first sexual partner after disclosing her status. In revealing image choices regarding individuals she would talk with about her positive HIV status, Fatsani’s account presented similar images of the constraints set by her mother, and extended the secrecy to her sexual partners contrary to her mother’s opinions. Compared to other adolescents in our sample, in her response to the question, Fatsani restricted her choice of images to services providers and family members (Fig 5: ‘Family members’ and Fig 6: ‘Service providers’).

Fig 5. Family members.

Fig 5

Fig 6. Service providers.

Fig 6

The stigma associated with HIV and previous termination of her relationship after status disclosure made Fatsani keep her status a secret even to her sexual partner. Fatsani’s choice of images confirmed silence and secrecy as coping strategies against the social stigma and demonstrated the need to protect her family from social embarrassment as well as future termination of relationships with sexual partners. However, secrets concerning status interfered with optimal relationships exposing Fatsani to subsequent emotional adjustments and risk of secondary HIV transmission or re-infection as reflected below:

You may not understand the pain of having this shameful disease; you could not even tell your boyfriend for fear of having the relationship terminated, but will he not know about it? How will he react? The pain of feeling lonely, not loved again, no! My mum, sisters and nurses have to know because they support me. It seems even mum and dad are ashamed of this disease, they wouldn’t want to hear that I have told someone but a boyfriend; I can’t! Why should I? It’s a pin code (secret) I need a companion. (Fatsani, 17)

The contributions of the young women and their support affirmed that living with HIV involves keeping secrets for various reasons at different levels. The consequences of this silence were not fully explored but, tangentially, we heard about risks of secondary HIV transmission, loss of social networks, or deprivation of intimate relationships, all of which were linked to affecting their ability to live positively.

Gaining insight into perceived inter-generational dissonance

‘My story’ book helped to generate and enable rich interview discussions on type and approach of health services, sexual behaviours and experiences. It gave female adolescents control over the representation of their own social realities as they chose images that best matched their individual sexual experiences and needs. Although service providers reported that the adolescents could not open up on their sexual experiences and needs despite prolonged involvements, the use of ‘my story’ book enabled them to share such information. In the case of Mwatitha responding to ‘what helps you cope up with living with your condition?’ She chose images in Figs 2, 5 and 6, on ‘having a sexual partner’ ‘family members’ ‘service providers’ respectively and Fig 7 on ‘Type and approach of health services’ to explain her coping strategies.

During interviews she explained that:

…you may not understand why I engaged in a sexual relationship at the age of 12. They (service providers including caregivers) could not be happy if they had heard that I was doing it (sex) but as I was growing, I felt lonely and not loved in my aunt’s house, I needed someone to love me; my boyfriend was always there for me. I had to do it (sex) as a token of appreciation for his support……. I ensured that they (my service providers and aunt) were not aware of our relationship; they advise us (adolescents living with HIV) to abstain for fear of transmitting the virus; but how could I with all the love and support I was getting from him? At clinic, I could not ask for condoms for I did not want them (service providers) to note that I was doing it (sex)…. (Mwatitha, 18)

Both Fatsani and Mwatitha opened their communication with ‘you may not understand’ which highlighted the perceived inter-generational dissonance, but ‘my story’ book vectored their expression of experiences and needs in a way that transects diagnosis, generation, and power roles. For example, Mwatitha presented the rationale and promotion of abstinence amongst adolescents living with HIV by service providers and their caregivers in an attempt to mitigate risk of secondary HIV transmission to their sexual partners or re-infection. This was confirmed by the following sentiments:

“I was shocked to discover that she (Mwatitha) has a boyfriend, I expected that she would abstain especially considering her positive status. Will she not pass on the virus to her boyfriend? Surprisingly, when I visited the centre………I heard one of the girls almost of her age on a mobile phone, I believed she was talking to her boyfriend, ‘please take care do not move out with other girls, I love you.’ I was paralysed, these girls are engaging in sexual relationships; we expect the impossibilities, they are engaging in sex as they are growing……” (Mrs Metani, Mwatitha’s caregiver, 40)

“I feel stigma and discrimination she (Tawina) encounters affects her access to condoms; most providers know that she is HIV infected because of her skin condition. So if they see her collecting condoms it could be an issue; the negative attitudes—they would not expect her to be sexually active; they would think she is being suicidal to sexual partners. This makes young people prefer buying condoms from shops than collecting them from the centre; personally, I don’t mind offering her condoms, but if she is seen by other service providers, will question her, why does she want to kill many? Reflecting on challenges with condom use in these rural areas, they would prefer she abstains—this discourages young women from using SRH services. (Mr Pamba, Tawina’s service provider, 25)

Service providers asserted that when they considered the ages and the small stature of some of the adolescents, they could not think they could be sexually active, only to be shocked later seeing some of them pregnant, contrary to their expectation that the young women were abstaining from sex.

Discussion

Images in research whether researcher or participants generated are not a taken-for-granted record of the subjects’ everyday life [6]. They are a representation, a version of events [27] co-produced by the researcher and the study participants subject to interpretation by both of them, as it is with any other source of data [28]. Images also do not become data until layered with interpretation and analysis [19]. In the current study the ‘my story’ book comprising of images and sentence completion exercise enabled adolescents to discuss their SRH needs and experiences, how they engaged with SRH services including aspects of their lives that might be difficult or sensitive to express in words to an adult researcher (See S1 Dataset: Study Conclusion). This satiates the findings of Fraser [6], who indicated that it can be difficult for an adult researcher to collect data on sensitive issues from young people during research. ‘My story’ book generated insights over and beyond the conventional data collection techniques developed for adults [27, 29]. The use of ‘my story’ book therefore positioned female adolescents as ‘experts’ of their own lives, capable of discussing their sexual experiences with an adult researcher without being coerced.

Creatively using images and sentence completion as data collection methods enabled female adolescents to express their own real life issues which were contrary to service providers’ perspectives particularly on sexual experiences. Teachman and Gibson [18] argued that dominant groups assert power through dogmatic, authoritative truth claims which could be contrary to social world of the interviewed. While abstinence could be an idealized behaviour for the adolescents from the service providers’ and caregivers’ perspectives [5], adolescents indicated that conforming to sexual abstinence could not resonate with the economic imperative and the shared social identity which served as the basis for the receipt of effective support from peers or sexual partners [4, 30]. Through ‘my story’ book, some adolescents spoke of the disregard for safer sexual behaviours by their cohorts because of their search for social, economic, and psychological well-being which they could not through interviews alone. They pretended to be ‘doing the right thing’ so as not to be seen as sexually active by caregivers and the service providers; they covertly engage in such relationships as conveyed through use of ‘my story’ book. It is in this context that O’Connell [31] refutes the premise that ‘children have nothing of interest or importance to tell researchers about their lives, and that adults understand much better than them on what is good for them and how events impact on them’. The ‘my story’ book enabled the adolescents’ stories to be captured through images, metaphors, ensuring the researcher, service providers understood their socio-economic and sexual realities in diverse ways, and making the ordinary become extraordinary. The ‘my story’ book embraces O’Connell’s [31] conjecture that adolescents be regarded as social actors with the capacity to construct and negotiate their personal and social contexts. This research revealed and gave voice to adolescents’ emotions, needs, and challenges which then became relatable to other sources of information and evidence, which is a critical component of ‘my story’ book’s methodological contribution.

With the use of ‘my story’ book, we found that chosen images provided a useful record of the phenomenon under study that could be mulled over, repeatedly viewed and reflected upon as the analysis was in progress. Focus on the number of images chosen, the rationale and meaning ascribed to the chosen images, and how the images impacted the range and depth of data collected overall, helped the researcher to make a more robust contribution to the body of knowledge. For instance, the use of images and the sentence completion exercise revealed that male relationships seemed to positively influence the young woman’s self-image and self-worth, which contradicted service providers’ expectations of abstinence among adolescents living with HIV. Our methodological choice to use images and sentence completion therefore empowered the adolescents, by asking them to perform an action they were skilled at and comfortable with, to reveal their own secrets and share their sensitive stories.

There are a number of limitations with the use of ‘my story’ book in the current study. The plan was for the adolescents to complete ‘my story’ book at their own time and pace within the scheduled period of completing the ‘my story’ book (two months), in order to give them a better sense of control over the activity. However, some adolescents took long than planned period (more than two months) to undertake the exercise, and complete ‘my story’ book as they were making every effort in seeking a safe place and to maintain privacy and confidentiality of the issues written in ‘my story’ book. For future studies adopting use of ‘my story’ book with young people, plans are needed in advance on how adolescents could be assisted in terms of locating and accessing space to conceal their books, thus when and where to complete ‘my story’ book and where to store ‘my story’ book during the period of completing the exercise to ensure maximum privacy and confidentiality. Whilst the study included only adolescents who were well and had a cognitive capacity to complete ‘my story’ book, it could have been significant as well to empower participants who were unwell to share their stories through ‘my story’ book hence boosting their self-esteem. Participants whose caregivers and service providers refused to assemble a complete ‘case’ might have had significant issues or challenges to influence practice and policy. However, ‘my story’ book as a methodological approach can be used beyond the group of female adolescents whose cases were analysed (to all young people in different settings).

Conclusion

Critically reflecting on the rich and sensitive data that was collected from the adolescents through the ‘my story’ book, it is evident that the book could be considered as one of the innovative visual data collection methods in exploring life experiences and needs of the female adolescents including sensitive and personal issues which could not easily been expressed with words only. In this context, the use of ‘my story’ book assisted the adolescents to actively construct the story of their experiences, attach meaning to the chosen images which communicated not only key events but also contexts, feelings, values, challenges and opinions as they were explaining the experiences and needs in reference to the chosen images. It also resulted in a shift towards a more equitable power distribution, providing the autonomy needed for female adolescents to reveal personal stories about their sexual and reproductive needs contrary to what caregivers and service providers believed as the truth about adolescents’ sexual experiences.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to all female adolescents who gave up their time to complete ‘my story’ book. We would also like to thank all caregivers and service providers working at Lighthouse and Baylor College of Medicine in Malawi for their support throughout data collection period. It is important to note that a portion of ‘my story’ book was previously published (in brief) under data collection.

Abbreviations

AIDS

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

ARVs

Antiretroviral

HIV

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

SRH

Sexual and Reproductive Health

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Malawi Government through the University of Malawi in the form of academic scholarships and the University of Malawi through the Faculty of Nursing in the form of academic scholarships used to support data collection and analysis and the writing of this paper.

References

  • 1.National Statistical Office (NSO) and ICF Macro 2016. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2015–16. Zomba, Malawi: NSO and ICF Macro and Calverton, Maryland, USA; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaunda-Khangamwa BN, Kapwata P, Malisita K, Munthali A, Chipeta E, Phiri S, et al. Adolescents living with HIV, complex needs and resilience in Blantyre, Malawi. AIDS Res Ther. 2020. Jun 22;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-00292-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dick B, Ferguson BJ. Health for the World’s Adolescents: A Second Chance in the Second Decade. J Adolesc Health. 2015. Jan;56(1):3–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mwalabu G, Evans C, Redsell S. Factors influencing the experience of sexual and reproductive healthcare for female adolescents with perinatally-acquired HIV: a qualitative case study. BMC Womens Health. 2017. Dec 8;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0485-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Busza J, Besana GVR, Mapunda P, Oliveras E. “I have grown up controlling myself a lot.” Fear and misconceptions about sex among adolescents vertically-infected with HIV in Tanzania. Reprod Health Matters. 2013. May;21(41):87–96. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(13)41689-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fraser S. Doing research with children and young people. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nash K, O’Malley G, et al. "Our girls need to see a path to the future"—perspectives on sexual and reproductive health information among adolescent girls, guardians, and initiation counselors in Mulanje district, Malawi. BMC Repro Health 2019; 16(8); 1–13 doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0661-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaphagawani C, & Kalipeni E. Sociocultural factors contributing to teenage pregnancy in Zomba district, Malawi, Global Public Health, 2017;12:6, 694–710, doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1229354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.WHO., “Making health services adolescent friendly: Developing national quality standards for adolescent-friendly health services.,”. Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Samuels J. When words are not enough: Eliciting children’s experiences of Buddhist monastic life through photographs. Vis Res Methods Image Soc Represent. 2007;197–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thomson R and Holland J. ‘Thanks for the memory’: memory books as a methodological resource in biographical research. Journal of Qualitative Research, 2005; 5 (2); 201–219 doi: 10.1177/1468794105050835 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burles M. and Thomas R. “I Just Don’t Think There’s Any Other Image That Tells The Story Like [This] Picture Does”: Researcher and Participant Reflections on the Use of Participant-Employed Photography in Social Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2014. doi: 10.1177/160940691401300109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Packard J. “I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here”: The power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies, 2008; 23(1), 63–77. doi: 10.1080/14725860801908544 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zoffman V., & Kirkevold M. Realizing empowerment in difficult diabetes care: A guided self-determination intervention. Qualitative Health Research, 2012; 22(1), 103–118. doi: 10.1177/1049732311420735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guillemin M., & Drew S. Questions of process in participant-generated visual methodologies. Visual Studies, 2010; 25(2), 175–188. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2010.502676 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shaw M. Photography as a metaphor for (epidemiological) research. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2005; 34, 239–241. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Freeman M, Mathison S. Researching Children’s Experiences. New York: The Guilford Press.; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Teachman G, Gibson BE. Integrating Visual Methods With Dialogical Interviews in Research With Youth Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Int J Qual Methods. 2018. Dec 1;17(1):1609406917750945. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wills WJ, Dickinson AM, Meah A, Short F. Reflections on the Use of Visual Methods in a Qualitative Study of Domestic Kitchen Practices. Sociology. 2016. Jun 1;50(3):470–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benninger E, Savahl S. The use of visual methods to explore how children construct and assign meaning to the “self” within two urban communities in the Western Cape, South Africa. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being [Internet]. 2016. Jun 9 [cited 2020 Dec 10];11. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.31251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Evans R, Becker S. Children caring for parents with HIV and AIDS: global issues and policy responses [Internet]. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2009. [cited 2019 May 9] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kelly SE. Chapter 16: Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, DeVries RG, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2010. p. 307–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tuckett AG, Stewart DE. Collecting qualitative data—Part I: Journal as a method: experience, rationale and limitations. Contemp NURSE. 2004;16:104–13. doi: 10.5172/conu.16.3.240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Easton G. Critical Realism in Case Study Research. Industrial Marketing Management. 2010;39:118–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Blaikie N. Approaches to Social Enquiry (2nd ed.). Great Britain: Polity Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stake R. Multiple case study analysis. London: The Guilford Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hill J. Using Participatory and Visual Methods to Address Power and Identity in Research with Young People. Grad J Soc Sci. 2013. May 1;10:132–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gibson JE. Interviews and Focus Groups With Children: Methods That Match Children’s Developing Competencies. J Fam Theory Rev. 2012. Jun 1;4(2):148–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bagnoli A. Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qual Res. 2009. Nov;9(5):547–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hardon A, Posel D. Secrecy as embodied practice: beyond the confessional imperative. Cult Health Sex. 2012. Nov;14(sup1):S1–13. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2012.726376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.O’Connell R. The use of visual methods with children in a mixed methods study of family food practices. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2013;16(1):31–46. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mary C Smith Fawzi

7 Sep 2020

PONE-D-19-34742

FEMALE ADOLESCENTS LIVING WITH HIV TELLING THEIR STORY THROUGH ‘MY STORY’ BOOK IN MALAWI: A VISUAL METHODOLOGY INNOVATION

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mwalabu:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by October 31, 2020. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

In your resubmission, ensure that the document is free from any typos or grammatical errors and check to ensure consistency of the style throughout the document, particularly as it relates to PLOS One requirements.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mary C Smith Fawzi, ScD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that Figures [1,3,4,5,6,7,8] includes an image of a [patient / participant / in the study]. 

As per the PLOS ONE policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research) on papers that include identifying, or potentially identifying, information, the individual(s) or parent(s)/guardian(s) must be informed of the terms of the PLOS open-access (CC-BY) license and provide specific permission for publication of these details under the terms of this license. Please download the Consent Form for Publication in a PLOS Journal (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=8ce6/plos-consent-form-english.pdf). The signed consent form should not be submitted with the manuscript, but should be securely filed in the individual's case notes. Please amend the methods section and ethics statement of the manuscript to explicitly state that the patient/participant has provided consent for publication: “The individual in this manuscript has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details”.

If you are unable to obtain consent from the subject of the photograph, you will need to remove the figure and any other textual identifying information or case descriptions for this individual.

3. Please amend either the title on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the title in the manuscript so that they are identical.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting area. However, the readability of the manuscript is obstructed by counteracting or inconsistent information, unstructured presented methodology and lack of succinctness in the presentation of information. The introduction needs heightening to clearly establish the problem statement. At the same time, the discussion should fall in line with the objective of the study.

Abstract

• Background information in this section should be revised to match that in the body’s introduction. This section is informing about the RSH challenges adolescents to encounter while the main document’s introduction is discussing communication and the method of data collection -my storybook

• Under the findings section, were these themes a representation of data from all sources?

Introduction

• In general, the introduction needs to be tuned to strongly establish the problem statement to support the objective. The authors should consider highlighting the essentialness of trying/testing ‘my story’ book data collection method on this vulnerable population.

• Also considering that this is a relatively novel method of data collection, readers (I am) would be interested to learn more about it, as it has been briefly introduced. What is it? What is already known? Who is it appropriate for? How is it used? Is it better than other methods? Has it been used before…..where and on who? Etc.

• A little background on adolescent girls with HIV in Malawi would also add value

Methods

This section needs reconstruction and rearrangement of information to improve readability and cohesion. There is a lot of areas in the methods section that have been presented in a backward forward manner or repetitions. Could the authors revise and summarise the information in this section to come up with a reasonably succinct and -still- informative section? I commend you to read articles published by Plose one for guidance.

Recruitment and sampling

• This section has information beyond recruitment and sampling only, I would suggest removing the title or include subsections, which can also help with the organisation of the information.

• It is not clear why caregivers and service providers were recruited in a study that aimed at exploring how a ‘my story’ book approach was developed and used as the basis for visual depictions and in-depth interviews with a group of female adolescents living with HIV’. Again, these carers shared experienced on care provision, which is contrary to the objective of the study……... Could the authors justify or rectify this, please

• How many multidisciplinary centres were samples drawn from? And where were they located- providing the name of the town (s) would be helpful

• The minimum duration of clinic attendance is stated as 6 months and participants unaware of their statuses were excluded. How did the authors balance these, considering that young people can attend a clinic for years, only to learn their status the very day for recruitment?

• On inclusion criteria, could the authors clarify what unwell and too sick meant in their research experience? Also, could they elaborate on how this was redefined throughout the study duration since participants kept these booklets at home for two months

• The second paragraph under the recruitment section is not related to the context. This information is better suited in the introduction section. At the same time, the study is aiming at enhancing data collection method because adolescents are usually shy/uncomfortable with the extant commonly used approaches to data collection. This paragraph is discussing sexual risk behaviours and SRH needs, which is good, but it has to be rephrased be relatable to the study content in the introduction and also to strengthening the problem statement. i.e. linking the identified needs/challenges to background, research and innovative data collection methods. The last sentence is highlighting biasness/inequality would the authors consider removing it?

• It is stated that ‘all 15 to 19 year old female adolescents who met the selection criteria were invited to participate’ on page 3, and on page 5 they state that ‘out of 20 who met the inclusion criteria…..’ Could the authors confirm that 20 represent the overall numbers of those who met inclusion criteria in all centres. Also, why did the recruitment begin from 16 years of age than the planned age of 15?

• Page 5: information beginning from ‘Out of the 14 participants, ten were from urban settings and four from rural locations should move to the results section.

o Were strategies to diversify sample used when recruiting these participants? Please include a statement to support the recruitment of more urban than rural participants and, less young youths ie 18 and 19-year-old?

• Please clarify why ethical approval was sought from a UK based ethics committee for a study done in Malawi.

• Ethics information under methods should be briefly stated as a better explanation is given at the end of the document

• Who conducted the interviews? How were the booklets returned? Was there an interview guide?

• No information is given on interviews of parents and guardians.

• Page 6 paragraph one stated that evidence-informed the choice of images, please include the themes that directed the choice……what message did the selected pictures carry

• Page 6 last paragraph, first two sentences starting with ‘The images were used as a catalyst’ should blend with paragraph 3 which is starting with ‘In this study, the adolescents were invited to put stickers on images’…….before proceeding to interviews

• Examples of stickers and generated information on paged 7 and 8 should be summarised please, or move some information to findings section

• Page 8 last paragraph, most information is a repeat of what has already been stated earlier

• In data coding section, it should come out clearly who was the researcher and the research supervisors…..Would use the initial of the authors. Include their credentials/research experience to/and justify their qualitative research abilities

• The researchers do indicate that ‘Codes, sub-themes, and themes were identified from individual accounts within the case then conclusions were dawn’ but it is unclear how this was done. Please provide a clearer explanation of steps taken to analyse data

• How was the data from storybook triangulated with that from in-depth interviews

• Was data saturation considered?

• Some elements of rigor have been highlighted under data analysis, which is good. Would this be made clearer to elaborated what components of trustworthiness were achieved by what action? This could come on a separate subsection.

• On table 2 , two last themes appear to discuss similar content and might as well be merged. Are these themes from interviews? If yes, please include in the caption

• Was there some translation involved, how was this carried out? By who? What was translated?

• Please use a COREQ reporting checklist for your methods

Findings

• The authors have exhibited their identified themes in table 2 that are not discussed in the findings section. Also, two sets of themes are presented, which is pretty confusing. Please explain the role of these themes in this study by justifying why Creating meanings, Confirmatory and complementary evidence and Power relations in inter-generational research are discussed instead.

• Contradicting statement on Page 13 ‘Among our key research questions was the issue of status disclosure’,

Discussion

The discussion section should be revised to analyse matters relatable to the objective of the study. The why, the how and the so what/what next of this innovative process of data collection are lacking. How were conclusions for the feasibility of my storybook data collection procedures proved ‘acceptable’ through this study? This needs to be established in the discussion section.

• The objective of this study as highlighted in the introduction section is different from ‘In seeking to examine female adolescents’ sexual experiences and needs we explored how female adolescents engage with sexual and reproductive health services and whether the HIV services meet the varying needs of this group as they grow into adulthood’

• Paragraph 2 is a stand-alone paragraph. It is not linked to my story book

• Only discuss findings that are presented in the results section ie findings from caregiver are not included in the findings section

Limitations

Omit the study limitation section/ merge relatable limitations only

Also revise and include limitations that are associated with conducting a qualitative study and interpreting the data thereof.

Consider tackling on disparities of your sample characteristic while aligning with the recommendation to use this approach to counsel (youth?) on one on one basis

Conclusion

Could the conclusion be shortened and without references, please?

Reviewer #2: This is a timely manuscript that addresses innovative, youth-friendly approaches with adolescents and openly discusses their complexities and sexuality. I have made the following observations and comments:

1. There are repetitions in manuscript which can be catered for if there is a stand-alone paragraph on 'what' and 'how' the innovative visual qualitative approach, the 'my story' book has been used at global, regional levels and particularly Malawi. This will fit best as part of the background and in the objectives

a. The paragraph or two may be put in the background, before the methods section

2. Please confirm the ages of the participants. The abstract says 16-19 years, while the methods section refers to 15-19 years.

3. The authors should confirm demographic information for caregivers and service providers.

a. It is also not clear how these were sampled and recruited.

4. The authors might need to consider to move the paragraph on the rationale of the study to the background section to situate the gap, objectives etc.

5. There is a need for a stand-alone paragraph about authors talking about their positionality. There is a need to acknowledge the power-related issues that come with the role of older woman/nurse/midwife working with adolescents living with HIV.

6. Please specify what 'other means of survival' entails.

7. There is a need for the authors to dedicate a paragraph on recruitment of adolescents, their caregivers, health workers and the advisory committee, 2) data collection processes using 'my story' book should be laid out, i.e. using images, stickers, and completion of 'my storybook'; including the use of in-depth interviews, the key examples of questions presented to adolescents/

a. The authors may consider presenting their research questions rather than figure 1 and 2 as they tend to read more like results.

8. Please provide the names of districts, 'multi-disciplinary centres', health facilities providing HIV care

9. Please specify the free websites or public domains that were accessed and their URL for the images presented in the manuscript

a. Specify if the authors' used researcher generated images or internet-based.?

10. Include the paragraph on the advisory committee under data analysis

11. There is a need for the authors to reduce the repetitions on the importance of using the 'my story' book approach'. It will help to make it succinct and coherent

12. There are a few grammatical errors in the results section, discussion sections

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Blessings N. Kaunda-Khangamwa

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Comments for Manuscripts.docx

Decision Letter 1

Mary C Smith Fawzi

26 Nov 2020

PONE-D-19-34742R1

FEMALE ADOLESCENTS LIVING WITH HIV TELLING THEIR STORY THROUGH ‘MY STORY’ BOOK IN MALAWI: A VISUAL METHODOLOGY INNOVATION

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mwalabu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

As the academic editor for your manuscript, I have some additional changes that you need to make before the manuscript can be considered for publication. Please refer to my list of changes below and resubmit your manuscript in addition to a letter that indicates how you addressed each of these points.

Please submit your revised manuscript by December 18, 2020. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the revised version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. These track changes should be new tracks on the clean copy that you created for your resubmission.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mary C Smith Fawzi, ScD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Title page:

-For the listing of authors remove the period after Malawi (in two places)

-For the correspondence section state: “… is a University Lecturer, Dean of Faculty of Nursing Studies at Kamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, a consultant, and an expert in Adolescent Health, Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH), Gender Issues, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) and conducts research with young people based in Malawi.”

Abstract page:

-Replace the word ‘Background’ with ‘Introduction’.

-Last sentence of introduction: remove words ‘gain voice’.

-First sentence of methods: replace ‘living with HIV share’ with ‘living with HIV to share’.

-Second sentence of methods: replace ‘researcher appreciate’ with ‘researcher to appreciate’.

-Last sentence of conclusion: replace ‘one-to-one’ with ‘one-on-one’.

Background:

-Instead of using ‘Background’ refer to this section as the ‘Introduction’.

-First paragraph: spell out ‘SRH’ the first time that you use it.

-Third sentence of first paragraph: Break down into 2 sentences since this is a long sentence.

-Middle of first paragraph: replace ‘grow to adulthood’ with ‘transition to adulthood’.

-End of first paragraph: replace ‘articulate the realities of lives including’ with ‘in articulating the realities of their lives, including’.

-Second sentence of second paragraph: replace ‘that becomes difficult to be completely bridged.’ With ‘and it can become difficult to bridge this gap.’

-Middle of second paragraph: replace ‘mature female researcher’ with ‘adult female researcher’.

-Middle of second paragraph: replace ‘perceive that what they’ with ‘ensure that what they’.

-Middle of second paragraph: replace ‘influence policy’ with ‘as well as influence policy’.

-Middle of third paragraph: replaces ‘However, my story’ book’ with ‘However, ‘my story’ book’.

-First sentence of fourth paragraph: replace ‘formed interview’ with ‘formed the interview’.

-Final paragraph of Introduction: replace ‘ensuring the researcher’ with ‘ensuring that the researcher’

-Very end of final paragraph of the introduction: revised to ensure that reader is absolutely clear that this paper is about the ‘my story’ book methodology and not about the content of the interviews. You can do this by starting the last sentence of the introduction to say: ‘The goal of this paper is to…’

Methods:

-Change title of this section to ‘Materials and Methods’.

-Remove any mention of the names of clinical sites to protect confidentiality. You should refer to the size of the patient population, scope of services (e.g. only pediatrics? Only HIV?). Refer to urban versus rural sites (e.g. 2 urban and 1 rural site).

-Under ‘recruitment and sampling’: replace ‘imposed to reduce any perceived additional’ to ‘implemented to reduce any additional’.

-Under ‘recruitment and sampling’: replace ‘Out of the 20 adolescents, who’ with ‘Out of the 20 adolescents who’.

-Under ‘recruitment and sampling’ specify out of the 14 the number who are from rural versus urban areas.

-For consent indicate that everyone 18 and above provided written informed consent (no need to include verbal). For those under 18 indicate that the parent or legal guardian provided consent and the adolescent study participant provided assent (in this order).

-Under ‘recruitment and sampling’: remove “(as outlined in PLOS consent form)”.

-Under ‘recruitment and sampling’ (last paragraph of this section: replace ‘they operate in’ with ‘they operate’.

-Last paragraph, recruitment and sampling: rephrase where it states ‘mature lady’ and include term adult. This last section should be rephrased as follows: ‘Based on her own experience as an adult female and mother, the researcher felt that older adolescents had a wider experience than younger adolescents, consistent with existing literature [provide at least 3 references]. Therefore, the researcher decided to include older participants, particularly ages 15-19 based on the age range she felt the young women could have broader experiences and be open to discuss issues like sexual behaviours.’

-Under ‘data collection using ‘my story’ book’: replace ‘formed ‘sentence’ with ‘formed the ‘sentence’.

-Under ‘data collection using ‘my story’ book’: It is unclear to the reader what sections of the story book are included as part of an interview with the researcher and what part they fill in by themselves (if that occurs at all)?

-Under ‘data collection using ‘my story’ book’: Where it states the majority of adolescents filled all sections of the story book, indicate the actual number.

-Under ‘data collection using ‘my story’ book’: Is there any data that is not interview data (e.g. the participant just ‘filled it out’?). If yes, please indicate how this data was included, e.g. was it typed into files to be included in the qualitative analysis?

Under ‘data collection using ‘my story’ book’, last paragraph: replace ‘interviewing process’ with ‘interview process’.

-Data analysis section: should be limited to 3-4 paragraphs maximum (do not include bullet points in this section).

-Data analysis, first paragraph: replace ‘researchers view’ with ‘researchers to view’.

-Data analysis: remove Table 1 and just state that the results related to the content are published elsewhere (and state reference) or that they are forthcoming (if not yet published).

-For methods: make it clear to reader how data were collected for caregivers and health care providers. For example, if there are in-depth interview guides state that and there is audio-recording, etc., provide this detail, and so forth.

Results:

-First sentence of first paragraph: replace ‘Through sentence’ with ‘Through the sentence’.

-Under ‘creating meanings’: it is not clear if the loss of parental affection is related to death of a parent?  Try to make this more clear.

-Under ‘creating meanings’: replace ‘were viewed as competent’ with ‘were competent’.

-Under ‘creating meanings’: for the quote that says ‘I got connected to him’ remove the extra space.

-Under ‘creating meanings’: for paragraph starting with the word ‘Similarly’, remove the space before this word.

-Under ‘creating meanings’: replace ‘In contrary, majority’ with ‘In contrast, the majority’.

Discussion:

-paragraph before limitations: replace ‘images, how did the images impacted on the range and depth of data collected overall, helped’ with ‘images, and how the images impacted the range and depth of data collected overall, which helped’.

Limitations:

-Remove this title and just start this paragraph with: ‘There are a number of limitations in the current study’.

-Remove ‘(taking into account their shorter attention spans)’.

-Refer to possible implications of not including participants who were too sick or unwell (e.g. implications for empowerment?)

-Refer to possible implications of only including adolescents in which a caregiver and health care provider could also be recruited.

Overall:

-References in the text are not in Vancouver format. Instead of XX et al., 2019, you should indicate the number in brackets, e.g. [5].

-References at end should all be consistent and in Vancouver format and in one size font.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0257126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257126.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


23 Mar 2021

Figure files have been uploaded to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/.

Attachment

Submitted filename: RESPONSES TO ACADEMIC EDITORS SUGGESTIONS MADE ON 261120.docx

Decision Letter 2

Avanti Dey

7 Jun 2021

PONE-D-19-34742R2

FEMALE ADOLESCENTS LIVING WITH HIV TELLING THEIR STORY THROUGH ‘MY STORY’ BOOK IN MALAWI: A VISUAL METHODOLOGY INNOVATION

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mwalabu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript has been further evaluated by two reviewers, and their comments are available below.

The reviewers have raised a number of minor concerns regarding the manuscript’s clarity and detail. They specifically request changes to improve organization and more well-defined terminology, in addition to providing more supporting information in the Introduction.

Could you please carefully revise the manuscript to address all comments raised?

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 19 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Avanti Dey, PhD

Staff Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have made a lot of helpful revisions and much improvement is seen in the manuscript as a result. There remain, however, some issues with the methods and the results sections that need rectifying. Lastly, the length of the manuscript can be reduced by thorough editing, which can also enhance the readability and cohesion in some areas.

1. Ethics statement

a. I can see that assents for adolescents under 18 were obtained. I am wondering if parental informed consent (not permission) was not obtained for the younger ones.

2. Introduction

a. Please include the year in the second sentence.

b. Please specify the type of support for adolescents in HIV programs. This should also link to the succeeding sentence for cohesion i.e. who benefits from these services as far as age is concerned (since you are talking about transition)? Is there any evidence that highlight the current status of issues surrounding transitioning into adult care? Consider the articles from Malawi that discuss health services eg content in number 2 and 4 of your bibliography and this article- “Uptake of health services by youth living with HIV: a focused ethnography”.

c. Consider re-organising sentences in the first paragraph to support the main topic, which I suppose is the epidemiology of HIV and SRH. For instance, the sentence “Yet, young people are frequently reported to be reluctant to discuss sexual matters….” does not seem to link well with the rest in this paragraph. Likewise, the sentence on lack of knowledge on experience is not supporting the SRH needs as stated in the former sentence. Ultimately, the content does not strongly highlight the need for an innovative data collection tool. I recommend a separate paragraph that can discuss challenges encountered while accessing/providing SRH including communication hierarchies and barriers to strengthen the problem statement (this was also highlighted in the first review). This should also provide a better transition into the next paragraph, which is discussing communication techniques.

3. Considering there are 4 authors, pay attention to how you are using ‘the researcher’ throughout the document- maybe lead author?

4. Consider moving paragraph 3, 4, 5, 6; which are more of procedures than an introduction, into the methods section.

5. How many experts were consulted?

Methods

6. Consider looking into the information provided under on Ethics statement and Ethics approval and consent to participate.

a. Was parental consent sought for adolescents below 18 years of age? Please clarify.

7. Under recruitment and sampling:

a. Consider substituting the second sentence with a statement on how and where the service providers were recruited from.

b. On inclusion criteria: did literacy matter in this study?

c. Consider merging the first part of paragraph 1 with paragraph 2 (discussing recruitment), and inclusion criteria should come in a separate paragraph,- for cohesion

d. Consider moving findings in paragraph 3 and 4 into the results section e.g. Six reported living with their biological parent(s) (father/mother), three were married e.t.c.

e. I feel working as a nurse/midwife or affiliation with an HIV management centre does not affect the relationship with both genders- please specify the meaning here. This paragraph can also be summarised and shortened.

f. In general, there is a lot of information that is not suitable for this section. Consider relocating such information. This section is also long, it can be reduced to 2 paragraphs at most.

g. The authors should consider highlighting reasons why health workers and parents were included in a study that was examining data collection methods on youth- you have talked about triangulation later in the document, maybe this should come earlier?

8. Data collection

a. Please clarify which transcript was audited (the original or the translated)?

b. How was translation bias managed considering only one person was involved in the process?

c. This fact is repeated ‘The researcher transcribed all the recorded interviews verbatim soon after each interview.”

9. Data analysis

a. The authors have mentioned that codes, subthemes and themes were identified but the procedures undertaken to analyze data are not clearly coming out for reproducibility. Could the authors make this section clearer? (This was also recommended in the previous review).

b. How was the data handled considering it came from different sources? Where/when did the merging/triangulation of findings occur? (This was also highlighted in the previous review)

10. Results

a. The second paragraph is not clear, consider rephrasing.

b. Please maintain consistency with the wording in the themes

c. The theme confirmatory and complementary is not quite relatable to the content, which is mostly on disclosure of HIV status and associated prejudice. It this the confirmation of adolescents' perspectives of disclosure of HIV with their caregiver’s views? If this is the case, I recommend renaming the theme since all other themes have confirmatory information from multiple sources.

d. ‘Among our key research questions was the issue of status disclosure particularly’ contradicts the aim of the study. Did you mean interview questions? (this was also queried in the last review)

e. Consider moving the last sentence of theme two to the discussion section

f. Is it ‘power relations in inter-generational research’ or ‘enabling intergenerational research?’

g. Similarly, the first two sentences under the last theme are more suitable in the discussion section information of disclosure from caregiver

h. Again, the title for theme three (research) does not relate to the content (perceived disagreement). Consider renaming the theme. Please add quotes from caregivers and health workers to support the claim of inter-generational dissonance.

11. Discussion

a. Please cite the first sentence

b. Please avoid repeating phrases or sentences e.g. it can be methodologically difficult for an adult researcher to find techniques to listen to the young people’s voices in research

c. The discussion section is much improved and reads well.

Reviewer #2: I would like to commend the authors for thoroughly revising the paper. However, the paper cannot be accepted for publication in the current form. There are minor changes to be considered and a few areas that need to be strengthened for coherence.

1. There are a few paragraphs where the authors repeat their ideas.

a. Pages 9 and 19 when the authors refer to ‘safe places’.

b. Pages 9 and 10 as they talk about ‘keeping the thematic log.’

2. The paragraphs in the introduction need to be strengthened.

I appreciate the arguments from Kellett, Chambers and the appropriateness of using the ‘my story book’.

a. There is a need to know more about the concept of ‘my story book’ or the ideas of ‘memory book’.

b. How did the ‘book’ work in the past? How they have been used global, sub-Saharan Africa and Malawi are still missing.

c. ‘How?; When? and where? These concepts have been used, will strengthen the gap that Teachman and colleagues and Wills and colleagues presented.

d. As it is, the paragraphs from pages 4-7.

i. The concept of my story books…

ii. The main themes of my story books…

iii. The discussion held with the researcher…

The above paragraphs leave the reader hanging and need real-life supporting evidence from the region or elsewhere. In addition, they continue to read like a paragraph that is part of the methodology section rather than the introduction. We need a solid and convincing introduction section.

3. The methodology is still too long and it shares some results too.

a. On page 7, the authors refer to 14 adolescents who completed the story book.

b. The researchers/author’s positionality should be reflected as part of data collection rather than recruitment and sampling.

4. The results section.

a. The first paragraph can be dedicated to demographic information and the emerging themes or contribution to knowledge.

b. Rather than reflecting on what the paper highlights, please rephrase and talk about key themes.

c. The case of Tawina may follow Ziliwe or Zaiwa’s narratives to maintain coherence.

5. Discussion section

a. Please include tangible evidence from the region (sub-Saharan Africa) on how using memory books/my story book or ‘visual research methods’ are better methods.

b. The comparative discussion should not be between quantitative vs qualitative methods but participatory or visual methodologies.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Maggie Zgambo

Reviewer #2: Yes: Blessings N. Kaunda-Khangamwa

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: MWalabu 2.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review comments 2.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0257126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257126.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


22 Jul 2021

The reviewers suggestions have been implemented in the manuscript and were very helpful in regard to improvement of the manuscript

Attachment

Submitted filename: RESPONSES TO REVIEWER 2 s COMMENTS 190721.docx

Decision Letter 3

Tanya Doherty

25 Aug 2021

FEMALE ADOLESCENTS LIVING WITH HIV TELLING THEIR STORY THROUGH ‘MY STORY’ BOOK IN MALAWI: A VISUAL METHODOLOGY INNOVATION

PONE-D-19-34742R3

Dear Dr. Mwalabu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tanya Doherty, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Please address the final comments from one reviewer in terms of amendments to your description of recruitment, data coding and analysis.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Could the authors edit information on recruitment - page 6 as 14 participants were recruited ---- “Through purposive sampling, eight adolescents aged 15-19 were recruited from each HIV management centre, and four from the rural facility (a total of 20)”

Could information on data coding and analysis be rearranged i.e. relocating coding information in paragraph starting with trustworthiness to the paragraph on top which is discussing coding as well?

Check references.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed most of the issues raised, responded with richer examples across the countries. The paper is ready for editing.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Maggie Zgambo

Reviewer #2: Yes: Blessings N. Kaunda-Khangamwa

Acceptance letter

Tanya Doherty

7 Oct 2021

PONE-D-19-34742R3

FEMALE ADOLESCENTS LIVING WITH HIV TELLING THEIR STORY THROUGH ‘MY STORY’ BOOK IN MALAWI: A VISUAL METHODOLOGY INNOVATION

Dear Dr. Mwalabu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Tanya Doherty

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Dataset

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Comments for Manuscripts.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: RESPONSES TO REVIEWER 2 COMMENTS.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: RESPONSES TO ACADEMIC EDITORS SUGGESTIONS MADE ON 261120.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: MWalabu 2.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review comments 2.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: RESPONSES TO REVIEWER 2 s COMMENTS 190721.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES