Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2021 Sep 22;9(2):e00453-21. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00453-21

Epidemiology of Candidemia in Children over 7 Years in a Medical Center in Turkey

Dilek Yılmaz-Ciftdoğan a,b, Ahu Kara-Aksay b,, Gülcan Erbaş c, Ümit Başak Sarkış c, Eda Karadağ-Oncel b, Ayşe Berna Anıl d, Maşallah Baran e, Halil Er f, Nisel Yılmaz f
Editor: Matthew Zack Andersong
PMCID: PMC8519503  PMID: 34550003

ABSTRACT

The aims of the study were to describe Candida species in children with candidemia, to determine the changing epidemiology of candidemia over time in our tertiary care hospital, and to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with candidemia caused by parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis Candida spp. From 2012 to 2018, we identified a total of 126 cases of candidemia. The most commonly isolated Candida sp. was C. parapsilosis (n = 71, 56.3%), followed by C. albicans (n = 34, 26.9%). A total of 21 candidemia episodes (16.6%) were caused by other Candida species. Patients were divided into two groups (parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis) to identify any potential differences between the groups in terms of risk factors, mortality, and antifungal resistance. The median age of the patients, the median durations of the hospital and pediatric intensive care unit stay, receipt of immunosuppressive therapy within 2 weeks of developing candidemia, the rate of using total parenteral nutrition, need for mechanical ventilation, and receipt of carbapenems were statistically significantly higher in the parapsilosis group than in the nonparapsilosis group (P = 0.020, P = 0.001, P = 0.011, P = 0.036, P = 0.002, P = 0.038, and P = 0.004, respectively). The overall 30-day mortality rates (4.2% versus 3.6%) and resistance to fluconazole (33.8% versus 32.7%) were similar between the groups (P = 0.790 and P = 0.860, respectively). The distribution of Candida strains isolated in this study was consistent with the global trend, with C. parapsilosis being the most commonly identified species. Determining local epidemiologic data at regular intervals in candidemia cases is important in terms of determining both the changing epidemiology and empirical antifungal agents.

IMPORTANCE In our study, the changing epidemiology of Candida species in candidemia in children was evaluated. The dominance of Candida parapsilosis species in the changing epidemiology was remarkable. We found that fluconazole resistance was high in both parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis groups. Updating local epidemiologic data at certain intervals in candidemia cases is important in determining both the changing epidemiology and empirical antifungal agents.

KEYWORDS: candidemia, epidemiology, fluconazole resistance, nonparapsilosis, parapsilosis

INTRODUCTION

Invasive candidiasis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized pediatric patients (1). Candida parapsilosis is second only to Candida albicans as a cause of systemic candidiasis. In recent years, the increase in the rate of C. parapsilosis candidemia is remarkable because of many risk factors, such as extreme prematurity, neutropenia or treatment with corticosteroids, or cytotoxic chemotherapy (2). Most patients with C. parapsilosis bloodstream infections (BSIs) are reported to have an underlying disease that requires the use of indwelling catheters and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (3). Although the intestinal tract is shown as the main source of candidemia, it has recently emerged that skin colonization is also important in C. parapsilosis fungemia (4, 5). Accordingly, hand hygiene has an important role in preventing outbreaks of C. parapsilosis infections (6).

Different Candida species are associated with various degrees of tissue tropism, invasive potential, virulence, and antifungal susceptibility, which underlines the importance of center-specific surveillance studies for a better understanding of the optimal treatment and risk factors facilitating candidemia. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to describe Candida species in children with candidemia and to determine the changing epidemiology of candidemia over time in our tertiary care hospital. In addition, it aimed to examine the clinical characteristics and risk factors of patients with candidemia, focusing on parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis Candida spp.

RESULTS

During the 7-year study period, we identified a total of 126 cases of candidemia. The incidence of candidemia was 3.6 per 1,000 pediatric patient admissions. The incidence of candidemia was 8.5 per 1,000 pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions. Specifically, the incidence rates of candidemia due to C. parapsilosis were 2.02 per 1,000 pediatric patient admissions and 4.8 per 1,000 PICU admissions. The distribution of C. parapsilosis and all other Candida species among patients with candidemia from 2012 to 2018 is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Distribution of isolated Candida strains according to parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis group

Groups or species Data from:
Total
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Parapsilosis group [n (%)] 4 (33.3) 8 (53.3) 15 (60) 13 (54.2) 13 (68.4) 9 (50) 9 (69.2) 71 (56.3)
Nonparapsilosis group [n (%)] 8 (66.7) 7 (46.7) 10 (40) 11 (45.8) 6 (31.6) 9 (50) 4 (30.8) 55 (43.7)
 C. albicans 5 (41.7) 6 (40) 6 (24) 6 (25) 4 (21.2) 5 (27.8) 2 (15.4) 34 (26.9)
 C. tropicalis 1 (8.3) 0 2 (8) 2 (8.2) 1 (5.7) 1 (5.5) 2 (15.4) 9 (7.1)
 C. glabrata 1 (8.3) 1 (6.7) 1 (4) 1 (4.2) 1 (5.7) 2 (11.1) 0 7 (5.6)
 C. lusitaniae 1 (8.3) 0 1 (4) 0 0 0 0 2 (1.6)
 C. dubliniensis 0 0 0 1 (4.2) 0 0 0 1 (0.8)
 C. guilliermondii 0 0 0 0 0 1 (5.5) 0 1 (0.8)
 C. krusei 0 0 0 1 (4.2) 0 0 0 1 (0.8)
Total [n (%)] 12 (100) 15 (100) 25 (100) 24 (100) 19 (100) 18 (100) 13 (100) 126 (100)

The most commonly isolated Candida sp. was C. parapsilosis (n = 71, 56.3%), followed by C. albicans (n = 34, 26.9%). A total of 21 candidemia episodes (16.6%) were caused by other Candida species (7.1% C. tropicalis, 5.6% C. glabrata, 1.6% C. lusitaniae, 0.8% C. krusei, 0.8% C. dubliniensis, and 0.8% C. guilliermondii) (Table 1).

Risk factors for candidemia, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, clinical procedures, and medications, between the parapsilosis group and nonparapsilosis group are shown in Table 2. The median age of the patients was higher in the parapsilosis group than in the nonparapsilosis group (P = 0.02). The median durations of the hospital and PICU stay were higher in parapsilosis group than in the nonparapsilosis group (P = 0.001, P = 0.011, respectively). The parapsilosis group had higher rates of receipt of immunosuppressive therapy within 2 weeks prior to candidemia than the nonparapsilosis group (P = 0.036). Also, higher rates of use of TPN (P = 0.002), need for mechanical ventilation support (P = 0.038), and receipt of carbapenems (0.004) were detected in the parapsilosis group than in the nonparapsilosis group. There were no statistically significant differences detected between the two groups for the rates of fluconazole use within 2 months prior to candidemia (P = 0.76).

TABLE 2.

Risk factors for the parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis groups

Factor Parapsilosis group (n = 71) [n (%)] Nonparapsilosis group (n = 55) [n (%)] P value
Age (mo)a 23 (3–192) 12 (4–186) 0.020 c
Sex (male/female) 40/31 28/27 0.540
Length of hospital staya 52 (9–255) 21 (7–147) 0.001 c
Length of PICU staya 15 (3–235) 3 (2–201) 0.011 c
Comorbidities and clinical proceduresb
Malignancy 1 (1.4) 2 (3.6) 0.822
Prior solid organ transplantation 10 (14.1) 5 (9.1) 0.561
Prior hematopoetic stem cell transplantation 1 (1.4) 1 (1.8) 0.850
Receipt of immunosuppressive therapy within 2 wks prior to candidemia 20 (28.2) 7 (12.7) 0.036 c
Surgery of the gastrointestinal tract within 2 wks prior to candidemia 21 (29.6) 14 (25.5) 0.750
Neutropenia 2 (2.8) 1 (1.8) 0.715
Need for mechanical ventilation support 35 (49.3) 17 (30.9) 0.038 c
Renal failure 1 (1.4) 1 (1.8) 0.850
Peritoneal dialysis 3 (4.2) 2 (3.6) 0.860
Hemodialysis 2 (2.8) 1 (1.8) 0.715
Use of total parenteral nutrition 49 (69) 22 (40) 0.002 c
Presence of central venous catheter 53 (74.6) 36 (65.5) 0.350
Presence of urinary catheter 34 (47.9) 32 (58.2) 0.330
Presence of temporary nasogastric tube 23 (32.9) 19 (34.5) 0.840
Presence of permanent nasogastric tube 5 (7) 4 (7.3) 0.960
Antibiotic use within 2 wks prior to candidemia
  Carbapenemes 60 (84.5) 33 (60) 0.004 c
  Expanded spectrum cephalosporins 40 (57.1) 32 (58.1) 0.820
  Aminoglycosides 39 (54.9) 30 (54.5) 0.780
  Vancomycin 27 (38.02) 23 (41.8) 0.850
  Teicoplanin 33 (47.1) 18 (32.7) 0.140
Fluconazole use within 2 mo prior to candidemiab 9 (12.7) 6 (10.9) 0.760
Overall 30-day mortality rateb 3 (4.22) 2 (3.63) 0.860
a

Values were given as median (min-max).

b

Values were given as a percentage.

c

The P value <0.05 is shown in bold.

The antifungal susceptibility of Candida species in both groups is shown in Table 3. A total of 24 isolated C. parapsilosis strains (33.8%) were resistant to fluconazole, and 18 of the other isolated Candida species strains (32.7%) were resistant to fluconazole. In both groups, intermediate resistance was detected in 2 isolated Candida strains. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of resistance and intermediate resistance to fluconazole between the two groups (P = 0.790 and P = 0.890, respectively). Itraconazole resistance was higher among the nonparapsilosis group than the parapsilosis group (P = 0.001). Voriconazole resistance rates were similar between the groups (P = 0.490), while intermediate resistance rates were higher among the parapsilosis group than the nonparapsilosis group (P = 0.010). No resistance or intermediate resistance to amphotericin B was observed in the parapsilosis group. In the nonparapsilosis group, 2 isolates (C. krusei, C. guilliermondii) were found to be amphotericin B resistant. There were no statistically significant differences detected between the two groups for the rates of flucytosine resistance and intermediate resistance (P = 0.18 and P = 0.43, respectively).

TABLE 3.

Antifungal susceptibility testing and antifungal-resistant candida strains

Candida species Antifungal susceptibilitya of (n):
Fluconazole
Itraconazole
Voriconazole
Amphotericin B
Flucytosine
S I R S I R S I R S I R S I R
C. parapsilosis (n = 71) 45 2 24 54 15 2 52 8 11 71 0 0 71 0 0
All other Candida spp. (n = 55) 35 2 18 32 9 14 43 0 12 53 0 2 52 2 1
 C. albicans 22 1 11 21 5 8 26 0 8 34 0 0 34 0 0
 C. tropicalis 5 0 4 4 1 4 5 0 4 9 0 0 9 0 0
 C. glabrata 4 0 3 4 1 2 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0
 C. dubliniensis 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
 C. krusei 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
 C. guilliermondii 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
 C. lusitaniae 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1
Total (n = 126) 80 4 42 86 24 16 95 8 23 124 0 2 123 1 2
a

S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R. resistant.

The fluconazole resistance was determined in 4 (44.4%) patient isolates among 9 patients who had fluconazole use within 2 months prior to candidemia with C. parapsilosis compared to 2 (33.3%) patient isolates among 6 patients with other Candida species.

The overall 30-day mortality rate in candidemia episodes was 3.9% (5 out of 126 patients). The overall 30-day mortality rate for the parapsilosis group was 4.2% (3 out of 71 patients) compared to a rate of 3.6% for the nonparapsilosis group; the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.860).

Logistic regression analysis was performed for risk factors that showed a statistically significant difference between the parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis group. The receipt of immunosuppressive therapy within 2 weeks prior to candidemia was found to be associated with a 3.44-fold increase in the developing candidemia due to C. parapsilosis (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25 to 10; P = 0.018) and need for mechanical ventilation support, with a 2.56-fold increase for developing candidemia due to C. parapsilosis (95% CI, 1.16 to 5.88; P = 0.021).

DISCUSSION

Candida spp. are the third most common etiology of health care-associated BSIs (1, 3). Identification of risk factors for invasive candidiasis is especially important in the development of preventive strategies. Overall, it is known that the risk of candidemia increases as the length of stay in the hospital, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU), and invasive interventions such as the insertion of central venous catheter (CVCs) and the use of TPN increase (7, 8). In our study, in accordance with the literature, patients had a high rate of TPN (56.3%) and CVC use (70.6%) in both groups.

The distribution of Candida species shows regional differences (9). In our study, C. parapsilosis (56.3%) was the most frequently isolated species, followed by C. albicans (26.9%), C. tropicalis (7.1%), C. glabrata (5.6%), C. lusitaniae (1.6%), C. krusei (0.8%), C. dubliniensis (0.8%), and C. guilliermondii (0.8%). In a study performed on 102 children with nosocomial candidemia in our country within a 9-year period, Celebi et al. (10) reported that the three most common causes of candidemia were C. albicans (39.2%), C. parapsilosis (21.6%), and C. tropicalis (15.7%). A study conducted from 2004 to 2012 showed that C. albicans was the most commonly identified species from candidemia episodes (11). In another study performed on children with malignancy and nosocomial candidemia in a similar region, nonalbicans candidemia was determined in 81.4% of 135 candidemia episodes during the study period (12). In a recent study from Turkey (13), the distribution of Candida strains was consistent with our results, showing that C. parapsilosis was the most common strain in children.

C. parapsilosis was first isolated as an agent in endocarditis developing in an intravenous (i.v.) drug-dependent individual in 1940 (14). Its incidence has increased greatly in the last 30 years (15). Various factors, such as affinity for intravascular catheters and prosthetic materials, an increase of TPN use, and transmission from the colonized hands of health care workers, have been shown to cause this increase in C. parapsilosis infection (4). In a surveillance study in Barcelona, Spain, Almirante et al. (8) revealed many risk factors for C. parapsilosis BSI, including vascular catheterization, previous antibiotic use, prior immunosuppressive therapy, malignancy, transplant receipt, neutropenia, and previous colonization. In our study, prolonged stay in the hospital and PICU, receipt of carbapenems and immunosuppressive therapy within 2 weeks of developing candidemia, the need for mechanical ventilation support, and the use of TPN were greater risk factors for fungemia in the parapsilosis group than in the other group.

Independent risk factors associated with the development of candidemia due to C. parapsilosis determined through logistic regression analysis were receipt of immunosuppressive therapy within 2 weeks of developing candidemia (odds ratio [OR], 3.44; 95% CI, 1.25 to 10) and the need for mechanical ventilation support (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.16 to 5.88). As is known, among Candida species, C. parapsilosis is the second most common biofilm producer after C. albicans. Compared with C. albicans, C. parapsilosis forms less complex and thin biofilms (16). The normal gastrointestinal barrier serves an important function in preventing invasive Candida infections. The destruction of this flora in major surgery is a potential risk factor for candidiasis (16). Additionally, C. parapsilosis also grows rapidly in TPN administered to patients without oral intake, especially patients in the ICU and those with gastrointestinal system disorders (16).

The ease of formation of C. parapsilosis biofilms in the presence of high-glucose or lipid-rich media is associated with the increased incidence of C. parapsilosis-induced candidemia in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (17, 18). All these results show that patients who require medical and/or nutritional support are the most likely to develop invasive Candida infections, especially when their hospital stay is prolonged. Neonates were not included in this study because their risk factors and epidemiologic characteristics for invasive fungal infections are very different from those of older children. It has been reported in recent studies that risk factors such as low birth weight and prematurity are important for C. parapsilosis in neonates (5).

Unlike the prior-colonization-dependent vertical transition of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis transitions horizontally; therefore, C. parapsilosis is one of the most frequently isolated Candida species in ICUs (19). The ability of this pathogen to form biofilms on permanent devices and its easy transmission through colonizing the hands of health care workers has been associated with the occurrence of hospital outbreaks and high mortality rates (2022). These data show that hand hygiene is very important in the formation of C. parapsilosis infections. In our study, it was observed that C. parapsilosis infections did not cluster together, so there was no outbreak.

It is known that there is azole resistance in C. parapsilosis. In our study, during the 7-year study period, out of 71 C. parapsilosis strains, 33.8% were resistant to fluconazole. However, 18 of the other isolated Candida species (32.7%) were also resistant to fluconazole. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding fluconazole resistance rates. Itraconazole resistance was higher among the nonparapsilosis group than in the parapsilosis group. Voriconazole resistance rates were similar between the groups. Thomaz et al. (23) revealed that eight (57.1%) of 14 C. parapsilosis isolates were fluconazole-resistant. It is well known that azole resistance can develop with previous or current use of fluconazole (2427) and even with the use of systemic antibiotics (2830). All of our patients had a history of antibiotic use within 2 weeks of developing candidemia. We determined that carbapenems or expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, in particular, were used in almost all patients. However, in our study, we found that the rate of fluconazole use within 2 months of developing candidemia was lower, contrary to the literature (7, 27).

In our study, the overall 30-day mortality rate in candidemia episodes was 3.9%. Belet et al. (7) showed that 22.8% of patients died in the first 30 days. In another study, Pappas et al. (1) also revealed that C. albicans was associated with high overall mortality among children (29%). In a previous study, the overall 30-day mortality rate in candidemia episodes was 23.4% (13). Karadag-Oncel et al. (11) showed that the C. albicans-related mortality in their study was 34.1% compared with a mortality rate of 23% for C. parapsilosis. These findings differ from our results; we had a low mortality rate in both the parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis groups (4.2% versus 3.6%). We associated this significant difference in mortality rates with the fact that only 38.8% of the patients had comorbid diseases and only 2.3% were neutropenic in our study.

A study conducted in Spain showed that the mortality rate was lower in patients with C. parapsilosis than in those with C. albicans infection, as in our study (31). In another pediatric study, Kollef et al. (32) found that C. parapsilosis had the highest mortality rate of all Candida species. Overall, pediatric studies have shown that candidemia has a high mortality rate. Studies demonstrated that mortality was closely related to both the timing of treatment and resource control (3338). This means that early intervention with appropriate antifungal therapy and removal of a contaminated CVC are generally associated with better overall outcomes. Therefore, a fungal etiology should be considered in appropriate clinical settings, especially in patients with risk factors. Empirical antifungal therapy is required in these patients because early diagnosis and treatment are associated with reduced mortality.

To the best of our knowledge, ours is the largest pediatric study comparing BSIs due to C. parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis Candida species; however, it has some potential limitations. The first is that it was a single-center study, and the second is its retrospective design. Future prospective multicenter studies with larger patient numbers will further contribute to the literature.

The changing epidemiology of Candida species in candidemia in children was evaluated in our study. The dominance of C. parapsilosis species in the changing epidemiology was remarkable. We found that fluconazole resistance was high in both parapsilosis and nonparapsilosis groups. Updating local epidemiologic data at certain intervals in candidemia cases is important in determining both the changing epidemiology and empirical antifungal agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design, setting, and patients.

We conducted this retrospective cohort study at İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, a university-affiliated referral medical center. From 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2018, all the hospitalized pediatric patients (18 years of age and younger) who had diagnosed candidemia were reviewed. Neonates were not included in the study.

Demonstration of growth of Candida spp. in blood culture was defined as candidemia. Patients who had diagnosed candidemia were identified using the records of the hospital and mycology laboratory.

In patients with multiple episodes of candidemia during the study period, the first episode was evaluated in this study. During the study period, the patients who had developed candidemia due to C. parapsilosis were referred to as the “parapsilosis group,” while the patients who had developed candidemia with different Candida spp. other than C. parapsilosis were referred to as the “nonparapsilosis group.” Also, the 30-day mortality, within 30 days from the onset of candidemia, was evaluated. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital.

Data collection.

The clinical and laboratory data were collected from the medical records. The data obtained included age, sex, duration of hospitalization prior to infection, history of hospitalization in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), duration of hospitalization in the PICU, comorbid conditions, prior use of antimicrobial medications, and presence of a medical device.

Comorbid conditions included malignancy, prior solid organ transplantation, prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count of <500 mm3), renal failure, use of TPN, need for mechanical ventilation support, receipt of immunosuppressive therapy and use of antimicrobial medications within 2 weeks prior to candidemia, and receipt of abdominal surgical procedure within 2 weeks prior to candidemia. The use of antimicrobial medications within 2 weeks prior to the diagnosis of candidemia were recorded. In addition, fluconazole use within 2 months prior to candidemia was also considered. The presence of a central venous catheter (CVC), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, urinary catheter, peritoneal dialysis catheter, and hemodialysis catheter was also recorded.

Identification of Candida species and antifungal susceptibility testing.

Blood samples were taken under sterile conditions from patients with suspected candidemia. The samples sent to the microbiology laboratory were placed in BacT/Alert medium bottles and incubated in a BacT/Alert 3D system (BioMérieux, France) for 7 days. Gram staining was performed from the samples which gave a positive growth signal during incubation. Samples found as yeast at the end of the Gram staining were inoculated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and 5% sheep blood agar plates. At the end of the incubation period, the germ tube test, Tween 80 agar inoculation, CHROMagar inoculation, and identification with the API ID 32C (BioMérieux, France) were conducted on the colonies. Duplicate isolates from the same patients were excluded.

One to two colonies which grew on the plates were suspended in saline (NaCl, 0.85%), and the turbidity was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard. RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2% glucose and with the pH adjusted to 7.0 and morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer were used for susceptibility tests. Yeast suspension was evenly spread onto the surface of the medium. Petri plates were allowed to dry for 10 to 15 min before the Etest (BioMérieux, France) strips were applied. The Etest procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s directions using fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B, and anidulafungin test strips. MIC values were recorded after 24 to 48 h of incubation at 35°C. Fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, anidulafungin, and flucytosine were evaluated according to CLSI breakpoint values, while posaconazole and amphotericin B were evaluated with EUCAST breakpoint values (39, 40). The results were evaluated as ≤8 μg/ml susceptible (S), 16 to 32 μg/ml intermediate (I), and ≥64 μg/ml resistant (R) for fluconazole; ≤1 μg/ml S, 2 μg/ml I, and ≥4 μg/ml R for voriconazole; ≤0.125 μg/ml S, 0.25 to 0.5 μg/ml I, and ≥1 μg/ml R for itraconazole; ≤2 μg/ml S and ≥2 μg/ml R for anidulafungin; ≤1 μg/ml S and ≥1 R for amphotericin B; and ≤0.064 S and ≥0.064 R for posaconazole (39, 40). Routine quality control of antifungal susceptibility tests was performed with ATCC 22019 C. parapsilosis and ATCC 6258 C. krusei strains.

Statistical analysis.

Data were analyzed with SPSS software version 23.0. Continuous variables were summarized using the median and interquartile range (IQR), while categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Categorical variables were compared with the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed to identify associations between variables and risk factors for developing candidemia due to C. parapsilosis. All variables with a univariate P value of <0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariate model.

Footnotes

[This article was published on 22 September 2021 with Dilek Yılmaz-Ciftdoğan′s, Ahu Kara-Aksay′s, and Eda Karadağ-Oncel′s surnames misspelled as “Ciftdoğan,” “Aksay,” and “Oncel,” respectively, in the byline and Ahu Kara-Aksay′s affiliation letter as “a” instead of “b.” The byline was updated in the current version, posted on 29 September 2021.]

Contributor Information

Ahu Kara-Aksay, Email: ahukara01@hotmail.com.

Matthew Zack Anderson, The Ohio State University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pappas PG, Rex JH, Lee J, Hamill RJ, Larsen RA, Powderly W, Kauffman CA, Hyslop N, Mangino JE, Chapman S, Horowitz HW, Edwards JE, Dismukes WE, NIAID Mycoses Study Group . 2003. NIAID Mycoses Study Group. A prospective observational study of candidemia: epidemiology, therapy, and influences on mortality in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients. Clin Infect Dis 37:634–643. doi: 10.1086/376906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.American Academy of Pediatrics. 2018. Candidiasis, 263–269. In Kimberlin DW, Brady MT, Jackson MA, Long SS (ed), Red book: 2018 report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 31st ed. American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Asbeck EC, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. 2009. Candida parapsilosis: a review of its epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical aspects, typing and antimicrobial susceptibility. Crit Rev Microbiol 35:283–309. doi: 10.3109/10408410903213393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nucci M, Anaissie E. 2001. Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut? Clin Infect Dis 33:1959–1967. doi: 10.1086/323759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pammi M, Holland L, Butler G, Gacser A, Bliss JM. 2013. Candida parapsilosis is a significant neonatal pathogen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32:e206–e216. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182863a1c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lark TA, Slavinski SA, Morgan J, Lott T, Arthington-Skaggs BA, Brandt ME, Webb RM, Currier M, Flowers RH, Fridkin SK, Hajjeh RA. 2004. Epidemiologic and molecular characterization of an outbreak of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections in a community hospital. J Clin Microbiol 42:4468–4472. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4468-4472.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Belet N, Ciftçi E, Aysev D, Güriz H, Uysal Z, Taçyildiz N, Atasay B, Doğu F, Kendirli T, Kuloğlu Z, Ince E, Doğru U. 2011. Invasive Candida infections in children: the clinical characteristics and species distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. Turk J Pediatr 53:489–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Almirante B, Rodríguez D, Cuenca-Estrella M, Almela M, Sanchez F, Ayats J, Alonso-Tarres C, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Pahissa A, the Barcelona Candidemia Project Study Group . 2006. Epidemiology, risk factors, and prognosis of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections: case-control population-based surveillance study of patients in Barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003. J Clin Microbiol 44:1681–1685. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1681-1685.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Simon J, Sun HY, Leong HN, Barez MY, Huang PY, Talwar D, Wang JH, Mansor M, Wahjuprajitno B, Patel A, Wittayachanyapong S, Sany BSM, Lin SF, Dimopoulos G. 2013. Echinocandins in invasive candidiasis. Mycoses 56:601–609. doi: 10.1111/myc.12085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Celebi S, Hacimustafaoglu M, Ozdemir O, Ozkaya G. 2008. Nosocomial candidaemia in children: results of a 9-year study. Mycoses 51:248–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Karadag-Oncel E, Kara A, Ozsurekci Y, Arikan-Akdagli S, Cengiz AB, Ceyhan M, Gur D, Celik M, Ozkaya-Parlakay A. 2015. Candidaemia in a paediatric centre and importance of central venous catheter removal. Mycoses 58:140–148. doi: 10.1111/myc.12288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Devrim İ, Demirağ B, Yaman Y, Bayram N, Ozdemir F, Kara A, Özek G, Ayhan Y, Gülfidan G, Oymak Y, Vergin C. 2015. A 7-year study of the distribution of nosocomial candidemia in children with cancer. Turk J Pediatr 57:225–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Öncü B, Belet N, Emecen AN, Birinci A. 2019. Health care-associated invasive Candida infections in children. Med Mycol 57:929–936. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myz005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Joachim H, Polayes S. 1940. Subacute endocarditis and systemic mycosis (monilia). JAMA 115:205–208. doi: 10.1001/jama.1940.72810290001009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guinea J. 2014. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia. Clin Microbiol Infect 20 Suppl 6:5–10. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Larkin EL, Dharmaiah S, Ghannoum MA. 2018. Biofilms and beyond: expanding echinocandin utility. J Antimicrob Chemother 73(Suppl. 1):73–81. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pereira L, Silva S, Ribeiro B, Henriques M, Azeredo J. 2015. Influence of glucose concentration on the structure and quantity of biofilms formed by Candida parapsilosis. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov043. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nosek J, Holesova Z, Kosa P, Gacser A, Tomaska L. 2009. Biology and genetics of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. Curr Genet 55:497–509. doi: 10.1007/s00294-009-0268-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Waggoner-Fountain LA, Walker MW, Hollis RJ, Pfaller MA, Ferguson IIJ, Wenzel RP, Donowitz LG. 1996. Vertical and horizontal transmission of unique Candida species to premature newborns. Clin Infect Dis 22:803–808. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.5.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Singaravelu K, Gácser A, Nosanchuk JD. 2014. Genetic determinants of virulence-Candida parapsilosis. Rev Iberoam Micol 31:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2013.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, Clark TA, Pujol C, Chandra J, Hajjeh RA, Warnock DW, Soll DR, Ghannoum MA. 2004. Candida parapsilosis characterization in an outbreak setting. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1074–1081. doi: 10.3201/eid1006.030873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Welsh RM, Bentz ML, Shams A, Houston H, Lyons A, Rose LJ, Litvintseva AP. 2017. Survival, persistence, and isolation of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris on a plastic health care surface. J Clin Microbiol 55:2996–3005. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00921-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thomaz DY, de Almeida JN, Lima GME, de Oliveira Nunes M, Camargo CH, Grenfell RC, Benard G, Del Negro GMB. 2018. An azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis outbreak: clonal persistence in the intensive care unit of a Brazilian teaching hospital. Front Microbiol 9:2997. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tóth R, Nosek J, Mora-Montes HM, Gabaldon T, Bliss JM, Nosanchuk JD, Turner SA, Butler G, Vágvölgyi C, Gácser A. 2019. Candida parapsilosis: from genes to the bedside. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00111-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Whaley SG, Berkow EL, Rybak JM, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Rogers PD. 2016. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida species. Front Microbiol 7:2173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang L, Xiao M, Watts MR, Wang H, Fan X, Kong F, Xu YC. 2015. Development of fluconazole resistance in a series of Candida parapsilosis isolates from a persistent candidemia patient with prolonged antifungal therapy. BMC Infect Dis 15:340. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1086-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oxman DA, Chow JK, Frendl G, Hadley S, Hershkovitz S, Ireland P, McDermott LA, Tsai K, Marty FM, Kontoyiannis DP, Golan Y. 2010. Candidaemia associated with decreased in vitro fluconazole susceptibility: is Candida speciation predictive of the susceptibility pattern? J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1460–1465. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Almooosa Z, Ahmed GY, Omran A, AlSarheed A, Alturki A, Alaqeel A, Alshehri M, Alfawaz T, AlShahrani D. 2017. Invasive candidiasis in pediatric patients at King Fahad Medical City in Central Saudi Arabia. A 5-year retrospective study. Saudi Med J 38:1118–1124. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.11.21116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ben-Ami R, Olshtain-Pops K, Krieger M, Oren I, Bishara J, Dan M, Wiener-Well Y, Weinberger M, Zimhony O, Chowers M, Weber G, Potasman I, Chazan B, Kassis I, Shalit I, Block C, Keller N, Kontoyiannis DP, Giladi M, Israeli Candidemia Study Group . 2012. Antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for fluconazole resistant Candida bloodstream infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2518–2523. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05947-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hebert C, Villaran R, Tolentino J, Best L, Boonlayangoor S, Pitrak D, Lin M, Weber SG. 2010. Prior antimicrobial exposure and the risk for bloodstream infection with fluconazole-non-susceptible Candida strains. Scand J Infect Dis 42:506–509. doi: 10.3109/00365541003699631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rodriguez D, Almirante B, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Mensa J, Ayats J, Sanchez F, Pahissa A, the Barcelona Candidemia Project Study Group . 2010. Barcelona Candidemia Project Study Group. Predictors of candidaemia caused by non-albicans Candida species: results of a population-based surveillance in Barcelona, Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:1676–1682. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kollef M, Micek S, Hampton N, Doherty JA, Kumar A. 2012. Septic shock attributed to Candida infection: importance of empiric therapy and source control. Clin Infect Dis 54:1739–1746. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grim SA, Berger K, Teng C, Gupta S, Layden JE, Janda WM, Clark NM. 2012. Timing of susceptibility-based antifungal drug administration in patients with Candida bloodstream infection: correlation with outcomes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:707–714. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Kullberg BJ, Bow EJ, Hadley S, León C, Nucci M, Patterson TF, Perfect JR. 2011. Early treatment of candidemia in adults: a review. Med Mycol 49:113–120. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.512300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morrell M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. 2005. Delaying the empiric treatment of Candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3640–3645. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3640-3645.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, Bearden DT. 2006. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis 43:25–31. doi: 10.1086/504810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, Playford G, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Sobel JD, Pappas PG, Kullberg BJ, Mycoses Study Group . 2012. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis 54:1110–1122. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Puig-Asensio M, Peman J, Zaragoza R, Garnacho-Montero J, Martin-Mazuelos E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Almirante B, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases . 2014. Impact of therapeutic strategies on the prognosis of candidemia in the ICU. Crit Care Med 42:1423–1432. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.CLSI. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast; third informational supplement. CLSI document M27-S3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2018. Antifungal agents breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs. Version 9.0, 2018. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/AFST/Clinical_breakpoints/Antifungal_breakpoints_v_9.0_180212.pdf.

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES