Paleomagnetic measurements of chondrules indicate the presence of a substructure in the solar nebula.
Abstract
Astronomical observations and isotopic measurements of meteorites suggest that substructures are common in protoplanetary disks and may even have existed in the solar nebula. Here, we conduct paleomagnetic measurements of chondrules in CO carbonaceous chondrites to investigate the existence and nature of these disk substructures. We show that the paleomagnetism of chondrules in CO carbonaceous chondrites indicates the presence of a 101 ± 48 μT field in the solar nebula in the outer solar system (~3 to 7 AU from the Sun). The high intensity of this field relative to that inferred from inner solar system (~<3 AU) meteorites indicates a factor of ~5 to 150 mismatch in nebular accretion between the two reservoirs. This suggests substantial mass loss from the disk associated with a major disk substructure, possibly due to a magnetized disk wind.
INTRODUCTION
Observations from the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array have shown that substructures, mostly in the form of rings and gaps, are prevalent in protoplanetary disks (1). Isotopic studies of meteorites and their components have been interpreted as evidence that two isotopically distinct regions existed within ~7 astronomical units (AU) from the young Sun (see the Supplementary Materials), known as the noncarbonaceous (<3 AU) and carbonaceous reservoirs (3 to 7 AU) (2, 3), that existed during the protoplanetary disk phase of the solar system (i.e., solar nebula). It has been proposed that these two reservoirs were separated by a gap in the disk, perhaps generated by the growth of Jupiter (4) and/or a pressure local maximum in the disk (5). Alternatively, these two reservoirs may have formed because of a migrating snowline with no persistent disk gap (6). Because the evolution of protoplanetary disks is thought to depend on the coupling of the weakly ionized gas of the disk with large-scale magnetic fields (7–10), we can search for evidence of disk substructures and explore their origin by studying the paleomagnetism of meteorites that formed in each reservoir.
Previous paleomagnetic measurements of LL chondrites, derived from the noncarbonaceous reservoir, indicate the presence of a disk midplane magnetic field of 54 ± 21 μT at 2.0 ± 0.8 million years (Ma) after the formation of calcium-aluminum–rich inclusion (CAIs) (11, 12). These paleointensities, which were measured from individual chondrules that carry thermoremanent magnetization (TRM) acquired before their accretion onto the LL parent body, provide evidence for the existence of a nebular magnetic field in the noncarbonaceous reservoir. Paleomagnetic studies of CM (13), CR (14), and CV (15) chondrites indicate a field in the carbonaceous reservoir of >6 μT at ~3 Ma after CAI formation, <8 μT at ~3.7 Ma after CAI formation (10, 16), and ≥ 40 μT sometime between ~3-40 Ma after CAI formation (15, 17). However, these records have several key limitations. For instance, the records in CM and CV chondrites are postaccretional chemical remanent magnetizations acquired during parent-body alteration (13). This poses two problems: The magnetic record could have been imparted by a parent-body dynamo field rather than from the solar nebula field and the retrieved paleointensity is likely a lower limit (10). In addition, the age of the CR record is within error of the estimated lifetime of nebula (18), such that it may not constrain the strength of the nebular field during the main period of disk accretion (10). Therefore, the intensity of the nebular field in the carbonaceous reservoir is currently poorly constrained.
To obtain robust paleointensity records from the midplane of the solar nebula in the carbonaceous reservoir, we conducted paleomagnetic studies on two CO carbonaceous chondrites: Allan Hills (ALH) A77307 (type 3.03) and Dominion Range (DOM) 08006 (type 3.00) (19–23). We selected these meteorites because they experienced low peak metamorphic temperatures (200° to 300°C), minor parent-body aqueous alteration, shock pressures below 5 GPa, and minimal terrestrial weathering (weathering grades A/B and Ae, respectively) (19–23). Therefore, they are unlikely to have been magnetically overprinted following accretion onto the CO parent body, with DOM 08006 in particular being one of the least altered known meteorites (20).
Following the previous paleomagnetic study of LL chondrules, we targeted dusty olivine chondrules because they contain high-fidelity paleomagnetic recorders in the form of fine-grained (~25 to 1000 nm) kamacite (α-Fe) crystals formed before accretion onto the parent body (11, 24–27). Because chondrules cooled quickly in the protoplanetary disk environment [100° to 1000°C hour−1; (28)], they should carry a near-instantaneous TRM record of the nebular field (11, 29, 30). Al-Mg dating of CO chondrules indicate that this record was acquired 2.2 ± 0.8 Ma after CAI formation (12, 31).
We extracted six 100- to 300-μm-diameter dusty olivine chondrules from both meteorites: two from ALHA77307 (DOC1 and DOC2) and four from DOM 08006 (DOC3, DOC4, DOC5, and DOC6). Three of the DOM 08006 chondrules were split into two subsamples each (DOC3a/DOC3b, DOC5a/DOC5b, and DOC6a/DOC6b) to produce nine total subsamples from both meteorites used for paleomagnetic measurements. All chondrules and chondrule fragments were mutually oriented during extraction and paleomagnetic measurements. Given the chondrules’ weak natural remanent magnetization (NRM) (ranging from 1.3 × 10−10 down to 1.7 × 10−12 Am2 before demagnetization), we obtained magnetic measurements using the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) microscope and quantum diamond microscope (QDM) in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Paleomagnetism Laboratory (see Materials and Methods) (32).
RESULTS
Backscattered electron microscopy (BSE) images and compositional analysis using wavelength dispersive spectrometry (WDS) indicate that the chondrules contain numerous submicrometer diameter inclusions of nearly pure-Fe kamacite (see the Supplementary Materials). Furthermore, QDM imaging confirms that the magnetization-carrying capacity of the chondrules is dominated by these grains rather than by any multidomain metal grains and/or secondary ferromagnetic minerals (see the Supplementary Materials). These fine metal grains are expected to have formed during subsolidus reduction of the chondrules before their accretion on the parent body (26). On the basis of their size and composition, many of these grains are predicted to be in the single vortex size range and smaller, which has been shown to have the potential to carry paleomagnetic records over a period longer than the lifetime of the solar system (11, 33).
Our alternating field (AF) demagnetization showed that some subsamples carried a low-coercivity (LC) component blocked up to <20 mT (Fig. 1 and figs. S2 and S3). The LC component may be a viscous remanent magnetization acquired on Earth and/or a weak-field isothermal remanent magnetization acquired during sample handling. After the removal of the LC component, all subsamples were found to contain high-coercivity (HC) components blocked up to at least 50 mT (Fig. 1, figs. S2 and S3, and table S1), with two subsamples having HC components blocked up to 160 and 270 mT (Fig. 1 and fig. S2).
The high AF-stability of the HC components coupled with the pristine conditions of the meteorites suggest that the HC components are likely records of the nebular field. To further test this conclusion, we conducted unidirectionality tests and conglomerate tests (see the Supplementary Materials). Because the nebular field is expected to have been directionally homogeneous on submillimeter length scales, a nebular TRM should be unidirectional within each chondrule. Our measurements confirm this: Pairs of subsamples of three DOM 08006 chondrules have HC directions within each other’s maximum angles of deviation (Fig. 2). In addition, if the chondrules have not been remagnetized since parent body accretion (including on their parent body and after arrival on Earth), then they should collectively exhibit random magnetization directions. Our measurements of two chondrules from ALHA77307 and four chondrules from DOM 08006 (Fig. 2) confirm this: We cannot reject the hypothesis that both sets of directions are random with 95% confidence (34) (see the Supplementary Materials). In summary, the unidirectionality and conglomerate tests strongly support the conclusion that the chondrules carry robust paleomagnetic records of the solar nebula magnetic field acquired before accretion onto their parent bodies.
To determine the paleointensity of the recorded field, we compared the AF demagnetization of the NRM to that of an anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) acquired in a bias field of 200 μT and a peak AF of up to 145 mT for seven chondrules [following previous studies (35)]. Paleointensity estimates were estimated assuming a ratio of ARM to TRM of 1.87 as previously measured for dusty olivine chondrules (see Materials and Methods). The resulting mean HC paleointensity estimates from two ALHA77307 chondrules and five DOM 08006 chondrules are 30 ± 10 μT and 59 ± 31 μT, respectively. Combining the seven samples and accounting for chondrule spinning during TRM acquisition [which decreases the background nebular field intensity recorded by the chondrule by an average factor of 2 (11)], we obtained a grand mean paleointensity of the background nebular field of 101 ± 48 μT (table S2).
DISCUSSION
Together with the previous paleomagnetic study of CM chondrites (13), the magnetic record from CO chondrules strongly supports the presence of a nebular magnetic field in the carbonaceous reservoir at ~2 to 3 Ma after CAI formation. Furthermore, the data from the CO chondrules provide the first accurate constraints on the intensity of the nebular magnetic field in the carbonaceous reservoir. In particular, the CO chondrule paleointensities are >16 times higher than the lower limit measured from bulk CM chondrites, which highlights the importance of measuring TRMs to obtain robust magnetic records. The identification of magnetic fields in the noncarbonaceous and carbonaceous reservoirs suggests a widespread role for magnetically driven accretion in the early solar system.
The structures and evolution of protoplanetary disks are governed by the mechanisms that drive disk accretion, likely mediated by magnetic fields. The accretion rate scales quadratically with field strength in the disk midplane with a prefactor depending on disk microphysics (especially ionization and field orientation). For a spatially constant accretion rate, the field intensity should decay as ~R−5/4 or ~R−11/8, where R is the radial distance from the Sun, depending on whether accretion is primarily driven by the radial-toroidal (Rφ) or vertical-toroidal (zφ) components of the Maxwell stress (Fig. 3) (10). Because of the Hall effect, the predicted field intensity is a factor of up to ~10 higher if the background field threading the disk is aligned with disk rotation axis compared to the antialigned case. Given typical astronomically observed disk accretion rates of ~1 × 10−8 M⊙ year−1 (36), the measured CO paleointensity strongly favors the scenario of aligned polarity (Fig. 3), which would otherwise lead to an unreasonably large accretion rate (~1 × 10−5 M⊙ year−1).
Considering the mean paleointensities from LL and CO chondrules, we find that the accretion rate was highly variable in the early solar system: for a disk with aligned polarity and a net vertical magnetic field (zφ only), the accretion rates are ×10−9 M⊙ year−1 in the noncarbonaceous reservoir and ×10−7 M⊙ year−1 in the carbonaceous reservoir (Fig. 3). The observed factor of ~5 to 150 variation in the magnetically driven accretion rate between the two reservoirs could reflect variations in the accretion rate in time and/or in space. Temporal variations would be broadly consistent with astronomically observed accretion bursts in protoplanetary disks that occur on a timescale of hundreds of years (37). However, our Monte Carlo simulations suggest that the probability that the observed changes in accretion are due to temporal fluctuations is <0.4% (see the Supplementary Materials). Thus, our results favor the presence of a spatial mismatch in the magnetically driven accretion rates between the two reservoirs. This spatial mismatch in the accretion rate has also been observed in recent paleomagnetic measurements of the CV chondrite Allende (15). While a spatial variation in accretion rate has also been proposed to explain the anomalously weak fields recorded by CR chondrules, it was not possible to conclusively differentiate between varying accretion rates or a null magnetic record because of the prior dissipation of the solar nebula in those samples (10).
The observed mismatch in the accretion rates requires a mechanism that removed mass from the accretion flux between the carbonaceous and the noncarbonaceous reservoirs. If proto-Jupiter or another giant planet was present between the two reservoirs, then it is possible that part of this accretion flux was intercepted and accreted onto the growing planet. However, if the mismatch was completely due to accretion onto proto-Jupiter, that would require a growth time scale of just ~10,000 years for the planet. This is several orders of magnitude faster than the several–million year time scale predicted by the core accretion model, the favored mechanism for Jupiter formation (38). Alternatively, a large fraction of accretion mass flux could be lost through a disk outflow. A substantial mass loss has been predicted in theoretical models of photoevaporation leading to inside-out disk clearing [e.g., (39–41)]. On the other hand, given the likely role magnetic fields in driving disk accretion, photoevaporation and magnetized disk winds may operate concurrently (42, 43), leading to magnetothermal disk winds whose mass loss rates are comparable to or exceed that of observed accretion rates of protoplanetary disks. This is sufficient to account for our observed mismatch in accretion rates and potentially lead to the formation of an inner cavity (i.e., extreme version of a gap) (44). Note, however, that this scenario does not preclude a role for Jupiter in gap formation. Its presence would likely accelerate the formation of the cavity (45), transforming the solar nebula into a transition disk.
In summary, we present a robust record of magnetic fields in the carbonaceous reservoir of the solar nebula. When compared to previous measurements of magnetic fields from the noncarbonaceous reservoir and models that describe the magnetic field in protoplanetary disks, we observe that the accretion rate in the carbonaceous reservoir is several times higher than that of the noncarbonaceous reservoir, implying the presence of a mismatch in accretion rates. This mismatch may be associated with disk mass loss through the presence of a gas giant, photoevaporation, and/or magnetized winds. These mechanisms could produce a disk substructure like those observed astronomically and like that inferred from the isotopic dichotomy measured among various meteorites in the early solar system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chondrule extraction and orientation
Bulk samples of ALHA77307,157 (0.57 g) and DOM 08006,102 (2.8 g) were obtained from the NASA Johnson Space Center. At MIT, oriented thick sections were cut from these using a wire saw cooled with ethanol during cutting. Each thick section had an average area of 4 cm2 and a thickness of ~500 μm. The thick sections were then polished down to 1-μm roughness, and dusty olivine chondrules were identified using reflected light microscopy. Overall, we found that dusty olivine chondrules are very rare among CO chondrites, with a frequency of only ~1 out of 100 chondrules (~0.005 inclusion mm−3). The six dusty olivine chondrules used in this study were obtained from two thick sections from ALHA77307 and eight from DOM 08006. We note that some thick sections did not contain identifiable dusty olivine chondrules. All extracted chondrules were at least 3 mm away from the fusion crust of the parent sample (table S1).
Figure S1 shows the procedure for chondrule extraction. Before extraction, the thick section surface orientation was documented using imaging with a petrographic microscope (step 1, fig. S1). A region of ~300 to 500 μm in thickness was excavated around the target chondrule using a degaussed carbide dental drill bit (step 2, fig. S1). After excavation, we used two different techniques to extract the chondrules. In the first technique, chondrule samples DOC1, DOC2, DOC3a, and DOC3b were extracted using a degaussed dental drill bit (step 3, fig. S1), and a pipette with isopropyl alcohol was used to transfer the sample to a nonmagnetic quartz disk. The samples were then glued to the quartz disk using cyanoacrylate cement. While the glue hardened, we oriented the sample by comparing its surface with the previously acquired image of the chondrule in situ. In the second technique, chondrule samples DOC4, DOC5a, DOC5b, DOC6a, and DOC6b each had a ~400 μm by 400 μm by 1000 μm nonmagnetic quartz glass coverslip glued with cyanoacrylate cement onto their top surfaces (step 3, fig. S1). We then marked the glass with a marker to orient it with respect to the thick section. The chondrules were then extracted using a degaussed dental drill bit and mounted on a quartz glass with cyanoacrylate cement. After extraction, we added Kapton tape as standoffs that were at least 2 mm away from the samples (step 4, fig. S1). The standoffs were added such that they were slightly higher than the samples, protecting the samples from rubbing against the SQUID microscope window during the magnetic measurements. Table S1 shows the orientations of the chondrules during the SQUID microscope measurements. We estimate that the extraction and mounting techniques can add up to 15° of total angular uncertainty.
Paleomagnetism
We used AFs to demagnetize the chondrules in steps of 5 or 10 mT, using an automatic 3-axis degausser system integrated into the 2G Enterprises Superconducting Rock Magnetometer 755R (46) at MIT. We demagnetized the samples with repeated AF applications to reduce spurious ARM and used the Zijderveld-Dunlop averaging method to correct for gyroremanent magnetization (47). The maximum AF field necessary to demagnetize the samples varied among our samples. Sample DOC1 was demagnetized up to 400 mT, DOC2 up to 410 mT, DOC3a up to 100 mT, DOC3b up to 60 mT, DOC4 up to 100 mT, DOC5a up to 60 mT, DOC5b up to 75 mT, DOC6a up to 70 mT, and DOC6b up to 100 mT. For each AF step, we measured the magnetic field of each sample six times: once after applications of the AF in the X, Y, and Z directions successively, twice after applications in the X direction, twice after applications in the Y direction, and once after an application in the Z direction.
NRM measurements were obtained using the SQUID microscope in the MIT Paleomagnetism Laboratory (32). Measurements of the samples’ magnetic fields were obtained at an effective sensor-to-sample distance of ~300 μm (32). For samples found to be dipolar magnetic field sources (DOC1, DOC2, DOC3a, DOC3b, DOC4, DOC5b, and DOC6b), we used a previously described inversion technique to obtain the magnetic moment from the magnetic field (48). For samples DOC5a and DOC6a, whose fields were found to be nondipolar, we upward-continued the magnetic maps by 150 μm and retrieved their dipole moments using averages from a first- to the fifth- and second-degree multipole model, respectively. After obtaining magnetic moments from each AF step, we averaged across the six steps and sometimes also across AF levels. The directions of NRM components were calculated using principal components analysis (49). The demagnetization projections are shown in figs. S2 and S3. If a NRM component had a deviation angle less than the maximum angle deviation, then this component was inferred to be the characteristic component and therefore anchored to the origin (49, 50). Table S1 shows the results of the principal components analysis including the levels that were averaged.
To obtain paleointensities, we used the ARM method (11, 35) for which
(1) |
where Bpaleo is the ancient magnetic field recovered from the experiment, Blab is the 200-μT ARM bias magnetic field applied to the sample, ∆NRM and ∆ARM are the respective changes in magnetic moment during the demagnetization of the NRM and the ARM, and f’ is the ratio of TRM to ARM. The ARM was applied with a peak AF field of 145 mT for DOC1 and DOC2, 100 mT for DOC3a, 60 mT for DOC3b, 100 mT for DOC4, 75 mT for DOC5b, and 100 mT for DOC6b. We AF demagnetized the ARM using the same sequence used for the NRM. All samples used for paleointensity determination were nearly dipolar sources, such that we used the inversion technique for dipolar sources described above. Following previous paleomagnetic studies of dusty olivine chondrules, we adopted an experimentally determined value for f’ of 1.87 (11, 27).
Figures S5 and S6 show the results of the paleointensity experiments. For all samples except DOC3a, we fit for ∆NRM/∆ARM using reduced major axis least squares. For DOC3a, we used ordinary least squares because the correlation parameter was <0.6 (51). ∆NRM was calculated by vector subtraction from the first demagnetization step in the HC component fit, while ∆ARM was calculated by subtraction from the first acquired ARM step. Table S5 shows a summary of the paleointensities and their quality criteria.
Mineralogy
Mineral compositions (fig. S4 and tables S3 and S4) were analyzed on a JEOL JXA-8200 Superprobe electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) using WDS in the MIT Electron Microprobe Facility. BSE images were obtained with the same instrument (fig. S4). The EPMA was operated at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and a beam current of 10 nA, and natural and synthetic standards were used for calibration. The counting times were typically 40 s per element, and the 1σ SDs of the accumulated counts were 0.5 to 1.0% from counting statistics. The raw data were corrected for matrix effects using the CITZAF package (52). To identify the origin of the magnetic signal of these two samples, we mapped the magnetization of chondrules using the QDM at MIT (fig. S4) (53, 54). The sensor to sample distance was ~5 μm, and the map resolution was 1.17 μm. The QDM maps were obtained after the demagnetization of an ARM applied to DOC2 (200 μT bias with an AF of 145 mT) to 145 mT (fig. S4C) and after the application of an ARM (200 μT bias with an AF of 100 mT) to DOC6b (fig. S4F).
Acknowledgments
We thank K. Righter and the Meteorite Working Group for allocating the samples, R. Fu and N. Kita for helpful discussions, and R. Walsworth and R. Fu for sharing quantum diamond microscopy technology and techniques.
Funding: This study was supported by NASA Discovery program (grant NNM16AA09C) and by the NSF (grant DMS-1521765).
Author contributions: Conceptualization: C.S.B. and B.P.W. Methodology: C.S.B., B.P.W., and E.A.L. Investigation: C.S.B. and B.P.W. Interpretation: C.S.B., B.P.W., J.F.J.B., and X.-N.B. Visualization: C.S.B. Supervision: B.P.W. Writing—initial drafts: C.S.B. and B.P.W. Writing—review and editing: B.P.W., J.F.J.B., X.-N.B., E.A.L., N.C., and E.N.M. Funding acquisition: B.P.W.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and available through the Magnetics Information Consortium (MagIC) Database (doi: 10.7288/V4/MAGIC/17129).
Supplementary Materials
This PDF file includes:
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Andrews S. M., Observations of protoplanetary disk structures. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 58, 483–528 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kruijer T. S., Kleine T., Borg L. E., The great isotopic dichotomy of the early solar system. Nat. Astron. 4, 32–40 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scott E. R. D., Krot A. N., Sanders I. S., Isotopic dichotomy among meteorites and its bearing on the protoplanetary disk. Astrophys. J. 854, 164 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kleine T., Budde G., Burkhardt C., Kruijer T. S., Worsham E. A., Morbidelli A., Nimmo F., The non-carbonaceous–carbonaceous meteorite dichotomy. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 55 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brasser R., Mojzsis S. J., The partitioning of the inner and outer solar system by a structured protoplanetary disk. Nat. Astron. 4, 492–499 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lichtenberg T., Draṃżkowska J., Schönbächler M., Golabek G. J., Hands T. O., Bifurcation of planetary building blocks during Solar System formation. Science 371, 365–370 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bai X.-N., Goodman J., Heat and dust in active layers of protostellar disks. Astrophys. J. 701, 737–755 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bai X.-N., Global simulations of the inner regions of protoplanetary disks with comprehensive disk microphysics. Astrophys. J. 845, 75 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 9.N. J. Turner, S. Fromang, C. Gammie, H. Klahr, G. Lesur, M. Wardle, X.-N. Bai, in Protostars and Planets VI, H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, T. K. Henning, Eds. (University of Arizona Press, 2014), pp. 411–432. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weiss B. P., Bai X.-N., Fu R. R., History of the solar nebula from meteorite paleomagnetism. Sci. Adv. 7, eaba5967 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fu R. R., Weiss B. P., Lima E. A., Harrison R. J., Bai X. N., Desch S. J., Ebel D. S., Suavet C., Wang H., Glenn D., le Sage D., Kasama T., Walsworth R. L., Kuan A. T., Solar nebula magnetic fields recorded in the Semarkona meteorite. Science 346, 1089–1092 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kita N. T., Ushikubo T., Evolution of protoplanetary disk inferred from 26Al chronology of individual chondrules. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 47, 1108–1119 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cournède C., Gattacceca J., Gounelle M., Rochette P., Weiss B. P., Zanda B., An early solar system magnetic field recorded in CM chondrites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 410, 62–74 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fu R. R., Kehayias P., Weiss B. P., Schrader D. L., Bai X.-N., Simon J. B., Weak magnetic fields in the outer solar nebula recorded in CR chondrites. J. Geophys. Res. 125, e2019JE006260 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fu R. R., Volk M. W. R., Bilardello D., Libourel D., Lesur G. R. J., Ben Dor O., The fine-scale magnetic history of the Allende meteorite: implications for the structure of the solar nebula. AGU Adv. 2, e2021AV000486 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schrader D. L., Nagashima K., Krot A. N., Ogliore R. C., Yin Q. Z., Amelin Y., Stirling C. H., Kaltenbach A., Distribution of 26Al in the CR chondrite chondrule-forming region of the protoplanetary disk. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 201, 275–302 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carporzen L., Weiss B. P., Elkins-Tanton L. T., Shuster D. L., Ebel D. S., Gattacceca J., Magnetic evidence for a partially differentiated carbonaceous chondrite parent body. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 6386–6389 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang H., Weiss B. P., Bai X.-N., Downey B. G., Wang J., Wang J., Suavet C., Fu R. R., Zucolotto M. E., Lifetime of the solar nebula constrained by meteorite paleomagnetism. Science 355, 623–627 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bonal L., Bourot-Denise M., Quirico E., Montagnac G., Lewin E., Organic matter and metamorphic history of CO chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 1605–1623 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Davidson J., Alexander C. M. O.’D., Stroud R. M., Busemann H., Nittler L. R., Mineralogy and petrology of Dominion Range 08006: A very primitive CO3 carbonaceous chondrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 265, 259–278 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alexander C. M. O.’D., Greenwood R. C., Bowden R., Gibson J. M., Howard K. T., Franchi I. A., A mutli-technique search for the most primitive CO chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 221, 406–420 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Scott E. R. D., Keil K., Stöffler D., Shock metamorphism of carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 4281–4293 (1992). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alexander C. M. O.’D., Fogel M., Yabuta H., Cody G. D., The origin and evolution of chondrites recorded in the elemental and isotopic compositions of their macromolecular organic matter. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 4380–4403 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shah J., Williams W., Almeida T. P., Nagy L., Muxworthy A. R., Kovács A., Valdez-Grijalva M. A., Fabian K., Russell S. S., Genge M. J., The oldest magnetic record in our solar system identified using nanometric imaging and numerical modeling. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–6 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Einsle J. F., Harrison R. J., Kasama T., Conbhuí P. Ó., Fabian K., Williams W., Woodland L., Fu R. R., Weiss B. P., Midgley P. A., Multi-scale three-dimensional characterization of iron particles in dusty olivine: Implications for paleomagnetism of chondritic meteorites. Am. Mineral. 101, 2070–2084 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lappe S.-C. L. L., Church N. S., Kasama T., da Silva Fanta A. B., Bromiley G., Dunin-Borkowski R. E., Feinberg J. M., Russell S., Harrison R. J., Mineral magnetism of dusty olivine: A credible recorder of pre-accretionary remanence. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12, Q12Z35 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lappe S.-C. L. L., Feinberg J. M., Muxworthy A., Harrison R. J., Comparison and calibration of nonheating paleointensity methods : A case study using dusty olivine. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 2143–2158 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 28.E. R. D. Scott, A. N. Krot, in Treatise on Geochemistry, vol. 2 of Planets, Asteroids, Comets, and the Solar System, H. D. Holland, K. K. Turekian, Eds. (Elsevier Science, 2013), pp. 66–137. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Desch S. J., Morris M. A., Connolly H. C. Jr., Boss A. P., The importance of experiments: Constraints on chondrule formation models. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 47, 1139–1156 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Desch S. J., Morris M. A., Connolly H. C. Jr., Boss A. P., A critical examination of the X-wind model for chondrule and calcium-rich, aluminum-rich inclusion formation and radionuclide production. Astrophys. J. 725, 692–711 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Recent high-precision Al-Mg ages of LL chondrules support a shorter formation interval than previous Al-Mg ages. See Supplementary Text for more information.
- 32.Weiss B. P., Lima E. A., Fong L. E., Baudenbacher F. J., Paleomagnetic analysis using SQUID microscopy. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B09105 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nagy L., Williams W., Tauxe L., Muxworthy A. R., Ferreira I., Thermomagnetic recording fidelity of nanometer-sized iron and implications for planetary magnetism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 1984–1991 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Watson G. S., A test for randomness of directions. Geophys. J. Int. 7, 160–161 (1956). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tikoo S. M., Weiss B. P., Cassata W. S., Shuster D. L., Gattacceca J., Lima E. A., Suavet C., Nimmo F., Fuller M. D., Decline of the lunar core dynamo. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 404, 89–97 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hartmann L., Calvet N., Gullbring E., D’Alessio P., Accretion and the evolution of T Tauri disks. Astrophys. J. 495, 385–400 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hartmann L., Herczeg G., Calvet N., Accretion onto pre-main-sequence stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 135–180 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 38.S. K. Atreya, A. Crida, T. Guillot, J. I. Lunine, N. Madhusudhan, O. Mousis, in Saturn in the 21st Century, K. H. Baines, F. M. Flasar, N. Krupp, T. Stallard, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018), pp. 5–43. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Clarke C. J., Gendrin A., Sotomayor M., The dispersal of circumstellar discs: The role of the ultraviolet switch. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 328, 485–491 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Owen J. E., Clarke C. J., Ercolano B., On the theory of disc photoevaporation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422, 1880–1901 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Picogna G., Ercolano B., Owen J. E., Weber M. L., The dispersal of protoplanetary discs – I. A new generation of X-ray photoevaporation models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 691–701 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang L., Bai X.-N., Goodman J., Global simulations of protoplanetary disk outflows with coupled non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics and consistent thermochemistry. Astrophys. J. 874, 90 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bai X.-N., Toward a global evolutionary model of protoplanetary disks. Astrophys. J. 821, 80 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Suzuki T. K., Ogihara M., Morbidelli A., Crida A., Guillot T., Evolution of protoplanetary discs with magnetically driven disc winds. Astron. Astrophys. 596, A74 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rosotti G. P., Ercolano B., Owen J. E., Armitage P. J., The interplay between x-ray photoevaporation and planet formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 1392–1401 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kirschvink J. L., Kopp R. E., Raub T. D., Baumgartner C. T., Holt J. W., Rapid, precise, and high-sensitivity acquisition of paleomagnetic and rock-magnetic data: Development of a low-noise automatic sample changing system for superconducting rock magnetometers. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q05Y01 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stephenson A., Three-axis static field demagnetization of rocks and the identification of natural remanent magnetization, gyroremanent magnetization, and anisotropy. J. Geoph. Res. 98, 373–381 (1993). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lima E. A., Weiss B. P., Ultra-high sensitivity moment magnetometry of geological samples using magnetic microscopy. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 17, 3754–3774 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kirschvink J. L., The least-squares line and plane and the analysis of palaeomagnetic data. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 62, 699–718 (1980). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tauxe L., Staudigel H., Strength of the geomagnetic field in the Cretaceous Normal Superchron: New data from submarine basaltic glass of the Troodos Ophiolite. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 5, Q02H06 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Smith R. J., Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 140, 476–486 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Armstrong J. T., CITZAF: A package of correction programs for the quantitative electron microbeam X-ray analysis of thick polished materials, thin films, and particles. Microbeam Anal. 4, 177–200 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fu R. R., Lima E. A., Volk M. W. R., Trubko R., High sensitivity moment magnetometry with the quantum diamond microscope. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 21, e2020GC009147 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Glenn D. R., Fu R. R., Kehayias P., Le Sage D., Lima E. A., Weiss B. P., Walsworth R. L., Micrometer-scale magnetic imaging of geological samples using a quantum diamond microscope. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 3254–3267 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ebert S., Render J., Brennecka G. A., Burkhardt C., Bischoff A., Gerber S., Kleine T., Ti isotopic evidence for a non-CAI refractory component in the inner solar system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 498, 257–265 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schneider J. M., Burkhardt C., Marrocchi Y., Brennecka G. A., Kleine T., Early evolution of the solar accretion disk inferred from Cr-Ti-O isotopes in individual chondrules. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 551, 116585 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 57.DeMeo F. E., Carry B., Solar system evolution from compositional mapping of the asteroid belt. Nature 505, 629–634 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.A. Morbidelli, K. J. Walsh, D. P. O’Brien, D. A. Minton, W. F. Bottke, in Asteroids IV, P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, W. F. Bottke, Eds. (University of Arizona, 2015), pp. 493–507. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sutton S., Alexander C. M. O.’D., Bryant A., Lanzirotti A., Newville M., Cloutis E. A., The bulk valence state of Fe and the origin of water in chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 211, 115–132 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 60.L. Testi, T. Birnstiel, L. Ricci, S. Andrews, J. Blum, J. Carpenter, C. Dominik, A. Isella, A. Natta, J. P. Williams, D. J. Wilner, in Protostars and Planets VI, H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, T. K. Henning, Eds. (University of Arizona Press, 2014), pp. 339–361. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Desch S. J., Kalyaan A., Alexander C. M. O.’D., The effect of Jupiter’s formation on the distribution of refractory elements and inclusions in meteorites. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 238, 11 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Selkin P. A., Gee J. S., Tauxe L., Meurer W. P., Newell A. J., The effect of remanence anisotropy on paleointensity estimates: A case study from the Archean Stillwater Complex. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 183, 403–416 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 63.Siron G., Fukuda K., Kimura M., Kita N. T., New constraints from 26Al-26Mg chronology of anorthite bearing chondrules in unequilibrated ordinary chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 293, 103–126 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.G. Siron, N. T. Kita, K. Fukuda, M. Kimura, in Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2021), p. 1639. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hertwig A. T., Kimura M., Ushikubo T., Defouilloy C., Kita N. T., The 26Al-26Mg systematics of FeO-rich chondrules from Acfer 094: Two chondrule generations distinct in age and oxygen isotope ratios. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 253, 111–126 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nagashima K., Krot A. N., Komatsu M., 26Al–26Mg systematics in chondrules from Kaba and Yamato 980145 CV3 carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 201, 303–319 (2017). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.