Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2021 Oct 18;376(1839):20200380. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0380

Modes of climate variability bridge proximate and evolutionary mechanisms of masting

Davide Ascoli 1,, Andrew Hacket-Pain 2, Ian S Pearse 3, Giorgio Vacchiano 4, Susanna Corti 5, Paolo Davini 6
PMCID: PMC8520781  PMID: 34657463

Abstract

There is evidence that variable and synchronous reproduction in seed plants (masting) correlates to modes of climate variability, e.g. El Niño Southern Oscillation and North Atlantic Oscillation. In this perspective, we explore the breadth of knowledge on how climate modes control reproduction in major masting species throughout Earth's biomes. We posit that intrinsic properties of climate modes (periodicity, persistence and trends) drive interannual and decadal variability of plant reproduction, as well as the spatial extent of its synchrony, aligning multiple proximate causes of masting through space and time. Moreover, climate modes force lagged but in-phase ecological processes that interact synergistically with multiple stages of plant reproductive cycles. This sets up adaptive benefits by increasing offspring fitness through either economies of scale or environmental prediction. Community-wide links between climate modes and masting across plant taxa suggest an evolutionary role of climate variability. We argue that climate modes may ‘bridge’ proximate and ultimate causes of masting selecting for variable and synchronous reproduction. The future of such interaction is uncertain: processes that improve reproductive fitness may remain coupled with climate modes even under changing climates, but chances are that abrupt global warming will affect Earth's climate modes so rapidly as to alter ecological and evolutionary links.

This article is part of the theme issue ‘The ecology and evolution of synchronized seed production in plants’.

Keywords: climate change, disturbance ecology, ENSO, environmental prediction, Moran effect, reproduction

1. Introduction

In 1997–1998, major plant reproductive events took place in many regions of the world, including tropical forests in South East Asia [1,2] and Central America [3,4], temperate forests of China and Japan [5,6], and boreal forests of northwest and northeast America [7,8]. The spatio-temporal synchrony of seeding in plants displaying variable reproduction (masting) has long interested ecologists [9]. Successful masting depends on the completion of consecutive stages of the reproductive process (i.e. resource uptake, floral induction, pollination and seed maturation), often spanning multiple seasons or years [1013]. Weather can affect each stage by priming resource uptake, cueing floral bud formation, influencing pollination success or vetoing seed production [11,14]. Consequently, when favourable weather conditions are aligned in time and space over the entire reproductive process, i.e. the Moran effect [15,16], they lead to synchronous seed production in masting plants [13,1719].

Many environmental patterns that play out over wide geographical areas are controlled by modes of climate variability, such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) [20], the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) [21] and other modes that are integral components of Earth's climate system [2225]. Different climate modes operate at different time scales, affecting weather patterns at frequencies from months to decades [20,21,26]. The spatio-temporal dynamics with which climate modes exert their influence has major implications for the synchronization of ecological processes and ecosystem functioning [22,25,27], including masting. Indeed, there is increasing evidence that masting events are associated with these modes of climate variability across all continents [2,3,2831] but the existence of a causal link has yet to be ascertained.

In this perspective, we explore the breadth of knowledge on how climate modes control variable and synchronous seed production throughout Earth's biomes. Under the hypothesis that the intrinsic properties of climate modes (periodicity, persistence and trend) drive proximate causes of seed production, we show that they coherently align, over multiple seasons, weather cues conducive to the success or failure of seed production in masting species. Furthermore, we assess the evidence that climate modes influencing the spatio-temporal combinations of proximate mechanisms drive the spatial synchrony/asynchrony of masting in several geographical regions.

Notably, modes of climate variability have tremendous cascading effects on multiple ecosystem processes, such as primary productivity [24,32], natural disturbance regimes [33,34] and animal population dynamics [22], and have the potential to force in-phase ecological processes [27] that interact synergistically with multiple stages of plant reproduction. We explore the hypothesis that climate modes create such synergies via their autocorrelation structure, lagged effects on ecosystem dynamics and density-dependent processes related to the extent of synchrony. From an evolutionary point of view, using climate modes as a pacemaker to time the production of large-seed crops can increase the fitness of an individual plant by promoting the success of its offspring.

Finally, we discuss whether the widespread concordance between seed production and climate modes has emerged by chance or is an evolved strategy, and to what extent it can be disrupted by global climate change.

2. Correlation of seed production with climate modes: a widespread phenomenon

Over the past three decades, studies have associated modes of climate variability and plant reproduction across several continents (figure 1), biomes and species (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Most studies [3,30,40] have analysed the correlation between time series of reproductive effort and large-scale climate indices [22]—often defined as “teleconnection” indices. For example, the NAO is described via the NAO index [21], while ENSO is characterized by the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) (see electronic supplementary material, glossary for indexes description).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Regional distribution of selected published studies (extracted from the electronic supplementary material, table S1) reporting correlations between climate indices and masting. Shading indicates regions where climate variability is influenced by the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO; orange) and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO; blue).

Seminal research first documented a correlation between ENSO and mass fruiting in Dipterocarp tropical forests of South East Asia [28], where ENSO strongly influence weather patterns (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). ENSO has subsequently been shown to correlate with seed production not only in South East Asia [2,3944], but also in New Zealand [29], Africa [38], western North America [7,31], South America [3,36,46] and in the Caribbean [4,47].

In the Northern Hemisphere, the NAO is one of the major climate modes concordant with plant reproduction (electronic supplementary material, table S1), particularly in Europe (figure 1) where the NAO index [21] correlates to the timing, variability and synchrony of flowering, pollination and seed production of dominant forest species [13,30,37,4852].

More generally, several episodes of community-wide mass flowering or fruiting have been tied to the main climate modes influencing a given area [1,3,29,30,35,37,45,53], suggesting that species with disparate life traits may all time their reproduction based on these modes.

The strength and direction of correlations between climate modes and seed production may vary in space and time, following the spatial arrangement of each mode: dipolar or more complex patterns [2,27,31,53,54], depending on the season (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) or on the time window considered [30], and being modulated by local orographical features which can enhance, reduce or revert the large-scale signal. Furthermore, modes interact with each other [33,5557]: higher frequency climate modes such as ENSO or NAO are affected by lower frequency modes such as the Atlantic multidecadal variability (AMV) [58]. Such complex interactions appear to be key in understanding cascading effects on linked ecological processes [33,59], including masting [7].

3. Climate modes affect the (dis-)alignment of proximate mechanisms for variable reproduction

Masting depends on the completion of multiple reproductive stages (i.e. resource priming, floral induction, flowering, pollination and fruit maturation) that may occur over several seasons or years [13,18,60]. Numerous studies linked reproductive success or failure to weather conditions experienced by plants during single reproductive stages [12,17]. Other studies correlated favourable weather during these stages to modes of climate variability [3,4,13,45,48], suggesting that climate modes are a key regulator of variable reproduction via their direct effect on weather, and particularly on temperature (electronic supplementary material, figure S1).

However, we highlight evidence that climate modes can also synergistically align favourable weather conditions during consecutive reproduction stages (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Climate modes are determined by quasi-oscillatory nonlinear dynamics arising from the interaction of oceanic and atmospheric processes and influence the persistence of circulation patterns over large portions of the globe across multiple seasons [2022]. For example, ENSO fluctuations between La Niña and El Niño phases display non-stationary periodicity [20]. Climate indices used to represent ENSO, such as ONI (see glossary), display intrinsic autocorrelation (electronic supplementary material figure S2a), positive at lags of six months (i.e. persistence of El Niño/La Niña) and negative at lags of 2 years (i.e. transition from the opposite phase), with a periodicity ranging from 2 to 8 years (electronic supplementary material figure S2b). These fluctuations have the potential for a multi-seasonal alignment of proximate mechanisms, which would occur for example under increased resource acquisition followed by favourable weather during flowering, pollination and fruit ripening.

(a) . Aligned reproductive stages under the El Niño Southern Oscillation

In tropical forests of South East Asia, cool and dry anomalies from December to February are believed to cue mass flowering in Dipterocarp forests: in Malaysia general flowering typically occurs in March and in southwestern Borneo in July [2,19,28,41,45,60]. Our analyses confirm significant negative temperature and precipitation anomalies in the region prior to general flowering events in the last 60 years (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). Ushio et al. [19] and Satake et al. [60] show that general flowering in the region is driven synergistically by low air temperature and drought. Moreover, Chechina & Hamann [2] suggest a cumulative-trigger model to predict flowering in Dipterocarps that incorporates temporal accumulation of resources. Interestingly, these regional masting events occur preferentially during the transition from La Niña (negative ENSO phase) to the onset of El Niño (positive ENSO phase) (electronic supplementary material, figure S4) indicating a potential dynamic role of ENSO in aligning cumulative and synergic cues. A wet period during La Niña stimulates resource priming [45,58] (electronic supplementary material, table S1), while the onset of El Niño reduces cloud cover [58], leading to increased daytime radiation, lower night-time temperatures (electronic supplementary material, figure S5a), and dry conditions (electronic supplementary material, figure S5b) over peninsular Malaysia, northern Sumatra and western Borneo, approximately 12 months before the El Niño peak (usually from December to February). In these Dipterocarp forests, ENSO temporally aligns increased resources and the dry-cool air cue of flowering. A similar synergic alignment of resource availability and flowering cues during the onset of El Niño has been observed in tropical moist forests in Central America [3].

Synergies caused by the transition from La Niña to El Niño also appear relevant for Picea glauca reproduction in western [7] and eastern North America (electronic supplementary material, figure S4). Masting of P. glauca in eastern regions of North America is associated with temperature differences from the two prior summers [61], a cue known as ΔT [17]. Notably, over the last six decades, the summer before the peak of El Niño showed negative anomalies in temperature throughout eastern North America (electronic supplementary material, figure S5g), while the following summer after the El Niño winter peak, positive anomalies occurred across the same region (electronic supplementary material, figure S5h). This mechanism highlights how in eastern North America the transition from La Niña to El Niño aligns the negative summer temperature cue 2 years before masting and the positive temperature cue the summer before masting, resulting in a significant positive ΔT cue (electronic supplementary material, figure S6).

(b) . Aligned reproductive stages under the North Atlantic Oscillation

Another example of multi-seasonal synergies comes from Central Europe, where positive winter NAO and negative summer NAO during the resource priming stage correlate positively with reproduction in several tree species (electronic supplementary material, table S1), including Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies, Quercus robur, Quercus petraea, Betula pendula and Pinus pinea [13,30,37,49,62,63]. In F. sylvatica and P. abies, positive summer NAO during floral bud initiation is associated with masting in the following year [30,37,64]. Positive winter to spring NAO correlates with increased and synchronous pollen influx [48,51] and high seed crops in several species [30,37]. The explanation for these relationships lies in how seasonal NAO phases generate consecutive weather conditions that are optimal for reproduction and thus promote masting (figure 2). In Central Europe, positive NAO in December–February is associated with warm-wet winters (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) and earlier snowmelt [21], which promotes earlier leafing out [48]. Warm-wet winters also increase water availability in spring and the length of the growing season [49] with direct consequences on ecosystem productivity [32]. Positive summer NAO is associated with warm temperature in July–August (electronic supplementary material, figure S1), which induces floral bud differentiation in several species in Central Europe [18,37], while positive spring NAO is associated with warm, dry and windy weather (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) that favours pollination [30,37].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Large-scale weather patterns associated with negative (left) and positive (right) phases of the NAO during key reproductive stages (resource priming, floral induction, pollination) leading to Fagus sylvatica masting failure (left) or success (right). Positive NAO aligns consecutive mechanisms that promote successful seed production, such as warm-wet winters and extended wet growing seasons favouring resource uptake, hot summers triggering floral bud initiation, dry springs ensuring successful flowering, pollination and fruiting (electronic supplementary material, table S1), leading to large-scale masting in Central Europe in 1995. The opposite occurs in 1966 during prolonged negative NAO phases. The December to March (DJFM) NAO index displayed in the bar plot was calculated using the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administratoin index. The large-scale beech masting index in Central Europe was derived by Ascoli et al. [30] and normalized (i.e. negative/positive values indicate higher/lower than average seed crops).

Several of these multi-seasonal reproductive cues align synergistically owing to the intrinsic temporal structure of the NAO (electronic supplementary material, figure S7). The NAO index averaged over December to April is positively autocorrelated with a 1-year lag (electronic supplementary material, figure S7a), probably owing to re-emergence of oceanic heat anomalies from one winter to another [65] and to decadal influences by the AMV [56]. Furthermore, the NAO shows a marked persistence from winter to early spring months, as shown by the correlation of the spring with the preceding winter NAO index (electronic supplementary material, figure S7b). In Central Europe periods of positive winter, NAO phases are associated with increased resource uptake in European forests [24,32,66]. Importantly, the lag-1 positive autocorrelation of the winter NAO index (electronic supplementary material, figure S7a) means that a positive winter NAO can persist for consecutive years, thus promoting a prolonged resource gain. Moreover, since positive spring NAO probably follows positive winter NAO (electronic supplementary material, figure S7b), this alignment promotes earlier and synchronized flowering and associated release, dispersal and transport of pollen [48] during a period of increased resources [30].

Another interesting mechanism that links NAO properties to plant reproduction in Central Europe depends on the lagged effect of the winter NAO on summer temperatures. Indeed, summer heat waves in Central-Northern Europe are strong and wide-ranging when positive summer NAO occurs in years of positive winter NAO [67]. For example, this was the case in 1994 before the beech masting in 1995, the largest event in the period 1952–2015 (figure 2). This suggests a potentially higher sensitivity of beech masting to the summer cue during a positive phase of the winter NAO [30]. Together with the higher probability of favourable conditions for pollination in spring, this means that positive trends in winter NAO increase the likelihood of beech masting (figure 2). On the contrary, prolonged negative periods can result in poor resource uptake and vetoes to pollination (wet spring, frost), leading to frequent reproductive failure and longer inter-mast periods, such as those that occurred in Central Europe in the 1960s and 1970s (figure 2).

4. Modes of climate variability affect reproductive synchrony through space and time

The geographical extent of masting is one of its most impressive properties [68]. The spatial coherence of proximate mechanisms of seed production (i.e. the Moran effect) plays a major role in synchronizing plant reproduction over different scales [10,18,54,69]. Synchrony in reproduction occurs when conditions favourable for each reproductive stage, from resource priming to fruit ripening, align not only in time, but also in space [30]. Likewise, large-scale reproductive vetoes affecting single stages may thwart reproduction over extended areas [70].

Climate modes are implicated in synchronizing both resource dynamics [32,59] and weather cues of masting in tropical [2,40], temperate [30,53] and boreal regions [7,8]. For example, in Central Europe, the large-scale synchronization of resource dynamics [32] and weather cues [67] driven by NAO results in spatially synchronized resource priming, bud initiation [30] and timing of pollination at different sites [49]. This led to continent-wide masting events such as those in 1990, 1992 and 1995 [18], which extended over an area of more than 1.3 million km2 (figure 2). Conversely, in southeastern Europe, the NAO has a more limited impact on local weather [21], which is more driven by multiple interacting climate modes [25] and a complex geomorphology (e.g. water bodies and orography). Greater local environmental variability differentiates weather patterns through space and time, working against large-scale reproductive synchrony [69]. Similarly, in South East Asia, the complexity created by the Malaysian Peninsula and Bornean and Sumatran coastlines and mountain ridges interacts with the response of atmospheric circulation to ENSO and generates regional weather and masting patterns. In southwestern peninsular Malaysia and western Borneo, flowering and fruiting of Dipterocarp often occurs during the transition from La Niña to El Niño (electronic supplementary material, figure S4). However, flowering starts in March in Peninsular Malaysia and in July in southwestern Borneo, which mirrors the northwest to southeast shift of dry-cool air that precedes the onset of El Niño (electronic supplementary material, figure S5a,c,g,i). Moreover, populations of Dipterocarps on eastern sides of Borneo usually flower and fruit after the onset of El Niño [40,42]. Indeed, the ENSO spatial impact is shaped by the geography of the Indonesian archipelago, which drives opposite responses in sea surface temperatures and cascading effects on weather patterns east and west of Borneo (electronic supplementary material, figure S5a–d). Still, the onset of particularly strong El Niño events, such as those in 1959, 1977 or 1983, coincided with mass flowering throughout most of the region [2,28].

Modes of climate variability often drive dipoles in the spatial synchrony of temperatures and precipitation and hence induce dipolar masting patterns [8,54,71,72]. In Central Europe, the geographical divide exerted by NAO on winter, spring and summer temperatures extends along a ridge from 45° N–3° W to 50° N–26° E, termed the ‘NAO node’ (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). This ridge parallels the boundary between positive and negative synchrony in both weather and large-scale masting of European beech [18,30,69]. Likewise, ENSO drives opposite effects on precipitation over different areas of the western United States, which are reflected by an asynchrony in seed production by Pinus edulis in the southern and northern part of its distribution [31]. The onset of El Niño might explain the peculiar spatial asynchrony that La Montagne et al. [8] observed in P. glauca masting when comparing western and eastern populations of Canada and northern America. Indeed, positive surface temperature anomalies appear in the west the summer before El Niño peaks, and negative in the east (electronic supplementary material, figure S5g), thus cueing masting in the west [7]. However, the dipole switches the summer after El Niño (electronic supplementary material, figure S5h), triggering masting in the east. The resulting west-east shift in the ΔT summer cue (electronic supplementary material, figure S6) is thus key to fully understand why this masting dipole was observed in some periods (i.e. during the onset of El Niño) but not in others.

5. Climate modes drive synergies between masting and reproductive fitness of plants

Climate modes do not only set the timing and extent of masting, but also influence the dynamics of ecosystem processes that affect the success of offspring survival. In the few systems where this hypothesis has been suggested [30,47,73] or tested [3,7], climate modes had concordant effects on proximate mechanisms of seed production and on the environment into which seedlings grow. Such concordance may exist in several geographical areas (figure 3). As discussed, in tropical Dipterocarp forests of peninsular Malaysia, flower initiation is associated with cool-dry air from January to March [2]. A recent study found a correlation between the cool-dry weather cue and wet conditions favourable for seedling emergence a few months later, in October to December [60]. Our analyses confirm such weather oscillation (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). Notably, in Malaysia and western Borneo this oscillation from cool-dry to wet conditions is associated with the transition from La Niña to El-Niño (electronic supplementary material, figure S5), which synergistically aligns the flowering cue and precipitation that favours seed germination, seedling emergence and seedling establishment a few months later (electronic supplementary material, figure S5c,i,q). The transition to El Niño coincides with other advantageous mechanisms (figure 3). Changes in large-scale weather during this transition are tracked by long-distance mobile pollinators, which anticipates general flowering [74]. The drought brought by El Niño can cause the formation of canopy gaps [73] and fire disturbance, which peaks six months before the El Niño in eastern Borneo, and during El Niño in western Borneo [75], prior to seed dispersal. Similarly, in boreal forests of northern America, the onset of El Niño leads to regional drought and heat pulses responsible for both fire disturbance and floral bud initiation in P. glauca (figure 4, left), resulting in masting the ensuing year [7]. This alignment benefits spruce recruitment because seeds dispersed shortly after fire germinate more easily owing to partial litter consumption, and seedlings can establish in canopy openings [76]. Positive ENSO is also responsible for extensive fires in tropical Amazon forests, with negative impacts on seed predators and positive influences on Bellucia sp. fruit production [77].

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Chord diagram showing the potential for climate mode phases (blue sector) to drive synergies between proximate (green sector) and ultimate (orange sector) mechanisms of masting in different geographical regions: Central Europe (left diagram, based on 45 sources) and South East Asia (right diagram, based on 35 sources). The sector size in the outer circle indicates the distribution of synergies, while the flows through the centre of the circle illustrate the relative importance of links between individual agents (as measured by the number of observations reporting on the respective link). Arrows point from the influencing climate mode to the mechanisms being influenced.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Examples of density-independent (left) and density-dependent (right) mechanisms with adaptive benefits linked to models of climate variability. In northwest America (left), the onset of El Niño time spruce reproduction to anticipate favourable conditions for offspring early-life fitness owing to fire disturbance. In South East Asia (right), the transition from La Niña to El Niño synchronizes community-wide reproduction in Dipterocarp forest setting a ‘regional’ escape from mobile animal predators such as Sus barbatus and Pongo pygmaeus.

Similarly, in Central Europe, the NAO has well-established links with both masting in multiple species (electronic supplementary material, table S1) and natural disturbance regimes that may promote seedling establishment (figure 3). For example, positive winter NAO causes major windstorms in the area [34,78], which supports seedling establishment by creating canopy gaps [79,80]. A large-scale climate cue similar to positive summer NAO is linked to both fire disturbance [81] and beech masting the following year [64], with potential benefits for beech establishment in the post-fire environment [82,83]. Also, a persistent positive NAO from winter to spring curbs populations of seed-eating rodents because of lower snow cover and increased predation [22]. Notably, these seasonal NAO patterns also promote dispersal dynamics. Positive winter NAO correlates with irruptions of key seed dispersers, such as Columba palumbus, Fringilla coelebs, Pica pica, Parus major and Carduelis spinus [84,85]. Similar synergies with seed dispersers were described in North America, where a west-east dipole in temperatures, resembling the pattern occurring in the summers before and after the peak of El Nino (electronic supplementary material, figure S5g,h), modulates both broad-scale masting [8] and the irruption of seed-eating birds anticipating the resource pulse [53], with potential benefits for seed dispersal.

In most other regions where the environment is under the influence of major climate modes, there is evidence that ecosystem processes respond to them, and it will be interesting to see how often that results in an alignment between drivers of seed production and other ecosystem processes improving reproductive fitness. For example, negative phases of ENSO, Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) and Southern Annular Mode (SAM) concurrently modulate rainfall in central Australia, with direct effects on the productivity [59] and seed output [8689] of mulga (Acacia sp.) and spinifex (Triodia sp.) vegetation. Increased rainfall triggers multiple cascading processes such as ant population dynamics [90] and wildfires [91]. Consequently, it is not surprising that synchronized flowering, ant abundance and fire in inland Australia have been correlated with La Niña [87,90,91]. In turn, landscape-scale fires limit predators in mulga species [92] and cue seed germination of both Acacia and Triodia [86,89]. The interaction between ENSO-IOD-SAM acts thus as a large-scale mechanism that synchronizes resource priming, flowering, seed dispersal by ants and large-scale fire disturbance with multiple adaptive benefits along with the entire plant reproduction sequence.

6. Relevance of climate modes for the evolution of masting

When considering the role of climate modes in the evolution of masting, we should ascertain whether these modes have existed and maintained their properties (i.e. autocorrelation, periodicity and trends) for timeframes relevant to the evolution of long-lived plants. There is evidence that modes of climate variability such as ENSO have been acting for evolutionary-relevant time periods [93,94]. For example, annular modes of variability (such as the SAM) are observed in extremely idealized climate numerical simulations, pointing to the fact that such modes of variability are an intrinsic feature of the Earth's climate system that have been existing for a long time [95].

We highlight how climate modes drive reproduction and recruitment success not only directly, but also indirectly, by forcing lagged but in-phase ecosystem dynamics conducive to favourable conditions for offspring. By synergistically aligning the proximate mechanisms that cause masting and the processes that improve offspring fitness (figure 3), climate modes make favourable environmental conditions more ‘predictable’ by plants [30], a hypothesis known as ‘environmental prediction’ [79,96]. Environmental prediction based on climate modes is possible since they have predictable dynamics, i.e. inherent autocorrelations and periodicities, and because their cascading effects lag in predictable ways.

The environmental prediction hypothesis has been regarded cautiously. Researchers have favoured adaptive hypotheses related to economies of scale (EOSs) implied by large-seed production events [96]. However, linking reproduction to climate modes may also have implications on EOSs. The two major EOS hypotheses are predator satiation and pollination efficiency. In predator satiation, occasional large-seed crops satiate predators resulting in higher per capita survival of seeds and seedlings [11,97]. In pollination efficiency, large flowering events lower the upper threshold for pollen limitation [96,98,99]. The primary distinction between EOS and environmental prediction is that EOSs are density-dependent, i.e. an individual plant benefits from pulsed flowering only when other individuals are also flowering. By contrast, under environmental prediction, if an individual plant produces seed based on cues that predict a favourable environment for seedlings, this would be enough to increase fitness. Notably, climate modes have the potential to let both emerge.

A major implication of the link between climate modes and reproduction in plants is the spatial extent of synchrony in flowering, pollination and seed production, which is usually larger than a population. EOSs of seed production emerge within a given range of extents in spatial synchrony. In some cases, it is sufficient for trees to synchronize pollination within a stand [100], while avoidance of predation by nomadic vertebrates requires a ‘regional escape’ strategy by ‘community-wide’ masting [1]. In the present study, we found evidence that climate modes synchronize reproduction over different spatial extents, covering the full range of scales needed for known EOSs to emerge. While adaptive benefits at smaller extents (i.e. individual, stand and population) have been extensively studied [97,100], benefits emerging from synchrony at larger scales are understudied and mostly discussed in relation to pollen coupling [98,99]. However, synchrony at scales larger than a population, peculiar of the climate mode-masting relationship, might imply adaptive benefits (figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Theoretical scheme of the scale of reproduction synchrony covered by climate modes which is relevant for different density-dependent EOS implying adaptive benefits. EOSs from left to right: seed predation escape (grey), pollination efficiency (green), attraction of seed dispersers (blue), disturbance intersection (red) and gene flow (violet). Escaping predation of low mobile predators (e.g. mice) occurs at the lower spatial scale, the benefit increases sharply and remains constant at increasing spatial scales since the EOS is local. Pollination efficiency benefits from a larger scale, although the cross-fertilization rate owing to the outsource pollen decreases at increasing distance of the pollen origin. Disperser attraction requires a spatial threshold of the reproduction synchrony after which the irruption of long-distance disperser such as birds is triggered. The probability of intersecting a disturbed seedbed increases linearly with the extent of the synchrony but decreases after the regional scale since large-scale disturbances (e.g. megafires) affect negatively post-disturbance seed availability. Gene flow benefits exponentially of reproduction synchrony up to the larger scale when geographically separated population synchronize and exchange genes.

For example, although climate-driven disturbances are predictable in the time domain (i.e. environmental prediction) by species that experience the same environmental cue (e.g. drought), they cannot be predicted in the space domain (i.e. where a disturbed patch will occur). Large-scale and community-wide reproduction increases the chances for a larger number of individuals to release seeds in favourable environments created by disturbances [7,73,79,89]. Regional seed predators may also select for large-scale and community-wide flowering/fruiting synchrony. The spatial scale at which synchrony in seed production effectively reduces losses to predators is influenced by predator's mobility [101,102]. If a predator can move easily between plants, stands or regions, selection will favour synchrony among plants at a scale comparable to the predator's mobility [97]. For long-distance mobile predators, strategies that generate large-scale synchrony in seeding would be favoured [103]. Relevant examples are the interaction between Araucaria araucana and the Austral parakeet, which is highly mobile [104] and effectively satiated by seeding synchrony over distances of 10–100 km [105]. A similar interaction occurs between Dipterocarps and large-bodied, highly mobile generalist predators (Pongo pygmaeus and Sus barbatus) in Borneo [1,106] (figure 4). Over 800 000 pigs were observed migrating out of northeast Kalimantan after the 1983 Dipterocarp mast event and severe El Niño-associated drought [107]. Such ability to move requires seeding synchrony over hundreds of kilometres for predator satiation to produce an effective ‘regional escape’ from predation [1] and is suggestive of similar interactions occurring in ecosystems with similarly mobile predators (e.g. Sus scrofa in Eurasia). Other large-scale examples involve specialist birds like the passenger pigeon, Carolina parakeet, and the Javanese finch [101]. Hence, testing the predator satiation hypothesis at the tree or stand scale may only miss processes occurring at larger scales.

The extent of synchrony needed for pollination efficiency is debated [98,108]. In South East Asia, minor and local flowering events that precede mass flowering in Dipterocarps [2] do not lead to fruit development because of low pollen density [109]. Synchronized flowering of many species in Dipterocarp forests causes an increase in long-distance mobile pollinators through immigration [74], which directly affects pollination efficiency [110].

Synchronous flowering over large distances may also have evolutionary implications by contributing to the flow of adaptive gene pools. Long-distance pollen dispersal contributes to a small percentage of pollination but is highly relevant for gene flow between populations over an evolutionary time scale [111,112]. Genetic similarities among separated populations have been attributed to gene flow due to long-distance pollen dispersal [113], which might occur only during synchronous flowering [114]. Intriguingly, the genetic structure of P. glauca in northern America [115], or of Shorea macrophylla in Borneo [116] resembles the west-east dipole in flowering synchrony shaped by ENSO in both regions. Bogdziewicz et al. [69] suggested that the spatial genetic structure of F. sylvatica in Europe [117] resembles the divide in weather and pollination synchrony that is under the control of the NAO. Interestingly, the same geographical divide in genetic structure is shared by other tree species in Central Europe [118], raising the question of whether the large-scale synchrony in pollination led by NAO plays a role in shaping genetic similarities, in addition to legacies from post-glacial migration dynamics [113,117]. Gene flow is a key process for increasing individual fitness since it allows exchange among diverse, separated or marginal populations, which continue to receive (and spread) genes with adaptive benefits. When masting synchronizes over large scales, the higher chance for long-distance gene flow might reinforce synchrony, since it reduces in-breeding depression and increases local adaptation potential and fitness [119].

7. Climate change, climate modes and masting

Anthropogenic climate change is having a strong impact on local weather in several regions on Earth, and masting patterns appear to be shifting in response to these changes [120]. Climate change can also affect climate modes, although their long-term response remains uncertain. ENSO is expected to remain the dominant mode in a warmer world, but model projections do not agree over a systematic increase in ENSO variability, nor on future changes in ENSO teleconnections [121,122]. However, most models show an increase in the amplitude of ENSO rainfall variability (therefore in the associated extreme events) ascribable to the increase in the mean sea surface temperature and moisture [123]. The SAM is projected to become more positive [124] possibly intensifying the Southern Hemisphere teleconnection with precipitation [33]. The positive phase of winter NAO is expected to occur with higher frequency in a warmer world, following a strengthening and zonalization of the mid-latitude westerly winds [125,126]. On the other hand, predicted future changes of the AMV are largely model dependent [127].

These changes are impacting—and will further impact in the near future—the associated ecological processes and their multiple spatio-temporal synergies [33,128], including masting [30]. In cases where weather influencing proximate mechanisms anticipates weather during germination or seedling development, it is likely that these processes will become decoupled as climates change [129]. Where lags in ecosystem processes result in environmental prediction, it is possible that those processes may remain coupled even as Earth's climate systems change considerably.

8. Concluding remarks

Studies testing for the influence in climate modes over variable and synchronous reproduction in seed plants made use of correlation analyses between climate indices and time series of fruit and seed production. However, in most cases, the causal mechanisms behind those correlations were uncertain. In this perspective, we explain the tight relationships between climate, weather patterns, and the physiology and ecology of plant species, and we demonstrate that climate modes shape the spatio-temporal patterns of reproduction of major masting species in most of Earth's biomes. We highlight how large-scale modes of climate variability, such as ENSO or the NAO, influence reproduction and recruitment both directly, through regional weather patterns that align proximate mechanisms of seed production through time and space, and indirectly, by density-dependent EOSs emerging at increasingly larger scales, and by forcing lagged but in-phase ecosystem dynamics conducive to favourable conditions for offspring. The observation that both ecosystem properties and seed production lag considerably behind climate [22,84] might renew interest in the subject of the evolutionary emergence of masting. We argue that climate modes have the potential to ‘bridge’ proximate and ultimate causes of masting selecting for variable and synchronous reproduction. To better understand the impacts of climate change on plant reproduction, a deeper understanding of changes of climate modes and their relationship with global warming will be critical. The future of such deep interaction is uncertain: processes that improve reproductive fitness may remain coupled even under changing climates, but chances are that abrupt global warming will affect Earth's climate modes so rapidly as to perturb ecological and evolutionary links.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Mario Pesendorfer, Michal Bogdziewicz and Andrea Piotti for fruitful discussion on several key ideas developed in the manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

Data accessibility

This article has no additional data.

Authors' contributions

D.A. led the overall study, formulated theses and drafted an initial manuscript. All authors participated in group discussions about research ideas and provided considerable and meaningful contributions to writing the manuscript and editing the figures. P.D. supervised and conducted climate data analysis. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

The work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) grant no. NE/S007857/1.

References

  • 1.Curran LM, Leighton M. 2000. Vertebrate responses to spatiotemporal variation in seed production of mast-fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecol. Monogr. 70, 101-128. ( 10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070[0101:vrtsvi]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chechina M, Hamann A. 2019. Climatic drivers of dipterocarp mass-flowering in South-East Asia. J. Trop. Ecol. 35, 108-117. ( 10.1017/s0266467419000087) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Detto M, Wright SJ, Calderón O, Muller-Landau HC. 2018. Resource acquisition and reproductive strategies of tropical forest in response to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Nat. Commun. 9, 913. ( 10.1038/s41467-018-03306-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zimmerman JK, Hogan JA, Nytch CJ, Bithorn JE. 2018. Effects of hurricanes and climate oscillations on annual variation in reproduction in wet forest, Puerto Rico. Ecology 99, 1402-1410. ( 10.1002/ecy.2236) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu W, Fox JED, Xu Z. 2003. Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in a montane moist evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountains, SW China. Plant Ecol. 164, 157-170. ( 10.1023/a:1021201012950) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yasaka M, Terazawa K, Koyama H, Kon H. 2003. Masting behavior of Fagus crenata in northern Japan: spatial synchrony and pre-dispersal seed predation. Forest Ecol. Manage. 184, 277-284. ( 10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00157-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ascoli D, Hacket-Pain A, LaMontagne JM, Cardil A, Conedera M, Maringer J, Motta R, Pearse IS, Vacchiano G. 2020. Climate teleconnections synchronize Picea glauca masting and fire disturbance: evidence for a fire-related form of environmental prediction. J. Ecol. 108, 1186-1198. ( 10.1111/1365-2745.13308) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.LaMontagne JM, Pearse IS, Greene DF, Koenig WD. 2020. Mast seeding patterns are asynchronous at a continental scale. Nat. Plants 6, 460-465. ( 10.1038/s41477-020-0647-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koenig WD. 2021. A brief history of masting studies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200423. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0423) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crone EE, McIntire EJB, Brodie J. 2011. What defines mast seeding? Spatio-temporal patterns of cone production by whitebark pine. J. Ecol. 99, 438-444. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01790.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pearse IS, Koenig WD, Kelly D. 2016. Mechanisms of mast seeding: resources, weather, cues, and selection. New Phytol. 212, 546-562. ( 10.1111/nph.14114) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bogdziewicz M, et al. 2020. From theory to experiments for testing the proximate mechanisms of mast seeding: an agenda for an experimental ecology. Ecol. Lett. 23, 210-220. ( 10.1111/ele.13442) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shestakova TA, Mutke S, Gordo J, Camarero JJ, Sin E, Pemán J, Voltas J. 2021. Weather as main driver for masting and stem growth variation in stone pine supports compatible timber and nut co-production. Agric. For. Meteorol. 298–299, 108287. ( 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108287) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bogdziewicz M, Żywiec M, Espelta JM, Fernández-Martinez M, Calama R, Ledwoń M, McIntire E, Crone EE. 2019. Environmental veto synchronizes mast seeding in four contrasting tree species. Am. Nat. 194, 246-259. ( 10.1086/704111) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moran PA. 1953. The statistical analysis of the Canadian lynx cycle. Aust. J. Zool. 1, 291-298. ( 10.1071/ZO9530291) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pesendorfer MB, Bogdziewicz M, Szymkowiak J, Borowski Z, Kantorowicz W, Espelta JM, Fernández-Martínez M. 2020. Investigating the relationship between climate, stand age, and temporal trends in masting behavior of European forest trees. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1654-1667. ( 10.1111/gcb.14945) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kelly D, et al. 2013. Of mast and mean: differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change. Ecol. Lett. 16, 90-98. ( 10.1111/ele.12020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vacchiano G, Hacket-Pain A, Turco M, Motta R, Maringer J, Conedera M, Drobyshev I, Ascoli D. 2017. Spatial patterns and broad-scale weather cues of beech mast seeding in Europe. New Phytol. 215, 595-608. ( 10.1111/nph.14600) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ushio M, Osada Y, Kumagai T, Kume T, Pungga R, Nakashizuka T, Itioka T, Sakai S. 2020. Dynamic and synergistic influences of air temperature and rainfall on general flowering in a Bornean lowland tropical forest. Ecol. Res. 35, 17-29. ( 10.1111/1440-1703.12057) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McPhaden MJ, Zebiak SE, Glantz MH. 2006. ENSO as an integrating concept in earth science. Science 314, 1740-1745. ( 10.1126/science.1132588) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hurrell JW, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M. 2003. An overview of the North Atlantic oscillation. Geophys. Monogr. Am. Geophys. Union 134, 1-36 ( 10.1029/134GM01) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stenseth NC, et al. 2002. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science 297, 1292-1296. ( 10.1126/science.1071281) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hallett TB, Coulson T, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Grenfell BT. 2004. Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather. Nature 430, 71-75. ( 10.1038/nature02708) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Buermann W, Beaulieu C, Parida B, Medvigy D, Collatz GJ, Sheffield J, Sarmiento JL. 2016. Climate-driven shifts in continental net primary production implicated as a driver of a recent abrupt increase in the land carbon sink. Biogeosciences 13, 1597-1607. ( 10.5194/bg-13-1597-2016) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhu Z, Piao S, Xu Y, Bastos A, Ciais P, Peng S. 2017. The effects of teleconnections on carbon fluxes of global terrestrial ecosystems. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3209-3218. ( 10.1002/2016gl071743) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang W, Mei X, Geng X, Turner AG, Jin F-F. 2018. A nonstationary ENSO–NAO relationship due to AMO modulation. J. Clim. 32, 33-43. ( 10.1175/jcli-d-18-0365.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zuckerberg B, Strong C, LaMontagne JM, St. George S, Betancourt JL, Koenig WD. 2020. Climate dipoles as continental drivers of plant and animal populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 440-453. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2020.01.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ashton PS, Givnish TJ, Appanah S. 1988. Staggered flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: new insights into floral induction and the evolution of mast fruiting in the aseasonal tropics. Am. Nat. 132, 44-66. ( 10.1086/284837) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schauber EM, et al. 2002. Masting by eighteen New Zealand plant species: the role of temperature as a synchronizing cue. Ecology 83, 1214-1225. ( 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)0831214:mbenzp]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ascoli D, Vacchiano G, Turco M, Conedera M, Drobyshev I, Maringer J, Motta R, Hacket-Pain A. 2017. Inter-annual and decadal changes in teleconnections drive continental-scale synchronization of tree reproduction. Nat. Commun. 8, 2205. ( 10.1038/s41467-017-02348-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wion AP, Pearse IS, Rodman KC, Veblen TT, Redmond MD. 2021. The effects of ENSO and the North American monsoon on mast seeding in two Rocky Mountain conifer species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200378. ( 10.1098/2020.0378) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gonsamo A, Chen JM, Lombardozzi D. 2016. Global vegetation productivity response to climatic oscillations during the satellite era. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3414-3426. ( 10.1111/gcb.13258) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mariani M, Holz A, Veblen TT, Williamson G, Fletcher M-S, Bowman DMJS. 2018. Climate change amplifications of climate-fire teleconnections in the Southern Hemisphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 5071-5081. ( 10.1029/2018gl078294) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steptoe H, Jones SEO, Fox H. 2018. Correlations between extreme atmospheric hazards and global teleconnections: implications for multihazard resilience. Rev. Geophys. 56, 50-78. ( 10.1002/2017RG000567) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wright SJ, Calderon O. 2005. Seasonal, El Nino and longer term changes in flower and seed production in a moist tropical forest. Ecol. Lett. 9, 35-44. ( 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00851.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Henkel TW, Mayor JR. 2019. Implications of a long-term mast seeding cycle for climatic entrainment, seedling establishment and persistent monodominance in a Neotropical, ectomycorrhizal canopy tree. Ecol. Res. 34, 472-484. ( 10.1111/1440-1703.12014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fernández-Martínez M, Vicca S, Janssens IA, Espelta JM, Peñuelas J. 2016. The North Atlantic Oscillation synchronises fruit production in western European forests. Ecography 40, 864-874. ( 10.1111/ecog.02296) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chapman CA, Valenta K, Bonnell TR, Brown KA, Chapman LJ. 2018. Solar radiation and ENSO predict fruiting phenology patterns in a 15-year record from Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biotropica 50, 384-395. ( 10.1111/btp.12559) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chang-Yang CH, Sun IF, Tsai CH, Lu CL, Hsieh C-F. 2015. ENSO and frost codetermine decade-long temporal variation in flower and seed production in a subtropical rain forest. J. Ecol. 104, 44-54. ( 10.1111/1365-2745.12481) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wich SA, Schaik CPV. 2000. The impact of El Niño on mast fruiting in Sumatra and elsewhere in Malesia. J. Trop. Ecol. 16, 563-577. ( 10.1017/s0266467400001577) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Numata S, Yasuda M, Okuda T, Kachi N, Noor NSMD. 2003. Temporal and spatial patterns of mass flowerings on the Malay Peninsula. Am. J. Bot. 90, 1025-1031. ( 10.3732/ajb.90.7.1025) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Curran LM, et al. 1999. Impact of El Niño and logging on canopy tree recruitment in Borneo. Science 286, 2184-2188. ( 10.1126/science.286.5447.2184) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fredriksson GM, Wich SA. 2006. Frugivory in sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) is linked to El Niño-related fluctuations in fruiting phenology, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 89, 489-508. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00688.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brearley FQ, Proctor J, Nagy L, Dalrymple G, Voysey BC. 2007. Reproductive phenology over a 10-year period in a lowland evergreen rain forest of central Borneo. J. Ecol. 95, 828-839. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01258.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sakai S, Harrison RD, Momose K, Kuraji K, Nagamasu H, Yasunari T, Chong L, Nakashizuka T. 2006. Irregular droughts trigger mass flowering in aseasonal tropical forests in Asia. Am. J. Bot. 93, 1134-1139. ( 10.3732/ajb.93.8.1134) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ramirez-Parada T, Cabrera D, Diaz-Martin Z, Browne L, Karubian J. 2020. Resource-related variables drive individual variation in flowering phenology and mediate population-level flowering responses to climate in an asynchronously reproducing palm. Biotropica 52, 845-856. ( 10.1111/btp.12792) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hogan JA, Nytch CJ, Bithorn JE, Zimmerman JK. 2019. Proposing the solar-wind energy flux hypothesis as a driver of inter-annual variation in tropical tree reproductive effort. Am. J. Bot. 106, 1519-1525. ( 10.1002/ajb2.1380) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.D'Odorico P, Yoo JC, Jaeger S. 2002. Changing seasons: an effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation? J. Clim. 15, 435-445. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Eckhardt S. 2005. ‘SSW to NNE’ - North Atlantic Oscillation affects the progress of seasons across Europe. Global Change Biol. 11, 909-918. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00954.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dalla MA, Grifoni D, Torrigiani Malaspina T, Cecchi L, Barbano F, Mancini M, Orlandini S. 2010. The effects of large-scale atmospheric fields on the cypress pollen season in Tuscany (Central Italy). Aerobiologia 27, 213-220. ( 10.1007/s10453-010-9190-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Donders TH, Hagemans K, Dekker SC, de Weger LA, de Klerk P, Wagner-Cremer F.. 2014. Region-specific sensitivity of Anemophilous pollen deposition to temperature and precipitation. PLoS ONE 9, e104774. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0104774) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hájková L, Hubálek Z, Kožnarová V, Bartošová L, Možný M. 2017. Flowering of allergenically important plant species in relation to the North Atlantic Oscillation system and thermal time in the Czech Republic. Aerobiologia 34, 157-169. ( 10.1007/s10453-017-9504-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Strong C, Zuckerberg B, Betancourt JL, Koenig WD. 2015. Climatic dipoles drive two principal modes of North American boreal bird irruption. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E2795-E2802. ( 10.1073/pnas.1418414112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bouchard M, Pernot C. 2020. Climate and size of previous cone crops contribute to large-scale synchronous cone production in balsam fir. Can. J. For. Res. 51, 638-646. ( 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0054) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ashok K, Guan Z, Yamagata T. 2001. Impact of the Indian Ocean dipole on the relationship between the Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4499-4502. ( 10.1029/2001gl013294) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Peings Y, Magnusdottir G. 2014. Forcing of the wintertime atmospheric circulation by the multidecadal fluctuations of the North Atlantic ocean. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 034018. ( 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mezzina B, García-Serrano J, Bladé I, Kucharski F. 2020. Dynamics of the ENSO teleconnection and NAO variability in the North Atlantic–European late winter. J. Clim. 33, 907-923 ( 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0192.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang Y, Dannenberg MP, Hwang T, Song C. 2019. El Niño-Southern oscillation induced variability of terrestrial gross primary production during the satellite era. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 2419-2431. ( 10.1029/2019jg005117) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cleverly J, et al. 2016. The importance of interacting climate modes on Australia's contribution to global carbon cycle extremes. Sci. Rep. 6, 23113. ( 10.1038/srep23113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Satake A, Leong Yao T, Kosugi Y, Chen Y. 2021. Testing the environmental prediction hypothesis for community-wide mass flowering in South-East Asia. Biotropica 53, 608-618. ( 10.1111/btp.12903) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.LaMontagne JM, Redmond MD, Wion AP, Greene DF. 2021. An assessment of temporal variability in mast seeding of North American Pinaceae. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200373. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0373) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sæther BE, et al. 2007. The extended Moran effect and large-scale synchronous fluctuations in the size of great tit and blue tit populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 315-325. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01195.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li J, Fan K, Xu Z. 2015. Links between the late wintertime North Atlantic oscillation and springtime vegetation growth over Eurasia. Clim. Dyn. 46, 987-1000. ( 10.1007/s00382-015-2627-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Drobyshev I, Niklasson M, Mazerolle MJ, Bergeron Y. 2014. Reconstruction of a 253-year long mast record of European beech reveals its association with large scale temperature variability and no long-term trend in mast frequencies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 192–193, 9-17. ( 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.02.010) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cassou C, Deser C, Alexander MA. 2007. Investigating the impact of reemerging sea surface temperature anomalies on the winter atmospheric circulation over the North Atlantic. J. Clim. 20, 3510-3526. ( 10.1175/jcli4202.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Messori G, Ruiz-Pérez G, Manzoni S, Vico G. 2019. Climate drivers of the terrestrial carbon cycle variability in Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 063001. ( 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1ac0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Quesada B, Vautard R, Yiou P, Hirschi M, Seneviratne SI. 2012. Asymmetric European summer heat predictability from wet and dry southern winters and springs. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 736-741. ( 10.1038/nclimate1536) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Koenig WD, Knops JMH. 1998. Scale of mast-seeding and tree-ring growth. Nature 396, 225-226. ( 10.1038/24293) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bogdziewicz M, Hacket-Pain A, Ascoli D, Szymkowiak J. 2021. Environmental variation drives continental-scale synchrony of European beech reproduction. Ecology 102, e03884. ( 10.1002/ecy.3384) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nussbaumer A, Meusburger K, Schmitt M, Waldner P, Gehrig R, Haeni M, Rigling A, Brunner I, Thimonier A. 2020. Extreme summer heat and drought lead to early fruit abortion in European beech. Sci. Rep. 10, 5334. ( 10.1038/s41598-020-62073-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Piovesan G, Adams JM. 2001. Masting behaviour in beech: linking reproduction and climatic variation. Can. J. Bot. 79, 1039-1047. ( 10.1139/b01-089) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wion AP, Weisberg PJ, Pearse IS, Redmond MD. 2020. Aridity drives spatiotemporal patterns of masting across the latitudinal range of a dryland conifer. Ecography 43, 569-580. ( 10.1111/ecog.04856) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Williamson GB, Ickes K. 2002. Mast fruiting and ENSO cycles: does the cue betray a cause? Oikos 97, 459-461. ( 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970317.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Itioka T, et al. 2001. Six-year population fluctuation of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a tropical lowland Dipterocarp forest in Sarawak. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94, 545-549. ( 10.1603/0013-8746(2001)0940545:sypfot]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fuller DO, Murphy K. 2006. The enso-fire dynamic in insular Southeast Asia. Clim. Change 74, 435-455. ( 10.1007/s10584-006-0432-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Peters VS, Macdonald SE, Dale MRT. 2005. The interaction between masting and fire is key to white spruce regeneration. Ecology 86, 1744-1750. ( 10.1890/03-0656) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Barlow J, Peres CA. 2005. Effects of single and recurrent wildfires on fruit production and large vertebrate abundance in a central Amazonian forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 15, 985-1012. ( 10.1007/s10531-004-3952-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Donat M, Leckebusch G, Pinto J, Ulbrich U. 2010. European storminess and associated circulation weather types: future changes deduced from a multi-model ensemble of GCM simulations. Clim. Res. 42, 27-43. ( 10.3354/cr00853) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Piovesan G, Adams JM. 2005. The evolutionary ecology of masting: does the environmental prediction hypothesis also have a role in mesic temperate forests? Ecol. Res. 20, 739-743. ( 10.1007/s11284-005-0096-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kramer K, Brang P, Bachofen H, Bugmann H, Wohlgemuth T. 2014. Site factors are more important than salvage logging for tree regeneration after wind disturbance in Central European forests. Forest Ecol. Manage. 331, 116-128. ( 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Drobyshev I, Bergeron Y, Linderholm HW, Granström A, Niklasson M. 2015. A 700-year record of large fire years in northern Scandinavia shows large variability and increased frequency during the 1800s. J. Quaternary Sci. 30, 211-221. ( 10.1002/jqs.2765) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ascoli D, Vacchiano G, Maringer J, Bovio G, Conedera M. 2015. The synchronicity of masting and intermediate severity fire effects favors beech recruitment. Forest Ecol. Manage. 353, 126-135. ( 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.031) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Maringer J, Wohlgemuth T, Hacket-Pain A, Ascoli D, Berretti R, Conedera M. 2020. Drivers of persistent post-fire recruitment in European beech forests. Sci. Total Environ. 699, 134006. ( 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Forchhammer MC, Post E, Stenseth NCR. 1998. Breeding phenology and climate. Nature 391, 29-30. ( 10.1038/34070)9422504 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hubalek Z. 2003. Spring migration of birds in relation to North Atlantic Oscillation. Folia Zoologica-Praha 52, 287-298. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wright BR, Zuur AF. 2014. Seedbank dynamics after masting in mulga (Acacia aptaneura): implications for post-fire regeneration. J. Arid Environ. 107, 10-17. ( 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.03.008) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kwok ABC, Wardle GM, Greenville AC, Dickman CR. 2016. Long-term patterns of invertebrate abundance and relationships to environmental factors in arid Australia. Austral. Ecol. 41, 480-491. ( 10.1111/aec.12334) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wright BR, Fensham RJ. 2017. Fire after a mast year triggers mass recruitment of slender mulga (Acacia aptaneura), a desert shrub with heat-stimulated germination. Am. J. Bot. 104, 1474-1483. ( 10.3732/ajb.1700008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wright BR, Fensham RJ. 2018. Fire timing in relation to masting: an important determinant of post-fire recruitment success for the obligate-seeding arid zone soft spinifex (Triodia pungens). Ann. Bot. 121, 119-128. ( 10.1093/aob/mcx136) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Radnan GN. 2018. The effect of changes in landscape and habitat complexity resulting from shrub encroachment and climatic factors (aridity and ENSO) on semi-arid ant communities. PhD thesis, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • 91.Greenville AC, Dickman CR, Wardle GM, Letnic M. 2009. The fire history of an arid grassland: the influence of antecedent rainfall and ENSO. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18, 631. ( 10.1071/wf08093) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Letnic M, Dickman CR. 2006. Boom means bust: interactions between the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), rainfall and the processes threatening mammal species in arid Australia. Biodivers. Conserv. 15, 3847-3880. ( 10.1007/s10531-005-0601-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Fletcher MS. 2015. Mast seeding and the El Niño-Southern oscillation: a long-term relationship? Plant Ecol. 216, 527-533. ( 10.1007/s11258-015-0456-x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Emile-Geay J, Cobb KM, Cole JE, Elliot M, Zhu F. 2020. Past ENSO variability. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 87-118. ( 10.1002/9781119548164.ch5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Merz N, Raible CC, Woollings T. 2015. North Atlantic eddy-driven jet in interglacial and glacial winter climates. J. Clim. 28, 3977-3997. ( 10.1175/jcli-d-14-00525.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kelly D. 1994. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 465-470. ( 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90310-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Bogdziewicz M, Szymkowiak J, Tanentzap AJ, Calama R, Marino S, Steele MA, Seget B, Piechnik Ł, Żywiec M. 2020. Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in perennial plants. New Phytol. 229, 2357-2364. ( 10.1111/nph.16835) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Satake A, Iwasa Y. 2002. Spatially limited pollen exchange and a long-range synchronization of trees. Ecology 83, 993-1005. ( 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)0830993:slpeaa]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Koenig WD, Knops JMH, Pesendorfer MB, Zaya DN, Ashley MV. 2017. Drivers of synchrony of acorn production in the valley oak (Quercus lobata) at two spatial scales. Ecology 98, 3056-3062. ( 10.1002/ecy.2010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Nilsson SG, Wastljung U. 1987. Seed predation and cross-pollination in mast-seeding beech (Fagus sylvatica) patches. Ecology 68, 260-265. ( 10.2307/1939256) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Janzen DH. 1976. Why bamboos wait so long to flower. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 347-391. ( 10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.002023) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kelly D, Sork VL. 2002. Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 427-447. ( 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095433) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Satake A, Bjørnstad ON. 2004. Spatial dynamics of specialist seed predators on synchronized and intermittent seed production of host plants. Am. Nat. 163, 591-605. ( 10.1086/382661) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Sun IF, Chen YY, Hubbell SP, Wright SJ, Noor NSMD. 2007. Seed predation during general flowering events of varying magnitude in a Malaysian rain forest. J. Ecol. 95, 818-827. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01235.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sanguinetti J, Kitzberger T. 2008. Patterns and mechanisms of masting in the large-seeded Southern Hemisphere conifer Araucaria araucana. Austral. Ecol. 33, 78-87. ( 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01792.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kanamori T, Kuze N, Bernard H, Malim TP, Kohshima S. 2016. Fluctuations of population density in Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus morio) related to fruit availability in the Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia: a 10-year record including two mast fruitings and three other peak fruitings. Primates 58, 225-235. ( 10.1007/s10329-016-0584-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Curran LM, Webb CO. 2000. Experimental tests of the spatiotemporal scale of seed predation in mast-fruiting Ddipterocarpaceae. Ecol. Monogr. 70, 129-148. ( 10.1890/0012-9615(2000)0700129:etotss]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Liebhold A, Koenig WD, Bjørnstad ON. 2004. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 467-490. ( 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132516) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Maycock CR, Thewlis RN, Ghazoul J, Nilus R, Burslem DFRP. 2005. Reproduction of dipterocarps during low intensity masting events in a Bornean rain forest. J. Veg. Sci. 16, 635-646. ( 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02406.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sakai S. 2002. General flowering in lowland mixed dipterocarp forests of South-East Asia. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75, 233-247. ( 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00016.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Liepelt S, Bialozyt R, Ziegenhagen B. 2002. Wind-dispersed pollen mediates postglacial gene flow among refugia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14 590-14 594. ( 10.1073/pnas.212285399) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kremer A, et al. 2012. Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 15, 378-392. ( 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Piotti A, Leonarduzzi C, Postolache D, Bagnoli F, Spanu I, Brousseau L, Urbinati C, Leonardi S, Vendramin GG. 2017. Unexpected scenarios from Mediterranean refugial areas: disentangling complex demographic dynamics along the Apennine distribution of silver fir. J. Biogeogr. 44, 1547-1558. ( 10.1111/jbi.13011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Varis S, Pakkanen A, Galofré A, Pulkkinen P. 2009. The extent of south-north pollen transfer in Finnish Scots pine. Silva Fenn. 43, 717-726. ( 10.14214/sf.168) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.de Lafontaine G, Turgeon J, Payette S. 2010. Phylogeography of white spruce (Picea glauca) in eastern North America reveals contrasting ecological trajectories. J. Biogeogr. 37, 741-751. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02241.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Utomo S, Uchiyama K, Ueno S, Matsumoto A, Widiyatno IS, Na'iem M, Tsumura Y. 2018. Effects of Pleistocene climate change on genetic structure and diversity of Shorea macrophylla in Kalimantan rainforest. Tree Genet. Genomes 14, 44. ( 10.1007/s11295-018-1261-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Magri D, et al. 2006. A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol. 171, 199-221. ( 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.König AO, Ziegenhagen B, van Dam BC, Csaikl UM, Coart E, Degen B, Burg K, de Vries SMG, Petit RJ. 2002. Chloroplast DNA variation of oaks in western Central Europe and genetic consequences of human influences. Forest Ecol. Manage. 156, 147-166. ( 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00640-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürr T. 2007. Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 595-619. ( 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hacket-Pain A, Bogdziewicz M. 2021. Climate change and plant reproduction: trends and drivers of mast seeding change. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200379. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0379) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cai W, Wang G, Dewitte B, Wu L, Santoso A, Takahashi K, Yang Y, Carréric A, McPhaden MJ. 2018. Increased variability of eastern Pacific El Niño under greenhouse warming. Nature 564, 201-206. ( 10.1038/s41586-018-0776-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Freund MB, Brown JR, Henley BJ, Karoly DJ, Brown JN. 2020. Warming patterns affect El Niño diversity in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. J. Clim. 33, 8237-8260. ( 10.1175/jcli-d-19-0890.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yun KS, Lee JY, Timmermann A, Stein K, Stuecker MF, Fyfe JC, Chung ES. 2021. Increasing ENSO–rainfall variability due to changes in future tropical temperature–rainfall relationship. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 43. ( 10.1038/s43247-021-00108-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ceppi P, Shepherd TG. 2019. The role of the stratospheric polar vortex for the Austral jet response to greenhouse gas forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6972-6979. ( 10.1029/2019gl082883) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Davini P, D'Andrea F. 2020. From CMIP3 to CMIP6: Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking simulation in present and future climate. J. Clim. 33, 10 021-10 038. ( 10.1175/jcli-d-19-0862.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Fabiano F, Meccia V, Davini P, Ghinassi P, Corti S. 2020. A regime view of future atmospheric circulation changes in northern mid-latitudes. Weather Clim. Dynam. 2, 163-180. [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hand R, Bader J, Matei D, Ghosh R, Jungclaus JH. 2020. Changes of decadal SST variations in the Subpolar North Atlantic under strong CO2 forcing as an indicator for the ocean circulation's contribution to Atlantic multidecadal variability. J. Clim. 33, 3213-3228. ( 10.1175/jcli-d-18-0739.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Seidl R, et al. 2017. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 395-402. ( 10.1038/nclimate3303) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gremer JR, Chiono A, Suglia E, Bontrager M, Okafor L, Schmitt J. 2020. Variation in the seasonal germination niche across an elevational gradient: the role of germination cueing in current and future climates. Am. J. Bot. 107, 350-363. ( 10.1002/ajb2.1425) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This article has no additional data.


Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES