Significance
We present an interventional optical imaging–guided oncologic technique. This interventional oncologic technique can differentiate, in vivo, the three definitive zones of tumor and tumor margin as well as normal surrounding liver, which enables differentiation of residual viable tumors from ablated nonviable tumors and thereby pretermit the intraprocedural real-time guidance for complete tumor eradication during a single interventional ablation session. This innovation should revolutionize the current ablation technology, leading to a significant advancement in the complete treatment of larger or irregular malignant lesions not only in the liver but also in other solid organs.
Keywords: indocyanine green, interventional optical imaging, hepatic VX2 tumor, radiofrequency ablation, residual tumor
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an interventional optical imaging (OI) technique for intraprocedural guidance of complete tumor ablation. Our study employed four strategies: 1) optimizing experimental protocol of various indocyanine green (ICG) concentrations/detection time windows for ICG-based OI of tumor cells (ICG cells); 2) using the optimized OI to evaluate ablation-heat effect on ICG cells; 3) building the interventional OI system and investigating its sensitivity for differentiating residual viable tumors from nonviable tumors; and 4) preclinically validating its technical feasibility for intraprocedural monitoring of radiofrequency ablations (RFAs) using animal models with orthotopic hepatic tumors. OI signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) among preablation tumors, residual, and ablated tumors were statistically compared and confirmed by subsequent pathology. The optimal dose and detection time window for ICG-based OI were 100 μg/mL at 24 h. Interventional OI displayed significantly higher fluorescence signals of viable ICG cells compared with nonviable ICG cells (189.3 ± 7.6 versus 63.7 ± 5.7 au, P < 0.001). The interventional OI could differentiate three definitive zones of tumor, tumor margin, and normal surrounding liver, demonstrating significantly higher average SBR of residual viable tumors compared to ablated nonviable tumors (2.54 ± 0.31 versus 0.57 ± 0.05, P < 0.001). The innovative interventional OI technique permitted operators to instantly detect residual tumors and thereby guide repeated RFAs, ensuring complete tumor eradication, which was confirmed by ex vivo OI and pathology. In conclusion, we present an interventional oncologic technique, which should revolutionize the current ablation technology, leading to a significant advancement in complete treatment of larger or irregular malignancies.
Advances in image-guided percutaneous ablation technologies, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, cryoablation, and irreversible electroporation, have greatly improved the management of malignancies in patients. These interventional oncologic therapies have some prominent advantages, including being minimally invasive and reproducible, offering low risk of complications and requiring only short hospital stay. However, with the current technology, these interventional ablation techniques are most effective at eradicating small (<3 cm) lesions (1, 2). For the ablation of larger and irregular lesions, these ablations appear to suffer the setback of incomplete tumor killing at the tumor periphery (3, 4). Residual viable tumor cells at the tumor periphery often serve as the source of tumor persistence and recurrence, ultimately leading to treatment failure (4–6).
Incomplete tumor ablation is attributed to the challenge of creating an effective and safe ablation periphery with a 1-cm surgical margin or “clear safety margin” beyond the tumor confinement using the current ablation technology (7, 8). The inability to obtain this clear margin is often caused by 1) infiltrative growth patterns of malignant tumors to form microsatellite lesions or microvenous tumor emboli located at the 1-cm surgical margin of ablated tumors; 2) intentional avoidance of rapid overheating by the operator in order to protect adjacent critical structures (such as vasculatures, bile ducts, the gastrointestinal tract, and the diaphragm); 3) RFA heat carried away by blood flow when presence of larger neighboring vasculatures at the tumor periphery (so-called “heat-sink” effect); and 4) off-center positioning of the ablation electrode due to limited percutaneous access windows (9, 10).
For the clinical practice of percutaneous ablations, the primary reason for such incomplete tumor ablation is the current lack of an effective and real-time intraprocedural monitoring tool to instantly detect any residual tumor before terminating the ablation procedure. To date, the assessment of complete tumor treatment is either identified on postprocedure follow-up imaging or confirmed by postoperative pathology, if available.
Optical imaging (OI) represents the newest member of the modern medical imaging family. OI uses either near-infrared (NIR-I and NIR-II, 700 to 1,700 nm) or visible (400 to 700 nm) light to simultaneously provide molecular, morphologic, and functional information of disease processes (11). The primary advantages of OI include real-time imaging capability, cost-effectiveness, portability, nonionizing, and generally well-tolerated by patients (11, 12). Use of OI dyes [optical contrast agents, such as indocyanine green (ICG)] or advanced optical probes have further strengthened the usefulness of OI techniques in better detecting relatively deep-seated lesions and providing better strategies of guiding cancer treatments (13–15). These advancements in OI technology led to our current innovation, which specifically addresses the clinical problem of incomplete tumor ablation, by developing an interventional oncologic technique, named “Interventional real-time OI–guided complete tumor ablation” (Fig. 1).
Results
Study Design.
This study consisted of four aims: 1) optimizing the ICG parameters, such as doses and detection time windows, specifically for in vitro experiments to achieve high-contrast and high-quality ICG-based OI of ICG-treated VX2 tumor cells (ICG cells); 2) using the optimized ICG-based OI to evaluate, in vitro, the ablation heat effect on ICG cells; 3) building an interventional real-time OI system with specific in vivo evaluation of its capability and sensitivity with accurate differentiation between the residual viable tumors and ablated nonviable tumors; and 4) via a preclinical longitudinal experiment using animal models with orthotopic liver VX2 tumors, to specifically validate the technical feasibility using the ICG-based interventional OI system to intraprocedurally guide complete tumor ablation, which closely mimicked image-guided percutaneous RFA of hepatic tumors in humans (Fig. 1).
Optimization of ICG Dose and Detection Time Window for In Vitro OI of ICG Cells.
We first established the optimized protocol specifically for in vitro evaluation of ICG-based OI. VX2 tumor cells were treated with ICG at 1) different concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 μg/mL for 24 h; 2) various incubation times of 1, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h; and 3) nontreated cell groups served as a control. In optimization of ICG dose, fluorescent microscopy showed that intracellular uptake of ICG by VX2 cells was well established by emitting red fluorescence, which was not seen in VX2 cells without ICG treatment. The red fluorescence signals of these cells became more intense as we increased ICG concentrations from 0 to 125 μg/mL (Fig. 2A). In vitro quantitative optical/X-ray images of ICG cells further confirmed similar results to fluorescent microscopy, demonstrating that the fluorescence signal intensities (SIs) of ICG cells increased as ICG concentrations increased from 0 to the peak of 100 μg/mL and then remained constant. Thus, the optimum ICG dose for in vitro ICG-based OI was determined to be 100 μg/mL (Fig. 2 B and C).
When optimizing the timing for detection of ICG cells, fluorescent microscopy demonstrated that ICG-emitting red fluorescence became more intense as the incubation times increased from 0 to 48 h (Fig. 3A). In vitro optical/X-ray images of ICG cells showed similar results of increased fluorescence signals as the incubation duration was extended (Fig. 3B). The quantitative optical/X-ray imaging displayed ICG SI reached its peak at the incubation time point of 24 h, which thus was considered as the optimum detection time window for ICG-based in vitro OI of VX2 cells (Fig. 3C).
Ablation Heat Effect on ICG Cells.
Once the optimized in vitro OI protocol was established, this was used to evaluate the ablation heat effect on ICG cells versus ICG solutions. After treating ICG cells by an ablation-mimicking lethal heat at 80 °C for 10 min, the immediate in vitro optical/X-ray image demonstrated a significant decrease in the average fluorescence SIs of ICG cells, compared with that before the ablation heat treatment (4.13 ± 0.26 × 106 photons/sec/mm2 versus 13.65 ± 0.56 × 106 photons/sec/mm2, P < 0.001). However, no significant change of ICG fluorescence SIs was seen in the cells of the non–ablation-treated control groups (13.23 ± 0.99 × 106 photons/sec/mm2 versus 13.25 ± 0.80 × 106 photons/sec/mm2, P = 0.889) (Fig. 4 A and C). After treating ICG solutions with the same ablation heat of 80 °C for 10 min, the immediate in vitro optical/X-ray images showed a significant decrease in the average fluorescence SIs of ICG solutions, compared with that before ablation heat treatment (6.47 ± 0.40 × 107 photons/sec/mm2 versus 12.82 ± 0.43 × 107 photons/sec/mm2, P < 0.001). No significant change of the average fluorescence SIs was detected in the non–ablation-heated control groups (12.66 ± 0.50 × 107 photons/sec/mm2 versus 12.69 ± 0.52 × 107 photons/sec/mm2, P = 0.482) (Fig. 4 B and D).
Fluorescent microscopy further demonstrated that the fluorescence signals of ICG cells was decreased, with smudged nuclei visualized after the ablation-heated treatment (Fig. 4 E and F). The findings were confirmed by the laboratory examinations with cell viability assay and flow cytometry analysis, showing no viable cells after the ablation heat treatment (Fig. 4 G–I). These results indicated that the ablation heat at 80 °C resulted in the destruction of ICG cells and depressed function of ICGs simultaneously.
Building the Interventional OI System.
The interventional OI system was constructed by created a micro-OI needle of 30-cm length and an outer diameter of 17 gauge. This type of micro-OI needle was specifically designed to be used in conjunction with any commercially available interventional devices/instruments, such as an access trochar used in image-guided percutaneous placement of ablation electrode. The OI needle was connected with 1) a 250-W halogen light source (KL 2500 LCD, Schott) that was equipped with a filter wheel containing an excitation filter (ET775/50x, Chroma Technology Corp.) and 2) a scientific complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (sCMOS) camera (Pco.edge 4.2 bi; Pioneer in Cameras and Optoelectronics Aktien Gesellschaft) through a band pass emission filter (ET845/55m, Chroma Technology Corp.) (Fig. 5A).
In Vitro Interventional OI for Differentiation between Living (Viable) and Dead (Nonviable) ICG Cells.
To evaluate the efficacy of interventional OI in differentiating the living ICG cells from the nonviable ICG cells, a cell phantom was created, consisting of a plastic tube that contained two separate chambers in the inferior portion (Fig. 5C). The living (viable) cells were centrifuged in one chamber with phosphate-buffered saline, while the dead (nonviable) tumor cells (treated by 80 °C of ablation heat) were present in the opposite chamber. The micro-OI needle was vertically positioned above the two cell-containing chambers to generate in vitro interventional OI (Fig. 5 B–D).
Interventional OI clearly detected the high fluorescence signals emitted from the living ICG cells, in sharp contrast to the low fluorescence signals from the dead ICG cells (Fig. 6D), which was later confirmed by fluorescent microscopy displaying as the decreased ICG signals of cells with smudged nuclei after the ablation heat treatment (Fig. 5 E and F). The quantitative analysis of fluorescence SIs further confirmed a significantly higher average fluorescence SI of the living ICG cells, in comparison with the ablation-treated nonviable ICG cells (189.3 ± 7.6 au versus 63.7 ± 5.7 au, P < 0.001) (Fig. 5G).
Creation of VX2 Tumor Models.
The primary goal for the in vivo experiments was to evaluate the functionality/sensitivity of the interventional OI system, which was required in conjunction with commercially available percutaneous interventional devices/instruments. For this objective, the use of larger animal models was ideal. To date, the preexisting rabbit model employing VX2 liver tumors has been the most well-accepted model for basic/preclinical research in hepato-oncology (16–18). Thus, in this study, we created 24 rabbit models with orthotopic hepatic VX2 tumors (Fig. 6).
In Vivo Real-Time Interventional OI of Liver Tumors.
With the interventional OI system, three distinct histopathologic zones, including tumor, tumor margin, and the surrounding normal liver (background fluorescence), could be clearly visualized in vivo. This could only be seen ex vivo using traditional pathology examination of either surgically removed or biopsied and autopsied tumor tissues if available (Fig. 7).
Capability and Sensitivity Using the Interventional OI in Differentiating Residual Viable Tumors from Ablated Nonviable Tumors.
Under real-time ultrasound imaging guidance, a multipolar RFA electrode, connected to an RFA generator (WE7568-II, Welfare Electronics Co.), was positioned into the tumor center during RFA treatment. To evaluate the capability/sensitivity of the interventional OI system, 16 animals with RFA-treated tumors were divided into two tumor model groups (8 per group): 1) incomplete ablation was achieved by not fully deploying the prongs of the multipolar RFA electrode which intentionally destroyed only part of the tumor, leaving a viable portion of the tumor along the tumor margin and 2) complete ablation to include the tumor margin by fully deploying the prongs of the RFA electrode to completely destroy the tumor. The partial or complete deployment of the electrode prongs to include the target tumor margins was precisely guided by real-time ultrasound imaging and later confirmed by X-ray imaging (Fig. 8 A–C, F, and G). All tumors were ablated at a lethal heat temperature of 80 °C for 4 min.
The interventional OI of the incompletely ablated tumor group was detected by the high fluorescence signals present in both the residual tumors and preablation tumors. However, low signals were detected in the ablated tumors. These findings were further confirmed by quantitative SI analysis with significantly higher average signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) in the peripheral residual tumors and preablation tumors (residual tumors versus ablated tumors = 2.54 ± 0.31 versus 0.57 ± 0.05, P < 0.001; preablation tumors versus ablated tumors = 2.52 ± 0.42 versus 0.57 ± 0.05, P < 0.001) (Fig. 8 D, E, and K). No statistically significant difference in the average SBRs were detected between the preablation tumors and residual tumors (2.52 ± 0.42 versus 2.54 ± 0.31, P = 0.751). The interventional OI of the completely ablated tumor group was detected as high signals in the preablation tumor, with a significantly reduced signal in the completely ablated tumor. A significantly higher average SBR was present in the preablation tumor group compared with that of the postablated tumor group (2.54 ± 0.34 versus 0.57 ± 0.04, P < 0.001) (Fig. 8 I, J, and L).
Confirmation with Ex Vivo OI.
The ex vivo OI of the gross, sectioned specimen functions as a “Gold standard” to corroborate the findings achieved by the in vivo interventional OI system, with final confirmation by pathologic examination. As shown in Fig. 9, ex vivo OI further confirmed the findings by in vivo interventional OI, demonstrating that the average SBR of the completely ablated tumors was significantly lower than that of the normal liver (0.58 ± 0.04 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, P < 0.001), and the average SBR of the residual tumors was significantly higher than that of the normal liver and the ablated tumor (residual tumors versus normal liver = 2.56 ± 0.39 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, P < 0.001; residual tumors versus ablated tumors = 2.56 ± 0.39 versus 0.58 ± 0.03, P < 0.001).
The in vivo and ex vivo OI findings in the sections Capability and Sensitivity Using the Interventional OI in Differentiating Residual Viable Tumors from Ablated Nonviable Tumors and Confirmation with Ex Vivo OI were further confirmed by pathologic examination with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling staining, Ki67 staining, and fluorescent microscopy (Fig. 10).
Preclinical Longitudinal Validation of the Technical Feasibility.
We further validated the technical feasibility of the ICG-based interventional OI technique via serial in vivo experiments to assist intraprocedurally in achieving complete tumor ablation at a longitudinal and more-preclinical setting by closely mimicking image-guided percutaneous RFA of hepatic tumors in humans (Fig. 1). When incomplete ablation, the interventional OI could clearly identify the high fluorescence signals being emitted from the residual tumor compared with the low signals emitted in the ablated tumor. The average SBRs of the residual tumor and preablation tumor were significantly higher than that of the ablated tumor (residual tumors versus ablated tumors = 2.56 ± 0.10 versus 0.58 ± 0.03, P < 0.001; preablation tumors versus ablated tumors = 2.52 ± 0.14 versus 0.58 ± 0.03, P < 0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference of the average SBRs between the preablation tumor and residual tumor (2.52 ± 0.14 versus 2.56 ± 0.10, P = 0.219). After a complete ablation, the interventional real-time OI detected low fluorescence signal in the fully ablated tumor. The average SBR of an ablated tumor was significantly lower than that of the normal liver (0.57 ± 0.02 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, P < 0.001) and the preablation tumor (0.57 ± 0.02 versus 2.52 ± 0.14, P < 0.001). The ex vivo OI, H&E staining, and fluorescent microscopy further confirmed that the tumor was completely ablated (Fig. 11).
Discussion
Residual viable tumor cells that located at the periphery of larger or irregular malignancies are frequently responsible for residual disease and/or recurrence using current interventional ablation technologies. In clinical practice, the primary reason for such incomplete tumor ablation is the absence of an intraprocedural real-time imaging tool, which would allow for residual tumors to be instantly detected before terminating the ablation procedure. In current clinical practice, residual tumor is usually identified on postablation follow up imaging, such as computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and MRI. However, these follow-up imaging modalities often detect persistent or recurrent tumor at days/weeks to months after terminating the initial ablation (19–21). Thus, it is imperative to develop a new intraprocedural real-time imaging tool, allowing immediate detection of residual tumors at the ablated tumor periphery during a single ablation session. The innovative design of the present study aims to specifically conquer the critical clinical problem of residual or recurrent tumor following RFA of larger and irregular malignancies: developing a “one-stop-shop” interventional oncologic technology “Intraprocedural real-time OI guidance for complete tumor ablation,” with a specific emphasis on the full eradication of malignant cells located at the difficult to treat tumor periphery, to create clean tumor (surgical) margins.
OI has several important advantages over other imaging modalities, such as CT or PET/CT (with no real-time imaging capability) and MRI (with high cost and environment requirements for MR safety). Recent advances in OI using target optical probes have further enhanced the ability of OI to detect deeper lesions and allow for better planning and guidance of localized cancer treatments (13–15). However, these novel OI compounds are still in preclinical development phase and a long way from regulatory approval (22). Thus, considering the potential smooth translation of the interventional OI technique to a further clinical trial, in this study we specifically selected the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved fluorescent agent, ICG, as the OI contrast agent, with our goal being to achieve superior imaging quality for instant detection of residual foci at the ablated tumor periphery during the ablation procedure.
ICG is an intracellular and relatively nontoxic protein-bound compound (13, 23). The potential mechanisms for intracellular localization of ICG have not been fully understood yet. A few studies suggest that the hepatic malignant tumor cells can take up ICG via the transporters of Na+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide and organic anion transporting polypeptide 8 (24). Intravenously administered ICG is excreted exclusively by the normal bile duct of liver. However, as the impaired biliary excretion in the cancer tissues, ICG is accumulated in the liver tumor cells, which thus results in ICG enhancement throughout the tumor, and thereby ICG-outlined tumors can be detected by OI.
ICG has been used for management of different cancers (25–27). In open liver surgery for example, the operators use an external ICG-based OI imager to obtain surface fluorescence images for the planning of liver tumor resection (24, 28). However, the surface OI for the detection of deep-seated small lesions has been a challenging task, since the tissue penetration depth of current ICG-based fluorescence imaging is ∼1 cm (24, 29). This problem, the limited penetration depth of current OI, can be solved using image-guided interventional approaches, which are capable of precisely guiding the position of micro-OI detectors to the targets, avoiding tissue scattering and reflection along the pathway of OI light.
In the present study, we attempted to fully apply the advantages of ICG-based OI by extending its use from open surgeries to image-guided, minimally invasive interventional oncology treatment for the thermal ablation of hepatic tumors as the first target. Under real-time image guidance, deep-seated tumors were accurately localized, allowing for the interventional micro-OI needle to be precisely positioned into the tumors. As the tumors were ablated, interventional OI was generated, and residual viable foci at the ablated tumor periphery could then be detected. With this strategy, we specifically designed and built the interventional OI system, which was equipped with a micro-OI needle, ICG-specific excitation and emission filters, and a high-performance digital sCMOS camera, to acquire the intratumoral near-infrared fluorescence signals emitting from ICG-outlined tumors. The interventional OI technique enables intraprocedural identification of residual viable foci of ablated tumors. This information provides immediate feedback to the interventionalists performing the procedure to carry out further action by either extending the ablation duration, increasing the ablation zone/energy, or repositioning the ablation electrode to assure the complete eradication of the entire tumor during an image-guided percutaneous ablation session.
Through the serial comprehensive in vitro experiments with VX2 tumor cells, we first need to optimize the in vitro experimental protocol of ICG dose and detection time window to achieve a satisfactory ICG based OI. By applying the optimum in vitro OI protocol, we confirmed the hypothesis that the micro-optical needle–based interventional OI apparatus could sensitively differentiate the living (viable) tumor cells from the ablated dead (nonviable) tumor cells. Subsequently, through serial in vivo experiments using larger animal (rabbit) models with orthotopic liver VX2 tumors, we further investigated the capability and sensitivity of this novel interventional OI system in identifying the residual foci of the ablated tumors. Ex vivo OI, as well as different pathology and laboratory examinations served as “gold standards” for comparison with the interventional OI system. In the final step of this study, we successfully validated the technical feasibility of the interventional OI system in a more-realistic clinical setting by mimicking the image-guided tumor ablation process in humans using the interventional OI for real-time guidance during the ablation process to differentiate incomplete and complete RFA. Thus, these comprehensive in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experiments in this study have allowed for the establishment of the interventional oncology technique. The intraprocedural OI/RFA protocol, as exemplified and optimized by this study, has demonstrated the essential aspects of this technique and will facilitate its eventual translation to clinical practice.
In conclusion, we present an innovative interventional oncologic technique: “Interventional real-time OI guidance for complete tumor ablation.” This technique and approach may revolutionize current ablation technology by changing real-time imaging capabilities and decision making during an image-guided intervention ablation session. This could lead to a significant advancement in the complete eradication of larger and irregular malignant lesions, not only in the liver but also in other solid organs. This will, in turn, greatly improve survival and the quality of life in patients suffering from unresectable solid organ malignancies.
Materials and Methods
Details of in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo OI experiments are described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Cell Culture.
VX2 tumor cells were cultured under different conditions for various examinations and evaluations, including 1) 1 × 105 cells seeded in 35 × 10-mm Petri dishes (Falcon, Becton Dickinson and Company) for in vitro optical/X-ray imaging, 2) 5 × 104 cells per chamber seeded in four-well chamber slides (Lab-TekII; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for fluorescent microscopy confirmation, and 3) 5 × 105 cells seeded in 100 × 20–mm Petri dishes (Falcon, Corning Incorporated) for interventional OI. All VX2 tumor cells were cultured by Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium 1640 (Gibco, Paisley, PA4 9RF) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and incubated at 37 °C with a 5% carbon dioxide atmosphere. When 80% confluence was reached, cells were treated with ICG (Patheon Italia S.P.A) at different concentrations and various incubation times and then examined using optical/X-ray imaging, fluorescent microscopy, and interventional OI.
In-Vivo Interventional Real-Time OI.
Twenty-four hours before RFA procedures, all animals received intravenous administration of ICG via an auricular vein (0.5 mg/kg body weight) (30). Before and after RFA, under ultrasound imaging guidance, the micro-OI needle was first positioned in the normal liver parenchyma just outside of the RFA electrode entering the tumor to achieve background interventional OI. Then, under real-time ultrasound imaging guidance, the micro-OI needle was advanced to the tumor periphery and achieved intratumoral “inside-output” OI at six different directions/points around the tumor periphery (i.e., at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock along the equator as well as the north and south poles) using the same interventional OI protocol as used for in vitro interventional OI in the section pertaining to in-vitro interventional OI of ICG-cells with and without ablation-heated treatments.
Ex-Vivo OI Confirmation.
Briefly, after achieving satisfactory in vivo interventional OI, the rabbits were euthanized, and the left liver lobe with the tumor was harvested and sliced at the thickness of 0.5 to 0.8 cm. These gross liver specimens were then imaged using the Bruker In Vivo Xtreme optical/X-ray imaging system at the excitation wavelength of 760 nm, emission wavelength of 830 nm, field of view of 120 × 120 mm, 1.40 F-Stop, 2 × 2 binning, and an exposure time of 1.0 min.
Statistical Analysis.
Three investigators independently interpreted the results from the in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experiments in each of the study sections. The statistical analysis with a paired Student’s t test was performed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions 24.0 software (IBM). The average fluorescence SIs and the average SBRs were compared with the different subject groups undergoing the different treatments. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. A probability level of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Grant No. NIH R01EB028095.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. N.K. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2113028118/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
All data used for the study are within the manuscript and SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Facciorusso A., Serviddio G., Muscatiello N., Local ablative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated review. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 7, 477–489 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Eisele R. M., et al., Results of liver resection in combination with radiofrequency ablation for hepatic malignancies. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 36, 269–274 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McWilliams J. P., et al., Percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 21, S204–S213 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Künzli B. M., Abitabile P., Maurer C. A., Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: Actual limitations and potential solutions in the future. World J. Hepatol. 3, 8–14 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hwang J. E., et al., Combination of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and systemic chemotherapy are effective treatment modalities for metachronous liver metastases from gastric cancer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 31, 25–32 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Iezzi R.et al.; HepatoCATT Group for the Multidisciplinary Management of HCC , Single-step multimodal locoregional treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Balloon-occluded percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation (BO-RFA) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Radiol. Med. (Torino) 118, 555–569 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Beland M. D., Wasser E. J., Mayo-Smith W. W., Dupuy D. E., Primary non-small cell lung cancer: Review of frequency, location, and time of recurrence after radiofrequency ablation. Radiology 254, 301–307 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahmed M.et al.; International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation; Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières Expert Panel; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology; Standard of Practice Committee of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe , Image-guided tumor ablation: Standardization of terminology and reporting criteria–A 10-year update. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 25, 1691–705.e4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van Tilborg A. A., et al., MWA versus RFA for perivascular and peribiliary CRLM: A retrospective patient- and lesion-based analysis of two historical cohorts. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 39, 1438–1446 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhatia S., et al., Radiofrequency ablation in primary non-small cell lung cancer: What a radiologist needs to know. Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 26, 81–91 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Di Leo G., Trimboli R. M., Sella T., Sardanelli F., Optical imaging of the breast: Basic principles and clinical applications. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 209, 230–238 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Causin P., Lupieri M. G., Naldi G., Weishaeupl R. M., Mathematical and numerical challenges in optical screening of female breast. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 36, e3286 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pansa A., Torzilli G., Procopio F., Del Fabbro D., Indocyanine-green fluorescence guided anatomical segmentectomy for HCC with portal thrombosis: The counter-fluorescence technique. Updates Surg. 72, 219–222 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reinhart M. B., Huntington C. R., Blair L. J., Heniford B. T., Augenstein V. A., Indocyanine green: Historical context, current applications, and future considerations. Surg. Innov. 23, 166–175 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nishino H., et al., Real-time navigation for liver surgery using projection mapping with indocyanine green fluorescence: Development of the novel medical imaging projection system. Ann. Surg. 267, 1134–1140 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kan X., et al., Stress test of contrast-enhanced US with phenylephrine in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model: Differentiating benign periablational enhancement from residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 27, 1077–1085.e2 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Breugel J. M. M., et al., Theranostic application of lipiodol for transarterial chemoembolization in a VX2 rabbit liver tumor model. Theranostics 9, 3674–3686 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Duran R., et al., Vandetanib-eluting radiopaque beads: Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy in a rabbit model of liver cancer. Radiology 293, 695–703 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim S. K., et al., Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radio-frequency ablation: Spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics 23, 107–121 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kan X., et al., Combined ultrasound/computed tomography guidance in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatic dome. Cancer Manag. Res. 11, 7751–7757 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang X. Y., Chen D., Zhang X. S., Chen Z. F., Hu A. B., Value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation: A comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J. Dig. Dis. 14, 433–438 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kurbegovic S., et al., Molecular targeted NIR-II probe for image-guided brain tumor surgery. Bioconjug. Chem. 29, 3833–3840 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Carr J. A., et al., Shortwave infrared fluorescence imaging with the clinically approved near-infrared dye indocyanine green. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 4465–4470 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ishizawa T., et al., Mechanistic background and clinical applications of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 21, 440–448 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kokudo T., et al., Assessment of preoperative liver function for surgical decision making in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 8, 447–456 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roh C. K., et al., Indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography during gastrectomy after initial endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Br. J. Surg. 107, 712–719 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chi C., et al., Use of indocyanine green for detecting the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients: From preclinical evaluation to clinical validation. PLoS One 8, e83927 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ishizawa T., et al., Real-time identification of liver cancers by using indocyanine green fluorescent imaging. Cancer 115, 2491–2504 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schaafsma B. E., et al., The clinical use of indocyanine green as a near-infrared fluorescent contrast agent for image-guided oncologic surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 104, 323–332 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sheth R. A., et al., Prospective trial with optical molecular imaging for percutaneous interventions in focal hepatic lesions. Radiology 274, 917–926 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data used for the study are within the manuscript and SI Appendix.