Abstract
As part of the CASP competition, the protein structure prediction algorithm AlphaFold2 generated multiple models of the proton/drug antiporter LmrP. Previous distance restraints from double electron-electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy, a technique which reports distance distributions between spin labels attached to proteins, suggest that one of the lower-ranked models may have captured a conformation that has so far eluded experimental structure determination.
Active transporters such as LmrP alternate between outward- and inward-facing conformations (OF and IF, respectively) during their transport cycles[1–3]. Whereas the crystal structure captures LmrP in the former[4], Alphafold2 modeled LmrP in the latter[5] (Figure 1A). Because LmrP is a proton/drug antiporter, we carried out DEER distance measurements[6–9] at low and neutral pH to stabilize the IF and OF conformation, respectively (shown in red and blue in Figures 1B and 1C). To evaluate the IF model’s consistency with the low pH DEER data, we modeled the predicted distances in silico using MDDS[10], a program hosted on the CHARMM-GUI web server[11]. Not only do the predicted distances overlap remarkably well with our experimental data (Figure 1B and 1C, dashed and solid lines, respectively), but importantly the magnitudes of the experimental distance changes agree with those predicted between the OF crystal structure and AlphaFold2’s IF model. These results suggest that the AlphaFold2 model depicts a functionally relevant intermediate of LmrP.
Figure 1. An inward-facing model of LmrP generated by AlphaFold2 is consistent with experimental data.
A) Outward- and inward-facing conformations determined using X-ray crystallography and modeled by AlphaFold2, respectively. B and C) Experimental DEER distance distributions on the extracellular and intracellular sides of the protein, respectively, overlap with distances predicted by AlphaFold2 model 1. Dashed lines are distance distributions predicted by either the crystal structure (blue) or the model (red). These data have been previously published. D) Average predicted DEER distance of all CASP14 LmrP models on the intracellular side (X-axis) and extracellular side (Y-axis). Solid blue and red circles represent components from the experimental DEER data corresponding to outward- and inward-facing conformations, respectively. The inward-facing AlphaFold2 model shown in panel A is located on the bottom-right.
The significance of this breakthrough in modeling transporter conformations is reinforced by comparison of this model to those submitted by other contestants, which overwhelmingly depicted LmrP in an occluded conformation (Figure 1D). Occluded models result from methodological biases that favor compactness[12]. Therefore, the success of AlphaFold2 in modeling IF LmrP suggests that these biases may finally have been overcome. Additionally, it sets the stage for the structural characterization of transporters and their functional intermediates by integrating computational modeling with experimental spectroscopy.
Acknowledgements:
The work presented here was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM077659).
References:
- [1].Boudker O, Verdon G, Trends Pharmacol. Sci 2010, 31, 418–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Masureel M, Martens C, Stein RA, Mishra S, Ruysschaert J-M, Mchaourab HS, Govaerts C, Nat. Chem. Biol 2014, 10, 149–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Martens C, Stein RA, Masureel M, Roth A, Mishra S, Dawaliby R, Konijnenberg A, Sobott F, Govaerts C, Mchaourab HS, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 2016, 23, 744–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Debruycker V, Hutchin A, Masureel M, Ficici E, Martens C, Legrand P, Stein RA, Mchaourab HS, Faraldo-Gómez JD, Remaut H, Govaerts C, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 2020, 27, 829–835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Tunyasuvunakool K, Ronneberger O, Bates R, Augustin Žídek AB, Meyer C, Simon AP Kohl AA, Ballard AJ, Cowie A, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Adler J, Back T, Petersen S, Reiman D, Steinegger M, Pacholska M, David Silver OV, Senior AW, Kavukcuoglu K, Kohli P, Hassabis D, in Fourteenth Crit. Assess. Tech. Protein Struct. Predict, 2020.
- [6].Jeschke G, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem 2012, 63, 419–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Dastvan R, Mishra S, Peskova YB, Nakamoto RK, Mchaourab HS, Science 2019, 364, 689–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].del Alamo D, Tessmer MH, Stein RA, Feix JB, Mchaourab HS, Meiler J, Biophys. J 2019, DOI 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- [9].McHaourab HS, Steed PR, Kazmier K, Structure 2011, 19, 1549–1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Roux B, Islam SM, J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 4733–4739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Jo S, Cheng X, Islam SM, Huang L, Rui H, Zhu A, Lee HS, Qi Y, Han W, Vanommeslaeghe K, MacKerell AD, Roux B, Im W, Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol 2014, 96, 235–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Nicoludis JM, Gaudet R, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr 2018, 1860, 895–908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

