LETTER
The continuing surge of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) worldwide is a challenging problem of antimicrobial resistance today. The introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) was an important step in the treatment of infections caused by CPE. Avibactam restores ceftazidime activity against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales of Ambler class A (KPC) and of Ambler class D (OXA-48 and 48-like), which are all serine β-lactamases. However, avibactam as well as the other β-lactam inhibitors currently in clinical use do not inhibit metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) such as the carbapenemases of Ambler class B. Aztreonam is stable to hydrolysis by MBLs, a unique feature compared with other β-lactams but is generally cleaved by other clinically relevant serine β-lactamases (1). Therefore, aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a drug combination currently undergoing clinical trials to assess its efficacy in treating infections with Gram-negative bacteria, including those that produce MBLs (2). As many Enterobacterales that produce an MBL often coproduce a serine-β-lactamase, a combination of aztreonam with avibactam offers an effective alternative to treating those CRE infections (3).
ATM has potent selective, specific activity toward the highly conserved penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3). Isolates carrying PBP3 variants with a specific insertion (333YRIN/K334) have reduced susceptibilities toward ATM-AVI. This resistance increased in isolates harboring the plasmid-borne blaCMY AmpC-β-lactamase, particularly when it coexisted in a combination with both NDMs and variant PBP3 (4).
We selected isolates exhibiting resistance to >4 mg/ml ATM and found ATM-AVI resistance in 15 of 110 carbapenem-resistant NDM- and OXA- producing Escherichia coli collected from 2017 to 2019 as part of a regional surveillance initiative (Table 1). The highest numbers were seen in 2019, suggesting recent emergence. For 11 isolates, we detected previously described combinations of PBP3 modifications either with or without blaNDM alleles and/or blaCMY-42. One isolate with blaNDM-5 and blaCMY-42 with a point mutation in its PBP3 sequence had a MIC of 8 mg/liter toward ATM-AVI. Three other isolates, being either OXA-181 or OXA-48producers harbored blaCMY-42 and a PBP3 insertion and exhibited resistance levels of 8 to 16 mg/liter. The blaCMY-42 alleles are present at an identical location on IncIγ plasmids of 27 to 53 kb. Many plasmids carry deletions of transfer genes (traB-Y) and the conjugative pilus (pilI-V) (Fig. 1A) (5, 6), as previously also reported for two IncIγ plasmids harboring blaCMY-42 (7).
TABLE 1.
Genetic characteristics and MICa
| Isolate | Sampling yr | Country | Gender | Age (yrs) | MLST type | Serotype | Carbapenemase gene(s) |
PBP3 |
CMY allele |
blaCMY-42–encoding plasmid |
MIC (mg/liter) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insertion | Mutation | Inc type | Size (bp) | ATM | ATM-AVI | ETP | IMI | |||||||||
| Survcare058 | 2017 | DE | Male | 83 | 405 | O102:H6 | NDM-5 | YRIK | A413V | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 48,544 | 64 | 16 | >32 | >32 |
| Survcare321 | 2019 | DE | Male | 81 | 405 | O102:H6 | NDM-5 | None | A413V | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 48,543b | >128 | 8 | 128 | 32 |
| Survcare385 | 2019 | DE | Male | 42 | 361 | O9:H30 | NDM-5 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 53,219b | 32 | 8 | 128 | 32 |
| Survcare420 | 2019 | DE | Male | 75 | 361 | O9:H30 | NDM-5 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 53,209 | >128 | 8 | 128 | 64 |
| N590 | 2019 | CH | Male | 69 | 167 | O89:H9 | NDM-5 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 48,546 | 64 | 8 | 64 | 32 |
| N640 | 2019 | CH | Female | 68 | 167 | O89:H9 | NDM-5 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 48,546 | 64 | 4 | 128 | 32 |
| N1013 | 2019 | CH | Female | 31 | 361 | O9:H30 | NDM-5 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 45,854 | 128 | 8 | >128 | 64 |
| Survcare052 | 2017 | DE | Female | 59 | 617 | O89:H9 | NDEM-5 | YRIK | A413V | None | NA | NA | >128 | 2 | >32 | >32 |
| Survcare278 | 2019 | DE | Male | 64 | 354 | O45:H6 | NDEM-1 | YRIP | A413V | None | NA | NA | >128 | 1 | >32 | >32 |
| Survcare289 | 2019 | DE | Female | 15 | 1284 | O9 | NDEM-5 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | None | NA | NA | >128 | 8 | 32 | 16 |
| Survcare292 | 2019 | DE | Male | 78 | 46 | O9:H10 | NDEM-5 | YRIK | A413V | None | NA | NA | >128 | 2 | 64 | 16 |
| Survcare293 | 2019 | DE | Female | <1 | 1284 | O9 | NDEM-5 | YRIK | A413V | None | NA | NA | >128 | 8 | 32 | 16 |
| Survcare309 | 2019 | DE | Male | <1 | 1284 | O9 | NDEM-5 | YRIK | A413V | None | NA | NA | >128 | 8 | 32 | 16 |
| Survcare408 | 2019 | DE | Male | 38 | 167 | O89:H5 | NDEM-5 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | None | NA | NA | >128 | 2 | 128 | 64 |
| Survcare253 | 2019 | DE | Male | 76 | 2851 | O154:H18 | NDEM-5, OXA-181 |
YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 26,256b | >128 | 16 | 128 | 32 |
| Survcare043 | 2018 | DE | Female | 67 | 167 | H9 | OXA-181 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 45,585 | >128 | 8 | 8 | 1 |
| Survcare045 | 2018 | DE | Female | 65 | 167 | O89:H9 | OXA-181 | YRIN | Q227H, E349K, I532K | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ::IncF [36:A4:B-] |
167,285b | >128 | 4 | 1 | 0.25 |
| Survcare453 | 2019 | DE | Female | 64 | 410 | O8:H21 | OXA-48 | YRIK | A413V | bla CMY-42 | IncIγ | 45,009 | >128 | 16 | 4 | 2 |
ATM, aztreonam; AVI, avibactam; CH, Switzerland; DE, Germany; ETP, ertapenem; IMI, imipenem; NA, not applicable; MLST, multilocus sequence type.
Closed genomes.
FIG 1.
(A) Comparison of the blaCMY-42-encoding IncIγ plasmids included pCMY-42_005008 with pR621a as the reference. The GenBank accession numbers of pCMY-42_005008 and pR621a are CP058662 and AP011954, respectively. Note the absence of the conjugal transfer and/or pilus formation regions on most plasmids. (B) Genetic map of pS045CMY-42, a conjugative chimeric IncIγ::IncFII plasmid, compared with the NDM-5-encoding IncF plasmids pS321-NDM5, pES3-NDM5, and pN525NDM-5 and the CMY-42-encoding IncIγ plasmids pS321CMY-42 and pS385CMY-42. The IncIγ plasmid is between positions 35000 and 105300. Many of the NDM-5-encoding IncF plasmids carry genes for conjugative transfer as well as a region with highly homology in IncIγ plasmids. The regions between positions 35043 and 38524 and 103905 and 1078381 share a DNA identity of ∼94%.
It is unlikely that these truncated plasmids can directly promote transfer of blaCMY-42 (horizontal transfer) (Fig. 1A). Nevertheless, they all carry the type I partition machinery (parAB) and a toxin-antitoxin pndBA postsegregational killing system, which can ensure stable presence and inheritance (vertical transfer) even without antibiotic selection (Fig. 1B) (8). Indeed, plasmids of isolates were highly stable across a 7-day serial passage in the absence of antibiotics.
The presence of these IncIγ plasmids in differing E. coli sequence types (STs), however, suggests inherent mobility (5, 9, 10). We detected a conjugative chimeric IncIγ::IncFII plasmid (pS045CMY-42) in the isolate Survcare045 and sequenced it to completion. This chimera of 167,286 bp was created through homologous recombination with subsequent duplication of a region in both plasmids containing highly related genes (Fig. 1B). This region of homology is found in all the IncFII-carrying NDM alleles and IncIγ plasmids examined here. However, resistance transfer, at a rate of 10−6, was only detected for the chimeric plasmid.
Here, we show that emergent aztreonam-avibactam resistance may be identified with MBL- producing strains but also with carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases, even if this combination is not yet in clinical use. This is of concern because OXA-48 and OXA-181 are commonly occurring carbapenemases found worldwide, often together with high-risk clones, and in Europe are by far the most prevalent type of carbapenemases (11, 12). Their occurrence in carbapenem-resistant E. coli, which is also associated with community spread, could limit use of this drug combination as a first-line therapy and exacerbate a situation of antibiotic resistance selection where, already, only a limited number of antibiotic options remains.
Data availability.
The sequences reported in this study have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA732846.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was carried out with funding from grants from the Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Germany) within the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF/grant numbers 8032808818 and 8032808820 to T.C. and C.I.) and the University of Fribourg by the Swiss National Reference center for Emerging Antibiotic Resistance. Support was also obtained from the Hessian State Ministry for Social Affairs and Integration (HMSI) within the project SurvCARE Hessen and the Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and Arts within the project HuKKH (Hessisches Universitaeres Kompetenzzentrum Krankenhaushygiene). The funders of the study played no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing the report.
We thank Christina Gerstmann, Sylvia Krämer, and Martina Hudel for excellent technical assistance.
We declare no conflicts of interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cornely OA, Cisneros JM, Torre-Cisneros J, Rodríguez-Hernández MJ, Tallón-Aguilar L, Calbo E, Horcajada JP, Queckenberg C, Zettelmeyer U, Arenz D, Rosso-Fernández CM, Jiménez-Jorge S, Turner G, Raber S, O’Brien S, Luckey A, Aguado ACP, Baranda MM, Bernedo CG, Bludau M, Boix-Palop L, Cheng K, de Jonge B, de Molina FJG, Gentil PR, Guzmán-Puche J, Jiménez VP, López-Ruiz JA, Mateos EM, Oporto CR, Piessen G, Postil D, Rodríguez RMJ, Ruiz JP, Rupp J, Soriano RM, Wible M, Yuste ÁC, Gómez-Zorrilla S, COMBACTE-CARE Consortium/REJUVENATE Study Group. 2020. Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results from the REJUVENATE study. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:618–627. 10.1093/jac/dkz497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bush K. 2018. Past and present perspectives on β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01076-18. 10.1128/AAC.01076-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tooke CL, Hinchliffe P, Bragginton EC, Colenso CK, Hirvonen VHA, Takebayashi Y, Spencer J. 2019. β-Lactamases and β-lactamase inhibitors in the 21st century. J Mol Biol 431:3472–3500. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sadek M, Juhas M, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2020. Genetic features leading to reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam among metallo-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01659-20. 10.1128/AAC.01659-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ma K, Feng Y, McNally A, Zong Z. 2020. Struggle to survive: the choir of target alteration, hydrolyzing enzyme, and plasmid expression as a novel aztreonam-avibactam resistance mechanism. mSystems 5:e00821-20. 10.1128/mSystems.00821-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sampei G-i, Furuya N, Tachibana K, Saitou Y, Suzuki T, Mizobuchi K, Komano T. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the incompatibility group I1 plasmid R64. Plasmid 64:92–103. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takahashi H, Shao M, Furuya N, Komano T. 2011. The genome sequence of the incompatibility group Iγ plasmid R621a: evolution of IncI plasmids. Plasmid 66:112–121. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koraimann G. 2018. Spread and persistence of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes: a ride on the F plasmid conjugation module. EcoSal Plus 8. 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0003-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lorme F, Maataoui N, Rondinaud E, Esposito-Farèse M, Clermont O, Ruppe E, Arlet G, Genel N, Matheron S, Andremont A, Armand-Lefevre L, VOYAG-R Study Group. 2018. Acquisition of plasmid-mediated cephalosporinase producing Enterobacteriaceae after a travel to the tropics. PLoS One 13:e0206909. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paul D, Babenko D, Toleman MA. 2020. Human carriage of cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli in North-East India: an analysis of STs and associated resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:72–76. 10.1093/jac/dkz416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marchetti VM, Bitar I, Mercato A, Nucleo E, Bonomini A, Pedroni P, Hrabak J, Migliavacca R. 2019. Complete nucleotide sequence of plasmids of two Escherichia coli strains carrying blaNDM-5 and blaNDM-5 and blaOXA-181 from the same patient. Front Microbiol 10:3095. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mathers AJ, Peirano G, Pitout JDD. 2015. The role of epidemic resistance plasmids and international high- risk clones in the spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:565–591. 10.1128/CMR.00116-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The sequences reported in this study have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA732846.

