Visual Abstract
Keywords: 18F-SKI-249380, dasatinib, PET imaging, Src kinase
Abstract
We developed a first-of-kind dasatinib-derivative imaging agent, 18F-SKI-249380 (18F-SKI), and validated its use for noninvasive in vivo tyrosine kinase-targeted tumor detection in preclinical models. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of using 18F-SKI for PET imaging in patients with malignancies. Methods: Five patients with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer, renal cell cancer, or leukemia underwent whole-body PET/CT imaging 90 min after injection of 18F-SKI (mean, 241.24 ± 116.36 MBq) as part of a prospective study. In addition, patients underwent either a 30-min dynamic scan of the upper abdomen including, at least partly, cardiac left ventricle, liver, spleen, and kidney (n = 2) or three 10-min whole-body PET/CT scans (n = 3) immediately after injection and blood-based radioactivity measurements to determine the time course of tracer distribution and facilitate radiation dose estimates. A subset of 3 patients had a delayed whole-body PET/CT scan at 180 min. Biodistribution, dosimetry, and tumor uptake were quantified. Absorbed doses were calculated using OLINDA/EXM 1.0. Results: No adverse events occurred after injection of 18F-SKI. In total, 27 tumor lesions were analyzed, with a median SUVpeak of 1.4 (range, 0.7–2.3) and tumor-to-blood ratios of 1.6 (range, 0.8–2.5) at 90 min after injection. The intratumoral drug concentrations calculated for 4 reference lesions ranged from 0.03 to 0.07 nM. In all reference lesions, constant tracer accumulation was observed between 30 and 90 min after injection. A blood radioassay indicated that radiotracer clearance from blood and plasma was initially rapid (blood half-time, 1.31 ± 0.81 min; plasma, 1.07 ± 0.66 min; n = 4), followed variably by either a prolonged terminal phase (blood half-time, 285 ± 148.49 min; plasma, 240 ± 84.85 min; n = 2) or a small rise to a plateau (n = 2). Like dasatinib, 18F-SKI underwent extensive metabolism after administration, as evidenced by metabolite analysis. Radioactivity was predominantly cleared via the hepatobiliary route. The highest absorbed dose estimates (mGy/MBq) in normal tissues were to the right colon (0.167 ± 0.04) and small intestine (0.153 ± 0.03). The effective dose was 0.0258 mSv/MBq (SD, 0.0034 mSv/MBq). Conclusion: 18F-SKI demonstrated significant tumor uptake, distinct image contrast despite low injected doses, and rapid clearance from blood.
A hallmark of cancer relies on the deregulation of cell signaling pathways, providing a rationale for mechanism-based targeted therapies (1,2). The Src family kinases regulate tumor cell proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis (3,4). Src family kinase activity is upregulated in various malignancies, making the Src family a promising target for tumor therapy (5). Dasatinib is an orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of Src family kinases (and other tyrosine kinases) that has been approved for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (6). It is being extensively studied in both preclinical and clinical studies for the management of solid malignancies, including breast cancer (7), renal cell cancer (8), non–small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, and glioma (Fig. 1) (9,10).
So far, dasatinib has been evaluated both as a single agent and as a combination therapy in solid tumors, with low RECIST response rates (10). However, Demetri et al. reported a phase 1 study investigating dasatinib in patients with metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapies or for which no effective standard therapy exists (11). Although no objective tumor responses were seen, durable stable disease was observed in 16% of patients. Thus, there is an obvious need for patient selection that can benefit from dasatinib-based treatment and monitoring of therapeutic outcome.
PET enables noninvasive assessment of target expression, monitoring response to tumor treatments, and outcome prediction. An emerging promising approach for personalized therapy is the use of PET for monitoring radioactively labeled drugs in vivo. PET-based monitoring of the pharmacokinetic behavior of radiolabeled drugs can also provide a noninvasive, quantitative read-out of the target engagement of radiolabeled drugs at the tumor site, which possibly correlates with its sensitivity or resistance to therapy.
Prior reports have indicated the feasibility of tyrosine kinase-based PET imaging (12,13). However, our group was the first to report on a 18F-radiolabeled dasatinib derivative, 18F-SKI-249380 (18F-N-(2-chloro-6-methylphenyl)-2-(6-(4-(2-fluoroethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4-ylamino)thiazole-5-carboxamide [18F-SKI]) (14,15). Using in vitro kinase and cellular assays, we investigated its kinase inhibition profile and verified that it closely parallels that of dasatinib. 18F-SKI demonstrated equipotent inhibition of proliferation of Bcr-Abl–dependent cells K562 and M07e/p210bcr-abl at 0.10 nM. To further substantiate the similarities of dasatinib and 18F-SKI, we examined the kinase inhibition of 18F-SKI at 10 nM in a panel of 21 kinases, including Abl, Src, Kit, EphA2, EphB4, and PDFRα. Using mouse models bearing K562 tumor xenografts, we verified selective in vivo targeting. 18F-SKI PET enabled noninvasive assessment of dasatinib-derivative target engagement in all 5 mice. Furthermore, our preclinical data demonstrated favorable dosimetry, supporting the rationale for clinical application.
The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of 18F-SKI for PET imaging in a first-in-humans pilot study and investigate detailed biodistribution and radiation dosimetry. Five patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), renal cell cancer, and leukemia were enrolled.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical Study with 18F-SKI
The study was an open-label, nonrandomized, first-in-humans microdose pilot trial conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center with the approval of the institutional review board (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01916135) and under the auspices of an Investigational New Drug application acknowledged by the Food and Drug Administration. All participants provided written informed consent.
Patient Selection
Eligibility criteria included a minimum age of 21 y, serum renal and hepatic function test values less than 1.5- to 2.5-fold greater than the lab-specific upper limit of normal, and a histologically confirmed solid, myeloid, or lymphoid neoplasm. The disease was either radiologically measurable, detectable by biopsy (e.g., bone marrow), or confirmed by peripheral blood assays obtained within 6 wk of study enrollment. Serum complete blood count and liver and renal function tests were obtained within 2 wk before study participation. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, breastfeeding, and acute major illness. No patients were taking dasatinib or other medications known as tyrosine kinase inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 (because dasatinib metabolism is CYP3A4-dependent) for less than 2 wk before participation (16).
Radiopharmaceutical Preparation and Administration
Manufacture of clinical-grade 18F-SKI and subsequent dose preparation were performed by the Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core at Memorial Sloan Kettering. The synthesis has been described previously (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) (17).
The synthesis of 18F-SKI involved 18F-fluoride nucleophilic incorporation onto the precursor molecule, followed by drug substance isolation by preparatory high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purification (Supplemental Fig. 1). Briefly, to obtain the 18F in the appropriate form, cyclotron-produced 18F was trapped on the quaternary methyl ammonium Sep-Pak (Waters), eluted with 0.6 mL of tetrabutylammonium bicarbonate (0.075 M) (N(n-Bu)4HCO3) into a reaction vial containing a Teflon (Chemours) magnetic stir bar, and dried by being heated at 90°C under vacuum. The precursor, 2 mg of the N-(2-chloro-6-methylphenyl)-2-((6-(4-(2-chloroethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4-yl)amino)thiazole-5-carboxamide (Advanced Biomedical Compounds), dissolved in 0.1 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide and 0.3 mL of acetonitrile, was then added to the reaction vessel and the reaction was heated at 80°C for 50 min. Once the fluorination reaction was complete, the unreacted 18F-tetrabutylammonium fluoride was removed via hydrophilic–lipophilic balance solid-phase extraction purification. The drug substance, 18F-SKI, was isolated by preparatory HPLC, with a gradient of 20 mM sodium acetate and 85% acetonitrile solution as the mobile phase (Phenomenex) and a Gemini C18, pentafluorophenyl, 5 µm, 250 × 10 mm column as the stationary phase; a flow of 4.0 mL/min; and an ultraviolet detector wavelength of 320 nm. The HPLC system was a Shimadzu Prominence 20 series, equipped with an ultraviolet detector and a Flow-Ram sodium iodide radioactivity detector supplied by Lablogic. The HPLC eluate fraction containing the drug substance, the radioactive peak for which was eluting at 18.5 ± 3 min, was collected into a pear-shaped glass flask containing 40 mL of sterile water for injection (of U.S. Pharmacopeia grade). To remove the HPLC mobile-phase solvents, the reaction mixture was loaded onto a light C18 cartridge and washed with an additional 10 mL of sterile water. The drug substance was eluted from the C18 Sep-Pak with 0.5 mL of ethanol, followed by 9.5 mL of normal saline, through a 0.22-μm sterilizing filter into a sterile, apyrogenic, U.S. Pharmacopeia type I glass vial, sealed with a rubber septum, and crimped with an aluminum crimp.
The final drug product underwent quality control testing before batch release for patient administration in accordance with acceptance specifications for radiochemical purity, endotoxin content, sterilizing filter integrity, pH, appearance, and radionuclide identity confirmation. Sterility was tested after release.
The radiochemical purity and specific activity measurements of 18F-SKI were performed using a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system equipped with a 20-μL injection loop, an SPD-20A ultraviolet–visible-light detector, and an LC-20AT mobile-phase pump. The stationary phase was a Phenomenex Kinetex C-18, 5-μm, 250 × 4.6 mm column. An isocratic mixture of 50% acetonitrile in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer at a flow rate of 1 mL/min was used as the mobile phase. A Flow-RAM radioactivity detector (Lablogic) was used to detect radioactive compounds. The mass of 18F-SKI in the final drug product was calculated by comparing the area under the curve for the corresponding ultraviolet peak against the mass standard curve of known concentrations of 19F-SKI-249380 at 320 nm. The specific activity was calculated by dividing the total radioactivity at the end of synthesis by the determined mass of 18F-SKI in the final drug product.
18F-SKI was administered to subjects at an activity of 241.24 ± 116.36 MBq (range, 114.7–421.1 MBq) by intravenous bolus injection. The administered activity for the clinical trial was based on human dosimetry estimates extrapolated from our published murine dosimetry (15).
Toxicity Monitoring
Preinjection and postscan vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature) were taken, and clinical symptoms were monitored. Physical examinations were performed immediately after injection, and 2 catheters (for tracer administration and blood sampling) were accessed to separate veins in the upper extremities. Patients voided the urinary bladder immediately before 18F-SKI injection and were monitored for signs and symptoms up to 4 h after injection. Patients were contacted about 24 h after injection for further inquiry and were advised to contact the study team if they experienced any signs or symptoms in the 30 d after injection. Clinical toxicity was monitored up to 1 wk after injection using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.
PET/CT Imaging with 18F-SKI
All 5 patients underwent whole-body (skull to proximal thigh) PET/CT imaging (GE Healthcare PET/CT Discovery STE and 710 scanners with time-of-flight capability) in 3-dimensional mode at 90 min after injection. Patients were asked to void their bladders before imaging.
A low-dose CT scan (120 kVp, 80-mA tube current, helical pitch of 1.5:1, estimated radiation dose of 9.0 mGy) was acquired before PET imaging for attenuation correction and anatomic localization. The total acquisition time was 18 or 21 min for 6 or 7 bed positions, respectively (3 min per position). Images were reconstructed using a 700-mm field of view into a 128 × 128 matrix with iterative ordered-subset expectation maximization (16 subsets; 2 iterations) with a 6.4-mm 2-dimensional Gaussian filter and heavy axial 3-point smoothing ([1 2 1]/4). Manufacturers’ corrections were used, including CT-based attenuation, scatter, and SharpIR (point-spread-function correction). PET scanner quality assurance, including an 18F well counter calibration, was performed quarterly per American College of Radiology guidelines.
All patients underwent additional imaging after injection to determine the tracer distribution time course and facilitate radiation dose estimates: 10-min whole-body sweeps at 0–10 min, 10–20 min, and 20–30 min (n = 3) or 30-min dynamic scanning of the upper abdomen, including, at least partly, cardiac left ventricle, liver, and spleen (n = 2). Three of the 5 patients underwent an additional delayed whole-body PET/CT scan at 180 min (Supplemental Fig. 2).
Image Interpretation, Lesion Detection, and Data Analysis
The whole-body static PET/CT scans acquired at 90 min after injection were first interpreted without reference to other imaging modalities. Lesions with focal radiotracer uptake and retention greater than blood-pool activity were interpreted as metastatic disease.
Volumes of interest (VOIs) were generated over lesions using a Hermes imaging workstation (GOLD, version 4.4-B; Hermes Medical Solutions) and AW Suite on Centricity PACS (GE Healthcare Integrated IT Solutions). Typically, a value of 40%–50% of maximum tracer uptake was used as a threshold, but this was guided by interpretation of the CT scan. In total, 27 lesions were analyzed.
For normal tissues (brain, left cardiac ventricle wall, lungs, liver, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, small intestines, spine, humerus, and skeletal musculature), regions of interest were drawn over at least 5 consecutive transaxial PET slices and combined to generate VOIs. Tracer uptake was quantified by SUVs normalized to body weight. For lesion VOI, SUVmean, SUVmax (maximum voxel in the VOI), and SUVpeak (SUVmean of the hottest 1 cm3 in the VOI) were recorded. For normal tissues, SUVmean and SUVpeak were used. Tumor-to-blood SUV ratios, defined as SUVpeak (lesion)/SUVmean (left cardiac ventricle), were also calculated. Intratumoral 18F-SKI mass concentrations were calculated using the specific molar activity at the time of injection and SUVmean (lesion).
SUVmean (lesion) is defined as the ratio of mean lesional radioactivity concentration (MBq/cm3) to the whole-body radioactivity concentration (injected dose in MBq/patient mass in g). Using the decay-corrected specific molar activity of 18F-SKI expressed in MBq/nmol, we calculate the number of molecules of 18F-SKI in the lesional volume in cm3 as defined during VOI analysis using coregistered PET and CT images. With unit conversion, we obtain the average lesional mass concentration of 18F-SKI expressed as a nanomolar concentration. We make several assumptions in this calculation. We assume that the average density of tissue is 1 g/cm3. Further, we assume that the tumor radioactivity present is due only to intact radiotracer.
A limitation of this work lies in our assumptions about the molecular species responsible for tumoral uptake, retention, and clearance. It is possible that the tumoral uptake was due, in part, to unanticipated radiolabeled species that confound the use of 18F-SKI as a surrogate marker for dasatinib. We posit that the interpretation of the imaging data and quantification of intratumoral drug concentration is valid on the basis of the following discussion.
The translation of the tumor activity concentration into drug concentration is predicated on the assumption that the activity in the tumor is in the form of the administered radiotracer, that is, 18F-SKI. The direct measurement of the radiochemical composition of the tumor activity is, of course, impractical in a clinical setting and was beyond the scope of this limited imaging trial design. As enumerated below, however, we believe that the collective available evidence, although largely circumstantial, strongly supports this assumption.
First, among the 27 lesions identified in the 5 patients described here, the time–activity data reveal stable activity concentrations (i.e., flat time–activity curves) in the tumors. Specifically, the tumor mean (±SD) SUV is 1.4 ± 0.6 and 1.4 ± 0.4 at 30 and 90 min, respectively, after injection of 18F-SKI. These fixed SUVs indicate little to no clearance of activity over this 60-min interval. This, in turn, is consistent with high-affinity binding of the 18F-labeled species within the tumor—binding specifically characteristic of the 18F-SKI itself but not of any possible non–kinase-binding or low-affinity-binding 18F-labeled metabolites. If significant concentrations of such metabolites were present in tumor, these would be cleared rapidly from tumor and the tumor SUV would therefore sharply decline, which clearly was not observed.
Second, there is no notable skeletal activity in any of the patients imaged, indicating that little to no free 18F-fluoride was produced in vivo. This, in turn, means 2 things: that there is little to no 18F-fluoride, specifically, in tumor, and that catabolism at the N-ethylpiperazine moiety, if occurring, is not generating free fluoride.
Third, the analysis of plasma-borne activity by HPLC revealed only 3 radioactive species in blood: a rapidly eluting, polar species; a later-eluting, somewhat hydrophobic species not yet definitively identified; and an even later-eluting, more hydrophobic species corresponding to the intact 18F-SKI. It is unlikely the polar species significantly contributes to tumor activity, as its highly polar nature would likely prevent entry into and subsequent retention by tumor (and other) cells. The second of these peaks likely corresponds to an 18F-SKI–derived aryl-hydroxylated species that may bind to the kinase but only with low affinity, as with dasatinib (18). Importantly, if that species were present within tumor cells, its low binding affinity and hydrophobic character would allow its rapid egress from these cells and rapid clearance of the associated activity from the tumor. However, as detailed in the above text, the tumor 18F activity does not decline at all between 30 and 90 min of 18F-SKI injection, indicating that little to none of this hydroxylated 18F-SKI species is actually present in tumor. The only other 18F-labeled species in vivo, based on the HPLC analysis, is 18F-SKI itself; plausibly, therefore, it is mostly 18F-SKI actually present in tumor.
Fourth, one may reasonably speculate that, in light of the specific site of the fluorination of the dasatinib molecule, the oxidative and conjugation metabolism to which dasatinib itself is susceptible is blocked at that site. This is because the fluorine replaces a hydroxyl group, which, based on the relevant literature, facilitates some of the metabolic clearance of dasatinib (18). The dearth of 18F-SKI metabolites after 18F-SKI injection, as demonstrated by HPLC, is consistent with that speculation. Furthermore, alternate catabolic pathways that destabilize the C–F bond, releasing 18F-fluoride, did not appear to be in operation.
The points in the foregoing discussion, we feel, provide a compelling validation of the assumption that the 18F activity in tumor is entirely or almost entirely intact 18F-SKI.
Blood Radioassays
Blood samples were collected at 1, 5, 15, 30, 90, and 180 min after tracer injection. Activity in whole blood and plasma samples was radioassayed by a well counter (1480 Wizard 3″ automatic γ-counter; PerkinElmer), and measured activity concentrations were converted to percentage injected activity per liter. Areas under the curve and corresponding residence times were derived by analytic integration.
Absorbed Dose Calculations
Absorbed doses to total body and individual organs were based on the time–activity data derived from each patient’s set of PET/CT images. VOIs were drawn over the liver, spleen, heart contents, bone, kidneys, brain, lungs, salivary glands, and urinary bladder using the Hermes Hybrid Viewer (Hermes Medical Solutions). As is routine, the PET images were parameterized in terms of SUVs, and the mean SUVs in the foregoing organs (i.e., VOIs) were converted to fractions of the administered activity in each organ by scaling by the respective fractional masses, based on the organ masses in the OLINDA/EXM 2.0 software (Hermes Medical Solutions) for the 70-kg reference adult. The resulting time–activity curves (Supplemental Fig. 3) were fit to exponential functions and the fitted functions analytically integrated to infinity to derive the organ time-integrated activity coefficients in MBq-h/MBq (or simply h), incorporating the physical decay of 18F. To derive the time-integrated activity coefficient urinary bladder contents, the voiding bladder model in OLINDA/EXM 2.0 was used, with the bladder activity estimated by multiplying the mean SUV in a VOI encompassing the bladder activity with its fractional mass. Although there was visualizable, but low, activity in the urinary bladder, there was actually no demonstrable total-body clearance of 18F over the time course of the PET studies. Therefore, a single total-body biologic clearance half-time was assumed and arbitrarily set to 100 h to estimate the bladder content time-integrated activity coefficient and its contribution to the bladder-wall absorbed dose; the bladder voiding interval was set to 3 h. Significant uptake was observed in the gut, but not surprisingly, the time course of gut activity was irregular and, again, there was no demonstrable clearance of activity. Therefore, to estimate the respective time-integrated activity coefficients for left colon, small intestine, right colon, and rectum, the International Commission on Radiological Protection human alimentary tract model, as implemented in OLINDA/EXM 2.0 (18), was used. It was assumed that the activity enters the small intestine from the liver, with the fraction of administered activity entering the small intestine (0.23) calculated by taking the maximum value for the liver SUVmean and multiplying it by its fractional liver mass and assuming no reabsorption of intestinal activity. The remainder-of-body time-integrated activity coefficient was derived by subtracting the sum of the time-integrated activity coefficients of the individual organs from that of the total body. The total-body time-integrated activity coefficient was calculated using the total-body time–activity curve for the activity in the PET field of view (from mid thigh to vertex), yielding a fractional administered activity averaging approximately only 0.9 at zero time among the 5 patients (presumably because the entire body was not in the field of view) (Supplemental Fig. 4) and equating the total-body effective half-life with the physical half-life of 18F. There was no demonstrable total-body clearance over the time course of the PET imaging studies. The 70-kg reference-adult organ absorbed doses were then calculated using the OLINDA/EXM 2.0 software (19). The time-integrated activity coefficients and absorbed doses are presented in Supplemental Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
Statistics
Patient data were summarized by descriptive statistics, including mean, SD, coefficients of variation, range, and 95% confidence intervals, when appropriate.
RESULTS
18F-SKI Administration and Safety
Five patients with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer, renal cell cancer, or leukemia were administered 18F-SKI, underwent at least 1 whole-body PET/CT scan, and were included in data analysis. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Both patients with breast cancer had undergone surgery and multiple lines of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. The patient with renal cell cancer underwent surgery only. Of the 2 patients with leukemia, one was diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (patient 4) and had evidence of disease, as confirmed by marrow biopsy or blood assay within 6 wk after study enrollment. At the time of the imaging study, however, the patient had no evidence of disease, as confirmed by blood and bone marrow assays. The other patient was diagnosed with chronic myelogenous leukemia (patient 5) with an ongoing myeloid blast crisis evident on blood and bone marrow assays at the time of the PET scan. Both patients were receiving targeted therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib about 2 mo before 18F-SKI PET. After the scan, both continued to receive treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
TABLE 1.
Patient | Sex | Age (y) | Cancer type | Lesion site | Lesions analyzed (n) | SUVpeak (30 min) | TNR-B (30 min) | SUVpeak (90 min) | TNR-B (90 min) |
1 | F | 59 | Breast | Bone | 16 | 1.23 ± 0.4 | 2.33 ± 0.8 | 1.27 ± 0.3 | 1.46 ± 0.4 |
2 | F | 55 | Breast | Bone, uterus | 9 | 1.53 ± 0.5 | 2.18 ± 0.6 | 1.42 ± 0.4 | 1.58 ± 0.4 |
3 | M | 77 | RCC | Muscle | 1 | 1.59 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.62 |
4* | F | 58 | ALL | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
5 | F | 59 | CML | Bone marrow | 1 | 3.23 | 3.32 | 2.12 | 1.89 |
*Patient with evidence of disease in blood and bone marrow at time of study inclusion but no evidence of disease at time of imaging.
TNR-B: tumor-to-blood ratio; RCC = renal cell cancer; ALL = Philadelphia chromosome-positive pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia; NA = not applicable; CML = chronic myelogenous leukemia.
The mean administered activity was 241.24 ± 116.36 MBq (range, 114.7–421.1 MBq), with a mean radiochemical purity of 97% ± 2.1% (range, 94.48%–99.33%), a specific molar activity of 274 ± 242 GBq/μmol (range, 62–719 GBq/μmol), and an injected mass of 1.7 ± 1.6 μg (range, 0.3–4.1 μg [0.6–8.3 nmol]). No infusion-related symptoms were noted. No significant changes were evident in heart rate, blood pressure, or body temperature before versus after injection, and no subsequent adverse events were observed in the follow-up period (mean, 7 d).
PET/CT Imaging with 18F-SKI
18F-SKI PET/CT revealed positive lesions in 4 of 5 patients. Patient 4 exhibited no disease on PET, as subsequently confirmed by blood and bone marrow assays. On visual inspection, images demonstrated little to no uptake in the brain, pituitary gland, salivary glands, thyroid, blood pool, lung, and musculature (Figs. 2–4). The predominant route of 18F-SKI excretion was hepatobiliary, and substantial radioactivity in the intestine was observed. Minimal urinary excretion was detected. Quantitative characterization of tumor and normal-organ uptake values based on VOI analysis is provided in Supplemental Figure 3.
Blood radioassay indicated that radiotracer clearance from blood and plasma was initially rapid (blood half-time, 1.31 ± 0.81 min; plasma half-time, 1.07 ± 0.66 min; n = 4), followed variably by either a prolonged terminal phase (blood half-time, 285 ± 148.49 min; plasma half-time, 240 ± 84.85 min; n = 2) or a small rise to a plateau (n = 2) (Fig. 5). The rise-to-plateau pattern possibly indicates systemic recirculation of an isotope extravasated into bodily tissues during the initial phase. The blood-to-plasma radiotracer activity ratio was 1.3 ± 0.1 at 5 min versus 1.1 ± 0.2 at 30 min. Like dasatinib, 18F-SKI undergoes extensive metabolism during the 2-h period after administration (18), but plasma radiotracer was predominantly intact parent compound (Supplemental Table 1). In vivo tracer metabolism yielded no free 18F on radio-HPLC.
In total, 27 lesions were examined on 18F-SKI PET/CT (16 in 1 patient, 9 in 1 patient, and 1 in 2 patients) (Table 1). Bone was the most common site of disease, with 24 lesions analyzed in the 2 patients with MBC (Table 1; Figs. 2 and 3). Two additional lesion sites included the uterus (a subsequently biopsy-proven metastasis in patient 2, with MBC) (Fig. 3) and skeletal muscle (patient 3, with renal cell cancer) (Fig. 4), neither of which was known at the time of imaging. Lesion uptake at 30 and 90 min remained relatively unchanged, with a mean SUVpeak of 1.4 ± 0.6 (range, 0.6–3.2) and 1.4 ± 0.4 (range, 0.8–2.5), respectively. In the 2 MBC patients with multiple predominant bone lesions and the patient with renal cell cancer, who had consecutive whole-body sweeps immediately after injection, lesion uptake was rapid (Fig. 2), typically plateauing by 30 min after injection and remaining close to the plateau in about 50% of lesions thereafter. About 30% of lesions demonstrated a continued slow increase in uptake. Few lesions (20%) showed a slow washout after 30 min.
To determine the intralesional concentration of the radiotracer, 4 lesions were selected as reference lesions. Lesion sites included skeletal muscle (patient 3), uterus (patient 2), and bone (2 lesions in patient 1). Intratumoral drug concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 0.07 nM. In all reference lesions, a constant accumulation of tracer was observed 30–90 min after injection (Fig. 6).
Absorbed Dose Estimates for 18F-SKI
Normal-tissue and total-body time–activity curves are presented in Supplemental Figures 3 and 4, respectively, and residence times are presented in Supplemental Table 2. The full set of normal-tissue absorbed dose estimates (mGy/MBq) is shown in Table 2. The highest values (mean ± SD) were in the right colon (0.167 ± 0.04), small intestine (0.153 ± 0.03), and liver (0.09 ± 0.02). The effective dose was 0.0258 (SD, 0.0034) mSv/MBq.
TABLE 2.
Absorbed dose (mGy/MBq) |
||
Target region | Mean | SD |
Adrenals | 0.0270 | 0.00356 |
Brain | 0.00636 | 0.00291 |
Breasts | 0.00513 | 0.00127 |
Esophagus | 0.0112 | 0.000534 |
Eyes | 0.00440 | 0.00163 |
Gallbladder wall | 0.0327 | 0.00855 |
Left colon | 0.0575 | 0.0176 |
Small intestine | 0.153 | 0.0278 |
Stomach wall | 0.0131 | 0.00102 |
Right colon | 0.167 | 0.0402 |
Rectum | 0.0155 | 0.00373 |
Heart wall | 0.0126 | 0.00120 |
Kidneys | 0.0461 | 0.00337 |
Liver | 0.0904 | 0.0200 |
Lungs | 0.0111 | 0.000712 |
Ovaries | 0.0125 | 0.000903 |
Pancreas | 0.0255 | 0.00231 |
Prostate | 0.00678 | |
Salivary glands | 0.00916 | 0.00162 |
Red marrow | 0.0204 | 0.00460 |
Osteogenic cells | 0.0395 | 0.0114 |
Spleen | 0.0406 | 0.00918 |
Testes | 0.00129 | |
Thymus | 0.00630 | 0.00150 |
Thyroid | 0.00474 | 0.00164 |
Urinary bladder wall | 0.00709 | 0.00148 |
Uterus | 0.0137 | 0.000755 |
Total Body | 0.0130 | 0.00178 |
Effective dose (mSv/MBq) | 0.0258 | 0.00340 |
DISCUSSION
This first-in-humans study of 18F-SKI demonstrated the feasibility of noninvasive in vivo measurement and visualization of dasatinib-target engagement in metastatic solid and leukemic tumors. Tumor uptake was rapid and resulted in distinct lesion-to-background contrast. The lack of uptake in the brain may facilitate intracranial lesion detection, which is limited on 18F-FDG PET by, for example, physiologic intense cortical uptake. 18F-SKI also detected an unknown metastasis in the uterus in one of the patients with MBC who underwent 18F-FDG PET 3 wk before 18F-SKI. Although uterine 18F-FDG uptake was observed, this was not further evaluated, as 18F-FDG uptake can be physiologic, related to the menstrual cycle. In the patient with renal cell cancer, a subcentimeter-sized muscle lesion was newly diagnosed on the basis of 18F-SKI uptake and confirmed on subsequent MRI. Despite the small sample size, these findings render 18F-SKI an attractive companion diagnostic for disease assessment.
18F-SKI PET imaging showed intense tracer uptake in the liver, gallbladder, and intestine related to the predominant hepatobiliary clearance, which impairs lesion detectability in the abdomen. Notable accumulation was also found in the spleen and kidney. The upper large intestines received the highest absorbed dose, consistent with its hepatobiliary excretion. Hepatobiliary excretion of 18F-SKI is similar to that of dasatinib (18). 18F-SKI–related radioactivity initially decreased rapidly in blood. After 30 min, intact tracer accounted for 55% of the total radiation activity in plasma, suggesting that metabolites contributed significantly to the total radiation. 18F-SKI is a lipophilic compound and is believed to enter cells by passive diffusion, similarly to dasatinib (20). The observed prolonged background clearance of 18F-SKI is probably due to binding of the tracer or its metabolites to plasma proteins, as is the case with dasatinib (21). 18F-SKI and dasatinib share nearly identical chemical structures, and as such, their metabolites are expected to be similar. The dosimetry of 18F-SKI evaluated in this study is in reasonable agreement with absorbed dose estimates previously derived by extrapolation from murine biodistribution studies (15).
We observed a gradual, progressive net accumulation of 18F-SKI in tumors during the initial 30 min after tracer injection, followed by a plateau phase yielding distinct contrast to enable lesion visualization. Although most lesions (80%) demonstrated this pattern of uptake or a continued rise in uptake, some (20%) showed a slow washout after 30 min. Further studies including dynamic scans are warranted to assess detailed uptake kinetics. In addition, to better characterize and ultimately elucidate the underlying biologic mechanism of the tumor signal, we are planning quantitative correlative analyses of lesion uptake and tissue expression of Src and other targets.
With a median administered dose of 212 MBq, as compared with common doses of 370 MBq for 18F-FDG PET, further dose escalation to optimize imaging parameters should be investigated in future clinical studies. Also, in view of the mass in the range of 0.3–4.1 μg of precursor used in this study, which corresponds to more than a 24,000-fold reduction from the equivalent therapeutic dose of dasatinib after standard dosing of 100 mg/d, further increases in administered dose and corresponding mass are not expected to cause a therapeutic effect (11).
Early-phase clinical trials of dasatinib monotherapy have demonstrated that a significant minority of patients with cancer benefit from dasatinib after conventional therapy fails. To identify this important responder subset, new predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. Although multiple surrogate biomarkers for response to dasatinib have been described, such as measuring vascular epidermal growth factor receptor 2, plasma N-telopeptide, and circulating tumor cells (22,23) in blood, as well as imaging αvβ3 (24), 18F-SKI PET offers the first investigational clinical assay of in vivo tumor kinetics and engagement of tumor dasatinib targets with a dasatinib-derivative compound. The need for predictive biomarkers is illustrated in our clinical study (NCT00820170), in which dasatinib and paclitaxel combination therapy in molecularly unselected MBC patients failed to show a correlation between clinic–radiologic response and changes in the surrogate response biomarkers N-terminal telopeptide, vascular epidermal growth factor, and circulating tumor cells (23). Of note, patients 1 and 2 were enrolled into this study after undergoing 18F-SKI PET, and stable osseous disease in both patients was observed.
Using 18F-SKI as a radiotracer to estimate therapeutic dosing requirements, we calculated intratumoral drug concentrations of 0.03–0.07 nM, approximately 1,000-fold less than pharmacologically relevant plasma concentrations. Surrogate imaging tools for receptor-targeted therapeutics, such as 18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone for MDV3100 (enzalutamide), demonstrated clinical utility in understanding tumor biology and target receptor occupancy (25). Accordingly, the role of 18F-SKI PET in dose selection, assessment of lesion-specific drug exposure, and biologic readout of kinase expression status should be assessed in future trials involving dasatinib.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated that 18F-SKI PET represents a promising clinical assay for imaging in vivo tumor targeting by a dasatinib-derivative compound. Our first-in-humans data support the continued clinical development of 18F-SKI.
DISCLOSURE
This work was supported by NIH/NCI grants R21 CA167803, P50 CA086438, and R01 CA164490. Memorial Sloan Kettering core facilities are supported by NIH/NCI Cancer Center support grant P30 CA008748. Additional salary support was provided by NCI grants R01 CA172546 (to Mark Dunphy) and R21 CA191913 (to Darren Veach). Simone Krebs was supported in part by the NIH/NCI Paul Calabresi Career Development Award for Clinical Oncology (K12 CA184746). Lukas Carter acknowledges support from the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellowship (F32-EB025050). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
KEY POINTS
QUESTION: What is the feasibility of noninvasive in vivo Src kinase-targeted tumor detection using 18F-SKI for PET imaging?
PERTINENT FINDINGS: Five patients with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer, renal cell cancer, or leukemia were included as part of a prospective study. PET images showed multiple osseous metastases in the 2 patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, previously undiagnosed metastases in uterus and muscle from primary breast tumor and renal cell carcinoma, respectively, were visualized. Using 18F-SKI as a quantitative molecular imaging tool to interrogate dosing requirements, we calculated intratumoral drug concentrations (range, 0.03–0.07 nM).
IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: 18F-SKI offers potential as a pharmacometric biomarker to guide dasatinib-based cancer therapies, thus increasing the scope of personalized medicine.
Acknowledgments
We thank Leah Bassity for editing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Summy JM, Gallick GE. Src family kinases in tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:337–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Felsenfeld DP, Schwartzberg PL, Venegas A, Tse R, Sheetz MP. Selective regulation of integrin–cytoskeleton interactions by the tyrosine kinase Src. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:200–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Parsons SJ, Parsons JT. Src family kinases, key regulators of signal transduction. Oncogene. 2004;23:7906–7909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Talpaz M, Shah NP, Kantarjian H, et al. Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2531–2541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reissig D, Clement J, Sanger J, Berndt A, Kosmehl H, Bohmer FD. Elevated activity and expression of Src-family kinases in human breast carcinoma tissue versus matched non-tumor tissue. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001;127:226–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sun J, Wang X, Tang B, et al. A tightly controlled Src-YAP signaling axis determines therapeutic response to dasatinib in renal cell carcinoma. Theranostics. 2018;8:3256–3267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lombardo LJ, Lee FY, Chen P, et al. Discovery of N-(2-chloro-6-methyl-phenyl)-2-(6-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4-ylamino)thiazole-5-carboxamide (BMS-354825), a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity in preclinical assays. J Med Chem. 2004;47:6658–6661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Araujo J, Logothetis C. Dasatinib: a potent SRC inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:492–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Demetri GD, Lo Russo P, MacPherson IR, et al. Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of dasatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6232–6240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Strand J, Varasteh Z, Eriksson O, Abrahmsen L, Orlova A, Tolmachev V. Gallium-68-labeled affibody molecule for PET imaging of PDGFRβ expression in vivo. Mol Pharm. 2014;11:3957–3964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wagner M, Wuest M, Hamann I, Lopez-Campistrous A, McMullen TPW, Wuest F. Molecular imaging of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFRα) in papillary thyroid cancer using immuno-PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2018;58:51–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Veach DR, Namavari M, Pillarsetty N, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a fluorine-18 derivative of dasatinib. J Med Chem. 2007;50:5853–5857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dunphy MP, Zanzonico P, Veach D, et al. Dosimetry of 18F-labeled tyrosine kinase inhibitor SKI-249380, a dasatinib-tracer for PET imaging. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:25–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li X, He Y, Ruiz CH, Koenig M, Cameron MD, Vojkovsky T. Characterization of dasatinib and its structural analogs as CYP3A4 mechanism-based inactivators and the proposed bioactivation pathways. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37:1242–1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Benezra M, Hambardzumyan D, Penate-Medina O, et al. Fluorine-labeled dasatinib nanoformulations as targeted molecular imaging probes in a PDGFB-driven murine glioblastoma model. Neoplasia. 2012;14:1132–1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Christopher LJ, Cui D, Wu C, et al. Metabolism and disposition of dasatinib after oral administration to humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008;36:1357–1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–1027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hiwase DK, Saunders V, Hewett D, et al. Dasatinib cellular uptake and efflux in chronic myeloid leukemia cells: therapeutic implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3881–3888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Luo FR, Yang Z, Camuso A, et al. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in animal models predict optimal clinical exposure. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:7180–7186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Somlo G, Atzori F, Strauss LC, et al. Dasatinib plus capecitabine for advanced breast cancer: safety and efficacy in phase I study CA180004. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1884–1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morris PG, Rota S, Cadoo K, et al. Phase II study of paclitaxel and dasatinib in metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:387–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dumont RA, Hildebrandt I, Su H, et al. Noninvasive imaging of alphaVbeta3 function as a predictor of the antimigratory and antiproliferative effects of dasatinib. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3173–3179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scher HI, Beer TM, Higano CS, et al. Antitumour activity of MDV3100 in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a phase 1-2 study. Lancet. 2010;375:1437–1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]