Abstract
A continuous flow approach to access α-trifluoromethylthiolated esters and amides using commercially available arylacetic acids and N-(trifluoromethylthio)phthalimide as the electrophilic reagent is described. The experimental protocol involves the in-flow conversion of the carboxylic acid into N-acylpyrazole followed by the α-trifluoromethylthiolation in a PTFE coil reactor and final reaction with primary or secondary amines, or alcohols, to afford in a telescoped process α-substituted SCF3 amides and esters, respectively, in good overall yield and short reaction times.
The growing interest in academia and industrial context, toward effective and large-scale syntheses of intermediates and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), has seen the flourishing of flow chemistry as a powerful enabling technology.1 An efficient optimization of the single transformations of a multistep synthesis, under better controlled and mild conditions, may lead to the development of telescoped processes, thus avoiding isolation of intermediates and maximizing efficiency, practicality, and environmental impact.2
Fluorinated compounds find important applications in the pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries.3 Indeed, when the polar C–F bond or fluorine-containing groups are present, the pharmacokinetics, lipophilicity, and bioavailability of the molecule is significantly affected and then can be modulated.4 Accordingly, over the past decades, many investigations have been undertaken to develop methods useful for installing fluorine-containing groups onto organic molecules.5
We recently reported the α-trifluoromethylthiolation of N-acyl pyrazoles using N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-1,8-naphthalenediamine (proton sponge) as a catalytic base and N-(trifluoromethylthio)phthalimide as the electrophilic source.6N-Acylpyrazoles are readily available carboxylic acid surrogates,7 which were suitable for undergoing α-functionalization via enolate formation under mild basic conditions (Scheme 1). In the same pot, the pyrazole group has been easily replaced by different nucleophiles, such as alcohols, amines, and water, to give the formal α-trifluoromethylthiolation of carboxylic acid derivatives. Although this methodology enabled us to successfully obtain the α-trifluoromethythiolated esters, amides, carboxylic acids, and other useful derivatives, the N-acyl pyrazoles had to be first synthesized from commercially available aryl/heteroaryl acetic acids. To make the entire process more convenient and practical, we envisaged that a telescoped continuous flow protocol,8 starting directly from the commercially and readily available carboxylic acids, would have improved the method further (Scheme 1).9
Scheme 1. Batch and Continuous-Flow Approaches to the Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethylthio Carboxylic Acid Derivatives via N-Acylpyrazoles.
We started our investigation by studying the conversion of the carboxylic acid into the corresponding N-acylpyrazole under continuous flow conditions using a PTFE coil reactor (1.58 mm outer diameter, 0.78 mm inner diameter) coiled in a bundle and immersed in an oil bath heated to the desired temperature. A 2.5 mL SGE gastight syringe A, containing phenylacetic acid and DMAP (0.1 mol/equiv) and a syringe B, containing 3 phenylpyrazole (0.63 M solution) and EDC*HCl (1.2 mol/eq), were connected by a PEEK tee junction to a 500 μL PTFE coil reactor. In some explorative tests different solvents and flow rates were studied, and a few selected results are reported in Table 1.
Table 1. In Flow Synthesis of N-Acylpyrazolesa.
entry | solvent | flow rate (mL/min) | resid, time (min) | NMR yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DCM | 0.1 | 5 | 94 |
2 | DCM | 0.25 | 2 | 95 |
3 | DCM | 1.0 | 0.5 | 85 |
4 | THF/CH3CN/DCM | 0.25 | 2 | 92 |
5c | THF/CH3CN/DCM | 0.25 | 2 | 93 |
Reaction conditions: concentration of 0.1 M carboxylic acid.
Yield determined by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.
Reaction run at a concentration of 0.3 M carboxylic acid.
After only 2 min of residence time, product 1 was obtained in DCM in 95% yield. However, in view of the following steps in the continuous process, other solvent systems were investigated, and among them the THF/CH3CN/DCM mixture was found to be optimal also in the preparation of the N-acylpyrazole (92% yield with 2 min residence time). Having established the conditions for a high yielding preparation of the activated ester, the trifluoromethylthiolation step was further investigated (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethylthioamides from N-Acylpyrazoles under Continuous Flow Conditions.
A 5 mL SGE gastight syringe, containing the pyrazoleamide of 4-bromophenylacetic acid 1 as a model substrate (3 mL of a 0.3 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.0 equiv) and two 1 mL SGE gastight syringes, containing a base (0.27 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 0.2 equiv) and N-SCF3 phthalimide 2 (1.6 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.2 equiv), respectively, were connected by a PEEK tee junction to a 500 μL PTFE coil reactor. The outcome of the reactor, the pyrazole derivative 3, was collected in a vial containing benzylamine (2 equiv), where it was stirred for further 2 h to afford N-benzyl amide 4. The yield was evaluated by 19F NMR and confirmed after chromatographic purification. At first, proton sponge (PS) was evaluated as a base, since it proved to be the base of election in the reaction.6 However, low yields were observed, due to solubility issues (Table 2, entry 1–4); therefore, other conditions were investigated and the combination of triethylamine with acetonitrile/THF mixture was found to be a good solution and allowed to perform the reaction in continuo in 61% yield and 30 min residence time (entry 5). Higher productivity can be obtained by further increasing the flow rate (entry 6, productivity = 107.4 mg/h), and better yields were achieved by operating at 60 °C (75% yield, entry 8 of Table 2).
Table 2. Synthesis of N-Benzyl α-Trifluoromethylthioamide from N-Acylpyrazoles under Flow Conditionsa.
entry | solvent | base | T (°C) | resid time (min) | yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | THF | PS | 25 | 30 | 0 |
2 | THF | PS | 25 | 15 | 0 |
3 | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | PS | 30 | 30 | 20 |
4 | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | PS | 30 | 15 | 15 |
5 | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | TEA | 30 | 30 | 61 |
6 | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | TEA | 30 | 15 | 41 |
7 | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | TEA | 45 | 15 | 52 (51) |
8 | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | TEA | 60 | 15 | 75 (73) |
9 | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | TEA | 90 | 15 | 50 |
10c | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | TEA | 45 | 15 | 83 |
11d | THF/CH3CN (1:1) | TEA | 45 | 15 | 85 (83) |
Reaction conditions: 0.2 mol/equiv of TEA was used.
Yield determined by 19F NMR analysis of the crude reaction product with α,α,α-CF3C6H5 as internal standard and in parentheses as yield after chromatographic purification.
0.35 mol/equiv of TEA.
0.5 mol/equiv of TEA.
By further optimization work, where reaction temperature, base stoichiometry, and flow rates were studied, 45 °C was identified as the ideal reaction temperature, and 0.35 or 0.5 mol/equiv of TEA, and 15 min of residence time for a 0.5 mL PTFE coil reactor as good experimental set up (85% yield, entries 10 and 11, Table 2 (see the Experimental Section for further details) affording a productivity = 217.4 mg/h of product 3. For the sake of comparison, the in-batch reaction,6 performed under the same experimental conditions (THF/CH3CN (1:1), TEA), afforded 66 mg of product 3 after 7h reaction time, while the same amount was produced in flow after 20 min. In order to proof the scalability of the method, the reaction was conducted using the same 0.5 mL PTFE reactor for 10 h under the optimized conditions of entry 10, Table 2, affording 2.02 g of N-benzyl amide 4.
The key step of the trifluoromethylthiolation was briefly investigated also with microreactor technology by using a 10 μL glass microreactor, observing a similar behavior and dependence of the yield from the temperature profile (Table 3). Operating under the same experimental conditions, in CH3CN–THF mixture and with TEA as a base, 65% conversion for product 4 was obtained at 60 °C with 3.3 min of residence time and 50% conversion with 1.3 min residence time (P = 14.3 mg/h for entry 2, P = 28 mg/h for entry 6).
Table 3. Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethylthio Amide 4 from N-Acylpyrazoles in Microreactorsa.
entry | T (°C) | flow rate (μL/min) | resid time (min) | NMR yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 45 | 3 | 3.3 | 57 |
2 | 60 | 3 | 3.3 | 65 |
3 | 90 | 3 | 3.3 | 56 |
4 | 30 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 43 |
5 | 45 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 45 |
6 | 60 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 50 |
7 | 90 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 46 |
0.2 molar equiv of TEA was used.
Yield determined by 19F NMR analysis of the crude reaction with α,α,α-CF3C6H5 as internal standard.
Finally, the telescoped process was studied (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Telescopic Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethylthio Amides and Esters from Carboxylic Acids.
The condensation of the arylacetic acid with pyrazole was performed in a 50 μL PTFE coil reactor (2 min residence time), and then the outcome of the reactor was connected to another tee junction, fed by two 2.5 mL SGE gastight syringes, containing TEA and N-SCF3 phthalimide, that were reacted at 30 °C in a second coil reactor (0.5 mL, 14 min residence time). After the first volume was discarded, the outcome of the reactor was collected in a vial containing amine (2 equiv), where it was stirred for further 2 h (Table 4).
Table 4. Telescoped Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethylthio N-Benzylamide 4 from 4-Bromophenylacetic Acid.
entry | 2 (molar equiv) | base (molar equiv) | T (°C) | yielda (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 30 | 30 |
2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 30 | 58 (56) |
3 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 30 | 72 (70) |
4 | 1.5 | 0.45 | 60 | 65 |
5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 60 | 55 |
6 | 1.5 | 0.35 | 60 | 52 |
7b | 1.5 | 0.5 | 60 | 50 (48) |
Yield determined by 19F NMR analysis of crude reaction with α,α,α-CF3C6H5 as internal standard and in parentheses as the yield after chromatographic purification.
Residence time second reactor: 7 min.
Some further optimization studies were necessary in order to set up an efficient multistep, telescopic process. Using a little excess of N-SCF3 phthalimide (1.5 mol/equiv) and operating at 30 °C, 70% overall yield starting from the carboxylic acid was reached (P = 183.4 mg/h of product 4 entry 3).
Under the same experimental conditions, the multistep synthesis in flow of other amides was successfully achieved, in overall good yields (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Telescoped synthesis of α-trifluoromethylthioamides and esters from carboxylic acids.
Starting from the carboxylic acid, the protocol allowed to synthesize α-trifluoromethylthio N-benzyl and N-alkyl amides in continuo in overall yields, ranging from 50 to 70%. The N,N-dialkyl amide 9 was obtained in lower yield, likely ascribed to more sterically hindered nature of the amine, whereas the preparation of an ester derivative 10 was satisfactorily accomplished in 70% yield. In both cases, longer reaction times for the acyl substitution were necessary.
In conclusion, a telescopic process for the synthesis of α-trifluoromethylthiolated esters and amides, using commercially available arylacetic acids and N-(trifluoromethylthio)phthalimide, was successfully accomplished. Micro- and mesoreactor technology was successfully employed to develop a multistep protocol for the in-flow synthesis of fluorinated derivatives in good yields and short reaction times, compared to the in-batch reactions. Based on the high versatility of the N-acylpyrazoles as activated carboxylic acids, the methodology is expected to offer further opportunities for the development of many other telescopic processes to access a wide variety of useful derivatives.
Experimental Section
General Methods
All reactions requiring dry or inert conditions were conducted in flame-dried glassware under a positive pressure of nitrogen. Anhydrous THF, dicloromethane, and acetonitrile were purchased from Aldrich. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on Macherey-Nagel precoated silica gel plates (0.25 mm) and visualized by UV light. Flash chromatography was performed on Merck silica gel (60, particle size: 0.040–0.063 mm). 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III HD 600, Bruker Avance-400, Bruker Avance-300, or Bruker Avance-250 spectrometer in CDCl3 as solvent at room temperature. Chemical shifts for protons are reported using residual solvent protons (1H NMR: δ = 7.26 ppm for CDCl3) as internal standard. Carbon spectra were referenced to the shift of the 13C signal of CDCl3 (δ = 77.0 ppm). The following abbreviations are used to indicate the multiplicity in NMR spectra: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; dd, double doublet; ddd, doublet of doublet of doublets; dt, doublet of triplets; m, multiplet; quint, quintuplet; sext, sextuplet sept, septet; br, broad signal; dq, doublet of quartets. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were acquired using a Bruker solariX XR Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a 7 T refrigerated actively shielded superconducting magnet. The samples were ionized in positive-ion mode using a MALDI or ESI ionization source. Melting points were measured with a Stuart Model SMP 30 melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. All starting materials (unless otherwise noted) were purchased from Aldrich and TCI used as received. N-SCF3 phthalimide 2 and the pyrazolamides 1 were prepared by using general procedures reported in literature.10
Synthesis of N-Benzyl α-Trifluoromethylthioamide (4) under Batch Conditions
In an oven-dried vial, under nitrogen atmosphere, TEA (5.6 μL 0.04 mmol, 0.2 equiv) was added to a mixture of N-acylpyrazole 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv) and N-(trifluoromethylthio)phthalimide 2 (59.3 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in a mixture of anhydrous CH3CN and THF (1:1, 1 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature and monitored by TLC. After completion of the first step, N-benzylamine (0.26 mmol, 1.3 equiv) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. After completion, the solvent was evaporated, and the crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 80/20) to afford products 4 in 70% yield.
General Flow Reactor Setup
The coil reactor was realized by using PTFE tubing (1.58 mm outer diameter, 0.78 mm inner diameter) coiled in a bundle and immersed in an oil bath heated to the desired temperature. Reagent solutions were mixed using a PEEK T-mixer. The end of tubing chain connected to a 75 psi back-pressure regulator, and the outlet stream was collected in vial. For further details, see the Supporting Information.
In-Flow Synthesis of Acyl Pyrazole (1)
Syringe A: 2.5 mL SGE gastight syringe containing 4-Br-phenylacetic acid (2 mL of a 0.6 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and DMAP (0.06 M solution CH3CN/THF 1:1, 0.04 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and Syringe B: 2.5 mL SGE gastight syringe containing 3 phenylpyrazole (2 mL of a 0.63 M solution in CH3CN/DCM 1:1, 0.42 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and EDC·HCl (0.72 M solution in CH3CN/DCM 1:1, 0.48 mmol, 1.2 equiv), were connected by a PEEK tee junction to a 500 μL PTFE coil reactor. Both syringes fed the solution at 125 μL/min giving a residence time of 2 min. The system was pressurized at 75 PSI by applying a PEEK black pressure regulator. The outcome of the reactor was collected in a vial, and the solvent was evaporated. After the first five volumes were discarded, steady-state conditions were reached. The yield of product was evaluated by 1H NMR, using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard (0.33 equiv), and was reported as an average value calculated on three separately collected reactor volumes.
In-Flow Synthesis of N-Benzyl α-Trifluoromethylthioamide (4)
Syringe A: 5 mL SGE gastight syringe containing pyrazoleamide 1 (3 mL of a 0.3 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 0.9 mmol), Syringe B: 1 mL SGE gastight syringes containing TEA (0.68 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 0.68 mmol), and Syringe C: 1 mL SGE gastight syringes containing N-SCF3 phtalimide (1.6 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.6 mmol) and α,α,α-CF3 toluene as an internal standard (1.3 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.3 mmol) were connected by a PEEK tee junction to a 500 μL PTFE coil reactor. Syringe A fed the solution at 25 μL/min, while both syringes B and C fed the solution at 5.5 μL/min, giving a residence time of 14 min and a molar ratio in the reactor of pyrazoleamide (1 mol/equiv), TEA (0.5 mol/equiv), N-SCF3 phtalimide (1.2 mol/equiv), and α,α,α-CF3 toluene (1 equiv). The outcome of the reactor was collected in a vial containing benzylamine (0.2 mmol, 2 equiv), where it was stirred for further 2 h. The reaction mixture was dissolved in CDCl3 (without removing reaction solvent to avoid the evaporation of the internal standard) and subjected to 19F NMR, to evaluate the NMR yield of the product.11 After discarding the first reaction volume, steady-state conditions were reached. The yield was reported as an average value calculated on three separately collected reactor volumes. Reactor volumes were reunited and purified by column chromatography.
Telescoped Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethylthioamides (4–9)
Syringe A: 5 mL SGE gastight syringe containing the appropriate phenylacetic acid (0.6 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.8 mmol, 1 equiv) and DMAP (0.06 M solution CH3CN/THF 1:1, 0.18 mmol 0.1 equiv) and Syringe B: 5 mL SGE gastight syringe, containing 3-phenylpyrazole (0.63 M solution in CH3CN/DCM 1:1, 1.89 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and EDC·HCl (0.72 M solution in CH3CN/DCM 1:1, 2.16 mmol, 1.2 equiv) were connected by a PEEK tee junction to a 50 μL PTFE coil reactor. Both syringes fed the solution at 12.5 μL/min giving a residence time of 2 min. The outcome of the reactor was connected by another tee junction to two 2.5 mL SGE gastight syringes: Syringe C containing TEA (0.68 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.70 mmol) and Syringe D containing N-SCF3 phtalimide 2 (2 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 5.11 mmol) and α,α,α-CF3 toluene as an internal standard (1.3 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 3.25 mmol). Both the syringes C and D fed the solution at 5.5 μL/min, giving an overall residence time of 36 min and a molar ratio in the reactor of pyrazoleamide (1 mol/equiv), TEA (0.5 mol/equiv), N-SCF3 phtalimide (1.5 mol/equiv), and α,α,α-CF3 toluene (1 equiv). The system was pressurized at 75 PSI by applying a PEEK black pressure regulator. To avoid the precipitation of the N-SCF3 reagent, syringe D was kept at 35 °C. After discarding the first volume, the outcome of the reactor was collected in a vial containing the proper amine (0.2 mmol, 2 equiv), and the mixture was stirred for further 2 h at the temperature reported in Figure 1. The reaction mixture was dissolved in CDCl3 (without removing the reaction solvent to avoid the evaporation of the internal standard) and subjected to 19F NMR, to evaluate the yield of the product. The 19F NMR experiments were recorded with d1 = 5 s to obtain a quantitative analysis. The yield was evaluated by the integral ratio between the signal of SCF3 group of the product (∼−40 ppm) and the signal of the CF3 group of the internal standard (−63 ppm). The NMR yield was reported as an average value calculated on three separately collected reactor volumes. Reactor volumes were reunited and purified by column chromatography.
N-Benzyl-2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-((trifluoromethyl)thio)acetamide (4)
The compound was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 80/20). White solid, 85.7 mg, 70% yield. Mp: 130.5–131.4 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.53 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.35–7.28 (m, 5H), 7.22 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.26 (br, 1H), 4.99 (s, 1H), 4.52 (dd, 1H, J = 14.7 Hz, J = 5.7 Hz), 443 (dd, 1H, J = 14.7 Hz, J = 5.7 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 167.1, 137.0, 134.4, 132.4, 129.7, 129.7 (q, 1JCF = 308.3 Hz), 128.8, 127.9, 127.7, 123.3, 53.0, 44.4. 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282 MHz): δ −40.6. HRMS (ESI-FT ICR) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C16H13BrF3NOSNa 425.9751; Found 425.9759.
N-Butyl-2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-((trifluoromethyl)thio)acetamide (5)
The compound was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 80/20). White solid, 66.2 mg, 60% yield. Mp: 85.6–87.0 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.52 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.30 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 6.08 (br, 1H), 4.96 (s, 1H), 3.29 (ddd, 2H, J = J = J ≈ 7.0 Hz), 1.49 (quint, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.31 (sext, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 0.92 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz): δ 167.0, 134.5, 132.3, 129.74 (q, 1JCF = 308.4 Hz), 129.7, 123.1, 52.9, 40.0, 31.2, 19.9, 13.6. 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −40.6. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C13H16BrF3NOS 370.0083; Found 370.0094.
N-Benzyl-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-((trifluoromethyl)thio)acetamide (6)
The compound was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 80/20). White solid, 57.8 mg, 55% yield. Mp: 127.8–129.1 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.33–7.29 (m, 5H), 7.31 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.51 (br, 1H), 5.01 (s, 1H), 4.45 (dd, 1H, J = 14.8 Hz, J = 5.8 Hz), 4.37 (dd, 1H, J = 14.8 Hz, J = 5.8 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 167.1, 137.0, 135.1, 133.8, 129.7 (q, 1JCF = 308.3 Hz), 129.4 (2C), 128.8, 127.9, 127.7, 52.9, 44.3. 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −40.6. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C16H14ClF3NOS 360.0437; Found 360.0431.
N-Butyl-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-((trifluoromethyl)thio)acetamide (7)
The compound was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 80/20). White solid, 49.4 mg, 50% yield. Mp: 72.7–73.7 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ 7.36 (m, 4H), 6.24 (br, 1H), 4.99 (s, 1H), 3.28 (ddd, 2H, J = J = J ≈ 7.0 Hz), 1.48 (quint, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 1.30 (sext, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 0.9 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 167.2, 135.0, 134.0, 129.80 (q, 1JCF = 308.2 Hz), 129.4, 129.3, 52.9, 40.1, 31.2, 19.9, 13.6. 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −40.7. HRMS (ESI-FT ICR) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C13H16ClF3NOS 326.0588; Found 326.0574.
N-Benzyl-2-(2-nitrophenyl)-2-((trifluoromethyl)thio)acetamide (8)
The compound was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 80/20). Colorless oil, 57.2 mg, 51% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.76–7.68 (m, 2H), 7.55 (t, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.35–7.22 (m, 5H), 7.00 (br, 1H), 5.45 (s,1H), 4.54 (dd, 1H, J = 14.9 Hz, J = 5.9 Hz), 4.41 (dd, 1H, J = 14.9 Hz, J = 5.7 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz): δ 166.1, 147.5, 137.2, 134.5, 132.8, 132.2, 130.3 (q, 1JCF = 308.4 Hz), 129.9, 128.9, 127.9, 127.7, 125.4, 49.7, 44.6. 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −41.5. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C16H13F3N2O3SNa 393.0497, Found 393.0472.
N,N-Diethyl-2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-((trifluoromethyl)thio)acetamide (9)
The compound was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 80/20). Pale yellow oil, 33.6 mg, 30% yield. °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.50 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.34 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 5.28 (s, 1H), 3.41 (m, 1H), 3.31 (m, 2H), 3.21 (m, 1H), 1.08 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.02 (t, 3H, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 166.5, 135.7, 132.3, 130.6 (q, 1JCF = 308.1 Hz), 129.8, 122.9, 51.9, 42.5, 41.0, 14.0, 12.5. 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −40.4. HRMS (ESI-FT ICR) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C13H15BrF3NOS 370.0083, Found 370.0087.
Telescoped Synthesis of Ethyl 2-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-((trifluoromethyl)thio)acetate (10)
Syringe A: 5 mL SGE gastight syringe containing 4-Br-phenylacetic acid (0.6 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.8 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and DMAP (0.06 M solution CH3CN/THF 1:1, 0.18 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and Syringe B: 5 mL SGE gastight syringe containing 3-phenylpyrazole (0.63 M solution in CH3CN/DCM 1:1, 1.89 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and EDC·HCl (0.72 M solution in CH3CN/DCM 1:1, 2.16 mmol, 1.2 equiv) were connected by a PEEK tee junction to a 50 μL PTFE coil reactor. Both syringes fed the solution at 12.5 μL/min giving a residence time of 2 min. The outcome of the reactor was connected by another tee junction to two 2.5 mL SGE gastight syringes: Syringe C containing TEA (0.68 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 1.70 mmol) and Syringe D containing N-SCF3 phtalimide (2) (2 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 5.11 mmol) and α,α,α-CF3 toluene as an internal standard (1.3 M solution in CH3CN/THF 1:1, 3.25 mmol). Both syringes C and D fed the solution at 5.5 μL/min, giving an overall residence time of 36 min and a molar ratio in the reactor of pyrazoleamide (1 mol/eq), TEA (0.5 mol/equiv), N-SCF3 phtalimide (1.5 mol/equiv), and α,α,α-CF3 toluene (1 equiv). The system was pressurized at 75 PSI by applying a PEEK black pressure regulator. To avoid the precipitation of the N-SCF3 reagent, syringe D was kept at 35 °C. The outcome of the reactor was collected in a vial containing ethanol (5 mmol, 50 equiv) and DMAP (1.3 mg, 0.01 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and the mixture was stirred for a further 8 h at 50 °C. The reaction mixture was dissolved in CDCl3 (without removing the reaction solvent to avoid the evaporation of the internal standard) and subjected to 19F NMR to evaluate the yield of the product. The 19F NMR experiments were recorded with d1 = 5 s to obtain a quantitative analysis. The yield was evaluated by the integral ratio between the signal of SCF3 group of the product (∼−40 ppm) and the signal of the CF3 group of the internal standard (−63 ppm). The NMR yield was reported as an average value calculated on three separately collected reactor volumes. Reactor volumes were reunited and purified by column chromatography (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate 100/0 to 90/10). Pale yellow oil, 72.8 mg, 70% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz):7.51 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.33 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 5.00 (s, 1H), 4.25 (dq, 1H, J = 15.8 Hz, J = 7.1 Hz), 4.19 (dq, 1H, J = 15.8 Hz, J = 7.1 Hz), 1.25 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ 168.4, 133.3, 132.2, 129.8, 129.6 (q, 1JCF = 306.9 Hz), 123.3, 62.8, 50.9, 13.8. 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −41.0. HRMS (ESI-FT ICR) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C11H10BrF3O2SNa 364.9408, Found 364.9429.
Acknowledgments
M.B. and A.P. thank ITN-EID project Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions Innovative Training Network - TECHNOTRAIN H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 Grant Agreement 812944 (www.technotrain-ITN.eu). A.P. thanks the project PRIN 2017 “SURSUMCAT”. F.F. thanks MUR for a PON RI 2014-2020 PhD fellowship. S.M. thanks MUR and the European Union for AIM-international attraction and mobility call for researchers funded by PON RI 2014-2020. MUR and the University of Salerno are acknowledged for financial support (ORSA187525).
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01270.
Flow setup for synthesis of α-trifluoromethylthioamide 4 and telescoped synthesis of α-trifluoromethylthio carboxylic acid derivatives. Copies of 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra for all compounds (PDF)
Author Contributions
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Dedication
Dedicated to Prof. Placido Neri (Università di Salerno) on the occasion of his 60th birthday.
Supplementary Material
References
- a May S. A. Flow Chemistry, Continuous Processing, and Continuous Manufacturing: A Pharmaceutical Perspective. J. Flow Chem. 2017, 7, 137–145. 10.1556/1846.2017.00029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Porta R.; Benaglia M.; Puglisi A. Flow Chemistry: Recent Developments in the Synthesis of Pharmaceutical Products. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 20, 2–25. 10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi Y. Pot Economy and One-Pot Synthesis. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 866–880. 10.1039/C5SC02913A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Kirsch P., Ed. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry: Synthesis, Reactivity, Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]; b Purser S.; Moore P. R.; Swallow S.; Gouverneur V. Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320–330. 10.1039/B610213C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Wang J.; Sánchez-Roselló M.; Aceña J. L.; del Pozo C.; Sorochinsky A. E.; Fustero S.; Soloshonok V. A.; Liu H. Fluorine in Pharmaceutical Industry: Fluorine-Containing Drugs Introduced to the Market in the Last Decade (2001–2011). Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432–2506. 10.1021/cr4002879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For selected examples, see:; a Gillis E. P.; Eastman K. J.; Hill M. D.; Donnelly D. J.; Meanwell N. A. Applications of Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 8315–8359. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Meanwell N. A. Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5822–5880. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For reviews, see:; a Yang X.; Wu T.; Phipps R. J.; Toste F. D. Advances in Catalytic Enantioselective Fluorination, Mono-, Di-, and Trifluoromethylation, and Trifluoromethylthiolation Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 826–870. 10.1021/cr500277b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Chachignon H.; Cahard D. Late Stage Trifluoromethylthiolation Strategies for Organic Compounds. Chin. J. Chem. 2016, 34, 445–454. 10.1002/cjoc.201500890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Barata-Vallejo S.; Bonesi S.; Postigo A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 7150–7182. 10.1039/C6OB00763E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Zhu Y.; Han J.; Wang J.; Shibata N.; Sodeoka M.; Soloshonok V. A.; Coelho J. A. S.; Toste F. D. Modern Approaches for Asymmetric Construction of Carbon Fluorine Quaternary Stereogenic Centers: Synthetic Challenges and Pharmaceutical Needs. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 3887–3964. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Szabó K. J., Selander N., Ed. Organofluorine Chemistry: Synthesis, Modeling, and Applications, 1st ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Franco F.; Meninno S.; Benaglia M.; Lattanzi A. Formal α-Trifluoromethylthiolation of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives via N-Acyl Pyrazoles. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 3073–3076. 10.1039/D0CC00116C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For reviews, see:; a Desimoni G.; Faita G.; Quadrelli P. Enantioselective Catalytic Reactions with N-Acyliden Penta-atomic Aza-heterocycles. Heterocycles as Masked Bricks To Build Chiral Scaffolds. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9922–9980. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Monge D.; Jiang H.; Alvarez-Casao Y. Masked Unsaturated Esters/Amides in Asymmetric Organocatalysis. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 4494–4504. 10.1002/chem.201405552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Meninno S.; Franco F.; Benaglia M.; Lattanzi A. Pyrazoleamides in Catalytic Asymmetric Reactions: Recent Advances. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 3380–3410. 10.1002/adsc.202100006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For a few selected reviews on flow chemistry in organic synthesis, see:; a Plutschack M. B.; Pieber B.; Gilmore K.; Seeberger P. H. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11796–11893. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Gutmann B.; Cantillo D.; Kappe C. O. Continuous-Flow Technology–A Tool for the Safe Manufacturing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6688–6728. 10.1002/anie.201409318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Porta R.; Benaglia M.; Puglisi A. Flow Chemistry: Recent Developments in the Synthesis of Pharmaceutical Products. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 20, 2–25. 10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Yu T.; Ding Z.; Nie W.; Jiao J.; Zhang H.; Zhang Q.; Xue C.; Duan X.; Yamada Y. M. A.; Li P. Recent Advances in Continuous Flow Enantioselective Catalysis. Chem. - Eur. J. 2020, 26, 5729–5747. 10.1002/chem.201905151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Yoo W.-J.; Ishitani H.; Laroche B.; Kobayashi S. Reworking Organic Synthesis for the Modern Age: Synthetic Strategies on Continuous-Flow Addition and Condensation Reactions with Heterogeneous Catalysts. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 5132–5145. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b03416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Pastre J. C.; Browne D. L.; Ley S. V. Flow Chemistry Syntheses of Natural Products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8849–8869. 10.1039/c3cs60246j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g For recent achievements in automated synthesis, see:Chatterjee S.; Guidi M.; Seeberger P. H.; Gilmore K. Automated Radial Synthesis of Organic Molecules. Nature 2020, 579, 379–384. 10.1038/s41586-020-2083-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Adamo A.; Beingessner R. L.; Behnam M.; Chen J.; Jamison T. F.; Jensen K. F.; Monbaliu J.-C. M.; Myerson A. S.; Revalor E. M.; Snead D. R.; Stelzer T.; Weeranoppanant N.; Wong S. W.; Zhang P. On-Demand Continuous-Flow Production of Pharmaceuticals in a Compact, Reconfigurable System. Science 2016, 352, 61–67. 10.1126/science.aaf1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Bédard A.-C.; Adamo A.; Aroh K. C.; Russell M. G.; Bedermann A. A.; Torosian J.; Yue B.; Jensen K. F.; Jamison T. F. Reconfigurable System for Automated Optimization of Diverse Chemical Reactions. Science 2018, 361, 1220–1225. 10.1126/science.aat0650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For a few selected works on the telescopic process, see:; a Britton J.; Raston C. L. Multi-Step Continuous-Flow Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 1250–1271. 10.1039/C6CS00830E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Vasudevan N.; Sharma M. K.; Reddy D. S.; Kulkarni A. A. A Multi-Step Continuous Flow Synthesis of the Cystic Fibrosis Medicine Ivacaftor. React. Chem. Eng. 2018, 3, 520–526. 10.1039/C8RE00025E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Gilmore K.; Kopetzki D.; Lee J. W.; Horváth Z.; McQuade D. T.; Seidel-Morgenstern A.; Seeberger P. H. Continuous Synthesis of Artemisinin-Derived Medicines. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12652–12655. 10.1039/C4CC05098C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Murray P. R. D.; Browne D. L.; Pastre J. C.; Butters C.; Guthrie D.; Ley S. V. Continuous Flow-Processing of Organometallic Reagents using an Advanced Peristaltic Pumping System and the Telescoped Flow Synthesis of (E/Z)-Tamoxifen. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013, 17, 1192–1208. 10.1021/op4001548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Jiao J.; Nie W.; Yu T.; Yang F.; Zhang Q.; Aihemaiti F.; Yang T.; Liu X.; Wang J.; Li P. Multi-Step Continuous-Flow Organic Synthesis: Opportunities and Challenges. Chem. - Eur. J. 2021, 27, 4817–4838. 10.1002/chem.202004477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Ötvös S. B.; Llanes P.; Pericas M. A.; Kappe C. O. Telescoped Continuous Flow Synthesis of Optically Active γ-Nitrobutyric Acids as Key Intermediates of Baclofen, Phenibut, and Fluorophenibut. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 8122–8126. 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- See ref (6) and:Abubakar S. S.; Benaglia M.; Rossi S.; Annunziata R. Organocatalytic α-trifluoromethylthiolation of Silylenol Ethers: Batch vs Continuous Flow Reactions. Catal. Today 2018, 308, 94–101. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.09.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- The 19F NMR experiments were recorded with d1 = 5 s to obtain a quantitative analysis. The product conversion was evaluated by the integral ratio between the signal of SCF3 group of the product (∼−40 ppm) and the signal of the CF3 group of the internal standard (−63 ppm).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.