Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2021 Sep 21;10:e62635. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62635

Metformin alleviates stress-induced cellular senescence of aging human adipose stromal cells and the ensuing adipocyte dysfunction

Laura Le Pelletier 1,, Matthieu Mantecon 1,, Jennifer Gorwood 1, Martine Auclair 1, Roberta Foresti 2, Roberto Motterlini 2, Mireille Laforge 3, Michael Atlan 4, Bruno Fève 5, Jacqueline Capeau 1, Claire Lagathu 1,‡,, Veronique Bereziat 1,‡,
Editors: Jessica K Tyler6, Jessica K Tyler7
PMCID: PMC8526089  PMID: 34544550

Abstract

Aging is associated with central fat redistribution and insulin resistance. To identify age-related adipose features, we evaluated the senescence and adipogenic potential of adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) from abdominal subcutaneous fat obtained from healthy normal-weight young (<25 years) or older women (>60 years). Increased cell passages of young-donor ASCs (in vitro aging) resulted in senescence but not oxidative stress. ASC-derived adipocytes presented impaired adipogenesis but no early mitochondrial dysfunction. Conversely, aged-donor ASCs at early passages displayed oxidative stress and mild senescence. ASC-derived adipocytes exhibited oxidative stress, and early mitochondrial dysfunction but adipogenesis was preserved. In vitro aging of aged-donor ASCs resulted in further increased senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and severe adipocyte dysfunction. When in vitro aged young-donor ASCs were treated with metformin, no alteration was alleviated. Conversely, metformin treatment of aged-donor ASCs decreased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction resulting in decreased senescence. Metformin’s prevention of oxidative stress and of the resulting senescence improved the cells’ adipogenic capacity and insulin sensitivity. This effect was mediated by the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase as revealed by its specific inhibition and activation. Overall, aging ASC-derived adipocytes presented impaired adipogenesis and insulin sensitivity. Targeting stress-induced senescence of ASCs with metformin may improve age-related adipose tissue dysfunction.

Research organism: Human

Introduction

Adipose tissue is the largest lipid storage and endocrine organ in the body. Recent studies have highlighted adipose tissue’s critical role in age‐related diseases and metabolic dysfunction. Aging is physiologically associated with fat redistribution and a metabolic and functional decline in adipose tissue, associated with oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis (Cartwright et al., 2007; Kuk et al., 2009; Cartwright et al., 2010; Tchkonia et al., 2010; Luo and Liu, 2016; Stout et al., 2017). The age-related redistribution of adipose tissue is characterized by the accumulation of truncal fat, hypertrophy of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and overall loss of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) (Oikawa et al., 2016; Park et al., 2016; Mancuso and Bouchard, 2019). An excess amount of VAT might reflect the paucity of SCAT during aging. Indeed, while accumulation of SCAT in the lower part of the body is considered to be a metabolic sink capable of buffering surplus energy, a decline in SCAT storage capacity might lead to (i) ectopic lipid deposition in the bone marrow, heart, liver, and muscles and (ii) an increase in cardiometabolic comorbidities (Stout et al., 2017). Accordingly, it has been suggested that appropriate SCAT plasticity and expandability guard against metabolic disorders (including insulin resistance) and that the age-related loss of these properties favors metabolic disorders (Pasarica et al., 2009; McLaughlin et al., 2011).

On the cellular level, several age-related changes in SCAT and VAT might contribute to adipose tissue dysfunction. Failure of SCAT is likely to result from the impaired recruitment of precursors and blunted adipogenesis. The identification of adipose-derived progenitor cells in the stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue has highlighted the importance of de novo adipogenesis in adipose tissue expansion (Cawthorn et al., 2012). Adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) are defined as plastic-adherent cells expressing specific surface antigens and that are able to differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondroblasts in vivo and in vitro (Dominici et al., 2006). They can be isolated, expanded, and induced to differentiate into the above-mentioned lineages by using specific culture conditions and thus constitute a useful tool for studying age-related diseases. The abundance of adipocyte progenitors/precursors that differentiate into adipocytes is an important determinant of SCAT expandability and functionality. Adipocyte-differentiated ASCs have a crucial role in lipid handling, adipose tissue expansion, and insulin sensitivity (Palmer and Kirkland, 2016). With age, the frequency of ASCs decreases (Liu et al., 2017). A reduction in the ASCs proliferation rate might ultimately reflect cell senescence and might be involved in the onset of metabolic alterations (e.g. insulin resistance) observed during aging.

The age-dependent senescence of ASCs has been linked to a decrease in mitochondrial activity and an increase in levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Choudhery et al., 2014; Maredziak et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017). Although most of the literature data show that aging has a negative effect on osteoblasts and chondrocytes, the results differ with regard to the impact of senescence on the ASCs’ adipogenic potential. Indeed, some studies found that aging had a negative effect on adipocyte differentiation (Karagiannides et al., 2001; Murphy et al., 2002; Sepe et al., 2011; Caso et al., 2013; Beane et al., 2014), whereas others found that adipocyte differentiation increased with age (de Girolamo et al., 2009; Choudhery et al., 2014; Maredziak et al., 2016). Lastly, it has been suggested that targeting senescent cells in adipose tissue will enhance adipogenesis and metabolic function in old age (Xu et al., 2015).

We show here that different mechanisms were involved in physiological, in vivo, aging and in passage-related, in vitro, aging, resulting in different adipocyte dysfunction. Thus, at early passages, ASCs isolated from SCAT of aged donors displayed stress-induced senescence leading to early adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and cellular insulin resistance but preserved adipogenesis. Conversely, in vitro passage-induced (long-term in vitro culture) aging in young-donor ASCs was responsible for the onset of senescence features in the absence of oxidative stress leading to a gradual decline in the proliferation and adipocyte differentiation capacity associated with enhanced insulin resistance. Interestingly, we showed that all these dysfunctions were more pronounced in aged-donors ASCs with increasing passage number.

The biguanide drug metformin is widely used to treat diabetes and also appears to modulate a number of aging-related disorders (Barzilai et al., 2016). Metformin exerts pleotropic effects and has a favorable influence on metabolic and cellular processes closely associated with the development of age-related conditions, such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and cellular senescence. We therefore sought to determine whether exposure of ASCs to metformin could prevent stress-induced senescence and rescue the impaired metabolic phenotype of ASCs obtained from aged donors. Our results show that, via the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), metformin exerted an antioxidant effect and improved mitochondria metabolism. Therefore, metformin alleviated the stress-induced cellular senescence of aged-donor ASCs and rescued adipocyte differentiation and function, which might be involved in the drug’s insulin-sensitizing effect in vivo.

Results

In vitro aging results in senescence and mitochondrial dysfunction while physiological aging induces early oxidative stress in ASCs

In order to determine the impact of aging on ASCs, we evaluated three cellular models: (i) ASCs isolated from human SCAT samples obtained from young adults (under the age of 25- referred as ‘young-donor’) that were cultured in vitro from early (P3) to late passage (P11); (ii) physiologically aged ASCs that were isolated from older adults (over the age of 60- referred as ‘aged-donor’) at early passage, (iii) and, finally, aged-donor ASCs cultured from P3 to P11.

First, we observed that the in vitro increased passage number of young ASCs led to a senescent phenotype. The population doubling times (PDT) of young-donor ASCs at P7 and P11 were slightly longer than at P3 (Figure 1A–B). The mean percentage of senescent young-donor ASCs (i.e. those positive for senescence-associated (SA)-β-galactosidase) was increased at P7 and P11 (Figure 1C–D) although the level of lysosome accumulation measured by Lysotracker fluorescence remained unchanged (Figure 1E). Accordingly, young-donor ASCs expressed significantly greater levels of the cell cycle arrest proteins p16INK4 and p21WAF1 at P7 and P11 and of the senescence-associated protein prelamin A at P11 compared to P3 (Figure 1F–G). However, the level of ROS production was the same regardless of the passages (Figure 1H), indicating that oxidative stress was not enhanced in that setting. In order to evaluate the presence of mitochondrial dysfunction, we measured both the volume (by using Mitotracker that labels mitochondria) and the membrane potential (with the aggregate to monomer ratio of the JCI dye) of mitochondria. Young-donor ASCs did not show any modification of mitochondrial mass over the passages (Figure 1I) but presented a decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, mostly at P11 as compared to P3 (Figure 1J), in favor of late mitochondrial dysfunction. These data suggest that long-term in vitro culture of young-donor ASCs induced the onset of senescence with mitochondrial dysfunction but without enhanced oxidative stress.

Figure 1. In vivo and in vitro aging are differently associated with senescence, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction in cultured adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs).

Figure 1.

After isolation from the abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) of young (gray circles or bars) and aged (black circles or bars) donors, ASCs were cultured from passages (P) 3–11. (A). Calculation of the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) population doubling time (PDT) is described in the Materials and methods section. Times were determined at the indicated passage (n = 9, in triplicate). (B) The % inhibition of cell proliferation was calculated for aged-donor ASCs by determining the increase in total cell number that occurred after 7 days, compared to young-donor ASCs. (C) Senescence was evaluated in terms of senescence-associated (SA)-β-galactosidase activity and expressed as the proportion (in %) of SA-β-galactosidase-positive cells at pH 6 in aged-donor ASCs vs. young-donor ASCs at the same passage (at P3, P7, and P11). (D) Representative micrographs of SA-β-galactosidase-positive cells. (E) Lysosomal accumulation (normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride [DAPI]) was assessed with the Lysotracker fluorescence probe and expressed as the fluorescence ratio for aged-donor ASCs vs. young-donor ASCs at P3. (F) Whole-cell lysates of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs at P3, P7, and P11 were analyzed by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of the cell cycle arrest markers p16INK4A and p21WAF1, prelamin A, and tubulin (the loading control) from three donors in each group are shown. (G) Quantification of western blot was normalized to young-donor ASCs at P3. (H) Reactive oxygen species production (normalized against DAPI) was assessed by the oxidation of CM-H2DCFDA and expressed as a ratio relative to young-donor ASCs at P3. (I) Mitochondrial mass (normalized against DAPI) was evaluated with Mitotracker Red-Probe and expressed as a ratio relative to young-donor ASCs at P3. (J) The cationic dye JC1 was used to evaluate the mitochondrial membrane potential. The results are expressed as the ratio of aggregate/monomer fluorescence. Results are quoted as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for aged- vs. young-donor ASCs, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. young- or aged-donor ASCs at P3. All experiments were performed in triplicate with ASCs isolated from four different donors in each group.

Figure 1—source data 1. SA-ß-galactosidase activity at P3.
Figure 1—source data 2. SA-ß-galactosidase activity at P7.
Figure 1—source data 3. SA-ß-galactosidase activity at P11.
Figure 1—source data 4. Analysis by western blot of senescence markers p16 p21 and prelamin A.

At P3, aged-donor and young-donor ASCs had similar proliferative abilities and thus a similar PDT (Figure 1A–B). Aged-donor ASCs presented a mild senescent phenotype as compared to young-donor ASCs, characterized by a slight increase in senescent cell count, greater lysosome accumulation, and higher expression of p16INK4, p21WAF1, and prelamin A (Figure 1C–G). This mild senescence was not associated with mitochondrial dysfunction (Figure 1I–J). In agreement, a Seahorse experiment performed in young-donor and aged-donor ASCs at P3 did not reveal any difference in basal oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and maximal respiration measured after the addition of the uncoupling agent carbonyl cyanide 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) (Figure 2). It is noteworthy that, unlike young-donor ASCs, aged-donor ASCs presented early oxidative stress (Figure 1H).

Figure 2. The oxygen consumption rate of young-donor or aged-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) is not different at early passage.

Figure 2.

Cellular respiration was assessed by the measurement of the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in young-donor (gray circles) and aged-donor ASCs (black circles) at P3 using Seahorse. OCR was measured at baseline and after sequential addition of oligomycin (oligo: inhibitor of ATP synthase), carbonyl cyanide 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP: uncoupling agent), and rotenone/antimycin A (R/AA, inhibitors of the respiratory chain complexes I and III). Results are quoted as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The experiment was performed in triplicate with ASCs isolated from three different donors in each group.

Finally, increased cell passages of aged-donor ASCs resulted in both physiological and in vitro aging with a more pronounced senescent phenotype regardless of the passage analyzed. In contrast to young-donor ASCs, the PDT for aged-donor ASCs increased markedly from P5 to P11 (Figure 1A–B), indicating a steady increase in growth inhibition. It is important to note that cell viability did not change significantly over the culture period (data not shown). Aged-donor ASCs also presented a marked increase in SA-β-galactosidase activity (Figure 1C–D), lysosome accumulation (Figure 1E), p16INK4, p21WAF1, and prelamin A expression (Figure 1F–G) at P7 and P11. Moreover, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions were amplified over the passages (Figure 1H–I).

Taken as a whole, these results show that only physiological aging led to senescence associated with oxidative stress and that during long-term in vitro culture, aged-donor ASCs expressed senescence earlier and more intensely than young-donor ASCs did.

In vitro senescence is responsible for altered adipocyte differentiation, while physiological aging is associated with preserved differentiation but dysfunction in adipocyte-differentiated ASCs

We next evaluated the impact of in vitro and physiological aging on the ASCs’ ability to differentiate in vitro into mature adipocytes. At P3, P7, or P11, confluent cells were induced to differentiate for 14 days in a pro-adipogenic medium.

Increasing in vitro passage was associated with lower lipid accumulation in adipocytes differentiated from young-donor ASCs (Figure 3A–B) via a decreased expression of the pro-lipogenic and pro-adipogenic markers SREBP1c and PPARγ (Figure 3C–D). Adipocytes differentiated from young-donor ASCs also presented a decrease in insulin-induced phosphorylation of Akt, a key enzyme involved in short-term metabolic responses to insulin, in favor of a cellular insulin resistance at P7 and P11 (Figure 3I).

Figure 3. In vivo and in vitro aging are differently associated with adipose dysfunction of adipocytes differentiated from young-donor and aged-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs).

Figure 3.

The ASCs were differentiated into adipocytes for 14 days at P3, P7, and P11. (A) Cells were stained with Oil-Red-O to visualize lipid droplets 14 days post-induction, and representative micrographs are shown. (B) Quantification of Oil-Red-O staining of adipocytes differentiated from ASCs and representative scans of wells are shown. (C) Whole-cell lysates, at day 14 post-induction, of adipocytes differentiated from ASCs isolated from young and aged donors, cultured until P3, P7, and P11, were analyzed by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of C/EBPα, SREBP-1c, PPARγ, and tubulin (loading control) are shown. (D) Quantification of western blot was normalized to young-donor ASCs at P3. (E) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI). (F) Mitochondrial mass (normalized against DAPI) and (G) mitochondrial membrane potential were assessed in adipocytes derived from aged-donor ASCs as described in Figure 1. (H) Whole-cell lysates (extracted at day 14 post-induction) of adipocytes differentiated from young- and aged-donor ASCs and stimulated (or not) with insulin were analyzed with immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of Akt and phospho-Akt (Ser473) are shown. (I) The phosphorylated Akt/total Akt ratio was determined in a densitometric analysis. (J) Insulin sensitivity at P11 in adipocytes differentiated from young- and aged-donor ASCs was evaluated by measuring glucose uptake in basal and insulin-stimulated conditions as described in the Materials and methods section. The insulin fold induction was determined. Results are quoted as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for aged-donor vs. young-donor ASCs, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. young- or aged-donor ASCs at P3. All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate with ASCs isolated from four different donors in each group.

Figure 3—source data 1. Analysis by western blot of sadipogenic markers C/EBPa, SREBP1C and PPARg.

Interestingly, in vitro aging of young-donor ASCs, that resulted in ASC senescence, was not associated with early mitochondrial dysfunction in derived adipocytes (at P7, Figure 3F and G), thus disentangling ASC senescence and adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction.

Interestingly, at P3, adipocytes differentiated from young-donor or aged-donor ASCs had similar adipogenic capacities as shown by the similar triglyceride accumulation (Figure 3A–B) and pro-lipogenic and pro-adipogenic markers expression level (Figure 3C–D). By contrast, only adipocytes differentiated from aged-donor ASCs displayed enhanced oxidative stress (Figure 3E) and mitochondrial dysfunction characterized by increased mitochondrial mass and decreased membrane potential (Figure 3F–G). Moreover, the analysis of basal OCR, using Seahorse experiments, did not reveal any significant difference (Figure 4). However, the adipocytes differentiated from aged-donors ASCs displayed a major decrease in their maximal respiratory capacity, as indicated by a significantly lower increase in OCR after the addition of the uncoupling agent FCCP (Figure 4). Therefore, increased oxidative stress associated with mild senescence in aged-donor ASCs resulted in mitochondrial dysfunction in ASC-derived adipocytes, suggesting that adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction could be linked to increased oxidative stress in ASCs.

Figure 4. The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of adipocyte differentiated from young-donor or aged-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) is different at early passage.

Figure 4.

Cellular respiration was assessed by the measurement of OCR in adipocytes differentiated from young-donor (gray circles) and aged-donor ASCs (black circles) at P3, using Seahorse, at baseline and after sequential addition of oligomycin (oligo), 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), and rotenone/antimycin A (R/AA). Results are quoted as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). **p < 0.01, adipocytes differentiated from young-donor ASCs vs. adipocytes differentiated from aged-donor ASCs. The experiment was performed in triplicate with ASCs isolated from three different donors in each group.

Adipocytes differentiated from aged-donor ASCs also presented decreased acute insulin-induced phosphorylation of Akt indicating of insulin resistance. Throughout the passages, adipocytes differentiated from aged-donor ASCs presented altered adipogenic capacities, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction that were more pronounced as compared to adipocytes differentiated from young-donor ASCs (Figure 3A–G). Insulin resistance paralleled oxidative stress (Figure 3H–I). Altogether, these results support the hypothesis that the senescence of ASCs, observed during the long-term in vitro culture, could be responsible for the altered adipogenic differentiation. By contrast, the physiological aging that leads to oxidative stress in aged-donors ASCs at early passages would lead to enhanced metabolic alterations in adipocytes, but preserved adipocyte differentiation capacities.

To further delineate the link between oxidative stress and senescence of ASCs and of derived adipocytes, we induced senescence of young-donor ASCs at P3 by treating them with HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) and analyzed the impact of this induced senescence on adipocyte-differentiated ASCs. PIs are known to induce senescence by accumulating farnesylated prelamin A, responsible for premature aging syndromes (Hernandez-Vallejo et al., 2013, Afonso et al., 2016, Afonso et al., 2017). As shown in Figure 5, a treatment for 30 days with lopinavir associated with a low dose of ritonavir (LPV/r) led to ASC senescence (Figure 5A) but also to marked oxidative stress (Figure 5B) and mitochondrial dysfunctions (Figure 5C–D). Adipocytes derived from these LPV/r-treated ASCs exhibited increased oxidative stress (Figure 5E) and mitochondrial dysfunctions (Figure 5F–G) together with altered adipogenesis (Figure 5H). This confirms that induction of oxidative stress and senescence in young-donor ASCs results in severe adipose dysfunction in derived adipocytes. Interestingly, another PI with less adverse effects, darunavir associated with a low dose of ritonavir (DRV/r), did not increase senescence in ASCs but induced mild oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Accordingly, treatment of ASCs with DRV/r did not impede differentiation of derived adipocytes further indicating that mild oxidative stress in the absence of senescence in ASCs did not impair adipogenesis.

Figure 5. The protease inhibitors (PIs) lopinavir/r and darunavir/r induce, at different extents, in young-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) at early passage senescence, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction leading or not to altered ASC-derived adipocytes.

Figure 5.

ASCs were treated during 30 days with DMSO or PIs: lopinavir (LPV) or darunavir (DRV) associated with a low dose of ritonavir (LPV/r or DRV/r) (A–D). The ASCs were then differentiated into adipocytes for 14 days in the absence of PIs (E–H). (A) ASCs’ senescence was evaluated in terms of senescence-associated (SA)-β-galactosidase activity and expressed as the proportion (in %) of SA-β-galactosidase-positive cells at pH 6. (B) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride [DAPI]) was assessed by the oxidation of CM-H2DCFDA and expressed as a ratio relative to DMSO. (C) Mitochondrial mass (normalized against DAPI) was evaluated with Mitotracker Red-Probe and expressed as a ratio relative to DMSO. (D) The cationic dye JC1 was used to evaluate the mitochondrial membrane potential. In ASC-derived adipocytes, 14 days post-induction, (E) ROS production (F) mitochondrial mass, and (G) mitochondrial membrane potential normalized to DAPI were evaluated. (H) Cells were stained with Oil-Red-O to visualize lipid droplets. Results are quoted as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. DMSO. All experiments were performed in triplicate with ASCs isolated from three different donors in each group.

Figure 5—source data 1. Impact of HIV protease inhibitors on SA-ß-galactosidase activity.

Metformin prevents the onset of senescence and associated dysfunctions in ASCs isolated from aged donors but not in ASCs from young donors

Next, we evaluated whether metformin could alleviate cellular senescence in ASCs. To that end, ASCs were treated with metformin from P3 to P11. As shown in Figure 6A–B, metformin did not modify the PDT of young-donor ASCs and had no effect on the level of senescence or oxidative stress and a mild effect on mitochondrial dysfunction (Figure 6C–I).

Figure 6. Metformin partially prevents the senescence and associated dysfunctions in adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) obtained from aged donors but not in those obtained from young donors.

Figure 6.

Metformin (25 µmol/L) was added to the culture medium of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs from P3 onward (young-donor ASC: gray dots and bars in the absence of metformin, gray dotted lines or gray striped bars in the presence of metformin; aged-donor: black circles and bars in the absence of metformin, black dotted lines and striped bars in the presence of metformin). Mean population doubling times (PDT) were determined at the indicated passages in aged-donor and young-donor ASCs treated (or not) with metformin at the same passage. (B) The % inhibition of cell proliferation was calculated for aged-donor ASCs and young-donor ASCs treated by metformin by determining the increase in total cell number that occurred after 7 days, compared to young-donor ASCs. (C) Senescence was evaluated in terms of senescence-associated (SA)-β-galactosidase activity and expressed as the proportion (in %) of SA-β-galactosidase-positive cells at pH 6 in metformin-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs at P11. (D) Representative micrographs of SA-β-galactosidase positive cells. (E) Lysosomal accumulation (normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride [DAPI]) was assessed with the Lysotracker fluorescence probe in metformin-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs at P11. (F) Whole-cell lysates of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs treated (or not) with metformin were analyzed at P11 by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of the cell cycle arrest markers p16INK4A and p21WAF1 and of tubulin (the loading control) for two donors in each group are shown. Quantitation of western blots, normalized against the values for non-treated young-donor ASCs at P11. (G) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, (H) mitochondrial mass (both normalized against DAPI) and (I) mitochondrial membrane potential were assessed as described in Figure 1 in metformin-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs at P11. The results correspond to the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for aged-donor vs. young-donor ASCs, §p < 0.05, §§p < 0.01 metformin-treated vs. non-treated ASCs. All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate in ASCs isolated from three different donors in each group.

Figure 6—source data 1. Impact of metformin on SA-ß-galactosidase activity.
Figure 6—source data 2. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young untreated ASCs.
Figure 6—source data 3. Impact of metformin on p16 p21 protein expression.

Conversely, metformin prevented the above-mentioned relative decrease in cell proliferation in aged-donor ASCs presenting stress-induced senescence (Figure 6A–B). Accordingly, metformin rescued the higher percentage of senescent cells (Figure 6C–D), the greater lysosome accumulation (Figure 6E), and the higher expression of cell cycle inhibitors p21WAF1 and p16INK4 (Figure 6F) previously observed at P11.

Taken as a whole, these data show that in aged-donor ASCs, metformin reversed the dysfunction associated with oxidative stress-induced senescence. Indeed, metformin treatment reversed oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction to the levels observed in young-donor ASCs whereas it did not reverse senescence features in young-donor ASCs which do not display enhanced oxidative stress (Figure 6G–I).

Metformin restores the ability of aged-donor but not young-donor ASCs to differentiate into adipocytes

We checked whether metformin pre-treatment was able to rescue the altered adipogenesis potential of young-donor and aged-donor ASCs. At first, ASCs were treated with metformin, then adipogenesis was induced at P11 in the absence of the drug to bypass its anti-adipogenic impact (Marycz et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2018) (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). First, we observed that metformin was unable to rescue the altered adipogenesis observed in adipocytes derived from young-donor ASCs at P11 (Figure 7A–B). Conversely, metformin restored the adipogenic capacity of aged-donor ASCs at P11 to the level observed in young-donor ASCs. Indeed, metformin treatment during the proliferation state increased lipid accumulation (Figure 7A–B) and increased C/EBPα, and SREBP1c expression (Figure 7C–D). Lastly, metformin pre-treatment lowered levels of oxidative stress (Figure 7G), leading to a partial rescue of the insulin sensibility in adipocytes-differentiated ASCs (Figure 7E–F) but did not restore mitochondrial function (Figure 7H–I).

Figure 7. Metformin can improve the adipogenic differentiation capacity of aged-donor but not young-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs).

Metformin was added to the culture medium of young- and aged-donor ASCs from P3 onward. The ASCs were differentiated into adipocytes for 14 days at P11, in the absence of metformin (young-donor ASC: gray bars in the absence of metformin, gray striped bars in the presence of metformin; aged-donor: black bars in the absence of metformin, black striped bars in the presence of metformin). (A) Cells were stained with Oil-Red-O to visualize lipid droplets 14 days post-induction, and representative micrographs are shown. (B) Quantification of Oil-Red-O staining and representative scans of wells are shown. (C) Whole-cell lysates on day 14 post-induction from adipocytes differentiated from non-treated young-donor and aged-donor ASCs at P11 and treated (or not) with metformin were analyzed by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of C/EBPα, SREBP-1c, PPARγ, and tubulin (the loading control) are shown. (D) Quantification of western blots is shown. (E) Whole-cell lysates extracted at day 14 post-induction stimulated (or not) by insulin from differentiated ASCs were analyzed by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of Akt and phospho-Akt (Ser473) and quantification of the pAkt/Akt are shown. (F) Insulin sensitivity was evaluated at P11 in adipocytes differentiated from non-treated young-donor and aged-donor ASCs treated (or not) with metformin, by measuring the glucose uptake in response to insulin and calculating the insulin fold induction, as described in the Materials and methods section. (G) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, (H) mitochondrial mass, and (I) mitochondrial membrane potential (both normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride [DAPI]) were assessed as described in Figure 1. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05 for adipocytes differentiated from aged-donor vs. adipocytes differentiated from young-donor ASCs, §p < 0.05, §§p < 0.01, §§§p < 0.001 metformin-treated vs. non-treated adipocytes differentiated from ASCs. All experiments were performed in duplicate on cells isolated from three different donors in each group.

Figure 7—source data 1. Impact of metformin on C/EBPa, SREBP1C and PPARg protein expression.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Culture scheme indicating that adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) were cultured in the presence or not of metformin along the passages but differentiated in adipocytes in the absence of metformin in the culture medium.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

The beneficial effect of metformin on ASC senescence is mediated by AMPK activation

We hypothesized that, in mechanistic terms, metformin’s action might be based on (among other things) the phosphorylation and thus activation of AMPK. As shown in Figure 8A, metformin treatment was associated with (i) greater AMPK expression in both young-donor and aged-donor ASCs but (ii) greater AMPK phosphorylation in aged-donor ASCs only. These findings are in line with metformin’s beneficial effect on aged-donor ASCs and lack of effect on young-donor ASCs, as reported above.

Figure 8. The beneficial effects of metformin on aged-donor adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) senescence is mediated by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation.

Metformin was added to the culture medium of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs from P3 onward. To evaluate the role of AMPK activation, compound C was added at P11. After 7 days of treatment, the experiments on ASCs were carried out (young-donor ASC: gray bars in the absence of metformin or in the presence of compound C, gray striped bars in the presence of metformin or metformin and compound C; aged-donor: black bars in the absence of metformin or in the presence of compound C, black striped bars in the presence of metformin or metformin and compound C). (A) Whole-cell lysates of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs treated (or not) with metformin and compound C at P11 were analyzed by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of AMPK, phospho-AMPK, and tubulin (the loading control) and a graph quantifying AMPK (normalized against tubulin) and the pAMPK/AMPK ratio are shown. (B) The % inhibition of cell proliferation was calculated for aged-donor ASCs and young-donor ASCs treated or not with metformin or compound C, by determining the increase in total cell number that occurred after 7 days, compared to young-donor ASCs. (C) Senescence was evaluated in terms of senescence-associated (SA)-β-galactosidase activity and was expressed as described in Figure 1. (D) Lysosomal accumulation (normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride [DAPI]) was assessed with the Lysotracker fluorescence probe. (E) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, (F) mitochondrial mass (both normalized against DAPI), and (G) mitochondrial membrane potential were assessed as described in Figure 1. (H) The ASCs were then differentiated into adipocytes on P11 in the absence of metformin and compound C. Cells were stained with Oil-Red-O to visualize lipid droplets 14 days post-induction. Quantification of Oil-Red-O staining and representative scans of wells are shown. (I) Insulin sensitivity was evaluated at P11 in adipocytes differentiated from non-treated young-donor and aged-donor ASCs treated (or not) with metformin and/or compound C, by measuring the glucose uptake in response to insulin and calculating the insulin fold induction, as described in the Materials and methods section. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 for aged-donor vs. young-donor ASCs, §p < 0.05, §§p < 0.01 for metformin-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 for compound C and metformin-treated ASCs vs. metformin-treated ASCs. All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate on ASCs isolated from at three different donors in each group.

Figure 8—source data 1. Impact of Compound C on SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged ASCs.
Figure 8—source data 2. Impact of Compound C on SA-ß-galactosidase activity in young ASCs.
Figure 8—source data 3. Impact of metformin on AMPK protein expression.

Figure 8.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1. 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxyamide ribonucleoside (AICAR) can reverse senescence and associated dysfunctions in aged-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs).

Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

Metformin or AICAR were added to the culture medium of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs at P11. After 7 days of treatment, the experiments on ASCs were carried out. (A) Whole-cell lysates of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs treated (or not) with metformin and AICAR at P11 were analyzed by immunoblotting. Representative immunoblots of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and phospho-AMPK (pAMPK), and (B) the pAMPK/AMPK ratio are shown. (C) Senescence was evaluated in terms of senescence-associated (SA)-β-galactosidase activity and was expressed as described in Figure 1. (D) Lysosomal accumulation (normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride [DAPI]) was assessed with the Lysotracker fluorescence probe. (E) Representative immunoblots of the cell cycle arrest markers p16INK4A and p21WAF1 and tubulin (the loading control) are shown. (F) Quantification of western blot was normalized to young-donor ASCs. (G) Reactive oxygen species production (normalized against DAPI) was assessed by the oxidation of CM-H2DCFDA and expressed as a ratio relative to young-donor ASCs. (H) Mitochondrial mass (normalized against DAPI) expressed as a ratio relative to young-donor ASCs. (I) Mitochondrial membrane potential expressed as a ratio relative to young-donor ASCs. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 for aged-donor vs. young-donor ASCs, §p < 0.05, for metformin-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 for AICAR-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs. All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate on ASCs isolated from three different donors in each group.
Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young untreated ASCs.
Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 2. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young metformin treated ASCs.
Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 3. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young AICAR treated ASCs.
Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 4. Impact of AICAR on AMPK protein expression.
Figure 8—figure supplement 2. 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxyamide ribonucleoside (AICAR) can restore the adipogenic differentiation capacity of senescent aged-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs).

Figure 8—figure supplement 2.

Metformin or AICAR were added to the culture medium of aged-donor and young-donor ASCs at P11. The ASCs were differentiated into adipocytes for 14 days at P11, in the absence of metformin or AICAR. (A) Cells were stained with Oil-Red-O to visualize lipid droplets 14 days post-induction. (B) Representative scans of wells quantification of Oil-Red-O staining are shown. (C) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, (D) mitochondrial mass (both normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride [DAPI]), and (E) mitochondrial membrane potential were assessed as described in Figure 1. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 for aged-donor vs. young-donor ASCs, §p < 0.05 for metformin-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs. #p < 0.05, ###p < 0.001 for AICAR-treated ASCs vs. non-treated ASCs. All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate on ASCs isolated from three different donors in each group.

To confirm AMPK’s potential role in the action of metformin, we determined whether the drug’s effects were influenced by treatment with the AMPK inhibitor compound C. Indeed, we observed that in aged-donor ASCs, treatment with compound C counteracted the beneficial effect of metformin on cell proliferation (Figure 8B), senescence marker levels (Figure 8C–D), oxidative stress (Figure 8E), and mitochondrial dysfunction (Figure 8F–G). Interestingly, adipocytes differentiated from aged-donor ASCs, then pre-treated with both metformin and compound C during proliferation but not during differentiation did not show metformin’s beneficial effect on adipogenesis (Figure 8H) and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Figure 8I). Accordingly, we showed that AMPK constitutive activation with AICAR (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxyamide ribonucleoside), an agonist of the AMPK pathway (Merrill et al., 1997), induced a decrease of aged-donor ASCs senescence and mitochondrial dysfunction at P11 (Figure 8—figure supplement 1) leading to increased triglycerides and decreased ROS production in adipocytes differentiated from aged-donor ASCs (Figure 8—figure supplement 2). These findings highlighted AMPK’s role in the beneficial action of metformin on aged-donor ASCs and the derived adipocytes.

Discussion

Our study shows for the first time that passage-related (in vitro) or physiological (age of the donor, in vivo) aging leads to different senescence mechanisms and thus differently affects adipocyte and adipose tissue function. In vitro passage-induced senescence impedes adipocyte differentiation while stress-induced senescence (as observed in physiological aging) results in oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction but not impaired differentiation in ASC-derived adipocytes. When aged-donor ASCs age in vitro, the two processes are present resulting in a severe dysfunction in derived adipocytes. By activating AMPK, metformin restored almost all the features of aging in aged-donor ASCs to the levels observed in young-donor ASCs. However, metformin did not modify these variables in the latter cells.

Our data are in line with previous studies of human ASCs (Zhu et al., 2009; Jung et al., 2019; Alicka et al., 2020). The ASCs have a typical mesenchymal stem cell morphology, and there are little or no morphological differences between young-donor and aged-donor cells in early passages. In most studies, the PDT of human ASCs did not vary with age (Zhu et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2012; Ding et al., 2013). Accordingly, we did not observe any differences between young-donor and aged-donor ASCs with regard to the phenotype or proliferation rate early in the period of culture (P3). However, with increasing passage numbers, aged-donor cells developed severe features of senescence (such as increased SA-β-galactosidase activity, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunctions) earlier than young-donor cells that also present in vitro features of senescence. These alterations might have driven the progressive fall in proliferation capacity seen for aged-donor ASC from P5 onward. Indeed, we found that aged-donor ASCs had molecular, morphological, and functional impairments late in culture (P11). We propose that our results provide a better understanding of the molecular events occurring in ASCs in the course of aging.

With regard to the mechanisms that might promote senescence in ASCs, greater mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production have previously been linked to the occurrence of age-dependent ASC senescence. Decreased mitochondrial function and elevated mitochondrial generation of ROS are thought to be critical in the aging process (Seo et al., 2010; Correia-Melo et al., 2016). Interestingly, ROS accumulation was observed at P3 in aged-donor ASCs, whereas mitochondrial dysfunctions were only observed at P7 suggesting that ROS could initially not originate from mitochondria. In agreement, Seahorse experiment did not show any difference in respiration capacities between aged- and young-donor ASCs. We report here that increased senescence during in vitro aging was not associated with early mitochondrial dysfunction in derived adipocytes while mild senescence and increased oxidative stress observed in the situation of in vivo aging were associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, we propose to disentangle ASC senescence from adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction and, conversely, to associate ASC increased oxidative stress with adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction.

It has already been reported that ASC senescence impairs adipogenic differentiation capacity. In particular, several other studies of human and murine mesenchymal stromal cells had shown a reduction in differentiation potential upon aging in vitro (Choudhery et al., 2014, Maredziak et al., 2016). Our data are in agreement with this point. Moreover, they allow to better decipher the respective roles of oxidative stress and senescence regarding adipogenesis. Accordingly, we show that in vitro passage-related senescence impairs adipogenesis even in the absence of enhanced oxidative stress. Conversely, in physiological aging, adipocyte-differentiated ASCs present early enhanced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions but not reduced adipogenic potential. Thus, senescence, but not oxidative stress alone, impairs adipogenic differentiation. However, a high level of oxidative stress results in stress-induced senescence and in turn in reduced adipogenic differentiation. When young-donor ASCs at early passages, that is, devoid of any age-related alteration, were treated with lopinavir, both oxidative stress and senescence occurred resulting in impaired adipogenesis. Conversely, darunavir induced neither senescence nor impaired adipogenesis.

One of the study’s objectives was to determine whether preventing the onset of senescence in aged-donor ASCs restored their adipogenic capacity. There is experimental evidence that metformin extends lifespan in model organisms, sparking interest in its clinical relevance (Martin-Montalvo et al., 2013). We used a metformin concentration of 25 µmol/L, in the upper range observed in diabetic patients and considered as a safe concentration (Frid et al., 2010). As a senomorphic drug, it has been shown that metformin can reduce the SA secretory phenotype. Accordingly, we observed that metformin decreased activin A secretion, a molecule that has been previously shown to impair adipogenesis (Xu et al., 2015), in both young-donor and aged-donor ASCs regardless the passage (data not shown). However, in our model, metformin did not restore the adipogenic capacity of senescent young-donor ASCs at P11, suggesting that (i) metformin could act by another mechanism, (ii) metformin was not able to reverse the ASCs’ senescence features when oxidative stress is low, and (iii) metformin was able to reverse stress-induced senescence by acting on oxidative stress.

Metformin was shown to decrease ROS production by ASCs (Marycz et al., 2016) and to significantly improve ASC proliferation and function, in correlation with a higher mitochondrial membrane potential (Smieszek et al., 2019). Here, we showed that aged-donor ASCs expressed and activated AMPK to a lower extent than young-donor ASCs, and that this impairment could be reversed by metformin treatment. This effect is related to metformin’s ability to inhibit complex 1 in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, leading to activation of AMPK and a reduction in endogenous ROS production. Accordingly, we found that metformin was a potent antioxidant and prevented the onset of mitochondrial dysfunction in aged-donor ASCs. Interestingly, we found that metformin treatment had a beneficial effect on aged-donor ASCs but not on young-donor ASCs; this suggests that in vitro and in vivo aging have different mechanisms, which result in different cellular and molecular alterations. It has been shown that metformin has various effects on several pathways and targets, in addition to AMPK (Barzilai et al., 2016). Even though metformin’s ability to inhibit mitochondrial complex 1 has been best characterized, many other pathways are affected. Nonetheless, we observed that beneficial effects of metformin were lost in the presence of compound C (a potent AMPK inhibitor) or mimicked with the AMPK activator AICAR – highlighting the central role of the AMPK-linked signaling network in the ASC aging process (Salminen and Kaarniranta, 2012; Burkewitz et al., 2014).

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to have shown that metformin can partially rescue/maintain the adipogenic capacity of aged-donor ASCs. Metformin has been shown to inhibit adipogenesis (Marycz et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2018) when cells are exposed during the process of differentiation. Here, we used a novel model in which ASCs were only treated with metformin before the induction of differentiation. By removing metformin during ASC differentiation, we were able to rule out a direct effect on adipogenesis. Thus, our data suggest that metformin’s prevention of oxidative stress-induced senescence and dysfunction during ASC proliferation restored adipogenesis. Interestingly, we also observed that metformin increased the insulin sensitivity of newly differentiated ASCs isolated from aged-donor ASCs by activating AMPK; this activation has been shown to contribute to the drug’s insulin-sensitizing effect in vivo – particularly in the liver and in muscle (Salminen and Kaarniranta, 2012).

Several studies strongly suggest that metformin could improve adipose tissue function. A treatment with metformin leads, in most cases, to fat loss and improved insulin sensitivity, but these effects are largely related to actions outside adipose tissue. A few studies evaluated the effect of metformin on the different fat depots. In the large clinical study ‘Diabetes Prevention Program Research group’, both SCAT and VAT were reduced in glucose-intolerant women after 1 year of treatment with metformin (Fujimoto et al., 2007). As well, adiponectin level was mildly improved while leptin was decreased in favor of improved adipose tissue function (Goldberg et al., 2019). Improved adipose tissue function is also observed in SCAT explants isolated from obese subjects treated ex vivo with metformin but not in isolated adipocytes suggesting that metformin affected cells from the stroma vascular fraction, that contains adipose stromal cells, and not directly differentiated adipocytes (Zulian et al., 2011). Finally, metformin improved expression of genes involved in adipogenesis and triglyceride synthesis, arguing for its ability to improve adipose function during aging (Kulkarni et al., 2018).

The present study had several limitations. First, we used ASCs obtained from abdominal SCAT; ASCs obtained from other subcutaneous or VAT depots might not behave in the same way. Another limitation concerns the use of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), which is required for the prolonged in vitro expansion of ASCs. It has been shown that FGF2‐treated ASCs are larger, less readily proliferative, and more senescent than control ASCs (Cheng et al., 2020). Thus, we cannot rule out a possible masking effect of FGF2 on the aging of ASCs. Finally, we cannot address in our ASC model the potential role of the cross talk with immune cells that could also affect adipose tissue functions.

Aging is associated with the induction of senescence and associated disorders (including impaired adipogenesis, oxidative stress, and insulin resistance) in ASCs isolated from SCAT. These changes might be involved in the alterations in fat redistribution (particularly a paucity of SCAT, favoring VAT accumulation) and cardiometabolic diseases observed during aging. Our results suggest that metformin may be a promising candidate for treating age-related dysfunction in adipose tissue (Figure 9) and thus warrants evaluation in a clinical setting.

Figure 9. A recapitulative scheme of the alterations observed in adipose stromal cells undergoing in vitro, physiological, and both in vitro and physiological aging and in derived adipocytes.

Figure 9.

Metformin alleviated stress-induced senescence of aged-donor adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) resulting in improved adipogenesis and insulin sensitivity to the levels observed in young-donor ASCs.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Antibody Anti-tubulin (Mouse monoclonal) Merck – Sigma-Aldrich T5168, RRID:AB_477579 WB (1:10 000)
Antibody Anti-P21 (Mouse monoclonal) BD Bioscience 554262, RRID:AB_395331 WB (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-P16 (Mouse monoclonal) BD Bioscience 551154, RRID:AB_394078 WB (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-prelamin A (Goat polyclonal) Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-6214, RRID:AB_648150 WB (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-C/EBPA (Rabbit polyclonal) Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-61, RRID:AB_631233 WB (1:500)
Antibody Anti-PPARG (Rabbit polyclonal) Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-7196, RRID:AB_654710 WB (1:500)
Antibody Anti-SREBP1 (Rabbit polyclonal) Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-366, RRID:AB_2194229 WB (1:500)
Antibody Anti-goat IgG, HRP-linked Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-2354, RRID:AB_628490 WB (1:3000)
Antibody Anti-Phospho-AMPK (Thr172) (Rabbit monoclonal) Cell Signaling 4188, RRID:AB_2169396 WB (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-AMPK (Rabbit polyclonal) Cell Signaling 2532, RRID:AB_330331 WB (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-Akt (Rabbit polyclonal) Cell Signaling 9272, RRID:AB_329827 WB (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (Rabbit monoclonal) Cell Signaling 9271, RRID:AB_329825 WB (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Cell Signaling 7074, RRID:AB_2099233 WB (1:3000)
Antibody Anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked Cell Signaling 7076, RRID:AB_330924 WB (1:3000)
Chemical compound, drug X-Gal 40 mg/mL DMF Euromedex UX-1000–05
Chemical compound, drug Oligomycine Merck – Sigma-Aldrich O4876
Chemical compound, drug Carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) Merck – Sigma-Aldrich C2920
Chemical compound, drug Rotenone Merck – Sigma-Aldrich R8875
Chemical compound, drug Antimycine A Merck – Sigma-Aldrich A8674
Chemical compound, drug Metformin hydrochloride Merck – Sigma-Aldrich PHR1084
Chemical compound, drug Dimethyl sulfoxide Merck – Sigma-Aldrich D8418
Chemical compound, drug 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine Merck – Sigma-Aldrich I5879
Chemical compound, drug Dexametasone Merck – Sigma-Aldrich D4902
Chemical compound, drug Rosiglitazone Merck – Sigma-Aldrich R2408
Chemical compound, drug Collagenase B Merck – Sigma-Aldrich 11088815001
Chemical compound, drug Formalin Solution, Neutral Buffered Merck – Sigma-Aldrich HT-501
Chemical compound, drug Oil-Red-O Merck – Sigma-Aldrich O9755
Chemical compound, drug Isopropanol Merck – Sigma-Aldrich 563935
Chemical compound, drug Lopinavir Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-207831
Chemical compound, drug Ritonavir Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-208310
Chemical compound, drug Darunavir Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-218079
Chemical compound, drug AICAR Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-200659
Chemical compound, drug Compound C Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-361173
Chemical compound, drug DAPI Thermo Fisher Scientific D1306
Chemical compound, drug CM-H2-DCFDA Thermo Fisher Scientific C6827
Chemical compound, drug MitoTacker Thermo Fisher Scientific M7512
Chemical compound, drug JC-1 Thermo Fisher Scientific T3168
Chemical compound, drug Lysotracker Thermo Fisher Scientific L7526
Commercial assay or kit Glucose Uptake-Glo Assay Promega J1341
Peptide, recombinant protein Human Insulin Merck – Sigma-Aldrich I9278
Peptide, recombinant protein Human FGF-basic Peprotech 100-18B
Software, algorithm Image J Image J RRID:SCR_003070
Software, algorithm Prism Prism RRID:SCR_005375

Isolation, culture, and treatment of ASCs

The human SCAT samples from which ASCs were isolated were obtained from 10 healthy women undergoing plastic surgery. The women were young adults (n = 5; mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM] age: 21.2 ± 3.2 years; mean ± SEM BMI: 23.6 ± 1.2 kg/m2) or aged adults (n = 5; mean ± SEM age: 60.0 ± 0.7 years; mean ± SEM BMI: 25.4 ± 0.4 kg/m2) (see Table 1 for details).

Table 1. Main characteristics of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) donors used for adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) isolation.

Sex Age(years) BMI(kg/m2) Ethnicity
F 29 23.5 Caucasian
F 16 23.7 Caucasian
F 16 26.6 Caucasian
F 16 24.6 Caucasian
F 29 19.3 Caucasian
F 61 26.0 Caucasian
F 62 26.6 Sub-Saharan African
F 58 24.9 Caucasian
F 60 24.4 Caucasian
F 59 24.6 Caucasian

Before surgery, all donors provided informed written consent to use of their tissue specimens for research purposes. The study was performed in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local independent ethics committee. The ASCs were isolated using collagenase B (0.1%) (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) digestion technique, as described previously (Gorwood et al., 2019; Gorwood et al., 2020). After centrifugation, stromal vascular fraction was filtered, rinsed, and plated (10,000 cells/cm2) in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium alpha (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany), 2 mmol/L glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 10 mmol/L HEPES (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 2.5 ng/mL FGF2 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ). On average, we isolated 65,000 cells per mL of SCAT liposuction sample, with similar yield between SCAT from aged or young donors. Upon confluence, adherent cells were trypsinized (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and seeded at a density of 2000/cm2 for the study of proliferating ASCs and of 4000 cells/cm2 prior to the induction of adipogenesis. During expansion, cells were exposed (or not) to 25 µmol/L metformin (Merck, Sigma-Aldrich, St Quentin Fallavier, France). The metformin concentration chosen in our study is close to Cmax observed in elderly subjects, which exhibited higher average Cmax than younger subjects (Jang et al., 2016). At a late passage (P11), cells were exposed (or not) to 0.1 µmol/L of compound C (Merck, Sigma-Aldrich). Proliferating ASCs were exposed for 30 days (from P3 to P9) to DMSO (0.01%) or the PIs: lopinavir (LPV/r 10 µmol/L) or darunavir (DRV/r 10 µmol/L) in association with 2 µmol/L ritonavir (Merck, Sigma-Aldrich), at clinically relevant concentrations near Cmax (Hernandez-Vallejo et al., 2013). Proliferating ASCs isolated from young and aged donor were cultured at P11 with or without AICAR (100 mmol/L) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 week and analyzed as described in Figure 8—figure supplement 1. ASCs were induced to differentiate into adipocyte differentiation for 14 days without AICAR. Upon day 14, adipocyte-derived ASCs were analyzed as described in Figure 8—figure supplement 2.

Adipocyte differentiation

Differentiation of ASCs was induced by the addition of pro-adipogenic Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), 4.5 g/L glucose (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% FBS, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 10 mmol/L HEPES, 1 µmol/L dexamethasone, 250 µmol/L 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), 1 µmol/L rosiglitazone, 1 µmol/L insulin (Merck, Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 days, and then maintained in DMEM with rosiglitazone and insulin until day 14. Cells were then stained for Oil-Red-O (Merck, Sigma-Aldrich) and quantified at 520 nm as described previously (Gorwood et al., 2019; Gorwood et al., 2020). To analyze the impact of ASC senescence and oxidative stress on adipogenesis, adipocytes were differentiated in the absence of metformin (Figure 7—figure supplement 1).

Cellular proliferation and senescence

Cellular senescence was evaluated in terms of the cell PDT at each cell passage, as described previously (Gorwood et al., 2020). The positive blue staining of SA-β-galactosidase has been used as a biomarker of cellular senescence. To detect SA-β-galactosidase activity, cells were incubated in an appropriate buffer solution at pH 6 containing bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France), as described previously (Gorwood et al., 2020). The percentage of blue SA-β-galactosidase-positive cells was estimated by cell counting in at least three random-selected fields at a magnification of 20×. The acidotropic dye Lysotracker (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) was used to evaluate the lysosomal mass. Cells cultured in 96-well plates (Corning, New York, NY) were incubated with Lysotracker for 2 hr at 37°C. The fluorescence was quantified on a plate reader at 504–570 nm (Tecan, Trappes, France), and normalized against 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) fluorescence at 345–458 nm.

Mitochondrial dysfunctions and oxidative stress

The cationic dye tetra-chloro-tetra-ethyl-benzimidazolyl-carbocyanine iodide (JC1) was used to evaluate the mitochondrial membrane potential, and the Mitotracker Red probe (both from Invitrogen Corporation) was used to measure the mitochondrial mass. The production of ROS was assessed by the oxidation of 5–6-chloromethyl-2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (CM-H2DCFDA) (Invitrogen Corporation). Cells cultured in 96-well plates were incubated with JC1, Mitotracker, or CM-H2DCFDA for 2 hr at 37°C. The fluorescence was quantified on a plate reader at 520–595 nm for JC1 aggregates, 485–535 nm for JC1 monomers, 575–620 nm for Mitotracker, and 485–520 nm for CM-H2DCFDA. The results were normalized against DAPI fluorescence.

Mitochondrial bioenergetics analysis

Cellular bioenergetic profiles were determined using the Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test and the Bioscience XF24 Analyzer (Agilent), providing real-time measurement of the OCR. ASCs seeded or submitted to adipocyte differentiation in XF24 Microplates (2000 cells/well) were washed two times and incubated for 1 hr in FBS- and bicarbonate-free DMEM (pH 7.4) supplemented with 1 g/L (for ASCs) or 4.5 g/L (for adipocytes) glucose respectively, 1% GlutaMax and 1% pyruvate (Gibco). OCR was then evaluated using the Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test (Agilent) at baseline and after sequential addition of 1 μmol/L oligomycin (inhibitor of ATP synthase), 0.63 μmol/L carbonyl cyanide FCCP (uncoupling agent), and 1 μmol/L rotenone/antimycin A (R/AA, inhibitors of the respiratory chain complexes I and III, respectively).

Protein extraction and western blotting

Proteins were extracted from cell monolayers as described previously (Gorwood et al., 2019; Gorwood et al., 2020). After SDS-PAGE, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Specific proteins were detected using antibodies against p16INK4A, p21WAF1 (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ), prelamin A, PPARγ, CEBPα, SREBP1c, AMPK, phospho-AMPK (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), and the protein loading control tubulin (Merck, Sigma-Aldrich). Immunoreactive complexes were detected using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) and enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Insulin signaling and glucose transport

The insulin sensitivity of adipocyte-derived ASCs at late passage (P11) was evaluated by the phosphorylation of Akt. On day 14, the adipocytes were serum-starved for 18 hr and stimulated or not for 7 min with 100 nmol/L insulin. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against the activated forms (Ser473 phosphorylation) of Akt (Cell Signaling Technology). Protein expression was checked using antibodies against Akt (Cell Signaling Technology). Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was measured using the Glucose Uptake-Glo assay kit (Promega, Fitchburg, WI), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, on day 14, adipocytes were serum-starved for 18 hr. Prior to the experiment, cells were incubated for 1 hr in glucose-free DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Next, 100 nmol/L insulin and 2-deoxyglucose mix were successively added for 60 and 10 min, respectively. In parallel with the insulin-stimulated and non-stimulated conditions, 50 µmol/L of the actin-disrupting agent cytochalasin B (Merck, Sigma-Aldrich) was added as a negative control and enabled determination of the net insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. The reaction was stopped with neutralization buffer and detection reagent mix was added and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature prior to measurement of luminescence on a plate reader.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate on ASCs isolated from at least three or five different donors from each age group. All data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. The statistical significance of intergroup differences or changes over time was determined by applying a non-parametric test (the Mann–Whitney test), as appropriate.

Acknowledgements

We thank the donors for their cooperation.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Claire Lagathu, Email: claire.lagathu@inserm.fr.

Veronique Bereziat, Email: veronique.bereziat@inserm.fr.

Jessica K Tyler, Weill Cornell Medicine, United States.

Jessica K Tyler, Weill Cornell Medicine, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale EQU201903007868 to Bruno Fève.

  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche RHU-ANR-15-RHUS-0003 to Jacqueline Capeau.

  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale to Laura Le Pelletier, Matthieu Mantecon, Jennifer Gorwood, Martine Auclair, Roberta Foresti, Roberto Motterlini, Michael Atlan, Bruno Fève, Jacqueline Capeau, Claire Lagathu, Veronique Bereziat.

  • Sorbonne University to Laura Le Pelletier, Matthieu Mantecon, Jennifer Gorwood, Martine Auclair, Michael Atlan, Bruno Fève, Jacqueline Capeau, Claire Lagathu, Veronique Bereziat.

  • Universite Paris Est Creteil to Roberta Foresti, Roberto Motterlini.

  • Universite de Paris to Mireille Laforge.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology.

Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation.

Methodology, Validation.

Methodology.

Resources.

Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing.

Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

Transparent reporting form

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

  1. Afonso P, Auclair M, Boccara F, Vantyghem M-C, Katlama C, Capeau J, Vigouroux C, Caron-Debarle M. LMNA mutations resulting in lipodystrophy and HIV protease inhibitors trigger vascular smooth muscle cell senescence and calcification: Role of ZMPSTE24 downregulation. Atherosclerosis. 2016;245:200–211. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afonso P, Auclair M, Caron-Debarle M, Capeau J. Impact of CCR5, integrase and protease inhibitors on human endothelial cell function, stress, inflammation and senescence. Antiviral Therapy. 2017;22:645–657. doi: 10.3851/IMP3160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alicka M, Kornicka-Garbowska K, Kucharczyk K, Kepska M, Rcken M, Marycz K. Age-dependent impairment of adipose-derived stem cells isolated from horses. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2020;11:4. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1512-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barzilai N, Crandall JP, Kritchevsky SB, Espeland MA. Metformin as a Tool to Target Aging. Cell Metabolism. 2016;23:1060–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beane OS, Fonseca VC, Cooper LL, Koren G, Darling EM. Impact of aging on the regenerative properties of bone marrow-, muscle-, and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e115963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burkewitz K, Zhang Y, Mair WB. AMPK at the nexus of energetics and aging. Cell Metabolism. 2014;20:10–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cartwright MJ, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL. Aging in adipocytes: potential impact of inherent, depot-specific mechanisms. Experimental Gerontology. 2007;42:463–471. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cartwright MJ, Schlauch K, Lenburg ME, Tchkonia T, Pirtskhalava T, Cartwright A, Thomou T, Kirkland JL. Aging, depot origin, and preadipocyte gene expression. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2010;65:242–251. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caso G, McNurlan MA, Mileva I, Zemlyak A, Mynarcik DC, Gelato MC. Peripheral fat loss and decline in adipogenesis in older humans. Metabolism. 2013;62:337–340. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cawthorn WP, Scheller EL, MacDougald OA. Adipose tissue stem cells meet preadipocyte commitment: Going back to the future. Journal of Lipid Research. 2012;53:227–246. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R021089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen HT, Lee MJ, Chen CH, Chuang SC, Chang LF, Ho ML, Hung SH, Fu YC, Wang YH, Wang HI, Wang GJ, Kang L, Chang JK. Proliferation and differentiation potential of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells isolated from elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2012;16:582–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01335.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen D, Wang Y, Wu K, Wang X. Dual Effects of Metformin on Adipogenic Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocyte in AMPK-Dependent and Independent Manners. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19:E1547. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng Y, Lin KH, Young TH, Cheng NC. The influence of fibroblast growth factor 2 on the senescence of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells during long-term culture. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2020;9:518–530. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Choudhery MS, Badowski M, Muise A, Pierce J, Harris DT. Donor age negatively impacts adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell expansion and differentiation. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2014;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Correia-Melo C, Marques FD, Anderson R, Hewitt G, Hewitt R, Cole J, Carroll BM, Miwa S, Birch J, Merz A, Rushton MD, Charles M, Jurk D, Tait SW, Czapiewski R, Greaves L, Nelson G, Bohlooly YM, Rodriguez-Cuenca S, Vidal-Puig A, Mann D, Saretzki G, Quarato G, Green DR, Adams PD, von Zglinicki T, Korolchuk VI, Passos JF. Mitochondria are required for pro-ageing features of the senescent phenotype. The EMBO Journal. 2016;35:724–742. doi: 10.15252/embj.201592862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Girolamo L, Lopa S, Arrigoni E, Sartori MF, Baruffaldi Preis FW, Brini AT. Human adipose-derived stem cells isolated from young and elderly women: their differentiation potential and scaffold interaction during in vitro osteoblastic differentiation. Cytotherapy. 2009;11:793–803. doi: 10.3109/14653240903079393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding DC, Chou HL, Hung WT, Liu HW, Chu TY. Human adipose-derived stem cells cultured in keratinocyte serum free medium: Donor’s age does not affect the proliferation and differentiation capacities. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2013;20:59. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-20-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy Position Statement." Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Frid A, Sterner GN, Londahl M, Wiklander C, Cato A, Vinge E, Andersson A. Novel assay of metformin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and varying levels of renal function: clinical recommendations. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1291–1293. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fujimoto WY, Jablonski KA, Bray GA, Kriska A, Barrett-Connor E, Haffner S, Hanson R, Hill JO, Hubbard V, Stamm E, Pi-Sunyer FX. Body size and shape changes and the risk of diabetes in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes. 2007;56:1680–1685. doi: 10.2337/db07-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldberg RB, Bray GA, Marcovina SM, Mather KJ, Orchard TJ, Perreault L, Temprosa M. Non-traditional biomarkers and incident diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program: comparative effects of lifestyle and metformin interventions. Diabetologia. 2019;62:58–69. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4748-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gorwood J, Bourgeois C, Mantecon M, Atlan M, Pourcher V, Pourcher G, Le Grand R, Desjardins D, Feve B, Lambotte O, Capeau J, Bereziat V, Lagathu C. Impact of HIV/simian immunodeficiency virus infection and viral proteins on adipose tissue fibrosis and adipogenesis. AIDS. 2019;33:953–964. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gorwood J, Ejlalmanesh T, Bourgeois C, Mantecon M, Rose C, Atlan M, Desjardins D, Le Grand R, Feve B, Lambotte O, Capeau J, Bereziat V, Lagathu C. SIV Infection and the HIV Proteins Tat and Nef Induce Senescence in Adipose Tissue and Human Adipose Stem Cells, Resulting in Adipocyte Dysfunction. Cells. 2020;9:259. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hernandez-Vallejo SJ, Beaupere C, Larghero J, Capeau J, Lagathu C. HIV protease inhibitors induce senescence and alter osteoblastic potential of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: beneficial effect of pravastatin. Aging Cell. 2013;12:955–965. doi: 10.1111/acel.12119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jang K, Chung H, Yoon JS, Moon SJ, Yoon SH, Yu KS, Kim K, Chung JY. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Metformin in Healthy Elderly Subjects. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2016;56:1104–1110. doi: 10.1002/jcph.699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jung JS, Volk C, Marga C, Navarrete Santos A, Jung M, Rujescu D, Navarrete Santos A. Adipose-Derived Stem/Stromal Cells Recapitulate Aging Biomarkers and Show Reduced Stem Cell Plasticity Affecting Their Adipogenic Differentiation Capacity. Cellular Reprogramming. 2019;21:187–199. doi: 10.1089/cell.2019.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Karagiannides I, Tchkonia T, Dobson DE, Steppan CM, Cummins P, Chan G, Salvatori K, Hadzopoulou-Cladaras M, Kirkland JL. Altered expression of C/EBP family members results in decreased adipogenesis with aging. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2001;280:R1772–R1780. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.280.6.R1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuk JL, Saunders TJ, Davidson LE, Ross R. Age-related changes in total and regional fat distribution. Ageing Research Reviews. 2009;8:339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kulkarni AS, Brutsaert EF, Anghel V, Zhang K, Bloomgarden N, Pollak M, Mar JC, Hawkins M, Crandall JP, Barzilai N. Metformin regulates metabolic and nonmetabolic pathways in skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissues of older adults. Aging Cell. 2018;17 doi: 10.1111/acel.12723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu M, Lei H, Dong P, Fu X, Yang Z, Yang Y, Ma J, Liu X, Cao Y, Xiao R. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Elderly Exhibit Decreased Migration and Differentiation Abilities with Senescent Properties. Cell Transplantation. 2017;26:1505–1519. doi: 10.1177/0963689717721221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo L, Liu M. Adipose tissue in control of metabolism. The Journal of Endocrinology. 2016;231:R99–R77. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mancuso P, Bouchard B. The Impact of Aging on Adipose Function and Adipokine Synthesis. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:137. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maredziak M, Marycz K, Tomaszewski KA, Kornicka K, Henry BM. The Influence of Aging on the Regenerative Potential of Human Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells International. 2016;2016:2152435. doi: 10.1155/2016/2152435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin-Montalvo A, Mercken EM, Mitchell SJ, Palacios HH, Mote PL, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Gomes AP, Ward TM, Minor RK, Blouin M-J, Schwab M, Pollak M, Zhang Y, Yu Y, Becker KG, Bohr VA, Ingram DK, Sinclair DA, Wolf NS, Spindler SR, Bernier M, de Cabo R. Metformin improves healthspan and lifespan in mice. Nature Communications. 2013;4:2192. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Marycz K, Tomaszewski KA, Kornicka K, Henry BM, Wronski S, Tarasiuk J, Maredziak M. Metformin Decreases Reactive Oxygen Species, Enhances Osteogenic Properties of Adipose-Derived Multipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro, and Increases Bone Density In Vivo. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016:9785890. doi: 10.1155/2016/9785890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. McLaughlin T, Lamendola C, Liu A, Abbasi F. Preferential fat deposition in subcutaneous versus visceral depots is associated with insulin sensitivity. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2011;96:E1756–E1760. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Merrill GF, Kurth EJ, Hardie DG, Winder WW. AICA riboside increases AMP-activated protein kinase, fatty acid oxidation, and glucose uptake in rat muscle. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1997;273:E1107–E1112. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.6.E1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Murphy JM, Dixon K, Beck S, Fabian D, Feldman A, Barry F. Reduced chondrogenic and adipogenic activity of mesenchymal stem cells from patients with advanced osteoarthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2002;46:704–713. doi: 10.1002/art.10118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Oikawa M, Owada T, Yamauchi H, Misaka T, Machii H, Yamaki T, Sugimoto K, Kunii H, Nakazato K, Suzuki H, Saitoh S, Takeishi Y. Predominance of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Reflects the Presence of Aortic Valve Calcification. BioMed Research International. 2016;2016:2174657. doi: 10.1155/2016/2174657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Palmer AK, Kirkland JL. Aging and adipose tissue: potential interventions for diabetes and regenerative medicine. Experimental Gerontology. 2016;86:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Park SE, Park CY, Choi JM, Chang E, Rhee EJ, Lee WY, Oh KW, Park SW, Kang ES, Lee HC, Cha BS. Depot-Specific Changes in Fat Metabolism with Aging in a Type 2 Diabetic Animal Model. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0148141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pasarica M, Xie H, Hymel D, Bray G, Greenway F, Ravussin E, Smith SR. Lower total adipocyte number but no evidence for small adipocyte depletion in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:900–902. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Salminen A, Kaarniranta K. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) controls the aging process via an integrated signaling network. Ageing Research Reviews. 2012;11:230–241. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Seo AY, Joseph AM, Dutta D, Hwang JC, Aris JP, Leeuwenburgh C. New insights into the role of mitochondria in aging: mitochondrial dynamics and more. Journal of Cell Science. 2010;123:2533–2542. doi: 10.1242/jcs.070490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sepe A, Tchkonia T, Thomou T, Zamboni M, Kirkland JL. Aging and regional differences in fat cell progenitors - a mini-review. Gerontology. 2011;57:66–75. doi: 10.1159/000279755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Smieszek A, Kornicka K, Szłapka-Kosarzewska J, Androvic P, Valihrach L, Langerova L, Rohlova E, Kubista M, Marycz K. Metformin increases proliferative activity and viability of multipotent stromal stem cells isolated from adipose tissue derived from horses with equine metabolic syndrome. Cells. 2019;8:E80. doi: 10.3390/cells8020080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Stout MB, Justice JN, Nicklas BJ, Kirkland JL. Physiological Aging: Links Among Adipose Tissue Dysfunction, Diabetes, and Frailty. Physiology. 2017;32:9–19. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00012.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tchkonia T, Morbeck DE, Von Zglinicki T, Van Deursen J, Lustgarten J, Scrable H, Khosla S, Jensen MD, Kirkland JL. Fat tissue, aging, and cellular senescence. Aging Cell. 2010;9:667–684. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00608.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu M, Palmer AK, Ding H, Weivoda MM, Pirtskhalava T, White TA, Sepe A, Johnson KO, Stout MB, Giorgadze N, Jensen MD, LeBrasseur NK, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL. Targeting senescent cells enhances adipogenesis and metabolic function in old age. eLife. 2015;4:e12997. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhu M, Kohan E, Bradley J, Hedrick M, Benhaim P, Zuk P. The effect of age on osteogenic, adipogenic and proliferative potential of female adipose-derived stem cells. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2009;3:290–301. doi: 10.1002/term.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zulian A, Cancello R, Girola A, Gilardini L, Alberti L, Croci M, Micheletto G, Danelli P, Invitti C. vitro and in vivo Effects of Metformin on Human Adipose Tissue Adiponectin. Obesity Facts. 2011;4:27–33. doi: 10.1159/000324582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: Jessica K Tyler1
Reviewed by: Yi Zhu2

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Acceptance summary:

The revised manuscript has been greatly improved. The authors provided more consolidated evidence linking fundamental aging processes, oxidative stress, cellular senescence and mitochondrial dysfunction to a progressive functional decline in adipose tissue. They also performed more mechanistic studies to explain the beneficial effects of metformin, such as stress resistance in human ASC. I believe that the authors provide sufficient data to support the main hypothesis in the current manuscript. I'm satisfied with all responses from the authors.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Metformin alleviates aging-associated cellular senescence of human adipose stem cells and derived adipocytes" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Jessica Tyler as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Yi Zhu (Reviewer #1).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

As the editors have judged that your manuscript is of interest, but as described below that additional experiments are required before it is published, we would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). First, because many researchers have temporarily lost access to the labs, we will give authors as much time as they need to submit revised manuscripts. We are also offering, if you choose, to post the manuscript to bioRxiv (if it is not already there) along with this decision letter and a formal designation that the manuscript is "in revision at eLife". Please let us know if you would like to pursue this option. (If your work is more suitable for medRxiv, you will need to post the preprint yourself, as the mechanisms for us to do so are still in development.)

We feel that the major conclusions are right but the manuscript and story is not quite clear enough at present and there is a lack of deeper cellular and molecular mechanistic understanding of these phenomena to distinguish this work from the previous published studies. That ASC senescence impairs adipogenic differentiation capacity, has been previously reported in eLife in 2015 (doi: 10.7554/eLife.12997). For example, you concluded that adipose derived progenitor cells from older adults have higher potential to become senescence, which impaired adipogenesis. The percentage of senescent cells in adipose tissues is low, but the mechanism of how they could significantly affect adipose tissue functions is unknown. Is this through paracrine effects? or cross talk with other immune cells? etc..

Essential revisions:

1. Although the authors found that ASC senescence is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, it the nature of the links between these cellular events is unclear. It is well-known that mitochondrial dysfunction can directly lead to senescence. If the authors meant to prove that ASC senescence causes early adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction, more evidence is required.

2. It has already been reported that ASC senescence impairs adipogenic differentiation capacity, in eLife in 2015 (doi: 10.7554/eLife.12997). Furthermore, although the authors found that metformin prevents the onset of senescence and associated dysfunctions in ASCs, it has been shown in many publications that metformin is a senomorphic drug that can reduce the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. So it is not surprising that metformin can block the effects of senescent ASCs. Also regarding the increased adipogenesis by metformin, it has been reported that metformin can directly regulate adipogenic transcription factors, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (C/EBPα). As such, sufficient novelty is lacking at this point, and would require demonstration of causal links among these cellular events.

3. Several conclusions need to be smoothed out and discussed in more detail. Methods must be described with more details, especially with regard to fat depot digestion (type of collagenase, concentration of collagenase, amount of tissue used for the digestion, are cell yields similar between young and old adipose tissue? Number of plated ASC?). The authors must consider that the term ASC is nowadays related to Adipose stromal cells and not Stem cells. As described in the introduction and method sections, ASC are stromal cells that adhere to plastic including fibroblast, smooth muscle cells, pericytes, endothelial cells, resident macrophages, preadipocytes and progenitors. This must be discussed since distribution and repartition of stromal cells are modulated with aging. The term "adipocyte" must be changed to "differentiated ASC" because adipocytes are characterized by unique lipid droplet (not the case here). The title must be modified. Senescence is related to ASC and not to adipocytes.

4. Figure 1: It is unclear why the authors conclude about they are recapitulating in vivo aging. If so, one might expect that senescent "young ASC" phenotype may recapitulate the one of "old ASC" with a time lag, what is not the case for all the studied parameters. For example, the % of βGal cells is equivalent between P7 old cells and P11 young cells what is also true for P16, P21 and prelamin A but not for reactive oxygen species or mitochondrial potential. Authors must discuss this point.

5. Figure 2: Was Cell number at confluency controlled and similar between "young" and "old" ASC? Since post-confluent mitosis are necessary for adipogenesis, one might speculate that the decreased adipogenesis might be related to less cell number and proliferation.

6. Figure 3 and 4: Cells were treated from P3 with metformin. Do the authors consider potential "resistance" effect? When taking into account the large number of individuals treated with metformin, is there any evidence of an impact of metformin treatment on age-related loss in subcutaneous adipose tissue? Finally, inhibition of senescence may lead to cancer development. Authors must discuss this point.

eLife. 2021 Sep 21;10:e62635. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62635.sa2

Author response


We feel that the major conclusions are right but the manuscript and story is not quite clear enough at present and there is a lack of deeper cellular and molecular mechanistic understanding of these phenomena to distinguish this work from the previous published studies. That ASC senescence impairs adipogenic differentiation capacity, has been previously reported in eLife in 2015 (doi: 10.7554/eLife.12997). For example, you concluded that adipose derived progenitor cells from older adults have higher potential to become senescence, which impaired adipogenesis. The percentage of senescent cells in adipose tissues is low, but the mechanism of how they could significantly affect adipose tissue functions is unknown. Is this through paracrine effects? or cross talk with other immune cells? etc..

We would like to thank the reviewers, and the reviewing Editor for their constructive comments that helped us to improve the quality of our manuscript. We now clearly outline that ASCs senescence could be either related to the in vitro aging (due to increased cell passages) or to the in vivo aging (stress-induced). These situations differently affect adipocyte differentiation and function. In our model we could not evaluate the role of the cross-talk with immune cells. We indicate that point as a limitation at the end of the discussion. We confirm the potential role of activin secreted by senescent cells and acting through paracrine mechanisms as previously shown [1]. We provide below a point-by-point reply to the reviewers’ remarks and criticisms.

Essential revisions:

1. Although the authors found that ASC senescence is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, it the nature of the links between these cellular events is unclear. It is well-known that mitochondrial dysfunction can directly lead to senescence.

In this study we used ASCs isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue of young and aged donors (named young-donor ASCs and aged-donor ASCs) both of which underwent in vitro aging over the culture passages. Therefore, we can evaluate 3 age-related processes: in vitro aging alone (young-donor ASCs with increasing passage number), in vivo physiological aging alone (aged-donor ASCs at early passage, P3) and in vitro and in vivo aging together (aged-donor ASCs at increasing cell passage numbers). Thus, we were able to analyze the defects presented by ASCs in each situation and the resulting adipose dysfunction presented by adipocyte-differentiated ASCs.

Regarding young-donor ASCs, we observed that, at P3, the level of senescence was minimal but increased cell passage number in vitro led to ASCs senescence without oxidative stress. In this situation, adipocyte differentiated-ASCs showed decreased adipogenesis starting from P7 but without mitochondrial dysfunction, despite mild oxidative stress.

Conversely, physiological aging (aged-donor ASCs at P3) was characterized by oxidative stress in proliferating ASCs but no mitochondrial dysfunction as evaluated by JC1. To go further, we performed additional Seahorse experiments. Young- and aged-donor ASCs presented a similar respiration profile, indicating the absence of mitochondrial dysfunction. These results suggest that increased ROS production observed in aged-donor ASCs at P3 did not initially result from mitochondrial dysfunction (new Figure 2). Interestingly, adipocytes differentiated from these aged ASCs, at this early passage, maintained their adipogenic potential but presented early oxidative stress. In addition, they presented mitochondrial dysfunction as outlined by seahorse experiments (new Figure 4). Altogether, these results are in favor of different senescence mechanisms depending on chronological (in vitro passages) or physiological (age of the donor) aging. in vitro passageinduced senescence impedes adipocyte differentiation while stress-induced senescence (as observed in physiological aging in aged-donor ASCs at P3) results in oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction but not impaired differentiation in derived adipocytes. When aged-donor ASCs age in vitro, the two processes are present resulting in severe dysfunction in adipocyte differentiated-ASCs.

We have now changed the manuscript accordingly in the results and Discussion sections and added the seahorse experiment (Figure 2 and 4 in the revised manuscript). For these experiments, we benefited from the help and expertise of our collaborators Roberta Foresti, Roberto Motterlini, and Mireille Laforge. Therefore, they were included in the authors of the article.

If the authors meant to prove that ASC senescence causes early adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction, more evidence is required.

Our data reveal that in vitro aging of young-donor ASCs, that resulted in ASC senescence, was not associated with early mitochondrial dysfunction in derived adipocytes (at P7, Figure 3F and G), thus disentangling ASC senescence and adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction. This sentence was added in the Results section.

To investigate the impact of physiological aging of ASCs, we analyzed the respiration profile at P3 in adipocyte differentiated-ASCs from young and aged donors. The analysis of basal OCR did not reveal any significant difference. However, the adipocyte differentiated from aged-donors ASCs displayed a major decrease in their maximal respiratory capacity as compared to those from young-donor ASCs, as indicated by a significantly lower increase in OCR after the addition of the uncoupling agent FCCP (new Figure. 4). Therefore, increased oxidative stress associated with mild senescence in aged-donor ASCs resulted in mitochondrial dysfunction in ASC-derived adipocytes, suggesting that adipocyte mitochondrial dysfunction could be linked to increased oxidative stress in ASCs. This sentence was added in the Result section and discussed in the Discussion section.

To further delineate the link between oxidative stress and senescence of ASCs and of derived adipocytes, we induced senescence of young-donor ASCs at P3 by treating them with an HIV protease inhibitor (PI) and analyzed the impact of this stress-induced senescence on adipocyte differentiated-ASCs. PIs are known to induce senescence by accumulating farnesylated prelamin A, responsible for premature aging syndromes [2-5]. As shown in new Figure 5, a treatment for 30 days of ASCs with lopinavir associated with a low dose of ritonavir (LPV/r) led to senescence but also to a high level of oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions (destabilization of the mitochondrial membrane potential, as shown by the JC1 assay despite increased mitochondrial mass). Adipocytes derived from these LPV/r-treated ASCs, which presented severe oxidative stress and marked senescence, exhibited increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions together with altered adipogenesis. This confirmed that induction of oxidative stress and senescence in young ASCs resulted in severe adipose dysfunction in derived adipocytes. Interestingly, another π with less adverse effects, darunavir associated with a low dose of ritonavir (DRV/r), did not increase senescence in ASCs but induced mild oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Accordingly, treatment of ASCs with DRV/r did not impede adipocyte differentiation, further indicating that mild oxidative stress in the absence of senescence in ASCs did not impair adipogenesis.

Overall, our results are in favor of the hypothesis that mild oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction do not preclude differentiation of ASC-derived adipocyte. Therefore, we were able to disentangle the effect of senescence alone versus oxidative stress on ASC-derived adipocyte differentiation, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. We added these data in the revised manuscript with new figures 2, 4, and 5.

2. It has already been reported that ASC senescence impairs adipogenic differentiation capacity, in eLife in 2015 (doi: 10.7554/eLife.12997).

We agree with the reviewer that it has already been reported that ASC senescence impairs adipogenic differentiation capacity. Our data are in agreement with this point. Moreover, we further show that in vitro passage-related senescence impairs adipogenesis even in the absence of increased oxidative stress. Thus, in our study we show, for the first time, that during physiological aging (aged-donor ASCs at early passage), adipocyte differentiated-ASCs present early oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions but not reduced adipogenic potential. Thus, senescence, but not oxidative stress alone, impairs adipogenic differentiation. However, when oxidative stress is high, this results in stress-induced senescence and in turn in reduced adipogenic differentiation. Our results allow to better decipher the respective role of oxidative stress and senescence regarding adipogenesis.

Furthermore, although the authors found that metformin prevents the onset of senescence and associated dysfunctions in ASCs, it has been shown in many publications that metformin is a senomorphic drug that can reduce the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. So it is not surprising that metformin can block the effects of senescent ASCs.

Regarding the effect of metformin, we agree with the reviewer that it can reduce the SASP. Accordingly, we observed a decrease in activin A secretion in response to metformin in both young-donor and aged-donor ASCs regardless the passage (Author response image 1). However, in our model metformin did not restore the adipogenic capacity of young-donor ASCs at P11 that present senescence but not oxidative stress, suggesting that (i) metformin could act by another mechanism and (ii) metformin was not able to reverse the ASCs’ senescence features when oxidative stress is low (iii) metformin was able to reverse stress-induced senescence by acting on oxidative stress.

Author response image 1. Activin A secretion increases with ASCs senescence.

Author response image 1.

The results correspond to the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 for aged-donor vs. young-donor ASCs, §P<0.05, §§P<0.01 metformin-treated vs. non-treated ASCs. All experiments were performed in duplicate in ASCs isolated from 3 different donors in each group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 vs. young- or aged-donor ASCs at P3.

As mentioned in the Discussion section, previous studies have demonstrated that metformin significantly improved ASC proliferation and function, which were correlated with a higher mitochondrial membrane potential [6]. Accordingly, we found that metformin was a potent antioxidant and prevented the onset of mitochondrial dysfunction in aged-donor ASCs. In young-donor ASCs at P11, which display senescence features and low oxidative stress, metformin had no impact on oxidative stress and did not improve adipogenesis.

This effect is believed to be related to metformin’s ability to inhibit complex 1 in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, leading to activation of AMPK. In agreement, we observed that the beneficial effects of metformin were lost in the presence of compound C (a potent AMPK inhibitor) (see figure 8 in the revised manuscript) – highlighting the central role of the AMPK-linked signaling network in the ASCs aging process [7,8]. To confirm this hypothesis, we directly activated AMPK using AICAR (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxyamide ribonucleoside), an agonist of the AMPK pathway [9]. The direct activation of AMPK by AICAR led to an impact on ASCs similar to that observed in the presence of metformin, characterized by decreased oxidative stress and senescence of aged-donor ASCs at P11 (new Figure 8—figure supplement 1). AICAR treatment also led to decreased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions in derived adipocytes together with improved adipogenesis (new Figure 8—figure supplement 2).

Also regarding the increased adipogenesis by metformin, it has been reported that metformin can directly regulate adipogenic transcription factors, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (C/EBPα). As such, sufficient novelty is lacking at this point, and would require demonstration of causal links among these cellular events.

As mentioned by the reviewer, metformin can directly regulate adipogenic transcription factors. Metformin has been shown to inhibit [10-12] or increase adipogenesis [13], depending on the concentration used [14], when cells are exposed throughout the differentiation process. In our study, we used a different model in which ASCs were treated with metformin only before the induction of differentiation. By removing metformin during ASCs differentiation, we were able to rule out a direct effect on adipogenesis (new Figure 7—figure supplement 1). We have added a figure illustrating the protocol used in our study to clarify this point.

3. Several conclusions need to be smoothed out and discussed in more detail.

We believe that all the constructive comments made by the reviewers and editor improved the quality of our manuscript. In addition to all the changes made throughout the paper, we toned down some of our conclusions. Moreover, our results allowed us to discuss the fact that ASCs senescence could be either related to in vitro aging (due to increased cell passages) or to in vivo aging (stress-induced).

Methods must be described with more details, especially with regard to fat depot digestion (type of collagenase, concentration of collagenase, amount of tissue used for the digestion, are cell yields similar between young and old adipose tissue? Number of plated ASC?).

We agree with the reviewer and we added the missing information in the Material and Methods section. The amount of tissue used depended on the volume of the sample withdrawn during surgery. However, the collagenase digestion protocol was always the same (we used a ratio of 2/3 of 0,2% collagenase combined with 1/3 of adipose tissue). Similarly, the cells were counted and plated at the same density (10,000 cells/cm2 in T75 flasks). On average, we isolated 65,000 cells per mL of SCAT liposuction sample, with similar yield in SCAT obtained from aged or young donors. These points are now detailed in the Materials and methods section.

The authors must consider that the term ASC is nowadays related to Adipose stromal cells and not Stem cells. As described in the introduction and method sections, ASC are stromal cells that adhere to plastic including fibroblast, smooth muscle cells, pericytes, endothelial cells, resident macrophages, preadipocytes and progenitors. This must be discussed since distribution and repartition of stromal cells are modulated with aging.

As requested we have replaced the term “stem cell” by “stromal cell “in the manuscript.

The term "adipocyte" must be changed to "differentiated ASC" because adipocytes are characterized by unique lipid droplet (not the case here).

In our study, we use an in vitro model that leads, as mentioned by the reviewer, to adipocyte with multilocular lipid droplet. This is always the case in vitro. We changed the term “adipocyte to “adipocyte differentiated from ASCs” or ‘ACS-derived adipocytes” throughout the manuscript.

The title must be modified. Senescence is related to ASC and not to adipocytes.

We have changed the title for “Metformin alleviates stress-induced cellular senescence of aging human adipose stromal cells and the ensuing adipocyte dysfunction”

4. Figure 1: It is unclear why the authors conclude about they are recapitulating in vivo aging. If so, one might expect that senescent "young ASC" phenotype may recapitulate the one of "old ASC" with a time lag, what is not the case for all the studied parameters. For example, the % of βGal cells is equivalent between P7 old cells and P11 young cells what is also true for P16, P21 and prelamin A but not for reactive oxygen species or mitochondrial potential. Authors must discuss this point.

We agree with the reviewer and we have modified the text and distinguished different types of aging as indicated above. In our study in vitro increased cell passage numbers led to young-donor ASCs senescence without oxidative stress. Adipocyte differentiated from young ASCs showed decreased adipogenesis starting from P7 but without mitochondrial dysfunction. Conversely, physiological aging (aged-donors versus young-donors) led to premature senescence and increased oxidative stress as soon as P3 as observed in proliferating ASCs obtained from aged-donors. Interestingly, the adipocyte differentiated-aged ASCs maintained their adipogenic potential but presented early mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress at P3.

In addition, we found that metformin was a potent antioxidant and prevented the onset of mitochondrial dysfunction only in aged-donor ASCs. In young-donor ASCs at P11, metformin has no impact on oxidative stress and doesn’t improve adipogenesis. Altogether, these results are in favor of different senescence mechanisms depending on chronological (in vitro passages) or physiological (age of the donor) aging. We have now extensively changed the manuscript in both the Results and Discussion sections.

5. Figure 2: Was Cell number at confluency controlled and similar between "young" and "old" ASC? Since post-confluent mitosis are necessary for adipogenesis, one might speculate that the decreased adipogenesis might be related to less cell number and proliferation.

As requested by the reviewer, we determined post-confluent cell number just before the induction of the differentiation process and observed no difference between young-donor and aged-donor ASCs. Moreover, ASCs were seeded in 6-well plates at a high density, thus preventing any delay between young- and aged-donor derived ASCs.

Author response image 2. Post confluent cell number in young-donor and aged-donor ASCs.

Author response image 2.

6. Figure 3 and 4: Cells were treated from P3 with metformin. Do the authors consider potential "resistance" effect?

We used this protocol to determine if metformin could prevent the onset of senescence. However, we performed an additional experiment in which AMPK was directly activated by its agonist AICAR. In these experiments, young-donor and aged-donor ASCs were cultured until P11 and then treated or not with AICAR and metformin for 7 days. Our results clearly show that AMPK activation reversed ASCs senescence and led to functional adipocytes. Since the effect of AICAR was observed after 7 days of treatment and was similar to the effect of metformin given for a long period, we think that our results cannot be explained by a resistance to metformin after a long duration of treatment.

When taking into account the large number of individuals treated with metformin, is there any evidence of an impact of metformin treatment on age-related loss in subcutaneous adipose tissue?

Several clinical studies strongly suggest that metformin could improve adipose tissue function. A treatment with metformin leads, in most cases, to reduced weight, i.e. global fat loss, and improved insulin sensitivity, and these effects are largely related to actions outside adipose tissue. A few studies evaluated the effect of metformin on the different fat depots. In the large study “Diabetes Prevention Program Research group” with more than 3,000 glucose intolerant subjects, mean age 54 years, treated with placebo or metformin or lifestyle intervention, both SCAT and VAT were reduced in women after 1 year of treatment with metformin [15]. As well, adiponectin level was mildly improved while leptin was decreased in favor of improved adipose tissue function [16]. Improved adipose tissue function is also observed in SCAT explants issued from obese subjects treated ex vivo with metformin. The treatment resulted in increased adiponectin expression. As well, a 3-month treatment of obese subjects with metformin resulted in increased adiponectin expression in SCAT. Interestingly this effect was observed in SCAT biopsies but not when adipocytes differentiated from patients’ adipose stromal cells were treated in vitro with metformin suggesting that metformin affected cells from the stroma vascular fraction, that contains adipose stromal cells, and not directly differentiated adipocytes [17]. Finally, a study evaluated, in a cross-over study, the effect of metformin versus placebo on SCAT parameters from aged subjects (mean age 71 years). As expected, treatment with metformin resulted in weight loss and overall improved insulin sensitivity. Interestingly, in adipose tissue, metformin improved expression of genes involved in PPAR signaling and in SREBP signaling and triglyceride synthesis, arguing for its ability to improve adipose function during aging [18].

Part of this paragraph is now added in the Discussion section.

Finally, inhibition of senescence may lead to cancer development. Authors must discuss this point.

Our data show that metformin did not improve directly senescence of adipose stromal cells but decreased oxidative stress and therefore decreased stress-induced senescence in these cells. Reactive oxygen species are considered as favoring DNA damage and carcinogenesis. To reduce oxidative stress is generally considered as favorable regarding this process.

Regarding the ability of metformin to modulate cancer development, a high number of studies have shown that metformin exerts antitumor effects. At first, the ability of metformin to reduce cancer risk was reported in patients with type-2 diabetes receiving metformin as an antidiabetic agent. Then, this was also shown in retrospective and meta-analysis studies regarding some cancers, which showed that metformin improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival, mainly in early-stage colorectal and prostate cancers [19]. Different mechanisms have been described among which the activation of AMPK and the reduction of oxidative stress but also a number of mechanisms independent of AMPK activation [20]. Even if studies are required to further decipher these mechanisms, no alert on a pro-oncogenic effect of metformin has been raised.

References:

1. Xu M. et al., eLife 2015. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.12997

2. Afonso P. et al., Antivir Ther 2017. DOI: 10.3851/IMP3160

3. Afonso P. et al., Atherosclerosis 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.12.012

4. Hernandez-Vallejo SJ. et al., Aging Cell 2013. DOI: 10.1111/acel.12119

5. Lefevre C. et al., Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010. DOI:10.1161/ATVBAHA

6. Smieszek A. et al., Cells 2019. DOI:10.3390/cells8020080

7. Salminen A. et al., Ageing Res Rev 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.005

8. Burkewitz K. et al., Cell Metab 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.002

9. Merrill GF. et al., Am J Physiol 1997. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.6.E1107

10. Chen SC. et al., Mol Cell Endocrinol 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.11.011

11. Gu Q. et al., Exp Med 2017. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.241.13.

12. Marycz K. et al., Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9785890

13. Jaganjac M. et al., Redox Biol 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.03.012

14. Chen D. et al., Int J Mol Sci 2018. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19061547

15. Fujimoto W. et al., Diabetes 2007. DOI: 10.2337/db07-0009

16. Goldberg R. et al., Diabetologia 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4748-2

17. Zulian A. et al., Obes Facts 2011. DOI: 10.1159/000324582

18. Kulkarni AS. et al., Aging Cell 2018. DOI: 10.1111/acel.12723

19. Coyle C. et al., Ann Oncol 2016. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw410

20. Mbara KC. et al., Eur J Pharmacol 2021.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173934

21. Ragnauth CD. et al., Circulation, 2010. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.902056

22. Bonello-Palot N. et al., Atherosclerosis 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.08.036

23. Bidault G. et al., Cells 2020. DOI: 10.3390/cells9051201

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. SA-ß-galactosidase activity at P3.
    Figure 1—source data 2. SA-ß-galactosidase activity at P7.
    Figure 1—source data 3. SA-ß-galactosidase activity at P11.
    Figure 1—source data 4. Analysis by western blot of senescence markers p16 p21 and prelamin A.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Analysis by western blot of sadipogenic markers C/EBPa, SREBP1C and PPARg.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Impact of HIV protease inhibitors on SA-ß-galactosidase activity.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Impact of metformin on SA-ß-galactosidase activity.
    Figure 6—source data 2. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young untreated ASCs.
    Figure 6—source data 3. Impact of metformin on p16 p21 protein expression.
    Figure 7—source data 1. Impact of metformin on C/EBPa, SREBP1C and PPARg protein expression.
    Figure 8—source data 1. Impact of Compound C on SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged ASCs.
    Figure 8—source data 2. Impact of Compound C on SA-ß-galactosidase activity in young ASCs.
    Figure 8—source data 3. Impact of metformin on AMPK protein expression.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young untreated ASCs.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 2. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young metformin treated ASCs.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 3. SA-ß-galactosidase activity in aged and young AICAR treated ASCs.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 4. Impact of AICAR on AMPK protein expression.
    Transparent reporting form

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES