Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2021 Oct 20;9(2):e00852-21. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00852-21

The Rare, the Best: Spread of Antimalarial-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum Parasites by Anopheles Mosquito Vectors

Antoine Berry a,b,✉,#, Sandie Menard a,#, Sandrine E Nsango c,d, Luc Abate e, Didier Concordet f, Majoline Tchioffo Tsapi e, Xavier Iriart a,b, Parfait H Awono-Ambéné g, Benjamin Roche e,h,i, Isabelle Morlais e,
Editor: Laura A Kirkmanj
PMCID: PMC8528099  PMID: 34668767

ABSTRACT

The emergence of resistance to antimalarials has prompted the steady switch to novel therapies for decades. Withdrawal of antimalarials, such as chloroquine in sub-Saharan Africa in the late 1990s, led to rapid declines in the prevalence of resistance markers after a few years, raising the possibility of reintroducing them for malaria treatment. Here, we provide evidence that the mosquito vector plays a crucial role in maintaining parasite genetic diversity. We followed the transmission dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum parasites through its vector in natural infections from gametocytes contained in the blood of asymptomatic volunteers until sporozoites subsequently developed in the mosquito salivary glands. We did not find any selection of the mutant or wild-type pfcrt 76 allele during development in the Anopheles mosquito vector. However, microsatellite genotyping indicated that minority genotypes were favored during transmission through the mosquito. The analysis of changes in the proportions of mutant and wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles showed that, regardless of the genotype, the less-represented allele in the gametocyte population was more abundant in mosquito salivary glands, indicating a selective advantage of the minority allele in the vector. Selection of minority genotypes in the vector would explain the persistence of drug-resistant alleles in the absence of drug pressure in areas with high malaria endemicity and high genetic diversity. Our results may have important epidemiological implications, as they predict the rapid re-emergence and spread of resistant genotypes if antimalarials that had previously selected resistant parasites are reintroduced for malaria prevention or treatment.

IMPORTANCE Drug selection pressure in malaria patients is the cause of the emergence of resistant parasites. Resistance imposes a fitness cost for parasites in untreated infections, so withdrawal of the drug leads to the return of susceptible parasites. Little is known about the role of the malaria vector in this phenomenon. In an experimental study conducted in Cameroon, an area of high malaria transmission, we showed that the vector did not favor the parasites based on sensitivity or resistance criteria, but it did favor the selection of minority clones. This finding shows that the vector increases the diversity of plasmodial populations and could play an important role in falciparum malaria epidemiology by maintaining resistant clones despite the absence of therapeutic pressure.

KEYWORDS: malaria, Anopheles, transmission, Plasmodium falciparum, resistance, antimalarials, genetic diversity, mosquito

INTRODUCTION

Antimalarial drug resistance represents one of the main obstacles for the control of malaria (1, 2). Indeed, Plasmodium falciparum has an outstanding ability to develop resistance to numerous drug regimens, including the most efficient ones, like artemisinins. Drug resistance to P. falciparum is associated with specific mutations or gene amplification that confer a fitness advantage to mutant parasites when exposed to drugs. In contrast, drug resistance imposes a fitness cost in untreated infections, and withdrawal of the drug leads to the return of sensitive parasites (36). Chloroquine (CQ) resistance (CQR) is related to point mutations in the P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (pfcrt) gene, and the pfcrt K76T mutation (encoding a change of K to T at position 76) is the best-known CQR marker (7).

Malaria infections are complex under natural conditions and generally harbor multiple genotypes of parasites (8, 9). Several lines of evidence suggest that genetic diversity within infections correlates with transmission intensity (10, 11), but whether the genetic composition influences the transmission dynamics remains elusive. Transmission of malaria parasites depends on the successful development of the sexual stages, the gametocytes, within the mosquito vectors. Parasite population structure and dynamics in the insect vector are complex and influenced by numerous factors from human or vector hosts (1217). We have previously shown that mixed-genotype infections in humans lead to lower parasite burdens in mosquitoes, supporting the existence of competitive interactions between coinfecting genotypes (17, 18). However, the importance of mosquitoes in the transmission of drug-resistant parasites in naturally acquired multiple-genotype infections is still poorly understood.

In this study, we investigated the genetic diversity of P. falciparum parasites in both gametocytes isolated from the blood of asymptomatic donors and salivary glands dissected from mosquitoes experimentally fed with blood from the same gametocyte donors. Samples were genotyped at the pfcrt 76 codon and at 7 microsatellite loci. We then assessed the role of mosquitoes in the spread of Plasmodium resistance to antimalarial drugs within the population. Our results shed light on the key role of the mosquito vector in shaping the antimalarial-resistant parasite population.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the infections.

P. falciparum gametocyte-containing blood from 67 naturally infected carriers was used to isolate gametocyte samples and to perform experimental feedings. The median gametocyte density of blood donors was 53 parasites/μl (minimum = 11; maximum = 2,304) (Table S1 in the supplemental material). A total of 723 mosquito salivary gland samples were P. falciparum positive.

No selection of the mutant or wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles by the Anopheles mosquito vector.

We excluded from the analysis all blood donors carrying a single genotype, either the mutant or the wild-type pfcrt 76 allele, in the gametocyte samples and all the paired sporozoite samples. Thus, 57 gametocyte samples and 643 sporozoite (salivary gland) samples, with a mean of 11 (minimum = 1; maximum = 24) mosquitoes per blood donor, were analyzed for pfcrt 76 alleles (Table S1). No selection of the mutant (or wild-type) allele was observed, as the median of the proportion of mutants (67.9%; interquartile range [IQR], 33.4% to 100.0%) in gametocytes was not different from that of paired sporozoite samples (mutant allele: 60.2%; IQR, 41.3% to 79.2%; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.268) (Fig. 1). By symmetry, the same observation was made for the wild-type allele (Fig. S3).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Box plot of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte and sporozoite samples. The dots represent the observed proportions of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in the gametocyte samples and the observed average proportions of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in the sporozoite samples. Box plots represent the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles and the minimum and maximum.

The pfcrt 76 allele had an advantage for transmission from humans to the vector when present at very low frequencies.

For each parasite donor, the fraction of the pfcrt 76 allele obtained for the sporozoite samples was plotted against the one obtained for the corresponding gametocyte samples (Fig. 2 and Fig. S4). The pfcrt 76 proportion in the sporozoite samples is expected to be similar to the one in the gametocyte sample in the absence of selection through the mosquito vector (blue line in Fig. 2 and Fig. S4). We tested this hypothesis using a logistic regression where the proportion of the mutant pfcrt 76 allele in the gametocyte sample was compared to that of the paired sporozoite samples. The probability of observing a higher proportion of the pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples than in gametocyte samples (red line in Fig. 3) was significantly different (P = 5.29e−05) from the expected 50% probability (blue line in Fig. 3) for the mutant pfcrt 76 allele. As the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles decreased in gametocyte samples, the probability of having a higher proportion of this mutant allele in sporozoite samples increased, while as the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles increased in gametocyte samples, the probability of having a lower proportion of this mutant allele in sporozoite samples increased. By symmetry and logically, the same observation was made for the wild-type allele (Fig. S5). These results suggest that the minority alleles, whether mutant or wild type, had a selective advantage within a parasite population in the transmission from humans to the vector.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Dispersion of the proportions of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte samples and in paired sporozoite samples. The dots represent the observed proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in each sporozoite sample against the observed proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in the paired gametocyte sample. The blue line represents the expected and theoretical distribution of dots if the vector has no influence in the transmission of pfcrt 76 alleles. The dot size is weighted by the number of samples.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Logistic regression of the probability of a higher proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples as a function of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte samples. The proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples was compared to that in the paired gametocyte samples. The probability of having a higher proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples was calculated for each gametocyte sample using a logistic regression; the donor effect was taken into account. This probability (expressed as a percentage) as a function of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte samples was plotted (red line). The blue line represents the expected probability if the variation of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples is randomly distributed (50% of a higher proportion and 50% of a lower proportion). By symmetry, the result was identical for the wild-type allele (see Fig. S3).

Next, we restricted our analysis to experimental feedings where gametocyte samples had a proportion of mutant pfcrt alleles below 20%, defining these parasites as a minority variant. We computed the difference of proportions between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages, where a positive value meant an increase in the proportion of parasites with the mutant pfcrt allele at the sporozoite stage. Through a simple chi-square test, we showed that the proportion of parasites with the minority allele at the sporozoite stage was significantly higher than zero (mean = 40%, P < 1e−16), suggesting that minority variants had a competitive advantage (Fig. 4). A similar pattern was observed for the wild-type minority allele (mean = 21%, P = 3.5e−9) (Fig. S6).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Distribution of the increase in the frequency of parasites with mutant pfcrt 76 alleles between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages for experimental infections where the proportion of parasites harboring the considered allele did not exceed 20% at the gametocyte stage. The comparison of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles was restricted to experimental feedings where gametocyte samples had a proportion of mutant pfcrt alleles below 20%, defining these parasites as a minority variant. The difference of proportions between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages was computed, where a positive value meant an increase in the proportion of parasites with the mutant pfcrt allele at the sporozoite stage. The dashed line represents the average of this increase.

Contribution of parasitological factors influencing the advantage of the minority variant.

To quantify the contribution of each factor influencing the advantage of this minority variant, we designed a generalized linear model through a forward approach (increasing sequentially the complexity of the model to find the most-parsimonious one) based on an improvement of the Akaike information criterion (AIC). This model aims at explaining the difference between the proportions of parasites with the mutant pfcrt allele at the gametocyte and sporozoite stages according to gametocytemia, oocyst count, and allelic diversity. It turned out that the most-parsimonious model involved a positive relationship with gametocytemia (coefficient = 0.046, P = 4.49e−6) and negative relationships with the oocyst count (coefficient = −0.331, P = 0.016) and genetic diversity at the gametocyte stage (coefficient = −6.692, P = 5.68e−6) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Results of the most-parsimonious generalized linear model explaining the increase in the frequency of pfcrt 76 mutant alleles between the gametocyte and sporozoite stagesa

Parameter Coefficient P value
Intercept 9.579 1.41e−4
Gametocytemia 0.046 4.49e−6
Oocyst count −0.331 0.016
MOI −6.692 5.68e−5
a

The results of the most-parsimonious generalized linear model explaining the increase in the frequency of pfcrt 76 mutant alleles between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages where the percentage of parasites harboring pfcrt 76 mutant alleles does not exceed 20% at the gametocyte stage. MOI, multiplicity of infection in the gametocyte population.

Advantage of the minority variant: a general phenomenon?

DNAs from P. falciparum-positive salivary glands and from gametocyte samples were successfully genotyped at 7 microsatellite loci for 49 blood donors and 560 salivary glands (Table S1). The multiplicity of infection (MOI) in the gametocyte samples was not different from that of the paired sporozoite bulks: the median MOI was 3 (mean = 3.47) for gametocyte samples versus 4 (mean = 3.96) for the sporozoite samples (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.120). At each microsatellite locus, the number of alleles varied from 4 to 16 (mean = 11.4) and was not different between gametocyte and sporozoite samples (chi-square test, P = 0.998). Furthermore, the distribution of alleles at each microsatellite locus was not different (Table 2). All these data indicate that the allelic diversity between the gametocyte and sporozoite samples was not different at the metapopulation level. In contrast, when considering the blood donor level, we observed changes in allelic composition in sporozoite samples compared to their paired gametocyte samples (Fig. 5). We detected additional alleles in sporozoite samples for 43 of 49 feedings (87.6%), whereas for 35 feedings (71.4%), alleles identified in the gametocyte samples were not recovered in sporozoite samples. Details for each locus can be found in Fig. 5.

TABLE 2.

Allele distribution in the gametocyte or sporozoite samples for each microsatellite locus

Microsatellite locus Type of samplea Number of observed alleles for the considered allele χ² test
P20 Allele 132 139 142 145 147 150 153 156 159 162 165 168 171 174 177 180 183 186 0.707
Gameto 5 1 4 9 0 9 25 17 19 15 14 4 4 5 8 0 1 1
Sporo 4 2 6 5 2 7 26 19 19 15 10 5 5 6 12 1 0 0
 
P24 Allele 157 160 163 166 169 172 175 177 180 183 186 189 192 0.359
Gameto 0 15 25 25 18 9 8 5 8 8 3 4 1
Sporo 2 11 21 25 24 18 13 6 13 6 3 4 2
 
P21 Allele 65 68 71 74 77 80 83 86 92 0.973
Gameto 3 1 26 16 5 24 14 3 2
Sporo 3 3 31 19 5 29 17 5 2
 
P23 Allele 93 96 99 102 105 108 0.780
Gameto 6 21 42 3 0 0
Sporo 7 30 45 5 1 1
 
P26 Allele 159 162 165 168 171 174 177 180 183 186 189 192 198 201 213 0.468
Gameto 2 33 27 3 1 23 22 2 2 7 3 3 0 1 1
Sporo 3 33 32 3 3 26 26 4 2 8 5 3 3 2 0
 
P22 Allele 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 0.671
Gameto 0 1 11 9 29 21 13 17 3 6 0
Sporo 1 1 14 7 29 21 14 21 0 8 3
 
P25 Allele 93 96 99 102 105 108 111 114 117 0.746
Gameto 1 1 14 17 29 11 17 7 3
Sporo 6 5 10 19 36 13 17 11 5
a

Gameto, gametocyte samples; Sporo, sporozoite samples. The text in bold corresponds to all the alleles observed for the considered microsatellite locus.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Frequencies of newly detected alleles and nondetected alleles in paired sporozoites for each feeding as a function of microsatellites (x axis). The allelic composition in sporozoite samples was compared to that in their paired gametocyte samples. Each bar represents the newly detected (frequency of >0%) or the nondetected (frequency of <0%) alleles in sporozoite samples for each paired gametocyte sample. The table shows, for each microsatellite, the frequency of newly detected or nondetected alleles in all sporozoite samples compared to their frequency in the paired gametocyte samples.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the transmission dynamics of malaria parasites through the mosquito vector from genetically diverse natural infections. Our results reveal that (i) the mosquito vector contributes to the spread of CQ-resistant parasites by maintaining subpatent genotypes and (ii) the minority genotype, whether wild-type or mutated, in the gametocyte population is favored during transmission through the vector.

Gametocyte carriers were identified in an area of high malaria transmission where infections are mostly asymptomatic and the complexity of infection is great (17, 18). In such infections, a high proportion of individuals carry gametocytes and contribute to parasite transmission (14, 19, 20). In this study, up to 10 coinfecting genotypes were identified in the gametocyte samples, which reflects high parasite exposure and a high level of acquired immunity (21, 22). Microscopy and even standard PCR do not allow the accurate determination of the relative densities of coinfecting genotypes, and this often represents a limitation in studies on transmission dynamics. Here, we identified microsatellite alleles in sporozoites that were not detected in gametocyte samples. These newly detected alleles were obviously already present in gametocytes but remained below the detection threshold of the quantitative PCR (qPCR). Even if we cannot preclude misamplification of low-density genotypes, our work confirms that gametocytes present at undetectable densities are infectious for the mosquito vector (17, 19).

Our data indicate that development within the mosquito favored minority, low-density genotypes, and this higher transmissibility of minority genotypes could represent a trade-off to maintain genetic diversity in the population (23, 24). A specific selection of genotypes by the mosquito cannot explain our results, as no differences in MOIs, allelic compositions, or allelic diversities were observed between gametocytes and sporozoites. Even if the microsatellite analysis is not able to formally demonstrate that low-density genotypes are favored by vectors, because the data produced are only qualitative (presence or absence of a given allele), these results strongly strengthen this hypothesis. As observed in the human host (25), multiple balances likely determine the outcome of malaria parasite infections in the vector. Indeed, we previously reported from natural P. falciparum infections that genetic complexity allows parasites to escape the mosquito’s immune responses (18) and that gametocytes are capable of sensing the genetic content within the infection to adapt inbreeding levels (17).

In Cameroon, chloroquine was used as a first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria until 2002, when CQ resistance was reported throughout the country and the drug was deemed inefficient (26). Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) were adopted starting in 2004 and have been used nationwide since 2007. Molecular monitoring of CQ resistance reported the reemergence of wild-type parasites a few years after chloroquine removal; 45% of blood isolates carried the K76 allele in 2009 and 75% in 2012 (27). Here, the wild-type genotype was identified in 69% of the gametocyte samples. Our study may indicate stability in the prevalence of the wild-type genotype, but it would be necessary to genotype the asexual blood stages to further investigate this, as the genetic diversity might differ between the sexual and asexual populations (19). In any case, the increase in wild-type prevalence in Cameroon occurred to a lesser extent than in malaria-endemic countries in East Africa (36). Other ecological parameters determine the distribution of resistant and sensitive parasites, even if they are mostly linked to drug pressure. The prevalence of resistant genotypes decreases during the dry, low-transmission season, when drug pressure is limited (28, 29). CQ-resistant parasites are more frequent in rural areas, where self-medication is a common practice and chloroquine is still available from drug vendors (27, 30). Moreover, a higher prevalence of wild-type genotypes has been reported in clinical infections than in asymptomatic parasite carriers, which could be suggestive of higher virulence in wild-type parasites (27, 31). Alternatively, wild-type parasites are expected to have better fitness in more-immune individuals, such as asymptomatic infections in areas of high malaria transmission (32, 33). Nonetheless, the heterogeneity of the epidemiological context in different malaria settings renders predictions about the spread of drug selection difficult.

The role of mosquitoes in the transmission dynamics of drug-resistant genotypes has already been investigated (34, 35). In field studies among sympatric human and mosquito populations from Zambia, P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) and pfcrt-resistant alleles were found at much lower frequencies in mosquitoes than in blood samples, and the authors suggested that the mosquito vector contributes to recovery of drug-sensitive parasites (34, 35). In our mosquito infection experiments, the frequencies of wild-type and mutant pfcrt alleles were similar over all gametocyte and sporozoite samples, which indicates that the cost of drug resistance observed in the human host does not occur in the mosquito vector. As we quantified the proportions of the pfcrt K76 allele in our samples, we further explored the dynamics of mutant and wild-type genotypes from gametocytes to sporozoites for each experiment and found that the least represented allele in the sexual stage population is more abundant in mosquito salivary glands, regardless of its identity, K76 or 76T. This result thus indicates a selective advantage of the minority allele in the mosquito vector. Negative frequency-dependent selection that maintains genetic diversity within populations has been largely described in the literature (36, 37). This pattern of selection would explain the persistence of drug-resistant genotypes in the absence of drug pressure in our study area, where malaria endemicity is high and genetic diversity great. Unfortunately, this may also have important epidemiological consequences, as it predicts the rapid reemergence and spread of resistant genotypes if antimalarial drugs that had previously selected resistant parasites are reintroduced for malaria prevention or treatment. Chloroquine has been massively used in Africa, including in Cameroon, since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (38), and thus, it will be important to follow the dynamics of the pfcrt K76T mutation and examine whether this novel change in drug pressure has induced an adaptive response by increasing the frequency of the pfcrt 76T allele.

The positive association we observed between gametocytemia and the increase in the minority pfcrt genotype strengthens the scenario of a competitive advantage of the minority allele in the mosquito vector. Conversely, the negative relationship between the MOI at the gametocyte stage and the increase in the minority pfcrt allele frequency suggests cooperative interactions, as more genotypes are at low densities in complex infections. Mixed infections lead to lower parasite burdens in mosquitoes (lower oocyst counts) but contribute to infecting more mosquitoes (higher infection prevalence), thereby increasing the chances of malaria parasite transmission to the next host (17, 18). Our results based on the pfcrt K76T mutation suggest that genetically diverse infections create a favorable environment for a genotype that would otherwise be less fit. We then provide evidence that heterogeneous interactions in mixed-genotype infections and the outcome of an infection depend on the interplay between competitive and cooperative behaviors.

Our study showed that the vector plays an important role in maintaining parasite genetic diversity and that the transmission of the minority pfcrt alleles by mosquitoes is possibly an evolutionary mechanism for the survival of P. falciparum genotypes with lower fitness in the human host. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm our findings, and the genotyping of a broad set of polymorphisms using deep sequencing will be necessary to investigate whether the selective advantage of minority genotypes occurs. Indeed, our results may have important implications for malaria control, particularly in the persistence of resistant strains in the absence of drug pressure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study sites and origin of samples.

The study was carried out over 2 years, from 2007 to 2008, during high-transmission (rainy) seasons. The recruitment sites were in primary schools from the Mfou district (3°43′N, 11°38′E), 26 km from the center of Yaoundé, Cameroon. This study was reviewed and approved by the Cameroonian National Ethics Committee (protocol number 039/CNE/MP/06). Naturally infected P. falciparum gametocyte carriers were identified by microscopy of a thick blood smear obtained by finger prick and stained in 10% Giemsa stain. Gametocyte densities were expressed as the number of gametocytes observed per 1,000 leukocytes, assuming a standard concentration of 8,000 leukocytes per microliter. Venous blood samples were drawn and used for mosquito feedings and gametocyte isolation. Children with trophozoite densities of >500 parasites per microliter were then treated with an artemisinin-based combination therapy according to national recommendations.

Gametocyte isolation.

Gametocytes were isolated from 1 ml of serum-free blood using a MACS column (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) as previously described (39). DNA from purified gametocytes was extracted with DNAzol (Molecular Research Center, Inc., USA) and was subjected to whole-genome amplification (WGA) using the GenomiPhi V2 DNA amplification kit (GE Health Care, Sweden). All DNA samples were frozen at −20°C until gametocyte genotyping.

Experimental feedings.

For each mosquito feeding experiment, 2 batches of about 60 females of the local Ngousso laboratory strain of Anopheles coluzzii were fed with 400 μl of gametocyte-containing blood using the serum replacement procedure (18). Blood-fed mosquitoes were kept under standard insectary conditions (26°C, 80% relative humidity) with a daily 6% sucrose solution until dissections. At day 8 postinfection (p.i.), mosquitoes from 1 batch were dissected. The midguts were removed and stained in a 0.4% Mercurochrome solution, and the developed oocysts were counted by light microscopy. The prevalence of infection was defined as the proportion of infected mosquitoes among the total number of dissected mosquitoes and the infection intensity as the number of oocysts per P. falciparum-positive mosquito. At day 14 p.i., salivary glands from mosquitoes in the second batch were dissected and transferred into 200 μl of DNAzol. DNA extractions were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A P. falciparum-specific PCR (PF1 5′-GGAATGTTATTGCTAACAC-3′ and PF2 5′-AATGAAGAGCTGTGTATC-3′) was carried out on salivary gland DNA to identify sporozoite-positive samples. DNA from positive salivary glands was frozen at −20°C until sporozoite genotyping.

Genotyping of gametocyte and sporozoite samples.

Genotyping of the pfcrt 76 codon (chromosome 7) was performed on both gametocyte and sporozoite DNA with a real-time PCR assay using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) hybridization probes and a melting curve analysis as previously described (40). Each run included two control DNA samples of P. falciparum, i.e., the DNA from the CQ-susceptible F32/Tanzania strain corresponding to the pfcrt K76 wild-type allele and that of the CQ-resistant FCM29/Cameroon clone carrying the pfcrt 76T mutant allele.

DNA from gametocytes and DNA from positive salivary glands, after being pooled for each donor, were amplified to assess genetic polymorphism at 7 microsatellite loci located on 5 different chromosomes according to Anderson et al. (41) and Annan et al. (12). PCR products were resolved on an ABI Prism 3100 DNA genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using 500-LIZ as the internal size standard. Alleles were read under GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). The maximum number of alleles at the more polymorphic locus provided the minimum number of clones per isolate and determined the multiplicity of the infection.

Quantification of mutant and wild-type alleles.

To assess the proportions of mutant and wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles in each sample, we used a hybridization probe-based FRET qPCR. We first produced standards with known proportions of mutant and wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles from laboratory strains (Fig. S1 and S2). All assays were performed in duplicate. The relative quantification of mutant/wild-type alleles of pfcrt 76 was determined using the plot of the negative first derivative of the fluorescence with respect to temperature (−dF/dT) versus temperature as previously described (42, 43). The relative amounts of mutant or wild-type alleles were determined by calculating the ratio of the melting peak heights of the high (mutant) or low (wild-type) melting temperature (Tm) curves against the sum of the heights of both mutant and wild-type melting peaks, respectively, as follows: mutant % = [mutant Tm peak height/(mutant Tm peak height + wild-type Tm peak height)] × 100, and wild-type % = [wild-type Tm peak height/(mutant Tm peak height + wild-type Tm peak height)] × 100.

The proportions of pfcrt 76 alleles were assessed in field-derived gametocyte and sporozoite samples after validating the reproducibility of the quantification method (Fig. S1 and S2). Samples were tested only once due to the small amount of DNA and the number of assays to be performed.

Statistical analysis.

Data that were not normally distributed were displayed as median values along with interquartile ranges and were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for two-group comparisons. Proportions were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. The relationship between the ratio of mutant to wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles and premixed standards was calculated by simple linear regression, and the strength of the relationship was assessed by correlation analysis using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Differences in comparisons were considered statistically significant if the P value was ≤0.05.

All the following statistical analyses were carried out using R (version 3.2) (44) and the lme4 package (45). To analyze the variations of proportions of pfcrt 76 alleles, we compared the proportion of wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles observed in the gametocyte samples to the proportion of wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles in the paired sporozoite samples, respectively. The same comparison was performed for the mutant pfcrt 76 alleles. The variations of proportions of the wild-type or mutant pfcrt 76 allele were analyzed using a logistic regression that took into account the donor effect because data were not independent (1 gametocyte sample corresponded to n sporozoite samples). The generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood (Laplace approximation) and the binomial family used the following formula: variations of proportions of pfcrt 76 alleles ∼ 1 + percentage in gametocyte sample + (1 | gametocyte sample).

The dynamics of pfcrt 76 alleles was assessed by considering infections where an allele, either mutant or wild type, was present below the threshold of 20% in the gametocyte sample, i.e., it was considered a “minority” variant. Differences in the proportions of the minority parasite among the two developmental stages were checked using the chi-square test. The increase in the proportion of the minority variant was modeled through a generalized linear model in which the infection characteristics (gametocytemia, MOI, and oocyst count) were included as explanatory variables. We then used the function glm to identify the most-parsimonious model through a forward approach and test for significant interactions between explanatory variables and the minority allele increase.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the volunteers from Mfou for their participation in this study, and to the teams from Mfou Hospital, IRD, OCEAC, and University Hospital of Toulouse for fieldwork, mosquito rearing, and P. falciparum genotyping.

This work was supported by the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement under scholarships awarded, by the Institut de Médecine et d’Epidémiologie Appliquée under grant no. MEA-AO-07, and by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under grant no. ANR-11-BSV7-009-01.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM00852-21_Supp_1_seq9.pdf, PDF file, 0.9 MB (958.2KB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Antoine Berry, Email: berry.a@chu-toulouse.fr.

Isabelle Morlais, Email: isabelle.morlais@ird.fr.

Laura A. Kirkman, Weill Cornell Medicine

REFERENCES

  • 1.Petersen I, Eastman R, Lanzer M. 2011. Drug-resistant malaria: molecular mechanisms and implications for public health. FEBS Lett 585:1551–1562. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.White NJ. 2004. Antimalarial drug resistance. J Clin Invest 113:1084–1092. doi: 10.1172/JCI21682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frosch AE, Laufer MK, Mathanga DP, Takala-Harrison S, Skarbinski J, Claassen CW, Dzinjalamala FK, Plowe CV. 2014. Return of widespread chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum to Malawi. J Infect Dis 210:1110–1114. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kublin JG, Cortese JF, Njunju EM, Mukadam RA, Wirima JJ, Kazembe PN, Djimde AA, Kouriba B, Taylor TE, Plowe CV. 2003. Reemergence of chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum malaria after cessation of chloroquine use in Malawi. J Infect Dis 187:1870–1875. doi: 10.1086/375419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Laufer MK, Thesing PC, Eddington ND, Masonga R, Dzinjalamala FK, Takala SL, Taylor TE, Plowe CV. 2006. Return of chloroquine antimalarial efficacy in Malawi. N Engl J Med 355:1959–1966. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mita T, Kaneko A, Lum JK, Bwijo B, Takechi M, Zungu IL, Tsukahara T, Tanabe K, Kobayakawa T, Bjorkman A. 2003. Recovery of chloroquine sensitivity and low prevalence of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene mutation K76T following the discontinuance of chloroquine use in Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68:413–415. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2003.68.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fidock DA, Nomura T, Talley AK, Cooper RA, Dzekunov SM, Ferdig MT, Ursos LM, Sidhu AB, Naude B, Deitsch KW, Su XZ, Wootton JC, Roepe PD, Wellems TE. 2000. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol Cell 6:861–871. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00077-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Read AF, Taylor LH. 2001. The ecology of genetically diverse infections. Science 292:1099–1102. doi: 10.1126/science.1059410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zwetyenga J, Rogier C, Tall A, Fontenille D, Snounou G, Trape JF, Mercereau-Puijalon O. 1998. No influence of age on infection complexity and allelic distribution in Plasmodium falciparum infections in Ndiop, a Senegalese village with seasonal, mesoendemic malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 59:726–735. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bruce MC, Donnelly CA, Alpers MP, Galinski MR, Barnwell JW, Walliker D, Day KP. 2000. Cross-species interactions between malaria parasites in humans. Science 287:845–848. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nkhoma SC, Nair S, Al-Saai S, Ashley E, McGready R, Phyo AP, Nosten F, Anderson TJ. 2013. Population genetic correlates of declining transmission in a human pathogen. Mol Ecol 22:273–285. doi: 10.1111/mec.12099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Annan Z, Durand P, Ayala FJ, Arnathau C, Awono-Ambene P, Simard F, Razakandrainibe FG, Koella JC, Fontenille D, Renaud F. 2007. Population genetic structure of Plasmodium falciparum in the two main African vectors, Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:7987–7992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702715104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boissiere A, Tchioffo MT, Bachar D, Abate L, Marie A, Nsango SE, Shahbazkia HR, Awono-Ambene PH, Levashina EA, Christen R, Morlais I. 2012. Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002742. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bousema T, Drakeley C. 2011. Epidemiology and infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gametocytes in relation to malaria control and elimination. Clin Microbiol Rev 24:377–410. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00051-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Churcher TS, Bousema T, Walker M, Drakeley C, Schneider P, Ouedraogo AL, Basanez MG. 2013. Predicting mosquito infection from Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte density and estimating the reservoir of infection. Elife 2:e00626. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eldering M, Morlais I, Van Gemert GJ, Van de Vegte-Bolmer M, Graumans W, Siebelink-Stoter R, Vos M, Abate L, Roeffen W, Bousema T, Levashina EA, Sauerwein RW. 2016. Variation in susceptibility of African Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites to TEP1 mediated killing in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Sci Rep 6:20440. doi: 10.1038/srep20440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morlais I, Nsango SE, Toussile W, Abate L, Annan Z, Tchioffo MT, Cohuet A, Awono-Ambene PH, Fontenille D, Rousset F, Berry A. 2015. Plasmodium falciparum mating patterns and mosquito infectivity of natural isolates of gametocytes. PLoS One 10:e0123777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nsango SE, Abate L, Thoma M, Pompon J, Fraiture M, Rademacher A, Berry A, Awono-Ambene PH, Levashina EA, Morlais I. 2012. Genetic clonality of Plasmodium falciparum affects the outcome of infection in Anopheles gambiae. Int J Parasitol 42:589–595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grignard L, Goncalves BP, Early AM, Daniels RF, Tiono AB, Guelbeogo WM, Ouedraogo A, van Veen EM, Lanke K, Diarra A, Nebie I, Sirima SB, Targett GA, Volkman SK, Neafsey DE, Wirth DF, Bousema T, Drakeley C. 2018. Transmission of molecularly undetectable circulating parasite clones leads to high infection complexity in mosquitoes post feeding. Int J Parasitol 48:671–677. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stone W, Goncalves BP, Bousema T, Drakeley C. 2015. Assessing the infectious reservoir of falciparum malaria: past and future. Trends Parasitol 31:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eldh M, Hammar U, Arnot D, Beck HP, Garcia A, Liljander A, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Migot-Nabias F, Mueller I, Ntoumi F, Ross A, Smith T, Sonden K, Vafa Homann M, Yman V, Felger I, Farnert A. 2020. Multiplicity of asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections and risk of clinical malaria: a systematic review and pooled analysis of individual participant data. J Infect Dis 221:775–785. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Galatas B, Bassat Q, Mayor A. 2016. Malaria parasites in the asymptomatic: looking for the hay in the haystack. Trends Parasitol 32:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mackinnon MJ, Marsh K. 2010. The selection landscape of malaria parasites. Science 328:866–871. doi: 10.1126/science.1185410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nkhoma SC, Trevino SG, Gorena KM, Nair S, Khoswe S, Jett C, Garcia R, Daniel B, Dia A, Terlouw DJ, Ward SA, Anderson TJC, Cheeseman IH. 2020. Co-transmission of related malaria parasite lineages shapes within-host parasite diversity. Cell Host Microbe 27:93–103.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deroost K, Pham TT, Opdenakker G, Van den Steen PE. 2016. The immunological balance between host and parasite in malaria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:208–257. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Niba PTN, Nji AM, Evehe MS, Ali IM, Netongo PM, Ngwafor R, Moyeh MN, Ngum LN, Ndum OE, Acho FA, Mbu’u CM, Fosah DA, Atogho-Tiedeu B, Achonduh-Atijegbe O, Djokam-Dadjeu R, Chedjou JPK, Bigoga JD, Moukoko CEE, Ajua A, Achidi E, Tallah E, Leke RGF, Tourgordi A, Ringwald P, Alifrangis M, Mbacham WF. 2021. Drug resistance markers within an evolving efficacy of anti-malarial drugs in Cameroon: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1998–2020). Malar J 20:32. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03543-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Menard S, Morlais I, Tahar R, Sayang C, Mayengue PI, Iriart X, Benoit-Vical F, Lemen B, Magnaval JF, Awono-Ambene P, Basco LK, Berry A. 2012. Molecular monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum drug susceptibility at the time of the introduction of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Yaounde, Cameroon: implications for the future. Malar J 11:113. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abdel-Muhsin AM, Mackinnon MJ, Ali E, Nassir el KA, Suleiman S, Ahmed S, Walliker D, Babiker HA. 2004. Evolution of drug-resistance genes in Plasmodium falciparum in an area of seasonal malaria transmission in Eastern Sudan. J Infect Dis 189:1239–1244. doi: 10.1086/382509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ord R, Alexander N, Dunyo S, Hallett R, Jawara M, Targett G, Drakeley CJ, Sutherland CJ. 2007. Seasonal carriage of pfcrt and pfmdr1 alleles in Gambian Plasmodium falciparum imply reduced fitness of chloroquine-resistant parasites. J Infect Dis 196:1613–1619. doi: 10.1086/522154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mawili-Mboumba DP, Ndong Ngomo JM, Maboko F, Guiyedi V, Mourou Mbina JR, Kombila M, Bouyou Akotet MK. 2014. pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y allele frequency in Plasmodium falciparum isolates and use of self-medication in a rural area of Gabon. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 108:729–734. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tukwasibwe S, Mugenyi L, Mbogo GW, Nankoberanyi S, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Joloba ML, Nsobya SL, Staedke SG, Rosenthal PJ. 2014. Differential prevalence of transporter polymorphisms in symptomatic and asymptomatic falciparum malaria infections in Uganda. J Infect Dis 210:154–157. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Escalante AA, Smith DL, Kim Y. 2009. The dynamics of mutations associated with anti-malarial drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Trends Parasitol 25:557–563. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Klein EY, Smith DL, Boni MF, Laxminarayan R. 2008. Clinically immune hosts as a refuge for drug-sensitive malaria parasites. Malar J 7:67. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mharakurwa S, Kumwenda T, Mkulama MA, Musapa M, Chishimba S, Shiff CJ, Sullivan DJ, Thuma PE, Liu K, Agre P. 2011. Malaria antifolate resistance with contrasting Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) polymorphisms in humans and Anopheles mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:18796–18801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116162108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mharakurwa S, Sialumano M, Liu K, Scott A, Thuma P. 2013. Selection for chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum by wild Anopheles arabiensis in Southern Zambia. Malar J 12:453. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Carius HJ, Little TJ, Ebert D. 2001. Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55:1136–1145. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[1136:GVIAHP]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fitzpatrick MJ, Feder E, Rowe L, Sokolowski MB. 2007. Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature 447:210–212. doi: 10.1038/nature05764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Belayneh A. 2020. Off-label use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 treatment in Africa against WHO recommendation. Res Rep Trop Med 11:61–72. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S269936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ribaut C, Berry A, Chevalley S, Reybier K, Morlais I, Parzy D, Nepveu F, Benoit-Vical F, Valentin A. 2008. Concentration and purification by magnetic separation of the erythrocytic stages of all human Plasmodium species. Malar J 7:45. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vessiere A, Berry A, Fabre R, Benoit-Vical F, Magnaval JF. 2004. Detection by real-time PCR of the Pfcrt T76 mutation, a molecular marker of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains. Parasitol Res 93:5–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anderson TJ, Haubold B, Williams JT, Estrada-Franco JG, Richardson L, Mollinedo R, Bockarie M, Mokili J, Mharakurwa S, French N, Whitworth J, Velez ID, Brockman AH, Nosten F, Ferreira MU, Day KP. 2000. Microsatellite markers reveal a spectrum of population structures in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biol Evol 17:1467–1482. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Karadag A, Riminucci M, Bianco P, Cherman N, Kuznetsov SA, Nguyen N, Collins MT, Robey PG, Fisher LW. 2004. A novel technique based on a PNA hybridization probe and FRET principle for quantification of mutant genotype in fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome. Nucleic Acids Res 32:e63. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nie H, Evans AA, London WT, Block TM, Ren XD. 2011. Quantification of complex precore mutations of hepatitis B virus by SimpleProbe real time PCR and dual melting analysis. J Clin Virol 51:234–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • 45.Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft 67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1

Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM00852-21_Supp_1_seq9.pdf, PDF file, 0.9 MB (958.2KB, pdf)


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES