Abstract
Exploring stable clusters to understand structural evolution from atoms to macroscopic matter and to construct new materials is interesting yet challenging in chemistry. Utilizing our newly developed deep-ultraviolet laser ionization mass spectrometry technique, here we observe the reactions of neutral cobalt clusters with oxygen and find a very stable cluster species of Co13O8 that dominates the mass distribution in the presence of a large flow rate of oxygen gas. The results of global-minimum structural search reveal a unique cubic structure and distinctive stability of the neutral Co13O8 cluster that forms a new class of metal oxides that we named as ‘metalloxocubes’. Thermodynamics and kinetics calculations illustrate the structural evolution from icosahedral Co13 to the metalloxocube Co13O8 with decreased energy, enhanced stability and aromaticity. This class of neutral oxygen-passivated metal clusters may be an ideal candidate for genetic materials because of the cubic nature of the building blocks and the stability due to cubic aromaticity.
Keywords: metalloxocube, oxygen-passivated metal cluster, cubic aromaticity, cluster materials, magnetic property
INTRODUCTION
Building materials with well-defined components and stable structures is one of the foremost challenges in chemistry and cluster science. Extensive efforts have been made to explore new clusters with highly symmetrical regular structures, and occasional success has been achieved, such as the discovery of fullerene C60 [1], Au20 [2], etc. [3,4]. In particular, a few ‘magic’ metal clusters possessing special stability, such as Al13− [5], have been found to be inert toward oxygen reactions due to the coincident closure of both electronic and geometric shells [6–8], embodying the nearly free electron gas (NFEG) theory of metals and epitomizing the jellium model of clusters within a symmetric potential function [9]. In view of this, the reactivity of metal clusters toward oxygen is often studied to explore the stability of these materials in the gas phase [10]. However, not all clusters are subject to this fundamental constraint. In some cases, cluster stability can be associated with aromaticity or superatom property [8,11,12], a large HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital)–LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) energy gap and a large spin excitation energy [13]. In particular, the metal cluster stability can be reinforced by ligand protection. In recent years, various ligand-protected metal clusters have been synthesized via wet chemistry [14–18], where diverse thiols are employed as stabilizers and ligands, allowing for electron transfer and hence balanced charge distribution, occasionally exhibiting superatom characteristics of the core [11,19].
For gas-phase naked metal clusters, especially those of main group elements, a few previous studies have illustrated that cluster stability can be altered by doping hydrogen or halogen ligands, which may induce formation of active sites on the cluster surface or passivate the metal cluster [20,21]. There are ongoing efforts devoted to exploring stable clusters for new materials, and to understanding atomically precise reactivity of metals. For example, Kapiloff and Ervin [22] studied the reactivity of small cobalt cluster anions Con− (n = 2–8) with O2, and noted rapid rate coefficients allowing fragmentation of the clusters (with a removal of CoO2−) independent of the cluster size. Bernstein and coworkers [23] studied 118-nm laser ionization of neutral cobalt oxides ConOm (n = 2–11) formed by laser ablation in plasma atmosphere, and have identified a series of ConOm clusters showing size-dependent mass abundances. Gutsev et al. [24] performed an systematic investigation on small (FeO)n, (CoO)n and (NiO)n clusters, where the 3d-metal oxides preferred oxygen bridge-linked Co(III) sites. Riley and coworkers [25] studied the reactions of cobalt clusters with water and ammonia, and found addition reactions to be dominant channels. Besides, Andersson et al. [26] studied the reactivities of neutral Fe, Co and Cu clusters at single-collision conditions and determined their reaction probability in a single collision. Among these studies, few-collision conditions are convenient to study size-selective cluster reactivity, and sufficient collision conditions are necessarily important to probe stable species in the gas phase. However, the reactivity and reaction-determined stability of preformed cobalt clusters and oxides, especially neutrals, have not been fully unveiled so far.
Recently, we have developed a highly sensitive mass spectrometer combined with a homemade ps-pulsed 177.3-nm (7 eV single-photon energy) deep-ultraviolet laser that has unique advantages of low fragmentation and high ionization efficiency, enabling detailed studies of neutral metal clusters that had been largely unexplored previously. Taking advantages of our optimized cluster source, flow tube reactor and the 177.3-nm laser (Scheme 1), here we are able to prepare and observe well-resolved Con (n ≤ 30) clusters and provide insights into their reactivities. Interestingly, a very stable cluster species Co13O8 emerges in the mass spectra of neutral cobalt clusters reacting with oxygen, and shows dominant mass abundance in the presence of sufficient oxygen. Using first-principles theoretical calculations based on genetic algorithm and basin-hopping strategies, we find a cubic structure and distinctive stability of this neutral cluster Co13O8 and show that it possesses unique cubic aromaticity. This new class of metal oxides with a cubic structure and special aromatic stability is named as ‘metalloxocubes’. Such neutral oxygen-passivated metal clusters with high stability and cubic aromaticity help to expand the chemistry of ligand-protected metal clusters [27], and provide an ideal candidate for genetic materials [19] with a perovskite-like structure.
Scheme 1.

Instrumentation. (A) A sketch of instrument showing the sampling, reaction and deep-ultraviolet laser ionization mass spectrometry (DUV-LIMS) strategy. (B) Ionization energies of the neutral Con (n = 1–30) clusters, which are <7 eV (except Co atom) suggesting unique advantages of the ps-pulsed 177.3-nm deep-ultraviolet laser available for single-photon ionization of these clusters. The values are from refs [28–30].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We prepared well-resolved neutral Con clusters (n = 2–30) via a homemade laser evaporation (LaVa) source, with a typical distribution shown in Fig. 1A. In general, the preparation of pure neutral metal clusters with >10 metal atoms is challenging in view of the much lower bond energy for metal–metal bonds than for the metal–nonmetal bonds. Here, the ionization energies of all the Con clusters (n = 2–30) are slightly smaller than 7 eV (Scheme 1); thus, the 177.3-nm laser happens to be a perfect ionization condition for such neutral Con clusters. Single-photon ionization is available for high-efficiency ionization with absence of photoinduced fragmentation. Figure 1B presents a typical mass spectrum of the neutral Con clusters upon reacting with oxygen (for details see Fig. S2).
Figure 1.
Mass spectrometry observation. (A) Representative size distribution of the naked Con clusters. (B and C) The mass spectra after reaction of the Con clusters with different amounts of 20% O2/He introduced into the flow tube (200 and 250 μs) and with varying pulse widths controlled by the pulse valve (more details in the Supplementary data). The Con and ConOm clusters are ionized by a ps-pulsed deep-ultraviolet 177.3-nm laser.
As seen, all the nascent Con clusters have decreased mass abundances; simultaneously, several ConOm (n ≥ 6) products, typically seen as ConO2, ConO4 and ConO6, appear in the spectrum. With an atomic electron structure of [Ar]3d74s2, cobalt readily forms oxides, as the Co–O bond energy (∼3.99 eV) is larger than the Co–Co bond energy (∼1.73 eV) [30]. With the rapid growth into ConOm (m ≥ 2), it is notable that the oxide products mostly bear an even number of oxygen atoms, indicating that the reactions are initiated by oxygen adsorption and activation on the cobalt clusters. This result is consistent with the previous findings [25,26]. Among the observed ConOm clusters, the dominant peaks belong to the ConO2 series, such as Co12O2, Co13O2 and Co16O2. A small portion of ConO4 and ConO6 clusters (such as Co13O4 and Co13O6) emerges in the mass spectra (Figs S3 and S4). This observation indicates that the Con clusters could primarily follow a sequential reaction channel to form
the ConOm products successively, i.e.
![]() |
(1) |
Upon further increasing the reactant oxygen content, however, we found that not all the Con clusters continued developing into ConO8 and ConO10, as shown in Fig. 1C. Interestingly, the neutral Co13O8 dominates the mass distribution, showing its distinction in surviving the large flow rate oxygen etching reaction. Meanwhile, the small cobalt clusters could find chances to grow up via a relatively slow subsequent reaction channel under sufficient He-assisted three-body collisions, written as
![]() |
(2) |
Note that, besides our calculations on Co12–14O2–8 clusters, previous studies indicated that all the ConO2 (n > 3) and ConO4 (n > 7) have an ionization energy <7 eV (for details see Tables S10 and S11). We have also prepared well-resolved Con±, Fen+ and Nin+ clusters and observed their reactions with oxygen; as a result, enhanced stabilities of such a class of M13O8±,0 (M = Fe, Co, Ni) clusters were repeatedly observed (for details see Figs S6–S8). While this observation is consistent with a few previously identified stable species via gas-phase collisional reactions, such as Al13− [5,31], Al13I− [5], Al13I2− [32] and Ag13− [13], it is a puzzle why such a oxide cluster (Co13O8) with significantly low oxidation state can be stable.
The stability and reactivity of metal clusters are often associated with the nature of both the metal itself and the correlative oxide products, and magic metal clusters could be conclusively determined by O2 etching reactions [33,34]. Here, the DFT (density functional theory)-calculated binding energies and HOMO–LUMO gaps of Con cluster do not find Co13 as a magic cluster (Fig. S12). According to the chemical valence of cobalt, the Con clusters may follow an etching reaction toward the formation of typical bivalent and trivalent cobalt oxide molecules:
![]() |
(3) |
On the other hand, the Con clusters and their oxides ConOm could undergo successive reactions with oxygen to generate stable species such as Co13O8. Based on these reaction channels, it is reasonable to yield distinctive Co13O8 clusters; however, it is unclear why Co13O8 is ‘magic’ and what kind of structure it is.
To determine the structure of Co13O8, we have conducted first-principles calculations based on a genetic algorithm strategy. The global lowest energy structures of all the Con (3 ≤ n ≤ 16) and Co13Om (m = 2, 4, 6, 8) clusters are provided in Fig. S10. While bare Co13 could have an icosahedral structure [35,36], it is interesting to find that Co13O8 exhibits a body-centered cubic structure (a large HOMO–LUMO gap of 2.14 eV) with 12 cobalt atoms surrounding the inner core and 8 oxygen atoms coherently anchoring the 8 triangular facets of the Co@Co12. Such a cubic structure is consistent with the previously predicted structures of Fe13O8 [37,38]. It is usual that such a class of M13O8 clusters can survive sufficient oxygen etching reactions. In general, sufficient reactions in high-pressure gas collision cells tend to screen out stable clusters of highly degenerate energy states and spherically symmetric structures, such as the previous findings of Al13I2n− [6], where the doping of iodine that is stretched out of an Al13 icosahedron helps to balance the surface charge enabling enhanced stability. Also, we did independent basin-hopping search for Co13O8 structure using TGMin code [39], and reproduced the pseudo-Oh global minimum of Co13O8. Further, we conducted ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations to identify their relative stability. AIMD simulations indicate that Co13O8 has outstanding thermal stability, with the cubic structure undissociated even up to 1200 K, as shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2.

AIMD simulations of Co13O8 at 300, 600, 900 and 1200 K for 3500 fs, with the average oxygen–oxygen distance on the eight edges indicated in Å.
Further, we performed DFT calculations to depict chemical reaction dynamics so as to understand how the stable Co13O8 cluster was formed (Fig. 3A and B), where the reaction channels for ‘O2 + Co13’ via ‘end-on’, ‘side-on’ and ‘face-on’ orientations are provided, respectively. Note that the O–O bond lengths increase significantly when an O2 molecule chemisorbed on the cluster surface (Fig. S15). The elongated O–O bonds of adsorptive oxygen, followed by the formation of epoxy oxygen, strengthen the subsequent reactivity of O–O bond dissociation. The following oxygen addition reactions on the Co13On (n = 2, 4, 6) are thermodynamically favorable (Fig. 3C), with O–O bonds elongated to different degrees. We also evaluated the stability of Co13O8 by checking the likely decomposition in the presence of excessive oxygen. However, the additional oxygen molecules toward the Co13O8 cluster just absorb on the surface but do not break its cubic structure; even at 900 K, Co13O8 survives the attack of additional O2 molecules (Table S3). It is inferred that four oxygen molecules fully passivate a Co13 cluster with the eight oxygen atoms anchoring eight triangular facets toward the cubic structure.
Figure 3.

Chemical reaction dynamics. (A) The reaction coordinate for ‘O2 + Co13 → Co13O2’ via an ‘end-on’ coordination orientation, showing readily O–O bond dissociation on Co13. The black versus red lines correspond to spin crossing. (B) The dynamic optimization processes for ‘O2 + Co13’ via ‘side-on’ and ‘face-on’ attack orientations, showing spontaneous O–O bond dissociation of Co13·O2 toward the energy minimum. (C) Thermodynamic energy changes from Co13O2 to Co13O8 [ΔE = E (Co13O2x+2) – E (Co13O2x) – E (O2)].
Further, we calculated the nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS) [40–43], which is often used as a criterion to evaluate the aromaticity. The NICS values were computed at a few points along the central axis of a Co4O4 plane of the cubic Co13O8. As shown in Fig. 4A, the negative NICS(0) and NICS(1) values (corresponding to the Co4O4 plane center and 1.0 Å above the plane surface) are up to −54.0 and −22.0 ppm, respectively, indicating this cluster is aromatic (larger than that of benzene; see Table S6). Meanwhile, we have also conducted electron localization function (ELF) analysis [44], which illustrates the bonding and nonbonding areas by measuring the local electron-pair density. As shown in the top-view plane (Fig. 4B), the charge-density distribution value in the central area of square with concave sides is ∼0.27e/
, pertaining to relatively weak metallic bond interactions between the Co atoms. In addition to covalent interactions, there is electron transfer between Co and O to form ionic bonds. Note that the electron cloud of oxygen shows obvious polarization toward the center of each plane, indicative of combined electrostatic interactions pertaining to oxygen passivation of the Co13 cluster.
Figure 4.

NICS, ELF, GIMIC and orbital analysis. (A) DFT calculation results of the NICS on the center of the Co4O4 plane of the cluster, with a charge of −1.054|e| on the oxygen atoms. (B) ELF analysis of charge-density distribution (e/
) of Co13O8 at the top-view plane. Blue and red areas represent high and low electron densities, respectively. (C) Stream tracer of the induced ring current when an external magnetic field in the [0, 0, 1] direction is applied, and the integral of the induced current that crosses the defined section is labeled. (D and E) The typical occupied orbital patterns of the Co13O8 cluster. The isosurfaces in gray and cyan refer to 0.02 and −0.02 e/Å3, respectively. (F) Superposition of the orbitals from HOMO to HOMO-66 showing electron delocalization with cubic aromaticity.
Furthermore, we estimated the magnetically induced current density using gauge-including atomic orbitals (GIMIC) [45,46] of the Co13O8 cluster, as displayed in Fig. 4C (more details in the Supplementary data). As a result, the positive contribution of the induced current is found to be up to 5.83 nA/T, while the negative contribution is only −0.69 nA/T (i.e. an integrated net current of 5.14 nA/T with an external magnetic field perpendicular to the Co4O4 plane), suggesting remarkable aromaticity on each Co4O4 plane of the Co13O8 cluster. Figure 4D–F depicts a few typical orbitals contributing to the delocalization (more details in the Supplementary data). The multicenter delocalization of electrons accounts for its aromaticity, which, in turn, promotes cluster stability within Wade–Mingos rules analogous to polyhedral boranes, boron clusters and all-metal clusters [43,47].
Having determined the stability, dynamics and aromaticity of the Co13O8 cluster, what is the nature of the chemical bonding and aromatic property? In order to elucidate the physical origin of the special stability of this cluster, we performed electronic structure analysis on the pseudo-cubic cluster, which can be viewed as Co@Co12@O8 for the sake of bonding analysis. Figure 5 depicts the Kohn–Sham energy levels from interactions among Co12, O8 and the central Co atom (labeled as Coc). The Co 3d-orbitals span a narrow 3d-band with 65 orbitals because of the relatively small orbital overlap between the neighboring Co atoms connected with a Co–Co distance of ∼2.4 Å. This narrow 3d-band allows hosting a large number of magnetically coupled, unpaired electrons on each Co center. In contrast, the radially more diffused Co 4s-orbitals form a much larger manifold of group orbitals of symmetry a1g, t1u, t2g, eg and t2u, respectively. Among them, the a1g and t1u orbitals are strongly bonding for Co12 cage, thus lying in the low-energy end of the 3d-band. The weakly antibonding orbitals t2g and eg of the Co12 cage are destabilized by the Coc atom (with 3d-orbitals in t2g + eg symmetry) so much that they become strongly antibonding orbitals in Co@Co12. As a result, the Co12 cage can only hold eight electrons in the 4s-based a1g and t1u orbitals to form an (a1g)2(t1u)6 configuration. This scenario is reminiscent to [Zn(I)8] and [Mn(I)8] clusters within a ‘6n + 2’ rule of electron counting and having so-called cubic aromaticity [48,49].
Figure 5.

A Kohn–Sham energy-level correlation diagram of the Co@Co12@O8 cluster. The centered Co atom of Co13O8 is defined as Coc. The arrows are representative for spin electron occupation.
As a metal oxide cluster, Co13O8 possesses special stability due to the cubic aromaticity from multicenter Co–Co metal–metal bonding. The electronic structure analysis shows that the oxidation states of the atoms in this cluster can be formally assigned as central Co(0), cage Co(4/3+), and O(2−), respectively, which are consistent with their calculated net charges and spin distribution (Table S7). Here, the Co12 cage (in cubic Co13O8 cluster) with 12 quasi-monovalent Co (I, 3d74s1) atoms is forced to lose 4 extra electrons because of the antibonding interaction with the 3d-orbitals of the central Co atom (Fig. 5). The calculated spin density populations support this chemical bonding analysis (for details see Table S7). Also, we searched for the lowest energy spin states of Co@Co12O8, and found that a total spin quantum number S = 29/2 corresponds to the lowest energy state. On this basis, we calculated the total magnetic moment of Co13O8 being up to 30μB, simply by using
(the Landé factor g = 2.0023), which is larger than the usual cobalt oxides [50].
CONCLUSION
In summary, utilizing self-developed DUV-LIMS technique that takes advantage of high-efficiency photoionization of neutral cobalt clusters, here we observe the reactions of cobalt clusters with oxygen and discover the prominent stability of Co13O8. Theoretical calculations based on different methods concur with this experimental finding, and unveil its distinctive stability pertaining to a perovskite-like body-centered cubic structure. Thermodynamics and reaction dynamics involving structural evolution from icosahedron Co13 to the cubic Co13O8 are addressed. We name this kind of clusters as ‘metalloxocubes’ to stimulate further research interest in exploring such materials with well-defined components and regular structures. This class of neutral oxygen-passivated metal clusters is a reasonable candidate for genetic materials in view of the cubic nature of the building blocks and the special stability from cubic aromaticity.
METHODS
Experimental
The experiments were carried out utilizing a customized reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Re-TOFMS) combined with the newly developed 177.3-nm deep-ultraviolet laser (details in the Supplementary data) [51]. The optimized Re-TOFMS, LaVa source and deep-ultraviolet laser ensure highly efficient preparation and detection of well-resolved neutral cobalt clusters under a normal distribution. Following the generation of cobalt clusters, a tangential deflection electric field (DC 200 V) was designed to remove any charged particles to attain neutral clusters. The homemade LaVa source is coupled with a reaction cell downstream (6 mm diameter, 6 cm long), allowing for sufficient collision reactions (∼30 Pa pressure) with varied reactants (e.g. 3–20% O2 seeded in He), controlled by a pulsed general valve with the on-time duration to be set as 150–250 μs per period of 100 ms (i.e. a frequency of 10 Hz). The neutral cluster beam and reaction products were then collimated into another high-vacuum TOF chamber through a skimmer (φ 2 mm). At the arrival in the ionization zone (i.e. the space between the first and second acceleration plates), the cluster beam meets the deep-ultraviolet laser from the coaxial front direction; simultaneously, the acceleration voltages are triggered so that the instantaneously ionized neutral clusters are analyzed by the Re-TOFMS.
Theoretical methods
Three methods are used to search and identify the global-minimum structures of the clusters in this study. The first one is CALYPSO approach based on the particle swarm optimization method [52]. Also, here we have used a homemade code strategy (see Appendix in the Supplementary data) based on the graph theory method [53] to help find the ground-state structures by taking into consideration the prototypes of crystal structures of metal cobalt, rock salt and spinel cobalt oxides. This is based on chemical knowledge that metal clusters tend to a closest stacking mode. This approach has equivalent efficiency to find energy-minimum structure of small clusters (e.g. n < 10) as nascent CALYPSO code, but shows faster speed for larger clusters (Fig. S9). Following DFT calculations of energetics were performed via a PWmat software package [54,55] in a plane-wave pseudopotential basis set, with a 20 Å vacuum space set in the x, y and z directions. Spin polarization was considered in all the calculations. Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange correlation functional [56] with SG15 pseudopotential and DFT-D2 van der Waals corrections were applied in the calculations. A Hubbard-U model based on PWmat code was employed to correct the strong-correlation Coulomb interaction between d-orbital electrons on Co atoms.
We also conducted independent basin-hopping global-minimum search using TGMin code to conclusively determine the cluster structure of Co13O8. Also, DFT calculations were carried out with Gaussian-16 quantum chemical package [57]. Using the standard 6-311G basis set augmented by 3df polarization, the molecular orbitals and ELF patterns are calculated by combining Becke's exchange and Perdew–Wang's correlation functionals (denoted BPW91). The program package of Multiwfn [58] is utilized to analyze the ELF and orbitals. Further sophisticated calculations of electronic structure and NICS [40–43] were performed via ADF code [59].
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the work team of DUV laser in Physical and Chemical Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The computational work was partly performed using the supercomputers at Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology.
Contributor Information
Lijun Geng, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Mouyi Weng, School of Advanced Materials, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Cong-Qiao Xu, Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Hanyu Zhang, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Chaonan Cui, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Haiming Wu, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Xin Chen, School of Advanced Materials, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Mingyu Hu, School of Advanced Materials, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Hai Lin, School of Advanced Materials, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zhen-Dong Sun, School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China; School of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Kashi University, Kashgar 844006, China.
Xi Wang, College of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Han-Shi Hu, Department of Chemistry and Key Laboratory of Organic Optoelectronics and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Jun Li, Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; Department of Chemistry and Key Laboratory of Organic Optoelectronics and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Jiaxin Zheng, School of Advanced Materials, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zhixun Luo, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Feng Pan, School of Advanced Materials, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jiannian Yao, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Advanced Materials, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
FUNDING
The computational work was partly sponsored by the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis (2020B121201002). Financial support for this work was provided by the National Project Development of Advanced Scientific Instruments Based on Deep Ultraviolet Laser Source (Y31M0112C1), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21722308, 21802146, 91536105, 91645203 and 21590792), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0700600) and the CAS Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences (QYZDBSSW-SLH024).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
L.G. and H.Z. conducted the experiments; M.W. conducted the main calculations; X.C., M.H., C.-Q.X., H.-S.H. and J.L. contributed to the theoretical calculations and analyses; Z.L., F.P. and J.Y. contributed to the design of this project. All authors contributed to analyzing the data and writing the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kroto HW, Heath JR, Obrien SCet al. C60: buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985; 318: 162–3. 10.1038/318162a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li J, Li X, Zhai H-Jet al. Au20: a tetrahedral cluster. Science 2003; 299: 864–7. 10.1126/science.1079879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Guo BC, Kerns KP, Castleman AW Jr.. Ti8C12+-metallo-carbohedrenes: a new class of molecular clusters? Science 1992; 255: 1411–3. 10.1126/science.255.5050.1411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martin TP. Shells of atoms. Phys Rep 1996; 273: 199–241. 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00083-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bergeron DE, Castleman AW Jr, Morisato Tet al. Formation of Al13I−: evidence for the superhalogen character of Al13. Science 2004; 304: 84–7. 10.1126/science.1093902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bergeron DE, Roach PJ, Castleman AW Jret al. Al cluster superatoms as halogens in polyhalides and as alkaline earths in iodide salts. Science 2005; 307: 231–5. 10.1126/science.1105820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luo Z, Castleman AW Jr, Khanna SN. Reactivity of metal clusters. Chem Rev 2016; 116: 14456–92. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reber AC, Khanna SN. Superatoms: electronic and geometric effects on reactivity. Acc Chem Res 2017; 50: 255–63. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brack M. The physics of simple metal clusters: self-consistent jellium model and semiclassical approaches. Rev Mod Phys 1993; 65: 677–732. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.677 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lange T, Göhlich H, Näher Uet al. Shell-dependent reactivity of sodium clusters with oxygen. Chem Phys Lett 1992; 192: 544–6. 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85513-A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luo Z, Castleman AW Jr. Special and general superatoms. Acc Chem Res 2014; 47: 2931–40. 10.1021/ar5001583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jena P, Sun Q. Super atomic clusters: design rules and potential for building blocks of materials. Chem Rev 2018; 118: 5755–80. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Luo Z, Gamboa GU, Smith JCet al. Spin accommodation and reactivity of silver clusters with oxygen: the enhanced stability of Ag13−. J Am Chem Soc 2012; 134: 18973–8. 10.1021/ja303268w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Walter M, Akola J, Lopez-Acevedo Oet al. A unified view of ligand-protected gold clusters as superatom complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 9157–62. 10.1073/pnas.0801001105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang H, Wang Y, Huang Het al. All-thiol-stabilized Ag44 and Au12Ag32 nanoparticles with single-crystal structures. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2422. 10.1038/ncomms3422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kambe T, Haruta N, Imaoka Tet al. Solution-phase synthesis of Al13− using a dendrimer template. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 2046. 10.1038/s41467-017-02250-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Higaki T, Li Q, Zhou Met al. Toward the tailoring chemistry of metal nanoclusters for enhancing functionalities. Acc Chem Res 2018; 51: 2764–73. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xu GT, Wu LL, Chang XYet al. Solvent-induced cluster-to-cluster transformation of homoleptic gold(I) thiolates: between catenane and ring-in-ring structures. Angew Chem Int Ed 2019; 58: 16297–306. 10.1002/anie.201909980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jia Y, Luo Z. Thirteen-atom metal clusters for genetic materials. Coord Chem Rev 2019; 400: 213053. 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roach PJ, Reber AC, Woodward WHet al. Al4H7− is a resilient building block for aluminum hydrogen cluster materials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 14565–9. 10.1073/pnas.0706613104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abreu MB, Powell C, Reber ACet al. Ligand-induced active sites: reactivity of iodine-protected aluminum superatoms with methanol. J Am Chem Soc 2012; 134: 20507–12. 10.1021/ja309473s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kapiloff E, Ervin KM. Reactions of cobalt cluster anions with oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon monoxide. J Phys Chem A 1997; 101: 8460–9. 10.1021/jp972404s [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xie Y, Dong F, Heinbuch Set al. Oxidation reactions on neutral cobalt oxide clusters: experimental and theoretical studies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010; 12: 947–59. 10.1039/B915590B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gutsev GL, Belay KG, Bozhenko KVet al. A comparative study of small 3d-metal oxide (FeO)n, (CoO)n, and (NiO)n clusters. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2016; 18: 27858–67. 10.1039/C6CP03241A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Parks EK, Klots TD, Winter BJet al. Reactions of cobalt clusters with water and ammonia: implications for cluster structure. J Chem Phys 1993; 99: 5831–9. 10.1063/1.465935 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Andersson M, Persson JL, Rosen A. Reactivity of Fen, Con, and Cun clusters with O2 and D2 studied at single-collision conditions. J Phys Chem 1996; 100: 12222–34. 10.1021/jp960889z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu X, Zhao L, Jin Jet al. Observation of alkaline earth complexes M(CO)8 (M = Ca, Sr, or Ba) that mimic transition metals. Science 2018; 361: 912–6. 10.1126/science.aau0839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang S, Knickelbein MB. Photoionization studies of transition metal clusters: ionization potentials for Fen and Con. J Chem Phys 1990; 93: 1533–9. 10.1063/1.459131 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hales DA, Su C-X, Lian Let al. Collision‐induced dissociation of Con+ (n = 2–18) with Xe: bond energies of cationic and neutral cobalt clusters, dissociation pathways, and structures. J Chem Phys 1994; 100: 1049–57. 10.1063/1.466636 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lide DR. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burgert R, Schnockel H, Grubisic Aet al. Spin conservation accounts for aluminum cluster anion reactivity pattern with O2. Science 2008; 319: 438–42. 10.1126/science.1148643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Luo Z, Reber AC, Jia Met al. What determines if a ligand activates or passivates a superatom cluster? Chem Sci 2016; 7: 3067–74. 10.1039/C5SC04293C [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Luo Z, Grover CJ, Reber ACet al. Probing the magic numbers of aluminum–magnesium cluster anions and their reactivity toward oxygen. J Am Chem Soc 2013; 135: 4307–13. 10.1021/ja310467n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Neumaier M, Olzmann M, Kiran Bet al. The reaction rates of O2 with closed-shell and open-shell Alx− and Gax− clusters under single-collision conditions: experimental and theoretical investigations toward a generally valid model for the hindered reactions of O2 with metal atom clusters. J Am Chem Soc 2014; 136: 3607–16. 10.1021/ja4125548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li Z-Q, Gu B-L. Electronic-structure calculations of cobalt clusters. Phys Rev B 1993; 47: 13611–4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.13611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Alonso-Lanza T, Ayuela A, Aguilera-Granja F. Chemical bonding of transition-metal Co13 clusters with graphene. ChemPhysChem 2015; 16: 3700–10. 10.1002/cphc.201500692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang Q, Sun Q, Sakurai Met al. Geometry and electronic structure of magic iron oxide clusters. Phys Rev B 1999; 59: 12672–7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12672 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sun Q, Wang Q, Parlinski Ket al. First-principles studies on the intrinsic stability of the magic Fe13O8 cluster. Phys Rev B 2000; 61: 5781–5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.5781 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao Y, Chen X, Li J. TGMin: a global-minimum structure search program based on a constrained basin-hopping algorithm. Nano Res 2017; 10: 3407–20. 10.1007/s12274-017-1553-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Elser V, Haddon RC. Icosahedral C: an aromatic molecule with a vanishingly small ring current magnetic susceptibility. Nature 1987; 325: 792–4. 10.1038/325792a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.von Ragué Schleyer P, Maerker C, Dransfeld Aet al. Nucleus-independent chemical shifts: a simple and efficient aromaticity probe. J Am Chem Soc 1996; 118: 6317–8. 10.1021/ja960582d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen Z, Corminboeu C, Heine Tet al. Do all-metal antiaromatic clusters exist. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125: 13930–1. 10.1021/ja0361392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen ZF, Wannere CS, Corminboeuf Cet al. Nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS) as an aromaticity criterion. Chem Rev 2005; 105: 3842–88. 10.1021/cr030088+ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Becke AD, Edgecombe KE. A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J Chem Phys 1990; 92: 5397–403. 10.1063/1.458517 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jusélius J, Sundholm D, Gauss J. Calculation of current densities using gauge-including atomic orbitals. J Chem Phys 2004; 121: 3952–63. 10.1063/1.1773136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fliegl H, Taubert S, Lehtonen Oet al. The gauge including magnetically induced current method. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011; 13: 20500–18. 10.1039/c1cp21812c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boldyrev AI, Wang L-S. All-metal aromaticity and antiaromaticity. Chem Rev 2005; 105: 3716–57. 10.1021/cr030091t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cui P, Hu HS, Zhao Bet al. A multicentre-bonded [Zn(I)]8 cluster with cubic aromaticity. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 6331. 10.1038/ncomms7331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hu HC, Hu HS, Zhao Bet al. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) of a cubic metal cluster with multicentered MnI–MnI bonds. Angew Chem Int Ed 2015; 54: 11681–5. 10.1002/anie.201504758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aguilera-del-Toro RH, Aguilera-Granja F, Vega Aet al. Structure, fragmentation patterns, and magnetic properties of small cobalt oxide clusters. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014; 16: 21732–41. 10.1039/C4CP03370A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang H, Wu H, Jia Yet al. An integrated instrument of DUV-IR photoionization mass spectrometry and spectroscopy for neutral clusters. Rev Sci Instrum 2019; 90: 073101. 10.1063/1.5108994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lv J, Wang Y, Zhu Let al. Particle-swarm structure prediction on clusters. J Chem Phys 2012; 137: 084104. 10.1063/1.4746757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Weng M, Wang Z, Qian Get al. Identify crystal structures by a new paradigm based on graph theory for building materials big data. Sci China Chem 2019; 62: 982–6. 10.1007/s11426-019-9502-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jia W, Cao Z, Wang Let al. The analysis of a plane wave pseudopotential density functional theory code on a GPU machine. Comput Phys Commun 2013; 184: 9–18. 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.08.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jia W, Fu J, Cao Zet al. Fast plane wave density functional theory molecular dynamics calculations on multi-GPU machines. J Comput Phys 2013; 251: 102–15. 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.05.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 1996; 77: 3865–8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HBet al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc., 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lu T, Chen F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem 2012; 33: 580–92. 10.1002/jcc.22885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Velde GT, Bickelhaupt FM, Baerends EJet al. Chemistry with ADF. J Comput Chem 2001; 22: 931–67. 10.1002/jcc.1056 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




