Skip to main content
FEMS Microbiology Ecology logoLink to FEMS Microbiology Ecology
. 2021 Oct 8;97(11):fiab140. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab140

Knowledge gaps in the assessment of antimicrobial resistance in surface waters

Magdalena Niegowska 1, Isabella Sanseverino 2, Anna Navarro 3, Teresa Lettieri 4,
PMCID: PMC8528692  PMID: 34625810

ABSTRACT

The spread of antibiotic resistance in the water environment has been widely described. However, still many knowledge gaps exist regarding the selection pressure from antibiotics, heavy metals and other substances present in surface waters as a result of anthropogenic activities, as well as the extent and impact of this phenomenon on aquatic organisms and humans. In particular, the relationship between environmental concentrations of antibiotics and the acquisition of ARGs by antibiotic-sensitive bacteria as well as the impact of heavy metals and other selective agents on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) need to be defined. Currently, established safety values are based on the effects of antibiotic toxicity neglecting the question of AMR spread. In turn, risk assessment of antibiotics in waterbodies remains a complex question implicating multiple variables and unknowns reinforced by the lack of harmonized protocols and official guidelines. In the present review, we discussed current state-of-the-art and the knowledge gaps related to pressure exerted by antibiotics and heavy metals on aquatic environments and their relationship to the spread of AMR. Along with this latter, we reflected on (i) the risk assessment in surface waters, (ii) selective pressures contributing to its transfer and propagation and (iii) the advantages of metagenomics in investigating AMR. Furthermore, the role of microplastics in co-selection for metal and antibiotic resistance, together with the need for more studies in freshwater are highlighted.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance (AMR), antibiotic resistance genes (ARG), antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB), co-resistance, water environment, metagenomics


The spread of antibiotic resistance in water environments is a complex issue affected by knowledge gaps relative to the (i) selection pressures, (ii) lack of harmonized assessment and (iii) methodological approaches, which require intense research efforts to estimate and limit the risk to human health.

INTRODUCTION

The widespread use and misuse of antibiotics, especially through direct use in healthcare practice and in food animal production, along with the release of their residue concentrations from wastewaters to the environment represent major contributors to the acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance (WHO 2014; O'Neill 2015; Kraemer, Ramachandran and Perron 2019; Polianciuc et al. 2020). With 700.000 deaths resulting from infections unresponsive to antibiotic therapies every year, the World Health Organization (WHO) included this phenomenon among the main threats to global health (WHO 2018a and 2020a) and the number is estimated to reach 10 million by 2050 if no action to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is taken (UN 2019). AMR is defined as the ability of a microorganism to withstand the effects of antimicrobial agents, including antibiotics and other compounds, that were initially able to treat the infection caused by that microorganism (WHO 2020b). Here, the acronym AMR is used when referring to a general effect of antibiotics and substances discussed further, while ‘antibiotic resistance’ refers to studies investigating resistance to antibiotics only when such term was specifically used in the source publication.

Lately, AMR has been defined a ‘slow moving pandemic’ with enormous impact for the society, the consequences of which are nowadays underestimated due to long time necessary to reach the maximum extent (NPR 2020). Over recent years, excessive and improper use of antibiotics has been addressed by the European Commission first (EC COM(2011)748) and other international authorities (WHO 2014; O'Neill 2016) with emphasis on global surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in humans and animals. Further, One Health European strategies and joint recommendations of WHO, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations and World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) highlighted the environmental contribution to AMR, particularly the role of polluted waterbodies (EC COM (2017) 339; WHO, FAO and OIE 2020).

At European level, the amended Water Framework Directive (WFD) includes the Watch List (WL) program which aims to gather good data quality for substances contaminating waterbodies to determine the risk they may pose to the aquatic environments (EC 2018). Given the threat on public health posed by the spread of AMR through waterbodies, three antibiotics belonged to the macrolide class (azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin) were introduced in the first WL (Calvalho et al. 2015), followed by two additional antibiotics (amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin) in the revised WL (Loos et al. 2018) and more recently sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and other antimicrobials (azole antifungal agents) have been included in the 3rd WL (Gomez Cortes et al. 2020; EC 2020a). The latter are substances either used as pharmaceuticals or pesticides which raised concern for their contribution to AMR spreading (Hendrickson et al. 2019). To minimize excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobials in animal and human healthcare, a 50% reduction of their sales for livestock and aquaculture by 2030 is one of the EU objectives within Farm to Fork Strategy (EC 2020b), while development of alternatives or novel antimicrobials, review of legislation to restrict and optimize their use along with non-legislative measures against AMR are foreseen by the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe (EC 2020c). In addition, expanded environmental monitoring and improved environmental risk assessment of medicinal products, including antibiotics and ARG, are among ongoing actions under the EU Strategic Approach to Pharmaceuticals in the Environment (EC 2019a).

Antibiotics enter surface water compartments mainly with hospital and urban wastewaters, industrial wastewaters (in particular from pharmaceutical production facilities), leachate from waste disposal sites, agricultural runoff from fields fertilized with manure and aquaculture practice (Baquero, Martínez and Cantón 2008; Kraemer, Ramachandran and Perron 2019). Among natural, semi-synthetic and synthetic antibiotics, many are poorly biodegradable and contribute to the spread of AMR by persisting in the environment (Ingreslev and Halling-Sørensen 2000; Kümmerer 2009; Adamek, Baran and Sobczak 2016; Reis et al. 2019; Rodriguez-Mozaz et al. 2020). For example, erythromycin has been considered not readily biodegradable raising a very high level of concern reagrding persistance (UBA 2014). Amoxicillin, which is the most widely used semi-synthetic β-lactam antibiotic recommended as first or second line therapy for common infection diseases, has a half-life in water of ∼20 days at pH 7 (Loos et al. 2018; WHO 2018b). However, a high consumption of more degradable antibiotics (e.g. β-lactams which are highly unstable in the environment) determines constant emissions of antibiotic residues and their metabolites by wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) at faster rates than their environmental removal. This results in the continuous presence of antibiotics at low concentrations in water environments where they can be degraded to metabolites that retain antimicrobial activity. Moreover, it has been shown that conventional wastewater treatment processes remove antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) at limited efficiencies, leading in certain cases to their increase in final effluents (Ferreira et al. 2006 and 2007; Zhang, Zhang and Fang 2009; Łuczkiewicz et al. 2010; Novo et al. 2013; Rodríguez-Chueca et al. 2019). This issue has been raised in the evaluation of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and follow up actions including possible upgrading of WWTP to more advanced technologies as well as revision of the UWWTD are expected (EC 2019b).

ARB constitute a potentially unlimited source of ARGs which can be replicated and disseminated among connected aquatic systems and organisms worldwide even when the selective pressure from environmental antibiotic residues disappears (Salyers and Amábile-Cuevas 1997; Pruden, Arabi and Storteboom 2012). The risk of clinically relevant ARG transfer from water environments to animal or human pathogens and vice versa has been widely hypothesized, especially in relation to impacted settings and resistance to last resort antibiotics (Cabello et al. 2016; Jiang et al. 2017; Marathe et al. 2017; Santos and Ramos 2018; Ben et al. 2019). However, it is uncertain to which extent this risk is due to various environmental pathways of discharged antibiotics (Bengtsson-Palme, Kristiansson and Larsson 2017).

Despite limited studies estimating daily intake of antibiotics through food consumption (Ben et al. 2019) and the documented presence of antibiotics, ARB and ARGs in the human gut (Casals-Pascual, Vergara and Vila 2018), the question of ARG spread and its impact on human gut microbiome has not been sufficiently addressed. Also, the spread of ARGs through the application of manure as soil fertilizers and their further transfer to surface waters is complex and needs more accurate estimates (Heuer, Schmitt and Smalla 2011; Udikovic-Kolic et al. 2014; Topp et al. 2018).

Although a large body of scientific literature reports the presence of antibiotics in surface waters and studies focused on genes involved in AMR, mechanisms leading to the selection and acquisition of resistance determinants by bacterial strains as well as ARG maintenance in aquatic environments remain elusive. At policy level, no safety threshold values or standardized guidelines on the environmental risk assessment of antibiotics currently exist, which is largely due to insufficient data on environmentally relevant concentrations (Schmitt, ter Laak and Duis 2017). Here, we briefly discuss the risk assessment of AMR in aquatic environments as a link between the acquisition of resistance by sensitive bacteria and risk to human health. In particular, we focus on areas characterized by low anthropogenic impact and on the application of metagenomics for environmental AMR detection. We also review the current state-of-the-art and knowledge gaps related to the relationship between the concentrations of antibiotics and the acquisition of ARGs by antibiotic-sensitive bacteria, paying attention to the unknowns involving the impact of heavy metals and other indirect selective agents on AMR.

RISK ASSESSMENT AND BIOAVAILABILITY OF ANTIBIOTICS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS

In the WFD, the assessment of priority substances and other substances of concern is based on environmental quality standards (EQS) referring to concentrations established for single chemicals at which adverse effects in humans and aquatic wildlife may be elicited (EC 2000). This parameter, however, translates only the toxicological potential of a compound without considering the spread of ARGs among microorganisms and underestimating the threat of resistant infections. The need to include AMR in the risk assessment was envisaged in the 3rd WL program, as for the sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, the predicted no-effect concentrations (PNEC) based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), were additionally evaluated to be proposed as safety thresholds (Bengtsson-Palme and Larsson 2016). However, these values were only selected if lower than the PNEC value, based on ecotoxicological data, to be more protective towards the aquatic ecosystem (Gomez Cortes et al. 2020).

According to antibiotic concentrations reported in Europe, mean values in surface water are equal or close to 0.01 µg L–1 for most antibiotics, however levels from less than 0.001 µg L–1 to over 1 µg L–1 were also observed (Sanseverino et al. 2019). At the same time, antibiotic concentrations in WWTP effluents worldwide ranged from 0.002 to 1.4 µg L–1 (Sanseverino et al. 2019). The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommends a tiered approach to assess ecotoxicological risk from pharmaceuticals in surface waters with concentration threshold of 10 ng L–1 derived from predicted environmental concentration (PEC) proposed as safety limit (except for substances such as endocrine disruptors or antiparasitics eliciting effects in biota at lower concentrations) (EMA 2018). Two-phase toxicity testing procedure, including Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) growth rate bioassays in cyanobacteria suggested for antibiotics, should be performed entirely to identify medicinal products which may affect organisms. Similar to EQS, these guidelines do not refer to the limitation of AMR which can occur in the presence of even lower antibiotic concentrations in water environments (Chen et al. 2017; Oberlé et al. 2012).

In several recent studies, the potential risk of antibiotics on aquatic organisms and AMR selection has been evaluated using risk quotient (RQ) method according to the EMA guideline, based on the ratio between PEC or measured effect concentration (MEC) and predicted no effect concentration (PNEC), the latter only derived from ecotoxicological data (EMA 2018). Despite low RQ in main Chinese rivers and coastal areas, the risk from some antibiotics was estimated to be significant due to their persistence resulting from high usage and inefficient removal, with algae particularly affected by sulfadiazine (Chen et al. 2017; Qiu et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2012). This approach was adopted to evaluate risk at three trophic levels including algae, invertebrates, and fish in Hong Kong rivers, where antibiotics exerted major impact on algal species (Deng, Li and Ying 2018).

To consider effects from antibiotic mixtures, Chen et al. (2018) estimated the toxicity to cyanobacteria and microalgae that may arise from synergistic action of four antibiotics based on concentrations detected in environmental samples, highlighting the increased risk compared to substances assessed individually (Hossain et al. 2017). In few studies, ecological risk from selected antibiotics has been reported for primary producers in aquaculture environments based on short-term exposure data (Bengtsson-Palme and Larsson 2016; Quinlan et al. 2011; Sun et al. 2016).

As PNEC values inform about the adverse effects, such as growth inhibition, elicited in organisms by environmental pressure, RQ has been used by some authors to evaluate fractions of bacteria with acquired resistance. Enrofloxacin, ampicillin and levofloxacin showed to pose a high risk of AMR by microbial communities in an experimental aquaculture pond including target and non-target species (Hossain et al. 2017). A dose-series exposure of freshwater periphyton to tetracycline in an experimental mesocosm mimicking natural stream conditions proved that antibiotic resistance and significant changes in the biotic community are induced within few days by concentrations of the antibiotic currently observed in aquatic environments (0.5 μg L–1) (Quinlan et al. 2011). In a literature-based prediction comprising data on MIC, PNEC values were estimated for a wide range of antibiotics at levels from 8 ng L–1 to 64 μg L–1 (Bengtsson-Palme and Larsson 2016).

The association between levels of resistance detected in water and environmental occurrence of antibiotics may be affected by site-specific factors and by intrinsic characteristics of the compound, therefore RQ may not be true for the same antibiotic in different scenarios. Variation of environmental conditions, such as salinity and pH, and physicochemical properties of antimicrobial molecules may influence the bioavailability of antibiotics, e.g. by determining changes in sorption capacity to decomposing organic matter (Xu and Li 2010; Zhang et al. 2018). A large body of evidence indicates that the co-occurrence of multiple chemicals, such as antibiotics and metals, in waterbodies and the presence of mobilizable ARGs (e.g. in plasmids or transducing phage particles) promote the AMR development (Lood, Ertürk and Mattiasson 2017; Schmitt, ter Laak and Duis 2017). Finally, biological features typical to each bacterial species differentially regulate their exposure and susceptibility to bioactive compounds through biofilm formation or complex cell-to-cell communication networks (Schroeder, Brooks and Brooks 2017).

Although no indications for ARG monitoring in environmental waters are currently in place (FAO 2019), discussions of the Working Group Chemicals under the WFD are at good progress. Inclusion of antibiotics and ARGs for monitoring in soil has been achieved thus far within the Land Use and Coverage Area frame Survey (LUCAS) under the EU Strategic Approach to Pharmaceuticals in the Environment (EC 2020c).

Main knowledge gaps underlying AMR spread not only refer to the relationship between antibiotics and ARGs as self-replicating elements but also to the abundance of resistant pathogenic bacterial species, their sources and behavior in the environment (FAO 2019). Risk assessment methods must therefore specifically consider a type of microbial community present in a waterbody and ARGs showing different rate of transmission that correlates with co-occurrence of pollutants or their transformation products. In this context, AMR surveillance in the water environment should be strictly linked to chemical monitoring which requires development of standardized protocols allowing interlaboratory comparison of results and reduction of possible technical errors.

CORRELATION BETWEEN ANTIBIOTIC CONCENTRATIONS AND ARG

Despite evidence linking the transfer of ARGs between clinical settings and environmental compartments subjected to anthropogenic pressure, a real correlation with antibiotic concentrations is missing (Ben et al. 2019). Numerous studies reporting the presence of antibiotics and ARGs in environmental samples do not describe actual resistance of bacteria verified by experimental exposure. On the other hand, bacteria able to grow on culture media supplemented with antibiotics are not always screened for the acquired ARGs using culture-independent methods as a confirmatory step of resistance observed in vitro.

Culture-independent methods, mainly PCR-based and high throughput sequencing, provide means to assess genetic material by detection and/or quantification of ARGs from entire microbial pool including unculturable microorganisms but do not consider their functional capability (Luby et al. 2016; Vaz-Moreira, Nunes and Manaia 2014). In vitro testing can overcome this gap only in a remarkably small fraction of microbial species capable of growing under laboratory conditions which does not necessarily reflect the real scenario (Allen et al. 2010). Indeed, numerous species and genotypes present in complex natural communities may be markedly sensitive to antibiotics with respect to pure strains used in laboratory experiments and therefore taken over by more tolerant bacteria (Zhang et al. 2011). In this context, antibiotic concentrations able to promote AMR under laboratory conditions, which are lower than those inhibiting bacterial growth (Andersson and Hughes 2012), may not correspond to levels eliciting the same effect in the environment.

In a study combining culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches, culturable bacteria bearing plasmid-mediated resistance genes to antibiotics frequently used in marine aquaculture were isolated (Buschmann et al. 2012). Nonetheless, the examined antibiotics could not be detected in the counterpart sediment samples, probably due to biodegradation or water currents causing a high dispersal of materials (Buschmann et al. 2012). In water samples from impacted sites, a significant correlation between antibiotic concentrations, resistant bacteria and sulfonamide resistant dihydropteroate synthase (sul1) gene variant conferring resistance to sulfonamide antibiotics was found when comparing raw wastewater influent and a final effluent (Gao, Munir and Xagoraraki 2012). The drop of sulfonamides concentrations throughout the WWTP from initial 1535.9 ng L–1 to 261.1 ng L–1 corresponded to almost 3 log reduction of colony-forming units (CFU) of bacteria screened on antibiotic-selective culture media (3.09×103 CFU/mL in final effluent) and to 2 log decrease in sul1 gene abundance quantified by real-time PCR. This example underlines the potential of ARGs and bacteria carrying these resistance genes to persist despite adverse conditions such as wastewater treatment processes and to be dislocated by natural forces like water currents.

Thus far, combined analysis describing a correlation between the concentrations of antibiotics and resistance genes has been performed in few studies (Yang et al. 2018). Inability to find significant correlations may be due to several factors. It has been partially explained by changes in the prevalence of resistance which is developed at generally very slow rates compared to the use of antibiotics which can follow rapid variations.

In aquatic ecosystems, antibiotics and ARG are subject to differential environmental fate. While events such as degradation through hydrolysis and photolysis, sorption to sediments and organic substances or dispersion through transport may affect the limit of detection of antibiotics, the rate of ARG decay following a similar fate may differ (Nnadozie and Odume 2019). Diverse environmental matrices (i.e. surface water, sediments, soil from a drawdown area) are also determinant in shaping ARG dynamics either for genes common to all or for those specifically found in a given habitat (Chen et al. 2019). Moreover, the selection for ARGs can be influenced by chemical pollutants, in particular heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), which exert a selective pressure for the occurrence of ARGs in the environment (Nguyen et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2017a). Finally, methods used for the detection of ARGs are rarely uniform in published literature and hardly focus on all available gene variants conferring resistance to a single antibiotic. Instead, testing methods usually include only selected ARGs that may not be representative of all gene variants within the population. Establishing such relationships needs therefore a holistic assessment to identify possible paths that ARGs follow starting from the source of antibiotics’ release to the environment which is the main determinant of downstream genetic AMR pool.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS OF ANTIBIOTICS AND STUDIES ON LOW-IMPACT AREAS

The investigation of natural resistance is crucial to establish the abundance of ARB and ARGs in the environmental background as a reference point to understand the extent to which anthropogenic impact contributes to the ARG spread. Even at low concentrations, antibiotic pressure can lead to the acquisition and expression of ARGs (Murray et al. 2021) which increase in abundance along with the proliferation of resistant bacteria and can be exponentially propagated in the environment as resistance to single or multiple antibiotics by numerous microbial species (Fig. 1). At the same time, ARGs can be released from bacteria due to the lysis of dead cells and secretion from live cells in membrane vesicles or packed within phages constituting the extracellular ARG pool (Dong et al. 2019; Woegerbauer, Bellanger and Merlin 2020; Zhang et al. 2018a). In turn, some of these ARGs can be uptaken by competent bacteria through natural transformation or phage-assisted DNA transfer leading to AMR (Woegerbauer, Bellanger and Merlin 2020).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Synergistic effects of antibiotics and ARGs on the spread of AMR. ARGs can be acquired by sensitive bacteria following exposure to antibiotics present in the environment. This may occur through several pathways such as 1. HGT through conjugation with already resistant bacteria, transformation with plasmids or membrane vesicles carrying ARGs, transduction by phages and/or uptake of free-floating extracellular DNA; 2. Mutations selecting for resistance in genes encoding key bacterial proteins which are antibiotic targets (e.g. mutations in gyrA and gyrB which are responsible for resistance to fluoroquinolones, and mutations in rpoB which confer resistance to rifampicin) while other genes may encode enzymes able to actively degrade antibiotics (e.g. β-lactamases); and 3. Expression of silent resistance genes. Much more severe pressure due to antibiotic use in human and veterinary medicine also results in the expression of resistance in exposed microorganisms. ARGs released from lysed cells may be uptaken from waterbodies by sensitive microorganisms or those already bearing other resistance genes, in the latter case leading to multidrug resistance. Vertical gene transfer due to the proliferation of resistant bacteria further contributes to the spread of AMR.

Antibiotic resistance can also be induced by mutations selecting for resistance and expression of silent resistance genes (Enne et al. 2006; Lupo, Coyne and Berendonk 2012; Woodford and Ellington 2007). These mechanisms have recently been discussed in a European technical report on the contribution of water to AMR, also providing relative concentrations of antibiotics detected in samples from surface waters worldwide (Sanseverino et al. 2019). Similarly, lists of ARGs identified in diverse types of environmental matrices are available (Zhang et al.2009; Zhuang et al. 2021).

Even though the presence of antibiotics and ARGs in anthropogenically impacted environments is already widely discussed, the phenomenon of AMR spread to non-impacted areas carries many unknowns and is poorly described (Hooban et al. 2020; Smalla et al. 2018). Studies on these areas are challenging due to the background resistance which microorganisms develop upon exposure to various stimuli (e.g. nutrient status, hypoxia) and to the naturally-occurring resistance such as i) intrinsic resistance independent of any selective pressure and not acquired by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (Cox and Wright 2013), or ii) silent resistance genes able to confer AMR only when expressed in other than their native hosts (Dantas and Sommer 2012). Further, antibiotic-producing bacteria contribute to the natural level of antimicrobial metabolites (e.g. streptomycin, aminoglycosides, β-lactams) in the environment, bearing in turn specific ARGs as self-defense mechanisms (Al-Amoudi et al. 2016; D'Costa et al. 2011; van der Meij et al. 2017). For example, nitric oxide can induce resistance to aminoglycosides by blocking aerobic respiration and energy-dependent phases of antibiotic uptake (McCollister et al. 2011). Consequently, pollution by ARB can be considered when increased fraction of resistant bacteria is observed with respect to normal levels of natural resistance.

It is recognized that remote regions may bear evidence of AMR derived from human activities due to transport of ARB and ARGs in the environment contributing to the conversion of pristine habitats into low-impact areas. Such trends have been demonstrated by detection of human-specific mitochondrial gene target in Arctic marine sediments (Tan et al. 2018) and poor correlation of ARGs and class 1 integrases (intI1) genes with the degree of anthropogenic impact (Zhang et al. 2020). When evaluating the association between antibiotic concentrations and ARGs in sediments from sites along Poudre River (United States of America) subjected to different anthropogenic pressures, bacteria resistant to tetracyclines and sulfonamides were found in the low-impact area at the river source devoid of antibiotics (Pei et al. 2006). The numbers of ARB increased downstream proportionally to the impact of urban and agricultural activities. Similar observations were made based on metagenomics profiles from samples along the Yarlung Tsangpo River (Tibetan Plateau), where ARGs present already at the source, mainly bacA conferring resistance to bacitracin, increased with the human activities (Liu et al. 2021a). Additionally, abundant ARGs showed lower diversity, were less prone to dispersal compared to rare gene targets and differently impacted by the land use, urbanization and dam construction (Liu et al. 2021b). The two last activities increased the presence of genes conferring resistance to sulfonamide/tetracycline and chloramphenicol/aminoglycoside, respectively. In another study, ARGs were investigated among bacterial communities in freshwater sediment from the Patagonian island Tierra del Fuego characterized by extremely low degree of urbanization (Nardelli et al. 2012). The outcomes revealed the presence of class 1 integrons grouped within the most successful elements involved in acquisition, maintenance and spread of AMR in clinical settings (Fluit and Schmitz 2004; Hall and Collis 1998; Mazel 2006). Similar results were obtained from environments hardly affected by any kind of human activity such as deep terrestrial subsurface where 90% of isolates carried ARGs to at least one antibiotic (Brown and Balkwill 2008). Other remote areas including Antarctic soils, glacier lakes and deep ocean sediments showed the presence of ARG, although different from genes conferring resistance in urban or agricultural areas, suggesting that a historical ARG reservoir evolved as a mechanism of microbial adaptation to face the selective pressures of the environment (Chen et al. 2013 and 2016; Patel and Rosenthal 2007; Van Goethem et al. 2018; Wang and Sun 2017). In line with these findings, antibiotic resistance has been detected in commensal bacteria of humans and animals inhabiting regions not subjected to antimicrobial use (Pallecchi et al. 2008).

A thorough investigation is needed to understand whether AMR detected in low-impact areas has natural background or if it results from the spread of ARG and resistant bacteria originating from areas impacted by human activities. Another challenge would be to estimate the impact of natural resistance on AMR propagation upon exposure to discharged antimicrobial compounds. Such assessment might be highly complicated by river flows and marine currents which contribute to dispersing introduced antibiotics, thereby lowering their levels to environmental concentrations. At the same time, more efforts should be dedicated to analyze the effects from environmentally realistic concentrations of antibiotics outside areas such as WWTPs which often reflect worst-case scenarios.

AMR AND PRESSURE FROM ANTIBIOTIC METABOLITES AND HEAVY METALS

The distribution of antibiotics in surface water may not be representative of compartments where utilization and sorption of antibiotic residues is more intense due to different rates of degradation in the environment and excretion from exposed organisms. As demonstrated by numerous studies, partitioning properties determine uneven distribution between water and sediments (Chen and Zhou 2014; Lei, Lu and Liu 2015; Li et al. 2018) while different sorption strengths to organic or inorganic phase may hamper the extraction of total antibiotic amounts for analytical purposes (Schmitt, ter Laak and Duis 2017). For this reason, particular attention should be paid when selecting the type of environmental matrix for risk assessment.

Certain metabolites have as well been shown to influence AMR. The excretion rate of antibiotics in an unchanged form may reach 90% in human and animal urine (Schmitt, ter Laak and Duis 2017; Sarmah, Meyer and Boxall 2006) with the remaining fraction of metabolites that may contain bioactive moieties. The degradation processes of antibiotics in aquatic environments may result in the release of metabolites which retain antimicrobial activity at the same or even increased level compared to their parent compounds (Berkner, Konradi and Schönfeld 2014; Jaén-Gil et al. 2020; Majewsky, Glauner and Horn 2015). This is the case for transformation products of sulfamethoxazole (García-Galán, Silvia Díaz-Cruz and Barceló 2008), one of the most important antibiotics monitored in European surface waters (Sanseverino et al. 2019). Similar to antibiotics, a complete elimination of their metabolites through water treatment processes is not attained (Majewsky et al. 2014), which implies the need of monitoring the concentrations of bioactive substances that may be generated during physiological metabolization and natural degradation of antibiotics. However, such solutions are hardly achievable in real scenarios, reason for which monitoring of the most relevant degradation products may be the first step in this approach.

Alongside antibiotics, heavy metals from natural and anthropogenic sources are widely distributed in water environments. Elevated environmental exposure to metals has raised an ecological and public health concern linked to the effects of metal toxicity (Bradl 2005; EEA 2018). An increasing scientific evidence demonstrates the relationship between molecular strategies developed by microbial species to resist pressure from a range of metals, antibiotics and the spread of AMR (Imran, Das and Naik 2019; Komijani et al. 2021; Pal et al. 2017; Poole 2017). It has been shown that metal resistance and antibiotic resistance in microorganisms are governed by shared genetic mechanisms and can be encoded by the same genetic elements (Randall et al. 2015). Similar findings have been described for cross-resistance to antibiotics and biocides (e.g. triclosan) (Carey and McNamara 2015; Gilbert and McBain 2003; SCENIR 2009; Webber et al. 2017). A study assessing the link between antibiotic and metal resistance in marine bacterial isolates found that most resistance genes were chromosomally located and identified homologs of efflux pump genes which are commonly expressed to overcome pressure from heavy metals and may further contribute to resistant phenotypes (Lloyd, Nazaret and Barkay 2018). Similar results were obtained among bacterial communities sampled from hot springs (Jardine, Mavumengwana and Ubomba-Jaswa 2019). In these low-impact environments an intrinsic or plasmid-related resistance has been suggested to drive antibiotic resistance and heavy metal tolerance, failing however to find a relative association (Jardine, Mavumengwana and Ubomba-Jaswa 2019).

Microplastics have recently been described as drivers of co-selection for resistance to heavy metals and antibiotics among bacteria associated with plastic particles (Imran, Das and Naik 2019). This results inter alia from major exposure due to the adsorption of heavy metals and antibiotics on the microplastic surface, which can be further increased by biofilm (Brennecke et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2017b). A study investigating the adsorption of five antibiotics (sulfadiazine, amoxicillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim) on various types of microplastics concluded that ciprofloxacin was most easily adsorbed to the assessed plastic materials with freshwater environment significantly increasing the adsorption capacity (Li et al. 2018). It has also been observed that the presence of metal ions such as Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cr3+ in aqueous solution enhances the adsorption of levofloxacin on polyvinyl microplastics (Yu et al. 2020). Moreover, microplastic-associated bacteria display a higher frequency of plasmid transfer compared to free-living bacteria or those in natural aggregates (Arias-Andres et al. 2018). In line with this finding, the abundance of int1 gene indicative of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in the microplastic-associated biofilm impacted by treated wastewaters increased proportionally to particle concentration, but not in the water surrounding the microplastic particles (Eckert et al. 2018). Likewise, microbial communities from marine microplastics displayed an average relative abundance of ARGs 5.69 times higher compared to seawater samples (Yang et al. 2019). Although microplastics provide surface allowing persistent colonization by environmental microorganisms and transport of potentially pathogenic ARB to new ecosystems (Shen et al. 2019), still a limited number of studies exist on their contribution to co-selection for resistance to heavy metals and antibiotics in the water environment. A major stability and persistence of heavy metals relative to antibiotics, which are more rapidly degraded in the environment, may constitute a long-term selective pressure enhancing AMR. In riverine microcosms, exposure to 50 and 100 μg L–1 of zinc or copper correlated with increased prevalence of bacteria intrinsically resistant to cefotaxime and kanamycin (Silva, Tacão and Henriques 2021). A paleontology study of pond sediments found that Zn concentrations and bioavailability correlated with the level of Zn tolerance, resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics and composition of culturable microbial isolates (Dickinson et al. 2019).

Considering the interconnection between confining soil and water environments, differentially impacted soils along the Savannah River (USA) were assessed for co-resistance in bacterial taxa (Thomas et al. 2020). Although ARG conferring vancomycin and multidrug resistance as well as metal resistance genes (MRG) were common to all sampling sites, their relative abundance was increased in areas impacted by metals and radionuclides compared to the reference low-impact site (Thomas et al. 2020). Yet, metal-rich matrices with co-occurring antibiotic residues, such as livestock manure and municipal WWTP, have been suggested to promote ARG transfer associated with higher ARG levels in comparison to clinical settings (Yuan et al. 2020).

Although intrinsic antimicrobial effects of some metals, in particular silver and mercury, may be elicited even at very low concentrations (Lemiere et al. 2013; Silver 2003), tolerance to exceptionally high concentration ranges was detected in non-urbanized areas, such as Antarctic marine waters and shallow sediments (10 mg L–1 for mercury, and varying for cadmium, copper, chromium and zinc depending on bacterial genus), and correlated with a double metal-antibiotic resistance in up to a 100% of samples (De Souza et al. 2006; Lo Giudice et al. 2013). Co-resistance driven by silver recently observed in hospital settings (Andrade et al. 2018) points at the risk of enhancing the phenomenon in aquatic environments through the dispersal of this metal into waterbodies that results from its broad use as a disinfecting agent.

Silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs), employed in a wide range of biomedical and consumer products such as sunscreens, have been reported to induce AMR in some bacterial strains after repeated exposure (Kaweeteerawat et al. 2017) and expression of efflux pump genes associated with resistance against heavy metals in bacteria from environmental samples (Chen et al. 2019). Likewise, dosing with Ag-NPs correlated with increased abundance of integrons in experimental wastewater reactors (Ma et al. 2016) and was associated with HGT (Lu et al. 2020). Although results on Ag-NP-mediated co-resistance provided by most authors are contradictory, the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) highlighted that unrestricted use of Ag-NPs may pose environmental pressure resulting in future generation and spread of AMR (SCENIR 2014). An additional question to be explored regards the effects of Ag-NP colloidal solutions formed upon contact with other chemical compounds on AMR development (Bundschuh et al. 2018).

Even though the extent to which metals and related molecular mechanisms promote co-selection of antibiotic resistance is still unclear, it has been recently demonstrated that sub-inhibitory concentrations of heavy metals present in water environments facilitate mutations or horizontal transfer of ARG and are able to induce resistance to antibiotics at environmentally relevant levels (Andersson and Hughes 2012; Xu et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2018b). In particular, exposure to 0.01 mg L–1 Cu(II), 0.01 mg L–1 Ag(I), 0.1 mg L–1 Cr(VI), and 0.05 mg L–1 Zn(II) was followed by downregulation of global regulatory genes (korA, korB and trbA) which resulted in increased expression of trbB and traF promoters by up to 5.1 folds (Zhang et al. 2018b). Proteins encoded by these two genes belong to the mating pair formation system involved in the establishment of conjugative bridges between cell surface proteins (Zatyka and Thomas 1998).

Such correlations appear stronger at short spatial scales and are lost with the distance from contamination source due to differences in fate of metals and antibiotics during transport (Kerrigan et al. 2018; Stepanauskas et al. 2006). Other studies reported antibiotic resistance to raise with decreasing concentrations of some heavy metals (lead, chromium, copper, zinc) present in the surrounding environment, although contrasting results have been obtained by different research groups (Seiler and Berendonk 2012; Zhou et al. 2015). In freshwater microcosms, 5 µg L–1 Cu concentrations increased the conjugative transfer 16 folds compared to control conditions (Wang et al. 2020).

Importantly, samples must be carefully selected for the assessment of metal-antibiotic synergistic actions. Sediments and microhabitats rich in organic matter (e.g. biofilm) attract metal deposition (Wright et al. 2006) meaning that concentrations measured in different matrices from the same site may show high variability.

METAGENOMICS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL AMR DETECTION

Metagenomics exploiting next generation technologies is a sequencing technique applied to analyze the entire genomic material from microbial communities with improved accuracy and deeper knowledge due to available databases. In environmental samples, this approach is useful in identifying and estimating relative gene abundance as a snapshot of microbial and genetic diversity including data relative to unculturable bacteria.

In recent years, metagenomics has been more frequently employed to investigate AMR in water environments giving a possibility to assess a large number of ARGs in one single experiment instead of performing multiple PCR/qPCR for each ARG one by one. Additional information can be obtained regarding the association with metal ion resistance (Reddy and Dubey 2019) and ways of ARG transmission by identifying key elements involved in gene mobilization in the entire bacterial community or in specific sample fractions, such as (MGEs) or phage genetic material (Chopyk et al. 2020; Moon et al. 2020; Pan et al. 2020; Raza et al. 2021). However, it is currently troublesome to compare the outcomes of various metagenomics studies due to complex data analysis and to the lack of standardized methods and protocols between different platforms.

Metagenomic techniques acquire more importance in ecosystems such as aquaculture sites and low-impact surface waters where effects of antibiotics on the prevalence and spread of ARG are less explored. When applied to aquaculture, metagenomics is becoming essential in evaluating the impact of current fish farming solutions on AMR in water ecosystems. The release of antibiotics in open aquaculture is of particular concern as they can be spread in the surrounding environment and persist over long periods in sediments (Amos et al. 2015; Rigos et al. 2004). It has been estimated that antibiotics administered to fish via supplemented feed are only partially absorbed (Cabello 2006) with largely unknown impact of released antimicrobials on non-target aquatic organisms and on the spread of resistance. Multi-trophic cultures of species representing different levels of the food chain (shrimp, selected fish species and/or duck) were found to increase the abundance of ARGs in water and sediments respect to fish monocultures (Xu et al. 2020; Yuan et al. 2019). Still, in sediments of a bullfrog farm, metagenomics analysis highlighted the association between plasmids carrying ARGs and resistance conferred to bacterial hosts against multiple antibiotics including classes not used in aquaculture (Chen et al. 2018). This approach permitted to associate the most dominant ARGs with bacterial genera as resistance carriers in mariculture (Jang et al. 2018) and to characterize the change of microbial community at the merge point of a river delta with backyard-based aquaculture effluents and at water/sediment interface in freshwater fish ponds (Nakayama et al. 2017; Xiong et al. 2015). In a recent study evaluating AMR in the crab aquaculture by metagenomics, distinct ARG distribution has been detected between water, where resistance to bacitracin was prevailing, and sediments with dominating multidrug resistance genes (Fang et al. 2019). In wastewater samples from swine feed yard, metagenomics approach revealed the presence of ARGs in bacteriophage DNA fraction and the inefficacy of wastewater treatment to induce significant changes in the relative abundance of all bacteria- and phage-associated ARG pool (Wang et al. 2018). Moreover, a possible spread of AMR through phage transduction was pointed out by resistance to β-lactam antibiotics and by detection of different plasmid types encoding mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1) gene already described in surface water environments worldwide (Drali et al. 2018; Kneis, Berendonk and Heß 2019; Tuo et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2018). The phage transduction was independent from the type of environment and, in the case of β-lactam resistance, showed a high spreading ability despite the low ARG abundance. Importantly, colistin is considered the last resort defense against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (Nation et al. 2015). Shotgun sequencing and gene profiling metagenomics confirmed a phage-bacterial interplay in aquaculture wastewater by detecting mobilized ARGs, especially those involved in the modulation of antibiotic efflux pumps, even in the absence of antibiotic treatment (Colombo et al. 2016). A small-scale modelling has been adopted to describe the dynamics of phage-mediated AMR spread in less hostile environments where bacterial mortality is low, such as those with sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics and with the presence of ARB (Sankalp et al. 2020).

Metagenomic studies on surface water biofilm niches, where HGT is largely facilitated (Madsen et al. 2012), are extremely limited and mostly refer to highly competitive environments like wastewaters. In recent years, bacterial membrane vesicles (MV) have been considered as DNA reservoirs at the basis of a new interspecies HGT mechanism in biofilms (Abe, Nomura and Suzuki 2020). Since minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antibiotics tolerated by biofilm-growing bacteria are conspicuously elevated compared with those applied to planktonic microorganisms (De Oliveira et al. 2016; Macia, Rojo-Molinero and Oliver 2014), chronic exposure may enhance mechanisms selecting for resistant phenotypes in these high-density microbial communities (Stewart 2002). Investigations based on shotgun metagenomics suggested that antibiotic pressure of 1 μg L–1 may be selective for resistant genotypes (Kraupner et al. 2018; Lundström et al. 2016), although this concentration falls in the upper range of antibiotic levels reported in European waterbodies (Sanseverino et al. 2019). A biofilm matrix allows the concentration of bacterial molecules, such as extracellular DNA released from damaged cells or signaling compounds, and reduces the penetration of exogenous substances (e.g. antibiotics) favoring tolerable exposure to bioactive mixtures. These conditions increase mutation rates and promote plasmid conjugation as well as transformation events through cell-to-cell interactions (Macia, Rojo-Molinero and Oliver 2014; Stadler and Top 2016). Such mobilization of ARGs persisting in a WWTP effluent biofilm was suggested to pose a risk of dissemination to receiving waterbodies as the relative abundance of ARGs associated with MGEs, which in system's effluent reached up to 82% (Petrovich et al. 2018) and differed based on the MGE type respect to river biofilms (Balcázar, Subirats and Borrego 2015). Numerous in vitro studies demonstrated that sub-inhibitory doses of some antibiotics are sufficient to specifically induce the switch from planktonic to biofilm forming phenotype of bacteria (Hoffman et al. 2005; Kaplan 2011). In the Yangtze Estuary, biofilms rather than sediments and water had a major contribution to ARG abundance that was greatly conferred by extracellular DNA (Guo et al. 2018).

Metagenomics is a promising technique for ARG mapping in different water environments in terms of relative abundance (detection normalized to total number of reads or more rarely total cell count in a sample), classification (type of conferred resistance) and impact (the extent of ARG propagation) (Chen et al. 2019; Li et al. 2015) with potential application in risk prediction and assessment of the environmental resistome based on identified ARG profiles (Amos et al. 2015). Several AMR clusters have been generated in line with specific anthropogenic pressures on natural waterbodies including low-impact areas where lower ARG richness correlated with minor genetic and microbial diversity (Hong et al. 2018; Li et al. 2015; Pal et al. 2016; Uyaguari-Díaz et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2019b). However, some technical aspects of shotgun metagenomic sequencing are still to be improved or clarified, including a definition of detection limits for various target genes, generation of short in length and random DNA reads, inadequate quality of databases for sequence identification, selection of the most suitable normalization method in the analysis of data (Pereira et al. 2018) along with missing criteria for comparison of data between different platforms (Durso, Miller and Wienhold 2012).

Metagenomics employed to investigate ARG propagation in aquatic ecosystems greatly improves the predictive ability of AMR impact on environmental and human microbiome, the latter defined as the collective genomes of microbes living on and within the human body (Baron, Diene and Rolain 2018; Dang et al. 2017; Guo et al. 2016). This technique is expected to reduce knowledge gaps in this context, even though the identification of DNA stretches putatively associated with ARGs should rely on verifying whether detected sequences are effectively responsible for conferring antibiotic resistance (Hadjadj et al. 2019). Approaches for predictive modeling of resistome analysis have been elaborated to face the question regarding data complexity and low sensitivity/specificity of currently available metagenomics methods (Arango-Argoty et al. 2018; Berglund et al. 2019; Lanza et al. 2018). Similarly, an updated profile of antibiotic resistome has been developed as online searching platform based on available databases confirming that water environments and animal feces cover 75% of all ARG families (Zhang et al. 2020).

A recent global prediction of AMR in untreated urban sewage by metagenomics approach revealed geographically specific distribution of abundance and diversity of ARGs that highly correlated with sanitation and health of clustered populations suggesting the improvement of both variables to mitigate the AMR burden worldwide (Hendriksen et al. 2019). In the last years, functional metagenomics approaches have been developed for activity-based screening of known and novel ARGs through the generation of metagenomics libraries followed by DNA expression in heterologous hosts, with a potential to identify sequences subjected to HGT (Mullany 2014). Major methodological challenges are linked to technical steps in library construction, sample purity and to the sequence diversity originally present in extracted DNA captured in constructed libraries (Lam et al. 2015). Despite always more numerous pieces of evidence supported by outcomes of functional metagenomics applied to river and ocean environments (Amos et al. 2014; Hatosy and Martiny 2015; Marathe et al. 2018) and a groundbreaking potential of functional gene annotation complementary to sequence-based metagenomics, factors underlying ARG distribution in surface water and sediments remain unclear (Chen et al. 2019; Jiang et al. 2018; Marathe et al. 2018).

Recently, a potential of high-throughput quantitative PCR (HT-qPCR) has been highlighted in the evaluation of ARGs in various environmental matrices, as a cost-effective technology requiring low sample volumes and less complex bioinformatic tools than metagenomics, which results particularly relevant for routine AMR analysis. Nonetheless, HT-qPCR is based on primers specific to the assessed sequences for which individual protocols must be optimized, therefore metagenomics remains the solution of choice for the identification of hitherto unknown resistance genes in research-oriented analysis (Waseem et al. 2019).

Technological advancements along with improved data analytics platforms seen in recent years provide always more sophisticated means for AMR detection and prediction (Gupta, Tiwari and Cytryn 2020). Not free from drawbacks, each method adapts to specific purposes such as routine analysis requiring low costs and straightforward protocols or environmental modeling in support of decision making based on high throughput techniques, allowing processing a large number of samples simultaneously and detecting a large number of ARGs per sample.

FINAL REMARKS

The universal interconnection between humans, biota and environment constitutes the axis of the One Health concept seeing well-being of each compartment dependent on mutual equilibrium. A better understanding of AMR selection pressures and ARG propagation is needed for an efficient and reliable risk assessment that ARB may pose on human and animal health. This can be achieved through increased scientific efforts to identify metabolic pathways inducing antibiotic resistance in bacterial species (e.g. basic cell metabolism modified by mutations in ATP synthase subunits) (Zalis et al. 2019).

Although the importance of standardized surveillance methods has been pointed out by several authors (Ben et al. 2019; Matheu, Aidara-Kane and Andremont 2017; Berendonk et al. 2015; Huijbers, Flach and Larsson 2019; Larsson et al. 2018), guidance taking into account both the toxicity and the acquisition of resistance by microorganisms in the environmental context is missing.

Functional metagenomics is a paramount approach to fill the knowledge gaps (Table 1) regarding correlation between the presence and the functional role of ARGs along with the definition of minimal concentrations of antibiotics able to induce AMR. Generation of ARG profiles in water environments and specific to antibiotic pressures in differentially impacted areas would have a great advantage in strategic planning for the mitigation of AMR effects (Fig. 2). However, the contribution of bioactive antibiotic metabolites and other compounds known for their co-selection potential must be considered based on contamination profiles of chemical mixtures in waterbodies. Also, the anthropogenic footprint in formerly pristine areas due to environmental transport of AMR determinants requires reconsideration of reference habitats used as controls for scientific studies and definition of low-impact areas.

Table 1.

Major knowledge gaps and technical limitations in the environmental assessment of AMR.

Issue Current approach Knowledge gap Solution
AR detection Culture-based methods Culture-independent methods (excluding metagenomics) Metagenomics Not representative for natural microbial communities and environmental conditions, no information on ARG in non-culturable bacteria No information on ARG functional activity Complex data analysis, low comparability between different platforms Approach combining all methods should be adopted and combined with metagenomics for ARG identification and function Standardization of methods and protocols in ARG metagenomics studies
Environmental concentrations of antibiotics Studies on samples from sites differently impacted by release of antibiotics or experimental set-ups Insufficient number of studies reporting correlations between antibiotic concentrations and AMR in surface water More studies on possible correlations between AMR and antibiotic concentrations unrelated to WWTP
Risk assessment Safety thresholds based on antibiotic toxicity Bioactive metabolites of antibiotics ARG/ARB distribution and transmission No standardized approach, no safety threshold for antibiotics considering AMR Not included in risk assessment of antibiotics Incomplete knowledge relative to environmental pathways and affecting factors Standardization of risk assessment procedure Quantification of bioactive metabolites in risk assessment, more studies on possible effects More studies required
Natural background resistance Studies on samples from low-impact areas Few studies, unknown contribution to AMR spread More studies needed to analyze the selective pressure promoted by antibiotics in low-impact areas
Metal/antibiotic co-resistance Identification of ARG/MRG and determination of antibiotic/metal concentrations Contribution of microplastics Unknown mechanisms and concentrations of antibiotics/metals inducing co-resistance Few studies, especially in freshwater More studies to address the molecular mechanisms involved in the association between metal exposure and the spread of ARG More studies required

AMR: antimicrobial resistance; ARB: antibiotic resistant bacteria; ARG: antibiotic resistance genes; MRG: metal resistance genes; WWTP: wastewater treatment plant

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

AMR risk assessment and mapping platform. The evaluation of effects induced by antibiotics in aquatic organisms may be evaluated in concert with detection and activity of ARGs through application of culture-based and culture-independent methods in low-impact and high-impact areas. ARG mapping for each type of pollution performed by means of metagenomics may help in generating AR profiles with specific driver antibiotics. Dilution factor due to site's natural characteristics and the contribution of chemical pollutants (e.g. metals, biocides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)) must be considered with particular attention for the AMR spread as the stability of ARGs may not be reflected by correlation with concentrations of antimicrobials.

Methodological approach for environmental assessment and monitoring should avoid evaluation of antibiotics as individual substances but consider molecular interactions within the mixture. More studies are therefore needed to understand the impact of antimicrobials in realistic scenarios including environmentally relevant concentrations of antibiotics and possible additive/synergistic effects of co-occurring compounds on AMR spread also in long-term perspective. For this purpose, technical harmonization and optimization of detection methods are of paramount importance for future regulatory applications aimed at protecting the environment from adverse effects from pharmaceuticals and at the same time ensuring safe and effective use of antimicrobials for human needs. These aspects have recently been discussed during the first Workshop on Pharmaceuticals in the Environment within the EU strategic approach (EC COM(2019a) 128) which gathered unprecedentedly high number of European participants making this event a milestone for further approach on AMR issue at international level. Actions to better understand the link between the presence of antibiotics in the environment and AMR spread have been recommended under the European Union Strategic Approach to Pharmaceuticals in the Environment (EC 2020d). Furthermore, since AMR is an increasing worldwide problem which requires broad scale responses as evidenced by the WHO Global Action Plan (WHO 2015) and the United Nations Interagency Coordination Group (IACG 2019 and 2020), a global and prompt collaboration between all countries in AMR prevention and control is envisaged.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by European Commission Joint Research Centre within the Exploratory Project ‘Antibiotics in aquatic environment: mechanism and key factors to understand the environmental contribution to the antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotic4you’. The authors would like to thank Ramón Pérez de Lara for producing all the figures and Úna Cullinan for making available all required literature.

Contributor Information

Magdalena Niegowska, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.

Isabella Sanseverino, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.

Anna Navarro, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.

Teresa Lettieri, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. Abe K, Nomura N, Suzuki S.. Biofilms: hot spots of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in aquatic environments, with a focus on a new HGT mechanism. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamek E, Baran W, Sobczak A.. Assessment of the biodegradability of selected sulfa drugs in two polluted rivers in Poland: effects of seasonal variations, accidental contamination, turbidity and salinity. J Hazard Mater. 2016;313:147–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Amoudi S, Razali R, Essack Met al. Metagenomics as a preliminary screen for antimicrobial bioprospecting. Gene. 2016;594:248–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen HK, Donato J, Wang HHet al. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:251–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amos GCA, Gozzard E, Carter CEet al. Validated predictive modelling of the environmental resistome. ISME J. 2015;9:1467–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amos GCA, Zhang L, Hawkey PMet al. Functional metagenomic analysis reveals rivers are a reservoir for diverse antibiotic resistance genes. Vet Microbiol. 2014;171:441–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andersson DI, Hughes D.. Evolution of antibiotic resistance at non-lethal drug concentrations. Drug Resist Updat. 2012;15:162–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andrade LN, Siqueira TES, Martinez Ret al. Multidrug-Resistant CTX-M-(15, 9, 2)- and KPC-2-producing Enterobacter hormaechei and Enterobacter asburiae isolates possessed a set of acquired heavy metal tolerance genes including a chromosomal sil operon (for acquired silver resistance). Front Microbiol. 2018;9:539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arango-Argoty G, Garner E, Pruden Aet al. DeepARG: a deep learning approach for predicting antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomic data. Microbiome. 2018;6:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arias-Andres M, Klümper U, Rojas-Jimenez Ket al. Microplastic pollution increases gene exchange in aquatic ecosystems. Environ Pollut. 2018;237:253–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Balcázar JL, Subirats J, Borrego CM.. The role of biofilms as environmental reservoirs of antibiotic resistance. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Baquero F, Martínez JL, Cantón R.. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:260–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Baron SA, Diene SM, Rolain J-M.. Human microbiomes and antibiotic resistance. Human Microbiome Journal. 2018;10:43–52. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ben Y, Fu C, Hu Met al. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: a review. Environ Res. 2019;169:483–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bengtsson-Palme J, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ.. Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;42:fux053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bengtsson-Palme J, Larsson DGJ.. Concentrations of antibiotics predicted to select for resistant bacteria: proposed limits for environmental regulation. Environ Int. 2016;86:140–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Berendonk TU, Manaia CM, Merlin Cet al. Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:310–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Berglund F, Österlund T, Boulund Fet al. Identification and reconstruction of novel antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomes. Microbiome. 2019;7:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Berkner S, Konradi S, Schönfeld J.. Antibiotic resistance and the environment—there and back again. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:740–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bradl H. Heavy metals in the environment: origin, interaction and remediation. Academic Press; 2005; vol. 6, 1st edition, 282. eBook ISBN 9780080455006. [Google Scholar]
  21. Brennecke D, Duarte B, Paiva Fet al. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 2016;178:189–95. [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown MG, Balkwill DL.. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from the deep terrestrial subsurface. Microb Ecol. 2008;57:484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bundschuh M, Filser J, Lüderwald Set al. Nanoparticles in the environment: where do we come from, where do we go to?. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2018;30:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Buschmann AH, Tomova A, López Aet al. Salmon aquaculture and antimicrobial resistance in the marine environment. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cabello FC, Godfrey HP, Buschmann AHet al. Aquaculture as yet another environmental gateway to the development and globalisation of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:e127–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cabello FC. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:1137–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Carey DE, McNamara PJ.. The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment. Front Microbiol. 2015;5:780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Carvalho RN, Ceriani L, Ippolito Aet al. Development of the first watch list under the environmental quality standards directive. Publications Office of the European Union. 2015;166. ISBN 978-92-79-46200-9. [Google Scholar]
  29. Casals-Pascual C, Vergara A, Vila J. Intestinal microbiota and antibiotic resistance: perspectives and solutions. Human Microbiome Journal. 2018;9:11–5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen B, Lin L, Fang Let al. Complex pollution of antibiotic resistance genes due to beta-lactam and aminoglycoside use in aquaculture farming. Water Res. 2018;134:200–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen B, Yang Y, Liang Xet al. Metagenomic profiles of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) between human impacted estuary and deep ocean sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:12753–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen B, Yuan K, Chen Xet al. Metagenomic analysis revealing antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and their genetic compartments in the Tibetan environment. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:6670–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen CQ, Zheng L, Zhou JLet al. Persistence and risk of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes in major mariculture sites in Southeast China. Sci Total Environ. 2017;580:1175–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen H, Bai X, Jing Let al. Characterization of antibiotic resistance genes in the sediments of an urban river revealed by comparative metagenomics analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2019;653:1513–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen H, Jing L, Teng Yet al. Characterization of antibiotics in a large-scale river system of China: occurrence pattern, spatiotemporal distribution and environmental risks. Sci Total Environ. 2018;618:409–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen K, Zhou JL.. Occurrence and behavior of antibiotics in water and sediments from the Huangpu River, Shanghai, China. Chemosphere. 2014;95:604–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen Q-L, Zhu D, An X-Let al. Does nano silver promote the selection of antibiotic resistance genes in soil and plant?. Environ Int. 2019;128:399–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen Y, Li P, Huang Yet al. Environmental media exert a bottleneck in driving the dynamics of antibiotic resistance genes in modern aquatic environment. Water Res. 2019;162:127–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Chopyk J, Nasko DJ, Allard Set al. Metagenomic analysis of bacterial and viral assemblages from a freshwater creek and irrigated field reveals temporal and spatial dynamics. Sci Total Environ. 2020;706:135395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Colombo S, Arioli S, Guglielmetti Set al. Virome-associated antibiotic-resistance genes in an experimental aquaculture facility. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Cox G, Wright GD.. Intrinsic antibiotic resistance: mechanisms, origins, challenges and solutions. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303:287–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. D'Costa VM, King CE, Kalan Let al. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature. 2011;477:457–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dang B, Mao D, Xu Yet al. Conjugative multi-resistant plasmids in Haihe River and their impacts on the abundance and spatial distribution of antibiotic resistance genes. Water Res. 2017;111:81–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dantas G, Sommer MOA.. Context matters — the complex interplay between resistome genotypes and resistance phenotypes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15:577–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. De Oliveira A, Cataneli Pereira V, Pinheiro Let al. Antimicrobial resistance profile of planktonic and biofilm cells of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. De Souza M-J, Nair S, Loka Bharathi PAet al. Metal and antibiotic-resistance in psychrotrophic bacteria from Antarctic Marine waters. Ecotoxicology. 2006;15:379–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Deng W-J, Li N, Ying G-G.. Antibiotic distribution, risk assessment, and microbial diversity in river water and sediment in Hong Kong. Environ Geochem Health. 2018;40:2191–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dickinson AW, Power A, Hansen MGet al. Heavy metal pollution and co-selection for antibiotic resistance: a microbial palaeontology approach. Environ Int. 2019;132:105117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Dong P, Wang H, Fang Tet al. Assessment of extracellular antibiotic resistance genes (eARGs) in typical environmental samples and the transforming ability of eARG. Environ Int. 2019;125:90–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Drali R, Berrazeg M, Zidouni LLet al. Emergence of mcr-1 plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from seawater. Sci Total Environ. 2018;642:90–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Durso LM, Miller DN, Wienhold BJ.. Distribution and quantification of antibiotic resistant genes and bacteria across agricultural and non-agricultural metagenomes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. EC (European Commission) . Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities, Brussels, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  53. EC . Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/840 of 5 June 2018 establishing a watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring in the field of water policy pursuant to Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495 (notified under document C(2018) 3362). Brussels, 2018. EU 2018/840. [Google Scholar]
  54. EC . Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1161 of 4 August 2020 establishing a watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring in the field of water policy pursuant to Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels, 2020a. C(2020)5205. [Google Scholar]
  55. EC . Commission Staff Working Document Evaluation of the Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991, concerning urban waste-water treatment. Brussels, 2019b. SWD(2019) 700 final. [Google Scholar]
  56. EC . Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). Brussels, 2017. COM (2017) 339 final. [Google Scholar]
  57. EC . Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Action Plan against the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance. Brussels, 2011. COM (2011) 748 final. [Google Scholar]
  58. EC . Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Farm to Fork Strategy. Brussels, 2020b. COM(2020) 381 final. [Google Scholar]
  59. EC . Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe. Brussels, 2020c. COM(2020) 761 final. [Google Scholar]
  60. EC . Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. European Union Strategic Approach to Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Brussels, 2019a. COM(2019) 128 final. [Google Scholar]
  61. EC . Update on Progress and Implementation. European Union Strategic Approach to Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg, 2020d. ISBN 978-92-79-25106-4. [Google Scholar]
  62. Eckert EM, Di Cesare A, Kettner MTet al. Microplastics increase impact of treated wastewater on freshwater microbial community. Environ Pollut. 2018;234:495–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. EEA (European Environment Agency) . Environmental pressures of heavy metal releases from Europe's industry. Briefing no. 3/2018. ISBN 978-92-9213-961-2. [Google Scholar]
  64. EMA (European Medicines Agency) . Draft guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use – revision 1. EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00 Rev. 1. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  65. Enne VI, Delsol AA, Roe JMet al. Evidence of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Silencing in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3003–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Fang H, Huang K, Yu Jet al. Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities and antibiotic resistance genes in the Eriocheir sinensis freshwater aquaculture environment. Chemosphere. 2019;224:202–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Antimicrobial movement from agricultural areas to the environment. The missing link. A role for nuclear techniques. Rome. 2019, ISBN: 978-92-5-131648-1. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ferreira da Silva M, Tiago I, Veríssimo Aet al. Antibiotic resistance of enterococci and related bacteria in an urban wastewater treatment plant. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;55:322–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ferreira da Silva M, Vaz-Moreira I, Gonzalez-Pajuelo Met al. Antimicrobial resistance patterns in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from an urban wastewater treatment plant. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;60:166–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Fluit AC, Schmitz FJ.. Resistance integrons and super-integrons. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:272–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Gao P, Munir M, Xagoraraki I.. Correlation of tetracycline and sulfonamide antibiotics with corresponding resistance genes and resistant bacteria in a conventional municipal wastewater treatment plant. Sci Total Environ. 2012;421-422:173–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. García-Galán MJ, Silvia Díaz-Cruz M, Barceló D. Identification and determination of metabolites and degradation products of sulfonamide antibiotics. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem. 2008;27:1008–22. [Google Scholar]
  73. Gilbert P, McBain AJ.. Potential impact of increased use of biocides in consumer products on prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:189–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Gomez Cortes L, Marinov D, Sanseverino Iet al. Selection of substances for the 3rd Watch List under the Water Framework Directive. Publications Office of the European Union; 2020. JRC121346. [Google Scholar]
  75. Guo F, Li B, Yang Yet al. Impacts of human activities on distribution of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes and antibiotic resistance genes in marine coastal sediments of Hong Kong. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Guo X-P, Yang Y, Lu D-Pet al. Biofilms as a sink for antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the Yangtze Estuary. Water Res. 2018;129:277–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Gupta CL, Tiwari RK, Cytryn E.. Platforms for elucidating antibiotic resistance in single genomes and complex metagenomes. Environ Int. 2020;138:105667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Hadjadj L, Baron SA, Diene SMet al. How to discover new antibiotic resistance genes?. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019;19:349–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Hall RM, Collis CM.. Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria: the role of gene cassettes and integrons. Drug Resist Updat. 1998;1:109–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Hatosy SM, Martiny AC.. The ocean as a global reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:7593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Hendrickson JA, Hu C, Aitken SLet al. Antifungal Resistance: a Concerning Trend for the Present and Future. Current Infectious Disease Reports. 2019;21:47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Hendriksen RS, Munk P, Njage Pet al. Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Heuer H, Schmitt H, Smalla K.. Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:236–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Hoffman LR, D'Argenio DA, MacCoss MJet al. Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation. Nature. 2005;436:1171–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Hong P-Y, Julian RT, Pype M-Let al. Reusing treated wastewater: consideration of the safety aspects associated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes. Water. 2018;10:244. [Google Scholar]
  86. Hooban B, Joyce A, Fitzhenry Ket al. The role of the natural aquatic environment in the dissemination of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase encoding genes: a scoping review. Water Res. 2020;180:115880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Hossain A, Nakamichi S, Habibullah-Al-Mamun Met al. Occurrence, distribution, ecological and resistance risks of antibiotics in surface water of finfish and shellfish aquaculture in Bangladesh. Chemosphere. 2017;188:329–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Huijbers PMC, Flach C-F, Larsson DGJ.. A conceptual framework for the environmental surveillance of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. Environ Int. 2019;130:104880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. IACG (United Nations Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance) . https://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/interagency-coordination-group/en/(23 September2020, date last accessed). [Google Scholar]
  90. IACG . No time to wait: securing the future from drug-resistant infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, April2019. https://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/interagency-coordination-group/final-report/en/. [Google Scholar]
  91. Imran M, Das KR, Naik MM.. Co-selection of multi-antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens in metal and microplastic contaminated environments: an emerging health threat. Chemosphere. 2019;215:846–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Ingerslev F, Halling-Sørensen B.. Biodegradability properties of sulfonamides in activated sludge. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19:2467–73. [Google Scholar]
  93. Jaén-Gil A, Farré M-J, Sànchez-Melsió Aet al. Effect-based identification of hazardous antibiotic transformation products after water chlorination. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54:9062–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Jang HM, Kim YB, Choi Set al. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes from effluent of coastal aquaculture, South Korea. Environ Pollut. 2018;233:1049–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Jardine J, Mavumengwana V, Ubomba-Jaswa E.. Antibiotic resistance and heavy metal tolerance in cultured bacteria from hot springs as indicators of environmental intrinsic resistance and tolerance levels. Environ Pollut. 2019;249:696–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Jiang H, Zhou R, Zhang Met al. Exploring the differences of antibiotic resistance genes profiles between river surface water and sediments using metagenomic approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;161:64–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Jiang X, Ellabaan MMH, Charusanti Pet al. Dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes from antibiotic producers to pathogens. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Kaplan JB. Antibiotic-induced biofilm formation. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34:737–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Kaweeteerawat C, Na Ubol P, Sangmuang Set al. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacteria mediated by silver nanoparticles. J Toxicol Environ Health, Part A. 2017;80:1276–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Kerrigan JF, Sandberg KD, Engstrom DRet al. Small and large-scale distribution of four classes of antibiotics in sediment: association with metals and antibiotic resistance genes. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2018;20:1167–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Kneis D, Berendonk TU, Heß S.. High prevalence of colistin resistance genes in German municipal wastewater. Sci Total Environ. 2019;694:133454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Komijani M, Shamabadi NS, Shahin Ket al. Heavy metal pollution promotes antibiotic resistance potential in the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut. 2021;274:116569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Kraemer SA, Ramachandran A, Perron GG.. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: from microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms. 2019;7:180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Kraupner N, Ebmeyer S, Bengtsson-Palme Jet al. Selective concentration for ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli grown in complex aquatic bacterial biofilms. Environ Int. 2018;116:255–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Kümmerer K. Antibiotics in the aquatic environment – A review – Part I. Chemosphere. 2009;75:417–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Lam KN, Cheng J, Engel Ket al. Current and future resources for functional metagenomics. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Lanza VF, Baquero F, Martínez JLet al. In-depth resistome analysis by targeted metagenomics. Microbiome. 2018;6:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Larsson DGJ, Andremont A, Bengtsson-Palme Jet al. Critical knowledge gaps and research needs related to the environmental dimensions of antibiotic resistance. Environ Int. 2018;117:132–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Lei X, Lu J, Liu Z.. Concentration and distribution of antibiotics in water–sediment system of Bosten Lake, Xinjiang. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015;22:1670–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Lemire JA, Harrison JJ, Turner RJ.. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:371–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Li B, Yang Y, Ma Let al. Metagenomic and network analysis reveal wide distribution and co-occurrence of environmental antibiotic resistance genes. The ISME Journal. 2015;9:2490–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Li J, Zhang K, Zhang H.. Adsorption of antibiotics on microplastics. Environ Pollut. 2018;237:460–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Li S, Shi W, Li Het al. Antibiotics in water and sediments of rivers and coastal area of Zhuhai City, Pearl River estuary, south China. Sci Total Environ. 2018;636:1009–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Liu S, Shi J, Wang Jet al. Interactions between microplastics and heavy metals in aquatic environments: a review. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:652520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Liu S, Wang P, Wang Cet al. Anthropogenic disturbances on antibiotic resistome along the Yarlung Tsangpo River on the Tibetan Plateau: ecological dissemination mechanisms of antibiotic resistance genes to bacterial pathogens. Water Res. 2021b;202:117447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Liu S, Wang P, Wang Xet al. Ecological insights into the elevational biogeography of antibiotic resistance genes in a pristine river: metagenomic analysis along the Yarlung Tsangpo River on the Tibetan Plateau. Environ Pollut. 2021a;286:117101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Lloyd NA, Nazaret S, Barkay T.. Whole genome sequences to assess the link between antibiotic and metal resistance in three coastal marine bacteria isolated from the mummichog gastrointestinal tract. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;135:514–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Lo Giudice A, Casella P, Bruni Vet al. Response of bacterial isolates from Antarctic shallow sediments towards heavy metals, antibiotics and polychlorinated biphenyls. Ecotoxicology. 2013;22:240–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Lood R, Ertürk G, Mattiasson B.. Revisiting antibiotic resistance spreading in wastewater treatment plants – Bacteriophages as a much neglected potential transmission vehicle. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Loos R, Marinov D, Sanseverino Iet al. Review of the 1st Watch List under the Water Framework Directive and recommendations for the 2nd Watch List. Publications Office of the European Union; 2018, 265. ISBN 978-92-79-81839-4. [Google Scholar]
  121. Lu j, Wang Y, Jin Met al. Both silver ions and silver nanoparticles facilitate the horizontal transfer of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance genes. Water Res. 2020;169:115229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Luby E, Ibekwe AM, Zilles Jet al. Molecular methods for assessment of antibiotic resistance in agricultural ecosystems: prospects and challenges. J Environ Qual. 2016;45:441–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Łuczkiewicz A, Jankowska K, Fudala-Książek Set al. Antimicrobial resistance of fecal indicators in municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 2010;44:5089–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Lundström SV, Östman M, Bengtsson-Palme Jet al. Minimal selective concentrations of tetracycline in complex aquatic bacterial biofilms. Sci Total Environ. 2016;553:587–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Lupo A, Coyne S, Berendonk T.. Origin and evolution of antibiotic resistance: the common mechanisms of emergence and spread in water bodies. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2012;3:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Ma Y, Metch JW, Yang Yet al. Shift in antibiotic resistance gene profiles associated with nanosilver during wastewater treatment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Macia MD, Rojo-Molinero E, Oliver A.. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:981–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Madsen JS, Burmølle M, Hansen LHet al. The interconnection between biofilm formation and horizontal gene transfer. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. 2012;65:183–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Majewsky M, Glauner T, Horn H.. Systematic suspect screening and identification of sulfonamide antibiotic transformation products in the aquatic environment. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:5707–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Majewsky M, Wagner D, Delay Met al. Antibacterial activity of sulfamethoxazole transformation products (TPs): general relevance for sulfonamide TPs modified at the para position. Chem Res Toxicol. 2014;27:1821–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Marathe NP, Janzon A, Kotsakis SDet al. Functional metagenomics reveals a novel carbapenem-hydrolyzing mobile beta-lactamase from Indian river sediments contaminated with antibiotic production waste. Environ Int. 2018;112:279–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Marathe NP, Pal C, Gaikwad SSet al. Untreated urban waste contaminates Indian river sediments with resistance genes to last resort antibiotics. Water Res. 2017;124:388–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Matheu J, Aidara-Kane A, Andremont A.. The ESBL tricycle AMR surveillance project: a simple, one health approach to global surveillance. AMR Control. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  134. Mazel D. Integrons: agents of bacterial evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:608–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. McCollister BD, Hoffman M, Husain Met al. Nitric oxide protects bacteria from aminoglycosides by blocking the energy-dependent phases of drug uptake. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:2189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Moon K, Jeon JH, Kang Iet al. Freshwater viral metagenome reveals novel and functional phage-borne antibiotic resistance genes. Microbiome. 2020;8:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Mullany P. Functional metagenomics for the investigation of antibiotic resistance. Virulence. 2014;5:443–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Murray AK, Stanton I, Gaze WHet al. Dawning of a new ERA: environmental Risk Assessment of antibiotics and their potential to select for antimicrobial resistance. Water Res. 2021;200:117233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Nakayama T, Tuyet Hoa TT, Harada Ket al. Water metagenomic analysis reveals low bacterial diversity and the presence of antimicrobial residues and resistance genes in a river containing wastewater from backyard aquacultures in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Environ Pollut. 2017;222:294–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Nardelli M, Scalzo PM, Ramírez MSet al. Class 1 integrons in environments with different degrees of urbanization. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Nation RL, Li J, Cars Oet al. Framework for optimization of the clinical use of colistin and polymyxin B: the Prato polymyxin consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:225–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Nguyen CC, Hugie CN, Kile MLet al. Association between heavy metals and antibiotic-resistant human pathogens in environmental reservoirs: a review. Front Environ Sci Engin. 2019;13:46. [Google Scholar]
  143. Nnadozie CF, Odume ON.. Freshwater environments as reservoirs of antibiotic resistant bacteria and their role in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Environ Pollut. 2019;254:113067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Novo A, André S, Viana Pet al. Antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial residues and bacterial community composition in urban wastewater. Water Res. 2013;47:1875–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. NPR (National Public Radio) . Former NIH director calls Trump administration's pandemic response ‘amateur hour’. 29 June2020; https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/06/29/884435625/former-nih-director-calls-trump-administrations-pandemic-response-amateur-hour?tc=1593530718831&t=1599633152924(22 September 2020, date last accessed). [Google Scholar]
  146. O'Neill J. Antimicrobials in agriculture and the environment: reducing unnecessary use and waste. The review on antimicrobial resistance. European Commission; 2015, 40. [Google Scholar]
  147. O'Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. The review on antimicrobial resistance. United Kingdom, HM Government; 2016, 81. [Google Scholar]
  148. Oberlé K, Capdeville M-J, Berthe Tet al. Evidence for a complex relationship between antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli: from medical center patients to a receiving environment. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:1859–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Pal C, Asiani K, Arya Set al. Chapter Seven - Metal resistance and its association with antibiotic resistance. Adv Microb Physiol. 2017;70:261–313.. DOI: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Pal C, Bengtsson-Palme J, Kristiansson Eet al. The structure and diversity of human, animal and environmental resistomes. Microbiome. 2016;4:54. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-016-0199-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Pallecchi L, Bartoloni A, Paradisi Fet al. Antibiotic resistance in the absence of antimicrobial use: mechanisms and implications. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:725–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Pan X, Lin L, Zhang Wet al. Metagenome sequencing to unveil the resistome in a deep subtropical lake on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China. Environ Pollut. 2020;263:114470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Patel SS, Rosenthal KS.. Microbial adaptation. Putting the best team on the field. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. 2007;15:330–4. [Google Scholar]
  154. Pei R, Kim S-C, Carlson KHet al. Effect of River Landscape on the sediment concentrations of antibiotics and corresponding antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). Water Res. 2006;40:2427–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Pereira MB, Wallroth M, Jonsson Vet al. Comparison of normalization methods for the analysis of metagenomic gene abundance data. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Petrovich M, Chu B, Wright Det al. Antibiotic resistance genes show enhanced mobilization through suspended growth and biofilm-based wastewater treatment processes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:fiy041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Polianciuc SI, Gurzāu AE, Kiss Bet al. Antibiotics in the environment: causes and consequences. Medicine and Pharmacy Reports. 2020;93:231–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Poole K. At the nexus of antibiotics and metals: the impact of Cu and Zn on antibiotic activity and resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:820–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Pruden A, Arabi M, Storteboom HN.. Correlation Between Upstream Human Activities and Riverine Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:11541–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Qiu W, Sun J, Fang Met al. Occurrence of antibiotics in the main rivers of Shenzhen, China: association with antibiotic resistance genes and microbial community. Sci Total Environ. 2019;653:334–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Quinlan EL, Nietch CT, Blocksom Ket al. Temporal dynamics of periphyton exposed to tetracycline in stream mesocosms. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:10684–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Randall CP, Gupta A, Jackson Net al. Silver resistance in Gram-negative bacteria: a dissection of endogenous and exogenous mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:1037–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Raza S, Jo H, Kim Jet al. Metagenomic exploration of antibiotic resistome in treated wastewater effluents and their receiving water. Sci Total Environ. 2021;765:142755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Reddy B, Dubey SK.. River Ganges water as reservoir of microbes with antibiotic and metal ion resistance genes: high throughput metagenomic approach. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:443–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Reis AC, Kolvenbach BA, Nunes OC Corvini PFX . Biodegradation of antibiotics: the new resistance determinants – part II. New Biotechnol. 2019;54:13–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Rigos G, Nengas I, Alexis Met al. Potential drug (oxytetracycline and oxolinic acid) pollution from Mediterranean sparid fish farms. Aquatic Toxicol. 2004;69:281–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Rodríguez-Chueca J, Varella Della Giustina S, Rocha Jet al. Assessment of full-scale tertiary wastewater treatment by UV-C based-AOPs: removal or persistence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes?. Sci Total Environ. 2019;652:1051–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Vaz-Moreira I, Varela Della Giustina Set al. Antibiotic residues in final effluents of European wastewater treatment plants and their impact on the aquatic environment. Environ Int. 2020;140:105733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Salyers AA, Amábile-Cuevas CF.. Why are antibiotic resistance genes so resistant to elimination?. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2321–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Sankalp A, Todman H, Baker Met al. A generalised model for generalised transduction: the importance of co-evolution and stochasticity in phage mediated antimicrobial resistance transfer. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Sanseverino I, Navarro Cuenca A, Loos Ret al. State of the art on the contribution of water to antimicrobial resistance. Publications Office of the European Union; 2019, JRC114775. [Google Scholar]
  172. Santos L, Ramos F.. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: current knowledge and alternatives to tackle the problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52:135–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall AB.. A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere. 2006;65:752/759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks) . Assessment of the Antibiotic Resistance Effects of Biocides. European Commission, Brussels2009, 87. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_021.pdf2009. [Google Scholar]
  175. SCENIHR . Opinion on nanosilver: safety, health and environmental effects and role in antimicrobial resistance. European Commission, Luxembourg: 2014, 103. ISBN: 978-92-79-30132-2. [Google Scholar]
  176. Schmitt H, ter Laak T, Duis K.. Development and dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the environmentally relevant concentrations of antibiotics and its risk assessment. German Federal Environment Agency. 2017. ISSN 1862-4804. [Google Scholar]
  177. Schroeder M, Brooks DB, Brooks EA.. The complex relationship between virulence and antibiotic resistance. Genes. 2017;8:39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Seiler C, Berendonk T.. Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2012;3:399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Shen M, Zhu Y, Zhang Yet al. Micro(nano)plastics: unignorable vectors for organisms. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;139:328–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Silva I, Tacão M, Henriques I.. Selection of antibiotic resistance by metals in a riverine bacterial community. Chemosphere. 2021;263:127936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Silver S. Bacterial silver resistance: molecular biology and uses and misuses of silver compounds. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27:341–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Smalla K, Cook K, Djordjevic SPet al. Environmental dimensions of antibiotic resistance: assessment of basic science gaps. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:fiy195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Stalder T, Top E.. Plasmid transfer in biofilms: a perspective on limitations and opportunities. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes. 2016;2:16022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Stepanauskas R, Glenn TC, Jagoe CHet al. Coselection for microbial resistance to metals and antibiotics in freshwater microcosms. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:1510–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Stewart PS. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002;292:107–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Sun M, Chang Z, Van den Brink PJet al. Environmental and human health risks of antimicrobials used in Fenneropenaeus chinensis aquaculture production in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016;23:15689–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Tan L, Li L, Ashbolt Net al. Arctic antibiotic resistance gene contamination, a result of anthropogenic activities and natural origin. Sci Total Environ. 2018;621:1176–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Thomas J, Oladeinde A, Kieran TJet al. Co-occurrence of antibiotic, biocide, and heavy metal resistance genes in bacteria from metal and radionuclide contaminated soils at the Savannah River Site. Microb Biotechnol. 2020;13:1179–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Topp E, Larsson DGJ, Miller DNet al. Antimicrobial resistance and the environment: assessment of advances, gaps and recommendations for agriculture, aquaculture and pharmaceutical manufacturing. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Tuo H, Yang Y, Tao Xet al. The prevalence of colistin resistant strains and antibiotic resistance gene profiles in Funan River, China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:3094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. UBA (German Federal Environment Agency) . EQS datasheet. Environmental Quality Standard – Erythromycin. 2014, Germany. FKZ 3712 28 232. [Google Scholar]
  192. Udikovic-Kolic N, Wichmann F, Broderick NAet al. Bloom of resident antibiotic-resistant bacteria in soil following manure fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:15202–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. UN (United Nations) . No time to wait: securing the future from drug-resistant infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (IACG). 2019. https://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/interagency-coordination-group/final-report/en/. [Google Scholar]
  194. Uyaguari-Díaz MI, Croxen MA, Luo Zet al. Human activity determines the presence of integron-associated and antibiotic resistance genes in southwestern British Columbia. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. van der Meij A, Worsley SF, Hutchings MIet al. Chemical ecology of antibiotic production by actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41:392–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Van Goethem MW, Pierneef R, Bezuidt OKIet al. A reservoir of ‘historical’ antibiotic resistance genes in remote pristine Antarctic soils. Microbiome. 2018;6:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Vaz-Moreira I, Nunes OC, Manaia CM.. Bacterial diversity and antibiotic resistance in water habitats: searching the links with the human microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38:761–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Wang H-l, Sun L.. Comparative metagenomics reveals insights into the deep-sea adaptation mechanism of the microorganisms in Iheya hydrothermal fields. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;33:86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Wang J, Peng J, Tan Yet al. Microplastics in the surface sediments from the Beijiang River littoral zone: composition, abundance, surface textures and interaction with heavy metals. Chemosphere. 2017b;171:248–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Wang J, Wang J, Zhao Zet al. PAHs accelerate the propagation of antibiotic resistance genes in coastal water microbial community. Environ Pollut. 2017a;231:1145–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Wang M, Xiong W, Liu Pet al. Metagenomic insights into the contribution of phages to antibiotic resistance in water samples related to swine feedlot wastewater treatment. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:2474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Wang Q, Liu L, Hou Zet al. Heavy metal copper accelerates the conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in freshwater microcosms. Sci Total Environ. 2020;717:137055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Wang R, van Dorp L, Shaw LPet al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Waseem H, Jameel S, Ali Jet al. Contributions and challenges of high throughput qPCR for determining antimicrobial resistance in the environment: a critical review. Molecules. 2019;24:163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Webber MA, Buckner MMC, Redgrave LSet al. Quinolone-resistant gyrase mutants demonstrate decreased susceptibility to triclosan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:2755–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. WHO (World Health Organization) . Antimicrobial Resistance: An emerging water, sanitation and hygiene issue. Briefing note. Document Production Services, Geneva, 2014. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-FWC-WSH-14.7. [Google Scholar]
  207. WHO, FAO, OIE . Technical Brief on water, sanitation, hygiene and wastewater management to prevent infections and reduce the spread of antimicrobial resistance. WHO Document Centre. 2020. ISBN: 978-92-4-000641-6. [Google Scholar]
  208. WHO . 10 global health issues to track threats to global health in 202119. 2020a. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/10-global-health-issues-to-track-in-2021https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019(13 April 2021, date last accessed) . [Google Scholar]
  209. WHO . Antimicrobial resistance fact sheet. 2020b. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance(22 August 2021, date last accessed). [Google Scholar]
  210. WHO . Antimicrobial resistance: Global report on surveillance. Geneva, WHO Document Centre; 2014. ISBN: 978 92 4 156474 8. [Google Scholar]
  211. WHO . Draft thirteenth general program of work, 2019-2023. Report. by Director General. Seventy-first World Health Assembly, 2018a. Provisional agenda item 11.1. A71/4. [Google Scholar]
  212. WHO . Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva, WHO Document Centre; 2015. ISBN: 9789241509763. [Google Scholar]
  213. WHO . Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016-2018. Early implementation. Geneva, WHO Document Centre; 2018b. ISBN: 978-92-4-151488-0. [Google Scholar]
  214. Woegerbauer M, Bellanger X, Merlin C.. Cell-Free DNA: an underestimated source of antibiotic resistance gene dissemination at the interface between human activities and downstream environments in the context of wastewater reuse. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Woodford N, Ellington MJ.. The emergence of antibiotic resistance by mutation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:5–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Wright MS, Peltier GL, Stepanauskas Ret al. Bacterial tolerances to metals and antibiotics in metal-contaminated and reference streams. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;58:293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Xiong W, Sun Y, Zhang Tet al. Antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes, and bacterial community composition in fresh water aquaculture environment in China. Microb Ecol. 2015;70:425–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Xu C, Lv Z, Shen Yet al. Metagenomic insights into differences in environmental resistome profiles between integrated and monoculture aquaculture farms in China. Environ Int. 2020;144:106005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Xu X-R, Li X-Y.. Sorption and desorption of antibiotic tetracycline on marine sediments. Chemosphere. 2010;78:430–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Xu Y, Xu J, Mao Det al. Effect of the selective pressure of sub-lethal level of heavy metals on the fate and distribution of ARGs in the catchment scale. Environ Pollut. 2017;220:900–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Yang Y, Li Z, Song Wet al. Metagenomic insights into the abundance and composition of resistance genes in aquatic environments: influence of stratification and geography. Environ Int. 2019b;127:371–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Yang Y, Liu G, Song Wet al. Plastics in the marine environment are reservoirs for antibiotic and metal resistance genes. Environ Int. 2019;123:79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Yang Y, Song W, Lin Het al. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in global lakes: a review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2018;116:60–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Yu F, Li Y, Huang Get al. Adsorption behavior of the antibiotic levofloxacin on microplastics in the presence of different heavy metals in an aqueous solution. Chemosphere. 2020;260:127650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Yuan J, Ni M, Liu Met al. Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in a typical estuary aquaculture region of Hangzhou Bay, China. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;138:376–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Yuan W, Tian T, Yang Qet al. Transfer potentials of antibiotic resistance genes in Escherichia spp. strains from different sources. Chemosphere. 2020;246:125736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Zalis EA, Nuxoll AS, Manuse Set al. Stochastic Variation in Expression of the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Produces Persister Cells. mBio. 2019;10:e01930–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Zatyka M, Thomas CM.. Control of genes for conjugative transfer of plasmids and other mobile elements. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1998;21:291/319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Zhang AN, Hou C-J, Negi Met al. Online searching platform for the antibiotic resistome in bacterial tree of life and global habitats. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Zhang K, Zhang Y, Xin Ret al. Variation pattern of terrestrial antibiotic resistances and bacterial communities in seawater/freshwater mixed microcosms. Chemosphere. 2018;200:201–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Zhang Q, Lambert G, Liao Det al. Acceleration of emergence of bacterial antibiotic resistance in connected microenvironments. Science. 2011;333:1764–17647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Zhang R, Zhang G, Zheng Qet al. Occurrence and risks of antibiotics in the Laizhou Bay, China: impacts of river discharge. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012;80:208–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Zhang X-X, Zhang T, Fang HHP.. Antibiotic resistance genes in water environment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;82:397–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Zhang Y, Gu AZ, Cen Tet al. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of heavy metals facilitate the horizontal transfer of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance genes in water environment. Environ Pollut. 2018b;237:74–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Zhang Y, Li A, Dai Tet al. Cell-free DNA: a Neglected Source for Antibiotic Resistance Genes Spreading from WWTPs. Environ Sci Technol. 2018a;52:248–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Zhang Y, Marrs CF, Simon Cet al. Wastewater treatment contributes to selective increase of antibiotic resistance among Acinetobacter spp. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:3702–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Zhou Y, Xu Y-B, Xu J-Xet al. Combined toxic effects of heavy metals and antibiotics on a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain ZY2 isolated from swine wastewater. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:2839–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Zhuang M, Achmon Y, Cao Yet al. Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in the environment. Environ Pollut. 2021;285:117402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from FEMS Microbiology Ecology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES