Abstract
Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) manifest tissue heterogeneity and are crucial modulators of regional immune responses. The molecular mechanisms regulating tissue ILC2 properties remain elusive. Here, we interrogate the signatures of ILC2s from five tissues at the transcriptome and epigenetic level. We have found that tissue microenvironment strongly shapes ILC2 identities. The intestine induces Aiolos+ILC2s, whereas lung and pancreas enhance Galectin-1+ILC2s. Though being a faithful gut ILC2 feature under the steady state, Aiolos is induced in non-intestinal ILC2s by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Specifically, IL-33 stimulates Aiolos expression in both human and mouse non-intestinal ILC2s. Functionally, Aiolos facilitates eosinophil recruitment by supporting IL-5 production and proliferation of ST2+ILC2s through inhibiting PD-1. At the epigenetic level, ILC2 tissue characters are imprinted by open chromatin regions (OCRs) at non-promoters. Intestinal-specific transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr) binds to Ikzf3 (encoding Aiolos) locus, increases the accessibility of an intestinal ILC2-specific OCR, and promotes the Ikzf3 transcription by enhancing H3K27ac. Consequently, Ahr prevents ILC2s entering an “exhausted-like” state through sustaining Aiolos expression. Our work elucidates mechanism of ILC2 tissue adaptation and highlights Aiolos as a potential target of type 2 inflammation.
Introduction
Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are a subset of ILCs that lack T and B cell antigen-specific receptors.1–4 ILC2s mirror the CD4+ type 2 T helper cells in terms of master transcription factor GATA3 expression and functional cytokine production.1,5,6 Both ILC2s and Th2 cells play fundamental roles in expulsion of parasites and induction of allergy through secretion of IL-5 and IL-13, which mediate multiple effects including recruitment of myeloid cells, eosinophil maturation, smooth muscle contraction, and mucin production from epithelial cells.7 Importantly, ILC2s are found to be more dominant source for type 2 cytokines than Th2 cells in tissues under the steady state, and are key drivers for allergic responses at early stage of diseases.8–10 ILC2s have also been reported to promote epithelial regeneration by producing amphiregulin (AREG).11 In addition, ILC2s have recently been indicated to have anti-tumor capacity.12–15 Therefore, ILC2s serve as promising therapeutic target not only for infectious diseases or allergy, but also for tissue damage and tumor.
Developed from the bone marrow (BM) common helper-like innate lymphocyte progenitors (ChILP, lineage−CD127+Id2+α4β7+),16 ILC2s accumulate at mucosal areas starting at an early age and populate locally through homeostatic expansion.17,18 As a result, tissue-resident ILC2s constantly crosstalk with environmental cues and are imprinted with specific characters that may endow ILC2s with site-specific functions.
One reflection of the tissue ILC2 heterogeneity is the preference of cytokine receptor expression.19 IL-18R has been shown to be highly expressed by skin ILC2s.20 Small intestine (SI) is abundant for ILC2s expressing IL-17RB, the receptor for IL-25.21 The IL-17RB+ILC2s have also been found in the lung upon injection of IL-25 and are defined as inflammatory ILC2s (iILC2s).22 ST2, the receptor for IL-33, is expressed by ILC2s distributed broadly in many organs including BM ILC2 progenitors.20,23 Correspondingly, IL-33 has been implicated with diseases from multiple tissues, including the lung, pancreas, intestine, and fat.11,24–28 IL-33 facilitates egress of ILC2s from BM, and is essential for the maintenance and cytokine production of ILC2s during inflammation, as well as generation of ILC2 memory.24–26 IL-33 efficiently expands ILC2s and results in systemic type 2 responses, and is indicated to be applicable in ILC2-related therapy for treatment of diseases, such as graft-versus-host disease or specific types of tumors.13,29–31 Therefore, the elaboration of ST2+ILC2 properties in different microenvironments may facilitate targeting ILC2s in a tissue-specific manner.
ILC2 tissue specificity has been previously investigated by bulk cell RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq, and mass cytometry.20,32,33 However, transcriptome profiles of ILC2s from the large intestine (LI) and pancreas, two organs in which ILC2s have recently been shown to be present in cancer patients and to be relevant to anti-tumor functions of ILC2s, remain unknown.13,14,33 In addition, it is not clear if the signatures of ILC2s from one specific tissue (donor tissue) will change as the cells are relocated to another tissue (host tissue).
In parallel with the transcriptome profiles, the heterogeneity of immune cells is also imprinted at the epigenetic level. Open chromatin regions (OCRs) at proximal and distal enhancers have been shown to play a fundamental role in lineage commitment of immune cells.34,35 Integrated analysis of assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) reveals that transcription factors play essential roles in regulating chromatin accessibilities, histone modifications, and gene expression.36,37 Transcription factors binding to OCRs in multiple tissue ILC2s, which has not been explored before, may be critical upstream events in determining ILC2 tissue properties.
In this study, we interrogated the transcriptomic and epigenetic features of ST2+ILC2s from the BM, pancreas, lung, and LI, as well as the features of KLRG1+ILC2s from SI. We identified Galectin-1 as a lung/pancreas ILC2 feature and Aiolos as an intestinal ILC2 signature under the steady state. Aiolos belongs to the Ikaros zinc-finger family transcription factors and is expressed by various types of immune cells.38 Through forming homodimer or forming heterodimer with Ikaros, or interaction with other non-Ikaros zinc finger family transcription factors and epigenetic modulators, Aiolos regulates gene expression by directly binding to target DNA with its C2H2 Krüppel-like zinc-finger motifs.38 Aiolos has been shown to regulate the function of ILC subsets. For example, Aiolos is important for the maturation of splenic CD11bhighCD27–NK cells and is required for the anti-viral capacity of NK cells through cell-intrinsically sustaining IFN-γ and granzyme B expression by NK cells.39 Nevertheless, mice with defective Aiolos expression in NK cells have an enhanced anti-tumor response in vivo.39 Recent research studies have found that Aiolos is expressed by a transitional ILC3-ILC1 subset, cooperates with T-bet to extinguish the ILC3 program, and facilitates the conversion of ILC3 to ILC1, a process possibly involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease.40–42 So far, studies on the role of Aiolos in ILC2s have been lacking. In this research, we investigated the molecular mechanisms regulating Aiolos expression and the function of Aiolos in tissue ILC2s. Our research is valuable for understanding the molecular regulation of ILC2 tissue specificity and provides potential insights for specifically targeting ILC2s during diseases.
Results
Tissue ILC2s share sub-clusters with similar characteristics
To interrogate the heterogeneity of mouse tissue ILC2s, we performed scRNA-seq on ILC2s sorted from five different organs, including BM, LI, lung, pancreas, and SI using flow cytometry. Lin–ST2+CD25+ was used as an identity for sorting ST2+ILC2s from the BM, LI, lung, and pancreas, more than 95% of which represents genuine ILC2s (Lin–CD45+CD127+GATA3high cells) (Supplementary Fig. S1a, c, e). Since SI ILC2s express low level of ST2,20 Lin–CD45+Thy1lowKLRG1high was used as markers for sorting SI ILC2s, more than 97% of which match identities of gold standard of ILC2s (Lin–CD45+CD127+GATA3high cells) (Supplementary Fig. S1b, d, e). T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) analysis identified six to eight sub-clusters from ILC2s of each tissue (Supplementary Fig. S2a). We observed that ILC2s from the same tissue manifested relatively low heterogeneity (Supplementary Fig. S2a). But a few sub-clusters appeared to be more separate from others, such as cluster 7 from the BM ILC2s, cluster 6 from the LI ILC2s, and cluster 5 and 6 from the pancreas ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S2a). Genes highly expressed by one sub-cluster compared to each of the other sub-cluster in a 1 versus 1 manner were specifically noticed. We found that sub-clusters with featured expression of Lgals1 together with several other characteristics were shared among all five tissue ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S2b). The Lgals1high clusters in BM, lung, and pancreas ILC2s had higher level of S100a4 and S100a6, whereas enriched Tnfsf8 expression in Lgals1high clusters was found in all the tissue ILC2s except for BM and SI ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S2b). Interestingly, Lgals1high clusters in intestinal ILC2s showed distinguished expression of Il17a (Supplementary Fig. S2b). BM, lung, and pancreas ILC2s were found to contain a sub-cluster with featured expression of Notch2 and genes encoding epigenetic modulators, including Kdm6b, Kmt2d, and Cbx3 (Supplementary Fig. S2c). This possibly indicates that Notch signaling supporting the development and expansion of ILC2s is coupled with epigenetic activities.43
Strikingly, cluster 1 from LI ILC2s and cluster 3 from SI ILC2s manifested high expression of Il5 and Il13, indicating them being an activated subpopulation (Supplementary Fig. S2d).44 Tnfrsf9, Cxcr6, and Dgat1 were identified together as featured genes of this activated ILC2 cluster (Supplementary Fig. S2d). We speculated that common signatures in specific clusters could predict co-expression in a cell subpopulation. Using the IL-5-RFP (Red5) mouse,45 we verified the enriched expression of Il13 mRNA in IL-5-RFP+ILC2s from SI, and concomitant abundance of Il5, Il13, and Tnfrsf9 mRNA in IL-5-RFP+ILC2s from LI (Supplementary Fig. S2e). At the protein level, surface expression of 4-1BB (encoded by Tnfrsf9) on ILC2s was hardly detected under the steady state (Supplementary Fig. S2f). However, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin stimulation significantly boosted both surface and intracellular 4-1BB, which was specifically highly expressed by IL-5+ILC2s rather than IL-5–ILC2s in the LI (Supplementary Fig. S2f, g). The data indicate that 4-1BB mark an activated ILC2 subpopulation and that signatures of sub-clusters identified by single-cell sequencing predict their co-expression as markers for tissue ILC2 sub-populations.
ILC2s have distinct tissue properties
Despite sub-clusters with similar features were found in ILC2s from different tissues, analysis aggregating downsampled ILC2s from each tissue revealed strong heterogeneity (Fig. 1a, b and Supplementary Data 1). We performed pairwise comparison on single-cell data between tissue ILC2s, and genes commonly upregulated in one tissue ILC2s compared to all other four tissue ILC2s were designated as “ILC2 tissue-specific genes” (ILC2 TS genes) (Supplementary Data 1). To compensate for the potential gender-biased results obtained from scRNA-seq data of male ILC2s, the expression of representative ILC2 TS genes was evaluated using female tissue ILC2s by quantitative PCR. Taking previously reported ILC2 tissue signatures as controls including Ccr9 (for BM ILC2), Il5 (for LI ILC2), and Il17rb (for SI ILC2), we identified and confirmed several tissue features for ILC2s, including Il6ra and Lztfl1 for BM ILC2s, Tnfrsf9 and Lilr4b for LI ILC2s, Ret, Gzma, and Epas1 for SI ILC2s, Nrp1 for lung ILC2s, and Lgals1, Alox5, and Arg1 for pancreas ILC2s (Fig. 1c–i). Intriguingly, peaked expression of Yes1, Smad7, Ccl5, and Stab1 in lung ILC2s, and peaked expression of Ass1 and Cd24a in pancreas ILC2s were only found in male but not female individuals (Fig. 1h, i), suggesting that sex hormones affect the establishment of lung and pancreas ILC2 tissue features.46 Notably, Lgals1 was also expressed at a higher level in lung ILC2s compared with BM and intestinal ILC2s especially in male mice (Fig. 1i).
Hierarchical clustering analysis indicated a closer relationship of LI and SI ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S3a, b). We then confirmed the differential expression of genes, which were concomitantly higher in LI and SI ILC2s compared to ILC2s from each of the other three tissues, from female mice using quantitative PCR (Fig. 1j and Supplementary Data 1). A series of genes were verified to be intestinal ILC2 features, including aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr) that has been reported to be an intestinal ILC2 character,47 and Ikzf3 encoding the transcription factor Aiolos (Fig. 1j, k). Gene ontology analysis showed that intestinal ILC2s signature genes were significantly enriched in pathways including transcription factor activities, lipid synthesis, cell cycle, cell apoptosis, cytoskeleton organization, protein folding and post-translational modification, and cytokine responses (Fig. 1l), which were not found to be over-presented in non-intestinal ILC2 signature genes (data not shown). This suggests that intestinal ILC2s undertake more active biological processes compared to other tissue ILC2s, and intestinal ILC2s are likely to be more intricately regulated at the molecular level to accommodate their complicated functions.
Tissue microenvironment actively shapes ILC2 characters
We next confirmed the protein expression of ILC2 tissue signatures by flow cytometry (Fig. 2a). In consistency with the mRNA level, 4-1BB, PD-1 (encoded by Pdcd1), and Gp49a (encoded by Lilr4b) were highly expressed by LI ILC2s (Fig. 2a). Galectin-1 (Gal-1, encoded by Lgasl1) specifically marked pancreas and lung ILC2s (Fig. 2a). Notably, Aiolos was confirmed to be a shared feature for LI and SI ILC2s (Fig. 2a). Strikingly, we found that Aiolos was conservatively presented as an intestinal ILC2 signature over BM, lung, and peripheral blood ILC2s in humans (Fig. 2b). To determine if tissue microenvironment affects ILC2 tissue features, we transferred ILC2s isolated from one specific tissue to immune-deficient Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– hosts, in which ILC2s from different tissues were analyzed 4 weeks later (Fig. 2c–g). We analyzed the expression of Aiolos as a marker highly expressed by ILC2s of intestine origins, and Gal-1 as a marker of ILC2s from pancreas and lung origins. Interestingly, we found that ILC2s from non-intestinal origins dramatically upregulated Aiolos expression upon settling in the gut, whereas intestinal ILC2s downregulated Aiolos expression upon arrival at the lung (Fig. 2d, e). Likewise, Gal-1 expression in ILC2s of the BM and intestine-origin was enhanced when ILC2s were located at the lung, whereas Gal-1 was reduced in ILC2s derived from lung upon homing to the intestine (Fig. 2f, g). As a note, ILC2s from non-BM origin could hardly traffic to the BM and few cells could be harvested from the BM of the host, probably due to lack of BM-homing receptors (Fig. 2d, f). Next, adaption of tissue ILC2s to the environment was tested ex vivo, by co-culture of isolated mononuclear cells from different tissues identified with separate congenic leukocyte markers (Fig. 2h, i). In consistency with observed in vivo, we found that intestinal cells triggered Aiolos expression and suppressed Gal-1 expression in pancreas and lung ILC2s as soon as 48 h of culture (Fig. 2h). Conversely, pancreas and lung cells promoted Gal-1 expression while inhibited Aiolos expression in intestinal ILC2s (Fig. 2i). Together, the data suggest that tissue microenvironment actively skews ILC2 tissue identities.
Aiolos is induced in non-intestinal ILC2s by pro-inflammatory cytokines
Next, a series of cytokines were used to treat ST2+ILC2s in vitro to search for potential factors affecting ILC2 tissue signatures (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. S4a). We found that IL-1β and TL1A promoted both mRNA and protein expression of Aiolos from lung ILC2s in vitro (Fig. 3a–c). Moreover, as a cytokine implicated in systemic allergic responses, IL-33 boosted Aiolos expression in ILC2s from multiple organs both in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 3a, d, e). Importantly, Aiolos expression was also induced in human peripheral blood ILC2s by IL-33, suggesting a conserved regulation of Aiolos by IL-33 (Fig. 3f). Together, the above data indicate that Aiolos could be induced in non-intestine organs by pro-inflammatory triggers such as IL-33, reflecting a plasticity of ILC2 tissue features during diseases.
As a lung/pancreas ILC2 signature, Lgals1 mRNA expression could be induced in LI ILC2s by IL-2, IL-25 and TGF-β (Supplementary Fig. S4a); however, only TGF-β could induce Gal-1 expression at the protein level (Supplementary Fig. S4b–d). Interestingly, co-presented as sub-cluster marker with Lgals1 in tissue ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S2b), S100a4 and S100a6 mRNA expression could also be induced by TGF-β (Supplementary Fig. S4e). This implies a role of TGF-β in shaping ILC2 tissue features as well as cluster features.
Aiolos sustains IL-5 expression in ILC2s by inhibiting PD-1
Aiolos plays a critical role in regulating the function of many types of immune cells, including intestinal ILC3s.39,40,42,48 And the induction of Aiolos by IL-33 in ILC2s implies a role of Aiolos in type 2 immunity. We were then prompted to investigate the function of Aiolos in ILC2s. We started the exploration by looking for genes correlated with Ikzf3 (encoding Aiolos) in mRNA expression at the single-cell level. Twelve genes (including Rora, Gata3, Pdcd1, Areg, and Il5) positively correlated with Ikzf3 and three genes (Hspa1a, Jun, and Fos) negatively correlated with Ikzf3 in expression in LI ILC2s were found (Supplementary Table S1).
To study the function of Aiolos on ILC2s in a cell-intrinsic system, we ablated Aiolos expression in IL-33-expanded LI ILC2s using retrovirus (Supplementary Fig. S5a, b). We found that Ikzf3 knockdown led to reduced mRNA expression of Rora, Gata3, Areg, and Il5, whereas the mRNA expression of Pdcd1 was enhanced (Fig. 4a). Moreover, expression of Hspa1a that negatively correlated with Ikzf3 in expression was increased upon disturbance of Aiolos (Fig. 4a). At the protein level, GATA3 expression was not altered in Ikzf3-knockdown ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S5c), whereas the decrease of IL-5 accompanied with enhanced PD-1 expression was significant (Fig. 4b, c). In vivo, ILC2s with curtailed Aiolos expression manifested reduced expression of IL-5, AREG and increased PD-1, when transferred to Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice (Fig. 4d, e and Supplementary Fig. S5d, e). And the function of ILC2s in recruiting eosinophils to the intestine was significantly impaired with Aiolos-deficiency (Fig. 4f). Using a CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9)-transgenic mouse, we deleted Aiolos using guide RNAs targeting Ikzf3 in IL-33-treated ILC2s in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S5f–i). Although Aiolos was only partially deleted in ILC2s probably due to proportional expression of Cas9 (Supplementary Fig. S5f, g and data not shown), reduced IL-5 and increased PD-1 were consistently observed (Supplementary Fig. S5h), whereas GATA3 was similar (Supplementary Fig. S5i). Strikingly, knocking down IKZF3 in IL-33-treated human ILC2s with siRNA led to significant reduction of Aiolos accompanied with decreased IL-5 at both mRNA and protein levels, suggesting a species-conserved regulation of IL-5 expression in ILC2s by Aiolos (Fig. 4g, h).
PD-1 has been shown to suppress the maintenance and IL-5 production of ILC2s.49 Consistently, cell proliferation indicated by Ki67 expression and absolute numbers of ILC2s were reduced upon Ikzf3 knockdown (Fig. 4i, j), whereas no difference in cell apoptosis was observed (Supplementary Fig. S5j). And a dramatic reduction of IL-5 level in the culture supernatant of Ikzf3-knockdown ILC2s was found (Fig. 4k). Strikingly, blockade of PD-1 with a neutralizing antibody reversed the downregulation of IL-5 expression in ILC2s (Fig. 4l), as well as reduced proliferation and numbers of ILC2s (Fig. 4m, n), caused by Ikzf3 knockdown. In addition, ablation of Aiolos had no effect on IL-5 production (Fig. 4o), cell proliferation, or absolute numbers of Pdcd1–/– ILC2s (Fig. 4p, q). Together, our data suggest that Aiolos supports the maintenance and IL-5 production by ILC2s through suppressing PD-1.
Differential OCRs outside of the promoters contribute to ILC2 tissue features
Our above data indicate that tissue ILC2s are endowed with distinct molecular features by the environment. We then determined to search for cis-regulatory elements imprinting tissue identities of ILC2s by examining the chromatin accessibility of tissue ILC2s by ATAC-seq. From ILC2s of five tissues altogether, we identified 50,039 peaks, majority of which were distributed in promoters, introns, and intergenic regions (Supplementary Fig. S6a, b). And 19,538 peaks were consistently identified to be shared among five tissue ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S6a). Principle component analysis manifested heterogeneity of OCRs among tissue ILC2s (Fig. 5a). This heterogeneity is mainly contributed by non-promoter regions indicated by correlation analysis on the accessibility of OCRs (Fig. 5b). Through pairwise comparisons looking for statistically differential peaks, we identified ILC2 tissue-specific open chromatin regions (TS OCRs) that were concomitantly higher in ILC2s from one specific tissue than in ILC2s from every other tissue (Fig. 5c). These ILC2 TS OCRs were expected to contain cis-regulatory elements determining the expression of tissue-specific genes. A total of 579–2126 ILC2 TS OCRs were identified from ILC2s of each tissue. Consistently, ILC2 TS OCRs were more frequently distributed in introns and intergenic regions, except for the BM ILC2 TS OCRs, a large proportion of which was also found at promoters (Supplementary Fig. S6b). We found that ILC2 TS OCR-correlated genes, rather than commonly reduced peaks-related genes, overlapped with ILC2 TS genes including Lztfl1, Klrk1, Smad7, Alox5, and Gzma as representatives (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. S6c).
Next, we performed integrated analysis on ILC2 TS OCRs with gene mRNA expression of tissue ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S6d and Supplementary Data 2). We found that the change of more than 50% differentially expressed genes was in line with genome accessibility at all analyzed regions of the gene locus, indicated by upregulated genes having increased genome accessibility compared to other tissue ILC2s (Supplementary Fig. S6d, upper right quadrant of coordinate axis), whereas decreased genes showing reduced genome accessibility (Supplementary Fig. S6d, lower left quadrant of coordinate axis). Importantly, genome accessibility at the intragenic and intergenic regions had better correlation with gene mRNA expression compared with accessibility of promoter regions, as was indicated by the correlation coefficient (Supplementary Fig. S6d). Together, the data suggest that environmental factors could imprint ILC2 tissue signatures by promoting chromatin accessibility especially at non-promoter regions.
Next, motif enrichment analysis was performed on ILC2 TS OCRs (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Data 3). GATA motifs were found to be shared among all tissue ILC2 TS OCRs, whereas KLF motifs, ROR motifs, SMAD motif, and IRF motifs were enriched in BM, LI, lung, and SI ILC2 OCRs, respectively (Fig. 5e). Among representative motif-related transcription factors, we found that Rora and Smad4 mRNA were expressed at a significantly higher level by the tissue ILC2s in which their motifs were enriched in TS OCRs (Fig. 5f). The mRNA of Irf1, Irf2, Irf3 in SI ILC2s and Smad3 in lung ILC2s showed increased expression on average but failed to reach a significant difference (Fig. 5f). The data imply that the increased chromatin accessibility may be partly but not completely caused by enhanced expression of the transcription factors.
Ahr sustains Aiolos to prevent exhaustion of ILC2 during in vitro expansion
Genes related to LI and SI ILC2 common TS OCRs had overlap with 28 of LI and SI ILC2 common signature genes, including Il13, Ikzf3, Gata3, and Ahr (Fig. 6a). Majority of intestinal ILC2-specific OCRs were distributed at non-promoter regions (Supplementary Fig. S7a). The gene expression in intestinal ILC2s had stronger positive correlation with accessibility of intragenic and intergenic regions of the genome compared to the promoter regions, as was indicated by the correlation coefficient (Supplementary Fig. S7b). Interestingly, an Arnt:Ahr-binding motif was significantly over-presented in intestine-specific OCRs (Supplementary Data 3). Ahr has been shown to possess self-regulatory property by association with and increasing the accessibility of the Ahr locus.47 Combining the previously published ATAC-seq data using Ahr-deficient ILC2s with our analysis, we found that one of the reported Ahr-dependent cis-regulatory elements (Ahr-+14 kb) at the Ahr locus was an intestine-specific OCRs (Supplementary Fig. S7c).37,47
Aiolos expression in Th17 cells has been shown to be regulated by Ahr.48 We then tested if Ahr also regulated Aiolos expression in ILC2s. Interestingly, activation of Ahr using 6-Formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ), a tryptophan-derived ligand of Ahr, led to increased Aiolos expression accompanied with reduced PD-1 expression in ST2+ILC2s in vitro (Fig. 6b, c). In vivo, intestinal ILC2s but not ILC2s from other organs of Ahr–/– mice had significantly reduced Aiolos expression compared with littermate controls (Fig. 6d). Using a BM chimeric mouse generated with mixed BM cells from Ahr-deficient or sufficient donors, we consistently found that Aiolos expression in intestinal ILC2s was significantly lower in the absence of Ahr (Fig. 6e). And PD-1 expression was increased in intestinal ILC2s from Ahr–/– mice compared to controls (Fig. 6f), and in intestinal ILC2s derived from Ahr–/– donors compared with wild-type donors in BM chimeric recipients (Fig. 6g). Together, the data suggest that Ahr supports Aiolos and represses PD-1 expression in intestinal ILC2s through a cell-intrinsic manner.
Ahr has been shown to suppress the maintenance of ILC2s possibly through a cell-extrinsic mechanism and to inhibit production of type 2 cytokines by cell-intrinsically inhibiting ST2 expression.47 Indeed, Ahr–/– ILC2s expressed higher IL-5 during short-term culture (3 days) in vitro (Fig. 6h). However, Ahr–/– ILC2s showed an accelerated “exhausted-like” phenotype when cultured for a longer time (10 days), manifested by reduced IL-5 expression (Fig. 6i) and decreased cell proliferation (Fig. 6j), compared with wild-type ILC2s. Importantly, overexpression of Aiolos in Ahr-deficient ILC2s suppressed PD-1 expression and reversed their “exhausted-like” phenotype by restoring cell proliferation and absolute numbers of IL-5+ILC2s in Ahr–/– ILC2s (Fig. 6k–o). Together, the above data suggest that Ahr is critical for the long-term maintenance and IL-5 production of ST2+ILC2s in vitro through sustaining Aiolos, which suppresses PD-1.
Ahr promotes Ikzf3 transcription in ILC2s at the epigenetic level
Ikzf3 mRNA expression was significantly reduced in Ahr-deficient ILC2s, suggesting that Ahr may regulate Ikzf3 at the transcription level (Fig. 7a). One intestinal ILC2-specific OCR was identified at the intron of the Ikzf3 locus (Ikzf3-+13 kb) (Fig. 7b). Through analysis on the published data, we found that the accessibility of Ikzf3-+13 kb, together with an adjacent OCR (Ikzf3-+19 kb), was significantly reduced in Ahr-deficient intestinal ILC2s (Fig. 7b).47 This suggests that the accessibility of Ikzf3-+13 kb and Ikzf3-+19 kb is Ahr-dependent. Integrated analysis with previous data indicates that Ikzf3-+19 kb is a potential cis-regulatory element with H3K4me2 modification (Fig. 7b).37 Interestingly, both Ikzf3-+13 kb and +19 kb appeared to be ILC2-specific peaks compared with ILC1s and ILC3s (Fig. 7b).37 Consistently, decreased Aiolos expression was not observed in non-ILC2-ILCs in Ahr–/– donors compared with wild-type donors in BM chimeric recipients, indicating that Ahr regulates Ikzf3 expression cell-type specifically (Fig. 7c). A further screening on association with OCRs at the Ikzf3 locus using ChIP Q-PCR identified that Ahr bound to +88 kb, +76 kb, +36 kb, and +13 kb loci of Ikzf3 gene (Fig. 7d) but no other observed OCRs (Fig. 7e). Strikingly, level of H3K27ac marking active transcription was significantly decreased at +88 kb, +87 kb, +33 kb, +13 kb, and +133 bp of the Ikzf3 locus in the absence of Ahr (Fig. 7f), consisting the Ikzf3 promoter (+133 bp) and an Ahr-binding site (+13 kb), but no other positions (Fig. 7g). Together, the data suggest that Ahr associates with the Ikzf3 locus and promotes the transcription of Ikzf3 by enhancing the genome accessibility and favoring H3K27ac modification. As summarized in the working model, our findings elaborate the molecular mechanisms involved in shaping ILC2 characters by tissue microenvironment and highlight Aiolos as a potential target for treating type 2 inflammatory diseases (Supplementary Fig. S8).
Discussion
In this study, we have interrogated the heterogeneity of tissue ILC2s shaped by tissue microenvironment at the transcriptome and epigenome level. We identified Aiolos as an intestinal ILC2-specific feature and Gal-1 as a lung/pancreas ILC2-specific feature under the steady state. Cross-tissue adoptive transfer demonstrated that the tissue signature of ILC2s was strongly shaped by microenvironment. Importantly, Aiolos could also be triggered by pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-33 in non-intestinal ILC2s, reflecting a plasticity of ILC2 tissue-specific feature in pathologic conditions. Our study highlights the importance for verification of tissue-specific features both under the steady state and during diseases for targeting ILC2s in site-specific and disease-specific manner.
Although ILC2 tissue features may be driven by one or two dominant factors, such as IL-33, IL-1β, TL1A, and TGF-β identified in our research, a collection of both supportive and suppressive signals may cooperatively regulate ILC2 tissue signatures. Whole genome-wide screening on tissue transcriptional profiles, facilitated by ligand and receptor database in addition to antibody blockade and mouse genetic tools, will be helpful for an elucidation of factors endowing ILC2 tissue features.
We have identified Gal-1 as a lung and pancreas ILC2 signature. Gal-1 is an endogenous lectin that could be secreted to the extracellular matrix and bind to glycans bearing N-acetyllactosamine, which can be found in a variety of cell surface receptors including CD45, CD43, and CD7.50 Gal-1 plays complex roles and acts as a double edge sword in inflammatory responses. On the one hand, Gal-1 suppresses autoimmunity by expanding regulatory T cells, inducing tolerogenic DCs and increasing the apoptosis of Th1 and Th17 cells.51–53 On the other hand, a recent finding has shown that Gal-1 acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern and increases inflammation and lethality of sepsis.54 Except for functioning as a secretory protein, Gal-1 located intracellularly has been associated a transformed phenotype of malignant breast cells and anti-tumor capacity of T cells, suggesting a cell-intrinsic regulation by Gal-1.55,56 Therefore, secretory Gal-1 by ILC2 may bridge the crosstalk of ILC2 and other immune or non-immune cells in tissues. And intracellular Gal-1 may regulate maintenance and function of ILC2s through cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Considering that pancreatic ILC2s could promote anti-tumor response of CD8 T cells upon α-PD-1 treatment, it will be interesting to investigate the role of Gal-1 on pancreatic ILC2s during pancreatic cancer.13
We demonstrated that Hspa1a was negatively correlated with Ikzf3 expression and knocking down Ikzf3 caused upregulation of Hspa1a, encoding the heat shock protein Hsp70. Hsp70 exhibits essential roles in protein homeostasis by prevention of protein misfolding, facilitating stress granule disassembling and restoring protein translation, and mediating protein degradation after ubiquitination.57–59 Typically, Hsp70 is triggered by elevated temperature, oxidative stress, or protein aggregation.59 It remains to be examined whether Ikzf3 knockdown-induced Hspa1a expression is due to a stressed state of the cells. Moreover, function of extracellular/secretory Hsp70 has been shown to affect CD8 cytotoxic response and tissue remodeling.60,61 Whether ablating Ikzf3 could enhance extracellular Hsp70 derived from ILC2s and then affects other types of cells in tissue environments remain to be further explored.
We have shown that majority of ILC2 TS OCRs are distributed at non-promoter areas. This suggests that potential cis-regulatory elements at non-promoter regions play important roles in regulating the expression of ILC2 tissue-specific genes. In addition, our finding that ILC2 tissue features are strongly shaped by environmental cues indicates a plasticity of ILC2 functions. However, the discovery of bona fide ILC2 tissue feature, which could hardly be driven by tissue environment, remains to be explored. Integrated multi-omics analyses involving genome-wide DNA methylation sequencing may facilitate the discovery of fate-stable ILC2 tissue signatures.
As a ligand-dependent transcription factor broadly expressed by the immune and non-immune cells, Ahr has been shown to play a critical role in intestinal immunity.62–64 Ahr has been found to suppress the accumulation (possibly through cell-extrinsic mechanism) and function of ILC2s previously.47 In consistency with the conclusion of the reported research, Ahr–/– ILC2s initially expressed higher IL-5 when cultured for a short time (3 days) in vitro. However, we observed that Ahr–/– ILC2s had significantly defective expansion and reduced IL-5 production when cultured for a longer time (10 days). The condition of those cells was described as “exhausted-like” phenotype since it manifested hypo-function and contraction after continuous activation, which was in contrast to their homeostatic status under the steady state. Interestingly, similar phenomenon has been reported in Cbfβ–/– mice, in which Cbfβ–/–ILC2s produce higher IL-5 under steady state whereas show “exhausted hyporesponsiveness” with decreased secretion of type 2 cytokines when cultured in vitro or during chronic inflammation in vivo.65 Consistent with the role of Aiolos in suppressing PD-1, “exhausted-like” Ahr–/– ILC2s have reduced Aiolos expression accompanied by increased PD-1 expression. And we further showed that the exhaustion of Ahr-deficient ILC2s could be rescued by overexpression of Aiolos. Therefore, Ahr prevents ILC2s entering an “exhausted-like” state by supporting Aiolos expression. Our work provides a mechanism for regulating ILC2 exhaustion and could be enlightening for optimizing ILC2 in vitro expansion used for ILC2-based cell therapies.
From published data, we have identified two OCRs (Ikzf3-+13 kb and Ikzf3-+19 kb) at intron 1 of the Ikzf3 locus, the accessibility of which is dependent on Ahr in ILC2s.47 These two sites could possibly act as Ahr-dependent enhancers driving Ikzf3 expression in ILC2s. Moreover, Ikzf3-+13 kb and Ikzf3-+19 kb are specifically accessible in ILC2s but not in ILC1s or ILC3s,37 in align with the observation that Aiolos was not decreased in non-ILC2-ILCs of Ahr-deficient mice, suggesting that epigenetic regulation of Ikzf3 by Ahr is cell-type specific. In summary, our findings suggest that integrated analysis of tissue-resident cells at transcriptome and epigenome level reveals distinct regulatory manners involving specific sets of machineries imprinted by tissue microenvironment. Interrogation of molecular features of multi-tissue ILC2s will provide tissue-specific targets for treating type 2 inflammatory diseases occurring in different organs.
Methods
Mice
Cas9-transgenic mice were generated through oocyte injection of genetically modified androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells (AG-haESCs) according to the previous publications. To establish the AG-haESC line carrying constitutively expressed Cas9, first we constructed a transposon mediated Cas9 transgene vector PB-Cas9-mRFP via subcloning Cas9 cassette into a PB-mRFP backbone. Then, PB-Cas9-mRFP supplemented with PBase were transfected into AG-haESCs using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life technology) according to the manufacturer’s instruction manual. After cell culture for 1 week, mRFP positive haploid cells were enriched with flow cytometry (FACS AriaII, BD Biosciences), following with single-cell expansion. The established cell lines were selected based on their mutation efficiency and then prepared for mouse construction.
Wild-type mice were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal (Shanghai, China). CD45.1 mice were purchased from the Jackson laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice were purchased from Taconics Biosciences (Rensselaer, NY). Il5tm1.1(icre)Lky/J (Red5) mice were purchased from the Jackson laboratory, and Ahr–/– mice were generated previously.45,66 Pdcd1–/– mice were ordered from Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. The mice used in this study were C57BL/6 background and maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions. For single-cell RNA sequencing and ATAC-sequencing, 6-week-old male mice were used. In other experiments, both male and female 6–10-week-old mice were used. All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” and approved by the institutional biomedical research ethics committee of the Shanghai Institutes for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Isolation of mononuclear cells from tissues
Bone marrow cells were processed by flushing femur and tibia using a syringe
For isolation of mononuclear cells from lung or pancreas, tissues were dissected and blood clots, fat tissues, and bronchus were discarded. Lung or pancreas tissues were cut into pieces and digested with 5 ml RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing DNase I (75 ug/ml for digestion of lung, pancreas was digested without DNase I, Sigma-Aldrich) and collagenase VIII (200 U/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C for 1 h (for digestion of lung) or 30 min (for digestion of pancreas). The digested tissues were homogenized by vigorous shaking and passed through a 70 μm cell strainer. Mononuclear cells were then harvested from the interphase of a 40 and 80% Percoll (GE Healthcare) gradient after a spin at 2500 rpm for 20 min at room temperature.
For isolation of large and SI lamina propria lymphocytes, tissues were dissected. Fat tissues and peyer’s patches in the SI were removed. The intestines were then cut into pieces, washed, and shaken in PBS containing 1 mM dithiothreitol for 10 min at room temperature. Intestines were incubated with shaking at 220 rpm in PBS containing 30 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at 37 °C for 10 min for two cycles. The tissues were then digested in 5 ml RPMI 1640 medium containing DNase I (150 ug/ml) and collagenase VIII (150 U/ml) at 37 °C in an incubator with 5% CO2 for 1.5 h. Mononuclear cells were then harvested from the interphase of a 40 and 80% Percoll gradient after a spin at 2500 rpm for 20 min at room temperature.
Isolation of mononuclear cells from human samples
The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of Shanghai Tongren Hospital (approval number 2019-052-01 and 2020-043-01) for obtaining human BM cells and human colon tissues. Human BM cells were obtained from the remaining materials of healthy donors subjected to medical tests aged from 30 to 65 years old. Human peripheral blood was obtained from the remaining materials of healthy donors subjected to medical tests aged from 20 to 30 years old. BM cells or peripheral blood was mixed with an equal volume of PBS and then mononuclear cells were then harvested from the interphase of Ficoll (GE Healthcare) gradient for BM cells and or the interphase of Lymphoprep™(Axis-Shield) gradient for peripheral blood after a spin at 2000 rpm for 20 min at room temperature.
Human colon samples were obtained from the intraoperative normal tissues (≥10 cm away from the tumor) collected from colorectal cancer patients with informed consent at the Department of General Surgery of Tongren Hospital. Fresh tissues were washed with pre-cold medium and the fat tissues and muscle were removed. The intestinal mucosa about 2 cm × 2 cm was cut into pieces and shaken in PBS containing 1 mM dithiothreitol for 10 min at room temperature. Then, tissue pieces were further incubated in a shaker at 220 rpm in PBS containing 30 mM EDTA at 37 °C for 10 min for two times. The tissues were then digested in 10 ml RPMI 1640 medium containing DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich, 300 ug/ml) and collagenase VIII (Sigma-Aldrich, 400 U/ml) at 37 °C in the cell culture incubator with 5% CO2 for 6 h. Mononuclear cells were then harvested from the interphase of a 40 and 80% Percoll gradient after a spin at 2500 rpm for 20 min at room temperature.
Human lung samples were obtained from the surgery collected from patients with lung cancer from Shanghai Chest Hospital with informed consent. Fresh lung tissues from distal regions of the tumor (>5 cm) were cut into pieces and digested with DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich, 350 ug/ml) and collagenase VIII (Sigma-Aldrich, 112.5 U/ml) at 37 °C for 45 min. Cells harvested from the digestion were directly used for analysis.
Flow cytometry and cell sorting
Dead cells were stained with live and dead violet viability kit (Invitrogen) and were gated out in cell sorting and cell analysis. Anti-mouse CD16/32 antibody was used to block the non-specific binding to Fc receptors before all surface stainings. Antibodies used for regular flow cytometry are listed in Supplementary Data 4. For detection of nuclear factor, cells were fixed and permeabilized using a Mouse Regulatory T Cell Staining Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For detection of protein expression in cytoplasm, BD Cytofix/Cytoperm™ kit was used. For detection of 4-1BB, AREG, GM-CSF, and IL-5, cells were stimulated by PMA (50 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) and ionomycin (500 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h, and brefeldin A (2 ug/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) was added for the last 2 h before cells were harvested for analysis. Unless used for sorting, cells were collected by using Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar). For cells sorted for scRNA-seq analysis, ILC2s from BM, LI, lung, and pancreas were sorted as Lin–ST2+CD25+ cells. And ILC2s from SI were sorted as Lin–Thy1lowCD45+KLRG1+ cells. For cells sorted for ATAC-seq analysis, ILC2s from BM were sorted as Lin–ST2+CD25+ cells. ILC2s for LI, lung, and pancreas were sorted as Lin–CD45+CD127+ST2+CD25+. And ILC2s from SI were sorted as Lin–CD127+Thy1lowCD45+KLRG1+ cells. BM ILC2s were sorted using BD FACSARIA III (BD biosciences). And ILC2s of other tissues were sorted using Moflo Astrios (Beckman). For mouse cell sorting used for sequencing, lineage markers were CD3, B220, CD11b, FcεRI, and CD11c. In all other mouse experiments, lineage markers were CD3, B220, CD11b, and CD11c. In all human experiments, lineage markers were CD3, CD5, CD19, CD11b, CD11c, CD14, and FcεRI.
scRNA-seq analysis
ILC2s sorted from five tissues of wild-type male mice were used for scRNA-seq. Viability of cells was more than 95% before cells were loaded on the Chromium Single Cell Controller (10X Genomics). Libraries were generated using the Chromium Single Cell 3′ Reagents Kits (v2 chemistry; 10X Genomics) following manufacturer’s protocol.67 The obtained libraries were sequenced on Illumina Hiseq X Ten system. Libraries of ILC2s from lung, LI, and SI were generated together in one batch of experiment from ten mice pooled together, and libraries of ILC2s from BM, pancreas were generated in another batch of experiment from ten mice pooled together. Two rounds of sequencing were performed on each library of ILC2s from every tissue to obtain abundant reads and pooled for subsequent analysis. Cell Ranger software (v2.2.0, 10X Genomics) was used to perform demultiplexing, alignment and counting. The reads were aligned to the mm10 genome. Further quality control was performed using Scater package:68 (1) cells with fewer than 102.5 UMIs, or with over 10% UMIs derived from mitochondrial genome (ENSMUSG00000064357,ENSMUSG00000064370,ENSMUSG00000064341,ENSMUSG00000064363,ENSMUSG00000065947,ENSMUSG00000064367,ENSMUSG00000064368,ENSMUSG00000064354,ENSMUSG00000064351,ENSMUSG00000064345,ENSMUSG00000064356,ENSMUSG00000064358,ENSMUSG00000064360), were removed. (2) Genes failed to be detected with a minimum total read counts of five in at least two cells were filtered. ScRNA-seq analysis was performed using Seurat package (version 2 and 3) in R (version 3.6.1).69,70 Briefly, counts were normalized using LogNormalize function. Then, FindViariableGenes, RunPCA, and JackStraw functions were used to perform linear dimensional reduction based on statistically significant principal components. FindClusters, RunTSNE, and FindAllMarkers were used to identify the cell clusters, visualize cluster, and look for differentially expressed genes. Contaminated clusters with representative signature genes for ILC3s (Il22, Rorc, Ccr6, Klrb1c), B cells (Jchain, Mzb1, Ebf1, Cd79a), T cells (Cd28, Cd3e, Cd8a), endothelial cells (Thbd, Cd93), NK cells (Klrb1c), myeloid cells (Lyz2, Itgam, Itgax), and Group 1 ILCs (Tbx21, Ifng) were filtered from analysis. Two rounds of filters were performed for LI and pancreas ILC2s. MergeSeurat was used to aggregate quality-filtered ILC2 single-cell data from all tissues. Cell counts of tissue ILC2s were downsampled to 2734 cells according to sample with fewest cell counts (Lung ILC2s). Hierarchically, proximity analysis was performed using PlotClusterTree function. Differentially expressed genes in clusters were identified using “1 versus 1” comparison between all clusters as one strategy and “1 versus all (other clusters as a bulk population)” as another strategy. Large and small intestinal ILC2 common signatures were obtained by overlapping large and small intestinal ILC2 differentially expressed genes compared to each of the other three tissue ILC2s (BM, lung, and pancreas ILC2s) through a “1 versus 1” method separately. Gene ontology analysis was performed using the “Gene Ontology Resource” (http://geneontology.org).
Analysis of mRNA expression by real-time RT-PCR
RNA was isolated with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using GoScript™ Reverse Transcription kit (Promega). Real-time PCR was performed using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche Mannheim) and reactions were run with QuantStudio 7 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The results were displayed as relative expression values normalized to Actb (for mouse) or GAPDH (for human) mRNA expression. Primers used for real-time RT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Data 5. Heatmaps based on Log10(fold change) of relative expression were generated using HemI 1.0.
Gene correlation analysis at the single-cell level
Clusters suspicious to be affected by enzymatic digestions in LI ILC2s were further removed for gene correlation analysis at the single-cell level.71,72 “Single-cell correlation” analysis was based on normalized counts in each cell at the single-cell level.73 Cells with no detected Ikzf3 expression was filtered from analysis. Significantly correlated genes in expression were identified according to p value of Pearson correlation analysis (p < 0.05).
ATAC-seq and analysis and integrated analysis with scRNA-seq
Biological duplicates of 50,000 ILC2s from five tissues of wild-type male mice (16 mice were pooled for BM, pancreas and lung ILC2, 10 mice were pooled for SI and LI ILC2) were sorted by flow cytometry and were subjected to ATAC-seq analysis. Library preparation was performed using TruePrepTM DNA Library Prep Kit V2 for Illumina® kit from Vanzyme (Nanjing, China) based on a previously published method.74 1.2 × Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) were used to purify libraries for sequencing; 150 paired-end sequencing was performed with Illumina HiSeq X Ten.
ATAC-seq raw sequence reads were initially processed by FastQC (version 0.11.9) for quality control, and then adapter sequences and poor quality reads were removed. Quality-filtered reads were then mapped to mouse genome (mm10) using Bowtie2 (version 2.2.9), and only uniquely mapped reads were kept. Sam files were converted to Bam format using Samtools (version 1.8). Peak calling was done using MACS (2.1.1) with an initial threshold q value of 0.01 as cutoff. Only peaks repeatedly present in biological repeats were considered as “genuine peaks.” Overlapped tissue ILC2 ATAC-seq peaks were identified by first quantifying peak signal using bedtools (version 2.29.2) multicov. “MergePeaks” of HOMER (version 4.1.5) was used to define common peaks. Then, differentially expressed peaks were analyzed using DESeq2. Differentially expressed peaks significantly higher or lower (p < 0.05) in one tissue ILC2s compared to other tissue ILC2s through a 1 versus 1 comparison mode were overlapped. And the overlapped peaks were defined as ILC2 TS OCRs or “commonly decreased peaks.” To look for large and small intestinal ILC2 common OCRs, differentially expressed peaks were first identified in large intestinal or small intestinal ILC2s compared to each of the other three tissue ILC2s, respectively, and then overlapped peaks were intestinal ILC2-specific OCRs. Visualization of read count data was performed by converting raw bam files to bigwig files using IGV tools. Motif enrichment analysis was performed using HOMER.
Integrated analysis of ATAC-seq and scRNA-seq data was performed similar a previously published method.75 The correlation of mRNA expression with chromatin accessibility was performed using Log2(fold change) (Log2Fc) of mRNA expression with average Log2Fc of accessibility of peaks in promoter, intragenic (5’UTR + 3’UTR + exon + intron) or intergenic regions annotated by HOMER. Only genes with significantly differential mRNA expression for more than 1.2 fold in tissue ILC2s through a “1 versus all comparison” were analyzed. Average Log2Fc of genome accessibility was calculated by sum of Log2Fc in accessibility of all observed peaks divided by the number of observed peaks at promoter, intragenic, or intergenic regions of correlated genes, regardless of significance in differential expression. Log2Fc of gene expression was analyzed by Seurat through “1 versus all” comparison. Specifically, for LI and SI common ILC2 features, the average Log2Fc (mRNA expression fold and fold of genome accessibility were both processed in this way) was obtained by following calculation. First, Log2Fc of LI or SI ILC2 over each of the other three tissue ILC2s (BM, lung, and pancreas ILC2s) through a “1 versus 1” method was summed and divided by 3 to obtain Log2Fc(LI/BM–lung–pancreas) and Log2Fc(SI/BM–lung–pancreas). Then, the above 2 Log2Fc values were further added up and divided by 2. Pearson correlation analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0.
In vitro culture of mouse ILC2s and treatment with cytokines
ILC2s (Lin–ST2+CD25+cells) were purified from the LI of wild-type mice, Ahr–/– or Pdcd1–/– mice and cultured in 96-well flat-bottom plates in RPMI 1640 complete medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 2 mM glutamine (Gibco), 50 uM of β-mercaptoethanol, non-essential amino acid (Gibco), 333 U/ml of penicillin (Gibco), and 333 µg/ml of streptomycin (Gibco). For all in vitro experiments used in this study, concentration for IL-7 (Peprotech) and IL-33 (BioLegend) were 10 ng/ml.
Sorting, culture, and siRNA treatment of human ILC2s
Human ILC2s were sorted as (Lin–CD45+CD127+CRTH2+) by flow cytometry from PBMC mixed from ten individuals as one biological sample. Cells were then cultured in 96-well flat-bottom plates with 10,000 cells per well with the same medium recipe used for culturing mouse ILC2s. Cells were treated with recombinant human (rh)IL-2(20 ng/ml, Peprotech) and rhIL-7(20 ng/ml, Peprotech) in the presence or absence of rhIL-33(50 ng/ml, Peprotech) for 5 days. For ablation of IKZF3, siRNA(3pmol) targeting IKZF3 or control siRNA were transfected to purified human ILC2s cultured with IL-2, IL-7, and IL-33 for 3 days using Lipofectamine™ 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). mRNA and protein expression of Aiolos and IL-5 was analyzed 2 days after transfection.
In vitro retroviral infection and treatment of mouse ILC2s with α-PD-1
MSCV-LTRmiR30-PIG (LMP) is a retroviral vector designed for the dual expression of GFP and short hairpin RNAs (shRNA) (Open Biosystems). Retro-gRNA-eGFP plasmid was a gift from Christophe Benoist & Diane Mathis (Addgene plasmid #116926; RRID:Addgene_116926).76 MIG plasmid was used previously.77 MIG-Ikzf3 was generated by cloning mouse Ikzf3 cDNA to MIG vector. LMP-Ikzf3shRNA#1, LMP-Ikzf3shRNA#2 were generated by ligation of synthesized DNA sequences targeting Ikzf3 (Supplementary Data 5) to the LMP vector. Ikzf3-sgRNA#1 and Ikzf3-sgRNA#2 were generated by cloning synthesized DNA sequenced targeting Ikzf3 to the Retro-gRNA-eGFP vector (Supplementary Data 5). Phoenix cells were transfected with retroviral plasmids and the packaging plasmid 10A1 using polyethylenimine (PEI, Polysciences). Viral supernatant was collected after transfection.
For retroviral infection of ILC2s (using LMP, LMP-Ikzf3shRNA#2, MIG or MIG-Ikzf3), purified large intestinal ST2+ILC2s from wild-type, or Ahr–/–, or Pdcd1–/– mice were expanded with IL-7 and IL-33 for 5 days. On day 5, spin-infection was performed using cells in 96-well flat-bottom plates in 200 ul of virus supernatant containing 8 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich), IL-7 (10 ng/ml), and IL-33 (10 ng/ml) at 2500 rpm for 1.5 h at 30 °C and cultured with an additional 2 h in an incubator with 5% CO2. Virus supernatant was then replaced with complete medium with IL-7 and IL-33. The retroviral transduction was repeated 24 h later. The infected GFP+ cells were sorted 24 h after the second spin-infection and re-plated with an equal number of 30,000 cells/well in each group. Cells were treated with or without α-PD-1 (J43, 10 ug/ml, Bioxcel) or hamster IgG (10 ug/ml, BioLegend) for 48 h before analysis. Brefeldin A (2 ug/ml) was added for the last 2 h of culture for detection of IL-5 by flow cytometry.
In the Ikzf3-knockdown experiment, mRNA expression of Hspa1a in purified GFP+ cells was analyzed 24 h after retroviral infection. For detection of Gata3, Rora, Il5, Pdcd1, and Areg mRNA expression, GFP+ cells were harvested 72 h after retroviral infection.
Adoptive transfer of cells to Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice
For repletion of ILC2s from different tissues to Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice, BM ILC2s, LI ILC2s, lung ILC2s, and SI ILC2s were sorted by flow cytometry and cultured with IL-7 and IL-33 for 4 days. A total of 2 × 105 cells were harvested and transferred to Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice, which were immediately intraperitoneally injected with 500 ng IL-33 for 4 consecutive days. Mice were sacrificed for analysis 4 weeks after transfer.
For construction of BM chimeric mice, BM cells were harvested from age and gender-matched CD45.2-Ahr–/–and CD45.1-wild-type mice and mixed at a ratio of 1:1. A total of 5 × 106 mixed BM cells were intravenously injected into Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice irradiated with 550 rads with 4-h interval. Host mice were sacrificed for analysis 6 weeks after transfer.
For adoptive transfer of Ikzf3-knockdown ILC2s, 2 × 105 ILC2s infected with control virus or LMP-Ikzf3shRNA#2 virus were intravenously injected into Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice. For detection of IL-5, PD-1, and AREG expression in ILC2s, mice were sacrificed 4 weeks after transfer for analysis. For analysis of eosinophil infiltration, Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– mice reconstituted with ILC2s infected with control virus or LMP-Ikzf3shRNA#2 virus were treated with 500 ng IL-33 for 4 consecutive days and sacrificed for analysis on day 5.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
LI ILC2s (Lin−ST2+CD25+ cells) were purified from littermate Ahr–/– and Ahr+/+ mice and cultured with IL-7 and IL-33 for 7 days. For ChIP of Ahr, cells were treated with FICZ (200 nM) for 4 h before cells were harvested. Cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min and the reaction was stopped by adding glycine solution of a final concentration of 0.125 M for 10 min. Chromatin was sheared by sonication with Vibra-Cell™ VCX150 (SONICS) (20% of power, 10 s on and 15 s off for 36 cycles) to 500 bp, and immune-precipitated with anti-Ahr (Enzo Life Science), or anti-H3K27ac (Abcam), or rabbit IgG (Abcam). The target DNA was purified by Magna ChIPTM Protein A Magnetic Beads (Sigma, 16-661X) and the eluted DNA was extracted and used for real-time PCR analysis. Primers used for quantitative PCR following ChIP are listed in Supplementary Data 5.
Statistical methods and Z-score
The following statistical analysis methods were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5.0 and 8.0). Statistical analyses were performed with two-tailed paired Student’s t-test, except that Supplementary Fig. S2e, g was performed with two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test and Fig. 7d–g was performed with one-tailed paired Student’s t-test. Paired data were cells from one mouse from the same batch of experiment, or littermate pairs of mice. Data from such experiments are presented as means + SEM; *p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
For where heatmaps were made with standard score (Z-score), the standard score of a raw score x is Z = (x – μ)/σ. μ is the mean of the expression and σ is the standard deviation of the expression.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Fernandez-Salguero P and the National Cancer Institute for sharing Ahr−/− mice. We would like to thank Dr Liang Zhou for reagent support and critical reading of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank Dr Xiaohuan Guo and Dr Jun Qin for their help on this research. We thank members of the Ju Qiu laboratory for their suggestions on this project. This study was supported by grant 2020YFA0509103 (to Ju Qiu), 2019YFA0802502 (to Ju Qiu), 2020YFA0509200 (to L. S.) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, grant 32022027 (to Ju Qiu), 31970860 (to Ju Qiu), 81971487 (to L. S.), 82070730 (to Huiming Sheng), 81672083 (to Huiming Sheng), 81702071 (to Hanxiao Sun) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and grant 20ZR1466900 (to Ju Qiu), 20ZR1430200 (to L. S.), 20142202300 (to L. S.) from Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (STCSM), and grant SSMU-ZDCX20180401 from Innovative research team of high-level local universities in Shanghai.
Author contributions
Ju Qiu and Lei Shen designed the research. Jinxin Qiu and Jingjing Zhang conducted the mouse experiments and analyzed the data. Huiming Sheng, Jinxin Qiu, and Hanxiao Sun designed and performed experiments and analysis using human samples. Yan Ji performed bioinformatics analyses. Jinxin Qiu, Ju Qiu, Zhen Shao, and Shiyang Li participated in bioinformatics data organizations. Meizhu Bai and Jinsong Li made the Cas9-transgenic mice. Zhitao Gu, Qiangling Sun, Jue Gong, Jupei Tang, and Yunpeng Zhang helped with experiments. Ju Qiu and Jinxin Qiu wrote the manuscript. Ju Qiu, Lei Shen, and Huiming Sheng supervised the project.
Data availability
The data files for the tissue ILC2 scRNA-seq in this study were deposited in the National Omics Data Encyclopedia (NODE) database in experiment OEX003341 under the project OEP000918, and were also deposited in GEO: GSE153748. The accession number for ILC2 ATAC-seq data in this study is GEO: GSE150179. Tissue ILC2 sub-cluster signature genes and tissue ILC2-specific OCRs were uploaded as processed data in GEO153748 and GSE150179, respectively. ATAC-seq data and ChIP-seq data for small intestinal ILCs were published previously with accession number GSE85153 and GSE85156.37 ATAC-seq data on ILC2s from Ahr-deficient and control mice of the Rag1−/− background were published previously with accession number GSE119461.47
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Jinxin Qiu, Jingjing Zhang, Yan Ji, Hanxiao Sun.
Contributor Information
Yan Ji, Email: jiyantrust@163.com.
Huiming Sheng, Email: HMSHENG@shsmu.edu.cn.
Lei Shen, Email: lshen@shsmu.edu.cn.
Ju Qiu, Email: qiuju@sibs.ac.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41385-021-00431-5.
References
- 1.Vivier E, et al. Innate lymphoid cells: 10 years on. Cell. 2018;174:1054–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moro K, et al. Innate production of T(H)2 cytokines by adipose tissue-associated c-Kit(+)Sca-1(+) lymphoid cells. Nature. 2010;463:540–544. doi: 10.1038/nature08636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neill DR, et al. Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature. 2010;464:1367–1370. doi: 10.1038/nature08900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Price AE, et al. Systemically dispersed innate IL-13-expressing cells in type 2 immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:11489–11494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003988107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klose CS, Artis D. Innate lymphoid cells as regulators of immunity, inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:765–774. doi: 10.1038/ni.3489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou L. Striking similarity: GATA-3 regulates ILC2 and Th2 cells. Immunity. 2012;37:589–591. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gurram RK, Zhu J. Orchestration between ILC2s and Th2 cells in shaping type 2 immune responses. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2019;16:225–235. doi: 10.1038/s41423-019-0210-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Halim TY, et al. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells are critical for the initiation of adaptive T helper 2 cell-mediated allergic lung inflammation. Immunity. 2014;40:425–435. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Klein Wolterink RG, et al. Pulmonary innate lymphoid cells are major producers of IL-5 and IL-13 in murine models of allergic asthma. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012;42:1106–1116. doi: 10.1002/eji.201142018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McGinty JW, et al. Tuft-cell-derived leukotrienes drive rapid anti-helminth immunity in the small intestine but are dispensable for anti-protist immunity. Immunity. 2020;52:528–541.e527. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Monticelli LA, et al. IL-33 promotes an innate immune pathway of intestinal tissue protection dependent on amphiregulin-EGFR interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:10762–10767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509070112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Trabanelli S, Chevalier MF, Derre L, Jandus C. The pro- and anti-tumor role of ILC2s. Semin. Immunol. 2019;41:101276. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moral JA, et al. ILC2s amplify PD-1 blockade by activating tissue-specific cancer immunity. Nature. 2020;579:130–135. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2015-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang S, et al. Transdifferentiation of tumor infiltrating innate lymphoid cells during progression of colorectal cancer. Cell Res. 2020;30:610–622. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0312-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wagner M, et al. Tumor-derived lactic acid contributes to the paucity of intratumoral ILC2s. Cell Rep. 2020;30:2743–2757.e2745. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Klose CSN, et al. Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages. Cell. 2014;157:340–356. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schneider C, et al. Tissue-resident group 2 innate lymphoid cells differentiate by layered ontogeny and in situ perinatal priming. Immunity. 2019;50:1425–1438.e1425. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gasteiger G, Fan X, Dikiy S, Lee SY, Rudensky AY. Tissue residency of innate lymphoid cells in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. Science. 2015;350:981–985. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kabata H, Moro K, Koyasu S. The group 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2) regulatory network and its underlying mechanisms. Immunological Rev. 2018;286:37–52. doi: 10.1111/imr.12706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ricardo-Gonzalez RR, et al. Tissue signals imprint ILC2 identity with anticipatory function. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:1093–1099. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang Y, et al. S1P-dependent interorgan trafficking of group 2 innate lymphoid cells supports host defense. Science. 2018;359:114–119. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huang Y, et al. IL-25-responsive, lineage-negative KLRG1(hi) cells are multipotential ‘inflammatory’ type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:161–169. doi: 10.1038/ni.3078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hoyler T, et al. The transcription factor GATA-3 controls cell fate and maintenance of type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. 2012;37:634–648. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martinez-Gonzalez I, et al. Allergen-experienced group 2 innate lymphoid cells acquire memory-like properties and enhance allergic lung inflammation. Immunity. 2016;45:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oboki K, et al. IL-33 is a crucial amplifier of innate rather than acquired immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:18581–18586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003059107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Halim TY, Krauss RH, Sun AC, Takei F. Lung natural helper cells are a critical source of Th2 cell-type cytokines in protease allergen-induced airway inflammation. Immunity. 2012;36:451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dalmas E, et al. Interleukin-33-activated islet-resident innate lymphoid cells promote insulin secretion through myeloid cell retinoic acid production. Immunity. 2017;47:928–942.e927. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Molofsky AB, et al. Interleukin-33 and interferon-gamma counter-regulate group 2 innate lymphoid cell activation during immune perturbation. Immunity. 2015;43:161–174. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schmitz J, et al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005;23:479–490. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim J, et al. Intratumorally establishing type 2 innate lymphoid cells blocks tumor growth. J. Immunol. 2016;196:2410–2423. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bruce DW, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells treat and prevent acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127:1813–1825. doi: 10.1172/JCI91816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yudanin NA, et al. Spatial and temporal mapping of human innate lymphoid cells reveals elements of tissue specificity. Immunity. 2019;50:505–519.e504. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Simoni Y, et al. Human innate lymphoid cell subsets possess tissue-type based heterogeneity in phenotype and frequency. Immunity. 2017;46:148–161. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yoshida H, et al. The cis-regulatory atlas of the mouse immune system. Cell. 2019;176:897–912.e820. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ernst J, et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature. 2011;473:43–49. doi: 10.1038/nature09906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bao X, et al. A novel ATAC-seq approach reveals lineage-specific reinforcement of the open chromatin landscape via cooperation between BAF and p63. Genome Biol. 2015;16:284. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0840-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gury-BenAri M, et al. The spectrum and regulatory landscape of intestinal innate lymphoid cells are shaped by the microbiome. Cell. 2016;166:1231–1246.e1213. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Read KA, Jones DM, Freud AG, Oestreich KJ. Established and emergent roles for Ikaros transcription factors in lymphoid cell development and function. Immunological Rev. 2021;300:82–99. doi: 10.1111/imr.12936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Holmes ML, et al. Peripheral natural killer cell maturation depends on the transcription factor Aiolos. EMBO J. 2014;33:2721–2734. doi: 10.15252/embj.201487900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mazzurana L, et al. Suppression of Aiolos and Ikaros expression by lenalidomide reduces human ILC3-ILC1/NK cell transdifferentiation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2019;49:1344–1355. doi: 10.1002/eji.201848075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bernink JH, et al. Interleukin-12 and −23 control plasticity of CD127(+) group 1 and group 3 innate lymphoid cells in the intestinal lamina propria. Immunity. 2015;43:146–160. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cella M, et al. Subsets of ILC3-ILC1-like cells generate a diversity spectrum of innate lymphoid cells in human mucosal tissues. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:980–991. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0425-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Song Y, et al. Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Nature. 2014;509:91–95. doi: 10.1038/nature13176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Licona-Limon P, Kim LK, Palm NW, Flavell RA. TH2, allergy and group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:536–542. doi: 10.1038/ni.2617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nussbaum JC, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis. Nature. 2013;502:245–248. doi: 10.1038/nature12526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cephus JY, et al. Testosterone attenuates group 2 innate lymphoid cell-mediated airway inflammation. Cell Rep. 2017;21:2487–2499. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li S, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling cell intrinsically inhibits intestinal group 2 innate lymphoid cell function. Immunity. 2018;49:915–928.e915. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Quintana FJ, et al. Aiolos promotes TH17 differentiation by directly silencing Il2 expression. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:770–777. doi: 10.1038/ni.2363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Taylor S, et al. PD-1 regulates KLRG1(+) group 2 innate lymphoid cells. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:1663–1678. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Thiemann S, Baum LG. Galectins and immune responses-just how do they do those things they do? Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2016;34:243–264. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Toscano MA, et al. Galectin-1 suppresses autoimmune retinal disease by promoting concomitant Th2- and T regulatory-mediated anti-inflammatory responses. J. Immunol. 2006;176:6323–6332. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ilarregui JM, et al. Tolerogenic signals delivered by dendritic cells to T cells through a galectin-1-driven immunoregulatory circuit involving interleukin 27 and interleukin 10. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:981–991. doi: 10.1038/ni.1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Toscano MA, et al. Differential glycosylation of TH1, TH2 and TH-17 effector cells selectively regulates susceptibility to cell death. Nat. Immunol. 2007;8:825–834. doi: 10.1038/ni1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Russo AJ, et al. Intracellular immune sensing promotes inflammation via gasdermin D-driven release of a lectin alarmin. Nat. Immunol. 2021;22:154–165. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00844-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bhat R, et al. Nuclear repartitioning of galectin-1 by an extracellular glycan switch regulates mammary morphogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E4820–E4827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609135113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Corapi E, Carrizo G, Compagno D, Laderach D. Endogenous galectin-1 in T lymphocytes regulates anti-prostate cancer immunity. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2190. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ganassi M, et al. A surveillance function of the HSPB8-BAG3-HSP70 chaperone complex ensures stress granule integrity and dynamism. Mol. Cell. 2016;63:796–810. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chen Z, et al. The ubiquitin ligase Stub1 negatively modulates regulatory T cell suppressive activity by promoting degradation of the transcription factor Foxp3. Immunity. 2013;39:272–285. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Daugaard M, Rohde M, Jaattela M. The heat shock protein 70 family: Highly homologous proteins with overlapping and distinct functions. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:3702–3710. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fang, L. et al. Secreted heat shock proteins control airway remodeling: evidence from bronchial thermoplasty. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. S0091-6749(21)00344-4 (2021). 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.022. Online ahead of print [DOI] [PubMed]
- 61.Figueiredo C, et al. Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) induces cytotoxicity of T-helper cells. Blood. 2009;113:3008–3016. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-162727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhou L. AHR function in lymphocytes: emerging concepts. Trends Immunol. 2016;37:17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cervantes-Barragan L, Colonna M. AHR signaling in the development and function of intestinal immune cells and beyond. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018;40:371–377. doi: 10.1007/s00281-018-0694-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Stockinger B, Di Meglio P, Gialitakis M, Duarte JH. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: multitasking in the immune system. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014;32:403–432. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Miyamoto C, et al. Runx/Cbfbeta complexes protect group 2 innate lymphoid cells from exhausted-like hyporesponsiveness during allergic airway inflammation. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:447. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08365-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fernandez-Salguero P, et al. Immune system impairment and hepatic fibrosis in mice lacking the dioxin-binding Ah receptor. Science. 1995;268:722–726. doi: 10.1126/science.7732381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zheng GX, et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14049. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.McCarthy DJ, Campbell KR, Lun AT, Wills QF. Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:1179–1186. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–420. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2017).
- 71.O’Flanagan CH, et al. Dissociation of solid tumor tissues with cold active protease for single-cell RNA-seq minimizes conserved collagenase-associated stress responses. Genome Biol. 2019;20:210. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1830-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.van den Brink SC, et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:935–936. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Klein AM, et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2015;161:1187–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2015;109:21.29.1–21.29.9. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lau CM, et al. Epigenetic control of innate and adaptive immune memory. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:963–972. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0176-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Magnuson AM, et al. Identification and validation of a tumor-infiltrating Treg transcriptional signature conserved across species and tumor types. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E10672–E10681. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810580115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Qiu J, et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates gut immunity through modulation of innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. 2012;36:92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data files for the tissue ILC2 scRNA-seq in this study were deposited in the National Omics Data Encyclopedia (NODE) database in experiment OEX003341 under the project OEP000918, and were also deposited in GEO: GSE153748. The accession number for ILC2 ATAC-seq data in this study is GEO: GSE150179. Tissue ILC2 sub-cluster signature genes and tissue ILC2-specific OCRs were uploaded as processed data in GEO153748 and GSE150179, respectively. ATAC-seq data and ChIP-seq data for small intestinal ILCs were published previously with accession number GSE85153 and GSE85156.37 ATAC-seq data on ILC2s from Ahr-deficient and control mice of the Rag1−/− background were published previously with accession number GSE119461.47