Abstract
Indocyanine Green (ICG) is a clinically approved near‐infrared fluorescent dye that is used extensively for various imaging and diagnostic procedures. One drawback with ICG is its instability in water, which means that reconstituted clinical doses have to be used very shortly after preparation. Two deuterated versions of ICG were prepared with deuterium atoms on the heptamethine chain, and the spectral, physiochemical, and photostability properties were quantified. A notable mechanistic finding is that self‐aggregation of ICG in water strongly favors dye degradation by a photochemical oxidative dimerization reaction that gives a nonfluorescent product. Storage stability studies showed that replacement of C−H with C−D decreased the dimerization rate constant by a factor of 3.1, and it is likely that many medical and preclinical procedures will benefit from the longer shelf‐lives of these two deuterated ICG dyes. The discovery that ICG self‐aggregation promotes photoinduced electron transfer can be exploited as a new paradigm for next‐generation photodynamic therapies.
Keywords: cyanines, deuterium, dyes/pigments, fluorescent probes, imaging agents
A deuterium atom in the right place mitigates the 60‐year problem of aqueous Indocyanine Green (ICG) instability. A clinical stock solution of heavy ICG in water can be stored for an extended period without significant loss of fluorescence brightness; this will improve the effectiveness of various biomedical imaging, diagnostic and therapy procedures.
Introduction
Indocyanine green (ICG, Scheme 1) is the only clinically approved near‐infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye with emission wavelength above 700 nm. It is commonly employed in a wide range of medical imaging and diagnostic procedures that assess cardiac output or hepatic function; visualize tissue perfusion, lymph nodes, or cancerous tissue before, during and after surgery; or visualize blood flow during ophthalmic angiography.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ] ICG is also used a great deal in preclinical research as a NIR fluorescence contrast agent for enhanced imaging of various animal models of disease. More than 5000 research papers and review articles have been published over the last five years with “indocyanine green” in the title or abstract. The recent discovery that the fluorescence emission tail of ICG extends beyond 1000 nm and can be detected using modern commercial cameras heralds a new set of opportunities in short wave infrared (SWIR) imaging,[ 7 , 8 ] and there is also considerable ongoing development of nanoscale ICG delivery systems for next‐generation imaging and treatment strategies. [9] The clinical safety record for ICG over several decades is impressive, [10] and substantial growth in clinical and pre‐clinical usage is expected in the coming years.
Scheme 1.
Chemical structures of ICG, [D5]‐ICG, and [D7]‐ICG.
ICG is chemically stable when stored as a dry powder and the standard clinical procedure is to reconstitute it as a sterile aqueous solution immediately before patient dosage. In some cases, the formulation includes ∼5 % NaI. [3] The clinical dose size varies with procedure, but a common concentration in a single 3 mL aqueous bolus is 2.5 mg/mL. ICG binds rapidly and strongly to serum proteins and the noncovalent ICG/protein complexes exhibit enhanced stability and fluorescence emission at 820 nm. [11] Moreover, there is very little extravasation of the ICG/protein complexes from the bloodstream which enables vasculature visualization using standard biomedical NIR fluorescence imaging equipment.[ 12 , 13 ] Within ∼20 minutes after dosing, virtually all of the ICG/protein complex is cleared from the bloodstream through the liver and into the bile juice without chemical modification.[ 14 , 15 ] Some clinical procedures, such as fluorescence guided surgery, benefit from repeated cycles of intravenous ICG dosing and subsequent fluorescence imaging.[ 14 , 16 ] A recently modified approach to fluorescence guided surgery of cancer is named “second‐window ICG” and involves infusion of a high dose of ICG (∼5.0 mg/kg) at 24 h before surgery.[ 17 , 18 , 19 ]
A well‐known drawback with ICG is its propensity to degrade rapidly in aqueous solution and generate nonfluorescent by‐products. For example, one study found that a solution in water had only 20 % ICG remaining after sitting for 24 h, [20] and a rat imaging study reported almost complete loss of vasculature image if the aqueous solution was more than 24 h old. [21] Because of this rapid decrease in aqueous ICG purity, the FDA recommendation is to discard any unused aqueous sample within six hours of reconstitution. There is little doubt that the clinical benefit of ICG would be enhanced if the shelf‐life of an aqueous stock solution could be extended and, not surprisingly, considerable effort has been made over the years to elucidate the degradation pathway(s) and identify the contributing factors. Systematic studies of ICG degradation are hard to conduct because the dye has an amphiphilic molecular structure which promotes extensive self‐aggregation at concentrations >10 μM, and the aggregation alters the chemical and photophysical properties.[ 3 , 8 ] However, there is good evidence that the degradation of ICG depends on several factors, including dye concentration, the nature of the solvent, temperature, and the presence of air, light, or specific chemical additives.[ 3 , 21 , 22 ] Moreover, the combination of light and molecular oxygen promotes three chemically distinct ICG degradation pathways (Scheme 2). The best known pathway is a photosensitized reaction of excited state singlet oxygen with ICG to produce carbonyl‐containing fragments that do not absorb or emit NIR light.[ 23 , 24 ] A second, minor photochemical process is a heptamethine truncation reaction that generates small amounts of the pentamethine homologue.[ 25 , 26 ] Quite recently, a third degradation process was elucidated, namely, coupling of two molecules of ICG to give the oxidative dimer 1.[ 27 , 28 ] However, its prevalence in a stored clinical formulation (2.5 mg/mL in water) was not reported.
Scheme 2.
Three distinct degradation pathways for aqueous ICG in the presence of air and light. Pathway a: double‐bond cleavage to produce carbonyl‐containing fragments. Pathway b: truncation to produce pentamethine homologue. Pathway c: oxidative dimerization to produce 1.
The general goal of this present study was to determine whether the kinetics of ICG degradation are altered if specific hydrogen atoms (H) on the heptamethine dye are replaced with heavier deuterium atoms (D). We reasoned that a large deuterium kinetic isotope effect would reveal valuable new chemical insight concerning the degradation mechanism, and at the same time provide a novel way to extend the shelf‐life of a clinical aqueous dose. The substantial literature on deuterium kinetic isotope effects includes multiple examples of deuterated pharmaceuticals and biomolecules with enhanced chemical stability. [29] The very few reports of deuterated dyes have primarily focused on the isotope‐induced changes in photophysical properties, [30] but a recent photostability study found that visible rhodamine dyes with appended deuterated alkylamino groups (auxochromes) exhibit decreased photobleaching when irradiated with intense light.[ 31 , 32 ] Here, we demonstrate enhanced stability using a very different deuterium substitution strategy that has not been described before; that is, direct deuteration of a near‐infrared polyene chromophore. We describe the synthesis of two novel deuterated analogues of ICG, specifically [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG (Scheme 1) and a comparison of spectral and chemical stabilities that reveals a threefold reduction in the rate of degradation in aqueous solution, leading to extended shelf‐life of stock solutions that match the clinical formulation. The results suggest that switching to deuterated ICG is likely to mitigate the 60‐year clinical problem of aqueous ICG instability.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and aqueous stability studies
We decided that direct deuteration of ICG to make [D5]‐ICG or [D7]‐ICG was not possible,[ 33 , 34 ] and that a more feasible approach was to exploit a recently refined method to make heptamethine cyanine dyes via Zincke salts as reaction intermediates.[ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] Using this versatile process we prepared [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG on a large scale using the chemical reactions in Scheme 3. The key intermediate is the Zincke salt 2, derived from cheap and readily available [D5]pyridine.[ 39 , 40 ] Separate transimination reactions provided the linear dianil intermediates 4 or 5 which were not isolated but condensed in situ with indolenium 3 to give [D5]‐ICG. Alternatively, conversion of [D5]‐pyridine into isolable [D5]glutaconaldehyde, 6, [41] offered a third successful path to [D5]‐ICG. These three different synthetic methods provide broad reactivity scope for future efforts to make additional heptamethine dyes with deuterated polymethines. To make [D7]‐ICG, the solvent was simply switched to CH3OD which enabled deuterium exchange with the acidic methyl protons on indolenium 3 to generate [D3]‐3 in situ. The number of peaks and peak splitting patterns within the 1H spectra of [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG were consistent with their >99 % isotopically labeled structures. Moreover, the 1H spectra showed that stock solutions of [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG sitting in H2O for one month do not undergo any measurable amount of deuterium/hydrogen exchange. In summary, the technically straightforward and scalable syntheses of [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG combined with the enhanced shelf‐life (see below) make them economically attractive options for immediate employment in preclinical research or future development for clinical applications.
Scheme 3.
Syntheses of [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG.
The photophysical properties of ICG, [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG are listed in Table 1. To ensure no spectral artefacts due to differences in synthetic methods, all three dyes were prepared and purified by homologous procedures. In DMSO, the solutions of [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG were found to be ∼30 % brighter than an equivalent solution of ICG, but in fetal bovine serum (FBS) there was essentially no difference in fluorescence brightness. We speculate that the brightness increase of free monomeric dye in DMSO is due to diminished non‐radiative decay since C−D bonds have significantly lower vibrational energy (ν≈2200 cm−1) than C−H bonds (ν≈3000 cm−1) and that the effect is lost when the dye is associated with serum proteins.
Table 1.
Photophysical properties at room temperature.
|
Dye |
Solvent[a] |
[nm] |
[nm] |
ϵ [M−1cm−1] |
R 2 |
Φ F [%][b] |
Brightness[c] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICG |
DMSO |
795 |
820 |
224 000 |
0.999 |
16.7±0.6 |
37 000 |
|
ICG |
FBS |
800 |
813 |
197 000 |
0.998 |
9.7±0.4 |
19 000 |
|
[D5]‐ICG |
DMSO |
793 |
819 |
253 000 |
0.999 |
19.8±0.5 |
49 000 |
|
[D5]‐ICG |
FBS |
796 |
813 |
205 000 |
0.997 |
10.5±0.3 |
21 000 |
|
[D7]‐ICG |
DMSO |
794 |
818 |
228 000 |
0.999 |
20.8±0.5 |
48 000 |
|
[D7]‐ICG |
FBS |
796 |
812 |
200 000 |
0.999 |
10.3±0.4 |
21 000 |
|
1 |
DMSO |
787 |
820 |
327 000 |
0.999 |
0.12±0.06 |
390 |
|
1 |
FBS |
796 |
820 |
256 000 |
0.998 |
0.12±0.04 |
310 |
[a] DMSO=dimethylsulfoxide; FBS=fetal bovine serum. Dye concentration range is 0–5 μM. All measurements conducted at room temperature. [b] For all ICG derivatives, absolute fluorescence quantum yield measured directly by photon counting. For 1, the measurements are relative to ICG in DMSO. [c] Brightness=ϵ × quantum yield, error is ±15 %.
The relative stabilities of aqueous ICG, [D5]‐ICG, and [D7]‐ICG were assessed under two distinctly different conditions. The first set of studies were high photon intensity photobleaching experiments that mimicked clinical imaging or diagnostic conditions that fragment the ICG and produce non‐fluorescent carbonyl‐containing compounds (pathway A in Scheme 2).[ 23 , 24 ] That is, the dye concentration was low (2 μM), the photon flux was continuous and high, and the samples were exposed to air. An intense light source (xenon lamp) was used to simultaneously illuminate separate solutions of the three dyes (each 2.0 μM in PBS), and the changes in NIR absorption spectra were monitored over time. The curves in Figure S15 (Supporting Information) show that all three dye solutions exhibited essentially the same rate of photobleaching. A repeat experiment examined the three dyes in FBS and observed a slower rate of photobleaching (consistent with the known protection of ICG due to noncovalent association with the albumin, globulin, and lipoprotein in FBS) with no difference between the dyes. [11] In other words, the photobleaching experiments indicated no significant deuterium kinetic isotope effect, a finding that is consistent with two literature facts: a) the mechanism for ICG photobleaching under high photon intensity illumination conditions (Scheme S1) is cycloaddition with photogenerated singlet oxygen and formation of unstable dioxetane intermediates that fragment to produce the carbonyl‐containing compounds,[ 23 , 24 , 42 , 43 ] and b) dioxetane fragmentation is known to exhibit a negligible secondary deuterium kinetic isotope effect. [44]
The second set of dye stability experiments were designed to mimic the low photon intensity storage conditions experienced by a typical reconstituted dose in water before it is administered in a clinical setting. Thus, stock solutions of the dyes were exposed to the atmosphere and laboratory lights during the initial reconstitution and periodic sampling, but otherwise stored as capped vials in the dark at room temperature. Most literature studies on the stability of aqueous ICG have focused on relatively dilute solutions (<50 μg/mL),[ 20 , 28 , 45 , 46 ] and very few studies have examined aqueous ICG solutions at the higher concentrations that match a reconstituted clinical dose (e. g., 1.0–2.5 mg/mL). [47] The water solubility of ICG is often quoted as 1 mg/mL and to ensure that all our studies used completely dissolved aqueous solutions we employed a consistent concentration of 1.0 mM (0.775 mg/mL). We discovered that the purity and composition of a 1.0 mM stock solution of ICG in water could be conveniently tracked over time by periodically removing a small aliquot and analyzing its chemical composition at a semi‐quantitative level by reverse phase thin‐layer chromatography (TLC), [48] or at a quantitative level using 1H NMR spectroscopy.[ 27 , 28 ] We found that under normal clinical reconstitution and shelf‐storage conditions, the oxidative dimerization of aqueous ICG to produce 1 (pathway C in Scheme 2) was by far the dominant degradation pathway and preparative experiments provided pure samples of 1, [D8]‐1, and [D12]‐1 whose 1H NMR and mass spectra were internally consistent (Figures S2) and matched the literature data.[ 27 , 28 , 49 ] The first indication that a stored 1.0 mM solution of aqueous [D5]‐ICG was substantially more stable than a homologous solution of ICG was gained by monitoring stock solutions over one week at room temperature using reverse phase TLC (Figure S18). This finding was confirmed by comparing NMR spectra of aliquots taken periodically from the separate stored stock solutions (Figures S19 and S20). In Figure 1a, the changes over time are shown for one particularly diagnostic peak corresponding to the −CH2SO3 − protons at δ=2.91 ppm for ICG or [D5]‐ICG, and δ=2.80 ppm for 1 or [D8]‐1. Comparison of peak integration values with an internal NMR standard (CH3SO3Na, δ=2.69 ppm) produced kinetic plots (Figure 1b, with expanded time plot in Figure S21) that could be analyzed to provide second‐order rate constants for the bimolecular dimerization reaction to form 1 (or [D8]‐1; Figure 1c).
Figure 1.
a) Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, [D4]methanol, 25 °C) showing differences in stability for separate stock solutions of ICG or [D5]‐ICG in water (1.0 mM) at room temperature. The spectra show a decrease in the peak for −CH2SO3 − protons at δ=2.91 ppm for ICG or [D5]‐ICG and an increase in the corresponding peak at δ=2.80 ppm for oxidative dimer 1 or [D8]‐1. b) Speciation plots showing the change in weight percentage with storage time. Each plot was fit to a pseudo‐second‐order dimerization reaction model. c) Curve fitting of the data to give the ratio of rate constants (k H/k D) as a deuterium kinetic isotope effect in water (1.0 mM) at room temperature (22 °C).
The ratio of rate constants (deuterium kinetic isotope effect) shows that the conversion of aqueous [D5]‐ICG to [D8]‐1 is slower than the conversion of ICG to 1 by a factor of 3.1. A subsequent kinetic study used the same NMR assay to quantify the conversion of [D7]‐ICG to oxidized dimer [D12]‐1 and found that it matched the conversion rate of [D5]‐ICG to [D8]‐1 (Figure S22 and Table S2).
Chemical implications
The scattered literature reports on ICG stability over several decades reflect a complicated dependence on light and solvent, and there is some previous evidence that ICG stability in water is moderately enhanced by higher concentration. [50] Repeated kinetic measurements on different batches of aqueous ICG (1.0 mM) under the same multiday storage and sampling conditions revealed a slight batch‐to‐batch variation in the rates of oxidative dimerization, likely reflecting minor differences in sample exposure to laboratory lighting. A systematic series of comparative experiments produced the following mechanistic observations.
The dimerization reaction to produce 1 was inhibited when air and/or light was excluded from the reaction (Figure S26). However, slow production of 1 continued after an illuminated sample of ICG was placed in the dark.
The dimerization reaction was strongly inhibited by the presence of additives that act as antioxidants, such as azide and ascorbate, but it was promoted by the presence of NaI an additive in some commercial versions of ICG (Figure S27).
There was less photochemical degradation when the concentration of ICG in water or ethanol was increased (Figures S16, S17, and S28b).
Under low photon intensity conditions, a stored solution of 1.0 mM ICG in water slowly produced 1 but an analogous solution of ICG in ethanol did not (Figure S28a).
The dimerization reaction to produce 1 under low photon intensity light conditions was enhanced when the aqueous solution of ICG (1.0 mM) included H2O2 (10 mM) (Figure S29).
The chemical analysis data clearly shows that the dominant degradation pathway for a stored clinical formulation of aqueous ICG (1.0–2.5 mg/mL) is oxidative dimerization to produce 1. The observed deuterium kinetic isotope effect of 3.1 with [D5]‐ICG (or [D7]‐ICG) is consistent with the reaction mechanism proposed by Rüttger and co‐workers, [27] although significant new insight is provided by the experimental observations listed above. The new chemical insight can be summarized as four major points.
The high optical density of a clinical formulation produces a very strong inner filter effect that stops light reaching the dye molecules located deep in the solution, thus attenuating ICG photobleaching by any mechanism (Figures S16, S17, and S28b).
There is extensive self‐association of ICG in water to form face‐to‐face H‐aggregates that favor rapid quenching of dye excited states,[ 8 , 51 ] This aggregation‐induced quenching reinforces the inner filter effect to further slow photobleaching of a clinical ICG formulation in water.
-
As summarized in Scheme 4
Scheme 4.
a, the dominant reaction of a monomeric ICG molecule and photosensitized singlet oxygen is cycloaddition with the heptamethine and subsequent fragmentation of the dioxetane intermediates to produce carbonyl‐containing fragments (pathway A in Scheme 2). A major finding of this work is an aggregation‐induced switch in ICG photoreactivity towards a path that produces the oxidative dimer 1 (pathway C in Scheme 2). As summarized in Scheme 4b, a tightly packed H‐aggregate sterically hinders attack of singlet oxygen at the polymethine double bonds, and concomitantly favors photosensitized oxidative dimerization by promoting the covalent coupling of an ICG radical cation with an adjacent ICG molecule in the same aggregate. [52] This picture of aggregation‐dependent reactivity is supported by experiments in organic solvents, such as ethanol, where there is negligible ICG self‐aggregation and very little oxidative dimerization (Figure S28a). There is also recent literature evidence that self‐aggregation in water promotes photoinduced electron transfer from ICG to molecular oxygen. [53]
The first two steps in the proposed photosensitized oxidative dimerization mechanism in Scheme 4c involve reversible electron transfer from excited triplet state ICG to dissolved molecular oxygen to produce a superoxide radical anion and ICG radical cation, followed by reversible attack of the radical cation on a second ICG molecule.[ 23 , 27 , 47 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] Subsequent proton abstraction is an irreversible third step that is slowed in [D5]‐ICG (and also in [D7]‐ICG) because the activation energy for deuteron abstraction is higher. These three steps rationalize the observed deuterium kinetic isotope effect of 3.1 and also the observed second order dependence on [ICG] (see Figure S30 for expanded kinetic expression). Hydrogen peroxide is a reaction by‐product that subsequently dimerizes two additional ICG molecules in a light‐independent manner; [57] and thus the oxidative dimer 1 continues to be slowly produced after an illuminated clinical dose of aqueous ICG is stored in the dark. In terms of reaction stoichiometry, one singlet oxygen molecule converts four molecules of ICG into two molecules of 1.
Clinical implications
The oxidative dimer 1 has a similar NIR absorption spectrum as ICG but the fluorescence quantum yield is ∼100‐fold lower (Table 1) and as shown in Figures S9 and S10, compound 1 emits virtually no fluorescence. The very low fluorescence quantum yield is consistent with that reported for an analogous oxidized dimer of a pentamethine cyanine dye, [58] and an energy minimized molecular model of 1 (Figure S31) reveals a highly twisted 3D shape with the two connected heptamethines oriented almost orthogonally. Compared to ICG there is little change in the absorption maxima band indicating very weak coupling of the polymethine transition state dipoles, but there is efficient intramolecular energy transfer and nonradiative decay of the excited state. In terms of fluorescence imaging, oxidized dimer 1 is a NIR light‐absorbing but nonfluorescent product of ICG degradation that builds up during storage of a clinical aqueous formulation and lowers the image brightness produced by the dose. To illustrate the difference in image brightness due to the change in stock solution stability, we conducted an NIR fluorescence imaging study that compared two mouse phantoms with fillable organs (Figures 2 and S31). To mimic a typical ICG in vivo imaging scenario, the heart port of each phantom mouse was filled with FBS and an aliquot from a 1.0 mM stock solution of either ICG or [D5]‐ICG (final dye concentration was 2 μM). NIR fluorescence images were acquired using an animal imaging station and the mean pixel intensities of the heart regions where determined. When the experiment used fresh stock solutions there was no difference in image intensities for the phantoms containing ICG or [D5]‐ICG, which is consistent with the matching fluorescence brightness observed when the dyes are in serum (Table 1). But when the imaging experiment was repeated using aliquots from stock solutions that had been stored in the dark for 3 days, the image intensity of the heart region containing ICG was 80 % of the image intensity of the heart region filled with [D5]‐ICG. TLC analysis of the stock solutions showed that conversion into non‐fluorescent 1 was the primary reason for the decreased ICG image intensity (Figure S31). Undoubtedly, the difference in NIR fluorescent image intensities would be even larger if the aqueous stock solutions were stored for longer periods or if they were exposed to more light during preparation and storage.
Figure 2.
NIR fluorescence images (λ ex: 745 nm, λ em: 850 nm) of two mouse phantoms with heart portals containing FBS and an aliquot from a 1.0 mM aqueous stock solution of either ICG or [D5]‐ICG (final dye concentration, 2 μM). The top pair of phantoms contain freshly prepared stock solutions and the bottom pair contain 1.0 mM aqueous stock solutions that had been stored for 3 days at room temperature (22 °C). The fluorescence intensity scale is in arbitrarily units. The graphs compare normalized mean pixel intensity (MPI) for the fluorescent heart regions within each pair of mouse phantom images. The graph error bars are too small to visualize.
One of the key pharmaceutical properties of ICG is its high affinity for blood proteins which ensures that it does not leave the vasculature of a living subject. Compared to ICG, the oxidative dimer 1 exhibits a higher retention factor (R f value) on a reversed phase TLC plate, indicating a more polar molecular structure; this is consistent with the molecular model in Figure S32 showing a dispersed projection of the four anionic sulfonate groups. The combination of polyanionic charge and nonplanar shape suggested to us that 1 would likely have relatively low affinity for blood proteins, [59] and this supposition was confirmed by measuring dissociation constants for binding to bovine serum albumin in pH 7.4 PBS buffer at 37 °C (Figures S11–S14). The measured values of K d for ICG, [D5]‐ICG, [D7]‐ICG were all within measurement error of 2.9 μM which is close to the literature value for ICG. [59] In contrast, the K d for 1 was ten‐fold higher at 34 μM which means if 1 was present in the blood at the low micromolar dose concentrations that are typically employed for clinical imaging, hardly any of it would be associated with high molecular weight albumin protein. Thus, there is high potential for polar 1 to extravasate from the bloodstream, [59] and a goal of future work is to determine if 1 induces any undesired pharmaceutical effects as a storage degradation product of ICG. For example, the structure of 1 suggests that it might be an inhibitor of the organic anion transporters that mediate renal clearance of many environmental toxins or clinically important drugs. [60]
Since ICG is excreted chemically unchanged into the intestines, it is very unlikely that [D5]‐ICG (or [D7]‐ICG) will exhibit any significant difference in clinical pharmacokinetics or in vivo imaging performance.[ 14 , 15 ] The longer shelf‐life of aqueous [D5]‐ICG (or [D7]‐ICG) is an attractive clinical prospect for several reasons. It means that multiple doses can be drawn from a single large stock solution of aqueous [D5]‐ICG (or [D7]‐ICG) and used for a multi‐dose imaging procedure with the reassurance that the purity of a carefully stored stock solution will not change significantly over several days at room temperature. In particular, multi‐dose surgical procedures using ICG would be simplified and shortened if all the doses could be drawn from a single stock solution. [14] Not surprisingly, the shelf‐life of an ICG stock solution is extended significantly when stored in the dark at 4 °C in a refrigerator. As shown in Figure S23, the purity of an aqueous solution of ICG (1.0 mM) was 85 and 52 % after 7 and 28 days′ storage at 4 °C in the dark, whereas the purity of an analogous stored sample of [D5]‐ICG (1.0 mM) was 95 and 85 % after the same storage times. The enhanced shelf‐life of refrigerated stock solutions of [D5]‐ICG will make it very convenient and economical for longitudinal preclinical in vivo imaging studies that need to repeatedly dose a large cohort of animals over a long period of time.[ 61 , 62 ]
Conclusions
Indocyanine Green (ICG) has been used extensively as a clinically approved NIR fluorescent dye for more than 60 years. While ICG is reasonably stable when associated with proteins in the bloodstream, its propensity to degrade as a concentrated aqueous stock solution means that clinical doses have to be used shortly after reconstitution. The results of this study show that self‐aggregation of ICG in water favors dye degradation by a photochemical oxidative dimerization reaction that gives the nonfluorescent product 1. [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG are deuterated versions of ICG with deuterium atoms on the heptamethine chain, and storage stability studies show that the replacement of C−H with C−D decreases the dimerization rate constant by a factor of 3.1. All three homologues have the same affinity for albumin protein and produce noncovalent complexes with the same fluorescence brightness. As ICG is excreted unchanged from the body, it is very likely that [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG will exhibit the same clinical performance. But the extended storage shelf‐lives of aqueous [D5]‐ICG and [D7]‐ICG will improve many biomedical imaging and diagnostic procedures, including fluorescence‐guided surgeries that draw repeated doses from the same stock solution over a lengthy period of time. From a broader biomedical perspective, the results of this study suggest additional future research directions for pursuit. For example, the idea that self‐aggregation of amphiphilic cyanine dyes, like ICG, can promote photoinduced electron transfer chemistry has been recognized by dye chemists for some time, [63] but has not yet been fully exploited as a rational design paradigm for next‐generation photodynamic therapy.[ 53 , 64 ] Likewise, deuterated polymethine cyanine dyes with a low propensity for photooxidative dimerization are promising future candidates for optimized super‐resolution microscopy. [65]
Supporting information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for funding support from the US NIH (R35GM136212). We thank Rananjaya S. Gamage for conducting the mouse phantom imaging experiments.
D.-H. Li, B. D. Smith, Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 14535.
References
- 1. van Manen L., Handgraaf H. J. M., Diana M., Dijkstra J., Ishizawa T., Vahrmeijer A. L., Mieog J. S. D., J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 118, 283–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Reinhart M. B., Huntington C. R., Blair L. J., Heniford B. T., Augenstein V. A., Surg. Innov. 2016, 23, 166–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Desmettre T., Devoisselle J. M., Mordon S., Surv. Ophthalmol. 2000, 45, 15–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Alander J. T., Kaartinen I., Laakso A., Pätilä T., Spillmann T., Tuchin V. V., Venermo M., Välisuo P., Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2012, 2012, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mazurek M., Kulesza B., Stoma F., Osuchowski J., Mańdziuk S., Rola R., Diagnostics 2020, 10, 1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rozenholc A., Samouelian V., Warkus T., Gauthier P., Provencher D., Sauthier P., Gauthier F., Drakopoulos P., Cormier B., Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 153, 500–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Byrd B. K., Marois M., Tichauer K. M., Wirth D. J., Hong J., Leonor J. P., Elliott J. T., Paulsen K. D., Davis S. C., J. Biomed. Opt. 2019, 24, 080501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cosco E. D., Lim I., Sletten E. M., ChemPhotoChem 2021, 5, 727–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Porcu E. P., Salis A., Gavini E., Rassu G., Maestri M., Giunchedi P., Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 768–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hope-Ross M., Yannuzzi L. A., Gragoudas E. S., Guyer D. R., Slakter J. S., Sorenson J. A., Krupsky S., Orlock D. A., Puliafito C. A., Ophthalmology 1994, 101, 529–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gathje J., Steuer R. R., Nicholes K. R., J. Appl. Physiol. 1970, 29, 181–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Yoneya S., Saito T., Komatsu Y., Koyama I., Takahashi K., Duvoll-Young J., Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998, 39, 1286–1290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fengler J., Colorectal Dis. 2015, 17, 3–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fanaropoulou N. M., Chorti A., Markakis M., Papaioannou M., Michalopoulos A., Papavramidis T., Medicine 2019, 98, e14765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Levesque E., Martin E., Dudau D., Lim C., Dhonneur G., Azoulay D., Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2016, 35, 49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kaplan-Marans E., Fulla J., Tomer N., Bilal K., Palese M., Urology 2019, 132, 10–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cho S. S., Buch V. P., Teng C. W., De Ravin E., Lee J. Y. K., World Neurosurg. 2020, 136, 326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Teng C. W., Huang V., Arguelles G. R., Zhou C., Cho S. S., Harmsen S., Lee J. Y. K., Neurosurg. Focus 2021, 50, E4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zeh R., Sheikh S., Xia L., Pierce J., Newton A., Predina J., Cho S., Nasrallah M., Singhal S., Dorsey J., Lee J. Y. K., PLoS One 2017, 12, e0182034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rappaport P. L., Thiessen J. J., J. Pharm. Sci. 1982, 71, 157–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rajagopalan R., Uetrecht P., Bugaj J. E., Achilefu S. A., Dorshow R. B., Photochem. Photobiol. 2000, 71, 347–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Maarek J. M. I., Holschneider D. P., Harimoto J., J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2001, 65, 157–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nani R. R., Kelley J. A., Ivanic J., Schnermann M. J., Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 6556–6563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Engel E., Schraml R., Maisch T., Kobuch K., Konig B., Szeimies R. M., Hillenkamp J., Baümler W., Vasold R., Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 1777–1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Helmerich D. A., Beliu G., Matikonda S. S., Schnermann M. J., Sauer M., Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 253–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Matikonda S. S., Helmerich D. A., Meub M., Beliu G., Kollmannsberger P., Greer A., Sauer M., Schnermann M. J., ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 1144–1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Rüttger F., Mindt S., Golz C., Alcarazo M., John M., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 4791–4796. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mindt S., Karampinis I., John M., Neumaier M., Nowak K., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2018, 17, 1189–1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cargnin S., Serafini M., Pirali T., Future Med. Chem. 2019, 11, 2039–2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.N. J. Turro, V. Ramamurthy, J. C. Scaiano, Principle of Molecular Photochemistry, University Science Books: Sausalito, 2009, pp. 304.
- 31. Grimm J. B., Xie L., Casler J. C., Patel R., Tkachuk A. N., Falco N., Choi H., Lippincott-schwartz J., Brown T. A., Glick B. S., Liu Z., Lavis L. D., JACS 2021, 1, 690–696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kolmakov K., Belov V. N., Bierwagen J., Ringemann C., Müller V., Eggeling C., Hell S. W., Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 158–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lipowska M., Patterson S. E., Patonay G., Strekowski L., J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1993, 30, 1177–1180. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kundu K., Knight S. F., Lee S., Taylor W. R., Murthy N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6134–6138; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 6270–6274. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Štacková L., Štacko P., Klán P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7155–7162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Štacková L., Muchová E., Russo M., Slavíček P., Štacko P., Klán P., J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 9776–9790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Okoh O. A., Bisby R. H., Lawrence C. L., Rolph C. E., Smith R. B., J. Sulfur Chem. 2014, 35, 42–56. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ficken G. E., Kendall J. D., J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 3988–3992. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Yamaguchi I., Kado A., Fukuda T., Fukumoto H., Yamamoto T., Sato M., Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46, 1119–1130. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kuthan J., Krechl J., Belohradsky M., Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1982, 47, 3283–3287. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Becher J., Christensen M. C., Tetrahedron 1979, 35, 1523–1530. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Gorka A. P., Nani R. R., Schnermann M. J., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 7584–7598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Demchenko A. P., Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2020, 8, 022001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Koo J.-Y., Schuster G. B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 99, 5403–5408. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Saxena V., Sadoqi M., Shao J., J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 92, 2090–2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Holzer W., Mauerer M., Penzkofer A., Szeimies R. M., Abels C., Landthaler M., Bäumler W., J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1998, 47, 155–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Zhang X., Rodgers M. A. J., J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 12797–12803. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Barbier F., Deweerdt G. A., Clin. Chim. Acta 1964, 10, 549–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Inspection of the 1H NMR spectra for samples of aqueous ICG stored at room temperature for extended periods (Figure S19) showed that the combined mass balance of ICG and 1 was >95 % of the dye-derived species. Mass spectral analysis of the samples indicated that the remaining mass balance was a mixture of the other compounds shown in Scheme 2, namely, the carbonyl-containing compounds and truncated pentamethine homologue. The latter compound was isolated and exhibited NMR and mass spectra that matched the literature (Figure S25).
- 50. Zhou J. F., Chin M. P., Schafer S. A., Proc. SPIE 1994, 2128, 495–505. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Berlepsch H. V., Böttcher C., J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 11900–11909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Freshly prepared solutions of concentrated ICG in water immediately form face-to-face stacked H-aggregates but upon room temperature storage over ∼2 weeks there is a morphological change to J-aggregates with head-to-tail packing. See, Landsman M. L., Kwant G., Mook G. A., Zijlstra W. G., J. Appl. Physiol. 1976, 40, 575–583. It seems unlikely that this very slow change in ICG aggregate morphological has any impact on the photochemistry described in Scheme 4.776922 [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fan H., Fan Y., Du W., Cai R., Gao X., Liu X., Wang H., Wang L., Wu X., Nanoscale 2020, 12, 9517–9523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.The mechanistic data does not preclude the possibility that 1 forms by bimolecular coupling of two ICG radical cations followed by deprotonation, a process that would likely be promoted by ICG aggregation in water.
- 55. Chen C., Zhou B., Lu D., Xu G., J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1995, 89, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Parton R. L., Lenhard J. R., J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Barros T. C., Toma S. H., Toma H. E., Bastos E. L., Baptista M. S., J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2010, 23, 893–903. [Google Scholar]
- 58. Miltsov S., Karavan V., Misharev A., Starova G., Alonso-Chamarro J., Puyol M., Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 3353–3357. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Berezin M. Y., Guo K., Akers W., Livingston J., Solomon M., Lee H., Liang K., Agee A., Achilefu S., Biochemistry 2011, 50, 2691–2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Duan P., Li S., Ai N., Hu L., Welsh W. J., You G., Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 3340–3346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Onda N., Kimura M., Yoshida T., Shibutani M., Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 673–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.It is worth noting that ICG degradation is inhibited by the presence of antioxidant additives such as azide or ascorbate (Figure S27), but ICG formulations with stabilizing additives are not clinically approved due to the increased risk of patient side effects. In contrast, a formulation of pure [D5]-ICG (or [D7]-ICG) in sterile water is more likely to be a safe clinical replacement of ICG in water. Of course, if an additive is eventually found to safely stabilize ICG, then the shelf-life of a clinical dose can likely be extended an additional three times by using [D5]-ICG (or [D7]-ICG).
- 63. Kirstein S., Daehne S., Int. J. Photoenergy 2006, 2006, 20363. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sevieri M., Silva F., Bonizzi A., Sitia L., Truffi M., Mazzucchelli S., Corsi F., Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lisovskaya A., Carmichael I., Harriman A., J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 5779–5793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information







