Abstract
Engineered G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are commonly used in chemogenetics as designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs). Although several GPCRs have been studied in astrocytes using a chemogenetic approach, the functional role of the astrocytic Gi pathway is not clear, as the literature is conflicting depending on the brain regions or behaviors investigated. In this study, we evaluated the role of the astrocytic Gi pathway in neuroinflammation using a Gi‐coupled DREADD (hM4Di). Gi‐DREADD was expressed in hippocampal astrocytes of a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced neuroinflammation mouse model using adeno‐associated viruses. We found that astrocyte Gi‐DREADD stimulation using clozapine N‐oxide (CNO) inhibits neuroinflammation, as characterized by decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, glial activation, and cognitive impairment in mice. Subsequent experiments using primary astrocyte cultures revealed that Gi‐DREADD stimulation significantly downregulated LPS‐induced expression of Nos2 mRNA and nitric oxide production. Similarly, in vitro calcium imaging showed that activation of the astrocytic Gi pathway attenuated intracellular calcium transients triggered by LPS treatment, suggesting a positive correlation between enhanced calcium transients and the inflammatory phenotype of astrocytes observed in the inflamed brain. Taken together, our results indicate that the astrocytic Gi pathway plays an inhibitory role in neuroinflammation, providing an opportunity to identify potential cellular and molecular targets to control neuroinflammation.
Keywords: astrocyte, chemogenetics, Gi‐DREADD, hM4Di, neuroinflammation
Abbreviations
- ACC
Anterior cingulate cortex
- CEBP
CCAAT/enhancer‐binding protein
- CNS
Central nervous system
- CREB
cAMP response element‐binding
- DMEM
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
- DREADD
Designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs
- ER
Endoplasmic reticulum
- GPCR
G protein‐coupled receptors
- STAT
Signal transducer and activator of transcription
1. INTRODUCTION
Designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) are genetically modified G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). DREADDs are used in chemogenetic approaches, which allow researchers to remotely control cellular activity via modulation of GPCR (Gi, Gq, or Gs)‐signaling pathways with the application of selective ligands, such as clozapine N‐oxide (CNO). 1 This strategy has commonly been used to regulate the activity of various types of neurons to study brain functions and behaviors. Recent studies have also used this technique to study glial cells, including astrocytes, 2 , 3 the most abundant glial cell type in the central nervous system (CNS), exhibiting notable heterogeneity in their morphology and function. 4 Among the GPCRs in astrocytes studied using DREADDs, there are inconsistencies reported in the functional role of Gi signaling, which requires further exploration.
The functional role of the Gi signaling pathway in astrocytes has been investigated in several studies using chemogenetic approaches. A study by Nam et al. revealed that chemogenetic activation of astrocyte‐specific Gi‐DREADD hM4Di enhanced synaptic transmission and plasticity of Schaffer collaterals in the hippocampus, thereby inducing the formation of contextual memory for conditioned place preference. 5 Conversely, another recent study demonstrated that activation of Gi‐coupled designer receptor hM4Di in hippocampal cornu ammonis (CA1) astrocytes during learning impairs remote, but not recent memory recall, and decreases the activity of CA1 neurons projecting to the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during memory retrieval. 6 Similarly, another study found that activation of astroglial Gi signaling in the hippocampus was sufficient to protect against the development of stress‐enhanced fear learning, post‐traumatic stress disorder‐like behavior. 7 Moreover, it has been demonstrated that striatal astrocyte Gi pathway activation corrects behavioral phenotypes in a Huntington's disease mouse model. 8 However, the same research group previously reported that activation of an astrocyte‐specific Gi pathway in the striatum produced inattentive hyperactivity in mice under physiological conditions. 9 Therefore, given the multiple contradicting results, the functional role of the astrocytic Gi pathway remains unclarified in both healthy and disease states. It is well accepted that in disease conditions astrocytes can undergo morphological and functional remodeling into “reactive astrocyte,” called “astrogliosis,” where normal homeostatic mechanisms are lost and proinflammatory responses occur at higher levels, contributing to neuroinflammation and associated diseases. 10 , 11 Astrocyte‐mediated neuroinflammation is associated with neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), 12 Parkinson's disease (PD), 13 traumatic brain injury (TBI), 14 multiple sclerosis (MS), 15 diabetes, and obesity. 16 However, to the best of our knowledge, the role of the astrocytic Gi pathway in neuroinflammation has not been yet studied.
To explore the role of astrocytic Gi pathway in neuroinflammation, we used the designer receptor hM4Di to manipulate the Gi pathway in these cells in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced neuroinflammation model. We found that chemogenetic activation of astrocytic Gi signaling in the hippocampus attenuates LPS‐induced neuroinflammation, as evidenced by decreased levels of inflammatory mediators, gliosis, and cognitive impairment in mice. In vitro studies using cultured astrocytes revealed that Gi activation in astrocytes reduced LPS‐induced expression of Nos2 mRNA, nitric oxide (NO) production, and intracellular calcium (Ca2+) levels. These findings provide evidence for the important role of astrocytic Gi activation and downstream signaling pathways in mitigating neuroinflammation.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Animals
Male C57BL/6 mice (age 8–12 weeks) were obtained from Samtaco. Only male mice were used in this study. All animal experiments were performed according to approved animal protocols and guidelines established by the Animal Care Committee of Kyungpook National University (No. KNU 2019‐09).
2.2. Viral gene transfer and chemogenetic stimulation in vivo
The following viral constructs were used: AAV5‐GFAP‐hM3Dq‐mCherry (VVF Zurich; viral titer 3.9 × 1012), AAV5‐GFAP‐hM4Di‐mCherry (VVF Zurich; viral titer 4.7 × 1012), and AAV5‐GFAP‐eYFP (control vector; VVF Zurich; viral titer 3.9 × 1012). To prepare animals for in vivo experiments, mice were anesthetized using 2%–4% isoflurane (Baxter) in oxygen and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. For chemogenetic stimulation in vivo, two stainless steel injection needles were bilaterally injected. The needle tip was gently lowered to 0.5 mm above the hippocampus (from the bregma: 2 mm posterior, 1.8 mm lateral, and 1.2 mm dorsoventral) to limit damage to the target region. A volume of 0.5 μl of the virus at 0.1 μl/min was injected into the hippocampus bilaterally. After injection, the needle tip was held in place for 10 min before retraction to prevent leakage, and then removed. Immediate postoperative care was provided, and the animals were allowed to recover for 14 days before the experiment, to ensure high levels of transgene expression. Prior to behavioral experiments following viral gene transfer, the expression of relevant proteins within the CA1 region was confirmed via fluorescence.
2.3. CNO administration
CNO (Tocris Bioscience, Catalog number: 4936) was dissolved in DMSO and then diluted in 0.9% saline to yield a final DMSO concentration of 0.5%. The saline solution used for control injections also consisted of 0.5% DMSO. Before conducting the behavioral assays, 1 or 3 mg/kg CNO was intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected at 8‐h intervals for 2 days. Despite the short CNO half‐life in mouse plasma (<2 h), 17 acute treatment of DREADD‐expressing experimental animals usually have much longer biological effects (6–10 h). 17 , 18 , 19 To investigate the effect of astrocyte chronic activation, we injected CNO (1 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) into mice at 8‐h intervals. We chose this 8‐h duration based on a previous report. 19 For in vitro studies, primary astrocytes expressing hM3Dq‐ or hM4Di‐mCherry were treated with CNO (10 μM).
2.4. Intracerebroventricular injection of LPS
Under isoflurane anesthesia, mice were mounted onto a stereotaxic frame. Two guide cannulas were surgically implanted bilaterally 0.5 mm above the lateral ventricle of the brain. The coordinates for the placement of the guide cannula were as follows: 1 mm posterior to the bregma, 1.6 mm lateral, and 2.0 mm below the skull surface at the point of entry. Mice were allowed to recover for a minimum of 14 days before treatment and initiation of behavioral testing. After recovery, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of sterile saline or lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1 mg/ml; Sigma‐Aldrich) were conducted. CNO (1‐ or 3‐mg/kg, i.p.) injection was initiated 4 h prior to LPS injection (2 μl, i.c.v., flow rate of 0.5 μl/min).
2.5. Immunohistochemistry
Animals were anesthetized using diethyl ether, and transcardially perfused first with saline and then with 4% paraformaldehyde diluted in 100 mM PBS. The brains were dissected, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 days, and then cryoprotected using a 30% sucrose solution for an additional 3 days. The fixed brains were embedded in OCT compound (Tissue‐Tek, Sakura Finetek) and then sectioned into 20‐μm‐thick slices. For immunofluorescence analysis, tissue sections were incubated with rabbit anti‐GFAP (Dako, Catalog number: Z0334), mouse anti‐NeuN (Sigma‐Aldrich, Catalog number: MAB377), and goat anti‐Iba‐1 (Novus Biologicals, Catalog number: NB100‐1028) antibodies. Sections were visualized by incubation with Cy3‐, Cy5‐, and FITC‐conjugated anti‐rabbit, anti‐mouse, or anti‐goat IgG antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch; Cy3‐goat, Catalog number 705‐165‐147; Cy5‐rabbit, Catalog number 711‐175‐152; FITC‐mouse, Catalog number 715‐095‐151; FITC‐goat, Catalog number 705‐095‐147) and examined under a fluorescence or confocal microscope. We took the images with a Lionheart FX Automated Microscope at 10× magnification and equalized their brightness and contrast. We measured fluorescence intensity using ImageJ software version 1.44 (National Institutes of Health). To count the GFAP‐ or Iba‐1‐positive cells, we set a FITC, Cy3, or Cy5 secondary mask within the DAPI primary mask and counted the cells with co‐localized staining using Gen 5 software (BioTek).
2.6. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from hippocampal tissues and cells using the QIAzol reagent (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For conventional RT‐PCR, reverse transcription was conducted using Superscript II (Invitrogen) and oligo(dT) primers. PCR amplification using specific primer sets was carried out at an annealing temperature of 55–60℃ for 20–30 cycles. PCR was performed using a DNA Engine Tetrad Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research). For analysis of PCR products, 10 μl of each PCR was electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel and detected under ultraviolet light. Gapdh was used as an internal control. Quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) was performed using the one‐step SYBR® PrimeScript™ RT‐PCR kit (Perfect Real‐Time; Takara Bio Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by detection using the ABI Prism® 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The relative changes in gene expression determined by qPCR experiments were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. 20 The primers used in qPCR analyses of mouse Lcn2, Il1b, Tnfa, Nos2, and Gapdh were as follows: Lcn2, 5′‐ATG TCA CCT CCA TCC TGG TC‐3′ (forward), 5′‐CAC ACT CAC CAC CCA TTC AG‐3′ (reverse); Il1b, 5′‐AGT TGC CTT CTT GGG ACT GA‐3′ (forward), 5′‐TCC ACG ATT TCC CAG AGA AC‐3′ (reverse); Tnfa, 5′‐CAT CTT CTC AAA ATT CGA GTG ACA A‐3′ (forward), 5′‐ACT TGG GCA GAT TGA CCT CAG‐3′ (reverse); Nos2, 5′‐GCC ACC AAC AAT GGC AAC A‐3′ (forward), 5′‐CGT ACC GGA TGA GCT GTG AAT T‐3′ (reverse); and Gapdh, 5′‐TGG GCT ACA CTH AHC ACC AG‐3′ (forward), 5′‐GGG TGT CGC TGT TGA AGT CA‐3′ (reverse).
2.7. Passive avoidance test
This test began with training, in which a mouse was placed in a light chamber; when the mouse crossed over to the dark chamber, it received a mild electric shock on the foot (0.25 mA for 1 s). The initial latency to enter the dark (shock) compartment was used as the baseline measure. During the probe trials, 24 h after training, the mouse was again placed in the light compartment, and the latency to return to the dark compartment was measured as an index of passive fear avoidance. The passive avoidance test method used for cognitive behavior assessment has a 200 s maximum latency, as observed with most of the vehicle and CNO‐treated animals. Thus, it is not suited for cognitive enhancement observation, which is similar to previously published studies. 21 Future studies will need to address this issue using other methods such as novel object recognition task, Barnes maze, or Morris water maze tests. 22 , 23
2.8. Primary astrocyte cultures and virus infection
The brains of 3‐day‐old mice were homogenized and mechanically disrupted using a nylon mesh. The obtained mixed glial cells were seeded in culture flasks, and cultured at 37℃ in a 5% CO2 incubator in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Culture media were changed initially after 5 days, and then changed every 3 days. After 14 days of culture, primary astrocytes were obtained from mixed glial cells using a mechanical shaker (200 rpm for 12 h). Then, primary astrocytes in 12‐well plates were infected with hM3Dq‐ or hM4Di‐mCherry virus. After 7 days of virus infection, the cells were used for experiments.
2.9. Nitrite quantification
Astrocyte cultures were treated with stimuli in 96‐well plates, and then NO2 − in culture media was measured in order to assess NO production levels by the Griess reaction as described previously. 24 Sample aliquots of 50 μl were mixed with 50 μl of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% naphthylmethyl diamine dihydrochloride, 2% phosphoric acid) in 96‐well plates, and then incubated at 25℃ for 10 min. The absorbance at 540 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Anthos Labtec Instruments). NaNO2 was used as a standard to calculate NO2 concentration.
2.10. Intracellular Ca2+ measurement
To measure intracellular Ca2+ in cultured astrocytes, we grew primary astrocytes on glass coverslips and washed them three times with a solution containing 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). We then incubated them with 1 μM Fluor‐4‐AM for 40 min at 37℃. We then mounted the coverslips with the Fluo‐4‐AM‐loaded cells on a chamber positioned on the movable stage. We obtained images using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 700) with a water‐immersion objective lens (40×). We used a 488 nm Argon laser to excite Fluo‐4‐AM, and measured emission signal using a bandpass filter (505–550 nm). We recorded the confocal images every 1.5 s for 460 s. The illumination intensity was limited to 0.5%–0.7% of the laser output. To measure the effect of CNO alone on intracellular Ca2+ levels in hM4Di‐expressing astrocytes, we recorded green fluorescence images every 0.5 s for 10 s (baseline) using a Lionheart FX Automated Microscope with a 10× phase lens. We then injected 10 μl of 10 μM CNO into the cells using the injector of the Lionheart FX Automate Microscope. We recorded images every 0.5 s for 170 s.
2.11. Statistical analysis
All data are presented as means ± SEM (in vivo data) or means ± SD (in vitro data), as indicated in the figure legends. A Student's t‐test was used to compare two experimental groups for RT‐PCR analysis. All other datasets were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc tests (in vitro experiments and passive avoidance test) using SPSS software (version 18.0; SPSS Inc.). Statistical significance was established at p < .05. The sample sizes for all experiments were chosen to ensure adequate statistical power on the basis of the G*power 3.1 software. 25
3. RESULTS
3.1. Chemogenetic stimulation of Gi signaling in hippocampal astrocytes attenuates local inflammation
To investigate the role of astrocytic Gi signaling in neuroinflammation, the muscarinic receptor variant hM4Di fused to a red fluorescent protein mCherry was expressed in astrocytes within the hippocampal CA1 region. To achieve this, adeno‐associated virus incorporating a GFAP promoter (AAV5‐hGFAP‐hM4Di‐mCherry) was directly injected into the hippocampus. The Gi‐coupled DREADD was then stimulated with CNO, delivered i.p. (Figure 1A). To confirm the astrocyte‐targeted expression of the hM4Di‐mCherry protein, we performed immunostaining with cell type‐specific antibodies in the hippocampal sections of injected mice, and found that the cells expressing hM4Di‐mCherry were mostly GFAP‐positive astrocytes, and not NeuN‐positive neurons (Figure 1B and Figure S1). To examine whether Gi‐mediated activation of hippocampal astrocytes can alter local inflammation, we used a mouse model of LPS‐induced neuroinflammation. Using this model, we measured the mRNA expression of proinflammatory mediators, such as Lcn2, Il1b, Tnfa, and Nos2, in the hippocampus using real‐time PCR. Administration of CNO at 3 mg/kg (Figure 1C) but not at 1 mg/kg (Figure S2A,B) decreased the LPS‐induced levels of Lcn2, Il1b, Tnfa, and Nos2 mRNA. Similarly, the role of astrocytic Gi signaling in neuroinflammation was further evaluated by the assessment of the state of glial activation in the hippocampus of LPS‐injected mice (Figure 2A). Brain sections were immunostained with anti‐GFAP and anti‐Iba‐1 antibodies to label the astrocytes and microglia, respectively (Figure 2B). Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that chemogenetic stimulation of Gi signaling via administration of CNO at 3 mg/kg diminished the LPS‐induced increase in the number of GFAP‐positive astrocytes and Iba‐1‐positive microglia, as well as the relative intensity of both GFAP and Iba‐1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus. These findings suggest that astrocytic Gi pathway plays an inhibitory role in neuroinflammation.
3.2. Chemogenetic stimulation of Gi signaling in hippocampal astrocytes ameliorates LPS‐induced cognitive impairment in mice
Accumulating evidence suggests that neuroinflammation is associated with impaired cognitive function in diverse neuropathological conditions. 26 , 27 To examine whether activation of astrocytic Gi signaling in the CA1 hippocampus could alleviate LPS‐induced cognitive impairment in mice, we performed the passive avoidance test. The hM4Di‐expressing mice received CNO (1 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) seven times (8 h intervals) for 2 days (Figure 3A and Figure S2). The chemogenetic stimulation of astrocytic Gi signaling (CNO at 3 mg/kg) increased the latency to escape in LPS‐injected animals 24 h after a foot shock, indicating that astrocytic Gi signaling ameliorates LPS‐induced cognitive deficit (Figure 3B, right). The latency during the training trial did not differ among the experimental and control groups, indicating that all the mice had similar responses to the testing environment (Figure 3B, left). The escape latency was not affected by CNO treatment at a low dose (1 mg/kg) (Figure S2C). These results imply that strong activation of Gi signaling in hippocampal astrocytes has an inhibitory effect on LPS‐induced neuroinflammation and on subsequent cognitive impairment in mice.
3.3. Chemogenetic stimulation of Gi signaling in cultured astrocytes attenuates LPS‐induced nitric oxide production
Since nitric oxide (NO) production has been used as an indicator of inflammation in astrocytes, 28 we investigated the effect of astrocytic Gi signaling activation on LPS‐induced NO production. Primary astrocytes were infected with a AAV5‐hGFAP‐hM4Di‐mCherry virus construct and stimulated with LPS for 24 h (Figure 4A). Subsequently, the accumulated nitrite in the culture media was estimated using Griess reaction as an index for NO synthesis. Exposure of primary astrocyte cultures to LPS markedly increased the levels of nitrite in the culture media (Figure 4B). However, hM4Di activation by CNO treatment in primary astrocytes significantly decreased LPS‐induced NO production. We also used a positive control chemogenetic stimulation of the Gq‐signaling pathway, by infecting astrocyte cultures with a AAV5‐hGFAP‐hM3Dq‐mCherry virus construct. As expected, the activation of the astrocytic Gq‐signaling pathway using CNO increased the levels of nitrite in the media. Next, to investigate whether the inhibitory effect of astrocytic Gi signaling on LPS‐induced NO production was mediated by iNOS suppression, we performed RT‐PCR analysis and found that activation of Gi significantly decreased LPS‐induced expression of Nos2 mRNA (Figure 4C). These findings support the inhibitory role of astrocytic Gi signaling in neuroinflammation.
3.4. Chemogenetic stimulation of Gi signaling in cultured astrocytes attenuates LPS‐induced intracellular Ca2+ transients
Ca2+ signals in astrocytes change both acutely and chronically in response to brain insults, such as injury and inflammation. 29 However, it is unclear how Gi signaling in astrocytes affects Ca2+ signals during neuroinflammation. To test this, we performed Ca2+ imaging in cultured astrocytes expressing either hM4Di, hM3Dq (a positive control), or without infection (a negative control), in which cultured astrocytes were loaded with Fluo‐4‐AM as shown in Figure 5A. The primary astrocytes expressing hM4Di were imaged before and after application of PBS, LPS, and CNO (10 μM) (Figure 5B,C). The data revealed that CNO application following LPS treatment reduced LPS‐induced intracellular Ca2+ levels in hM4Di‐expressing astrocytes (Figure 5B). The application of CNO prior to LPS also prevented LPS‐induced upregulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels in hM4Di‐expressing astrocytes (Figure 5C). However, hM3Dq‐expressing astrocytes showed an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels following CNO application (Figure 5D). As shown in Figure 5C, CNO application acutely increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in hM4Di‐expressing astrocytes. Thus, to better characterize the effect of intracellular Ca2+ levels in hM4Di‐expressing astrocytes, we measured intracellular Ca2+ levels in hM4Di‐expressing astrocytes treated with CNO alone. Treatment with CNO alone increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in hM4Di‐expressing astrocytes (Figure S3). Similarly, chemogenetic activation of either the Gq or Gi pathway increased intracellular Ca2+ in astrocytes. 9 , 30 , 31 , 32 However, whereas Gq pathway activation resulted in a long‐lasting increase of Ca2+ activity (Figure 5D), the Gi pathway‐induced intracellular Ca2+ transient wanes in time (Figure S3). Collectively, these findings suggest that the alteration in intracellular Ca2+ levels following Gi or Gq pathway activation in astrocytes may reflect the features of reactive astrocytes associated with neuroinflammation.
4. DISCUSSION
Our findings demonstrate that chemogenetic stimulation of the astrocytic Gi signaling pathway in the hippocampus plays an inhibitory role in neuroinflammation and subsequent cognitive decline in mice. Stimulation of Gi signaling was sufficient to inhibit proinflammatory activation of astrocytes, which correlated with intracellular Ca2+ transients.
In this study, we have shown that long‐term hM4Di activation ameliorates LPS‐induced production of proinflammatory mediators and cognitive impairment, suggesting that Gi signaling could lead to suppression of inflammatory activation of astrocytes and concurrent neuroinflammatory changes. The role of astrocytic GPCR signaling in neuroinflammation has been previously reported. 33 The astrocyte dopamine receptor (DRD)‐2 coupled to Gi 34 , 35 has been found to decrease in the aging brain, 36 implying a potential involvement of DRD2 in aging‐related neuroinflammation. It has been reported that DRD2‐deficient astrocytes produce higher levels of proinflammatory molecules. 37 This effect is mediated through inhibition of αB‐crystallin signaling, a small heat‐shock protein known to negatively regulate the production of proinflammatory mediators and to exhibit neuroprotective effects. Intriguingly, DRD2‐deficient astrocytes also display robust upregulation of GFAP expression with a reactive morphology in the substantia nigra and the striatum of aged mice, 33 suggesting a possible link between astrocytic Gi signaling and age‐related neuroinflammation and subsequent behavioral impairment. Conversely, dopaminergic signaling triggered by the stimulation of Gi‐coupled DRD3 promotes a proinflammatory phenotype in astrocytes. 38 Moreover, Gi‐coupled P2Y12R and P2Y14R signaling has also been reported to be involved in proinflammatory activation of astrocytes and immune cells. 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45
In this study, chemogenetic stimulation of Gi signaling in primary astrocytes led to the downregulation of iNOS and subsequent NO production. Elevated levels of NO produced within the CNS are associated with the pathogenesis of neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. 46 Astrocytes express iNOS and produce high levels of NO in response to a wide range of stimuli, including pathogens, which have been implicated in neuroinflammatory processes. 47 Several transcription factors are involved in transactivation of the Nos2 gene, such as nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) and activator protein‐1 (AP‐1), as well as various members of the CCAAT/enhancer‐binding protein (CEBP), activating transcription factor (ATF)/cAMP response element‐binding protein (CREB), and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) families of transcriptional factors. 48 In addition, the second messenger cAMP has been implicated in Nos2 gene regulation as well. It has been reported that the increase of intracellular cAMP levels inhibits LPS‐stimulated iNOS or proinflammatory cytokine expression in several cell types. 49 Paradoxically, astrocytic iNOS expression and NO production have been reported to be both enhanced 50 , 51 and suppressed 52 , 53 by cAMP; however, studies using chemogenetic approaches demonstrate that activation of Gi signaling in astrocytes suppresses cAMP. 54 As our study revealed an inhibitory effect of the astrocytic Gi pathway on LPS‐induced NO production, further studies are necessary to elucidate the precise signaling pathways downstream of Gi, including those involving cAMP and potassium channels, 55 in astrocytes.
Our study demonstrates that chemogenetic stimulation of the astrocytic Gi pathway attenuated LPS‐induced intracellular Ca2+ levels, supporting an inhibitory role of Gi signaling in the inflammatory activation of astrocytes. Astrocytes are not electrically excitable cells, and their responses to external input are best represented by the elevation of intracellular Ca2+ levels. 56 Multiple sources contribute to astrocytic Ca2+ elevation, among which the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is known to be the major source of Ca2+, the release of which is triggered via activated inositol triphosphate (IP3) receptors. 57 Reactive astrocytes show elevated Ca2+ levels upon various inflammatory stimuli. 58 It has been reported that the upregulation of astrocytic Ca2+ is also essential for GFAP upregulation (a marker for reactive astrocytes) in diverse neuropathologies, including AD, 59 Alexander disease, 60 photothrombosis, 59 and traumatic brain injury, 61 whereas abrogation of aberrant Ca2+ signals (via IP3 receptor KO, etc.) strongly suppresses GFAP upregulation and subsequent inflammatory phenotypes.
Astrocytes express toll‐like receptor type 4 (TLR4), which belongs to the TLR family in the vertebrate immune system and specifically recognizes LPS. 62 On astrocytes, LPS decreases the expression of proteins such as gap junction proteins 63 and increases the expression of others such as GFAP, s100β, IL‐1, and TNF‐α. 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 Treating primary astrocytes with LPS stimulates the expression and activity of L‐type voltage‐operated calcium channels (VOCCs), which induces Ca2+ signals. 68 Functional L‐type VOCCs are important for the activation of astrocytes in response to LPS, and L‐type VOCC blockers cancel these effects. Knocking down/out the L‐type VOCC subunit Cav1.2 in astrocytes further confirmed these results. Another study demonstrated that LPS stimulation also affects the astrocytes’ intracellular Ca2+ signaling. LPS‐elicited Ca2+ transients occurred in a concentration‐dependent bell‐shaped distribution. Besides, the TLR4 antagonist Rhodobacter sphaeroides LPS (LPS‐RS) blocked the Ca2+‐induced peak. 69 The authors have found that LPS‐induced Ca2+ transients oscillate, Na+/K+‐ATPase is downregulated, and the actin filaments are disorganized. 69 The Na+/K+‐ATPase is an energy‐transducing pump, and its expression decreased with time. Modulating this pump's activity affects intracellular Na+ concentration, which in turn changes intracellular Ca2+ concentration via Na+‐Ca2+ exchanges. 70 Therefore, these data implicate L‐type Ca2+ channels in the LPS‐induced activation of astrocytes. 71 However, identifying the molecular pathways involved in L‐type VOCCs modulation by LPS requires further studies.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that the astrocytic Gi pathway plays an inhibitory role in neuroinflammation via downregulation of proinflammatory mediators, NO production, and intracellular Ca2+ levels. These results provide opportunities to identify potential cellular and molecular targets for the control of neuroinflammation.
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in regards to this manuscript.
ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT
All animal experiments were performed according to approved animal protocols and guidelines established by the Animal Care Committee of Kyungpook National University (No. KNU 2019‐09).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
J.‐H. K. performed experiments and analyzed data; J.‐H. K. W.H. L., and K. S. designed the study; J.‐H. K., M. H. R., and K. S. wrote the paper. All authors critically reviewed the text and figures.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All data pertinent to this work are contained within this manuscript or available upon request. For requests, please contact: Kyoungho Suk, Kyungpook National University, ksuk@knu.ac.kr.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (Grant Number: 2018R1A2A1A05077118, 2016M3C7A1904148, 2017R1A5A2015391 and 2020M3E5D9079764).
Kim J‐H, Rahman MH, Lee WH, Suk K. Chemogenetic stimulation of the Gi pathway in astrocytes suppresses neuroinflammation. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9:e00822. 10.1002/prp2.822
REFERENCES
- 1. Urban DJ, Roth BL. DREADDs (designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs): chemogenetic tools with therapeutic utility. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:399‐417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hirbec H, Déglon N, Foo LC, et al. Emerging technologies to study glial cells. Glia. 2020;68:1692‐1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Grace PM, Wang X, Strand KA, et al. DREADDed microglia in pain: implications for spinal inflammatory signaling in male rats. Exp Neurol. 2018;304:125‐131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pelvig DP, Pakkenberg H, Stark AK, Pakkenberg B. Neocortical glial cell numbers in human brains. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29:1754‐1762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Nam MH, Han KS, Lee J, et al. Activation of astrocytic mu‐opioid receptor causes conditioned place preference. Cell Rep. 2019;28:1154‐1166 e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kol A, Adamsky A, Groysman M, Kreisel T, London M, Goshen I. Astrocytes contribute to remote memory formation by modulating hippocampal‐cortical communication during learning. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1229‐1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Jones ME, Paniccia JE, Lebonville CL, Reissner KJ, Lysle DT. Chemogenetic manipulation of dorsal hippocampal astrocytes protects against the development of stress‐enhanced fear learning. Neuroscience. 2018;388:45‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Yu X, Nagai J, Marti‐Solano M, et al. Context‐specific striatal astrocyte molecular responses are phenotypically exploitable. Neuron. 2020;108(6):1146‐1162.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nagai J, Rajbhandari AK, Gangwani MR, et al. Hyperactivity with disrupted attention by activation of an astrocyte synaptogenic cue. Cell. 2019;177:1280‐1292.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liddelow SA, Barres BA. Reactive astrocytes: production, function, and therapeutic potential. Immunity. 2017;46:957‐967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:7‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fu W, Jhamandas JH. Role of astrocytic glycolytic metabolism in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. Biogerontology. 2014;15:579‐586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cabezas R, Avila M, Gonzalez J, et al. Astrocytic modulation of blood brain barrier: perspectives on Parkinson's disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Barreto G, White RE, Ouyang Y, Xu L, Giffard RG. Astrocytes: targets for neuroprotection in stroke. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2011;11:164‐173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Brosnan CF, Raine CS. The astrocyte in multiple sclerosis revisited. Glia. 2013;61:453‐465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rahman MH, Bhusal A, Kim J‐H, et al. Astrocytic pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase‐2 is involved in hypothalamic inflammation in mouse models of diabetes. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Guettier JM, Gautam D, Scarselli M, et al. A chemical‐genetic approach to study G protein regulation of beta cell function in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19197‐19202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wess J, Nakajima K, Jain S. Novel designer receptors to probe GPCR signaling and physiology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34:385‐392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Alexander GM, Rogan SC, Abbas AI, et al. Remote control of neuronal activity in transgenic mice expressing evolved G protein‐coupled receptors. Neuron. 2009;63:27‐39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real‐time quantitative PCR and the 2(‐Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Jeong GW, Lee HH, Lee‐Kwon W, Kwon HM. Microglial TonEBP mediates LPS‐induced inflammation and memory loss as transcriptional cofactor for NF‐kappaB and AP‐1. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Stragier E, Martin V, Davenas E, et al. Brain plasticity and cognitive functions after ethanol consumption in C57BL/6J mice. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hou Y, Wang Y, Zhao J, et al. Smart Soup, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, ameliorates amyloid pathology and related cognitive deficits. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lee S, Kim J‐H, Kim J‐H, et al. Lipocalin‐2 is a chemokine inducer in the central nervous system: role of chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) in lipocalin‐2‐induced cell migration. J Biol Chem. 2011;51:43855‐43870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2003;5:453‐458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhao J, Bi W, Xiao S, et al. Neuroinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide causes cognitive impairment in mice. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kumar A. Editorial: neuroinflammation and cognition. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lee S, Park J‐Y, Lee W‐H, et al. Lipocalin‐2 is an autocrine mediator of reactive astrocytosis. J Neurosci. 2009;29:234‐249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Pekny M, Pekna M, Messing A, et al. Astrocytes: a central element in neurological diseases. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:323‐345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Durkee CA, Covelo A, Lines J, Kofuji P, Aguilar J, Araque A. Gi/o protein‐coupled receptors inhibit neurons but activate astrocytes and stimulate gliotransmission. Glia. 2019;67:1076‐1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Adamsky A, Kol A, Kreisel T, et al. Astrocytic activation generates de novo neuronal potentiation and memory enhancement. Cell. 2018;174:59‐71.e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chai H, Diaz‐Castro B, Shigetomi E, et al. Neural circuit‐specialized astrocytes: transcriptomic, proteomic, morphological, and functional evidence. Neuron. 2017;95:531‐549.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Shao W, Zhang SZ, Tang M, et al. Suppression of neuroinflammation by astrocytic dopamine D2 receptors via alphaB‐crystallin. Nature. 2013;494:90‐94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Shioda N. Dopamine D2L receptor‐interacting proteins regulate dopaminergic signaling. J Pharmacol Sci. 2017;17:30171‐30178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ilani T, Fishburn CS, Levavi‐Sivan B, Carmon S, Raveh L, Fuchs S. Coupling of dopamine receptors to G proteins: studies with chimeric D2/D3 dopamine receptors. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2002;22:47‐56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kaasinen V, Vilkman H, Hietala J, et al. Age‐related dopamine D2/D3 receptor loss in extrastriatal regions of the human brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:683‐688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ousman SS, Tomooka BH, van Noort JM , et al. Protective and therapeutic role for alphaB‐crystallin in autoimmune demyelination. Nature. 2007;448:474‐479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Montoya A, Elgueta D, Campos J, et al. Dopamine receptor D3 signalling in astrocytes promotes neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sesma JI, Weitzer CD, Livraghi‐Butrico A, et al. UDP‐glucose promotes neutrophil recruitment in the lung. Purinergic Signal. 2016;12:627‐635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Azroyan A, Cortez‐Retamozo V, Bouley R, et al. Renal intercalated cells sense and mediate inflammation via the P2Y14 receptor. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Idzko M, Ferrari D, Eltzschig HK. Nucleotide signalling during inflammation. Nature. 2014;509:310‐317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kinoshita M, Nasu‐Tada K, Fujishita K, Sato K, Koizumi S. Secretion of matrix metalloproteinase‐9 from astrocytes by inhibition of tonic P2Y14‐receptor‐mediated signal(s). Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2013;33:47‐58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Xu J, Morinaga H, Oh D, et al. GPR105 ablation prevents inflammation and improves insulin sensitivity in mice with diet‐induced obesity. J Immunol. 2012;189:1992‐1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kobayashi K, Yamanaka H, Yanamoto F, Okubo M, Noguchi K. Multiple P2Y subtypes in spinal microglia are involved in neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury. Glia. 2012;60:1529‐1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gao ZG, Ding Y, Jacobson KA. UDP‐glucose acting at P2Y14 receptors is a mediator of mast cell degranulation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;79:873‐879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Saha RN, Pahan K. Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase gene in glial cells. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:929‐947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sola C, Casal C, Tusell JM, Serratosa J. Astrocytes enhance lipopolysaccharide‐induced nitric oxide production by microglial cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16:1275‐1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Saha RN, Pahan K. Signals for the induction of nitric oxide synthase in astrocytes. Neurochem Int. 2006;49:154‐163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Galea E, Feinstein DL. Regulation of the expression of the inflammatory nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) by cyclic AMP. FASEB J. 1999;13:2125‐2137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Hsiao HY, Mak OT, Yang CS, Liu YP, Fang KM, Tzeng SF. TNF‐alpha/IFN‐gamma‐induced iNOS expression increased by prostaglandin E2 in rat primary astrocytes via EP2‐evoked cAMP/PKA and intracellular calcium signaling. Glia. 2007;55:214‐223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Lee J, Ryu H, Ferrante RJ, Morris SM Jr, Ratan RR. Translational control of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by arginine can explain the arginine paradox. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:4843‐4848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kozuka N, Kudo Y, Morita M. Multiple inhibitory pathways for lipopolysaccharide‐ and pro‐inflammatory cytokine‐induced nitric oxide production in cultured astrocytes. Neuroscience. 2007;144:911‐919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Pahan K, Namboodiri AM, Sheikh FG, Smith BT, Singh I. Increasing cAMP attenuates induction of inducible nitric‐oxide synthase in rat primary astrocytes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:7786‐7791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Oe Y, Wang X, Patriarchi T, et al. Distinct temporal integration of noradrenaline signaling by astrocytic second messengers during vigilance. Nat Commun. 2020;11:471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Olsen ML, Sontheimer H. Functional implications for Kir4.1 channels in glial biology: from K+ buffering to cell differentiation. J Neurochem. 2008;107:589‐601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Farhy‐Tselnicker I, Allen NJ. Astrocytes, neurons, synapses: a tripartite view on cortical circuit development. Neural Dev. 2018;13:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Shigetomi E, Patel S, Khakh BS. Probing the complexities of astrocyte calcium signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:300‐312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Shigetomi E, Saito K, Sano F, Koizumi S. Aberrant calcium signals in reactive astrocytes: a key process in neurological disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Li H, Xie Y, Zhang N, Yu Y, Zhang Q, Ding S. Disruption of IP(3)R2‐mediated Ca(2)(+) signaling pathway in astrocytes ameliorates neuronal death and brain damage while reducing behavioral deficits after focal ischemic stroke. Cell Calcium. 2015;58:565‐576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Saito K, Shigetomi E, Yasuda R, et al. Aberrant astrocyte Ca(2+) signals "AxCa signals" exacerbate pathological alterations in an Alexander disease model. Glia. 2018;66:1053‐1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kanemaru K, Kubota J, Sekiya H, Hirose K, Okubo Y, Iino M. Calcium‐dependent N‐cadherin up‐regulation mediates reactive astrogliosis and neuroprotection after brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:11612‐11617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Carpentier PA, Duncan DS, Miller SD. Glial toll‐like receptor signaling in central nervous system infection and autoimmunity. Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22:140‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Liao CK, Wang SM, Chen YL, Wang HS, Wu JC. Lipopolysaccharide‐induced inhibition of connexin43 gap junction communication in astrocytes is mediated by downregulation of caveolin‐3. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42:762‐770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tarassishin L, Suh HS, Lee SC. LPS and IL‐1 differentially activate mouse and human astrocytes: role of CD14. Glia. 2014;62:999‐1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Guerra M, Tortorelli LS, Galland F, et al. Lipopolysaccharide modulates astrocytic S100B secretion: a study in cerebrospinal fluid and astrocyte cultures from rats. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. van Neerven S , Nemes A, Imholz P, et al. Inflammatory cytokine release of astrocytes in vitro is reduced by all‐trans retinoic acid. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;229:169‐179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Vergara D, Martignago R, Bonsegna S, et al. IFN‐beta reverses the lipopolysaccharide‐induced proteome modifications in treated astrocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;221:115‐120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Cheli VT, Santiago Gonzalez DA, Smith J, Spreuer V, Murphy GG, Paez PM. L‐type voltage‐operated calcium channels contribute to astrocyte activation in vitro. Glia. 2016;64:1396‐1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Forshammar J, Block L, Lundborg C, Biber B, Hansson E. Naloxone and ouabain in ultralow concentrations restore Na+/K+‐ATPase and cytoskeleton in lipopolysaccharide‐treated astrocytes. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:31586‐31597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Zhang L, Zhang Z, Guo H, Wang Y. Na+/K+‐ATPase‐mediated signal transduction and Na+/K+‐ATPase regulation. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2008;22:615‐621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Hashioka S, Klegeris A, McGeer PL. Inhibition of human astrocyte and microglia neurotoxicity by calcium channel blockers. Neuropharmacology. 2012;63:685‐691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data pertinent to this work are contained within this manuscript or available upon request. For requests, please contact: Kyoungho Suk, Kyungpook National University, ksuk@knu.ac.kr.