Skip to main content
Biomolecules logoLink to Biomolecules
. 2021 Oct 5;11(10):1460. doi: 10.3390/biom11101460

Description of Joint Alterations Observed in a Family Carrying p.Asn453Ser COMP Variant: Clinical Phenotypes, In Silico Prediction of Functional Impact on COMP Protein and Stability, and Review of the Literature

Quitterie Rochoux 1,2, Jana Sopkova-de Oliveira Santos 3, Christian Marcelli 2, Anne Rovelet-Lecrux 4, Virginie Chevallier 5, Jean-Jacques Dutheil 5, Sylvain Leclercq 1,6, Karim Boumédiene 1, Catherine Baugé 1, Juliette Aury-Landas 1,*
Editor: Vladimir N Uversky
PMCID: PMC8533395  PMID: 34680093

Abstract

The role of genetics in the development of osteoarthritis is well established but the molecular bases are not fully understood. Here, we describe a family carrying a germline mutation in COMP (Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein) associated with three distinct phenotypes. The index case was enrolled for a familial form of idiopathic early-onset osteoarthritis. By screening potential causal genes for osteoarthritis, we identified a heterozygous missense mutation of COMP (c.1358C>T, p.Asn453Ser), absent from genome databases, located on a highly conserved residue and predicted to be deleterious. Molecular dynamics simulation suggests that the mutation destabilizes the overall COMP protein structure and consequently the calcium releases from neighboring calcium binding sites. This mutation was once reported in the literature as causal for severe multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED). However, no sign of dysplasia was present in the index case. The mutation was also identified in one of her brothers diagnosed with MED and secondary osteoarthritis, and in her sister affected by an atypical syndrome including peripheral inflammatory arthritis of unknown cause, without osteoarthritis nor dysplasia. This article suggests that this mutation of COMP is not only causal for idiopathic early-onset osteoarthritis or severe MED, but can also be associated to a broad phenotypic variability with always joint alterations.

Keywords: mutation, genetics, arthritis, osteoarthritis, COMP, dysplasia

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common worldwide joint disease [1]. It is a complex disease, caused by a combination of three main risk factors: genetics, environmental factors, and age [2]. The first study demonstrating the importance of genetic factors in OA was carried out by Stecher in 1941 [3]. Since then, numerous studies have demonstrated that the genetic influence depends on the localization of the disease, and is comprised between 35% and 65% [4,5,6]. A large number of studies support the theory of a polygenic inheritance, as opposed to defect in a single gene [4]. However, rare OA forms, which are characterized by the early onset of the disease, may represent Mendelian diseases with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. To date, mutations in 13 genes have been reported to be potentially causal for OA [5,7]. These genes encode components of the extracellular matrix (COL2A1, COL9A1, COL9A2, COL9A3, COL11A1, COL11A2, ACAN, COMP and MATN3), the transforming growth factor b pathway (SMAD3), vesicular transport (TRAPPC2) or bone remodeling proteins (TNFRSF11B and TUFT1). However, these genes do not explain all the genetic forms of the disease, and some of them are not fully validated. Thus, the identification of disease-causing genes for OA remains important to unravel the etiology and pathogenesis of this disease in order to highlight potential targets for curative treatment. Indeed, the treatment of OA remains a problem because none of the current therapies can promote the regeneration of degenerated tissues. Regenerative medicine is an innovative approach, which is being evaluated such as the use of mesenchymal stem cells in combination with bio-scaffolds [8,9,10].

Here, we describe a family harboring a germline heterozygous mutation of the COMP gene (c.1358C>T, p.Asn453Ser) associated with three distinct phenotypes, including one atypical syndrome reported for the first time. This highlights the extreme clinical variability of this mutation even within the same family.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Subjects

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee, named “Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest III” (ID RCB 2013-A00211-44) and CNIL (905.515), and deposited at clinical trial website as Exorhum Project (NCT01999166, registered in 2013). All patients signed an informed consent before inclusion in the study.

A patient with early-onset OA from a French family was identified and recruited by rheumatologists at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Caen, and two of her family members were also enrolled. Clinical presentations including medical history, physical examination, and radiography as well as peripheral blood were collected from all enrolled subjects. Clinical data were collected and reviewed by rheumatologists on the basis of X-rays, medical reports or clinical examinations (III.1, III.2, III.3, III.4 and IV.9) or relatives’ narration.

2.2. Genetic Analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using FlexiGene DNA kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and quantified on Multiskan GO spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France). DNA integrity was checked on 1.2% agarose gel. Whole-exome sequencing was performed by Integragen Genomics (Evry, France) on HiSeq4000 (Illumina, Evry, France) after exome capture using SureSelect XT Human All Exon V5-UTR (Agilent technologies, Les Ulis, France). Sequencing reads alignment to the human reference genome hg19/GRCh37 and variant calling were processed using the CASAVA v1.8 pipeline (Illumina). Variants were annotated using Annovar software [11]. Filtering was performed following strict criteria and consisted of removing any low confidence variants (not passing the Variant Quality Score Recalibration from GATK tools) and excluding variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.001 reported in Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) or the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v2.1.1). Variants present in the Integragen reference database with a MAF > 0.01 were excluded as they must correspond to false positives related to the technology. For this study, we screened known pathogenic genes of OA (COL2A1, COL9A1, COL9A2, COL9A3, COL11A1, COL11A2, ACAN, COMP, MATN3, SMAD3, TRAPPC2, TNFRSF11B and TUFT1). Mutation validation and co-segregation analysis were performed by Sanger sequencing.

2.3. In Silico Variant Pathogenicity Prediction Analysis

To predict the potential pathogenicity of genetic variants, in silico prediction analysis was performed according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines [12].

To evaluate the evolutionary conservation, twelve FASTA sequences of COMP homologs were obtained from ”homologene” and “protein” databases of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), U.S. National Library of Medicine: NP_000086.2 for Homo sapiens, NP_001092035.1 for Pan troglodytes, XP_014978841.2 for Macaca mulatta, XP_533869.2 for Canis lupus familiaris, NP_001159989.2 for Bos Taurus, NP_057894.2 for Mus musculus, NP_036966.1 for Rattus norvegicus, for XP_418238.2 for Gallus gallus, XP_012821130.2 for Xenopus tropicalis, NP_001313279.1 for Danio rerio, NP_523495.2 for Drosophila melanogaster, and XP_308033.5 for Anopheles gambiae. Multiple sequence alignment of COMP protein sequences from these different species was performed by Clustal Omega program [13].

Four in silico prediction tools were used to evaluate variant pathogenicity: MutationTaster [14], PolyPhen-2 HumDiv [15], Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) [16], and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) [17]. Conserved domains database (CDD) [18] was used to identify structural domains and Ca2+ binding sites present on the COMP protein (NP_000086.2).

2.4. Molecular Dynamics Simulations

The crystal structure of signature domain of COMP (PDB ID: 3FBY) was used as a starting structure for all molecular dynamics simulations [19]. Two molecular dynamics simulations of 100 ns each were produced: a wild type (WT) and N453S one on which the Asn453 was mutated to a Ser using PyMOL mutagenesis tool (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0, Schrödinger, L., & DeLano, W. (2020). PyMOL. Retrieved from http://www.pymol.org/pymol, accessed on 24 July 2021). Both simulations were carried out using NAMD 2.12 [20] with the all-atom Chemistry at HARvard Macromolecular Mechanics (CHARMM) 36 m force field [21,22]. To simulate the aqueous solvent environment, each system was surrounded by a rectangular box of TIP3P water molecules [23] and 0.15 M of KCl was added to the system using CHARMmGUIsolvator [24]. The chosen box size ensured, for each complex, that the simulated complex was at a minimum distance of 10 Å from the edge. Periodic boundary conditions were applied to the systems using the ‘IMAGE’ algorithm. Van der Waals interactions were truncated using a force switching function between 10 and 12 Å and the particle mesh Ewald [25] was used to calculate long-range electrostatic interactions. The ‘SHAKE’ algorithm was applied to restrain all bonds involving hydrogen atoms [26]. The vacuum dielectric constant was used during all calculations. Firstly, the systems underwent energy minimization in 10,000 steps. Next, the minimized systems were heated to 303.15 K and the dynamics were temperature-equilibrated during 50 ps via heating reassignment under constant atoms’ number, constant volume, and constant temperature - NVT conditions. Finally, the systems ran freely for 100 ns under constant atoms’ number, pressure, and temperature (NPT conditions) with a time step of 2 fs. Langevin dynamics with a damping coefficient of 1 ps−1 were used to maintain the system temperature and the Nosé-Hover Langevin piston method was used to control the pressure at 1 atm. Production trajectories were saved every 100 ps and subsequent analyses were performed using the CHARMM program version c40b2 [27].

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Presentation

A four-generation French family with autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset hip OA (Figure 1a) was identified. Three members from this family (members III.1, III.3 and III.4) were recruited. Phenotypes of the index case and her relatives include joint pain, early-onset hip OA necessitating bilateral hip prosthesis (II.10, III.1, III.2 and III.3), and mild short stature (around 155–160 cm on average).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pedigree, radiographic findings and COMP mutation co-segregation in the family. (a) Pedigree of the family. Asterisk represents individuals genotyped for p.Asn453Ser COMP mutation. Black color filled symbols indicate patients with idiopathic early-onset osteoarthritis, gray color filled symbols indicate patients with dysplasia, and uncolored symbols indicate unaffected individuals. The arrow indicates the index case. (b) Hip joint radiographic findings of the 3 genotyped cases. Right hip joint of the index case (III.1) at the age of 50 years shows signs of hip osteoarthritis with superior medial narrowing of the coxofemoral joint space, subchondral condensation, and pericapital osteophytic production (Kellgren and Lawrence score of 3), without signs of dysplasia. Hip joint of his brother (III.3) shows dysplasia. No dysplasia nor osteoarthritis were shown on hip joint of her sister (III.4). (c) Electropherogram obtained by Sanger sequencing of germline DNA from index case affected by early onset osteoarthritis without dysplasia (III.1), her brother affected by dysplasia (III.3), and her unaffected sister (III.4). The arrows indicate the presence of c.1358A>G mutation of COMP in the 3 cases.

The index case (III.1) is a 51-year-old woman diagnosed with severe early-onset OA of the hip, which necessitated a total bilateral hip prosthesis at the ages of 47 and 51 years old. Bilateral hip pain complaints started at the age of 25 years old. No sign of dysplasia was present on hips, knees, shoulders, elbows or spine X-rays (Figure 1b). Outside the OA, she did not complain of any other pathology. She measured 157 cm and 68 kg. No evident environmental causes of OA (congenital skeletal abnormalities, acquired bone diseases, chronic inflammatory rheumatism, metabolic diseases, obesity and traumatisms) could be identified. Thus, her clinical presentation is strongly evocative of a genetic form of OA (familial history, precocity, severity and absence of evident environmental cause).

Besides a family history of idiopathic early-onset hip OA, two first-degree relatives of the index case (III.2 and III.3) were diagnosed with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED), as shown on X-rays for III.3 (Figure 1b). The brother III.6 had no symptoms but the diagnosis of MED was made recently for his 10-year-old son. Moreover, three first-degree relatives of the index case presented atypical phenotypes.

The brother III.5 presented fractures of the femoral neck at 13 years and 35 years, respectively, after moderate trauma, which is surprising and unusual in young people with no medical history. The brother III.3 presented a spontaneous osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle at 45 years, without obvious etiology, having required a valgisation osteotomy. This spontaneous osteonecrosis could indicate a local anomaly, as well as the femoral neck fracture in these two men.

The sister (III.4) presented a syndromic phenotype, including dwarfism (138 cm), mild facial dysmorphic features, brachydactyly without clubbing, moderate intellectual disability and, more recently, a progressive development of a sensorineural hearing loss, a premature ovarian insufficiency and a peripheral inflammatory arthritis. Regarding rheumatism, it started at the age of 39. Pain predominated in the hands, knees with swelling and shoulders. The wrist MRI showed inflammatory extensor synovitis and flexor and extensor tenosynovitis. The knee puncture had found a sterile but inflammatory fluid (6000 elements), without crystals. To explore the rheumatism, the biological analyzes did not show any abnormality, in particular auto-immune analyzes (including Rheumatoid factor and antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide, CCP). The radiographs did not find any anomalies and, in particular, no chondrodysplasia. Bone scintigraphy found moderate fixations of the knees, carpus and right ulno-carpal joint, right hip and last lumbar vertebra, but aspecific, described as rather of degenerative origin. The recent lumbar spine and sacro-iliac MRI were normal. As such, she presented with atypical rheumatism, seronegative, in a context of syndromic picture. She benefited from an opinion from geneticists who eliminated the diagnosis of pseudoachondroplasia, known to be associated with COMP mutation.

The father (II.1) developed early-onset OA, necessitating bilateral hip prosthesis before the age of 50.

On the maternal side, the mother (II.2), aged 70, presents rather late pain with in particular a coxarthrosis awaiting total hip arthroplasty. Among her six sisters, two were carrying total hip prosthesis. Among her three brothers, one complains of coxalgia that started around the age of 14, requiring bilateral hip prosthesis at 49 years old. He had six children, including four sons, all having coxalgia.

3.2. Genetic Analysis and Co-Segregation

In order to identify the molecular basis underlying the early-onset OA form of the index case, genes already described to be causal for early-onset OA were screened by whole exome sequencing. Only a rare heterozygous variant c.1358A>G (NM_000095.2) was identified within exon 13 of the COMP gene encoding Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein, and confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Figure 1c). This missense variant results in the substitution of the asparagine in position 453 by a serine (NP_000086.2:p.Asn453Ser) in a thrombospondin-type 3 repeat, corresponding to a calcium-binding domain of the COMP protein (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic representation of COMP gene and protein. (a) Human COMP gene is long of 9532bp, located in chromosome 19 and composed of 19 exons. It encodes a pentameric protein of 524 kDa in which the monomers are joined together by a coiled coil domain in the N terminus. Each N-terminal domain is followed by four EGF repeat domains, eight thrombospondin (TSP) type III domains, and a C-terminal globular domain. The EGF repeat and thrombospondin type III domains are able to bind calcium ions, while the C-terminal domain is involved in interactions with other proteins in the extracellular matrix (collagens, fibronectin, aggrecan). (b) Ribbon representation of X-ray structure of COMP protein: β-sheet are colored in red, α-helices in cyan and the coils/loops in pink. Ca2+ ions are schematized as green spheres. Left panel: Detailed view of Ca2+ binding site with N453.

One of her brothers (III.3) who underwent bilateral total hip replacement at 40 and 41 years old was found to be also heterozygous for the COMP mutation. Surprisingly, this mutation was also present in the genomic DNA of her sister (III.4, 43 years) who was not affected by OA but had a peripheral inflammatory arthritis (Figure 1c).

3.3. In Silico Prediction of Variation Pathogenicity

The mutated residue (Asparagine at position 453) is highly conserved in different species: it is present at least until Bilateria lineage (Figure 3). The variation p.Asn453Ser is considered as deleterious by four in silico prediction tools, with the following annotation: “deleterious” by SIFT (score = 0), “probably damaging” by PolyPhen2 HumDiv (score = 0.99), “disease causing” by MutationTaster (score = 1), and “pathogenic” by CADD (Phred score = 23.8). Interestingly, this variant is totally absent from the general population (gnomAD). It is predicted as “pathogenic” in Clinvar databases (Variation ID 9190), and has been reported in a patient with severe MED [28]. However, no obvious sign of dysplasia was detected in the index case, nor in her sister (III.4) although some related present MED phenotype (namely III.3 case who has also the variation in the COMP gene).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Evolutionary conservation of COMP protein around the position 453 (asparagine). Multiple sequence alignment of COMP protein sequences from different species was performed by Clustal Omega program. Residue in red (N) corresponds to the asparagine located at position 453 in the human protein (NP_000086.2). Percentage corresponds to global identity compared to the human COMP protein. Asterisk represents individuals genotyped for p.Asn453Ser COMP mutation.

3.4. Structural Analysis and Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Using the conserved domains database, we could observe that the variation induced a mutation of a residue essential for Ca2+ binding (Figure 2b), suggesting that the variation significantly affects Ca2+ binding, and consequently protein folding. As such, we checked calcium binding ability as well as whole protein stability through molecular dynamics simulations on the WT protein and mutated one (N453S). The visualization of molecular dynamics trajectories allowed us to observe that the COMP beta sheet core stayed stable in both simulations and that the loops binding the calcium ions fluctuated highly (Figure 4a). This was confirmed by the root mean squared fluctuations calculated on backbone atoms from both simulations (Figure 4b). In the majority, the calcium ions remained in their binding sites and the loops forming these binding sites changed the position during the dynamic. The detected mutation is situated in one loop binding calcium ion and the Asn453 coordinates directly the binding of calcium ion (Figure 2a). In the WT simulation we observed that the fluctuations occurring in this calcium binding loops region did not affect the calcium ion binding. In the N453S dynamics we observed that the mutation did not disturb the calcium binding in this site, and Ser453 coordinated the calcium ion in this site during all simulations. However, we observed a greater amplitude of the fluctuations in the region surrounding the mutation site (Figure 4a), which affected mainly the loops binding the calcium ions situated before the mutated loop. The neighboring loops’ restructuration during the simulation induced a release of calcium ion from the neighboring binding site in N453S dynamics. Looking at the simulations’ results, we can conclude that the Asn453Ser mutation, while not influencing directly the target calcium binding site, induces an important mobility in its environment and therefore destabilizes the COMP protein and consequently other calcium binding sites.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Molecular dynamics simulation. (a) Ribbon representation of the superposition of representative structures from the WT and N453S dynamics. (b) The root mean squared fluctuations calculated on backbone atoms per COMP residue for WT and N453S dynamics simulations.

4. Discussion

Here, we describe an extreme clinical variability including atypical phenotypes in a family with a p.Asn453Ser COMP mutation. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein gene, also known as thrombospondin 5, encodes a 524 kDa pentameric extracellular matrix glycoprotein member of the thrombospondin family of calcium-binding proteins. It interacts with multiple extracellular matrices, catalyzes collagen assembly and promotes the formation of well-defined fibrils.

Originally described in cartilage, COMP has also been identified in numerous tissues, such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle or skin. COMP plays diverse roles including the regulation of collagen secretion and fibrillogenesis, and the proliferation of chondrocytes in cartilage, the enhancement of cellular attachment and the inhibition of thrombin in blood vessels, the resistance to mechanical stress in tendons, the tissue remodeling in systemic sclerosis, or the trigger of the alternate pathway of the complement in the immune system [29,30,31]. In cartilage, COMP has shown promise as a diagnostic and prognostic indicator for OA. Serum COMP level is indeed elevated in OA patients, and could serve as a prognostic biomarker for the early diagnosis of this joint disease [32,33].

COMP protein is composed of five identical glycoprotein subunits (Figure 2). Each subunit consists of 757 amino acids that interacts close to their N-terminal extremity, resulting in a bouquet-like arrangement of the five monomers and forming a cavity in which different hydrophobic compounds like Vitamin D3 and all-trans retinol can reside [31,34]. This domain is followed by flexible regions of four EGF-like domains and eight TSP calmodulin-like repeats, which present numerous Ca2+ binding sites and are essential for correct protein folding [29]. The C-terminal globular domain binds to extracellular matrix proteins, namely collagens I, II and IX, aggrecan and fibronectin. This association of COMP with major components of the cartilage extracellular matrix supports a role of this protein in the structural integrity of cartilage. These bindings of COMP to extracellular matrix proteins appear to depend on divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+ or Mn2+) [31]. Additionally, COMP interacts also with cell surface proteins that influence various chondrocyte activities (cell adhesion, migration and intracellular communication), as well as with growth factors, such as Transforming Growth Factor beta or Bone Morphogenetic protein [31].

In humans, COMP is encoded by a 9,532 bp-long gene present in chromosome 19 at position 19p13.1 (GRCh38/hg38: chr19:18,782,773–18,791,305) and composed of 19 exons (Figure 2). To date, 148 unique public variants on COMP gene have been referenced in the Global Variome shared LOVD database (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/COMP, accessed on 2 April 2020), of which 131 are predicted to be pathogenic. Most of the variations correspond to substitutions (82%; 108/131) or deletions (12%; 16/131). The majority of COMP variations (>85%) are located in exons 9–14 which encoded the TSP type-3 repeat domains. These mutations compromise calcium binding and protein folding, leading to the retention of COMP in the chondrocyte endoplasmic reticulum. This causes oxidative and inflammation processes leading to chondrocyte death and loss of long bone growth [29]. These mutations are causal for the development of MED and pseudoachondroplasia (Table S1). These two autosomal dominant osteochondrodysplasias result in varying degrees of short stature, joint pain, joint laxity, joint stiffness and early-onset OA [29,35]. Only two COMP mutations are reported in OA patients without dysplasia, suggesting that predisposition to OA could correspond to the mild end of the COMP gene mutations spectrum [36,37].

In this report, we have identified a germline mutation (c.1358C>T, p.Asn453Ser) in the COMP gene in a family with an extreme phenotypic variability. The mutated residue is well conserved in different species, and present at one Ca2+ binding site in a TSP-type 3 repeat domain of COMP protein. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the mutation does not influence directly the Ca2+ bound in the target calcium binding site but it induces an important mobility in its environment and so destabilizes the COMP protein inducing the Ca2+ release from neighboring calcium binding sites. Therefore, along with the simulation results, the mutation will affect protein folding and cause a reduction in the number of bound calcium ions. This suggests that COMP function may be altered, since it has been previously described that mutations of coordination residues of others Ca2+ binding sites present in the same TSP-type 3 repeat domain of COMP protein disturb the local conformations of the type 3 repeats and reduced the binding to the extracellular matrix (collagens I, II and IX) [38,39].

The mutation is absent from gnomAD and was previously described once in a family with a severe form of MED [28]. Herein, the mutation was identified in three first-degree relatives (III.1, III.3 and III.4), which present three distinct phenotypes. The other family members were not screened for the mutation due to unavailability of genomic DNA. The index case (III.1) is affected by idiopathic early-onset hip OA without hip dysplasia. This was unexpected in view of the literature, since the mutation was associated with severe MED [28]. Contrariwise, one of her brothers (III.2) has MED and secondary OA requiring bilateral hip and knee prosthesis (from 22 to 35 years old). However, in this relative, we could not investigate the presence or not of the mutation. Another of her brothers (III.3), who also carries the mutation, was also diagnosed with MED, which is in accordance with the initial report from Briggs, and coherent with the phenotype induced by other COMP mutations. In addition, this family member (III.3) developed spontaneous osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle at 45 years old, while another brother (III.5) developed fractures of the femoral neck at 23 and 35 years old, suggesting some bone alterations in these individuals. This is coherent with a role of COMP in osteogenesis [40], and in pathological processes of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head [41].

Unexpectedly, the sister (III.4) who was 43 at the date of recruitment, also carries the COMP mutation. She is affected by an atypical syndrome, characterized by dwarfism, mild facial dysmorphic features, brachydactyly without clubbing, moderate intellectual disability, a sensorineural hearing loss, a premature ovarian insufficiency and peripheral inflammatory arthritis of unknown cause (seronegative on complete auto-immune analyses), without OA nor dysplasia. Her phenotype does not correspond to MED nor pseudoachondroplasia. We suggest that at least two mutations could be involved in the atypical clinical presentation of this patient. Considering the role of COMP mutations in inflammation process, the Asn453Ser mutation would lead to inflammation responsible for peripheral inflammatory arthritis [29]. Another alteration would be causal for the new syndrome observed. In addition, we cannot exclude that the absence of OA is due to the younger age of the patient compared to the index case.

The non-diagnostic of hip dysplasia in the index case (III.1) and in her sister (III.4) might be explained by the difficulty to diagnose mild form of MED due to the specific expression of the disease in childhood, only characterized by a nonspecific expression of early-onset OA in adults [37]. We also suggest that modifier factors, such as other genetic alterations, epigenetic modifications or the environment, may play a role in the expression of this mutation, resulting in modification of the phenotypic severity of the disease.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this report extends the phenotypic spectrum associated with COMP mutations. In this study, the p.Asn453Ser COMP mutation was not linked to an inherited form of severe MED (contrary to what is described in the initial report from Briggs or observed with other mutations in COMP gene), but was associated with a marked intrafamilial variability. Individuals having the mutation present cartilage or bone alterations which induced different phenotypes: MED with secondary OA, but also primary OA, osteonecrosis, or peripheral inflammatory arthritis. Future investigations on modifier factors should be conducted to better understand the phenotypic heterogeneity and to improve the interpretation of COMP mutations in order to improve the medical care management of patients carrying mutations.

Acknowledgments

The present work was performed thanks to the generous computing re-sources provided by the CRIANN (Normandy, France). The authors gratefully acknowledge the European Community (ERDF: European Regional Development Fund) for the molecular modeling software. We thank the patient and her family for their participation to the study.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom11101460/s1, Table S1: COMP mutations involved in Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED) and in Pseudoachondropla-sia (PSACH) according Uniprot databases (UniProtKB-P49747).

Author Contributions

Q.R.: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review & editing; (J.S.-d.O.S.): Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review & editing; C.M.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing–review & editing; A.R.-L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing–review & editing; V.C.: Investigation, Writing–review & editing; J.-J.D.: Project administration, Writing–review & editing; S.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing–review & editing; K.B.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing–review & editing; C.B.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review & editing; J.A.-L.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project is supported by grants from the Groupement de coopération sanitaire (GSC) G4 (PHRC-I EXORHUM). JAL was the recipient of a fellowship from Région Basse-Normandie.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the local Ethics Committee, named “Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest III” (ID RCB 2013-A00211-44) and CNIL (905.515), and de-posited at clinical trial website as Exorhum Project (NCT01999166, registered in 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Mandl L.A. Osteoarthritis year in review 2018: Clinical. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019;27:359–364. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sandell L.J. Etiology of osteoarthritis: Genetics and synovial joint development. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2012;8:77–89. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stecher R. Heberden’s nodes: Heredity in hypertrophic arthritis of the finger joints. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1941;201:801–809. doi: 10.1097/00000441-194106000-00004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fernández-Moreno M., Rego I., Carreira-Garcia V., Blanco F.J. Genetics in osteoarthritis. Curr. Genomics. 2008;9:542–547. doi: 10.2174/138920208786847953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aury-Landas J., Marcelli C., Leclercq S., Boumédiene K., Baugé C. Genetic determinism of primary early-onset osteoarthritis. Trends Mol. Med. 2016;22:38–52. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spector T.D., MacGregor A. Risk factors for osteoarthritis: Genetics. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2004;12:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sliz E., Taipale M., Welling M., Skarp S., Alaraudanjoki V., Ignatius J., Ruddock L., Nissi R., Männikkö M. TUFT1, a novel candidate gene for metatarsophalangeal osteoarthritis, plays a role in chondrogenesis on a calcium-related pathway. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhu C., Wu W., Qu X. Mesenchymal stem cells in osteoarthritis therapy: A review. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021;13:448–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ballini A., Boccaccio A., Saini R., Van Pham P., Tatullo M. Dental-Derived Stem Cells and Their Secretome and Interactions with Bioscaffolds/Biomaterials in Regenerative Medicine: From the In Vitro Research to Translational Applications. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:6975251. doi: 10.1155/2017/6975251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tatullo M., Spagnuolo G., Codispoti B., Zamparini F., Zhang A., Degli Esposti M., Aparicio C., Rengo C., Nuzzolese M., Manzoli L., et al. PLA-Based Mineral-Doped Scaffolds Seeded with Human Periapical Cyst-Derived MSCs: A Promising Tool for Regenerative Healing in Dentistry. Materials. 2019;12:597. doi: 10.3390/ma12040597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang H., Wang K. Genomic variant annotation and prioritization with ANNOVAR and wANNOVAR. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:1556–1566. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–423. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Madeira F., Park Y.M., Lee J., Buso N., Gur T., Madhusoodanan N., Basutkar P., Tivey A.R.N., Potter S.C., Finn R.D., et al. The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W636–W641. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schwarz J.M., Cooper D.N., Schuelke M., Seelow D. MutationTaster2: Mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:361–362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adzhubei I.A., Schmidt S., Peshkin L., Ramensky V.E., Gerasimova A., Bork P., Kondrashov A.S., Sunyaev S.R. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sim N.-L., Kumar P., Hu J., Henikoff S., Schneider G., Ng P.C. SIFT web server: Predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W452–W457. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rentzsch P., Witten D., Cooper G.M., Shendure J., Kircher M. CADD: Predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:D886–D894. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lu S., Wang J., Chitsaz F., Derbyshire M.K., Geer R.C., Gonzales N.R., Gwadz M., I Hurwitz D., Marchler G.H., Song J.S., et al. CDD/SPARCLE: The conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48:D265–D268. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tan K., Duquette M., Joachimiak A., Lawler J. The crystal structure of the signature domain of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein: Implications for collagen, glycosaminoglycan and integrin binding. FASEB J. 2009;23:2490–2501. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-128090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Phillips J.C., Braun R., Wang W., Gumbart J., Tajkhorshid E., Villa E., Chipot C., Skeel R.D., Kalé L., Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005;26:1781–1802. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Best R.B., Zhu X., Shim J., Lopes P.E., Mittal J., Feig M., MacKerell A.D., Jr. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone ϕ, ψ and side-chain χ1 and χ2 dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012;8:3257–3273. doi: 10.1021/ct300400x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huang J., Rauscher S., Nawrocki G., Ran T., Feig G.N.M., De Groot B.L., Grubmüller S.R.B.L.D.G.H., MacKerell A.D. CHARMM36m: An improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods. 2016;14:71–73. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jorgensen W.L., Chandrasekhar J., Madura J., Impey R.W., Klein M.L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983;79:926–935. doi: 10.1063/1.445869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jo S., Kim T., Iyer V.G., Im W. CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 2008;29:1859–1865. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Darden T., York D., Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: AnN⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:10089–10092. doi: 10.1063/1.464397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ryckaert J.-P., Ciccotti G., Berendsen H.J. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977;23:327–341. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brooks B.R., Brooks C.L., III, Mackerell A.D., Jr., Nilsson L., Petrella R.J., Roux B., Won Y., Archontis G., Bartels C., Boresch S. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:1545–1614. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Briggs M.D., Mortier G., Cole W.G., King L.M., Golik S.S., Bonaventure J., Nuytinck L., De Paepe A., Leroy J.G., Biesecker L., et al. Diverse Mutations in the Gene for Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein in the Pseudoachondroplasia–Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia Disease Spectrum. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998;62:311–319. doi: 10.1086/301713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Posey K.L., Coustry F., Hecht J.T. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein: COMPopathies and beyond. Matrix Biol. 2018;71-72:161–173. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Otteby K.E., Holmquist E., Saxne T., Heinegård D., Hesselstrand R., Blom A.M. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein-induced complement activation in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013;15:1–8. doi: 10.1186/ar4410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Acharya C., Yik J.H., Kishore A., Van Dinh V., Di Cesare P.E., Haudenschild D. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and its binding partners in the cartilage extracellular matrix: Interaction, regulation and role in chondrogenesis. Matrix Biol. 2014;37:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Das B.R., Khan F.R., Roy A. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein in monitoring and prognostication of osteoarthritis and its utility in drug development. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2015;6:4–9. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.148792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mishra A., Awasthi S., Raj S., Mishra P., Srivastava R.N. Identifying the role of ASPN and COMP genes in knee osteoarthritis development. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019;14:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1391-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tseng S., Reddi A.H., Di Cesare P.E. Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein (COMP): A Biomarker of Arthritis. Biomark. Insights. 2009;4:33–44. doi: 10.4137/BMI.S645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Briggs M.D., Brock J., Ramsden S.C., Bell P.A. Genotype to phenotype correlations in cartilage oligomeric matrix protein associated chondrodysplasias. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014;22:1278–1282. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Styrkarsdottir U., Helgason H., Sigurdsson A., Norddahl G.L., Agustsdottir A.B., Reynard L.N., Villalvilla A., Halldorsson G.H., Jonasdottir A., Magnusdottir A., et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies rare genotypes in COMP and CHADL associated with high risk of hip osteoarthritis. Nat Genet. 2017;49:801–805. doi: 10.1038/ng.3816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mu S.-C., Lin Y.-J., Liu H.-C., Wu J.-Y., Li S.-C., Lee M.-T.M., Chou C.-H., Chen L.-K., Chen Y.-T. A Mutation in Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein (COMP) Causes Early-Onset Osteoarthritis in a Large Kindred Study. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2011;75:575–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2011.00667.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thur J., Rosenberg K., Nitsche D.P., Pihlajamaa T., Ala-Kokko L., Heinegård D., Paulsson M., Maurer P. Mutations in Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Causing Pseudoachondroplasia and Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia Affect Binding of Calcium and Collagen I, II, and IX. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:6083–6092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009512200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen H., Deere M., Hecht J.T., Lawler J. Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Is a Calcium-binding Protein, and a Mutation in Its Type 3 Repeats Causes Conformational Changes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:26538–26544. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909780199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ishida K., Acharya C., Christiansen B.A., Yik J.H., DiCesare P.E., Haudenschild D. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein enhances osteogenesis by directly binding and activating bone morphogenetic protein-2. Bone. 2013;55:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gong S.-D., Chen X., Chen Z.-Q., He X.-M., Pang F.-X., Huang J.-Y., Zhou Y.-C., Qin Y.-X., Liu S.-J., Wei Q.-S. Elevated plasma cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) level are associated with the progression of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2018;490:214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Biomolecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES