Abstract
TLR5 ligand flagellin-containing fusion proteins are potential vaccine candidates for many diseases. A recombinant fusion protein of flagellin A and the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (rFlaA:Betv1) modulates immune responses in vitro and in vivo. We studied the effects of rFlaA:Betv1 on bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). BMDMs differentiated from BALB/c, C57BL/6, TLR5−/−, or MyD88−/− mice were pre-treated with inhibitors, stimulated with rFlaA:Betv1 or respective controls, and analyzed for activation, cytokine secretion, metabolic state, RNA transcriptome, and modulation of allergen-specific Th2 responses. Stimulation of BMDMs with rFlaA:Betv1 resulted in MyD88-dependent production of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10, CD69 upregulation, and a pronounced shift towards glycolysis paralleled by activation of MAPK, NFκB, and mTOR signaling. Inhibition of either mTOR (rapamycin) or SAP/JNK-MAPK signaling (SP600125) resulted in dose-dependent metabolic suppression. In BMDM and T cell co-cultures, rFlaA:Betv1 stimulation suppressed rBet v 1-induced IL-5 and IL-13 secretion while inducing IFN-γ production. mRNA-Seq analyses showed HIF-1a, JAK, STAT, phagosome, NLR, NFκB, TNF, TLR, and chemokine signaling to participate in the interplay of cell activation, glycolysis, and immune response. rFlaA:Betv1 strongly activated BMDMs, resulting in MyD88−, MAPK−, and mTOR-dependent enhancement of glucose metabolism. Our results suggest macrophages are important target cells to consider during restauration of allergen tolerance during AIT.
Keywords: flagellin, TLR5, allergen, Bet v 1, fusion protein, metabolism, Warburg, HIF-1a, immune metabolism
1. Introduction
In the future, novel adjuvants and vaccines may be valuable tools to improve the efficacy, safety, and convenience of allergen immunotherapy. However, for their safe and efficient application, basic knowledge describing their immune modulating capacity, activated cell types, as well as a characterization of the underlying immunological mechanisms is needed.
The Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) ligand flagellin is a bacterial motility protein that forms the main body of the bacterial flagellum [1]. Because of its intrinsic immune-activating potential, flagellin was demonstrated to be an effective mucosal adjuvant mediating protective immune responses [2,3,4].
Since flagellin is the only proteinaceous TLR ligand, its application for the generation of recombinant flagellin:antigen fusion proteins is of special interest in vaccine development. Flagellin-containing fusion proteins have already been shown to be both safe and well-tolerated in clinical trials [5,6]. Consequently, fusion proteins combining flagellin with different antigens have been investigated for their potential to generate immune protection against different diseases including, among others: influenza [7,8,9], poxvirus [10], West Nile virus [11], and C. tetani [12], and Pseudomonas infections [13].
Moreover, flagellin:antigen fusion proteins are suggested as treatment options for IgE-mediated type I allergies [14,15,16,17]. Kitzmüller and colleagues recently described the enhanced immunogenicity, reduced allergenicity, and intrinsic adjuvant activity of flagellin C:Betv1 fusion proteins containing the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells from allergic patients [14].
In theory, adjuvant:antigen fusion proteins have the potential to both boost and modulate antigen-specific immune responses by targeting the fused antigen to immune cells in vivo that express receptors for the respective adjuvant. In addition, adjuvant-mediated immune cell activation influences the processing and increases the presentation of antigen-derived peptides in the context of the adjuvant-mediated immune cell activation [4]. Concordantly, our work has demonstrated that the fusion of allergens to the TLR5-ligand flagellin was able to suppress allergen-specific Th2 responses both in vitro and in vivo via the induction of both IL-10-mediated anti-inflammatory responses and Th1 responses [15,16,17,18]. However, the induction of overreaching Th1 responses may also have detrimental effects [19]. Therefore, the balanced induction of both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses by rFlaA:Betv1 may have advantages compared to exclusively triggering Th1-biased responses.
In our previous work, the fusion protein rFlaA:Betv1, consisting of flagellin A from Listeria monocytogenes and the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1, was shown to suppress allergic sensitization in vivo [15]. These immune-modulatory effects were paralleled by a pronounced rFlaA:Betv1-mediated activation of myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) in vitro, secretion of both pro- (IL-6, IL-12, and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines, and a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent metabolic switch towards glycolysis [15]. In this context, the contribution of both immune cell metabolism to the overall immune responses induced by such fusion proteins and other immune cell types needs further investigation.
Macrophages are both the main effector cells of the innate immune system and professional antigen-presenting cells (together with DCs and B cells). Therefore, macrophages control the induction and regulation of T cell immune responses via the uptake, processing, and presentation of antigens to antigen-specific T cells [20,21]. Epigenetics, cell survival, and the tissue microenvironment are the three main pathways controlling the phenotypical polarization of macrophages [22].
Based on both surface marker expression and their function, macrophages can be divided into classically activated (M1) or alternatively activated (M2) phenotypes [22]. Moreover, M2 macrophages can be further subdivided into the four sub-populations M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d [23,24,25]. M1 macrophages are induced by either microbial products or Th1 cytokines, such as LPS, IFN-γ, or granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [22,26]. Functionally, they are capable of secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines, eliminating pathogens, and promoting a local Th1 environment [22,27].
M2a macrophage differentiation is induced by the Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13; IL-1 receptor ligands and immune complexes were reported to induce M2b macrophages. IL- 10, TGFβ, and glucocorticoids were reported to induce M2c macrophages, and finally, TLR antagonists were reported to induce M2d macrophage differentiation [28]. Here, M2a macrophages secrete high levels of the Th2 cytokine IL-13 as well as other chemokines, which promote Th2 responses and induce eosinophil infiltration [28]. Both M2b and M2c macrophages are capable of secreting anti-inflammatory IL-10 in order to regulate immune responses. The M2d phenotype is known as a tumor-associated macrophage that regulates tumor metastasis [26]. While M1 and M2 macrophages are closely related to Th1 and Th2 responses, several studies have indicated the role of macrophages in allergic responses, especially in asthma [28,29,30,31,32]. In general, the M1 phenotype is the major effector macrophage in non-allergic asthma [31], and patients with higher frequencies of M1 cells have less severe clinical allergic reactions [29]. In contrast, M2 cells, especially of the M2a phenotype, are suggested to be the major effector macrophages in allergic asthma because they can promote Th2 responses, promote the secretion of histamine by interaction with antigen-specific Th2 cells, and induce eosinophil migration [28,29,30,31,32]. Therefore, understanding the effects of rFlaA:Betv1 on macrophages could further improve our knowledge of the immune-modulating properties of this promising vaccine candidate for type I allergies.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Generation of Recombinant Proteins
Recombinant flagellin A from Listeria monocytogenes (rFlaA, Acc. No: NC_003210) was generated according to [33]; recombinant birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (Acc. No: X15877.1) was generated according to [34]. The fusion protein rFlaA and rBet v 1 (rFlaA:Betv1) was generated according to [15] by cDNA fusion using the cDNAs of both FlaA and Bet v 1 as templates. All proteins displayed an estimated purity greater than 95%, correct folding of secondary structure elements as determined by circular dichroism-spectroscopy, and an endotoxin content of 1.14 pg/µg protein (rFlaA), <0.48 pg/µg protein (rBet v 1), and 1.7 pg/µg protein (rFlaA:Betv1), respectively (data not shown).
2.2. Determination of Beta-Glucans
To exclude the immunological effects of TLR2 ligands in the used preparation of rFlaA:Betv1, the concentration of (1→3) beta-glucans contained within the used rFlaA:Betv1 preparation was determined using the Endosafe-PTS Portable Test System (Charles River Laboratories, Cologne, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
2.3. Mice
BALB/c, C57BL/6 mice, TLR5−/−, and MyD88−/− mice (C57BL/6 background, all from Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME, USA) were bred at the animal facility of the Paul Ehrlich Institute under specific pathogen-free conditions. All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the German animal protection law (granting authority: RP Darmstadt, Germany, Approval number: F107/131).
2.4. In Vitro Generation of Mouse Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages, Stimulation, and Flow Cytometry
Mouse BMDMs were generated from bone marrow by culture in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented with 10% FCS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 1 mM l-glutamine, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 20 ng/mL of mouse recombinant macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rmM-CSF, PeproTech, Hamburg, Germany). For differentiation into BMDMs, 2 × 106 cells were seeded per 100 mm dish in 10 mL complete medium. On day 3, 10 mL of complete medium were added per culture dish. On days 6 and 8, 10 mL medium were exchanged and on day 10 M-CSF concentration was reduced to 12.5 ng/mL.
On day 11, BMDMs were harvested, seeded at 3.2 × 105 cells/mL in 24-well plates (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany), and stimulated with the indicated equimolar concentrations of rFlaA, rBet v 1, rFlaA + rBet v 1, rFlaA:Betv1, or LPS for either 24 h or 96 h, based on the experimental design. As an additional control, BMDMs were stimulated with LPS amounts corresponding to the residual amounts contained within the rFlaA:Betv1 preparation used for BMDM stimulation. Supernatants were analyzed for cytokine secretion by ELISA using the following antibody combinations: IL-1β (capture antibody: IL-1β monoclonal mouse antibody 1:500 (#14-7012-85, eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany) plus secondary detection antibody: IL-1β polyclonal mouse biotin-conjugated antibody 1:500 (#13-7112-81, eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany)), IL-6 (capture antibody: IL-6 monoclonal mouse antibody 1:1000 (#14-7061-85, eBioscience) plus detection antibody: IL-6 monoclonal mouse biotin-conjugated antibody 1:1000 (#13-7062-85, eBioscience)), TNF-α (capture antibody: TNF-α monoclonal mouse antibody 1:500 (#14-7325-85, eBioscience) plus detection antibody: TNF-α monoclonal mouse biotin-conjugated antibody 1:250 (#13-7326-85, eBioscience)). Levels of IL-10 were measured using the mouse ELISA Development Kit from PeproTech (#900-T53, PeproTech) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
For flow cytometric analyses, BMDMs were seeded at 3.2 × 105 cells/mL in 24-well plates (Thermo Scientific) and stimulated with the indicated equimolar concentrations of rFlaA, rBet v 1, rFlaA + rBet v 1, or rFlaA:Betv1 for 24 h. 10 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS, L5886, Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) served as a positive control. Cells were stained with anti-mouse, Pacific Blue-conjugated CD11b (clone: M1/70.15, dilution: 1:50; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and PE-Cy5-conjugated F4/80 (clone: BM8, dilution: 1 to 100, eBioscience). The activation of CD11b+F4/80+ BMDMs was assessed using anti-mouse PE-Cy7-conjugated CD69 (clone: H1.2F3, dilution: 1 to 100, eBioscience) and the PE-Cy7 intensity was quantified using a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience). For analysis of cell viability, BMDMs were treated as indicated and stained for dead cells using the fixable viability dye eFlour 780 (eBioscience). Data were analyzed using FlowJo V.7 (Treestar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
2.5. Preparation of BMDM:CD4+ T Cell Co-Cultures
BALB/c BMDMs were either cultured alone (5 × 105 cells/mL) or with splenic CD4+ T cells (6.3 × 105 cells/mL) isolated from BALB/c mice immunized with Bet v 1 plus alum (2 times 10 µg rBet v 1 plus 0.5 mg alum i.p., 2 weeks apart) using the CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Cultures were stimulated with Bet v 1, rFlaA:Betv1, or rFlaA + rBet v 1 for 72 h. Subsequently, cytokine secretion into culture supernatants was determined using either BD OptEIA ELISA Sets (IFN-γ, IL-5, BD Bioscience), Ready-Set-Go-ELISA kits (IL-13, eBioscience) or the following antibody combination for IL-2: capture antibody: IL-2 monoclonal mouse antibody 1:500 (#503702, BioLegend, Koblenz, Germany) plus detection antibody: IL-2 monoclonal mouse biotin-conjugated antibody 1:500 (#503804, BioLegend).
2.6. Inhibitors
To analyze signaling pathways involved in rFlaA:Betv1-mediated BMDM activation, BMDMs were pre-incubated with the indicated amounts of rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor) or the respective MAPK inhibitors, including either SP600125 (SAP/JNK MAPK inhibitor), SB-202190 (p38α/β MAPK inhibitor, all Invivogen, Toulouse, France), or U0126 (MEK1/2 MAPK inhibitor, Cell Signaling Technologies, Leiden, The Netherlands) for 90 min and subsequently stimulated with rFlaA:Betv1 for either 24 h (ELISA) or 96 h (ELISA and analysis of cell metabolic state).
2.7. Western Blotting
For Western blot experiments, BMDMs were starved in RPMI1640 supplemented with 1% FCS (Sigma-Aldrich) and cultured for 3 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in either T25/75 flasks, cell culture plates, or FACS tubes. Subsequently, 1 × 106 BMDMs were stimulated with the indicated proteins in RPMI1640. 30 min to 48 h post-stimulation, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and subsequently lysed with 200 µL lysis buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% w/v SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM DTT, 0.01% w/v bromophenol blue) for 10 min on ice. Target proteins in lysates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with 5% non-fat milk, the membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies from Cell Signaling Technologies overnight at 4 °C: phospho-MAPK Family Antibody Sampler Kit (#9910), NF-κB Pathway Sampler Kit (#9936), mTOR Substrates Antibody Sampler Kit (#9862), Glycolysis Antibody Sampler Kit (#8337), anti-Phospho-Stat3 (Ser727) antibody (#9134), anti-HIF-1a antibody (#14179), anti-ACO2 antibody (#6571), and loading control anti-histone H3 antibody (#12648, HRP Conjugate) or anti-GAPDH antibody (#8884, HRP Conjugate). Detection was performed with the provided secondary antibodies using ACE Glow substrate (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany) and images were captured with either a Fusion-Fx7 Spectra reader (Vilber Lourmat, Eberhardzell, Germany) or an iBright CL1500 system (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Band intensities in Western blots were quantified with ImageJ software (imagej.nih.gov, version: 1.52a) as relative light units (RLU) normalized to the histone H3 loading control.
2.8. Analysis of Cell Metabolic State
The Warburg effect, glucose consumption, and metabolic rate in stimulated BMDM cultures were determined according to [15].
2.9. Metabolic Flux Analysis
For metabolic flux analysis, 1 × 105 BMDMs per well were seeded in Seahorse XF96 cell culture microplates (V3-PS, TC-treated, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The next day, the medium was exchanged, and cells were stimulated as indicated using the different proteins. Seahorse XF Real-Time ATP rate assays, Seahorse XF Glycolysis, and Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Tests were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Agilent). Cycle numbers were as follows: 4 cycles of baseline measurement, 14 cycles of stimulation with the different proteins, and 8 cycles with either oligomycin, rotenone/ antimycin A (Rot/AA), and 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG), respectively (1 cycle = 3 min mixing plus 3 min measuring). Post-measurement, samples were normalized to total protein content via BCA (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and analyzed using Wave Desktop software (Agilent) and Graphpad Prism v8. Glycolytic Stress and Mito Stress results were analyzed using the respective report generator sheets according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Agilent).
2.10. RNA-Seq and Bioinformatics
For RNA-Seq analyses, 3.2 × 105 BMDMs/mL were stimulated in 24-well plates with either LPS as a positive control or the indicated equimolar concentrations of rFlaA + rBet v 1 or rFlaA:Betv1 for 48 h. Subsequently, BMDMs were harvested (4 biological replicates per condition) and frozen in Trizol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) before total RNA isolation with the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Freiburg, Germany). We harnessed a modified version of the NNSR priming method [35] to prepare stranded, Illumina-compatible libraries as follows: we used the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEB) to isolate mRNA from 1 µg total RNA per sample. cDNA was synthesized with Superscript IV in the presence of 4 µg Actinomycin D and RiboLock RNase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the NNSR_RT primer (see Table 1 below) for 30 min at 45 °C, following the recommendations of the manufacturer. After subsequent magnetic bead purifications and RNase H (NEB) treatment, samples were subjected to second-strand cDNA synthesis with 3′-5′ exo(−) Klenow (NEB) and with the primer NNSR_2 for 30 min at 37 °C. The bead-purified DNA samples were amplified with the NNSRnest_ind_N and NNSR_Illumina primers using the NEBNext Ultra II Master Mix (NEB) to obtain the barcoded libraries with the following cycling conditions: 98 °C 10 s; 5 cycles of 98 °C 10 s, 55 °C 30 s, 68 °C 30 s; 15 cycles of 98 °C 10 s, 65 °C 30 s, 68 °C 30 s. The smears of PCR products were agarose gel-purified, and the libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq instrument with single-end 86 bp settings.
Table 1.
Oligo Name | Sequence |
---|---|
NNSR_RT | gctcttccgatctctNNNNNN |
NNSR_2 | gctcttccgatctgaNNNNNN |
NNSRnest_ind_N | CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATNNNNNNGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTGA (N stands for a 6mer TruSeq index (Illumina)) |
NNSR_Illumina | AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTCT |
The raw sequencing reads were quality-, length-, and adapter-trimmed with fastp [36]. We used STAR [37] to align the trimmed reads to the human genome (hg38 assembly) and to count the mapped reads on gene level. The quantitative evaluation of the counts, differential gene expression, and the accompanying statistical analyses were performed in the R environment (https://www.r-project.org, version 3.5.0. (accessed on 23 April 2018) using the DESeq2 package (version 1.28.3)) [38]. KEGG pathway analysis [39] and gene set enrichment analysis were performed with the clusterProfiler package [40]. Data were deposited in the SRA database (accession number: PRJNA755840).
2.11. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism v6 to v8 for either Mac or Windows using 2-way ANOVA tests with confidence intervals adjusted for multiple comparisons according to either Bonferroni or Tukey. For statistically significant results, the following convention was used: * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001.
3. Results
3.1. Activation of BMDM Metabolism by rFlaA:Betv1 Is Accompanied by Both Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Cytokine Secretion
BMDMs differentiated from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated with equimolar amounts of rBet v 1, rFlaA, the mixture of rFlaA and rBet v 1 (rFlaA + rBet v 1), or the fusion protein rFlaA:Betv1 for 96 h and analyzed for their cellular metabolic state and cytokine secretion profile (Figure 1A). Both rFlaA and rFlaA:Betv1 activated BMDM metabolism (Figure 1B). While differences between the rFlaA:Betv1- and either the rFlaA− or rFlaA + rBet v 1-induced Warburg effect were significant, there was no difference in glucose consumption between rFlaA:Betv1− and rFlaA + Bet v 1-stimulated BMDMs (Figure 1B). Activation of BMDM glucose metabolism was paralleled by a highly significantly increased production of both pro- (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines from rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs compared to cells stimulated with either both proteins alone or provided as a non-fused mixture (for a stimulation concentration equimolar to 10 µg/mL rBet v 1, rFlaA:Betv1 induced 1.6-fold higher IL-1β secretion, 3.4-fold higher IL-6 secretion, 5.5-fold higher TNF-α secretion, and 6.1-fold higher IL-10 secretion than the respective mixture of both proteins, Figure 1C). Similar activation of BMDM metabolism (Repository Figure S1) and cytokine secretion profiles were observed for BALB/c BMDMs (Repository Figure S2).
To exclude potential immune-activating effects of the residual amounts of LPS contained within the used rFlaA:Betv1 preparation, we established thresholds for LPS-induced BMDM activation (Repository Figure S3A). Here, the threshold for an LPS-induced Warburg effect was between 1 and 10 ng. Increased glucose consumption and significant secretion of IL-10 were observed starting at 10 ng; secretion of IL-6 started at 1 ng, while IL-1β- and TNF-α-secretion were detected after stimulation with 1 µg of LPS (Repository Figure S3B,C). In addition, stimulation of BMDMs with the amounts of LPS contained within the used concentrations of rFlaA:Betv1 (0.59 pg LPS contained within 0.247 μg/mL rFlaA:Betv1, 5.9 pg LPS in 2.47 μg/mL rFlaA:Betv1, and 59 pg LPS in 24.7 μg/mL rFlaA:Betv1) neither resulted in activation of BMDM metabolism nor cytokine secretion (Repository Figure S3B).
To further exclude effects of LPS or potentially contaminating TLR2 ligands in the used rFlaA:Betv1 preparation, we used HEK293 cell lines stably transfected with either mouse TLR2, TLR4, or TLR5 as well as non-TLR-transfected HEK293 control cells (Repository Figure S4A). Here, rFlaA:Betv1 exclusively induced TLR5 activation, as indicated by a dose-dependent release of IL-8 from these cells (Repository Figure S4B). To further exclude the presence of TLR2 ligands in the rFlaA:Betv1 preparation, levels of (1→3) beta-glucans were determined. Detection of (1→3) beta-glucans in the used rFlaA:Betv1 preparation showed the levels of (1→3) beta-glucans to be below 0.8 pg/µg of protein, which is safely below the low ng amounts of different TLR2-ligands (LPS, mycoplasma diacylated lipoprotein, lipomannan, lipoarabinomannan, and Pam3CysK4) that were previously reported to activate TLR2 on BMDMs [41]. Therefore, we could show that neither the residual LPS amounts nor TLR2 ligands contribute to the rFlaA:Betv1-mediated activation of BMDMs.
In summary, stimulation of BMDMs with rFlaA:Betv1, and, to a lower degree, with rFlaA and rFlaA + rBet v 1, resulted in a pronounced activation of both BMDM metabolism and pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion.
3.2. rFlaA:Betv1 Triggers a Pronounced Shift Towards Glycolysis in BMDMs
In-depth analysis of the BMDM metabolic state using Seahorse technology (Figure 2A) revealed rFlaA, rFlaA + rBet v 1, and rFlaA:Betv1 to dose-dependently increase glycolysis (detected by enhanced extracellular acidification rates (ECAR)), while at the same time reducing mitochondrial respiration (reduced oxygen consumption rates (OCR), Figure 2B). In contrast, rBet v 1 had only minimal effects on BMDM metabolism (Figure 2B). Further inhibition of the mitochondrial ATP synthase by oligomycin and of electron transport chain complexes by rotenone/antimycin A (Rot/AA) resulted in compensatory increases in ECAR, which were less pronounced in rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs compared to the controls (Figure 2B). Treatment with the competitive inhibitor of glucose-6-phosphate, generation of 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG) completely suppressed extracellular acidification (Figure 2B). In line with these results, analysis of the glycolytic state showed that rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs have similar glycolytic capacities (capacity to produce energy by glycolysis) but higher glycolytic rates (amount of energy generated by glycolysis per minute and cell) compared to BMDMs stimulated with rFlaA + rBet v 1. In comparison, BMDMs stimulated with equimolar amounts of rFlaA + rBet v 1 have higher glycolytic reserves (capacity to further increase energy production by glycolysis) while no significant differences in non-glycolytic acidification (acidification of the extracellular medium by processes other than glycolysis) were observed between treatment groups (Figure 2C). In contrast to this, detailed analysis of mitochondrial function via Mito Stress tests revealed no differences in basal respiration, spare respiratory capacity, mitochondrial ATP production, proton leak, and non-mitochondrial respiration between rFlaA + rBet v 1- and rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated cells (Repository Figure S5).
Taken together, the metabolic phenotyping of rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs suggested the fusion protein induced a pronounced shift towards increased levels of glycolysis while mitochondrial respiration was suppressed.
3.3. rFlaA:Betv1-Induced BMDM Metabolism and Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion Depend on MyD88 While Only Being Partially TLR5-Dependent
In order to study the signaling mechanisms contributing to rFlaA:Betv1-mediated BMDM activation, BMDMs were differentiated from either C57BL/6, TLR5-, or MyD88-deficient mice, stimulated with the fusion protein and the respective controls, and analyzed to assess their metabolic state and cytokine secretion profile (Figure 3A).
Interestingly, activation of BMDM metabolism (Warburg effect and glucose consumption) by both rFlaA and rFlaA:Betv1 was shown to be partially TLR5-dependent (Figure 3B). MyD88-deficient BMDM did not show increased metabolic activity after stimulation with either of the tested proteins (Figure 3B). In line with these results, cytokine secretion induced by either rFlaA, rFlaA + rBet v 1, or rFlaA:Betv1 was shown to be abrogated in MyD88-deficient BMDMs (Figure 3C). Among the tested cytokines, only rFlaA:Betv1-induced IL-10 and TNF-α showed a substantial TLR5 dependency (41% and 87% reduction in TLR5-deficient mice compared to C57BL/6 BMDMs, respectively) while secretion levels of all other cytokines were unaffected by TLR5 deficiency (Figure 3C).
In summary, using BMDMs differentiated from either TLR5− or MyD88-deficient bone marrow, the activation of glucose metabolism and cytokine secretion was shown to be abrogated in the absence of MyD88 while being partially TLR5 dependent for the secretion of IL-10 and TNF-α.
3.4. rFlaA:Betv1 Induces MAPK, NFκB, and mTOR Signaling in BMDMs
Subsequently, the activation status and intracellular signaling cascades of C57BL/6, TLR5−/−, or MyD88−/− BMDMs stimulated by rFlaA:Betv1 were analyzed (Figure 4A).
Stimulation of C57BL/6 BMDMs with rFlaA:Betv1 resulted in higher up-regulation of CD69 compared to either rFlaA− or rFlaA + rBet v 1-stimulation (Figure 4B and quantified in Figure 4C). Of note, both rFlaA− and rFlaA:Betv1-induced CD69 upregulation was partially, but not significantly, reduced in TLR5-deficient BMDMs, while being completely abrogated in MyD88-deficient BMDMs (Figure 4B,C). Stimulation with rBet v 1 alone in either tested mouse strain did not result in increased CD69 expression (Figure 4B,C).
Stimulation of C57BL/6 BMDMs with rFlaA:Betv1 resulted in strongly increased levels of phosphorylated MAP kinases p38, p42/44, and SAP/JNK, phosphorylation of NFκB p65, as well as phosphorylation of the mTOR target protein p70 S6 kinase compared to either rBetv 1−, rFlaA−, or rFlaA + rBet v 1-stimulated BMDMs (Figure 4D,E, left panel). Here, both rFlaA− and rFlaA:Betv1-induced phosphorylation of MAP kinases, NFκB, and p70 S6 kinase was reduced but still detectable in TLR5-deficient BMDMs (Figure 4D,E, middle panel). Interestingly, while rFlaA-induced phosphorylation of p70 S6 kinase and MAP kinases was abrogated in MyD88-deficient BMDMs, rFlaA:Betv1-induced MAP kinase, SAP/JNK, and NFκB activation could still be detected in MyD88-deficient BMDMs (Figure 4D,E, right panel).
Taken together, we observed rFlaA:Betv1 to induce a stronger activation of MAPK, NFκB, and mTOR signaling in BMDMs compared to either rFlaA alone or the mixture of both proteins. rFlaA:Betv1-induced activation of MAPK and NFκB signaling was largely TLR5− and MyD88-independent, while p70 S6 kinase activation was only abrogated in MyD88-deficient BMDMs.
3.5. Activation of BMDM Metabolism and IL-10 Secretion are Partly mTOR-Dependent while Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion Is mTOR-Independent
To study the contribution of either mTOR and/or different MAP kinases to rFlaA:Betv1-mediated activation of BMDM metabolism and cytokine secretion, BMDMs were pre-incubated with either rapamycin to inhibit mTOR activation (Figure 5A) or different MAPK inhibitors (Figure 6A). Toxicity of all tested inhibitors on BMDMs was excluded by live/dead staining (Repository Figure S6).
To inhibit mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) activation, BMDMs were pre-treated with rapamycin and checked for the Warburg effect, glucose consumption, and cytokine secretion after either 6, 12, 24, or 96 h (Figure 5B,C). Interestingly, dependent on the time, the engagement of mTOR had different effects on IL-10 secretion.
While up to 24 h post-stimulation a rFlaA:Betv1-induced Warburg effect and increased glucose consumption were not yet detectable, mTOR inhibition dose-dependently suppressed rFlaA:Betv1-induced IL-10 secretion at all investigated time points. Here, pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion was either unaffected (IL-6 & TNF-α) or even increased (IL-1β, Figure 5B). In contrast to this, at 96 h post-stimulation, inhibition of mTORC1 activation slightly, but not significantly, inhibited the rFlaA:Betv1-induced Warburg effect and reduced glucose consumption from the culture medium (Figure 5C). With the exception of a dose-dependent 2.4-fold increase in rFlaA:Betv1-induced IL-1β secretion, rFlaA:Betv1-induced IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-α secretion were all unaffected by mTOR-inhibition (Figure 5C).
To compensate for a potential degradation of rapamycin in the BMDM cultures, we added 2.5 nM of rapamycin daily for 4 days and compared the results to a one-time application of 10 nM rapamycin (as was done before in Figure 5, Repository Figure S7A). Here, in accordance with our previous results, neither a single application of 10 nM rapamycin at the beginning of the culture nor sequential adding of rapamycin over the whole culture time had any significant effects on either the rFlaA:Betv1-induced Warburg effect, glucose consumption, or cytokine secretion (Repository Figure S7B).
Therefore, these data suggest that, while rFlaA:Betv1-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion is largely mTOR-independent, early rFlaA:Betv1-induced IL-10 secretion is mediated via mTOR. At later time points, mTOR-independent factors seem to drive IL-10 secretion.
3.6. MAP Kinase Signaling Contributes to rFlaA:Betv1-Induced Activation of BMDM Metabolism as well as Both Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion
To investigate the contribution of different types of MAPK to rFlaA:Betv1-induced activation of BMDM metabolism and cytokine secretion, BMDMs were pre-treated with either the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB202190, the p42/44 MAPK inhibitor U0126, or the SAP/JNK MAPK inhibitor SP600125 (Figure 6). Interestingly, inhibition of different types of MAP kinases had differential effects on rFlaA:Betv1-induced activation of BMDM metabolism and cytokine secretion (Figure 6A).
Inhibition of p38 MAPK by pre-treatment with SB202190 and p42/44 MAPK by pre-treatment with U0126 had no effect on either the rFlaA:Betv1-induced Warburg effect or glucose consumption (Figure 6B, left and middle lane). In contrast to this, inhibition of SAP/JNK MAPK by SP600125 dose-dependently and highly significantly suppressed the rFlaA:Betv1-induced Warburg effect and glucose consumption (Figure 6B, right lane).
Inhibition of all types of MAPK dose-dependently inhibited rFlaA:Betv1-induced IL-10 secretion (Figure 6C). IL-6 secretion was significantly increased upon inhibition of either p38 MAPK (4.2-fold increase compared to rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated cells) or p42/44 MAPK (2.6-fold increase), but inhibited upon SAP/JNK MAPK-inhibition (4.1-fold reduction) (Figure 6C). rFlaA:Betv1-induced IL-1β secretion was significantly increased upon inhibition of either p38 MAPK inhibition (2.2-fold reduction compared to rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated cells) or SAP/JNK MAPK inhibition (1.9-fold increase), but significantly suppressed upon p42/44 MAPK inhibition (2.7-fold reduction) (Figure 6C). Finally, rFlaA:Betv1-induced TNF-α secretion was 12.6-fold increased by pre-treatment with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB202190, while SAP/JNK MAPK inhibition (28.9-fold) suppressed TNF-α production (Figure 6C).
In summary, MAPK activation was shown to significantly contribute to rFlaA:Betv1-mediated BMDM activation. While the tested MAPK inhibitors differentially influenced rFlaA:Betv1-mediated cytokine secretion, only SAP/JNK MAPK activation was shown to be involved in the activation of glucose metabolism. Statistical significance indicated as: n.s. p-value > 0.05, * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001;
3.7. rFlaA:Betv1 Suppresses Th2 Responses from Bet v 1-specific CD4+ T Cells In Vitro
To test the immune-modulatory capacity of rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs, cells were cultured with CD4+ T cells isolated ex vivo from rBet v 1 plus alum-sensitized BALB/c mice (Figure 7A). Co-cultures were re-stimulated with either (I) rBet v 1 to induce rBet v 1-specific recall responses, (II) equimolar amounts of rFlaA:Betv1 to check for rFlaA:Betv1-induced metabolic changes and cytokine secretion in BMDM:CD4+ T cell co-cultures, (III) rBet v 1 plus the equimolar mixture of rFlaA + rBet v 1 to analyze the effect of the protein mixture on rBet v 1-induced cytokine responses, or (IV) rBet v 1 plus rFlaA:Betv1 to investigate the effect of the fusion protein on rBet v 1-induced cytokine responses.
Interestingly, stimulation with rBet v 1 only induced a very slight Warburg effect in BMDM:CD4+ T cell co-cultures, which was stronger after stimulation with the mixture of rFlaA + rBet v 1 (equimolar to 10 µg rBet v 1), while rFlaA:Betv1 induced a strong Warburg effect. even in the lowest stimulation concentration (Figure 7B). Results of glucose consumption paralleled the results observed for the Warburg effect (with high Warburg effects resulting in high glucose consumption, Figure 7B).
rBet v 1-induced IL-2 secretion was further boosted upon co-stimulation with the mixture of both proteins, while being suppressed after co-stimulation with rFlaA:Betv1 (Figure 7C). Stimulation of co-cultures with either rFlaA:Betv1 or rBet v 1 + rFlaA:Betv1 resulted in significantly increased levels of IFN-γ or IL-6 secretion (Figure 7C). Here, both levels of rFlaA:Betv1-induced IFN-γ and IL-6 secretion were reduced for the highest stimulation concentration (equimolar to 20 µg rBet v 1/mL) compared to the other stimulation concentrations (Figure 7C). In line with previous results, stimulation of BMDM:CD4+ T cell co-cultures with rFlaA:Betv1 resulted in pronounced anti-inflammatory IL-10 secretion (Figure 7C). Here, levels of secreted IL-10 were approximately 500 pg/mL for all tested stimulation concentrations (Figure 7C). rBet v 1-induced secretion of the Th2 cytokines IL-5 and IL-13 was significantly suppressed by either co-stimulation with either rFlaA + rBet v 1 or rFlaA:Betv1 (Figure 7C). Of note, in contrast to rBet v 1, rFlaA:Betv1 did not induce secretion of Th2 cytokines IL-5- and IL-13 from BMDM:CD4+ T cell co-cultures (Figure 7C). Neither rFlaA + rBet v 1 nor rFlaA:Betv1 directly activated the metabolism or cytokine secretion from naïve CD4+ T cells (data not shown).
Taken together, rFlaA:Betv1-mediated activation of BMDM metabolism was also observed in BMDM:CD4 T cell co-cultures. Here, both addition of rFlaA:Betv1 and rFlaA + rBet v 1 suppressed the rBet v 1-induced secretion of Th2 cytokines, while rFlaA:Betv1 also triggered significant production of IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10.
3.8. rFlaA:Betv1 Induces a Transcriptional Shift Towards HIF-1a-Mediated Glycolytic Metabolism in BMDMs
To (I) confirm both the activation of glycolytic metabolism and BMDM activation and (II) investigate the regulation of other signaling pathways in rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs in an unbiased way, BMDMs were stimulated with either LPS, rFlaA + rBet v 1, or rFlaA:Betv1 for 48 h, and whole-cell RNA expression profiles were generated using MiSeq technology (Figure 8A). In addition, samples were collected for Western blot analysis 2, 6, 24, and 48 h post-stimulation (Figure 8A).
Principal component analyses showed the biological replicates for each stimulation condition to closely group with each other, while the different stimulation conditions formed clearly separated groups (Figure 8B). Here, rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs showed similar cell activation capacity as LPS-stimulated cells (Figure 8B).
The most prominently regulated KEGG pathways for the different stimulation conditions are depicted in Figure 8C. In general, an upregulation of endocytosis, glycolysis, antigen processing and presentation, proteasome, oxidative phosphorylation, and signaling of HIF, JAK-STAT, phagosomes, NLR, NFκB− TNF, TLR, and chemokines was observed 48 h post-stimulation. Instead, signaling pathways mediating the early events of BMDM activation, such as phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)-AKT, MAPK, and mTOR signaling, were down-regulated compared to unstimulated samples (Figure 8C). Here, a general similarity between LPS- and rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated samples was again observed (Figure 8C). Compared to rFlaA + rBet v 1-stimulated BMDMs, rFlaA:Betv1-stimulation resulted in an upregulation of pathways associated with HIF-1a, TNF, TLR, and chemokine signaling, while lysosome-associated signaling was downregulated (Figure 8C).
Finally, activation of JAK-STAT-HIF-1a signaling, glycolysis, and the downregulation of mitochondrial respiration observed in transcriptomic samples were confirmed by Western blot (Figure 8D). Here, we observed a phosphorylation of STAT3 2, 6, and 24 h post-stimulation, which was more pronounced in LPS− and rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs, and followed by a strong upregulation of HIF-1a starting 24 h post-stimulation after the peak of STAT3 phosphorylation at 6 h (Figure 8D). We also observed a stronger expression of the glucose transporter Glut-1 in all stimulation conditions 48 h post-stimulation and a stronger expression of the glycolysis-promoting enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) in LPS− and rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs 24 h post-stimulation. In accordance with the observed switch to glycolytic metabolism, expression levels of the mitochondrial enzyme aconitase 2 (ACO2) were lower in LPS− and rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs both 24 and 48 h post-stimulation (Figure 8D).
Taken together, the results obtained by RNA-seq analyses confirm a pronounced shift towards anaerobic metabolism in rFlaA:Betv1−, LPS−, and, to a lesser extent, rFlaA + rBet v 1-stimulated BMDMs.
Our current mechanistic understanding of the molecular events contributing to rFlaA:Betv1-mediated BMDM activation is depicted in Figure 9.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we analyzed the activation, metabolic state, and transcriptional state of BMDMs, as well as their immune-modulatory properties upon stimulation with a flagellin:allergen conjugate (rFlaA:Betv1), which was recently shown in preclinical studies to prevent allergic Th2 responses [15]. Here, the allergen Bet v 1 serves as a model antigen that is conjugated to the TLR5 ligand flagellin FlaA, which acts as an adjuvant activating the immune system. Thereby, FlaA may modulate the immunological properties of the conjugated antigen while also targeting the antigen to innate immune cells.
Currently, the effects of flagellin-containing fusion proteins on macrophages, which serve as important innate immune cells, are less described. So far, only one study by Verma et al. has described the insertion of a cytochrome C molecule into the flagella of Salmonella dublin to efficiently trigger processing and presentation of cytochrome-derived peptides by mouse peritoneal macrophages [42]. This prompted us to investigate the effect of FlaA and FlaA-containing fusion proteins on mouse macrophages.
4.1. rFlaA:Betv1 Induces a Partly TLR5-Dependent Activation of BMDMs Characterized by Both Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion
We observed a stronger activation of mouse BMDMs by rFlaA:Betv1 compared to the respective controls. However, both stimulation with rFlaA and rFlaA + rBet v 1 resulted in a weaker, but still clearly detectable, activation of cytokine secretion and glycolytic metabolism in BMDMs. In line with the available literature [2,3,4], these results confirmed the adjuvant effect of non-conjugated flagellin.
BMDM activation by rFlaA:Betv1 was characterized by strongly increased pro- (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokine secretion. In terms of the net outcome of this mixed pro- and anti-inflammatory response, the observed suppression of rBet v 1-induced Th2 cytokine secretion from BMDM:CD4+ T cell co-cultures suggested rFlaA:Betv1-mediated anti-inflammatory signaling (at least in higher stimulation concentrations) to be more pronounced.
While rFlaA:Betv1-mediated TNF-α secretion was largely TLR5-dependent, IL-10 secretion was partially reduced in TLR5−/− BMDMs, and IL-1β and IL-6 secretion were found to be TLR5-independent. In line with our results, Bao and colleagues reported S. typhimurium FliC to induce a TLR5-dependent TNF-α production via the activation of PI3K/AKT /mTOR-dependent NFκB and STAT3 signaling in mouse macrophages [43]. Inhibition of both PI3K by either LY294002 or wortmannin and the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) by rapamycin decreased flagellin-induced TNF-α and IL-6 expression as well as macrophage proliferation [43]. In an additional study, flagellin-induced TNF-α production from alveolar macrophages [44] was shown to be TLR-dependent, while FliC-induced IL-1ß secretion from mouse macrophages was shown to be IPAF-dependent, but TLR5-independent [45]. Interestingly, upregulation of CD69 was substantially reduced in TLR5−/− BMDMs, while neither rFlaA:Betv1-induced cytokine secretion nor cell activation were observed in MyD88-deficient BMDMs.
Interestingly, we observed a significantly increased secretion of IL-1β upon inhibition of mTOR in rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs both 24 and 96 h post-stimulation. Tang et al. reported similar results from tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC-1)-deficient macrophages, which display constitutively active mTOR signaling [46]. Here, impaired (LPS-induced) IL-1β secretion from tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC-1)-deficient macrophages could be increased by either inhibition of mTOR activation or mTOR deletion [46]. Mechanistically, mTOR-mediated downregulation of the CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBPβ) was shown to critically contribute to the reduction in IL-1β production [46]. These results suggest that, both in the model of Tang et al. and in rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs, TSC-1 may promote IL-1β production via the C/EBPβ pathway, while activation of mTOR suppresses both TSC-1 itself and TSC-1-dependent downstream processes (including IL-1β production) [46].
In our previous publication describing the molecular characterization of rFlaA:Betv1, we reported rFlaA:Betv1 to be aggregated [15]. Here, rFlaA:Betv1 formed high molecular aggregates, which were only visible under native PAGE conditions [15]. Increased uptake of these aggregates in myeloid dendritic cells was shown to be TLR5-independent while being essential for the induction of rFlaA:Betv1-mediated IL-10 and IL-6 secretion [15]. Therefore, aggregation was previously shown to be an important factor determining the immunogenicity of the fusion proteins.
Mechanistically, we assume the stronger BMDM-activating potential of the fusion protein compared to both single proteins to result from: (i) the previously observed aggregation of rFlaA:Betv1 [15], which results in higher densities of the fusion protein on the surface of BMDMs, higher protein uptake, and therefore stronger activating signals transmitted to the respective BMDMs nucleus, (ii) changes in BMDM metabolic state due to the strongly activating signal provided by rFlaA:Betv1, and (iii) (for the induction of adaptive immune responses by rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs) differences in antigen processing upon fusion to flagellin already reported for rOva contained within a rFlaA:Ova fusion protein [18].
Taken together, these results suggest that both TLR5-dependent and -independent processes contribute to rFlaA:Betv1-mediated BMDM activation, while MyD88 is a key molecule in rFlaA:Betv1-mediated macrophage activation.
4.2. rFlaA:Betv1-Stimulated BMDMs Efficiently Modulate Allergen-Specific T Cell Responses
Considering that the activation of BMDMs by rFlaA:Betv1 is antigen unspecific, we checked for the effect of rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs on Th2-biased Bet v 1-specific T cells in an ex vivo co-culture model. Here, both rFlaA + rBet v 1 and rFlaA:Betv1 efficiently suppressed rBet v 1-induced Th2-cytokine secretion, while only rFlaA:Betv1 boosted IL-10 and IFN-γ secretion, once again confirming the pronounced immune modulatory capacity and Th1-inducing capacity of the fusion protein. One weakness of the employed co-culture setup is that the cellular source of the secreted cytokines (BMDMs or T cells) cannot be exactly determined. However, despite this limitation, our data provide evidence that simultaneous targeting of adjuvant and antigen to BMDMs efficiently promotes modulation of antigen-specific effector T cell responses. While in this study we investigated rBet v 1-specific T cell responses, our previous work on the model antigen ovalbumin [16,18] and the major mugwort allergen Art v 1 [17] suggests that the findings can also be transferred to other antigens.
4.3. rFlaA:Betv1 Activates Both Glycolytic Metabolism and HIF-1a Signaling in BMDMs
A further objective of this study was to explore the mechanisms underlying the observed immune modulation in more detail. Previous reports suggested mTOR to be engaged in rFlaA:Betv1-mediated cytokine responses [15]. rFlaA:Betv1 also triggered changes in the metabolic phenotype of the stimulated BMDMs. In activated immune cells, distinct metabolic changes not only provide the energy needed by these cells to proliferate and fulfill their effector functions, but are also used to generate important immunological active effector molecules (e.g., prostaglandins, ROS, NOS, or itaconate generated from a disrupted Krebs cycle in highly glycolytic cells) [47]. Therefore, cellular metabolism and signaling pathways classically associated with the activation and effector function of immune cells have recently been recognized to be intimately intertwined, regulating each other, and thereby shaping the overall immune responses induced.
We observed a highly significant induction of the Warburg effect in rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs. The observed induction of the Warburg effect suggests a cellular shift towards glycolysis with lactate generation and extracellular acidification [48]. The suggested metabolic changes were confirmed using both Seahorse Metabolic Flux and transcriptomics analyses. RNA Seq confirmed the activation of both BMDM glycolytic metabolism (upregulation of key glycolysis enzymes Glut-1/2, phospho-fructo-kinase (PFK), PFKFB3, phosphoglycerate mutase (PGM), pyruvate kinase isozyme (PKM), and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1)), intracellular signaling (TLR, MAPK, and NFκB signaling), and both cytokine and chemokine secretion (Repository Figure S8). Taken together, the activation status and metabolic phenotype of rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs closely relates to M1-polarized macrophages, which switch their metabolism towards glycolysis after being activated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns [49,50,51,52,53]. Increases in glycolytic metabolism enable M1-like macrophages to efficiently fulfill their effector function, including the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [54] and phagocytosis [55].
In our experimental setting, HIF-1a, which was shown to be essential for glycolytic metabolism in macrophages, seems to be of particular importance. HIF-1a-deficient macrophages lack both lactate and ATP production after LPS stimulation, and impaired glycolysis was shown to profoundly reduce the clearance of bacteria and fungi [56,57]. In contrast to M1 macrophages, activated M2 macrophages were reported to display STAT6− and PGC-1β-dependent decreases in glycolytic activity, while mitochondrial oxygen consumption rates and fatty acid oxidation were increased [58,59]. In line with the suggested M1 phenotype, stimulation of BMDMs with rFlaA:Betv1 resulted in a pronounced activation of HIF-1a signaling, which was not observed in BMDMs stimulated with equimolar amounts of rFlaA + rBet v 1. These results suggest the induction of HIF-1a signaling being critical for rFlaA:Betv1-mediated BMDM activation. Remarkably, succinate accumulating from a disrupted Krebs cycle in LPS-stimulated macrophages was shown to promote both glycolysis and IL-1ß production via the stabilization of HIF-1a (reviewed in [47]), thereby linking the activation of glycolytic metabolism to the activation of HIF-1a signaling. Interestingly, this newly discovered activation of HIF-1a signaling by rFlaA:Betv1 might further explain the previously observed induction of Th1-biased immune responses by flagellin:allergen fusion proteins in vitro and in vivo [15,16,17,18], as the activation of HIF-1a in macrophages was recently described to promote induction of Th1 responses [60]. Besides, M1 macrophages are known to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6, and can further induce Th1 responses [61]. The production of these cytokines was also reported to be downregulated in macrophage-specific HIF-1a knockout mice upon β-aminopropionitrile stimulation [62]. Indeed, we observed that rFlaA:Betv1 boosted production of the Th1 cytokine IFN-γ secretion even from BMDM:CD4+ T cell co-cultures with Th2-biased T cells (Figure 7).
4.4. MAPK, NFκB, and mTOR Signaling Contribute to rFlaA:Betv1-Mediated BMDM Activation
Finally, we observed a pronounced activation of MAPK, NFκB, and mTOR signaling in rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs. Interestingly, the activation of these signaling pathways was TLR5-independent, while MAPK and NFκB (but not mTOR) signaling were still observed in MyD88-deficient BMDMs.
We speculate MAPK signaling and mTOR/HIF-1a-controlled activation of BMDM metabolism to extensively cross-talk in rFlaA:Betv1-stimulated BMDMs. Here, activated p42/44 MAPK signaling can cross-activate mTOR signaling by either (i) activating PI3K [63,64,65,66,67], (ii) phosphorylation of TSC-2, which releases TSC-1/2-mediated mTOR inhibition [67,68], (iii) phosphorylation of regulatory associated protein of mTOR (RAPTOR), which promotes mTORC1 activation, and (iv) direct activation of the mTOR downstream target protein p70 S6 kinase [69,70,71].
In summary, the presented study reports the immune metabolic effects of a novel type of vaccine candidate generated by combining the TLR5 ligand flagellin with the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (which serves a model antigen). Our results suggest that stimulation of BMDMs with rFlaA:Betv1 triggered a MyD88-dependent, but only partly TLR5-dependent, cytokine production, stronger activation of HIF-1a, MAPK, NFκB, and mTOR signaling (with the activation of MAPK being located upstream of mTOR signaling), and increased glucose metabolism. In BMDM and CD4+ T cell co-cultures, rFlaA:Betv1 stimulation significantly suppressed Bet v 1-induced IL-5 and IL-13 secretion while inducing IFN-γ production (summarized in Figure 9). Therefore, macrophages contribute to the strong immune-modulating effects of rFlaA:Betv1 previously observed in vivo [15] and should be considered important target cells contributing to the re-establishment of allergen tolerance in AIT.
Finally, our results suggest that both the fusion of antigens to immune-activating molecules and the resulting structural alterations in the fused antigen can increase its immunogenicity, resulting in the induction of distinct immune responses. Therefore, such adjuvant:antigen fusion proteins likely are valuable tools to induce distinct (in our case balanced Th1) immune responses against antigens with otherwise either low immunogenicity or a high risk of triggering potentially harmful Th2 responses.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dorothea Kreuz and Maren Krause (Paul Ehrlich Institute) for breeding transgenic animals.
Abbreviations
2-DG | 2-deoxy-glucose |
ACO2 | Aconitase 2 |
BMDM | Bone marrow-derived macrophage |
CD | Cluster of differentiation |
C/EBPβ | CCAAT enhancer-binding protein |
ECAR | Extracellular acidification rate |
GM-CSF | Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor |
IFN-γ | Interferon gamma |
IL | Interleukin |
Ipaf | ICE-protease activating factor |
MAP(K) | Mitogen-activated protein (kinase) |
(m)DC | (Myeloid) Dendritic cell |
mTOR | Mammalian target of rapamycin |
mTORC1 | mTOR complex 1 |
MyD88 | Myeloid differentiation primary response 88 |
NFκB | Nuclear factor ‘kappa-light-chain-enhancer’ of activated B-cells |
OCR | Oxygen consumption rate |
PI3K | Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase |
PDK:1 | Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 |
PFK | Phospho-fructo-kinase |
PFKFB3 | 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 |
PGM | Phosphoglycerate mutase |
PKM | Pyruvate kinase isozyme |
rBet v 1 | Recombinant major birch pollen allergen number one from Betula verrucosa |
rFlaA | Recombinant Listeria monocytogenes flagellin A |
rFlaA:Betv1 | Recombinant fusion protein of FlaA and Bet v 1 |
rmM-CSF | Recombinant mouse macrophage colony-stimulating factor |
RAPTOR | Regulatory associated protein of mTOR |
TSC | Tuberous sclerosis complex |
Rot/AA | Rotenone/ antimycin A |
SAP/JNK MAPK | Stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase |
Th1/2 | T helper 1/2 cell |
TLR | Toll-like receptor |
TNF-α | Tumor necrosis factor alpha |
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells10102614/s1: Figure S1: Both rFlaA and rFlaA:Betv1 activate BMDM metabolism, Figure S2: Activation of BMDM metabolism is accompanied by both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion, Figure S3: The amount of LPS contained within the used rFlaA:Betv1 preparations do not induce BMDM activation, Figure S4: The used rFlaA:Betv1 preparation does not have mTLR2- or mTLR4-activating potential, Figure S5: Both rFlaA + rBet v 1 and rFlaA:Betv1 comparably reduce mitochondrial respiration, Figure S6: Toxicity of the tested inhibitors on C57BL/6 BMDMs, Figure S7: 96 h post-stimulation, rapamycin has only minor effects on rFlaA:Betv1-induced activation of BMDM metabolism and cytokine secretion, Figure S8: rFlaA:Betv1 induces a transcriptional shift towards both increased glycolytic metabolism and higher activation status in BMDMs.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.S. (Stefan Schülke), S.S. (Stephan Scheurer), Y.-J.L., C.M.; methodology, Y.-J.L., G.P., C.M., A.F., A.G., S.W., P.C., Z.I., G.v.Z., S.S. (Stefan Schülke); software, C.M.; formal analysis, Y.-J.L., G.P., C.M., J.Z., A.F., A.G., S.W., J.Z., P.C., Z.I., G.v.Z., S.S.; investigation, Y.-J.L., G.P., C.M., J.Z., A.F., A.G., S.W., P.C., S.S. (Stefan Schülke); resources, Z.I., G.v.Z., S.V.; data curation, Y.-J.L., S.S. (Stefan Schülke); writing—original draft preparation, S.S. (Stefan Schülke), Y.-J.L.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, S.S. (Stefan Schülke), Y.-J.L.; supervision, S.S. (Stefan Schülke), S.S. (Stephan Scheurer).; project administration, S.S. (Stefan Schülke), S.S.; funding acquisition, S.S. (Stefan Schülke), S.S. (Stephan Scheurer). Some of the results of this work are also part of the medical Ph.D. thesis of author G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was in part funded by the Paul Ehrlich Institute, Langen, Germany. Y.-J.L. was funded by the German research foundation (DFG SCHE637/4). A.G. was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG SCHU2951/4).
Institutional Review Board Statement
All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the German animal protection law (granting authority: RP Darmstadt, Germany, Approval number: F107/131).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Hayashi F., Smith K.D., Ozinsky A., Hawn T.R., Yi E.C., Goodlett D.R., Eng J.K., Akira S., Underhill D.M., Aderem A. The Innate Immune Response to Bacterial Flagellin Is Mediated by Toll-like Receptor 5. Nature. 2001;410:1099–1103. doi: 10.1038/35074106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee S.E., Kim S.Y., Jeong B.C., Kim Y.R., Bae S.J., Ahn O.S., Lee J.J., Song H.C., Kim J.M., Choy H.E., et al. A Bacterial Flagellin, Vibrio Vulnificus FlaB, Has a Strong Mucosal Adjuvant Activity to Induce Protective Immunity. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:694–702. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.694-702.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Honko A.N., Sriranganathan N., Lees C.J., Mizel S.B. Flagellin Is an Effective Adjuvant for Immunization against Lethal Respiratory Challenge with Yersinia Pestis. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:1113–1120. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1113-1120.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huleatt J.W., Jacobs A.R., Tang J., Desai P., Kopp E.B., Huang Y., Song L., Nakaar V., Powell T.J. Vaccination with Recombinant Fusion Proteins Incorporating Toll-like Receptor Ligands Induces Rapid Cellular and Humoral Immunity. Vaccine. 2007;25:763–775. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Turley C.B., Rupp R.E., Johnson C., Taylor D.N., Wolfson J., Tussey L., Kavita U., Stanberry L., Shaw A. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant M2e-Flagellin Influenza Vaccine (STF2.4xM2e) in Healthy Adults. Vaccine. 2011;29:5145–5152. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Treanor J.J., Taylor D.N., Tussey L., Hay C., Nolan C., Fitzgerald T., Liu G., Kavita U., Song L., Dark I., et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Hemagglutinin Influenza-Flagellin Fusion Vaccine (VAX125) in Healthy Young Adults. Vaccine. 2010;28:8268–8274. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Song L., Xiong D., Kang X., Yang Y., Wang J., Guo Y., Xu H., Chen S., Peng D., Pan Z., et al. An Avian Influenza A (H7N9) Virus Vaccine Candidate Based on the Fusion Protein of Hemagglutinin Globular Head and Salmonella Typhimurium Flagellin. BMC Biotechnol. 2015;15:79. doi: 10.1186/s12896-015-0195-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stepanova L.A., Kotlyarov R.Y., Kovaleva A.A., Potapchuk M.V., Korotkov A.V., Sergeeva M.V., Kasianenko M.A., Kuprianov V.V., Ravin N.V., Tsybalova L.M., et al. Protection against Multiple Influenza A Virus Strains Induced by Candidate Recombinant Vaccine Based on Heterologous M2e Peptides Linked to Flagellin. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0119520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang B.-Z., Gill H.S., He C., Ou C., Wang L., Wang Y.-C., Feng H., Zhang H., Prausnitz M.R., Compans R.W. Microneedle Delivery of an M2e-TLR5 Ligand Fusion Protein to Skin Confers Broadly Cross-Protective Influenza Immunity. J. Control Release. 2014;178:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Delaney K.N., Phipps J.P., Johnson J.B., Mizel S.B. A Recombinant Flagellin-Poxvirus Fusion Protein Vaccine Elicits Complement-Dependent Protection against Respiratory Challenge with Vaccinia Virus in Mice. Viral Immunol. 2010;23:201–210. doi: 10.1089/vim.2009.0107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McDonald W.F., Huleatt J.W., Foellmer H.G., Hewitt D., Tang J., Desai P., Price A., Jacobs A., Takahashi V.N., Huang Y., et al. A West Nile Virus Recombinant Protein Vaccine That Coactivates Innate and Adaptive Immunity. J. Infect. Dis. 2007;195:1607–1617. doi: 10.1086/517613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee S.E., Nguyen C.T., Kim S.Y., Thi T.N., Rhee J.H. Tetanus Toxin Fragment C Fused to Flagellin Makes a Potent Mucosal Vaccine. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 2015;4:59–67. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2015.4.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Weimer E.T., Lu H., Kock N.D., Wozniak D.J., Mizel S.B. A Fusion Protein Vaccine Containing OprF Epitope 8, OprI, and Type A and B Flagellins Promotes Enhanced Clearance of Nonmucoid Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2009;77:2356–2366. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00054-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kitzmüller C., Kalser J., Mutschlechner S., Hauser M., Zlabinger G.J., Ferreira F., Bohle B. Fusion Proteins of Flagellin and the Major Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 1 Show Enhanced Immunogenicity, Reduced Allergenicity, and Intrinsic Adjuvanticity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;141:293–299.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schülke S., Fiedler A.-H., Ann-Christine J., Flaczyk A., Wolfheimer S., Anke H., Hendrik B., Birgit N., Bohle B., Vieths S., et al. Critical Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin for IL-10 DC Induction by a Flagellin FlaA-Conjugate Preventing Allergic Sensitization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;141:1786–1798. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schülke S., Burggraf M., Waibler Z., Wangorsch A., Wolfheimer S., Kalinke U., Vieths S., Toda M., Scheurer S. A Fusion Protein of Flagellin and Ovalbumin Suppresses the TH2 Response and Prevents Murine Intestinal Allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011;128:1340–1348.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schülke S., Kuttich K., Wolfheimer S., Duschek N., Wangorsch A., Reuter A., Briza P., Pablos I., Gadermaier G., Ferreira F., et al. Author Correction: Conjugation of Wildtype and Hypoallergenic Mugwort Allergen Art v 1 to Flagellin Induces IL-10-DC and Suppresses Allergen-Specific TH2-Responses in Vivo. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20635-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schülke S., Wolfheimer S., Gadermaier G., Wangorsch A., Siebeneicher S., Briza P., Spreitzer I., Schiller D., Loeschner B., Uematsu S., et al. Prevention of Intestinal Allergy in Mice by RflaA:Ova Is Associated with Enforced Antigen Processing and TLR5-Dependent IL-10 Secretion by MDC. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e87822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kay A.B. Immunomodulation in Asthma: Mechanisms and Possible Pitfalls. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2003;3:220–226. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4892(03)00038-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Koya T., Matsuda H., Takeda K., Matsubara S., Miyahara N., Balhorn A., Dakhama A., Gelfand E.W. IL-10–Treated Dendritic Cells Decrease Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Airway Inflammation in Mice. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;119:1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gentile D.A., Patel A., Ollila C., Fireman P., Zeevi A., Doyle W.J., Skoner D.P. Diminished IL-10 Production in Subjects with Allergy after Infection with Influenza A Virus. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1999;103:1045–1048. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70177-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murray P.J. Macrophage Polarization. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2017;79:541–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mantovani A., Biswas S.K., Galdiero M.R., Sica A., Locati M. Macrophage Plasticity and Polarization in Tissue Repair and Remodelling. J. Pathol. 2013;229:176–185. doi: 10.1002/path.4133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mantovani A., Sica A., Sozzani S., Allavena P., Vecchi A., Locati M. The Chemokine System in Diverse Forms of Macrophage Activation and Polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:677–686. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yao Y., Xu X.-H., Jin L. Macrophage Polarization in Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:792. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Viola A., Munari F., Sánchez-Rodríguez R., Scolaro T., Castegna A. The Metabolic Signature of Macrophage Responses. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1462. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tam J.S. Macrophages: Time to Take Notice. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123:229. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saradna A., Do D.C., Kumar S., Fu Q.-L., Gao P. Macrophage Polarization and Allergic Asthma. Transl. Res. 2018;191:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jiang Z., Zhu L. Update on the Role of Alternatively Activated Macrophages in Asthma. J. Asthma Allergy. 2016;9:101–107. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S104508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Iwasaki N., Terawaki S., Shimizu K., Oikawa D., Sakamoto H., Sunami K., Tokunaga F. Th2 Cells and Macrophages Cooperatively Induce Allergic Inflammation through Histamine Signaling. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0248158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Robbe P., Draijer C., Borg T.R., Luinge M., Timens W., Wouters I.M., Melgert B.N., Hylkema M.N. Distinct Macrophage Phenotypes in Allergic and Nonallergic Lung Inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2015;308:L358–L367. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00341.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Siddiqui S., Secor E.R., Silbart L.K. Broncho-Alveolar Macrophages Express Chemokines Associated with Leukocyte Migration in a Mouse Model of Asthma. Cell Immunol. 2013;281:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schülke S., Waibler Z., Mende M.-S., Zoccatelli G., Vieths S., Toda M., Scheurer S. Fusion Protein of TLR5-Ligand and Allergen Potentiates Activation and IL-10 Secretion in Murine Myeloid DC. Mol. Immunol. 2010;48:341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Siebeneicher S., Reuter S., Krause M., Wangorsch A., Maxeiner J., Wolfheimer S., Schülke S., Naito S., Heinz A., Taube C., et al. Epicutaneous Immune Modulation with Bet v 1 plus R848 Suppresses Allergic Asthma in a Murine Model. Allergy. 2014;69:328–337. doi: 10.1111/all.12326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Levin J.Z., Yassour M., Adiconis X., Nusbaum C., Thompson D.A., Friedman N., Gnirke A., Regev A. Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Strand-Specific RNA Sequencing Methods. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:709–715. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. Fastp: An Ultra-Fast All-in-One FASTQ Preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., Gingeras T.R. STAR: Ultrafast Universal RNA-Seq Aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kanehisa M., Furumichi M., Tanabe M., Sato Y., Morishima K. KEGG: New Perspectives on Genomes, Pathways, Diseases and Drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D353–D361. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yu G., Wang L.-G., Han Y., He Q.-Y. ClusterProfiler: An R Package for Comparing Biological Themes among Gene Clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sorgi C.A., Rose S., Court N., Carlos D., Paula-Silva F.W.G., Assis P.A., Frantz F.G., Ryffel B., Quesniaux V., Faccioli L.H. GM-CSF Priming Drives Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages to a Pro-Inflammatory Pattern and Downmodulates PGE2 in Response to TLR2 Ligands. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Verma N.K., Ziegler H.K., Stocker B., Schoolnik G.K. Induction of a Cellular Immune Response to a Defined T-Cell Epitope as an Insert in the Flagellin of a Live Vaccine Strain of Salmonella. Vaccine. 1995;13:235–244. doi: 10.1016/0264-410X(95)93308-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bao W., Wang Y., Fu Y., Jia X., Li J., Vangan N., Bao L., Hao H., Wang Z. MTORC1 Regulates Flagellin-Induced Inflammatory Response in Macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hawn T.R., Berrington W.R., Smith I.A., Uematsu S., Akira S., Aderem A., Smith K.D., Skerrett S.J. Altered Inflammatory Responses in TLR5-Deficient Mice Infected with Legionella Pneumophila. J. Immunol. 2007;179:6981–6987. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.6981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Carvalho F.A., Aitken J.D., Gewirtz A.T., Vijay-Kumar M. TLR5 Activation Induces Secretory Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (SIL-1Ra) and Reduces Inflammasome-Associated Tissue Damage. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:102–111. doi: 10.1038/mi.2010.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang T., Zhu L., Zhai Y., Zhao Q., Peng J., Zhang H., Yang Z., Zhang L., Ding W., Zhao Y. TSC1 Controls IL-1β Expression in Macrophages via MTORC1-Dependent C/EBPβ Pathway. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2016;13:640–650. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ryan D.G., O’Neill L.A.J. Krebs Cycle Rewired for Macrophage and Dendritic Cell Effector Functions. FEBS Lett. 2017;591:2992–3006. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Narayanan K., Erathodiyil N., Gopalan B., Chong S., Wan A.C.A., Ying J.Y. Targeting Warburg Effect in Cancers with PEGylated Glucose. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016;5:696–701. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Feingold K.R., Shigenaga J.K., Kazemi M.R., McDonald C.M., Patzek S.M., Cross A.S., Moser A., Grunfeld C. Mechanisms of Triglyceride Accumulation in Activated Macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2012;92:829–839. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1111537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yu Q., Wang Y., Dong L., He Y., Liu R., Yang Q., Cao Y., Wang Y., Jia A., Bi Y., et al. Regulations of Glycolytic Activities on Macrophages Functions in Tumor and Infectious Inflammation. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:287. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Suzuki H., Hisamatsu T., Chiba S., Mori K., Kitazume M.T., Shimamura K., Nakamoto N., Matsuoka K., Ebinuma H., Naganuma M., et al. Glycolytic Pathway Affects Differentiation of Human Monocytes to Regulatory Macrophages. Immunol. Lett. 2016;176:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Krawczyk C.M., Holowka T., Sun J., Blagih J., Amiel E., DeBerardinis R.J., Cross J.R., Jung E., Thompson C.B., Jones R.G., et al. Toll-like Receptor-Induced Changes in Glycolytic Metabolism Regulate Dendritic Cell Activation. Blood. 2010;115:4742–4749. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-249540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Everts B., Amiel E., van der Windt G.J.W., Freitas T.C., Chott R., Yarasheski K.E., Pearce E.L., Pearce E.J. Commitment to Glycolysis Sustains Survival of NO-Producing Inflammatory Dendritic Cells. Blood. 2012;120:1422–1431. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-419747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tannahill G.M., Curtis A.M., Adamik J., Palsson-McDermott E.M., McGettrick A.F., Goel G., Frezza C., Bernard N.J., Kelly B., Foley N.H., et al. Succinate Is an Inflammatory Signal That Induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature. 2013;496:238–242. doi: 10.1038/nature11986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Michl J., Ohlbaum D.J., Silverstein S.C. 2-Deoxyglucose Selectively Inhibits Fc and Complement Receptor-Mediated Phagocytosis in Mouse Peritoneal Macrophages II. Dissociation of the Inhibitory Effects of 2-Deoxyglucose on Phagocytosis and ATP Generation. J. Exp. Med. 1976;144:1484–1493. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.6.1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cramer T., Yamanishi Y., Clausen B.E., Förster I., Pawlinski R., Mackman N., Haase V.H., Jaenisch R., Corr M., Nizet V., et al. HIF-1alpha Is Essential for Myeloid Cell-Mediated Inflammation. Cell. 2003;112:645–657. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00154-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li C., Wang Y., Li Y., Yu Q., Jin X., Wang X., Jia A., Hu Y., Han L., Wang J., et al. HIF1α-Dependent Glycolysis Promotes Macrophage Functional Activities in Protecting against Bacterial and Fungal Infection. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:3603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22039-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jha A.K., Huang S.C.-C., Sergushichev A., Lampropoulou V., Ivanova Y., Loginicheva E., Chmielewski K., Stewart K.M., Ashall J., Everts B., et al. Network Integration of Parallel Metabolic and Transcriptional Data Reveals Metabolic Modules That Regulate Macrophage Polarization. Immunity. 2015;42:419–430. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vats D., Mukundan L., Odegaard J.I., Zhang L., Smith K.L., Morel C.R., Wagner R.A., Greaves D.R., Murray P.J., Chawla A. Oxidative Metabolism and PGC-1beta Attenuate Macrophage-Mediated Inflammation. Cell Metab. 2006;4:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Talreja J., Talwar H., Bauerfeld C., Grossman L.I., Zhang K., Tranchida P., Samavati L. HIF-1α Regulates IL-1β and IL-17 in Sarcoidosis. Elife. 2019;8 doi: 10.7554/eLife.44519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Atri C., Guerfali F.Z., Laouini D. Role of Human Macrophage Polarization in Inflammation during Infectious Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1801. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lian G., Li X., Zhang L., Zhang Y., Sun L., Zhang X., Liu H., Pang Y., Kong W., Zhang T., et al. Macrophage Metabolic Reprogramming Aggravates Aortic Dissection through the HIF1α-ADAM17 Pathway. EBioMedicine. 2019;49:291–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mendoza M.C., Er E.E., Blenis J. The Ras-ERK and PI3K-MTOR Pathways: Cross-Talk and Compensation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011;36:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kodaki T., Woscholski R., Hallberg B., Rodriguez-Viciana P., Downward J., Parker P.J. The Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase by Ras. Curr. Biol. 1994;4:798–806. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00177-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rodriguez-Viciana P., Warne P.H., Dhand R., Vanhaesebroeck B., Gout I., Fry M.J., Waterfield M.D., Downward J. Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH Kinase as a Direct Target of Ras. Nature. 1994;370:527–532. doi: 10.1038/370527a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Suire S., Hawkins P., Stephens L. Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Gamma by Ras. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:1068–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00933-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Roux P.P., Ballif B.A., Anjum R., Gygi S.P., Blenis J. Tumor-Promoting Phorbol Esters and Activated Ras Inactivate the Tuberous Sclerosis Tumor Suppressor Complex via P90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:13489–13494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405659101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zoncu R., Efeyan A., Sabatini D.M. MTOR: From Growth Signal Integration to Cancer, Diabetes and Ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;12:21–35. doi: 10.1038/nrm3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pearce L.R., Komander D., Alessi D.R. The Nuts and Bolts of AGC Protein Kinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrm2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Carriere A., Romeo Y., Acosta-Jaquez H.A., Moreau J., Bonneil E., Thibault P., Fingar D.C., Roux P.P. ERK1/2 Phosphorylate Raptor to Promote Ras-Dependent Activation of MTOR Complex 1 (MTORC1) J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:567–577. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.159046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Foster K.G., Acosta-Jaquez H.A., Romeo Y., Ekim B., Soliman G.A., Carriere A., Roux P.P., Ballif B.A., Fingar D.C. Regulation of MTOR Complex 1 (MTORC1) by Raptor Ser863 and Multisite Phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:80–94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.029637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.