Abstract
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP) increase the risk of offspring with a low birth weight, preterm birth and small-for-gestational age; however, evidence of the anthropometric measurements during early childhood remains limited. We aimed to understand the associations between maternal HDP and anthropometric measurements of children aged up to seven years in a Japanese cohort. In total, 20,926 mother–infant pairs participated in the Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children’s Health, Japan, from 2002 to 2013. Medical reports were used to confirm HDP exposure, while weight, height, height z score, and weight z score were the outcomes. The prevalence of HDP in the study population was 1.7%. The birth height of male children born to HDP mothers was smaller as compared to those born to non-HDP mothers. When adjusted with covariates, the linear regressions showed significant changes in birth weight (β: −79.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −154.8, −3.8), birth height (−0.67; 95% CI: −1.07, −0.26), weight at seven years (1.21; 95% CI: 0.13, 2.29), and weight gain between four and seven years (1.12; 95% CI: 0.28, 1.96) of male children exposed to HDP. Differences were more significant in male children than female. Our study showed that despite low birth weight, male children exposed to HDP caught up with their growth and gained more weight by seven years of age compared with male children not exposed to HDP, whereas no such differences were observed in female children; however, this finding requires replication.
Keywords: hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, anthropometric measurement, child, Hokkaido study, cohort, weight, height, sex-difference, pregnancy, Japan
1. Introduction
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP) are defined as hypertension (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg) with or without proteinuria (≥300 mg/24 h), emerging after 20 weeks of gestation. HDP has been classified into four types: preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension, excluding eclampsia in the previous disease type classification [1,2]. Several studies have shown the impact of HDP on birth outcomes, such as preterm birth and small-for-gestational age, and these infants have a higher need for intensive care units [3,4,5,6]. HDP, including preeclampsia and the hemolytic anemia, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, increase the risk and severity of fetal growth restriction even after birth [7,8]. HDP is associated with a low birth weight, which is reported to predispose to central obesity, including high body mass index (BMI) combined with a high waist-to-hip ratio, hypertension, and coronary heart disease due to fetal programming [9,10].
The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis may be appropriate for children’s long-term development. Barker’s hypothesis, along with the DOHaD hypothesis, have explained the patterns of the life course in detail, and state that poor fetal nutrition, indicated by small birth size, might lead to fetal adaptations altering the propensity for diseases in adulthood [11,12]. Therefore, it is crucial to describe the growth patterns during childhood to confirm these findings.
Catch-up growth refers to the “a height velocity above the statistical limits of normality for age or maturity during a defined period, following a transient period of growth inhibition; the effect of catch-up growth is to take the child towards his/her pre-retardation growth curve” [13]. Catch-up growth also occurs in regard to other growth parameters such as body weight, body composition, head circumference, sitting height, and leg length [14]. The most remarkable difference in rates of weight gain is seen in the first one to two years of life when infants might show significant “catch up” or “catch down” in their weight [15]. Generally, BMI, which is used as an index of obesity, increases during the first year of life, decreases subsequently, and reaches a nadir. After this, BMI increases throughout childhood, and this second rise is called adiposity rebound [16]. Birth weight is the measure of fetal growth [17]. A high BMI at the age of five and seven years has been suggested to be associated with obesity in adulthood [18]. A substantial increase in adiposity as compared to height has been associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular disease [14]. Early catch-up growth is a risk factor for childhood obesity [19].
Early postnatal growth is strongly affected by genetic factors, and infants genetically predisposed to a large size, but born to small mothers, show fast natal growth [20]. In developed countries, catch-up occurs during the first six months of life and continues during infancy and adolescence. However, in developing countries, the compensatory growth of children born with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) has not been observed until six years of age. Therefore, these children remain shorter in height [21]. This suggests that their growth is chronically affected due to unfavorable intrauterine conditions. The intrauterine environment plays an essential role in shaping the children’s growth during their childhood [22]. Different maternal factors, such as smoking, alcohol use, low socioeconomic status, and hypertensive disorders, cause IUGR. Although previous studies have assessed the effect of smoking, alcohol consumption, and low socio-economic status on the prenatal and postnatal health of Japanese children, there is a lack of studies on the association between HDP and early anthropometric growth in children [23,24,25,26]. Moreover, there are limited reports on the association between HDP and anthropometric factors of children up to seven years of age in Japan. Therefore, in this study, we explored growth of children in regard to anthropometric factors, in a cohort of children born to mothers with HDP. We aimed to determine the changes in height, weight, the height for age z score, and the weight for age z score while considering the maternal characteristics.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
The Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children’s Health is a prospective birth cohort that was started in 2002; further information about this cohort can be found elsewhere [27,28,29]. From February 2003 to March 2012, the Hokkaido cohort included Japanese women recruited during early pregnancy (13 weeks of gestation), who visited the maternity unit in one of the 37 hospitals and clinics in the Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan. These 37 health services covered the entire Hokkaido area. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the participants. The cohort consisted of 20,926 pregnant women. As the focus of this study was HDP, we selected mothers who had their medical records of pregnancy. We excluded mothers with miscarriages, stillbirths, abortions, twins, and multiple births. To calculate z-scores, mothers who did not have information on parity and anthropometry of their children at birth were excluded. Thus, we included mothers with live births and singleton pregnancies. Children with no information on anthropometric measurements at one, two, four, and seven years were excluded. We included 12,186 participants from the time of their birth. In total, we included the data obtained from participants at one year (n = 10,329), two years (n = 9014), four years (n = 7211), and seven years (n = 6198), and assessed the associations between HDP and anthropometric measurements.
2.2. Questionnaire and Medical Records
Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire comprising information on parental characteristics. Baseline data on maternal age, height, weight, education, socioeconomic status, smoking, alcohol consumption before and during pregnancy, and use of artificial reproductive technology were obtained. The medical record provided information on gestational days at delivery, sex, birth height and weight of the infant, and history of HDP of the mother. The exposure variable was HDP. We used the Japanese standard definition of HDP and classified the symptoms based on severity. Mild HDP (h) was defined as a blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg but <160/110 mmHg after 20 weeks of gestation, and proteinuria (p) ≥300 mg/24 h without exceeding 2.0 g/24 h or a score of 3 + on the dipstick. Severe HDP (H) was defined as a blood pressure of ≥160/110 mmHg and proteinuria (P) exceeding 2.0 g/24 h or a score of 3 + on the dipstick [2].
2.3. Anthropometric Measurement
The primary outcomes were weight, height, weight gain, and height gain. The weight and height of each infant measured at birth were defined as birth weight (g) and birth height (cm), respectively. Birth weight, birth height, and z-score were defined as the respective standard deviation (SD) for gestational age in the normal distribution, accounting for infant sex, maternal parity, and gestational age according to the guidelines of the Japan Pediatric Society, created by The Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology [26,30,31].
Height and weight gain were estimated by subtracting the height and weight at birth, respectively, at different age intervals. Anthropometric data at birth were obtained from the birth records. Anthropometric data at one year were obtained after the infant reached one year of age. While the data at two years were obtained from medical checkups during a year and a half of age. Data at four years of age were obtained from the latest checkup at around four years of age. These data were obtained from the Maternal and Child Health Handbook (MCH Handbook) by the parents. The MCH handbook system in Japan was developed to promote the health of all children [32]. The data at seven years of age were obtained from the physical checkup in the first grade at elementary school.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
A descriptive analysis was performed on the demographic and socio-personal information of mothers and children over different years. Anthropometric measurements of the children were taken at different ages. Linear regressions were performed to evaluate the association between HDP and height and weight of the infant at different ages. Height gain and weight gain from birth to different ages were compared. The outcomes were adjusted with the following covariates: age at measurement, child’s sex, maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, status of smoking during the first trimester, and alcohol consumption during the first trimester. For stratified analysis, sex was excluded from the adjusted covariates. Confidence interval (CI) was set at 95%, with a level of significance at 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 27.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Demographic Information
The characteristics of children at different ages are presented in Table 1. Of the 12,186 mothers, 209 (1.7%) mothers had a history of HDP. At baseline, there was no difference in maternal characteristics such as age, BMI, education level, socioeconomic status, smoking, drinking history before and during the first trimester, plasma cotinine levels, in vitro fertilization in the HDP-exposed and non-HDP groups. Similarly, there was no difference in smoking and alcohol consumption habits between HDP-exposed and non-HDP mothers when their children were aged one year, two years, four years, and seven years (data not shown). There was no significant difference between sex, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and birth weight and height among children born from HDP mothers compared to those born to mothers without HDP. There were no differences in height, weight, BMI, height-z-score, weight-z-score, and BMI z-score at one year, two years, four years, and seven years of age in children born to mothers with and without HDP.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Total (12186) | Non HDP (11977) | HDP (209) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Infants at Birth | ||||
Sex | ||||
Male | 6086 (49.9) | 5975 (49.9) | 111 (53.1) | 0.356 |
Female | 6100 (50.1) | 6002 (50.1) | 98 (46.9) | |
Weight at birth (g) | 3054.85 ± 387.54 | 3054.93 ± 387.58 | 3050.12 ± 386.51 | 0.859 |
Height at birth (cm) | 49.01 ± 2.08 | 49.02 ± 2.08 | 48.86 ± 1.98 | 0.288 |
Birth weight z score | 0.15 ± 1.01 | 0.15 ± 1.01 | 0.13 ± 0.93 | 0.727 |
Birth height z score | 0.10 ± 0.99 | 0.10 ± 0.99 | 0.00 ± 0.86 | 0.142 |
1 year | Total (10329) | Non HDP (10144) | HDP (185) | p |
Sex | ||||
Male | 5155 (49.9) | 5058 (49.9) | 97 (52.4) | 0.488 |
Female | 5174 (50.1) | 5086 (50.1) | 88 (47.6) | |
Age at measurement (years) | 1.13 ± 0.11 | 1.14 ± 0.11 | 1.13 ± 1.13 | 0.629 |
Height at 1 year (cm) | 69.83 ± 6.72 | 69.82 ± 6.73 | 70.47 ± 6.07 | 0.191 |
Weight at 1 year (kg) | 8.35 ± 1.80 | 8.35 ± 1.80 | 8.47 ± 1.72 | 0.363 |
BMI at 1 year (kg/m2) | 16.85 ± 1.72 | 16.85 ± 1.72 | 16.83 ± 1.61 | 0.877 |
Height z score (1 years) | −2.11 ± 2.61 | −2.11 ± 2.61 | −1.85 ± 2.38 | 0.173 |
Weight z score (1 years) | 0.0 ± 1.0 | −0.00 ± 1.00 | 0.07 ± 0.95 | 0.362 |
BMI z score | 0.39 ± 1.28 | 0.39 ± 1.28 | 0.37 ± 1.21 | 0.792 |
2 year | Total (9014) | Non HDP (8848) | HDP (166) | p |
Sex | ||||
Male | 4544 (50.4) | 4456 (50.4) | 88 (53.0) | 0.499 |
Female | 4470 (49.6) | 4392 (49.6) | 78 (47.0) | |
Age at measurement (years) | 1.60 ± 0.17 | 1.60 ± 0.17 | 1.61 ± 0.17 | 0.337 |
Weight at 2 years (kg) | 10.56 ± 2.02 | 10.56 ± 2.03 | 10.57 ± 1.24 | 0.943 |
Height at 2 years (cm) | 80.28 ± 2.86 | 80.28 ± 2.85 | 80.48 ± 3.01 | 0.380 |
BMI at 2 year (kg/m2) | 16.36 ± 3.31 | 16.36 ± 3.33 | 16.28 ± 1.30 | 0.75 |
Height z score (2 years) | −0.07 ± 1.12 | −0.07 ± 1.12 | −0.06 ± 1.16 | 0.88 |
Weight z score (2 years) | 0.00 ± 1.00 | −0.00 ± 1.00 | 0.00 ± 0.61 | 0.943 |
BMI z score | 0.33 ± 1.17 | 0.33 ± 1.17 | 0.30 ± 1.01 | 0.734 |
4 year | Total (7211) | Non HDP (7066) | HDP (145) | p |
Sex | ||||
Male | 3654 (50.7) | 3581 (50.7) | 73 (50.3) | 0.936 |
Female | 3557 (49.3) | 3485 (49.3) | 72 (49.7) | |
Age at measurement (years) | 3.15 ± 0.69 | 3.15 ± 0.70 | 3.11 ± 0.34 | 0.488 |
Weight at 4 years (kg) | 13.82 ± 1.55 | 13.82 ± 1.54 | 13.77 ± 1.65 | 0.664 |
Height at 4 years (cm) | 93.20 ± 3.57 | 93.20 ± 3.57 | 93.26 ± 3.44 | 0.845 |
BMI at 4 year (kg/m2) | 15.88 ± 1.28 | 15.89 ± 1.28 | 15.79 ± 1.19 | 0.350 |
Height z score (4 yrs) | −0.09 ± 1.07 | −0.09 ± 1.07 | −0.05 ± 0.95 | 0.631 |
Weight z score (4 yrs) | 0.00 ± 1.00 | 0.00 ± 1.00 | −0.04 ± 1.07 | 0.664 |
BMI z score | 0.35 ± 0.92 | 0.35 ± 0.91 | 0.27 ± 0.93 | 0.307 |
7 year | Total (6198) | Non HDP (6085) | HDP (118) | p |
Sex | ||||
Male | 3140 (50.7) | 3080 (50.6) | 60 (50.8) | 0.967 |
Female | 3058 (49.3) | 3000 (49.4) | 58 (49.2) | |
Age at measurement (years) | 7.01 ± 0.32 | 7.01 ± 0.32 | 7.01 ± 0.25 | 0.960 |
Weight at 7 years (kg) | 22.68 ± 3.95 | 22.67 ± 3.94 | 23.11 ± 4.50 | 0.227 |
Height at 7 years (cm) | 119.73 ± 5.39 | 119.73 ± 5.39 | 119.74 ± 5.39 | 0.978 |
BMI at 7 years (kg/m2) | 15.75 ± 2.00 | 15.75 ± 1.99 | 16.02 ± 2.24 | 0.146 |
Weight z score (7 years) | −0.00 ± 0.90 | −0.01 ± 0.90 | 0.09 ± 1.02 | 0.227 |
Height z score (7 years) | 0.15 ± 1.05 | 0.15 ± 1.05 | 0.15 ± 1.04 | 0.984 |
BMI z score | −1.09 ± 1.02 | −0.11 ± 1.02 | 0.01 ± 1.09 | 0.213 |
Chi-squared test for categorical data and t-test for continuous data; p-values are the statistical tests between non-HDP and HDP groups.
The characteristics of male children at different ages are presented in Table 2. There was significant difference in birth height and birth height z-score of male children born to HDP mothers when compared to non HDP mothers. Similarly, when compared at age seven, there was a significant increase in the weight, weight z score and BMI of male children born to HDP mothers.
Table 2.
Characteristics of Male | Total (6086) | Non HDP (5975) | HDP (111) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Infants at Birth | ||||
Weight at birth (g) | 3096.46 ± 386.15 | 3097.57 ± 385.44 | 3036.34 ± 420.26 | 0.098 |
Height at birth (cm) | 49.28 ± 2.06 | 49.29 ± 2.06 | 48.73 ± 2.23 | 0.005 |
Birth weight z score | 0.15 ± 1.02 | 0.15 ± 1.02 | 0.02 ± 0.93 | 0.198 |
Birth height z score | 0.27 ± 0.97 | 0.27 ± 0.97 | 0.02 ± 0.92 | 0.005 |
1 year | Total (5155) | Non HDP (5058) | HDP (97) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 1.14 ± 0.11 | 1.14 ± 0.11 | 1.14 ± 0.12 | 0.532 |
Height at 1 year (cm) | 70.52 ± 6.73 | 70.51 ± 6.73 | 71.27 ± 6.31 | 0.268 |
Weight at 1 year (kg) | 8.61 ± 1.83 | 8.61 ± 1.83 | 8.73 ± 1.78 | 0.537 |
BMI at 1 year (kg/m2) | 17.05 ± 1.73 | 17.05 ± 1.73 | 16.95 ± 1.69 | 0.602 |
Height z score (1 years) | −2.10 ± 2.59 | −2.11 ± 2.59 | −1.84 ± 2.43 | 0.311 |
Weight z score (1 years) | 0.14 ± 1.01 | −0.14 ± 1.01 | 0.21 ± 0.99 | 0.537 |
BMI z score | 0.36 ± 1.28 | 0.36 ± 1.27 | 0.30 ± 1.23 | 0.644 |
2 year | Total (4544) | Non HDP (4456) | HDP (88) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 1.59 ± 0.17 | 1.60 ± 0.17 | 1.59 ± 0.10 | 0.993 |
Weight at 2 years (kg) | 10.81 ± 1.51 | 10.81 ± 1.51 | 10.88 ± 1.26 | 0.671 |
Height at 2 years (cm) | 80.89 ± 2.87 | 80.89 ± 2.87 | 81.05 ± 3.06 | 0.584 |
BMI at 2 year (kg/m2) | 16.51 ± 2.40 | 16.51 ± 2.41 | 16.53 ± 1.29 | 0.939 |
Height z score (2 years) | −0.06 ± 1.11 | −0.06 ± 1.12 | −0.01 ± 1.02 | 0.687 |
Weight z score (2 years) | 0.13 ± 0.75 | 0.13 ± 0.75 | 0.16 ± 0.62 | 0.671 |
BMI z score | 0.30 ± 0.98 | 0.30 ± 0.98 | 0.34 ± 1.04 | 0.733 |
4 year | Total (3654) | Non HDP (3581) | HDP (73) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 3.15 ± 0.24 | 3.15 ± 0.24 | 3.10 ± 0.18 | 0.080 |
Weight at 4 years (kg) | 14.04 ± 1.53 | 14.04 ± 1.52 | 14.03 ± 1.74 | 0.952 |
Height at 4 years (cm) | 93.72 ± 3.44 | 93.72 ± 3.44 | 93.65 ± 3.28 | 0.855 |
BMI at 4 year (kg/m2) | 15.96 ± 1.17 | 15.96 ± 1.17 | 15.96 ± 1.28 | 0.978 |
Height z score (4 years) | −0.11 ± 1.03 | −0.11 ± 1.02 | −0.03 ± 0.92 | 0.510 |
Weight z score (4 years) | 0.14 ± 0.99 | 0.14 ± 0.98 | 0.14 ± 1.13 | 0.952 |
BMI z score | 0.37 ± 0.92 | 0.37 ± 0.92 | 0.35 ± 1.02 | 0.820 |
7 year | Total (3140) | Non HDP (3080) | HDP (60) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 7.01 ± 0.32 | 7.01 ± 0.32 | 7.03 ± 0.31 | 0.604 |
Weight at 7 years (kg) | 23.02 ± 4.16 | 23.00 ± 4.13 | 24.171 ± 5.09 | 0.031 |
Height at 7 years (cm) | 120.01 ± 5.39 | 120.00 ± 5.39 | 120.65 ± 4.84 | 0.346 |
BMI at 7 years (kg/m2) | 15.91 ± 2.09 | 15.90 ± 2.09 | 16.47 ± 2.54 | 0.036 |
Weight z score (7 years) | 0.07 ± 0.94 | 0.07 ± 0.94 | 0.33 ± 1.15 | 0.031 |
Height z score (7 years) | 0.12 ± 1.04 | 0.12 ± 1.05 | 0.23 ± 0.97 | 0.427 |
BMI z score | −0.05 ± 1.06 | −0.06 ± 1.06 | 0.18 ± 1.17 | 0.081 |
Chi-squared test for categorical data and t-test for continuous data; p-values are the statistical tests between non-HDP and HDP groups.
Similarly, Table 3 presents demographic characteristics of female children. No such difference was observed in the anthropometric measurements from birth to seven years when female children born to non HDP and HDP mothers were compared.
Table 3.
Characteristics of Female | Total (6100) | Non HDP (6002) | HDP (98) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Infants at Birth | ||||
Weight at birth (g) | 3013.27 ± 384.59 | 3012.41 ± 385.16 | 3065.72 ± 345.82 | 0.173 |
Height at birth (cm) | 48.75 ± 2.06 | 48.74 ± 2.07 | 49.01 ± 1.65 | 0.212 |
Birth weight z score | 0.15 ± 1.00 | 0.15 ± 1.00 | 0.24 ± 0.93 | 0.377 |
Birth height z score | −0.06 ± 0.99 | −0.06 ± 0.99 | −0.01 ± 0.79 | 0.595 |
1 year | Total (5174) | Non HDP (5086) | HDP (88) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 1.13 ± 0.11 | 1.14 ± 0.11 | 1.12 ± 0.13 | 0.178 |
Height at 1 year (cm) | 69.14 ± 6.63 | 69.13 ± 6.65 | 69.59 ± 5.69 | 0.526 |
Weight at 1 year (kg) | 8.10 ± 1.74 | 8.09 ± 1.75 | 8.19 ± 1.62 | 0.591 |
BMI at 1 year (kg/m2) | 16.65 ± 1.70 | 16.85 ± 1.70 | 16.69 ± 1.53 | 0.831 |
Height z score (1 years) | −2.11 ± 2.63 | −2.11 ± 2.63 | −1.85 ± 2.33 | 0.361 |
Weight z score (1 years) | −0.13 ± 0.97 | −0.14 ± 0.97 | −0.09 ± 0.89 | 0.591 |
BMI z score | 0.43 ± 1.28 | 0.43 ± 1.29 | 0.44 ± 1.20 | 0.899 |
2 year | Total (4470) | Non HDP (4392) | HDP (78) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 1.60 ± 0.18 | 1.60 ± 0.18 | 1.62 ± 0.23 | 0.176 |
Weight at 2 years (kg) | 10.30 ± 2.40 | 10.30 ± 2.42 | 10.22 ± 1.12 | 0.763 |
Height at 2 years (cm) | 79.67 ± 2.71 | 79.67 ± 2.71 | 79.82 ± 2.84 | 0.609 |
BMI at 2 year (kg/m2) | 16.21 ± 4.02 | 16.22 ± 4.05 | 16.00 ± 1.25 | 0.641 |
Height z score (2 years) | −0.08 ± 1.13 | −0.09 ± 1.12 | −0.11 ± 1.30 | 0.831 |
Weight z score (2 years) | −0.13 ± 1.12 | −0.13 ± 1.20 | −0.17 ± 0.55 | 0.763 |
BMI z score | 0.36 ± 1.33 | 0.37 ± 1.33 | 0.26 ± 0.99 | 0.496 |
4 year | Total (3557) | Non HDP (3485) | HDP (72) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 3.14 ± 0.24 | 3.14 ± 0.24 | 3.16 ± 0.24 | 0.579 |
Weight at 4 years (kg) | 13.59 ± 1.54 | 13.60 ± 1.54 | 13.50 ± 1.51 | 0.586 |
Height at 4 years (cm) | 92.67 ± 3.63 | 92.66 ± 3.63 | 92.86 ± 3.58 | 0.643 |
BMI at 4 year (kg/m2) | 15.81 ± 1.37 | 15.81 ± 1.38 | 15.61 ± 1.08 | 0.228 |
Height z score (4 years) | −0.08 ± 1.11 | −0.08 ± 1.11 | −0.07 ± 0.98 | 0.967 |
Weight z score (4 years) | −0.15 ± 0.99 | −0.15 ± 0.99 | −0.21 ± 0.98 | 0.586 |
BMI z score | 0.32 ± 0.91 | 0.32 ± 0.92 | 0.19 ± 0.83 | 0.223 |
7 year | Total (3058) | Non HDP (3000) | HDP (58) | p |
Age at measurement (years) | 7.01 ± 0.32 | 7.01 ± 0.32 | 6.99 ± 0.18 | 0.548 |
Weight at 7 years (kg) | 22.32 ± 3.70 | 22.33 ± 3.71 | 22.02 ± 3.52 | 0.533 |
Height at 7 years (cm) | 119.44 ± 5.41 | 119.45 ± 5.40 | 118.79 ± 5.81 | 0.360 |
BMI at 7 years (kg/m2) | 15.59 ± 1.88 | 15.59 ± 1.88 | 15.55 ± 1.78 | 0.858 |
Weight z score (7 years) | −0.08 ± 0.84 | −0.08 ± 0.84 | −0.15 ± 0.80 | 0.533 |
Height z score (7 years) | 0.17 ± 1.06 | 0.18 ± 1.06 | 0.07 ± 1.11 | 0.443 |
BMI z score | −0.16 ± 0.98 | −0.16 ± 0.98 | −0.17 ± 0.97 | 0.941 |
Chi-squared test for categorical data and t-test for continuous data; p-values are the statistical tests between non-HDP and HDP groups.
3.2. HDP and Anthropometric Measurements
3.2.1. HDP and Weight during Different Years of Age
Table 4 shows the regression analysis of the association between HDP and weight during different years of age. When adjusted for the covariates, compared to male children born to non-HDP mothers, those born to HDP mothers were lighter at birth (mean decrease of −79.3 g [95% CI −154.8, −3.8]). Compared to male children born to non-HDP mothers, those born to HDP mothers were heavier at seven years of age (mean increase of 1.21 kg [95% CI 0.13, 2.29]) after adjusting for the covariates. The weight-for-age z-score had similar findings.
Table 4.
All | Male | Female | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | |||
Year | Outcome | Exposure | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | |||
Birth | Weight (g) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | −4.8 (−57.8, 48.2) | −5.89 (−60.0, 48.3) | −61.23 (−133.7, 11.3) † | −79.3 (−154.8, −3.8) * | 53.31 (−23.46, 130.10) | 73.8 (−3.9, 151.4) † | ||
1 year | Weight (kg) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 122 (−140.8, 384.7) | 78 (−192.6, 348.5) | 115.6 (−251.9, 483.1) | 45.26 (−343.5, 434.1) | 101.06 (−267.2, 469.3) | 112.7 (−263.7, 489.1) | ||
2 years | Weight (kg) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.01 (−0.30, 0.32) | 0.00 (−0.32, 0.33) | 0.07 (−0.25, 0.39) | 0.07 (−0.27, 0.41) | −0.08 (−0.62, 0.46) | −0.09 (−0.65, 0.47) | ||
4 years | Weight (kg) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | −0.06 (−0.31, 0.20) | −0.02 (−0.28, 0.24) | −0.01 (−0.26, 0.34) | 0.05 (−0.32, 0.42) | −0.10 (−0.46, 0.26) | −0.08 (−0.44, 0.28) | ||
7 years | Weight (kg) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.44 (−0.28, 1.16) | 0.48 (−0.24, 1.20) | 1.17 (0.10, 2.23) * | 1.21 (0.13, 2.29) * | −0.31 (−1.27, 0.66) | −0.22 (−1.16, 0.72) | ||
Birth | Weight z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | −0.02 (−0.16, 0.11) | −0.05 (−0.19, 0.08) | −0.13 (−0.32, 0.07) | −0.20 (−0.39, −0.01) * | 0.09 (−0.11, 0.29) | 0.10 (−0.09, 0.30) | ||
1 year | Weight z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.07 (−0.08, 0.21) | 0.04 (−0.11, 0.19) | 0.06 (−0.14, 0.27) | 0.025 (−0.19, 0.24) | 0.06 (−0.15, 0.26) | 0.06 (−0.15, 0.27) | ||
2 years | Weight z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.01 (−0.15, 0.16) | 0.01 (−0.16, 0.17) | 0.03 (−0.12, 0.19) | 0.04 (−0.13, 0.21) | −0.04 (−0.31, 0.22) | −0.04 (−0.47, 0.06) | ||
4 years | Weight z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | −0.04 (−0.20, 0.13) | −0.01 (−0.18, 0.15) | −0.01 (−0.24, 0.22) | 0.02 (−0.22, 0.25) | −0.06 (−0.30, 0.17) | −0.05 (−0.28, 0.19) | ||
7 years | Weight z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.10 (−0.06, 0.26) | 0.10 (−0.06, 0.27) | 0.27 (0.02, 0.51) * | 0.28 (0.03, 0.53) * | −0.07 (−0.29, 0.15) | −0.06 (−0.28, 0.15) |
†p < 0.1, * p < 0.05; Confidence interval 95%, Adjusted covariates: Child age at measurement, child sex, maternal age, maternal pre pregnancy BMI, parity, smoking during first trimester, alcohol during first trimester; Sex was excluded during stratified analysis.
3.2.2. HDP and Height during Different Years of Age
Table 5 shows the association between HDP and height during different years of age. There was a difference in the mean height at birth of male children born to HDP mothers as compared to those born to non-HDP mothers in the crude model (mean decrease, −0.55 cm [95% CI −0.94 −0.17]). Compared to male children born to non-HDP mothers, those born to HDP mothers were shorter at birth (mean −0.67 cm [95% CI −1.07, −0.26]) after adjusting for the covariates. The height for age z-score at birth was similar.
Table 5.
All | Male | Female | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | |||
Year | Outcome | Exposure | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) |
Birth | Height (cm) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | −0.15 (−0.44, 0.13) | −0.18 (−0.47, 0.11) | −0.55 (−0.94, −0.17) ** | −0.67 (−1.07, −0.26) *** | 0.26 (−0.15, 0.67) | 0.34 (−0.08, 0.76) | ||
1 year | Height (cm) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.65 (−0.33, 1.63) | 0.42 (−0.59, 1.44) | 0.76 (−0.59, 2.11) | 0.32 (−1.11, 1.75) | 0.45 (−0.95, 1.85) | 0.53 (−0.90, 1.96) | ||
2 year | Height (cm) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.20 (−0.24, 0.64) | 0.15 (−0.29, 0.59) | 0.17 (−0.43, 0.77) | 0.09 (−0.54, 0.72) | 0.11 (−0.49, 0.71) | 0.20 (−0.41, 0.82) | ||
4 year | Height (cm) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.09 (−0.48, 0.67) | 0.01 (−0.59, 0.61) | −0.07 (−0.87, 0.72) | −0.16 (−0.99, 0.68) | 0.20 (−0.65, 1.05) | 0.20 (−0.66, 1.06) | ||
7 year | Height (cm) | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.01 (−0.97, 1.00) | −0.06 (−1.06, 0.94) | 0.66 (−0.71, 2.03) | 0.32 (−1.10, 1.75) | −0.66 (−2.06,0.75) | −0.40 (−1.79, 1.00) | ||
Birth | Height z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | −0.10 (−0.24, 0.03) | −0.12 (−0.26, 0.02) † | −0.26 (−0.44, −0.08) ** | −0.31 (−0.50, −0.12) *** | 0.05 (−0.14, 0.25) | 0.08 (−0.13, 0.28) | ||
1 year | Height z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.26 (−0.11, 0.64) | 0.20 (−0.19, 0.60) | 0.27 (−0.25, 0.79) | 0.14 (−0.41, 0.69) | 0.26 (−0.30, 0.81) | 0.26 (−0.30, 0.83) | ||
2 year | Height z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.01 (−0.16, 0.19) | 0.01 (−0.17, 0.19) | 0.05 (−0.19, 0.28) | 0.01 (−0.24, 0.26) | −0.03 (−0.28, 0.23) | 0.00 (−0.26, 0.26) | ||
4 year | Height z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.04 (−0.13, 0.22) | 0.02 (−0.17, 0.20) | 0.08 (−0.16, 0.32) | 0.02 (−0.23, 0.28) | 0.01 (−0.25, 0.26) | 0.003 (−0.26,0.27) | ||
7 year | Height z score | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
HDP | 0.002 (−0.19, 0.19) | −0.01 (−0.21, 0.19) | 0.11 (−0.16, 0.38) | 0.06 (−0.22, 0.35) | −0.11 (−0.38, 0.17) | −0.08 (−0.36, 0.21) |
†p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; CI: Confidence interval; Adjusted covariates: Child age at measurement, child sex, maternal age, maternal pre pregnancy BMI, parity, smoking during first trimester, alcohol during first trimester. Sex was excluded from stratified analysis.
3.2.3. HDP and Difference in Weight and Height Gain at Different Years of Age
Table 6 shows the weight and height gain from birth to different years of age and at different age intervals. Compared to male children born to non- HDP mothers, those born to HDP mothers showed increased weight gain from birth to seven years (mean increase of 1.17 kg [95% CI 0.12, 2.21]) in the crude model and an increase of 1.12 kg ([95% CI 0.16, 2.30]) when adjusted for the covariates. In particular, there was a difference in weight gain at four to seven years of age among male children born to HDP mothers (mean increase of 1.04 kg [95% CI 0.20, 1.87]) in the crude model and a mean increase 1.12 kg [95% CI 0.28, 1.96] when adjusted for covariates. Compared to the children born to non-HDP mothers, the children born to HDP mothers had shorter height gain (mean decrease −1.17 [95% CI −2.16, −0.18]). The difference was marginal when stratified by sex.
Table 6.
Total | Male | Female | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | Crude | Adjusted | |||
Variables | Mean Score | Exposure | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) |
Weight gain | ||||||||
Birth–1 year (g) | 5298.9 ± 1770.4 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
5421.1 ± 1713 | HDP | 122.2(−135.1379.5) | 83.2 (−182.9, 349.4) | 184.3 (−175.6, 544.2) | 136.4 (−245.3, 518.1) | 30.5 (−332.2, 393.3) | 30.0 (−341.1, 401.1) | |
Birth–2 year (kg) | 7.50 ± 2.0 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
7.50 ± 1.2 | HDP | 0.00(−0.30, 0.31) | −0.002 (−0.33, 0.32) | 0.10 (−0.21, 0.41) | 0.13 (−0.20, 0.45) | −0.13 (−0.67, 0.40) | −0.15 (−0.71, 0.41) | |
Birth–4 year (kg) | 10.77 ± 1.46 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
10.71 ± 1.58 | HDP | −0.06 (−0.31, 0.18) | −0.02 (−0.27, 0.22) | 0.03 (−0.31, 0.36) | 0.11 (−0.24, 0.46) | −0.16 (−0.50, 0.16) | −0.15 (−0.49, 0.20) | |
Birth–7 year (kg) | 19.62 ± 3.89 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
20.04 ± 4.40 | HDP | 0.42 (−0.29, 1.13) | 0.46 (−0.25, 1.17) | 1.17 (0.12, 2.21) * | 1.12 (0.16, 2.30) * | −0.36 (−1.31, 0.59) | −0.29 (−1.22, 0.65) | |
1 year–2 year (kg) | 2.17 ± 2.26 † | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
1.86 ± 1.21 | HDP | −0.31 (−0.66, 0.04) † | −0.28 (−0.65, 0.08) | −0.24 (−0.66, 0.18) | −0.17 (−0.61, 0.27) | −0.39 (−0.96, 0.18) | −0.37 (−0.96, 0.21) | |
2 year–4 year (kg) | 3.27 ± 2.03 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
3.25 ± 0.79 | HDP | −0.02 (−0.35, 0.32) | 0..01 (−0.35, 0.37) | −0.05 (−0.25, 0.14) | −0.03 (−0.24, 0.18) | 0.02 (−0.64, 0.68) | 0.06 (−0.63, 0.75) | |
4 year–7 year (kg) | 8.78 ± 3.68 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
9.27 ± 3.42 | HDP | 0.49 (−0.20, 1.18) | 0.47 (−0.24, 1.18) | 1.04 (0.20, 1.87) * | 1.12 (0.28, 1.96) ** | −0.10 (−1.23, 1.02) | −0.19 (−1.34, 0.95) | |
Height gain | ||||||||
Birth–1 year (cm) | 20.82 ± 6.72 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
21.57 ± 6.17 | HDP | 0.76 (−0.22, 1.73) | 0.58 (−0.43, 1.60) | 1.32 (−0.03, 2.67) † | 1.04 (−0.39, 2.47) | 0.09 (−1.31, 1.50) | 0.12 (−1.32, 1.56) | |
Birth–2 year (cm) | 31.26 ± 2.79 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
31.50 ± 2.68 | HDP | 0.23 (−0.19, 0.66) | 0.23 (−0.20, 0.67) | 0.52 (−0.07, 1.11) † | 0.57 (−0.04, 1.19) † | −0.13 (−0.75, 0.49) | −0.11 (−0.74, 0.51) | |
Birth–4 year (cm) | 44.21 ± 3.50 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
44.25 ± 3.14 | HDP | 0.05 (−0.53, 0.62) | 0.06 (−0.54, 0.65) | 0.27 (−0.52, 1.05) | 0.32 (−0.50, 1.15) | −0.17 (−1.01, 0.66) | −0.20 (−1.05, 0.65) | |
Birth–7 year (cm) | 70.78 ± 5.32 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
70.69 ± 4.81 | HDP | −0.09 (−1.06, 0.88) | −0.11 (−1.09, 0.87) | 0.82 (−0.53, 2.17) | 0.66 (−0.73, 2.06) | −1.02 (−2.41, 0.36) | −0.83 (−2.21, 0.55) | |
1 year–2 year (cm) | 10.33 ± 6.39 * | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
9.16 ± 4.32 | HDP | −1.17 (−2.16, −0.18) * | −0.97 (−2.0, 0.06) † | −1.21 (−2.58, 0.15) † | −0.92 (−2.37, 0.53) | −1.11 (−2.55, 0.34) | −0.99 (−2.45, 0.48) | |
2 year–4 year (cm) | 12.96 ± 2.27 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
12.71 ± 1.81 | HDP | −0.25 (−0.62, 0.13) | −0.28 (−0.68, 0.11) | −0.31 (−0.80, 0.18) | −0.39 (−0.91. 0.13) | −0.18 (−0.76, 0.40) | −0.19 (−0.79, 0.40) | |
4 year–7 year (cm) | 26.38 ± 4.36 | Non-HDP | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
26.22 ± 3.03 | HDP | −0.16 (−0.98, 0.66) | −0.19 (−1.02, 0.63) | 0.22 (−0.99, 1.43) | 0.18 (−1.08, 1.45) | −0.56 (−1.66, 0.53) | −0.56 (−1.63, 0.50) |
†p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, Confidence interval 95%, Adjusted covariates: Child age at measurement, child sex, maternal age, maternal pre pregnancy BMI, parity, smoking during first trimester, alcohol during first trimester; For stratified analysis, sex was excluded from adjusted covariates.
Some changes were observed when the BMI of the children was compared at different years of age. Compared to male children born to non-HDP mothers, the children born to HDP mothers had higher BMI at seven years of age (mean increase of 0.57 kg/m2 [95% CI 0.04, 1.11]) (Supplementary Table S1). Similarly, compared to male children born to non-HDP mothers, the children born to HDP mothers had a higher BMI gain from birth to seven years, when adjustments with covariates were made (0.61 [95% CI 0.01, 1.22]) (Supplementary Table S2). No other association was observed.
4. Discussion
In the present population-based cohort study, we attempted to understand the association between HDP and anthropometric measurements of children from birth to seven years of age. Intrauterine exposure to HDP was negatively associated with height during birth in male children (p < 0.05) while no association was observed in females (p < 0.1). HDP can cause adverse effects, resulting in several maternal and neonatal complications leading to fetal distress, preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, and IUGR as suggested by our previous as well as other different studies [5,6,33].
The prevalence of HDP in our study was 1.7%, which is less than that reported in the Japan Environment and Children’s study (3.1%) [34]. The difference might be due to variations in the study group and in the Japanese population of pregnant women. The Japanese national survey showed that the mean height and weight of boys were 49.6 cm and 3.2 kg at birth, 81.3 cm and 10.7 kg at a year and a half of age, and 93.3 cm and 13.8 kg at three years of age, respectively [35]. These findings were consistent with our findings and those of another Japanese study that assessed rapid weight gain during early childhood with cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents [36].
Our study did not show any significant difference in the birth weight of children, regardless of HDP. This might be owing to the mild effect of HDP. Patients with non-severe HDP generally have a favorable prognosis, and most studies report that birth weight, incidence of fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth are similar to those of normal pregnancies [37,38,39,40]. The height, height z-score, weight, and weight z-score during birth were significantly lower among children born to HDP mothers; however, no such difference was observed when comparing children at one, two, and four years of age. At seven years of age, the weight and BMI of male children born to HDP mothers were significantly higher than those of children born from normotensive mothers. The weight gain from four to seven years was higher among children born to mothers with HDP. This might suggest that although the weight of such infants at birth is low, these children catch up with the growth and gain more weight by seven years, as compared to other groups. A study conducted among 6343 participants from the ALSPAC cohort showed that nine-year-old children exposed to gestational hypertension presented with higher BMI and waist circumference than those born to normotensive pregnancies [41,42]. The tracking of weight and growth patterns, especially in children with predisposing factors (HDP mothers and small for gestational age babies) may help in identifying children at increased risk of obesity along with enabling prompt early intervention, even before being overweight is evident. Furthermore, in this study, it is very interesting to note that even if children born from an HDP mother weighed within a normal range at birth, the weight gain was still significantly greater with accelerated catch-up, which might result in the risk of obesity and noncommunicable diseases in the future. A retrospective study conducted among 51,505 children showed that among the adolescents who were obese, the greatest acceleration in annual BMI increments occurred between two and six years of age, with a further increase in BMI percentile thereafter [43].
Our study did not show any association between HDP and anthropometric measurements at different ages in female children. From birth till adolescence, linear growth, weight and BMI trajectories differed between the sexes according to the severity of exposure to HDP. In general, HDP and preeclampsia are negatively associated with linear growth. A cohort study from Norway showed that differences in anthropometric measurements were limited to male children [44]. Another international study conducted in Brazil, Great Britain, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Singapore, and the United States showed that the changes in BMI during childhood and adolescence differ between boys and girls, resulting in the development of age- and sex-specific reference data [45,46]. An Israeli study showed that exposure to preeclampsia was positively associated with weight and BMI of 17 years in boys, but no such association was observed in girls [47]. The discrepancies across studies might be due to differences in race and age at assessment.
Male children exposed to HDP had a lower weight at birth. The vast majority of low-birth-weight infants will show postnatal catch-up growth, and most of this catch-up occurred in the first 6–12 months of life, regardless of the height or weight at birth [19,48,49]. Male children born to HDP mothers had a positive weight gain from four to seven years of age. The height gain of the male children from HDP mothers was marginally associated from birth to one year, birth to two years, and one to two years of age. This finding is supported by another cohort study which showed that exposure to preeclampsia was associated with accelerated height gain during early childhood [50]. Another cohort study showed that children exposed to preeclampsia had low birth weight, however, had accelerated catch-up growth postnatally [49]. The effects of preeclampsia on weight trajectories in boys could be influenced by some of the same mechanisms as those for linear growth, such as low levels of IGF-1, mediated through prematurity and inflammation [51]. In our study, there was no difference in height and weight during childhood between children born from HDP and normotensive mothers. In regard to children born from normotensive mothers, similar findings were obtained on the postnatal growth of normal children until 1.5 years of age, excluding preterm and small for gestational age [8]. Children born to HDP mothers were growth-restricted at birth and had complete catch-up growth at 4.5 years of age; however, they were smaller and lighter compared to their peers [7]. Prenatal starvation is associated with epigenetic changes that can persist throughout one’s life, causing a tendency for energy conservation and rapid weight gain [52]. This might explain one of the reasons behind the weight gain of HDP-exposed children from four to seven years.
A Japanese study also showed multiple developmental patterns in boys and girls, suggesting that maternal BMI and some unfavorable behaviors during early pregnancy impacts a child’s pattern of body mass development [53]. Although there are inconsistencies in the literature regarding sex differences in growth after exposure to HDP, boys are more prone to neonatal complications; whether born to term and of adequate birth weight; small for gestational age, and extreme prematurity affects boys more severely than girls [54,55,56]. Our study showed no difference in height, height z-score, weight, and weight z-score of children born to HDP and non-HDP mothers during early childhood. However, this growth pattern could be linked at a low birth weight and the risk of future obesity, suggesting the need for further studies. Studies related to the exposure of HDP and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders could help understand the casual intrauterine effects. Further research is necessary to understand the health consequences of HDP on the offspring and to observe the transgenerational effect [57].
The strength of this study includes its prospective birth cohort design, comprising 20,926 mother–infant pairs. Owing to the nature of its cohort, we were able to follow up the participants until different years of age. We obtained information on HDP from medical records, which is a highly reliable source. Anthropometric measurements were obtained from the MCH handbook, which is one of the essential records for tracing the health of Japanese children. However, this study has some limitations. The prevalence of HDP was 1.7% in the total participants, which might have led to an underestimation of the results. The data on pre-pregnancy BMI, smoking, and alcohol consumption habits were self-reported by the participants, which might have caused recall biases. Although paternal obesity is also known to accelerate growth in children, we did not have paternal BMI data to compare. Preterm infants with maternal hypertension may have worse outcomes than full-term infants, which could not be assessed in our study due to fewer preterm infants, adding to other limitations. Additionally, the risk of gestational diabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders, and dietary factors were not assessed in this study.
5. Conclusions
Our study showed that despite lower weight at birth, male children exposed to HDP had accelerated catch-up growth and gained more weight by seven years as compared to children born to mothers without HDP; however, this finding needs replication. HDP can cause adverse birth outcomes. Hence, identifying risk factors and assessing risk during pregnancy, along with monitoring medical history and proper health education by medical personnel, and public health community interventions can reduce the complications associated with pregnancy. As intrauterine exposure to hypertensive disorders can affect the neurodevelopmental and cardiometabolic health of children in the long run, our study recommends further studies on Japanese mothers to strengthen the evidence provided by our findings.
Acknowledgments
We extend our sincere thanks to the mothers who participated in this study, including all staff involved in The Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children’s Health. Our heartfelt appreciation goes to all hospitals and clinic personnel who collaborated with us during the study, including Keiai Hospital, Endo Kikyo Maternity Clinic, Shiroishi Hospital, Memuro Municipal Hospital, Aoba Ladies Clinic, Obihiro-Kyokai Hospital, Akiyama Memorial Hospital, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kitami Red Cross Hospital, Hoyukai Sapporo Hospital, Gorinbashi Hospital, Hashimoto Clinic, Asahikawa Medical College Hospital, Hakodate Central General Hospital, Ohji General Hospital, Nakashibetsu Municipal Hospital, Sapporo Tokushukai Hospital, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Wakkanai City Hospital, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital, Shibetsu City General Hospital, Nikko Memorial Hospital, Sapporo City General Hospital, Kohnan Hospital, Hakodate City Hospital, Hokkaido Monbetsu Hospital, Tenshi Hospital, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital, Nakamura Hospital, Kin-ikyo Sapporo Hospital, Kitami Lady’s Clinic, Engaru-Kosei General Hospital, Kushiro Red Cross Hospital, Nayoro City General Hospital, and Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph182010951/s1. Table S1: Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and body mass index during different years of age; Table S2: Association between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and difference in body mass index gain at different age intervals.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.P. and S.K.; methodology, K.P., S.K. and C.M.; formal analysis, K.P. and S.K.; investigation, S.K., C.M., T.Y., N.T., A.I.-A., Y.A.B., S.I., K.Y. and R.K.; data curation, K.P. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.P.; writing—review and editing, S.K., C.M., T.Y., N.T., H.M., M.I. and R.K.; supervision, R.K.; funding acquisition, R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences (JSPS) (grant numbers: 19H01071, 19K22730 and 20K10445) and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (grant numbers: JPMH18950314 and JPMH19188595).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study protocol was approved by the ethical review board for epidemiological studies at Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine (2003/3/31) and the Hokkaido University Center for Environmental and Health Sciences (reference no. 122, 2020/10/1), in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent Statement
All mothers, prior to participation, provided written informed consent.
Data Availability Statement
The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and specific legal framework in Japan. All inquiries should be addressed to Reiko Kishi, principal investigator of the Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children’s Health, Center for Environmental and Health Sciences, Hokkaido University.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Makino S., Takeda J., Takeda S., Watanabe K., Matsubara K., Nakamoto O., Ushijima J., Ohkuchi A., Koide K., Mimura K., et al. New definition and classification of “Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP)”. Hypertens. Res. Pregnancy. 2019;7:1–5. doi: 10.14390/jsshp.HRP2019-010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Watanabe K., Matsubara K., Nakamoto O., Ushijima J., Ohkuchi A., Koide K., Makino S., Mimura K., Morikawa M., Naruse K., et al. Outline of the new definition and classification of “Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP)”; a revised JSSHP statement of 2005. Hypertens. Res. Pregnancy. 2018;6:33–37. doi: 10.14390/jsshp.HRP2018-014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Allen V.M., Joseph K., Murphy K.E., Magee L.A., Ohlsson A. The effect of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy on small for gestational age and stillbirth: A population based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2004;4:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-4-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bokslag A., van Weissenbruch M.V., Mol B.W., de Groot C.J.M. Preeclampsia: Short and long term consequences for mother and neonate. Early Hum. Dev. 2016;102:47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Poudel K., Kobayashi S., Miyashita C., Ikeda-Araki A., Tamura N., Bamai Y.A., Itoh S., Yamazaki K., Masuda H., Itoh M., et al. Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP), maternal characteristics, and birth outcomes among Japanese women: A Hokkaido study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:3342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ferrazzani S., Luciano R., Garofalo S., D’Andrea V., de Carolis S., de Carolis M.P., Paolucci V., Romagnoli C., Caruso A. Neonatal outcome in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Early Hum. Dev. 2011;87:445–449. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Beukers F., Cranendonk A., de Vries J.I.P., Wolf H., Lafeber H.N., Vriesendorp H.C., Ganzevoort W., van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A.G. Catch-up growth in children born growth restricted to mothers with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Arch. Dis. Child. 2013;98:30–35. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martikainen A. Growth and development at the age of 1.5 years in children with maternal hypertension. J. Périnat. Med. 1989;17:259–270. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1989.17.4.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barker M., Robinson S., Osmond C., Barker D.J.P. Birth weight and body fat distribution in adolescent girls. Arch. Dis. Child. 1997;77:381–383. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.5.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ros H.S., Lichtenstein P., Ekbom A., Cnattingius S. Tall or short? Twenty years after preeclampsia exposure in utero: Comparisons of final height, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and age at menarche among women, exposed and unexposed to preeclampsia during fetal life. Pediatr. Res. 2001;49:763–769. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200106000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barker D.J. Maternal nutrition, fetal nutrition, and disease in later life. Nutrition. 1997;13:807–813. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(97)00193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mandy M., Nyirenda M. Developmental origins of health and disease: The relevance to developing nations. Int. Health. 2018;10:66–70. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihy006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boersma B., Wit J.M. Catch-up growth. Endocr. Rev. 1997;18:646–661. doi: 10.1210/edrv.18.5.0313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De Wit C.C., Sas T.C., Wit J.M., Cutfield W.S. Patterns of catch-up growth. J. Pediatr. 2013;162:415–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tanner J.M. Growth from birth to two: A critical review. Acta Med. Auxol. 1994;26:7–45. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rolland-Cachera M.F., Deheeger M., Bellisle F., Sempé M., Guilloud-Bataille M., Patois E. Adiposity rebound in children: A simple indicator for predicting obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1984;39:129–135. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/39.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eriksson J., Forsén T., Tuomilehto J., Osmond C., Barker D. Fetal and childhood growth and hypertension in adult life. Hypertension. 2000;36:790–794. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.36.5.790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kang M.J. The adiposity rebound in the 21st century children: Meaning for what? Korean J. Pediatr. 2018;61:375–380. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2018.07227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ong K.K.L., Ahmed M.L., Emmett P., Preece M.A., Dunger P.D. Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: Prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000;320:967–971. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singhal A. Long-term adverse effects of early growth acceleration or catch-up growth. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2017;70:236–240. doi: 10.1159/000464302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Batista R.F.L., Silva A.A.M., Barbieri M.A., Simoes V.M.F., Bettiol H. Factors associated with height catch up and catch down among school children. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Strauss R.S. Effects of the intrauterine environment on childhood growth. Br. Med. Bull. 1997;53:81–95. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Suzuki K., Kondo N., Sato M., Tanaka T., Ando D., Yamagata Z. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and childhood growth trajectory: A random effects regression analysis. J. Epidemiol. 2012;22:175–178. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20110033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kamiya M., Suzuki K., Yamagata Z. Effect of maternal active smoking during pregnancy on the trajectory of childhood body mass index: A multilevel analysis using quartiles of birthweight. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2020;18:34. doi: 10.18332/tid/119117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tamura N., Hanaoka T., Ito K., Araki A., Miyashita C., Ito S., Kobayashi S., Ito Y., Minakami H., Cho K., et al. Mediating factors between parental socioeconomic status and small for gestational age in infants: Results from the Hokkaido study on environment and children’s health. Matern. Child Health J. 2021;25:645–655. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03035-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cho K., Kobayashi S., Araki A., Miyashita C., Itoh S., Saijo Y., Ito Y., Sengoku K., Baba T., Minakami H., et al. Prenatal alcohol exposure and adverse fetal growth restriction: Findings from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Pediatr. Res. 2021:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01595-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kishi R., Kobayashi S., Ikeno T., Araki A., Miyashita C., Itoh S., Sasaki S., Okada E., Kobayashi S., Kashino I., et al. Ten years of progress in the Hokkaido birth cohort study on environment and children’s health: Cohort profile—Updated 2013. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2013;18:429–450. doi: 10.1007/s12199-013-0357-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kishi R., Araki A., Minatoya M., Hanaoka T., Miyashita C., Itoh S., Kobayashi S., Ait Bamai Y., Yamazaki K., Miura R., et al. The Hokkaido birth cohort study on environment and children’s health: Cohort profile—Updated 2017. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2017;22:46. doi: 10.1186/s12199-017-0654-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kishi R., Ikeda-Araki A., Miyashita C., Itoh S., Kobayashi S., Bamai Y.A., Yamazaki K., Tamura N., Minatoya M., Ketema R.M., et al. Hokkaido birth cohort study on environment and children’s health: Cohort profile 2021. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2021;26:1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00980-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kobayashi S., Kishi R., Saijo Y., Ito Y., Oba K., Araki A., Miyashita C., Itoh S., Minatoya M., Yamazaki K., et al. Association of blood mercury levels during pregnancy with infant birth size by blood selenium levels in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study: A prospective birth cohort. Environ. Int. 2019;125:418–429. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.The Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology Excel-based Clinical Tools for Growth Evaluation of Children. 2011. [(accessed on 10 April 2021)]. Available online: http://jspe.umin.jp/medical/chart_dl.html.
- 32.Fujimoto S., Nakamura Y., Ikeda M., Takeda Y., Higurashi M. Utilization of maternal and child health handbook in Japan. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2001;48:259–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ye C., Ruan Y., Zou L., Li G., Li C., Chen Y., Jia C., Megson I., Wei J., Zhang W. The 2011 survey on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in China: Prevalence, risk factors, complications, pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Iwama N., Metoki H., Nishigori H., Mizuno S., Takahashi F., Tanaka K., Watanabe Z., Saito M., Sakurai K., Ishikuro M., et al. Association between alcohol consumption during pregnancy and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Japan: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Hypertens. Res. 2018;42:85–94. doi: 10.1038/s41440-018-0124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Suwa S., Tachibana K. Standard growth charts for height and weight of Japanese children from birth to 17 years based on a cross-sectional survey of national data. Clin. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 1993;2:87–97. doi: 10.1297/cpe.2.87. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fujita Y., Kouda K., Nakamura H., Iki M. Association of rapid weight gain during early childhood with cardiovascular risk factors in Japanese adolescents. J. Epidemiol. 2013;23:103–108. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20120107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Buchbinder A., Sibai B.M., Caritis S., MacPherson C., Hauth J., Lindheimer M.D., Klebanoff M., VanDorsten P., Landon M., Paul R., et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;186:66–71. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.120080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sibai B.M. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;102:181–192. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00475-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hnat M.D., Sibai B.M., Caritis S., Hauth J., Lindheimer M.D., MacPherson C., van Dorsten J., Landon M., Miodovnik M., Paul R., et al. Perinatal outcome in women with recurrent preeclampsia compared with women who develop preeclampsia as nulliparas. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;186:422–426. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.120280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cruz M.O., Gao W., Hibbard J.U. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes among women with gestational hypertension, mild preeclampsia, and mild chronic hypertension. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;205:260.e1–260.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Geelhoed J.J., Fraser A., Tilling K., Benfield L., Smith G.D., Sattar N., Nelson S.M., Lawlor D.A. Preeclampsia and gestational hypertension are associated with childhood blood pressure independently of family adiposity measures: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Circulation. 2010;122:1192–1199. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.936674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lawlor D.A., Macdonald-Wallis C., Fraser A., Nelson S.M., Hingorani A., Smith G.D., Sattar N., Deanfield J. Cardiovascular biomarkers and vascular function during childhood in the offspring of mothers with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Eur. Hearth J. 2012;33:335–345. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Geserick M., Vogel M., Gausche R., Lipek T., Spielau U., Keller E., Pfaffle R., Kiess W., Korner A. Accelaration of BMI in early childhood and risk of sustained obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018:1303–1312. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Byberg K.K., Øymar K., Eide G.E., Forman M.R., Júlíusson P.B. Exposure to preeclampsia in utero affects growth from birth to late childhood dependent on child’s sex and severity of exposure: Follow-up of a nested case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0176627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cole T.J., Bellizzi M.C., Flegal K., Dietz W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Singh A.S., Mulder C., Twisk J.W.R., van Mechelen W., Chinapaw M.J.M. Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: A systematic review of the literature. Obes. Rev. 2008;9:474–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Seidman D.S., Laor A., Gale R., Stevenson D.K., Mashiach S., Danon Y.L. Pre-eclampsia and offspring’s blood pressure, cognitive ability and physical development at 17-years-of-age. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1991;98:1009–1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15339.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hokken-Koelega A.C., de Ridder M.A., Lemmen R.J., Hartog H.D., Keizer-Schrama S.D.M., Drop S.L. Children born small for gestational age: Do they catch up? Pediatr. Res. 1995;38:267–271. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199508000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Karlberg J., Albertsson-Wikland K. Growth in full-term small-for-gestational-age infants: From birth to final height. Pediatr. Res. 1995;38:733–739. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199511000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gunnarsdóttir J., Cnattingius S., Lundgren M., Selling K., Högberg U., Wikström A.-K. Prenatal exposure to preeclampsia is associated with accelerated height gain in early childhood. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hellström A., Ley D., Hansen-Pupp I., Hallberg B., Löfqvist C., van Marter L., van Weissenbruch M., Ramenghi L.A., Beardsall K., Dunger D., et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 has multisystem effects on foetal and preterm infant development. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105:576–586. doi: 10.1111/apa.13350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jain V., Singhal A. Catch up growth in low birth weight infants: Striking a healthy balance. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2012;13:141–147. doi: 10.1007/s11154-012-9216-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Haga C., Kondo N., Suzuki K., Sato M., Ando D., Yokomichi H., Tanaka T., Yamagata Z. Developmental trajectories of body mass index among Japanese children and impact of maternal factors during pregnancy. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e51896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aibar L., Puertas A., Valverde M., Carrillo M.P., Montoya F. Fetal sex and perinatal outcomes. J. Périnat. Med. 2012;40:271–276. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2011-0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Simchen M.J., Weisz B., Zilberberg E., Morag I., Weissmann-Brenner A., Sivan E., Dulitzki M. Male disadvantage for neonatal complications of term infants, especially in small-for-gestational age neonates. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2013;27:839–843. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.845658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Månsson J., Fellman V., Stjernqvist K., the EXPRESS Study Group Extremely preterm birth affects boys more and socio-economic and neonatal variables pose sex-specific risks. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:514–521. doi: 10.1111/apa.12937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pinheiro T.V., Brunetto S., Ramos J.G.L., Bernardi J., Goldani M.Z. Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and health outcomes in the offspring: A systematic review. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2016;7:391–407. doi: 10.1017/S2040174416000209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and specific legal framework in Japan. All inquiries should be addressed to Reiko Kishi, principal investigator of the Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children’s Health, Center for Environmental and Health Sciences, Hokkaido University.