Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 22;13(10):3308. doi: 10.3390/nu13103308

Table 8.

Association between low HDL-C and quartiles of dietary patterns in the older participants by BMI subgroups (BMI >= 27.1 kg/m2).

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 p for Trend
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Balanced Pattern
Crude model 1.00 0.64 0.30–1.33 0.33 0.16–0.66 0.62 0.30–1.26 0.019
Model 1 * 1.00 0.56 0.27–1.17 0.25 0.12–0.52 0.36 0.17–0.78 0.003
Model 2 & 1.00 0.64 0.30–1.37 0.30 0.14–0.63 0.40 0.18–0.87 0.012
Model 3 a 1.00 0.61 0.28–1.30 0.29 0.14–0.63 0.39 0.17–0.90 0.014
Model 3+WC+BP 1.00 0.60 0.27–1.31 0.29 0.13–0.63 0.38 0.16–0.88 0.013
Western Pattern
Crude model 1.00 1.21 0.59–2.50 1.38 0.66–2.89 1.44 0.70–2.94 0.767
Model 1 * 1.00 1.09 0.54–2.23 1.17 0.60–2.27 1.10 0.57–2.14 0.974
Model 2 & 1.00 1.16 0.57–2.36 1.32 0.68–2.57 1.30 0.66–2.55 0.833
Model 3 b 1.00 1.07 0.52–2.22 1.16 0.59–2.28 1.28 0.64–2.58 0.906
Model 3+WC+BP 1.00 0.99 0.47–2.08 1.07 0.54–2.13 1.20 0.60–2.39 0.948
Thrifty Pattern
Crude model 1.00 1.05 0.53–2.08 1.04 0.51–2.12 1.48 0.77–2.88 0.624
Model 1 * 1.00 1.02 0.51–2.06 0.95 0.48–1.86 1.54 0.82–2.90 0.451
Model 2 & 1.00 1.04 0.51–2.10 1.01 0.51–2.00 1.72 0.92–3.23 0.286
Model 3 c 1.00 1.08 0.53–2.20 1.11 0.56–2.20 1.98 1.00–3.91 0.206
Model 3+WC+BP 1.00 1.07 0.52–2.20 1.10 0.54–2.21 2.03 1.02–4.05 0.180

Model 1 *: adjusted for district (urban/rural), age groups (60 y-, 65 y-, 70 y-, 75 y-, 80 y-), gender (male/female), marital status (having a partner/other status), nationality (Han/others), income (low/medium/high/no response), and education level (low/middle/high); Model 2 &: adjusted for smoking (yes/no), drinking (yes/on), physical activity (yes/no), and Model 1; Model 3 a: adjusted for the Western dietary pattern, the thrifty pattern, energy intake, and Model 2; Model 3 b: adjusted for the Western pattern, the thrifty dietary pattern, energy intake, and Model 2; Model 3 c: adjusted for the balanced pattern, the Western dietary pattern, energy intake, and Model 2.