Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2021 Oct 3;9(10):2091. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9102091

Case-Control Study to Assess the Association between Epilepsy and Toxocara Infection/Exposure

Ali Alizadeh Khatir 1, Mahdi Sepidarkish 2, Mohammad Reza Rajabalizadeh 3, Solmaz Alizadeh Moghaddam 3, Saeed Aghapour 4, Saeed Mehravar 5, Peter J Hotez 6, Robin B Gasser 7,*, Ali Rostami 8,*
Editor: Gereon R M Schares
PMCID: PMC8537584  PMID: 34683412

Abstract

Although causes and etiology of epilepsy are mostly obscure, some zoonotic parasites, such as Toxocara species, have been proposed as a risk factor for this disease. Here, we conducted an age-matched case-control study to evaluate whether there is an association between epilepsy and the presence of serum antibodies to Toxocara in incident cases. We included 94 idiopathic epileptic patients as cases, and—from the same geographical region—88 people with no own history of epilepsy or neurological disease as control subjects. Epilepsy was confirmed by a physician using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition. All participants were screened for the anti-Toxocara IgG serum antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Univariate and mutltivariate statistical analyses were applied to calculate the crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Anti-Toxocara serum antibody was detected in 37 epileptic patients and in 23 control subjects, giving respective seroprevalences of 39.3% (95% CI, 29.4–49.9%) and 26.1% (95% CI, 17.3–36.5%), respectively. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis estimated an OR of 2.38 (95% CI, 1.25–4.63), indicating a significant association between epilepsy and Toxocara seropositivity. There was also a significant association between seropositivity to Toxocara and partial (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.14–6.04) or generalized (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.09–4.40%) seizures. Findings from the present study of incident epileptic cases support previous studies proposing that Toxocara infection/exposure is a risk factor for epilepsy. However, further well-designed population-based surveys and mechanistic/experimental studies in animal models are required to better understand the reason(s) for this association.

Keywords: Toxocara, epilepsy, association, case-control study

1. Introduction

Epilepsy is a serious neurological condition with a worldwide distribution, and characterized by abnormal brain activity that causes seizures and/or other neurological, cognitive, and psychological problems [1]. The burden of epilepsy is high; it is reported that at least 7 of every 1000 persons have epilepsy during their life-time, which means that ~50 million people of all ages are affected worldwide, relating to 13 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 0.5% of the global burden of disease (GBD) [2]. In spite of these figures, epilepsy is often neglected in public health agendas. There is a higher incidence of epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs, 139 per 100,000 person-years) than in high-income countries (30–50 per 100,000 person-years) [2]. Current evidence indicates that 80% of people with epilepsy live in LMICs, most of whom do not have access to effective chemotherapy or clinical management [2]. While the specific etiology of epilepsy is not established for most patients (~60%), this disease is recognized as being multi-factorial, involving both genetic and environmental components [3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) indicates that 25% of epilepsy cases are preventable, such that there is an urgent need to identify risk factors for this disease [4]. Key, modifiable risk factors include infections, stroke, perinatal insults and traumatic injuries of the brain [5]. Neurotropic parasites including Toxoplasma gondii (causing toxoplasmosis) Plasmodium falciparum (malaria), Taenia solium (neurocysticercosis), Onchocerca volvulus (onchocerciasis) and Toxocara species (toxocariasis) can be important causative agents of infections of the central nervous system (CNS) [5]. The links between onchocerciasis and nodding syndrome and other forms of epilepsy are only now emerging [6].

Toxocara canis and T. cati are particularly significant zoonotic nematodes of canids and felids, respectively [7]. Humans are accidental hosts and become infected mainly through the accidental ingestion of eggs of Toxocara from contaminated soil, food or water and sometimes via eating undercooked or raw meat carrying Toxocara larvae [7]. Human Toxocara infection and toxocariasis (the disease) are important worldwide, and current estimates indicate that >1.4 billion people have been exposed to, or are infected with, Toxocara species [8]. In Iran, estimates indicate that ~6 (mean; range: 3–10%) of people have specific serum antibodies against Toxocara [8]. Moreover, ~16% and 26% of dogs and cats, respectively, are infected with Toxocara, and 20% of public places are contaminated with Toxocara eggs [7].

Toxocariasis of humans manifests itself in four clinical forms: visceral larva migrans (VLM), ocular larva migrans (OLM), covert/common toxocariasis (CT) and neurotoxocariasis (NT) [9]. NT is caused by the migration of larvae in the CNS, and is reported to occur commonly in middle-aged males (sex-ratio: 1.49; median age: 42 years) and less so in children of <18 years of age [10]. NT is characterized by encephalitis, meningitis, myelitis and/or cerebral vasculitis, but asymptomatic infection is common [10,11]. There are also proposed links between NT and developmental delays and cognitive impairments, especially in children [12]. MRI findings of neurotoxocariasis include subcortical, cortical or deep white-matter lesions with variable enhancement, which can associate with hydrocephalus, leptomeningeal or spinal cord involvement [13]. Findings from a range of epidemiological studies and meta-analyses [11,14,15,16,17,18,19] have indicated that Toxocara infection/exposure might play an under-appreciated role in inducing or contributing to neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and/or epilepsy.

Based on GBD 2016 estimates, there were 344,959 cases of epilepsy in Iran associated with 153,434 DALYs, and 765 people died from epilepsy and/or associated disorders [2]. Due to the high burden and public health importance of epilepsy in Iran, there is a need to explore its potential links with toxocariasis due to its high prevalence in Iran, as well as other LMICs [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Although numerous clinical studies of human epilepsy have been conducted in Iran and worldwide, all of them recruited prevalent epileptic patients as the case-group; thus, it was not possible to exclude a reverse causality, in which the development of epilepsy acted as a risk factor for Toxocara infection [17]. Here, we follow the recommendation from a recent meta-analysis [17] to attempt to better understand the causality of epilepsy, and conduct a matched case-control study of incident epileptic patients versus matched control subjects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

This study was conducted in the Rouhani Hospital, a referral hospital in Babol, Mazandaran province, in northern Iran, between January 2019 and September 2020. Most people in this region are involved in farming animals and rice. The climate in the Mazandaran province is hot-humid in summer and mild-humid in winter, with an average annual temperature of ~18 °C, high annual precipitation (>800 mm) and high relative humidity (>70%), which provides favorable conditions for the transmission of many parasites, including Toxocara spp. [26]. A previous epidemiological study demonstrated that > 23.5% of people in this region have specific anti-Toxocara IgG serum antibodies, indicating infection with, or exposure to, species of Toxocara [26].

2.2. Study Population and Design

This human case-control study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Babol University of Medical Science, Babol, Iran (permit no. IR.MUBABOL.HRI. REC.1399.105). All participants provided informed consent, and a structured questionnaire was used to obtain sociodemographic data. Clinical and neurological data/information were recorded and critically examined by an expert neurologist (A.A.K.). The incident cases were 94 patients diagnosed with ‘idiopathic epilepsy’, according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) guidelines [27]. Individuals were considered as ‘epileptics’ if they had at least two unprovoked seizures within a period of >24 h, and if the cause of their epilepsy was unknown; people with febrile convulsions, seizures caused by alcohol, intoxication by drugs or other substances, eclampsia or any other neuropathological condition were excluded. According to the ILAE classification and using electroencephalogram (EEG) records and clinical data, all patients with epilepsy (PWE) were stratified according to whether they had focal or generalized seizures; patients whose epilepsy could not be classified were excluded. Moreover, PWE who were mentally retarded and those with abnormal neurological findings, detected by computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were also excluded. The group of control subjects were 88 age-matched (±3 years), healthy individuals referred to the General Health Outpatient Clinic (Rouhani Hospital); none of these subjects had a history of epilepsy or any other neurological disease (confirmed by a neurologist), although some of them indicated that they had relatives or parents with a history of epilepsy (Table 1).

Table 1.

Toxocara seropositivity in epileptic patients and healthy people (control group) according to sociodemographic characteristics subjected to analysis using the Pearson’s chi-square test.

Variable Patients with Epilepsy [n = 94] Healthy Controls [n = 88] p
Value
ORcrude
(95%CI)
Number (%) Number Sero-
Positive (%)
Number (%) Number Sero-
Positive (%)
Sex
Male 50 (53.2) 18 (36) 29 (33) 10 (34.48) 0.89 1.07 (0.41–2.79)
Female 44 (46.8) 19 (43.18) 59 (67) 13 (22.41) 0.02 ** 2.69 (1.14–6.34)
Age
≤18 13 (13.8) 2 (15.38) 10 (11.4) 3 (30.00) 0.62 * 0.42 (0.06–3.21)
19–39 43 (45.7) 15 (34.88) 45 (51.1) 12 (26.67) 0.40 1.47 (0.59–3.66)
40–59 25 (26.6) 13 (52.00) 23 (27.3) 5 (21.74) 0.03 ** 3.90 (1.10–13.80)
≥60 13 (13.8) 7 (53.85) 9 (10.2) 3 (33.33) 0.41 * 2.33 (0.40–13.61)
Residence
Urban 32 (34) 13 (40.63) 32 (36.4) 9 (28.13) 0.29 1.75 (0.62–4.97)
Rural 62 (66) 24 (38.71) 56 (63.6) 14 (25) 0.11 1.89 (0.86–4.18)
Education
Illiterate 12 (12.8) 5 (41.67) 25 (28.4) 7 (28) 0.47 * 1.84 (0.43–7.77)
Primary school 31 (33) 11 (35.48) 27 (30.7) 8 (30.77) 0.63 1.31 (0.43–3.95)
High school 40 (42.6) 15 (37.50) 28 (31.8) 7 (25) 0.28 1.80 (0.62–5.24)
College and above 11 (11.6) 6 (54.55) 8 (9.1) 1 (12.50) 0.14 * 8.40 (0.76–93.34)
Occupation
Farmer 14 (14.9) 7 (50) 31 (35.2) 8 (26.67) 0.17 * 2.88 (0.77–10.77)
House-wife 26 (27.7) 13 (50) 36 (40.9) 9 (25) 0.04 3.00 (1.02–8.81)
Other 54 (57.4) 17 (31.48) 21 (23.9) 6 (28.57) 0.80 1.15 (0.38–3.48)
Dog contact
No 83 (88.3) 32 (38.55) 16 (18.2) 4 (25) 0.30 1.88 (0.56–6.34)
Yes 11 (11.7) 5 (45.45) 72 (81.8) 19 (26.39) 0.28 * 2.32 (0.64, 8.51)
Cat contact
No 81 (86.2) 29 (35.80) 75 (85.2) 20 (26.67) 0.22 1.53 (0.77–3.04)
Yes 13 (13.8) 8 (61.54) 13 (14.8) 3 (23.08) 0.05 5.33 (0.97–29.39)
Frequent contact
with soil
No 57 (60.6) 22 (38.6) 41 (46.6) 9 (21.95) 0.08 2.23 (0.90–5.56)
Yes 37 (39.4) 15 (40.54) 47 (53.4) 14 (29.79) 0.30 1.61 (0.65–3.98)
Eating unwashed
vegetables
No 49 (52.1) 20 (40.82) 39 (44.3) 8 (20.51) 0.04 ** 2.67 (1.02–7.01)
Yes 45 (47.9) 17 (37.78) 49 (55.7) 15 (30.61) 0.46 1.38 (0.58–3.24)
Eating raw or undercooked meat
No 52 (55.3) 20 (38.46) 52 (59.1) 14 (26.92) 0.21 1.69 (0.74–3.89)
Yes 42 (44.7) 17 (40.48) 36 (40.9) 9 (25) 0.14 2.04 (0.77–5.40)
Drinking water source
Treated 56 (59.6) 25 (44.64) 50 (56.8) 15 (30) 0.12 1.88 (0.84–4.20)
Untreated 38 (40.4) 12 (31.58) 38 (43.2) 8 (21.05) 0.29 1.73 (0.61–4.88)
Relative with a history of epilepsy
Yes 27 (28.7) 11 (40.74) 2 (2.3) 1 (50) 1 * 0.69 (0.04–12.20)
No 67 (71.3) 26 (38.81) 86 (97.7) 22 (25.58) 0.08 1.84 (0.93–3.68)
Parental history of
epilepsy
Yes 21 (22.3) 8 (38.10) 7 (8) 0 (0) 0.07 * 9.44 (0.48–187.54)
No 73 (77.7) 29 (39.73) 81 (92) 23 (28.40) 0.13 1.66 (0.85–3.26)

* Fisher exact test was used for these variables; ** statistically significant.

2.3. Sample Collection and Laboratory Analysis

Blood samples were collected from individual participants (n = 182) and immediately centrifuged at 1000× g for 5 min, serum collected, aliquoted and frozen at −20 °C. Specific anti-Toxocara IgG serum antibodies were detected using a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of >95% (NovaTec Immunodiagnostics, Dietzenbach, Germany). The test results were recorded as international units (IU), as recommended. According to the instructions, respective values of <9.0 IU/mL, 9.0–11.0 IU/mL and >11.0 IU/mL were recorded as ‘test-negative’, ‘suspicious’ and ‘test-positive’ for anti-Toxocara IgG serum antibodies. Laboratory testing was conducted in a blinded manner, so that the expert technician who tested the samples was not aware of the health status of individuals whose serum samples were tested.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were done by Stata statistical software (v.16 Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). The seroprevalence, based on anti-Toxocara serum antibodies in individual epileptic patients or healthy controls, was given as a relative percentage with a binomial 95% confidence interval (CI). Variables describing the characteristics and exposure factors associated with Toxocara seropositivity in the cases and control subjects were assessed by the Pearson’s χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests (when expected frequencies were ≤5), in order to identify significant differences between the two groups. The association between Toxocara seropositivity and epilepsy was assessed using approximate Bayesian logistic regression employing a penalized likelihood (PL) estimation via data augmentation, and the associated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated [28]. We introduced a command, “penlogit”, to automatically add specific prior-data records to a data set. These records were computed, so that they generated a penalty function for the log-likelihood of a logistic model, which equals (up to an additive constant) a set of independent log prior distributions on the model parameters [28]. The models were adjusted for potential confounders, including age, gender, and history of epilepsy in parents or relatives; variables were adjusted based on a minimal sufficient adjustment set using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) [29]. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Features of Participants

Overall, 182 human subjects (94 epileptic people and 88 healthy controls) were enrolled in the study. Of the 94 patients with epilepsy, 50 (53.2%) were male and 44 (46.8%) were female. The participants’ ages ranged from 13 to 78 years, with a mean age of 36.7 ± 15.9 years. A total of 62 (66%) patients lived in rural and 32 (34%) in urban areas. For 28.7% (27/94) of those with epilepsy, there was a family history of epilepsy, and 22.3% (21/94) had parents with epilepsy. According to the ILAE classification, considering both EEG and clinical data, 28 (29.8%) of the epileptic people presented with focal seizures, while 66 (70.2%) subjects exhibited generalized seizures. Epileptics who were affected by focal and generalized seizures were 37.3 ± 15.1 and 36.8 ± 16.5 years of age, respectively. Controls included 29 males (33%) and 59 females (67%) of 37.5 ± 17.1 years of age. Two control subjects had relatives with a history of epilepsy, and seven had parents with a history of epilepsy. The baseline characteristics of cases and controls are shown in Table 1.

3.2. Association between Toxocara Infection/Exposure and Epilepsy

The overall prevalence of anti-Toxocara IgG serum antibody in the study subjects was 32.9% (95% CI, 12.2–70.4%; 60/182); 37 of the 94 epileptic patients were positive for anti-Toxocara antibody (seroprevalence: 39.3–95% CI, range: 29.4–49.9%); 23 of the 88 control subjects were seropositive for the same antibody (seroprevalence: 26.1–95% CI, range: 17.3–36.5%). In the Pearson’s χ2 test, there was an association between Toxocara seropositivity and epilepsy (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.14–3.23; p value = 0.019); in a multivariate analysis, when the model was adjusted for covariates, this association was still statistically significant (adjusted OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.25–4.63; p value = 0.009) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses to assess whether there is an association between epilepsy and seropositivity to Toxocara in people.

Study Participants Number Seropositive (%) Number Seronegative (%) Univariate Analysis
OR (95% CI) *
Multivariate Analysis
OR (95% CI) *
Total no. epileptic patients 37 (39.36) 57 (60.64) 1.86 (1.14–3.23) 2.38 (1.25–4.63)
Number of healthy controls 23 (26.44) 64 (73.56) 1 1
Partial epilepsy 12 (41.9) 16 (57.1) 2.04 (1.12–4.21) 2.60 (1.14–6.04)
Healthy controls 23 (26.14) 65 (73.86) 1 1
Generalized epilepsy 25 (37.9) 41 (62.1) 1.79 (1.08–3.21) 2.17 (1.09–4.40)
Healthy controls 23 (26.14) 65 (73.86) 1 1
Partial epilepsy 12 (41.9) 16 (57.1) 1.58 (0.93–3.02) 1.38 (0.63–3.01)
Generalized epilepsy 25 (37.9) 41 (62.1) 1 1

* Crude or adjusted odds ratios (ORs) estimated by approximate Bayesian logistic regression employing a penalized likelihood (PL) estimation via data augmentation [28]; the final multivariable models were adjusted for the following risk factors: age, sex, relatives’ history of epilepsy, and history of epilepsy in a parent.

Of the 28 and 66 epileptic patients with focal and generalized seizures, 12 (42.8%; 95% CI, 24.4–62.8%) and 25 (37.8%; 95% CI, 26.2–50.6%) subjects were seropositive for anti-Toxocara IgG serum antibody, respectively. Statistical analyses showed that there was a significant difference in Toxocara seropositivity between patients with focal seizures (adjusted OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.14–6.04; p value = 0.024) or generalized seizures (adjusted OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.09–4.40; p value = 0.028) and the control group. In addition, seroprevalence was higher in patients with focal seizures than in patients with generalized seizures, although the difference was not significant (adjusted OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.63–3.01; p value = 0.412) (Table 2). In subgroup analysis, Toxocara seropositivity was associated with epilepsy in females (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.14–6.34), PWE aged 40-59 years (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.1–13.8), and those that did not consume unwashed vegetables (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.02–7.01). Additional information is presented in Table 1.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we conducted a case–control study to assess the relationship between Toxocara spp. infection/exposure and epilepsy in a region in northern Iran. Our findings revealed that incident epileptic patients had a significantly higher seropositivity rate for Toxocara (IgG) serum antibody compared with control subjects, suggesting that there is an association between epilepsy and Toxocara infection/exposure. These findings are consistent with previous meta-analyses and the hypothesis that Toxocara infection/exposure may play a role in triggering the occurrence of epilepsy in people [16,17]. The results are also in accord with some previous studies from the USA [30], Italy [23], Bolivia [31] and Iran [20], showing a significant association, but not with other reports from Turkey [24], Burundi [22], Tanzania [32], India [33] and Egypt [34]. The differences in results between these groups of studies could be due to the type of participants (children, adults or various age groups), the type of epileptic patients (cryptogenic, idiopathic or unspecified), matching criteria and diagnostic methods (ELISA or Western blot analysis). In a relatively recent meta-analysis, Luna et al. (2016) showed a significant association in subgroup analyses, considering the diagnostic method used (Western blot) (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.24–2.59), ‘young’ population (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.02–2.87) and type of study (i.e., population-based) (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17–2.40), suggesting no variation in findings for different sub-groups [17]. Our findings showed that seropositivity to Toxocara was significantly higher in patients with focal seizures than in healthy controls, and also in those with generalized seizures. Few previous studies provided a stratified analysis according to the type of seizures [20,31,35]. Consistent with our findings, studies in Bolivia [31] and Italy [35] indicated a significant association between seropositivity to Toxocara and focal seizures, but Zibaei et al. (2013) found an insignificant association between this seropositivity and focal seizures in Iranians [20]. Interestingly, the findings here suggested that females might be more risk of epilepsy; this aspect was not assessed in previous studies and should be critically evaluated in future studies.

Although seroepidemiological studies suggest a relationship between Toxocara infection/exposure and epilepsy and other disorders, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the neurological disorders are not well understood. One proposed mechanism relates to the migration of Toxocara larvae to, and through, the CNS [14], which may also account for other neuropsychiatric sequelae related to toxocariasis. Experimental studies in mice have revealed that Toxocara larvae can migrate in the tissues of the CNS for up to 28 days and survive for up to 2 years after infection [36]. This migration can result in haemorrhagic lesions, parenchymal damage, focal malacia, demyelination, neuronal necrosis and/or granulomatous alterations in brain [37,38,39,40]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the few confirmed epileptic cases apparently linked to Toxocara infection revealed granulomatous changes (‘ring-enhancing lesions’) in cortical or sub-cortical regions of the brain [13,41]. Some studies indicated that acute granulomatous reactivity might cause symptomatic seizures, and chronic granulomatous lesions might induce epilepsy [41]. Moreover, migrating Toxocara larvae might cause neurodegeneration or neuronal damage, possibly through alterations in neurotransmitter profiles (e.g., gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin) [42], elevated expression of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and/or pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL1β, IL6 and TNF-α [43,44]), and/or an increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier [11,42]. It is well established that increased levels of iNOS and pro-inflammatory cytokines can play a role in the development of epilepsy [45,46,47], and that these suggested pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed also for the epileptogenesis due to neurocysticercosis [48]. Another possible mechanism relates to the autoimmune nature of some types of epilepsy and that Toxocara infection can induce the production of autoantibodies [49,50]. There is growing evidence that autoantibodies against neuronal elements might also play a role [51], although the contribution of the autoantibodies produced in the pathogenesis of epilepsy is unclear, and would require detailed investigation [17].

5. Conclusions

In summary, future efforts are required to elucidate the immunological and molecular mechanisms linked to epilepsy and its association with Toxocara and other parasites that can affect the brain and other parts of the CNS. In addition, efforts should focus on prevention and implementing practical programs for the prevention and animal control of Toxocara/toxocariasis and other parasitic and zoonotic infections/diseases.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the staff of the Rouhani Hospital, Babol, Iran. The authors would like to thank all the participants in this study, and Constantine E. Gasser for comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.K. and A.R.; methodology, A.A.K., A.R., M.R.R., S.A. and S.A.M.; software, M.S. and S.M.; validation, A.R. and M.S.; formal analysis, M.S. and S.M.; investigation, A.R.; resources, A.A.K.; data curation, A.A.K. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R. and R.B.G.; writing—review and editing, A.A.K., A.R., P.J.H. and R.B.G.; visualization, A.R.; supervision, A.R.; project administration, A.R. and R.B.G.; funding acquisition, A.R. and R.B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.R.’s research is supported by the Health Research Institute of Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran (IR.MUBABOL.HRI. REC.1399.105) is gratefully acknowledged (A.R.), and R.B.G.’s research is presently supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC), Yourgene Health Singapore and Melbourne Water.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Babol University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUBABOL.HRI. REC.1399.105).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Beghi E. The epidemiology of epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54:185–191. doi: 10.1159/000503831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beghi E., Giussani G., Nichols E., Abd-Allah F., Abdela J., Abdelalim A., Abraha H.N., Adib M.G., Agrawal S., Alahdab F. Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:357–375. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30454-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vezzani A., Balosso S., Ravizza T. Neuroinflammatory pathways as treatment targets and biomarkers in epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019;15:459–472. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0217-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization (WHO) Epilepsy: A Public Health Imperative. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singh G., Angwafor S.A., Njamnshi A.K., Fraimow H., Sander J.W. Zoonotic and vector-borne parasites and epilepsy in low-income and middle-income countries. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020;16:333–345. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0361-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Colebunders R., Njamnshi A.K., van Oijen M., Mukendi D., Kashama J.M., Mandro M., Gumisiriza N., Preux P.M., Suykerbuyk P., Idro R. Onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy: From recent epidemiological and clinical findings to policy implications. Epilepsia Open. 2017;2:145–152. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ma G., Rostami A., Wang T., Hofmann A., Hotez P.J., Gasser R.B. Global and regional seroprevalence estimates for human toxocariasis: A call for action. Adv. Parasitol. 2020;109:275–290. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rostami A., Riahi S.M., Holland C.V., Taghipour A., Khalili-Fomeshi M., Fakhri Y., Omrani V.F., Hotez P.J., Gasser R.B. Seroprevalence estimates for toxocariasis in people worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019;13:e0007809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rostami A., Ma G., Wang T., Koehler A.V., Hofmann A., Chang B.C., Macpherson C.N., Gasser R.B. Human toxocariasis–a look at a neglected disease through an epidemiological ‘prism’. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019;74:104002. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.104002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deshayes S., Bonhomme J., de La Blanchardière A. Neurotoxocariasis: A systematic literature review. Infection. 2016;44:565–574. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0889-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fan C.-K., Holland C.V., Loxton K., Barghouth U. Cerebral toxocariasis: Silent progression to neurodegenerative disorders? Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015;28:663–686. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00106-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hotez P.J. Neglected infections of poverty in the United States and their effects on the brain. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:1099–1100. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sánchez S.S., García H.H., Nicoletti A. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings of neurotoxocariasis. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:53. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Taghipour A., Rostami A., Esfandyari S., Aghapour S., Nicoletti A., Gasser R.B. “Begging the Question”—Does Toxocara Infection/Exposure Associate with Multiple Sclerosis-Risk? Pathogens. 2020;9:938. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9110938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Taghipour A., Habibpour H., Mirzapour A., Rostami A. Toxocara infection/exposure and the risk of schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021;115:1114–1121. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Quattrocchi G., Nicoletti A., Marin B., Bruno E., Druet-Cabanac M., Preux P.-M. Toxocariasis and epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012;6:e1775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Luna J., Cicero C.E., Rateau G., Quattrocchi G., Marin B., Bruno E., Dalmay F., Druet-Cabanac M., Nicoletti A., Preux P.-M. Updated evidence of the association between toxocariasis and epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0006665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Çelik T., Kaplan Y., Ataş E., Öztuna D., Berilgen S. Toxocara seroprevalence in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: Chance association or coincidence? BioMed Res. Int. 2013;2013:685196. doi: 10.1155/2013/685196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fan C.-K. Pathogenesis of cerebral toxocariasis and neurodegenerative diseases. Adv. Parasitol. 2020;109:233–259. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zibaei M., Firoozeh F., Bahrami P., Sadjjadi S.M. Investigation of anti-Toxocara antibodies in epileptic patients and comparison of two methods: ELISA and Western blotting. Epilepsy Res. Treat. 2013;2013:156815. doi: 10.1155/2013/156815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Allahdin S., Khademvatan S., Rafiei A., Momen A., Rafiei R. Frequency of Toxoplasma and Toxocara sp. antibodies in epileptic patients, in south western Iran. Iran. J. Child. Neurol. 2015;9:32–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nicoletti A., Bartoloni A., Sofia V., Mantella A., Nsengiyumva G., Frescaline G., Preux P.M. Epilepsy and toxocariasis: A case-control study in Burundi. Epilepsia. 2007;48:894–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arpino C., Gattinara G.C., Piergili D., Curatolo P. Toxocara infection and epilepsy in children: A case-control study. Epilepsia. 1990;31:33–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1990.tb05356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Akyol A., Bicerol B., Ertug S., Ertabaklar H., Kiylioglu N. Epilepsy and seropositivity rates of Toxocara canis and Toxoplasma gondii. Seizure. 2007;16:233–237. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2006.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eraky M.A., Abdel-Hady S., Abdallah K.F. Seropositivity of Toxoplasma gondii and Toxocara spp. in children with cryptogenic epilepsy, Benha, Egypt. Korean J. Parasitol. 2016;54:335–338. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.3.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aghamolaie S., Seyyedtabaei S.J., Behniafar H., Foroutan M., Saber V., Hanifehpur H., Mehravar S., Rostami A. Seroepidemiology, modifiable risk factors and clinical symptoms of Toxocara spp. infection in northern Iran. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019;113:116–122. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fisher R.S., Cross J.H., French J.A., Higurashi N., Hirsch E., Jansen F.E., Lagae L., Moshé S.L., Peltola J., Roulet Perez E. Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:522–530. doi: 10.1111/epi.13670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Discacciati A., Orsini N., Greenland S. Approximate Bayesian logistic regression via penalized likelihood by data augmentation. Stata J. 2015;15:712–736. doi: 10.1177/1536867X1501500306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Textor J., Hardt J., Knüppel S. DAGitty: A graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology. 2011;22:745. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318225c2be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Glickman L.T., Cypess R.H., Crumrine P.K., Gitlin D.A. Toxocara infection and epilepsy in children. J. Pediatrics. 1979;94:75–78. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80359-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nicoletti A., Bartoloni A., Reggio A., Bartalesi F., Roselli M., Sofia V., Chavez J.R., Barahona H.G., Paradisi F., Cancrini G. Epilepsy, cysticercosis, and toxocariasis: A population-based case-control study in rural Bolivia. Neurology. 2002;58:1256–1261. doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.8.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Winkler A.S., Blocher J., Auer H., Gotwald T., Matuja W., Schmutzhard E. Anticysticercal and antitoxocaral antibodies in people with epilepsy in rural Tanzania. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008;102:1032–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Singh G., Bawa J., Chinna D., Chaudhary A., Saggar K., Modi M., Sander J.W. Association between epilepsy and cysticercosis and toxocariasis: A population-based case–control study in a slum in India. Epilepsia. 2012;53:2203–2208. doi: 10.1111/epi.12005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.El-Tantawy N.L., El-Nahas H.A., Salem D., Salem N., Hasaneen B.M. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Toxocara spp. in children with cryptogenic epilepsy. Am. J. Infect. Dis. Microbiol. 2013;1:92–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nicoletti A., Sofia V., Mantella A., Vitale G., Contrafatto D., Sorbello V., Biondi R., Preux P.M., Garcia H.H., Zappia M. Epilepsy and toxocariasis: A case–control study in Italy. Epilepsia. 2008;49:594–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Strube C., Waindok P., Raulf M.-K., Springer A. Toxocara-induced neural larva migrans (neurotoxocarosis) in rodent model hosts. Adv. Parasitol. 2020;109:189–218. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sprent J. On the migratory behavior of the larvae of various Ascaris species in white mice: II. Longevity. J. Infect. Dis. 1953;92:114–117. doi: 10.1093/infdis/92.2.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cardillo N., Rosa A., Ribicich M., López C., Sommerfelt I. Experimental infection with Toxocara cati in BALB/c mice, migratory behaviour and pathological changes. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009;56:198–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Janecek E., Beineke A., Schnieder T., Strube C. Neurotoxocarosis: Marked preference of Toxocara canis for the cerebrum and T. cati for the cerebellum in the paratenic model host mouse. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Epe C., Sabel T., Schnieder T., Stoye M. The behavior and pathogenicity of Toxacara canis larvae in mice of different strains. Parasitol. Res. 1994;80:691–695. doi: 10.1007/BF00932955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wagner R.G., Newton C.R. Do helminths cause epilepsy? Parasite. Immunol. 2009;31:697–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01128.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Arulsamy A., Shaikh M.F. Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, the Pathological Key to Post-Traumatic Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020;11:1900–1908. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Haspolat S., Mihçi E., Coşkun M., Gümüslü S., Özbenm T., Yegin O. Interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and nitrite levels in febrile seizures. J. Child. Neurol. 2002;17:749–751. doi: 10.1177/08830738020170101501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Othman A.A., Abdel-Aleem G.A., Saied E.M., Mayah W.W., Elatrash A.M. Biochemical and immunopathological changes in experimental neurotoxocariasis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2010;172:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.González-Hernández T., García-Marín V., Perez-Delgado M.d.M., González-González M.L., Rancel-Torres N., González-Feria L. Nitric oxide synthase expression in the cerebral cortex of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2000;41:1259–1268. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb04603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhu X., Dong J., Han B., Huang R., Zhang A., Xia Z., Chang H., Chao J., Yao H. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase contributes to PTZ kindling epilepsy-induced hippocampal endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative damage. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017;11:377. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yu N., Di Q., Hu Y., Zhang Y.-F., Su L.-Y., Liu X.-H., Li L.-C. A meta-analysis of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the plasma of epileptic patients with recent seizure. Neurosci. Lett. 2012;514:110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nash T.E., Mahanty S., Loeb J.A., Theodore W.H., Friedman A., Sander J.W., Singh G., Cavalheiro E., Del Brutto O.H., Takayanagui O.M. Neurocysticercosis: A natural human model of epileptogenesis. Epilepsia. 2015;56:177–183. doi: 10.1111/epi.12849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Quek A.M., Britton J.W., McKeon A., So E., Lennon V.A., Shin C., Klein C.J., Watson R.E., Kotsenas A.L., Lagerlund T.D. Autoimmune epilepsy: Clinical characteristics and response to immunotherapy. Arch. Neurol. 2012;69:582–593. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.2985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Obwaller A., Duchêne M., Walochnik J., Wiedermann G., Auer H., Aspöck H. Association of autoantibodies against small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) with symptomatic Toxocara canis infestation. Parasite. Immunol. 2004;26:327–333. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Levite M., Ganor Y. Autoantibodies to glutamate receptors can damage the brain in epilepsy, systemic lupus erythematosus and encephalitis. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2008;8:1141–1160. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.7.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES