Skip to main content
Pathogens logoLink to Pathogens
. 2021 Sep 26;10(10):1243. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101243

Morphology, Phylogeny and Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum menglaense sp. nov., Isolated from Air in China

Min Qiao 1, Jie Li 1, Lin-lin Fang 1, Jian-ying Li 2, Ze-fen Yu 1,*
Editor: Sónia Gomes
PMCID: PMC8539784  PMID: 34684192

Abstract

A new species, Colletotrichum menglaense, isolated from air in Mengla, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China, was characterized and described combining morphological characteristics and multigene phylogenetic analysis. Morphologically, it is characterized by oblong, sometimes slightly constricted, micro-guttulate conidia and simple obovoid to ellipsoidal appressoria. Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS, ACT, CHS, and GAPDH sequences showed that C. menglaense belongs to the C. gloeosporioides complex. The pathogenicity of C. menglaense on fruits of several crop plants, including strawberry, orange, grape, tomato, and blueberry, was tested and confirmed by the re-isolation of C. menglaense.

Keywords: airborne fungi, coelomycetes, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides complex, taxonomy, pathogenicity

1. Introduction

There are numerous bacteria and fungi in the near-surface atmosphere and upper troposphere, with millions of cells per cubic metre of air [1]. More than 40,000 species of fungi live in the air, mainly from soil, animals and plants, human activities, and excreta [2]. Fungi eject spores into the atmosphere by water jets or droplets, and become an important part of aerosols [3,4]. Hence, airborne fungi are closely related to air pollution, environmental quality, and human health.

Earlier investigations of microorganisms in air were connected with dust [5,6] or aerosol particles [7,8,9,10,11] to detect the fungal distribution or characterisation. Other studies suggested that a considerable proportion of indoor airborne fungi were derived from outdoor fungi [12,13], and fungi had a great impact on human health [14,15,16,17,18]. With the advance of molecular approaches and the awareness of the importance of mycobiota diversity research, the number of studies about outdoor mycobiota is increasing. Many investigations recovered fungi from various places: the atmosphere in the urban environment of the USA [19], a rural area in India [20], at an altitude of 20,000 m in Earth’s atmosphere [5], in southeastern Austria [16], and from the Himalayan region [21]. Most of these studies monitored remote, extreme, sparsely populated sites to learn the diversity, distribution, and seasonal variations of fungal species [22]. Several genera were often detected in air samples, Curviclavula G. Delgado et al. [23], Aspergillus P. Micheli, Penicillium Link, and Talaromyces C.R. Benj [13], and occasionally also species of Colletotrichum Corda [24,25].

Colletotrichum (Sexual morph: Glomerella) is a genus of the family Glomerellaceae, Glomerellales, Sordariomycetes, which was established with C. lineola Corda as the type species. Anthracnose, caused by the Colletotrichum species, is a major disease of plants, mainly fruit, worldwide. It causes significant yield losses and reduces the marketability of the fruit [26,27,28,29]. There is growing evidence showing that Colletotrichum spp. is ubiquitous and widespread. As one of the top ten plant pathogenic fungi in the world [30], many Colletotrichum species were isolated from diseased plants, e.g., C. miaoliense P.C. Chung & H.Y. Wu and C. australianum W. Wang et al. were isolated from anthracnose symptoms on strawberry and citrus fruits [31,32]. In addition, Colletotrichum spp. were often reported as endophytes, including from healthy leaves of Bletilla ochracea [33]. Species of Colletotrichum are occasionally found as saprobes [34,35]. Some species were also isolated simultaneously as an endophyte, pathogen, and saprobe [36,37]. As for Colletotrichum spp. from air, an unidentified and a known species were reported. Colletotrichum sp. was isolated from the air of Dhaka, Bangladesh by Sultana [24]. Lal also trapped propagules of C. falcatum in air and confirmed that this species infected healthy plants [25].

When we investigated the fungi diversity of air samples in the town of Mengla, Xishuangbanna, a new species of Colletotrichum was identified based on morphological characteristics and DNA sequence data from four loci, and we named it C. menglaense. Its pathogenicity to several fruits was tested and confirmed by re-isolating the fungus.

2. Results

2.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

In the phylogenetic tree inferred from ITS, the strain is well clustered in the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides complex (not shown here). Therefore, we downloaded ITS, ACT, CHS, and GAPDH sequences in the C. gloeosporioides complex species. The dataset comprised 47 species, 67 isolates, and 1 outgroup taxa Monilochaetes infuscans (Table 1). A total of 1534 characters (ACT: 305, CHS: 300, GAPDH: 306, ITS: 623) were analysed by using Bayesian. The topologies of the tree were shown with the Bayesian posterior probability values for the analysed clades (Figure 1). In this tree, C. menglense is a sister clade to C. aeschynomenes B.S. Weir & P.R. Johns and C. dianesei N.B. Lima, M.P.S. Câmara & Michereff, and formed a single clade with high Bayesian inference posterior probability values (Figure 1). Therefore, we determined that our strain belonged to a novel species of Colletotrichum.

Table 1.

Fungal strains and the GenBank accession numbers of their sequences used in molecular phylogenetic analyses in this study.

Name of the Taxon Culture Collection GenBank Accessions Numbers
ACT ITS CHS GAPDH
C. aenigma ICMP 18686 JX009519 JX010243 JX009789 JX009913
C. aeschynomenes OBrC1 KU239794 KU239115 KU239352 KU239576
C. aeschynomenes ICMP 17673 * JX009483 JX010176 JX009799 JX009930
C. alatae CBS 304.67 * JX009471 JX010190 JX009837 JX009990
C. alienum ICMP 18621 JX009552 JX010246 JX009755 JX009959
C. alienum ICMP 12071 * JX009572 JX010251 JX009882 JX010028
C. aotearoa ICMP 18532 JX009544 JX010220 JX009764 JX009906
C. asianum MFLU 090232 FJ903188 FJ972605 FJ972571
C. asianum MFLU 090234 FJ907421 FJ972615 FJ972573
C. asianum MFLU 090233 FJ907424 FJ972612 FJ972576
C. boninense CBS 128547 JQ005507 JQ005159 JQ005333 JQ005246
C. camelliae ICMP 10643 * JX009540 JX010224 JX009891 JX009908
C. chengpingense MFLUCC 150022 * KP683093 KP683152 KP852449 KP852469
C. clidemiae ICMP 18658 * JX009537 JX010265 JX009877 JX009989
C. cliviae CSSS1 GU085861 GU109479 GU085865 GU085867
C. communis MTCC 11696 KF451940 KC790977 KF451988 KF452016
C. communis MTCC 11695 KF451941 KC790980 KF451989 KF452017
C. conoides CAUG34 KP890146 KP890170 KP890158 KP890164
C. conoides CAUG17 * KP890144 KP890168 KP890156 KP890162
C. cordylinicola ICMP 18579 * HM470235 JX010226 JX009864 JX009975
C. dianesei CMM4078 KC533745 KC329775 KC517158
C. dianesei CMM4081 KC517304 KC329790 KC517166
C. dianesei CMM4077 KC517295 KC329773 KC517156
C. endophyticum LC0324 KF306258 KC633854 KC832854
C. fructicola ICMP 18120 JX009436 JX010182 JX009844 JX010041
C. fructicola ICMP 18645 JX009543 JX010172 JX009873 JX009992
C. gloeosporioides ICMP 17821 JX009531 JX010152 JX009818 JX010056
C. grevilleae CBS 132879 * KC296941 KC297078 KC296987 KC297010
C. grossum CAUG7 * KP890141 KP890165 KP890153 KP890159
C. hebeiense MFLUCC130726 * KF377532 KF156863 KF289008 KF377495
C. helleniense CPC 27108 KY856022 KY856449 KY856189 KY856273
C. henanense LF238 * KM023257 KJ955109 KJ954810
C. horii NBRC 7478 * JX009438 GQ329690 JX009752 GQ329681
C. hymenocallidicola MFLUCC 12-0531 KT290260 KT290264 KT290262
C. hymenocallidis CAUG9 KP145311 KP145423 KP145367 KP145395
C. hystricis CPC 28154 KY856024 KY856451 KY856191 KY856275
C. hystricis CPC 28153 KY856023 KY856450 KY856190 KY856274
C. jasmini-sambac HLTX-01 HM131512 HM131498
C. jasmini-sambac LLTA-01 HM131507 HM131511 HM131497
C. jiangxiense CGMCC3.17363 * KJ954471 KJ955201 KJ954902
C. cigarro ICMP 18539 * JX009523 JX010230 JX009800 JX009966
C. menglaense YMF1.04960 MH023506 MH023505 MH023508 MH023507
C. musae ICMP 17817 JX009432 JX010142 JX009815 JX010015
C. musae ICMP 19119 JX009433 JX010146 JX009896 JX010050
C. musae ICMP 17923 JX009587 JX010143 JX009841 JX009929
C. nupharicola ICMP 17938 JX009486 JX010189 JX009834 JX009936
C. nupharicola ICMP 18187 JX009437 JX010187 JX009835 JX009972
C. nupharicola ICMP 17940 JX009582 JX010188 JX009836 JX010031
C. proteae CBS 132882 * KC296940 KC297079 KC296986 KC297009
C. psidii ICMP 19120 * JX009515 JX010219 JX009901 JX009967
C. queenslandicum ICMP 1778 * JX009447 JX010276 JX009899 JX009934
C. salsolae CBS 130420 JX009562 JX010242 JX009863 JX009916
C. siamense ICMP 18121 JX009460 JX010245 JX009845 JX009942
C. siamense ICMP 18574 JX009535 JX010270 JX009798 JX010002
C. siamense ICMP 12567 JX009541 JX010250 JX009761 JX009940
C. syzygicola MFLUCC100624 * KF157801 KF242094 KF242156
C. theobromicola ICMP 18649 JX009444 GU994360 JX009869 JX010006
C. ti ICMP 4832 * JX009520 JX010269 JX009898 JX009952
C. tropicale ICMP 18651 JX009570 JX010277 JX009868 JX010014
C. tropicale ICMP 18672 JX009480 JX010275 JX009826 JX010020
C. viniferum GZAAS 5.08601 JN412795 JN412804 JN412798
C. viniferum GZSSS 5.08608 * JN412793 JN412802 JN412800
C. viniferum CAUG27 KP145328 KP145440 KP145384 KP145412
C. wuxiense CGMCC3.17894 * KU251672 KU251591 KU251939 KU252045
C. xanthorrhoeae ICMP 17903 JX009478 JX010261 JX009823 JX009927
C. yulongense CFCC 50818 * MH777394 MH751507 MH793605 MK108986
Monilochaetes infuscans CBS 869.96 JQ005843 JQ005780 JQ005801 JX546612

Abbreviations of isolates and culture collections: MFLU: Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand; CMM: Culture Collection of Phythopathogenic Fung “Prof. Maria Menezes”, Recife, Brazil; ICMP: International Collection of Micro-organisms from Plants, Landcare Research, New Zealand; MAFF: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tsukuba, Japan; MTCC: Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank, Chandigarh, India; MFLUCC: The Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection; CPC: Culture collection of P.W. Crous, housed at the Westerdijk Institute; CBS: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; YMF: formerly Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology and Fermentation Technology of Yunnan. * Ex-type strains. Sequences obtained in this study were shown in bold.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree based on Bayesian analysis of combined ITS, ACT, CHS, and GAPDH sequences. Monilochaetes infuscans was used as outgroup. Bayesian posterior probability values ≥ 0.85 were shown at the nodes. The scale bar shows the expected changes per site. * Ex-type strains. Newly described taxa were shown in boldface.

2.2. Pathogenicity Test

After 7 days, five kinds of fruit inoculated with conidia suspension developed pale white hyphae around the wounds, and typical dark brown anthracnose lesions appeared on the strawberries, but no symptoms developed on the controls. Strawberry and tomato were the most susceptible, with disease scores from 7 to 9 (Table 2). Then, after 14 days, there were obvious anthracnose lesions around the wounds of the strawberry, orange, and tomato fruits. In fact, all of the fruits were susceptible to YMF 1.04960. The results showed that C. menglaense YMF 1.04960 is not host-specific (Figure 2).

Table 2.

Disease Score (DS) on a 0–9 scale of different fruits for C. menglaense inoculated by wounding or non-wounding methods.

Number of Days Fruit
Strawberry Orange Grape Tomato Blueberry
7 7 3 1 9 3
14 9 9 3 9 9

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pathogenicity test results of C. menglaense. (AE). Control fruit. (A1E1). Symptoms on fruits 7 d after inoculation. (A2E2). Symptoms on fruits 14 d after inoculation.

The conidia isolated from the infected fruits are the same as those of YMF 1.04960 (Figure 3F), and the ITS sequence is also the same as YMF 1.04960. So, the pathogenicity was confirmed.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Colletotrichum menglaense (YMF1.04960). (A): Culture grown on PDA above and below (B): Culture grown on CMA above and below. (C): Culture grown on MEA above and below. (D,H): Conidiophores and conidia. (E): Conidioma on CMA. (F): Conidia from infected fruits. (I): Appressoria. (G): Conidia. Scale bars: (AC) = 1.37 cm. (D) = 0.6 μm. (E) = 500 μm. (F,G) = 10 μm.

2.3. Taxonomy

Colletotrichum menglaense M. Qiao & Z. F. Yu, sp. nov. -MycoBank: MB 839092; Figure 3.

Etymology: Latin, menglaense, referred to Mengla, the locality of the isolation in Yunnan Province.

Type: CHINA, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Tropical Forest of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences, 21°41’ N, 101°25’ E, ca 570 m, collected from the air, Jul 2016, Zefen Yu (holotype: YMF1.04960, ex-holotype: CGMCC 3.18958).

Description: Colonies growing on CMA with entire margin, 28–32 mm diameter in 4 d at 28 °C; aerial mycelia medium grey to pale buff in centre, light grey to greyish white in the margin, entirely covered with floccose to dense. Reverse dark white to grey with white margin. Conidiomata acervular, with orange conidial masses. No setae observed. Conidiophores cylindrical, unbranched or branched, straight or flexuous, 0–1-septate, hyaline, branched, 14.9–59.7 μm × 1.4–3.3 μm. Conidiogenous cells monophialidic, subulate, integrated, determinate, terminal, hyaline. Conidia acrogenous, oblong, sometimes slightly constricted at the middle, micro-guttulate, hyaline, unicellular, smooth-walled, 12.2–17.1 μm × 4.2–6.4 μm (av. = 14.4 μm × 5.1μm, n = 30). Appressoria simple, brown to dark brown, aseptate, mostly ellipsoidal to broadly obovoid, entire or irregular, somewhat crenate to lobed at margin, 6.7–20.0 μm × 4.8–11.0 μm, L/W ratio = 2.7.

Notes: C. menglaense can be distinguished from phylogenetically closely related C. aeschynomenes and C. dianesei by the dimensions of conidia. The conidia of C. menglaense are shorter (12.2–17.1 μm × 4.2 –6.4 μm, mean = 14.4 μm × 5.1 μm, n = 30) than those of C. aeschynomenes (14–)17–18.5 (–20) μm × 4 (–5) µm (mean = 17.6 μm × 4.1 µm, n = 30) [38] and longer and narrower than those of C. dianesei (10.5–14.5 μm × 4–5.5 µm, mean = 12.0 μm × 4.5 μm, n = 30) [39].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection and Morphological Characterisation

Samples were collected from the Tropical Forest of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (101°25′ E, 21°41′ N, altitude 570 m) in Mengla, Yunnan Province, China in July 2015. For each sample, we used a surface air system (SAS) Super ISO 180 (VWR European Cat.No.710-0870, San Giusto, Italy) that takes five minutes to capture 1,000 L of air. A 90 mm Petri dish containing RBA (5 g peptone, 10 g dextrose, 1 g potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 0.5 g magnesium sulfate, 15 g agar, 0.033 g rose bengal, 0.1 g chloramphenicol, 1000 mL distilled water) was put on the sampler for a few seconds to collect air. The Petri dishes were immediately sealed after air collection and brought back to the laboratory. Petri dishes were incubated in the continuous light at outdoor ambient temperature (mean 25 °C) and examined periodically. When a few mycelium appeared, it was picked up and transferred to PDA (200 g potato, 20 g glucose, 18 g agar, 40 mg streptomycin, 30 mg ampicillin, 1000 mL distilled water) dishes for incubation at 25 °C. The pure cultures were further incubated on CMA (20 g cornmeal, 18 g agar, 40 mg streptomycin, 30 mg ampicillin, 1000 mL distilled water) dishes to induce sporulation. Colony morphology and microscopic characteristics were examined, measured, and photographed after incubation for 7 days by using the aid of a BX51 microscope.

The pure culture was deposited in the Herbarium of the Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resources, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, China (YMF, formerly Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology) and the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Centre (CGMCC).

3.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Detailed protocols for Genomic DNA extraction are described previously [40,41]. The relative quantity of total genomic DNA was observed on a 1% TAE agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The following loci were amplified with the indicated primers: the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and actin gene (ACT) with primers ITS4/ITS5 [42,43]; ACT512F/ACT783R [40], respectively. The thermo-cycling parameters were used: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 34 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 52 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. Chitin synthase 1 (CHS-1) were amplified with CHS-79F/CHS-354R [44]. The cycling parameters consisted of 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 7 min. Partial sequences of the glyceraldehyde -3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were amplified with primers GDF1/GDR1 [45]. The cycling parameters consisted of a denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C for 45 s, 60 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final cycle at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplification was performed in a total of 25 µL reaction volume, which contained 1.0 µL DNA template, 1.0 µL of each forward and reverses primer, 12.5 µL 2 × Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), and 9.5 µL dd H2O. The sequencing reactions were carried out by TsingKe Biological Technology, Kunming, China using the same primers as for amplification. The new sequences were submitted to the GenBank database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and the accession numbers are listed in Table 1.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The obtained ITS sequences were compared with those in GenBank using BLAST searches to determine the primary phylogenetic placement of the fungus. The results indicated that our strain belongs to Colletotrichum. Neighbour-joining analysis of ITS sequence was used to determine further phylogenetic placement. Then, we retrieved ITS, ACT, GAPDH, and CHS sequences of representative species and additional species belonging to this complex species. All sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1 and were aligned through ClustalX 1.83(Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire (CNRS/INSERM/ULP), Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) [46]. The resulting alignments were subsequently manually adjusted and linked by BioEdit version v. 7.0(Borland, Austin, TX, United States) [47]. To ensure that all sequences are of the same length, the missing base was replaced with “?”. Then, the combined alignment was converted to a NEXUS file using the program mega7(Mega Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) [48]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed for Bayesian inference (BI) analysis using MrBayes v.3.2.2 (Department of Biodiversity Informatics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden) [49].

For BI analysis, the best nucleotide substitution model for each locus was determined using Mrmodeltest v. 2.3 (Department of Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden) [50]. The analyses of four MCMC chains were run from random trees for 1,000,000 generations, and trees were sampled every 100 generations, resulting in 20,000 total trees. The first 25 % of the trees were discarded as the burn-in phase of each analysis, and the remaining trees were used to calculate posterior probabilities. Sequences derived in this study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1), and the concatenated alignments were deposited in TreeBASE with http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S27941, and the descriptions and nomenclature in MycoBank (www.mycobank.org).

3.4. Pathogenicity Assay and Confirmation

In order to test the pathogenicity of the new species, detached fruits inoculations were conducted. Healthy Fragaria ananassa Duch. (strawberry), Citrus tachibana (Makino) Tanaka (orange), Vitis vinifera L. (grape), Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. (tomato), and Vaccinium uliginosum Linn. (blueberry) were used for the pathogenicity test. All fruits were immersed in 70% ethanol for 3 min and 1% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min, then rinsed three times in sterile distilled water and air dried in the laminar flow cabinet.

Prior to the inoculation, holotype strain YMF 1.04960 of new species was cultivated on CMA for 7 days at 28 °C, adding 0.4 g yeast extract per 100 mL to induce sporulation. After incubation, conidia were harvested by adding 10 mL sterile water to each culture followed by scraping the surface with a sterile brush. The resulting conidia suspensions were filtered through sterile six layers of filter paper. Then, conidia were diluted to 106/mL using sterile water (concentration was adjusted by using a haemocytometer). Fruit were wounded with a sterilised insect needle and inoculated with 10 μL conidium suspension. Control fruits were inoculated with sterilised water. Five replications were set. The inoculated fruits with the controls were put into plastic containers, covered with plastic wrap to maintain humidity, sealed and stored in a constant temperature incubator, and examined periodically.

Seven days and 14 days after inoculation, the virulence was evaluated as described by Montri et al. [51]. In particular, 0 (highly resistant), no infection; 1 (resistant), 1–2% of the fruit with a necrotic lesion or a larger water soaked lesion surrounding the infection site; 3 (moderately resistant), >2 to 5% of the fruit with a necrotic lesion, possibly acervuli, may be present, or a watery lesion covering up to 5% of the fruit surface; 5 (susceptible), >5 to 10% of the fruit showing a necrotic lesion, possibly acervuli, or a water-soaked lesion covering up to 25% of the fruit surface; 7 (very susceptible), >10 to 25% of the fruit covered with a necrotic lesion with acervuli; and 9 (highly susceptible), >25% of the fruit showing necrosis, lesion often encircling the fruit, abundant acervuli. Symptomatic fruits were surface-sterilised as described above. The symptomatic tissue segments were cut with a sterilised scalpel about 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm and then placed on the PDA to re-isolate the fungus. The identity of obtained isolates was confirmed on the basis of morphological characteristics and ITS sequence.

4. Discussion

ITS has been proposed as the official fungal barcoding marker [52], but phylogenetic analysis using only ITS sequences could not confidently resolve the phylogenetic placement of some species within Colletotrichum. In this study, phylogenetic analysis based on ITS showed that C. menglaense could not be distinguished from C. queenslandicum, C. salasolae, and C. siamense, but the results showed that C. menglaense is well clustered in the C. gloeosporioides species complex, so we further used multi-locus phylogeny to distinguish closely related species. Combining sequences of ITS, ACT, CHS, and GAPDH, the phylogenetic position of C. menglaense was determined. In the phylogenetic tree, the species relationships were well defined, with all of the major clades supported by high Bayesian inference posterior probabilities (Figure 1). C. menglaense grouped together with C. aeschynomenes and C. dianesei, and the ITS similarity between C. menglaense and C. aeschynomenes (KU239115) is 99.08%, while, between C. menglaense and C. dianesei (KC329775), it is 99.47%. Morphologically, C. menglaense obviously differs from C. aeschynomenes and C. dianesei in the shape and size of the conidia.

The pathogenicity test showed that C. menglaense may be a potential pathogen to fruit. Among all of the test fruits, C. menglaense was very aggressive on strawberries, while it was less aggressive on blueberries and grapes. This is in agreement with Xavier et al., who reported that the C. gloeosporioides species complex was more aggressive to strawberry than other Colletotrichum species complex organisms [53]. The degree of fruit infection may be related to fruit condition, humidity, temperature, inoculum concentration, and inoculation method [54], so, among fruits tested here, strawberry with softer tissue showed the highest disease scores of 5 to 9. Several fruits inoculated with C. menglaense presented different degrees of anthracnose, indicating that C. menglaense was non-host specific. In fact, many Colletotrichum species present on a wide range of host plants [27,55]. For example, C. karstiiwas was reported from diseased black plum (Diospyros australis), strawberry (Fragaria xananassa), and banana (Musa nana Lour). C. gloeosporioides species complex organisms were also frequently isolated from a variety of hosts, including kumquat, finger lime, grapefruit, lemon, lime, mandarin, orange, and Persian lime [37,56].

Previously, it was reported that Cladosporium was the most frequent fungus in the air; the next were Fusarium, Alternaria, and Epicoccum [57]. Some leaf surface fungi are major contributors to air spores through the action of wind or rain spatter, and the canopy is closer to the leaves of the plant, so there are more fungal spores in the air below the canopy [58]. Similar to previous reports, the air samples that we obtained were collected in the lower part of the canopy. Besides, some airborne spores have been reported to be pathogenic fungi. Alternaria alternata airborne spores might be sufficient to cause human spore-related asthma symptoms to people even with only a limited concentration [59]. Here, C. menglaense is an airborne fungus that has certain pathogenicity to plants. Previous studies also showed that Colletotrichum spp. from air were pathogenic fungi to plants [25]. Due to limited study, we do not know how many pathogenic fungi are present in the air and how they contribute to the spread of plant diseases. In this respect, the present article provides new information.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to reviewers for critically reviewing the manuscript and for providing helpful suggestions to improve this paper. We are also grateful for the support of Yunnan University Research and Innovation Fund for Postgraduates (2020268).

Abbreviations

RBA: Rose Bengal Agar; PDA, potato dextrose agar; CMA, corn meal agar; ITS, internal transcribed spacer; ACT, actin gene; CHS-1, chitin synthase 1; GAPDH, the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Author Contributions

Z.-f.Y. conceived and designed the study. M.Q. and J.L. wrote the manuscript. J.-y.L. and L.-l.F. conducted the experiments. Z.-f.Y. and J.L. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly financed by National Natural Science Foundation Program of PR China (31760012, 31970013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequences have been deposited in GenBank at the accession numbers given in the text. The GenBank accession numbers of Colletotrichum menglaense: ITS MH023505; ACT MH023506; GAPDH MH023507; CHS MH023508.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bowers R.M., Clements N., Emerson J.B., Wiedinmyer C., Hannigan M.P., Fierer N. Seasonal variability in bacterial and fungal diversity of the near-surface atmosphere. Env. Sci. Technol. 2013;47:12097. doi: 10.1021/es402970s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li D.W., Kendrick B. Functional relationships between airborne fungal sporesand enviromental factors in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario, as detected by Canonical correspondence analysis. Grana. 1994;33:166–176. doi: 10.1080/00173139409428995. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Elbert W., Taylor P.E., Andreae M.O., Pöschl U. Contribution of fungi to primary aerosols in the atmosphere: Wet and dry discharged spores, carbohydrates, and inorganic ions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007;7:4569–4588. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-4569-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heald C.L., Spracklen D.V. Atmospheric budget of primary biological aerosol particles from fungal spores. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009;36:1–5. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Griffin D.W. Terrestrial Microorganisms at an Altitude of 20,000 m in Earth’s Atmosphere. Aerobiologia. 2004;20:135–140. doi: 10.1023/B:AERO.0000032948.84077.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anthony J.P., Markus D.P., Sonia M.K., Colette L.H., Scot T.M., Paulo A., Rebecca M.G., Adam G.W., Ulrich P. Relative roles of biogenic emissions and Saharan dust as ice nuclei in the Amazon basin. Nat. Geosci. 2009;2:402–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Atin A., Tiina R., Sergey A.G., Dainius M., Grace L. Correlation of ambient inhalable bioaerosols with particulate matter and ozone: A two-year study. Environ. Pollut. 2006;140:16–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Després V.R., Nowoisky J.F., Klose M., Conrad R., Andreae M.O., Pöschl U. Characterization of primary biogenic aerosol particles in urban, rural, and high-alpine air by DNA sequence and restriction fragment analysis of ribosomal RNA genes. Biogeosciences. 2007;4:1127–1141. doi: 10.5194/bg-4-1127-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heidi B., Elisabeth S., Gert W., Anna B., Regina H., Iain L.M., Hans P. Significant contributions of fungal spores to the organic carbon and to the aerosol mass balance of the urban atmospheric aerosol. Atmos. Environ. 2008;42:5542–5549. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dannemiller K.C., Lang-Yona N., Yamamoto N., Rudich Y., Peccia J. Combining real-time PCR and next-generation DNA sequencing to provide quantitative comparisons of fungal aerosol populations. Atmos. Environ. 2014;84:113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liang L., Engling G., Du Z., Duan F., Cheng Y., Liu X., He K. Contribution of fungal spores to organic carbon in ambient aerosols in Beijing, China. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2017;8:351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2016.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cetinkaya Z., Fidan F., Unlu M., Hasenekoglu I., Demirel R. Assessment of indoor air fungi in Western-Anatolia, Turkey. Asian Pac. J. Allegy. 2005;23:87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Visagie C.M., Hirooka Y., Tanney J.B., Whitfield E., Mwange K., Meijer M., Amend A.S., Seifert K.A., Samson R.A. Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces isolated from house dust samples collected around the world. Stud. Mycol. 2014;78:63–139. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rafał L.G., Tiina R., Sergey A.G., Klaus W. Source strength of fungal spore aerosolization from moldy building material. Atmos. Environ. 2001;35:4853–4862. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Górny R.L., Reponen T., Willeke K., Schmechel D., Robine E., Boissier M., Grinshpun S.A. Fungal fragments as indoor air biocontaminants. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2002;68:3522–3531. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3522-3531.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haas D., Habib J., Luxner J., Galler H., Zarfel G., Schlacher R., Friedl H., Reinthaler F.F. Comparison of background levels of culturable fungal spore concentrations in indoor and outdoor air in southeastern Austria. Atmos. Environ. 2014;98:640–647. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee T., Grinshpun S.A., Martuzevicius D., Adhikari A., Crawford C.M., Reponen T. Culturability and concentration of indoor and outdoor airborne fungi in six single-family homes. Atmos. Environ. 2006;40:2902–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nasir Z.A., Colbeck I., Sultan S., Ahmed S. Bioaerosols in residential micro-environments in low income countries: A case study from Pakistan. Environ. Pollut. 2012;168:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Levetin E. Studies on airborne basidiospores. Aerobiologia. 1990;6:177–180. doi: 10.1007/BF02539111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adhikari A., Sen M.M., Gupta-Bhattacharya S., Chanda S. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: A 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations. Sci. Total. Environ. 2004;326:123–141. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumar A., Attri A.K. Characterization of fungal spores in ambient particulate matter: A study from the Himalayan region. Atmos. Environ. 2016;142:182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Froehlich-Nowoisky J., Pickersgill D.A., Despres V.R., Poeschl U. High diversity of fungi in air particulate matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:12814–12819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811003106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Delgado G., Miller A.N., Fernández F.A. Curviclavula, a new genus of anamorphic Helotiales (Leotiomycetes) isolated from air. Mycol. Prog. 2015;14:3. doi: 10.1007/s11557-015-1025-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sultana T. Master’s Thesis. University of Dhaka; Dhaka, Bangladesh: Oct, 2016. Aeromycoflora of Dhaka city, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Singh R.P., Lal S. Air borne propagules of Colletotrichum falcatum and their role in the epidemiology of sugarcane red rot. Indian Phytopathol. 1996;49:89–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meneses P.R., Dorneles K.R., Bellé C., Moreira-Nuñez V.L., Gaviria-Hernández V., de Farias C.R.J. Detection of Colletotrichum boninense causing leaf anthracnose on Alcantarea imperialis in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2019;103:2125. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-19-0410-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cacciola S.O., Gilardi G., Faedda R., Schena L., Pane A., Garibaldi A., Gullino M.L. Characterization of Colletotrichum ocimi population associated with black spot of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) in Northern Italy. Plants. 2020;9:654. doi: 10.3390/plants9050654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dowling M., Peres N., Villani S., Schnabel G. Managing Colletotrichum on fruit crops: A “complex” challenge. Plant Dis. 2020;104:2301–2316. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-19-2378-FE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Peres N.A., Timmer L.W., Adaskaveg J.E., Correll J.C. Lifestyles of Colletotrichum acutatum. Plant Dis. 2005;89:784–796. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kan R.D.J. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2012;13:414–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chung P.C., Wu H.Y., Wang Y.W., Hiran A.A., Hsien-Pin H., Ting-Hsuan H., Shean-Shong T., Chung C.L. Diversity and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species causing strawberry anthracnose in Taiwan and description of a new species, Colletotrichum miaoliense sp. nov. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14664. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70878-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang W., de Silva D.D., Moslemi A., Edwards J., Ades P.K., Crous P.W., Taylor P.W.J. Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of citrus in Australia. J. Fungi. 2021;7:47. doi: 10.3390/jof7010047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tao G., Liu Z.Y., Liu F., Gao Y.H., Cai L. Endophytic Colletotrichum species from Bletilla ochracea (Orchidaceae), with descriptions of seven new species. Fungal Divers. 2013;61:139–164. doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0254-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Osono T., Ishii Y., Takeda H., Khamyong S., And S. Fungal succession and lignin decomposition on Shorea obtusa leaves in a tropical seasonal forest in northern Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2009;36:101–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thongkantha S., Lumyong S., McKenzie E.H.C., Hyde K.D. Fungal saprobes and pathogens occurring on tissues of Dracaena lourieri and Pandanus spp. in Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2008;30:149–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang Y.L., Liu Z.Y., Cai L., Hyde K.D., Yu Z.N., McKenzie E.H.C. Colletotrichum athnracnose of Amaryllidaceae. Fungal Divers. 2009;39:123–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Riolo M., Aloi F., Pane A., Cara M., Cacciola S.O. Twig and shoot dieback of citrus, a new disease caused by Colletotrichum species. Cells. 2021;10:449. doi: 10.3390/cells10020449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Weir B.S., Johnston P.R., Damm U. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012;73:115–180. doi: 10.3114/sim0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lima N.B., Batista M.V.D.A., De Morais M.A., Barbosa M.A.G., Michereff S.J., Hyde K.D., Câmara M.P.S. Colletotrichum species are responsible for mango anthracnose in northeastern Brazil. Fungal Divers. 2013;61:75–88. doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0237-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Murray M.G. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8:4321–4326. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Turner D., Kovacs W., Kuhls K., Lieckfeldt E., Peter B., Arisan-Atac I., Strauss J., Samuels G.J., Börner T., Kubicek C.P. Biogeography and phenotypic variation in Trichoderma sect. Longibrachiatum and associated Hypocrea species. Mycol. Res. 1997;101:449–459. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gardes M., Bruns T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993;2:113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. Academic Press. 1990:315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Carbone I., Kohn L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia. 1999;91:553–556. doi: 10.2307/3761358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Templeton A.R., Crandall K.A., Sing C.F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics. 1992;132:619–633. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D.G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;24:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hall T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sudhir K., Glen S., Koichiro T. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;7:1870. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nylander J.A.A., Fredrik R., Huelsenbeck J.P., Joséluis N.A. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 2004;53:47–67. doi: 10.1080/10635150490264699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Montri P., Taylor P.W.J., Mongkolporn O. Pathotypes of Colletotrichum capsici, the causal agent of chili Anthracnose, in Thailand. Plant Dis. 2009;93:17–20. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-1-0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schoch C.L., Seifert K.A., Huhndorf S., Robert V., Schindel D. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:6241–6246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xavier K.V., Achala K.C., Peres N.A., Deng Z., Vallad G.E. Characterization of Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of pomegranate in the southeastern U.S. Plant Dis. 2019;103:2771–2777. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0598-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tovar-Pedraza J.M., Mora-Aguilera J.A., Nava-Díaz C., Lima N.B., Michereff S.J., Sandoval-Islas J.S., Câmara M.P.S., Téliz-Ortiz D., Leyva-Mir S.G. Distribution and pathogenicity of colletotrichum species associated with mango anthracnose in mexico. Plant Dis. 2020;104:137–146. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0178-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Crouch J.A., Tredway L.P., Clarke B.B., Hillman B.I. Phylogenetic and population genetic divergence correspond with habitat for the pathogen Colletotrichum cereale and allied taxa across diverse grass communities. Mol. Ecol. 2010;18:123–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shivas R.G., Tan Y.P., Edwards J., Dinh Q., Maxwell A., Andjic V., Liberato J.R., Anderson C., Beasley D.R., Bransgrove K., et al. Colletotrichum species in Australia. Australas Plant Pathol. 2016;45:447–464. doi: 10.1007/s13313-016-0443-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen L., Fang K., Dong X.F., Yang A.L., Zhang H.B. Characterization of the fungal community in the canopy air of the invasive plant Ageratina adenophora and its potential to cause plant diseases. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0230822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Levetin E., Dorsey K. Contribution of leaf surface fungi to the air spora. Aerobiologia. 2006;22:3–12. doi: 10.1007/s10453-005-9012-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Burch M., Levetin E. Effects of meteorological conditions on spore plumes. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2002;46:107–117. doi: 10.1007/s00484-002-0127-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All sequences have been deposited in GenBank at the accession numbers given in the text. The GenBank accession numbers of Colletotrichum menglaense: ITS MH023505; ACT MH023506; GAPDH MH023507; CHS MH023508.


Articles from Pathogens are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES