Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2021 Oct 15;7(10):865. doi: 10.3390/jof7100865

Genomic Diversity Analysis Reveals a Strong Population Structure in Histoplasma capsulatum LAmA (Histoplasma suramericanum)

Fernando Almeida-Silva 1,*,, Marcus de Melo Teixeira 2,3,, Daniel R Matute 4, Marcela de Faria Ferreira 1,5, Bridget M Barker 3, Rodrigo Almeida-Paes 1, Allan J Guimarães 6, Rosely M Zancopé-Oliveira 1,*
Editors: Chiung-Yu Hung, Yufeng Wang
PMCID: PMC8540737  PMID: 34682286

Abstract

Histoplasmosis is a severe mycotic disease affecting thousands of immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals with high incidence in Latin America, where the disease agents are Histoplasma capsulatum and Histoplasma suramericanum. In this work, we used whole-genome sequencing to infer the species diversity and the population structure of H. suramericanum in South America. We find evidence for strong population structure and little admixture within the species. Genome-level phylogenetic trees indicate the existence of at least three different discrete populations. We recovered the existence of a previously identified population, LAmB, and confirm that it is highly differentiated along the whole genome. We also find that H. suramericanum is composed of two populations, one in Northern South America, and another in the southern portion of the continent. Moreover, one of the lineages from the southern population is endemic to Rio de Janeiro and there was no association with clinical data and species isolated from patients with histoplasmosis. Our results point out the need to characterize the symptomatology of histoplasmosis caused by different species and lineages of Histoplasma spp.

Keywords: histoplasmosis, Histoplasma suramericanum, genetic variation, population structure, symptoms

1. Introduction

Histoplasmosis is one of the most prevalent endemic fungal diseases and occurs in all continents in tropical and sub-tropical areas of the globe [1]. Samuel Darling described the first case of this disease in 1906. In Latin America, the disease is responsible for thousands of deaths in immunocompromised patients, primarily due to the high burden of HIV/AIDS disease in this region; however, it is a neglected disease due to the lack of accurate diagnostic tests and notification [2]. The disease also affects immunocompetent hosts, as acute infections acquired from the environment are often associated with mining and speleology activities, fowl roosts, old building demolitions and cleaning of contaminated buildings in urban areas, or disturbing soils containing a high load of the fungus growing on bat guano or bird droppings [3]. Histoplasma is a dimorphic fungus and, under specific environmental conditions or in laboratory cultures at 25 to 30 °C, develops long hyphae that produce infectious microconidia and tuberculate macroconidia. The infection caused by these fungi initiates with the inhalation of airborne microconidia or hyphal fragments that, upon internationalization by alveolar macrophages, switch their morphology to single-budding yeasts, constituting the parasitic form of the fungus [3].

Natural infection often leads to an asymptomatic disease, or mild and self-resolved pneumonia in susceptible hosts, in the vast majority of the cases. Since histoplasmosis primarily affects the lungs, the acute pulmonary disease is commonly reported as Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP), including outbreaks involving several people due to high environmental fungal exposure [4]. If not well-managed, histoplasmosis can progress into a chronic pulmonary disorder and disseminate to different parts of the body.

Histoplasmosis is highly endemic in Latin America, especially in Brazil. The prevalence of natural Histoplasma spp. infections in Brazil is about 20%, but the annual incidence of histoplasmosis among people living with HIV (PLWH) is estimated to be as high as 79%, being latterly considered an AIDS-defining illness [2]. Within this population, especially for individuals with a severe immunosuppressive condition and frequently not adept to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the infection may disseminate from the lungs to spleen, liver, and bone marrow resulting in a life-threatening illness [2]. In Brazil, the number of human histoplasmosis reported cases in the literature exceeds 3500 [5], and over 2000 AIDS-associated histoplasmosis cases have been reported up to 2016 [6]. Autochthonous histoplasmosis occurs in 21 of the 26 Brazilian states, and human outbreaks have been reported primarily in the southeastern region [7]. The disease is highly endemic in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, and Espírito Santo, including both primary and opportunistic histoplasmosis [5]. Rio de Janeiro state (RJ) has historical importance in histoplasmosis public health studies since the first chronic and disseminated cases of this disease in Brazil were reported here [8,9]. RJ is a highly endemic area with a 93.2% prevalence of skin histoplasmin sensitivity [10]. Researchers have described at least 20 outbreaks within RJ, accounting for 50% of all Brazilian episodes reported to date [11]. Moreover, several reports of environmental, veterinarian, and human clinical isolation of Histoplasma have occurred over the past three decades in RJ, supporting claims of high endemicity [5]. Lastly, AIDS-associated histoplasmosis has been extensively diagnosed within southeast Brazil, suggesting RJ as a histoplasmosis hotspot in Brazil [12,13].

The genus Histoplasma is formed by a worldwide-distributed complex of species with distinct geographical patterns. The first phylogenetic report using the Multi Locus Sequencing Typing (MLST) methodology of four nuclear loci classified H. capsulatum into eight monophyletic clades [14]. By applying next-generation whole genome sequencing (WGS) to fungal species concepts, the Histoplasma genus was re-classified into four species as follows: Histoplasma mississipiense (formerly NAm1), Histoplasma ohiense (formerly NAm2), Histoplasma suramericanum (formerly LAm A), and H. capsulatum senso strictu (formerly Panama) [15]. South American Histoplasma has been reported to harbor extensive genetic variation [16], an observation that remains unexplored from a WGS point-of-view. In spite of the high prevalence of histoplasmosis in southern Brazil, the genetic composition of the Histoplasma isolates from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, which is geographically isolated from other endemic areas of histoplasmosis, remains largely unexplored. MLST has revealed the existence of a prevalent genotype in southeastern Brazil, mainly in RJ. Clinical isolates from Southern Brazil (São Paulo state) appear to be phylogenetically related to the RJ genotype [16].

In this study, we bridge this gap by obtaining WGS data from clinical isolates from RJ. We used phylogenetic reconstruction and population genetics to understand the extent of the genetic diversity of Brazilian isolates of Histoplasma and compare the genetic profiles of those lineages to Colombian strains previously characterized as H. suramericanum [15]. In this work, we used MLST [14] of 50 clinical and environmental Histoplasma strains from a single research hospital in RJ and found the existence of at least five unique Histoplasma genotypes. We identified three patients carrying multiple genotypes, potentially suggesting dual infections. Next, we sequenced the genomes of 18 of those strains. The genomes of 14 isolates from RJ are phylogenetically divergent from Colombian H. suramericanum strains. These observations are consistent with strong structure between populations, or even species, from the southern and northern parts of South America. Moreover, we find that isolates from the LAm B clade of Histoplasma are phylogenetically unrelated to those species classified using genome-based taxonomy. We also show that in the sample studied, the RJ genotype was not associated with different symptoms in patients. Finally, we show that the RJ can be identified using a reduced MLST approach as opposed to whole genome sequencing. These results reveal the utter importance of genotyping natural populations of Histoplasma in Latin America as they harbor distinct genetic patterns.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Isolation and Culture Conditions

Histoplasma sp. environmental isolates were previously recovered from soil or clinical specimens from small wild mammals as described elsewhere [17]. We collected human-derived clinical specimens from different patients at the Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases (INI) Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. INI/Fiocruz is a reference health facility for infectious disease and especially the care of people living with HIV/AIDS in Rio de Janeiro and immunocompromised individuals from different parts of Brazil. Single monosporic colonies of 50 H. capsulatum isolates were inoculated and cultivated into Ham’s F12 medium (GIBCO), supplemented with 16 g/L glucose, 1 g/L glutamic acid, 8.4 mg/L cystine, and 6 g/L HEPES. The isolates were maintained at 37 °C for 14 days in a rotatory incubator at 150 rpm [17]. All clinical and environmental isolates are maintained and available at the INI/Fiocruz strains collection (Table 1).

Table 1.

General information of the 50 studied isolates in this study.

Patient Isolate Origin Specimen Clinical Features Phylogenetic
Species
1 13H Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated NE
2 129H Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated NE
3 20231 Human Tongue Scraping HIV+/Disseminated Unknown1
- 11354 Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated Unknown1
4 3416 Human Sputum HIV−/Chronic Pulmonary RJ
- 3612 Human Lung Biopsy HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- 39439 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- 39942 Human Biopsy NA Panama
5 6503 Human Ganglion Biopsy HIV+/Opportunistic RJ
- 84502 Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated NE
- 84564 Human Skin Biopsy HIV+/Disseminated NE
- AC 05 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- CÃO 4 Animal/Dog Liver and Spleen NA RJ
- CO4 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- EP 02 Environmental Soil NA RJ
1 HC 18 Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated RJ
6 40039 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- IGS 19 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- IGS 4/5 Environmental Soil NA RJ
7 INI 01/16 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated NE
8 INI 02/16 Human Skin Biopsy HIV+/Disseminated LAmB1
8 INI 03/16 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated LAmB1
9 INI 04/16 Human Sputum HIV-/Disseminated NE
9 INI 05/16 Human Ganglion Fragment HIV-/Disseminated RJ
10 INI 06/16 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
11 INI 07/16 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated Unknown1
12 01_12 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
13 01_13 Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- 02_13 Animal/Dog Blood Culture NA RJ
14 02_14 Human Skin Biopsy HIV+/Disseminated RJ
15 04_12 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
16 04_14 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- 05_12 Animal/Cat Lesion Exudate NA RJ
17 06_12 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- 07_12 Animal/Dog Lymph Node Biopsy NA RJ
18 09_12 Human Bronchoalveolar Lavage Chronic Pulmonary NE
19 11_12 Human Skin Biopsy HIV+/Disseminated LAmB1
13 23_11 Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated Unknown1
- 24_11 Human Blood Culture HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- 26_11 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
20 27_11 Human Oropharyngeal Swab HIV+/Disseminated RJ
20 28_11 Human Bone Marrow Aspirate HIV+/Disseminated RJ
- IT 04 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- RPS 35 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- RPS 45 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- RPS 51 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- RS 36 Wild Animal NA NA RJ
- TI 01 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- TI 05 Environmental Soil NA RJ
- 36GAL Human Blood HIV+/Disseminated Unknown1

Legend: NA = Not Available.

2.2. Patient’s Information

The Human Research Ethics Committee of INI/Fiocruz approved the de-identified use of patient data in this study (CAAE 02109418.2.0000.5262). We recovered the medical records for 20 patients retrospectively from January 1989 to December 2016. For each patient, we obtained the following 15 symptoms: fever, weight loss, cough, dyspnea, abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomit, asthenia, headache, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, adenomegaly, acute renal failure, hemorrhage, and skin lesion.

2.3. DNA Extraction

Yeast cells were recovered from seven-day cultures in Ham’s F12 Media, washed with PBS, and macerated with a pestle and mortar in liquid nitrogen. Then, the resulting fine powder was transferred (~500 mg) to a tube containing zirconia beads and 500 µL of lysis buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8; 50 mM EDTA; 1% SDS). The cell suspension was vigorously mixed (3 cycles of 30 s in a mini-bead-beater™ (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA) and pelleted-down by centrifugation at 14,000× g for 2 min. To separate proteins from DNA, 500 µL of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl-alcohol (25:24:1) was added. The aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube, precipitated with isopropanol, washed with 1 mL of ethanol, and 100 µL of RNase (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) was added to prevent RNA contamination. The DNA was re-suspended in 50 µL MilliQ water and integrity was determined by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and quantified by spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) as previously described [17].

2.4. Whole Genome Sequencing and SNP Variant Calling

Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) was performed for 18 strains, both environmental and clinical (Table 1). To generate sequencing libraries, 1 µg of genomic DNA was processed with a KAPA Library Preparation Kit for Illumina® Sequencing Platforms (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Equivalent amounts of paired-end libraries previously quantified using KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Kapa Biosystems) were pooled together and sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 Instrument using the v.3 chemistry on a 2 × 101 bp mode. Samples were de-multiplexed according to the corresponding barcode and initial read verification quality was accessed using FastQC [18]. The Illumina sequencing adapters were removed using the Trimmomatic v 0.36 [19]. Next, the read files to the H. mississipiense strain NAm 1 (AAJI00000000.1) reference genome or the Paracoccidioides brasiliensis strain Pb18 (ABKI00000000.2) were aligned using BWA—v 0.7.7 [20]. Potentially spurious intervals were identified using the RealignerTargetCreator and IndelRealigner modules available in the GATK v 3.3-0 [21]. Next, SNPs were called using the GATK UnifiedGenotyper [21] following the same parameters and filters previously used for polymorphism identification in Histoplasma species [15] as follows: QD = 2.0 || FS_filter = 60.0 || MQ_filter = 30.0 || MQ_Rank_Sum_filter = −12.5 || Read_Pos_Rank_Sum_filter = −8. Finally, Nucmer was used to identify and remove SNPs in duplicated regions and those with less than 10× coverage or with less than 10% of variant allele calls [22,23]. All .fastq files were deposited at the Sequence Archive Repository under the following accession: PRJNA497408.

2.5. Phylogenetic Trees Using Whole Genomes

Phylogenetic trees were generated to assess the genealogical relationships between the Histoplasma isolates. Then, a tree was built using the SNP dataset which included whole-genome data for 49 isolates. The Maximum Likelihood (ML) was used as implemented in IQ-TREE [24] and the -m MFP option (ModelFinder) was used for model selection [25]. To measure branch support, 1000 ultrafast bootstraps were performed and a Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) [26,27]. Phylogenetic trees were visualized with FigTree v1.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 17 September 2021).

2.6. Population Structure and Admixture

The most likely clustering scenario in South American Histoplasma was also studied. Two different and complementary approaches were used: first, a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was generated using the R package adegenet [28]. The functions fasta2genlight and glPca were used to compute the principal components (PCs); the resulting Eigenvalues were used to generate a Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree. Additionally, ADMIXTURE [29] was used to infer the individual ancestry of each South American isolate by comparing whole genome allele frequencies from different strains from southeastern Brazil to Colombia [15]. Polymorphisms were considered unlinked under the admixture model. Then, two lines of evidence for two populations (see Results) were found. Thus, the extent of admixture in each individual using ADMIXTURE and conditioning to two populations (K = 2) was evaluated. Individual single-color plots were used to represent homozygous lineages, whereas mixed-color bar plots represent potentially admixed genotypes; the proportion of each allele was represented as percentages.

2.7. Clinical Differences between RJ and Non-RJ Samples

Next, whether the RJ strains were more likely than other genotypes found in Brazil to cause any of the 15 symptoms in the clinical history of the patients was evaluated (Table 2). Additionally, the frequencies of clinical symptoms of patients infected by different Histoplasma genotypes (RJ vs. non-RJ) using 2-sample tests for equality of proportions with continuity correction (function prop.test, R package: stats [30]) was also compared. The power for each of these comparisons was calculated using the function pwr.2p2n.test (R package: pwr, [31]. P-values were then corrected with Bonferroni corrections as implemented in the function p.adjust [30].

Table 2.

Clinical features of histoplasmosis cases distributed among different genotypes of H. capsulatum isolated in National Institute of Infectious Diseases Evandro Chagas/Fiocruz, Brazil.

Clinical Data Genotype Power p-Value Corrected
p-Value
RJ Others
Fever 9 (90%) 5 (71.4%) 0.166
Weight Loss 6 (60%) 5 (71.4%) 0.078
Cough 6 (60%) 6 (85.7%) 0.226
Dyspnea 3 (30%) 1 (14.2%) 0.122
Abdominal Pain 3 (30%) 2 (28.5%) 0.050
Diarrhea 1 (10%) 4 (57.1%) 0.584 0.119 0.476
Vomit 3 (30%) 3 (42.8%) 0.085
Asthenia 3 (30%) 5 (71.4%) 0.411 0.234 0.701
Headache 0 (0%) 2 (28.5%) 0.629 0.301 0.701
Hepatomegaly 4 (40%) 2 (28.5%) 0.078
Splenomegaly 5 (50%) 4 (57.1%) 0.060
Acute Renal Failure 7 (70%) 2 (28.5%) 0.411 0.234 0.701
Hemorrhage 3 (30%) 1 (14.2%) 0.122
Skin Lesion 4 (40%) 3 (42.8%) 0.0516
Adenomegaly 6 (60%) 4 (57.1%) 0.0516

2.8. Strain Genotyping Using Multi Locus Sequencing Type (MLST) Analysis

Finally, whether the RJ lineage could be detected with a MLST strategy instead of a WGS approach was also evaluated. The partial DNA sequences of four nuclear genes (arf, h-anti, ole, and tub) that have been previously used to characterize the genetic diversity of the genus [14] were used. Each sample’s DNA (extracted as described in 2.3) was amplified using PCR in 50 µL reactions containing 100 ng of a genomic DNA, 0.45 mM of each primer, 1.0 U of Taq platinum DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, and 0.2 mM dNTPs. The PCR had 32 cycles of DNA denaturation for 15 s at 94 °C, annealing for 30 s, and extension for 1 min at 72 °C, followed by a final extension for 5 min at 72 °C. The annealing temperature was set to 65 °C in the first cycle and reduced 0.7 °C per cycle for the next 12 cycles. Next, the PCR was continued using an annealing temperature of 56 °C for the remaining 20 cycles [21]. Additional sequences for the same four loci of 238 isolates from previously published reports were also obtained [16,17]. The DNA partial sequences were individually aligned for each locus using the MAFFT online service tool, and concatenated in the following order: arf, h-anti, ole, and tub. The final DNA matrix had 1600 bp and 288 isolates, after removing duplicate sequences. We used this dataset to build a tree following a similar approach to that described in 2.5 to generate whole genome phylogenetic trees.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenomic Diversity

The genomes of 18 Histoplasma strains were obtained and aligned to the reference H. mississippiense NAm 1 or the P. brasiliensis Pb18 genomes. Using this dataset, the consensus Maximum Likelihood tree under the GTR+F+ASC+R5 nucleotide substitution model using no outgroup or under the TVM+F+ASC+R2 model on the dataset rooted with P. brasiliensis was estimated (Figure S1). The unrooted phylogenomic tree suggests that H. suramericanum (former LAm A clade) is composed of multiple distinct phylogenetic clades: RJ, Northeast Brazil, and Colombia, suggesting local genetic variation within this species in South America. RJ, Colombia, Northeast Brazil (BR), as well the MZ5 and 27_14 lineages share a common ancestor and are limited to the South American continent (Figure 1A). This genome-wide survey also revealed that a clade previously identified with MLST and known as LAm B [14,16] is a monophyletic group. The strains IPEC 11_12 and INI 03_16 are representative of this lineage (Figure 1A and Figure S1). This clade differs from H. suramericanum, H. capsulatum, Africa clade, and the North American Histoplasma species H. ohiense and H. mississippiense (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Genomic diversity of Histoplasma sp. collected from a single Research Institute in Rio de Janeiro/Brazil. (A) Unrooted Maximum Likelihood tree based on 1,470,938 SNPs indicating the existence of three genotypes: RJ, Northeast BR, and LAm B1. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCA) showing the population structure of H. suramericanum. The PC1 axis, which corresponds to 36% of the total genetic variation, discriminates the isolates from RJ (Southeast Brazil) and Colombia/Northeast Brazil. (C) Admixture analysis of H. suramericanum showing strong population between isolates from RJ and Colombia/Northeast. No admixture was observed between those two main groups of H. suramericanum.

3.2. Population Structure within H. Suramericanum

Next, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to investigate the population structure within H. suramericanum (Figure 1B). PC1, which corresponds to 36% of the total variation, separated individuals from RJ (Southeast Brazil) clustered together and differed from a second cluster formed by Colombia and Northeast Brazil isolates. PC2 (15% of the total genetic variation) revealed a similar pattern, and Colombian isolates appeared differentiated from Brazilian ones. Following this two-population split, evidence for admixture between them were studied using ADMIXTURE [29]. Notably, when conditioning two lineages (K = 2), there was a recapitulation of the results from the PCA and identification of two clusters, one from Southern South America (RJ—Southeast Brazil) and one from Northern South America (Northeast Brazil and Colombia). No evidence for admixture between these groups was found (Figure 1C). These results suggest a strong population structure within H. suramericanum between northern and southern parts of South America and pose the possibility of Histoplasma speciation within the South American continent.

Given the existence of the lineages of Histoplasma in South America, differences in the clinical manifestations of histoplasmosis caused by different lineages were evaluated. For the statistical analysis, we excluded three patients with two distinct genotypes isolated. The medical records of the others 17 patients included in this study were accessed, and information was drawn regarding differences in the prevalence of 15 different clinical features of histoplasmosis. Ten of these patients were infected by the RJ genotype and seven by other genotypes. Table 2 shows the 15 signs and symptoms. We refrained from conducting comparisons with low power (power < 0.4, Table 2). Out of the four symptoms (diarrhea, asthenia, headache, and acute renal failure) with enough power for pairwise comparisons, all were equally prevalent in histoplasmosis caused by RJ and other lineages. The other characteristics showed no difference between the RJ clade and the non-RJ clade. However, increasing sampling, differences in the symptoms of histoplasmosis caused by different Histoplasma strains may be observed. A systematic assessment of this issue with a larger number of samples is sorely needed. A systematic assessment of this issue with a larger number of samples is sorely needed.

3.3. MLST Is Sufficient to Identify the RJ Clade

Finally, we studied whether the RJ lineage and other South American Histoplasma lineages could be identified using MLST. This approach can be advantageous because of its cost-effectiveness and rapidity. Our MSLT dataset suggests that the majority of the strains from Rio de Janeiro (n = 34) grouped in a cluster separated from the Northeast clade by 19 mutations, from LAm B by 22 mutations, and from H. capsulatum sensu stricto (i.e., Panama) by 22 mutations (Figure 2). Conversely, this MLST scheme allows to uniquely identify each of these other three lineages. Even though MLST is limited to infer the evolutionary processes involved in pathogen diversification [32], our results indicate that this approach is efficient to differentiate between South American lineages of Histoplasma.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Median vector haplotype network demonstrating the phylogenetic relationships among the 50 isolates of the present study grouping both in RJ clade and others. Red dots represent median vectors. Circle size is proportional to the frequency of isolates (h). The numbers around each vertex represent the number of mutations separating each haplotype.

3.4. Multiple Infections Caused by Histoplasma spp.

Our MLST screening also allowed us to determine whether each patient was infected by more than one haplotype. Five patients had at least two Histoplasma isolates during the course of the study. Two patients, numbers 8 and 20, carried two isolates with the same background as follows: LAm B and RJ. Three patients were infected by strains with different genetic backgrounds. Patients 1 and 9 had both RJ and Northeast genotypes, while patient number 13 was infected with the RJ and Unknown Histoplasma genotypes.

4. Discussion

Studies aiming to explore the genetic complexity of H. capsulatum sensu lato began around the year of 1990, and at least 17 phylogenetic lineages are recognized so far [16,33,34]. Four of those phylogenetic lineages were recently reclassified into different species based on genome congruence criteria [15]. Despite the evidence for strong genetic isolation, interspecific admixture has also been reported in Histoplasma. Gene flow can increase the possibility of the emergence of new strains with varied clinically relevant phenotypes [35,36]. For example, different levels of virulence and different strategies of host immune system escape have been proposed for different species of Histoplasma [37,38]. Thus, understanding the phylogenetic relationships, population genetics, and epidemiology of Histoplasma is essential for investigating local disease dynamics, outbreaks, pathogenicity, and drug resistance. It is worth noting that most of the genetic diversity of Histoplasma is observed in Latin America, and molecular epidemiological studies are urgently needed. Our results have three major implications for our understanding of the biology of Histoplasma in South America: (i) the existence of a clade, RJ, that is prevalent in southern Brazil, (ii) the strong population structure of H. suramericanum which is formed by at least two well-defined populations, and (iii) the high genetic diversity of Histoplasma in South America. We discuss each of these implications in the sections that follow.

4.1. Histoplasma Genotypes from Southeast Brazil, Rio de Janeiro

Both of our genotyping surveys, genome-wide and MLST, suggest the existence of a Rio de Janeiro (RJ) population, which is part of the previously proposed LAm1 MLST clade [16]. This genotype has been identified in all environmental and animal Histoplasma-derived strains from this state, suggesting that human cases of histoplasmosis caused by the RJ genotype in Rio de Janeiro are locally acquired. So far, 58 strains have been typed as the RJ genotype and in its majority are composed by isolates from Southeastern Brazil, which suggests a recent emergence or a low ability for migration (Figure 2, [14,16]).

Notably, histoplasmosis caused by RJ and non-RJ clades was not associated with any clinical signs and symptoms. However, it is important to note that some limitations of this work are the low number of patients infected by different genotypes (i.e., low statistical power for pairwise comparisons) and the fact that this is a single-center study. In addition, as the center where the study was conducted is focused to treat patients living with HIV/AIDS, the number of Histoplasma isolates from non-HIV infected patients in this study is insufficient to address possible associations between genotypes and histoplasmosis manifestations in patients with or without HIV infection. Additionally, we detected dual infections with RJ and other genotypes (Northeast, Lam B, and Unknown). This pattern has already been observed by our research group in HIV/AIDS patients from Northeast Brazil [17]. These dual infections could be due local infections by multiple genotypes or by the reactivation of a previous latent Histoplasma infection because of the immunosuppressive condition of patients living with HIV/AIDS. It is worth mentioning that these patients have a migratory history reported. Nonetheless, this observation deserves to be followed up with larger studies. Clinical and genomic researchers need to collaborate to study the symptomatology caused by different species and populations of Histoplasma. Multicenter studies involving large cohorts from different geographic regions and, ideally, genome sequencing, are necessary to fully understand the impact of Histoplasma genotypes in the clinical setting.

4.2. Strong Population Structure in H. suramericanum in South America

Previous MSLT studies suggested a complex structure within the Histoplasma LAm A phylogenetic species (now formally known as H. suramericanum). Both phylogenetic and population genetic studies herein conducted also show a strong partition of the genetic variation within this clade. Phylogenomic analysis revealed the presence of two main groups composed by strains collected in both northern and southern parts of South America, indicating a strong geographical split within H. suramericanum. In this effort, we focused on the H. suramericanum RJ population which seems to be endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. This biome is a biodiversity hotspot for plants [39], birds (e.g., spinetails) [40], and mammals [41]. Nonetheless, no effort has determined whether the Atlantic Forest also harbors more fungal pathogens. Future studies should explore the possibility that cosmopolitan fungal pathogens show local adaptation and speciation when associated to particular biomes.

Other endemic human fungal pathogens also show evidence of genetic differentiation within the American continent. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis is predominately found in the southern part of South America, while P. restrepiensis and P. venezuelensis are found in Northern part of the continent. A strong genetic bottleneck was observed within Coccidioides posadasii by comparing clinical isolates from Central/South America to Mexico and the USA. Similarly, Sporothrix schenckii isolates from North America and South America are genetically different from each other. All these reports have been somehow limited by the availability of clinical and environmental samples. Larger genomic surveillances of endemic fungal pathogens and synergy between clinicians and fungal geneticists are needed to deeply understand the evolutionary history of these pathogens.

4.3. South America Harbors at Least Two Different Species of Histoplasma

Genome sequencing has revolutionized the definition of species boundaries in fungi (reviewed in [42]). Pathogenic fungi are on the rise since taxonomy changes over time by incorporating more taxa from unexplored areas and due to the implementation of different methods. Moreover, researchers and clinicians claim for the correlation of divergent species with a plausible clinically relevant phenotype (i.e., disease manifestation, antifungal resistance, antigenic variation). The pioneer studies aiming to quantify the genetic magnitude of Histoplasma in the American continent have proposed multiple genotypes that were latter classified into former species as follows: H. capsulatum senso strictu (Panama), H. mississipiense (NAm1), H. ohiense (NAm2), and H. suramericanum (LAm A) [15]. A fifth phylogenetic species, named LAm B was also described using MLST data, showing strong genetic isolation from other Latin American and North American genotypes [14]. However, the genomes of this putative phylogenetic species have never been studied. Here, we bridge that gap and show that LAm B is genetically differentiated from other Histoplasma species across its genome (Figure 1A and Figure S1). We do refrain from defining it as a species because the group only has two known strains, both included in this study. Previous studies suggest that this genotype is broadly distributed in South America, and its occurrence was documented in Colombia and Argentina, beyond Brazil [16,43].

More generally, our MLST genetic survey revealed the possibility of other clades, some of which might be highly differentiated species. For example, unknown1, a lineage composed by the two isolates, H4 and H24, seems to be mostly but not completely isolated from H. suramericanum (see H8 and H37 in Figure 2). As of now, we have no data that allows us to conclude these are different species, but the level of differentiation at the four diagnostic loci among lineages is certainly high.

5. Conclusions

We found evidence for strong population structure and little admixture within H. suramericanum. One of the lineages within the H. suramericanum Southern population is endemic to Rio de Janeiro and seems to have clinical impact in histoplasmosis patients. Additional genome sequencing efforts aiming to address critical gaps in the taxonomy, ecology, and evolution of this important fungal pathogen are needed in South America.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Anastasia Litvintseva and the CDC mycology branch for providing materials to support the sequencing of Histoplasma spp. We also thank the the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen North) for their support on the sequencing of the Histoplasma spp. genomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7100865/s1, Figure S1: Whole-genome Maximum Likelihood tree of Histoplasma sp.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.Z.-O.; methodology, F.A.-S., R.A.-P., A.J.G.; software, M.d.M.T., B.M.B., D.R.M.; validation, M.d.M.T., B.M.B., D.R.M.; formal analysis, F.A.-S., M.d.F.F.; investigation, F.A.-S.; resources, R.M.Z.-O.; data curation, M.d.M.T., R.A.-P., D.R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A.-S., M.d.M.T.; writing—review and editing, R.M.Z.-O., R.A.-P., A.J.G., D.R.M., B.M.B., A.J.G., M.d.M.T.; visualization, M.d.M.T.; supervision, R.M.Z.-O.; project administration, R.M.Z.-O.; funding acquisition, R.M.Z.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), grant number E-26/203.076/2016. R.M.Z-O. was supported in part by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq 302796/2017-7] and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro [FAPERJ E-26/202.527/2019]; M.M.T. was supported by CNPq/UNIVERSAL award 43460/2018-2; B.M.B. was supported by NIH/NIAID award R21AI28536, ADHS17-0007403, and ADHS16-162415; D.R.M. was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI153523); A.J.G. was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq, 311470/2018-1] and Fundação Carlos Chagas de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado do Rio de Janeiro [FAPERJ E-26/202.696/2018].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases (protocol code CAAE 02109418.2.0000.5262—date of approval: 26 February 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Miranda C., Jaker M.A., Fitzhugh-Kull V.A., Dever L.L. Oropharyngeal histoplasmosis: The diagnosis lies in the biopsy. IDCases. 2018;11:33–35. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2017.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adenis A.A., Valdes A., Cropet C., McCotter O.Z., Derado G., Couppie P., Chiller T., Nacher M. Burden of HIV-associated histoplasmosis compared with tuberculosis in Latin America: A modelling study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18:1150–1159. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30354-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deepe G.S., Jr. Outbreaks of histoplasmosis: The spores set sail. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007213. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hage C.A., Knox K.S., Wheat L.J. Endemic mycoses: Overlooked causes of community acquired pneumonia. Respir. Med. 2012;106:769–776. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Almeida M.A., Almeida-Silva F., Guimaraes A.J., Almeida-Paes R., Zancope-Oliveira R.M. The occurrence of histoplasmosis in Brazil: A systematic review. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;86:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wheat L.J., Azar M.M., Bahr N.C., Spec A., Relich R.F., Hage C. Histoplasmosis. Infect. Dis Clin. North. Am. 2016;30:207–227. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Faiolla R.C., Coelho M.C., Santana Rde C., Martinez R. Histoplasmosis in immunocompetent individuals living in an endemic area in the Brazilian Southeast. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2013;46:461–465. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0124-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duarte E. Histoplasmose. Mem Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 1945;43:457–494. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02761945000600004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aidé M.A. Chapter 4–Histoplasmosis. J Bras Pneumol. 2009;35:1145–1151. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132009001100013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fava S.D.C., Fava Netto C. Epidemiologic Surveys of Histoplasmin and Paracoccidioidin Sensitivity in Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. S. Paulo. 1998;40:155–164. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46651998000300005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guerra B.T., Almeida-Silva F., Almeida-Paes R., Basso R.P., Bernardes J.P.R.A., Almeida M.A., Damasceno L.S., Xavier M.O., Wanke B., Zancopé-Oliveira R.M., et al. Histoplasmosis in Brazil: Lessons to learn about preventing exposure. Mycopathologia. 2020;185:881–892. doi: 10.1007/s11046-019-00389-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Almeida M.A., Damasceno L.S., Pizzini C.V., Muniz M.M., Almeida-Paes R., Zancope-Oliveira R.M. Role of western blot assay for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis in AIDS patients from a National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mycoses. 2019;62:261–267. doi: 10.1111/myc.12877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leimann B.C., Pizzini C.V., Muniz M.M., Albuquerque P.C., Monteiro P.C., Reis R.S., Almeida-Paes R., Lazera M.S., Wanke B., Perez M.A., et al. Histoplasmosis in a Brazilian center: Clinical forms and laboratory tests. Rev. Iberoam Micol. 2005;22:141–146. doi: 10.1016/S1130-1406(05)70027-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kasuga T., White T.J., Koenig G., McEwen J., Restrepo A., Castaneda E., Da Silva Lacaz C., Heins-Vaccari E.M., De Freitas R.S., Zancope-Oliveira R.M., et al. Phylogeography of the fungal pathogen Histoplasma capsulatum. Mol. Ecol. 2003;12:3383–3401. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01995.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sepulveda V.E., Marquez R., Turissini D.A., Goldman W.E., Matute D.R. Genome Sequences Reveal Cryptic Speciation in the Human Pathogen Histoplasma capsulatum. MBio. 2017;8:e01339-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01339-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Teixeira Mde M., Patane J.S., Taylor M.L., Gomez B.L., Theodoro R.C., de Hoog S., Engelthaler D.M., Zancope-Oliveira R.M., Felipe M.S., Barker B.M. Worldwide Phylogenetic Distributions and Population Dynamics of the Genus Histoplasma. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10:e0004732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Damasceno L.S., Teixeira M.D.M., Barker B.M., Almeida M.A., Muniz M.D.M., Pizzini C.V., Mesquita J.R.L., Rodríguez-Arellanes G., Ramírez J.A., Vite-Garín T., et al. Novel clinical and dual infection by Histoplasma capsulatum genotypes in HIV patients from Northeastern, Brazil. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:11789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48111-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Andrews S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010. [(accessed on 23 May 2019)]. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 19.Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McKenna A., Hanna M., Banks E., Sivachenko A., Cibulskis K., Kernytsky A., Garimella K., Altshuler D., Gabriel S., Daly M., et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kurtz S., Phillippy A., Delcher A.L., Smoot M., Shumway M., Antonescu C., Salzberg S.L. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sahl J.W., Lemmer D., Travis J., Schupp J.M., Gillece J.D., Aziz M., Driebe E.M., Drees K.P., Hicks N.D., Williamson C.H.D., et al. NASP: An accurate, rapid method for the identification of SNPs in WGS datasets that supports flexible input and output formats. Microb. Genom. 2016;2:e000074. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nguyen L.T., Schmidt H.A., von Haeseler A., Minh B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kalyaanamoorthy S., Minh B.Q., Wong T.K.F., von Haeseler A., Jermiin L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Minh B.Q., Nguyen M.A., von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:1188–1195. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jombart T., Ahmed I. Adegenet 1.3-1: New tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:3070–3071. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alexander D.H., Novembre J., Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19:1655–1664. doi: 10.1101/gr.094052.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Team R.C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Core Team; Vienna, Austria: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Champely S., Ekstrom C., Dalgaard P., Gill J., Weibelzahl S., Anandkumar A., Ford C., Volcic R., De Rosario H. Basic Functions for Power Analysis, Package ‘pwr’. 2020. [(accessed on 25 July 2021)]. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/
  • 32.Munoz M., Wintaco L.M., Munoz S.A., Ramirez J.D. Dissecting the Heterogeneous Population Genetic Structure of Candida albicans: Limitations and Constraints of the Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1052. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vincent R.D., Goewert R., Goldman W.E., Kobayashi G.S., Lambowitz A.M., Medoff G. Classification of Histoplasma capsulatum isolates by restriction fragment polymorphisms. J. Bacteriol. 1986;165:813–818. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.3.813-818.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kasuga T., Taylor J.W., White T.J. Phylogenetic relationships of varieties and geographical groups of the human pathogenic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum Darling. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37:653–663. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.653-663.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ropars J., Maufrais C., Diogo D., Marcet-Houben M., Perin A., Sertour N., Mosca K., Permal E., Laval G., Bouchier C., et al. Gene flow contributes to diversification of the major fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2253. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04787-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maxwell C.S., Sepulveda V.E., Turissini D.A., Goldman W.E., Matute D.R. Recent admixture between species of the fungal pathogen Histoplasma. Evol. Lett. 2018;2:210–220. doi: 10.1002/evl3.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sepulveda V.E., Williams C.L., Goldman W.E. Comparison of phylogenetically distinct Histoplasma strains reveals evolutionarily divergent virulence strategies. MBio. 2014;5:e01376-01314. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01376-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jones G.S., Sepulveda V.E., Goldman W.E. Biodiverse Histoplasma Species Elicit Distinct Patterns of Pulmonary Inflammation following Sublethal Infection. mSphere. 2020;5:e00742-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00742-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Garcia M.G., Silva R.S., Carniello M.A., Veldman J.W., Rossi A.A., de Oliveira L.O. Molecular evidence of cryptic speciation, historical range expansion, and recent intraspecific hybridization in the Neotropical seasonal forest tree Cedrela fissilis (Meliaceae) Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 2011;61:639–649. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Batalha-Filho H., Maldonado-Coelho M., Miyaki C.Y. Historical climate changes and hybridization shaped the evolution of Atlantic Forest spinetails (Aves: Furnariidae) Heredity. 2019;123:675–693. doi: 10.1038/s41437-019-0234-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gonçalves-Oliveira J., Teixeira B.R., Olifiers N., dos Santos Lucio C., Riski L.L., da Costa-Neto S.F., de Lemos E.R.S., Bonvicino C.R., D’Andrea P.S. A Survey of Small Mammals in the Atlantic Forest Of the Northwestern Region Of Rio De Janeiro State. Oecologia Aust. 2016;20:492–500. doi: 10.4257/oeco.2016.2004.08. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Matute D.R., Sepulveda V.E. Fungal species boundaries in the genomics era. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019;131:103249. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gomez L.F., Arango M., McEwen J.G., Gomez O.M., Zuluaga A., Pelaez C.A., Acevedo J.M., Taylor M.L., Jimenez M.D.P. Molecular epidemiology of Colombian Histoplasma capsulatum isolates obtained from human and chicken manure samples. Heliyon. 2019;5:e02084. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES