Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2021 Sep 25;10(10):2014. doi: 10.3390/plants10102014

Functional Characterization of Hedychium coronarium J. Koenig MYB132 Confers the Potential Role in Floral Aroma Synthesis

Farhat Abbas 1,†, Yanguo Ke 1,2,†, Yiwei Zhou 1, Rangcai Yu 3, Muhammad Imran 4, Sikandar Amanullah 5, Dylan O’Neill Rothenberg 6, Qin Wang 1, Lan Wang 1, Yanping Fan 1,7,*
Editors: Viktor Korzun, Freddy Mora-Poblete, Antônio Teixeira do Amaral Junior
PMCID: PMC8541032  PMID: 34685822

Abstract

The R2R3-MYB transcription factors (TFs) play several key roles in numerous plant biological processes. Hedychium coronarium is an important ornamental plant well-known for its elegant flower shape and abundant aroma type. The floral aroma of H. coronarium is due to the presence of a large amount of terpenes and benzenoids. However, less is known about the role of R2R3-MYB TFs in the regulatory mechanism of floral aroma production in this breed. Herein, we isolate and functionally characterize the R2R3-MYB TF HcMYB132, which is potentially involved in regulating floral aroma synthesis. Sequence alignment analysis revealed that it includes a nuclear localization signal NLS(s) and a 2R, 3R motif signature in the sequences. A subcellular localization assay revealed that HcMYB132 protein localizes to the nucleus. Real-time qPCR assays showed that HcMYB132 is specifically expressed in flowers and its expression pattern correlates with the emission of floral volatile compounds. In HcMYB132-silenced flowers, the levels of floral volatile compounds were significantly reduced, and the expression of key structural volatile synthesis genes was downregulated compared to control. Collectively, these results suggest that HcMYB132 might play a significant role in the regulation of terpenoid biosynthesis in H. coronarium.

Keywords: floral scent, Hedychium coronarium, R2R3-MYB, structural genes, terpenes

1. Introduction

The floral aroma is one of the crucial characteristics of plants, which improves the economic and aesthetic values of ornamental plants. White ginger lily (H. coronarium) is famous due to its pure white color and butterfly flower shape. The H. coronarium flower emits a strong aroma, which is a combination of several floral volatiles including terpenes, benzenoids, and phenylpropanoids [1,2,3,4,5]. Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes are the major floral volatile contents of this breed, and in our previous studies we identified several key volatile synthesis genes (HcTPS1/2/3/5/7/8/10, HcBSMT1/2, HcIAA2/4, HcARF5 and HcPAL) involved in floral aroma biosynthesis [6,7,8,9]. The identification of the genes, transcription factors (TFs), and proteins relevant to floral scent biosynthesis has been advanced. However, less is known about the regulatory mechanism of R2R3-MYB TFs in H. corornarium. In our previous RNA sequence and genome-wide data, we reported on a group of HcMYB genes potentially involved in the regulating mechanism of secondary metabolites [1,10]. Among them, HcMYB132 is specifically expressed in flowers and its expression correlates with flower development and emission contents of floral volatiles. However, a detailed functional characterization of this transcription factor in H. coronarium has not yet been produced.

MYB TFs are vital regulators of secondary metabolites such as isoflavones and phenylpropanoids [11,12,13]. MYB TFs are classified into four groups based on the number of repeats (1R, R2R3, 3R, and 4R-MYB) [13]. Among them, R2R3-MYB domain proteins are widely abundant in plants and play important role in several processes, including environmental stress, growth and development, secondary wall biosynthesis, and flavonoid/phenylpropanoid metabolism [14,15,16,17]. For example; GbMYB5, AtMYB44 and AtMYB60 induced drought tolerance in cotton and Arabidopsis [18,19]. AtMYB33 and AtMYB65 assist in the formation of viable pollen and produce high pollen fertility, while AtMYBL2 functions as a transcriptional repressor, and prevents the accumulation of proanthocyanin in Arabidopsis [12,20]. In Malus domestica, MdMYB3 modulates the production of anthocyanin via its effect on the various flavonoid pathway genes and assists in flower formation [21]. Similarly, Arabidopsis AtMYBL2/4/7 and litchi R2R3-MYB showed their important role in the regulation of flavonoid and anthocyanin biosynthesis, respectively [12,22,23]. The soybean GmMYB100-and grape VvMYB4-like genes negatively regulate the production of flavonoids [24,25].

However, only limited MYB TFs related to volatile biosynthetic pathways have been characterized from a few plant species, including snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) and petunia (Petunia spp.), which are known as model floral scent species. The volatile phenylpropanoid/benzenoid metabolic pathway is regulated by AmMYB305/340, ODORANT 1 (ODO1), and EMISSION OF BENZENOID II (EOBII) in snapdragon [26,27] and petunia, respectively [28,29,30]. Likewise, PpMYB15 and PpMYBF1 exhibited a floral expression and participated in the biosynthetic control of flavanol from Prunus persica [31]. The production of phenylalanine and its metabolic flow to lignin biosynthesis are controlled by MYB8 and ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (HY5) in Pinus pinaster [32]. Until now, several reports of MYB TFs related to flavonoid biosynthesis in other species have been discussed, but still, there is a gap in knowledge of the role of MYB in H. coronarium.

In the current study, HcMYB132 was isolated and functionally characterized. Multiple sequence analyses revealed the existence of 2R and 3R motif signatures in the sequences. Furthermore, qRT-PCR, green fluorescent protein (GFP), hormone treatments, GC-MS, and gene silencing assays were performed to elucidate its potential involvement in floral aroma biosynthesis in H. coronarium. These findings will lay the cornerstone for the functional characterization of MYB TFs in H. coronarium.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of HcMYB132

In a previous genome-wide analysis, we identified a group of R2R3-MYB family members expressed specifically in flowers that increased in expression with flower development and floral volatile emissions [1]. Among them, HcMYB132 is specifically expressed in flowers. The coding sequences of HcMYB132 include open reading frames of 624 bp, encoding polypeptides of 207 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of 23.76 kilodaltons (kDa), isoelectric point (pI) 6.16, and the protein GRAVY −0.733. Further analysis revealed that HcMYB132 contains two exons, and is located on chromosome 11. Prediction analysis of HcMYB132 protein sequences showed the presence of R2 and R3 repeat signatures at the N-termini, which is a key feature of R2R3 DNA-binding MYB proteins (Figure 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of HcMYB132. (a) Multiple sequence alignment of HcMYB132 with R2R3-MYB proteins. Sequence alignment was performed by ClustalX 2.1 and shaded in GeneDoc. Amino acid residues are shaded in light gray, gray, and black showing 50, 70 and 100% identity, respectively, while dashes indicate gaps used for optimal alignment. R2R3 motifs are indicated by orange lines. (b) Phylogenetic analysis of HcMYB132 together with previously characterized R2R3-MYB proteins. The protein sequences were aligned by Clustal X 2.1 and the phylogenetic tree was built in MEGA X using the Nj method. All R2R3-MYBs are grouped into 4 subclades named G I–G IV. Genes used in phylogenetic tree and their accession numbers are listed in Table S2.

The phylogenetic analysis of HcMYB132 was performed with the previously characterized R2R3-MYB proteins involved in secondary metabolism derived from H. coronarium and other plant species. All R2R3-MYBs were clustered into 4 distinct groups (G I–G IV) (Figure 1b). Among them, subgroup G II included the least number of R2R3-MYB members (6), while subgroup G IV constituted the largest group, holding 13 R2R3-MYB members. HcMYB132 clustered into subgroup III, which included FaMYB1/10 (Fragaria × ananassa), HcMYB7/8 (H. coronarium), and AtMYB11/12/111/113/114/123 (Arabidopsis thaliana).

2.2. Subcellular Localization of HcMYB132

Nuclear localization prediction tools predicted that HcMYB132 is located in the nucleus. To verify the prediction results, we generated HcMYB132-GFP constructs driven by a CaMV 35S promoter and transferred them to N. benthamiana leaves via agroinfiltration, followed by visualization using confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss, Jena, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). The results verified that HcMYB132 protein was localized to the nucleus (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Nuclear localization of H. coronarium MYB132 protein in N. benthamiana leaves. Green: GFP fluorescence, red: mcherry as NLs marker, merged: merged green and red channels and bright field. Bars, 50 µM.

2.3. Expression Pattern of HcMYB132

Previous research indicated that the accumulation of floral volatiles increases with flower development [1,2,7]. To analyze the aforementioned process, flower development was divided into four stages (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A pictorial view of labeled H. coronarium tissues. (a) Figure representation of H. coronarium flower, bracts, leaves, and rhizome; (b) figure illustration of different flower developmental stages (bud stage, half bloom, full-bloom and senescence stage); (c) pictorial representation of three different Hedychium accessions. Scale bar indicates 2 cm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Expression analysis of HcMYB132 in different tissues. (a) Relative expression level of HcMYB132 in different parts; (b) different flower development stages of H. coronarium, results are shown as a percentage with a maximum value set to 1 (100%); (c) emission level of eucalyptol during flower development stages, data are shown as ± SEM of three to five repeats. Lowercase letters represent statistically significant differences at p < 0.01, according to least significant difference (LSD).

The data showed that HcMYB132 was specifically expressed in flowers, while negligible expression was measured in the rhizome and bracts (Figure 4a). Furthermore, the mRNA transcript levels of HcMYB132 were abundant in the full-bloom stage, and low during senescence (Figure 4b). A similar pattern was observed in the emission level of eucalyptol contents; low during the bud stage, peaking during full bloom, and decreasing thereafter (Figure 4c).

2.4. Suppression of HcMYB132 Modifies the Emission of Eucalyptol and Expression of Key Structural Genes

The results confirmed that the expression level of HcMYB132 was significantly reduced compared to the control (unsilenced flowers) (Figure 5). Transcript levels of HcMYB132 were downregulated by 47.42% in silenced flowers compared to the control flowers (Figure 5a). Furthermore, the volatile contents of eucalyptol were decreased by 50% in response to HcMYB132 silencing, while ocimene, linalool, and methyl benzoate contents did not significantly change (Figure 5b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Suppression of HcMYB132 in H. coronarium flowers. (a) RT-qPCR assay of HcMYB132 transcript levels in HcMYB132-silenced and control flowers; (b) GC-MS analysis of floral volatiles in HcMYB132-silenced and control flowers; (c) transcript levels of key structural genes in HcMYB132-silenced and control flowers. Data are shown as ± SEM of three to five repeats. Lowercase letters represent statistically significant differences in LSD test (p < 0.01).

We further investigated the mRNA level of the key genes involved in eucalyptol biosynthesis (HcTPS1, and HcTPS3) and few other HcTPSs (HcTPS5 and HcTPS8) in HcMYB132-silenced flowers. The results revealed that transcript levels of HcTPS1, HcTPS3 and HcTPS5 were significantly decreased, while the expression level of HcTPS8 was significantly increased. In HcMYB132-silenced flowers, HcTPS1, HcTPS3, and HcTPS5 transcripts were all significantly reduced, by 56.45, 50.44, and 65.90%, respectively, compared to control (Figure 5c). Interestingly, the mRNA levels of HcTPS8 increased by 275.72% compared to the control, implying that HcMYB132 positively regulates the expression of HcTPS1, HcTPS3, and HcTPS5, and negatively regulates the expression of HcTPS8. These findings indicate that HcMYB132 plays a significant role in floral aroma production in H. coronarium.

2.5. Expression of HcMYB132 in Response to Auxin and PCIB Treatments

The treatment results showed that the expression level of HcMYB132 was substantially increased in response to IAA treatments (Figure 6a). Under IAA treatments, the expression level of HcMYB132 increased by 107.45% compared to the control flowers. In a previous study, we found that under IAA treatment the emission contents of eucalyptol significantly increased [7], and the emission contents of eucalyptol were also found to increase by 102.35% under IAA treatment, relative to the untreated control.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

mRNA levels of HcMYB132 and emission level of eucalyptol under IAA and PCIB treatment. (a) transcript levels of HcMYB132 under IAA and PCIB treatment; (b) mRNA levels of HcMYB132 in IAA and PCIB treated flowers. Error bars indicate SD of 3–5 repeats, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences using the LSD test (p < 0.01).

To validate the above findings, we examined the same parameters under PCIB. PCIB has extensively been used to inhibit the actions of auxin. The results showed that the transcript levels of HcMYB132 decreased substantially, by 91.73%, in PCIB treated flowers compared to flowers not treated with PCIB (Figure 6a). Likewise, under PCIB treatment, eucalptol emission contents declined significantly, by 64.04%, in PCIB treated flowers compared to the control [7]. These findings support the above-mentioned results that HcMYB132 significantly influenced the biosynthesis of floral aroma production via auxin signaling.

We further analyzed the expression level of HcMYB132 in three different Hedychium accessions. The data showed that the transcript levels of HcMYB132 were highest in H. coronarium followed by H. ‘Jin’ and H. coccineum, respectively (Figure 6b). These results suggest that HcMYB132 is potentially involved in floral aroma production in H. coronarium.

3. Discussion

H. coronarium is popular in tropical and subtropical parts of the world due to its appealing strong aroma type and medicinal properties [3,33]. R2R3-MYB TFs are the main regulators of terpenes and phenylpropanoids [34,35]. However, less is known about the transcriptional regulatory mechanism of floral aroma production. Until now, a few MYB TFs have been reported that control the regulatory network of floral scent production [29,30,36,37]. Herein, we identified and functionally characterized a R2R3-MYB TF (HcMYB132) that is potentially involved in floral aroma synthesis in H. coronarium.

Multiple sequence analyses of HcMYB132 revealed the existence of 2R and 3R repeats in the sequences (Figure 1a). Several previous findings suggest that the R2 and R3 signature motifs are highly conserved and regulate various aspects of plant secondary metabolites [13,38,39,40]. We generated a phylogenic tree using the previously characterized R2R3-MYB TFs involved in the regulatory network of secondary metabolism, together with HcMYB132 (Figure 1b). HcMYB132 was classified into Group III with FaMYB1, FaMYB10, and AtMYB11/12/111/113/114/123. The functional characterization of aforementioned genes revealed their role in the regulation of the flavonoid/phenylpropanoid metabolism [14,41,42,43], indicating that HcMYB132 might play a significant role in secondary metabolism. It has been reported that MYB TFs in same subclade have identical functions [13,35]. The structure analysis revealed that the HcMYB132 contains two exons, which are in line with the previous reports [44]. A subcellular localization assay revealed that HcMYB132 protein is localized to the nucleus, which is consistent with the previous findings [1,7,13,45].

The process of floral scent production is interrelated with flower development [46,47,48]. Our previous studies revealed that production and emission of floral volatile compounds and the expression of key structural volatile biosynthesis genes were low during the bud stage and peaked during the full bloom stage [7,8,9,10]. Previous studies also showed that volatile emission content was significantly larger from the flower than from the rhizome and leaf, which is consistent with the expression pattern of HcMYB132 [7]. In the current findings, it was revealed that HcMYB132 was mainly expressed in the flowers and its expression pattern increased with flower development, peaked during the fully bloomed stage, and dropped down thereafter (Figure 4a,b), implying that it might potentially be involved in the floral aroma production and emission mechanism. A similar expression pattern was observed in Fragaria ananassa EOBII, EOBI, and ODO1, and was involved in the regulatory network of eugenol [15,29]. Likewise, Prunus persica MYBF1 and MYB15 showed the highest expression in the flower and were involved in flavanol biosynthesis regulation [31]. In Lilium hybrid, ODO1 TF had highest expression in the flower and plaedy a crucial role in the regulation of phenylpropanoid/ benzenoid volatile production [49]. These results suggest that HcMYB132 potentially regulates the process of floral scent production.

To reveal the role of HcMYB132 in floral aroma production in H. coronarium, the activity of HcMYB132 was repressed via gene silencing. The data showed that the volatile contents of eucalyptol were substantially decreased in HcMYB132-silenced flowers compared to control flowers. Furthermore, in HcMYB132-silenced flowers, the transcript levels of key eucalyptol volatile biosynthesis genes (HcTPS1 and HcTPS3) were significantly decreased (Figure 5). Likewise, strawberry MYB10 regulates the expression of numerous key genes involved in the flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis process [14]. In petunia ODO1-suppressed plants, the mRNA levels of several scent-related genes were downregulated [29]. Similarly, litchi MYB5 activates the transcript levels of key genes involved in the synthesis of anthocyanin [23]. In HcMYB1/2/7/8/75/79/145/238/248-silenced flowers, the emission of floral volatiles and the expression of structural genes were significantly decreased [1,7]. Moreover, the emission of eucalyptol and the expression of HcMYB132 were influenced by auxin treatments, which are consistent with previous findings [7,50]. These data endorse the previous findings that R2R3-MYB TFs are involved in the regulation of volatile formation in H. coronarium.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Plants (H. coronarium, H. coccincum¸and H. ‘Jin’) were planted in a growth chamber at 25 ± 2 °C with 75–80% humidity and a 13 h–11 h light-dark cycle. To analyze the spatial and temporal expression pattern, different plant parts including the rhizome, flower, leaf and bracts of H. coronarium were used (Figure 3a). To analyze the expression pattern of HcMYB132 during H. coronarium flower development, the flower developmental process was divided into four stages; bud, half bool, full bloom, and senescence (Figure 3b). For RNA isolation, plant materials were obtained and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, then stored at −80 °C. For the subcellular localization assay, N. benthamiana plants were grown under the same conditions. The plant materials were remained in the growth chamber until analysis.

4.2. Hormone Treatments

For hormone treatment, the stems of the H. coronarium flowers were cut into 40 cm section, and placed in sterilized water comprising 100 μM IAA and 100 μM p-chlorophenoxyisobutyric acid (PCIB). IAA and PCIB stock solutions (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) were made following the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, IAA (18.79 mg) powder was liquified in 1.5 mL methanol and then diluted in sterilized water (100 mL). Similarly, PCIB powder (321 mg) was dissolved and diluted as mentioned above. Afterward, detached flowers were put in glass beakers that included the hormone solution (100 mL), and covered with a silver sheet to prevent degradation. The mock/control flowers were placed under the same conditions and same volume as described above. The volatile compound analysis was carried out at the full-bloom stage of treated flowers, which were subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 ℃. The experiment was performed in triplicate for each experimental variant.

4.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

The sequence of HcMYB132 was obtained from the previously published MYB genome-wide data [1]. The other scent-related protein sequences were obtained from the NCBI database. The amino acid sequences were aligned using Clustal Ω [51], and a phylogenetic tree was generated in MEGA X [52] by selecting the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

4.4. Subcellular Localization Analysis

For subcellular localization, Hthe cMYB132 coding sequence with SpeI and NcoI restriction sites was fused into the vector pEAQ-HT-GFP [53]. The ClonExpress ® II one-step cloning kit (Vazyme, China) was used to construct the vectors. Sequencing confirmed that no errors had been introduced. The plasmid was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain EHA105) and Luria–Bertani (LB) medium with antibiotics, then was cultured overnight. After that, pellets were collected via centrifugation at 2000× g and resuspended in MMA solution (10 mM MgCl2, 100 μM acetosyringone, 10 mM MES (2-[N-morpholino] ethane sulfonic acid) with pH 5.8 to an OD600 of 0.6. The suspension was infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves as explained previously [2,8]. The infected tissues were visualized 48 h after infiltration by a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS spectral confocal scanner mounted on a Leica DM RXA2 upright fluorescence microscope with 409 × 0.75 numerical aperture objectives, and the images were further processed using Adobe Photoshop. Primers used in the assay are listed in Table S1.

4.5. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS)

To analyze the potential role of HcMYB132 in floral aroma production, we suppressed its expression via virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in flowers. For VIGS, A 250–300 bp amplicon of HcMYB132 gene was inserted in a pCaBSγ vector using Apa I as a restriction site, making a pCaBSγ:HcMYB132 construct for the silencing of the corresponding gene, as described previously [54]. The constructs (pCaBS-α, pCaBS-β, pCaBSγ, pCaBSγ:HcMYB132) were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (EHA105). The transformed A. tumefaciens lines were cultured in LB medium supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 25 μg/mL rifampicin. The cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min and resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM acetosyringone, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6). For infiltration, A. tumefaciens culture was suspended in infiltration buffer to an OD600 of 1. The solution was applied at the bud stage by vacuum infiltration via submerging the flowers in the bacterial solution. The culture mixtures were placed at room temperature in the dark for 3 to 5 h before vacuum infiltration into the H. coronarium flowers. Thereafter, the flowers were cleaned with deionized water and placed into an MS liquid culture at 16 °C with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle for 4–5 days. The floral volatile analysis was performed during the full-bloom stage via GC–MS. The assay was carried out in 3–5 biological replicates.

4.6. GC-MS Analysis of Floral Volatiles

The floral volatile analysis was performed by placing the whole flower in a glass bottle for 30 min, as explained previously [7,55]. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber was inserted into the bottle for 30 min to adsorb volatile compounds followed, then injected into a GC-MS system (Agilent). The GC–MS system with Agilent 7890A GC and Agilent 5975C MSD was provided with an Agilent DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm), and helium gas was provided as a carrier. The flow of helium gas was kept constant at 1 mL/min. Initially, the GC injection port temperatures were kept at 40 °C for 3 min, which was followed by an increase in temperature of 5 ℃/min to 250 °C. The chromatographic running time was 30 min. The relative quantification of volatiles was calculated using the Agilent ChemStation data analysis application based on the peak area ratio and the quantity of the internal standard.

4.7. Identification of Floral Volatiles

The floral volatile compounds were identified by comparing them with mass spectra from the NIST mass spectral library (NIST 08), with existing works of literature, and with authentic standards. Mass spectra were obtained by automatic scanning at m/z 20 to 500 amu. The identification of compounds was perceived via comparing the mass spectra with NIST 08 at a match factor of ≥80. The data were processed using mass hunter qualitative analysis workflow software (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

4.8. RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and RT-qPCR

Total RNA isolation and cDNA was synthesized as explained earlier [56,57]. Total RNA from different organs/tissues and flower developmental stages was extracted using a HiPure plant RNA mini kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s suggestions. In total RNA, genomic DNA contamination was removed by DNase I. The qRT-PCR analysis was executed in an ABI 7500 fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, MA, USA) using iTaqTM Universal SYBR Green Supermix (BIO-RAD, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 µL containing 10 µL iTaq ™ Universal SYBR Green Supermix (BIO-RAD), 7.2 µL of ddH2O, 0.4 µL each of forward and reverse primers, and 2 µL of cDNA, using an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). GAPDH was used for normalization of data and the 2 °C-ΔΔCT method was employed for measuring the relative expression analysis [58]. The reactions were performed in triplicate.

4.9. Data Analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. The differences among samples were calculated via analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3–5).

5. Conclusions

In the present study, an R2R3-MYB TF (HcMYB132) was isolated and functional characterized. Expression pattern analysis revealed that HcMYB132 was highly expressed in the flowers and its expression pattern correlated with flower development and emission of floral volatiles and was influenced by auxin. Suppression of HcMYB132 resulted in the downregulation of key structural genes and a decreased emission level of eucalyptol contents. Subcellular localization assay showed that HcMYB132 was localized to the nucleus.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants10102014/s1, Table S1: Primers used in the experiments, Table S2: Genes used in phylogenetic tree and their accession numbers.

Click here for additional data file. (158.4KB, zip)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.K. and Y.F.; data curation, D.O.R. and Q.W.; formal analysis, Y.K., Y.Z., M.I., S.A., Q.W. and L.W.; funding acquisition, R.Y. and Y.F.; investigation, F.A., Y.K., Y.Z., M.I. and S.A.; methodology, S.A., D.O.R. and L.W.; project administration, R.Y. and Y.F.; resources, D.O.R. and Y.F.; software, Y.Z., D.O.R. and L.W.; validation, M.I. and Q.W.; visualization, R.Y.; writing–original draft, F.A. and Y.K.; writing–review and editing, F.A., D.O.R., R.Y. and Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31770738), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFD1000407), the Key-Areas Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020B020220007), the People’s Livelihood Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou (Grant No. 201903010054) to YF, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China to RY (Grant No. 31870690).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article and supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Abbas F., Ke Y., Zhou Y., Yu Y., Waseem M., Ashraf D., Wang C., Wang X., Li X., Yue Y. Genome-wide analysis reveals the potential role of MYB transcription factors in floral scent formation in Hedychium coronarium. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:58. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.623742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abbas F., Ke Y., Zhou Y., Yu Y., Waseem M., Ashraf U., Li X., Yu R., Fan Y. Genome-wide analysis of ARF transcription factors reveals HcARF5 expression profile associated with the biosynthesis of β-ocimene synthase in Hedychium coronarium. Plant Cell Rep. 2021;40:1269–1284. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02709-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Báez D., Pino J.A., Morales D. Floral scent composition in Hedychium coronarium J. Koenig analyzed by SPME. J. Essen. Oil Res. 2011;23:64–67. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2011.9700460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fan Y., Yu R., Huang Y., Chen Y. Studies on the essential constituent of Hedychium flavum and H. coronarium. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2003;30:475. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2003.04.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fan Y.-p., Wang X.-r., Yu R.-c., Yang P. Analysis on the aroma components in several species of Hedychium. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2007;34:231. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2007.01.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang C., Abbas F., Zhou Y., Ke Y., Li X., Yue Y., Yu Y., Yu R., Fan Y. Genome-wide identification and expression pattern of SnRK gene family under several hormone treatments and its role in floral scent emission in Hedychium coronarium. PeerJ. 2021;9:e10883. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ke Y., Abbas F., Zhou Y., Yu R., Fan Y. Auxin-responsive R2R3-MYB transcription factors HcMYB1 and HcMYB2 activate volatile biosynthesis in Hedychium coronarium flowers. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:1626. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.710826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ke Y., Abbas F., Zhou Y., Yu R., Yue Y., Li X., Yu Y., Fan Y. Genome-wide analysis and characterization of the Aux/IAA Family genes related to floral scent formation in Hedychium coronarium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3235. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yue Y., Yu R., Fan Y. Characterization of two monoterpene synthases involved in floral scent formation in Hedychium coronarium. Planta. 2014;240:745–762. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yue Y., Yu R., Fan Y. Transcriptome profiling provides new insights into the formation of floral scent in Hedychium coronarium. BMC Genom. 2015;16:470. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1653-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ramya M., Kwon O.K., An H.R., Park P.M., Baek Y.S., Park P.H. Floral scent: Regulation and role of MYB transcription factors. Phytochem. Lett. 2017;19:114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2016.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dubos C., Le Gourrierec J., Baudry A., Huep G., Lanet E., Debeaujon I., Routaboul J.M., Alboresi A., Weisshaar B., Lepiniec L. MYBL2 is a new regulator of flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008;55:940–953. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03564.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dubos C., Stracke R., Grotewold E., Weisshaar B., Martin C., Lepiniec L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Medina-Puche L., Cumplido-Laso G., Amil-Ruiz F., Hoffmann T., Ring L., Rodríguez-Franco A., Caballero J.L., Schwab W., Muñoz-Blanco J., Blanco-Portales R. MYB10 plays a major role in the regulation of flavonoid/phenylpropanoid metabolism during ripening of Fragaria × ananassa fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 2014;65:401–417. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Medina-Puche L., Molina-Hidalgo F.J., Boersma M., Schuurink R.C., López-Vidriero I., Solano R., Franco-Zorrilla J.-M., Caballero J.L., Blanco-Portales R., Muñoz-Blanco J. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor regulates eugenol production in ripe strawberry fruit receptacles. Plant Physiol. 2015;168:598–614. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.252908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen K., Du L., Liu H., Liu Y. A novel R2R3-MYB from grape hyacinth, MaMybA, which is different from MaAN2, confers intense and magenta anthocyanin pigmentation in tobacco. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:390. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1999-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen R., Ni Z., Nie X., Qin Y., Dong G., Sun Q. Isolation and characterization of genes encoding Myb transcription factor in wheat (Triticum aestivem L.) Plant Sci. 2005;169:1146–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen T., Li W., Hu X., Guo J., Liu A., Zhang B. A cotton MYB transcription factor, GbMYB5, is positively involved in plant adaptive response to drought stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:917–929. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jung C., Seo J.S., Han S.W., Koo Y.J., Kim C.H., Song S.I., Nahm B.H., Do Choi Y., Cheong J.-J. Overexpression of AtMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:623–635. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.110981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Millar A.A., Gubler F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell. 2005;17:705–721. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.027920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vimolmangkang S., Han Y., Wei G., Korban S.S. An apple MYB transcription factor, MdMYB3, is involved in regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis and flower development. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jin H., Cominelli E., Bailey P., Parr A., Mehrtens F., Jones J., Tonelli C., Weisshaar B., Martin C. Transcriptional repression by AtMYB4 controls production of UV-protecting sunscreens in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2000;19:6150–6161. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lai B., Du L.-N., Hu B., Wang D., Huang X.-M., Zhao J.-T., Wang H.-C., Hu G.-b. Characterization of a novel litchi R2R3-MYB transcription factor that involves in anthocyanin biosynthesis and tissue acidification. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:62. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1658-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pérez-Díaz J.R., Pérez-Díaz J., Madrid-Espinoza J., González-Villanueva E., Moreno Y., Ruiz-Lara S. New member of the R2R3-MYB transcription factors family in grapevine suppresses the anthocyanin accumulation in the flowers of transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016;90:63–76. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0394-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yan J., Wang B., Zhong Y., Yao L., Cheng L., Wu T. The soybean R2R3 MYB transcription factor GmMYB100 negatively regulates plant flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015;89:35–48. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0349-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shin B., Choi G., Yi H., Yang S., Cho I., Kim J., Lee S., Paek N.C., Kim J.H., Song P.S. AtMYB21, a gene encoding a flower-specific transcription factor, is regulated by COP1. Plant J. 2002;30:23–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Uimari A., Strommer J. Myb26: A MYB-like protein of pea flowers with affinity for promoters of phenylpropanoid genes. Plant J. 1997;12:1273–1284. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12061273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Verdonk J.C., Haring M.A., van Tunen A.J., Schuurink R.C. ODORANT1 regulates fragrance biosynthesis in petunia flowers. Plant Cell. 2005;17:1612–1624. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.028837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Spitzer-Rimon B., Farhi M., Albo B., Cna’ani A., Zvi M.M.B., Masci T., Edelbaum O., Yu Y., Shklarman E., Ovadis M. The R2R3-MYB–like regulatory factor EOBI, acting downstream of EOBII, regulates scent production by activating ODO1 and structural scent-related genes in petunia. Plant Cell. 2012;24:5089–5105. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spitzer-Rimon B., Marhevka E., Barkai O., Marton I., Edelbaum O., Masci T., Prathapani N.-K., Shklarman E., Ovadis M., Vainstein A. EOBII, a gene encoding a flower-specific regulator of phenylpropanoid volatiles’ biosynthesis in petunia. Plant Cell. 2010;22:1961–1976. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.067280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cao Y., Xie L., Ma Y., Ren C., Xing M., Fu Z., Wu X., Yin X., Xu C., Li X. PpMYB15 and PpMYBF1 transcription factors are involved in regulating flavonol biosynthesis in peach fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018;67:644–652. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.El-Azaz J., de la Torre F., Pascual M.B., Debille S., Canlet F., Harvengt L., Trontin J.-F., Ávila C., Cánovas F.M. Transcriptional analysis of arogenate dehydratase genes identifies a link between phenylalanine biosynthesis and lignin biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2020;71:3080–3093. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu Z., Raven P. Flora of China. Vol. 24 (Flagellariaceae through Marantaceae) Science Press; Beijing, China: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.An X.-H., Tian Y., Chen K.-Q., Liu X.-J., Liu D.-D., Xie X.-B., Cheng C.-G., Cong P.-H., Hao Y.-J. MdMYB9 and MdMYB11 are Involved in the Regulation of the JA-Induced Biosynthesis of Anthocyanin and Proanthocyanidin in Apples. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;56:650–662. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhu N., Cheng S., Liu X., Du H., Dai M., Zhou D.-X., Yang W., Zhao Y. The R2R3-type MYB gene OsMYB91 has a function in coordinating plant growth and salt stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2015;236:146–156. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bedon F., Bomal C., Caron S., Levasseur C., Boyle B., Mansfield S.D., Schmidt A., Gershenzon J., Grima-Pettenati J., Séguin A. Subgroup 4 R2R3-MYBs in conifer trees: Gene family expansion and contribution to the isoprenoid-and flavonoid-oriented responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2010;61:3847–3864. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Van Moerkercke A., Haring M.A., Schuurink R.C. The transcription factor EMISSION OF BENZENOIDS II activates the MYB ODORANT1 promoter at a MYB binding site specific for fragrant petunias. Plant J. 2011;67:917–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stracke R., Ishihara H., Huep G., Barsch A., Mehrtens F., Niehaus K., Weisshaar B. Differential regulation of closely related R2R3-MYB transcription factors controls flavonol accumulation in different parts of the Arabidopsis thaliana seedling. Plant J. 2007;50:660–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03078.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stracke R., Werber M., Weisshaar B. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:447–456. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00199-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Millard P.S., Kragelund B.B., Burow M. R2R3 MYB transcription factors–Functions outside the DNA-binding domain. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24:934–946. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aharoni A., de Vos C.R., Wein M., Sun Z., Greco R., Kroon A., Mol J.N., O’Connell A.P. The strawberry FaMYB1 transcription factor suppresses anthocyanin and flavonol accumulation in transgenic tobacco. Plant J. 2001;28:319–332. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu J., Osbourn A., Ma P. MYB transcription factors as regulators of phenylpropanoid metabolism in plants. Mol. Plant. 2015;8:689–708. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pandey A., Misra P., Bhambhani S., Bhatia C., Trivedi P.K. Expression of Arabidopsis MYB transcription factor, AtMYB111, in tobacco requires light to modulate flavonol content. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:5018. doi: 10.1038/srep05018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu C., Hao J., Qiu M., Pan J., He Y. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the MYB transcription factor in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) Genomics. 2020;112:4875–4886. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Colquhoun T.A., Kim J.Y., Wedde A.E., Levin L.A., Schmitt K.C., Schuurink R.C., Clark D.G. PhMYB4 fine-tunes the floral volatile signature of Petunia× hybrida through PhC4H. J. Exp. Bot. 2010;62:1133–1143. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Abbas F., Ke Y., Yu R., Yue Y., Amanullah S., Jahangir M.M., Fan Y. Volatile terpenoids: Multiple functions, biosynthesis, modulation and manipulation by genetic engineering. Planta. 2017;246:803–816. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2749-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dudareva N., Klempien A., Muhlemann J.K., Kaplan I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013;198:16–32. doi: 10.1111/nph.12145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dudareva N., Martin D., Kish C.M., Kolosova N., Gorenstein N., Fäldt J., Miller B., Bohlmann J. (E)-β-ocimene and myrcene synthase genes of floral scent biosynthesis in snapdragon: Function and expression of three terpene synthase genes of a new terpene synthase subfamily. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1227–1241. doi: 10.1105/tpc.011015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yoshida K., Oyama-Okubo N., Yamagishi M. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor ODORANT1 regulates fragrance biosynthesis in lilies (Lilium spp.) Mol. Breed. 2018;38:144. doi: 10.1007/s11032-018-0902-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shin R., Burch A.Y., Huppert K.A., Tiwari S.B., Murphy A.S., Guilfoyle T.J., Schachtman D.P. The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB77 modulates auxin signal transduction. Plant Cell. 2007;19:2440–2453. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.050963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sievers F., Wilm A., Dineen D., Gibson T.J., Karplus K., Li W., Lopez R., McWilliam H., Remmert M., Söding J. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sainsbury F., Thuenemann E.C., Lomonossoff G.P. pEAQ: Versatile expression vectors for easy and quick transient expression of heterologous proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009;7:682–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Abbas F., Nian X., Zhou Y., Ke Y., Liu L., Yu R., Fan Y. Putative regulatory role of hexokinase and fructokinase in terpenoid aroma biosynthesis in Lilium ‘Siberia’. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021;167:619–629. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abbas F., Ke Y., Yu R., Fan Y. Functional characterization and expression analysis of two terpene synthases involved in floral scent formation in Lilium ‘Siberia’. Planta. 2019;249:71–93. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-3006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Abbas F., Ke Y., Zhou Y., Ashraf U., Li X., Yu Y., Yue Y., Ahmad K.W., Yu R., Fan Y. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of LoTPS2 and LoTPS4 involved in floral scent formation in oriental hybrid Lilium variety ‘Siberia’. Phytochemistry. 2020;173:112294. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Abbas F., Ke Y., Zhou Y., Waseem M., Yu Y., Ashraf U., Li X., Wang C., Yue Y., Yu R. Cloning, functional characterization and expression analysis of LoTPS5 from Lilium ‘Siberia’. Gene. 2020;756:144921. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (158.4KB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article and supplementary material.

Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES