Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Oct 24;52(2):112–116. doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2021.10.005

Exhaustive assessment of Reunion Island inpatients with COVID-19 during the first wave

L Bruneau a,b,, V Lenclume a,1, A Maillot a,1, A Rousseau b, M Lagrange-Xélot c, N Allou d, P Gérardin a
PMCID: PMC8542257  PMID: 34706299

On Reunion Island, a French overseas department of 860,000 inhabitants located in the Southwestern part of the Indian Ocean (SWIO), the first confirmed case of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) was imported by March 11, 2020. Considering the intense air traffic, we hypothesized that importations would be a major source of COVID-19 cases on Reunion Island. It was even more likely given that high-level standard of care, regional organization and policies confer a central role to Reunion Island for receiving air-flight medical evacuations from the SWIO region (Mauritius, Madagascar, Mayotte, and The Comoros).

So far, limited information is available to describe the characteristics of inpatients from insular tropical settings. The Reunionese population is still relatively young but yet strongly affected by obesity (11%), diabetes (9.8%), and dengue, raising fear of increasing severe COVID-19 infections [1], [2], [3].

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical severity of all COVID-19 inpatients presenting at the referral hospital of SWIO.

The COVID-EPI retrospective cohort study was conducted within Félix Guyon University Hospital, the only referral facility allowed to treat patients with COVID-19 on Reunion Island. Between March 11 and May 10, 2020, we enrolled all consecutive COVID-19 inpatients either diagnosed by a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from a nasopharyngeal swab specimen or positive antibodies. We divided our study period into two periods: Stage-1 period (introduction of an emergent pathogen into the territory) for admissions between March 11 and March 24, 2020, and Stage-2 period (start of its autochthonous spread) between March 25 and May 10, 2020 (end of lockdown). Hospitalization policy changed to comply with national and local guidelines according to the stage of the outbreak.

Consent to participate was obtained orally for each patient before enrolment in the cohort after written information had been handed out.

Epidemiological, clinical, sociodemographic characteristics and outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. Length of stay was provided by the Medical Informatics Department, blood group by the French blood establishment, and health insurance status by the administrative department of the hospital.

Clinical outcomes included the length of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, vital status at discharge [4], type of discharge for patients discharged alive, readmission, and vital status on day 28 post admission.

Continuous variables were described using median and interquartile range (IQR) values and categorical variables as percentages. Comparison between Stage-1 and Stage-2 periods were performed using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney test or Chi2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Two-sided tests and a significance threshold set at p≤0.05 were used. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS® software (v9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2013).

Out of 436 COVID-19 cases diagnosed on the island, 171 (39%) required hospitalization. Among these, 168 were enrolled in the COVID-EPI cohort.

The median age of inpatients was 50 years (IQR: 35-63, range 3-86 years). Half were females, of whom five were pregnant. Eighty-two inpatients (50%) had one or more comorbidities (including age and obesity), 70 (43%) excluding age. The most common comorbidities were hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus (Table 1 ).

Table 1.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 168 inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 on Reunion Island (March 11–May 10, 2020).

Total
(n = 168)
Stage 1 (n = 68)
March 11- March 24
Stage 2 (n = 100)
March 25–May 10
P-value
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age, yearsc 0.466
 < 18 y 4 (2) 2 (3) 2 (2)
 18–44 y 62 (37) 27 (40) 35 (35)
 45–54 y 27 (16) 13 (19) 14 (14)
 55–64 y 38 (23) 14 (21) 24 (24)
 65–74 y 21 (12) 9 (13) 12 (12)
 Aged ≥ 75 y 16 (10) 3 (4) 13 (13)
Male gender 86 (51) 31 (46) 55 (55) 0.231
Health insurance (n = 167)b 161 (96) 67 (100) 94 (94) 0.082
Supplemental health insurance (n = 162) 0.150
 Yes 115 (71) 52 (78) 63 (66)
 Social benefits for vulnerable population 28 (17) 7 (10) 21 (22)
 No 19 (12) 8 (12) 11 (12)
Place of birth (n = 118)c 0.088
 Reunion Island 68 (58) 26 (54) 42 (60)
 Mainland France 25 (21) 15 (31) 10 (14)
 Other Indian Ocean Island 18 (15) 4 (9) 14 (20)
 Other 7 (6) 3 (6) 4 (6)
Place of residence (n = 167)c 0.065
 Reunion Island 143 (86) 61 (91) 82 (82)
 Mainland France 17 (10) 6 (9) 11 (11)
 Other (Mayotte and Comoros Islands) 7 (4) 0 (0) 7 (7)
Epidemiological data
 Imported cases (n = 167) 132 (79) 61 (90) 71 (72) 0.005
 Of which medical evacuation (Yes) 9 (7) 0 (0) 9 (13) 0.004
 Healthcare workers (n = 154)b 10 (6) 7 (12) 3 (3) 0.048
 Contact with positive COVID-19 case (n = 158) 69 (44) 26 (39) 43 (47) 0.290
 Of which household transmission 42 (61) 13 (50) 29 (67) 0.150
Comorbidities
 Hypertension 41 (24) 14 (21) 27 (27) 0.342
 Obesity (Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2)b 23 (14) 3 (4) 20 (20) 0.005
 Diabetes mellitus 23 (14) 6 (9) 17 (17) 0.130
 Cardiovascular disease (n = 167)b 17 (10) 2 (3) 15 (15) 0.017
 Cerebrovascular diseaseb 8 (5) 2 (3) 6 (6) 0.476
 Chronic respiratory disease (n = 167) 22 (13) 11 (16) 11 (11) 0.310
 Immunosuppression (n = 167)b 4 (2) 0 (0) 4 (4) 0.147
 Malignancyb 7 (4) 0 (0) 7 (7) 0.042
 Dementia and psychiatric disordersb 7 (4) 0 (0) 7 (7) 0.042
Number of comorbidities (n = 164) < 0.001
 None 82 (50) 46 (70) 36 (37)
 ≥ 1 comorbidity 82 (50) 20 (30) 62 (63)
Smoking (n = 162) 0.045
 Never 118 (73) 50 (75) 68 (71)
 Past 29 (18) 15 (22) 14 (15)
 Active 15 (9) 2 (3) 13 (14)
Blood group (n = 76) 1
 Blood group O 25 (33) 9 (33) 16 (33)
 Blood group A 37 (49) 13 (48) 24 (49)
 Other blood groups (B, AB) 14 (18) 5 (19) 9 (18)
Clinical presentation 0.022
 Symptomatic 140 (84) 61 (90) 79 (79)
 Pauci-symptomatic 19 (11) 7 (10) 12 (12)
 Fully asymptomatic 9 (5) 0 (0) 9 (9)
Symptoms at disease onset (n = 159)
 Fever 104 (65) 49 (72) 55 (60) 0.128
 Dry cough 91 (54) 37 (54) 54 (59) 0.534
 Asthenia 52 (33) 18 (26) 34 (37) 0.148
 Myalgia 52 (33) 23 (34) 29 (32) 0.795
 Headache 49 (31) 18 (26) 31 (34) 0.305
 Dyspnea 43 (26) 11 (16) 32 (35) 0.008
 Ageusia 38 (23) 11 (16) 27 (30) 0.048
 Diarrhea 34 (21) 8 (12) 26 (29) 0.011
Symptom main locations (n = 159)c 0.003
 Upper respiratory tract 70 (42) 41 (60) 29 (32)
 Lower respiratory tract 59 (35) 18 (27) 41 (45)
 Abdominal 11 (7) 2 (3) 9 (10)
 Other 28 (16) 7 (10) 12 (13)
 Coinfection with dengue feverb 3 (2) 0 (0) 3 (3) 0.273
Time, median (IQR a), days
 between symptom onset and RT-PCR 4 (2-7) 3 (2-5) 5 (2-9) 0.013
 between symptom onset and admission 5 (3-9) 4 (3-6) 7 (4-10) 0.001
Additional tests
 Chest X-ray (yes) (n = 167) 65 (39) 44 (65) 21 (21) < 0.001
  Abnormal (n = 59)b 31 (53) 20 (45) 11 (73) 0.078
 1st chest CT scan (yes) 68 (40) 15 (22) 53 (53) < 0.001
  Abnormalb 59 (87) 13 (87) 46 (87) 1
  Bilateral distribution of patchy shadows or ground glass opacity (n = 67)b 53 (79) 12 (80) 41 (79) 1
 Injected chest CT scan (yes) (n = 166) 46 (28) 13 (19) 33 (34) 0.039
 At least one ECG (n = 166) 107 (64) 36 (55) 71 (71) 0.030
  At least one abnormal (n = 106) 36 (34) 7 (19) 29 (41) 0.023
  QTc on 1st ECG, median (IQRa), ms 392 (367-420) 380 (360-417) 392 (374-420) 0.313

Data is shown as n (column percentages) or median. All p-values refer to comparisons between the two periods using the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative variables and the Chi2 test for categorical variables. RT-PCR, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction; CT scan, computed tomography; ECG, electrocardiogram.

a

Interquartile range.

b

Fisher's exact test.

c

Fisher-Freeman-Halton test.

Stage-2 inpatients were more likely autochthonous than Stage-1 inpatients. However, there were no significant differences between imported and autochthonous cases regarding age, comorbidities, severity of illness, and time from symptom onset to RT-PCR and from symptom onset to admission. Importantly, most imported cases (82%) were permanent residents of the island. Among 159 symptomatic people, the five most common symptoms at onset of illness were fever, dry cough, asthenia, myalgia, and headache.

Median time between fever onset and apyrexia was 9 days (IQR: 6-13 days).

Forty (23%) inpatients had a severe to critical COVID-19 presentation. There was a trend towards more severe forms of COVID-19 in Stage-2 compared with Stage-1 (P  = 0.059). None of the patients have been included in an interventional research study protocol (Table 2 ).

Table 2.

Severity of illness, complications, therapeutic and clinical outcomes of 168 inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 on Reunion Island (March 11–May 10, 2020).

Total
(n = 168)
Stage 1 (n = 68)
March 11- March 24
Stage 2 (n = 100)
March 25–May 10
P-value
Severity of illness (n = 159)b 0.059
 Mild 107 (64) 49 (72) 49 (54)
 Moderate 21 (13) 6 (9) 15 (16)
 Severe 36 (21) 13 (19) 23 (25)
 Critical 4 (2) 0 (0) 4 (4)
Complications
 Anemia 18 (11) 2 (3) 16 (16) 0.009
 Bacterial pneumonia (n = 167) 15 (9) 5 (7) 10 (10) 0.542
 Digestive complicationsa 11 (7) 3 (4) 8 (8) 0.528
 Acute renal failure or extra-renal purificationa 10 (6) 1 (2) 9 (9) 0.050
 ARDSa 6 (4) 1 (2) 5 (5) 0.403
 Pleural effusiona 6 (4) 1 (2) 5 (5) 0.403
 Altered mental statusa 6 (4) 2 (3) 4 (4) 1
 Cardiac rhythm disordersa 4 (2) 1 (2) 3 (3) 0.648
 Pulmonary embolisma 3 (2) 1 (2) 2 (2) 1
 Thrombosisa 3 (2) 0 (0) 3 (3) 0.273
 Cardiac ischemiaa 3 (2) 0 (0) 3 (3) 0.273
 Bacteremiaa 3 (2) 0 (0) 3 (3) 0.273
 Endocarditisa 2 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1) 1
 At least one complication (n = 167) 50 (30) 14 (21) 36 (36) 0.029
Therapeutic outcomes
 Pharmaceutical treatment
  Anticoagulanta 42 (25) 4 (6) 38 (38) <0.001
  Antibiotics 40 (24) 10 (15) 30 (30) 0.022
  Antivirals 33 (20) 12 (18) 21 (21) 0.591
  Steroidsa 16 (10) 3 (4) 13 (13) 0.106
 Highest level of respiratory support (n = 165)b 0.507
  None 125 (76) 55 (81) 70 (72)
  Oxygen inhalation (nasal cannula/face mask) 32 (19) 12 (18) 20 (21)
  High flow oxygen 2 (1) 0 (0) 2 (2)
  NIV 3 (2) 1 (2) 2 (2)
  IMV 3 (2) 0 (0) 3 (3)
Clinical outcomes
 ICU admissiona 17 (10) 4 (6) 13 (13) 0.193
 Vital status at discharge (at study end point)b 1
  Discharged alive 166 (99) 68 (100) 98 (98)
  Deceased 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)
  Currently hospitalized 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)
 Type of discharge for patients discharged alive (n = 166)a 0.145
  Home 162 (98) 68 (100) 94 (96)
  Facilities (rehabilitation) 4 (2) 0 (0) 4 (4)
 GOS at discharge (n = 167)b 0.875
  1. Death 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)
  2. Persistent vegetative state 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  3. Severe disability 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)
  4. Moderate disability 4 (2) 1 (1) 3 (3)
  5. Low disability 161 (96) 67 (99) 94 (95)
 Readmitted 13 (8) 7 (10) 6 (6) 0.307
 Vital status at 28 days after admission (n = 167)a 1
  Alive 166 (99) 68 (100) 98 (99)
  Died 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)

Data is shown as n (column percentages). All P-values refer to comparisons between the two periods using the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative variables and the Chi2 test for categorical variables. ARDS, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; NIV, Non-invasive ventilation; IMV, Invasive mechanical ventilation; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale.

a

Fisher's exact test.

b

Fisher-Freeman-Halton test.

The median length of stay was seven days (IQR: 3-13 days). Seventeen (10%) patients required admission to the ICU. One patient died in the ICU, 12 days after admission (death attributable to COVID-19). He was an 82-year-old man with hypertension and chronic kidney failure, who had been medically evacuated from Mayotte Island. Evacuated patients from Mayotte or Comoros Islands (n  = 9) more frequently presented with comorbidities (89% vs. 47%; P  = 0.034) and were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (33% vs. 9%; P  = 0.050).

Our data highlight the low severity of the illness on our territory during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic (low infection fatality rate: 0.6%). Several factors may influence SARS-CoV-2 severity here. First, COVID-19 severity can be modulated by age [5]. Compared to some other European hospital-based studies, our population was about 10 to 20 years younger [6], [7], [8]. People under 20 years of age represent 31% of the Reunionese population [9]. Second, the health service has never been overburdened. Postponement of non-urgent care was implemented in the hospital as soon as March 11, 2020 (6 days prior to the national lockdown), thus increasing hospital bed capacity. Treatment has evolved during this period according to new scientific knowledge. In addition, early diagnosis at the time of travel return and systematic monitoring during Stage-1 may have contributed to prevent progression to severe disease.

We observed changes in the clinical presentation of COVID-19 over the study period and a non-significant trend towards more severe forms of the disease in the Stage-2 period that could be explained by an increase in the virulence as the transmission rate grew [10]. However, this hypothesis must be counterbalanced by the fact that hospitalization policy has also evolved over time, voluntarily selecting comorbid and severe patients who consulted later in hospital during the Stage-2 period.

This hospital-based study is one of the first to report exhaustive high-quality data about SARS-CoV-2 infection, from an insular tropical setting of the Indian Ocean. The study is still ongoing, which will allow us to follow the evolution of patients’ characteristics, especially for the South African variant

Ethical approval

An oral non-opposition to participate was obtained for each patient before inclusion in the study and a written information notice was handed out. Patients already discharged from hospital were called over the phone, and the information notice was sent at home. The study was registered at the National Institute for Health Data (French acronym INDS, No. MR0614010420) and was approved by an Institutional Review Board from the French infectious diseases ethics committee (CERC-MIT, No. 2020-043; N°IRB00011642). Collected data complied with the French data protection authority (CNIL MR-004). The review board approved this case series as minimal-risk research using data collected for routine clinical practice.

Consent to participate

An oral non-opposition to participate was obtained for each patient before inclusion in the study and a written information notice was handed out.

Availability of data and materials

The corresponding author (LB) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

Funding

The authors did not receive any specific grant for this research from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest. The corresponding author confirms that he had full access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

References

  • 1.Mandereau-Bruno L. Prévalence du diabète traité pharmacologiquement (tous types) en France en 2015. Disparités territoriales et socio-éconmiques. BEH. 2017:6. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Muniyappa R., Gubbi S. COVID-19 Pandemic, Corona Viruses, and Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00124.2020. [Epub ahead of print 31 March] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simonnet A., Chetboun M., Poissy J., et al. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obes Silver Spring Md. 2020 doi: 10.1002/oby.22831. [Epub ahead of print 9 April] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McMillan T., Wilson L., Ponsford J., et al. The Glasgow Outcome Scale - 40 years of application and refinement. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:477–485. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fang X., Li S., Yu H., et al. Epidemiological, comorbidity factors with severity and prognosis of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging. 2020;12:12493–12503. doi: 10.18632/aging.103579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pellaud C. Characteristics, comorbidities, 30-day outcome and in-hospital mortality of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in a Swiss area–a retrospective cohort study. 2020 doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20314. [Epub ahead of print 14 July] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Giacomelli A., Ridolfo A.L., Milazzo L., et al. 30-day mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first wave of the Italian epidemic: A prospective cohort study. Pharmacol Res. 2020;158:104931. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Vito A., Geremia N., Fiore V., et al. Clinical features, laboratory findings and predictors of death in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Sardinia, Italy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:7861–7868. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202007_22291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Une population vieillissante - Insee Analyses Réunion - 25, https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/3047952.(accessed 10 November 2020).
  • 10.Ebert D., Bull J.J. Challenging the trade-off model for the evolution of virulence: is virulence management feasible? Trends Microbiol. 2003;11:15–20. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(02)00003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author (LB) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.


Articles from Infectious Diseases Now are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES