Skip to main content
Healthcare logoLink to Healthcare
. 2021 Oct 16;9(10):1386. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101386

Trends and Factors Associated with Oral Contraceptive Use among Korean Women

Hyejin Park 1, Kisok Kim 2,*
Editor: Francesco Sessa
PMCID: PMC8544440  PMID: 34683066

Abstract

Although oral contraceptives (OC) are widely used, few national-level epidemiologic studies have evaluated the prevalence of OC use and factors related to their use in Korea. We performed a population-based cross-sectional study on OC use by premenopausal women aged 20–59 years residing in Korea. We used secondary data from the 2010–2019 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to examine trends in the annual prevalence of OC use between 2010 and 2019, and factors influencing OC use. Based on data from 14,386 premenopausal women, the average annual prevalence of OC use was 8.2–10.7% between 2010 and 2014; it increased to 12.6–14.4% during 2015–2019. The prevalence of OC use was significantly higher in women with higher (≥5) than lower gravidity (<5). In addition, among sociodemographic factors, education level, household income, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking were significantly associated with OC use in Korean women. As OC use is affected by sociodemographic factors, a contraceptive plan that considers sociodemographic factors is needed to establish an effective family planning policy.

Keywords: oral contraceptive, annual trends, sociodemographic factors, postmenopausal women, KNHANES

1. Introduction

Advances in contraceptive methods are an important achievement in the field of public health, with about 60% of women of childbearing age using modern methods of contraception [1]. Oral contraceptives (OCs) are an important and widely accepted method of contraception worldwide [2]. OCs are used by more than 150 million women worldwide, as an effective and reversible method of family planning [3,4]. In general, OCs are among the most commonly used methods of contraception in developed countries. However, the prevalence of OC use is lower in developed Asian countries, such as Japan and Korea, than in Western countries [5], suggesting differences in the sociodemographic factors affecting the prevalence of OC use.

Understanding the factors influencing contraceptive use among premenopausal women who are at risk of unintended pregnancy is important for the development of effective family planning policies. Previous studies have suggested that socioeconomic factors including age, education, residency, and occupation are among the main factors influencing contraceptive use [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Some studies have also reported that reproductive factors including marital age, gestational age, gravidity, parity, and birth interval also affect contraceptive use [7,8,9].

In addition, cultural and religious variables are known to influence the prevalence of contraceptive use [12,13]. Thus, identifying factors that influence the use of contraceptives, including OCs, in premenopausal women is essential for reducing the risk of unintended pregnancy. However, few studies have examined variables related to OC use in Korean women of reproductive age. Furthermore, few longitudinal epidemiological studies have identified trends in OC use in Korea.

The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and related factors of OC use in premenopausal Korean women using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), a nationally representative survey conducted in the Republic of Korea. We analyzed the factors associated with such use and changes in its prevalence from 2010 to 2019.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

We used secondary data from the 2010–2019 KNHANES, which were provided by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. To obtain nationally representative samples of the Korean population, the KNHANES used a stratified, multistage, cluster-sampling design with proportional allocation based on the National Census Registry. This study included data of 14,386 premenopausal women aged 20–59 years, who were not pregnant, surveyed across 10 consecutive years. The study protocol was approved by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects defined by the Helsinki Declaration. All participants provided written informed consent.

2.2. Variable Definitions

The KNHANES employed well-established questions to determine participants’ demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, including age, gender, education level, income, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, and gravidity. Education level was categorized as less than a high school diploma, high school diploma, college, or advanced degree. Alcohol consumption was assessed by questions about drinking behavior during the month before the interview. Subjects were asked about the average frequency of alcoholic beverage intake. Alcohol consumption frequency was classified as none, drinking less or equal to once a month, and drinking more than once a month. Height and weight were measured while participants wore light clothing and no shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kg) divided by the square of height (in m). Subjects were categorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 23.0 kg/m2), overweight (23.0 kg/m2≤ BMI < 25.0 kg/m2), or obese (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) based on World Health Organization (WHO) definitions for Asian populations.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We calculated frequencies (with percentages) for categorical variables and means and standard deviations (SDs) for continuous variables, when describing the sample population. We compared continuous variables between OC users and non-users using the t-test. The statistical significance of differences was determined using the Mantel–Haenszel chi-squared test. Sampling weights were used to determine the annual prevalence of OC use. The sampling weights were estimated by the following three factors: the sample selection probability, the adjustment for non-response, and the post-stratification factor [14]. Sampling weights calculated by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were used in this study. The use of sample weights helped to account for unequal probability sampling among the different strata and ensured the representativeness of the survey results at the national level. The statistical analyses also took account of the survey design, and appropriate procedures in SAS (‘surveymeans’) were applied to the weighted data to calculate the mean prevalence (with a 95% confidence interval, CI) of OC use. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software (ver. 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

A total of 14,386 women aged 20–59 years were included in this study; their demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean age and BMI of the study population were 37.2 years and 22.6 kg/m2, respectively.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the participants.

Characteristics n %
Age (years)
20–29 3255 22.6
30–39 4887 34.0
40–49 5172 36.0
50–59 1072 7.4
BMI
<18.5 1204 8.4
18.5–22.9 7664 53.3
23–25 2421 16.8
>25 3097 21.5
Education
<High School Diploma 891 6.2
High School 5827 40.5
High shool < – ≤ Undergraduate degree 6869 47.8
Advanced Degree 799 5.5
Average Household Income (USD/month)
<1600 3446 23.9
1600–2299 3580 24.9
2300–3300 3678 25.6
>3300 3682 25.6
Cigarette Smoking
Yes 1021 7.1
No 13,365 92.9
Alcohol Drinking
Yes 8698 60.5
No 5688 39.5
Number of Gravidity
0 3971 27.6
1–3 7487 52.0
>3 2928 20.4

Among Korean women aged 20–59 years, the estimated annual mean prevalence of OC use was 8.2–10.7% during 2010–2014. Compared to 2010–2014, this value increased to 12.6–14.4% during 2015–2019 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Annual prevalence (95% confidence interval) of OC use from 2010 to 2019.

Figure 2 shows the prevalence of OC use across categories of gravidity. The prevalence of OC use was significantly higher among subjects with the higher (≥5) than lower gravidity (<5) (p < 0.01).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Annual prevalence (95% confidence interval) of OC use according to gravidity. * p < 0.01, compared with the other groups.

The participants’ basic characteristics are presented in Table 2 by OC use and the study outcomes. As the education level decreased, the participants’ use of OCs increased (p < 0.001). In addition, women belonging to the lowest income quartile were more likely to use OCs than those in the highest income quartile (p = 0.011). Cigarette smoking (p < 0.001) and alcohol drinking (p = 0.022) were associated with increased OC use. However, OC use was not significantly correlated with BMI, marital status, employment status, or area of residence.

Table 2.

Sociodemographic factors affecting oral contraceptive (OC) use among married Korean women.

Characteristics OC User (n = 1573) Non-OC User (n = 12,813) p-Value 1
Age (years), mean (SD) 37.4 (9.1) 37.2 (8.8) 0.386
BMI, mean (SD) 22.8 (3.8) 22.6 (3.7) 0.051
Marriage, n (% within group) 0.619
Yes 9513 (74.2) 1177 (74.8)
No 3300 (25.8) 396 (25.2)
Education, n (% within group) <0.001
<High school diploma 184 (11.7) 707 (5.5)
High school 668 (42.5) 5159 (40.3)
High shool < – ≤ Undergraduate degree 654 (41.6) 6215 (48.5)
Advanced degree 67 (4.2) 732 (5.7)
Income, n (% within group) 0.011
<1600 413 (26.3) 3033 (23.7)
1600–2299 409 (26.0) 3171 (24.7)
2300–3300 364 (23.1) 3314 (25.9)
>3300 387 (24.6) 3295 (25.7)
Cigarette smoking, n (% within group) <0.001
Yes 225 (14.3) 796 (6.2)
No 1348 (85.7) 12,017 (93.8)
Alcohol drinking, n (% within group) <0.001
Never 239 (15.2) 2636 (20.6)
≤1 drink/month 594 (37.8) 5088 (39.7)
>1 drink/month 740 (47.0) 5089 (39.7)
Employment, n (% within group) 0.055
Yes 979 (62.2) 7652 (59.7)
No 594 (37.8) 5161 (40.3)
Residence, n (% within group) 0.498
Urban 1361 (86.5) 11,164 (87.1)
Rural 212 (13.5) 1649 (12.9)

1 p-values were determined using the t-test or Mantel–Haenszel chi-square test, based on comparison between the OC and non-OC groups.

4. Discussion

OCs containing estrogen and progestin have long been used as an effective contraceptive method. Contemporary third- or fourth-generation OCs, which have fewer side effects than earlier generations [15,16,17], are now widely used worldwide as a family planning method. In the present nationwide survey of premenopausal Korean women aged 20–59 years, the most recent (2019) annual prevalence rate of OC use was 12.8%, which is higher than that in Japan and lower than those in many European countries, such as the United Kingdom and France [3,18,19,20]. This variation in OC use could be attributed to variations in cultural or religious attitudes, as well as the accessibility and availability of OCs in each country.

In this study, the prevalence of OC use between 2010 and 2014 fluctuated between 8.2 and 10.7% but increased sharply after 2015. The increased use of OCs in Korea has two possible explanations. First, a national survey examining the use of contraceptive methods among Korean married women indicated that condoms were the most commonly used form of contraception in Korea. On the other hand, the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) as a method of contraception in Korea has significantly decreased since 2015 [21], which may have contributed to the greater use of OCs in addition to condoms.

Disasters at the national level may also, at least in part, have influenced patterns of contraception use. In April 2014, a large ferry disaster caused severe distress in Korean society. Studies have provided evidence of the long-lasting negative psychological impact of this disaster, manifested as depressive symptoms and anxiety not only among the victims’ families and community residents, but also in the Korean population as a whole [22,23,24,25]. Previous studies have reported that social disasters affect contraceptive behavior, and that depressive symptoms may affect methods of contraception [26,27]. In addition, a recent study reported that social disasters significantly reduce the fertility rate for a fairly long period of time [28]. Thus, the notable increase in OC use in 2015 may be partly attributable to the adverse psychological effects of the ferry disaster.

In addition, the present study showed that gravidity affects OC use. Similar to the results of this study, a study analyzing US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data [29] identified differences in trends of OC use according to pregnancy history, suggesting that the use of OC to avoid unintended pregnancies may increase with higher gravidity.

The present study found that sociodemographic factors including education level, household income, smoking, and drinking affected OC use. Women with lower educational and socioeconomic status tend to have sex at a younger age [30]. Therefore, young women with low educational attainment and/or low household income may be more likely to require contraceptive methods, including OCs. Furthermore, smoking prevalence is known to be higher in socioeconomically vulnerable groups [31]. Additionally, similar to the results of the present study, previous studies indicated that women who reported using OCs were more likely to smoke and drink than non-OC users [32,33]. Thus, there may be a relationship between smoking/drinking and early sexual initiation, which could lead to increased OC use.

This study has some limitations. Given the complexity of factors influencing drug use behavior, it is reasonable to assume that there are additional factors or demographic variables that are not accounted for in our model. Factors such as associated comorbidities, use of contraindicated drugs, and cultural or religious variables need to be included in the analysis of future studies. Another limitation of this study is that self-reporting OC use and sociodemographic variables, including alcohol drinking and smoking, may lead to misclassification and recall bias. The results of this study suggest that, when formulating a family planning policy including the use of contraceptives, it is necessary to consider sociodemographic factors such as the target group’s education level, alcohol drinking and smoking habits as well as the number of pregnancies.

5. Conclusions

In this study, using nationally representative data, the prevalence of OC use between 2010 and 2019 ranged from 8.2 to 14.4%, with the prevalence increasing since 2015. OC use was related to gravidity, education level, household income, smoking, and drinking. The results of this study could be used to predict trends in contraception use and will be valuable for establishing policies to improve the availability and accessibility of OCs for specific groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.P. and K.K.; methodology, K.K.; formal analysis, H.P.; investigation, H.P. and K.K.; resources, H.P.; data curation, H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, H.P.; writing—review and editing, K.K.; visualization, K.K.; supervision, K.K.; project administration, H.P.; funding acquisition, H.P. and K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Nos. NRF-2019R1F1A1057499, NRF-2018R1D1A1B07050009).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of KNHANES (IRB approval # 2010-02CON-21-C, 2011-02CON-06-C, 2012-01EXP-01-2C, 2013-07CON-03-4C, 2013-12EXP-03-5C, 2018-01-03-P-A, 2018-01-03-C-A).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Alkema L., Kantorova V., Menozzi C., Biddlecom A. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: A systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet. 2013;381:1642–1652. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62204-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benagiano G., Bastianelli C., Farris M. Contraception today. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006;1092:1–32. doi: 10.1196/annals.1365.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Contraceptive Use by Method. 2019. [(accessed on 12 May 2021)]. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2019_contraceptiveusebymethod_databooklet.pdf.
  • 4.Mansour D., Inki P., Gemzell-Danielsson K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: A review of the literature. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care. 2010;15:4–16. doi: 10.3109/13625180903427675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Contraceptive Use. 2020. [(accessed on 12 May 2021)]. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/dataset/contraception/wcu2020.asp.
  • 6.Mohammed A., Woldeyohannes D., Feleke A., Megabiaw B. Determinants of modern contraceptive utilization among married women of reproductive age group in North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Reprod. Health. 2014;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Apanga P.A., Adam M.A. Factors influencing the uptake of family planning services in the Talensi District, Ghana. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2015;20:10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.10.5301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.New J.R., Cahill N., Stover J., Gupta Y.P., Alkema L. Levels and trends in contraceptive prevalence, unmet need, and demand for family planning for 29 states and union territories in India: A modelling study using the Family Planning Estimation Tool. Lancet Glob. Health. 2017;5:e350–e358. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30033-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Siddiqui M., Fatima K., Ali S.N., Fatima M., Naveed W., Siddiqui F., Naqvi T., Khan S., Amin M., Liaquat A., et al. Prevalence and predictors of contraception usage in Karachi, Pakistan. Cureus. 2020;12:e11265. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Letamo G., Navaneetham K. Levels, trends and reasons for unmet need for family planning among married women in Botswana: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:1–11. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Debebe S., Limenih M.A., Biadgo B. Modern contraceptive methods utilization and associated factors among reproductive aged women in rural Dembia District, Northwest Ethiopia: Community based cross-sectional study. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2017;15:367. doi: 10.29252/ijrm.15.6.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wulifan J.K., Mazalale J., Kambala C., Angko W., Asante J., Kpinpuo S., Kalolo A. Prevalence and determinants of unmet need for family planning among married women in Ghana-a multinomial logistic regression analysis of the GDHS, 2014. Contracept. Reprod. Med. 2019;4:2. doi: 10.1186/s40834-018-0083-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gueye A., Speizer I.S., Corroon M., Okigbo C.C. Belief in family planning myths at the individual and community levels and modern contraceptive use in urban Africa. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health. 2015;41:191–199. doi: 10.1363/intsexrephea.41.4.0191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Park E.Y., Han K.H., Chung T.H., Kim N.Y., Lee J.M., Choi S.J., Kim J.K. Association between reproductive span and sarcopenia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;18:154. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Speroff L., DeCherney A. Evaluation of a new generation of oral contraceptives. The Advisory Board for the New Progestins. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993;81:1034–1047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Paton D.M. Drospirenone: A novel progestogen used as an oral contraceptive without an estrogen component. Drugs Today. 2020;56:321–328. doi: 10.1358/dot.2020.56.5.3134788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaplan B. Desogestrel, norgestimate, and gestodene: The newer progestins. Ann. Pharmacother. 1995;29:736–742. doi: 10.1177/106002809502907-817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yasui T., Ideno Y., Shinozaki H., Kitahara Y., Nagai K., Hayashi K. JNHS Research Group. Prevalence of the use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy in Japan: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study. J. Epidemiol. 2020 doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200207. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lundberg V., Tolonen H., Stegmayr B., Kuulasmaa K., Asplund K. WHO MONICA Project. Use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy in the WHO MONICA project. Maturitas. 2004;48:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rashed A.N., Hsia Y., Wilton L., Ziller M., Kostev K., Tomlin S. Trends and patterns of hormonal contraceptive prescribing for adolescents in primary care in the UK. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care. 2015;41:216–222. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.A Study on Factors of Childbirth Experience Affecting Contraceptive Practices among Married Women in Childbearing Age. 2020. [(accessed on 16 June 2021)]. Available online: http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15528919.
  • 22.Lee M.J., Lee T.R., Lee S.J., Jang J.S., Kim E.J. Machine learning-based data mining method for sentiment analysis of the Sewol ferry disaster’s effect on social stress. Front. Psychiatry. 2020;11:505673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.505673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang H.J., Kim G., Lee K., Lee J., Cheong H.K., Choi B.Y., Lee S.Y. Changes in the levels of depressive symptoms and anxiety in Ansan city after the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster. J. Affect. Disord. 2018;241:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang H.J., Cheong H.K., Choi B.Y., Shin M.H., Yim H.W., Kim D.H., Kim G., Lee S.Y. Community mental health status six months after the Sewol ferry disaster in Ansan, Korea. Epidemiol. Health. 2015;37:e2015046. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2015046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Woo H., Cho Y., Shim E., Lee K., Song G. Public trauma after the Sewol ferry disaster: The role of social media in understanding the public mood. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:10974–10983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120910974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Freed B., Hillman S., Shantikumar S., Bick D., Dale J., Gauly J. The impact of disasters on contraception in OECD member countries: A scoping review. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care. 2021;26:429–438. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1934440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Garbers S., Correa N., Tobier N., Blust S., Chiasson M.A. Association between symptoms of depression and contraceptive method choices among low-income women at urban reproductive health centers. Matern. Child. Health J. 2010;14:102–109. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0437-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kurita N. Association of the great east Japan earthquake and the Daiichi nuclear disaster in Fukushima city, Japan, with birth rates. JAMA Netw. Open. 2019;2:e187455. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.King L.A., Michels K.A., Graubard B.I., Trabert B. Trends in oral contraceptive and intrauterine device use among reproductive-aged women in the US from 1999 to 2017. Cancer Causes Control. 2021;32:587–595. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01410-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lara L.A., Abdo C.H. Age at time of initial sexual intercourse and health of adolescent girls. J. Pediatric Adolesc. Gynecol. 2016;29:417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hiscock R., Bauld L., Amos A., Fidler J.A., Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1248:107–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Carrasco-Garrido P., López de Andrés A., Hernández-Barrera V., Jiménez-Trujillo I., Esteban-Peña M., Pérez-Farinós N., Jiménez-García R. Trends in the use of oral contraceptives among adolescents and young women in Spain. Reprod. Health. 2016;13:122. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0239-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lund E., Jacobsen B.K. Use of oral contraceptives in relation to dietary habits and alcohol consumption. Contraception. 1990;42:171–177. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90100-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Healthcare are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES