Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2021 Aug 30;52(11):e739–e741. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035112

The Effect of Adjusting for Baseline Stroke Severity in the National Inpatient Sample

Adam de Havenon 1,*, Kevin N Sheth 2, Karen C Johnston 3, Mohammad Anadani 4, Shadi Yaghi 5, David Tirschwell 6, John Ney 7
PMCID: PMC8545762  NIHMSID: NIHMS1733377  PMID: 34455821

Prior research has shown that stroke severity measured on the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is important for accurate modeling of post-stroke outcome.1,2 However, NIHSS scores in stroke registries, such as Get With The Guidelines, are not readily available to researchers. In October of 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released an ICD-10-CM code (R29.7x) for documentation of admission NIHSS, to be used in conjunction with the diagnosis of ischemic stroke (I63.x).3 To determine if an administratively coded NIHSS improved the accuracy of outcome prediction in ischemic stroke patients, we created a cohort from October 2016 to December 2018 of National Inpatient Sample (NIS) non-elective hospital discharges aged ≥18 with a primary discharge diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-10-CM I63.x) and a documented NIHSS. We conformed to the RECORD guidelines and because our study used de-identified data, it was exempt from IRB approval. The data is publicly available at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov.

To evaluate the accuracy of multivariable models fit to the study outcomes of in-hospital death and good outcome (discharge to home or self-care) with and without adjustment for NIHSS, we compared the models’ areas under the receiver operating curves (AUC) using DeLong’s method, which provides a statistical measure of the difference in AUC.4 Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, patient urban-rural residence, median household income by ZIP code, expected primary payor, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), intravenous alteplase (tPA), intubation, APR-DRG mortality risk (model fit to in-hospital death) or APR-DRG severity of illness (model fit to good outcome), Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, hospital Census region, teaching status, and bed size (small/medium/large). As a measure of multicollinearity, we report the models’ mean variance inflation factor (VIF), with a VIF of >5 indicating unacceptable multicollinearity. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 16.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

Of 224,995 discharges with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke, we included 76,801 (34.1%) with an available NIHSS (Supplemental Figure 1), of which 49.1% were female, 15.1% received tPA, 7.3% had EVT, and the mean (SD) age was 69.7 (14.0) years. The median (IQR) NIHSS was 4 (2–10), 3.8% had in-hospital death and 35.7% had good outcome. The AUC of the multivariable model fit to in-hospital death without NIHSS was 0.924 (95% CI 0.920–0.929), while with NIHSS it increased to 0.940 (95% CI 0.937–0.943) (p<0.001) (Supplemental Figure 1). The AUC of the multivariable model fit to good outcome increased from 0.778 (95% CI 0.776–0.782) without NIHSS to 0.817 (95% CI 0.814–0.820) with NIHSS (p<0.001) (Supplemental Figure 2). The mean VIF of both models was <3 and the VIF of NIHSS in both models was <3, indicating acceptable multicollinearity.

Several important differences in the point estimates emerged when comparing models before and after adjustment for NIHSS. Without adjustment for NIHSS, EVT was associated with lower odds of good outcome (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–0.99). With NIHSS in the model, a more accurate picture of EVT’s effect on good outcome emerged (OR 2.45, 95% CI 2.24–2.68), consistent with the HERMES collaboration meta-analysis, which reported an odds ratio of 2.49 (95% CI 1.76–3.53).5 Without adjustment for NIHSS, women had a higher odds of death than men (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.22), but the association did not retain significance after adjustment for NIHSS (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.08). Likewise, the point estimate of tPA’s effect on good outcome changed with NIHSS in the model (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.91–2.12), compared to without NIHSS (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.31–1.44). Forest plots of the odds ratios for patient sex, EVT, and tPA before and after adjustment for NIHSS are seen in Figure 1 and a forest plot of the full model is shown in Supplemental Figure 3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Multivariable models without and with NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) showing odds ratios for patient sex, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and intravenous alteplase (tPA).

In patients with ischemic stroke, the addition of ICD-coded admission NIHSS to adjusted models fit to in-hospital death or good outcome improves accuracy. Outside-of-disease adjustments, such as the Charlson, Elixhauser or APR-DRG, are important, but a within-disease measure like NIHSS is critical for epidemiologic and health service researchers and quality officers. The results of the VIF testing confirm that NIHSS was not collinear with other severity adjustments, rather it was additive. The main limitations of our analysis include selection bias from focusing on a subgroup of patients with an available NIHSS and the lack of longer-term outcome data after discharge. Nonetheless, we show that associations between post-stroke outcome and patient sex or stroke interventions require adjustment for NIHSS to reveal the true direction and size of effect. This has implications for the interpretation of prior ischemic stroke research that used administrative datasets without NIHSS data.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Publication Material

Acknowledgments:

Dr. de Havenon had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. This article was prepared using National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database obtained from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the AHRQ. The AHRQ had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Sources of Funding: Dr. de Havenon: NIH-NINDS K23NS105924. Dr. Sheth: NIH-NINDS U01NS106513, R01NS11072, R01NR018335, R03NS112859, U24NS107215, U24NS107136, and American Heart Association 17CSA33550004. Dr. Johnston: NIH-NCATS UL1TR003015, NIH-NCATS KL2TR00316, NIH-NINDS - U01 NS086872, and VBHRC.

Nonstandard Abbreviations:

ARP-DRG

All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups

NIS

National Inpatient Sample

Footnotes

Disclosures: Dr. de Havenon has investigator-initiated research support from Regeneron and AMAG pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr. Sheth reports funding from Zoll, NControl, Biogen, Novartis, Bard, Hyperfine, Alva Health outside the submitted work. Dr. Johnston is a paid consultant or DSMB member for Biogen, Neurotrauma Science LLC, FDA, NIH-NINDS outside the submitted work.

Supplemental Materials: Supplemental Figures 1, 2, 3, and RECORD checklist.

Contributor Information

Adam de Havenon, Departments of Neurology, University of Utah.

Kevin N. Sheth, Departments of Neurology, Yale University.

Karen C. Johnston, Departments of Neurology, University of Virginia.

Mohammad Anadani, Departments of Neurology, Washington University.

Shadi Yaghi, Departments of Neurology, Brown University.

David Tirschwell, Departments of Neurology, University of Washington.

John Ney, Departments of Neurology, Boston University.

References

  • 1.Thompson Michael P, Zhehui Luo, Joseph Gardiner, Burke James F., Adrienne Nickles, Reeves Mathew J. Impact of Missing Stroke Severity Data on the Accuracy of Hospital Ischemic Stroke Mortality Profiling. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2018;11:e004951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gattellari M, Goumas C, Jalaludin B, Worthington J. The impact of disease severity adjustment on hospital standardised mortality ratios: Results from a service-wide analysis of ischaemic stroke admissions using linked pre-hospital, admissions and mortality data. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0216325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2021 Jan 25];Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/Downloads/2019-ICD10-Coding-Guidelines-.pdf
  • 4.DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goyal M, Menon BK, Zwam WH van, Dippel DWJ, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CBLM, Lugt A van der, Miquel MA de, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. The Lancet. 2016;387:1723–1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Publication Material

RESOURCES