Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1999 Sep;37(9):3062–3064. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.9.3062-3064.1999

Identification of and Hydrogen Peroxide Production by Fecal and Vaginal Lactobacilli Isolated from Japanese Women and Newborn Infants

Yu-Li Song 1, Naoki Kato 1,*, Yoshiko Matsumiya 1, Cheng-Xu Liu 1, Haru Kato 2, Kunitomo Watanabe 1
PMCID: PMC85459  PMID: 10449509

Abstract

We identified Lactobacillus isolates from Japanese women and newborn infants by a DNA-DNA hybridization method. The predominating lactobacilli were Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus gasseri in the women’s vaginas and the newborns’ intestines and L. gasseri and Lactobacillus fermentum in the women’s intestines. All L. crispatus strains were exclusively strong H2O2 producers.


The human intestinal tract and vagina harbor a number of microorganisms which form complex and finely balanced ecosystems with their environments. Among these microbes, Lactobacillus spp. are believed to play an important role in stabilization of the microflora by providing an important microbial defense against vaginal and intestinal colonization by exogenous pathogenic microorganisms. Classification studies have resulted in recent taxonomic changes of human-related lactobacilli; members of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group have been divided into six species—L. acidophilus, Lactobacillus amylovorus, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gallinarum, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus johnsonii (7, 11)—and Lactobacillus vaginalis has been recently classified (4). Few studies adapted to the recent classification of Lactobacillus have been performed for investigation of fecal and vaginal lactobacilli (1, 2).

Although previous reports have suggested that production of H2O2 by lactobacilli may represent an important nonspecific antimicrobial defense mechanism in the vaginal ecosystem (5, 9, 10, 14, 16), the H2O2-producing lactobacilli have been seldom identified to the species level.

In this study, using a DNA-DNA hybridization method, we identified to the species level Lactobacillus strains which had been isolated from stool specimens of mothers and infants and vaginal swabs of women to understand the precise ecology of intestinal and vaginal lactobacilli, and we investigated their abilities to produce H2O2.

Reference strains used were 26 Lactobacillus species or subspecies (Table 1). Eighty-five fecal lactobacilli were isolates from 49 healthy mothers and 36 infants born by normal vaginal delivery at Gifu University Hospital in Gifu between 1995 and 1996; 91 vaginal lactobacilli from healthy women were isolated from 27 of the mothers mentioned above and from 64 pregnant women who visited a prenatal clinic in Gifu (16); and 6 vaginal lactobacilli from women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) were isolates from 6 pregnant women (16). MRS agar (Becton Dickinson and Company, Cockeysville, Md.) was used for anaerobic culture of isolates. Lactobacilli were identified as catalase-negative, non-spore-forming, microaerophilic gram-positive rods producing abundant lactate as an end product with or without small amounts of acetate (12).

TABLE 1.

Reference strains of Lactobacills species used for DNA hybridization studies

Group and species Strain
L. delbrueckii group (obligately homofermentative)a
L. acidophilus JCM 1132
 L. amylophilus JCM 1125
 L. amylovorus JCM 1126
 L. crispatus JCM 1185
 L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus JCM 1002
 L. delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii JCM 1012
 L. delbrueckii subsp. lactis JCM 1248
 L. gallinarum JCM 2011
 L. gasseri JCM 1025
 L. helveticus JCM 1120
 L. jensenii JCM 1146
 L. johnsonii JCM 2012
L. delbrueckii group (facultatively heterofermentative)a
 L. acetotolerans JCM 3825
L. casei-Pediococcus group (obligately homofermentative)a
 L. salivarius subsp. salicinius JCM 1150
 L. salivarius subsp. salivarius JCM 1231
L. casei-Pediococcus group (facultatively heterofermentative)a
 L. casei JCM 1134
 L. paracasei subsp. paracasei JCM 1181
 L. paracasei subsp. tolerans JCM 1171
 L. plantarum JCM 1149
 L. rhamnosus JCM 1136
L. casei-Pediococcus group (obligately heterofermentative)a
 L. brevis subsp. brevis JCM 1059
 L. buchneri JCM 1115
 L. fermentum JCM 1173
 L. fructivorans JCM 1117
 L. reuteri JCM 1112
 L. vaginalis JCM 9505
a

Data from the review by Vandamme et al. (17). 

Bacterial DNA was extracted by the method described previously (13). DNA was labeled with PHOTOPROBE biotin (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, Calif.), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA-DNA hybridization was carried out as described elsewhere (6) with modifications. Genomic DNA was adjusted to 100 μg/ml with distilled water. DNA diluted 10-fold with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 M MgCl2 was distributed into a microtiter plate (100 μl/well). Hybridization of DNA from reference strains with denatured, biotinylated sample DNA was carried out for 4 to 5 h at 45°C.

H2O2 production by Lactobacillus strains was tested with MRS agar supplemented with 0.25 mg of tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) per ml and 0.01 mg of horseradish peroxidase (Sigma) per ml (5). Inoculated plates were anaerobically incubated for 2 days at 37°C. H2O2 production was ranked as strongly positive, weakly positive, or negative according to the intensity of blue color development.

Ten species and subspecies from mothers’ stools and eight species from stools of infants were detected, whereas three strains from mothers and one from an infant remained unidentified (Table 2). L. gasseri was the most commonly found species in both mothers and infants, but the second most predominant species differed between the mothers and infants studied: Lactobacillus fermentum in the mothers and L. crispatus and Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius in the infants.

TABLE 2.

Lactobacillus species isolated from stool and vaginal specimens of Japanese women and newborn infants

Species No. of specimens (%)
Stool
Vagina
Mothers Infants Mothers and women without BV Women with BV
L. crispatus 4 (8.2) 6 (16.7) 48 (52.7) 2 (33.3)
L. fermentum 9 (18.4) 2 (5.6) 5 (5.5) 1 (16.7)
L. gasseri 11 (22.4) 12 (33.3) 19 (20.8) 2 (33.3)
L. paracasei subsp. paracasei 5 (10.2) 3 (8.3) 0 0
L. paracasei subsp. tolerans 3 (6.1) 2 (5.6) 0 0
L. plantarum 4 (8.2) 0 3 (3.3) 0
L. reuteri 2 (4.1) 0 0 0
L. rhamnosus 2 (4.1) 1 (2.8) 0 0
L. salivarius subsp. salicinius 3 (6.1) 3 (8.3) 1 (1.1) 0
L. salivarius subsp. salivarius 3 (6.1) 6 (16.7) 1 (1.1) 0
L. vaginalis 0 0 8 (8.8) 1 (16.7)
Unidentified 3 (6.1) 1 (2.8) 6 (6.6) 0
Total 49 36 91 6

The predominant species found in the vaginas of 91 healthy women included L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. vaginalis (Table 2). In women with BV, L. crispatus and L. gasseri were common.

A total of 172 strains identified by DNA hybridization were tested for H2O2 production (Table 3). All L. crispatus strains were strongly positive for H2O2 production, and all L. gasseri and L. vaginalis strains were strongly or weakly positive, while L. paracasei and L. plantarum strains were all negative. Of six isolates from women with BV, two were L. crispatus, two were L. gasseri, one was L. vaginalis, and one was L. fermentum; all but the L. fermentum strain were positive for H2O2 production.

TABLE 3.

H2O2 production by lactobacilli isolated from stool and vaginal specimens

Species No. of strains tested H2O2 production No. of isolates
Stool
Vagina Total (%)
Mother Infant
L. crispatus 60 Strongly positive 4 6 50 60 (100)
Weakly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Negative 0 0 0 0 (0)
L. gasseri 44 Strongly positive 6 6 6 18 (40.9)
Weakly positive 5 6 15 26 (59.1)
Negative 0 0 0 0 (0)
L. fermentum 17 Strongly positive 4 0 1 5 (29.4)
Weakly positive 2 1 1 4 (23.5)
Negative 3 1 4 8 (47.1)
L. paracasei subsp. paracasei 8 Strongly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Weakly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Negative 5 3 0 8 (100)
L. paracasei subsp. tolerans 5 Strongly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Weakly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Negative 3 2 0 5 (100)
L. plantarum 7 Strongly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Weakly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Negative 4 0 3 7 (100)
L. reuteri 2 Strongly positive 1 0 0 1 (50)
Weakly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Negative 1 0 0 1 (50)
L. rhamnosus 3 Strongly positive 0 0 0 0 (0)
Weakly positive 1 1 0 2 (66.7)
Negative 1 0 0 1 (33.3)
L. salivarius subsp. salicinius 7 Strongly positive 1 0 0 1 (14.3)
Weakly positive 1 2 0 3 (42.9)
Negative 1 1 1 3 (42.9)
L. salivarius subsp. salivarius 10 Strongly positive 0 3 0 3 (30)
Weakly positive 0 3 1 4 (40)
Negative 3 0 0 3 (30)
L. vaginalis 9 Strongly positive 0 0 4 4 (44.4)
Weakly positive 0 0 5 5 (55.6)
Negative 0 0 0 0 (0)

We found that L. crispatus was the predominant vaginal lactobacillus, followed by L. gasseri, in Japanese women. Giorgi et al. (8), who used DNA homology techniques, reported that L. crispatus and L. jensenii were the predominating lactobacilli in healthy women. These data suggest that L. crispatus is a common vaginal lactobacillus in healthy women in both Japan and Western countries.

The present study showed that the predominant species in stools were L. gasseri, L. fermentum, and L. paracasei subsp. paracasei for women and L. gasseri, L. crispatus, and L. salivarius subsp. salivarius for infants. Benno et al. (2) reported that L. gasseri was the dominant species among lactobacilli isolated from the intestinal tracts of elderly Japanese people. Meanwhile, in the studies in Western countries, the L. acidophilus group, L. salivarius, and L. fermentum were usually recovered from stools of adults and infants (3), and the largest taxa in the rectal mucosa of healthy adults were L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and L. paracasei subsp. paracasei (1). These results indicate that the intestinal lactobacilli may be different between Japanese and Western people. Although the reasons for this dissimilarity are unclear, it may be speculated that the inhabiting Lactobacillus species in stools and in the intestinal mucosa are different and that differences between Japanese and Western diets may influence the Lactobacillus species resident in the intestine.

We found that all L. crispatus strains were strong H2O2 producers, while L. paracasei and L. plantarum strains were negative for H2O2 production, and that there was relatedness between Lactobacillus species and H2O2 production regardless of whether or not the isolates were from women with BV. Nagy et al. (15), who identified lactobacilli by phenotypic characteristics, showed that the ability to produce H2O2 was more likely to be associated with the origins of strains (BV or non-BV) than with the Lactobacillus species themselves. Since the methods used for detection of the ability to produce H2O2 were almost the same between our study and that of Nagy et al., differences in lactobacillus identification might be responsible for the contradictory results.

Acknowledgments

Y.-L.S. is a recipient of a Nihon Monbusho Scholarship.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ahrne S, Nobaek S, Jeppsson B, Aderlberth I, Wold A E, Molin G. The normal Lactobacillus flora of healthy human rectal and oral mucosa. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85:88–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benno Y, Endo K, Mizutani T, Namba Y, Komori T, Mitsuoka T. Comparison of fecal microflora of elderly persons in rural and urban areas of Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55:1100–1105. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.5.1100-1105.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cooperstock M S, Zedd A J. Intestinal flora of infants. In: Hentges D J, editor. Human intestinal microflora in health and disease. New York, N.Y: Academic Press; 1983. pp. 79–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Embley T M, Faquir N, Bossart W, Collins M D. Lactobacillus vaginalis sp. nov. from the human vagina. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989;39:368–370. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eschenbach D A, Davick P R, Williams B L, Klebanoff S J, Young-Smith K, Critchlow C M, Holmes K K. Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:251–256. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.2.251-256.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989;39:224–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fujisawa T, Benno Y, Yaeshima T, Mitsuoka T. Taxonomic study of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group, with recognition of Lactobacillus gallinarum sp. nov. and Lactobacillus johnsonii sp. nov. and synonymy of Lactobacillus acidophilus group A3 (Johnson et al. 1980) with the type strain of Lactobacillus amylovorus (Nakamura 1981) Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:487–491. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-3-487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Giorgi A, Torriani S, Dellaglio F, Bo G, Stola E, Bernuzzi L. Identification of vaginal lactobacilli from asymptomatic women. Microbiologica. 1987;10:377–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hawes S E, Hillier S L, Benedetti J, Stevens C E, Koutsky L A, Wolner-Hanssen P, Holmes K K. Hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli and acquisition of vaginal infections. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:1058–1063. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.5.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hillier S L, Krohn M A, Klebanoff S J, Eschenbach D A. The relationship of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli to bacterial vaginosis and genital microflora in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:369–373. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199203000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Johnson J L, Phelps C F, Cummins C S, London J, Gasser F. Taxonomy of Lactobacillus acidophilus group. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30:53–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kandler O, Weiss N. Genus Lactobacillus. In: Sneath P H A, Mair N S, Sharp M E, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Vol. 2. Baltimore, Md: The Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1986. pp. 1209–1234. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kato N, Ou C Y, Kato H, Bartley S L, Brown V K, Dowell V R, Jr, Ueno K. Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:33–37. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.33-37.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klebanoff S J, Hillier S L, Eschenbach D A, Waltersdorph A M. Control of the microbial flora of the vagina by H2O2-generating lactobacilli. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:94–100. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.1.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nagy E, Petterson L, Mardh P A. Antibiosis between bacteria isolated from the vagina of women with and without signs of bacterial vaginosis. APMIS. 1991;99:739–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1991.tb01253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Puapermpoonsiri S, Kato N, Watanabe K, Ueno K, Chongsomchai C, Lumbiganon P. Vaginal microflora associated with bacterial vaginosis in Japanese and Thai pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:748–752. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.4.748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vandamme P, Pot B, Gillis M, De Vos P, Kersters K, Swings J. Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:407–438. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.407-438.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES