DLX6-AS1 activated by H3K4me1 enhanced secondary cisplatin resistance of lung squamous cell carcinoma through modulating miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p/CELF1 axis

Xu Zhao; Jizhao Wang; Rui Zhu; Jing Zhang; Yunfeng Zhang

doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99555-8

. 2021 Oct 25;11:21014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99555-8

DLX6-AS1 activated by H3K4me1 enhanced secondary cisplatin resistance of lung squamous cell carcinoma through modulating miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p/CELF1 axis

Xu Zhao ^1,^#, Jizhao Wang ^2,^#, Rui Zhu ², Jing Zhang ², Yunfeng Zhang ^2,^✉

PMCID: PMC8546124 PMID: 34697393

Abstract

Cisplatin (CDDP) based chemotherapy is widely used as the first-line strategy in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). However, secondary cisplatin resistance majorly undermines the cisplatin efficacy leading to a worse prognosis. In this respect, we have identified the role of the DLX6-AS1/miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p/CELF1 axis in regulating cisplatin resistance of LUSC. qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis were applied to detect gene expression. Transwell assay was used to evaluate the migration and invasion ability of LUSC cells. CCK-8 assay was used to investigate the IC50 of LUSC cells. Flow cytometry was used to test cell apoptosis rate. RNA pull-down and Dual luciferase reporter gene assay were performed to evaluate the crosstalk. DLX6-AS1 was aberrantly high expressed in LUSC tissues and cell lines, and negatively correlated with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression. DLX6-AS1 expression was enhanced by H3K4me1 in cisplatin resistant LUSC cells. Besides, DLX6-AS1 knockdown led to impaired IC50 of cisplatin resistant LUSC cells. Furthermore, DLX6-AS1 interacted with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p to regulate CELF1 expression and thereby mediated the cisplatin sensitivity of cisplatin resistant LUSC cells. DLX6-AS1 induced by H3K4me1 played an important role in promoting secondary cisplatin resistance of LUSC through regulating the miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p/CELF1 axis. Therefore, targeting DLX6-AS1 might be a novel way of reversing secondary cisplatin resistance in LUSC.

Subject terms: Cancer, Lung cancer, Non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

Lung cancer, divided into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is one of the most common malignancies and the most common cause of cancer death in the world, with almost 1.8 million newly diagnosed cases every year¹. Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), one of the major subtypes of NSCLC, accounts for nearly 30% of all confirmed cases of NSCLC, with the characteristics of rapid growth, quick metastasis and high mortality². Although relatively sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year survival rate for patients with LUSC is merely about 18%³. Platinum-based systemic chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for LUSC patients, but it often leads to clinical treatment failure due to the development of secondary chemoresistance⁴. Therefore, it is urgent to identify the novel molecular targets that affect the secondary chemoresistance of LUSC patients.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are non-protein-coding RNAs with a length of more than 200 nucleotides, accounting for more than 90% of all transcriptome⁵. At present, increasing evidence has shown that lncRNAs, which could act as competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA), play a crucial role in the occurrence and progression of malignant tumors via competitively binding to microRNAs (miRNAs) to regulate the expression of target mRNAs, and their aberrant expression are usually closely related to the proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and chemoresistance of tumor cells^6–8. For instance, lncRNA LINC01963 increases TMEFF2 expression to inhibit the progression of pancreatic carcinoma cells via targeting miR-641⁹. LncRNA TALC promotes the expression of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) by competitively binding miR-20b to activate the c-MET/STAT3/p300 axis, which leads to temozolomide (TMZ) resistance in glioblastoma¹⁰. The lncRNA DLX6-AS1, located at chromosome 7q21.3, is a 1990 bp non-coding transcript¹¹. Recently, growing reports have indicated that DLX6-AS1 could interact with the target miRNAs to regulate the progression and treatment resistance of multiple cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAC)¹², ovarian cancer¹³, hepatocellular cancer (HCC)¹⁴, glioma¹⁵ and bladder cancer¹⁶. Nevertheless, the potential role of DLX6-AS1 in LUSC chemoresistance has rarely been entirely investigated.

miRNAs represent a class of short non-coding RNA molecules, with a length of 19 to 25 nucleotides, which negatively regulate gene expression at both post-transcriptional and translational levels via interacting with the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs)¹⁷. Recent evidence indicated that miRNAs played a crucial role in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and chemoresistance of multiple cancers^18,19. miR-181a-5p was confirmed to act as a tumor suppressor in many cancers, including breast cancer²⁰, NSCLC²¹, and colorectal cancer²². In addition, the aberrant expression of miR-382-5p was reported to be closely related to proliferation, invasion, and migration of many types of cancers^23–25. Nevertheless, the specific function of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in chemoresistance of LUSC has not been clearly elucidated.

CUGBP, Elav-like family member 1 (CELF1) is an RNA binding protein regulating pre-mRNA alternative splicing, mRNA editing, and translation²⁶. Recently, CELF1 was demonstrated to be abundantly expressed in various cancers, and its aberrant expression was closely correlated to growth, metastasis, as well as chemoresistance in multiple malignancies^27–29. However, the involvement of CELF1 in the acquired cisplatin resistance of LUSC remains unclear.

Therefore, the main aim of this research was to explore the underlying function of lncRNA DLX6-AS1 in the progression of LUSC and to reveal the possible mechanisms of which DLX6-AS1 correlated with platinum-based secondary chemoresistance in LUSC. Furthermore, we also investigated in the present study the interaction of DLX6-AS1 with miR-181a-5p, miR-382-5p, and CELF1 in this process. Taken together, our findings suggested that DLX6-AS1 served as a new molecular target for modulating the secondary chemoresistance of LUSC, which might provide a promising therapeutic target for LUSC treatment.

Results

DLX6-AS1 was highly expressed in LUSC tissues and was negatively correlated with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression

Based on Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), we noticed that DLX6-AS1 was significantly differentially expressed in LUSC but not LUAD (Fig. 1a). Then we validated DLX6-AS1 expression in vivo and found that it was highly expressed in LUSC tissues (153 cases) compared with para-cancer tissues (153 cases; Fig. 1b). Then DIANA LncBase Experimental v.2 prediction showed that miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p were the potential downstream targets of DLX6-AS1. Further in vivo experiments showed that miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression were decreased in LUSC tissues (153 cases; Fig. 1c,d). In addition, DLX6-AS1 expression was negatively correlated with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression (Fig. 1e, f). Furthermore, we found that DLX6-AS1 level was increased in local recurrence LUSC tissues (39 cases; Fig. 1g), while miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p levels were apparently decreased (Fig. 1h,i). Moreover, survival analysis showed that DLX6-AS1 overexpression led to worse cancer-specific survival (Fig. 1j), whereas miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p led to better cancer-specific survival (Fig. 1k,l).

DLX6-AS1 knockdown inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion and promoted apoptosis of LUSC cells

Further in vitro experiments indicated that DLX6-AS1 overexpressed in SK-MES-1 and NCI-H226 cell lines than that in MRC-5 cell line (Fig. 2a), besides DLX6-AS1 mostly expressed in the cytoplasm of LUSC cells (Fig. 2b). Then we inhibited the expression of DLX6-AS1 in SK-MES-1 and NCI-H226 cells (Fig. 2c). CCK-8 results suggested that DLX6-AS1 knockdown led to decreased proliferation ability in SK-MES-1 and NCI-H226 cells (Fig. 2d,e). In addition, transwell assay showed that DLX6-AS1 knockdown significantly suppressed the migration and invasion of SK-MES-1 cells (Fig. 2f). Furthermore, apoptosis rate was obviously increased by attenuating DLX6-AS1 expression in SK-MES-1 cells (Fig. 2g). Thus, these results indicated that DLX6-AS1 served as an oncogene to promote the growth and progression of LUSC cells.

DLX6-AS1 negatively regulated the expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p

Then we detected the expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in LUSC cells and found that miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression was at lower levels in SK-MES-1 and NCI-H226 cell lines than that in MRC-5 cell line (Fig. 3a,b). Furthermore, DLX6-AS1 knockdown resulted in increased expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p (Fig. 3c–f), indicating that miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p might be the target of DLX6-AS1. Then we performed Dual luciferase reporter gene assay and noticed that DLX6-AS1 could interact with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in SK-MES-1 and NCI-H226 cells (Fig. 3g,h). Further RNA pull-down assay showed that DLX6-AS1 was directly binding with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in LUSC cells (Fig. 3i,j). These findings suggested that DLX6-AS1 negatively regulated miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in LUSC cells.

DLX6-AS1 was induced by H3K4me1 in cisplatin resistant LUSC cells

Then we further investigated the effect of DLX6-AS1 on secondary cisplatin resistant of LUSC cells. CCK8 results showed that the IC50 of CDDP in SK-MES-1 cells was 0.63 μg/mL, and 7.72 μg/mL in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 4a). Then we found that DLX6-AS1 expression was higher in SK-MES-1-resistance cells than that in SK-MES-1 cells (Fig. 4b), and was major in the cytoplasm of SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 4c). Further experiments showed that cisplatin treatment (7 μg/mL for resistant cells and 0.5 μg/mL for SK-MES-1 cells) significantly decreased DLX6-AS1 expression both in SK-MES-1 cells and SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 4d,e). According to UCSC prediction, H3K4me1 was enriched in the promoter region of DLX6-AS1 (Fig. 4f). Then Western blot analysis indicated that H3K4me1 was significantly up-regulated in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 4g and Supplementary Figure S1). Further ChIP assay confirmed that H3K4me1 was abundantly enriched in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 4h). In addition, CDDP treatment markedly decreased the expression and enrichment of H3K4me1 in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 4i,j and Supplementary Figure S1). Therefore, the above results suggested that DLX6-AS1 expression was induced by H3K4me1 in cisplatin resistant LUSC cells.

DLX6-AS1/miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p regulation influenced the effect of secondary cisplatin resistance in LUSC cells

After inhibiting the expression of DLX6-AS1, we noticed that the IC50 of SK-MES-1-resistance (IC50: si-NC, 7.18 ug/mL vs. si-DLX6-AS1, 3.17 ug/mL) and SK-MES-1 cells (IC50: si-NC, 0.60 ug/mL vs. si-DLX6-AS1, 0.43 ug/mL) was significantly decreased, indicating that DLX6-AS1 might regulate secondary cisplatin resistance in LUSC cells (Fig. 5a,b). Moreover, the expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p was significantly lower in SK-MES-1-resistance cells than that in the parental cells (Fig. 5c,d). Then we up-regulated the expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in SK-MES-1-resistance cells, CCK8 results showed that the IC50 of SK-MES-1-resistance cells was remarkably decreased (IC50: miR-NC, 6.83 ug/mL vs. miR-181a-5p mimic, 3.59 ug/mL; miR-NC, 6.44 ug/mL vs. miR-382-5p mimic, 3.07 ug/mL; Fig. 5e,f). Further rescue experiments showed that inhibition of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p partially rescued the decreased IC50 caused by DLX6-AS1 knockdown in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (IC50: si-NC, 5.82 ug/mL vs. anti-miR-181a-5p, 8.58 ug/mL, anti-miR-181a-5p and si-DLX6-AS1, 5.81 ug/mL; si-NC, 5.38 ug/mL vs. anti-miR-382-5p, 9.29 ug/mL, anti-miR-382-5p and si-DLX6-AS1, 4.81 ug/mL; Fig. 5g,h). Taken together, these results indicated that DLX6-AS1/miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p regulation influenced the effect of secondary cisplatin resistance in LUSC cells.

CELF1 served as the target of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p

Based on Starbase, CELF1 was predicted as the potential target of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p (Fig. 6a). Then, we inhibited the expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in SK-MES-1 cells and verified the inhibition efficiency by performing qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 6b,c), and found that CELF1 expression was significantly increased both at mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 6d–g and Supplementary Figure S2). Furthermore, Dual luciferase reporter gene assay showed that miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p directly interacted with CELF1 (Fig. 6h,i). In addition, CELF1 was found to be overexpressed in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 6j and Supplementary Figure S2). Then we suppressed CELF1 expression in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (Fig. 6k and Supplementary Figure S2) and found that the IC50 was significantly decreased in SK-MES-1-resistance cells (IC50: si-NC, 6.70 ug/mL vs. si-CELF1, 2.96 ug/mL; Fig. 6l). Thus, these findings indicated that CELF1 was the target of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in secondary cisplatin resistance LUSC cells.

Discussion

Hitherto, the standard chemotherapy regimen for LUSC is still based on platinum-containing alkylating agents³⁰. Although most LUSC patients initially respond well to chemotherapy, the clinical outcome of LUSC remains extremely poor due to inevitably recurrence and development of secondary chemoresistance³¹. In recent years, a large number of genome-wide studies verified that lncRNAs played a vital role in the chemoresistance of tumor cells³². For instance, lncRNA RAD51-AS1 reduced the activity of DNA damage repair pathway involved in RAD51 to increase the etoposide sensitivity of HCC cells³³. LncRNA LINC00461 negatively regulated the expression of miR-411-5p to mediate docetaxel resistance in breast cancer³⁴. In present research, we found that lncRNA DLX6-AS1 was highly expressed in LUSC and local recurrence tissues, and overexpressed in LUSC cell lines. Additionally, survival analysis indicated that a high level of DLX6-AS1 was closely correlated with worse cancer-specific survival. Thus, DLX6-AS1 was selected to deeply study its role in secondary chemoresistance of LUSC.

Recently, increasing studies demonstrated that lncRNAs sponged the specific miRNAs to regulate the initiation, progression, and therapeutic response of lung cancer^35–37. For example, lncRNA MALAT1 sponged miR-374b-5p to regulate the proliferation, migration, and invasion of NSCLC cells by upregulating SRSF7³⁸. LncRNA MEG3 was overexpressed in NSCLC tissues and positively regulated SOX7 expression to induce cisplatin sensitivity of NSCLC cells by targeting miR-21-5p³⁹. Our study found that DLX6-AS1 had a higher expression in LUSC tissues and cell lines, while miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression were at a lower level in LUSC tissues and cell lines. Furthermore, DLX6-AS1 knockdown restrained proliferation, invasion, migration, and promoted apoptosis of LUSC cells. Recent studies of DLX6-AS1 involved in cell growth and apoptosis of breast cancer and renal cell carcinoma uncovered similar results^40,41. The further assay showed that miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p were up-regulated after DLX6-AS1 inhibition. Accordingly, Dual luciferase reporter gene assay and RNA pull-down assay further demonstrated that DLX6-AS1 directly interacted with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p. Therefore, our results indicated that DLX6-AS1 negatively modulated the expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p.

Then we explored the potential effect of DLX6-AS1 in LUSC secondary chemoresistance and found that DLX6-AS1 expression was increased in CDDP resistance LUSC cells, while its expression was reversed after treated with CDDP. Interestingly, further experiments revealed that H3K4me1 was enriched at the DLX6-AS1 promoter in CDDP resistance LUSC cells, and this trend was partially reversed by CDDP treatment. This finding was important because the methylation and demethylation of histone precisely regulated specific regulatory processes by activating or inhibiting the expression of certain cancer-related genes⁴². For example, histone methylation around the PTEN promoter inhibited its protein expression in colon cancer and melanoma⁴³. The JMJD2D histone demethylase was recruited at the p21 promoter, which led to up-regulated p21 expression in liver cancer⁴⁴. The present results indicated that H3K4me1 was abundant at the promoter of DLX6-AS1 and was inhibited by CDDP treatment, suggesting that histone methylation modification played a crucial role in mediating the transcription of DLX6-AS1 in the CDDP resistance process of LUSC. Then we suppressed DLX6-AS1 expression in CDDP resistance LUSC cells and found that the CDDP resistance index was significantly decreased, indicating the promoting role of DLX6-AS1 in LUSC chemoresistance. Moreover, miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression were lower in CDDP resistance LUSC cells, and their overexpression significantly enhanced the cisplatin sensitivity of CDDP resistance LUSC cells, whereas their knockdown partially reversed this trend. Previous studies highlighted the tumor suppressor function of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p in regulating the progression and chemoresistance of several malignant tumors. Yang et al. revealed that miR-181a-5p enhanced the sensitivity of esophageal adenocarcinoma cells to cisplatin⁴⁵. Zheng et al. suggested that miR-382-5p inhibited proliferation and invasion of breast cancer through regulating SNHG1 expression⁴⁶. Similarly, our research also illustrated that miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p were down-regulated in LUSC tissues and cell lines, and miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p overexpression remarkably restrained the effect of platinum on cell viability of LUSC, which was reversed by the depletion of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p.

Generally, miRNAs could bind to the 3′ UTR region of a specific mRNA to restrain its transcription, thereby affecting its function⁴⁷. In present study, CELF1 was predicted as the potential target of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p, and the interaction relationship was verified by qRT-PCR, Western blot, and Dual luciferase reporter gene assay. Former investigations revealed that CELF1 could enhance cell migration, invasion, and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer by targeting ETS2²⁸. CELF1 was abundantly expressed in the glioma tissues, and CELF1 expression was repressed by miR-330-3p to inhibit proliferation and migration of glioma cells²⁷. Similarly, our results also indicated that CELF1 was overexpressed in CDDP resistance LUSC cells, and CELF1 attenuation led to the decline of CDDP resistance in LUSC cells.

In conclusion, this research was the first to illustrate that DLX6-AS1 was highly expressed in LUSC tissues and cell lines, and the aberrant expression of DLX6-AS1 was tightly associated with proliferation, apoptosis, and local recurrence of LUSC. Moreover, our results demonstrated that DLX6-AS1 induced by H3K4me1 facilitated platinum-based chemoresistance in LUSC through interacting with miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p/CELF1 axis. Hence, these findings identified the pivotal role of DLX6-AS1 in the progression and secondary chemoresistance in LUSC and provided a novel therapeutic target for patients with LUSC.

Methods

Study subjects

153 LUSC patients diagnosed based on pathology results were recruited from 2011 to 2013 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Every recruited patient was informed about the pros and cons of acquiring their tissues for academic research. And all of the patients had signed the written informed consents. Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Approval number: H-582). And all experiments were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, which consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki regulations.

Cell culture

SK-MES-1, NCI-H226, and MRC-5 cell lines were purchased from American type culture collection (ATCC, USA). DMEM medium (HyClone, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Rockville, MD) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (HyClone, USA) in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37 °C. The SK-MES-1 cells were then treated with continuous low-dose of cisplatin in a stepwise manner to developed cisplatin resistant SK-MES-1 (SK-MES-1-resistance) cells. This process was repeated until cells could stably survive in 1 µg/mL cisplatin medium. Then we increased the concentration of cisplatin to 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 µg/mL. Resistance Index (IC50 of resistant cells/IC50 of parental cells) was used to evaluate the resistance ability. Resistance Index larger than 5 was considered resistant.

Cell transfection

The small interference RNAs against DLX6-AS1 (si-DLX6-AS1), CELF1 (si-CELF1), and their corresponding negative control (si-NC) were synthesized by Shanghai Genechem Chemical Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The miR-181a-5p mimic, miR-382-5p mimic, miR-181a-5p inhibitor (anti-miR-181a-5p), and miR-382-5p inhibitor (anti-miR-382-5p), as well as their respective negative control (miR-NC and anti-miR-NC) were acquired from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Then the siRNAs (50 nM per well in a 24-well) above were transfected into SK-MES-1 and NCI-H226 cell lines by using the Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA) reagent according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

qRT-PCR

RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Leusden, Netherlands) was used to extract the total RNA extraction. PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (Takara Biotechnology Ltd., China) was used to reverse transcribe the extracted the RNA into cDNA. As for miRNAs, One Step PrimeScript™ miRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit was used for reverse-transcription. SYBR Premix Ex Taq II kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) was used for the qRT-PCR process. 2−ΔΔCt method was used to quantify the results. U6 and GAPDH were used as the internal control for miRNAs and genes respectively. The primers are as follows: DLX6-AS1 F: 5′-AGTTTCTCTCTAGATTGCCTT-3′ R: 5′-ATTGACATGTTAGTG CCCTT-3′; miR-181a-5p: F: 5′-GGGCAGCCTTAAGAGGA-3′ R: 5′-CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGA-3′; miR-382-5p: F:5′-ATCCGTGAAGTTGTTCGTGG-3′ R: 5′-TATGGTTGTAGAGGACTCCTTGAC-3′; GAPDH: F: 5′-CACTGGGCTACACTGAGCAC-3′ R: 5′-AGTGGTCGTTGAGGGCAAT-3′; U6: F: 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ R: 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′.

Isolation of cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA

Cytoplasmic & Nuclear RNA Purification Kit (Norgen, Canada) was used to isolate cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA. According to the manufacturer’s guidance, lysis buffer J was used to lyse the target cells. Then the cell lysis was centrifuged; the supernatant was used to extract the cytoplasmic fraction and a pellet was used to extract the nuclear fraction. Buffer SK and ethanol were used to purify and extract the cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA.

Western blot analysis

The total proteins were extracted by using radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) lysis buffer added with phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, Switzerland) and protease inhibitors (Roche, Switzerland). After being quantified by using a bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) protein assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), the proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Vazyme). 5% skimmed milk was used for transferred PVDF membranes block for 1 h at room temperature. And then the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies, including H3K4me1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), Histone (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), CELF1 (1:2000, Proteintech, USA), and GAPDH (1:5000, Proteintech, USA). The membranes were then incubated with the secondary antibody (1:10,000, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) labeled with horseradish peroxidase at room temperature for 2 h. Then the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used to evaluate the protein expression levels.

Transwell assay

To investigate cell invasion and migration abilities, cells were resuspended in a serum-free medium and plated onto the upper chamber of a Matrigel-coated Transwell insert (EMD Millipore). Complete medium with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. The plate was incubated in a CO₂ incubator at 37 °C. After 24 h, the upper layer of the membrane was wiped with a cotton swab, and cells attached to the lower surface were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, and stained with 1% 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylin-dole (DAPI) solution for 15 min. Then cells were observed and counted under an inverted microscope.

Cell apoptosis assay

Annexin V-FITC/PI double Kit (BD Bioscience, USA) was used to test the apoptosis rate of SK-MES-1 cell line. SK-MES-1 cells were seeded on the 6-well plates and washed with cold PBS after 24 h, and then suspended in 100 μL binding buffer. The cells were subsequently stained with 5 μL annexin V-FITC and 5 μL propidium iodide (PI) and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in dark. Finally, the apoptosis rate of SK-MES-1 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA).

Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

Cell viability was investigated by performing CCK-8 (APExBIO, USA) assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol. LUSC cells were resuspended and seeded in a 96-well plate at the concentration of around 1 × 10³/well. Cells were then cultured at the 5% CO₂ and 37 °C with DMEM medium for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 120 h respectively. Each well was added with 10 μL CCK-8 reaction solution followed by incubation for 2 h. Finally, the optical density (OD) values at 450 nm were measured.

RNA pull-down assay

Biotinylated probes for miR-181a-5p-WT, miR-181a-5p-Mut, miR-382-5p-WT, and miR-382-5p-Mut were constructed by Genecreate. The miR-181a-5p-Mut and miR-382-5p-Mut refer to the mutations in the binding sites between DLX6-AS1 and miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p. M-280 Streptavidin-coated MagneSphere particles were used to harvest the bonded RNA, which was then eluted, harvested and purified. Finally, qRT-PCR was used to investigate the DLX6-AS1 expression level.

Dual luciferase reporter gene assay

The binding site sequences of DLX6-AS1, miR-181a-5p, and miR-382-5p were cloned into a luciferase reporter vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Then the plasmids of pmirGLO-DLX6-AS1 wild type (WT) or pmirGLO-DLX6-AS1 mutant type (Mut) were co-transfected with the miR-181a-5p/NC and miR-382-5p/NC mimic into SK-MES-1 and NCI-H226 cells by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) for 48 h. Then the luciferase activities were estimated by applying a Dual luciferase reporter analysis system (Promega, USA) based on the manufacturer’s instructions.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP assay was conducted by using an EpiQuik ChIP kit (Epigentek, USA) according to the instruction of the manufacturer. Briefly, LUSC cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. Then cells were added with 1/10 volume of 1.25 M glycine to stop fixation and incubated for 5 min. Then added 5 mL cell lysis buffer to resuspend the cell pellet and lysed on ice for 10 min. After centrifugation, cells were added with 1 ml ChIP buffer (added 12 μL PMSF and 10 μL protease inhibitor for every 1 mL ChIP buffer) for sonication (10 min, 10 s on, 10 s off). Then 200 µg of the protein-chromatin complex was extracted for each immunoprecipitation, and the pre-blocked dynabeads protein G (Invitrogen) was used to capture antibody-protein complexes. The eluted product was purified with a DNA purification kit (Invitrogen) to obtain ChIP DNA. Then the ChIP DNA was analyzed by qPCR. The antibodies included: H3K4me1 (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), and normal mouse IgG (Epigentek, USA).

Statistics analysis

All data involved in this study were processed and visualized by using the SPSS 18.0 software and the Graphpad Prism 8.2 software. The results presented were expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). A paired Student’s t-test was used for comparison between two groups. One-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the differences among multiple groups. Survival analysis was performed by applied Kaplan–Meier analysis. Each experiment in this research was independently repeated at least three times. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.^{(366KB, pdf)}

Author contributions

X.Z. designed and performed the experiments in this study, and completed the writing of the manuscript. Y.F.Z. supervised the progression of the study. J.Z.W. completed the statistical analyses of the data and contributed to the manuscript editing. R.Z. and J.Z. plotted the statistical graphs and helped to edit the manuscript. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2019JM-599).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Xu Zhao and Jizhao Wang.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-99555-8.

References

1.Wadowska K, Bil-Lula I, Trembecki L, Sliwinska-Mosson M. Genetic markers in lung cancer diagnosis: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:1–22. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Yu-Zhen Y, et al. Systematic analysis using a bioinformatics strategy identifies SFTA1P and LINC00519 as potential prognostic biomarkers for lung squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021;13:168–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Liu Y, et al. Investigation on the potential of circulating tumor DNA methylation patterns as prognostic biomarkers for lung squamous cell carcinoma. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9:2356–2366. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Xu F, et al. A TP53-associated gene signature for prediction of prognosis and therapeutic responses in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1731943. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1731943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Chen S, et al. LncRNA CCAT2 predicts poor prognosis and regulates growth and metastasis in small cell lung cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016;82:583–588. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Ghafouri-Fard S, Shoorei H, Branicki W, Taheri M. Non-coding RNA profile in lung cancer. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2020;114:104411. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Li TT, et al. Long non-coding RNAs in small cell lung cancer: A potential opening to combat the disease (review) Oncol. Rep. 2018;40:1831–1842. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Yan Z, et al. YY1-induced lncRNA ZFPM2-AS1 facilitates cell proliferation and invasion in small cell lung cancer via upregulating of TRAF4. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:108. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-1157-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Li K, Han H, Gu W, Cao C, Zheng P. Long non-coding RNA LINC01963 inhibits progression of pancreatic carcinoma by targeting miR-641/TMEFF2. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;129:110346. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Wu P, et al. Lnc-TALC promotes O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression via regulating the c-Met pathway by competitively binding with miR-20b-3p. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2045–2060. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10025-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Liang Y, Zhang CD, Zhang C, Dai DQ. DLX6-AS1/miR-204-5p/OCT1 positive feedback loop promotes tumor progression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2020;23:212–227. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-01002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Li J, et al. Expression of long non-coding RNA DLX6-AS1 in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2015;15:48–56. doi: 10.1186/s12935-015-0201-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.You Q, Shi H-Y, Gong C-F, Tian X-Y, Li S. Long non-coding RNA DLX6-AS1 acts as an oncogene by targeting miR-613 in ovarian cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;23:6429–6435. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201908_18524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Li D, Tang X, Li M, Zheng Y. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes liver cancer by increasing the expression of WEE1 via targeting miR-424-5p. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019;120:12290–12299. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Li X, Zhang H, Wu X. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 accelerates the glioma carcinogenesis by competing endogenous sponging miR-197-5p to relieve E2F1. Gene. 2019;686:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.10.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Fang C, Xu L, He W, Dai J, Sun F. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes cell growth and invasiveness in bladder cancer via modulating the miR-223-HSP90B1 axis. Cell Cycle. 2019;18:3288–3299. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1673633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Ala U. Competing endogenous RNAs, non-coding RNAs and diseases: An intertwined story. Cells. 2020;9:1574–1597. doi: 10.3390/cells9071574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Wang S, et al. The role of microRNA in cisplatin resistance or sensitivity. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2020 doi: 10.1080/14728222.2020.1785431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Dong H, et al. MicroRNA-195 inhibits proliferation and metastasis in renal cell carcinoma via regulating HMGA1. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020;12:2781–2792. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Benedetti R, et al. Regulatory interplay between miR-181a-5p and estrogen receptor signaling cascade in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:543. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Li L, et al. Long noncoding RNA SNHG7 accelerates proliferation, migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells by suppressing miR-181a-5p through AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Cancer Manage. Res. 2020;12:8303–8312. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S258487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Shang A, et al. Long non-coding RNA CCAT1 promotes colorectal cancer progression by regulating miR-181a-5p expression. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12:8301–8320. doi: 10.18632/aging.103139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Wang J, Luo J, Liu G, Li X. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0008285 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration via the miR-382-5p/PTEN axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;527:503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Xu Q, Deng B, Li M, Chen Y, Zhuan L. circRNA-UBAP2 promotes the proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of ovarian cancer though miR-382-5p/PRPF8 axis. J. Ovarian Res. 2020;13:81. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00685-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Wang J, Chen C, Yan X, Wang P. The role of miR-382-5p in glioma cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:4993–5002. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S196322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Chang K-T, Cheng C-F, King P-C, Liu S-Y, Wang G-S. CELF1 mediates connexin 43 mRNA degradation in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2017;121:1140–1152. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.117.311281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Wang H, et al. MiR-330-3p functions as a tumor suppressor that regulates glioma cell proliferation and migration by targeting CELF1. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020;16:1166–1175. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.95027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Wang H, et al. RNA-binding protein CELF1 enhances cell migration, invasion, and chemoresistance by targeting ETS2 in colorectal cancer. Clin. Sci. 2020;134:1973–1990. doi: 10.1042/cs20191174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Saul MJ, et al. miR-574-5p as RNA decoy for CUGBP1 stimulates human lung tumor growth by mPGES-1 induction. FASEB J. 2019;33:6933–6947. doi: 10.1096/fj.201802547R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Jiang T, et al. Utilization of circulating cell-free DNA profiling to guide first-line chemotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma. Theranostics. 2021;11:257–267. doi: 10.7150/thno.51243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Li X, Wang Y, Hu S, Bai Y. Screening and identifying cisplatin-related gene mutations in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Pharmgenomics Pers. Med. 2020;13:757–766. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S264545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Zhou Y, et al. LncRNA regulation: New frontiers in epigenetic solutions to drug chemoresistance. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020;189:114228. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Chen C-C, et al. Melatonin sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to chemotherapy through long non-coding RNA RAD51-AS1-mediated suppression of DNA repair. Cancers. 2018;10:320. doi: 10.3390/cancers10090320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Zhang C, Wang J, Zhang J, Qu H, Tang X. LINC00461 overexpression can induce docetaxel resistance in breast cancer by interacting with miR-411-5p. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:5551–5562. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S247776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Jiang L, Li Z, Wang R. Long noncoding RNAs in lung cancer: Regulation patterns, biologic function and diagnosis implications (review) Int. J. Oncol. 2019;55:585–596. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Guo T, et al. Multidimensional communication of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in lung cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019;145:31–48. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2767-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Chi Y, Wang D, Wang J, Yu W, Yang J. Long non-coding RNA in the pathogenesis of cancers. Cells. 2019;8:1015–1059. doi: 10.3390/cells8091015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Song J, Su Z-Z, Shen Q-M. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 regulates proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion via miR-374b-5p/SRSF7 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:1853–1862. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202002_20363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Wang P, Chen D, Ma H, Li Y. LncRNA MEG3 enhances cisplatin sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer by regulating miR-21-5p/SOX7 axis. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:5137–5149. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S146423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Zhao P, et al. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes breast cancer progression via miR-505-3p/RUNX2 axis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019;865:172778. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Zeng X, et al. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes renal cell carcinoma progression via miR-26a/PTEN axis. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:2212–2219. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1361072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Greer EL, Shi Y. Histone methylation: A dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:343–357. doi: 10.1038/nrg3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Liangliang W, et al. Enhancing KDM5A and TLR activity improves the response to immune checkpoint blockade. Sci Transl. Med. 2020;12:2282. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Li M, et al. Demethylase-independent function of JMJD2D as a novel antagonist of p53 to promote liver cancer initiation and progression. Theranostics. 2020;10:8863–8879. doi: 10.7150/thno.45581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Yang S, et al. miRNA-181a-5p enhances the sensitivity of cells to cisplatin in esophageal adenocarcinoma by targeting CBLB. Cancer Manage. Res. 2020;12:4981–4990. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S251264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Zheng S, Li M, Miao K, Xu H. SNHG1 contributes to proliferation and invasion by regulating miR-382 in breast cancer. Cancer Manage. Res. 2019;11:5589–5598. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S198624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Qu Y, et al. The functional role of long noncoding RNA in resistance to anticancer treatment. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2020;12:1–18. doi: 10.1177/1758835920927850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information.^{(366KB, pdf)}

[CR1] 1.Wadowska K, Bil-Lula I, Trembecki L, Sliwinska-Mosson M. Genetic markers in lung cancer diagnosis: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:1–22. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Yu-Zhen Y, et al. Systematic analysis using a bioinformatics strategy identifies SFTA1P and LINC00519 as potential prognostic biomarkers for lung squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021;13:168–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Liu Y, et al. Investigation on the potential of circulating tumor DNA methylation patterns as prognostic biomarkers for lung squamous cell carcinoma. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9:2356–2366. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Xu F, et al. A TP53-associated gene signature for prediction of prognosis and therapeutic responses in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1731943. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1731943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Chen S, et al. LncRNA CCAT2 predicts poor prognosis and regulates growth and metastasis in small cell lung cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016;82:583–588. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Ghafouri-Fard S, Shoorei H, Branicki W, Taheri M. Non-coding RNA profile in lung cancer. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2020;114:104411. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Li TT, et al. Long non-coding RNAs in small cell lung cancer: A potential opening to combat the disease (review) Oncol. Rep. 2018;40:1831–1842. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Yan Z, et al. YY1-induced lncRNA ZFPM2-AS1 facilitates cell proliferation and invasion in small cell lung cancer via upregulating of TRAF4. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:108. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-1157-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Li K, Han H, Gu W, Cao C, Zheng P. Long non-coding RNA LINC01963 inhibits progression of pancreatic carcinoma by targeting miR-641/TMEFF2. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;129:110346. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Wu P, et al. Lnc-TALC promotes O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression via regulating the c-Met pathway by competitively binding with miR-20b-3p. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2045–2060. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10025-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Liang Y, Zhang CD, Zhang C, Dai DQ. DLX6-AS1/miR-204-5p/OCT1 positive feedback loop promotes tumor progression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2020;23:212–227. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-01002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Li J, et al. Expression of long non-coding RNA DLX6-AS1 in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2015;15:48–56. doi: 10.1186/s12935-015-0201-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.You Q, Shi H-Y, Gong C-F, Tian X-Y, Li S. Long non-coding RNA DLX6-AS1 acts as an oncogene by targeting miR-613 in ovarian cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;23:6429–6435. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201908_18524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Li D, Tang X, Li M, Zheng Y. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes liver cancer by increasing the expression of WEE1 via targeting miR-424-5p. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019;120:12290–12299. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Li X, Zhang H, Wu X. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 accelerates the glioma carcinogenesis by competing endogenous sponging miR-197-5p to relieve E2F1. Gene. 2019;686:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.10.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Fang C, Xu L, He W, Dai J, Sun F. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes cell growth and invasiveness in bladder cancer via modulating the miR-223-HSP90B1 axis. Cell Cycle. 2019;18:3288–3299. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1673633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Ala U. Competing endogenous RNAs, non-coding RNAs and diseases: An intertwined story. Cells. 2020;9:1574–1597. doi: 10.3390/cells9071574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Wang S, et al. The role of microRNA in cisplatin resistance or sensitivity. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2020 doi: 10.1080/14728222.2020.1785431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Dong H, et al. MicroRNA-195 inhibits proliferation and metastasis in renal cell carcinoma via regulating HMGA1. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020;12:2781–2792. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Benedetti R, et al. Regulatory interplay between miR-181a-5p and estrogen receptor signaling cascade in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:543. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Li L, et al. Long noncoding RNA SNHG7 accelerates proliferation, migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells by suppressing miR-181a-5p through AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Cancer Manage. Res. 2020;12:8303–8312. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S258487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Shang A, et al. Long non-coding RNA CCAT1 promotes colorectal cancer progression by regulating miR-181a-5p expression. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12:8301–8320. doi: 10.18632/aging.103139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Wang J, Luo J, Liu G, Li X. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0008285 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration via the miR-382-5p/PTEN axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;527:503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Xu Q, Deng B, Li M, Chen Y, Zhuan L. circRNA-UBAP2 promotes the proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of ovarian cancer though miR-382-5p/PRPF8 axis. J. Ovarian Res. 2020;13:81. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00685-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Wang J, Chen C, Yan X, Wang P. The role of miR-382-5p in glioma cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:4993–5002. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S196322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Chang K-T, Cheng C-F, King P-C, Liu S-Y, Wang G-S. CELF1 mediates connexin 43 mRNA degradation in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 2017;121:1140–1152. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.117.311281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Wang H, et al. MiR-330-3p functions as a tumor suppressor that regulates glioma cell proliferation and migration by targeting CELF1. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020;16:1166–1175. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.95027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Wang H, et al. RNA-binding protein CELF1 enhances cell migration, invasion, and chemoresistance by targeting ETS2 in colorectal cancer. Clin. Sci. 2020;134:1973–1990. doi: 10.1042/cs20191174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Saul MJ, et al. miR-574-5p as RNA decoy for CUGBP1 stimulates human lung tumor growth by mPGES-1 induction. FASEB J. 2019;33:6933–6947. doi: 10.1096/fj.201802547R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Jiang T, et al. Utilization of circulating cell-free DNA profiling to guide first-line chemotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma. Theranostics. 2021;11:257–267. doi: 10.7150/thno.51243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Li X, Wang Y, Hu S, Bai Y. Screening and identifying cisplatin-related gene mutations in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Pharmgenomics Pers. Med. 2020;13:757–766. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S264545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Zhou Y, et al. LncRNA regulation: New frontiers in epigenetic solutions to drug chemoresistance. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020;189:114228. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Chen C-C, et al. Melatonin sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to chemotherapy through long non-coding RNA RAD51-AS1-mediated suppression of DNA repair. Cancers. 2018;10:320. doi: 10.3390/cancers10090320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Zhang C, Wang J, Zhang J, Qu H, Tang X. LINC00461 overexpression can induce docetaxel resistance in breast cancer by interacting with miR-411-5p. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:5551–5562. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S247776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Jiang L, Li Z, Wang R. Long noncoding RNAs in lung cancer: Regulation patterns, biologic function and diagnosis implications (review) Int. J. Oncol. 2019;55:585–596. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Guo T, et al. Multidimensional communication of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in lung cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019;145:31–48. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2767-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Chi Y, Wang D, Wang J, Yu W, Yang J. Long non-coding RNA in the pathogenesis of cancers. Cells. 2019;8:1015–1059. doi: 10.3390/cells8091015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Song J, Su Z-Z, Shen Q-M. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 regulates proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion via miR-374b-5p/SRSF7 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:1853–1862. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202002_20363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Wang P, Chen D, Ma H, Li Y. LncRNA MEG3 enhances cisplatin sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer by regulating miR-21-5p/SOX7 axis. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:5137–5149. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S146423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Zhao P, et al. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes breast cancer progression via miR-505-3p/RUNX2 axis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019;865:172778. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Zeng X, et al. Long noncoding RNA DLX6-AS1 promotes renal cell carcinoma progression via miR-26a/PTEN axis. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:2212–2219. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1361072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Greer EL, Shi Y. Histone methylation: A dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:343–357. doi: 10.1038/nrg3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Liangliang W, et al. Enhancing KDM5A and TLR activity improves the response to immune checkpoint blockade. Sci Transl. Med. 2020;12:2282. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Li M, et al. Demethylase-independent function of JMJD2D as a novel antagonist of p53 to promote liver cancer initiation and progression. Theranostics. 2020;10:8863–8879. doi: 10.7150/thno.45581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Yang S, et al. miRNA-181a-5p enhances the sensitivity of cells to cisplatin in esophageal adenocarcinoma by targeting CBLB. Cancer Manage. Res. 2020;12:4981–4990. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S251264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR46] 46.Zheng S, Li M, Miao K, Xu H. SNHG1 contributes to proliferation and invasion by regulating miR-382 in breast cancer. Cancer Manage. Res. 2019;11:5589–5598. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S198624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Qu Y, et al. The functional role of long noncoding RNA in resistance to anticancer treatment. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2020;12:1–18. doi: 10.1177/1758835920927850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

DLX6-AS1 activated by H3K4me1 enhanced secondary cisplatin resistance of lung squamous cell carcinoma through modulating miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p/CELF1 axis

Xu Zhao

Jizhao Wang

Rui Zhu

Jing Zhang

Yunfeng Zhang

Abstract

Introduction

Results

DLX6-AS1 was highly expressed in LUSC tissues and was negatively correlated with miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p expression

Figure 1.

DLX6-AS1 knockdown inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion and promoted apoptosis of LUSC cells

Figure 2.

DLX6-AS1 negatively regulated the expression of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p

Figure 3.

DLX6-AS1 was induced by H3K4me1 in cisplatin resistant LUSC cells

Figure 4.

DLX6-AS1/miR-181a-5p/miR-382-5p regulation influenced the effect of secondary cisplatin resistance in LUSC cells

Figure 5.

CELF1 served as the target of miR-181a-5p and miR-382-5p

Figure 6.

Discussion

Methods

Study subjects

Cell culture

Cell transfection

qRT-PCR

Isolation of cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA

Western blot analysis

Transwell assay

Cell apoptosis assay

Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

RNA pull-down assay

Dual luciferase reporter gene assay

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

Statistics analysis

Supplementary Information

Author contributions

Funding

Competing interests

Footnotes

Supplementary Information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases