Abstract
The title structure [systematic name: 4-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)benzene-1,2-diol], C12H8Cl2O2, is a putative metabolite of 3,5-dichlorobiphenyl (PCB 14). The dihedral angle between the two benzene rings of the title compounds is 58.86 (4)°. In the crystal, it displays intra and intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonding and intermolecular O—H···Cl hydrogen···chlorine interactions.
Structure description
Humans are exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a class of persistent organic pollutants, via the diet (Schecter et al., 2010; Shin et al., 2015) and by inhalation (Dhakal et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2010). In particular lower chlorinated PCBs are oxidized by cytochrome P450 enzymes to the corresponding monohydroxylated and further to dihydroxylated compounds (Grimm et al., 2015; Kania-Korwel & Lehmler, 2016). Dihydroxylated PCBs can be oxidized to reactive PCB quinones. Both dihydroxylated PCBs and the corresponding quinones are highly toxic, for example because they can promote oxidative stress or bind to nucleophilic sites on cellular macromolecules (Grimm et al., 2015). To better understand the mechanism(s) of toxicity of these molecules in living organism, it is important to characterize the three-dimensional structure of these PCB metabolites (Lehmler et al., 2002; Shaikh et al., 2008).
4-(3,5-Dichlorophenyl)benzene-1,2-diol (Figure 1) is a putative metabolite of PCB 14 (3,5-dichlorobiphenyl). The dihedral angle between the least-square planes of the two benzene rings of the title compound is 58.84 (4)°. For comparison, the dihedral angle of other PCB derivatives with one OH-group ortho to the phenyl-phenyl bond ranges from 48 to 59.5° (Lehmler et al., 2001; Perrin et al., 1987). Dihedral angles of PCB derivatives without any ortho chlorine substituents are 4.9 to 43.9° (Dhakal et al., 2019a), whereas PCB derivatives with one ortho chlorine substituent range from 47.34 to 59.92° (Dhakal et al., 2019b). The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c and displays intra and intermolecular molecular O—H···O hydrogen bonding (Figure 2, Table 2) and intermolecular O— H···Cl interactions (Figure 3, Table 2).
Figure 1.
View of the title compound showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The intramolecular hydrogen bond is shown as a dashed line. For information regarding the hydrogen bond geometry, see Table 2.
Figure 2.
A packing plot viewed approximately along the a-axis. Intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds are drawn as solid dashed lines. For information regarding the hydrogen bond geometry, see Table 2.
Table 2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (k02114)
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| O1—H1O···Cl2i | 0.79 | 2.73 | 3.2538 (12) | 126 |
| O1—H1O···O2 | 0.79 | 2.20 | 2.6459 (16) | 117 |
| O2—H2O···O1ii | 0.77 | 2.02 | 2.7708 (16) | 169 |
Symmetry codes:
x+1, −y+1/2, z+1/2
x, −y+1/2, z+1/2.
Figure 3.
A packing plot viewed approximately along the b-axis. Intermolecular hydrogen···chlorine interactions are drawn as solid dashed lines. For information regarding the hydrogen bond geometry, see Table 2.
Synthesis and crystallization
The title compound was synthesized via Suzuki cross coupling reaction of 1-bromo-3,5-dichlorobenzene with 2,3-di-methoxyphenyl boronic acid in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4, and 2M aqueous solution of Na2CO3 followed by demethylation with BBr3 (Bauer et al., 1995). Crystals suitable for crystal structure analysis were obtained by recrystallization of the title compound from diethyl ether : hexanes (approximately 1:3, v/v) as described (Bauer et al., 1995).
Refinement
H atoms were found in difference Fourier maps, but subsequently included in the refinement using riding models, with constrained distances set to 0.95 Å (Csp2H). Uiso(H) parameters were set to values of either 1.2Ueq or 1.5Ueq (RCH3 only) of the attached atom.
Supplementary Material
Table 1.
Experimental details
| Crystal data | |
| Chemical formula | C12H8Cl2O2 |
| M r | 255.08 |
| Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
| Temperature (K) | 90 |
| a, b, c (Å) | 6.2198 (3), 16.9271 (8), 10.4460 (5) |
| β (°) | 101.013 (3) |
| V (Å3) | 1079.53 (9) |
| Z | 4 |
| Radiation type | Mo Kα |
| μ (mm−1) | 0.58 |
| Crystal size (mm) | 0.28 × 0.25 × 0.25 |
| Data collection | |
| Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer |
| Absorption correction | Multi-scan |
| SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 2006) | |
| Tmin, Tmax | 0.855, 0.869 |
| No. of measured, independent and observed [I> 2σ(I)] reflections | 6641, 2470, 2029 |
| R int | 0.037 |
| (sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.650 |
| Refinement | |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.033, 0.074, 1.04 |
| No. of reflections | 2470 |
| No. of parameters | 149 |
| H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
| Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.31, −0.28 |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 2006), DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 2006), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL-2018/1 (Sheldrick, 2015b), XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELX(Sheldrick, 2008) and CIFFIX(Parkin, 2013).
Acknowledgements
The Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer was funded by the University of Kentucky.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grant No. P42 ES013661; grant No. P30 ES005605; grant No. R21 ES027169).
References
- Bauer U, Amaro AR & Robertson LW (1995). Chem. Res. Toxicol 8, 92–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhakal R, Parkin S & Lehmler H-J (2019a). IUCrData 4, x190518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhakal R, Parkin S & Lehmler H-J (2019a). IUCrData 4, x190662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhakal K, Uwimana E, Adamcakova-Dodd A, Thorne PS, Lehmler H-J & Robertson LW (2014). Chem. Res. Toxicol 27, 1411–1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimm FA, Hu D, Kania-Korwel I, Lehmler H-J, Ludewig G, Hornbuckle KC, Duffel MW, Bergman A & Robertson LW (2015). Crit. Rev. Toxicol 45, 245–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hope H (1994). Prog. Inorg. Chem 41, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Hu X, Adamcakova-Dodd A, Lehmler H-J, Hu D, Kania-Korwel I, Hornbuckle K & Thorne PS (2010). Environ. Sci. Technol 44, 6893–6900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kania-Korwel I & Lehmler H-J (2016). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int 23, 2042–2057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmler H-J, Parkin S & Robertson LW (2002). Chemosphere 46, 485–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmler H-J, Robertson LW, Parkin S & Brock CP (2001). Acta Cryst. B58, 140–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- Otwinowski Z & Minor W (2006). International Tables for Crystallography, F, 226–235. [Google Scholar]
- Parkin S (2000). Acta Cryst. A56, 157–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkin S (2013). CIFFIX, http://xray.uky.edu/people/parkin/programs/ciffix.
- Parkin S & Hope H (1998). J. Appl. Cryst 31, 945–953. [Google Scholar]
- Perrin M, Bekkouch K & Thozet A (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 980–982. [Google Scholar]
- Schecter A, Colacino J, Haffner D, Patel K, Opel M, Papke O & Birnbaum L (2010). Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 796–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaikh NS, Parkin S, Luthe G & Lehmler H-J (2008). Chemosphere 70, 1694–1698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldrick GM (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldrick GM (2015a). Acta Cryst. A64, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
- Sheldrick GM (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin ES, Nguyen KH, Kim J, Kim CI & Chang YS (2015). Environ. Pollut 207, 403–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spek AL (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



